Speaker 1: All right, thank you, Scott Shannon, and thanks to all
Speaker 1: of you for being with us. Right down are toll
Speaker 1: free telephone number if you want to be a part
Speaker 1: of the program ats eight hundred nine to four one
Speaker 1: sean if you want to join us. It's amazing how
Speaker 1: many people want to engage me and discuss the issue
Speaker 1: of America's role in the world. And if you ask,
Speaker 1: my short answer is I support the Trump doctrine. Military
Speaker 1: equipment is advancing so quickly, and it's going to be
Speaker 1: a revolution in the next five years, never mind the
Speaker 1: next ten years. But the next generation of weaponry is here,
Speaker 1: and it's more sophisticated than ever. I'm not wrong in
Speaker 1: my observation that future conflicts, future wars are not going
Speaker 1: to be fought traditionally on battlefields. They're going to be
Speaker 1: fought with drones and advanced military equipment that we are
Speaker 1: not even thinking of today. And also are the Golden
Speaker 1: Dome is going to be and vital to America's security
Speaker 1: at some point down the line. I'm I'm pretty convinced
Speaker 1: of that. Maybe maybe will all be long gone by
Speaker 1: the time it's necessary, but I think moving in that
Speaker 1: direction may end up being Trump's greatest legacy. It ended
Speaker 1: up being one of Ronald Reagan's greatest legacies. And you know,
Speaker 1: but if you want me to sum up what I believe,
Speaker 1: and it's it's it's not a there's not a pure
Speaker 1: formula to really explain to you, except that I accept
Speaker 1: the Trump doctrine as what I think is the best
Speaker 1: course of action for America, especially in today's world.
Speaker 2: And what is the Trump doctrine? All right? You start
Speaker 2: with no forever wars.
Speaker 1: The President has been consistent, both in his first term
Speaker 1: and a second term, that that is a non starter
Speaker 1: for him. I totally completely agree with him. And and
Speaker 1: then that, however, some of interpreted that wrongly so to
Speaker 1: mean isolationism, and I don't believe that that is the
Speaker 1: right course of action either. And you know, the President
Speaker 1: is not an isolationist, although I think there are people
Speaker 1: that would like to convince you that he is. He's
Speaker 1: not an isolationist. I mean President Trump showed that in
Speaker 1: his first term. The Isis Caliphate, remember Convert die. I
Speaker 1: don't know how many of you remember the images of
Speaker 1: people being beheaded on beaches by Isis. You know their philosophy,
Speaker 1: their ideology, They want to convert the whole world or
Speaker 1: die in the process, and martyrdom and everything associated with
Speaker 1: that radicalism and that whole Isis Caliphate grew during the
Speaker 1: Obama years, just like Crimea was annexed during the Obama years.
Speaker 1: So no forever wars. But that doesn't mean isolationism, that
Speaker 1: doesn't mean that I think President Trump made the right
Speaker 1: call to feeding the Isis Caliphate. He never got the
Speaker 1: credit that he really deserved for that, or taking out
Speaker 1: the world's worst terrorists. The person responsible for killing Americans
Speaker 1: in Iraq and elsewhere around the world, responsible for orchestrating
Speaker 1: Iran and as being the number one states sponsor of terror.
Speaker 1: That would be General Solimani, which was an incredible military
Speaker 1: strike by President Trump and a successful one. The same
Speaker 1: thing with Bagdaddi and associates, and the same thing with
Speaker 1: dropping the mother of all bombs on Afghanistan. I think
Speaker 1: at each point, each decision, each inflection point, I think
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump made the right decision. I'm not exactly
Speaker 1: sure why there was any hesitation among some conservatives on
Speaker 1: the issue of taken out Iran's nuclear sites. To me,
Speaker 1: it was a no brainer. You have the number one
Speaker 1: state sponsor of terror. They chant death to America, they
Speaker 1: chant death to Israel. We know that they have been
Speaker 1: building bigger and bigger, more powerful, more lethal ballistic missile systems,
Speaker 1: and we know they've been in pursuit of a nuclear weapon.
