1 00:00:08,440 --> 00:00:20,680 Speaker 1: Body Backs with Joseph Scott Morgan. I don't clean up 2 00:00:20,680 --> 00:00:24,599 Speaker 1: my house necessarily the way I probably should, particularly on 3 00:00:24,680 --> 00:00:28,520 Speaker 1: the yard. I've got an old ship and tools and 4 00:00:28,520 --> 00:00:31,080 Speaker 1: whatnot playing around. I don't keep them in the best order, 5 00:00:31,200 --> 00:00:36,640 Speaker 1: probably by some people's standards. And I've often wondered if 6 00:00:36,680 --> 00:00:40,520 Speaker 1: I suddenly passed away, what would happen to everything I own? 7 00:00:41,320 --> 00:00:44,560 Speaker 1: What kind of impression would that leave with the folks 8 00:00:44,600 --> 00:00:46,599 Speaker 1: that have to come up and kind of clean up 9 00:00:46,640 --> 00:00:51,479 Speaker 1: after me. I know it's kind of morbid, but it happens. 10 00:00:51,560 --> 00:00:55,160 Speaker 1: It happens on a regular basis. But I want to 11 00:00:55,160 --> 00:01:00,360 Speaker 1: tell you about a case where the gentleman passed away 12 00:01:01,480 --> 00:01:05,080 Speaker 1: naturally and the police when they were at his owl 13 00:01:06,600 --> 00:01:12,760 Speaker 1: found something that I think that they will never ever forget. 14 00:01:14,800 --> 00:01:24,679 Speaker 1: I'm Joseph Scott Morgan, and this is Body Backs. Jackie Howard, 15 00:01:24,720 --> 00:01:29,360 Speaker 1: executive producer of Crime Stories with Nancy Grace, is with me. Jackie. 16 00:01:29,600 --> 00:01:31,600 Speaker 1: I gotta tell you, I don't know about you. I'm 17 00:01:31,640 --> 00:01:34,000 Speaker 1: sure your house is in gray order. Maybe you've got 18 00:01:34,080 --> 00:01:37,480 Speaker 1: a toolshid. But for me, I gotta tell you, it 19 00:01:37,560 --> 00:01:39,759 Speaker 1: really does bother me. I think about I guess it's 20 00:01:39,800 --> 00:01:42,399 Speaker 1: because I've been out to so many death scenes, and 21 00:01:42,440 --> 00:01:44,320 Speaker 1: I think there, but for the grace of God, go 22 00:01:44,400 --> 00:01:47,520 Speaker 1: high kind of look around and man, when you die, 23 00:01:47,600 --> 00:01:50,000 Speaker 1: it's just it's the way it is. You know, if 24 00:01:50,040 --> 00:01:52,360 Speaker 1: you didn't clean up before you died, it's just gonna 25 00:01:52,760 --> 00:01:55,800 Speaker 1: stay that way. And I guess it leaves an impression 26 00:01:55,840 --> 00:01:57,320 Speaker 1: on the people that come out and find you and 27 00:01:57,360 --> 00:02:00,400 Speaker 1: the people that have to clean up after you. That's lootly. 28 00:02:00,440 --> 00:02:02,640 Speaker 1: And in this case, as in many others we've talked 29 00:02:02,680 --> 00:02:07,840 Speaker 1: about it did I've told you before, Joe, if I 30 00:02:07,920 --> 00:02:10,160 Speaker 1: run across something and I don't know what it is, 31 00:02:10,200 --> 00:02:12,440 Speaker 1: I'm not opening at it. And this is another one 32 00:02:12,480 --> 00:02:17,000 Speaker 1: of those cases. This gentleman died of natural causes. Yet, 33 00:02:17,120 --> 00:02:19,480 Speaker 1: as with any death, the police came out. They're looking 34 00:02:19,520 --> 00:02:22,959 Speaker 1: around to make sure that it is indeed natural causes, 35 00:02:23,080 --> 00:02:29,000 Speaker 1: and they find in a bucket a severed foot. I 36 00:02:29,000 --> 00:02:31,480 Speaker 1: can only imagine the condition of this foot. We don't 37 00:02:31,480 --> 00:02:33,840 Speaker 1: know how long it's been there. We don't know where 38 00:02:33,840 --> 00:02:36,080 Speaker 1: it came from, we don't know how it was stored. 39 00:02:36,120 --> 00:02:38,320 Speaker 1: All we know is that it was in a bucket. 40 00:02:38,960 --> 00:02:41,639 Speaker 1: What did the police find? I just wish I could 41 00:02:41,680 --> 00:02:45,480 Speaker 1: have been kind of an independent observer knowing what was coming, 42 00:02:45,520 --> 00:02:48,079 Speaker 1: just to see the expression on their faces, because that's 43 00:02:48,080 --> 00:02:50,880 Speaker 1: one of those oh my god moments. Just imagine. And 44 00:02:50,960 --> 00:02:53,880 Speaker 1: this is in Biloxi, Mississippi, and it's the busy jurisdiction, 45 00:02:54,560 --> 00:02:57,640 Speaker 1: and these guys are just going out and look, my 46 00:02:57,720 --> 00:03:00,400 Speaker 1: hats off to him, because are working at something. Is 47 00:03:00,919 --> 00:03:04,400 Speaker 1: in any kind of death investigation. As forensic investigators, certainly, 48 00:03:04,919 --> 00:03:08,320 Speaker 1: you know, we say our supposition is that every death, 49 00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:11,200 Speaker 1: not some death, but every death is a homicide until 50 00:03:11,200 --> 00:03:13,600 Speaker 1: we can prove otherwise. So these guys were doing their 51 00:03:13,680 --> 00:03:17,080 Speaker 1: job out there, and they were just checking to take 52 00:03:17,240 --> 00:03:21,600 Speaker 1: everything into consideration to try to understand what was going 53 00:03:21,680 --> 00:03:24,560 Speaker 1: on and what exactly do you do when you find 54 00:03:24,639 --> 00:03:27,720 Speaker 1: a foot? How in the world are you going to 55 00:03:27,760 --> 00:03:30,000 Speaker 1: try to make sense of this. You've got a guy 56 00:03:30,080 --> 00:03:32,959 Speaker 1: that's died of natural causes. I think my first inclination 57 00:03:33,480 --> 00:03:35,800 Speaker 1: would be, well, let's go examine this guy's body one 58 00:03:35,840 --> 00:03:37,880 Speaker 1: more time to make sure he's got both of his feet, 59 00:03:37,880 --> 00:03:40,640 Speaker 1: and in this case he did. So then you have 60 00:03:40,760 --> 00:03:45,640 Speaker 1: to to ask yourself, from an investigative standpoint, why what 61 00:03:45,800 --> 00:03:50,480 Speaker 1: a man, first off, have a foot that has obviously 62 00:03:50,560 --> 00:03:56,840 Speaker 1: been dissected away from another person, and it's in a bucket. 63 00:03:56,920 --> 00:04:00,640 Speaker 1: It's in an advanced state of decomposition, which to me 64 00:04:00,800 --> 00:04:03,760 Speaker 1: is kind of fascinating. But it was in such a 65 00:04:03,800 --> 00:04:06,760 Speaker 1: state it was not as far gone as maybe we 66 00:04:06,880 --> 00:04:10,680 Speaker 1: might think, because the police were instantly able to still 67 00:04:11,320 --> 00:04:14,680 Speaker 1: understand that they were staring at a foot that belonged 68 00:04:14,720 --> 00:04:17,640 Speaker 1: to some person out there. So it wasn't just like 69 00:04:17,680 --> 00:04:19,719 Speaker 1: a collection of bones where they had to kind of 70 00:04:19,720 --> 00:04:23,080 Speaker 1: go through it and say, well, this might be a 71 00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:25,599 Speaker 1: bone that originated from a hand, or maybe this is 72 00:04:25,600 --> 00:04:27,760 Speaker 1: a bone that originated from a foot. No, they said 73 00:04:27,760 --> 00:04:31,599 Speaker 1: that this is a severed human foot. So automatically, you know, 74 00:04:31,680 --> 00:04:35,400 Speaker 1: you're thinking, well, I got a foot, where's the rest 75 00:04:35,400 --> 00:04:38,599 Speaker 1: of the body, because you have to answer that question. 