WEBVTT - From the Vault: The Necromantic Urge, Part 3

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:11.040
<v Speaker 2>This is Robert Lamb and this is Joe McCormick, and

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 2>it's Saturday. We're heading on down into the vault for

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 2>an older episode of the show. This is part three

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 2>of our series on necromancy called The Necromantic Urge, originally

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 2>published on October fifth, twenty twenty three.

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Enjoy but Macmore and Sodosma were necromancers who came from

0:00:28.520 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the dark Isle of Nat to practice their baleful arts

0:00:32.960 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>in Tinniath beyond the shrunken seas. But they did not

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>prosper in Tinniath, for death was deemed a holy thing

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>by the people of that gray country, and the nothingness

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of the tomb was not lightly to be desecrated, and

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the raising up of the dead by necromancy was held

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>in abomination. Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind, production

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of by Heart Radio. Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb.

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 2>And I am Joe McCormick, and we're back with part

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 2>three in our series on necromancy. The ancient practice of

0:01:20.040 --> 0:01:23.080
<v Speaker 2>consulting the dead or the spirits of the dead for

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 2>the purpose of divination, of accessing hidden knowledge.

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, despite the fact that a lot of our modern

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>pop cultuy uses of necromancy tend to involve raising of

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the dead. And actually that quote that I read at

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the top of this episode is from the nineteen thirty

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 1>two short story The Empire of the Necromancers by Clark

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Ashton Smith, and it is full of raising the dead

0:01:48.320 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>via the necromantic arts. But as we've discussed in these

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>episodes so far, necromancy, as we loosely categorize it, is

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>more situated in the realm of divination.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, in the previous episodes in the series, which if

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 2>you haven't listened to yet, you should probably go check

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.559
<v Speaker 2>those out first. But in these previous episodes we talked

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 2>about accounts of necromancy or pseudo necromantic legends from ancient China.

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 2>We talked about accounts of how necromancy was practiced or

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:21.200
<v Speaker 2>may have been practiced in ancient Mesopotamia, including consulting these

0:02:21.639 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 2>tablets that have descriptions of the incantations to use and

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 2>the potions to prepare if you want to speak to

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 2>the dead through a prepared skull in a special ritual.

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 2>In part two, we talked about a lot of accounts

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 2>of necromancy as practiced or at least as used as

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 2>a plot device in stories from ancient Greece and Rome

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>and today, we wanted to come back and finish out

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 2>the discussion by talking about necromancy a little bit more.

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, We're going to jump around a little bit here

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 1>later on in the episode. I think we're going to

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>get into some medieval Christian ideas about necromancy, what it was,

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and whether you should do it or not. A spoiler

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in tended to say no, don't do it, but with

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 1>some caveats, so I'll get into.

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I also want to interrogate the boundaries of necromancy a

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 2>little bit and maybe pick apart the concept somewhat. But

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 2>before we do that, there's a question that's been coming

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:16.480
<v Speaker 2>up because we've been looking at examples from the ancient

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 2>world of how this may have been practiced, or at

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 2>least was thought by some to be practiced in the

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 2>ancient world. My question would be, well, how far back

0:03:26.000 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 2>does it go? What's the earliest evidence we have of

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 2>people trying to communicate or consult with the dead.

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so let's get into that a little bit again,

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>with the huge caveat that the term necromancy can be

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>applied very broadly or very specifically, and is ultimately just

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a word. So with that in mind, I will refer

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>back briefly to the paper The Origins of Necromancy or

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>How We Learn to Speak to the Dead by Czech

0:03:54.880 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>academic Andres Kabcar. He argues for a connection potentially between

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>ancient shamanistic practices and what we might think of as necromancy,

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>with individual human beings often serving as psychopomps. For example,

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, guardians guide there to guide one spirit from

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>this world into the next. Other functions that would put

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>a living mortal shaman in some form of communication with

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the deceased are also imaginable. This in addition to just

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>general ancestor veneration, ancestor cults, and ancestor worshiped. So it's

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 1>not it's not inconceivable to consider all of this potential

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>hallmark of human spiritual and religious thought going back to

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>very early human culture as a coping method for the

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>emotionally and socially devastating reality of death. Right.

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 2>We don't know, but it seems perfectly plausible that it

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 2>could be something like first people, you know, just merely

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 2>emotionally missed their dead loved ones and wanted to you know,

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 2>continue thinking about them and talking about them and so forth,

0:05:01.960 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 2>and maybe from this arose some kind of culture of

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 2>keeping their memory alive, out of which arose some kind

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 2>of idea that, well, maybe there are ways to still

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 2>talk to them somehow, and maybe they have something to

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 2>say to us.

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because I mean, we undeniably have a desire to

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>speak to them. I mean, that's that's proven out in

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>so many countless examples, including our own individual experiences. I mean,

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:29.239
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of us have visited the grave

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of a deceased loved one and spoken to them, you know,

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 1>varying degrees of understanding or expectation of them hearing us well,

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>and certainly of them speaking back to us. But to

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>speak to the dead, I think is not necessarily this

0:05:49.200 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, this alien supernatural thing. I think it comes

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>from a very natural place in the human psyche, and I

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 1>mean probably gets back into this idea that, yeah, when

0:05:57.560 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>someone dies is it is emotionally and soually devastating and

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>we have to find ways to deal with it.

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 2>On the other hand, while you can imagine that historical

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:10.280
<v Speaker 2>or prehistoric development and it certainly seems plausible. It's hard

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.440
<v Speaker 2>to have decisive evidence for things like that, or to

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 2>have decisive evidence of practices of communicating with and getting

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 2>knowledge from the dead from before times of say literary

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 2>writings about such.

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Right, right, because the literature gives us more insight into

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>what was done, why it was done, and what the

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>expectation was. In many instances, sometimes you know there are

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>still questions, certainly, but otherwise what are you left with?

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>You're left with human remains, and you can sort of

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>look at like two broad categories, situations where human remains

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>have not been manipulated by human beings and situations where

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>they have been manipulated by human beings and added caveat.

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>As we've discussed in the show before, and we've recently

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>had a guest in the show to discuss this, like

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.679
<v Speaker 1>sometimes that's up for dispute too, with one side saying,

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think these bodies were manipulated by human beings.

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they were manipulated by predatory animals, and then

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the other side saying, no, this is evidence of humans

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>manipulating their dead, and intentional manipulation of the dead has

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>been going on for a very long time. At least

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>since the time of the Neanderthals. We move bodies, and

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>we've moved bodies for various purposes, and a rich global

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 1>heritage of funerary practices have grown out of these traditions.

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>But with the oldest burials, you look at them and yeah,

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>we just have very little to go on when we're

0:07:31.040 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to decide, try and figure out what was the

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>intent behind this practice? It was it a practice and

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>what was the intent? Right?

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 2>So, given those extreme caveats, what are some of these

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 2>pieces of ambiguous evidence people might point to to think,

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if this was used for romantic purposes, for necromancy.

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, Kapcar highlights ancient archaeological sites linked to ancestor cults

0:07:55.040 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>as being some of the main candidates for some form

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 1>of ancient necromancy in the Middle East. And I should

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>add that he's not arguing, like one hundred percent this

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 1>is necromancy. He's just saying, like, Okay, beyond what we

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>can be certain about, what evidence could we make an

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>argument about. A specific mention is made of the plaster

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:18.200
<v Speaker 1>covered heads of cattle hook dating back to seventy five

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred to fifty seven hundred BCE. We've mentioned this place

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on the show before, specifically in our invention episodes on

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the coffin, the toilet, and the Mirror, as well as

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.280
<v Speaker 1>our stuff to Blow your Mind episodes on brain and

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 1>head theft. Because there does seem to be some sort

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of ritual removal of the head here.