Speaker 1: And I think whenever it's a squared B, squared C
Speaker 1: squared to me, and that is that if you have
Speaker 1: a sick, twisted ideology of convert die, and you're threatening
Speaker 1: to wipe Israel in America off the map, and they
Speaker 1: specifically were threatening to hit once they had the ballistic
Speaker 1: capability of doing so, hitting the continental United States with
Speaker 1: those missiles, it was a clear and present danger. That
Speaker 1: was that one could foresee down the road and we
Speaker 1: had to act, and we had to take out the
Speaker 1: Iranian nuclear sites or else the world would be a
Speaker 1: far more dangerous place. And so I think the President
Speaker 1: has pretty much thread the needle perfectly. And then the
Speaker 1: larger question becomes, well, what role should America play in
Speaker 1: the world. I think you can make an argument that
Speaker 1: maybe and there was a very strong isolation, a contingent
Speaker 1: during World War Two which kept America. America held back
Speaker 1: did not want to get involved in Europe's conflict and
Speaker 1: meanwhile you're watching the rise of Adolf Hitler and his expansionism,
Speaker 1: and ultimately Pearl Harbor happens, and Winston Churchill visits and
Speaker 1: wouldn't leave the White House of FDR and lo and behold,
Speaker 1: America is involved in a conflict in Europe and a
Speaker 1: conflict against in the Pacific, against the Japanese. My father
Speaker 1: fought in the Pacific for four years. It wasn't the
Speaker 1: best four years of his life. As I was young
Speaker 1: and curious and asking questions. He never wanted to talk
Speaker 1: about it like ever because he lost friends during that conflict.
Speaker 1: You know, at what point does the world does America
Speaker 1: have to see evil for what it is emerging and
Speaker 1: maybe root out the answer before it metastasizes and becomes
Speaker 1: something that much larger and that much more difficult and
Speaker 1: that much more complicated to get rid of. Now that
Speaker 1: now again, you're threading a needle. You don't want America
Speaker 1: to be the world's policeman. That's not the situation here
Speaker 1: with Ukraine and Russia. It just isn't. I mean, the
Speaker 1: president sees an opportunity to accomplish something that no other
Speaker 1: world leader can accomplish. The President and this is this
Speaker 1: is where I said yesterday, I really blame Europe a
Speaker 1: lot for where we are with Russia because none of
Speaker 1: these European leaders in.
Speaker 2: Forever.
Speaker 1: And by the way, the same with American leaders, the
Speaker 1: same with Obama, the same with Biden. The annexed Crimea.
Speaker 1: If you really want to go back, I mean, if
Speaker 1: you want to know why security was lost for Ukraine,
Speaker 1: go back to the point where Bill Clinton convinced the
Speaker 1: Ukrainians to give up their nuclear weapons after the disintegration
Speaker 1: of the former Soviet Union. That was their big mistake.
Speaker 1: That they'd still have Crimea. They wouldn't be at war
Speaker 1: with Russia, there wouldn't be talk about landswaps, there wouldn't
Speaker 1: be any talk about security guarantees because they had security
Speaker 1: guarantees and Russia signed on to them. And in many
Speaker 1: ways they were betrayed by all of the European allies,
Speaker 1: and frankly, the United States under Bill Clinton, under Barack
Speaker 1: Obama and Joe Biden did not live up to those concerns.
Speaker 1: So I mean, I kind of sympathize with the Ukrainians.
Speaker 1: Their mistake was giving up their strength. The only thing
Speaker 1: I would say about the role of the United States
Speaker 1: that some of you may disagree with is there are
Speaker 1: going to be moments where it's really only US that
Speaker 1: can accomplish things and the rest of the world's not
Speaker 1: capable of accomplishing it. Now, did we really lose anything
Speaker 1: when when President Trump got involved in the conflict and
Speaker 1: was able to bring about a cease fire with Iran
Speaker 1: in Israel in twelve days. No. I think the President
Speaker 1: showed number one, it was the best time to take
Speaker 1: out their nuclear sites because we already knew the Israelis
Speaker 1: had their air defense systems down. It was a risky
Speaker 1: military effort by our military. It showed their incredible precision
Speaker 1: and skill and expertise and power. And I think the
Speaker 1: world is a safer place because of it. So I
Speaker 1: think that was the right decision. But you know, but
Speaker 1: back to the fundamental question, what is America's role in
Speaker 1: the world?