76 00:04:38,839 --> 00:04:42,120 Speaker 1: It's not one of these findings from an investigative standpoint 77 00:04:42,120 --> 00:04:44,600 Speaker 1: that you can just kind of gloss over and say, well, yeah, 78 00:04:44,680 --> 00:04:46,440 Speaker 1: he had a human foot. We'll just move on to 79 00:04:46,520 --> 00:04:49,320 Speaker 1: the next thing. Let's let's close this case. Now that 80 00:04:49,360 --> 00:04:52,200 Speaker 1: begs more questions. The first thing that would have to 81 00:04:52,240 --> 00:04:56,880 Speaker 1: be done is retrieval of the foot, obviously, but as 82 00:04:56,920 --> 00:04:59,520 Speaker 1: you said, the question is where's the rest of the body. 83 00:05:00,120 --> 00:05:04,520 Speaker 1: What would investigators have done on the scene to determine 84 00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:10,279 Speaker 1: if there was more remains on that property. Well, first off, 85 00:05:10,320 --> 00:05:13,080 Speaker 1: you're going to look if you've got a if you 86 00:05:13,160 --> 00:05:16,200 Speaker 1: have a an element of a body. In this case 87 00:05:16,240 --> 00:05:18,680 Speaker 1: of foot. Essentially, what it's been presented is that it's 88 00:05:18,720 --> 00:05:22,000 Speaker 1: in a bucket beneath the house. You're going to treat 89 00:05:22,080 --> 00:05:25,960 Speaker 1: this as if there might be the rest of the remains. 90 00:05:26,279 --> 00:05:28,400 Speaker 1: When you say that the bucket was underneath the house, 91 00:05:28,440 --> 00:05:30,440 Speaker 1: do you don't mean that it was buried? No, no, 92 00:05:31,400 --> 00:05:35,960 Speaker 1: underneath right, Yeah, this would have been in plain view 93 00:05:36,120 --> 00:05:38,280 Speaker 1: for the police. It would have been enough so that 94 00:05:38,320 --> 00:05:42,800 Speaker 1: there there's searching beneath this guy's home and they look, 95 00:05:42,960 --> 00:05:45,279 Speaker 1: there is a bucket. Well, let's look in the bucket. 96 00:05:45,320 --> 00:05:47,760 Speaker 1: They pulled the bucket out and they see the foot there. 97 00:05:48,640 --> 00:05:51,440 Speaker 1: So you have to think, well, if there's a dismembered 98 00:05:51,480 --> 00:05:56,800 Speaker 1: foot here, this entire area surrounding the foot and the 99 00:05:56,880 --> 00:05:59,560 Speaker 1: placement of it is a potential that has to be 100 00:06:00,000 --> 00:06:02,920 Speaker 1: am and maybe even excavated at that point in time, 101 00:06:02,960 --> 00:06:06,360 Speaker 1: because you're gonna go through here and see if maybe 102 00:06:06,440 --> 00:06:09,840 Speaker 1: the rest of the remains have been dismembered and buried 103 00:06:09,960 --> 00:06:13,200 Speaker 1: beneath the house. So that's something just from Jump Street 104 00:06:13,240 --> 00:06:15,240 Speaker 1: that you would have to consider to see if you 105 00:06:15,279 --> 00:06:17,760 Speaker 1: can find anything that's going to match up with the 106 00:06:17,800 --> 00:06:20,920 Speaker 1: dismembered foot. Do you find a legma and for instance, 107 00:06:21,000 --> 00:06:24,280 Speaker 1: that has actually got saw marks on it where dismemberment 108 00:06:24,400 --> 00:06:28,480 Speaker 1: may have taken place, Then you have to go into 109 00:06:28,560 --> 00:06:32,400 Speaker 1: the house because if you have a person that is 110 00:06:33,279 --> 00:06:37,040 Speaker 1: storing okay for lack of a better term, or retaining 111 00:06:37,520 --> 00:06:39,560 Speaker 1: a severed foot, you have to think, well, are they 112 00:06:39,640 --> 00:06:43,119 Speaker 1: retaining other parts? Are there other items inside the house 113 00:06:43,160 --> 00:06:46,839 Speaker 1: that might be associated some mortal remains of someone you 114 00:06:46,880 --> 00:06:49,360 Speaker 1: know as this person. Have they taken a body apart 115 00:06:49,480 --> 00:06:52,720 Speaker 1: and preserved organs for instance? There have been cases of 116 00:06:52,760 --> 00:06:55,640 Speaker 1: that where people have done this. You have people that 117 00:06:55,920 --> 00:07:01,280 Speaker 1: obviously that have taken bodies apart, preserved individual parts, say, 118 00:07:01,320 --> 00:07:04,560 Speaker 1: for instance, like organs, hearts, lungs, these sorts of things 119 00:07:04,560 --> 00:07:06,719 Speaker 1: and put them in jars and put preservative in there. 120 00:07:07,080 --> 00:07:11,320 Speaker 1: People that retain heads. Jeffrey Dahmer famously did that, and 121 00:07:11,360 --> 00:07:14,240 Speaker 1: there have been other people that that like to do 122 00:07:14,280 --> 00:07:17,040 Speaker 1: this sort of thing. Are that are compelled to do 123 00:07:17,120 --> 00:07:19,680 Speaker 1: it for whatever reason. There are people that you know 124 00:07:19,720 --> 00:07:23,200 Speaker 1: have been caught ordering human body parts through the mail 125 00:07:23,920 --> 00:07:26,320 Speaker 1: or over the internet over the years, and of course 126 00:07:26,520 --> 00:07:28,640 Speaker 1: they try to stem that u S Customs does, but 127 00:07:29,000 --> 00:07:30,760 Speaker 1: you know there have been cases where things have come 128 00:07:30,760 --> 00:07:33,360 Speaker 1: into this country. So you know, I guess the big 129 00:07:33,440 --> 00:07:35,240 Speaker 1: thing here is you're trying to find a point of 130 00:07:35,280 --> 00:07:38,080 Speaker 1: origin and where's the rest of the body. So as 131 00:07:38,080 --> 00:07:40,480 Speaker 1: an investigator, you would go from stem to stern in 132 00:07:40,560 --> 00:07:44,520 Speaker 1: this Phylla's house, looking through the house, trying to determine 133 00:07:44,560 --> 00:07:49,200 Speaker 1: what's there, is anything odd out of place? You would 134 00:07:49,200 --> 00:07:52,000 Speaker 1: have to really begin to pick apart this guy's life. 135 00:07:52,000 --> 00:07:55,400 Speaker 1: And keep in mind, at this point in time, he's dead. 136 00:07:56,280 --> 00:07:59,160 Speaker 1: He's dead. It's not like you can take him downtown 137 00:07:59,240 --> 00:08:01,440 Speaker 1: and send him in a table and begin to question him. 138 00:08:01,440 --> 00:08:03,600 Speaker 1: You know, where were you on this date? What had 139 00:08:03,640 --> 00:08:05,800 Speaker 1: you been doing on this date? How did you come 140 00:08:05,840 --> 00:08:09,160 Speaker 1: into possession of a severed human foot? You don't have 141 00:08:09,280 --> 00:08:13,240 Speaker 1: that person to ask us questions of. And to my 142 00:08:13,360 --> 00:08:15,920 Speaker 1: way of thinking, if he's got close friends or relatives, 143 00:08:16,840 --> 00:08:20,840 Speaker 1: unless he is really out of his mind, this is 144 00:08:20,880 --> 00:08:23,240 Speaker 1: not something he's going to disclose to anybody else. So 145 00:08:23,320 --> 00:08:25,360 Speaker 1: his family might not even be aware that he had 146 00:08:25,400 --> 00:08:27,880 Speaker 1: this there. His friends might not be aware that he 147 00:08:27,920 --> 00:08:30,200 Speaker 1: had this there. This is some kind of secret that 148 00:08:30,240 --> 00:08:32,760 Speaker 1: he has taken with him to his grave. So then 149 00:08:32,800 --> 00:08:38,160 Speaker 1: the investigation turns to trying to discover the identity of 150 00:08:39,320 --> 00:08:43,160 Speaker 1: this foot. Who does this foot belong to and how 151 00:08:43,200 --> 00:08:46,679 Speaker 1: did it end up in a bucket? D n A 152 00:08:46,960 --> 00:08:49,440 Speaker 1: is your friend? Is it not? Of course it is. 153 00:08:49,600 --> 00:08:53,360 Speaker 1: There's not a lot you can do from an anthropological standpoint. 