Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. Republicans are sick of
Speaker 1: the double standards in social media. Trump and the rest
Speaker 1: of the GOP want answers for why Twitter suspended Mitch
Speaker 1: McConnell related Twitter. We'll get into that. And also Bernie Carrick,
Speaker 1: former commissioner of the NYP, He's going to join to
Speaker 1: talk about a possible pardon for Blagoyevic And is there
Speaker 1: really a movie where libs are hunting Trump supporters? That
Speaker 1: and more coming up on The buck Sexton Show. This
Speaker 1: is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or mission
Speaker 1: is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence. Make
Speaker 1: no mistake American, You're a great American Again the buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show begins. Remember then, might today? I'm directing my
Speaker 1: administration to explore all regulatory and legislative solutions to protect
Speaker 1: free speech and the free speech rights of all Americans.
Speaker 1: We hope to see transparency, more accountability, and more freedom.
Speaker 1: Welcome to the buck Sexton Show. That's right, not just
Speaker 1: calling out the fake news media now that Trump White
Speaker 1: House is saying, yeah, that's right. When we see something
Speaker 1: that's really egregious, when one of the social media giants
Speaker 1: decides that they're not going to play fair. It's time
Speaker 1: the American people know about this. Here's what happened last night.
Speaker 1: Mitch McConnell, as we discussed here in the week, had
Speaker 1: people outside of his home saying horrible things. You probably
Speaker 1: heard a lot less about this than you did about
Speaker 1: how Trump is a racist. Oh you so wasist. What
Speaker 1: happened was Trump's a racist, That's why he won twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: I'm just waiting for Hillary to pop out and tell
Speaker 1: us all that that's what happened. But we've been hearing
Speaker 1: so much about how Trump is a racist, We've been
Speaker 1: hearing a lot less about, for example, the horrific stuff
Speaker 1: said outside of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's home. Buy
Speaker 1: a bunch of Libs who are driven to their rage,
Speaker 1: to their insanity by the mainstream media and by Democrat
Speaker 1: politicians who run around like Beto Rourke's saying Trump is
Speaker 1: just like he's like worse than like Adolf Hitler, because
Speaker 1: like I mean, like even like Hitler like was nice
Speaker 1: to dogs, like Betto's a moron. You know, there's just
Speaker 1: no way that you can justify the kinds of things
Speaker 1: that these Democrats are saying about this president in any
Speaker 1: sane world, in any realm of rationality, but they're just
Speaker 1: they're all on all now because it's a it's an
Speaker 1: arms race of stupidity. Who can say the most outlandish
Speaker 1: thing about how terrible Trump is, That's what's gonna get
Speaker 1: the headline. This is how you have Scarborough over at MSNBC,
Speaker 1: who wishes that his swoop was quite as grandiose as yours.
Speaker 1: Truly swoop, I am just saying, but he's saying insane
Speaker 1: stuff about Trump, horrific stuff about Trump. And yet when
Speaker 1: Mitch McConnell has people outside of his home saying, you know, murder,
Speaker 1: calling him a murder turtle and all kinds of things,
Speaker 1: then sure enough you don't hear that stuff at all.
Speaker 1: You don't hear it, you don't hear about it. Why
Speaker 1: is that so? Mitch McConnell had a Twitter account. The
Speaker 1: Twitter account got suspended. You might ask, why was the
Speaker 1: Twitter account suspended? Oh, that's right, because they shared footage
Speaker 1: of the lunatics outside Mitch McConnell's home. Here's what happened.
Speaker 1: There was a tweet from Kevin McLaughlin hashtag massacre Mitch. Sorry,
Speaker 1: I was saying, you know, murder turtle. If there's all
Speaker 1: kinds of things, hashtag massacre Mitch trended on Twitter for
Speaker 1: a full day and Twitter did nothing. Someone threatens to
Speaker 1: stab the majority leader at Team Mitch, that is Mitch McConnell.
Speaker 1: He posts the video and they get locked out. The NRSC,
Speaker 1: the National Republican Senate Committee is a senatorial committee, is
Speaker 1: not spending money until this is addressed. That's right, folks.
Speaker 1: You can threaten the Senate Majority leader on Twitter all
Speaker 1: day long and nothing happens. But if the Senate Majority
Speaker 1: Leader's account shows the threats so that people can see
Speaker 1: what's happening, that account gets shut down. What other bias
Speaker 1: do you need to see? What do you need to
Speaker 1: know about to understand how deep the bias runs here
Speaker 1: at Twitter in these other places. I mean, I think
Speaker 1: I think it's quite clear, and I'm glad that Trump
Speaker 1: is calling it out. And it's also nice to have
Speaker 1: a little bit of a respite, isn't it just from
Speaker 1: the constant Oh my gosh, Trump is so racist all
Speaker 1: the stuff that they're saying, because the rhetoric from the
Speaker 1: left is completely out of line, and you know this.
Speaker 1: It's laughable, although it's really not funny at all. It's
Speaker 1: absurd the kind of things that the left says on
Speaker 1: a regular basis about Trump, about his supporters, and then
Speaker 1: they want to lecture us on good faith debate and
Speaker 1: keeping things, you know, lowering the temperature a little bit.
Speaker 1: I mean, here's Maxine Waters, elected Democrat folks talking about Trump.
Speaker 1: Play five. Well, I know the audio wasn't great there
Speaker 1: she's saying, well, what if you if you get rid
Speaker 1: of Trump, then you have Penn She said, quote I say,
Speaker 1: knock off the first one and then go after the
Speaker 1: second one. Yeah, she's a real sweetheart. You know, She's
Speaker 1: really somebody that's elevating the discourse, isn't she? And they're
Speaker 1: countless other examples here. There's so much else that we
Speaker 1: could point to to just show how completely out of
Speaker 1: line the left is on a regular basis, and yet
Speaker 1: now they want to lecture us. Joe Biden wants to
Speaker 1: lecture us too. For those who don't, I started to
Speaker 1: doubt myself a little bit with my Joe Biden's not
Speaker 1: going to be the nominee. He's starting to look like
Speaker 1: he is. But then things like this happened. I know
Speaker 1: this seems minor, but but Play nineteen. This is Joe
Speaker 1: Biden today, out of what is the Iowa State fair
Speaker 1: Play nineteen. Everybody knows who Donald Trump is, even the
Speaker 1: supporters know who he is. We gotta let him know
Speaker 1: who we are. We choose unity over division, We choose
Speaker 1: science over fiction. We choose truth over facts. We gotta
Speaker 1: make a T shirt there with Joe Biden's face, hutter.
Speaker 1: We choose truth over facts. Joe Biden man, oh, the
Speaker 1: Biden Nator, the Bideroski. Yep, he's trying real hard to
Speaker 1: see him like a fighter, but he's I just don't
Speaker 1: think he's got it in him. I don't think that
Speaker 1: he's certainly not woke enough for the left. Is he
Speaker 1: dishonest enough? Is is he full of enough slanderous vitriol
Speaker 1: toward the President the United States? I think the answer
Speaker 1: is we'll have to wait and see. We'll have to
Speaker 1: see the Dayton mayor. By the way, you know, Trump
Speaker 1: visited yesterday in El Paso, Texas, and in Dayton, Ohio.
Speaker 1: Nan Whaley, who I thought was a Democrat, and sure enough,
Speaker 1: of course is a Democrat. This is what she says
Speaker 1: about that the leader of the free world, the commander
Speaker 1: in chief, goes to heal the country in her city
Speaker 1: after something that By the way, the Dayton shooter nobody
Speaker 1: thinks was inspired by Trump. I mean that's if anything,
Speaker 1: he was. If you're gonna start saying the inspired by stuff,
Speaker 1: which I don't like as a general rule, but if
Speaker 1: you're going to start saying, well, this person's politics or
Speaker 1: the reason or some part of the reason the Dayton
Speaker 1: shooter was an Elizabeth Warren supporter and a Bernie Sanders supporter.
Speaker 1: Why haven't you seen more of that in the media.
Speaker 1: Why amn't you see more about his leftist inclinations. By
Speaker 1: the way, Byron York also did a great deep dive
Speaker 1: into the manifesto of the El Paso shooter, and yes,
Speaker 1: there was some stuff on him. First of all, he says,
Speaker 1: this person's crazy. So can we stop trying to think
Speaker 1: that there's a cohesive and and you know, piece by piece,
Speaker 1: block by block political philosophy that's motivating this psychopath. There's
Speaker 1: really fragments of ideas all smashed again other in this
Speaker 1: psycho's head. That's what the reality is. But if you
Speaker 1: look at the fragments, some of them have to do
Speaker 1: with you know, he he's down for the Green New Deal.
Speaker 1: I mean, the guy is not some maga hat wearing
Speaker 1: super trumper. That was not the case with the El
Speaker 1: Paso guy. He just is a psychotic anti immigrant racist.
Speaker 1: But there's a whole lot of other stuff that would
Speaker 1: be more in line with what with byron Y're called
Speaker 1: national socialism. Oh that's right, the Nazis were socialists. I
Speaker 1: know we're never supposed to talk about that, but it's true.
Speaker 1: Nazis were socialists. Just say it in front of a
Speaker 1: lib sometime and see the reaction you get. It's almost
Speaker 1: as much fun as as pointing out to them. Yeah,
Speaker 1: which was the party that was in favor of slavery?
Speaker 1: And what was the party of segregation? That's right? Name
Speaker 1: was the Democratic Party, wasn't it. Huh. It's weird how
Speaker 1: you just don't hear more about that national socialists with
Speaker 1: the Nazis. Segregation is the slavery party? Was Democrat Party? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Now they're just so self righteous about everything all the time,
Speaker 1: aren't they. Here's the Dayton mayor showing that plenty of
Speaker 1: midsize cities have mayors who are deeply unimpressive one of
Speaker 1: the biggest city of the country's mayors of Buffoon. So
Speaker 1: I guess there's no no way to account for voter
Speaker 1: taste these days. Play four. Look. I mean, I think
Speaker 1: I've known and watched President Trump's Twitter feed for a while.
Speaker 1: He is a bully and a coward. And it's fine
Speaker 1: that he wants to bully me and Senator Brown. We're okay,
Speaker 1: we can take it. But the citizens of Dayton deserve action,
Speaker 1: and you know, we're just hoping that you know, this
Speaker 1: isn't just a typical politician that's all talking, no action.
Speaker 1: We want to see, and the citizens of Dayton want
Speaker 1: to see him do something around some common sense gun legislations.
Speaker 1: Great to say that there's so much about that. First
Speaker 1: of all, comments calling something common sense doesn't make a
Speaker 1: common sense. It's just a stupid high school debaters tactic
Speaker 1: and it's annoying. Oh, let's just do common sun socialism.
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean it's common sense. Start with that. But
Speaker 1: this assert assertion that Donald Trump is a coward. Donald
Speaker 1: Trump was a super famous billionaire with a really hot
Speaker 1: wife and a big family and lots of stuff that
Speaker 1: he could have done in the world he decided to
Speaker 1: have to put himself in front of the most relentless
Speaker 1: and well moneyed political machine in the world, the Clinton machine,
Speaker 1: and break the whole thing and defeat it, and have
Speaker 1: at least, you know, fifty percent of the country more
Speaker 1: or less hate his guts for all eternity, and have
Speaker 1: them try to imprison him and his family because he
Speaker 1: wanted to, Oh my gosh, make America great again. Good
Speaker 1: heavens anything but that. I mean, to call this guy
Speaker 1: a coward is just the height of stupidity. He's definitely
Speaker 1: not a coward. You can say you don't like his policies,
Speaker 1: you can say you don't like his tweets. Guy's not
Speaker 1: a coward, all right. He he took the full brunt
Speaker 1: of the left wing machine on the chin, he won,
Speaker 1: and he keeps doing a day in and day out.
Speaker 1: So I just I just have to know. To call
Speaker 1: him a coward, it's absurd, But lives are full of
Speaker 1: absurdity these days. We'd know that we'll talk more about
Speaker 1: the gun control policies that are not trying to push.
Speaker 1: Got some more thoughts to you on red flag laws.
Speaker 1: Bernie Carrot's going to join for a couple of segments
Speaker 1: later on the show. I want to talk to him
Speaker 1: about the possible Blagoievic pardon that's been floated out there.
Speaker 1: I want to talk to him about the Eric Garner
Speaker 1: Officer Pantaleo incident and what should happen officer Pantaleo, how
Speaker 1: to clean up Wes Baltimore. I mean, he was commissioner
Speaker 1: the NYPD, was gonna be Department of Homeland Security chief
Speaker 1: and then he got he got they decided to take
Speaker 1: him out to the woodshed for political reasons and really
Speaker 1: go after him. So, and we're talking about that too.
Speaker 1: What's it like when the prosecutorial office is weaponized for
Speaker 1: political reasons against you? How does that feel? What is
Speaker 1: that like? We'll ask him about all that. So I'm
Speaker 1: looking I like Bernie. I'm looking forward to talking to him,
Speaker 1: and we will also get into this movie The Hunt,
Speaker 1: which that's right, folks, Hollywood is now making movies where
Speaker 1: Trump supporters more or less are getting hunted by rich
Speaker 1: East Coast lives. That's what's happening. We'll talk about it.
Speaker 1: Stay with me. I'm very glad that the Department of
Speaker 1: Justice and the FBI are treating this as domestic terrorism.
