WEBVTT - Wall Street Traders Set for $27.8 Billion Haul

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Volatility we know has been

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>triving investors crazy. We're seeing it bounce around, certainly on

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the equity trade today. And yet if you're one of

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>the biggest US banks, get ready for a multibillion dollar windfall.

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>This story Tim Longer most read on the Bloomberg That

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>windfall not coming from M and A like it did

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.919
<v Speaker 1>last year. That's seeing a decline. A great piece by

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Hannah Leavitt and Shabum Sahar and she Bum joins us

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>now in the Bloomberg Interactive at Brokers Studio. Shabum Sahar

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and finance reporter for Bloomberg News. Okay, so let's talk

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>about this twenty billion dollars. Volatility a pretty good thing

0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>if you're trading. Yeah, Tim, exactly as you said. No,

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I think the one thing that we can say is

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>that banks really profit during periods of market volatility. And

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what we're gonna see, or we're hoping to

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>see in the upcoming quarter starting on Thursday. You know,

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:23.119
<v Speaker 1>massive market swings resulting from you know, recessionary fears. We're

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>seeing inflation on the rise, you know, the Russian invasion

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of Ukrainians really expected to bolster some of the trading

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>revenue that we're seeing. And I think what's unique about

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>this quarter that we haven't seen in previous ones is

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that it's not just one asset class across the board,

0:01:37.560 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>so we're really seeing it across you know, fixed income, commodities.

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Equity is also anticipated to be up almost twenty in

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming quarter as well. That's interesting. I find that

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>fascin right, Yeah, because it's been really tough on the

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>equity front. I got I do feel like when we

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>start to get those numbers will just pick it apart. Um.

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a great quote, can I if you can just

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>take us there um the global head of markets at

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>City Group and need Morton. I guess there was an

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>industry conference last month. What did he have to say? Yeah,

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>so we're seeing any more in saying that about volatility

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>being kind of our friend or something, so exactly, volatility

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>is our friend, and that we're seeing it across those

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>asset classes as we as I was talking about before,

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not just limited to one thing. I love it

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that they've kind of given us a heads up a

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit about because because you never know, like we

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>talked about this all the time, and this is why

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>we write the big banks report that ultimately and get

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>one that can do really well because they were on

0:02:28.639 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the right side of the trades, another that might not. Okay,

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the flip side of that coin, though,

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>because if about a year ago we'd be sitting here

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in the Interactive Broker studio is talking about all the

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>great revenue that these these banks would bring in from

0:02:41.680 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>making deal after deal after deal I p O after

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I p O after I pos fact. Yeah, I mean,

0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 1>when was the last time you heard of a spac

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:50.880
<v Speaker 1>actually completing a deal? Carroll No, it's been a long

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>How is that going to be reflected in earnings this quarter? Yeah,

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>so I think the sumth that we saw last quarters

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>expected to you know, continue on into this one. We

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>saw you know, as you said, like massive amounts of

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:05.119
<v Speaker 1>deals in the making last year, and we're really seeing

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 1>that slow down and all of the you know, sort

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of economic turbulence that that has bolstered the trading revenue

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing for the upcoming quarter is actually what's

0:03:13.560 --> 0:03:16.079
<v Speaker 1>going to end up slowing down our investment banking revenue.

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, we have executives analysts predicting almost decrease year

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 1>over year in the revenue that we're expected to see. Yeah,

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:25.560
<v Speaker 1>it's really kind of come to a start after you know,

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of record years. Talk to us about interest

0:03:27.960 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>interest income, because I do think about this in the banks, right,

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to know, you know, they're certainly making money,

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>is right, it's go upwards. It's a much more positive

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>environment for them when it comes to interest income. How

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>big of a kick might that be? Yeah, you know, Carol,

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm so glad that you brought that up, because we're

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>expected to see almost you know, fifty billion in over

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a fifty billion actually in interest income for the big

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:53.119
<v Speaker 1>five names, um, and that's about increase from last year.

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we're really seeing those higher rates benefit banks.

0:03:56.960 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>They're able to you know, pass those down onto their

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>loan products. You know, we've seen credit card used to

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>go up. We're seeing those also reflected in credit card rates.

