Speaker 1: Rabbi Fred Newlander was on trial for the murder of
Speaker 1: his wife, Carol Newlander. He's accused of hiring len Jenoff
Speaker 1: as his hitman. As the trial came to its climax,
Speaker 1: Rabbi Fred Newlander decided to take the stand in his
Speaker 1: own defense.
Speaker 2: Fred had virtually hung himself when he took the stand.
Speaker 2: He was his own worst witness.
Speaker 1: But the prosecution struggled with their own star witness, len Jenoff, to.
Speaker 3: Convict this man. You have to believe what len Jenoff
Speaker 3: told you was the truth.
Speaker 2: Having him take the stand was very risky by the prosecution,
Speaker 2: and the defense did a great job of attempting to
Speaker 2: shred Jenoff to pieces.
Speaker 1: The whole case boiled down to who was more credible,
Speaker 1: the adulter as holy man or the line hit man.
Speaker 1: We are in South Jersey today for the conclusion of
Speaker 1: who killed Carol. I'm Sloane Glass and this is American Homicide.
Speaker 1: Just a note that this episode contained some graphic content.
Speaker 1: Please take care while listening. After three and a half
Speaker 1: weeks of heated testimony, the case of Rabbi Fred Newlander
Speaker 1: went to the jury. At the same time, a curious
Speaker 1: book debut in bookstores titled Keep your Mouth Shut and
Speaker 1: Your Arms Open. The book explored how to be a
Speaker 1: good Rabbi and was written by Fred Newlander, by the
Speaker 1: way I looked, and that book is still available online.
Speaker 4: Council, we've received a note from the jury.
Speaker 1: On the seventh day of deliberations, Judge Baxter received a
Speaker 1: handwritten note from the jury's foreman.
Speaker 4: It reads as, follows your honor.
Speaker 5: After revisiting evidence and testimony, we the jury have concluded
Speaker 5: that a unanimous decision on all three counts is not possible.
Speaker 4: On that note, I am going to declare a mistrial.
Speaker 2: I was stunned. Everybody was stunned. How could this possibly be?
Speaker 1: Arthur mcgita, who wrote extensively about this case, was sitting
Speaker 1: with Carrol's family when Judge Baxter called a mistrial.
Speaker 2: I did not want to turn around. I did not
Speaker 2: want to look in their faces. How dare they let
Speaker 2: him go out on the street and they did. I
Speaker 2: know what I felt and I know what I thought,
Speaker 2: and it had to have been just a fraction of
Speaker 2: their emotions.
Speaker 1: Judge Baxter ordered a retrial for Rabbi Newlander. This time,
Speaker 1: the trial would head about an hour north of cherry
Speaker 1: Hill to Freehold, New Jersey. Freehold is where Bruce Springsteen
Speaker 1: grew up and even sang about it in his nineteen
Speaker 1: eighty five song My Hometown. The reason Judge Baxter moved
Speaker 1: the trial was to find an impartial jury.
Speaker 2: It was difficult finding a jury because this case had
Speaker 2: been so well publicized.
Speaker 1: Mcgita was among the dozens of journalists who packed the
Speaker 1: tiny courtroom their reporter.
Speaker 2: There were cameras. It was a madhouse. It was a frenzy.
Speaker 1: Just like the first trial, The Rabbi's retrial was aired
Speaker 1: from start to finish on Court TV. This allowed people
Speaker 1: from all over the country to play armchair duror and
Speaker 1: debate the guilt or innocence of Rabbi Fred Newlander. But
Speaker 1: back in Cherry Hill, most had already made up their minds.
Speaker 2: A majority of the residents of Cherry Hill, of South Jersey, Jory,
Speaker 2: the Congregants from Macorse alone believed that Fred Newlander had
Speaker 2: a hand somehow in killing Carol.
Speaker 1: In the first trial, jurors heard from Rabbi Newlander's mistress
Speaker 1: and four witnesses who said the Rabbi wanted his wife dead.
Speaker 1: Three of the twelve jurors didn't believe the state proved
Speaker 1: its case beyond a reasonable doubt, which resulted in a hungery.
Speaker 2: I could not believe that so much evidence against the
Speaker 2: Rabbi was eliminated, discard disgraced by the jury.
Speaker 1: In late two thousand and two, most of the players
Speaker 1: from the first trial returned for the retrial, including the prosecutor,
Speaker 1: James Lynch.
