WEBVTT - Super Bowl Weekend: Nick's Pick

0:00:00.440 --> 0:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>If your football team had one option in their playbook,

0:00:03.000 --> 0:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the results probably wouldn't be great. The same could be

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>said for your investments. CIBO index options like SPX and

0:00:09.600 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>XSP can help expand your investing strategies with cash settlement

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and potential tax advantages. If you're ready for a more

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 1>dynamic game plan, head to Better with Options dot Com.

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>Cebo life is better with options, Your investments.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:23.119
<v Speaker 2>Could be too.

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:26.159
<v Speaker 1>There are risks associated with CBO company products. Review the

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>disclosures and disclaimers at CBO dot com slash us underscore disclaimers.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 3>All right, welcome in What Dright with Nick Wright, Episode

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 3>one twenty seven, our Super Bowl gambling show. Now, this

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 3>show is going to be released at a different day

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 3>than usual, so you guys will be hearing and seeing

0:00:56.680 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 3>it earlier in the week than you typically do. All

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 3>full disclosure, we are recording this on Monday. We're doing

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.319
<v Speaker 3>that for a number of reasons, not the least of

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 3>which is we are traveling to the Super Bowl and

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 3>it's gonna be some logistical, you know, potential concerns, so

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 3>that we are going to do this without the full

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 3>information that you could get at the end of the week.

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:23.959
<v Speaker 3>So take that into account if you are listening to

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 3>this on Friday or Saturday, that we are recording it

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 3>on Monday. Here's where we're at on the season so far.

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 3>We're just above five hundred. Given the vig we're slight losers.

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 3>Money wise, we're fifty seven to fifty three and two

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs we are seven and five. Championship weekend, obviously,

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 3>we split that. We talked about it last week. The

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 3>fifty to one bet did not come through for US,

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 3>as Brockberry's elbow exploded and then Josh Johnson couldn't play,

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 3>and then McCaffrey wasn't allowed to play quarterback, and it

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 3>was a disaster of a bet. It turned out San

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:10.119
<v Speaker 3>Francisco plus two and a half Kansas City plus one

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 3>obviously came through in truly glorious fashion. So we split

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 3>last week. This week, there is of course, only one

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 3>game to pick. My Kansas City Chiefs are insultingly once

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 3>again getting points a point and a half against the

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 3>Philadelphia Eagles. This line opened at the Chiefs minus two

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 3>and a half, It got bet all the way to

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Philly minus two and a half, and it is now

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 3>settled at Philly minus one and a half. I believe

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.800
<v Speaker 3>the Kansas City Chiefs are going to win. I believe

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Mahomes is going to do the one thing he

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 3>has not done his NFL career, which is have a

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 3>start to finish great Super Bowl. And I think this

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Philadelphia defense is going to be exposed a bit on

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 3>the back end due to the fact that they have

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 3>not played great quarterbacks all year long. So this is

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 3>something we've discussed on the television show throughout the week.

0:03:28.480 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 3>I discussed it a bit on Monday's pod. It is

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 3>worth mentioning again that the Philadelphia Eagles, for as dominant

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 3>as the pass rush has been and as dominant as

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 3>the defense has appeared to be, this is what they

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 3>have done this season. They played Jared Goff and the

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 3>Lions scored thirty five points. They played Kirk Cousins. Give

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Cousins credit. The Viking I'm sorry, give the Eagles credit.

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 3>The Vikings scored seven. Goff and Cousins would be two

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 3>of the best quarterbacks they play all year. They then

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 3>played the Washington Commanders, who in that game were starting

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Carson Wentz. They then played the Jacksonville Jaguars, who had

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 3>the Prince who was promised However, in that game, if

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:23.719
<v Speaker 3>you remember, Trevor fumbled the ball four times and lost

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 3>all four fumbles. Jack still scored twenty one. They then

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 3>played Kyler Murray. They then played Cooper Rush. They then

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 3>played I believe it was Kenny Pickett for the Steelers.

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 3>They then played who the hell was playing for the

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 3>Texans that game, Davis Mills. They then played the Commanders again.

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 3>At this point, the Commanders were starting Taylor Heineke. They

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:54.560
<v Speaker 3>then played Matt Ryan. They then played Aaron Rodgers. He

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 3>scored thirty three points. They then played Daniel Jones, then

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Just Fields, then Dak Prescott. He scored forty points. They

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 3>then wrapped the season playing Andy Dalton, Davis Webb, and

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 3>then in the postseason Daniel Jones and Brock Purty slash

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Josh Johnson. So, by my count, the Philadelphia Eagles played

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 3>on the season five above average quarterbacks Goff Cousins, Trevor,

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Dak Rogers. Dak put up forty, Trevor I'm sorry, Rogers

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:42.280
<v Speaker 3>put up thirty three, Goff put up thirty five. Trevor

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 3>put up twenty one, but turned the ball over five times,

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 3>four of which were fumbles, and if you remember, that game,

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 3>they weren't like forced fumbles. He was dropping the football

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:56.920
<v Speaker 3>and then Kirk Cousins put up seven points. My point

0:05:57.000 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 3>here is, I do not think the Philadelphia Eagles are

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 3>ready for the leveling up that playing Patrick Mahomes and

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 3>this Chiefs offense is. I do not think the Philadelphia

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 3>Eagles were done any favors by the fact that they

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 3>now head into the Super Bowl having not played a

0:06:22.960 --> 0:06:27.720
<v Speaker 3>good quarterback, forget a great quarterback, a good quarterback since

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:31.159
<v Speaker 3>Christmas Eve, and that they have not played Oh and

0:06:31.160 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 3>I left out by the way when I was going

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 3>through their game, they also played the Titans once. My apologies,

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 3>and that was the game. Did Tannehill play the entire game?

