WEBVTT - The FTX and BlockFi Deal, and Abortion Misinformation Online

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.640
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.400 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Emily Ja I met Lolow in San Francisco in for

0:00:28.560 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Emily Chang. This is Bloomberg Technology coming up in the

0:00:31.400 --> 0:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>next hour. Crypto sector shake up f t X pounder

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bankman Freed signing an option to buy crypto lender

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>block five, an exclusive conversation with SPF and why he

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>thinks there are synergies between the two businesses. Plus misinformation

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>moment one week on from the U. S. Supreme Court

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>overturning Roe v. Wade, doctors tell Bloomberg potentially deadly abortion

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>advice is spreading online and Tesla test The ev makers

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>expected to report quartly production numbers this weekend. A hot

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.960
<v Speaker 1>streak of records is on the line as Shanghai shutdowns

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and supply chain snags leave Wall Street to cut forecasts.

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's continue the week, Let's switch to crypto. Fd X

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>sign an agreement with block fire today. The deal includes

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 1>an option to purchase the crypto lender for as much

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>as two hundred and forty million dollars. Sam Bankman Freed,

0:01:20.440 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>co founder of FDx, spoke exclusively with Bloomberg Shinnaldi Bassak

0:01:24.400 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>about how the deal and the companies will align. H

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 1>I think that there are a lot of ways that

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 1>our products can work together and can mesh together in

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a way that's sort of better than you know, either

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>would be independently. And I will also say that you know,

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>they've been working really productively with regulators on you know,

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>building out regulated yield products and licensed yield products, which

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>which you know were it stated about and excited that

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>they've been doing it in a regulated way. I think

0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that's the healthy way to do it. And I think

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that's to serve them well, um, you know long term, um.

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's something that you know worksage work with as well.

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>You know you told political that f TX is looking

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:12.399
<v Speaker 1>for opportunities to bail out, you know, places where customers

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>would otherwise be underwater. But are you worried here about

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>moral hazard at all that bailing out a company may

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.520
<v Speaker 1>not actually be what's best for the industry at large.

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a good question, and you know, and and guessing

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>what you're getting at there is like does that bail

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>out a company that really should have failed? And and

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>teacher is the wrong lesson to that company. Um. And

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I think what I would say, there's two things. First

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.239
<v Speaker 1>of all, I'm way more excited to bail out customers

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>than shareholders, right. And so the focus of this is

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:48.239
<v Speaker 1>not how do we deliver as much shareholder value do

0:02:48.560 --> 0:02:52.519
<v Speaker 1>troubled assets as possible? Right, It's how do we protect customers?

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think those imply pretty different things. Um uh.

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>So that that's that's one thing that will say. And

0:02:59.480 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that one of them is way more important

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>for the ecosystem and the other is the one that

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>has the biggest moral hazard. Um. The other thing is

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that um uh, is that you know, we are trying

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to find who were the responsible players who were building

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:18.959
<v Speaker 1>out you know, a good business you know, how to

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>sustainable model and you know would use short term liquidity

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>um and and and and that that could help protect

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>customer funds fundamentally built you know, a a a real

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>valuable business that I think, um, you know, had something

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>real to offer to customers rather than you know, which

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>companies honestly should never have existed probably and um and

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you know as of today, you know, maybe we should

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>just let let them sort of uh you know, diet

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:58.160
<v Speaker 1>quiet death joining me. Now is Bloomberg shallybas act for

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>more and I mean sly what strikes me this is

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a guy who who's just strengthening his grip on this industry, right,

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>talk us about, talk to us about I guess the

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 1>importance of this deal in the landscape. Yeah, it's it

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is a really interesting deal because remember there are other

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.400
<v Speaker 1>firms that have paused withdrawals. A lot of people talking

0:04:15.440 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>about how Black five was one that, with the help

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of sam BANKM and Freedom f TX, has been able

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to make it through and be there for their clients

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 1>even in the midst of these really tumultuous times. I

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>want to point out also what's happening with Voyager, because

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>they are suspending certain operations and you do you they

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 1>have the withdrawal issue as well. And remember another sam

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Bankman Free entity had lended them credit line as well,

0:04:39.960 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So that question of moral hazard is a real one.

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Who will make it through and who won't. It's interesting

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>on block Fire as well, Like if I slept through

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:49.359
<v Speaker 1>the last year, I thought this was a three billion

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>dollar company. This seems to value them at a much

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>lower evaluation. Yeah, absolutely, And you know, you think about

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 1>it when from three billions to potentially one billion, and

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.160
<v Speaker 1>now you have them much low or four million dollars

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>with the credit line, as well as that money that

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>you had been talking about here two million dollars with

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that option to purchase, and you think about it. And

0:05:10.839 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>when we spoke to Sam, he really said opportunistic buying

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>valuations were really a big reason here. But he also

0:05:18.160 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>hinted that really some firms will just simply not get

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>back to their former glory. Yeah, I think on the

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Tamino, I'm seeing this guy's name over and over again.

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 1>What did he have to say about M and A.