Speaker 6: You're going to hear that Fred Newlander, the Rabbi was
Speaker 6: a man of God who acted in a thoroughly ungodly fashion.
Speaker 1: A year had passed between trials, and Rabbi Fred Newlander
Speaker 1: appeared much thinner and his gray hair shorter. He also
Speaker 1: had a new lawyer named Michael Riley.
Speaker 7: Let me tell you something, ladies and gentlemen. There is
Speaker 7: no evidence of mister Newlander's involvement in this case unless
Speaker 7: you listen to the words from the mouth of Len General.
Speaker 7: There is nothing. There's nothing physical, there's no business wreckers,
Speaker 7: there's no bank records, there is nothing except the mouth
Speaker 7: of Len Gennal.
Speaker 1: Just like in the first trial, the defense said Len
Speaker 1: Jenoff could not be trusted, and frankly, from everything we've
Speaker 1: learned so far, Len was not credible or trustworthy.
Speaker 7: Glen Jenoff's life is nothing but he even, in an
Speaker 7: effort to support this belief that he is a CIA agent,
Speaker 7: had a picture of Ronald Reagan ostensibly autographed dar Lenny
Speaker 7: from Ronnie.
Speaker 1: Many said the handwriting on that photo looked more like
Speaker 1: len Jenoff's than Ronald Reagan's.
Speaker 7: There's nothing real about this man.
Speaker 4: He's a liar.
Speaker 1: The defense argued it was len Jenoff who came up
Speaker 1: with the plan to rob and murder Carol Newlander.
Speaker 7: Len Jenoff became aware that she would take large sums
Speaker 7: of money home from her cake company. Glen Jenoff went
Speaker 7: to the new Lander house that night to kill her
Speaker 7: and steal her money.
Speaker 1: The defense also suggested the rabbi's ex mistress, Elaine Sencini,
Speaker 1: had franked him.
Speaker 7: Does she have a reason to be angry at this
Speaker 7: person who betrayed her too?
Speaker 6: He was seeing other women.
Speaker 4: He was nine cheating on his wife.
Speaker 7: He was cheating on his girlfriend.
Speaker 1: Just like the first trial. Jurors her testimony from Elaine Cencini,
Speaker 1: Peppy Levin, len Jenof, and Paul Michael Daniels. Their testimony
Speaker 1: was nearly identical to the first trial, except for one witness,
Speaker 1: the rabbi's son, Matthew. By then, Matthew was a doctor,
Speaker 1: and the prosecutor referred to him by his title doctor Newlander.
Speaker 1: Back on the night of his mother's murder, Matthew was
Speaker 1: working as an emt. In fact, he was one of
Speaker 1: the first responders to his mother's murder at their home.
Speaker 1: I bring that up because of how Matthew's testimony began.
Speaker 1: Listened closely to his testimony as he describes arriving at
Speaker 1: his house.
Speaker 8: Here are two large guys, and they physically grabbed me
Speaker 8: and brought me back down the driveway to where I
Speaker 8: finally saw for for it.
Speaker 1: Did you catch that? It was so subtle that you
Speaker 1: may have missed it. But doctor Matthew Newlander referred to
Speaker 1: his father as Fred. That testimony caused Fred Newlander to
Speaker 1: immediately whisper into his lawyer's ear and ask, why is
Speaker 1: he calling me Fred? But calling his father Fred was
Speaker 1: just the beginning.
Speaker 8: When I first saw him, he looked kind of the
Speaker 8: way he looks right now, sort of blank and unemotional.
Speaker 8: He said nothing to me. He wasn't breathing heavily, wasn't
Speaker 8: crying or showing any outward sign of grief or remorse
Speaker 8: at all. He didn't have a drop of blood on
Speaker 8: his clothing.
Speaker 1: Matthew didn't hold back about his father's lack of emotion
Speaker 1: or perceived lack of emotion over his mother's murder.
Speaker 8: Never, at any time did he show any signs outwardly
Speaker 8: of grief remorse.
Speaker 4: And never, in all the times.
Speaker 8: That I've seen him in the year since, as he
Speaker 8: ever cried, never had a pleasant memory of her, or
Speaker 8: seemed to grieve or worn for her in any way.
Speaker 1: What you're hearing is the one huge difference between the
Speaker 1: first and second trial. Matthew Newlander was no longer protecting
Speaker 1: his father.
Speaker 8: I asked him, where's mom? What happened? Is she okay?
