WEBVTT - What is Energy?

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Or Hey, did you have a good snack before you

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>just hit record? I did. I just finished the banana, actually,

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:16.479
<v Speaker 1>And is that banana enough energy to power you for

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>a whole hour? Depends on what I'm doing that hour.

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, procrastination doesn't take much energy. Well, it's amazing

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to me that you can turn bananas into physics podcasts.

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>That amazes you as a physicist. Isn't all energy conserved?

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Shouldn't be possible from a physics point of view? Yeah,

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it might even be possible to do the opposite, right,

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>to turn physics podcasts back into bananas. What wouldn't that

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>violate the laws I don't know of physics, because imagine

0:00:46.479 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>all those thousands of people out there with this podcast

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>turning this into a banana. There must be some loss, though,

0:00:52.560 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they would end up with a smaller banana

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>than the when you started with, or overly ripe banana.

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's a good way to describe podcast. Maybe you

0:01:00.960 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 1>can think of I heart media is basically amplifying your

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>original banana. That's bananas, Daniel. At least you're feeding your

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>mind as well as your body. I am more handmade

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>cartoonists and the creator of PhD comics. Hi, I'm Daniel.

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 1>I'm a particle of physicist and a professor at UC Irvine,

0:01:30.840 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and I am sending you all physics energy, physics vise

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:39.559
<v Speaker 1>or knowledge is knowledge energy? Daniel, there's a question about

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 1>whether information has mass. So if it does, the information

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>would have energy and knowledge is information, So in some

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>weird theories of the universe, maybe it does. Wait what

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>information might have mass? So all those people listening to this,

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>we're increasing their mass only if we actually put some

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>information into this podcast. So far, it's just banana jokes,

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>basic cholesterol. You know, there's good information and there's bad information.

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:10.839
<v Speaker 1>Which one is healthier for you? Scientists are still debating it. Yeah,

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>stay tuned as they gather more information to answer this question.

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, welcome to our podcast, Daniel and Jorge Explain

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the Universe, a production of I Heart Radio in which

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>we try to sift through all the information humanity has

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>gathered about the crazy universe that's out there. We try

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to systematize, we tried to organize, We tried to educate

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you on what we do know and what we don't

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>know about this crazy universe, how it works, how things

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>slosh and flow around, how it comes together to make

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 1>this incredible, beautiful and dangerous universe that we all love. Wait,

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>are you saying that our job here is to take

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>everything that's beautiful in the universe, chew it up, eat it,

0:02:49.639 --> 0:02:54.239
<v Speaker 1>and then regurgitated back to people as information edible information.

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure which side it comes out, but yeah,

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:02.320
<v Speaker 1>we consume it and then produce it. It's not a

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty picture either way, is it. I like to think

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of it as all part of the information food web.

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, don't think so much about who is eating

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>who as much as you know information is flowing from

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>person to purses. We're all just stardust and predigested information. Yeah,

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.520
<v Speaker 1>although maybe you are the information super predator. You're the

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>apex information consumer. Oh I really huh? And nobody has

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>ever called me the apex anything. Well, think about it.

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:32.799
<v Speaker 1>You talked to lots of scientists, and you distill from

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>all of them little bits of crucial science knowledge. Wow,

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's why I'm so full all the time. It's

0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of bananas to keep that. Or you're just

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>consuming all those scientists brains effectively. That makes you so

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.000
<v Speaker 1>like a science zombie. I'm not sure now, zombie too.

0:03:48.080 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh my goodness. First I was regurgitating. Now I'm stumbling

0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>around half dead. Actually that that is pretty accurate these days,

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>at this time in the morning. You do a good

0:03:59.160 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>zombie impression. Now you told me zombies don't always stumble

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is sometimes zombies are fast moving and even articulate. Yeah, yeah,

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of zombies. Yeah, then the new kinds of

0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>zombies are now fast and furious. We've got a lot

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>of response from the Zombie Star episode, people writing in

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 1>recommending zombie movies that they thought I might enjoy. Oh good,

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna watching? Do you need an honest answer

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:24.599
<v Speaker 1>to that question? Why? Well, why not? There's too many

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>things out there to watch. So they're on my list,

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>but I might not make it. I see, that's the

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 1>political answer, got it, got it. But thank you everyone

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.280
<v Speaker 1>for your suggestions. I will get to them eventually. Well

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm curiously know what's on that list. But today we're

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about something a little bit different than Zombie Stars.

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>That's right. We are venturing into the border between physics

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and philosophy. We are not just trying to understand how

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>the universe work, We're trying to understand what it means,

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>because physics is more than just a list of laws.

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 1>It's an attempt to get some deep intuitive understanding into

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>how the universe works, to reach those ah ha moments

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 1>where you feel I get it. I understand something now

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:05.200
<v Speaker 1>about how the universe is doing it that I didn't

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>understand before. Wait. Wait, wait, wait, we're going into philosophical

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>territory here. Can we go back to the zombies? Well,

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about philosophical zombies if you like. That's

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite topics, or the philosophy of zombies.

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>M like, is a zombie still a person or not? No,

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that's philosophy by zombies. You know, they have whole journals

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>that only zombies, right for Oh no, it is kind

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 1>of a half that discipline. Anyways, you know, the the

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 1>overlap between physics and philosophy is very healthy, very vibrant,

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating, and for me, one of the motivating aspects

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of physics. One reason we do physics is to help

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.800
<v Speaker 1>answer questions, which, in the end our philosophical what does

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 1>it mean to be alive? Why are we here? What

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>should we do with our lives? How do we make

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>sense of this cosmos? Those aren't science questions, but the

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>answers to science questions can help us understand how to

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>tackle those other more difficult philosophical questions. Yeah, because I

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>guess it is a pretty incredible universe, and even though

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>we may want to understand how it all works, there's

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>still sort of the questions that you can ask beyond that,

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>beyond physics, right, like what does it mean? Or why

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>are we here? And some of those questions are really

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.840
<v Speaker 1>simple signing questions, the kind of questions you often ask

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>me when I start talking about something complicated and you're like,

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>hold on, back up, what are we even talking about?

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 1>Can you give me a definition of space or mass?

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>What are these things we're talking about? Do we really

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>understand them? Yeah, because I guess you know, you grew

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>up in this universe and maybe you become a physicist

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>or not, but you still kind of study it, and you,

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, you start to take things a little bit

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>for granted, you know, in a way, you know, you know,

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>we think about the fact that we walk around on

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:43.880
<v Speaker 1>this planet, but why are we stuck to this planet

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 1>at all and not floating out there in space. Yeah,

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a really important exercise to take a step back

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and say, what is this thing we're talking about, What

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>does it really mean? What do we know about it?

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>What can we learn about the nature of the universe

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>from what we know about how these physical processes happen. Yeah,

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it always amazes me that there are basic concepts and

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>physics that physicists don't really have a good definition for

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>or a good explanation for. You know, we've covered a

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of them in our book. We have No Idea

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>a guide to the Unknown Universe. But it's still amazing

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that there are things that even we didn't cover in

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the book that physicists still struggle to define. You don't

0:07:16.360 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 1>have to know what you're talking about to sometimes accomplish

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>something in physics. The most famous example is quantum mechanics.

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Nobody really understands what it means, but we can do

0:07:25.240 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>really complicated, really accurate calculations and predictions using quantum mechanics,

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>even if we don't quite grasp what exactly is going on. Yeah,

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and maybe out of all those basic concepts about the universe,

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>there are maybe none more basic than the idea of energy.