Speaker 1: As a hate crime. It clearly is terrorism and a
Speaker 1: hate crime, and the full force of the prosecutorial authority
Speaker 1: of both the state government and the federal government will
Speaker 1: appropriately ensure that the maximum penalty is enforced against this
Speaker 1: mass murder. Look, that's been the position that all of
Speaker 1: us have held all along. Here, what happened in El Paso,
Speaker 1: what happened in Dayton, what also happened in Chicago, though
Speaker 1: it's the details are different, but still loss of innocent
Speaker 1: life through murder with firearms. But what happened was horrible,
Speaker 1: and the full weight of a law should be brought
Speaker 1: against the people involved. But our animosity are disgusted, should
Speaker 1: be reserved for the people that actually do the thing,
Speaker 1: And we should not allow conversations about policy to get
Speaker 1: dragged into a Oh but this person that once did
Speaker 1: this terrible thing liked a few things that you like,
Speaker 1: so you're basically the same, which is what the game
Speaker 1: has been for Libs all week. And this is not new.
Speaker 1: They've been doing this for quite some time. But we
Speaker 1: should not allow them to get away with that, because
Speaker 1: if we're going to be concerned about what tears us apart,
Speaker 1: if we can't have an versation with the other side
Speaker 1: without hearing Oh that's so racist. Why are you so racist?
Speaker 1: This country is not long for this world as a
Speaker 1: place where ideas can flourish and we can live in
Speaker 1: Let's be honest, relative harmony with each other over you know,
Speaker 1: there's been some interruptions in that in this country's history,
Speaker 1: but of a relative harmony with each other despite having
Speaker 1: some very very different ideas about important things. You know,
Speaker 1: we're not. We don't just disagree left and right, Democrat
Speaker 1: and Republican about you know, minor issues of policy. You know,
Speaker 1: what the exact tax rate should be or you know,
Speaker 1: when we how much early voting should be allowed, and
Speaker 1: things like that. Although we do disagree about that. We
Speaker 1: also disagree about you know, is an infant in the
Speaker 1: womb a human being or not? We disagree with the
Speaker 1: left on that one, and yet we still I mean,
Speaker 1: they're wrong, but we still live in the same country
Speaker 1: and try to deal with the same rule of law issues.
Speaker 1: And that's where we are. I think we're finally outside
Speaker 1: the hysteria realm enough. I mean, we're never really outside
Speaker 1: the hysteria realm with Libs, but we're outside this enough
Speaker 1: where we can all take a breath. They can't just
Speaker 1: get everything they want by calling us white supremacists. That
Speaker 1: they're not going to actually manage to steamroll anything that
Speaker 1: we have for political opposition on all kinds of bad
Speaker 1: liberal ideas out there by claiming that we are white supremacists.
Speaker 1: And in fact, I think some Democrats are smart enough
Speaker 1: to figure out that they if they're gonna win an election,
Speaker 1: they're gonna have to do more than just call everybody
Speaker 1: racists and white nationalists and all the rest of it.
Speaker 1: They have to have some ideas that will make people
Speaker 1: want to vote for them. Just peddling in in a
Speaker 1: hatred of Trump is not going to get them what
Speaker 1: they want. Governor Steve Bullock, who he's one of these
Speaker 1: guys in the Democrat stage who's been telling them things
Speaker 1: that they don't want to hear. And he's right. Here's
Speaker 1: him talking about Obamacare, for example, and how single payer
Speaker 1: to get would get rid of Obamacare. I mean, they
Speaker 1: keep forgetting about this. Here's what he says, Play eight.
Speaker 1: It's taken a seventy years to get disclose. It makes
Speaker 1: no sense to go back to swear one. I should
Speaker 1: have not debate sage and I can not believe it
Speaker 1: after seventy attempts by Republicans, seven of the Democrats we're
Speaker 1: calling to reveal and replace Obamacare. If you propose abolish
Speaker 1: and private health insurance, you will lose, You will be Electron.
Speaker 1: He's right. I almost almost want to be very, very quiet.
Speaker 1: We don't want Libs to figure out that if they
Speaker 1: abolish private health insurance, they're done. They're not gonna win.
Speaker 1: I should probably running other Yeah, Bernie's plan is great.
Speaker 1: But what I'm bringing this all to here, folks, is
Speaker 1: that the Democrats lose when we talk about ideas and
Speaker 1: what matters, but they are pushing for these red flag laws.
Speaker 1: We should delve into that a bit more, and we will.
Speaker 1: They are still calling Trump a racist. It's unfair, it's nasty,
Speaker 1: but we have to fight back against it. Also a
Speaker 1: major ice raid in Mississippi. Want to get into that
Speaker 1: and the way the media plays propaganda games about how
Speaker 1: those stories are told. We'll give the accounter narrative. That's
Speaker 1: all coming up in the next hour. I'm asking all Democrats.
Speaker 1: Democrats will want to run for president and come into
Speaker 1: the state of New York, just make it's a simple,
Speaker 1: clear choice with the American people, the Make America Safer
Speaker 1: Pledge for elements an assault weapon band, high capacity magazines,
Speaker 1: universal ground check, mental health database, red flag laws. Those
Speaker 1: four elements of gun control will change this nation. They
Speaker 1: will change the nation. Maybe not in a way that
Speaker 1: is quantifiable. But Governor Cuomo wants you to know that
Speaker 1: creating a mental health database will in no way be
Speaker 1: super creepy and big brotherlike because you can totally trust
Speaker 1: this government not to lose data about your mental health,
Speaker 1: which he is smart enough to know maybe one of
Speaker 1: the most personal I can't. I can't keep going anymore.
Speaker 1: I think about this, folks, a mental mental health database.
Speaker 1: Those of you who have been who have been shouting
Speaker 1: from the rooftops about red flag laws, you're right, it's
Speaker 1: about It's a bad idea. I've thought more about the
Speaker 1: last couple of days. I'm looking at this just not
Speaker 1: gonna work. First of all, it's not gonna it's not
Speaker 1: gonna stop anybody. What you really need is to have
Speaker 1: you know, you need to have intervention from family, from school,
Speaker 1: call on for law enforce, and can always do a
Speaker 1: well check on somebody if necessary, even a turns check
Speaker 1: where they show up. Now, look, we heard you're thinking
Speaker 1: about some crazy stuff. You really don't want to do that,
Speaker 1: and you know, maybe threats need to be taken more serious.
Speaker 1: You can't threaten to kill people. That's that's illegal. You
Speaker 1: can't say I'm gonna go kill a bunch of people.
Speaker 1: That's illegal. So there are laws that I think should
Speaker 1: be better enforced that are on the books, and many
Speaker 1: of these different mass shooters violated those laws, and for
Speaker 1: whatever reason, we're not held to account for it. But
Speaker 1: now they're talking about, I mean, outlawing assault weapons is
Speaker 1: just is we've done this. It does nothing. This is
Speaker 1: just people who they don't like something, and so they're
Speaker 1: willing to ignore the fact that we already have the
Speaker 1: answer here. We know that that doesn't work. If they
Speaker 1: want to bring it back, it's because they just don't
Speaker 1: like it. But not like something is not an excuse
Speaker 1: to infringe on the second Amendment number two, Create a
Speaker 1: mental health database, the governor says, create a mental health database. Right,
Speaker 1: that's terrifying those of you who have been writing me saying, okay,
Speaker 1: buck red flag gloves, How does that affect somebody who
Speaker 1: serve serving the military have PTSD. Are they going to
Speaker 1: take their farms the way now, And I said, no,
Speaker 1: of course, we need to have strict protections for people
Speaker 1: that are seek therapy for PTSD. And you know, our
Speaker 1: our warriors should know they come back and they get
Speaker 1: all the help they need and suffer no consequences. All
Speaker 1: they should have to suffer through is us shaking their
Speaker 1: hands and saying thank you when we see them in public.
Speaker 1: But now they're talking about a mental health database. Oh yeah, sure,
Speaker 1: that's that's not going to be abused. Think about what
Speaker 1: that's like if that ever gets leaked, by the way, Oh,
Speaker 1: you're gonna we're gonna trust the government. I mean, I
Speaker 1: got a letter saying that all my biographical information is
Speaker 1: basically sitting on a Chinese server right now. They know
Speaker 1: everything about me, and I know my family's names, where
Speaker 1: I've lived in, all kinds of stuff because I wanted
Speaker 1: to work for the government. We're gonna trust that this
Speaker 1: mental health information is going to be that's just a
Speaker 1: centralized mental health abbas. Who's going to have access to that.
Speaker 1: Who's gonna be able to run checks? Oh, someone's running
Speaker 1: someone's running for office. But did they ever you know,
Speaker 1: did they ever go through a deep clinical depression, when
Speaker 1: they were going through a divorce, or when they lost
Speaker 1: a loved one, or maybe they had some struggles with
Speaker 1: alcohol abuse for a while and had to see a therapist,
Speaker 1: a counselor Oh, that'd be really really juicy information. Maybe
Speaker 1: for a political opponent. You just happen to be able
Speaker 1: to leak to the media, right, Oh, I don't think
Speaker 1: anyone's above it. One of the stories about Barack Obama
Speaker 1: that I've tried so hard to get more people that
Speaker 1: pay attention to, but no, you know, it was Obama.
Speaker 1: He was untouchable. You couldn't stop him. Everyone loved him.
Speaker 1: He's amazing that you guys probably didn't, but a lot
Speaker 1: of other people did, although their Democrats. To listen to
Speaker 1: show What's Up Democrat? Team Buck. I know you're you're
Speaker 1: coming over into the light. I know you are slowly
Speaker 1: maturely Team Buck, Democrat. You're like, I can't tell my friends,
Speaker 1: but I listened to this guy and he's smarter and
Speaker 1: nicer and better at this than all the Democrats are.
Speaker 1: But I don't want anyone to know. But I still
Speaker 1: listen to a show. It's cool. You can be Team
Speaker 1: Bucks delfth mode and we're still very happy to have you.
Speaker 1: And you don't have to change your party affiliation. You
Speaker 1: can go independent, maybe maybe tell people you're independent, or
Speaker 1: you stay Democrat. And I don't know, maybe we're turning
Speaker 1: into an infiltrator in the Democrat Party to bring us
Speaker 1: back information. But I have to say, I mean, there's
Speaker 1: just no way that. Oh sorry. The Barack Obama story.
Speaker 1: The thing with Obama was that I was gonna leave
Speaker 1: you on a cliffhanger. There. What's the story about Obama?
Speaker 1: Buck right after this break, I'll give it to you.
Speaker 1: He had two political opponents in a row just happened
Speaker 1: to have by request, if I believe David axel Rod's
Speaker 1: newspaper at the time, the Chicago Tribune I think it was,
Speaker 1: but went to court to unseal seal oh, and the
Speaker 1: judge just happened to say, yeah, I guess we'll unseal
Speaker 1: those sealed divorce records twice to clear the way with
Speaker 1: two of Obama's political opponents, not once, but twice. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: that's in that convenient folks. Isn't that easy for Obama? There? Anyway?
Speaker 1: Just trust to go look at it. This guy is
Speaker 1: something Ryan I think his name might have been Jack Ryan.
Speaker 1: Actually I'm not producer Mike Check on that one form.
Speaker 1: I think the guy's name is Jack Ryan, but he
Speaker 1: was not, in fact, a super government ninja who lives
Speaker 1: in Georgetown and is on the rowing team. Sounds like
Speaker 1: somebody else. What's up? That would have been great if
Speaker 1: it's the real Jack Ryan. Yeah, if real. I mean, look,
Speaker 1: I vote for the real Jack Ryan. Anyway. They want
Speaker 1: to create a mental health database past universal background checks.
Speaker 1: All that means is that people that are selling guns
Speaker 1: to another individual are going to have to go to
Speaker 1: a federal firearm licensee and they're gonna have to pay. Pay.
Speaker 1: Money slows down the transactions. That makes people, and then
Speaker 1: red flag laws, which leaves a lot of it's all
Speaker 1: the devil's in the detail with those red flag laws,
Speaker 1: There's no question about it. So now that I see
Speaker 1: what they're really planning, this isn't gonna make anything better.
Speaker 1: And I also just can't accept that the response to
Speaker 1: a tragedy like what we saw, you know, Passo and Dayton, Ohio,
Speaker 1: is a politicized Well this wouldn't have stopped it, but
Speaker 1: let's just do this anyway because we want to. No,
Speaker 1: I don't want to set that precedent. Speaking of Cuomos,
Speaker 1: I'm trying to think if I have the other, there's
Speaker 1: another Cuomo, but this one is on CNN. Nobody needs
Speaker 1: ten rounds to kill a deer. You guys, remember that
Speaker 1: it's back in the day. Some of you who are
Speaker 1: OG squad know what I'm talking about. That was way
Speaker 1: back when when Governor Cuomo was showing what an ignoramus
Speaker 1: he was when it came to the Second Amendment. But
Speaker 1: there was another. The other Cuomo, the one who's got
Speaker 1: the show at CNN, has shown that he has no
Speaker 1: under He's basically taking the whole Oh, this was never
Speaker 1: meant to be an individual right, which is just just
Speaker 1: shows a historical and legal illiteracy. Now he's a lawyer technically,
Speaker 1: and I think he went to a Sunnis law school somewhere.
Speaker 1: One other one other factory, folks, And this was making
Speaker 1: the rounds today. Four times as many people, because I
Speaker 1: know there was just a mass stabbing in California. Four
Speaker 1: times as many people die from stabbings every year as
Speaker 1: die from a rifle fire, I should say, from rifles
Speaker 1: four X. And Britain don't think this is just a
Speaker 1: theoretical Britain has thought about having more stringent laws about
Speaker 1: knives and knife bands and all this stuff. So these
Speaker 1: are these are unserious policy solutions that are pushed by
Speaker 1: people who won engage in demagogue gery so they can
Speaker 1: create a sterea of, oh my gosh, we must do something.
Speaker 1: Why is the NRA not want to save lives? You know,
Speaker 1: they just do this whole get everyone whipped up into
Speaker 1: a frenzy. They don't care what the facts are, they
Speaker 1: don't care what the reality maybe. Um, and then they
Speaker 1: try to ram it through while everyone's still so. Look,
Speaker 1: I I was open to hearing about red flag laws.