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 2>There?

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Let me make sure no. Tannehill got injured in that game.

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Malik Willis came out. But regardless, they have not played

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:52.119
<v Speaker 3>well against an above average quarterback since the Jags game

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 3>on October second, and so or I guess you could

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 3>argue Kyler is an above average quarterback. You throw him

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.480
<v Speaker 3>there as well. That was the following week. I think

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:08.599
<v Speaker 3>that for the Eagles, had the bracket fallen a little

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 3>differently for them, yes, they would have had to play

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 3>tougher opponents, or they would have had to play tougher games.

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 3>But if they had been able to get through it,

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 3>they would have also been more prepared. I'm gonna make

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 3>another point here that again it speaks to how dominant

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 3>the Eagles have been, but I also don't know how

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 3>much it prepares them. Fully. The Eagles have not had

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 3>to compete for four full quarters in quite some time.

0:07:46.000 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Because they blew out the Giants, because they blew out

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 3>the forty nine Ers, those games were laughers. The Chiefs,

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:57.679
<v Speaker 3>on the other hand, just had a sixty minute war

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 3>with Cincinnati and had a game that was not decided

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 3>until the final minutes against Jacksonville in part because of

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 3>Patrick Mahomes' injury. So for all those reasons, I think

0:08:12.240 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs were battle tested. I think they have played

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:19.239
<v Speaker 3>far tougher opponents. I think they come into this game

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 3>ready for everything, and Philadelphia, if the Chiefs offensive line

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 3>can hold up just enough, I think the Philadelphia defense

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 3>can be had. And then there's the Jalen Hurts part

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 3>of it, which is he has not looked good throwing

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 3>the football since his injury. He keeps telling us he's hurt.

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 3>He has thrown for less than two hundred and eighty

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 3>yards combined in this postseason, and he's yet to throw

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 3>for one hundred and sixty yards in either of these games.

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 3>And he hasn't exactly been a super dynamic runner in

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 3>either of these games. Also, keep in mind the one

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 3>big passing play Jalen has in these playoffs was an

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 3>incompletion that was incorrectly called a completion. Without that play,

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 3>he's less. He's under two hundred and thirty or two

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 3>hundred and forty total passing yards this postseason. So I

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 3>like the Chiefs Demons, I know you have some notes

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 3>to give me here.

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:25.320
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 4>So as an underdog, Mahomes is seven and one and

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 4>one against the spread, six and three.

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 3>Straight up as yeah, so, and I'm trying to remember

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 3>the three losses as an underdog that it would be Cincinnati,

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Cincinnati for sure, that earlier this year, Buffalo earlier this year,

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 3>and I think the old No. The only other loss

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 3>as an underdog I think was his first year starting

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 3>when they played New England in twenty eighteen, not in

0:10:02.559 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs but in the regular season. And the producers

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 3>can correct me, but I think those are the three

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 3>go ahead.

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 4>So is it more concerning to you that the Chiefs

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 4>have the worst defense so that they have the worst

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:15.240
<v Speaker 4>skill players.

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.079
<v Speaker 3>So I think the Chiefs defense right now is a

0:10:19.120 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 3>touch underrated. Now they need to get Lugerius Snead back.

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 3>He's their number one corner. But the Chiefs number one

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:31.839
<v Speaker 3>corner went down on the third play of the game

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 3>against a team with Chase and Higgins and Cincinnati scored

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 3>twenty points. Those rookie Willie Gay, their second best linebacker,

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 3>went down in that game as well. The rookie corners

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 3>were exceptional in that game. Chris Jones, with respect to Mahomes,

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 3>was the best player on the field in that game.

0:10:57.360 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Now the Eagles have a brilliant defensive line now, Lane

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 3>Johnson their great right tackle, potential future Hall of Famer.

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 3>He reportedly retore his groin recently. He's gonna play through it.

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 3>But Jason Kelcey, Travis's brother is their center, and that

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Kelsey versus Chris Jones matchup should be great. With that said,

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm not certain that even Jason Kelsey can block Chris

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Jones one on one. By the way the other the

0:11:33.800 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 3>other Chiefs loss. I'm being told that I left out

0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 3>was the Rams. That famous Monday night football game that

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 3>was supposed to be in Mexico, who was Mahomes' first

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 3>year starting, ended up being I think in Los Angeles

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.559
<v Speaker 3>because the Mexican field's turf wasn't good enough and that

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 3>game was fifty four fifty one. But that would have

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 3>been a push, I think because I think they lost

0:11:57.679 --> 0:11:59.839
<v Speaker 3>that game by three. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe they lost

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 3>for but regardless the oh, straight up loss. Of course,

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm not talking about against the spread of straight up loss,

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 3>that's right. So that's the other game. Now to get

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.319
<v Speaker 3>back here, what you're saying about the skill position, guys,

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs need these receivers back. They can't do what

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 3>I'm talking about them doing with none of these receivers back.

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 3>So Juju is the one I'm most confident will be playing.