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>That seems like a super duper basic concept in physics.

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>It is, in fact, and it's something a lot of

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>listeners over the years have written in to ask us

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk about so to the on the podcast will

0:07:51.960 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>be tackling the question what is energy? And where can

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>we get some more of it? Yeah? That's not coming

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>from a coffee cup maybe or dead plants underground. But

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it is kind of sort of an interesting question, I

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>think because it's so short, right, Like, this is one

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>of the shortest questions we've tackled in a long time

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>on this podcast. It's just three words, what is energy?

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we should add a fourth one man, what is energy? Man?

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 1>What is energy? Anyway? Or maybe what? I guess we

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:31.960
<v Speaker 1>could go deeper, we go what is Eventually we'll just

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>be asking the question what. Maybe that's all physics and

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>philosophy is just responding to the universe and going what. Yeah,

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 1>but then we will, you know, like a Marvel movie

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 1>will find another sequel. We'll go with where or Speechless

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the new seel. But it is a really simple sounding

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>question with a lot of subtle nuances, which is why

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it took us a little while to figure out how

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to attack it. It's a short question without an the

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 1>simple answer. Yeah, I was thinking about this word and

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.679
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of interesting. Because I think everyone you know

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>knows the word obviously energy and has something you know,

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>some some intuitous sense attached to it. But you know,

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>if you sort of think about what is it, it's

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of hard to define. Yeah, you're used to talking

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>about it, you think about it in your life, you

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 1>pay for it, you use it. But if you sit

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>on your couch late at night and wonder, like, what

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is it? Has seems to have so many forms, they

0:09:24.600 --> 0:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>can transform back and forth into each other. It's a

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.559
<v Speaker 1>vital part of the universe. It feels like it should

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>be something fundamental. But is a physical thing? Is it

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>just a calculation that we do? Is it a philosophical question?

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a really hard thing to grapple with. Yeah, and

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 1>even physicists in their textbooks have sort of a hard

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>time pinning this down right. I mean, there is sort

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of an official definition of it, right as the capacity

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:49.079
<v Speaker 1>to do work. Yeah, there is that definition. But then

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you look at the official definition of work and its

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>energy transfer a lot, it moves back on itself, like inception, Yeah, exactly,

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>deaf nisition ce definition. So energy is defined in terms

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:05.839
<v Speaker 1>of work, and work is defined in terms of energy,

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 1>So like, what is this thing we're talking about. Wow. Interesting, Yeah,

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>because I guess that's the only way we know how

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.079
<v Speaker 1>to define it. Kind of maybe, sort of, And you

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>have to grapple with the subtlety between physics definitions like

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>what we technically mean by work and our intuitive understanding

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of these concepts, because physics often repurposes a word that

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>everybody uses a normal language to mean something very specific

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>and technical. For physics, that's true for example for work. Interesting. Well,

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 1>let's start to dig into this, but first, as usually,

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>we're wondering how many people out there have thought about

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.719
<v Speaker 1>this very basic question and how many people out there

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.319
<v Speaker 1>think they know the answer to this. So thanks very

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>much to everybody who volunteered to answer difficult, random questions

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>from an internet physicist. I really appreciate your work. And

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>if you're out there and have been listening to the

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:58.120
<v Speaker 1>podcast and want to put your roove always to these questions,

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>please don't be shy. Send me an email two questions

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>at Daniel and Jorge dot com. Think about it for

0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a second. What do you think energy is or how

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>would you explain it? Here's what people had to say. Um,

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember learning in maybe high school physics that energy

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>is the ability for something to do work. UM. I

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>think that that's probably not nuanced enough of a definition.

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>More nuanced way to look at it might be it's

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>um something's ability to affect change, which doesn't necessarily have

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to be work, and sort of like the classic physics definition.

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I think energy is truly just a vibration, and the

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>energy potential is dictated by the field the vibration or

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>string sits with him. I've asked this question to someone

0:11:46.480 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>who knew a lot about physics before, and their answer

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 1>was not useful to me. What I came away with

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is like energy is potential for things to happen, and

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 1>concentrations of that potential, and it's expressed in a lot

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of ways. This feels like it should be one of

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>those like really easy questions to answer fifth graders should

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>know this or something, but I'm having trouble explaining it.

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>It is a force like but needed to create force.

0:12:16.280 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think of going down to like the

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>atomic level. Energy is like the movement of electrons. Intuitively,

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>when I think of energy, I think about vibrating particles

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and the fast of their vibrating more energy they have.

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>But I guess at a more fundamental level energy is

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>about probably fields and like how much energy is in

0:12:45.400 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a certain field, dictating what kind of particle is and

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>what that particle is doing. I think energy is just

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 1>like tiny movement of particles that gets passed along from

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>particle to particle. Energy is the opposite side of the

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>coin is mass. But my us as you're referring to

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental building blocks of energy, and I'm not sure

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:07.080
<v Speaker 1>what those could be. All Right, interesting answers um pretty

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:08.839
<v Speaker 1>deep ones to a lot of people are like, it's

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 1>a vibe, man, it's a mood. Yeah, And some people

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>giving examples of what energy is and some people talking

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>about the different forms of it. It's the really interesting

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:22.080
<v Speaker 1>answers here. Thanks everyone. Yeah, and some people even sort

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:24.439
<v Speaker 1>of went with the official definition, which is that it's

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 1>related to your ability to do work or to make

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:29.880
<v Speaker 1>work or change work. But did did you follow up

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 1>with them? Then? What does work mean? No? I don't

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 1>actually have live conversations with these folks. It's just the email.

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>When I do interviews on campus, then I can ask

0:13:38.520 --> 0:13:41.079
<v Speaker 1>fun follow up questions like does that scare you? Are

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.839
<v Speaker 1>you worried about that? But here I just give them

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:47.679
<v Speaker 1>the one shot I see, I see, I see. You're

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to still fear in them. No, I try to

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>be friendly and not instill fear in them over email

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>in person. Yeah, absolutely, I'll put them on the spot.

0:13:57.480 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, it's a tricky subject, and I think

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>I will find out it's something that has some deep

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>mysteries about it, right, It's not an easy answer answer.

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, Daniel step us through. What are some

0:14:09.720 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of the first things that physicists think of when they

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>think of energy? So right off the bat, we should

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>just admit that we don't fundamentally know what energy is. Wait,

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>what we're done with the podcast? Nobody knows that's it.

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>You know some things about it, We figured some things out.