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.239
<v Speaker 1>In fact, why don't we just take a listen, because

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you asked in directly about some recent reports on interesting

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 1>robin hood. Would we do a large acquisition if it

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>did make sense and if all the parties were aligned

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>on it, you know we could in theory. Um, you know,

0:05:45.080 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we we have you know, a few billion on our

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet right now. We are profitable. Um, you know,

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:54.479
<v Speaker 1>we are able to further capitalize if we need. Tom

0:05:55.240 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean no name check, but takeaway, yeah, I mean

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the idea that they could buy something. He said, we

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>could buy something for billions of dollars, not thirty billion dollars,

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 1>but billions of dollars is certainly possible. Here we talked

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.040
<v Speaker 1>about by versus build because f t X has traditionally

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>built before. Of course, you know robin Hood fast growth

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:17.200
<v Speaker 1>company with a lot of employees under their employee base

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 1>and f t X runs really really lean ed and

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>so does that really fit together at the end of

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the day, he has a lot of ambitions, remember a

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.799
<v Speaker 1>firm like robin Hood. He also talked about potentially distressed

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>crypto minors. But again it's got to be a strategic

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>fit at the end of the day when you take

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>a look at what's happening between this potential robin Hood wanderlust,

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the block FI option to purchase maybe crypto miners. The

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:43.360
<v Speaker 1>question at the end of the day is who does

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bankman Freed want to be uh And it's got

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to be more than JP Morgan when you look at

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 1>a company that is coming out of this crypto winter

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>merging trade FI and defy and looking to the future

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:58.039
<v Speaker 1>for for what this new market structure could be under

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 1>a new regulatory regime. Right bloom Motion Alie Bassett, my

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 1>good mate, thank you. We'll see you later in the

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>show and Crypto will also be on the minds of those.

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Next week in some valley little road trip for us,

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg will be there, starting to lie sick for the

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>number of great guests, including so far's Anthony no To

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty three and me c O and Wijki, Event Brights,

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Harts, and many others. You don't want to miss it.

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Today marks one week since the U. S. Supreme Court

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>overturned Row v. Wade, which allowed women to access an

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>abortion if they needed one. In one week's time, medical

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>professionals have told Bloomberg that they've seen an uptick in

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the number of social media posts promoting various herbs, tonics,

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>and other dangerous substances and not viable substitutes for abortion.

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>For more and all of this, including social media's role

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in the conversation on abortion, I'm joined by Bloomberg's Alex

0:07:55.760 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Brinker along with David Kirkpatrick, founder of Techonomy. Ali gonna

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>start with you, what have we learned from doctors? What

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>is it that they're seeing and where are they seeing it? Yeah,

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and these doctors are are kind of sounding the alarm

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>um a lot earlier, maybe because they are now used

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to this pattern. We have a a health issue. We

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>saw it with COVID, we saw it with baby formula,

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and we have social media a place where people go

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to find the latest hack. The problem is, um, we're

0:08:23.120 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing some of these hacks, Um, some of these at

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>home solutions start to bleed into really serious health issues

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>like lack of abortion care for women. So already in

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>less than a week, we have seen at home tonics, herbs,

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>things that doctors Bloomberg talked to said are dangerous, potentially fatal.

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>We've seen these posts and content pop up across TikTok,

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>across Twitter, across Facebook and Instagram. So it's basically everywhere

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>if you know where to look, or if you just

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>happen to be passively scrolling through your feed and have

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>some of this, um what doctors would call misinformation pop

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>up in your social media. Well, I get what you mean.

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Right when you're scrolling through Instagram, even when you're on Twitter,

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>any social media platform, you come across something that doesn't

0:09:08.960 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>seem to be of any substance. It's it's kind of

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>packaged in a lighthearted way. David, how many times have

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 1>we've had this conversation about a number of topics are

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you surprised that the platforms weren't sort of more proactive

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in thinking about this kind of information and how it's

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>being shared. That is an understatement, and as Alex points out,

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we all unfortunately have gotten used to this

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>pattern pretty much whenever it comes to any kind of

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>misinformation because, for for several reasons, social media generally and

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>met US companies in particular, UM have designed their systems

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in a way that make it very hard for them

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 1>to detect and remediate misinformation of any type. And then separately,

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.559
<v Speaker 1>they really have a disincentive to do so because they

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>get revenue from eyeballs and attention and also from ads,

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>many of which shouldn't be there in the first place.

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>For example, you know, Meta allows prescription drug ads to

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 1>go to anyone above eighteen in the United States. They

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 1>don't even have to do that. They could have said

0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a much higher limit for that. And you know, prescription

0:10:17.720 --> 0:10:20.960
<v Speaker 1>drug ads are only consumer directed in the United States

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and New Zealand of all developed countries. So you know,

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>we have a lot of problems, Alex. When Bloomberg was

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>speaking to medical professionals, they raised an issue, which is

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 1>that you know, it's often easier to seek information or

0:10:35.000 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>advice online than it is to book an appointment to

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>go and see your practitioner or whatever. Can you explain

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the concerns that doctors had with that respect, of course,

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:46.199
<v Speaker 1>and I can break it into a couple of groups.