Speaker 1: The more I've read into them, the more I've seen
Speaker 1: what the other side really has in mind, I'm not
Speaker 1: on board. Not on board. Not a good idea. UM.
Speaker 1: I mean the state states can pass them and have
Speaker 1: passed them. I don't think that more states should follow suit.
Speaker 1: How about this. Give me one example of a time
Speaker 1: credibly that a red flag law looks to have saved lives.
Speaker 1: That's what I would like to know. Uh, let's play
Speaker 1: some of the sound of President Trump back in twenty
Speaker 1: seventeen saying he had said today that he answered the
Speaker 1: question perfectly. Let's take a listen, and you had some
Speaker 1: people in that group, but you also had people that
Speaker 1: were very fine people on both sides. Now, elsewhere in
Speaker 1: this remarks, the President did condemn neo Nazis and white supremacists.
Speaker 1: So he's not saying that the neo Nazis and white
Speaker 1: supremacists are very fine people, but he is saying people
Speaker 1: protesting alongside those neo Nazis and white supremacists are very
Speaker 1: fine people. Why didn't we play the Why didn't Tapper
Speaker 1: play the audio of where Trump did condemn them? Breitbarts
Speaker 1: Joel Pollock confronted Joe Biden on this very same issue
Speaker 1: of oh, because remember they Charlottesville was they got him?
Speaker 1: You know that was with awe, see we got him.
Speaker 1: Trump's are racist. No one really thinks that Trump likes
Speaker 1: that tiki torch idiots. Nobody really thinks that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is like, yeah, those guys, they're great. It's all lie.
Speaker 1: He was speaking, he was under he was under a
Speaker 1: barrage from the media, and he was trying to speak
Speaker 1: more broadly about people who don't want statues being taken
Speaker 1: down and people who do want statues being taken down.
Speaker 1: He's not saying that the people that are yelling about
Speaker 1: blood and soil are good people. That's not what he
Speaker 1: was saying. We all know it, but they pretend that
Speaker 1: they can't because because later on he said, no, those
Speaker 1: guys are terrible. So why would he say they're terrible
Speaker 1: in the same remarks the same day if his intent
Speaker 1: all along isn't to say that they're terrible, right, This
Speaker 1: is just it's like they were in an interrogation and
Speaker 1: they got him to stumble on something and they go, ah,
Speaker 1: now we've got you. Here's Breitbart's Joel Pollack, who confronted
Speaker 1: Joe Biden about this play fifteen specific he did not,
Speaker 1: he said, he walked out and he said, let's get
Speaker 1: this straight. They said there were very fine people on
Speaker 1: both groups. They're chanting anti Semitic slogans, carrying fla. Pollock
Speaker 1: is like, that's that's not what happened that day, And
Speaker 1: we can keep going back to this, but this is
Speaker 1: because this is a central This is a central media,
Speaker 1: a central media lie that in context, what Trump was
Speaker 1: saying was really meant to be. Yeah, sure that the
Speaker 1: the tiki torch neo Nazis. You know, there were good
Speaker 1: people in that group too. That's of course not what
Speaker 1: the President was saying, but they pretend that that's what
Speaker 1: he says because it makes them feel better to believe
Speaker 1: that that the president is such an awful human being.
Speaker 1: And I mean, you know Joe Biden, who's trying to
Speaker 1: just keep his lead going. Now, he's gonna say whatever
Speaker 1: he asked to. Look, he's Biden the demagogue. This is
Speaker 1: who he always has been, Biden the demagogue. So if
Speaker 1: he's getting tractioned by running around saying that Trump is
Speaker 1: a white supremacist, which is just a horrible thing to say, untrue, nasty, unfair,
Speaker 1: Biden's gonna say it though. Play eighteen. Do you believe
Speaker 1: that the president is a white supremacis? I believe everything
Speaker 1: the President says is done encourages white supremacist And I'm
Speaker 1: not sure there's much of a distinction. As a matter
Speaker 1: of fact. It may be even worse. In fact, if
Speaker 1: you're out there trying to, in fact curry the favor
Speaker 1: of white supremacists or any group that in fact is
Speaker 1: anathem to everything we believe. So whether he is or
Speaker 1: is not a white supremacist, he encourages them. Everything he does,
Speaker 1: he speaks to them, he's afraid to take them on.
Speaker 1: And if you're noticed, the one time he used the
Speaker 1: word white supremacy, he was you know, it was not
Speaker 1: was he talked about sleepy, he was awful sleepy. And
Speaker 1: the way in which he talked about worse. You hear
Speaker 1: Biden said they're worse than white supremacists in his own way,
Speaker 1: worse than a white supremacy. I mean, how much more
Speaker 1: disgraceful and dishonest are things going to get? Here? There
Speaker 1: are people who listen to this and they say, you know,
Speaker 1: they're Democrat. They say, you know, I like Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: I trust Joe Biden. They don't know that the Democrats
Speaker 1: are exaggerating, lying, misleading on this issue. They think, wow,
Speaker 1: the president really is I mean, he's basically David Duke,
Speaker 1: That's what That's what the Democrats are saying. He might
Speaker 1: he might as well be in the KKK, might as
Speaker 1: well be. In fact, Biden might say he's worse than
Speaker 1: somebody in the kk because Biden's a moron. But this
Speaker 1: is where we are, This is what is happening across
Speaker 1: the country, and this is how they get attention from themselves. Oh,
Speaker 1: here's I mean MSNBC. At least Jordan. I remember when
Speaker 1: she used to think that she was a conservative. Now
Speaker 1: she's just a never Trumper who does the bidding like
Speaker 1: a little marionette, my little puppet of the left. Here's
Speaker 1: what she says over on MSNBC nine, very plain and
Speaker 1: obvious that Donald Trump is racist. He uses incendiary racial
Speaker 1: language constantly. I can't believe that. Right now, in twenty
Speaker 1: nineteen America, we are tolerating this kind of language and behavior,
Speaker 1: and there are people who are excusing it, people who
Speaker 1: are leaders who know better. And right now, you work
Speaker 1: at the White House, you own this too, because you're
Speaker 1: supporting and uplifting Donald Trump's racist regime. She used to
Speaker 1: go on Real News in the Blaze. She used to
Speaker 1: appear sometimes as a guest on that show, and I
Speaker 1: was one of the hosts. Miss she was all about
Speaker 1: the tea party, you know. Conservative. Oh yeah, now it's whatever,
Speaker 1: It's a puppet whatever MSNBC wants her to say, do do.
Speaker 1: I'll just attack Republicans, I'll attack Trump, call him a racist.
Speaker 1: If you work at the White House, you own this too.
Speaker 1: They want to smear everybody around him. They want to
Speaker 1: isolate the president. They want to. They want to make
Speaker 1: it impossible to be a person of good character and
Speaker 1: still work with this president. That's their plan, that's the plot.
Speaker 1: It's disgusting. You guys all know that I'm I'm a
Speaker 1: fan of Tea Money Carlson Alston as Tucker crossing Tucker is.
Speaker 1: He's doing so much good work on Fox News, and
Speaker 1: I always appreciate this too. There's some guys in the
Speaker 1: TV business who could do a lot more for the
Speaker 1: buster here, and they just for whatever reason, on our team,
Speaker 1: they choose not to not gonna name names, but some
Speaker 1: of them just choose not to help, not to put
Speaker 1: me on their show. And even though they know that
Speaker 1: I'm as good as anybody else at this stuff, Tucker
Speaker 1: is very generous. Ducker likes to have me on his show,
Speaker 1: which I appreciate because I'm good on his show, and
Speaker 1: he's good on his show, and it makes for good TV.
Speaker 1: Here's Tucker, though, getting to a core point about all
Speaker 1: this Trump is racist stuff. Play twelve. It is now
Speaker 1: telling you and demanding that you believe that anyone who
Speaker 1: supports Donald Trump is a white supremacist and must be destroyed.
Speaker 1: Now they're telling you that for political reasons. This is
Speaker 1: election season, obviously, and they want more political power. But
Speaker 1: there are other reasons too that they're saying this. Ever,
Speaker 1: wonder why rich people seem the most hysterical on the subject.
Speaker 1: Ever noticed that it's the highest paid people on television
Speaker 1: who are the most of term And to convince you
Speaker 1: that white supremacy is America's biggest problem. Why is that simple?
Speaker 1: Every minute you're angry about race is a minute you're
Speaker 1: not thinking about class, which, of course is the real
Speaker 1: divide in this country. Working class people of all colors
Speaker 1: have a lot more in common, infinitely more in common
Speaker 1: with each other than they do with some overpaid MSNBC anchor.
Speaker 1: And if you were allowed to think about that for
Speaker 1: long enough, you might start to get unauthorized ideas about economics,
Speaker 1: and that would be disruptive to a very lucrative status quo.
Speaker 1: So they whip you into a frenzy of racial fear
Speaker 1: so that it never enters your mind. It's a diversion.
Speaker 1: Everyone else hates each other. They get to keep their money.
Speaker 1: Pretty tricky. Unfortunately, it's also destroying the country. This is
Speaker 1: the path to civil war. Obviously, we'll be right back.
Speaker 1: Is not just eleven years. We got about ten years
Speaker 1: before we lose the opportunity to stop the erosion that's
Speaker 1: occurring now. First thing I would do as president of
Speaker 1: the United States, I'd rejoin the Parish Climate Accord, which
Speaker 1: I helped put together. And but one other thing people
Speaker 1: don't know about that accord. It calls for what we negotiated.
Speaker 1: It requires those one hundred and ninety some nations to
Speaker 1: up the anti every two years. Folks, we are responsible
Speaker 1: for fifteen percent of global warming. Joe Biden's just not
Speaker 1: very smart. He might win the Democratic nomination anyway, but
Speaker 1: he's lost a step. He's too old, and he was
Speaker 1: never very smart. Here he is saying that, you know
Speaker 1: right away he'd rejoin the Paris Climate Accord. Yeah, because
Speaker 1: one hundred ninety countries are really going to be held
Speaker 1: to standards of climate change that are meaningful, like the Chinese,
Speaker 1: the Indians, and other countries are really going to put
Speaker 1: enormous artificial constraints on the economic growth because a bunch
Speaker 1: of religious zealots, which is what climate change catastrophes are,
Speaker 1: are claiming that we have ten years to save the planet.
Speaker 1: I don't know what to say. Then, This is all
Speaker 1: you have to have is common sense, and you know
Speaker 1: that these people are nuts. It's all you have to have,
Speaker 1: the same voices, the same models, wrong, wrong and wrong again.
Speaker 1: They don't practice what they preach, and they love preaching
Speaker 1: it though. You know. This is what I always say.
Speaker 1: I'm not trying to start a whole vaccine discussion here
Speaker 1: because some of you get very contentious with me about that,
Speaker 1: and you're entitled to. But every doctor I know who
Speaker 1: says vaccinations are safe and you should do them, every
Speaker 1: single one I've ever talked to, and I've talked to
Speaker 1: many of them about this, have been vaccinated and they
Speaker 1: get their kids vaccinated. If they just had a newborn,
Speaker 1: guess what the newborn's going through the standard vaccination protocol.
Speaker 1: So whether you agree or disagree, at least we can
Speaker 1: all agree that they are living. They are practicing what
Speaker 1: they preach. The people most precious to them they think
Speaker 1: should be vaccinated. I've never come across an MD that
Speaker 1: that was not the case. All I come across with
Speaker 1: the loudest voices on climate change are individuals who were like, oh,
Speaker 1: you should stop eating like, you know, meat, and but
Speaker 1: I'm going to take a private jet to this climate
Speaker 1: change conference because I'm really important and it is a
Speaker 1: religious belief. If you don't think that that's the case.
Speaker 1: You know, Frank Luntz, who I don't know. I guess
Speaker 1: he wants to be a little more popular with the Libs.
Speaker 1: He wants some good Lib press. He's now decided that
Speaker 1: he is. He was a climate change skeptic, but now
Speaker 1: he's come over into the light, you know, and and
Speaker 1: oh man, it's look, it's good. On the other side,
Speaker 1: I always say, these people, if I really wanted to
Speaker 1: have a nice life and make money and you know,
Speaker 1: have beautiful women clapping for me every time I went
Speaker 1: on TV, over at MSNBC and CNN, you know, and
Speaker 1: the whole thing, I would be a LIB because it's
Speaker 1: so much easier. You know. You get all the celebrity
Speaker 1: all the and I meant when I meant beautiful women,
Speaker 1: I meant like the celebrity. You know, I'd get the
Speaker 1: various actresses would say, oh, he's so good on telling. Instead,
Speaker 1: I get, you know, people telling me that I'm part
Speaker 1: of the dark, dark psychic force or whatever. I get.
Speaker 1: You know, I get told that I'm destroying the country
Speaker 1: by all my favorite, my favorite female actresses, the ones
Speaker 1: who at least have come across my work. But Frank,
Speaker 1: I don't know what his deal is. He decided these
Speaker 1: he's switching teams, and you know he's he's not allowed back.
Speaker 1: According to the New Republic, this is what I thought
Speaker 1: was fascinating, Climate reformed. Climate deniers don't deserve redemption. According
Speaker 1: to the New Republic, which is a lefty a lefty
Speaker 1: rag online, democrats are seeking advice from people who wants
Speaker 1: opposed action on global warming. They should be seeking accountability. See, folks,
Speaker 1: they they want to punish heretics more than they want
Speaker 1: to make converts on climate change. Because what's the best
Speaker 1: thing about climate change? Really? What is the thing about
Speaker 1: it that is so seductive? It's yeah, people that believe
Speaker 1: in climate change. It gives them a sense of purpose.
Speaker 1: It makes them think that they're part of the smart set.