154 00:08:53,559 --> 00:08:55,360 Speaker 1: Kind of let me put a finer point on that. 155 00:08:55,480 --> 00:08:59,920 Speaker 1: When you look at a foot, unlike a skull, for instance, 156 00:09:00,040 --> 00:09:04,439 Speaker 1: where we can do kind of a a typology where 157 00:09:04,480 --> 00:09:06,200 Speaker 1: you know, you you think about you can look for 158 00:09:06,240 --> 00:09:10,320 Speaker 1: certain racial characteristics. You can look for indications of whether 159 00:09:10,440 --> 00:09:14,440 Speaker 1: or not this is a male versus female skull. There's 160 00:09:14,559 --> 00:09:17,640 Speaker 1: terms that we use, for instance, with male skull versus 161 00:09:17,760 --> 00:09:20,240 Speaker 1: a female skull, Like the features of a male skull 162 00:09:20,320 --> 00:09:22,800 Speaker 1: tend to be what are called robust. You think about 163 00:09:22,800 --> 00:09:26,040 Speaker 1: your brow line, kind of run your finger across your 164 00:09:26,080 --> 00:09:28,720 Speaker 1: brow there. Males tend to have kind of a what's 165 00:09:28,760 --> 00:09:33,960 Speaker 1: called a protuberant brow line, very pronounced, whereas with female 166 00:09:33,960 --> 00:09:36,920 Speaker 1: skulls you'll have a use of term grassisle. I love 167 00:09:36,960 --> 00:09:39,360 Speaker 1: that term, by the way. It means kind of fine 168 00:09:39,800 --> 00:09:43,000 Speaker 1: and it's less robust, and that that would be, but 169 00:09:43,800 --> 00:09:45,440 Speaker 1: you don't have that with a foot. How are you 170 00:09:45,440 --> 00:09:48,600 Speaker 1: going to actually begin to narrow this down? Right? You 171 00:09:48,640 --> 00:09:51,040 Speaker 1: are Jackie and saying that DNA would be your friend. 172 00:09:51,120 --> 00:09:53,680 Speaker 1: I think the key is are you going to be 173 00:09:53,720 --> 00:09:57,000 Speaker 1: able to recover any kind of viable DNA from this foot? 174 00:09:57,000 --> 00:09:59,240 Speaker 1: How well preserved is it? Because you know, we talked 175 00:09:59,240 --> 00:10:02,720 Speaker 1: about this all the where you have a sample, and 176 00:10:03,640 --> 00:10:07,959 Speaker 1: the term that we use is degradation, it becomes degraded 177 00:10:08,200 --> 00:10:11,720 Speaker 1: where the sample will be no longer viable. What your 178 00:10:11,760 --> 00:10:15,080 Speaker 1: source would be is so decomposed to the point where 179 00:10:15,120 --> 00:10:17,200 Speaker 1: you're not going to be able to find vible DNA. 180 00:10:17,360 --> 00:10:21,319 Speaker 1: But I think in this particular case, that's what they 181 00:10:21,320 --> 00:10:24,720 Speaker 1: were relying on. So they were able to actually retrieve 182 00:10:25,360 --> 00:10:28,880 Speaker 1: a DNA sample from the foot, and I think that 183 00:10:28,880 --> 00:10:31,400 Speaker 1: that's when the story actually takes a turn here. So 184 00:10:31,520 --> 00:10:38,679 Speaker 1: let me throw another scenario into the mix. This foot 185 00:10:38,880 --> 00:10:43,880 Speaker 1: was found in two thousand nineteen. What if you had 186 00:10:44,600 --> 00:10:50,200 Speaker 1: another body part found say three years earlier, two thousand 187 00:10:50,320 --> 00:10:54,520 Speaker 1: six in another state. How do we see if there's 188 00:10:54,559 --> 00:11:00,400 Speaker 1: a connection. Excellent question, and it's kind of simple. All 189 00:11:00,400 --> 00:11:03,280 Speaker 1: it's going to require on the part of the investigators 190 00:11:03,280 --> 00:11:09,319 Speaker 1: over in Biloxi is to begin to search news stories. Okay, 191 00:11:09,840 --> 00:11:13,600 Speaker 1: are there any stories that are out there involving dismembered 192 00:11:13,640 --> 00:11:17,760 Speaker 1: bodies where they were actually missing part of the body. 193 00:11:18,120 --> 00:11:21,360 Speaker 1: They found two legs, or they found a torso, or 194 00:11:21,360 --> 00:11:23,840 Speaker 1: they found an arm, or they found a head, but 195 00:11:24,000 --> 00:11:28,079 Speaker 1: yet the feet are missing. In this particular case, that's 196 00:11:28,120 --> 00:11:31,800 Speaker 1: actually where you start from an investigative standpoint. And then 197 00:11:32,679 --> 00:11:35,280 Speaker 1: I think that some of the tools that we now 198 00:11:35,400 --> 00:11:39,760 Speaker 1: have at our disposal, these are repositories that exist for 199 00:11:39,960 --> 00:11:44,120 Speaker 1: individuals you know that are currently unidentified, like name us 200 00:11:44,160 --> 00:11:46,480 Speaker 1: in those those types of places where they have a 201 00:11:46,520 --> 00:11:50,440 Speaker 1: repository of DNA sample from unknown bodies. If you can 202 00:11:50,520 --> 00:11:54,400 Speaker 1: retrieve a DNA sample from that item that you have 203 00:11:54,600 --> 00:11:57,640 Speaker 1: and submitted, are you going to get a DNA match? 204 00:11:58,320 --> 00:12:01,280 Speaker 1: That kind of intensifies the instigation. And of course if 205 00:12:01,280 --> 00:12:03,520 Speaker 1: you come up with zero, then you have to kind 206 00:12:03,559 --> 00:12:07,520 Speaker 1: of rethink your approach to the case. In this particular case, 207 00:12:07,720 --> 00:12:11,280 Speaker 1: they were able to find I think a match in 208 00:12:11,520 --> 00:12:14,480 Speaker 1: in this case, it does actually go back to a 209 00:12:14,520 --> 00:12:36,640 Speaker 1: case that originated in two thousand sixteen. I've never been 210 00:12:36,679 --> 00:12:42,200 Speaker 1: one for puzzles I've never particularly liked jigsaw puzzles. I 211 00:12:42,320 --> 00:12:44,760 Speaker 1: lose my patients with them. When I was a kid, 212 00:12:44,800 --> 00:12:47,640 Speaker 1: I'd be compelled to have to participate in that activity. 213 00:12:47,640 --> 00:12:50,040 Speaker 1: It's just something I lose my patients with really quickly. 214 00:12:50,960 --> 00:12:54,000 Speaker 1: In this particular case, we've got kind of a human 215 00:12:54,080 --> 00:12:56,400 Speaker 1: jigsaw puzzle at this point in time. How are we 216 00:12:56,480 --> 00:13:01,520 Speaker 1: going to match up a foot that's found in Biloxi, 217 00:13:01,559 --> 00:13:06,520 Speaker 1: Mississippi with any other dismembered body that might be found, 218 00:13:07,600 --> 00:13:10,840 Speaker 1: I would assume in a kind of a regional context, 219 00:13:10,880 --> 00:13:13,200 Speaker 1: because you got to think that whoever took the foot 220 00:13:13,200 --> 00:13:16,200 Speaker 1: off of this body didn't go too far with it perhaps, 221 00:13:16,360 --> 00:13:18,160 Speaker 1: and I think that that's what the police were looking 222 00:13:18,200 --> 00:13:21,600 Speaker 1: at here. What happened in this case? A body was 223 00:13:21,679 --> 00:13:26,120 Speaker 1: found along the side of US ninety in Louisiana, in St. 224 00:13:26,160 --> 00:13:32,560 Speaker 1: Tammany Parish. And it was also not intact body. It 225 00:13:32,720 --> 00:13:36,800 Speaker 1: was just a torso. The man's arm was missing and 226 00:13:37,120 --> 00:13:42,040 Speaker 1: one leg had been severed just below the knee. Now, again, 227 00:13:42,200 --> 00:13:45,480 Speaker 1: this was in a different state. It obviously took three 228 00:13:45,559 --> 00:13:49,839 Speaker 1: years to put these body parts together. How did they 229 00:13:49,840 --> 00:13:53,360 Speaker 1: do it? What is the connection here? Well, the connection 230 00:13:53,480 --> 00:13:56,480 Speaker 1: is the fact that in two thousand and sixteen when 231 00:13:56,520 --> 00:14:01,560 Speaker 1: this dismembered remain was found. That owner at that particular time, 232 00:14:01,720 --> 00:14:05,080 Speaker 1: this St. Tammany Parish, the corner at that time, made 233 00:14:05,080 --> 00:14:08,080 Speaker 1: the determination of the cause of death. He knew that 234 00:14:08,120 --> 00:14:11,920 Speaker 1: he was dealing with with a body that was missing 235 00:14:12,040 --> 00:14:14,880 Speaker 1: