WEBVTT - TechStuff Tidbits: Patents

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you? It's time for a

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>text of tidbit, those shows that at least in my mind,

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:26.600
<v Speaker 1>are going to be a little shorter and really focused

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>on a specific topic related to tech. And earlier this

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>week I talked a little bit about patents and their purpose. Namely,

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a patent is a government backed grant that covers an invention,

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>and it gives the inventor or you know, whomever's name

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>happens to be on the patent application, the exclusive right

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to exploit that invention. So the inventor can produce the

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>invention themselves if they have the means to do so.

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>They could build it, manufacture it, you know, sell it

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to people. They would have exclusive rights to do that,

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>or they could license the design to others. So let's

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>say you're an inventor, but you don't happen to have,

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, a manufacturing facility at your disposal. You can

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>make a deal with a company that will manufacture your design.

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>They'll pay you a license fee and you know, maybe

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>there will be some other's parts of the agreement there

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and then in return they'll have the right to produce

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>whatever is based off your invention, or you could even

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, just sit on your invention and wait more

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>on that in a little bit. But that exclusivity is

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>key here. Should you, as patent holder, discover that someone

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>else is making use of your patented technology without your consent,

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you know you haven't signed a licensing deal or given permission,

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>well you would have the right to pursue legal action

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.280
<v Speaker 1>against that other person or a company or entity. The

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>flip side of this is that patents tend to be

0:01:54.800 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>public information, like publicly accessible, so if you want to,

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you can browse through patent applications and read up on

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>various inventions covering pretty much everything you can think of.

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>It's all laid out there. Uh, it's it's a description

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 1>of the invention and supposed to describe not just how

0:02:15.840 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the invention works, but you know what it's supposed to

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.240
<v Speaker 1>do and what effect it's supposed to have, often in

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>language that is a little inscrutable. I think perhaps as

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>part of a strategy to protect the inventions somewhat, and

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>it can be a little vague, like you don't typically

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>see patents that go into such detail that just by

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>reading the patent you could easily duplicate whatever was invented.

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>And also, patent protection has a time limit to it.

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 1>They expire. Here in the United States, a patent now

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>lasts twenty years from the earliest filing date of the patent.

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>That's filing date, not the date upon which the patent

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:01.960
<v Speaker 1>was granted. Sometimes it can take years before a patent

0:03:02.080 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>goes from being filed to being granted, so the expiration

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.920
<v Speaker 1>will go back to whenever the inventor first filed for

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the patent in the first place. So after twenty years

0:03:13.880 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of filing, the patent protection on the invention expires, and

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>then anyone can make free use of that invented technology

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>or process in whatever way they like. They don't have

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to pay licensing vs. They don't have to fear reprisal

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>from the patent holder because now it's it's public domain.

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Of course, you know, in two decades after the filing,

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a pretty good chance that the state of the

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>art in whatever we happen to be talking about has

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>advanced to a point that the old patented invention is

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>less applicable, might even be obsolete depending upon the technology

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>in question. But you know, not all tech involved superfast

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:56.440
<v Speaker 1>computers or pupi lasers. It could be something so fundamental

0:03:56.480 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and simple that all technology following it is built up

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>upon it and incorporates it in some way. It might

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>not be like an end product. It might just be

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a part of larger things. Now, let's contrast that, you know,

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the whole patent idea with just keeping your invention a

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>secret from others. You keep it secret, keep it safe,

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>with the hope that you can perpetually maintain control over

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>your invention and have exclusive use of it because no

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>one knows how it works. You never share that information,

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you never filed for a patent. However, if someone else

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>figures out how you're doing what you're doing, you know

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>they're able to reverse engineer your invention in some way,

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>then you don't have that patent protection to fall back on,

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and you are, in technical terms, up the creek as

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>far as that exclusivity goes. I mean, obviously there are

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>different circumstances, like if you can prove someone was uh

0:04:56.760 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>using industrial espionage to steal trade secret, it's that's a

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>big no note. But if someone independently figures out how

0:05:04.120 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you're doing stuff and you never bothered to patent your inventions,

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>then you really you're you're lacking a major component of

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>protection on your ideas. Now, patents get way more complicated

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>than what I just describe. That's a very high level

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>overview of what patents are and what they're for. Different

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>nations have their own rules for patents, including when patents

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>expire and what can and cannot be patented. Like typically,

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>patent offices require a submission to be something that you

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 1>can produce or that can be used. Uh, there are

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:46.400
<v Speaker 1>some really interesting cases with patents that seem to go

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>outside of this. I mean, there are software patents, and

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that becomes a whole thing because it starts to enter

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.680
<v Speaker 1>into an argument of when do you get to a

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>point where you're talking just about math, Because you can't

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>patent math, right, you can't generally patent anything natural. Now,

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're able to engineer something out of natural products

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and you create something new, you can potentially patent that.