Speaker 1: You know, they like science. You know, whether you're a
Speaker 1: man or a woman has nothing to do with your genitalia,
Speaker 1: they say, But you know, they believe in climate change,
Speaker 1: so they like science. And these people are nuts. But
Speaker 1: the single most seductive part of climate change for libs
Speaker 1: and for the leftist mentality is that you get to
Speaker 1: think you're better than other people just because you agree
Speaker 1: with this one thing. You're a better human being, and
Speaker 1: they don't want that to be taken away from them
Speaker 1: because it's a great They talk about otherising on the
Speaker 1: left all the time. What better otherising could there be?
Speaker 1: Then you're so backwards in your thinking as a climate
Speaker 1: change skeptic or denier. Remember they use the term denier
Speaker 1: explicitly to link questioning climate catastrophe with holocaust denial, because
Speaker 1: you're in that same category of moral Reproba eight if
Speaker 1: you have any questions about climate change. Meanwhile, every every
Speaker 1: honest and real scientist, the reason they don't appear on
Speaker 1: TV is because if you made them appear on TV
Speaker 1: and ask them, hold on a second. The IPCC report,
Speaker 1: which they always talk about, does it really say the
Speaker 1: world's gonna end in twelve years? Or does it say
Speaker 1: that if X, Y, Z and a bunch of other
Speaker 1: things happen in the worst possible way they could happen,
Speaker 1: we could have catastrophic warming in fifty years. But we
Speaker 1: also have a whole bunch of ways where we could
Speaker 1: have no catastrophic warming whatsoever. According to the Intergovernmental Panel
Speaker 1: on Climate Change un report. Any honest scientists would have
Speaker 1: to say, yeah, there's there's plenty of ways that even
Speaker 1: even if you believe all their models and everything else.
Speaker 1: And I don't even believe their models. Their models just
Speaker 1: make it up as they go along. I mean, their
Speaker 1: models are a joke. Even if you believe everything, there's
Speaker 1: still a very serious, very realistic chance that nothing would
Speaker 1: happen based on their own But they just picked the
Speaker 1: worst case scenario based on data that's being fudged with
Speaker 1: a million different ways anyway. But they want to make
Speaker 1: sure that if you've ever been on the wrong side
Speaker 1: of this, they don't really want you to switch teams.
Speaker 1: They prefer to have you there so you can continue
Speaker 1: to take abuse. You're the bad guy. You're on the
Speaker 1: bad side of this. You want of the bad people
Speaker 1: if you want to know how bad they are. Get
Speaker 1: ready for all kinds of moralizing on meat. Oh yes, friends,
Speaker 1: they're coming for your bacon. You heard it here. First,
Speaker 1: there's a big movie coming out this fall. Schwartzenegger's in it.
Speaker 1: This guy who I think is the world's strongest man,
Speaker 1: is in it. You know, they're the line I've seen
Speaker 1: the trailer for it. They do this. He has this line,
Speaker 1: you know, do you do you ever worry? Do you
Speaker 1: ever hear strong as an ox? We ever seen an
Speaker 1: ox eat meat? Oxes are very large and don't move
Speaker 1: particularly fast. So I'm not really sure I want to
Speaker 1: mimic an ox is metabolic rate and all that, But anyway,
Speaker 1: there's going to be a war on meat coming your way.
Speaker 1: I'm serious. Wall Street Journal Today has a piece climate
Speaker 1: experts advise eating more vegetables less meat. After issuing a
Speaker 1: new report detailing farming's contribution to warming, researchers suggested diet
Speaker 1: changes to reduce the impact. Researchers have said that people
Speaker 1: should consider eating more vegetables. The switch may help slow
Speaker 1: greenhouse gas emissions because farming vegetables releases less greenhouse gases
Speaker 1: than livestock production. Diets that are rich in plant based
Speaker 1: foods have lower greenhouse gas emissions than diets heavy in
Speaker 1: red meat consumption. According to climatologist Cynthia Rosenswig, who's at
Speaker 1: NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, Folks, this is the
Speaker 1: cow fart thing. They're not going to call it that,
Speaker 1: but this is here. We are again being told by
Speaker 1: scientists going into an election year in this country, of course,
Speaker 1: eat more veggies because the cow farts are destroying the world. This,
Speaker 1: this is what we have to deal with. It's stunning,
Speaker 1: but they won't stop. They are coming for your bacon,
Speaker 1: They're coming for your porterhouse, God forbid, They're coming for
Speaker 1: your ribi. They're going to tell you what you can
Speaker 1: and can't eat. And if they're in charge and the government,
Speaker 1: guess what they're going to regulate. You know. This is
Speaker 1: another version of the socialist mindset as well. If we
Speaker 1: can't control the market by owning it and running it,
Speaker 1: we'll control it through oh, you guessed it. Regulation. We'll
Speaker 1: direct all market based activity through just regulation. This is
Speaker 1: another way that the socialist statist mentality inflicts itself on
Speaker 1: all the rest of us. I'm going to tell you this,
Speaker 1: and you're not. You're gonna think that I make this up.
Speaker 1: But I even read a piece I think it was
Speaker 1: a week ago that was about reformed vegetarians. I kid
Speaker 1: you not, who now say I think they might have
Speaker 1: even ben vegans, which the whole other thing. But there
Speaker 1: were formed vegetarians for sure who are saying, no, you
Speaker 1: should eat meat because a lot of the plant based
Speaker 1: crops are so water and resource intensive that it's better
Speaker 1: to have a balanced diet. That's better for the environment. Folks,
Speaker 1: they don't know, No one really knows. There is a
Speaker 1: twenty five percent of the world, and particularly in the
Speaker 1: major cities of the world, water scarcity is becoming a
Speaker 1: major issue. You know what, some of the worst crops
Speaker 1: are globally for water usage. Rice, I think soybeans are
Speaker 1: up there too, I know rices though. I mean there's
Speaker 1: very water intensive crops out there. So you're just you know,
Speaker 1: they're they're always going to run these scare campaigns to
Speaker 1: get you to do what they want. Here's what I say, Shields, Hie,
Speaker 1: eat your steak, eat your bacon. Just have it be
Speaker 1: a balanced meal. You know, steak and bacon, that's balance.
Speaker 1: You know. The Green New Deal says we need to
Speaker 1: get rid of cows. I don't agree with that because
Speaker 1: well managed grassland where you rotationally graze to all these
Speaker 1: paddocks like that system there has about eight different paddocks.
Speaker 1: You're actually going to use more CEO two and sequester
Speaker 1: more carbon because of the red growth all the time.
Speaker 1: And yet you know that's a permanent pasture. So anyway,
Speaker 1: my point is we have become so ignorant of the
Speaker 1: basic principles of biologic biology in food production that we
Speaker 1: have said we answer them all through technology instead of
Speaker 1: letting Mother Earth and having respect. Oh wow, you mean
Speaker 1: an actual farmer in Iowa doesn't agree with the Green
Speaker 1: New Deal insanity. This is where I tell you if
Speaker 1: you want to, if you want to read a very
Speaker 1: academic and dry but excellent treatment of why central planning fails.
Speaker 1: Read seeing like a state German forest forestry smartest minds
Speaker 1: in all of Germany in the late nineteenth century say,
Speaker 1: I've got a good idea. If we want trees that
Speaker 1: we can harvest, let's plant them in rows. Let's plant
Speaker 1: them perfectly spaced apart. Let's plant one type of tree
Speaker 1: this way. We have all the same implements. We can
Speaker 1: standardize everything, we can count everything, We know what yield
Speaker 1: will get and it will be fantastic. You know what
Speaker 1: the problem was with the state German forestry. They didn't
Speaker 1: really have anybody who understood how a forest works. They
Speaker 1: didn't understand that you need undergrowth and you need trees
Speaker 1: to burn, you need things to happen You need there
Speaker 1: to be radio diversity because you could have species die
Speaker 1: off in a certain area, especially if you have a
Speaker 1: different anti you know, tree fungus and other things that
Speaker 1: come along. You want diversity of the different kinds of plants.
Speaker 1: There's a reason that forests look the way they do,
Speaker 1: and they don't look like they were built by a robot.
Speaker 1: Actually there's actually a sense to mother nature. It's beyond
Speaker 1: just But you know, they had to figure it out
Speaker 1: the hard way. They had to have whole whole forests
Speaker 1: just die off because they had only one kind of
Speaker 1: tree and then all of a sudden something came along
Speaker 1: and kill all the trees and they didn't know what
Speaker 1: they were doing. They didn't have as rich soil afterwards either,
Speaker 1: because there's just so much I mean, they completely mess
Speaker 1: the whole thing up. But this is just another another
Speaker 1: instance of improvisation at a local level. That is, this
Speaker 1: is the constant failure of central planning. Comes the lack
Speaker 1: of ability to make individualized, localized decisions based on data,
Speaker 1: data that generally comes from the market, but also just
Speaker 1: comes from being there on the ground, right. You know,
Speaker 1: this is you know, if you've got to if you've
Speaker 1: got to take this. It's almost like a battlefield tactic situation.
Speaker 1: If you've got a sniper on a foreign battlefield. If
Speaker 1: we've got one of our guys, we've got a you know,
Speaker 1: marine sniper and he's getting ready to take the shot.
Speaker 1: Is that sniper and the spotter or they are they
Speaker 1: the ones best situated to pull that trigger and make
Speaker 1: that determination? Or should they call back to a guy
Speaker 1: on you know, in the e Ring of the Pentagon,
Speaker 1: who's talking to a guy who's you know, in Baghdad,
Speaker 1: who's talking to a guy who's in Mosul. Who's then
Speaker 1: really you know, no, you want localized decision making for
Speaker 1: a local outcome. And this is why central planning always fails.
Speaker 1: This is why the Green New Deal fails. Um speaking
Speaker 1: of I don't really have a I don't really have
Speaker 1: a perfect transition here the Castro tweet. I just want
Speaker 1: to get in this for a couple of minutes again,
Speaker 1: because you know Donna Brazil some of you. I did
Speaker 1: to Donna Brazil's show, or rather I did Outnumbered on
Speaker 1: Fox News with Donna Brazil pretty recently, and I will
Speaker 1: say she's very charming lady. She's very nice to me.
Speaker 1: Off off camera, and I always appreciate that. I like
Speaker 1: happy warriors. I like people that, you know, they want
Speaker 1: to disagree on air and they want to put out
Speaker 1: their ideas, but then they're decent human beings off air.
Speaker 1: I always, I always appreciate it because not everyone's like that,
Speaker 1: but Donna, Donna's very friendly offer I will tell you,
Speaker 1: and some of you are. You can boom me, but
Speaker 1: I speak the truth. Van Jones was also always a
Speaker 1: very friendly guy, offset very very well mannered. He just
Speaker 1: was you know, there are others who were horrible. Ruler
Speaker 1: Gibrawl horrible, Anna Navarro horrible. I mean I could name
Speaker 1: a whole bunch of different different people. Anderson Cooper never
Speaker 1: say a word to me every time I'm in the
Speaker 1: Greenham never had a word, just never like, hey man,
Speaker 1: what's up? Nothing like I did not exist. So you know,
Speaker 1: some people are cool, some people some people suck just reality.
Speaker 1: But Donna's actually pretty cool. I don't like her ideas,
Speaker 1: but she's a cool lady. Here's what she said about
Speaker 1: the Castro tweet. Let's call good out when it's good
Speaker 1: and this is good play one when you decide in
Speaker 1: a political rally on Twitter social media to put names out.
Speaker 1: You put people in jeopardy, you put you put them
Speaker 1: in jeopardy because you don't put the context. This is
Speaker 1: a First Amendment right to contribute to any candidate. I
Speaker 1: don't like the what I call uh, you know, people
Speaker 1: coming at you simply because you're doing your job while
Speaker 1: you're supporting a candidate. Yep, that's right. It's gross. See,
Speaker 1: even some old school Democrats know that this is crossing
Speaker 1: a line. This is this has gone too far. And
Speaker 1: what Joaking Castro did was disgraceful. And anybody, including Joe Scarborough,
Speaker 1: who look, I understand Joe Scarborough's deal. He's just obsessed
Speaker 1: with Joe Scarborough and will do anything and say anything
Speaker 1: as long as he gets to keep a show at
Speaker 1: MSNBC and keep making you know, millions of dollars a
Speaker 1: year to do a job that a lot of people
Speaker 1: would be better at for you know, a couple one
Speaker 1: hundred grand really honestly, but you know he'll say whatever
Speaker 1: you have to say. I mean, this is a guy
Speaker 1: who was Trump's buddy buddy until all of a sudden
Speaker 1: Trump is like, you know what, I don't like this
Speaker 1: guy anymore. And then he became the greatest anti Trumper
Speaker 1: you could ever imagine. Right, But going after donors, this
Speaker 1: really pulls apart this country politically, and it's scary and
Speaker 1: it's wrong. There's a guy who's a Trump donor who
Speaker 1: talked here about how you know he also just is
Speaker 1: sick of what's been going on all week, which is
Speaker 1: ever just calling everybody racist because of who they support
Speaker 1: politically played too free country. No, shouldn't that I'm not
Speaker 1: free to support or think to what I think is
Speaker 1: and to be bullied with slurs of racist. I just
Speaker 1: I think a lot of people of my generation that
Speaker 1: support the president or tired of it. We are tired
Speaker 1: of it. I know I'm tired of it. I hate.
Speaker 1: I mean, I go into my mentions on Twitter, which
Speaker 1: I try to avoid doing unless it's one of you,
Speaker 1: and then you know, then I'll actually read it. If
Speaker 1: I see like hashtag team buck, then I know, okay,
Speaker 1: at least I want to read what this person saying.
Speaker 1: But eg on your mentions and I'll be talking. It
Speaker 1: doesn't matter what I'm talking about racist? Why just because
Speaker 1: because I support Donald Trump? That makes me racist? How
Speaker 1: about this? What if I supported Trump just because I
Speaker 1: couldn't in good conscience support the Democrats because they're insane.