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you are a an individual in a state

0:10:49.200 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 1>that still has access to abortion. It might take seven

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>weeks to get into see your primary care doctor. But

0:10:54.360 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're somebody who is seeking an abortion in the

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>state where it is suddenly not available, you don't your options.

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>You don't know where to look, but you're used to,

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, getting your advice from everything firm how to

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>style your outfit, to you know what the healthiest meal

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>is you can put on your dinner table. You're gonna

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.959
<v Speaker 1>turn to social media. It's there. It's passive and these

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>this information is kind of being packaged in this um

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>entertainment meets advice, UM, kind of passively going through your

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>eyeballs into your brain in a way that feels um

0:11:27.320 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 1>much with it feels like it has a lot more

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>levity than the serious of this information. So um. You know,

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>even if you're somebody who still has access and you

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>see a quick fix for something that is a really

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>serious health issue. You know, folks are used to getting

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 1>this information in this way right now, I think, so

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to stick with you. Move to another story.

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>Tik Tik TikTok confirming that Chinese nationals will have some

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:57.679
<v Speaker 1>access to US user data. Can you explain what the

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>latest is? I know this is the story you've been covering. Yeah,

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>absolutely so. TikTok responded in a letter today to UM

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>nine senators who had basically asked TikTok a lot of

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>questions that we are starting to hear a lot in

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>regards to the company who has access to US users data?

0:12:15.200 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Do any China employees have access to US users data?

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:21.599
<v Speaker 1>What about the Chinese government? And hey, what about the algorithm?

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Where does that fall? So there was a big report

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>from BuzzFeed a couple of weeks ago. Senator sent a

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>letter to them, and TikTok CEO came back today with

0:12:30.080 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the response basically clarifying and confirming that yes, some employees

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>in China do have access to publicly available data for

0:12:39.320 --> 0:12:43.440
<v Speaker 1>TikTok users. This includes things like your videos, comments. But

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:47.719
<v Speaker 1>he's also saying the company is developing something called Project Texas.

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Basically this is their solution that they're working with the

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:54.240
<v Speaker 1>US government to court and off US users data, but

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>only specific US users data, um the the identifiers, the names,

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the addresses, things that or what we can expect. So

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>they're basically coming back saying, hey, this is where we stand. Look,

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>this letter came through today. There are folks in the

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>US government who are already coming back saying this is

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.719
<v Speaker 1>not enough. I can guarantee you. As we start to

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>end closer to things like the mid terms, and questions

0:13:18.080 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>around the veracity of information and is their influence from

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>China and US voters start to sneak into uh the

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>into the ether here, these questions will continue to get

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 1>louder from US officials. David, your reaction to that, please, Well.

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.960
<v Speaker 1>While I seldom agree with anything, Marsha Blackburn says, I

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:38.880
<v Speaker 1>have to say that he was quoted by Alex in

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>her story today saying that pretty much, if you use TikTok,

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you should assume your data is in the hands of

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese government. And unfortunately, that is what a lot

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of US observers have recognized for a long time. The

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that TikTok's management is directly confirming that today in effect,

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>is what is really news here. So you know, it

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>amazes me that people aren't We're concerned about this, and

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>this is an area where I think these Republican congress

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>people and Republican FCC members are really rightly focusing on

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a real issue. David, I want to bring you some

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>news just crossing the Bloomberg terminal, Google saying that it's

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:18.480
<v Speaker 1>going to begin deleting location history and its systems that

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it identifies as being personal information. It gives the example

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of certain medical facilities, for example, the change dudes come

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 1>into effect in the coming weeks. Facilities could include counseling

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>centers or domestic violence shelters, abortion clinics, fertility centers. Seems

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to be linked to, you know, search and maps and

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>when one might be seeking a destination. What's your sense

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>of how Alphabet and Google handling data and privacy at

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>this time. Well, I think that's very good news, and

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm really glad you told us that. I think Google

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is handling data and privacy better than it used to.

0:14:55.800 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's feeling a lot of pressure from

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple in particular, because Apple is so rigid about this

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and so principled about privacy. So I think it's great

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to see Alphabet and Google moving more firmly in the

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>direction of by default trying to protect user data. That's

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 1>really welcome. David, very quickly, give twenty seconds, give me

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.680
<v Speaker 1>your big tech outlook right now. What's the one thing

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you're watching? Oh my gosh, the the exaggeration of the

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>metaverse actually is the thing that I find the most

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of satisfying. I think there is absurd over promising

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>going on right now about where the kind of consumer

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Internet is going in the near term. There's no way

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be metaversity in anytime soon. So I

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>find that amusing. There's plenty of other things going on.