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's expected to be a big you know, um,

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a theme across the board this quarter and

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>honestly moving on from this quarter as well. Okay, lots

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>of macro stuff to talk about. And again we love

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>hearing from banks because we get an idea of what

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 1>consumers are doing with their money, how they're spending. From

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Dimon the weather man. The weather man. Yeah, it's

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>like there's like a Bob Dylan song in here somewhere, right,

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>there's totally but right, the commentary is going to be crucial. Um.

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 1>So I think that you know, the one word on

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>everyone's mind right now is recession. You're gonna say hurricane, well,

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>hurricane to tsunami, you know, thunderstorms, whatever he was mentioning before.

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know, again, one word on every everyone's mind

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is recession. And I think the way that we're really

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>going to start seeing that is um, how banks are

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>going to start shoring up whether or not they're anticipating

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>a recession is really going to be reflected in their reserves. Yeah,

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>so interesting, Well, what we'll go ahead, Carol, No, I

0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about that too, right, you know, we look

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>at like low lost for visions, right and things like

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that that given indication of maybe what the banks are

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>worried about are just preparing for maybe in the second half. Well,

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I think about are the headlines that

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the quarter about companies laying off people

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>in the mortgage division or reassigning them in the mortgage division,

0:05:14.240 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and how perhaps that foretold some of the challenges that

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 1>we might hear about when it comes to home loans

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>as interest rates have gone up. Yeah, so I mean,

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>as you said, you know, markets rates are surging, which

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>means that there has really been that cool down in

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>UM in the in the housing market overall, we've seen

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:34.520
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan whilst Fargo start either laying off or reassigning

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 1>their UM reassigning some of their stuff there. So that's

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>definitely something that we're going to keep a lookout for

0:05:40.440 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in the earnings calls. And then the reports and how

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that's going to continue on. Well, I noticed it even

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>just like you know, getting bombarded by my own bank,

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, in terms of my mortgage company, and like

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:54.040
<v Speaker 1>rEFInd its refined so long ago, like it's the lowest rates,

0:05:54.080 --> 0:05:55.640
<v Speaker 1>and then you can just see it's just come to halt.

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>And I have a relative um that works in the industry,

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, how you're doing because they she was

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>frenetic through the pandemic, additional assistance and processing mortgages and refinancing,

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and she's like, it's been really quiet. I'm sure it has.

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.280
<v Speaker 1>With six rates. Well, Uh, this is going to be

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 1>really important in terms of the sentiment. We talked so

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:17.560
<v Speaker 1>much A part a part, so much how important the

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.719
<v Speaker 1>investor sentiment is. Uh, and I think the banks are

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:22.480
<v Speaker 1>going to go a long way to shaping it. So

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much. Good preview, good set up for

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:28.119
<v Speaker 1>the week. Sabam Sahara, And she is Bloomberg News Finance

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>reporter joining us in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. We

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>get what JP Morgan Thursday morning? Who else do we

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>get Thursday morning Morgan Stanley? So there's a big one,

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and then I think we get Alban Sacks. We've got

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>well spargo for next week. It's not all happening in

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.119
<v Speaker 1>one week. This year quarter. We spread out the wealth.

0:06:44.880 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, we spread out the wealth. When it said

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I didn't know what he said. We

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 1>have fun here. It's a wacky Tuesday, guys. All right,

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>you're listening to Bloomberg Business with Carol Masther, Jim Stanivic

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg Radio. You're listening to Bloomberg Business

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:06.839
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick takes Tim Stinovic

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. In the upcoming issue of Bloomberg Business Week,

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a story that looks into the U s rivalry with

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>China over advanced technologies. And what's interesting about that, Tim,

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is the role of Israel and all of that. Yeah,

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:20.840
<v Speaker 1>it kind of finds itself in the middle of this

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>global conflict. Joshua Brewstein is Technology editor for Bloomberg Business Week.

0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>He joins us on the phone from New York City.

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna talk all about this story by Sarah Zang

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and Coco Lou. It is in feed thee upcoming issue

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week magazine. But you can read it

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>now on the Bloomberg in at Bloomberg dot com Slash

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>business Week. Also with us right now is Joel Weber,

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>editor of Bloomberg Business Week. He's with us in the

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Brokers studio. So, Joel, how how does Israel

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>find itself right now when it comes to tech? You know,

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a really interesting question. Israel long been fascinating to

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>me just as a tech obsessed country, and like within

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the last ten to twenty years the country is actually

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>trans formed its economy and gone all in on tech.