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>You can use those to piece together a picture of

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>what it might be and what that means, But fundamentally

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it remains a philosophical mystery what energy is. First, maybe

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I should put the question back on you and ask, like,

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>what kind of answer do people expect? Like what kind

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of answer would be satisfying? Where is the sort of

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.640
<v Speaker 1>nature of the question we're even asking? Do you want

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to know if energy is like a thing that flows

0:14:48.520 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>or if it's made out of little energy ons? Or

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>just like a concise definition of what this thing is. Well,

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean you sort of give it away. He kind

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of spoiled the answer for me here and seem to

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>not want to try. I mean, if you guys don't

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>know what it is, what I know. But it's kind

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of an interesting question. I think, you know, at the

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>base of it, I think most people think of energy

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is like the opposite of of not moving, you know

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, Like it's the opposite of standing still

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and not doing anything. Like if you have energy, then

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you're doing something, You're doing work, I guess, yeah. And

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that a lot of the concepts about energy

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>start from examples. I think some of the difficulty comes

0:15:27.280 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>from the fact that you can put lots of different

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 1>kinds of examples together and then wonder, like what do

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they all have in common? You know, the mass is

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>energy or this is energy, Then what do they all

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 1>have in common? And so maybe we should start with

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the history of the idea of the

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>development of energy, how people discover different forms of energy

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and then talk about the common thread between them. Yeah, yeah, sure,

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>well I was thinking kind of it's kind of like

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe the opposite of the phrase nothing happens. Like if

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>nothing happens, ever, then there's no energy, but if things happen,

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>then there's energy. It's like maybe related to the word happening,

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that's possibly true, but there are subtle wrinkles there, like

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>you can have a universe with a lot of energy

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>but no free energy, like the heat death of the universe.

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Nothing can really happen. But there is a lot of

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>energy in the universe, there's just none available to do

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:18.040
<v Speaker 1>work because there's no energy gradients. So there are different

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>kinds of energy, different kinds of energy. And fundamentally, the

0:16:21.320 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>game we're playing here is that we're looking around in

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the universe and we're coming up with ways to do calculations,

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're wondering do those mean anything? And energy in

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that sense isn't like something physical. It's an observation we

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.640
<v Speaker 1>make about the universe. Like I can look at a

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>physical system, you know, the Earth moving around the Sun,

0:16:40.080 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and I can do a calculation that could say, well,

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to define some quantity. I call it energy,

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And here's how I calculated. I take the velocity I'm

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>multiplied by the mass. I add this, I add that

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that's the something I invented call it energy. And most

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of the time, if you just invent a quantity, it's

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>not interesting or useful, doesn't reveal anything about the universe.

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes it does, and it was especially when it

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>seems like it might be conserved when you've constructed this

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>quantity which seems to like not change as time goes

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 1>on through the universe. Mm hmmmm. Well, that's an interesting

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>concept to think about. How they came up how humans

0:17:12.760 --> 0:17:14.320
<v Speaker 1>came up with the word, right, Like, did we come

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>up with that word for energy before science even you

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean? Like that? I wonder if Caveman

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>had a phrase or a word for this idea of

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>things happening or energy. I think Caveman had teenagers, and

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>teenagers didn't get out of the cave very early in

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.119
<v Speaker 1>the morning, and people wondered if they needed more energy.

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure that you know the intuitive concept of feeling

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>like you have energy or you're tired. That's an age

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>old idea for sure. M So we probably had a

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>word for it, and then people started to use it

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in physics. Yeah, and scientifically, one of the first concepts

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>that was developed was kinetic energy. So you've got to

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 1>go back to people like Leibnitz. It was Newton's contemporary

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know, also developed calculus, and like Newton, he

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>also did a bit of physics, right, And the Leibnitz

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>note us that things moved, that there's motion. And he

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>came up with this quantity mass times velocity times velocity again,

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>so MV squared, And he said, this thing seems to

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 1>be conserved. He called this thing vis visa, like a

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 1>living force, and so he essentially stumbled across the definition

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of kinetic energy and said, hey, here's a quantity which

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:23.920
<v Speaker 1>is interesting because it seems to be conserved. It seems

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>like as time passes and you recalculate this quantity, it

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:29.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't change, right. But I guess maybe a question is

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>how did he noticed that it was conserved? Like why

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.399
<v Speaker 1>did he pick MV squared? As the quantity that was

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 1>concerned was just something specific he was studying. He didn't

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:41.400
<v Speaker 1>know why. He was just sort of like playing around.

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:43.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's sort of like a discovery in mathematics,

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>But what do you mean it playing around around with

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>what you know? At that time, people didn't understand motion.

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Newton hadn't developed his laws yet, so people would just

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>like multiplying random stuff together and seeing what it could do.

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's not that many ways to combine basic

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:00.160
<v Speaker 1>quantities mass and velocity in these things, and so it's

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>not that hard to study them. You know, across the

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>English channel, Newton was studying momentum, mass, time, velocity. So

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:09.120
<v Speaker 1>likeness has just multiplied it by velocity one more time.

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure he studied other quantities like mass squared times

0:19:12.280 --> 0:19:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of loss that didn't have any interesting properties. You make

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>it sound like a bunch of monkeys in a in

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>an infinite room piping that typewriter. It's a bunch of

0:19:19.840 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>grass students in an infinite room, and they all come

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>with one quantity and they're like, oh, this one's not interesting.

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh look at this one. This one seems to be conserved.

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what that means, but I guess, I mean, like,

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 1>what did he see it conserved in? Do you know

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>what I mean? Like he calculated in for one thing

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.119
<v Speaker 1>and then for another, and then he saw that it

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 1>was the same. I guess, But what was that thing? Yes, So,

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>for example, physicists of this age like to do calculations

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>about billiard balls. Right now, billiards is a very very

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>old game. So you can take the kinetic energy of

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the first ball and then it hits another one, maybe

0:19:49.160 --> 0:19:51.159
<v Speaker 1>it has a different mass, but you notice that the

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy is conserved, and so you can do simple

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:57.679
<v Speaker 1>calculations there and see that kinetic energy is conserved in

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>these systems, so like after a collision. Then they noticed

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that this quantity seems to stay the same, Like you

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>added up at the beginning for the two balls, and

0:20:07.440 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>then you added up at the end for the two balls,

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and it seemed to be the same. Is that what happened,

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>because if you look at the velocities, the velocities don't

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 1>stay the same. That's right. The velocities do not stay

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the same unless the two masses are the same. But

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:20.959
<v Speaker 1>like the really slow moving massive ball bumps into a

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:23.640
<v Speaker 1>very light ball, a low mass ball, that low mass

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>ball will fly off at higher speeds, and so you're write,

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>velocity isn't conserved. But this weird combination of mass and

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>velocity squared did seem to be conserved. So that was

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of like an experimental discovery that lenn has made.

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, this idea of conservation means it might

0:20:38.560 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>be something important, It might be something like fundamental to

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>the universe. It's like, there's the philosophy aspect to it. Right,

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>just because something is conserved, why do we care? Because

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it reveals something about the inner workings of the universe.

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I think about this sometimes an analogy to other systems,

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.639
<v Speaker 1>like economics, or like the water system. You know, like

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>water goes through lots of different forms. It rains into

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the ocean and evaporates back up in the clouds, that

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 1>flows down rivers, but in the end, the water is

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the water. It's changing, it's transforming, but it's flowing through

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the system. The amount of water isn't changing. So that

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 1>tells you that, like water is deeply important to this

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>whole cycle. Right, if you identify a quantity which is

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>conserved in physical processes, you get the sense that maybe

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it's important, right. I think what you're saying is that

0:21:19.600 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we notice that there are things that sort of

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:25.479
<v Speaker 1>don't disappear, like you're saying water. In the water cycle,

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 1>water it changes shape and it changes forms and it

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>changes states, but it's still sort of like you know,

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the water, the molecules don't disappear. And maybe in the

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>case of the billiard balls that you notice that this quantity,

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>like if you computed, it's there in the beginning, and

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>it's there at the end, and somehow it got like transform.

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>So maybe it's like a thing itself. Yeah, because it's

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:48.960
<v Speaker 1>easy to think of counter examples, like the number of bananas. Right,

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the number of bananas is not constant in the universe.