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>In some places, genetically modified organisms are something that you

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>can patent. But but if we're looking at it from

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>big picture, whatever you're patenting it should be new. That

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>means you can't submit something that already exists out there.

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 1>If I went out and tried to patent uh, you know,

0:06:31.520 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a a car jack, just a regular car jack, that

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the basic kind that you can find anywhere, well, that

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>would just fall flat in its face. That invention has

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>been around for ages. I can't patent that. Also, whatever

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.840
<v Speaker 1>you patent should be inventive. It shouldn't just be a

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 1>modification of existing technology. So you know, you couldn't go

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.480
<v Speaker 1>out with an AMP and patent it because this one

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>goes to eleven. That doesn't mean anything. So and it

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>also can't just be an idea. You can't patent just

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>an idea. And theoretically it should be something that actually works,

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>although proof that it works is not always required or

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>even frequently required. However, in the United States, an examiner

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 1>as in someone who is examining the patent application and

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>determining whether or not the US government should grant a

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>patent to the applicant. An examiner can contact that applicant

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>if there is a question about operability. The applicant can

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 1>then demonstrate the operability of their invention in any so

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 1>way they choose to prove that in fact, it works. However,

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>there is one big exception to this. If someone should

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.280
<v Speaker 1>submit a patent for a perpetual motion machine, that is,

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a machine that, once you set it into motion, will

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to be in motion, in defiance of the laws

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, well, then the applicant has to produce

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a working model of the device before the patent office

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>will even go any further. There are no exceptions to

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that rule. And that's because for a while there was

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a kind of this craze where people were convinced that

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>they had come up with a perpetual motion machine or

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a free energy machine, a machine that, once you put

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in the energy to start it going, produces more energy

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.679
<v Speaker 1>than it consumes. That's also in defiance of the laws

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>of the universe as we understand them. And Uh, if

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you ever see claims that say that, you should certainly

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>be skeptical. Uh. I've talked about those extensively on this

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>show before. And I'm sure there's no shortage of patents

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>that have gone through the process for inventions that actually

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>don't work, or maybe they quote unquote work, as in,

0:08:45.600 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 1>they operate, but they don't do what is intended. I'm

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 1>reminded of numerous kinds of of like exercise equipment for example,

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.680
<v Speaker 1>where you could argue, well, it works in the sense

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that all the parts moved together, and like the motor

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 1>makes things move or whatever, but it might not work

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that it actually helps you get into shape. Right,

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>So there are different different points of view on what

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.760
<v Speaker 1>work means here. Uh. It would also be far too

0:09:13.840 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 1>labor intensive to demand each and every patent applied for

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.959
<v Speaker 1>has to pass some sort of operability test. When we

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.080
<v Speaker 1>start talking about the numbers of patents, you'll see it's

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>just it would be unreasonable to expect any government agency

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to go through and make that sort of demand. But

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, if you're applying for a patent, that patent

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>should be for some sort of invention that actually works.

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned that the invention shouldn't just be a modification

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of existing technology. That is true, it shouldn't just be

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a minor modification. However, it can be a significant evolution

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 1>of technology, and that can be patentable. You'll often see

0:09:51.960 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>patents that reference earlier patents, and in some cases it's

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>to explain how the new invention is a significant improvement

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>over an older one, and in other cases it's just

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to differentiate the two, to say, Okay, I'm filing this patent.

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm aware of this earlier patent that's for something similar. However,

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 1>my invention is different enough to justify its own patent.

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>At least that's the argument you're making. Patents in the

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>United States date back to the late eighteenth century, but

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the concept is much much older. According to the Encyclopedia Britannica,

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the oldest patent on record dates to fourteen twenty one.