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>So just to set this table, there's it's a very interesting,

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:11.080
<v Speaker 1>uh environment. Also, keep in mind there's this larger east

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>West tension between China and the US and Israel right

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>smack dad in the middle of it. What's interesting and

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>what caught my attention with this story is the US

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>has been really trying to move Israel into its sphere

0:08:22.840 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of influence on the tech front. Um. China has long

0:08:26.120 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>been uh, you know present there. But but Josh, how

0:08:30.200 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 1>how has the US managed to sort of ice China

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:37.600
<v Speaker 1>out in regards to Israel? Yeah, thanks, Joel. The interesting

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.320
<v Speaker 1>thing is, as you said, Israel really punches above its

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>way when it comes to tech, especially in cybersecurity, and

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the US has been over the last several years, UM

0:08:49.120 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>really focus on his global effort to try to keep

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>China from getting Western technologies and being able to kind

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.959
<v Speaker 1>of build up its own capacity. And it's it's really

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 1>been aggressive on doing at UM with US companies and

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>companies in Europe. And you know, China was trying to

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 1>get into UM into Israeli companies that it was making

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>an increasing amount of investments there, and the US through UM,

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 1>through pressure, through pressure on the government hasn't really done

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 1>anything formal, but Israeli companies are kind of getting the

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>message and and just steering away from taking Chinese investment

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>UM not because they have to, but just because they

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of see the winds shifting. Well, Josh, so what

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 1>does this look like in practice? Right? Like you you

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously have this is like a meta meta level kind

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 1>of like influence play, But how does it actually work

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>in practice? Because China's you know, poured a lot of

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>money into play here and maybe it's just not as

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>much now or is it? Is it bigger than that? Yeah?

0:09:49.679 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's two things. The main thing is that

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.599
<v Speaker 1>China had been increasing Chinese investors had been increasing the

0:09:56.640 --> 0:10:00.079
<v Speaker 1>amount of money they were putting into Israeli startups. It

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>wasn't there weren't the main source of capital, but there

0:10:02.600 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 1>was a growing source and that changed UM kind of

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in the late Trump administration, you saw Israeli startups and

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 1>they went to look for funding UM, shying away from

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Chinese sources. The amount of money that Israeli companies were

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 1>taking from Chinese investors has just been steadily declining. UM.

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>And you saw, like for instance, in an electric vehicle

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:31.320
<v Speaker 1>UM company that UH said, you know, it didn't want

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to take money from you know, from from from China

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that was being offered UM. And just kind of a

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>general chilling of the mood. But you know, Joshua, it's

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not black and white here, right, It's not totally binary.

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I noticed in the reporting from our colleagues, the piece

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that that you edited that you know, US investors. For example,

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>in in an Israeli chip company, they would allow this

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>company to sell products in China, but only if it

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>promised not to conduct research there. This according to a

0:10:58.360 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>person familiar with the company plans, and just discussing it,

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>not saying their name because it's a sensitive matter. In

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the reporting. UM. I'm wondering though, like where the gray

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>areas are here, because it's not like they're going to

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>completely cut themselves off from from doing business right right, Absolutely,

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>And obviously the U S and China UM, despite the rivalry,

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>are are very interwoven themselves. What the US doesn't want

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>China to get ahold of our the types of technologies

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that would allow it to be able to make the

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>most advanced semiconductors completely on their own. So that is

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>really the focus of US policy. UM. For technologies that

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>aren't as sensitive, there's kind of as you move further

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>down UM down the scale, there's less and less concern

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and less and less pressure to kind of ice China

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>out there. And it does sound like increasingly we're seeing

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to and Israeli startup, that they're going

0:11:56.480 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>to lean more towards the West, whether it's US or

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>their versus over a Chinese investor. Is that fair to say, Yeah,

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that that is really the dynamic we're seeing now.

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>One thing the US has done is pushed for a

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:14.559
<v Speaker 1>more for the Israeli government to adopt a more formal

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:18.199
<v Speaker 1>review process for technologies that might have national security implication.