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Then there's Tony, who I think likely plays, but it's

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, he gets in it. It was the knock

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.840
<v Speaker 3>on him with the Giants. It's been a problem for

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 3>him in Kansas City. He has a hard time making

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 3>it through games. Hardman, I would be very surprised if

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 3>he plays. Hardman suffered a pelvis injury in mid October

0:12:55.600 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 3>the AFC Championship game was his first game back and

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 3>then he reinjured. Now they didn't have active on game day,

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 3>that white guy Justin Watson, who actually has been good

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:10.520
<v Speaker 3>for the Chiefs deep down the field. The other thing

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 3>that happened in that AFC Championship game, and I'll be

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 3>honest with the audience here to Monsey, I had said

0:13:17.840 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 3>to demand early in the game, MBS has been so

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 3>disappointing that he hadn't come through for him all year.

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:29.319
<v Speaker 3>He was exceptional in that game. That was the best

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:34.199
<v Speaker 3>game of his career. Can he do that in consecutive weeks?

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 3>That is a bit of a concern. Flipside is this.

0:13:38.080 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes is going to be better.

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes is going to be way healthier, way healthier, and

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 3>the running game can't be worse. Jarrett McKinnon did nothing

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 3>in that game. Pacheco was excellent catching the ball, but

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 3>on handoffs did nothing. And I think Mahomes is going

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 3>to be a little at least a little more mobile

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:06.319
<v Speaker 3>with the two weeks off. And they reported that he

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 3>didn't get the painkilling shot in the last game before

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.680
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals game. No, no, no, that was Mahomes who

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 3>did not get the painkilling shot copy. So my thought

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 3>process there was I think one of the reasons he

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 3>didn't want to take the painkilling shot was he didn't

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 3>want to have his foot numbed to a degree re

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 3>injure it more not know it make it way worse

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 3>to where he might have to miss the super Bowl.

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 3>But now it's the last game of the year. So

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 3>even if he were to re injure it to a degree,

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 3>he you know, he has months and months to recover.

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.680
<v Speaker 3>So I think Mahomes will look close to fully functional,

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 3>assuming he doesn't get landed on or you know what

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean. And so in those regards. But to me,

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 3>the biggest concern right now is the Chiefs received injuries.

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 3>What else you got?

0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 2>All right? So the Eagles are getting seventy percent of

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the money right now?

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 3>Yep.

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that we should bet on the Chiefs

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 2>right now or should we wait?

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 3>Well? I do like getting the point and a half,

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 3>and I do think there is in what could be.

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 3>This is an interesting one because all outcomes are possible here.

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 3>It is possible that the Chiefs can't block Philly, that

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs receivers you know, two of the three don't

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:35.520
<v Speaker 3>come back and nobody can get separation, Mahomes doesn't have

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 3>time to throw, and the Eagles defensive line wins this

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:43.240
<v Speaker 3>game and it gets ugly. It is also possible that

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 3>the Mahomes hurts discrepancy is too much to overcome, the

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Eagles defense gets exposed early, and now all of a sudden,

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Philly is playing a style they don't want to play,

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 3>which is having to throw the ball, and it gets

0:15:56.840 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 3>ugly for Philly early. It's also possible, again, like I said,

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 3>this is not a nuanced commentary that this is a

0:16:04.000 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 3>nip and tuck game. In a nip and tuck game,

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 3>getting that one point is super valuable. Not super valuable,

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 3>but valuable. However, this line is basically settled at a

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 3>point and a half. It would take a shocking development

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 3>for the Chiefs to end up being the favorites. Conversely,

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 3>if there is bad receiver injury news from Kansas City

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 3>or sneakily bad Travis Kelsey injury news which I would

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.560
<v Speaker 3>not expect but he wasn't dealing with that back issue,

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 3>this line could move up to two and a half.

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 2>I was gonna say three.

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't think it'll get to three. I ain't

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 3>get at three. I it'll be way way too much

0:16:56.520 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 3>people coming in on the Chiefs. I think three is

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 3>two key, So I don't think there's a lot of

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 3>risk embedting it now. But if you're anticipating some line movement,

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 3>I would say that Kansas City, it would it's more

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 3>likely to have the line move in to where you

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 3>get more points with Kansas City. And let me say

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.159
<v Speaker 3>one other thing about if it moves from one and

0:17:23.160 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 3>a half to two and a half. Games don't typically

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:34.239
<v Speaker 3>land on two unless a team is down eight, like

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 3>it's twenty eight to twenty. One team has scored four touchdowns,

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 3>the other team has two touchdowns and two field goals,

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 3>and that trailing team scores very very late, goes for

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 3>two and misses. That's where you know what I mean.

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 3>That could be value on getting the extra point there

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 3>from one and a half to two and a half,

0:17:56.440 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 3>but it's not going to cross any key numbers basically

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 3>betting a winner in this spot. So I don't think

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 3>there's damage done in betting the Chiefs now. But I

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 3>also think you probably get slight ev by waiting, because

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think you're giving up much and you could

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 3>be getting it getting an extra half point or so.

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.879
<v Speaker 4>All right, next, all right, So Brandon Ayuk from the

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 4>forty nine ers think there's only one possible outcome. He says,

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 4>I would take everything that I own, get it in cash,

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 4>and put my money on the Kansas City Chiefs.

0:18:27.920 --> 0:18:28.600
<v Speaker 2>Are you taking that?

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.399
<v Speaker 3>Well, listen, I'm not putting everything I own on the Chiefs.

