WEBVTT - Does Sunscreen Actually Work?

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:06.519
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Part Time Genius, the production of Kaleidoscope

0:00:06.720 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and iHeartRadio.

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Guess what, Well, what's that Mango?

0:00:14.440 --> 0:00:17.759
<v Speaker 1>So the US Open starts this week and I was

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking about that old Seinfeld, the one where they're at

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the match talking about sunscreen.

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:23.599
<v Speaker 2>I think maybe I'm gonna need you to be a

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 2>little bit more specific. I was a fan of the show,

0:00:25.760 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 2>but I'm not remembering here.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Let me just play this clip.

0:00:28.400 --> 0:00:32.520
<v Speaker 2>For you, the ways the sunblock. Yeah, it says Papa

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:32.839
<v Speaker 2>in it.

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I need Papa free.

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 2>You got a problem with Papa? Yes, I have a

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 2>problem with Papa. You don't even know what Paba is.

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 2>No enough to stay away from. Ah classic Seinfeld dialogue.

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 2>It's like nothing happens and nothing matters.

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>It is beautiful. But I kept thinking about the scene

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>this summer because I've been getting back into playing tennis. Actually,

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>my friend Joanna keeps making fun of me and calling

0:00:57.040 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>me a little tennis prince because I keep talking about it.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>But as you probably know, I hate wearing sunscreen. I

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>do not like the way it feels. I don't like

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't quite rub into my skin, and it

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 1>makes me look white or purple when I try to

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:14.399
<v Speaker 1>rub it in, but when you're spending hours outside, obviously

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to burn or get skin damage. And

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to figure out which sunscreens are actually good.

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 1>So I thought maybe we could look into it a little.

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 2>And I'm curious if you ever figured out what Papa is.

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Papa. There's some problems with Papa. I'll explain it in

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a minute.

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Hey, their podcast listeners, Welcome to Part Time Genius. I'm

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:56.960
<v Speaker 2>Will Pearson and as always I'm joined by my good

0:01:56.960 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 2>friend mangesh Ho Ticketer and sitting there behind that big

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 2>glass booth. Actually it's sort of hard to see him

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>because there's a lot of white smudged all over there,

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 2>and wearing armlength UV gloves, giant Hollywood sunglasses, and the

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 2>top it off, he's got an umbrella hat. I didn't

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 2>even know he owned one of those, which I think

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 2>is a Japanese contraption he ordered online. If I'm not mistaken,

0:02:19.880 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 2>that is our good friend Dylan.

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>So I guess Dylan is really trying to protect his

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>skin and avoiding any sun today, which is on theme,

0:02:28.240 --> 0:02:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and I guess makes sense, except that we're all sitting indoors.

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 2>You can never be too careful there, all right, So

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 2>let's get back to sunscreen. We are old enough that

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 2>when we were kids, you just run around the neighborhood

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 2>without really thinking too much about sun protection, especially when

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 2>it wasn't that hot out. But over time, everyone's just

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 2>gotten used to putting it on all the time. I

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:51.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know if you're this way with your kids, but

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.320
<v Speaker 2>my kids hardly ever go outside without sunscreen on.

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 1>No, it's the same over here. And it's one of

0:02:57.680 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>those things like wine or chocolate, where every time you

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>read an article about sunscreen, it's either like sunscreen is

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>going to save you from cancer or sunscreen is giving

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you cancer, and it is hard to parse out. So

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought it'd be good to look at some of

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the stuff.

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I know we want to talk about Papa

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 2>and sunscreens and what some of the terminology means, But

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 2>why don't we start from the very beginning with a

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 2>bit of a primer on where sunscreen actually comes from.

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's a good idea. So originally sunscreens and sun

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.120
<v Speaker 1>protection wasn't done so much out of a life saving necessity,

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>but more out of this sort of cosmetic concern and

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the ancient Egyptians used various methods of sun protection because

0:03:36.520 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>lighter skin was more desirable culturally, which obviously has been

0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>a thing all over the world. In India, they used

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to make this awful skin bleaching thing called fair and

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Lovely to make you look more light skinned. But in

0:03:48.400 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>ancient Egypt they use stuff like rice brand, jasmine, and

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>lupine to block the tanning effects of the sun on

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the skin.

0:03:56.160 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 2>And did any of that stuff actually work?

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? So, actually rice brand absorbs UV light and jasmine

0:04:02.960 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>helps repair DNA, and lupine's the thing that lightens the skin.