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>The applicant was an engineer named Filippo Bruno Leski, and

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the invention was for a barge that included a hoist

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:47.200
<v Speaker 1>mechanism for the purposes of lifting and transporting marble. And

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:50.160
<v Speaker 1>this was in Florence, Italy during the Renaissance. Marble was

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in high demand. So the grant that that Philip got,

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the good Old phil received, gave him a three year

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>period of exclusivity in which he would have the exclusive

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>rights to his invention before other uh folks on in

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Florence would be allowed to copy what he was doing.

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>So he had some protection there. He could go after

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>anyone who was making use of a barge with a

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>hoist and they didn't. You know go through him first.

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is actually super important because in the early

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Renaissance folks were more than happy to run with a

0:11:25.600 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>good idea, especially if it wasn't their own, and run

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>away with that idea. So let's say you're a smarty

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 1>pants kind of person, right, you are an inventive engineering type,

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and you come up with an ingenious way to simplify

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>something that is otherwise a difficult task, and your invention

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to make things much much easier and streamlined

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>and be a huge benefit. However, you also happen to

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>know that if you come forward with your idea and

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't have any like significant wealth of your own,

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 1>people who have more resources than you are just gonna

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>take your idea. They're just gonna say, like, that's brilliant,

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm using it, and then you're left out in the cold.

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>That kind of removes your incentive to do anything with

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>your idea. Right If you're discouraged, if you think, well, yeah,

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I know how to do this better than anyone else,

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:17.719
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not in a position to do it and

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>profit from it, well, then your idea may never materialize

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in the real world. You may just let it die.

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>But if you are granted at least temporary exclusive rights

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to your idea, then you can profit from your invention,

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and that in turn encourages other inventive types to seek

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>out the same sort of protection so that they can

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>actually benefit from their good ideas and not just see

0:12:41.760 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 1>them stolen like crazy. In fact, this is the same

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>reason folks came up with the idea of copyright and trademarks.

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:50.679
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like making sure the right person gets

0:12:50.679 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the credit, whether the credit is acknowledgement or you know,

0:12:54.400 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 1>actual credits as in cold hard cash. We've got more

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to say about patents, but before we do that, let's

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. The first patent in the United

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>States was for a process for making potash a component

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and fertilizer. George Washington himself signed the patent, which went

0:13:18.320 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to Samuel Hopkins. In eli Whitney received a patent for

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 1>his invention of the cotton gin, which is a pretty

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>famous example, and by eighteen o two the United States

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>needed a dedicated superintendent to oversee the patent office. In

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>eighteen twenty one, Thomas Jennings received the first patent issued

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to an African American for his invention of dry scouring

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.559
<v Speaker 1>kind of a predecessor to dry cleaning. Flash forward a

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:44.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of centuries, and now we're well past ten million

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>patents issued in the United States. In fact, we hit

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the ten million milestone in two thousand and eighteen, and

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>in one we had eleven million patents. That just goes

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:56.679
<v Speaker 1>to show that folks are really inventive. Like the the

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 1>pace of invention increases, and a lot of course happened

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.679
<v Speaker 1>in the middle there. I mean, you're talking about more

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>than two hundred years of history. Obviously tons of stuff happen.

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>But the patent law has been revised numerous times throughout

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the history of the United States. But let's go more

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 1>high level. I mentioned earlier that one of the things

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you can do with patents is just sit on them,

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and you can also buy and sell them, like they

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 1>can be property, like real estate or things like that.

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So you might be an inventor and the way you

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>make your money as you invent something and then you

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>sell your invention to someone else and that's the end

0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of that. So there are companies that essentially just deal

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in the business of purchasing patents and then kind of

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>lying in wait like a predator, and the derogatory name

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>for these sorts of companies as a patent troll. Typically,

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a patentrol company is one that doesn't make anything on

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>its own. It doesn't produce stuff, it doesn't sell anything,

0:14:49.480 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 1>but it holds patents to various technologies, and if someone

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>tries to make a product or service that overlaps with

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>one or more of the patents, then the troll pounces

0:14:58.640 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and usually there's some legal timidation that goes on. Essentially

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the troll saying, hey, you can't make this product that's

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>key to your business because we hold the patent on

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>it and we didn't give you permission, so we're gonna

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>sue you. And the goal is just to get as

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>big a settlement out of the target as you possibly can,

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's how the patentrol makes money. Meanwhile, if no

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 1>one actually tried to make something that overlapped with the

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>patentrols patents, well then nothing related to those patents ever

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>really comes into being, because again, the patentrol isn't going

0:15:28.280 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>to do anything about it. So you have these ideas

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>that are effectively locked away, and it's antithetical to the

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>spirit of the patent system in the first place. Patentrols

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>are not always successful in their efforts. There's the famous

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:45.440
<v Speaker 1>example of Personal Audio LLC, which claimed a patent it owned,

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>specifically Patent number eight million, five hundred four, which was

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>called a System for Disseminating media content covered the technology

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of podcasting, and this company then began suing podcast producers,

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>including Adam Corolla, uh and that turned into a massive

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>legal battle, and ultimately Personal Audio LLC dropped the case.