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's zero in on the example of plastered human

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 2>skulls from the ancient Fertile Crescent to see what we

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 2>can figure out from them. A rob, I've attached a

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 2>picture for you to look at here. This is a

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 2>famous plastered skull from I think dates given or sometimes

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 2>nine thousand or nine thousand, five hundred years ago. This

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 2>is sometimes known as the Jerre Coast skull. It is

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 2>one of the skulls recovered from the tell or the

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 2>mound of the ancient settlement of Jericho, and this is

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 2>from the Neolithic period.

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is quite intriguing to look at because again

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you have a human skull, but it has been covered

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:19.960
<v Speaker 1>in plaster in a way to sort of it seems like,

0:09:20.120 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to recreate the flesh of the dead. And then we

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>have what I believe these are shells that have been

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>placed in where the eyes would be.

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, exactly. So there are multiple artifacts of this type

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 2>from the ancient Levant and some from Turkey, from again

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 2>the site of Chattelhuyuk and is essentially what these are,

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 2>real human skulls, sometimes without the mandible, so without the

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:49.559
<v Speaker 2>lower jaw, filled in with earth or plaster, and then

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 2>covered on the outside in plaster at least on the front,

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 2>and decorated with individual facial features. So as you said,

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 2>rob seashells for eyes, they might be clamshell or cowie shells,

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 2>some kind of shells, marine shells to simulate eyeballs, and

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:11.160
<v Speaker 2>then plaster facial structure, so maybe even like eyelids, overlapping

0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 2>the seashells in a way, and of course painting on

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 2>the outside, so hair and eyebrows, mustaches and so forth

0:10:17.600 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 2>would be painted on the plaster. I was actually watching

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 2>an interview with a curator at the British Museum, coincidentally

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 2>another in the series Curator's Corner, which I mentioned in

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 2>part one of this series for unrelated reasons. That was

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 2>just an interview with an author named Irving Finkel who

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 2>we were reading a paper from that was about ancient

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Mesopotamian exorcism practices. This is an interview with a curator

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 2>from the British Museum named Alexandra Fletcher about the Jericho skull,

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 2>and she opines that the Jericho skull, the one you're

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 2>looking at here, rob is probably the oldest example of

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 2>portraiture in the British Museum's collection because of the assumption

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 2>that it was made to resemble a specific person, though

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 2>we don't know that. We don't know for sure, but

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 2>these skulls are usually assumed to have been made to

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 2>resemble the person the skull belonged to in life.

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Which makes sense, right. I mean, if you're gonna do

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:16.839
<v Speaker 1>a plaster sculpture of someone and you have their skull

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>on hand, like there you go, that's the perfect foundation

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>upon which to create your art.

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 2>And there's an interesting scientific and technological parallel to this

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 2>that comes up in a second. So Fletcher goes into

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 2>describing some work, like analysis work that has been done

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 2>on the Jericho skull. She says, as background, he was

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 2>part of a group of seven people who were buried

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 2>together uncovered in the nineteen fifties, and she talks about

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 2>research to try to analyze the human skull underneath without

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 2>damaging the plaster surrounding it, at least at least surrounding

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 2>the front of the skull. The back is more exposed,

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 2>and she says that the researchers used CT scanning to

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 2>create an image of the bone underneath without hurting the place,

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 2>and that revealed some interesting stuff. For example, this man's

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 2>nose was broken sometime in life, and it shows how

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 2>it had been broken and healed. And as a child,

0:12:11.600 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 2>this man had had his head bound to possibly to

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 2>shape the skull. As the man grew up, so there

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 2>was a sense in which the skull was sort of pinched,

0:12:22.760 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 2>and you can see a ridge in the skull where

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 2>it was pinched that way. And this as he developed,

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 2>he had slightly elongated skull for this reason.

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh yes, yes, not an uncommon practice in certain parts

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of the ancient world.

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 2>After death, the inside of the skull was stuffed with

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 2>soil and clay, and there's a hole in the back

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:46.760
<v Speaker 2>of the skull where Fletcher says you can still see

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 2>the indentations of the fingers of the person who packed

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 2>the clay into the brain cavity.

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:56.559
<v Speaker 2>But the interesting parallel to the ancient plaster surrounding the

0:12:56.600 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 2>skull is that by analyzing the bone structure, modern scientists

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 2>were able to with a good degree of accuracy, they think,

0:13:03.760 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 2>reconstruct this man's face. The process is considered not exact,

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 2>but pretty accurate, to the extent that Fletcher claims that

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 2>if people who knew this man in life walked into

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 2>the room and saw the reconstruction, she says she thinks

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 2>they would instantly recognize him. So, in a way, we

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 2>have used modern technology to reconstruct this man's face around

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 2>the basis of the skull, much like ancient people used

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 2>I guess probably memory of what this man looked like

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 2>to reconstruct his face in plaster around the skull.

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, it's fascinating, though again we can't know one

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 1>d you know why they did this, and certainly you

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>can make arguments for the lifelike qualities being bestowed upon

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the skull in order to communicate with it. I mean,

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that's that's certainly the hard nechromatic angle to take on it,

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and others have found this interesting as well. These skulls

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>are brought up by Julian James in his book The

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Origin of Consciousness and the Breakdown of the Biicameral Mind

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>as being you know, one of the many different bits

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of evidence or alleged evidence from the ancient world that

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>he uses to back up this this hypothesis of the

0:14:21.360 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>biicameral mind.

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he probably is leaning heavily on the interpretation that

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 2>people talk to these skulls, which again I want to

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 2>really emphasize, like, we don't know that. All we have

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 2>are the artifacts. There are not there's not literature describing

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 2>how these skulls were used in the ancient world, So

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:38.160
<v Speaker 2>we just don't know.

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we don't know if they spoke to the skulls.

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 1>For the most I mean, we don't know the skull

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>We assume the skulls did not answer, though Jane's would

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>argue that they possibly did. And yes, if Julian Jane's

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>hypothesis was correct, that would impact everything we've been discussing

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>about in terms of necromancy, because it would mean that, yes,

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>there here is a neural logical way that the dead

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>not only could speak to human beings, but spoke to

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:06.960
<v Speaker 1>them on a regular basis. Go back and listen to

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>our old episodes on his hypothesis if you want to

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>know more about that. But yeah, at the end of

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the day, like did they just simply recreate these faces

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in order to honor them, to remember them, and if

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>they were speaking to them, like we can sort of

0:15:22.480 --> 0:15:28.640
<v Speaker 1>imagine like a broad scale a spectrum of possible necromancy,

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, and there's you know, there are certainly versions

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>of this interpretation in which they might have been speaking

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>to these skulls, but we're not actually seeking knowledge from

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the dead.

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 2>That's right. So I want to get deeper into that

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 2>in a minute. But in a way, this connects to

0:15:45.200 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 2>what I thought was an interesting little side comment that

0:15:49.800 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 2>this British Museum researcher Alexander Fletcher makes in this interview

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 2>where she just kind of says that, you know, the

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 2>longer you work with work with these skulls, do research

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 2>on them, especially maybe from the you know, the reconstruction

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 2>of the face, the more you come to see the

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 2>skulls not just as an artifact but as a person.