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>So if your goal was to look like an indoor

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>kid or a vampire, it wasn't a bad combo. But

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:14.720
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't the only way that early people protected their

0:04:14.720 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>skin from the sun. The Greeks pioneered the idea of

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>slathering olive oil on your skin to protect it. It

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:25.040
<v Speaker 1>turns out that olive oil has an SPF of around eight.

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 2>I would have thought the exact opposite, because you always

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 2>know those kids when we were younger that would like

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:32.919
<v Speaker 2>put the oil on themselves to try to get a

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 2>better tan or a burn in many cases. But that's

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:36.919
<v Speaker 2>good to know, so I guess if you're out of

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 2>sun's green, maybe just pivot to salad dressing.

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean everyone of the beach loves the guy

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>who smells like hot garlics, so totally. Some protection continues

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to be about racism basically well into the sixteen hundreds,

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>and you have things like women in Europe using velvet

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>face bizards to protect themselves. And it isn't until eight

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>ninety six that really there's this first idea of sun

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>exposure and skin cancer being linked that comes from a

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>German physician named Paul Anna, and he termed these pre

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:17.159
<v Speaker 1>cancerous changes sailor's skin carcinoma or in German seema's shout

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>a carzinome.

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, semen showers are causernome. Yeah, sc scary stuff.

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 2>So how did he come up with something to protect

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 2>against semen's shouder carcinome?

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>So he did make something to help, but it wasn't

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>very popular. It was made of horse chestnut and it

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>was super thick and awkward on the skin. But basically

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>two guys do emerge in the twentieth century as the

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 1>godfathers of what we would recognize today as sunscreen. So

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the first is in nineteen forty four Benjamin Green. He's

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>an airman and pharmacist. He used a greasy substance called

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>red vet pet red veterinary petroleum to protect himself and

0:05:55.920 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>other soldiers from ultraviolet rays during World War Two, and

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.719
<v Speaker 1>after the war he mixes this with cocoa butter and

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:06.600
<v Speaker 1>coconut oil into this product that would eventually become Coppertone

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Suntan Cream. And the second person is a Swiss chemistry

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:14.039
<v Speaker 1>student named Franz Greider. This is in nineteen thirty eight.

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 1>He got a sunburn while climbing this mountain, Mount Pisbooon,

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>so he invented a product called Glacier Cream and it's

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>under the brand Pisboon. In the nineteen seventies he introduces

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>sunscreens with ultraviolet A and ultraviolet B filters.

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:34.479
<v Speaker 2>You know, actually, I was looking up a little of

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the history of Coppertone, which is of course famous for

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 2>that old logo with the toddler and the dog pulling

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 2>at the underwear, and I guess the idea was to

0:06:42.279 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 2>show a tan line there. And what's weird is that

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.960
<v Speaker 2>the original tagline for that campaign was don't be.

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>A pale face, isn't uh isn't it the girl's bum

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 1>that's exposed? Like why did they use that tagline?

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I was curious about the exact same thing, and I

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 2>guess Coppertne was mainly about preventing but also allowing you

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 2>to tan. And before they had that Baby on the

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 2>Beach campaign, copper Tone's logo was of a Native American

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:12.040
<v Speaker 2>chief basically encouraging everyone to get tan. They later changed

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 2>it to tan, Don't burn and for the fastest tan,

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 2>things like that, both of which are a little more PC.

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 2>But you know, obviously we're going to get into sunscreens

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 2>in just a bit. But as you were talking about

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 2>the ancient Egyptians who were lotioning up with rice brand

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and jasmine, it did get me thinking about the Dylan

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 2>like approaches that some other civilizations used to protect themselves

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 2>from the sun.

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Like umbrella hats.

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Well more umbrellas and hats, not really that brilliant combination

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 2>that was eventually brought together. But one thing I found

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 2>interesting was that parasols were symbols of status and power

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 2>throughout Asia and Africa. And again this does get into

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:56.960
<v Speaker 2>racist notions where fair skin sort of signified higher birth,

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 2>but ceremonial parasols which were carried by tendants. They actually

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 2>helped preserve the pale complexions of the elite, which reinforced

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 2>their entitlement to rule, so sun protection was actually subject

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 2>to law, like for example, in Assyria, only the king

0:08:12.280 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 2>himself could use a parasol. Now by this sixteen hundred's

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.560
<v Speaker 2>personal sun shades had filtered down to a few more

0:08:19.600 --> 0:08:23.560
<v Speaker 2>of the classes, and parasols were customary and Mediterranean Europe,

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 2>mostly among women, where sunburn or freckled skin was generally

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 2>avoided at all costs by polite society, and gentil ladies

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:34.719
<v Speaker 2>went to great links to preserve the pale complexion expected

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 2>of their rank and their sex.