both arms, but the head was intact, most of the 236 00:14:14,920 --> 00:14:17,800 Speaker 1: torso was intact, and you know, like you said, one 237 00:14:17,840 --> 00:14:21,440 Speaker 1: of the feet were missing, and there was also some 238 00:14:21,480 --> 00:14:24,760 Speaker 1: other trauma that would have been what's called superior to 239 00:14:24,880 --> 00:14:28,520 Speaker 1: where the foot was dissected off. It's almost like somebody 240 00:14:28,760 --> 00:14:31,120 Speaker 1: got into the knee. They were going to attempt to 241 00:14:31,280 --> 00:14:34,560 Speaker 1: also dissect that knee. They had taken the foot off, 242 00:14:34,640 --> 00:14:37,240 Speaker 1: and they had moved up the leg to the knee, 243 00:14:37,440 --> 00:14:41,520 Speaker 1: and they kind of stopped midway through this. And that 244 00:14:41,560 --> 00:14:44,400 Speaker 1: gives you an idea that there was an attempt perhaps 245 00:14:44,720 --> 00:14:49,000 Speaker 1: two take apart the entire body. Maybe they just lost energy, 246 00:14:49,200 --> 00:14:51,800 Speaker 1: maybe they were scared, thought that they were going to 247 00:14:51,840 --> 00:14:56,680 Speaker 1: be found out, and they essentially put the body into 248 00:14:56,840 --> 00:14:59,800 Speaker 1: a vehicle and then dumped it along US Highway ninety, 249 00:15:00,040 --> 00:15:03,720 Speaker 1: which runs along the Gulf Coast. It ninety is actually 250 00:15:03,760 --> 00:15:07,280 Speaker 1: the old road US Federal Highway that people would go 251 00:15:07,320 --> 00:15:09,480 Speaker 1: back and forth on now I ten, which is just 252 00:15:09,560 --> 00:15:11,440 Speaker 1: to the north of it has taken the place of that, 253 00:15:11,880 --> 00:15:18,120 Speaker 1: but US Highway nineties still exists. Interestingly enough, where the 254 00:15:18,200 --> 00:15:22,080 Speaker 1: foot was found was over in Biloxi, where the body 255 00:15:22,160 --> 00:15:26,560 Speaker 1: was found back in two thousand and sixteen, was roughly 256 00:15:26,560 --> 00:15:29,920 Speaker 1: about only sixty miles away, you know, And that's that's 257 00:15:29,960 --> 00:15:33,240 Speaker 1: what that's like a fifty five minute car drive. Maybe 258 00:15:33,680 --> 00:15:36,080 Speaker 1: if you're just staying within a speed limits, say you're 259 00:15:36,120 --> 00:15:38,840 Speaker 1: driving sixty five miles per hour, fifty five to an 260 00:15:38,840 --> 00:15:41,240 Speaker 1: hour and five minutes, depending upon how fast you're going, 261 00:15:41,760 --> 00:15:46,000 Speaker 1: it's not that far away. So the question I think 262 00:15:46,080 --> 00:15:50,280 Speaker 1: for me is, well, why is it that an individual 263 00:15:50,360 --> 00:15:57,360 Speaker 1: would take apart this body to a certain degree, dump 264 00:15:57,400 --> 00:16:02,440 Speaker 1: it in Louisiana and then travel down the road to 265 00:16:02,800 --> 00:16:05,960 Speaker 1: their home and retain the foot. Why in the world 266 00:16:06,000 --> 00:16:08,480 Speaker 1: would you retain the foot, because you would think that 267 00:16:08,520 --> 00:16:11,840 Speaker 1: the body itself would be the biggest obstacle to overcome. 268 00:16:11,880 --> 00:16:13,600 Speaker 1: You're trying to dispose of it. You just throw it 269 00:16:13,600 --> 00:16:15,840 Speaker 1: out alongside the road. There's no indication that there was 270 00:16:15,880 --> 00:16:18,400 Speaker 1: an attempt to really hide it or anything like that. 271 00:16:18,480 --> 00:16:21,280 Speaker 1: It's almost like it was a dump. If you will 272 00:16:21,640 --> 00:16:24,560 Speaker 1: just alongside the road, a thoroughfare where somebody is traveling, 273 00:16:24,600 --> 00:16:27,160 Speaker 1: so conveniently they just kind of take it and lay 274 00:16:27,200 --> 00:16:29,960 Speaker 1: it out alongside the road. But yet they retain the 275 00:16:29,960 --> 00:16:32,720 Speaker 1: foot and take it home with them. That's that's super bizarre. 276 00:16:33,120 --> 00:16:36,520 Speaker 1: I'm like you, though, Joe, I'm beginning to question why. 277 00:16:36,640 --> 00:16:39,920 Speaker 1: I guess the better question would be what was the purpose? 278 00:16:39,960 --> 00:16:42,720 Speaker 1: As opposed to why would they do it? What purposed 279 00:16:42,760 --> 00:16:47,000 Speaker 1: them to engage in this? Are they attempting to hold 280 00:16:47,000 --> 00:16:50,200 Speaker 1: onto the foot as a as a trophy item? Are 281 00:16:50,240 --> 00:16:52,520 Speaker 1: they forgetful and say, well, you know, I got the 282 00:16:52,520 --> 00:16:54,440 Speaker 1: foot in a bucket, I'm just gonna stick it under 283 00:16:54,480 --> 00:16:57,160 Speaker 1: the house and I'll get to it eventually. What's your 284 00:16:57,160 --> 00:17:00,200 Speaker 1: purpose for retaining the foot if you're the perpetrator? I 285 00:17:00,240 --> 00:17:03,160 Speaker 1: have no idea. Maybe there's some kind of psychological attachment 286 00:17:03,200 --> 00:17:06,320 Speaker 1: to it. But the fact that he did have it 287 00:17:05,920 --> 00:17:09,359 Speaker 1: is what led to the break in the case because 288 00:17:09,400 --> 00:17:12,640 Speaker 1: the corner over in St. Tammany, when obviously they've they've 289 00:17:12,680 --> 00:17:18,240 Speaker 1: got this um, this horrible remain that they've recovered off 290 00:17:18,280 --> 00:17:23,080 Speaker 1: of Highway ninety. In addition to their assessment the physical 291 00:17:23,119 --> 00:17:25,959 Speaker 1: assessment of the body, they did take a DNA sample, 292 00:17:26,359 --> 00:17:30,280 Speaker 1: and so that DNA sample was sent to a repository 293 00:17:30,280 --> 00:17:34,560 Speaker 1: where you have these individuals that are unknown, and hopefully, 294 00:17:34,560 --> 00:17:37,720 Speaker 1: at some point in time in the future they would 295 00:17:37,760 --> 00:17:40,600 Speaker 1: be able to get a hit, maybe a familial hit 296 00:17:40,760 --> 00:17:43,119 Speaker 1: on a family member, where they could say, yeah, well 297 00:17:43,400 --> 00:17:47,399 Speaker 1: we have a human remain that is more than likely 298 00:17:47,440 --> 00:17:49,919 Speaker 1: related to this living person. I don't know that in 299 00:17:49,960 --> 00:17:52,440 Speaker 1: their wildest fantasies they would have thought that the connection 300 00:17:52,520 --> 00:17:55,960 Speaker 1: would have been made between the dismembered foot and the 301 00:17:56,000 --> 00:17:58,879 Speaker 1: body that they had found three years earlier. What was 302 00:17:58,920 --> 00:18:03,600 Speaker 1: the cause of death? The body was found discarded on 303 00:18:03,640 --> 00:18:06,000 Speaker 1: the side of the road, not sure how long it 304 00:18:06,080 --> 00:18:08,840 Speaker 1: had been there, What was the cause of death, and 305 00:18:08,880 --> 00:18:12,560 Speaker 1: how was that determined? Considering that there were body parts missing. Well, 306 00:18:12,640 --> 00:18:14,520 Speaker 1: let's get to the cause of death. I like that, 307 00:18:14,600 --> 00:18:17,680 Speaker 1: and then I really want to talk about the missing arms. 308 00:18:17,840 --> 00:18:19,440 Speaker 1: The cause of death in this case, it's going to 309 00:18:19,480 --> 00:18:21,720 Speaker 1: be blunt force trauma. And what that means is that 310 00:18:21,760 --> 00:18:27,040 Speaker 1: somebody had taken this fellow and literally beaten him to death. 311 00:18:27,160 --> 00:18:32,320 Speaker 1: Because the way the corner terms it, he had sustained 312 00:18:32,640 --> 00:18:37,639 Speaker 1: massive skull fractures. There was massive skull trauma, multiple fractures. 