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, wow, maybe I am over interpreting,

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 2>but that seems perhaps revealing about the effect they might

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 2>have had on the people who originally made them as well. Yeah,

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 2>I want to come back to the idea of adding

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 2>some sort of complications to the idea of necromancy or

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 2>divination through the dead as a coherent and discreet practice.

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 2>So I was thinking about this, and I was thinking

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 2>about how in a lot of these early settlements where

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 2>these plaster skulls are found, you know, the settlements with

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 2>permanent structures like chattlehou Yuk which you mentioned in Jericho,

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 2>there are other interesting features about how the dead were

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 2>dealt with as well, not just the creation of plaster skulls,

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 2>But in these settlements, it seems sometimes the bodies of

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 2>the dead were buried inside people's houses. So maybe your grandparents'

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 2>bones might not be often a cemetery somewhere else that

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 2>you go and visit from time to time, but right

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.880
<v Speaker 2>in the house with you, maybe buried under the floor

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 2>or under your bed. Again, we don't know for sure

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:26.280
<v Speaker 2>why they did this. All kinds of speculation abounds. In

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 2>some cases, it looks like the bodies might have been

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 2>removed elsewhere for the flesh to rot off the bones

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 2>or be picked off the bones. Maybe the bones were

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 2>defleshed somewhere else and then maybe brought back inside the house,

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 2>and then they would live under the floor, under your

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 2>bed or something. But these are also places where we

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 2>encounterplastered skulls. So it just seems it seems possible to

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 2>me that if the skull had some kind of significance

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 2>as a conduit for communication with the dead, I wonder

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 2>if it wasn't a spec discrete, transactional event ritual like

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 2>we've been talking about in some of these Greek stories,

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, where you like you go to the oracle

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:10.840
<v Speaker 2>and you know what I mean, like it being a

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 2>special event. I wonder if it's more like just a

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of continuous belief that, yes, Grandma is still here

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 2>with us, she's in the house, she lives with us.

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I can easily imagine that that being

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the case. Again, it's not too far away from sort

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of the mild background supernatural ideas that many of us

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>may may dabble in, you know, like to think about

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a deceased loved one being nearby, you know. I think

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it is something that a lot of us probably do

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.239
<v Speaker 1>to some degree without even being on the level of,

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>like I believe in ghosts, you know.

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 2>And so if the situation were something more like that,

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:50.919
<v Speaker 2>to the extent that you would seek advice from your

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 2>grandparent in this context, I wonder if it would give

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 2>kind of the wrong impression to call that necromancy, because

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 2>again of the all the stories we have in which

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 2>the necromancy is usually more a like I was saying,

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 2>a discrete, transactional kind of event ritual versus something that

0:19:08.880 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 2>is just intimate and continuous in part of life.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so many of these stories, ancient and modern, depict

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>necromancy as kind of an extreme thing. You do, you know,

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:25.439
<v Speaker 1>when other attempts to remedy a situation have not worked,

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:28.359
<v Speaker 1>that's when you seek out the necromantic solution.

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:31.119
<v Speaker 2>But then again, just to emphasize how little we know

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 2>for sure, there could be totally different explanations as well.

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 2>I mean, maybe burying the bones in the house and

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 2>putting a plaster face over your ancestor skull, maybe that

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 2>was just merely a form of honoring and remembering people,

0:19:44.440 --> 0:19:46.920
<v Speaker 2>just like you might I don't know, have a photo

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 2>of a dead relative on the wall today or something

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 2>buried with them. You know, we miss our ancestor who

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 2>has passed on. So maybe we keep the bones or

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 2>plaster the skull in a way under the house or

0:19:59.760 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 2>in the house in a way of remembering them.

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and so certainly these are not neutral skulls. These

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>are skulls that are conceivably connected to loved ones, but

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>still like even like human understanding and appreciation of skulls

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>is kind of complex because they take on all these

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>symbolic meanings, but then they're also there's also this sort

0:20:17.560 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of like coolness to the skull that has seem to

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>exist for a long time, and you know, we get

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>into this with other skull based traditions and artifacts as well.

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Is discussed in their recent either recently rerun or about

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to be rerun episode where I interviewed Brian Hoggart about

0:20:35.640 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>anti witchcraft precautions, some of which involved putting skulls, particularly

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>horse skulls, in the foundation of a building. Like a

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of it's just kind of like, well, horse skulls

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 1>are really interesting looking. They don't look like horses, but

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:52.639
<v Speaker 1>yet they are horses, and horses have this important place

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>in human lives. So yeah, there are a number of

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>different ways you can go in and try and figure

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 1>out like why was this important?

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 2>Right, So there's just so much like we don't know

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:07.399
<v Speaker 2>anybody who has too confident or too certain a theory

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 2>about what these remains meant and how they were used.

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.600
<v Speaker 2>I think you should be highly skeptical of that, but

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 2>I do think one interesting piece of information that we

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 2>can use is not from the ancient world itself, but

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 2>just from looking at practices of ancestor veneration today by analogy,

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.959
<v Speaker 2>which is a totally common practice all over the world.

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>That's right, we discussed We've discussed some of these already,

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 1>at least in Passing, particularly the importance of ancestor veneration

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>in Chinese culture, right.

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 2>And so I was looking for some documentation of people

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 2>today with religious practices that could be considered to include

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 2>strong elements of ancestor veneration and also something that could

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:55.960
<v Speaker 2>be considered divination via deceased ancestors. And I think from

0:21:55.960 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 2>what I can tell, this combination of beliefs is not

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 2>especially unique or unusual. Lots of people around the world

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:05.200
<v Speaker 2>practice forms of ancestor veneration that might include some way

0:22:05.240 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 2>of establishing contact with the dead or getting information or

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 2>messages from them. But I wanted to find one clear

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 2>example with documentation of specifics so we're not just dealing

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 2>with generalities. And I came across an interesting paper looking

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 2>at the Bupeti people. So this was by Maura kang

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 2>E k Lebaka, who is a scholar at the University

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.959
<v Speaker 2>of South Africa specializing in African musical arts and ethnomusicology.

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 2>The paper was called the Art of Establishing and Maintaining

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 2>Contact with Ancestors, a study of Bapeti tradition published in

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 2>the journal HTS Theological Studies in the year twenty eighteen.

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 2>So the Buppetti people mostly live within northern South Africa,

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 2>and Lebaca, synthesizing the work of some previous ethnographers, describes

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:56.560
<v Speaker 2>a common view of ancestors among the Bapeti people. Again,

0:22:57.040 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 2>same caveat with all of the examples we've talked about.