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 1>You can make more bananas, you can eat bananas, right,

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.159
<v Speaker 1>They can disappear, they can be destroyed, they can be created. Right.

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.360
<v Speaker 1>The number of bananas is not fundamentally interesting to the verse,

0:22:00.560 --> 0:22:03.080
<v Speaker 1>even if it might be personally interesting to various people.

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Well that you know, if right, Daniel, Like maybe they're

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I you haven't starved the whole universe. Maybe every time

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>someone needs a banana here, bananas born in another planet

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the universe. Right, you don't know exactly. And

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>if you discovered that to be true, that would mean

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>something deep about bananas and the relationship to the universe.

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 1>That would be a huge discovery. That would be crazy,

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't it, Like somehow the universe likes to keep the

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>same number of bananas all the time. That would be weird. Right,

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:31.440
<v Speaker 1>And if you eat a banana here or destroy it

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 1>or make a bananas movie, another banana is born somewhere,

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that would be really strange. That would be very strange,

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and it would be a big clue. It would say

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the universe is kind of banana or bananas are fundamental

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to the universe. So when you discover a conserved quantity

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>something the universe maintains, then you're seeing something about the

0:22:47.040 --> 0:22:50.399
<v Speaker 1>inner workings of the universe. It's revealing to you what's important,

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.000
<v Speaker 1>just like how water is important in the water cycle,

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:56.040
<v Speaker 1>whereas clouds are not. So if kinetic energy is conserved,

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>liveness thought, well, this must be an important thing, you know.

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:00.879
<v Speaker 1>I think if you tell anyone these days, like hey,

0:23:00.960 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>energy is conserved or waters conserved, nobody would blink and

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I but if you tell them, like, hey, did you

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>know the universe conserves bananas, that would be a big

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 1>revelation about the universe, just like how we should look

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>at energy and water as being kind of a big deal. Right. Yeah,

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>And just in case anybody is being misled, as far

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.239
<v Speaker 1>as we know, the universe does not conserve bananas, as

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 1>far as we know. Yes, as far as we know.

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>For example, I'm pretty sure there were billions of years

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.200
<v Speaker 1>in which they were exactly zero bananas in the universe

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know of that I know of, Yes, But

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe all the bananas that are appearing on Earth mean

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that they're anti bananas being created on alien world somewhere

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>else to balance that. Or I think you're saying what

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>happened before the Earth with four maybe there were other

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>planets with bananas. I'm just saying, keep an open mind.

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 1>You're saying bananas could predate the Earth. Yeah, that's my

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 1>theory of bananas. Well, I think your philosophy is bananas. Yeah.

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>But anyways, I think obviously trying to make the point

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we should be sort of amaze and

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>awed at the act that energy seems to be conserved

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>in that water and for example, that water cycle is

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>conserved because it doesn't have to write. I think that's

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying to You can come up with all

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.639
<v Speaker 1>sorts of quantities, you can define them, and most of

0:24:11.640 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>them are not conserved. So when you find one that

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 1>is that tells you you're onto something, it's a really

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>interesting clue. All right, So then I guess that leapness

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>called this energy. Did he coined the phrase or was

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>he the first one to use it? On envy square.

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Did he call it kinetic energy? Also know, he called

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>it vis visa, which is I think Latin for like

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a living force. And you know, now we know the

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.120
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy on its own isn't actually conserved. I mean,

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>under certain assumptions it is. In elastic collisions, we don't

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>break things up, kinetic energy is conserved, but on its own,

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy more generally isn't conservative. Course, And I think

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Newton was mostly looking at momentum, right, because that one

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is conserved in most collisions. Yeah, momentum is actually conserved.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>So Newton's combination of kinematic variables mass times velocity, momentum,

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.440
<v Speaker 1>this thing actually is conserved. But again, at the time,

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>nobody knew why. It wasn't until we had a great

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>mathematical genius a couple hundred years later who told us

0:25:04.960 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>about the connections between conservation laws and symmetries, how these

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>conservation laws revealed deep symmetries of the universe. Well, I

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 1>mean that's what they thought, was that the fundamental law

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, right, the momentum is conserved. Yeah, the

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>momentum conservation was discovered before we understood what it meant

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and why we have it. What symmetry of the universe created.

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>We just did a whole podcast episode about why momentum

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>is conserved. It's really fun and deep topic. Okay, so

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>that's one kind of energy. What were some of the

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:33.399
<v Speaker 1>other kinds of energy we've discovered? So there is a

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>second kind of energy, potential energy, which is a different

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of energy from kinetic energy and something I've never

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>really been comfortable with. Wait, what potential energy makes you uncomfortable?

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>You don't like the idea of potential I don't want

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>any surprises. Just give me straight up energy. Yeah, potential

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 1>energy is weird and confusing. It's definitely a different kind

0:25:52.880 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of energy than kinetic energy, but it's also closely related

0:25:55.920 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to kinetic energy because while kinetic energy by itself isn't conserved,

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>some kinetic plus potential that is conserved in the universe. Mm. Interesting. Well, okay,

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 1>let's get into the details of that, and I want

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to know why it makes you uncomfortable. But first, let's

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:27.719
<v Speaker 1>take a quick break. Wright. We're talking about energy, and

0:26:27.760 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it's been a very energetic discussion here. Daniel talked about

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>how you know humans when we start to try to

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>understand the world, we came up with the idea of

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 1>energy because it seems to be conserved in some circumstances,

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and that was kinetic energy. But there's also potential energy,

0:26:43.000 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>which is kind of a weird concept in physics, right,

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.479
<v Speaker 1>it makes you uncomfortable. Yeah, it is a weird concept

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in physics, but it's also something sort of intuitive. Like

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:52.159
<v Speaker 1>let's say you have a banana on the top of

0:26:52.200 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a bookshelf and it's just sitting there right not doing anything,

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and you bump it and it falls off before it

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.440
<v Speaker 1>hits the ground. It's going pretty fast, so it has

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy. Where did that kinetic energy come from? Right?

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>It came from its height. It came from the fact

0:27:06.160 --> 0:27:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that it was sitting high up above the ground, and

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>it turned that height in the gravitational field into energy.

0:27:13.520 --> 0:27:16.639
<v Speaker 1>So that's the potential energy of the banana getting turned

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>into kinetic energy of the banana. So it's definitely energy

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>because you can transform it into kinetic energy into motion.

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:26.719
<v Speaker 1>But it's sort of weird because it's energy of its location.

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>It's energy of its configuration, right right. I think that's

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>where the name potential comes from. Like, it doesn't really

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>have energy right now, it's just sitting on the table.

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.400
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't really it's not really moving, but it has

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a potential to move along. Yeah. I think that's tempting

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>to describe it that way, but it really is energy.

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Potential energy is not just like the potential to have energy.

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>It comes from energy of a potential. Potential is the

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>way we describe how a field impacts a force on

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>an object, Like an electron moving through a potential you know,

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 1>feels a force, right. But I think you're getting mixed up,

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of tripped up here because you're saying

0:28:02.640 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>it's in a potential because it has the potential to move,

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>to cause it to move, you know what I I mean.

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like a circular definition. Yeah, it has the potential

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to move exactly. So we don't really know what this

0:28:12.520 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 1>stuff is. Potential energy. I always found it really strange.