313 00:18:37,640 --> 00:18:41,080 Speaker 1: So for every if you just imagine cracking of an 314 00:18:41,080 --> 00:18:43,720 Speaker 1: egg and that represents the skull. Every time you kind 315 00:18:43,720 --> 00:18:46,840 Speaker 1: of strike an egg, saying hard boiled egg, that's a 316 00:18:46,880 --> 00:18:50,920 Speaker 1: better example than an an unboiled egg. Hard boiled egg. 317 00:18:51,480 --> 00:18:56,399 Speaker 1: Every time you strike the exterior, that external table of 318 00:18:56,720 --> 00:18:59,640 Speaker 1: that shell, you're going to create a fracture and will 319 00:18:59,720 --> 00:19:01,760 Speaker 1: kind of have like a spider web appearance. I think 320 00:19:01,760 --> 00:19:05,239 Speaker 1: that most people can kind of appreciate that. So for 321 00:19:05,320 --> 00:19:07,560 Speaker 1: every one of those little spider webs that you see, 322 00:19:07,840 --> 00:19:10,520 Speaker 1: imagine that it's a wagon wheel with a hub. For 323 00:19:10,640 --> 00:19:15,480 Speaker 1: every one of those, that represents an individual impact. Okay, 324 00:19:15,520 --> 00:19:19,440 Speaker 1: so when you hear a corner and medical examiner say, well, 325 00:19:19,960 --> 00:19:23,159 Speaker 1: we've got multiple blunt force trauma to the head, what 326 00:19:23,280 --> 00:19:26,360 Speaker 1: they're saying is they can appreciate, first off, what's called 327 00:19:26,359 --> 00:19:29,760 Speaker 1: a focal area of hemorrhage if you have soft tissue 328 00:19:29,800 --> 00:19:34,200 Speaker 1: remaining that is the scalp, and then underlying, perhaps there's 329 00:19:34,240 --> 00:19:36,720 Speaker 1: this kind of egg like fracture that has taken place, 330 00:19:36,960 --> 00:19:39,560 Speaker 1: and you'll have multiple of these. So for every say, 331 00:19:39,600 --> 00:19:43,040 Speaker 1: for instance, you have this skull fracture that is radiating 332 00:19:43,080 --> 00:19:46,600 Speaker 1: out like the spokes on a wagon wheel. Every time 333 00:19:46,800 --> 00:19:51,240 Speaker 1: this fellow is struck, it's leaving behind this evidence of 334 00:19:51,480 --> 00:19:54,360 Speaker 1: individual strikes all the way around it. And in addition 335 00:19:54,440 --> 00:19:58,600 Speaker 1: to that, not only was he struck about his cranium, okay, 336 00:19:58,640 --> 00:20:02,080 Speaker 1: but he's also got mull table fractures over his face 337 00:20:02,480 --> 00:20:07,359 Speaker 1: as well. So whoever did this to him intended to 338 00:20:07,359 --> 00:20:10,480 Speaker 1: bring about his death as a result of literally beating 339 00:20:10,600 --> 00:20:13,960 Speaker 1: him to death. So you've got these fractures that are existent. 340 00:20:14,200 --> 00:20:16,440 Speaker 1: And one of the difficult things in the morgue when 341 00:20:16,440 --> 00:20:20,480 Speaker 1: you have multiple fractures like this, you'll have these kind 342 00:20:20,480 --> 00:20:25,280 Speaker 1: of interrelated, communicating fractures, okay, And what that means is 343 00:20:25,320 --> 00:20:29,360 Speaker 1: that where an individual is struck, it radiates out like spiderweb, 344 00:20:29,480 --> 00:20:33,080 Speaker 1: and then from an adjacent fracture point of impact, you'll 345 00:20:33,119 --> 00:20:35,480 Speaker 1: have those radiating lines that will come out in that 346 00:20:35,600 --> 00:20:38,479 Speaker 1: kind of overlap many times, and if you've got a 347 00:20:38,520 --> 00:20:41,840 Speaker 1: lot of them, it takes some time for the pathologists 348 00:20:41,880 --> 00:20:44,640 Speaker 1: to sit there and say, Okay, this, this little line 349 00:20:44,640 --> 00:20:47,720 Speaker 1: of fractures is related to this impact. This one is 350 00:20:47,760 --> 00:20:51,000 Speaker 1: related to this impact. And you say, moran, why is 351 00:20:51,000 --> 00:20:53,359 Speaker 1: that even important? Well, it's important because you get an 352 00:20:53,400 --> 00:20:57,840 Speaker 1: idea as to perhaps the sequencing of the injuries. You 353 00:20:57,840 --> 00:21:01,040 Speaker 1: know in what order did they occur, if there's any 354 00:21:01,119 --> 00:21:04,520 Speaker 1: evidence of For instance, this is very important where we 355 00:21:04,600 --> 00:21:07,200 Speaker 1: have no hemorrhage that indicates that this is a post 356 00:21:07,240 --> 00:21:10,160 Speaker 1: mortem injury, that somebody continue to beat this guy after 357 00:21:10,240 --> 00:21:13,600 Speaker 1: he is dead. So you have to kind of assess 358 00:21:13,720 --> 00:21:16,080 Speaker 1: all of that as as you go along, and it 359 00:21:16,160 --> 00:21:19,080 Speaker 1: puts a fine point on what brought about this guy's 360 00:21:19,119 --> 00:21:40,520 Speaker 1: cause of death. And my money, you learn more about 361 00:21:40,560 --> 00:21:44,320 Speaker 1: the dead from the life that they lead, those things 362 00:21:44,359 --> 00:21:47,560 Speaker 1: that that they were associated with, family friends, all those 363 00:21:47,560 --> 00:21:50,280 Speaker 1: sorts of things. You learn more from their identification many 364 00:21:50,320 --> 00:21:53,400 Speaker 1: times than you do about their cause of death. And 365 00:21:53,840 --> 00:21:57,680 Speaker 1: with this victim that was partially dismembered, we know specifically 366 00:21:57,720 --> 00:22:01,080 Speaker 1: what brought about his death. He was humbled to death, 367 00:22:01,119 --> 00:22:04,680 Speaker 1: he was beaten to death with multiple skull fractures, facial fractures. 368 00:22:05,280 --> 00:22:06,639 Speaker 1: But if you really want to get it to the 369 00:22:06,640 --> 00:22:08,280 Speaker 1: heart of the story, you have to find out who 370 00:22:08,280 --> 00:22:12,359 Speaker 1: he is. And for the police in both Mississippi and 371 00:22:12,480 --> 00:22:15,159 Speaker 1: in Louisiana, it was a head scratcher for him. They 372 00:22:15,160 --> 00:22:18,719 Speaker 1: had no idea trying to identify this person who has 373 00:22:18,760 --> 00:22:21,800 Speaker 1: been left on the side of the road and identifying 374 00:22:21,880 --> 00:22:27,679 Speaker 1: and matching this foot How is that done? Obviously we 375 00:22:27,760 --> 00:22:31,680 Speaker 1: know they made the DNA match, that's how they were 376 00:22:31,680 --> 00:22:34,760 Speaker 1: able to connect the two different body parts, but this 377 00:22:34,840 --> 00:22:39,680 Speaker 1: gentleman was still not identified. The arms were missing, which 378 00:22:39,720 --> 00:22:43,960 Speaker 1: meant they couldn't do fingerprints. How did they make the identification? 