Speaker 2: And I go back.
Speaker 1: I have been quoting this week Barry Farber, one of
Speaker 1: the great pioneers of talk radio. He used to always say,
Speaker 1: has never been a country in the history of mankind
Speaker 1: that has accumulated more power and abused it less than
Speaker 1: this country. I add to that, not that I have
Speaker 1: any right to but I do. It's never been a
Speaker 1: country in the history of mankind that has accumulated more power,
Speaker 1: abused it less, and used it to advance the good
Speaker 1: of mankind. So, if America is going to get involved
Speaker 1: in the conflict with Rwanda and the Congo, or Indian Pakistan,
Speaker 1: or Israel and Iran, or Azerbaijan and Armenia, or Ethiopia
Speaker 1: in Egypt or the Congo, or wherever wherever these conflicts
Speaker 1: are taking place, and the president wants to expend some
Speaker 1: political effort, nothing more, and meet with Vladimir Putin. And
Speaker 1: because European leaders have been so pathetically impotent and weak
Speaker 1: that they don't even communicate with Putin, why wouldn't they
Speaker 1: communicate with pu Why wouldn't Racrone, Why wouldn't the prime
Speaker 1: ministers of Great Britain and all these other European Union nations.
Speaker 1: Why wouldn't they be reaching out to Putin and establishing
Speaker 1: diplomatic relationships with them. Why wouldn't they be seeking solutions
Speaker 1: to problems?
Speaker 2: What you know?
Speaker 1: To me, it's sort of like President Trump got criticized.
Speaker 1: And by the way, there is a difference depending who's president.
Speaker 1: I have a different ideology and philosophy, like I don't
Speaker 1: think Joe Biden is any match for Vladimir Putin. I
Speaker 1: think the last person I'd ever want to put in
Speaker 1: front of Vladimir Putin would be the cognitively impaired Joe
Speaker 1: Biden or the ever so weak Barack Obama. I think
Speaker 1: Obama was weak. I don't think he was that Well,
Speaker 1: he took out he took out Ben Laden. Okay, well,
Speaker 1: our military took out Ben Laden. I give him credit.
Speaker 1: He made the call, he made the right call. Biden,
Speaker 1: interestingly was on the wrong side of that call. But
Speaker 1: putting that aside, I don't think that European leaders have
Speaker 1: done the right thing. They've helped fund Putin's war machine
Speaker 1: by buying all of their energy, the lifeblood of their
Speaker 1: economies from him.
Speaker 2: They've become dependent on.
Speaker 1: Him, and I don't think that that silence has been
Speaker 1: particularly helpful. I don't think, you know, not including him
Speaker 1: or looking to include him in business endeavors short of
Speaker 1: the cheap energy he's selling them, has been particularly productive either.
Speaker 1: I think Europe has made a mistake. I think similarly,
Speaker 1: European leaders generally are weak and woke and politically correct,
Speaker 1: and I think that you know, for example, I'd never
Speaker 1: thought i'd see a day where what is a great
Speaker 1: Britain as somewhat seventy five eighties sharia courts? What about assimilation?
Speaker 1: As one Australian prime minister famously said, if you're going
Speaker 1: to come to Australia, become an Australian and adopt our moras,
Speaker 1: our values, And we're not talking about religious freedom, that's
Speaker 1: separate in the part, but they certainly shouldn't. You shouldn't
Speaker 1: have two justice systems anyway. So, just to kind of
Speaker 1: circle back to where I started here, you know, the
Speaker 1: Trump doctrine is pretty clear, no forever wars. However, that
Speaker 1: doesn't mean isolationism. And for America to use its standing
Speaker 1: and its strength to advance peace around the world so
Speaker 1: that it is a better business environment and a safer
Speaker 1: place in the world with less conflict and less death
Speaker 1: and less dying, I think is a pretty sound foreign policy.