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I know, you think about all the toxic powders that

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>women of the court used to wear in Victorian times

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to make themselves whiter, or like Japanese women would wear,

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 1>and it had mercury in it. I think the Victorian

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>women had arsenic in it, and it was all to

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>show people they were of such high class that they

0:08:55.040 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>never had to work in the sun or be exposed

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>as sun. But you wonder how did we go from

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:03.599
<v Speaker 1>those extremes to like tans being a sign of status.

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 2>It really started in the nineteen twenties when socialites started

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 2>frequenting glamorous beaches of California and the French Riviera, and

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 2>it became fashionable to acquire a sun tan. And there's

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of chatter about how Coco Chanel kind of

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 2>launched a movement and used tan mannequins, but actually it

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 2>predates her.

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's interesting. So now that we've talked a little

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>bit about the history of sunscreens and went a little

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>off track with parasols, let's get back to original question.

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Do sunscreens actually do anything? All?

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 2>Right? Well, why don't we start with that Seinfeld clip

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 2>U teased at the beginning of the show. So what

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 2>is papa.

0:09:42.840 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Papa is an organic compound that can absorb UVB rays

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and those are the UV rays that caused sunburns. So

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:54.040
<v Speaker 1>it was a really popular ingredient in sunscreens starting in

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen forties. PAPA stands for para amino benzoic acid,

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>but unfortu actunately, it caused allergic reactions in a significant

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>part of the population. So PAPA is no longer approved

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>by the FDA for use in sunscreens.

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 2>And I'm guessing it gets banned in the nineties, like

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 2>around the time of that clip from Seinfeld.

0:10:14.679 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>So weirdly, the FDA only put PABA on its list

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of unsafe for ineffective compounds in twenty nineteen. So even

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>though George Costanza warned us about PAPA way back in

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety three, the FDA does tend to move a

0:10:29.640 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit slowly on these things.

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean to be fair, George Costanza also lied

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 2>about being a marine biologist and tried to get the

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 2>Yankees to wear cotton uniform so he's not exactly a

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:45.319
<v Speaker 2>trusted source. But how exactly is the FDA defining sunscreens

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 2>and making some of these decisions?

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>So I came prepared for this question. Sunscreen refers to

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>a product in the US which is typically a lotion, cream, gel,

0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>or spray that blocks harmful UV rays from damaging your skin,

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and it also includes filters, which are the active ingredients

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in sunscreen. A sunscreen product is a mix of various moisturizers, fragrances, preservatives,

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 1>and of course the filters. But these filters can vary,

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, I'm sure you've heard some of your

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>fancier friends talk about how European and Asian sunscreens are

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>far superior.

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean people always say you got to go

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 2>far away to find the best stuff. You think about

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Belgian chocolates, Japanese kit cats, I mean, I know you

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 2>think about Japanese kit cats, Korean face mask and fried chicken,

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 2>and pop music like the list goes on.

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the K pop thing is crazy to me.

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Like the last time I was in India, kids knew

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>more about kpop than they did about American bands for

0:11:43.960 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the first time, and that was something that never happened

0:11:46.360 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in my lifetime. But back to foreign sunscreens, So the

0:11:49.480 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>sunscreen abroad works better because the filters are actually better.

0:11:53.360 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>There are all kinds of UV filters that have been

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>approved for decades in Europe and Asia, but aren't approved

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in the US because in most of the world, sunscreen

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>is actually classified as a cosmetic but in the US

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that isn't the case.

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 2>And why is that.

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Back in nineteen thirty eight, the Federal Food, Drug and

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Cosmetic Act was passed and it required sunscreens to be

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>classified as both a cosmetic and a drug and drugs

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>have to be tested on animals.

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 2>Wait, we had a law that required us to test

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 2>sunscreen on animals.