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that was That's a really interesting part of

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>the story, Josh, because it speaks to like, you know,

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Sippius became such a you know, just that thing during

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 1>especially during the Trump administration, and I'm just curious, like,

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>what what kind of uh pressure has the US really

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>tried to put on Israel on that front? Yeah, exactly, So,

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration was pushing, uh for for the Israeli

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>government to implement a similar review process to Sippius. The

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration continues to advocate for that Israel hasn't done it,

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>um in the way that the US would like. But

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>even without that formal review um. You know, companies are

0:12:56.559 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>making their own decisions, uh, you know and steering away

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.839
<v Speaker 1>from you know, steering away from doing deals that you know,

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>even that that don't have a formal review process. Um.

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, even even without the formal even without

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the formal success, they're having, you know, the informal sway.

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So do we anticipate with President Biden making that first

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.960
<v Speaker 1>presidential visit to Israel that's tomorrow, should we anticipating kind

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of headlines on this front or I'm just thinking about

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>our investment audience. Should they be looking out for something

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>or this is going to be stepp probably under the radar,

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:31.199
<v Speaker 1>but watch for more stories to come. Yeah, I think

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>I could go either way. I mean, Israel and the

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>United States. Uh, you know, it's one of the most

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>important relationships that the Biden administration has, and there's a

0:13:39.559 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>lot to discuss, um, things that they are closer on

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and things that they're further away from. So this might

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>not be up on the same level as say the

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>Russian war in Ukraine or you're any nuclear deal, but

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're certainly going to discuss it in some context.

0:13:53.679 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Until something that you said earlier in our conversation really

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.480
<v Speaker 1>stuck out to me was the over the last decade.

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:00.719
<v Speaker 1>And I think for me what I remember as a

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>as a pivotal point was when Google bought Ways years ago.

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And what's remarkable, I think is the way that cybersecurity

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in particular just dominates. And one thing that I found

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty striking is that of global investment in cybersecurity that's

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.199
<v Speaker 1>happening in the tiny country of Israel. Yeah, and I

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>mean he does speak to like I mean Josh said

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>said it. You know, it is a country that hits

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>above its weight. Um and what's even interesting to me

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>is that you know, the US doesn't maybe you know,

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>as you heard Josh, it's like Israel is the way

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of like kind of also rebuffing the US and not

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>giving the U s everything that I want, so so

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>they can throw their away around for sure. Well, and

0:14:36.360 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 1>I think about the Cold War right when it comes

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to technology and how we're starting to see, you know,

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>potentially things being divated up even more and more, or

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>the role of Israel and all of it. And look

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>like I just think from from again from an investment standpoint,

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a hot better place, and like from an

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>investors standpoint, like we will see more and more interest there.

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And if this sphere influenced thing really does play out,

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you know that that bodes well for American investors especially.

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I think about the number of startups that we often

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>feature on air that are coming from Israel. Our guys

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>we got around Joshua Breustin. He's Technology editor of Bloomberg

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.400
<v Speaker 1>business Week, along with Jill Weber, the editor of Bloomberg

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Business Week magazine. Check out this story in the upcoming issue.

0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Business Week with

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say we are obsessed with this story. I am.

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about Tim, but I think we both Oh,

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I am too. I'm ready to get adopt what Europe

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:33.920
<v Speaker 1>is doing when it comes to passengers bill of rights.

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's get into it with Brook Southerland Carol, because she's

0:15:37.280 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 1>deals in industrials. Columness from Bloomberg Opinion. She joined this

0:15:39.800 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>this afternoon on the phone from New York City. Well,

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's interesting because you know, we're coming off this

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>story about Heathrow UM that's imposing a two month camp

0:15:47.840 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>on daily passenger traffic. There's just so much going on

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in this industry at the same time, Brooke, I don't know.

0:15:53.160 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>First of all, great to have you here with us

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>on the phone in New York City. Um. Tim and

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>I've done some flying and some of the experiences have

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>been okay, some so okay, like the last one we had.

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like, who's speaking up for me, the

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>traveler who's paying for these tell us a little bit

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>about what's going on here? Sure, And I think, I

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>mean the unfortunate reality is that you two are not

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>alone in having a very difficult travel experience. Uh, this

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>is you know some of it. I do think, you know,

0:16:22.200 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we collectively have a little bit of amnesia about how

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>annoying it was to travel pre pandemic because you know,

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 1>we just haven't done it very often. But the data

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>does suggest that delays, cancelations, all of that is becoming

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>more frequent. Um, so there is, you know, some some

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>data to back up those anecdotes that you yourself have experienced.