Speaker 1: Why there are some people that are purposely misinterpreting Donald
Speaker 1: Trump's doctrine. I have no idea why. And if you
Speaker 1: dare to challenge what they're saying, I'll give you an example.
Speaker 2: You know, President Trump, you.
Speaker 1: Know, gave, gave Gaza and Hamas every opportunity, just like
Speaker 1: he gave Iran every opportunity to choose peace. And then
Speaker 1: on the fifty first day, Israel attacked. And then once Israel,
Speaker 1: you know, took out a lot of their missile defense
Speaker 1: systems and air defense systems and their missile batteries. Then
Speaker 1: in came America to take out their nuclear sites because
Speaker 1: President Trump stated as part of his doctrine that they
Speaker 1: can't have nuclear weapons, not with their sick ideology and
Speaker 1: the direct threats they're making against the US and against Israel.
Speaker 1: And now President Trump said, you know, after a period
Speaker 1: of time, they still haven't released these hostages. October seventh
Speaker 1: was in twenty twenty three, and he backed Israel's expansion
Speaker 1: of the war in Gaza, saying the remaining hostages can
Speaker 1: be freed only if Hamas is completely eradicated. We will
Speaker 1: only see the return of the remaining hostages when Hamas
Speaker 1: is confronted and destroyed. He wrote on truth Social that
Speaker 1: doesn't sound like an isolationist to me. And by the way,
Speaker 1: I think he's right. Hamas has part of their charter
Speaker 1: the destruction of Israel. Israel is an ally. I think
Speaker 1: that we do need worldwide alliances, and they're the only
Speaker 1: democracy in the region. And I think that the Abraham Accords,
Speaker 1: as a result of President Trump's strength, can be expanded,
Speaker 1: and I hope that that's one of the outcomes in
Speaker 1: the end. You look at the president's approval rating, it's
Speaker 1: fifty four percent. Now, if you look at the state
Speaker 1: run Legacy media mob and their polls, they would have
Speaker 1: you convinced that Donald Trump is not doing well because
Speaker 1: I've been following their polls and I don't report them
Speaker 1: because I don't trust them because they haven't polled President
Speaker 1: Trump accurate for ten years. There are a few companies
Speaker 1: that have. Rasmussen has been very accurate, for example, Trefalgar
Speaker 1: and that would be Robert Kahley been very accurate. John
Speaker 1: McLaughlin been very accurate, our friend Matt Towery very accurate.
Speaker 1: And many of them, by the way, are joining forces
Speaker 1: to get to get America accurate polling numbers because a
Speaker 1: lot of the polls that just sheer garbage, and a
Speaker 1: lot of them are political. It's amazing that they get
Speaker 1: away with it, but they do anyway. So Matt Towery
Speaker 1: Insider Advantage went out did a poll of Donald Trump
Speaker 1: his approval rating post the summit with Vladimir Putin, and anyway,
Speaker 1: it was conducted over the weekend, and if you look
Speaker 1: at the results, their pretty astounding fifty four percent approval
Speaker 1: rating after meeting with Putin, forty four percent approval rating.
Speaker 2: And if you look.
Speaker 1: At they found that he now has an advantage among
Speaker 1: every age group other than the most senior of voters.
Speaker 1: Improved his numbers among African Americans to twenty four percent,
Speaker 1: Hispanic voters to forty seven percent. White voters are at
Speaker 1: a near record high of sixty four percent. Half of
Speaker 1: independence fifty plus percent are approving of Trump, while the
Speaker 1: vast majority of Republicans ninety two percent approve of what
Speaker 1: he's doing. And even seventeen point nine percent of Democrats
Speaker 1: said the same, Well, why is it happening because president
Speaker 1: that people are watching a president in action every second,
Speaker 1: every minute, every hour of every day.
Speaker 2: They're paying attention. They compared to the.
Speaker 1: Last four years of Joe Biden. I mean, he's accomplishing
Speaker 1: more in a week than Biden did in four years.