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean the intentions were good. And remember this

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is from nineteen thirty eight when the Act was really

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a huge advance in US food policy, and it took

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of effort, Like the US largely through the

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.600
<v Speaker 1>efforts of women's groups, pioneered policies that were designed to

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>protect the pocketbooks of consumers, and all these standards were

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:48.600
<v Speaker 1>implemented for safety and ensuring value. But sunscreen fell into

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>this weird gray area because of the question of is

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>sunscreen a drug or cosmetic? And the thing is it's

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty hard to answer. Like the way the fd and

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 1>C ACT defined cosmetics is quo as articles intended to

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>be rubbed, poured, sprinkled, or sprayed on, introduced into, or

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 1>otherwise applied to the human body for cleansing, beautifying, promoting attractiveness,

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:13.360
<v Speaker 1>or altering the appearance.

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I mean, with the exception of sprinkling, I don't

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 2>think I've ever sprinkled sunscreen, But that does sound like

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 2>what sunscreen is.

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And the way the FDNC defines drugs is articles

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>intended for use in the mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease.

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 2>That that also sounds what sunscreen is.

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you see the problem, and it isn't just sunscreen.

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>So like a lot of products fall into this both

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>category if you think about it, like anti dandrift shampoo

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>is a cosmetic because you know it's used to clean

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the hair, and it's also a drug because it's intended

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to treat dan drift. Toothpaste claims to freshen your breath

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and cleanse the teeth, but it also contains fluoride. Like,

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>these products all have to meet the standards of both

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>cosmetics and drugs.

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 2>So to get back to the animal thing, it still

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 2>sounds like one of those standards for drugs in the

0:14:00.520 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 2>US is testing it on animals.

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And to be clear, there was a new law

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>passed last year that says drugs no longer have to

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>be tested on animals. President Biden signed a law that

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.840
<v Speaker 1>you can use organ chips and computer modeling and other

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>types of electronics in place of animal testing. But according

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>to the journal Science, it'll take a while for the

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>industry to adapt to these methods and it's unclear how

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>much it'll actually change things because, as one scientist in

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the article put it, quote, we can drop a new

0:14:31.880 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>candidate drug onto a bunch of liver cells, and we

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>can see that it doesn't damage them, But what we

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know is whether it's going to make a person cough,

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it's going to damage their own testines or their brain.

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's a really deeply complicated issue, and drugs obviously

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>deserve to be tested deeply, but the European Union has

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>long banned any animal testing of cosmetics, which is how

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>they define sunscreen, and because the regulations are more lax

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in places like France, they can actually innovate and test

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>much more quickly.

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.479
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's talk a little bit about the specifics

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 2>you see on a sunscreen, Like what type of sunscreen

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 2>are you using?

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I try to go for every single benefit. It' says,

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>so like a fifty plus SPF broad spectrum waterproof REEF

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 1>safe sunscreen.

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 2>You just said so much, nothing like you know, you

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:23.680
<v Speaker 2>don't even know. I don't think I know.

0:15:23.720 --> 0:15:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I just like words and I trust advertising. But I

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:30.800
<v Speaker 1>feel like if I if I slap some of this

0:15:30.840 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>on my face and go play a tennis, I've covered right.

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, the first thing you should know is

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 2>that there's no such thing as an all day, waterproof,

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 2>sweat proof sunscreen. So if that's what you're hoping for,

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 2>it actually doesn't exist, Mango.

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm not playing that long because I'm out

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>of ship, so all day isn't really interesting for me.

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 2>That's fair. But regardless, if you're out there for more

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 2>than a few sets, you just have to reapply sunscreen

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 2>like the rest of us, after you sweat or swim

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 2>or just after a of hours.

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>And what about this reef safe business, Like, I don't

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>want to hurt the reefs, and you know how much

0:16:06.400 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I love reefs.

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 2>You love the reefs. I mean, there's no standard or

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:14.360
<v Speaker 2>regulated meaning behind reef, say for reef friendly. This is

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 2>something that comes up in a lot of places like

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Hawaii or Australia, where they obviously want to protect the

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 2>coral and so some of the sunscreens that are labeled

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 2>as reef save for sunscreens that aren't using things like

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 2>oxybenzone or octanoxate too filters that might be harmful to

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 2>coral reefs. But some of these reef safe products use

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 2>minerals like titanium dioxide, which can produce hydrogen peroxide in

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 2>the water, a chemical that's actually harmful to marine organisms.

0:16:41.960 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 2>So again it's it's pretty murky when you look at

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 2>something like that. But the reefs are under a much

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 2>greater threat from climate change than from sun's grain, to

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 2>be sure.