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Mostly it makes me uncomfortable because it doesn't really have

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a value in itself. It's relational like the banana. How

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 1>much potential energy does it have at the top of

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the bookshelf. We don't know. There's no number, but it

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:31.440
<v Speaker 1>has more potential energy than at the bottom of the bookshelf.

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Potential energy is only important in differences, and you can

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 1>add an arbitrary number to the potential energy of the

0:28:37.400 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>banana at the bookshelf. Doesn't matter. The only thing that

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>matters is how much more potential energy it has the

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>top in the bottom right. Like it's a relative quantity

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of like it depends on where you measure, and

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>if you measure it from the floor, it's one thing.

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>If you measure it from the table, it's zero. Yeah.

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:53.760
<v Speaker 1>It's sort of like velocity in that sense. It's no

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 1>meaning to say you're moving at a certain speed. You're

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>only moving at a certain speed relative to something else.

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>The banana has pential energy relative to the floor. And

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>something that's fascinating is that it's very easy to see

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy and potential energy slashing back and forth into

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>each other. If you have, for example, a ball, and

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you drop it, then it's potential energy is getting turned

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.200
<v Speaker 1>into kinetic energy, and then it gets turned around when

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.360
<v Speaker 1>it hits the floor, and it's kinetic energy then gets

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>turned back into potential energy as it climbs back up

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to your hand. And if there wasn't friction or air resistance,

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:27.320
<v Speaker 1>then it would just go on forever, smoothly sliding back

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:29.959
<v Speaker 1>between the two different forms of energy, right, Like, if

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it was jumping on an infinite trampoline kind of like

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a perfect trampoline, this energy would, like the kinetic energy

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>would appear and disappear, appear and disappear, and the pinetial

0:29:38.800 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>energy would also appear and disappear, but it would always

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>add up to the same thing. It would always added

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to the same thing. And a trampoline is a great

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>example because it's basically like a spring. Springs have potential

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>energy in them also, right, You squeeze a spring that

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>takes energy, and now the energy you put into squeezing

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>it is somehow stored in the spring, in the arrangement

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of the spring, the compactification of the as bonds that

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:03.320
<v Speaker 1>would prefer to be relaxed, And so that's the same

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of energy. You can put it into a gravitational field,

0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you can put it into a spring, you can put

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it into a squeezing of a ball, which is basically

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 1>another spring. And so all these things are potential energy, right,

0:30:14.720 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>And in that sense, you can sort of think of

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it as a thing. Right, it's just the thing that

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>changes from being kinetic to being potential, Like it's somehow

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>there and it's always conserved. But is it a thing?

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>When you say a thing, I think something physical, you know,

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>like water is flowing. And for a long time people

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:34.280
<v Speaker 1>who are wondering, like is energy a thing to like

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>flow from one thing to another? Is it made of

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>little energy particles? But here because potential energy is a

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of energy, and it's just an arrangement of other things.

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And is it itself a thing or is it just

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the arrangement of other things. It's complicated, you mean, like

0:30:49.240 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>does it have a physical embodiment or is it just

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like a label we put on other things. Yeah,

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a deep question. I'm not sure the answer to

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the same question can be asked, like you know makes

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>you you? You were made of the same particles as

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I am, you just arranged a different way. So the

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>units is in the arrangement of the particles, the same way.

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Potential energy comes from configuration of particles together, not the

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>particles themselves. The potential energy isn't stored in the particle,

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 1>It's in the relationship between the particles, right right, unless

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you're a zombie, in which case your body is arrangement.

0:31:23.920 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Is the decay? Well, I guess, but what about mass?

0:31:28.000 --> 0:31:30.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, like, we know that mass is the same

0:31:30.760 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>as energy kind of in a way, right, according to

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>equals empty squared is mass energy. Then I'm going to

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>take probably surprising and weird philosophical position here, which is

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that mass is not its own kind of energy. Mass

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is just a representation of how much energy is stored

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>inside something, how much kinetic and potential energy is in something.

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean like things don't have inherent mass,

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Like don't particle from the fundamental particles, don't they have

0:31:56.880 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, mass, Like the electron has mass? Right, yeah,

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>so let's break it down, Like the electron fundamentally doesn't

0:32:02.520 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>have mass on its own. Its mass comes from its

0:32:05.120 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>interactions with the Higgs field. So that's the kinetic and

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>potential energy of the Higgs field, which changes how the

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>electron moves through the universe as if it did have mass.

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>But if you listen to our episode on like what

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>is renormalization, what is the electron's true mass and charge?

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Discover that fundamentally, truly, the electron and the other particles

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>have no mass on their own, It's all in their energy, right,

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Because I guess even the electron it's it's not like

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that has a little bit of stuff in the middle.

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>It just has the potential to interact with the Higgs field.

0:32:34.600 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we call its mass. That's what we

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>call its mass. I act to truck because we're doing

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:42.120
<v Speaker 1>this podcast, but really because we wrote a chapter on

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it for our second book. Frequently asked questions about the universe. Yeah,

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and if you think about composite particles like a proton,

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and proton is made out of quarks, those corks have

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:52.840
<v Speaker 1>almost no mass, but the proton has a good bit

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>of mass. Where does that come from? It comes from

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the energy that binds those corks together. So the protons

0:32:59.320 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>mass some other weird kind of mass in the universe,

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>not like you're converting kinetic energy into some sort of substance.

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>It just comes from its internal stored energy. So the

0:33:10.320 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>way I think about mass is sort of like an

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>indicator tells you how much energy is internally stored inside

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>this thing. In the end, it's all just energy. Mass

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't its own form of energy. It just reflects how

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 1>much energy is inside something. You're basically saying, all masses

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>just potential energy, potential and kinetic energy. Right, some of

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the protons. Mass comes from the kinetic energy of those

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>gluons and quarks slashing around, So not just potential energy

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:39.120
<v Speaker 1>but also kinetic all right. So I think what you're

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:42.880
<v Speaker 1>saying is that we're trying to define energy. One way

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to do it is to look at its different kinds,

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>and there are really toward fens that there's only two

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:50.840
<v Speaker 1>kinds of energy, kinetic energy and potential energy. There are

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 1>no other other kinds, right, are there? I mean there's

0:33:53.160 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>dark energy. Wow, way to secure us with our own

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>terrible names. You totally right, But we don't know what

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 1>dark energy is. One theory is that it's like the

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 1>fundamental quantum potential energy of all of these fields, in

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:10.280
<v Speaker 1>which case it would be a kind of potential energy.

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>But we really just don't know what dark energy is.

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a big mystery, all right. So ignore the scent

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>of the universe that is dark energy for this discussion

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and let's just focus on the small bit of it

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that we like to talk about. No, it's a great point,

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:29.000
<v Speaker 1>but when we do figure out what dark energy is,

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:32.520
<v Speaker 1>either it will be kinetic energy or to be potential energy,

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>or it'll be some new kind of bonkers energy. And

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll be wrong, in which case I'll be the first

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:40.799
<v Speaker 1>to celebrate. Well, yeah, basically, like I said, let's just

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:45.839
<v Speaker 1>ignore of the universe that is dark energy. And uh,

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, for our for what impacts is there's really

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:52.319
<v Speaker 1>only two kinds of energy. You're saying, kinetic energy and

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:55.840
<v Speaker 1>potential energy. And that's it, right, And that's kind of

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 1>what goes into your basic equations of the universe, right, Like,

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>that's basically the definition of the equations of the universe.