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously the stocks are not great opportunities for

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the short term because they got so valued, so highly valued,

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't resist. Sorry. Technology Teconomy founded David Kopatrick and

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>my mate bloombergs Alex Brinka. Good to see you. Thanks

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to you both. And just coming up on Tuesday, we'll

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>have FCC commission a Brending car on the show, where

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll ask him about TikTok. Coming up, Spotify's bet on

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>podcasting rather than music streaming. Has it paid off? We'll

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>discuss this is Bloomberg. Let's take a look at Spotify,

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the music streaming platform. Stock is down almost six this year,

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>even after spotify buys move into podcasts made it the

0:16:36.000 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>world's biggest audio service. The idea podcasting offers Spotify exclusive material,

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>forcing other tech giants to carry its service, and creating

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a revenue stream music labels can't touch. So why is

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it in trouble? Let's break it all down with Bloomberg's

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Lucas Shure, who wrote about this in quite a lot

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of detail and a fantastic Business Week piece. The strategy working,

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'd say it's a mixed bag right now.

0:16:58.840 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>It's it's working in the sun that more and more

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>people are what are listening to podcasts on Spotify? About

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>nine million of Spotify's users listen to podcasts. The revenue

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 1>that it generates from podcasting is growing at a at

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>a big clip. But Spotify has spent a lot of money,

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>more than a billion dollars so far. And you spend

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.919
<v Speaker 1>all that money and podcasting makes up about seven percent

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of listening and two percent of revenue. And they've done

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:24.159
<v Speaker 1>a lot of expensive deals with big name talent that

0:17:24.200 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 1>hasn't gone anywhere, and so there are a lot of

0:17:26.359 --> 0:17:29.120
<v Speaker 1>people inside and outside the company who are questioning where

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 1>some of that money is going. At the heart of

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>any good story is is a name a person, And

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>for Spotify, that's dull on ostrof Right, What's what's her

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>role be and how successful has she been? So she's

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the chief content officer, she also oversees the advertising business.

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>A long time TV executive who didn't have a lot

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of background in music or in podcasting before she joined Spotify.

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, she's the a in a lot of ways,

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the architect of the strategy. There's some people who work

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>for her who were very instrumental in it as well,

0:17:57.640 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>but she in particular has been a big drive. Are

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>these deals with big name talent? Uh? You know, the

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the Obama is an higher ground, the Royals, some filmmakers,

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 1>some social media celebrities, Kim Kardashian and there have not

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of big shows to come out of

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>those deals. The big names are important, right and thinking

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>about Joe Rogan, shout out, Draymond Green show have been

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a big one for me over the last few months.

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>The Obamas, we'll slippa forward. Are they just going to

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>have to sign up more names to keep this going.

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of it is going to come

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:30.800
<v Speaker 1>down to how big the advertising business can get and

0:18:30.840 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 1>how much Spotify can start to replicate. Uh, you know,

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a service like YouTube, those big name shows are really

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>great for getting people in and for marketing. But the

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>core and of that Spotify business is supposed to be

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the mass of podcasts. You know, they host four million

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast give or take right now right, they said that

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>by I think they want to have like fifty million

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>creators on the platform. That is a lot of people.

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>And they figure if they have that many people posting,

0:18:57.359 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>they will kind of hoover up all the demand and

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>they'll be able to sell ads against all these all

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.360
<v Speaker 1>these users, and their ad business is growing, but it's

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>still only about of the overall high Alright, bloom Bog's

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Lucas Shore out in l A all Things Spotify, Thank

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>you very much. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Ed

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Lovelow in San Francisco. Tesla ends the week in the green,

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's been slipping, making it one of the worst

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>weeks of the year. This is the company is still

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>dealing with delivery issues with its Shanghai factory remaining in lockdown.

0:19:35.800 --> 0:19:38.160
<v Speaker 1>For more on all of this, I'm joined by Bloomberg's

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Shawn o'caine out in Austin, Sean. The expectation we get

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>quarterly delivery figures this weekend what you're looking for? I mean,

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the consensus seems to be in the high two thousands,

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe around two and sixty thou or so. Which if

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, we're talking about a quarter that is

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>about ut or so delivery short of around where the

0:19:59.240 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>last two quarters, as were an elon Musk at the

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 1>end of que one had said that they expected basically

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a flat quarter to quarter change or or no change.

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>So if there is a drop, then we can see

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 1>pretty much just how much we should attribute to the

0:20:14.320 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Shanghai lockdowns and the trouble that they've had over at

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that plan. So so what is the latest and what

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.760
<v Speaker 1>test is dealing with? Right? We haven't heard from me

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a little mosque for a little while. He's not sent

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>any tweets. But in Shanghai things have been tough. I mean,

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 1>their story is still about growth as it kind of

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:35.080
<v Speaker 1>always has been. I mean they're set up to open

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.760
<v Speaker 1>or have already sort of opened new factories both here

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>in Austin and in Berlin. Uh Musk recently made in

0:20:41.640 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>comments in an interview at the end of May. Uh

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe the claim that both of these new factories are

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 1>money furnaces, and really what he means by that is,

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, he said they're losing billions of dollars right now.