0:16:51.440 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>And what about the SPF label on my ies on screen?

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 2>So SPF stands for sun protection factor, and it's a

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 2>measure of how well sunscreen protects the skin from UVB rays,

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 2>not UVA. So quick Google search tells you that SPF

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 2>compares how long it would take for the sun's UV

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 2>rays to red and skin without sunscreen to how long

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 2>it would take with sunscreen. And if it takes twenty

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 2>minutes for unprotected skin to turn red, SPF thirty. Sunscreen

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:24.959
<v Speaker 2>prevents reddening for thirty times longer. But again, some of

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:27.960
<v Speaker 2>this is a little bit murky, Like there's this book

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 2>called sun Tanning in the twentieth Century, and in it

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 2>it talks about how spfs are really useful for manufacturers

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 2>because fear is a powerful selling tool. Like in nineteen

0:17:39.400 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 2>eighty two, this Forbes piece showed that sixty five percent

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 2>of all sunscreen sold had an SPF value of only

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:51.120
<v Speaker 2>SPF two to SPF eight. But by nineteen ninety two,

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 2>when things like ozone holes and skin cancer were in

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 2>the public conversation, and sunscreen started to have this halo quality.

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>As this per detective goop, most sunscreens started being SPF

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:07.959
<v Speaker 2>fifteen or higher, which is obviously better for protection, but

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 2>part of the reason for the change was that companies

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 2>could charge more. Like at the time, companies could charge

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 2>four ninety nine or so for a bottle of SPF four,

0:18:17.280 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 2>almost seven dollars for SPF eight and seven ninety nine

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 2>for SPF fifteen, But the numbers didn't exactly match up,

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 2>like SPF fifty supposedly only gave six percent more protection

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 2>than SPF fifteen, So again it's all a little confusing.

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>So what SPF should I be using? Then?

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, there's this whole debate about this, and we'll get

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 2>into what Australia is recommending in a bit as a

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 2>nation with some of the most skin cancer. But the

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 2>American Academy of Dermatology recommends SPF thirty or higher, with

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:54.440
<v Speaker 2>an emphasis on higher, like most recommend anything from SPF

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 2>fifty to seventy.

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Great, so I feel like at least I'm covered on

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that front. And what about the bit that says broad spectrum.

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, broad spectrum is a real term, but it means

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of different things. So in the US, broad

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 2>spectrum refers only to protection against UVA light. In Europe,

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 2>broad spectrum also refers to the quality of UVB shielding.

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 2>So brands earn the right to use that term broad

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 2>spectrum if laboratory measurements of UVA protection are at least

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 2>a third the values of laboratory measurements of UVB protection.

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 2>You got this right. This is all super clear.

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>So remind me what's the difference between VA and UVV, Like,

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:37.000
<v Speaker 1>which one's the bad one.

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Well, they can actually both be harmful. So UVB radiation

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.320
<v Speaker 2>makes up about five percent of the sun's UV light.

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 2>It causes sunburns, damages the top layers of the skin,

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 2>can cause DNA mutations that lead to skin cancer. And

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 2>UVA radiation makes up about ninety five percent of the

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 2>sun's UV light, and these rays penetrate deep into the skin.

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 2>They go past the epidermis, which is that outermost layer

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 2>of course, and into the dermis, which is that middle layer.

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 2>They can even pass through glass, which is why you

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 2>can get a sunburn while driving or sitting by a window.

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 2>So these are the rays that caused sun tans. They

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 2>cause wrinkles, sunspots, collagen damage, and those signs of aging.

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 2>But what many people don't realize is that UVA rays

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 2>can also cause cancer. I mean, all of.

0:20:26.720 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 1>This is so scary. So if you buy a bottle

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of sunscreen in the US and it says broad spectrum,

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it means it might not protect against UVB light at all.

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean not only that, but according to a twenty

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 2>ten Environmental Working Group analysis of four hundred and forty

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 2>six beach and sports sunscreens, all of which had SPF

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 2>ratings of thirty plus, nearly two thirds of them provided

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 2>inadequate UVA protection, and a product survey by Procter and

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Gamble in two thousand and four noted that a third

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:03.159
<v Speaker 2>of products that claimed spectrum protection on the label didn't

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 2>actually provide it. The most common UVA filter in the

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 2>US is avibin zone, which was the last big filter

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 2>approved in the US in the nineteen nineties. But among

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 2>the UVA filters approved in Europe, the good ones we

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 2>can't get, like three of them, tenosorb S, tenosorb M,

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 2>and mexiil SX are between four and five times more

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 2>protective than avibenzone.