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:36.439
<v Speaker 3>What I will tell you is that he also said,

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 3>and I actually texted this story to Wilds, he also

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 3>said the following, I'm gonna read it. I don't fully

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 3>know about that Eagles defense. They talk about them being

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 3>a good defense, I'm not too sure. I think this

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 3>Kansas City pass game will expose what we thought we

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 3>were gonna be able to expose before some unfortunate circumstances.

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:01.479
<v Speaker 3>We'll see. And like I said, you got to get

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 3>lucky to win a super Bowl, and they just got

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.919
<v Speaker 3>extremely lucky last week. Now, it's a lot of trash

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:09.479
<v Speaker 3>talking for a team that just got absolutely rolled.

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 2>But I mean some truth in this.

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 3>I agree with some of that analysis, and I think

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 3>this Eagles defense is not battle tested for the test

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:27.640
<v Speaker 3>they are going to have to take this coming Sunday.

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 3>So the Chiefs plus one and a half is our

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 3>final game wager of the year. If we win this bet,

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 3>we finished fifty eight fifty three and two, which is

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 3>essentially dead even on the year when you incorporate the

0:19:44.359 --> 0:19:47.800
<v Speaker 3>viig We did well in our preseason win total bets,

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 3>and make miss playoff bets. So it no matter what

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 3>happens here, this is a profitable season. Not nearly as

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 3>wildly profitable if it did as it would have been

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.160
<v Speaker 3>if the Niners had won that game against Philly.

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 2>But so be it that I have a little bit

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 2>more money had you edged that Super Bowl bit.

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 3>Stop talking about hedging that you could have a little

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 3>more money if you'd stop making NBA teasers.

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.640
<v Speaker 2>I made one, Yeah, I lost eleven books.

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, well that's eleven more dollars. We're in play game

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 3>with some player props. That's next, what's right.

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 5>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.679
<v Speaker 5>inspiring true story about Anthony Roblasts, who defined every expectation

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 5>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 5>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 5>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 5>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:20:48.040 --> 0:20:51.560
<v Speaker 5>including Jirell Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Pania, and

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 5>Bobby Canavalli. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, welcome back in What's Right with Nick Right,

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Episode one twenty seven, our Super Bowl gambling show.

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Again.

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 3>We're recording this on Monday, so some of these things

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 3>could change, but we're now gonna do some player props

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 3>to Monsay. You go right ahead.

0:21:09.760 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 4>We'll start off with your chiefs. Yeah, Rebec Patrick Mahomes.

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 4>First off, we've got over one and a half touchdown

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.879
<v Speaker 4>passes that's at minus two ten, okay, over three hundred

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 4>and thirteen passing plus combined or passing plus rushing yards

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 4>at minus one fifteen as well, huh or not as well,

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:28.400
<v Speaker 4>and then over twenty five and a half completions at

0:21:28.400 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 4>minus one ten.

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So this is two wrongs one right, So I'm

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 3>supposed to pick one of these that I like, the

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 3>one that I like. Listen. I do think he's going

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 3>to have over one and a half passing touchdowns, but

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 3>minus two ten is a big number.

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 2>To lay right.

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:59.520
<v Speaker 3>So I think the right play here is the over

0:21:59.640 --> 0:22:03.360
<v Speaker 3>three hundred and thirteen and a half total total yards

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 3>and the twenty five and a half completions probably goes

0:22:08.760 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 3>hand in hand with that, but not necessarily not if

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 3>he gets a few big chunk plays, which I think

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 3>will be available against Philly. I do again, I do

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 3>like the over one and a half passing touchdowns for him,

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 3>but at minus two ten rather than over three hundred

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 3>and thirteen and a half total yards at minus one

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 3>p fifteen. To me, that's better. Now his individual rushing

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 3>and passing props are two eighty eight and a half

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 3>passing yards and twenty and a half rushing yards. I

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 3>like the rushing yards side of that way more. I

0:22:44.640 --> 0:22:48.320
<v Speaker 3>think that listen, fifteen, Mahomes is gonna be running in

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 3>this game. To me, there's no question about it, and

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 3>I think the ankle will be healthy enough that over

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 3>twenty and a half rushing yards is potentially my fate,

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 3>like my fa favorite bet that I've seen so far.

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 3>With that said, remember in the Niners Super Bowl, mahomes

0:23:06.720 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 3>rushing yard total was at like thirty four something like that.

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:16.880
<v Speaker 3>He was in the forties and then took three massive

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 3>kneel downs at the end of the game for minus

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 3>three yards, minus five yards, minus seven yards, and they

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:26.800
<v Speaker 3>ended up those count as negative rushing yards. They ended

0:23:26.880 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 3>up going under because he landed on like twenty six

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 3>after being at I think forty one thanks to the

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 3>kneel downs. That was, though more circumstantial than anything. If

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 3>I do think the Chiefs are gonna win the game,

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.639
<v Speaker 3>he might need to be at twenty six rushing yards

0:23:44.680 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 3>though for you to feel fully comfortable if he's gonna

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 3>have three kneel downs. But I still like it. All right,

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 3>now we're on to Jalen Hurts.

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, Yeah, Jalen Hurts overs. Yeah.

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 4>So we got over one and a half touchdown pass

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 4>as well, Yeah, minus one oh five over two hundred

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 4>and ninety eight combined passing and rushing yards yep, minus

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:05.239
<v Speaker 4>one fifteen, and then over twenty one over twenty one

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 4>and a half completions at minus one o five.