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Beliefs are not usually universal within a culture. All you

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 2>can do is describe commonly found beliefs. He says, first

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 2>of all, in the words of a scholar named Mibiti,

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 2>there is a widespread belief in many African traditional religions

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 2>that quote, death does not annihilate life, and the departed

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:21.719
<v Speaker 2>continue to exist in the hereafter, so the dead are

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 2>not gone, they remain spiritually alive in some sense. Also,

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 2>Lebacca says that the character of ancestors is believed to

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:36.880
<v Speaker 2>remain fundamentally unchanged since they were alive dead ancestors go

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 2>on existing. They remain themselves in good and bad ways,

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:45.199
<v Speaker 2>so they can protect and advise their descendants. But they

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 2>are also not like perfect, perfected, ethereal beings. They're like us,

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 2>and they are like they were in life, so also

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 2>prone to jealousy and motivations of that sort. He says,

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.040
<v Speaker 2>the spirits of ancestors have the power to affect the

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 2>fates of the living, and this can be for good

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 2>or for ill. Their behavior toward the living depends largely

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 2>on if they are properly honored and venerated, and Lebaca

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 2>argues that veneration is different from worship. Veneration is more

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 2>like the respect that the young are expected to give

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 2>to their elders, except extended beyond the bound boundary of death,

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 2>and does have special rituals involved. He says ancestral spirits

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 2>guard and enforce morality within the family and prevent feuds

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 2>and conflicts between living members of the family. This is

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:39.639
<v Speaker 2>mentioned later in the article, but it's worth noting that

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 2>ancestors are believed to be powerful and can cause supernatural

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 2>outcomes to affect people, but they're not omnipotent. They can't

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 2>do anything Lebaca says that sometimes but petty ancestors need

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 2>to be contacted, need to be communicated with, and he

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 2>says there are a couple of main ways to establish contact.

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 2>There are these communal music and dance ceremonies known as

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:09.239
<v Speaker 2>the Malopo ritual, and that appeases the ancestral spirits. But

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 2>there is also a way of seeking help of traditional healers,

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 2>especially with the use of divination bones. Now, I want

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 2>to note that, as far as I could tell, these

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 2>are not the bones of ancestors. The paper doesn't address

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 2>this question directly, but it seemed to me, based on

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.960
<v Speaker 2>a photo included in the paper and the fact that

0:25:29.000 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 2>it was not specified otherwise, that these would probably be

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 2>normal kind of bones that would be used in practices

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 2>of osteomancy.

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think in other instances of bones being used

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>as essentially, you know, dies of some sort, they've always

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>been animal bones. I don't remember off hand an example

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>of them being human bones, but it may exist elsewhere.

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 2>I only specified that because we were just talking about

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 2>examples of bones being kept like within the houses of

0:25:55.600 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 2>the living, So I think we're not talking about ancestors

0:25:59.280 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 2>bones here.

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think you're right, they would assurely specified if

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that was the case.

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 2>So Lebaca in this paper includes a number of interviews

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 2>with traditional healers, one of whom describes that direct communication

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:16.959
<v Speaker 2>between healers and their own ancestors happens through music and

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 2>through dreams, and that the purpose of the use of

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 2>music and group singing in ritual contact with ancestors is

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 2>quote to create harmony between the living and the ancestors.

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:32.439
<v Speaker 2>And I thought that was interesting because it reminds me

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 2>of the way that, of course singing can be used

0:26:34.920 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 2>to create a sense of togetherness among the living alone,

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, just like a people a group of people

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 2>singing together. I think almost everybody will know what I'm

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 2>talking about when I say the way that creates this

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 2>weird sense of emergent harmony and sort of group identity.

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 2>And so maybe by inviting the dead to be a

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.440
<v Speaker 2>part of that as well, you're sort of bringing them

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 2>to the table in a way.

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, absolutely.

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 2>But this paper a naturalistic approach of observing malopo rituals

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 2>and interviewing traditional healers about the function of ancestor veneration

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:11.480
<v Speaker 2>in Bapetti society. And there's one story recounted in the

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:14.400
<v Speaker 2>paper Told by a Healer that that goes basically as follows.

0:27:14.520 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 2>I'll do a shorter summary the healer. Before she was

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 2>a traditional healer, she had been sick and had experienced

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 2>trouble sleeping, and then she had a dream of a

0:27:25.440 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 2>man who gave her a plastic bag full of divination bones,

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 2>and so she went to her Christian church to find

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:36.320
<v Speaker 2>out what to do, and they gave her some instructions

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 2>of things she could do, but she did not follow

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 2>the instructions and started having encounters with snakes, like there

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.640
<v Speaker 2>was a snake in her pillowcase one night, and then

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 2>the encounters got worse. She and her husband encountered a

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 2>much bigger snake. So she and her husband went to

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 2>visit a traditional healer and he used divination bones to

0:27:56.320 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 2>discover that her grandfather had been a traditional healer himself,

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 2>and he wanted her to become a healer as well,

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:08.360
<v Speaker 2>and the illness, the insomnia, and the snakes were signs

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:11.399
<v Speaker 2>to push her onto this path. So in her story,

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 2>she accepted the call became a healer, and after her training,

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 2>she came home and was welcomed back with a malopo ritual,

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 2>and the snakes and the pain and the insomnia were gone.

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 2>There are also other stories included here of ill health

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:29.239
<v Speaker 2>and frightening experiences brought on by ancestors to sort of

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 2>pressure the living descendants to follow their advice and Lebaca

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 2>this is not a point Lebacca raises in the paper,

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 2>but I just happened to note that in the cases

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 2>documented in this study, the communication with dead ancestors sought

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 2>with the help of healers, does not provide information about

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 2>like objective future outcomes, such as you know what will

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.600
<v Speaker 2>happen in the future, who's going to ascend to the throne,

0:28:55.640 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 2>who's going to win the war, like we talked about

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 2>in some of these ancient examples. Rather, it seems to

0:28:59.920 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 2>be providing the ancestor's personal perspective. So in this case

0:29:04.720 --> 0:29:10.600
<v Speaker 2>of divination, it has less of a prophetic quality than

0:29:10.800 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 2>in some of the like, especially the fictional accounts, and

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 2>seems more to me like it's focused on seeking the

0:29:16.560 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 2>ancestors advice, like it allows the person to understand the

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:24.400
<v Speaker 2>ways that the ancestor is influencing their life for good

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 2>or for ill, and kind of the same way a

0:29:27.680 --> 0:29:30.920
<v Speaker 2>chat with a living elder might provide both personal advice

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 2>of things that they think you should do with your life,

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 2>but also explanations of why and how the elder is

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 2>treating you the way they are.

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and sort of serving to bring the current generation

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:48.240
<v Speaker 1>in line with past generations and the will and the

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>expectations of ancestors. This reminds me of how, in certain

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 1>analysis I've read of traditional Chinese ancestor generation, that you

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>could think of it as a kind of structural completeness,

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>that the family unit is not just a thing that exists,

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, with borders and a certain head count in

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the present, but it is a thing that exists in

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>the present and stretching back through the past, and therefore,

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.680
<v Speaker 1>like being in line with the will of ancestors is

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>about like keeping the structure sound and making sure that

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>everything is lined up and has this structural completeness, which

0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I think can be a slightly alien concept to many

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of us, especially if you tend to sort of view

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>like the family is a thing that exists solely in

0:30:41.640 --> 0:30:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the present, maybe it sinks back a little bit in time,

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>but is not deeply rooted in the past.

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, it seems to me to highlight how culturally variable.