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>So I get that Europe and Asia have all these

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 1>advanced sunscreens because of our I guess, rigorous testing process.

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>But how do we know if these foreign filters are

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:37.880
<v Speaker 1>actually safe?

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, people in Europe and Asia have been using these

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 2>newer chemical filters for years, decades in some cases, so

0:21:43.920 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 2>industry advocates argue that there is plenty of data to

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 2>support their safety. No one seems to be experiencing any

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 2>widespread health problems related to these sunscreens.

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess when you've got populations of two

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 1>continents and you've got about a decade of experience, it

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>sounds like good data.

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, but the FBA is still dragging its feet.

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.360
<v Speaker 2>And on top of that, sunscreen manufacturers are reluctant to

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 2>attempt the approval process because you know, the return on

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 2>investment on sunscreen is low. Most of the UV filters

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.360
<v Speaker 2>in question aren't eligible for patent protection.

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>That's where they're not actually covered by patents.

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and because the profit margin on suns green is

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 2>nowhere near what it is on pharmaceuticals. The battery of

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 2>tests the FDA asks for takes years and cost a

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 2>lot of money. Companies really aren't that incentivized to enter

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:36.680
<v Speaker 2>the US market. For instance, the top chemical maker DSM

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 2>recently started advancing a filter known as tensorb S through

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 2>the FDA approval process. It would be the first new

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 2>UV filter to hit the US market since Abben Zone

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:51.080
<v Speaker 2>in the nineteen nineties. But the final bill for this

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 2>process will come to between twelve million and twenty million dollars.

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Seven other organic V filters, all of which are in

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 2>regular use and the rest of the world, are stuck

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 2>in the FDA approval pipeline, even though Congress has repeatedly

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 2>tried to force the agency to move faster.

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's kind of fine to see that these

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>things are actually bipartisan, Like Rand Paul was the one

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>pushing away from animal testing to get meaningful drugs tested

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>quicker and out to market faster, particularly during the COVID era.

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And then AOC was using TikTok to get people to

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 1>press Congress for changes to sunscreen regulation. And I know

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>she got some criticism because people were saying that she

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>was making all this ruckus about a beauty product, but

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>sunscreen obviously impacts a massive number of people's health.

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of course. And it's particularly weird because while the

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.920
<v Speaker 2>FDA is dragging its feet to approve new filters. They're

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 2>worried about some of the existing filters, where an FDA

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 2>terms sunscreens that are not grace GRASEE, which is an

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 2>acronym for generally recognized as safe and effective. So agencies

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 2>has recently published a studies showing that under normal usage conditions,

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 2>most commonly used organic UV filters show up in the

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:13.440
<v Speaker 2>bloodstream at levels that trigger a toxicology study requirement.

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>That sounds terrifying.

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Super scary, But I mean the thing is, that's as

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 2>far as the FDA will go with their internal research.

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Like the agency says it's up to the industry to

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 2>generate the rest of the data.

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 1>So they're basically saying, there's enough of this stuff going

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to your body that you should check if it's toxic,

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>but we're not going to pay for that research.

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 2>That's that's pretty much sums it up.

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, that is a terrible place to leave consumers,

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>especially when you look at the stats right like skin

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.119
<v Speaker 1>cancer rates are so high in the US right now,

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>one in five Americans will develop skin cancer by the

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>age of seventy. This year, the American Cancer Society reported

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.919
<v Speaker 1>that about three point three million Americans were diagnosed with

0:24:54.000 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 1>skin cancer, and each year that number is increasing.

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but this misinformation about Quote Kim sunscreens was so

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:05.000
<v Speaker 2>bad that the FDA had to issue its own caveat.

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Like the statement they put out says, while research indicates

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 2>that some topical drugs can be absorbed into the body

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 2>through the skin, this does not mean these drugs are unsafe,

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 2>but this finding does call for further testing to determine

0:25:19.359 --> 0:25:21.400
<v Speaker 2>the safety of repeated use.

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 1>It's such a messy statement after making a mess of

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it to begin with. But one thing I think is

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.240
<v Speaker 1>weird is that it almost feels like the attitude towards

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:35.880
<v Speaker 1>sunscreen and sun protection is that they're luxury products. And

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 1>this is what I was getting to with the AOC

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff that you know, it feels like these are only

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>things that you need if you're spending time on a yacht.