379 00:22:44,760 --> 00:22:47,639 Speaker 1: I actually had a case in my distant past where 380 00:22:47,800 --> 00:22:50,919 Speaker 1: I found a body in a creek and both of 381 00:22:50,960 --> 00:22:54,040 Speaker 1: the hands were missing off of the body. And it 382 00:22:54,080 --> 00:22:56,480 Speaker 1: wasn't the smartest person that had done this because they 383 00:22:56,560 --> 00:22:59,000 Speaker 1: left guy's wallet in his back pocket. But they cut 384 00:22:59,000 --> 00:23:02,880 Speaker 1: the hands off of this individual. And immediately you begin 385 00:23:02,960 --> 00:23:05,400 Speaker 1: to think, well, they cut the hands off because they 386 00:23:05,440 --> 00:23:09,560 Speaker 1: wanted to impede the ability of us to get him 387 00:23:09,560 --> 00:23:13,720 Speaker 1: identified their fingerprints. But in this case, you've got both 388 00:23:13,840 --> 00:23:17,960 Speaker 1: arms missing, which is is odd in itself, and what 389 00:23:18,000 --> 00:23:20,240 Speaker 1: do you accomplished by that? What? A lot of this 390 00:23:20,320 --> 00:23:23,600 Speaker 1: is supposition on our part As an investigator. You have 391 00:23:23,640 --> 00:23:26,639 Speaker 1: to kind of think, what's the purpose behind removing not 392 00:23:26,800 --> 00:23:28,919 Speaker 1: just the hands, but also the arms. And this is 393 00:23:28,960 --> 00:23:34,080 Speaker 1: my thought nowadays with proliferation of tattoos, tattoos or specific 394 00:23:34,080 --> 00:23:36,560 Speaker 1: identifiers that we look at, So if anybody has tattoos 395 00:23:36,560 --> 00:23:38,080 Speaker 1: on their arms. You can look at it and say 396 00:23:38,200 --> 00:23:40,680 Speaker 1: that appears to be the same tattoo that my brother had, 397 00:23:40,760 --> 00:23:42,720 Speaker 1: or my dad had, or whatever the case might be. 398 00:23:42,760 --> 00:23:45,920 Speaker 1: When you're trying to get a body visually identified, removing 399 00:23:45,960 --> 00:23:49,000 Speaker 1: the arms, it can mean that maybe the individual had 400 00:23:49,040 --> 00:23:53,560 Speaker 1: tattoos and you're trying to impede the investigation by doing that. 401 00:23:53,680 --> 00:23:55,480 Speaker 1: And oh, by the way, at the end end of 402 00:23:55,560 --> 00:23:58,400 Speaker 1: the arms, you've also got hands which you can roll 403 00:23:58,440 --> 00:24:01,040 Speaker 1: a print off of. And if a person has a 404 00:24:01,080 --> 00:24:04,600 Speaker 1: record anywhere, and not necessarily just a record, but you know, 405 00:24:04,680 --> 00:24:06,639 Speaker 1: for those of us that have have been in the 406 00:24:06,720 --> 00:24:09,200 Speaker 1: armed forces, for instance, if you've never been printed before 407 00:24:09,240 --> 00:24:11,639 Speaker 1: in your life, you're gonna get printed in the armed forces. 408 00:24:11,720 --> 00:24:15,760 Speaker 1: And today they do DNA swabs, but you're gonna get printed. 409 00:24:15,760 --> 00:24:18,080 Speaker 1: And so you've got a print card on file somewhere 410 00:24:18,119 --> 00:24:21,080 Speaker 1: out there. Certain employers keep print cards. And then, not 411 00:24:21,160 --> 00:24:24,160 Speaker 1: to mention the criminal population, anybody's been booked at any 412 00:24:24,160 --> 00:24:26,800 Speaker 1: point in time, you've got a print card somewhere. So 413 00:24:27,720 --> 00:24:31,239 Speaker 1: that's something else. From an investigative standpoint, it's gonna hamper you. 414 00:24:31,359 --> 00:24:33,800 Speaker 1: You're trying to make an I D. You have to 415 00:24:34,280 --> 00:24:37,400 Speaker 1: begin to think. You look at it and you think, well, 416 00:24:37,800 --> 00:24:40,399 Speaker 1: it was the purpose of taking the arms off? Was 417 00:24:40,440 --> 00:24:44,919 Speaker 1: it just part and parcel of dismembering a body to 418 00:24:44,960 --> 00:24:48,719 Speaker 1: try to make it compact so that it would make 419 00:24:48,840 --> 00:24:53,040 Speaker 1: for easier disposal or are you trying to hamper the 420 00:24:53,040 --> 00:24:56,840 Speaker 1: authority's ability to roll a print or make a visual. 421 00:24:56,840 --> 00:25:01,679 Speaker 1: I d with the tattoos. What's fascinating about this case 422 00:25:02,359 --> 00:25:05,399 Speaker 1: and I can't get past this having grown up in 423 00:25:05,400 --> 00:25:12,440 Speaker 1: this area. You have got possibly two of the apex 424 00:25:12,520 --> 00:25:17,520 Speaker 1: predators in the world that inhabit this area. You've got 425 00:25:17,520 --> 00:25:21,520 Speaker 1: alligators because the body was actually found immediately adjacent to 426 00:25:21,560 --> 00:25:23,879 Speaker 1: an area that's called the riggle Eas And the Riggles 427 00:25:25,200 --> 00:25:28,119 Speaker 1: is a is a pass essentially a pass in the 428 00:25:28,119 --> 00:25:31,679 Speaker 1: water where it goes from Lake Ponta Train into what 429 00:25:32,040 --> 00:25:34,159 Speaker 1: another body water is called leg Born and then that 430 00:25:34,200 --> 00:25:36,359 Speaker 1: opens out into the Gulf of Mexico. So you've got 431 00:25:36,560 --> 00:25:39,920 Speaker 1: alligators that are in twelve this area out there, there's 432 00:25:39,960 --> 00:25:43,720 Speaker 1: there's actually swamp tours in this particular area. People got 433 00:25:43,720 --> 00:25:46,440 Speaker 1: on boats and they see alligators. They're they're everywhere down there. 434 00:25:46,480 --> 00:25:49,600 Speaker 1: And then out in the Gulf of Mexico, you've got sharks. 435 00:25:49,640 --> 00:25:51,960 Speaker 1: So why just take the body and kind of dump 436 00:25:52,000 --> 00:25:53,600 Speaker 1: it right there on the side of the road when 437 00:25:53,960 --> 00:25:58,080 Speaker 1: it could have been more easily facilitated where you nobody'd 438 00:25:58,080 --> 00:26:00,600 Speaker 1: ever find the remains potentially if you placed it out there. 439 00:26:01,280 --> 00:26:04,960 Speaker 1: And the fact that they went to these laborious links 440 00:26:05,000 --> 00:26:07,760 Speaker 1: of trying to dissect out a body and then just 441 00:26:07,840 --> 00:26:10,359 Speaker 1: kind of suddenly dump it's kind of fascinating to me. 442 00:26:10,440 --> 00:26:14,200 Speaker 1: I think it's almost like it was an incomplete attempt 443 00:26:14,240 --> 00:26:17,520 Speaker 1: at getting rid of a body. But thankfully, because they 444 00:26:17,520 --> 00:26:21,640 Speaker 1: were able to retain and capture DNA, they were able 445 00:26:21,720 --> 00:26:24,879 Speaker 1: to get a positive id on this individual. You mentioned 446 00:26:24,960 --> 00:26:28,200 Speaker 1: a couple of times in their Joe about being able 447 00:26:28,240 --> 00:26:32,240 Speaker 1: to identify tattoos. How is that? Are you talking about 448 00:26:32,400 --> 00:26:37,240 Speaker 1: recognizing the pattern the kind of inks? How do you 449 00:26:37,280 --> 00:26:42,000 Speaker 1: do that? Depended upon the artists that actually and look 450 00:26:43,000 --> 00:26:45,760 Speaker 1: we we can. Let's just say plainly, tattoos are far 451 00:26:45,840 --> 00:26:48,560 Speaker 1: more common than they used to be. In the early days. 452 00:26:48,720 --> 00:26:52,600 Speaker 1: There were specific people that that were highly skilled at 453 00:26:52,640 --> 00:26:57,520 Speaker 1: identifying the work of specific tattoo artist. I don't know 454 00:26:57,520 --> 00:27:00,280 Speaker 1: if people understand this. You would sit the people would 455 00:27:00,359 --> 00:27:04,119 Speaker 1: learn to kind of perform tattoo artistry would sit at 456 00:27:04,119 --> 00:27:06,119 Speaker 1: the feet of a master essentially, and they would kind 457 00:27:06,160 --> 00:27:08,920 Speaker 1: of learn how to do this, and they all kind 458 00:27:08,960 --> 00:27:11,520 Speaker 1: of had this family tree that they would descend out of. Well, 459 00:27:11,560 --> 00:27:13,960 Speaker 1: this looks like so and so's work, okay, so you 460 00:27:13,960 --> 00:27:18,520 Speaker 1: could almost regionalize it. There was like several famous tattoo artists. 