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 2>The idea of the family is like what constitutes the

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 2>family and as especially as like a functional unit still

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:03.959
<v Speaker 2>having an effect on all members within. Yeah, but so anyway,

0:31:04.000 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 2>to look at a few assessments from this paper, Lebacca

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 2>says that there's a common belief among people of the

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Bipetti society that the main thing ancestors want is to

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 2>be remembered and respected by their descendants. And if the

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 2>living faithfully remember and venerate their ancestors, they're going to

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 2>be blessed with good health, healthy livestock and crops, good weather,

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 2>and so forth. And sometimes for a healing to take place,

0:31:29.040 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 2>a healer will have to consult the spirits of ancestors

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 2>directly to find out what to do. Another interesting thing

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 2>he notes is that he says Bipetti often feel that

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 2>it is inappropriate to approach their supreme deity or God directly,

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 2>and instead would use their ancestral spirits as sort of

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 2>intermediaries or emissaries between themselves and God. So I thought

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 2>this was an interesting layer of perspective that gives us,

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 2>I think, a more nuanced view of what it means

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 2>to be in contact in communication with the dead, because

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 2>here's one case where people today certainly do use rituals

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 2>such as communal music and dance and consultation with healers

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.960
<v Speaker 2>using divination bones to get in contact with the dead,

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 2>But it does not seem to me, at least not

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 2>in the cases documented in this study, to usually be

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 2>for the purpose of like knowing the future in advance,

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 2>but rather for the purpose of gaining perspective on the

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 2>present and the past. You establish communication with the dead

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 2>in order to receive wisdom and to receive advice, and

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 2>to find out what your ancestors want you to do

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 2>or expect you to do, and to find out how

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:49.400
<v Speaker 2>the ancestors advice and desires are connected to the trials

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 2>and other things you are experiencing in your daily life.

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:57.000
<v Speaker 2>And this really got me thinking, because it made me

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:00.640
<v Speaker 2>think that actually, even in a lot of the cases

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 2>we've already been looking at from you know, accounts from

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 2>the ancient world and so forth, a lot of the

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 2>cases of divination through spirits of the dead that we

0:33:10.400 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 2>looked at did not consist of a person seeking to

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 2>know the future in the kind of you know, the

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 2>fictional sorcerer sense we think about, where like somebody wants

0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 2>ultimate power, and so they want to know what happens

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 2>ahead of time to exploit that. Instead, it very often

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:31.520
<v Speaker 2>seemed to involve a much more personal, intimate, interactive kind

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 2>of knowledge, like knowledge useful for the exorcism of an

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 2>unwanted ghost, or knowledge useful to get advice, or you know,

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 2>wisdom from an ancestor or other knowledge of that kind

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 2>of personal sort. Does that make sense?

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I mean in a way it almost puts

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>things more in line with this idea that what we

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:53.920
<v Speaker 1>think of as necromancy is maybe more in line with

0:33:54.040 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>various shamanistic practices going stretching back through various human cultures,

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:02.960
<v Speaker 1>very far back in human existence. But yeah, not the

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of like smaller practices aimed at sort

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of realigning your life, things that almost could be thought

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 1>of as having a therapeutic property to them. You know,

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it's like something feels out of line in my life.

0:34:17.800 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I need to get right with the ancestors. I need

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to touch base with the ancestors in one form or another.

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 2>But that makes me feel like maybe we should come

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.400
<v Speaker 2>back and further explore the other side of the scale

0:34:28.440 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 2>as well. If that's a view of divination seeking communication

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 2>with the dead as a kind of intimate, wholesome, integrated

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:40.080
<v Speaker 2>thing within people's lives and culture that helps provide the

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 2>perspective of ancestors and wisdom. There are also culturally very

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 2>different views that would place it back in the category

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 2>of like a special extreme, transactional kind of event ritual.

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, And in this we're gonna we've been talking

0:34:56.520 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 1>about sort of bottom up necromancy, necromancy, things like necromancy

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that have emerged as part of traditional practices. Now let's

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 1>turn back to medieval Christian Europe and think about sort

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 1>of like the top down view of a Christian hierarchy

0:35:14.160 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>looking to stamp out necromatic practices and necromatic texts, because,

0:35:20.160 --> 0:35:22.920
<v Speaker 1>as we've mentioned several times already, there is this general

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:26.640
<v Speaker 1>attitude in medieval Christian Europe, again very top down, not

0:35:26.800 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 1>talking about like traditional pre Christian beliefs that are still

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:33.440
<v Speaker 1>resonating among the various peoples of Europe and various peoples

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>under the control of Christian forces, but rather this top

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>down view that first of all, the dead cannot be

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:45.879
<v Speaker 1>communicated with, and they should not be communicated with. If

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you attempt necromancy, you may well speak with something, but

0:35:49.760 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it will be a demon rather than a ghost, and

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:55.720
<v Speaker 1>so only ill can come of it. Now that being said,

0:35:56.160 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>necromancy and necromatic texts certainly existed and were circul related.

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 1>At times, they were greatly feared by the Church, as

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>pointed out by Richard Keikeffer in nineteen ninety sevens Forbidden Rights.

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:12.719
<v Speaker 1>When Franciscan Friar Bernard de Lussius was accused by the

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Holy Inquisition of using necromancy against the Pope in thirteen nineteen,

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>he was cleared of the charge, but he was still

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:24.280
<v Speaker 1>sent to prison for merely possessing a book of alleged necromancy.

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:26.840
<v Speaker 2>Simon, I'd rather see you dead.

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. I mean that the movie you're referencing does does

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>present this various top down view of forbidden knowledge and

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:39.240
<v Speaker 1>so forth.

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:41.919
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about The Devil Rides Out by the Way,

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 2>where Christopher Lee's character like, Oh, it's okay for him

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 2>to know about all of the forbidden magical rituals, but

0:36:48.320 --> 0:36:50.960
<v Speaker 2>it's not okay for his friend Simon to know about them.

0:36:51.120 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I mean within one of these cultural situations,

0:36:54.120 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>it's always okay for someone to know about them, to

0:36:56.600 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>know about these things, and those are the ones who

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 1>get to tell everyone else that they're not allowed to

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>know about them. The witch hunters get all the cool texts. Anyway,

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Fears and accusations of clergy possessing and or using necromantic

0:37:10.200 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>writings continued afterwards. However, Keir Keffer discusses these books as

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 1>concerning quote explicitly demonic magic as well, and this seems

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:22.439
<v Speaker 1>to have been the case during the Middle Ages as well,

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:27.680
<v Speaker 1>where sometimes something described as necromancy did involve divination via

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the dead, but other times it was used interchangeably with

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:36.760
<v Speaker 1>demonic magic. By most theological definitions. However, communication with demons

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and demonic divination would not be the same as merely

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 1>speaking with the dead, unless you're getting into this again

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>this very specific Christian caveat about the distinction or the

0:37:49.000 --> 0:37:52.280
<v Speaker 1>lack of a distinction between the two key Keffer writes quote.

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:55.319
<v Speaker 1>One possible reason for the conflation of these terms and

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:58.799
<v Speaker 1>concepts was the widespread assumption that when one engaged in

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:03.000
<v Speaker 1>necromancy in the area sense conjuring the spirits of the deceased,

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the spirits which in fact appeared were demons in the

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:10.960
<v Speaker 1>forms of the dead and the biblical example here that

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:16.360
<v Speaker 1>is often summoned up to support this is the shade

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:20.239
<v Speaker 1>of Samuel being conjured by the Witch of Indoor, and

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it is said that this is not really the spirit

0:38:23.080 --> 0:38:26.319
<v Speaker 1>of Samuel, this is a demon in the guise of

0:38:26.360 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>his spirit.

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 2>I don't think the Bible says that. I think in

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 2>the Bible it is pretty much understood to be Samuel.