Speaker 1: We're seeing more of him in a week than we
Speaker 1: see we saw Biden in four years. And anyway, it's
Speaker 1: you know, we'll see what happens. There's no guarantees. I'm
Speaker 1: not sure if I you know, people said, well, when
Speaker 1: do you agree with disagree with President Trump? I'm not
Speaker 1: sure if I wouldn't have Trump ride this out with
Speaker 1: both of them to the end, if it's going to
Speaker 1: go that way. I know what his thinking is because
Speaker 1: he told me, and that is at some point they've
Speaker 1: got to be alone and they got to get along
Speaker 1: together if a deal is going to be lasting. And
Speaker 1: so the next step apparently is going to be bilateral,
Speaker 1: a bilateral meeting with Zelensky and Putin. I worry that
Speaker 1: meeting is where this whole thing could blow up.
Speaker 2: Now.
Speaker 1: I would prefer a trilateral meeting where President Trump can
Speaker 1: can moderate, if you will, if things get a little
Speaker 1: bit tense, and I think they're both capable of going there.
Speaker 1: I didn't finish the thought in the last segment, but
Speaker 1: I was trying to point out, what did President Trump
Speaker 1: in his first term give Kim Jong un and I
Speaker 1: went to both of those meetings. What did he give him? Nothing?
Speaker 1: He gave him his time. What was the result of
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, you know, meeting with Little Rocketman on two occasions,
Speaker 1: I think three total. When he went to the DMZ.
Speaker 1: What did we give up?
Speaker 2: Nothing?
Speaker 1: The President gave his time, Little Rocketman stopped firing his rockets.
Speaker 1: He handed over the remains of Americans from the Korean War,
Speaker 1: and the relationship it thawed and North Korea was not
Speaker 1: the big threat that it once was.
Speaker 2: And so was it worth it? Yeah? It was worth it.
Speaker 1: Is it worth President Trump's time to meet with Putin
Speaker 1: and Alaska and then meet with European leaders, you know,
Speaker 1: three days later?
Speaker 2: Yeah?
Speaker 1: I think it's worth it. What's the downside? We're not
Speaker 1: giving up anything. And I do think that there's a
Speaker 1: Plan B, and I think Plan B is pretty transparent.
Speaker 1: And he said that the consequences to Vladimir Putin, if
Speaker 1: Putin blows up this deal, are going to be devastating.
Speaker 1: We already know what the consequences are. He put a
Speaker 1: fifty percent tariff on India if they continue to import
Speaker 1: Russian oil. We know that he made a deal with
Speaker 1: the European Union that they're going to purchase nearly a
Speaker 1: trillion dollars of energy from US and not fund Putin's
Speaker 1: war machine. And Donald Trump's going straight at Putin's economy,
Speaker 1: which is already struggling. On top of that, he's going
Speaker 1: to provide Ukraine weapons, and on top of that he
Speaker 1: got NATO to commit to more than double what they
Speaker 1: were paying in terms of security for the continent of Europe.
Speaker 1: So I think it's it's all good stuff. It's fun
Speaker 1: to watch. This is America's you know, America add its
Speaker 1: best when it uses its power for the advancement of
Speaker 1: good causes, the cause of peace. I can't think of
Speaker 1: a better cause. It was kind of interesting. I don't
Speaker 1: know if you noticed the Italian Prime Minister Georgia Maloney
Speaker 1: rolling her eyes as the German Chancellor was trying to
Speaker 1: lecture Trump about the need for a Ukraine war ceasefire.
Speaker 1: The President rightly pointed out and every conflict that I
Speaker 1: mentioned that he got involved in, they never had a
Speaker 1: ceasefire step first. I mean, I guess it would be
Speaker 1: okay on paper, but that was not his stated goal
Speaker 1: when he went in to get the ceasefire. His stated
Speaker 1: goal was to get a second meeting, and he got
Speaker 1: that part, and that was supposed to be the Trilateral meeting.
Speaker 1: I would prefer that order. That's my own thought. I
Speaker 1: don't think Putin and Zelenski. I think they can't stand
Speaker 1: each other, and there's nothing but hatred and resentment and animosity.