Speaker 1: How about that? Maybe that's the defense against the ear
Speaker 1: must be racist? Well, no, I just can't vote for
Speaker 1: a party run by crazy people. How about that? Is
Speaker 1: that an acceptable way to get around this whole racist thing.
Speaker 1: There's nothing to do with racism, and it has to
Speaker 1: do with I'm not voting for the socialist infanticide gender
Speaker 1: eradication party. How about that? It is terrifying for the
Speaker 1: families who've been torn apart, for kids who don't know
Speaker 1: when or if they're going to see their kids their
Speaker 1: parents again. This is part of the environment in this
Speaker 1: country that sees immigrants as the enemy or a danger,
Speaker 1: or something less than human to be treated in this way.
Speaker 1: So we've got to change these practices if we're going
Speaker 1: to be able to change the kind of violence and
Speaker 1: the kind of hatred that we see in this country.
Speaker 1: Right now, change it, how betto? It's the law. This
Speaker 1: is the enforcement of existing law. If you don't like
Speaker 1: the law, you should say we need to repeal it.
Speaker 1: You shouldn't just operate in this make believe land of
Speaker 1: what the law can say what it says. Because I
Speaker 1: don't have the strength of character to advocate for its repeal.
Speaker 1: But then I'm going to come plane and pull out
Speaker 1: all the crocodile tears for the cameras to show how
Speaker 1: much I care about the Latino populations troubles with illegal
Speaker 1: immigration and the enforcement of our immigration laws. You had
Speaker 1: six hundred and eighty Wow, CNN calls them undocumented workers
Speaker 1: illegal aliens. CNN, the term is illegal aliens. That is
Speaker 1: the legal term. Right. If somebody breaks into your home
Speaker 1: and steals things, they are a burglar. They are not
Speaker 1: an unrequested temporary visitor. Anyway, six hundred and eighty illegal
Speaker 1: aliens were arrested in this immigration sweep. So there are
Speaker 1: some ice raids that are happening. I will note I
Speaker 1: was on Fox a few weeks ago and Tom Homing
Speaker 1: came up me afterwards. Tom Holman's great and he said,
Speaker 1: you know, you're totally right, because I'd gone on TV
Speaker 1: and said, look, they have to actually do this. They
Speaker 1: can't keep saying ice raids are going to happen and
Speaker 1: then they don't happen. That that does not deter anybody.
Speaker 1: In fact, that is the oposite of a deterrence effect.
Speaker 1: So now that there's the beginning of some enforcement and
Speaker 1: this was at some plants where there were undocumented undocumented
Speaker 1: workers there. And now that this is happening, what do
Speaker 1: you think the approach of the media is. Are they saying,
Speaker 1: you know what, we should just never have anyone deported
Speaker 1: from this country because there should be no such thing
Speaker 1: as illegal status in this country anymore. No, they won't
Speaker 1: say that, even though that's what they want. Now they
Speaker 1: go for the heartstrings. Now they start telling stories about
Speaker 1: how sad the kids are. Keep in mind that we
Speaker 1: arrest people in this country for all kinds of things
Speaker 1: that separate them from their families, and we don't hear
Speaker 1: these we don't have these sob stories about it. Every
Speaker 1: single person who's illegal in the country made an active decision,
Speaker 1: made a choice to break the law. Nobody kidnaped them
Speaker 1: and drag them across the border. None of the people
Speaker 1: in this ice raid who were arrested were brought here
Speaker 1: against their will. They're not dreamers. These are adults working
Speaker 1: in this facility. They're not covered under DAKA and DAPPA
Speaker 1: and all that stuff. Or maybe they would have been
Speaker 1: under DAPPA. That's a whole other story. They made a
Speaker 1: choice and they are an active violation of the law. Now,
Speaker 1: if Democrats hate that so much, they should just say
Speaker 1: they want to get rid of the law. But the
Speaker 1: Washington Post, CNN and others are all about the crying children.
Speaker 1: Here's the Washington Post today, Ice arrested hundreds of people
Speaker 1: in raids. Now devastated, children are without their parents, Separating families,
Speaker 1: separating families. That's the whole point here, that's the propaganda effect. Oh,
Speaker 1: every criminal law. We separate families in this country for
Speaker 1: drug sail and possession on a regular basis, and a
Speaker 1: lot of people say that that shouldn't be illegal. You know,
Speaker 1: you're just providing a service, you're selling weed on the streets.
Speaker 1: Should you really go to prison for Well, people do.
Speaker 1: And those families gets separated all the time in a
Speaker 1: lot of communities where families are under tremendous pressure as
Speaker 1: it is to say that you know that they should
Speaker 1: be staying together and they're not. But it's all about
Speaker 1: the sad kids, all about kids crying and how we're
Speaker 1: look Do I feel badly for the kids, of course,
Speaker 1: no one. No one's an unfeeling maniac here. It's it's
Speaker 1: I feel badly for kids, But I feel badly for
Speaker 1: kids whose parents get sent away for you know, white
Speaker 1: collar crimes too. I feel badly when a twelve year
Speaker 1: old finds out that you know, daddy cheated on his
Speaker 1: taxes and he's gonna go spend a year in federal penitentiary.
Speaker 1: These individuals are overwhelmingly the worst thing that's gonna happen
Speaker 1: is they get sent to their home country. They could
Speaker 1: reunite their family in their home country where they have citizenship. Folks,
Speaker 1: that that's the possible. No one's getting ten years in
Speaker 1: prison when they say the families are separated. No one's
Speaker 1: getting ten years in prison because they're in the country
Speaker 1: illegally unless they've done a lot of other really bad things.
Speaker 1: But they may be sent home. Okay, Well, if you
Speaker 1: don't want the family to be broken up, take your
Speaker 1: family with you to the country of your citizenship. That
Speaker 1: is your home under the law. That's just the way
Speaker 1: it is. But they don't like this law, Well I
Speaker 1: like that over at Where was this over in Denver?
Speaker 1: And this is Denver ABC seven. There's another another side
Speaker 1: to this story too. If we're going to hear about
Speaker 1: the kids who cry because their parents get arrested in
Speaker 1: ice raids, and that's supposed to be the totality of
Speaker 1: the policy opposition to this. Well, then we should hear
Speaker 1: about this too, and good for these Denver reporters. This
Speaker 1: is by Jacqueline Allen and the ABC affiliate in Denver.
Speaker 1: Suspect in crash that killed father of five was facing
Speaker 1: deportation driving without a license. Here's the story quote. Eight
Speaker 1: months after he sought sanctuary from a Colorado Springs church
Speaker 1: to avoid portation, Miguel Ramirez Valiente stands accused of careless
Speaker 1: driving with a revoked license in a crash that claimed
Speaker 1: the life of a father of five. Now, those who
Speaker 1: know Ramirez Valiente say he never should have been driving.
Speaker 1: It took people saying you need to say something about
Speaker 1: this to get that family help and justice. And that's
Speaker 1: when we made the call, said a close acquaintance of
Speaker 1: Ramirez Valiente, who asked to have her identity protected for safety.
Speaker 1: My heart broke for this family because this could have
Speaker 1: been prevented. Last Friday, Sean Buchanan, a father of five,
Speaker 1: was riding his motorcycle on Highway eighty three when Colorado
Speaker 1: State Patrol trooper said another driver swerved into his lane
Speaker 1: and killed him. He was amazing, said his grieving wife, Cathy,
Speaker 1: Struggling to cope with an unimaginable loss. It's trying to
Speaker 1: figure out what the new normal looks like when the
Speaker 1: old normal was so good. The other driver, Miguel Ramirez Valiente,
Speaker 1: received national media attention in January while seeking sanctuary at
Speaker 1: a Colorado Springs church. He was pleading to avoid deportation
Speaker 1: to El Salvador to stay with his family. I can't
Speaker 1: be separated from them, he said. I've always worked hard
Speaker 1: to support my family. They depend on me. But those
Speaker 1: who know Ramirez said his arrest history tells a different story,
Speaker 1: and they want the Buchanan family to know it. This
Speaker 1: family deserves to know who they're dealing with. Set a
Speaker 1: close acquaintance of Valientes. He's an alcoholic and an abuser.
Speaker 1: His arrest record shows charges for reckless endangerment in twenty
Speaker 1: eleven in Douglas County and domestic violence in El Paso County.
Speaker 1: CBI record show both cases were dismissed by the disattorney's offices.
Speaker 1: In twenty eighteen. He pleaded guilty to a twenty seventeen
Speaker 1: charge of driving under the influence, and his license was
Speaker 1: revoked on August first, one day before the deadly crash.
Speaker 1: His probation for that dui was extended because he had
Speaker 1: not completed alcohol therapy. He was driving without a license
Speaker 1: when trooper said he overcorrected and swerved into Buchanan's laying
Speaker 1: on August second. Those who know ramiraz Valiente question whether
Speaker 1: he should have been arrested or deported long ago. He
Speaker 1: should have been arrested after the crash. That a woman
Speaker 1: who knows him, he just had a DUI and he's
Speaker 1: driving with no license and he killed somebody, like you
Speaker 1: shouldn't walk away from that. Now she's worried he will
Speaker 1: flee before he's brought to justice. So folks end quote there.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is you know, this is a father.
Speaker 1: There's a photo of him, father of five, two adopted
Speaker 1: young African American children, and then three other children. His
Speaker 1: father five is gone. He's separated from his family forever.
Speaker 1: Not just oh, I don't get to live in the
Speaker 1: country where I have access to a better job market
Speaker 1: and better welfare benefits. That's always an option for people
Speaker 1: who are deported. Take your family back where you are
Speaker 1: a citizen. Instead of enforcing your own view of immigration
Speaker 1: law by just staying here. But we're gonna talk about
Speaker 1: separated families and crying children. This illegal who should have
Speaker 1: been deported right away, stuck around, got chance after chance
Speaker 1: in the system, was an alcoholic and an abuser allegedly,
Speaker 1: and then he killed a guy who had five kids.
Speaker 1: They're never going to see their dad again. Do we
Speaker 1: hear that story from the media, Well, you'll hear it here.
Speaker 1: I guarantee you won't see it on CNN. Hey there, Dolpia,
Speaker 1: what state is this? Sorry you don't understand the question?
Speaker 1: Oh no, I didn't. Most people know where they are,
Speaker 1: all right, most people. You're in the glorious state art.
Speaker 1: It's all sweetheart. Your idea is incredible and can argue
Speaker 1: with that. We pay through everything, so this country belongs
Speaker 1: to us. It's just business hunting human beings for sports.
Speaker 1: They're not human beings. So that's the trailer for this
Speaker 1: movie that's now getting all kinds of attention. I'm starting
Speaker 1: to think that this was all the plan, my friends,
Speaker 1: because it's so egregious and so over the top that
Speaker 1: they had They had to know that this was going
Speaker 1: to turn into a big, a big issue for them. Right,
Speaker 1: So this is the movie The Hunt, and they're they're
Speaker 1: now saying that it's a satire and it's where thrill
Speaker 1: seekers fly down to a five star resort and then
Speaker 1: they go and hunt down humans and it's super liberal,
Speaker 1: you know, elitists who are hunting down essentially maga people,
Speaker 1: people from Red States who are kind of more just
Speaker 1: American and and all that stuff. So you know, you
Speaker 1: can kind of figure out how this whole thing goes.
Speaker 1: I mean, if you there's more video out there where
Speaker 1: they release some weapons and them so they can fight
Speaker 1: back a little bit. But obviously they're supposed to be
Speaker 1: hunted down and killed. And this is by Blumhouse Pictures,
Speaker 1: I think, which is the same the same company that
Speaker 1: did I believe, the same people behind this, the ones
Speaker 1: that did Get Out, which I think is one of
Speaker 1: the worst movies. I think they're also behind get Out.
Speaker 1: John John am I right. We got producer John by
Speaker 1: the way in for producer Mark today. Yeah, let me
Speaker 1: take a look at that. Let me I think it's
Speaker 1: the same one. I know it's Blumhouse. Hilary Swank is
Speaker 1: in it. She's been kind, she's been kind of m
Speaker 1: Ia for a while, so I don't know what she's
Speaker 1: been up to um, but it's yeah. So it's a
Speaker 1: movie that everyone's getting all all upset, well, particularly because
Speaker 1: this week there's a there's a sense that we're always
Speaker 1: being told that, oh there's you know, we need to
Speaker 1: have more friendly rhetoric and exchange with each other. And
Speaker 1: people are very upset about this because it shows essentially
Speaker 1: liberal elites hunting red state. I don't know what Trump supporters.
Speaker 1: I don't think it gets that explicit about Trump support
Speaker 1: per se, but it's definitely implied here. Universal Studios or
Speaker 1: Universal Pictures rather has temporarily pulled some of the trailers
Speaker 1: for this movie, and let me just make sure I've
Speaker 1: got all the right details here. Yeah, we've got Hilary
Speaker 1: Swank and people are obviously sensitive about it because what's
Speaker 1: happened this week, But we got yeah. Jason Blum is
Speaker 1: producing this alongside Damon Lindeloff, and it's coming out in September.
Speaker 1: I just think it's Look, it's gonna be a crap movie.