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, but again you get into like, what are

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the official interpretations of a given religious text, right, Yeah, Still,

0:38:40.760 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>there was discussion of pure necromancy in various texts. A

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of examples are brought up here. There's the Rowlinson

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Necromatic Manuscript, as it's popularly known. This is a Latin

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and Middle English collection of texts on magic and divination,

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 1>including the invocation of angels as well as the dead.

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Its name for Richard Rowlinson, an eighteenth century clergy member

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 1>and collector of rare books and manuscripts. So yeah, it

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:09.839
<v Speaker 1>contains instructions for necromantic magic, as does the so called

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Munich Manual of Demonic Magic, a fifteenth century Godick grimour.

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Instructions from the Munich Manual via Keith Kefer involve the

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 1>creation of multiple magic circles, a sword and a ring,

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and you can use these rights to speak to the dead, certainly,

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 1>but also you can make a living person appear dead.

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>You can also make a living person fall in love

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:47.280
<v Speaker 1>with you, and many other things. Hmm. Now. In one section,

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:50.759
<v Speaker 1>ki Keffer adds some interesting ideas about the idea of

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>necromancy and nonsense. We often assume that everyone considering necromancy

0:39:56.440 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 1>in medieval times was either an eager believer or a

0:40:00.280 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 1>fearful inquisitor when it came to this kind of stuff,

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>so he writes the following quote. One might add to

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:10.319
<v Speaker 1>this that it is not altogether anachronistic to see the

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 1>notion of necromancy as nonsense. As it's at its most playful,

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it was a deliberate violation of sense, a fantasy of illusion,

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:23.399
<v Speaker 1>perhaps intended more for imaginative entertainment than for actual use.

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Yet the boundaries between sense and nonsense are rarely quite stable,

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and themes that seem to an outsider absolutely nonsensical could

0:40:33.000 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 1>be taken in deadly earnest by some observers within the

0:40:36.480 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>culture quote and the deadly earnest observers in this particular case,

0:40:42.360 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>he would be referring to would be like the witch

0:40:45.120 --> 0:40:50.320
<v Speaker 1>hunters and so forth, the demonology theorists that brought about

0:40:50.360 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>so much actual, real misery in the world.

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:57.719
<v Speaker 2>Ah, So he's exploring the possibility that it was the

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 2>inquisitors and so forth who would who were taking the

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 2>concept more literally than the people who practiced it.

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:07.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think maybe suggesting that there is again

0:41:08.040 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of a it's not just necromancy and non necromancy.

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:15.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a broad spectrum of various beliefs, practices, rights,

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:20.680
<v Speaker 1>but also stories, legends, myths that may concern speaking with

0:41:20.760 --> 0:41:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the dead that are understood to varying degrees within a

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:29.840
<v Speaker 1>given group to not be reality, you know, to in

0:41:29.880 --> 0:41:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the same way that myth is somewhere between reality and fiction.

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 1>You know that some of these traditions hold that place.

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 1>But then you have someone come in with an agenda,

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 1>with a violent agenda, and they're here to stamp out

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.960
<v Speaker 1>practices that are a threat to the church, to stamp

0:41:47.000 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 1>out individuals that are a threat to the church. Well,

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:51.759
<v Speaker 1>then they can take any of these things and use

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:55.279
<v Speaker 1>them to support their case. Now for a little more

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>detail on where the church stood on necromancy, and again

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:00.879
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with. We're dealing with a with centuries here,

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with all sorts of individuals coming in with

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:06.920
<v Speaker 1>different ideas. So this is not presented to be like

0:42:07.920 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the word on necromancy. But I thought it would be

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:18.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting to turn to the famous writings of Thomas Aquinas,

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:21.399
<v Speaker 1>who lived twelve twenty five through twelve seventy four. This

0:42:21.520 --> 0:42:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is from the Summa Theologica, or the Summary of Theology.

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:28.839
<v Speaker 1>The book covers a great deal of ground, but it

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:32.799
<v Speaker 1>does mention necromancy in a few places and gets to

0:42:32.840 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the meat of what it was thought to be at

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the time in terms of divination. So this is from

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a translation of a Summa theological quote. All divinations seek

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to acquire for knowledge of future events by means of

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:50.560
<v Speaker 1>some council and help of a demon who is either

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:54.040
<v Speaker 1>expressly called upon to give his help, or else thrust

0:42:54.080 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 1>himself in secretly, in order to tell certain future things

0:42:58.680 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>unknown to men but known to him the demon in

0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>such manners as to have been explained in Isaiah fifty

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 1>seven to three.

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 2>The statement almost seems like a direct argument against what

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:13.400
<v Speaker 2>we were just talking about with respect to the subtlety

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:17.000
<v Speaker 2>and complex range of different kinds of communication with the

0:43:17.040 --> 0:43:19.799
<v Speaker 2>dead that might take place, especially in a culture that

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:23.400
<v Speaker 2>practices common forms of ancestor veneration.

0:43:24.200 --> 0:43:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean this is like, clearly we're dealing with

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a situation where it is not thought that there is

0:43:28.600 --> 0:43:31.560
<v Speaker 1>any room for this sort of thing within within the

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Christian world, and anything outside of the Christian world that

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:38.240
<v Speaker 1>even looks like this is probably against the rules.

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 2>It's always to know the future, and it's always a demon.

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, So Aquinas continues to in states when demons are

0:43:46.440 --> 0:43:49.360
<v Speaker 1>expressly invoked, they are wont to foretell the future in

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:52.880
<v Speaker 1>many ways. Sometimes they offer themselves to human sight and

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:56.840
<v Speaker 1>hearing by mock apparitions in order to foretell the future,

0:43:57.200 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and this species is called the digitation because man's eyes

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:06.440
<v Speaker 1>are blindfolded. Sometimes they make use of dreams, and this

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:10.640
<v Speaker 1>is called divination by dreams. Sometimes they employ apparitions or

0:44:10.719 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 1>utterances of the dead, and this species is called necromancy,

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>for as Isidore observes, in Greek, necron means dead and

0:44:20.280 --> 0:44:24.800
<v Speaker 1>mantilla divination, because after certain incantations and the sprinkling of blood,

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the dead seem to come to life to divine and

0:44:27.719 --> 0:44:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to answer questions so he goes on to discuss other

0:44:30.560 --> 0:44:33.759
<v Speaker 1>forms of divination. Divination, he says, which is practiced without

0:44:33.800 --> 0:44:37.960
<v Speaker 1>express invocation of demons, occurs in two forms, one by

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:41.359
<v Speaker 1>observing things in nature, and the other by observing things

0:44:41.440 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>due to human action, like rolling dice or flipping through

0:44:44.160 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 1>a book. He writes again in translation, accordingly, it is

0:44:47.640 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 1>clear that there are three kinds of divination. The first

0:44:50.640 --> 0:44:53.399
<v Speaker 1>is when the demons are invoked openly. This comes under

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the head of necromancy. The second is merely an observation

0:44:57.080 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 1>of the disposition or movement of some other being, and

0:45:00.280 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 1>this belongs to augury, while the third consists in doing

0:45:03.600 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>something in order to discover the occult, and this belongs

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to sordilach. Under each of these, many others are contained

0:45:10.320 --> 0:45:14.720
<v Speaker 1>as explained above, And he says, in all the afore said,

0:45:15.000 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>there is the same general, but not the same special

0:45:17.719 --> 0:45:21.000
<v Speaker 1>character of sin, For it is much more grievous to

0:45:21.120 --> 0:45:23.920
<v Speaker 1>invoke the demons than to do things that deserve the

0:45:23.920 --> 0:45:27.719
<v Speaker 1>demon's interference. So he's saying, look, if you're trying to

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:30.040
<v Speaker 1>do let's say you're trying to speak to the spirit

0:45:30.080 --> 0:45:32.359
<v Speaker 1>of the dead, and a demon intercepts the call, as

0:45:32.360 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 1>they always will and then manipulates you through that communication.