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>That's right. The Shortinger equation has kinetic energy plus potential

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>energy in it. Hamiltonian mechanics is built on that principle,

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Classical mechanics is based on the principle of

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 1>least action, and action in the end is defined in

0:35:14.480 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of these two quantities, kinetic and potential energy. And

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the deep mystery really is if these two things independently

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>are not conserved potential and kinetic energy, but together they are,

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:27.360
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean about what they have in common?

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.319
<v Speaker 1>And what is that commonality? I think that in the

0:35:30.440 --> 0:35:32.799
<v Speaker 1>end is the question what is energies? What do these

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:36.560
<v Speaker 1>two things together, what larger picture do they make up? Right?

0:35:36.600 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Because I think maybe that's something that maybe a lot

0:35:38.520 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of people don't know. Is that when you know, in physics,

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.320
<v Speaker 1>say oh, the laws of the universe or the equations

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that define the universe, Really what you're talking about is

0:35:47.360 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 1>basically the idea that kinetic energy and potential energy is conserved,

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 1>because that's what you assume when you formulate the laws

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:57.719
<v Speaker 1>of physics. Right, you start with, hey, let's assume that

0:35:57.800 --> 0:36:01.200
<v Speaker 1>kinetic and potential energy is conserved, you know, and then

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:03.600
<v Speaker 1>let's see what kind of rules that gives us. I

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 1>think it actually goes the opposite direction. You can make

0:36:06.640 --> 0:36:10.280
<v Speaker 1>up laws to a universe that don't have conservation of energy.

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 1>If those laws, for example, are changing in time, then

0:36:13.480 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>they don't conserve energy. And one of the greatest insights

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:20.439
<v Speaker 1>into this relationship between conservation laws and symmetries came when

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 1>people were asking about general relativity. They're like, hold on

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:26.759
<v Speaker 1>a second, does general relativity conserve energy? That seems like

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it should be important. So we actually derived the laws

0:36:29.120 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 1>from other places and then ask like, hold on a second,

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is energy conserved? What does that mean about these things?

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I guess I mean, like, you know, like the Hamiltonian

0:36:36.800 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 1>that's that's basically you're you saying Hey, the sum of

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:42.279
<v Speaker 1>kinetic and potential energy should always stay the same, and

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:45.279
<v Speaker 1>then from that you derive some of these other equations. Right, Well,

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:48.520
<v Speaker 1>there's very non satisfactory physics definition. The answer to that,

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:52.959
<v Speaker 1>which is that once you define the Hamiltonian, then energy

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is defined to be the thing that's conserved if these

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 1>rules don't change in time. So you sort of start

0:36:58.680 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>from the Hamiltonian and and you figure out what is

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the energy of the system from that, I guess what

0:37:03.400 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying is um that it's It's a very fundamental

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>concept in in how theoretical physics works. Right. It's not

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 1>like you assume, like, hey, let's assume it's changing. What

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:13.960
<v Speaker 1>does that give us? It's like you'd assume that it's

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:16.040
<v Speaker 1>not changing. Kind of. I think there are different ways

0:37:16.080 --> 0:37:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to formulate the theories of the universe. And you can

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 1>either start from the assumption that energy is conserved to

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 1>figure out what rules are allowed, or you can just

0:37:23.000 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 1>start building laws and figuring out what the consequences are,

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 1>which ones actually describe our universe, and then noticing that

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>in the ones that describe our universe, this quantity we

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:34.879
<v Speaker 1>call energy seems to be conserved. There's some different orders

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 1>you could use there. All right, well, I guess for

0:37:36.680 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>our discussion, the basic idea is that, you know, physicists

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:42.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of describe or define energy as the sum of

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:46.600
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy plus potential energy. But what you're saying is

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 1>that that's kind of a weird thing to do, because, like,

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 1>how do you know kinetic energy and potation energy have

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to be related to each other exactly? They seem like

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>very different things, right, What does it mean that these

0:37:57.040 --> 0:38:00.120
<v Speaker 1>two very different things are closely related? Like if you discovered, well,

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the number of bananas in the universe isn't conserved, but

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>bananas plus apples that's conserved. That would be really interesting

0:38:06.000 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>connection between bananas and apples. You're like, it turns out

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to have more in common than I thought. Right, then

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.840
<v Speaker 1>they have a kids song together, apples and bananas. I

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>think we need to hear a snippet of it. Go ahead,

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>all right, can you play it for us? Um, I

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have my kazoo here otherwise I would. Well, I

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:21.920
<v Speaker 1>think I think what you're saying is that it's kind

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of weird to put them together. But if you put

0:38:23.480 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it together, then it seems to be constant in the universe.

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:29.919
<v Speaker 1>And it seems to give us these equations that seem

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to work and seems to like predict where particles are

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:34.359
<v Speaker 1>going to go and what's going to happen to them,

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and what kinds there are even exactly. And what that

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:39.760
<v Speaker 1>means is that they really do have something in common.

0:38:39.800 --> 0:38:42.759
<v Speaker 1>They're part of the same thing. They're not the same thing.

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 1>They're like two halves of a puzzle that clicked together

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 1>perfectly to make something new. And then we have to

0:38:48.760 --> 0:38:50.560
<v Speaker 1>ask the question, what does that mean where they have

0:38:50.560 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 1>in common? What is this larger thing that they're a

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:56.399
<v Speaker 1>part of? All right? So then are they conserved? Because

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I know sometimes they're not conserved. So they are conserved

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>in the case where the laws of physics do not change.

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 1>So the laws of physics you're using are the same

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 1>now and the same in ten minutes and the same

0:39:06.360 --> 0:39:10.040
<v Speaker 1>in a thousand years, then kinetic energy plus potential energy

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is conserved. That's absolutely true. Now in our universe, the

0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 1>laws of physics are almost the same from moment to moment.

0:39:18.080 --> 0:39:20.239
<v Speaker 1>They're usually the same. You can do the experiment the

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Large Hadron Collider today and tomorrow and next year and

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 1>get the same measurements. But there is one way in

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>which those laws are changing, which is that space itself

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is expanding. As you mentioned, dark energy is accelerating the

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 1>expansion of the universe, making it bigger and bigger and

0:39:34.960 --> 0:39:38.239
<v Speaker 1>changing the distances between things, and that technically is a

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>change in the laws of physics as a function of time,

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:45.879
<v Speaker 1>meaning that energy is not technically conserved. It's not really

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:48.800
<v Speaker 1>relevant for balls rolling down planes, or banana is falling

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:51.839
<v Speaker 1>off of bookshelves, or any experiment we are going to do.

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:55.040
<v Speaker 1>But you want the deepest understanding of energy. That turns

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:58.719
<v Speaker 1>out in our universe it's not technically conserved but almost

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>right right. Well, I've feel like you're maybe cheating a

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit here. I feel like you're saying that we

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 1>have these laws that we think described the universe, and

0:40:06.800 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 1>in them energy is conserved unless our laws are wrong,

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:15.319
<v Speaker 1>in which case they doesn't. Does that Does that make sense?