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 1>The point he was trying to make there is that

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>as they scale up production and try to get from

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>a hundred units a week or a hous and vehicles

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>a week, they're going to be spending far more money

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 1>on building out as factories than they are making any

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.560
<v Speaker 1>money back from them. And you know, I think a

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of people looked at that is possibly negative. The

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:14.239
<v Speaker 1>thing that keep in mind with that is that, like,

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>that's just the nature of it, and it's not going

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to slow Tesla down. Tesla's actually still working on expanding,

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>especially the factory here in Texas, even though it doesn't

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:24.040
<v Speaker 1>have production up to the level that he wants it

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>at yet. Well, let's talk about it. For those that

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Sean is out in Austin. He's awesome. If

0:21:28.800 --> 0:21:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't follow him on Twitter at s O Kane one,

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>I work with him every single day towards me about Austin, Like,

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 1>what is the grand master plan for Austin? What how

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is this Tesla factory change that city? I mean, right now,

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>it's still feels very much like the times that I

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 1>went to uh outside Reno when the Giga factory was

0:21:49.760 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>still in its first few years there, the original one

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>where you know, certainly you see a lot of Tesla

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>cars here more and more every day, but it is

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 1>now a topic of conversation. It's the kind of thing

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that it's an easy conversation to strike up with people

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:04.639
<v Speaker 1>who have lived here and worked here. Everybody has a

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>different opinion on it um, but it is it is

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>something that is sort of you know, it is a

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>very large facility, but it's also something that looms sort

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.119
<v Speaker 1>of metaphorically in people's minds now that it's up and

0:22:14.200 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 1>running even right sort of in a in a small volume.

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's something that is changing what is going

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.159
<v Speaker 1>on here. I think the bigger question about like what

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Elon Must actually wants to do in Austin still is

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>an answered. Although we've seen some reporting, including from our

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>own Sarah McBride at Bloomberg News, about all the different

0:22:32.119 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>things that he needs to do with other companies like

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the boring company here. I mean, he has a lot

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 1>more plans that he's really publicly led on too for

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:43.720
<v Speaker 1>this city, right Bloomberg Shawn O'Kaine, awesome, Thank you very much.

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's go from public market pain to private markets gain.

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:50.000
<v Speaker 1>It's been a wild week in the world of venture capital.

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>Despite recession fears volatility, new funds are popping me up

0:22:53.720 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>around the world. One report, so KOA Capital is trying

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>to raise two point two five billion from investors for

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>two new funds. Canada, CIBC Innovation Banking launched a new

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>one point five billion dollar venture fund, and around the

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>world money seems to be flowing to earlier stage startups,

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>but deal counts down. That's a lot's take on board

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:15.719
<v Speaker 1>joining us to discuss. Kathie gaw, partner of Sapphire Ventures.

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the world is a bit crazy right now.

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 1>But you, as a venture capitalist, how are you seeing things? Well?

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:23.960
<v Speaker 1>First of all, it's so great to be back here,

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 1>ed um, wow, it's still I first right, just they

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:31.119
<v Speaker 1>made it, We made it. You know. The past six

0:23:31.200 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>months have been the worst six months, as you reported

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>on earlier in the stock market for over fifty years.

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of turmoil in the markets. And I

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.000
<v Speaker 1>always say this that uncertainty is a foe of the markets.

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:45.959
<v Speaker 1>From my seat in the private markets, we haven't fully

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>seen the impact of the effect on the public markets

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.239
<v Speaker 1>flow into the private markets. That's a good point. We've

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>got this chart that looks at deal count, basically the

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 1>number of rounds or venture backed startups bringing in fundraising,

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>and between the first quarter in second quarter, there is

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>this dip, you know, we see it on our screens,

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>particularly pronounced in early stage, but there still seems to

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 1>be money flowing to early stage. I mean, where are

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you looking right now in the world. Is now a

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>great time to fund young startups? Or are you looking

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>at later stages. That's a very complicated situation for me personally.

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:22.359
<v Speaker 1>I focus on the Series B all the way up

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to pre I p O stage. When we think about

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.360
<v Speaker 1>what's been happening in the markets, all this volatility, everything

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>from you know, record high interest rates to rising inflation

0:24:32.119 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and even geopolitical risk. We saw that impact in the

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>public markets. The next group of assets to be affected

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>are the very late stage private markets companies like Karna

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 1>and instat cart and then it's kind of my stage.

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>My stage is a little bit frozen right now, because,

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, a lot of companies raise a lot

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.679
<v Speaker 1>of money in they might have thirty months of runway.