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So I here's the thing. I like the under

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 3>on total yards. I I don't love any of these

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 3>because I think Jalen might truly struggle and that even

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.439
<v Speaker 3>if the Eagles win, it's gonna be miles Sanders and

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:37.719
<v Speaker 3>Boston Scott and Kenneth Gainwell and Jalen running. So I

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 3>I wouldn't bet any of these. But of the three,

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 3>the one that I think might have the most value

0:24:45.640 --> 0:24:49.000
<v Speaker 3>as the completions is that a lot of dinking and

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 3>dunking and short completions. But my gut feeling is to

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 3>stay away from these and you can just bet the unders,

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 3>you know what I mean? For usually about same big

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 3>here his individual if we not do total yards but

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and forty five pass yards and forty nine

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 3>and a half rush yards. I do think he could

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:14.840
<v Speaker 3>hit the over on rushing yards. I do think Jalen

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 3>could run for like sixty five yards in this game potentially,

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 3>But to me, under three hundred combined passing and rushing

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 3>yards is the bet I would be making there.

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 4>All right, Next, all right, so I'm assuming you expect

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 4>a lot of Chiefs touchdowns in the game. So who

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 4>do you think will score them? Travis Kelcey We got

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 4>anytime touchdown score for him at minus one thirty, Kadarius

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 4>Tony at plus two forty, and Juju Smith Schuster at

0:25:41.160 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 4>plus two forty as well.

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so Tony and Juju right now, are can't bets obviously,

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 3>we need to wait and see what their health status is.

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Kelsey is a must bet. Travis Kelcey in the playoffs

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 3>scores touchdowns and especially with a banged up receiving corps.

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 3>To me, that one is an easy, obvious bet, and

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 3>the Kelsey would be my bet there after Kelsey. I

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 3>would like Jared McKinnon as a potential touchdown score. I

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 3>would like Pat. I like Patrick Mahomes a ton as

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 3>a rushing touchdown score, like it a ton he's in

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 3>the playoffs, he has I think six career rushing touchdowns.

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:28.439
<v Speaker 2>So do you think that he's I mean, he's definitely

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 2>probably plus money. How much money do you think he's.

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Oh Mahomes or no you no, no, no, it won't

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.680
<v Speaker 3>be that much. Uh. I mean, I can just look

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 3>real quick. My guess is he's around the same as

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 3>the as around the same as kid area as Tony.

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:49.560
<v Speaker 3>But I'll just check real quick what Mahomes anytime touchdown

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 3>score is. While I look, go ahead and read me

0:26:52.000 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 3>the next one.

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 4>All right, So the next one we've got is Eagles

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:56.600
<v Speaker 4>anytime touchdown score.

0:26:58.080 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 2>So we've got Jalen Hurt set minus one eight.

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:06.439
<v Speaker 3>Oh, real quick. By the way, Patrick Mahomes, Oh wow, wow,

0:27:06.640 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 3>you were right. Demant is plus four sixty. That's way

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 3>too high. That's way too high. I like that bet

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 3>a lot. I like that bet a lot.

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 2>They're probably thinking about his ankle a lot.

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I think he'll get out and run, right,

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I think he'll get out and run in this game.

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 3>All right, go ahead, now we're on the Eagles.

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 4>Sorry, Eagles anytime touchdown score. We got Jalen Hurts at

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:33.439
<v Speaker 4>minus one ten, AJ Brown at plus one ten and

0:27:33.560 --> 0:27:36.479
<v Speaker 4>Dallas go Derrekt Goddard got it sorry at plus one.

0:27:37.440 --> 0:27:44.120
<v Speaker 3>Uh. I like uh, I like Jalen in this Yeah,

0:27:44.160 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 3>it takes one penalty in the end zone to put

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 3>him at the one, and that QB sneak is unguardable.

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 3>So I like Jalen as anytime touchdown score, or Jalen

0:27:52.960 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 3>just to be scrambling when they're in the red zone. Jayalen,

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, I like j you know, let me check

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 3>something real quick. And by the way, listen, in general,

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 3>we always suggest you bet with our friends at Fox Bet.

0:28:06.040 --> 0:28:10.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm gonna tell you something here though. When it comes

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:14.639
<v Speaker 3>to these player prop markets, they have They are so

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:17.959
<v Speaker 3>widely different as far as what they'll give you at

0:28:17.960 --> 0:28:21.959
<v Speaker 3>different places. Like at some books, Jalen is plus one

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:25.159
<v Speaker 3>oh five is supposed to minus one ten to score

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:29.359
<v Speaker 3>a touchdown. When it comes to player props, you absolutely

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:32.160
<v Speaker 3>should shop it around. You should chop around and find

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 3>the best bet. The best value Mahomes and Hurts to

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 3>both rush for a touchdown is ten to one. I

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 3>like that bet.

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty cool.

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Ten to one for Mahomes and Hurts to both have

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 3>a rushing touchdown in this game. All right, next, all.

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 4>Right, So these stars set of quarterbacks will be throwing

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.000
<v Speaker 4>at a bunch. Who do you think is going to

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:54.200
<v Speaker 4>be getting the bulk of these yards? So we got

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 4>aj Brown at over seventy one at over seventy one

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 4>and a half at minus one twenty and Devon Smith

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 4>over sixty one and a half at minus one thirty

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 4>and Travis Kelcey over seventy nine and a half at

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 4>minus one fifteen.

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 3>I like Kelsey in this spot, of course. I think

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:12.760
<v Speaker 3>Kelsey's gonna have a huge game. I think this is

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 3>it lined up for it. They're gonna have to target him.