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel I feel like maybe what's really happening is

0:40:17.440 --> 0:40:19.200
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have the right laws of the universe,

0:40:19.440 --> 0:40:21.479
<v Speaker 1>Like we only have laws that seemed to work for

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:24.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, moment to moment, or that doesn't take into

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 1>account to six seven of the universe. That's that's making

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it expand really we just kind of maybe don't have

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the right laws. It might also be that the laws

0:40:32.560 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 1>really are a function of time, right, that the way

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:39.600
<v Speaker 1>things work changes as the universe goes on. That's just

0:40:39.680 --> 0:40:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the way the universe is. Wait, what you mean like

0:40:43.360 --> 0:40:45.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a function of something, But it's not a function

0:40:45.440 --> 0:40:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of anything. It could be a function of time, right,

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>But based on what law, the laws themselves could just

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>be a function of time, you know why. For example,

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:58.080
<v Speaker 1>are constants constant? If the gravitational constant changed as a

0:40:58.120 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>function of time, then you can get free energy. If

0:41:01.239 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 1>gravity disappeared every Tuesday morning for an hour, then I could,

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:06.440
<v Speaker 1>with no energy, take a big box of bananas and

0:41:06.480 --> 0:41:09.080
<v Speaker 1>put it on a bookshelf, and then when gravity came back,

0:41:09.200 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I could knock it off and extract the energy from it.

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:14.839
<v Speaker 1>So I'd have an infinite energy machine. If the gravitational

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 1>constant wasn't constant. So if these constants are changing, then

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>energy is not concerned, right, right, But it isn't that

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:23.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean that idea what you're saying, like, hey, let's

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:26.359
<v Speaker 1>just give up and start asking questions. Isn't that sort

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of what you talk against about, right? Like,

0:41:28.920 --> 0:41:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you discovered that the laws of the

0:41:30.400 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>universe are changing for some unknown reason, wouldn't you want

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 1>to know what that reason was? Oh? Absolutely yes, And

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:38.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean you can't find an explanation. Right. The laws

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>can be changing, and those laws can be changing for

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a good reason. It could be like only one consistent

0:41:43.280 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 1>way for the universe to be, and it requires these

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 1>constants to change. Right, It's still following some system which

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is governing how those constants change. But the constants themselves,

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:55.399
<v Speaker 1>the ones that describe the motion of things and how

0:41:55.440 --> 0:41:58.239
<v Speaker 1>you get equations of motion, if those are changing, then

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 1>this quantity we call energy is not conserved right, Right,

0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:03.279
<v Speaker 1>But I guess I'm saying, if there's a system that

0:42:03.440 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is determining how the laws of the universe are changing,

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 1>then maybe that system is the real true you know,

0:42:09.480 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a set of equations that that governed the universe. Sure, absolutely,

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and they could be like the true system that governs

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:19.319
<v Speaker 1>these laws. But the ones that determine how things move, right,

0:42:19.440 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that determine motion of things through the universe. If those

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:25.440
<v Speaker 1>laws are a function of time because they're controlled by

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:28.680
<v Speaker 1>some super deep metal laws. Right, If those laws that

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 1>determine how things move through the universe. If those are changing,

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:34.399
<v Speaker 1>then energy is not conserved. Well, I think we're getting

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit lost because we're talking about energy. I

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 1>think what you're saying is that energy is conserved if

0:42:40.600 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you look at it locally, like our little you know,

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen of the universe and what laws we've

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:47.880
<v Speaker 1>coupled together. But if you look at the big, big picture,

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:51.440
<v Speaker 1>energy is not conserved, which kind of makes you wonder,

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:54.440
<v Speaker 1>like what it is right exactly, or throws into question

0:42:54.840 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 1>even more our ideas of it and points of the

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:00.720
<v Speaker 1>fact that we don't really know what it is because

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:03.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not even conservad like we thought it was exactly,

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:05.920
<v Speaker 1>And it also questions like how important is it? One

0:43:05.960 --> 0:43:07.759
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons we thought it was important because it's

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>because we thought it was conserved and we thought it

0:43:09.480 --> 0:43:12.440
<v Speaker 1>was a deep truth in the universe. It revealed something fundamental.

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:15.359
<v Speaker 1>If it's not actually conserved, you mean, it's maybe not

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 1>as important as we thought, right right, It points like

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:23.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's just the pawn in the meadow law of

0:43:23.239 --> 0:43:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the universe that we have no idea about so far exactly.

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:28.440
<v Speaker 1>It's just like a lowly fruit, like a cherry instead

0:43:28.480 --> 0:43:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of the regal banana instead of the legal banana, exactly,

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:35.919
<v Speaker 1>the all important banana. Yes, all right, well let's get

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:38.719
<v Speaker 1>into a little bit more about what we don't know

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:42.479
<v Speaker 1>about the definition of energy and what it could all mean. Man,

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:58.280
<v Speaker 1>But first let's take another quick break. All right, welcome

0:43:58.280 --> 0:44:02.239
<v Speaker 1>back to Daniel and Jorge argue about energy when one

0:44:02.280 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of us is a physicist and the other one is

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 1>not clearly, but I guess I'm getting the picture that,

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, we kind of thought we knew what energy was.

0:44:11.800 --> 0:44:14.120
<v Speaker 1>We thought it was this fundamental thing that always seems

0:44:14.160 --> 0:44:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to be conserved. But it turns out that it's not

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:19.799
<v Speaker 1>always conserved. So now maybe it's not only do we

0:44:19.840 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 1>not know what it is, but maybe it's not even fundamental. Yeah,

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:25.799
<v Speaker 1>that's right, And it's sort of disappointing because even a

0:44:25.920 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>small amount of non conservation means it's just not conserved.

0:44:29.480 --> 0:44:31.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's like two things, things are conserved and

0:44:31.440 --> 0:44:33.880
<v Speaker 1>things that are not. There's a whole bunch of categories

0:44:33.880 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of things that are not conserved, and being almost conserved

0:44:36.920 --> 0:44:39.960
<v Speaker 1>means I guess you're important, but not really truly fundamental.

0:44:40.120 --> 0:44:43.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, then what would you say energy is then?

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I would say, I wish I knew, and it's something

0:44:45.600 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>definitely deep and interesting in the universe, right, It's something

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that is almost conserved, and it can slash back and

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:54.799
<v Speaker 1>forth between these two different kind of things that feel very,

0:44:54.920 --> 0:44:58.120
<v Speaker 1>very different. What is energy? The philosophical question really is

0:44:58.320 --> 0:45:01.080
<v Speaker 1>what do kinetic and potential energy have in common? What

0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 1>are they part of when you put them together in

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:06.279
<v Speaker 1>the same way that like you can put electricity and

0:45:06.320 --> 0:45:09.920
<v Speaker 1>magnetism together into a holistic thing and get an understanding

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:13.279
<v Speaker 1>of electromagnetism, You're like, oh, that explains this and that

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and brings all these ideas together. You have a feeling

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of having an answer. If we understood how kinetic energy

0:45:18.040 --> 0:45:20.719
<v Speaker 1>and potential energy you fit together into one holistic thing,

0:45:21.080 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll be able to grapple better with this question. I

0:45:23.480 --> 0:45:25.840
<v Speaker 1>feel like you're saying, like, maybe even the word energy

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:29.400
<v Speaker 1>is a little distracting from the real question, which is

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:32.800
<v Speaker 1>like why is there a relationship between you know, motion

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and potential in a way, or even like why does

0:45:36.400 --> 0:45:38.960
<v Speaker 1>potential exists at all? Exactly? And you can try to

0:45:39.000 --> 0:45:41.280
<v Speaker 1>tease it apart by looking at the equations of motion

0:45:41.760 --> 0:45:44.239
<v Speaker 1>and thing like what is it that defines how things

0:45:44.320 --> 0:45:47.680
<v Speaker 1>move and why can this weird quantity slash back and forth.