461 00:27:18,520 --> 00:27:21,000 Speaker 1: I think there was one in particular Baltimore that was very, 462 00:27:21,080 --> 00:27:24,680 Speaker 1: very popular, and he was well known, and you could 463 00:27:24,720 --> 00:27:26,840 Speaker 1: see people that had kind of copied his work or 464 00:27:26,920 --> 00:27:29,080 Speaker 1: learned from him. So that's kind of a tie back. 465 00:27:29,160 --> 00:27:32,840 Speaker 1: But nowadays you've got people that have shops everywhere. There's 466 00:27:32,880 --> 00:27:35,600 Speaker 1: been a real proliferation, so it kind of waters down 467 00:27:35,640 --> 00:27:38,840 Speaker 1: your ability as an investigator, kind of narrowed down what 468 00:27:39,000 --> 00:27:42,120 Speaker 1: the actual origin of that is. Now if you've got 469 00:27:42,119 --> 00:27:44,800 Speaker 1: an older gentleman that's had a tattoo for a protracted 470 00:27:44,840 --> 00:27:47,240 Speaker 1: period of time. It used to be that you would 471 00:27:47,280 --> 00:27:49,920 Speaker 1: have people that were in service, particularly people that had 472 00:27:49,960 --> 00:27:53,280 Speaker 1: traveled overseas to like the Philippines, that would get tattoos, 473 00:27:53,320 --> 00:27:55,960 Speaker 1: say around Subic Bay and those those areas like that 474 00:27:55,960 --> 00:27:59,520 Speaker 1: that were in the Navy, those were specifically identifiable. Then 475 00:27:59,600 --> 00:28:03,480 Speaker 1: you have of more rough hewn tattoos, which actually kind 476 00:28:03,480 --> 00:28:06,080 Speaker 1: of make it easier to identify an individual. And I'm 477 00:28:06,080 --> 00:28:10,240 Speaker 1: thinking things like homemade tattoos and jailhouse tattoos, because you 478 00:28:10,240 --> 00:28:13,240 Speaker 1: can certain tattoos you look at it and you can say, 479 00:28:13,320 --> 00:28:15,119 Speaker 1: well that, yeah, that that kind of looks like a 480 00:28:15,200 --> 00:28:18,199 Speaker 1: jailhouse tattoo, that somebody had this done in prison. It 481 00:28:18,240 --> 00:28:20,480 Speaker 1: doesn't have the same precision to it, it doesn't have 482 00:28:20,480 --> 00:28:24,160 Speaker 1: a variety of inks, and so those are little indicators 483 00:28:24,160 --> 00:28:27,400 Speaker 1: to us as to the origin of the tattoo. Well, 484 00:28:27,440 --> 00:28:31,200 Speaker 1: if you've got a gailhouse tattoo, guess what as that's 485 00:28:31,240 --> 00:28:34,480 Speaker 1: invaluable when it comes to an investigation because you can say, well, 486 00:28:34,480 --> 00:28:37,760 Speaker 1: this person has done time in the joint perhaps, and 487 00:28:38,240 --> 00:28:41,160 Speaker 1: depend upon the type of tattoo, it might lead back 488 00:28:41,200 --> 00:28:44,120 Speaker 1: to a specific point of origin and where they had 489 00:28:44,160 --> 00:28:46,719 Speaker 1: done time. It leads you have a place to start. 490 00:28:46,880 --> 00:28:49,640 Speaker 1: That's the important thing about getting i d s done 491 00:28:49,920 --> 00:28:52,760 Speaker 1: in forensics and death investigation. You know, we kind of 492 00:28:52,760 --> 00:28:56,480 Speaker 1: have this old, this old idea that doesn't really exist 493 00:28:56,600 --> 00:29:00,960 Speaker 1: anymore of visual idea. Visual idea is the worst kind 494 00:29:01,000 --> 00:29:03,560 Speaker 1: of I D that you can do, where you kind 495 00:29:03,560 --> 00:29:06,600 Speaker 1: of have this drupio Morganton and you think about from 496 00:29:06,600 --> 00:29:10,400 Speaker 1: the movies years ago where weeping family member comes into 497 00:29:10,640 --> 00:29:12,920 Speaker 1: the morgue and they pull the sheet back and they say, yes, 498 00:29:13,000 --> 00:29:15,680 Speaker 1: that's my brother or whatever. It doesn't really happen like 499 00:29:15,760 --> 00:29:17,960 Speaker 1: that anymore, and if it does, it shouldn't happen that 500 00:29:18,000 --> 00:29:21,160 Speaker 1: way because we have so many tools at hand to 501 00:29:21,280 --> 00:29:24,200 Speaker 1: get people identified. So there's three levels of identification that 502 00:29:24,280 --> 00:29:28,160 Speaker 1: we have. We have unidentified, which means we have no 503 00:29:28,240 --> 00:29:31,920 Speaker 1: idea who this person is, which in this case certainly happened. 504 00:29:32,120 --> 00:29:34,040 Speaker 1: You know, we had a foot, and then we had 505 00:29:34,040 --> 00:29:37,840 Speaker 1: a partially dissected remain that was in another state. I 506 00:29:37,960 --> 00:29:40,479 Speaker 1: had no idea who they were, so that's unidentified. Then 507 00:29:40,520 --> 00:29:44,120 Speaker 1: we have something that's called presumptive I d Presumptive idea 508 00:29:44,160 --> 00:29:46,320 Speaker 1: is kind of that mushy middle ground that you have. 509 00:29:46,680 --> 00:29:52,080 Speaker 1: And I've had cases where I had no DNA to 510 00:29:52,160 --> 00:29:55,960 Speaker 1: necessarily work with, or the individual had no family members 511 00:29:55,960 --> 00:29:58,800 Speaker 1: to compare the identity to. I had a case in particular, 512 00:29:58,920 --> 00:30:01,040 Speaker 1: where a woman was locked in her house with her 513 00:30:01,080 --> 00:30:04,560 Speaker 1: dogs for about five months and the dogs had consumed 514 00:30:04,680 --> 00:30:08,240 Speaker 1: a goodly portion of her body, and so the house 515 00:30:08,320 --> 00:30:11,640 Speaker 1: was locked from the inside, her keys were there her 516 00:30:11,680 --> 00:30:14,640 Speaker 1: whilet was there her car was there, but there was 517 00:30:14,800 --> 00:30:18,360 Speaker 1: nothing of her that remained from her waist up. Okay, 518 00:30:18,360 --> 00:30:19,960 Speaker 1: I had no fingerprints to go on, she had no 519 00:30:20,080 --> 00:30:23,440 Speaker 1: living relatives, So that's that would be a presumptive i D. 520 00:30:23,800 --> 00:30:26,920 Speaker 1: That body was a female body, she was African American, 521 00:30:27,160 --> 00:30:29,640 Speaker 1: and she resided there. We knew that that was her home, 522 00:30:29,880 --> 00:30:32,480 Speaker 1: and then we had nothing else to hang her hat on. Okay, 523 00:30:32,560 --> 00:30:34,560 Speaker 1: so that's a presumptive i D. And then we have 524 00:30:34,640 --> 00:30:38,200 Speaker 1: a positive i D where scientifically we've been able to 525 00:30:38,360 --> 00:30:44,160 Speaker 1: verify through DNA, fingerprints, dental that sort of thing that 526 00:30:44,280 --> 00:30:49,120 Speaker 1: definitively is that person. The least reliable probably is a 527 00:30:49,280 --> 00:30:52,160 Speaker 1: visual i D because you can have there are too 528 00:30:52,160 --> 00:30:54,840 Speaker 1: many things that can happen with the visual i D. 529 00:30:55,040 --> 00:30:57,640 Speaker 1: First off, people are terrified when they show up to 530 00:30:57,680 --> 00:31:00,280 Speaker 1: the MOREK to see a body. They're so emotional many 531 00:31:00,320 --> 00:31:03,800 Speaker 1: times that they'recked. I've had multiple bodies misidentified over the 532 00:31:03,840 --> 00:31:07,320 Speaker 1: years through visual idea. I never rely on government i D. 533 00:31:07,560 --> 00:31:10,360 Speaker 1: It's it's something that it's a starting place. You know, 534 00:31:10,400 --> 00:31:13,160 Speaker 1: if somebody has a driver's license on them, it's a 535 00:31:13,160 --> 00:31:15,200 Speaker 1: starting place. But I have to be able to verify 536 00:31:15,320 --> 00:31:17,800 Speaker 1: that to say okay, I think that this is who 537 00:31:17,840 --> 00:31:21,240 Speaker 1: I have. I've got a body that is just torn shreds. 