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>But of course that's not true. And when you think

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:47.920
<v Speaker 1>about people who regularly work in the sun, like farm

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 1>workers and people who do manual labor outdoors, whether that's

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:55.119
<v Speaker 1>construction or landscaping or whatever, it really affects everyone. So

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:58.600
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to hear, like, what is some practical advice here?

0:25:58.760 --> 0:25:59.959
<v Speaker 1>How do we stay safe.

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 2>Well, Dylan actually has the right idea as always. I

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 2>mean when does Dylan not have the right idea. So

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 2>staying out of the sun is key, and you can

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 2>do it with hats and clothes that now have SPF

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 2>ratings and of course parasols. And so we already talked

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 2>about using sunscreens that have an SPF of thirty or higher,

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of dermatologists advocate to sticking to fifty

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 2>or higher. But SPF doesn't matter if you're not applying

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 2>the sunscreen correctly. So an adult body in a bathing

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 2>suit typically needs at least one liquid ounce or what

0:26:32.760 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 2>fills your palm applied every two hours or after you

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 2>swim or sweat a lot, and make sure it is

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 2>not expired.

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I always forget that a sunscreen can actually expire.

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 1>And what if I've already built up my base tan.

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think you have a natural based tand because

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 2>of your skin color. But for those who think a

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:56.200
<v Speaker 2>base tan from the sun or a tanning bed will

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 2>protect your body from the sun, a quote base tan

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 2>is actually sun damage. It's your body producing melanin to

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 2>try to protect itself from more UV rays penetrating deeper

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 2>into your skin. Besides, a base tan only provides an

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 2>SPF of around say five.

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Which is less than olive oil.

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 2>At eight, it is exactly less than olive oil. You're right,

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 2>and you're better off slathering yourself in delicious olive oil

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:25.600
<v Speaker 2>for sun protection than trying to build a base tan,

0:27:25.680 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 2>if you want to put it that way.

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm waiting for the FDA to approve an olive

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 1>oil sunscreen, but you know, gives me safe sun protection

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>but also tastes great. Drizzled over sliced tomatoes.

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Love olive oil so much it's weird. I didn't expect

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 2>to be hungry talking about US sunscreen. Well, one other

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 2>thing to think about is that there's still a lot

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 2>of debate on all of this. The standards we're talking

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 2>about are really American notions. But there's an article in

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:54.919
<v Speaker 2>the Atlantic by Rowan Jacobsen who talks about how Australia

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 2>has really changed on this issue. Australia has by far

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 2>the world's highest skin care answer rate. So in the

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 2>nineteen eighties they launched this campaign of quote slip slop

0:28:05.280 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 2>slap and it was basically as big as our just

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Say No campaign in the US, and the idea was

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 2>to promote protection from the sun. Slip on a shirt,

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 2>slop on some sunscreen, and slap on a hat. It's

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 2>just so much fun to say, slip, slap, slap. Yeah. Yeah,

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 2>but keeping people out of the sun wasn't the answer,

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 2>because sunlight has all these benefits that a vitamin D

0:28:28.960 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 2>pill doesn't give you, including protecting from things like MS

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:37.400
<v Speaker 2>and diabetes. Anyway, recently the country has revised their sun

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:42.600
<v Speaker 2>protection advice according to skin color and susceptibility to skin cancer. So,

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:46.160
<v Speaker 2>according to this same piece, for those with pale skin

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 2>or olive skin plus other risk factors, practice extreme caution,

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 2>keep slip slop slapping.

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:55.160
<v Speaker 1>For those with.

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Olive oil or pale brown skin, take a balanced approach,

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 2>using sun screen whenever the UV index is at least

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 2>a three, which is most days of the year in Australia. Actually,

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 2>and for those with dark skin, you really only need

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:13.120
<v Speaker 2>sunscreen for extended outings in the bright sun. So it's

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 2>a more complicated approach, but it's one of the country's

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 2>health officials actually stand by.

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess that makes sense that it doesn't have to

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>be this one size fits all approach. Yeah, and this

0:29:23.480 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>whole thing is so wordy and so mush to think about.

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know, one thing we don't have to think

0:29:28.840 --> 0:29:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot about is whether or not to end this

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>on a fact off.