0:45:36.640 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 1>That's one thing, like, that's bad, you've messed up, But

0:45:40.200 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you haven't messed up as badly if you had gone

0:45:43.120 --> 0:45:46.800
<v Speaker 1>out and done a demonic ritual and said, hey, demons,

0:45:48.120 --> 0:45:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I need you to come here because we have things

0:45:49.719 --> 0:45:53.799
<v Speaker 1>to talk about now. I did find it interesting that

0:45:54.080 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Aquinas stresses that merely speaking to a demon or inquiring

0:45:59.600 --> 0:46:04.239
<v Speaker 1>of the truth from a demon is not unlawful, in

0:46:04.320 --> 0:46:08.200
<v Speaker 1>part because Christ spoke to the demon legion. He spoke

0:46:08.239 --> 0:46:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to the demons that were in the swine or were

0:46:11.480 --> 0:46:16.480
<v Speaker 1>driven into the swine. However, it is unlawful to invoke

0:46:16.560 --> 0:46:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a demon. So by this classification, I would think, if

0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:23.399
<v Speaker 1>a demon comes up to you and is like, hey, suck,

0:46:24.160 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you have every right to go suck back, but it

0:46:27.200 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>is unlawful to summon the demon and then go suck. Right.

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:34.200
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So if you encounter a demon, you can talk

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 2>to you, probably you can argue with it or whatever,

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:40.880
<v Speaker 2>but you can't say like, hey, demons, if any demon

0:46:40.960 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 2>is out there, come debate me.

0:46:42.800 --> 0:46:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, Like if you're Martin Luther and the demons

0:46:44.800 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 1>show up, you can cuss at them and throw things

0:46:46.680 --> 0:46:50.200
<v Speaker 1>at them. And drive them away, right, that's not demonic

0:46:50.480 --> 0:46:53.560
<v Speaker 1>witchcraft or what have you. But if you summon them,

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess even if you summon them to cuss at

0:46:56.120 --> 0:46:57.279
<v Speaker 1>them like, that's bad.

0:46:57.840 --> 0:47:00.960
<v Speaker 2>I would assume so. But especially if you summon them

0:47:01.000 --> 0:47:03.399
<v Speaker 2>in order to gain power from them, that's bad.

0:47:04.280 --> 0:47:06.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so Aquina says, quote. Now, it is one thing

0:47:06.840 --> 0:47:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to question a demon who comes to us of his

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:11.000
<v Speaker 1>own accord, and it is lawful to do so at

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:13.719
<v Speaker 1>times for the good of others, especially when he can

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:15.880
<v Speaker 1>be compelled by the power of God to tell the truth,

0:47:16.440 --> 0:47:18.799
<v Speaker 1>and another to invoke a demon in order to gain

0:47:18.840 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 1>from him knowledge of things hidden from us. Now that

0:47:22.200 --> 0:47:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, it seems to me like that opens

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:27.799
<v Speaker 1>up a gray area. Are like, are you just could

0:47:27.800 --> 0:47:29.719
<v Speaker 1>you put yourself in a position where you're just in

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the right place to encounter demons, so you're not quite

0:47:33.440 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 1>summoning them, but you're like, you're not baiting the demon,

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:39.839
<v Speaker 1>but you are hanging out in a place or a

0:47:39.880 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 1>position where they might show up.

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:44.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, Like, I'm gonna just keep moving my

0:47:44.440 --> 0:47:46.440
<v Speaker 2>arms this way, and if they happen to touch a

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:49.280
<v Speaker 2>wija board, that that's its problem, not mine.

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm or yeah, I'm going to hang out in

0:47:51.560 --> 0:47:56.719
<v Speaker 1>this this this haunted crypt and we'll just see what happens. Yeah.

0:47:56.840 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 1>He also mentions that divination by the stars is fine

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:03.759
<v Speaker 1>so long as you're not invoking a demon. So again,

0:48:03.840 --> 0:48:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this is just a snapshot at some of the top

0:48:06.520 --> 0:48:09.360
<v Speaker 1>down ideas about speaking to the dead and why you

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't do it, and ultimately a little bit of demonology

0:48:12.360 --> 0:48:15.319
<v Speaker 1>splashed in there as well. But you know, there's so

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:19.160
<v Speaker 1>much that would have been going on in different cultures

0:48:19.440 --> 0:48:24.279
<v Speaker 1>throughout the centuries covered by the Middle Ages here. I mean,

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:27.720
<v Speaker 1>there are all sorts of traditions involving, you know, speaking

0:48:28.200 --> 0:48:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to the dead, conjuring the dead at crossroads and so forth,

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and then there's so many on top of that, there's

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:38.279
<v Speaker 1>so many different traditions, legends, ghost stories, et cetera that

0:48:38.400 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 1>deal with this sort of thing that again may not

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:43.920
<v Speaker 1>have a like literal role within the culture saying this

0:48:44.080 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is how you speak to the dead, but like here

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:49.120
<v Speaker 1>is an idea of speaking to the dead, and it

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 1>can still have a great deal of importance within a

0:48:51.719 --> 0:48:52.320
<v Speaker 1>given culture.

0:48:52.719 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 2>Now, seeing these different views of communicating with the dead

0:48:56.200 --> 0:49:01.080
<v Speaker 2>side by side, it really highlights how how one, I

0:49:01.120 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 2>think could easily be mistaken for the other by an

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 2>unsympathetic observer, like somebody who's got a particular theological point

0:49:10.000 --> 0:49:12.799
<v Speaker 2>of view and who looks into a culture, one of

0:49:12.800 --> 0:49:16.560
<v Speaker 2>the many cultures that practice's forms of ancestor veneration that

0:49:16.719 --> 0:49:20.239
<v Speaker 2>may involve some type of ritual of consulting with the

0:49:20.280 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 2>dead with the ancestors seeking their wisdom or getting information

0:49:23.719 --> 0:49:27.799
<v Speaker 2>about how they're continuing to affect your life. Like that,

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:31.239
<v Speaker 2>an unsympathetic observer looks in on a culture and sees that,

0:49:31.760 --> 0:49:35.360
<v Speaker 2>and they say, oh, they're doing witchcraft in order to

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:37.960
<v Speaker 2>get power from the dead so that they can like

0:49:38.320 --> 0:49:41.840
<v Speaker 2>no events in advance and you know, and manipulate people.

0:49:42.320 --> 0:49:44.800
<v Speaker 2>It seems very clear how that kind of mistaken impression

0:49:44.880 --> 0:49:49.720
<v Speaker 2>could be formed. And I wonder if that gives rise

0:49:49.920 --> 0:49:55.120
<v Speaker 2>to some legends of necromantic practices that probably weren't ever

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:59.680
<v Speaker 2>actually practiced, that were just like unsympathetic observer looking in

0:49:59.840 --> 0:50:04.319
<v Speaker 2>on ancestor veneration of some form in another culture and

0:50:04.400 --> 0:50:07.279
<v Speaker 2>saying like, ah, they're they're consulting the dead in order

0:50:07.320 --> 0:50:08.560
<v Speaker 2>to do something malicious.