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know that we hear all too much about

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of different factors that play. I think

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to point the finger in any one direction.

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>You did have the U. S. Taxpayer step in and

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>provide more than fifty billion of you mean, like you,

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>me and Tim and everybody else. Yeah, comolutely, I mean,

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 1>you know this is this is what we did during

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. In terms of stimulus. The airline industry was

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>the only one to receive special dispensation among those hard

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>hit pandemic sectors. Certainly, they were not the only ones

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>that asked for it. There was lots of calls to

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>have special protections for restaurants, bus operators, you name it,

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>but airlines were the ones that got the special protection.

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Now that did not necessarily stop them from shrinking their workforces. Um,

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were bleeding cash pretty significantly, and so

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:34.359
<v Speaker 1>they leaned heavily on things like voluntary leave, uh in

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>early retirement offers. So they are now trying to ramp

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.920
<v Speaker 1>their staffing back up. Um, we're seeing, you know, especially domestically,

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>demand above and beyond what we saw pre pandemic, and

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 1>so they're playing catch up with that. And now you

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 1>also have some of these third party operators to do

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>things like baggage handling, catering. They're all facing staffing shortages.

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Air traffic control plays a role. We also have weather

0:17:58.840 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 1>that all popular, Um, you know issue for delays. Yes,

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 1>sometimes I look sometimes I get that delay or cancelation

0:18:05.560 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>and I see zero weather anywhere in the country. So

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna say, you know, whether in quotation mark

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>meaning we could find a pilot, Yeah, exactly. Yes. I

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:17.960
<v Speaker 1>want to get an understanding of of what this bill

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of rights could look like for US travelers here because

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 1>right now as you write that, you know, passengers, if

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>their flight is canceled or or then they get they're

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>entitled to a full cash refund. It goes further in Europe. Um,

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>what happens in Europe if a plane is delayed, for example,

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>it does And so I think this is really interesting.

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>First emphasize, you know, I I'm not suggesting that Europe

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>is a sort of panacea for fight travel right now,

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 1>because they certainly have issues of their own in terms

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of delays and cancelations. But there is more of a safeguard,

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>There are more consumer protections for when these travel experiences

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>go awry. So in the US you are entitled to

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a refund if the carrier cancels your flight, and that

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>is a cash refund um. And then you can theronically

0:19:03.800 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 1>get a refund if your flight is significantly delayed. But

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>there's no definition for what is a significant delay, and

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Transportation decides this on a case by

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>case basis. Just from a practical standpoint, that's a pain. Uh,

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you are not, I mean as long as you ultimately

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.719
<v Speaker 1>get to your destination. The number of people who are

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.639
<v Speaker 1>going to go through this process of sort of figuring

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:28.960
<v Speaker 1>this out with the Department of Transportation are are few

0:19:29.040 --> 0:19:32.679
<v Speaker 1>and far between, um, And so that contrasts with Europe,

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>which does have provisions in place to say that, you know,

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>passengers who face significant delays should get not only refunds,

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.159
<v Speaker 1>but also compensation up to six hundred euros that is

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of variable depending on the length of the flight.

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>They also have all kinds of rules around requiring the

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>airlines to provide refreshments and meals in the event of

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>significant delays UH and to also provide overnight accommodation if

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that rerouting forces passengers to have to take a flight

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the following And I will say my recent one where

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:03.479
<v Speaker 1>I had some flight delays, they were offering me up

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a meal cupon and asking me if I needed a hotel.

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>So I was pretty impressed with that, and I gotta say,

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>get that and I had the same issue. I don't

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>want to tell you, buddy, I will say, I remember.

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Think that's the problem is that, you know, like sometimes

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>airlines will step in and do something sort of of

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:21.360
<v Speaker 1>their own free will, because you know they are customer

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>facing industry. They will try to help you out. But

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not standardized, and so people can have wildly different

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>experiences depending on the airlines, the circumstances of your fight,

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:32.920
<v Speaker 1>what airport you get stranded at. Yeah, and I think

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 1>that can be really frustrating for people. Absolutely absolutely, all right,

0:20:36.720 --> 0:20:39.040
<v Speaker 1>brooks So good to catch up with you, brook Sutherland.