538 00:31:21,920 --> 00:31:25,920 Speaker 1: I can't look at a driver's license and actually say, well, yeah, 539 00:31:25,960 --> 00:31:28,720 Speaker 1: this is the same person. It kind of looks like them. 540 00:31:28,760 --> 00:31:30,280 Speaker 1: How are you going to do that when a person's 541 00:31:30,320 --> 00:31:34,080 Speaker 1: face is horribly disfigured. It's a starting place. Okay, I 542 00:31:34,120 --> 00:31:36,160 Speaker 1: don't trust any kind of idea because it can be 543 00:31:36,200 --> 00:31:40,160 Speaker 1: forged a year from now after I've stated that definitively 544 00:31:40,280 --> 00:31:43,160 Speaker 1: that I got that body I d through a driver's 545 00:31:43,200 --> 00:31:47,400 Speaker 1: license and it turns out not to be them. Why, 546 00:31:47,480 --> 00:31:49,440 Speaker 1: I've just put myself in a heck of a position 547 00:31:49,520 --> 00:31:53,320 Speaker 1: not to mention the horror that descends upon the family 548 00:31:53,360 --> 00:31:56,160 Speaker 1: at that point in time because I assume something. I 549 00:31:56,240 --> 00:31:58,080 Speaker 1: assume something and it turns out not to be their 550 00:31:58,120 --> 00:32:01,040 Speaker 1: loved when that has happened as well. So you have 551 00:32:01,080 --> 00:32:03,400 Speaker 1: to be very definitive about these things. And one of 552 00:32:03,440 --> 00:32:06,080 Speaker 1: the most definitive things you can do nowadays, and there's 553 00:32:06,120 --> 00:32:09,280 Speaker 1: no excuse not to use it, is d NA. There's 554 00:32:09,360 --> 00:32:14,280 Speaker 1: another component here, and that is phenotyping. What is that 555 00:32:14,360 --> 00:32:17,480 Speaker 1: and how does it come into play? Well? With phenotyping, 556 00:32:17,680 --> 00:32:22,040 Speaker 1: you're taking a sample of d N a okay, And 557 00:32:22,400 --> 00:32:28,960 Speaker 1: based upon the markers within that DNA as it is examined, 558 00:32:29,400 --> 00:32:33,040 Speaker 1: you can come up with certain traits or characteristics that 559 00:32:33,120 --> 00:32:37,640 Speaker 1: are unique to that DNA strand. And what that means 560 00:32:37,720 --> 00:32:43,680 Speaker 1: is that they can and listen, listen, it's not okay, 561 00:32:43,720 --> 00:32:48,520 Speaker 1: it's not, but it's it's really quite amazing technology because 562 00:32:48,560 --> 00:32:52,320 Speaker 1: they can they can hazard an educated guests. They can 563 00:32:52,320 --> 00:32:56,520 Speaker 1: say that with phenotyping, based upon the markers that we 564 00:32:56,600 --> 00:33:00,959 Speaker 1: see on this strand of DNA, we can offer an 565 00:33:01,000 --> 00:33:04,520 Speaker 1: opinion that this individuals, say, for instance, is Middle Eastern 566 00:33:04,560 --> 00:33:07,720 Speaker 1: in origin. Okay, So therefore they're going to be more 567 00:33:07,800 --> 00:33:11,360 Speaker 1: dark complexed, maybe olive complexed. There's a high likelihood they'll 568 00:33:11,360 --> 00:33:14,800 Speaker 1: either have brown or green eyes. Their hair might be 569 00:33:15,480 --> 00:33:19,720 Speaker 1: black and straight, brown and straight, maybe slightly wavy. We 570 00:33:19,760 --> 00:33:23,000 Speaker 1: can get an idea for height in many of these cases. 571 00:33:23,400 --> 00:33:26,040 Speaker 1: They can also get an idea for the build of 572 00:33:26,080 --> 00:33:28,200 Speaker 1: the of the person. And if they really dig deep 573 00:33:28,240 --> 00:33:30,600 Speaker 1: with this, they can see certain markers that might be 574 00:33:30,640 --> 00:33:33,880 Speaker 1: indicative of the type of health the subject may have had. 575 00:33:33,880 --> 00:33:37,560 Speaker 1: There might be some kind of DNA predispositions to certain 576 00:33:37,680 --> 00:33:40,560 Speaker 1: types of health issues they might have in their life. 577 00:33:40,880 --> 00:33:42,960 Speaker 1: And when you do that, you begin to kind of 578 00:33:43,200 --> 00:33:46,120 Speaker 1: bring this picture together of who this person might be. 579 00:33:46,200 --> 00:33:49,240 Speaker 1: And you know, amazingly, with these types of cases, they 580 00:33:49,240 --> 00:33:54,280 Speaker 1: can create create a composite of these individuals DNA snapshot, 581 00:33:54,720 --> 00:33:59,400 Speaker 1: and these DNA snapshots are absolutely amazing. They can create 582 00:33:59,480 --> 00:34:02,360 Speaker 1: in general rate an image of a person. Now, like 583 00:34:02,440 --> 00:34:06,320 Speaker 1: I said, imagery went back to driver's licenses, imagery itself 584 00:34:06,880 --> 00:34:11,520 Speaker 1: is not necessarily enough to confirm an identification. This is 585 00:34:11,600 --> 00:34:14,600 Speaker 1: merely a place to start. So just because you have 586 00:34:14,640 --> 00:34:18,000 Speaker 1: a phenotype that gives you an outline of what the 587 00:34:18,040 --> 00:34:20,960 Speaker 1: person or who the person might be, what their point 588 00:34:21,000 --> 00:34:22,839 Speaker 1: of origin is, it doesn't mean that you have a 589 00:34:22,840 --> 00:34:27,960 Speaker 1: specific identification on the body, Okay, And I gotta I 590 00:34:28,040 --> 00:34:30,960 Speaker 1: gotta mention this as well. In this particular case, the 591 00:34:31,080 --> 00:34:34,480 Speaker 1: l s U Faces Lab got involved with this. With 592 00:34:34,600 --> 00:34:37,200 Speaker 1: this case, the l s U Faces Lab was the 593 00:34:37,280 --> 00:34:40,560 Speaker 1: first lab in the United States located Louisiana State University. 594 00:34:40,800 --> 00:34:43,400 Speaker 1: They were the first lab where they actually digitized a 595 00:34:43,520 --> 00:34:46,240 Speaker 1: human skull and and we're able to model a skull 596 00:34:46,400 --> 00:34:49,920 Speaker 1: to great effect. And they also do clay modeling, and 597 00:34:49,960 --> 00:34:52,680 Speaker 1: they did a they generated a clay model on this 598 00:34:52,800 --> 00:34:55,600 Speaker 1: gentleman that they found in St. Tammany, Paris back in 599 00:34:55,640 --> 00:34:58,920 Speaker 1: two thousand and sixteen, and we're able to get an 600 00:34:58,960 --> 00:35:01,920 Speaker 1: idea of what he may have looked like in life 601 00:35:01,920 --> 00:35:03,920 Speaker 1: in a in a three D sense like that. So 602 00:35:04,000 --> 00:35:07,279 Speaker 1: you coupled that along with the phenotyping, and now an 603 00:35:07,320 --> 00:35:11,400 Speaker 1: image begins to appear. The key, though, the key is 604 00:35:11,480 --> 00:35:15,840 Speaker 1: to find specific connectivity linkage, if you will, through DNA 605 00:35:16,239 --> 00:35:21,960 Speaker 1: to a family member. Ultimately, this gentleman was identified. His 606 00:35:22,080 --> 00:35:26,360 Speaker 1: name is Cleanthus constants they were able to through the 607 00:35:26,480 --> 00:35:30,200 Speaker 1: d N a match to a family member of North 608 00:35:30,520 --> 00:35:36,480 Speaker 1: and not surprisingly, the phenotype sketches of what they thought 609 00:35:36,480 --> 00:35:41,640 Speaker 1: this man would look like matched Joe. Isn't that amazing? 610 00:35:41,960 --> 00:35:46,960 Speaker 1: DNA is the It's a modern wonder From a forensic standpoint, 611 00:35:47,480 --> 00:35:50,040 Speaker 1: Clay modeling is fine, and we've done that for a 612 00:35:50,120 --> 00:35:51,960 Speaker 1: number of years, and that was kind of the first step, 613 00:35:52,000 --> 00:35:55,160 Speaker 1: I think for many of us. But when we see 614 00:35:55,200 --> 00:35:59,120 Speaker 1: what they're doing with these so called phenotyping snapshots, if 615 00:35:59,120 --> 00:36:03,160 Speaker 1: you will, it's absolutely amazing how you can take those 616 00:36:03,239 --> 00:36:06,760 Speaker 1: base elements that we are, that we kind of spring 617 00:36:06,880 --> 00:36:10,840 Speaker 1: from and and capture a picture, capture a picture for 618 00:36:10,880 --> 00:36:14,279 Speaker 1: a real person and kind of conjure them up out 619 00:36:14,280 --> 00:36:21,080 Speaker 1: of this DNA phenotyping and the similarities are absolutely just striking. 620 00:36:25,120 --> 00:36:29,280 Speaker 1: I'm Joseph Scott Morgan and this is body backs