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>And Outsider suspected that the company realized that it was

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>facing an uphill legal battle and that it could potentially

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>lose that patent, like the patents teeth could be removed,

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and that the court was likely to find that the

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>patent was overbroad and vague. But Personal Audio LLC said

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the reason they dropped the case was that podcasters weren't

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>generating a significant amount of revenue from infringing their patents,

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>which I mean, I guess that just means the company said,

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't expect to actually make any money off this lawsuit,

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's all that really matters, so we're done. But

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Corolla actually countersued and sought the Patent Office to invalidate

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the patent in question. Personal Audio LLC ultimately settled with

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Corolla out of court for an undisclosed amount, but the

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Electronic Frontier Foundation or e f F, filed a challenge

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to that patent, and the U S Patent Office ultimately

0:16:55.480 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>revoked five provisions within the patent, essentially neutering it. And

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Patent Audio LLC appealed all the way to the Supreme Court,

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>but the Supreme Court rejected the petition for review and

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the case ended with the podcasting patent effectively neutralized. Part

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:14.159
<v Speaker 1>of the arguments in that case was that the patent

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>wasn't just overly broad, it was describing something that had

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 1>already existed before the patent was granted. And that's one

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>of the big things about patents. If someone can prove

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>that person did not actually invent something, but that the

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:30.919
<v Speaker 1>supposed invention already existed, well, that's called prior art. It

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>means the invention is already known and that the patent

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.080
<v Speaker 1>office shouldn't issue a patent in that case. We've seen

0:17:37.119 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that pop up in a defense time and again, um

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes in an attack as well, and sometimes pop culture

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:46.959
<v Speaker 1>serves as an example of prior art, such as the

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>tablet like computers that are seen in two thousand one

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>A Space Odyssey, the Stanley Kubrick film of the Arthur C.

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Clark story that served as an example of the tablet

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>form factor in a patent dispute that was between Sam

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Sung and Apple, and companies often use patents as both

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of a shield and a sword at the same time.

0:18:05.680 --> 0:18:08.480
<v Speaker 1>You'll frequently hear stories of companies suing one another for

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>patent infringement, and it's not unusual to hear company A

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 1>sues Company B for infringing on like ten patents, and

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.959
<v Speaker 1>then company B SU's Company A for infringing on twelve

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>other patents and so on. That happened a lot between

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Samsung, as well as Apple and tons of

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>other companies. And sometimes these are maneuvers that play apart

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in tough negotiations between companies as they try to land

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a favorable licensing deal. That's what we've seen recently between

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Ericsson. Patent licenses are key to business these days.

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty much impossible to do business in the tech

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>sector without relying on someone else's patented technology in some way,

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>so typically businesses secure licenses with those patent holders to

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>avoid any litigious entanglements down the line, and there's usually

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of criss crossing agreements between these large companies,

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>with them becoming dependent upon one another, though things can

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>get ugly when license agreements come too close to expiring,

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>which we've seen recently. There are tons of other interesting

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:09.240
<v Speaker 1>stories about patents, including some of history's greatest feuds. Maybe

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll cover those in a future text stuff tidbit. Uh.

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>The one that leaps to mind is between Nikola, Tesla

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and Marconi, but I'll have to wait and hold off

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>on that. Maybe I'll do a text stuff tidbit to

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>really lay out that story. It's a pretty infuriating one,

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>but a really interesting one as well. And uh, yeah,

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that's our tech stuff tidbits about patents. You get a

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit of information about that, and again I can

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>probably do another follow up to talk about it more.

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 1>But if you have suggestions for topics I should cover

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>on tech stuff, reach out to me on Twitter. The

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>handle for the show is text Stuff h s W

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'll talk to you again, really sick. Text Stuff

0:19:53.720 --> 0:19:56.880
<v Speaker 1>is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 1>my Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app Apple

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts wherever you listen to your favorite shows,