Speaker 1: And I think if Trump was there, I think they'd
Speaker 1: be both be better behaved, and I think the odds
Speaker 1: would go up exponentially that a final deal can be reached.
Speaker 1: Trump did vow there will be no US troops defending
Speaker 1: Ukraine's border as part of any security arrangement that is
Speaker 1: in keeping with the Trump doctrine. As I was trying
Speaker 1: to explain it to you, one thing I want all
Speaker 1: of you in this audience to pay attention to. I
Speaker 1: always tell you in my audience to please never depend
Speaker 1: on government for anything in your life. And if you're
Speaker 1: a young person, I would say, don't count on Social
Speaker 1: Security being there for you when you get older, because
Speaker 1: it's headed towards insolvency.
Speaker 2: I mean, we don't know.
Speaker 1: We've got three and a half years of Trump left,
Speaker 1: and I can't tell you who's going to be the
Speaker 1: next president. Although I do like the idea, and we'll
Speaker 1: get into some detail on this on Hennity tonight the
Speaker 1: President and we'll get into more later in the program today.
Speaker 1: But I do like the fact that the president, both
Speaker 1: in my interview in Alaska and then this pool spray.
Speaker 1: Yet yesterday brought up the issue of paper ballots, and
Speaker 1: that would include integrity and American elections, the idea that
Speaker 1: we don't have that. But both Democrats and Republicans have
Speaker 1: questioned election results. Neither side is innocent here. Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: questioned it. Stacy Abrams's question that many many Democrats said, Oh,
Speaker 1: Donald Trump didn't win it, just it happens. You want
Speaker 1: more integrity in the system, Switch to paper ballots, Switch
Speaker 1: to same day voting. With the exception of the military
Speaker 1: and people that are sick or elderly and can't make
Speaker 1: it to the polls, they should have the right to vote.
Speaker 1: But you need paper ballots, you need voter ID, you
Speaker 1: need signature verification, chain of custody, and cameras watching any
Speaker 1: mail in ballots from the military or sick people as
Speaker 1: it comes in. They stay in a room and they
Speaker 1: get counted on election day. And then I would have
Speaker 1: updated voter rolls every single election season, partisan observers watching
Speaker 1: the voting all day, the vote counting all night, and
Speaker 1: then they can count up the votes paper ballots. And
Speaker 1: then I think people on both sides would have more
Speaker 1: faith in the system, but don't have trust in government.
Speaker 1: And I'm just going to add one thing to this.
Speaker 1: There's an article today in Axios that artificial intelligence could
Speaker 1: replace a trillion dollars a year in wages. Now, first
Speaker 1: of all, good thing. Donald Trump has fifteen trillion dollars
Speaker 1: in committed investment money in manufacturing for automobiles, semiconductor chips, pharmaceuticals,
Speaker 1: rare earths, et cetera. So there's going to be millions
Speaker 1: and millions of high paying career jobs on coming in
Speaker 1: the future. But even with automotive, you got you got robotics,
Speaker 1: and the same with a lot of other manufacturing. But
Speaker 1: fully adopting AI might end up saving Corporate America nine
Speaker 1: hundred and twenty billion dollars annually, according to a new
Speaker 1: Morgan Stanley study. That's a lot of potential jobs that
Speaker 1: are lost. So if you're thinking about or advising your
Speaker 1: children on the issue of what careers to pick up,
Speaker 1: remember we had Mike Row on this program. The next
Speaker 1: generation of millionaires, they're going to be people that are tradespeople.
Speaker 1: They're making a ton of money and I highly recommend it.
Speaker 1: By the way, young adults say friendship is getting too expensive,
Speaker 1: according to a new survey. I know, did you see
Speaker 1: that one, Linda, that was pretty fun? Getting very expensive
Speaker 1: to be friends with you? Very expensive. Democratic presidential quote
Speaker 1: hopeful this is a joke.
Speaker 2: JB.