Speaker 8: Is someone taking care of her? His answers were really
Speaker 8: just one repeated over and over again. Everything's going to
Speaker 8: be okay, Everything's going to be okay.
Speaker 1: Matthew said he and his dad had had many conversations
Speaker 1: about the night of his mother's murder, so.
Speaker 8: He was repulsed by what he saw. Two repulsed to
Speaker 8: go in to see if she was okay. I found
Speaker 8: my wife for a child on the floor right. I
Speaker 8: would want to go try to help and you know,
Speaker 8: if he couldn't help, fine, but at least you're there.
Speaker 1: A couple of the jurors wiped away tears as Matthew
Speaker 1: struggled to choke back his own. Ironically, it was while
Speaker 1: talking about his dad's lack of emotion.
Speaker 8: I would have given my right arm for five minutes
Speaker 8: just to sit there with her and hold her hand
Speaker 8: and tell her that I was there.
Speaker 1: Matthew's heartbreaking testimony stunned the defense, but would it be
Speaker 1: enough to overshadow the juror's doubts about len Jenoff. If
Speaker 1: there was one major difference between the first trial and
Speaker 1: the retrial of Rabbi Fred Newlander, it was the testimony
Speaker 1: of his son, Matthew. While on the witness stand, Matthew
Speaker 1: Newlander only referred to his father by his first name, Fred.
Speaker 1: It was something even the rabbi's defense lawyer did not ignore,
Speaker 1: so he calls.
Speaker 7: Father bade to call him father, no, to call him Fred.
Speaker 7: Right from the beginning, Fred does fread.
Speaker 4: That the anger of that young man in the sadness
Speaker 4: was all.
Speaker 6: Of a whelming.
Speaker 1: Interestingly enough, the defense did not put the rabbi back
Speaker 1: on the witness stand. Instead, they focused on len Jenoff's
Speaker 1: long history of lying, and urged the jurors not to
Speaker 1: let emotion cloud their judgment.
Speaker 4: Ladies and gentlemen, emotion, it's not evidence.
Speaker 6: Passion is not true.
Speaker 1: Prosecutor James Lynch had the final word.
Speaker 4: Mister Leonard Jennoff.
Speaker 6: Is not being held up to you as a model citizen.
Speaker 6: He is a man who took money to kill someone.
Speaker 1: The case went to the seven men and five women
Speaker 1: of the jury on Friday, November fifteenth, two thousand and two.
Speaker 1: The following Wednesday, Judge Baxter received a note from the
Speaker 1: jury's fore women.
Speaker 4: I understand from your note that you have reached a verdict. Yes,
Speaker 4: we have.
Speaker 1: After twenty seven hours of deliberations, the jury's for women
Speaker 1: stood before Judge Baxter. When she spoke, her voice quivered,
Speaker 1: and there was something else. She tears in her eyes.
Speaker 1: Before anyone could guess the meaning of those tears, the
Speaker 1: verdict echoed through the courtroom.
Speaker 4: Guilty.
Speaker 1: Nearly eight years after the murder of Carol Newlander, her husband,
Speaker 1: Rabbi Fred Neulander, was found guilty of capital murder. In
Speaker 1: the back of the courtroom, Carol's siblings all locked hands,
Speaker 1: put their heads down and started to cry. Meanwhile, the
Speaker 1: Rabbi stood there in a daze. As Judge Baxter addressed
Speaker 1: the jury.
Speaker 5: Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, having found the defendant,
Speaker 5: Fred Newlander, guilty of murder, you now have, as you know,
Speaker 5: the added responsibility of determining what penalty for that crime
Speaker 5: is to be imposed upon him.
Speaker 1: A guilty verdict in a capital murder trial triggers what's
Speaker 1: known as the penalty phase. This meant these twelve jurors,
Speaker 1: one who already had tears in her eyes, had the
Speaker 1: a I did responsibility of deciding the Rabbi's fate, and
Speaker 1: at the time, New Jersey still had the death penalty.
Speaker 5: Under the law enacted by our legislature, the penalty may
Speaker 5: be either death or a term of years between thirty
Speaker 5: years and life imprisonment, of which thirty years must be
Speaker 5: served before the defendant is eligible for parole.
Speaker 1: Much like the trial itself, the prosecutors and the defense
Speaker 1: both presented their arguments for what they considered just punishment,
Speaker 1: and that included testimony from the Rabbi.
Speaker 9: I am here to a for aplea for my life.