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 3>He has not had in these playoffs. Really a giant

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:25.479
<v Speaker 3>chunk play. Now, he's been incredibly productive, but against the Jags,

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 3>for instance, he had fourteen catches for ninety eight yards.

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 3>That's seven yards of catch, you know what I mean.

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 3>So they have that many catches and not have one

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 3>hundred yards. Crazy Patrick Mahomes just off Kelsey. Yeah, well

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 3>they weren't all him, remember because Henny came in. But

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 3>still the So I think Kelsey to me, this is

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 3>a Travis Kelcey nine catch, one hundred and fifteen yard,

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 3>one touchdown type of game. I think Travis Kelcey has

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 3>a monster game in the Super Bowl. So I would

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 3>take his over there. And again I've made it clear

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 3>one of those Eagles. Those guys will go over probably,

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 3>but I eyeing Jalen could potentially struggle a lot in

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 3>this game. All right, next, All.

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 4>Right, we're showing a lot of love to the pass

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 4>catchers now, so let's not forget about the running backs.

0:30:10.920 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 4>This is just rushing yards yep. Miles Sanders over fifty

0:30:14.560 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 4>nine and a half at minus one twenty five, Isaiah

0:30:17.400 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 4>Pachecko over forty nine and a half at minus one fifteen,

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 4>and Jery McKinnon over twenty one and a half at

0:30:23.720 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 4>minus one fifteen.

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 2>That that's pretty nice. Jerick McKinnon.

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Well, the thing is this, they don't run him pass cat. Yeah,

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.000
<v Speaker 3>I get it, they don't run him a ton, But

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:37.640
<v Speaker 3>alls it takes is a couple decent ones. Eying Miles

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Sanders is the smarter bet here Pa check O and McKinnon.

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 3>I would be interested in their total yards props, potentially

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:51.480
<v Speaker 3>more than just rushing yards. But I don't know that

0:30:51.560 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 3>this is going to be a big Pa check O game.

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 3>I think this is so McKinnon receiving yards, McKinnon to

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 3>score a touchdown. I like Miles. The thing is this,

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 3>if the Eagles get down big, then they might have

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 3>to abandon the run somewhat, and that would hurt Miles Sanders. Yeah,

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 3>but if we think this is gonna be a close game,

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna feed Miles Sanders a lot. Try to have

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 3>long possessions. I like the Miles Sanders over there.

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 4>All right, next, all right, let's put your prognostication skills

0:31:20.160 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 4>to the test. What will the outcome of the first

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 4>drive be? This is used to be one of my

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 4>favorite bets. Yeah, put at plus one hundred, offensive touchdown

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 4>at plus two seventy five field goal attempt at plus

0:31:30.600 --> 0:31:31.280
<v Speaker 4>three twenty five.

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 3>I hate I hate Adams. I don't know who's getting

0:31:34.120 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 3>the ball first.

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 2>This is my time.

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 3>What do you think? What do you want to do?

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.200
<v Speaker 2>I definitely think it's gonna be a field goal.

0:31:40.440 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Field goal attempts. Yeah, you don't care who gets the.

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 4>Ball, no, honestly, And I remember how you said something

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 4>about the how I have no no edge on or

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 4>I got. I've got no knowledge on what it would

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 4>be heads and tails? Yeah, when like I have the

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:57.440
<v Speaker 4>knowledge that it's either going to be heads or tails.

0:31:57.720 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that's all the knowledge that I need. Right.

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 3>But Okay, we're gonna get too four team thing later,

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 3>but go ahead.

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:05.000
<v Speaker 4>I think there's are two good teams, and I think

0:32:05.040 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 4>that no matter who gets the ball first, I can't

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 4>really I don't see this being an opening drive touchdown,

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 4>but I see them driving down the field a little bit,

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 4>get getting scary, and they ended up being a field

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:15.440
<v Speaker 4>goal because they hold them.

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 3>So I get that. What I would say is, if

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs get the ball first, the Chiefs opening script

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 3>those scripted first fifteen plays, particularly with extra time to

0:32:29.720 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 3>prepare under Andy Reid, have been historically efficient. I also

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 3>think the Chiefs understand that, unlike that Bengals game, they

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 3>can't be settling for field goals. If the Chiefs get

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 3>the ball first, I do like their chances of scoring

0:32:44.120 --> 0:32:44.680
<v Speaker 3>a touchdown.

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 4>I think they're going forward if they get like a

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 4>fourth and short maybe yeah.

0:32:49.360 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 3>And I think they're gonna listen. I just think they're

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 3>gonna be uber efficient in the red zone. I think

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna know they have to be. This is a

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:59.320
<v Speaker 3>bet that if you want to make it, I would

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:02.520
<v Speaker 3>just wait until you see he's getting the ball first

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 3>and they.

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 2>That doesn't drop the numbers at all.

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 3>No, the odds would change a little bit, you know

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.479
<v Speaker 3>what I mean, depending on But the thing is this,

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 3>these two teams are so, according to Vegas evenly matched

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 3>in this spot. I don't think it would change the

0:33:18.000 --> 0:33:21.560
<v Speaker 3>odds drastically. It's not like when you have a mismatch

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 3>and then the odds are kind of middled because they

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 3>don't know who's gonna get the ball.

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:27.160
<v Speaker 4>Like, there's a way to do that, To do what

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 4>I kind of like, I feel like you could kind

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 4>of hedge on that.