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>She's deals in Industrials, communist at Bloomberg Opinion on the

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:43.640
<v Speaker 1>phone in New York City. I mean, I remember days

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of like circling for a long time waiting to land

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>or kicking off from the gate and just sitting for

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>hours on a runway. I do feel like something. We're

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:58.920
<v Speaker 1>driving from Cincinnati next month. You've just given up the

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>journal now, but you let me drive? Oh no, no, no, no,

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, please, I want to drive. It's good question. Drive.

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:22.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the clothes on Bluebirg radio.

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, just about ten minutes left in today's trading session,

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and we had seen take it back about I don't know,

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>forty minutes or so. We really saw some selling uh

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>deepening and hitting our loads of the session. We bounced

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:35.400
<v Speaker 1>off those levels, but we're still down across the board.

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>The NASTAC though tim taking the biggest hit on a

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>percentage basis down about one percent. But we've talked about

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to some extent some white volume in all of this.

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 1>But nonetheless, this is ahead of that important CPI print tomorrow. Yeah,

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>let's get to Sandy Villeri, portfolio manager at Villary and Co.

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Just Sandy joining us this afternoon on the phone from

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans. Sandy, good to have you back with us.

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 1>How are you? Yeah, thanks, Tim, doing well, appreciate it.

0:21:57.720 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I love the way that you start out your notes

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>here to our producer Paul Brennan, who then passed them

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>along to us. Uh, you said that you're forty seven

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>years old and that we're going to finish the first

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>half of two with the worst six month returns since

0:22:10.600 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you've been alive. So what's an investor to do seeing declines? Yeah, no,

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's been an unbelievable start to start to the year.

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>But I do think people can take advantage of of

0:22:22.680 --> 0:22:25.200
<v Speaker 1>some of this weakness, especially when you look at you know,

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the Vanguard Growth index is off about you know, year

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 1>to date, Vanguard values off just ten percent. So we

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>would actually begin to chase some of those growth names

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that have really been left for dead and been beaten up,

0:22:39.160 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to uh, you know, going after the most

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:45.680
<v Speaker 1>crowded trade there is, which is buying the value names,

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the staples, the health care of the utility in the

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>telecoms So are you saying, I mean, are you saying

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that the worst is behind us and that it's now

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is the time to get And are you saying, you know,

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>if you have a three to five year time horizon,

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.440
<v Speaker 1>even if we see more declines in the second half

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of the year, you're still in a good place putting

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 1>your money to work right now. Yeah, I think people

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>don't really want to buy stocks quite yet, not until

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll see the inflation number tomorrow. And then

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>two things are kind of happening at once. You're gonna

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 1>have all these companies reporting second quarter earnings, which you

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>are coming out you know now through the next you know,

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>let's call it the end of July. Well, we'll see

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the bulk of them. And I think I think companies

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in general gonna report good numbers, but they're going to

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:25.360
<v Speaker 1>use that as an opportunity to probably guide down, um,

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, just kind of moderate expectations. And I think

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that's one thing that people may want to just wait for.

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And and um, you know, really the the um the

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>second is really just where um you know, um, you

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>know what what the FED does at the end of

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>their meeting July when they go ahead and raise that

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:47.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's all but a foregone conclusion. They're gonna

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.359
<v Speaker 1>raise seventy five basis points. So if you can you know,

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>own them, you know, right after that, I think that's

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 1>going to set the loads for the market as things

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 1>get reset. Alright, Sandy, your Portfolido manager, you know you've

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>got money to put to work. You've got to figure

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 1>it out for your investors. Let's get to some names

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that you brought to our attention on semiconductor. Is one

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>UM that you like tickers? Oh and tell me why

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the stocks off about year to day. It's a semi

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>device maker. Why this particular name? Yeah, I like it

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:16.719
<v Speaker 1>UM for a couple of reasons. You know, one UM,

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I love the CEO, Hassan el Cory. We we owned

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a Cyper Semiconductor before it was sold and he um,

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>he did a great job running that company and really

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.959
<v Speaker 1>transforming it. So he is uh currently you know, basically

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>getting rid of a lot of the lower margin commodity

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>or in in parts of their business and getting into

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the more you know, higher growth, higher margin business. In fact,

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you get a goal of reaching gross margins in three years.