Speaker 1: Pritzker is never going to be president. Signed to bill
Speaker 1: granting taxpayer funded financial benefits to illegals. You know, this
Speaker 1: is where Pam Bondi is now going to after all
Speaker 1: these sanctuary cities sanctuary states because he explained to me
Speaker 1: how that's not aiding in a betting and law breaking.
Speaker 1: Trump Homeland Security Department has moved to block billions of
Speaker 1: dollars in Chinese goods that were produced using forced labor.
Speaker 1: Products like steel, copper, lithium, and other products from China
Speaker 1: designed designated high priority for inspection will come under the
Speaker 1: microscope of customs and border protection. I mean, it is
Speaker 1: sad to think in this day and age that you know,
Speaker 1: this type of thing actually is going on in the world,
Speaker 1: you know, using forced labor, in some cases child forced labor.
Speaker 1: The Trump administration has confirmed they have revoked six thousand
Speaker 1: student visas six thousand. Goodbye. Don't let the door hit
Speaker 1: you in the ass on the way out. We showed
Speaker 1: you last night on TV. You have this illegal alien
Speaker 1: truck driver came into the sanctuary state of California, got
Speaker 1: a commercial driver's license, was rejected by the first Trump
Speaker 1: administration in terms of a work visa, and then anyway
Speaker 1: ended up getting the work permit after being turned away
Speaker 1: by Trump by the Biden administration. The result this guy
Speaker 1: killed three people making a rogue U turn right here
Speaker 1: in the Free State of Florida on a highway, and
Speaker 1: he was handed work papers under the Biden administration after
Speaker 1: they were deny during President Trump's first term. According to
Speaker 1: the Department of Homeland Security, this is why these you know,
Speaker 1: I have said, as far as I'm concerned that Biden,
Speaker 1: Harris may orcis, all these democrats that lied about the
Speaker 1: border being closed and secured, they you know, they all
Speaker 1: have blood on their hands, all of them. They're aiding
Speaker 1: in a betting in this entire process. By the way,
Speaker 1: Justice Department now probing allegations DC officials doctored the crime
Speaker 1: statistics to make the city seem safer. Now that you
Speaker 1: know we discovered, oh yeah, well, we have forty one
Speaker 1: homicides per one hundred thousand, by far at the highest
Speaker 1: homicide rate per one hundred thousand of any capital of
Speaker 1: any other country in the world. The next closest is
Speaker 1: only sixteen for one hundred thousand people. And since Donald
Speaker 1: Trump deployed the National Guard to fight crime in our
Speaker 1: nation's capital, Oh, look at this. Robbery's down forty six percent,
Speaker 1: carjackings down a whoppings eighty three percent, car theft down
Speaker 1: twenty one percent, violent crime down twenty two percent. Oh,
Speaker 1: I would say that it's working. I'd say that DC
Speaker 1: is a safer place. President mentioned this morning with my
Speaker 1: name in it. Did you see that one? Pretty funny?
Speaker 2: I sure did.
Speaker 1: I'm finding it very entertaining. It's like there's a new
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom emerging every day, and he thinks he's being clever.
Speaker 1: He's trying to be Trump. Remember they spent millions and
Speaker 1: millions of dollars how to communicate with young men. And
Speaker 1: remember that we've got to act quote act more Trumpian,
Speaker 1: and we've got to curse more, and we've got to
Speaker 1: learn to speak to you know guys better. Hey, Joe,
Speaker 1: I want to go to Brucekie. I want to go
Speaker 1: grab a Bruski Kroski or what did you think of
Speaker 1: the big game last night. I mean you have to pay.
Speaker 1: You have to pay millions, tens of millions of dollars
Speaker 1: to learn that. How about you just be real and authentic.
Speaker 1: Gavin Newsom's changing his identity every day. I'm gonna be
Speaker 1: a podcaster that talks to conservatives. Now I'm gonna curse
Speaker 1: like Donald Trump. Now I'm gonna tweet like Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: My advice to Gavin Newsom just be Gavin Newsom. Problem
Speaker 1: is being Gavin Newsom means he has to run on
Speaker 1: his record. That's a problem.