Speaker 1: Fred Newlander was sixty one years old at the time
Speaker 1: and delivered what was arguably the most important sermon of
Speaker 1: his life.
Speaker 9: If I look at the days of the years of
Speaker 9: my life before the first of November of nineteen ninety four,
Speaker 9: they were filled with great blessings. First and foremost, I
Speaker 9: had my wife, Carol. She was a remarkable woman, and
Speaker 9: I miss her, and I loved her, and I love her.
Speaker 9: Now there are those who I'm sure behind their hands
Speaker 9: with snicker, I have acknowledged for the longest time my
Speaker 9: behavior that was reprehensible, and my behavior that was disgraceful.
Speaker 9: And yet.
Speaker 4: You must believe I.
Speaker 9: Loved her and love her. Starting today, there is another
Speaker 9: sense of the days of the years of my life
Speaker 9: that will unfold. I do not know where I will be,
Speaker 9: quite obviously don't know now, But wherever I will be,
Speaker 9: there will be men who cannot read.
Speaker 1: The Rabbi explained that in Hebrew, the word rabbi means teacher.
Speaker 9: I'm a good teacher, I was a good teacher. I
Speaker 9: can be a good teacher. And I want to help
Speaker 9: that young man that will enhance the days of the
Speaker 9: years of my life. By helping the days of the
Speaker 9: years of that young man's life. That's all I want
Speaker 9: is that opportunity to teach. I beseech you, I importune you,
Speaker 9: I beg of you for that privilege, and I promise,
Speaker 9: I promise that I will do whatever a teacher should
Speaker 9: do to enrich the lives of people that come in
Speaker 9: contact with that teacher.
Speaker 1: The rabbi smiled and nodded to the jury before slowly
Speaker 1: walking back to the defense table. He sat down, removed
Speaker 1: his glasses, and looked exhausted. Two full days past before
Speaker 1: the jury returned. That's when the four women handed a
Speaker 1: note to Judge Baxter.
Speaker 5: After due deliberation, the jury cannot unanimously agree upon punishment.
Speaker 1: This shifted the responsibility back to Judge Baxter, who now
Speaker 1: had to impose a sentence. At another hearing in early
Speaker 1: two thousand and three, witnesses from both sides stated their
Speaker 1: case for punishment, including the rabbi's sister in law.
Speaker 10: He is truly a monster beyond human comprehension, and he
Speaker 10: should never ever be free again.
Speaker 1: Carol's brother also didn't mince words.
Speaker 11: You are the lowest form of humanity. You dishonored Carol, yourself,
Speaker 11: your children, this court, your congregation.
Speaker 4: The rabbitt and.
Speaker 1: Judaism absent from the hearing were the rabbi's son Matthew
Speaker 1: and daughter Rebecca. Instead, they sent letters to the court.
Speaker 1: Rebecca wrote, I'm not sure that he will ever fully
Speaker 1: comprehend what his ego, maniacal and selfish acts did to
Speaker 1: my family and me. Matthew went a step further and
Speaker 1: called his father a sociopath and a worthless, soulless, pathetic
Speaker 1: shell of a man. Throughout both of these trials, the
Speaker 1: third Newlander child, Benjamin, steered clear of the courtroom. Until now,
Speaker 1: Benjamin had refrained from commenting and testifying about his mother's murder,
Speaker 1: but that day all eyes were on him as he
Speaker 1: walked into the courtroom and broke his silence about his father.
Speaker 11: Things like soccer games, swim meets, school events at as
Speaker 11: many as he could. I remember seeing him there, and
Speaker 11: you know, those were the good times. I knew that
Speaker 11: when I needed somebody to be there for me for
Speaker 11: any particular difficulty that I was having, he and I
Speaker 11: could relate on a very special level. And I knew
Speaker 11: that as busy as he was, he would always be
Speaker 11: able to find time to just guide me through whatever
Speaker 11: issues that I was having. That's what he did for
Speaker 11: many people was to guide them, and I knew that
Speaker 11: I could always count on him to be around for that.
Speaker 1: Benjamin Newlander was now returning the favor for his dad.
Speaker 11: I'm a teacher, and one of the biggest reasons that
Speaker 11: I'm a teacher is because of my father. So I
Speaker 11: think that speaks for just his influence on me. I
Speaker 11: think he led me down an amazing path, and I
Speaker 11: think that there are other people that he can do
Speaker 11: that for. And just give him the chance to show
Speaker 11: that he can still do that, because I know that
Speaker 11: you can.