0:50:09.320 --> 0:50:11.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, absolutely. And then at the same time, I mean,

0:50:11.880 --> 0:50:15.239
<v Speaker 1>you have things like the veneration of saints within uh,

0:50:16.040 --> 0:50:19.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, Catholic Christian traditions that you know, you could

0:50:19.280 --> 0:50:21.600
<v Speaker 1>make an argument for sort of you know, scratching the

0:50:21.640 --> 0:50:24.400
<v Speaker 1>same itch. So you know, a lot of this falls

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, a lot of this depends on who's judging,

0:50:29.360 --> 0:50:32.120
<v Speaker 1>who's laying out the laws, and who's saying what is

0:50:32.160 --> 0:50:36.560
<v Speaker 1>acceptable and what is not acceptable. When we consider individuals

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:38.239
<v Speaker 1>and generations that came before us.

0:50:38.719 --> 0:50:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you think Aquinas was saying it's okay to talk

0:50:41.600 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 2>to a demon if you didn't summon it, because like

0:50:44.719 --> 0:50:48.000
<v Speaker 2>he did that one time, Like he's a actually that's

0:50:48.120 --> 0:50:48.840
<v Speaker 2>not a problem.

0:50:49.920 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, there there are so many you know, I enjoy

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:56.719
<v Speaker 1>reading about this occasionally, like getting into exactly what was

0:50:56.880 --> 0:51:01.279
<v Speaker 1>thought of as correct concerning demons at various points in

0:51:01.280 --> 0:51:03.839
<v Speaker 1>the Middle Ages, like what could they do and what

0:51:03.920 --> 0:51:07.719
<v Speaker 1>could they not do in accordance with divine will? And

0:51:07.760 --> 0:51:11.000
<v Speaker 1>there's some of that in Aquinas's writing, for sure, and

0:51:11.040 --> 0:51:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you see that in the writings of other key individuals

0:51:13.000 --> 0:51:16.960
<v Speaker 1>as well, like can they like one classic example of

0:51:16.960 --> 0:51:20.200
<v Speaker 1>this we just we've discussed multiple times is can an

0:51:20.239 --> 0:51:24.279
<v Speaker 1>incubus or succubist take on a complete disguise as a

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:28.359
<v Speaker 1>beautiful human to seduce humans, And there's the ideal, No,

0:51:29.360 --> 0:51:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't be fair to the faithful. So there'll always

0:51:32.239 --> 0:51:35.360
<v Speaker 1>be some sort of a tell like duck feed or

0:51:35.440 --> 0:51:37.880
<v Speaker 1>some sort of goat feed or something just so that

0:51:37.960 --> 0:51:40.719
<v Speaker 1>you'll have so the faithful will have an out that

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, and so there's a lot of stuff like that.

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Can demons do miracles and so forth.

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:47.239
<v Speaker 2>Though I think as we discussed with the idea of

0:51:47.239 --> 0:51:50.319
<v Speaker 2>the duck feed, I wonder if the idea was was

0:51:50.400 --> 0:51:54.719
<v Speaker 2>really about the faithful having out or more about saying like, ah, yeah,

0:51:54.719 --> 0:51:57.960
<v Speaker 2>if you did succumb to an incubus or a succubus,

0:51:57.960 --> 0:52:00.439
<v Speaker 2>it's your fault because there was something there you should

0:52:00.480 --> 0:52:03.480
<v Speaker 2>have noticed, right. It's about saying, like, you, you know,

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:05.759
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't unfair to you. You should have been more

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:06.880
<v Speaker 2>on the lookout.

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Right, And also like what would a just god allow

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:14.440
<v Speaker 1>under his domain? You know? And you know, there's of

0:52:14.480 --> 0:52:17.400
<v Speaker 1>course the more pressing side of that, like why do

0:52:17.560 --> 0:52:19.600
<v Speaker 1>bad things happen to good people? Why is there suffering

0:52:19.640 --> 0:52:21.560
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and so forth, And that's I guess

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the larger concern. But then when you get into demonology,

0:52:25.160 --> 0:52:27.359
<v Speaker 1>like that's a whole other area. Like, Okay, well these

0:52:27.440 --> 0:52:29.839
<v Speaker 1>demons get to run around and just do whatever. That

0:52:29.880 --> 0:52:32.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem right. They're like, well, no, no, no, they can

0:52:32.239 --> 0:52:35.319
<v Speaker 1>do certain things. And I believe Aquinas writes that, like,

0:52:35.719 --> 0:52:38.840
<v Speaker 1>they are allowed to do certain things because by allowing

0:52:38.920 --> 0:52:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the demons a certain amount of freedom, it actually has

0:52:43.239 --> 0:52:46.520
<v Speaker 1>a positive impact on the faithful, you know, because like

0:52:46.680 --> 0:52:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in having to deal with all this demonic stuff, like

0:52:51.200 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it's going to end up bolstering your faith to some extent.

0:52:54.440 --> 0:52:54.800
<v Speaker 2>Hmm.

0:52:55.520 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's complicate. It's complicated. That's why. That's why people

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 1>like Aquinas did so many words to it.

0:53:01.880 --> 0:53:03.759
<v Speaker 2>Okay, should we wrap up necromancy there?

0:53:04.360 --> 0:53:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I believe we will, but you know, we'd love to

0:53:06.640 --> 0:53:08.840
<v Speaker 1>hear from everyone out there. If there's an example of

0:53:09.600 --> 0:53:15.520
<v Speaker 1>outright necromancy and fiction, legend and lore, or various examples

0:53:15.560 --> 0:53:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of communication with spirits or ancestor veneration that you think

0:53:20.640 --> 0:53:22.880
<v Speaker 1>are notable and you'd like to bring up, well, write in.

0:53:23.000 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 1>We would love to hear from you. We can keep

0:53:25.080 --> 0:53:30.240
<v Speaker 1>discussing this topic on future editions of listener Mail. Listener

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Mail publishes on Mondays and The Stuff to Blow your

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Mind podcast feed We have our core episodes of the

0:53:35.160 --> 0:53:37.520
<v Speaker 1>show Stuff to Blow Your Mind on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

0:53:37.800 --> 0:53:40.680
<v Speaker 1>On Wednesdays, we generally have a short form monster fact

0:53:40.760 --> 0:53:43.280
<v Speaker 1>or Artifact episode, and then on Fridays we set aside

0:53:43.280 --> 0:53:46.000
<v Speaker 1>most serious concerns to just talk about a weird film

0:53:46.120 --> 0:53:47.400
<v Speaker 1>on Weird House Cinema.

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Here's thanks to our excellent audio producer, JJ Posway. If

0:53:51.160 --> 0:53:52.680
<v Speaker 2>you would like to get in touch with us with

0:53:52.760 --> 0:53:55.200
<v Speaker 2>feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest a

0:53:55.239 --> 0:53:57.719
<v Speaker 2>topic for the future, or just to say hello, you

0:53:57.760 --> 0:54:00.760
<v Speaker 2>can email us at contact a, stuff blow your Mind

0:54:00.920 --> 0:54:11.480
<v Speaker 2>dot com. Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of iHeartRadio.

0:54:11.840 --> 0:54:14.759
<v Speaker 2>For more podcasts from my Heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:54:14.920 --> 0:54:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.