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And he's basically they're already uh he's getting into you know,

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>silicon carbide, which is really the fastest growing segment of

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>their of their business. It's growing at thirty percent and

0:24:49.240 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 1>it's just totally it's of the revenue, So I think

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it's going to uh, you know, do quite well. And

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it's cheap, but it's it's eleven times earning, So I

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.520
<v Speaker 1>like on a lot how much of it is. Also,

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:01.399
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be part of the S and P five hundred.

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Does that make a little bit more attractive to That

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>means those index managers gotta gotta include this one. Yes,

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:10.719
<v Speaker 1>that that definitely helps will take all the all the buying. Uh,

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, power that we can we can throw that

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>we can find for them. Um but uh no great

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>great end markets and when you're looking at it versus

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, some of the other semiconductor names, as the

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>sector has kind of been left for dead. Uh certainly

0:25:23.040 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 1>like the way that uh these guys have you know,

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>end markets that aren't totally you know, tied up to

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.959
<v Speaker 1>cell phones and PCs and the consumer um. But uh,

0:25:32.160 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, but areas that you know, electric vehicles and um,

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 1>industrial automation and alternative energy and and and and things

0:25:39.200 --> 0:25:41.640
<v Speaker 1>like that. Solether end markets as well. All Right, it's

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a nice sunny day here in the summer in New

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>York City. Perfect day to talk about the lack of

0:25:47.000 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>pools that me and all my friends have, but a

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:51.440
<v Speaker 1>good day to talk about Pool Corporation another one of

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>your picks. It's got about a fourteen billion dollar market cap. Um,

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>why are you bullish on Pool and you've liked it before? Correct? Yeah,

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean we we have. You know, we're a very

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>long term holder. Um. Five years is almost young for us,

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 1>and we've been involved with Pool since nine six when

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it went public. And what I think people don't quite

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>get about pools that of their revenue is really from

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>repair and maintenance of your swimming pools. So if you

0:26:17.760 --> 0:26:19.959
<v Speaker 1>think about your cell phone bill and your electric bill

0:26:20.040 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and things you tend to continue to pay in any

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:25.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of recession, etcetera. Most people continue to, you know,

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>buy chlorine and don't let the pool turn green or

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>black or something like that, and they rarely fill them in.

0:26:30.119 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>So once you have this hole in your ground and

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.639
<v Speaker 1>in your backyard, you tend to continue to maintain it.

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:40.119
<v Speaker 1>So only of the revenue really comes from new pool construction,

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>which you know, it will be a little bit choppy

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>as as housing slows down with higher interest rates, but

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't think enough to warrant a thirty five you

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>know pull back in the stock. And it really sets

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>up as a nice opportunity for for people that have

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, two to three year time horizon alright, pool

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 1>and on semi conductor. There's are bigger market caps. You've

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 1>got a smaller market cap about one point six billion.

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.600
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about Palmar Technologies. I think this is another

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>name that you've talked to us before preas in the

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>insurance market. Seconds, why this name and why now? Yeah? Yeah, so, um,

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>this is also pulled back pretty sharply, and it's it's

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>awfully cheap trades that less than you know, fifteen times

0:27:19.359 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, two thousand twenty three earnings and the peers

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 1>around seventeen times. Um. But these guys are pretty getting

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>into some pretty um, you know, great markets with you

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:32.199
<v Speaker 1>know hurricanes and Hawaii and you know earthquakes in California. Um,

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 1>it's just a very nice business that's only a two

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>percent market share of basically an eighteen billion dollar you know,

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 1>total addressable market. So we think these guys um have

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:46.159
<v Speaker 1>incredible technology. It allows them to get really granular UH

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>in their underwriting and and really get into some UH

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>inefficient markets to help, you know, drive drive their return.

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 1>So we like it a lot. And and mc armstrong

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.359
<v Speaker 1>is also a very solid CEO that we're looking forward

0:27:57.359 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to the next you know, several years with him at

0:27:59.320 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>the Helm. All right, I'm gonna leave it there. I

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate it. And it's interesting to how you note

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 1>the leaders, and that obviously is something that's on your

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 1>radar when you pick and choose some of the names

0:28:07.800 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to invest in. Sandy Villery, he's portfolio manager at Villery

0:28:10.840 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>and Company, on the phone in New Orleans, joining us

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 1>on the phone on this Tuesday. Thanks for listening to

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to our

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 1>radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>watch us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News