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.400
<v Speaker 1>They don't need to absolutely raise now. On the other hand,

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>investors don't know where the valuation is going to set

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>at all quite just yet. I would to bring you

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>up on that point. Down rounds. You know, we've seen

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a few. What's your read on that it's not necessarily

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a bad thing. But what's your take? It's definitely not

0:25:11.960 --> 0:25:15.159
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a bad thing. I think it's inevitable given some

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>of the run ups that we saw in and it

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 1>might feel really bad, you know, with all the headlines

0:25:21.160 --> 0:25:24.080
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing around layoffs and everything like that. But this

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.640
<v Speaker 1>is an opportunity for companies to re evaluate what they're

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>actually worth and prepare themselves for future rounds that they

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>may have to raise. I want to ask you about opportunities,

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>but we just showed some of your portfolio companies on

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the screen. What are you telling your founders, you know,

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>what advice are you giving to them if there is

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a recession looming about how they manage their businesses? About

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>their cash. You're telling them, you know, in any times

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>with uncertainty, there's so many things they can't control, But

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>what can they do to gain ball control? Right to

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>control their own destiny. So the top two things are

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Number one, cash is king in a recession. Keep a

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>very very sharp eye in cash and a related matter,

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>really focus on efficiency, take a hard look at your

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>go to market and overall burn efficiency and make changes

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 1>if you have to. And also it's an opportunity to

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>play offensive. You know, we always talk about some of

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>these great companies. Are you always come in with a

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:21.960
<v Speaker 1>smile on your face, You're you're optimistic about opportunity. Where

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 1>do you see the opportunity? Oh, I'm very very optimistic.

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean at a high level, we're very very bullish

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>on general cloud based staff. I think the transformation to

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>cloud is still in this early endings. And there are

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>many pockets that I am focused on in my firm,

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>sapphires focus on that I think are going to be

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>doing well regardless of any market. You know, things like

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:45.679
<v Speaker 1>cyber security right always going to be a hot topic.

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Things like future of work, things like healthcare and how

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>technology can transform healthcare. With the greatest respect cloud sas

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:56.119
<v Speaker 1>cybersecrazy that these things always come across in a lot

0:26:56.160 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of abstract you know, the president in everyday lives. How

0:26:59.000 --> 0:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>do you deter I mean, what's a real company, one

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>that's product is going to thrive with those things being

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>important to Corporate America the world. Yeah. We look at

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>two things very very closely UM. The first one being

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:16.360
<v Speaker 1>how do customers actually use a product and do they

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>love the product? This is where being a later stage

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 1>investor is a little bit easier than a super early

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>stage investor because the companies I'm looking at they have

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>real customers. So we spend a lot of time talking

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>to the customers and understanding, hey, is this solution really

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>solving an important pain point for you? And importantly are

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you willing to pay for this solution. The second thing

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>we look at is a proxy of how strong the

0:27:39.400 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>product market fit is, and that's how efficiently can you

0:27:42.160 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>sell your product very quickly? Are you optimistic about the

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>second half of UM. I think it's going to take

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>some time for the changes to flow through the market.

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we're in for some hard times ahead. I

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's going to be one quarter, two quarters,

0:27:57.800 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>three quarters, or more. But again my message to everyone

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is this is an opportunity to look inwards, you know,

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>get your house and shape and be ready for the future.

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Sapphire Ventures, Cafe Gow, thank you, such a pleasure to

0:28:09.640 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>have you here. Coming up crypto lawsuits from deceitful marketing

0:28:13.920 --> 0:28:16.919
<v Speaker 1>to pump and dump schemes. Why there's an uptick in

0:28:17.000 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>retail investor lawsuits and what the app called Do Not

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Pay wants to do about it? More on that. Next,

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>this is gloom Bug. How do you take on a

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>crypto lawsuit? People are dying to know, even VC investor

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Channa Pella Avatia reference one Bloomberg article on the battle

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>of an investor with finance. Is it tried to sue

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the crypto platform and take a listen, lost one point

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>two million dollars who wanted to file a lawsuit and

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.520
<v Speaker 1>they have every right to do that. UM couldn't even

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>find the corporate entity to to actually file. This lawsuit

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>against crypto has generated more than two hundred class action

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits and private litigation cases up more than fifty since

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the start of according to law firm Morrison Cohen, which

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>attracks the activity. Our next guest, Joshua a Browder, CEO

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of Do Not Pay the Legal services chatbot that wants

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to help the average crypto investor get their money back,

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>along with our crypto Contributortionalie Bassett back with us, Joshua,

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you for having me answer that question. How do

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you tackle a lawsuit like that? So everyone talks about

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 1>class actions, but in all of these big companies, like

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Celsius's terms of service, they say that you can't actually

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 1>sue them in federal court, but there's a loophole which

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.400
<v Speaker 1>says that you can sue them in small claims court.

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>And so what my company does is we automate small

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>claims court lawsuits. And so it's almost fitting that the

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>answer to decentralized crypto fraud is thousands of small claims

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>decentralized lawsuits. So, Joshua been excited to speak to you

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>because you know that I went to law school and

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:06.080
<v Speaker 1>it was never cut out to be an attorney. Just

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 1>bring me back to basics. He is laughing in New

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>York and shes bring me back to basics. What is

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a chat bought lawyer? So do not pay his messioners

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>to empower the consumer to fight back. We've been operating

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>for about six years taking on big companies like Equifax

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>and Comcast. When United doesn't refund your money, consumers come

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to us. And recently we decided why not help consumers

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>get justice against these crypto companies that are freezing people's

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>money like Celsius. Well, why have you chosen to move

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:37.479
<v Speaker 1>over to crypto companies? Obviously there are a lot of

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>them right now, and if many of them that are

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>freezing withdrawals at this point in time, and if you're

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a crypto customer, that is part of that pain. It's

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>not like you have a lot of money left over

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to spend on a lawsuit like this. So why have

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>you moved over from other forced arbitration clauses into into

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 1>this world? So All Claims Court is an amazing tool.