Speaker 1: Ultimately, Fred Newlander's fate was in Judge Baxter's hands, and
Speaker 1: after careful consideration, she spared him the death penalty, instead
Speaker 1: issuing the maximum sentence short of death, thirty years to life.
Speaker 1: Here's his former lawyer, death sucker.
Speaker 3: He's in a prison where almost everybody in the prison
Speaker 3: is serving tremendously long sentences, their life sentences. The last
Speaker 3: time I saw him, he still professes his innocence, says
Speaker 3: he had nothing to do with it.
Speaker 1: Rabbi Fred Newlander was incarcerated in a maximum security prison
Speaker 1: in New Jersey. It's one of the country's oldest facilities.
Speaker 3: I feel horribly for the family. I mean, I don't
Speaker 3: think he's had any contact with his children. I spent
Speaker 3: a lot of time with each of his children preparing
Speaker 3: for this trial, and they were all nice kids, they
Speaker 3: really were. It's a horrible tragedy for them. I think
Speaker 3: Matthew was legitimately horrified by his father. First, your mother's murdered,
Speaker 3: and then your father's convicted of the murdered. Can't get
Speaker 3: much worse.
Speaker 1: More than eight years and two trials later, Rabbi Fred
Speaker 1: Newlander was convicted of hiring a hitman to kill his
Speaker 1: wife Carol. In two thousand and three, Rabbi Newlander agreed
Speaker 1: to an interview with Barbara Walters, and once again the
Speaker 1: Rabbi declared his innocence.
Speaker 10: If you were innocent, why would God do this to you?
Speaker 9: I don't think God is a great puppeteer. I think
Speaker 9: what happened to me was driven by human beings.
Speaker 1: Rabbi Newlander said law enforcement was under an enormous amount
Speaker 1: of pressure to solve the murder and used his infidelity
Speaker 1: to label him a murderer.
Speaker 10: Am By, as God is your witness, did you have
Speaker 10: anything to do with your wife's murder?
Speaker 9: No?
Speaker 1: He said that of all the victims, he cried the
Speaker 1: most for his children. He added that he was devastated
Speaker 1: that two of them wrote him off.
Speaker 10: Aren't you tormented? If you're sitting here an innocent man,
Speaker 10: you have.
Speaker 9: No idea how much rage I.
Speaker 10: Have shot it.
Speaker 9: You know, one of the things that I have been
Speaker 9: trained to do is hold on to my emotions.
Speaker 1: The rabbi explained that there's no book that says this
Speaker 1: is how a guilty person acts, and this is how
Speaker 1: an innocent person acts.
Speaker 9: I can't express remorse for a murder that I did
Speaker 9: not commit.
Speaker 1: Afterwards, Barbara Walters called their interview eerie because the rabbi,
Speaker 1: who claimed to be enraged, laid no emotion throughout their interview.
Speaker 1: As for Len Jenoff and Paul Michael Daniels, the two
Speaker 1: who actually carried out the murder of Carol Newlander, both
Speaker 1: pled guilty and were sentenced to twenty three years in prison.
Speaker 2: I've dealt in one way or another with the new
Speaker 2: Lander case since nineteen ninety nine.
Speaker 1: Arthur mcgida wrote the book The Rabbi and the hit Man,
Speaker 1: and there was one final and bizarre twist in this case.
Speaker 1: In May two thousand and eight, Len Jennof filed emotion
Speaker 1: challenging his sentence. In that motion, he claimed ineffective counsel
Speaker 1: and stated that his lawyer slept through most of his
Speaker 1: court proceedings. He also alleged he had been promised significantly
Speaker 1: less time than twenty three years.
Speaker 2: Len Jenoff was such a dubious and questionable character, and
Speaker 2: in the best of all worlds, nobody should believe anything
Speaker 2: he ever said.
Speaker 1: In two thousand and nine, len Jenov said he had
Speaker 1: given a lot of thought to what happened and wanted
Speaker 1: to set the record straight. In assigned affidavit, len wrote,
Speaker 1: Fred Neulander never asked me to kill his wife, and
Speaker 1: to the best of my knowledge, he never had any
Speaker 1: idea of any attempt on his wife's life. In other words,
Speaker 1: len Jenoff recanted and said the incident at the Newlanders
Speaker 1: was a robbery gone bad and not a murder for hire.