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it, all right, So here's one to kick

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 2>us off. Kristin Little has the Guinness record for most

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 2>spray tans in one hour. That's not a record I

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.479
<v Speaker 2>would have thought about where she got one hundred and

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 2>seven spray tans. Apparently she wasn't just doing it for

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 2>the glow up. Kristin is in the spray tanning business

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 2>and did this stunt to raise awareness for skin cancer

0:30:01.440 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 2>and also to fundraise for a local cancer center.

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:08.479
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that's a very different type of dunking

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:13.440
<v Speaker 1>booth than most of the year. So, speaking of fake tan's,

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>we've all heard about how Richard Nixon lost the election

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to Kennedy because of how pale and sweaty he looked

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>on TV during those debates. But one thing I'd never

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:26.680
<v Speaker 1>heard before was that JFK's ten wasn't natural. According to

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>David Halberstam's reporting, JFK's appearance was the result of his

0:30:30.880 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>experimenting with Man ten, the first self tanning lotion.

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I would have no idea that that existed at the

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 2>time of JFK being around. That's wild. Well, did you

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 2>know that even when you're dead, your body can keep tanning?

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 2>According to a twenty twenty three paper in the American

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 2>Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, quote, post mortem tanning

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 2>is very much a thing. The paper actually describes and

0:30:57.080 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 2>analyzes three bodies from different climates had been left in

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 2>the sun and showed tan lines from the exposure after death.

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>That is so weird and so morbid, But I guess

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it's good to know. Like, if you have a dead relative,

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>you can send them to a tanning booth before a funeral.

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, oh, good call.

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>So here's a weird one from that GEO. To protect

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>itself from the sun, the West African lungfish goes into estivation,

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>or a summer version of hibernation, where it bundles itself

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 1>in a cocoon of mucus and then digs itself into

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the mud.

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 2>That's one way for us to handle it next time

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 2>we go to the beach. All right, Well, according to Vox,

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 2>higher spfs will give you more protection. In a study

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 2>published in twenty seventeen, two hundred people in Vail, Colorado,

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 2>applied SPF fifty Son's Green to one side of their

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 2>face and SPF one hundred to the other. I sort

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:56.920
<v Speaker 2>of love this study, And so the next day, forty

0:31:56.960 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 2>one percent of them were sunburned on their SPF fifty

0:32:00.560 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 2>side compared to fourteen percent on their SPF one hundred side.

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I love that pretty great. So I think it's pretty

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>easy for us all to take the sun for granted,

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>especially in the summertime. But there's a group of kids,

0:32:15.680 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the so called children of the Night, who no amount

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of sunscreen can help because they're allergic to the sun.

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:25.520
<v Speaker 1>And Atlas Obscura writes about them and describes the phenomena.

0:32:25.560 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>It's called zeroderma pigmentosum. And this phenomena actually makes summer

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:35.959
<v Speaker 1>camp or any daytime activity painful and even fatally dangerous.

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But luckily, since nineteen ninety five, there's a place called

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>Camps Sundown in Prairieville, New York, and it's been catering

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to these kids and it really lets them reclaim the summer.

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>They get to do night swims, flashlight tag late night movies,

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>and campfires, which all takes place under the glow of

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the moonlight.

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 2>That is so sweet. It's such a great idea you

0:32:59.600 --> 0:33:01.760
<v Speaker 2>have and did it with the sweetest facts. So I

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 2>think I'm gonna have to give you this week's trophy, Mango.

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much, and I'm gonna grab it from

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>your slippery sunscreeny hands before we head out. Please remember

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>we love hearing from you, but more importantly, our moms

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:19.719
<v Speaker 1>love hearing from you, and you can always hit us

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.600
<v Speaker 1>up with questions and comments at our mom's email address,

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>keyty Genius Moms at gmail dot com. And that is

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 1>it for this week's episode from Will, Dylan, Mary, and myself.

0:33:31.120 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for listening. Part Time Genius is

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>a production of Kaleidoscope and iHeartRadio. This show is hosted

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>by Will Pearson and me Mongagetikler and research by our

0:33:54.960 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>good pal Mary Philip Sandy. Today's episode was engineered and

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>produced by the one Wonderful of Dylan Fagan with support

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 1>from Tyler Klang. The show is executive produced for iHeart

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 1>by Katrina Norvel and Ali Perry, with social media support

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>from Sasha Gay trustee Dara Potts and Viney Shorey. For

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from Kaleidoscope and iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.