Speaker 1: First of all, it's not even a particularly original it's
Speaker 1: not really an original idea. In fact, some of you
Speaker 1: the true action movie devotees in the audience. As soon
Speaker 1: as I told you the concept for this movie, you
Speaker 1: should have thought to yourself, Oh so now they're ripping
Speaker 1: off Van Dam movies. Because there was a Van Dam
Speaker 1: movie that I have seen more times than I care
Speaker 1: to admit, called Hard Target, where he is in New
Speaker 1: Orleans and he's being hunted down. And Van Dam plays
Speaker 1: this guy who is Cajun and yes, has a mullet,
Speaker 1: and he has great lines like your name is Chance,
Speaker 1: and he's like, yeah, my mama took one, just like
Speaker 1: that in his little Vandam his little Belgian French accent,
Speaker 1: my memo took one. But yeah, Van Dam is in
Speaker 1: the movie and it's they take people who are in
Speaker 1: that case, it's I mean, they take people who are
Speaker 1: essentially homeless and alcoholics, and then they offer them money
Speaker 1: and they actually just hunt them down. It's a really
Speaker 1: messed up premise, but that movie was already And of
Speaker 1: course Vandem tons the tables on the bad guys and
Speaker 1: does a lot of fly kick, a lot of tip
Speaker 1: tap kick where he does the leg that is extended
Speaker 1: but kick kick, you know, like a ballet dancer, because
Speaker 1: Vedam actually did some ballet too. Folks, by the way,
Speaker 1: makes you very strong true story, not that I've ever
Speaker 1: tried it. Now some of you are thinking about Buck
Speaker 1: doing ballet, and that's an image you're never going to
Speaker 1: be able to get out of your minds. But yeah,
Speaker 1: vandam hard target this movie, The Hunt. It's great publicity
Speaker 1: for them, even though they're having to pull publicity right
Speaker 1: now because the whole country is talking about it. Uh,
Speaker 1: you know, is it? Do? I do I think that
Speaker 1: this is going to change anything? Or you know, how
Speaker 1: how upset should we really be? Um? Look, you know
Speaker 1: there's there's very there's all kinds of very offensive movies
Speaker 1: that are made. There's a pretty clear tendency in pop
Speaker 1: culture right now to always go right wing on I mean,
Speaker 1: go against the right, I should say, always pick on
Speaker 1: the right wing, and this is this is gonna be
Speaker 1: no different from that. But I do not think I'll
Speaker 1: end up seeing this movie. It's They also made The Purge,
Speaker 1: which is overrated. I mean, it was an interesting concept,
Speaker 1: but it's really not that. The Purge movie, when I
Speaker 1: saw it, really was not that well executed. I thought
Speaker 1: it was. There's a lot of hype around it, and
Speaker 1: then there's the more recent purge movie that came out.
Speaker 1: I can't even remember what it was, but that one
Speaker 1: just goes way, way off the rails. So yeah, this
Speaker 1: is when Emmon's talking about today, a movie hunting deplorables. Look,
Speaker 1: we know there's a double standard, folks. The double standard
Speaker 1: is that anything that is associated with conservatism will be
Speaker 1: bashed if it has any violence in it or any
Speaker 1: and liberals can actually make movies call it a farce,
Speaker 1: or they can actually make movies that have them hunting
Speaker 1: people who live in Red states, and we're supposed to
Speaker 1: think that, oh this is not Look it's silly. I mean,
Speaker 1: I haven't seen the movie, so I can't critique it
Speaker 1: all that much, but just wanted to note this is
Speaker 1: getting at getting a lot of attention. I did watch
Speaker 1: some of season two of Add Blood. By the way,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna give you a little favor to my listeners.
Speaker 1: Season one of Bad Blood on Netflix pretty good. Season
Speaker 1: two garbage just completely collapses into nonsense. It no longer
Speaker 1: is based on a true story, and you can just
Speaker 1: tell that they lose their best actors except for the
Speaker 1: lead guy. The storyline all of a sudden doesn't make
Speaker 1: any sense. They got all these mafia bosses who are
Speaker 1: getting into one on one gun battles with pistols themselves.
Speaker 1: It's just it's not good. It's not good, So I
Speaker 1: gotta tell you to be I don't want you to
Speaker 1: watch season two and then blame me for that one.
Speaker 1: So bail on Bad Blood season two on Netflix, and
Speaker 1: bail on the Hunt. I don't think it's gonna be
Speaker 1: a good movie. It's not worth anyone's time. But I
Speaker 1: also don't want to get too upset about it, because
Speaker 1: that just gives them free press. In the President's statement
Speaker 1: on Air Force One, he said, quote, I'm very strongly
Speaker 1: considering that I think he was treated unbelievably unfairly. And
Speaker 1: he's a Democrat, he's not a Republican. And we're thinking
Speaker 1: about commuting his sentence so we can go back home
Speaker 1: to his wife than children. And I'm very impressed with
Speaker 1: his family. I'm very impressed with his wife. I mean,
Speaker 1: she has lived for this. She's one hell of a woman.
Speaker 1: She has lived. She goes on and makes her case,
Speaker 1: and it's really very sad. Is President Trump going to
Speaker 1: possibly pardon Bligoyevich. It's got a lot of attention today folks.
Speaker 1: People are reporting on it across the country. I want
Speaker 1: to bring somebody on who could discuss this is all
Speaker 1: as well as some issues of policing and gun control.
Speaker 1: We're joined now by Bernard Carrick. He is the fortieth
Speaker 1: Police Commissioner of the NYPD in the City of New York.
Speaker 1: Also New York Times best selling author Bernie Great to
Speaker 1: have you on, thanks book. All right, First off, Bilgoevich,
Speaker 1: A lot of people hear this, and I even know conservatives,
Speaker 1: and they immediately roll their eyes and they go, oh,
Speaker 1: you mean the guy who said a Senate see, it's
Speaker 1: a blanking valuable thing. You don't just give it away.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's the quote that everybody thinks of. I've
Speaker 1: seen you take a more lenient and or perhaps more
Speaker 1: open minded a pro It's the possibility of a commutation
Speaker 1: or a pardon for Bagloyevic. Why is that? Here's why.
Speaker 1: Give me one member of Congress, one politician that works
Speaker 1: in Washington, DC that makes a decision and it's not
Speaker 1: based on some political gain or political ramification that would
Speaker 1: benefit them. Give me one. You can't. You can't give
Speaker 1: me one because nobody in Washington, DC does anything political
Speaker 1: without looking at how it's going to impact them to
Speaker 1: the positive. That's exactly what this guy was doing. He
Speaker 1: talked about politics on the phone. And more importantly, there
Speaker 1: was no personal gain. There was no financial gain, there
Speaker 1: was no political gain. Basically, he went to prison for
Speaker 1: eighteen years for politicking. And think of it this way, Buck,
Speaker 1: This is I think of this in a in a
Speaker 1: much more dramatic way. There's a convicted terrorist that was
Speaker 1: convicted in the same courthouse, I think, by the same judge,
Speaker 1: in the same courtroom, convicted of planning a mass shooting
Speaker 1: attack on American citizens. He was sent to prison for
Speaker 1: eight years. Why do you think they went after Blogoyevitch
Speaker 1: so hard? I mean getting over a decade for what
Speaker 1: he did. I mean, who was really the victim of
Speaker 1: Blugoyevich's crimes? There was none, There was no victim of
Speaker 1: his crime. And like I said, there was no gain
Speaker 1: personally for him, professionally, financially, politically, there was no gain.
Speaker 1: All he did was talking about politics. So here's here's
Speaker 1: the reality in today's world. And nobody knows this better
Speaker 1: than the President of the United States. We are living
Speaker 1: in a society today where selective and political prosecutions are
Speaker 1: pretty much the norm. A lot of this started with
Speaker 1: Rod Bologoyevitch, A lot of this started ten years ago.
Speaker 1: The reality is Rod Blagoyevitch was the target of a
Speaker 1: selective and political prosecution and they wanted to make an
Speaker 1: example out of him, and in doing so, he was
Speaker 1: sentenced to eighteen years for talking about something that never happened,
Speaker 1: talking about something that he gained nothing from. And it's bizarre.
Speaker 1: It's completely bizarre when you think of the constitution, when
Speaker 1: you think of the punishment fit the crime. This is insanity.
Speaker 1: This is complete insanity. He could have been given probation,
Speaker 1: he could have been given a year and a day.
Speaker 1: He could have been back with his family, paying taxes,
Speaker 1: taking care of his family. His daughters have gone out
Speaker 1: gone without his father for over seven years now. It's
Speaker 1: costing us thirty to forty thousand dollars a year to
Speaker 1: take care of a guy that we could have really
Speaker 1: reaped with rewards from in a number of different ways
Speaker 1: had we given him, you know, community service. And Bertie
Speaker 1: did this something. This obviously hits home for you because
Speaker 1: you're somebody who in your own life and dealt with
Speaker 1: what I would say, just from my perspective, was certainly
Speaker 1: an over zealous prosecution. Can you just tell the folks
Speaker 1: that are listening, you know what what you what? They
Speaker 1: came in. I mean, I remember that the judge gave
Speaker 1: you more than even the prosecutor wanted, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: you had a particularly egregious case of over zealous I
Speaker 1: had a you know, I listened to short, short summit,
Speaker 1: if you will. I was nominated from the Director of
Speaker 1: the Secretary of Homeland Security in two thousand and four.
Speaker 1: I accepted the nomination. I had to drop out and
Speaker 1: withdraw my name from consideration because I hired a nanny,
Speaker 1: a domestic servant for my kids, and I paid that
Speaker 1: nanny cash over a two year period, which in today's
Speaker 1: world is completely bizarre to me, since every Democrat in
Speaker 1: the country is trying to let every illegal into this country.
Speaker 1: And you know, I basically was sent to prison for
Speaker 1: four years for hiring a nanny, not paying payroll tax
Speaker 1: on the nanny. Some apartment renovations. Mine was a political prosecution.
Speaker 1: It was a selected prosecution. The probation department, the prosecutors,
Speaker 1: my attorneys all agreed that I would be I would
Speaker 1: plead guilty and serve twenty seven to thirty three months.
Speaker 1: Yet my judge, who was as political as they get,
Speaker 1: a big, huge Democratic supporter, friends with Hillary and everybody else,
Speaker 1: he gave me forty eight months. So I went to
Speaker 1: prison for three years in eleven days. I ran the
Speaker 1: largest jail system in this country, on the largest police
Speaker 1: department in this country. And I've been inside this system.
Speaker 1: Nobody knows better than I do how flawed and failed
Speaker 1: our criminal justice system is. But I gotta be honest, buck,
Speaker 1: Nobody's ever seen it like they've seen it now in
Speaker 1: this Russian you know, witch hunt or a hoax or
Speaker 1: whatever you want to call it against the president and
Speaker 1: what's going on in Washington. What happened to me and
Speaker 1: Blugovitch is only a tip of the iceberg. So you
Speaker 1: are you are in favor then of at least a commutation,
Speaker 1: if not a pardon for Rob Lgoievitch's fair. He should
Speaker 1: I think he should have been commuted to six years ago.
Speaker 1: You know, if the president wants to pardon him, so
Speaker 1: be it. I think he's done enough time. I think
Speaker 1: you can benefit from his release in a number of
Speaker 1: different ways. And I think he has to get back
Speaker 1: to his family. So I'm all, I'm one thousand percent
Speaker 1: in support of the president community. And since when you
Speaker 1: were going through that process, Bernie, I've never had answer
Speaker 1: really ask you about this, But was there anybody who
Speaker 1: would look you in the eyes and say, yeah, this
Speaker 1: seems fair what you're getting, You're getting what you deserve.
Speaker 1: Or does everyone just look at you in this process
Speaker 1: when there is a politicized prosecution and say, well, you know,
Speaker 1: this is just kind of happening. Sorry. You know what, Buck,
Speaker 1: that's a really good question, because the people in the
Speaker 1: political world, they'll look at you and say, I get it,
Speaker 1: I understand it. This is the life, you know, this
Speaker 1: is the price you pay for the life you choose.
Speaker 1: And that's a hell of a thing to say, especially
Speaker 1: to a public servant. You know, I just spent I
Speaker 1: just spent eight weeks out in San Diego. I put
Speaker 1: together the legal team for Chief Eddie Gallagher, the US
Speaker 1: Navy seal who was recently acquitted of war crimes. We
Speaker 1: went through the same thing. An overzealous prosecutor, Prosecutors that
Speaker 1: lie to a judge, prosecutors that spied on the defense team,
Speaker 1: prosecutors that never should have brought a case in the
Speaker 1: first place. And this is something that continues to happen.
Speaker 1: And I have to tell you people that in the
Speaker 1: political world, they seem they get it, they understand that
Speaker 1: they know it. The problem I have is every member
Speaker 1: of Congress knows how it works and knows what happens,
Speaker 1: yet they don't do anything to fix it. That's what
Speaker 1: bothers me the most. And they also listen. What they
Speaker 1: do is they weaponize, they weaponize our criminal justice system
Speaker 1: for their own political gain. And that's what we've seen
Speaker 1: against the President. I've done an experiment before, Bernie, We're
Speaker 1: just off the top of my head on radio. I've
Speaker 1: rattled off all of the high profile and in many
Speaker 1: cases national level and nationally recognizable Republican politicians who have
Speaker 1: been the subjects of what is effectively a precursor to
Speaker 1: the Trump witch hunt. Right. But you look at Rick
Speaker 1: Perry going after him for the exercise of his office
Speaker 1: as a governor, trying to get a drunk attorney general
Speaker 1: who was called drunk driving out of office. They went after,
Speaker 1: I mean zealously, went after Chris Christie on Bridgegate. They
Speaker 1: went after Scott Walker in Wisconsin for nothing trying to
Speaker 1: get him on collusion with outside groups with his campaign.
Speaker 1: They went after McDonell and his wife in Virginia after
Speaker 1: the Feds initially or rather after the State of Virginia
Speaker 1: initially passed on any charges, they were going to send
Speaker 1: him away for eleven years. I do sense a pattern, Bernie. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you know what, Buck, There's nothing more dangerous in a
Speaker 1: society like ours, in a democratic society, than a government
Speaker 1: that weaponizes this criminal justice system against its own citizens.
Speaker 1: And that's what we're doing. And there's nobody more guilty
Speaker 1: of this than members of Congress. And it's not it's
Speaker 1: not only Democrats that do it to Republicans. Republicans have
Speaker 1: done it to Democrats. Bottom line is it shouldn't be done.