Speaker 1: He said he made up the story that implicated the
Speaker 1: rabbi because he was promised leniency if he cooperated with
Speaker 1: the prosecutor's office.
Speaker 2: How could Jenov be believed? Now he's wild over and
Speaker 2: over again, he admits, but he claims he's telling the truth.
Speaker 2: Just this one time.
Speaker 1: Well, it turns out len Jenov wasn't done lying. Three
Speaker 1: years after retracting his confession, Jenoff flip flopped yet again.
Speaker 1: In twenty twelve, Len told the Philadelphia Inquirer that he
Speaker 1: regretted forcanting his statement. He said, I testified at two
Speaker 1: trials that Fred Newlander did hire me, in fact, to
Speaker 1: kill his wife and make it look like a robbery,
Speaker 1: and that is the truth. Len called his actions immoral
Speaker 1: and again reverted to his initial testimony at the trials.
Speaker 2: Lender Jenoff, who was not a man of his word,
Speaker 2: had never been a man of his word, and absolutely
Speaker 2: nothing coming out of Jenoff's mouth could be believed.
Speaker 1: In twenty fourteen, both Len Jenoff and Paul Michael o'daniels
Speaker 1: walked out of prison free men. They both had served
Speaker 1: more than fourteen years before being released from prison. Throughout
Speaker 1: the years, Rabbi Fred Newlander has appealed his conviction and
Speaker 1: petitioned for a new trial each time he was denied.
Speaker 1: In a twenty twelve interview with NBC ten in Philadelphia,
Speaker 1: the rabbi mid his behavior in his marriage was appalling.
Speaker 1: He called himself an embarrassment and said he should have
Speaker 1: behaved better, but maintained he did not kill his wife.
Speaker 2: I would hope that there was some deep core of
Speaker 2: Fred Newlander that was speaking to him, nagging at him
Speaker 2: and telling him he was a shame and a shambles
Speaker 2: of a human being. We'll never know what happened.
Speaker 1: He's right, we will never know the full story about
Speaker 1: why Carol Newlander was murdered because in April twenty twenty four,
Speaker 1: the rabbi took those answers to his grave.
Speaker 2: Fred Newlander, a former Cherry Hill rabbi who was convicted
Speaker 2: in the murder for hire of his wife, has died
Speaker 2: in prison at the age of eighty two.
Speaker 7: Correctional officers found Fred Newlander unresponsive on Wednesday.
Speaker 1: After performing CPR and using an ad a new Land
Speaker 1: was pronounced oad of the hospital. No cause of death
Speaker 1: was released to the public, and according to one of
Speaker 1: the rabbi's former lawyers, up until the time of his death,
Speaker 1: the rabbi had been counseling other inmates on religion. Next
Speaker 1: time on American homicide. When a popular teenage artist goes missing,
Speaker 1: her community jumps into action, but when police discovered a
Speaker 1: secret box full of cash, questions are raised around if
Speaker 1: police were looking for a crime scene or the trail
Speaker 1: of a young woman who planned her own disappearance. I'm
Speaker 1: Sloan Glass. We head to Neptune City, New Jersey for
Speaker 1: the case of Sarah Stern. That's next time on American Homicide.
Speaker 1: You can contact the American Homicide team by emailing us
Speaker 1: at American Homicide Pod at gmail dot com. That's American
Speaker 1: Homicide Pod at gmail dot com. American Homicide is hosted
Speaker 1: and written by me Sloan Glass and is a production
Speaker 1: of Glass Podcasts, a division of Glass Entertainment Group, in
Speaker 1: partnership with iHeart Podcasts. The show is executive produced by
Speaker 1: Nancy Glass and Todd Gans. The series is also written
Speaker 1: and produced by Todd Gans, with additional writing by Ben
Speaker 1: Fetterman and Andrea Gunny. Our associate producer is Kristin Melcurie.
Speaker 1: Our Ihearty is Ali Perry and Jessica Crimechak. Audio editing
Speaker 1: and mixing by Matt Delvecchio, Dave Seya, and Britt Robashow.
Speaker 1: Additional editing support from Nico Ruka, Tanner Robbins, and Patrick Walsh.
Speaker 1: American Homicide's theme song was composed by Oliver Baines of
Speaker 1: Neiser Music Library provided by my Music. Follow American Homicide
Speaker 1: on Apple Podcasts, and please rate and review American Homicide.
Speaker 1: Your five star review goes a long way towards helping
Speaker 1: others find this show. For more podcasts from iHeart, visit
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.