0:31:02.240 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>It can get consumers between ten and twenty five thousand

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>dollars and it's a very easy process. A judge will

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 1>often side with a consumer in their local jurisdiction just

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>because they feel bad for them. And so if Celsius

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:17.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't show up to all these small claims court lawsuits

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>across the country, the consumer wins by default. And so

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>because it's such an easy process, it only takes about

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>a month or two, and it allows the consumer to

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 1>get justice before these companies declare bankruptcy, which is looking

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 1>very likely. What's the likelihood of really recouping funds here

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and how costly do you think it could be for

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a from like Celsius. So Celsius has to send someone

0:31:42.600 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in every single case, even if it's for ten thousand

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars sount So Do Not Pay has initiated over one thousand,

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>five hundred lawsuits against Celsius in different parts of the country,

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 1>even in rural towns. They have to stand a lawyer

0:31:55.880 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 1>just to defend themselves, and in my opinion, I don't

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>think they will and the consumers will when so even

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:05.200
<v Speaker 1>an average of ten tho dollars a lawsuit, these these

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>small claims lawsuits are going to cost them millions um.

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 1>But these are small retail investors who are getting their

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>money back, and once a judgment has gotten in small

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>claims court, you're actually at the front of the line

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in the bankruptcy proceeding. So it's very good that small

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>retail investors can be ahead of the institutional investors if

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>things really go bad with these big platforms. Joshua, can

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>we talk about Twitter Yes, I spend a lot of

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>time on Twitter. You spend quite a lot of time

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. Yes, I'm addicted to Twitter. I'm not gonna

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>go as far as to say I'm addicted. But there's

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of tweeting about cryptocurrencies from very well known people,

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk probably being the easiest example, through two accounts

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:47.000
<v Speaker 1>with very few users. But markets seem to move on tweets. Yes,

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 1>what's your take on that. I think everything you say

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter is has to be legal and everything and

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the same standards as everything you say in real life.

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>People think that just because it's an online platform they

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>aren't held to the same standard it, but they really are,

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing this in crypto fraud. We've used tweets

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in the past in small claims law lawsuits, and it's

0:33:07.520 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the same with moving markets and sec violations and things

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>like that. Well, that's a fascinating question too, about tweets

0:33:15.040 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and where it falls in regard to customers getting bunny back,

0:33:19.360 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>any any distortions in the markets. There's a lot of

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:24.400
<v Speaker 1>questions about even some of the advertising some of these

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>crypto firms had done prior to pausing withdrawals. I mean,

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>what type of um evidence does that create for the

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>retail investor in terms of being encouraged to put their

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>money into something that was not going to work out later, Well,

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>if it seems too good to be true, it probably is.

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of these platforms one advertising the risks

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>of getting interest rate properly. They were saying things like

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>your money is safe and secure, you can get it

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>back very quickly. And even though they buried in the

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 1>times of service, they have all of these special clauses

0:33:58.640 --> 0:34:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that's really not clear and consent based on like FTC guidelines,

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and so if you're not clear with the consumer, you

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>will face all of this litigation and regulatory problems if

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>things go badly. We're seeing a pretty ugly chart on

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the screen Bitcoin year to date one year, it's down

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:17.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot. That's been a part of the story. I'm

0:34:17.840 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>going to use Shinnali's favorite word, regulation, you reckon that

0:34:22.520 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll see some more regulation in this space. I think

0:34:25.640 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 1>we will. I think so many people will lose so

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:29.960
<v Speaker 1>much money that everyone is going to write to their

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:32.960
<v Speaker 1>congressmen do not pay. Also, does that to get as

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>much regulation as possible be more specifical there, what exactly

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is do not pay asking for for regulation here, especially

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:42.680
<v Speaker 1>because you know there is a sense that the SEC

0:34:42.880 --> 0:34:45.279
<v Speaker 1>might come down harder on the enforcement side than it

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:48.280
<v Speaker 1>will on the actual regulatory side in creating new rules.

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>So all of these crypto companies generally have money transmitter licenses,

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>which is a very low standard of regulation. What they're

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:00.759
<v Speaker 1>actually doing is something called being a broker ealer. And

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 1>so at the very least, we would want them to

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 1>all be licensed as broker dealers versus money transmitters. And

0:35:07.040 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that would lead to more disclosures and consumers

0:35:09.920 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 1>feeling like they're better protected. And there are lots of

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:15.719
<v Speaker 1>legitimate companies like coin base who would probably go in

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:19.279
<v Speaker 1>that direction. But last legitimate players like Celsius that are

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>speculating with funds um might not survive all right. Joshua Browder,

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>CEO Do Not Pay, and Bloomberg's Shinnali Bassek thank you

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to you both. More news in the app store ecosystem,

0:35:40.120 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Google reached an agreement with US developers that will let

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 1>consumers subscribe to services outside the company's play store. This

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 1>after Apple made a similar deal last year with small developers.