Speaker 1: Selective and political prosecutions are wrong, but they happen constantly,
Speaker 1: and I don't think anybody's are realized that until we
Speaker 1: got to see it firsthand, close up and personal with
Speaker 1: the president. All right, Bernie, I want to keep you
Speaker 1: because I want to ask you some law enforcement specific questions.
Speaker 1: The other side of the break, everybody stayed with us.
Speaker 1: We'll be back with Bernard Kerrick in just a moment.
Speaker 1: All right, Team we're back with Bernard Kerrick. He was
Speaker 1: the police commissioner of the NYPD, where I firmly formerly
Speaker 1: worked for the Intel Division for a little while. You
Speaker 1: guys know him. He's also a New York Times bestselling author.
Speaker 1: All right, Bernie, I want to ask about this a lot.
Speaker 1: We could talk police suff all day, but you know,
Speaker 1: I know you've got a life, so we'll have to
Speaker 1: have you back another time. But the throwing of water
Speaker 1: in the videos that's been happening happened in New York.
Speaker 1: These police officers, uniformed officers, had water thrown at them,
Speaker 1: people laughing and everything else. What do you make I mean,
Speaker 1: you're somebody who held I believe, like every job all
Speaker 1: the way up to commissioner. What do you make of this? Well, listen,
Speaker 1: what I make of it? You know, is a disrespect
Speaker 1: towards toward the law enforcement community which has been going
Speaker 1: on since Ferguson Um, you know, and it seems to
Speaker 1: grow in democratic cities where you have mayors and governors
Speaker 1: and state representatives that you know, they constantly promote this
Speaker 1: anti police rhetoric. And it also it's also pretty heavy
Speaker 1: handed in areas where you have mayors that's not going
Speaker 1: to support their cops because the cops are afraid to
Speaker 1: go out and really do their job. What do you
Speaker 1: think of the bass relationship with the NYPD. It's horrible.
Speaker 1: It's horrible. I think personally, I think he's the worst
Speaker 1: mayor the city has ever had, at least in my lifetime.
Speaker 1: And you know, I wasn't too happy with David Dinkins.
Speaker 1: I think the Blasio is far worse. The Blasio is
Speaker 1: a socialist. De Blasio is somebody that doesn't give a
Speaker 1: damn about quality of life fishes in the city, the
Speaker 1: homeless population and the hand handlers and all this stuff
Speaker 1: that was reminiscent of New York City back in the
Speaker 1: bad old days prior to Rudy Giuliani taken over. It's
Speaker 1: all coming back. We've had a major spike in the
Speaker 1: last month or two in shootings in the city, and
Speaker 1: as people disrespect the police and as this stuff is promoted,
Speaker 1: you're going to see increases in crime. And nobody understands
Speaker 1: this stuff better than I do. I was a cop
Speaker 1: on the city streets from nineteen eighty sixty to nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety four when it was the height of the crack
Speaker 1: epidemic when it was the height of violent crime. Keep
Speaker 1: in mind, in New York City in nineteen ninety we
Speaker 1: had twenty four hundred murders when Giuliani came in in
Speaker 1: nineteen ninety four and he said, look, nobody wants to visit, live,
Speaker 1: go to school, or work in a place where they're
Speaker 1: not safe. So this isn't about socioeconomic issues. This is
Speaker 1: about violent crime and murder, and we're going to reduce that.
Speaker 1: In honest, buck, for every percentage point that we reduced
Speaker 1: violent crime and murder, I can show you increases in
Speaker 1: economic development, real estate values, tourism, reductions at welfare roles.
Speaker 1: And the bottom line is Giuliani proved that it can
Speaker 1: be done. So why isn't it done in Baltimore Milwaukee. Well,
Speaker 1: that's actually the next question I was going to ask you.
Speaker 1: I was. I was in West Baltimore about a week
Speaker 1: ago and really made it made the rounds. I mean,
Speaker 1: I went to go see the worst because I have
Speaker 1: some some colleagues and friends in Baltimore said look, guys,
Speaker 1: I need to see this for myself. It is every
Speaker 1: bit as bad in the bad areas. There's nice areas
Speaker 1: of Baltimore too, of course, but it's every bit as
Speaker 1: bad in the bad areas as Trump has been saying
Speaker 1: and as the public has been led to believe recently.
Speaker 1: If I if I've brought you out of you know,
Speaker 1: civilian life and said, all right, Bernie, you're you're now
Speaker 1: the police commissioner of Baltimore. We got to get this
Speaker 1: place to have a murder rate that isn't frightening away
Speaker 1: investment and people that want to live there and everything else.
Speaker 1: What has to happen? What do you do? Well, first
Speaker 1: and foremost, you have to engage aggressive policing. And that
Speaker 1: is what the lefts against. They're completely against aggressive policing.
Speaker 1: They're one hundred percent against it. You know, they want,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm not exactly sure what they want, but
Speaker 1: they don't want what we did in New York City
Speaker 1: in nine from nineteen ninety four to two thousand and two,
Speaker 1: when we reduced the violent crime. I think the numbers
Speaker 1: were sixty five percent sixty five percent reduction in violent
Speaker 1: crime and close to a seventy percent in murder. And
Speaker 1: in some of the minority communities, the black communities, the
Speaker 1: black precincts around the city, the murder rate was dropped
Speaker 1: by close to eighty percent. That's what should be happening
Speaker 1: in places like Baltimore, in Chicago and these other places.
Speaker 1: But you need a mayor that's going to take the
Speaker 1: handcuffs off the cops, let them go out and do
Speaker 1: their job. You need a mayor that's not going to
Speaker 1: villainize the police. They're not going to victimize the thugs
Speaker 1: in the street. And unfortunately, in the democratic arena, you know,
Speaker 1: especially in the far left leaning politicians, they're never going
Speaker 1: to do that. If you were back in the top
Speaker 1: job at the NYPD, how would you have handled the
Speaker 1: case of Officer Pantalio and Eric Garner. You know that
Speaker 1: got a lot of attention recently. People were yelling out
Speaker 1: at a Democratic debate fire Pantalio. You've seen the video.
Speaker 1: I'm sure you've read the reports. What do you think
Speaker 1: of what happened there? Pantalio was making a lawful arrest.
Speaker 1: You know. The big thing to outsiders, you know, when
Speaker 1: they see me or they talk to me, they'll say
Speaker 1: they killed the guy for selling loose cigarettes. You know,
Speaker 1: one two cigarettes at a time. No. No. A guide
Speaker 1: died as a result of resisting arrest. An arrest that
Speaker 1: was lawful one selling loose cigarettes as a crime. Somebody
Speaker 1: called the police. They wanted him arrested. They made a complaint,
Speaker 1: a police complaint because he was doing this in front
Speaker 1: of a store. The police responded, affected an arrest. He
Speaker 1: resisted arrest. I don't care if he was selling loose
Speaker 1: cigarettes or he committed mass murder. Does not make any difference.
Speaker 1: When the police say you're under arrest, you must comply.
Speaker 1: He resisted. Pantaleo engaged in a takedown, not a chokehold.
Speaker 1: A takedown. I've been involved in the martial arts since
Speaker 1: i was fourteen years old. I know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: It was a takedown. They were panic strict, and those
Speaker 1: cops were scared at death. They're fighting a three hundred
Speaker 1: and eighty pound guy in front of a major plate
Speaker 1: glass window and they're all armed. Two things you don't
Speaker 1: want to happen. You don't want to get through and
Speaker 1: thrown through that plate glass window, and you damn sure,
Speaker 1: I don't want this guy taking your gun. You gotta
Speaker 1: get him down on the ground and get him in cuffs.
Speaker 1: That's what they did during the course of this. As
Speaker 1: a result of some medical conditions. He dies. They didn't
Speaker 1: kill him. He died as a result of resisting. That's
Speaker 1: the bottom line. There's been a civil rights inquiry by
Speaker 1: the US Department of Justice and there was a grand
Speaker 1: jury investigation, both of which refused to charge Pantaleo. He
Speaker 1: should not be fired, and if he is fired, it's
Speaker 1: nothing but a political stunt or political move by the
Speaker 1: Blasio and should never happen. Bernard Carrick, everybody, fortieth police
Speaker 1: Commissioner of the NYPD in New York City, best selling
Speaker 1: author Bernie really appreciate your time, your expertise. Please please
Speaker 1: come back to the show soon. All right, you take
Speaker 1: care buck, Thank you. All right, team, we've got more
Speaker 1: coming up here in just a moment. Stay with me. Well, team,
Speaker 1: I'm getting down in my last couple of weeks here
Speaker 1: in Washington, d C. Now I'm gonna start to get
Speaker 1: a little nostalgic about the swamp. I've only been down
Speaker 1: here for about a year, but I've lived here before
Speaker 1: for a number of years. Today, i'd never been to
Speaker 1: the Treasury Department, which just seemed like a Yeah, I've
Speaker 1: been to the White House a bunch of times. DJ.
Speaker 1: Obviously I worked at the CIA. Been there are a
Speaker 1: million times, been to the Pentagon, you know, I've been
Speaker 1: a lot of these places. I decided that, you know,
Speaker 1: I want to I want to go check out the
Speaker 1: Treasure Department. So I had lunch with a friend over there.
Speaker 1: Very nice. They had a I don't know if it's
Speaker 1: a balcony or a veranda or a terrorist I don't
Speaker 1: know what you call it. Those are all different things.
Speaker 1: I know you guys are gonna send me the definitions
Speaker 1: for all these. But in an outdoor eating area where
Speaker 1: you look over the White House, and it was very
Speaker 1: It's very civilized. I had a cop solid and iced tea.
Speaker 1: It felt very like, oh oh, perhaps perhaps we'll talk
Speaker 1: about bonds and stocks and Randolph, Yes, you know wind
Speaker 1: Throw it's the guy's name, Mortimer randol Off and Mortimer
Speaker 1: from Coming to America. You guys remember that. I think
Speaker 1: that's the I think that's the second best Eddie Murphy movie.
Speaker 1: I think number one is Beverly Hills Cop one, and
Speaker 1: then I think number two is coming is coming to America. No,
Speaker 1: not coming to America. Sorry. Trading places. Trading places, that's
Speaker 1: Rondolph Mortimer. Some of you have a lot. No exactly
Speaker 1: what I'm talking about A lot. You have no idea. Oh,
Speaker 1: that's right, they are that they exist in in uh
Speaker 1: coming to America again, that's right, we're bucking business Mortimer.
Speaker 1: I remember that. Yeah, those guys are great. That's a
Speaker 1: great movie. So uh yeah, I was at the Treasury Department.
Speaker 1: You walk around Treasury and you think that all of
Speaker 1: a sudden, the Harvard, the Harvard Faculty Lounge has essentially
Speaker 1: turned into a building. It's just very everything is very
Speaker 1: elegant and quiet, and I gotta say it's definitely the
Speaker 1: money building, you know what I mean. You you walk
Speaker 1: around an Apartment of Justice and you're like, yeah, there's
Speaker 1: a fair amount of ill fitting suits and square toed
Speaker 1: loafers in here, and it looks like there's probably a
Speaker 1: couple of romans where they might do that might do
Speaker 1: some on the side interrogations. You know, it's not exactly
Speaker 1: as There are very nice parts. If you go near
Speaker 1: the Attorney General's office and such. I've been over there.
Speaker 1: That's very fancy, But overall DJ is a little a
Speaker 1: little government bureaucracy, drab and depressing. You go to CIA,
Speaker 1: and I always tell people the CIA has a couple
Speaker 1: of cool parts for visitors, but the actual building where
Speaker 1: you work, it's like the inside of a bus terminal
Speaker 1: or something. I mean, it's just a lot of anomium
Speaker 1: floors and track lighting, and it is not sexy in there.
Speaker 1: There then no, you do not open a door and
Speaker 1: there are people doing ninja training with flamethrowers and climbing
Speaker 1: up and down ropes and stuff like that. That's unfortunately
Speaker 1: or is there, but no, just kidding that that's not
Speaker 1: really a thing that happens. The White House is the
Speaker 1: white I will say the White House actually has some
Speaker 1: parts of it where you go really this is it.
Speaker 1: The office I think is smaller than people would would imagine,
Speaker 1: especially from TV and other things. It's really not that
Speaker 1: big though, press pool area, the you know where the
Speaker 1: in the west wing that's it's almost like run down.
Speaker 1: It looks kind of like the science the science or
Speaker 1: the auditorium rather for you know, high school biology class
Speaker 1: that nobody really wants to take. It's just not really
Speaker 1: that not really that impressive. So anyway, first time over
Speaker 1: Treasury is pretty cool. If you ever get the chance,
Speaker 1: somebody will give you a tour of it. I saw
Speaker 1: the vault, and I saw them the cash room. There
Speaker 1: was interesting fact, until nineteen seventy there was a working
Speaker 1: bank in the Department of the Treasury. But yeah, that's
Speaker 1: that's a fancy building. That's where all the people making
Speaker 1: money cash millionaires, or at least they used to and
Speaker 1: now they work for the government. That's that. I was
Speaker 1: trying to think of what the nicest of all these
Speaker 1: federal buildings. That the Treasury is pretty nice. I think
Speaker 1: that's probably the most. If you're looking for the federal
Speaker 1: equivalent of the Country Club Agency, I think it's probably
Speaker 1: got to be the Treasury Department. It's definitely not the Pentagon,
Speaker 1: which you walk around that thing and you're like just
Speaker 1: hoping at least I used to walk around and I
Speaker 1: hope that I wouldn't get lost. It's like where am I?
Speaker 1: But you never want to be that dork who's walk
Speaker 1: from the Pentagon, like excuse me, mister two star general.