0:33:31.480 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, if you're very confident, you could put a little

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 3>bit of money on two outcomes if you're confident that

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 3>one of them's gonna hit. But the problem is if

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 3>the third possible outcome if a turnover or if you know,

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:48.440
<v Speaker 3>let's say you think it's gonna there's gonna be points

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 3>and you have offensive touchdown or field goal attempts. You

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 3>could do that, but then if there's a punt or

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 3>a turnover, you lose both bets, you know what I mean.

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 3>Like so you you could do it, but it would

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:00.480
<v Speaker 3>be difficult. All right, next, all.

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:02.840
<v Speaker 4>Right, this one is just a mix of long shots.

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 4>So first off, we got kick to hit the post

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 4>at plus four fifty, kicker makes a sixty sixty plus

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 4>yard field goal at plus nine hundred, octopus at plus

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 4>fourteen hundred.

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:13.919
<v Speaker 2>That's up.

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 4>That, by the way, is a player to score a touchdown.

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:19.800
<v Speaker 4>Passing doesn't count. And the following is a two point conversion.

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Well where and they then they get they score the

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 3>two point conversion. All right, I know this will shock you.

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 3>I hate all of these. Uh none of them have

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:36.440
<v Speaker 3>good enough odds. The kick to hit the post maybe,

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 3>but I don't. I hate all these. I'm not making

0:34:41.160 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 3>any of these move on. That's dumb. It's all dumb stuff.

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:47.399
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sixty yard field goal. I need a lot.

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 3>I need better odds.

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 2>These pick six in this is there? Like will there

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 2>be a pix? Sure? Yes?

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 3>After yeah, of course no, demon's a your mind. Your

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 3>brain is gonna melt when you see all of Yeah,

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 3>there's for everything next.

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:04.240
<v Speaker 4>All right, So this one we call it the gatorade color.

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 4>Only one coach wins, but we can all win if

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.759
<v Speaker 4>we gets the color of their gatorade shower Eagles wearing green,

0:35:10.840 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 4>shees wearing white. So at first we first we got

0:35:13.640 --> 0:35:16.440
<v Speaker 4>orange at plus three hundred, yellow or green at plus

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 4>four hundred, red or pink at plus four fifty.

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:21.880
<v Speaker 3>All right, this is one of those bets like the

0:35:21.920 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 3>time of the national anthem, or the first song that

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:28.920
<v Speaker 3>Rihanna's gonna sing, any of those things. I forbid you

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 3>for making these bets unless you have inside info. Right,

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 3>these are bets that they get enough dumb money on

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:40.880
<v Speaker 3>that they continue to put them up there even though

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 3>certain people have the inside info, Like someone will know

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 3>what color gatorade the Chiefs have and what color gatorade

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 3>the Eagles have. And if you have that dead set,

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 3>you can just bet that instead of bet the winner.

0:35:59.239 --> 0:35:59.879
<v Speaker 3>You know what I mean.

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 2>You just had a guy go over to the little

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:02.759
<v Speaker 2>thing and tell you.

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, but they're so a big thing with national

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:09.000
<v Speaker 3>They do national anthem timing props, and it always leaks

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:11.640
<v Speaker 3>out how long the rehearsal went. There will be what

0:36:11.680 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 3>will Rihanna's first song be, and it will leak out what,

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 3>you know what, how her rehearsal went. These types of bets,

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:22.440
<v Speaker 3>if you don't have insight info, you just can't make

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:25.280
<v Speaker 3>them flatle you just can't make them all right, last

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 3>last one?

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 4>Oh well, after winning, after winding our coin saws on Thursday,

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm fully confident in picking the super Bowl coin flip.

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 3>You no, I know? All right, So what are the options?

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:44.319
<v Speaker 4>Heads at minus one o five, Tails at minus one

0:36:44.320 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 4>o five on its side at plus infinity.

0:36:46.719 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm putting a dollar on plus infinity.

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Well that bet doesn't exist, but I appreciate that happened.

0:36:55.320 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 2>I'd go with heads.

0:36:56.480 --> 0:37:00.839
<v Speaker 3>Why just because I won the last one? Okay, So

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 3>that's your logic.

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a lot of people are gonna be like, tails

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 2>never fails.

0:37:05.440 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 3>So here's the thing. If you could get plus one

0:37:11.440 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 3>oh two, don't. Then it would be a smart bet

0:37:16.840 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 3>at plus one oh one, it would be a smart

0:37:18.880 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 3>bet at even plus one hundred. It's it's a fine,

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 3>but it's not. The thing is it's not. And so

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:32.200
<v Speaker 3>you and I could We're not going to, but we

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 3>could do this and flip a coin one hundred times.

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 3>And I promise you that if you're laying one oh

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 3>five to me, you're going to lose. And so it

0:37:47.640 --> 0:37:52.839
<v Speaker 3>is gambling just for the sake of gambling, with no

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 3>skill or idea connected to it. And it can you

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:01.879
<v Speaker 3>can start down money before the game even starts. I

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 3>can't recommend against this strongly enough. I'm telling you right

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 3>now it is a dumb bet and a sign that

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:14.320
<v Speaker 3>you might have a gambling problem. If you're betting the

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:17.279
<v Speaker 3>Super Bowl coin toss the books love when you do it,

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 3>you're laying one oh five on an even money thing

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.919
<v Speaker 3>that you can have no possible insight info on. I'm

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 3>telling you it's a dumb bet. Speaking of dumb bets,

0:38:27.760 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 3>you guys are gonna try to get me to make

0:38:29.320 --> 0:38:31.319
<v Speaker 3>like a thirty to one prop bet. We'll do that.