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's scoop Dogg German joins us for more on this mark.

0:35:56.840 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>How does this impact Google the for having me? Well,

0:36:01.239 --> 0:36:04.799
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really impact Google that much, right, So if

0:36:04.800 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna start allowing, just like Apple has allowed starting recently,

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is they're gonna allow if you're a third party developer

0:36:11.120 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to point users to the web essentially to subscribe to

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 1>your services. Right. I still think a lot of people

0:36:16.920 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 1>that are gonna want to subscribe to services within the

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 1>actual apps themselves, which then they still have to use

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the Google Play processing engine, which then we'll give Google

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a percentage there, right, So I think most consumers are

0:36:29.000 --> 0:36:30.319
<v Speaker 1>not going to want to go to the web to

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 1>sign for applications, So I don't really think it's going

0:36:32.320 --> 0:36:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to hurt Google long term at all. Obviously, a ninety

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 1>million dollar payout is probably an hour's worth the revenue

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>for Google, so that's not really gonna hurt them elsewhere.

0:36:42.400 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>They also decided that they're going to keep that fifteen

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>percent revenue share feed long term. That's for developers that

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>make up to two million dollars per year on the

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Google Play Store. They never really said they would get

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>rid of it, but at least they now have in

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 1>writing as part of the settlement. They're not going to

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:58.080
<v Speaker 1>get rid of it, so you're not going to see

0:36:58.120 --> 0:37:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that fifteen percent go up to act to any point soon.

0:37:02.320 --> 0:37:04.759
<v Speaker 1>So that is an interesting little, you know, piece of

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 1>the pie right there. Right, It's that's the kind of

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:11.440
<v Speaker 1>business side. This is about consumer choice, right drawl the

0:37:11.480 --> 0:37:15.760
<v Speaker 1>parallel with Apple. What has the difference been since Apple

0:37:15.800 --> 0:37:19.439
<v Speaker 1>made that same move last year? Yes, so right now,

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Google in terms of their app store distribution,

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in their policies, they're nearly at an identical point. The

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:29.399
<v Speaker 1>only differences is that Apple's fiftcent program where they charge

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a developer off the costs instead of that's only up

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to a million dollars in sales, Googles is going to

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:37.920
<v Speaker 1>be up to two million dollars of sale. So it's

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>about doubles. That's really you know, the loan hold out

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>big difference. You're seeing app removal transparency reports from both companies. Now,

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing the ability from both companies now to allow

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:50.919
<v Speaker 1>developers to advertise lower pricing from outside the Google Play

0:37:50.960 --> 0:37:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Store and the Apple App Store. You're seeing this idea

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 1>where they can go to the web to sign up

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>for subscription services. You see that happening on both platforms,

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:01.200
<v Speaker 1>so they're really unequal footing right now in terms of

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>consumer behavior, do we see any material fact like is

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it made consumers go out and and make different choices

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and they would have otherwise had to make when they

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:15.759
<v Speaker 1>were forced to stay within those platforms? You know, I

0:38:15.760 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 1>think consumers only really care if they're going to be

0:38:18.600 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 1>paying more money or less money. Right if Netflix is

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:24.239
<v Speaker 1>charging ten dollars a month if you sign up through

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 1>their app, or if they're charging ten dollars a month

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 1>if you go to sign up through their website. If

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just a consumer, I'm going to just sign them

0:38:30.120 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 1>through the app because it's much easier. Right, Apple and

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Google already have my billing information on hand. I don't

0:38:34.960 --> 0:38:36.680
<v Speaker 1>need to go and make an account and sign up

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 1>online and put my credit card information again. Right, So

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:42.640
<v Speaker 1>from a consumer choice perspective, I don't really think that's,

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, changing much. I think developers are need to

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>adjust their pricing and tell consumers, hey, if you go

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 1>to the web and in put your credit card information

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:51.960
<v Speaker 1>through the web and you go through that process, we're

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 1>going to charge you seven dollars a month instead of

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:55.920
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars a month. But if pricing is equal on

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 1>both platforms, I think any you know, normal consumer is

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>going to go right through the absolutely Google play story.

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:04.919
<v Speaker 1>All right, Bloomberg's Mark German out in l A thank

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>you that doesn't for this edition of Bloomberg Technology Rules

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Week is up next from my colleague David Western.

0:39:11.840 --> 0:39:14.719
<v Speaker 1>Next week Bloomberg and me will be in live in

0:39:14.760 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 1>some Valley, Idaho. Media moguls, billionaires, and some of the

0:39:18.239 --> 0:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>biggest names from tech, media and business will converge on

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:24.439
<v Speaker 1>July six. Will bring you live reports from the ground

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and interviews with some of the n t S attendees,

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 1>with Sophi c O nt NO to twenty three c

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 1>O and with Jicky event Brights, Kevin Harts, and many

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>others you definitely don't want to miss it. Will be

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:39.400
<v Speaker 1>there Tuesday onwards. This is Bloomberg