Speaker 1: But this floor is like E seven two and I
Speaker 1: want to go to I want to go to sub
Speaker 1: basement q RZ, and I just you don't want to
Speaker 1: be that guy, so you just end up doing what
Speaker 1: I did as a dork from Langley who would just
Speaker 1: walk around the hallways totally lost, like what am I
Speaker 1: doing here? But anyway, Treasury Department was fun getting in
Speaker 1: some last DC stories. Roll calls up next, Hey, team Buck,
Speaker 1: it's time for roll call roll call time, which means
Speaker 1: Facebook dot com slash Buck Sexton. Is how you get
Speaker 1: this action going? I do hope one day we'll get
Speaker 1: an email account we can start to use for the show.
Speaker 1: But I just you know what it is. It's too
Speaker 1: hard to switch into all these different email accounts all
Speaker 1: the time. I need like thumb print and eye scanner stuff.
Speaker 1: I'm sick of all the passwords. I feel like I
Speaker 1: spend whole days of my life trying to trying to
Speaker 1: get the passwords that I don't I can't remember, I
Speaker 1: can't figure out all right, I know, I get off
Speaker 1: my lawn. True. Okay, UM, let's see here we have
Speaker 1: Andy Rights. I don't know about the other guy, Buck,
Speaker 1: but these are sleeper cells. Whether you want to admit
Speaker 1: it or not. I understand you can't say this on radio,
Speaker 1: but I think with your training you can get it.
Speaker 1: Andy U. If we're gonna have to agree to disagree
Speaker 1: on this one, Eric, all rights, Hey back, love a show.
Speaker 1: I've been a listener since Saturday shows in the Blaze.
Speaker 1: I know you said you have an open mind toward
Speaker 1: red flag laws. However, I would like you to consider something.
Speaker 1: If anyone were to suggest that instead of taking away
Speaker 1: the guns of a dangerous person, we would lock the
Speaker 1: person up for a period of time without due process,
Speaker 1: everyone will be screaming that's totally unconstitutional. We cannot give
Speaker 1: up our rights, not even a little. Giving this much
Speaker 1: power to the court system is a recipe for disaster shields.
Speaker 1: High Eric, you know, I do see it as a problem.
Speaker 1: I just think it to trade off and we have
Speaker 1: to see what the specifics are of the proposed legislation.
Speaker 1: But this is one of these times when I think
Speaker 1: for myself, maybe maybe I even subconsciously was feeling more
Speaker 1: of the heat of the moment here. We must do something,
Speaker 1: we must do something. No, we don't have to do
Speaker 1: something unless it's worth doing. I think that's a good
Speaker 1: rule for everything, a good rule for life in general.
Speaker 1: So that's what I would say about that. Keith rights. Yes,
Speaker 1: they are completely off the rails. They'll say or do anything.
Speaker 1: The eight to eight thing on MSNBC proves it. Yeah, Keith.
Speaker 1: I mean, that was one of the one of the
Speaker 1: craziest things I've ever seen on television. Somebody who was
Speaker 1: a former senior FBI agent is really going around saying
Speaker 1: that because of August eighth is the day the flag
Speaker 1: will be raised from I mean, it's just a question
Speaker 1: of something terrible happened. They're gonna have the flags that
Speaker 1: have staff for a couple of days, and then they're
Speaker 1: not going to have them have There's no special messaging
Speaker 1: there that has anything to do with eight eight in
Speaker 1: white supremacy. I agree with you. It was just nuts.
Speaker 1: Steven writes, red flag laws more cyber monitoring. What the
Speaker 1: hell have you lost your damn mind? Reality check? Buck
Speaker 1: slap Sexton, stand down, go reread the Declaration the Bill
Speaker 1: of Rights, all right, Steven, I mean, first of all,
Speaker 1: cyber monitoring is if it's public space, it's public space,
Speaker 1: my friends. So that's not you know, I deal with
Speaker 1: this in the law enforcement side. If you're posting stuff
Speaker 1: and it's open to anyone on the Internet, it's open
Speaker 1: to anyone, including law enforcement the Internet. So it depends
Speaker 1: on the cyber monitoring we're talking about. There's no constitutional
Speaker 1: issue with public forum law enforcement looking at public forum.
Speaker 1: That's just the way it is. As for red flag laws,
Speaker 1: all right, all right, I get it. You guys are
Speaker 1: really not on you know, go yell at Trump? Why
Speaker 1: are all yelling at me over red flag laws? He's
Speaker 1: the one that's saying that he's open to this idea.
Speaker 1: You've got a bunch of Republicans that are talking about
Speaker 1: how maybe this is finally something that they're willing to do.
Speaker 1: So we shall see. Laurie. Right, here's a suggestion for
Speaker 1: you for your show who to have on? All right,
Speaker 1: I'll take a look at this guy, Laurie, thank you
Speaker 1: for sending that in here. We got to go to
Speaker 1: the unred folder. Jeff right Buck, I love a show.
Speaker 1: Stumbled across the trailer for a movie that depicts the
Speaker 1: elite lives hunting deplorables for sport. Yeah, man, I've been
Speaker 1: talking about that on the show. I'm aware this is
Speaker 1: not This is not good. This is not something that
Speaker 1: the Buckster thinks is in the realm of good taste
Speaker 1: or acceptable, acceptable creative discourse. Richard writes Buck on More Guns,
Speaker 1: Less Crime. As a freelance animator and artist, I used
Speaker 1: to deliver pizza for Papa John's when the work would
Speaker 1: get slow. If why, if you're ever moving somewhere, I
Speaker 1: want to know if it's a neighborhood that's safe or not.
Speaker 1: Papa John's will not deliver to an area with a
Speaker 1: bad crime rate. The only exception is if you go
Speaker 1: to your local Papa john and get on the exception list.
Speaker 1: One such exception was this really nice lady on the
Speaker 1: south side of town. On the receiver always said take
Speaker 1: off your car topper. She has a gun. It's okay.
Speaker 1: Would you pull up and knock on the door and
Speaker 1: five locks would click until the door would crack open
Speaker 1: and over under shotgun would greet you. She would see
Speaker 1: you and pay fast, wanting you to get out of
Speaker 1: here before they see you. Referring to the thugs down
Speaker 1: the street. Those thugs didn't mess with that lady because
Speaker 1: she had a gun. If it was easier for law
Speaker 1: abiding citizens to defend themselves and their property than thugs
Speaker 1: would thing twice before terrorizing an inner city neighborhood, shields high. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, Richard, that's quite a story. Thanks for sharing that,
Speaker 1: And I would tell you that. Look, I mean, I
Speaker 1: had some pretty decent training when I was in the
Speaker 1: federal government on different weapons systems, particularly on handguns. So
Speaker 1: I always believe that if you have a trained, law
Speaker 1: abiding patriot who is armed, everybody is safer in that
Speaker 1: person's vicinity, because I know that if I could walk
Speaker 1: around and I can't because I don't. I can't get
Speaker 1: a concealed carry permit here or an open carry permit here.
Speaker 1: But if I could walk around DC concealed carry, every
Speaker 1: person in my vicinity is safer. If something goes down,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be able to react and respond in a
Speaker 1: way that could neutralize the threat. Rachel Or just wanted
Speaker 1: to commend you on your mar appearance. The blonde was
Speaker 1: overly expressive with her hands and totally in your bubble,
Speaker 1: but you handled it well well, rachel That blonde is
Speaker 1: Jennifer Granholm, who was the governor of Michigan, which makes
Speaker 1: me think that Michigan and I need to have a conversation.
Speaker 1: What's what's going on Michigan? Miss Granholm seems like a
Speaker 1: nice lady, but putting her in charge? Come on, Wendy, right.
Speaker 1: Thank you for your monologue opening. I've been waiting for
Speaker 1: it all day. I just love you. Thanks Buck really well, Wendy,
Speaker 1: love you too, Thank you so much, very kind of you,
Speaker 1: and I'm glad that you got to hear the monologue
Speaker 1: and waiting for all day. We try to always make
Speaker 1: it worth your time here. Let's see Linda, whoa, this
Speaker 1: is a long one. Sometimes I don't get to hear
Speaker 1: your programs at work five nights a week. But now
Speaker 1: we're hearing about these two mass shootings and people are
Speaker 1: bringing up gun control. Why are the Republicans so willing
Speaker 1: to go with gun control with a socialist when no
Speaker 1: one ever talks about controlling illegals entering after they commit
Speaker 1: horrific crimes. I dare say more Americans have died at
Speaker 1: the hands of illegals than have died at the hands
Speaker 1: of a gun toting person. Lydia, I appreciate your passion.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's correct, but I'm pretty sure it's not,
Speaker 1: but I get what you're saying. By the way, I
Speaker 1: love your show and listening to you, you just make sense. Well,
Speaker 1: thank you very much, Lydia. That's the most important part
Speaker 1: of this whole exchange. Thank you for listening to the
Speaker 1: show and sending your thoughts on this one. Sandy right
Speaker 1: so I'm very thankful for patriots. Thank you, Sandy. I'm
Speaker 1: thankful for patriots like you are willing to give me
Speaker 1: your time and listen to what I've got going on
Speaker 1: here in the Freedom Hunt. Let's see here, Steve. It's
Speaker 1: excited to watch you on mar Hopefully you you were
Speaker 1: able to get in all the words you had to
Speaker 1: see or had to say. You have been inspirational to
Speaker 1: thousands and thousands of American patriots, including myself. Now you're
Speaker 1: on the stage that I assume lives are tuning into.
Speaker 1: Pray to God. Your speech and words you are able
Speaker 1: to shake some common sense and in many across our
Speaker 1: great nation. Steve Shields High, thank you so much. Thank
Speaker 1: you so much, Steve. We've got another one coming in here.
Speaker 1: It's I can't see who wrote it. The name is
Speaker 1: going blank on you right now. But it's just as
Speaker 1: please don't sing, all right, all right? I know, I
Speaker 1: know if I did a little practice, I'm telling you
Speaker 1: I could, I could carry a tune. But I know
Speaker 1: right now it's not really not as good as it
Speaker 1: should be. Thomas writes, break me up off a piece
Speaker 1: of that Kitcat bar. Lol, Thomas, I don't know are
Speaker 1: you hungry or what? What's got kitcat bar on your mind?
Speaker 1: My friend, that's I don't know. I can't explain that one. Andrea,
Speaker 1: all right, I hope you're doing well. Thank you very much, Andrea,
Speaker 1: I am doing well. Let's see Dave from Earlton, New York,
Speaker 1: w g Y listener, and this is Shinola is an
Speaker 1: old brand of shoe polish. Thanks very much. Your show's insightful.
Speaker 1: I appreciate that. Yes, Shinolah shoe polish. Randy also right,
Speaker 1: Shinolah shoe polish. Deborah. Okay, okay, guys, thank you. We
Speaker 1: have we have established that Shinola is shoe polish. Let's see.
Speaker 1: Here's Scott. We got from Scott Park. I love the show,
Speaker 1: so it's the best way to start out. Any note,
Speaker 1: I myself had a recent running with CBP. I drove
Speaker 1: to Canada. When coming back across the border, was told
Speaker 1: to park and go inside. I went inside and stood
Speaker 1: around for about forty five minutes before anyone would talk
Speaker 1: to me. Well, my name was called. I was told
Speaker 1: to turn over my keys and no, I was not
Speaker 1: allowed to watch them search my vehicle. After the search,
Speaker 1: I was told I owed thirteen dollars for the commercial
Speaker 1: goods I was carrying, which I had declared, and I
Speaker 1: was sent on my way. I support CBP when they're
Speaker 1: interdicting illegal activity, but I do not support this type
Speaker 1: of harassment of US citizens who are simply trying to
Speaker 1: get across the border after conducting business activity. A simple sir,
Speaker 1: we're going to search your vehicle since you were randomly selected,
Speaker 1: would have made things a lot better. Instead of telling
Speaker 1: me to sit down and wait until I was told
Speaker 1: they were ready to talk to me, CBP agents all
Speaker 1: had bad attitudes, and I nearly expressed my true thoughts
Speaker 1: on the situation. I travel a lot. I know there's
Speaker 1: nothing to gain by saying anything to an agent in
Speaker 1: the US government except to answer their direct questions with
Speaker 1: as few details as possible. Everything you do and will
Speaker 1: say will always be held against you. Well, Scott, I'm
Speaker 1: sorry you had that interaction with CBP. I gotta tell you,
Speaker 1: I'm not surprised. CBP folks, they've got a tough job,
Speaker 1: and you know they are trying to stop people from
Speaker 1: doing illegal stuff, particularly drug trafficking, but other illegal stuff too,
Speaker 1: and so they're not going to be particularly warm and fuzzy. Usually,
Speaker 1: I will say I've had plenty of people in CBP
Speaker 1: when I've returned into the into the country though, say something.
Speaker 1: You know, once they've cleared and they know I'm a
Speaker 1: good guy, that they'll say like, you know, welcome home
Speaker 1: or something. You know, so they some of them make
Speaker 1: an effort, but some of them don't. Look, it's a
Speaker 1: federal government job. It's it's not glorious work all the time,
Speaker 1: and you know people will tend not to be that
Speaker 1: nice as CBP. They all just want to get through it,
Speaker 1: and you know, it's not fun. It's really not fun
Speaker 1: for anyone. It's just necessary. They have a lot of
Speaker 1: power though, so you're smart to not when you're when
Speaker 1: you're at that border crossing, you're in CBP's world. You
Speaker 1: want to be very respectful and truthful and just help
Speaker 1: them get their job done and you'll get out of
Speaker 1: there in a reasonable reasonable order. You start getting mouthy
Speaker 1: with CBP, it's not gonna be a good day. I've
Speaker 1: seen it happen. I've seen it happen a hundred times,
Speaker 1: not a hundred times, probably once or twice, but I've
Speaker 1: seen it happen. All right, Team that's gonna be the
Speaker 1: show for today. Shields High