0:38:31.440 --> 0:38:32.960
<v Speaker 3>Drap the show next. What's right?

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:38:39.239 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back in last segment of our last NFL gambling

0:38:42.600 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 3>show of this football season. We've got the Chiefs plus

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:48.480
<v Speaker 3>a point and a half before we get to the offer.

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:55.359
<v Speaker 3>I there is a teaser out there that does go

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:58.680
<v Speaker 3>through all the key numbers and is worth at least

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 3>looking at, which is teasing a seven point teaser of

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 3>teasing the Chiefs up to plus eight and a half

0:39:08.239 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 3>and teasing the total down to forty three and a half.

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 3>So you would have the Chiefs getting more than eight,

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:21.759
<v Speaker 3>and the total would come through the forty seven, the

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 3>forty eight, obviously, the forty five, the forty four. It

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't go through the forty two, which is another key

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 3>to total number. But that's one at least worth looking at.

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:36.120
<v Speaker 3>I'm not gonna make that bet, but that is the

0:39:36.280 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 3>logical teaser that's on the board. You can also do

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:41.600
<v Speaker 3>a six pointer, but then you don't get the teaser

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:44.439
<v Speaker 3>through the twenty four or the forty four. And again

0:39:44.480 --> 0:39:47.799
<v Speaker 3>a lot of games end on forty four, so you'd

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 3>like to get it through that is twenty four to

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:53.399
<v Speaker 3>twenty games. Obviously in there, you know there's a lot

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 3>of combinations if you will that where you get twenty

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 3>seven to seventeen ins on forty four. So that's why

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 3>I would pay the little extra and have a seven

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 3>point Taser down over forty three and a half and

0:40:07.880 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs plus eight and a half. All right, Demanse,

0:40:10.040 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 3>what's the offer?

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:11.239
<v Speaker 2>All right?

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 4>So you haven't been having so much fun so far

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:15.719
<v Speaker 4>with all these player props. Yeah, there's a parlay that

0:40:15.760 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 4>basically is exactly what you said. There's exactly how you

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:20.919
<v Speaker 4>said the Chiefs one. Sorry, so tell me what's wrong

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 4>with this and we can even customize it for.

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 2>You if you'd like.

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:26.919
<v Speaker 4>Okay, So, Mahomes super Bowl MVP at plus one twenty five,

0:40:27.400 --> 0:40:30.640
<v Speaker 4>Chiefs money line at plus one oh five, Kelsey overs

0:40:30.680 --> 0:40:34.080
<v Speaker 4>seventy nine and a half minus one fifteen at minus

0:40:34.080 --> 0:40:38.360
<v Speaker 4>one fifteen. That's receiving yards obviously, Kelsey touchdown minus one thirty,

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:41.279
<v Speaker 4>and Mahomes over passing yards two hundred and eighty eight

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:44.840
<v Speaker 4>point five at minus one fifteen. All this combined for

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 4>plus two thousand, seven hundred and fifty two.

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 3>So twenty eight to one. Almost. I'm gonna tweak it

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 3>slightly and it won't change the numbers on it significantly.

0:40:55.800 --> 0:41:00.800
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna remove the Mahomes over passing yards and replace

0:41:00.880 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 3>it with Mahomes over rushing yards. So Chiefs to win,

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:10.359
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes to win MVP, Kelsey to have over eighty yards,

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 3>Kelsey to score a touchdown, and Mahomes to rush for

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:20.239
<v Speaker 3>over twenty and a half. That will actually probably slightly

0:41:21.520 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 3>improve the odds because the Mahomes passing and the Kelsey

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 3>receiving are so correlated that you're not gonna eat. So

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 3>my guess is that puts that out about thirty to one.

0:41:32.120 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 2>What is it?

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 3>Right? Okay, so it doesn't improve him all that much,

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 3>but it's at twenty eight to one. Okay, that's the

0:41:41.200 --> 0:41:45.480
<v Speaker 3>That's that's what I'm doing that they all make that bet.

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:48.600
<v Speaker 3>I'll take that offer to end the year with me

0:41:48.719 --> 0:41:52.080
<v Speaker 3>finally taking the offer. Demondy's refused to take the offer

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:54.759
<v Speaker 3>all year, mostly because he just forgets to, even though

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 3>a few of them have hit. But this is one. No,

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm telling You've said it. You've said like you like

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:04.080
<v Speaker 3>the offers, but that you hadn't been placing them. I

0:42:04.120 --> 0:42:07.400
<v Speaker 3>do like this one. Twenty eight to one. Mahomes has

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 3>a big day, Kelsey has a big day, The Chiefs win,

0:42:10.880 --> 0:42:14.760
<v Speaker 3>Mahomes wins Super Bowl MVP God Willing, and the Dynasty

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 3>is alive and well there it is fun year gambling

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 3>shows feel like we've done a lot, learned a lot,

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:26.640
<v Speaker 3>gave out some good picks, survived some rough stretches of

0:42:26.680 --> 0:42:31.000
<v Speaker 3>the season, kept with our plan. Demond's learned to gamble

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:35.400
<v Speaker 3>whole thing. Overall, great success. Next time you hear from me,

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:37.879
<v Speaker 3>I'll be live in Arizona from the Super Bowl. Talk

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:43.839
<v Speaker 3>to you guys then, what's right