0:45:48.080 --> 0:45:49.760
<v Speaker 1>And one way to get a little bit of insight

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:53.200
<v Speaker 1>into it is to understand that potential really is also

0:45:53.239 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 1>about motion, Like potential energy is what causes forces. Right,

0:45:57.239 --> 0:46:00.239
<v Speaker 1>the reason that the banana falls off the book shelf

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and accelerates towards the floor is because there's a gravitational

0:46:03.560 --> 0:46:06.560
<v Speaker 1>force there. There's a force there because there's a difference

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:08.759
<v Speaker 1>in the potential. So you can think about in terms

0:46:08.760 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 1>of kinetic energy and potential energy. You can also think

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:14.480
<v Speaker 1>about it in terms of like motion and forces. Like

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a particle just flying through the universe, it just has

0:46:17.080 --> 0:46:21.400
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy. Now add other particles interacting with it, putting

0:46:21.440 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 1>forces on it. Those are creating potential energy for that particle.

0:46:25.239 --> 0:46:28.279
<v Speaker 1>In some sense, it's not kinetic energy and potential energy.

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:32.400
<v Speaker 1>It's kinetic energy and other forces changing its kinetic energy.

0:46:33.120 --> 0:46:34.879
<v Speaker 1>I think what you're saying is that maybe there's really

0:46:34.880 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>only motion and potential motion, Like there's only motion in

0:46:40.600 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the universe, and then there's what happens when two things

0:46:43.120 --> 0:46:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that have motion kind of bump into each other somehow,

0:46:46.400 --> 0:46:49.239
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, they interact in a way that creates potential,

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 1>but really you're just talking about motion and what happens

0:46:52.680 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>in that interaction exactly. And this is the philosophical process

0:46:55.880 --> 0:46:58.959
<v Speaker 1>of sort of stumbling towards a deeper concept or trying

0:46:58.960 --> 0:47:01.959
<v Speaker 1>to understand what these things have in common and generalize

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:04.640
<v Speaker 1>it into an idea that really fits together that can

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>hold as a bucket all these different concepts that we

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:09.480
<v Speaker 1>consider energy and its properties. And it's connected to this

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 1>other question we talked about, like our fields. Real well,

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:13.879
<v Speaker 1>it sort of sounds like you're saying that maybe there's

0:47:13.960 --> 0:47:17.520
<v Speaker 1>only really kinetic energy, right, Like, there's only kinetic energy,

0:47:17.600 --> 0:47:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and there's also what happens when two things that have

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy interact with each other, right, Like, it sounds

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 1>like maybe potential energy is really just about motion and interactions,

0:47:28.200 --> 0:47:29.799
<v Speaker 1>and so you've got to ask, like, why does the

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 1>universe have motion and why does it have interactions? Like

0:47:32.800 --> 0:47:35.640
<v Speaker 1>right right, if it didn't have interactions, everyone would just

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:38.839
<v Speaker 1>fly around by themselves. They would just be kinetic energy

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and that would never change. But it changes because we

0:47:41.760 --> 0:47:44.080
<v Speaker 1>have these interactions in the universe. And that goes to

0:47:44.160 --> 0:47:46.439
<v Speaker 1>like an even more abstract question, which is like why

0:47:46.440 --> 0:47:49.439
<v Speaker 1>do you consider things is interacting. That assumes that there's

0:47:49.520 --> 0:47:51.799
<v Speaker 1>different things that you can say, like there's this one

0:47:51.840 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 1>thing and the other thing, Well, how do you draw

0:47:54.239 --> 0:47:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the line between them? Right, it's like one half of

0:47:56.200 --> 0:47:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the earth interacting with the other half of the earth.

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:00.239
<v Speaker 1>How do you slice that? Why do you call the

0:48:00.239 --> 0:48:02.879
<v Speaker 1>earth one thing and not two things? And anytime your

0:48:02.960 --> 0:48:06.480
<v Speaker 1>ideas are based on totally arbitrary designations like that, like

0:48:06.560 --> 0:48:08.239
<v Speaker 1>this is a thing, but that's not a thing, or

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 1>this is two things, then you know that you're looking

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 1>at it the wrong way. I think the work that's

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:14.359
<v Speaker 1>left to be done is to understand this as one

0:48:14.400 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 1>holistic thing. You know, what is it really that's flowing

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:20.040
<v Speaker 1>between two objects where one is in motion and then

0:48:20.080 --> 0:48:22.319
<v Speaker 1>another one is in motion. How is that flowing? Is

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 1>it really changing into a different kind of energy? Or

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is there one holistic, super kind of idea there that

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you can understand connects these two things right? Right, Like

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:33.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe there aren't humans and zombies. Maybe maybe we're all

0:48:33.920 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 1>just human and zombies just have the potential to eat humans. Exactly.

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe before you eat the banana, the banana is already

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:44.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of party, you you know, or hey, plus banana

0:48:44.800 --> 0:48:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is already the thing before you eat the banana. I

0:48:47.640 --> 0:48:49.440
<v Speaker 1>think what you're saying is that, you know, we talk

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:52.120
<v Speaker 1>about kinnetic energy and potential energy, but really maybe there's

0:48:52.200 --> 0:48:56.160
<v Speaker 1>just part of the same thing, like motion plus interactions. Right.

0:48:56.200 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 1>If I zoom in on a particle on like a proton,

0:48:58.239 --> 0:49:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and say, oh, look, those quirks have kinnectic energy inside

0:49:00.880 --> 0:49:02.359
<v Speaker 1>of them. But if I zoom out and just look

0:49:02.360 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 1>at the proton, I'm like, oh no, the proton is

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:06.359
<v Speaker 1>at rest. It has no kinetic energy. So how much

0:49:06.440 --> 0:49:09.080
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy there is depends on what I'm defining to

0:49:09.120 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 1>be a thing or not. It seems sort of arbitrary,

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's the biggest clue that will lead

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:16.279
<v Speaker 1>us to a deeper understanding of energy, but I don't

0:49:16.320 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 1>have that understanding today. Well, let's touch a little bit

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 1>into that the scenario that you mentioned earlier in the episode,

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 1>which is the end of the universe, and that maybe

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:26.959
<v Speaker 1>one potential end of the universe is the heat death

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, where you know, everything has energy, but

0:49:31.120 --> 0:49:34.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing can happen everything. You know, particles are moving like

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a giant gas, and so there's definitely energy there, but

0:49:38.000 --> 0:49:40.839
<v Speaker 1>no potential energy is that what you're saying that there's

0:49:40.840 --> 0:49:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it's an scenario where there's no potential energy left in

0:49:44.920 --> 0:49:48.279
<v Speaker 1>the universe. Yeah, there's useful energy, and then there's sort

0:49:48.320 --> 0:49:52.359
<v Speaker 1>of useless energy. Useful energy is energy you can use

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to do work, to like move something up a potential

0:49:55.719 --> 0:49:57.840
<v Speaker 1>for example. And you know if you have energy in

0:49:57.880 --> 0:50:00.360
<v Speaker 1>a battery, you can take that energy and use it

0:50:00.360 --> 0:50:02.399
<v Speaker 1>to power and engine and it can like push your

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:04.560
<v Speaker 1>banana up off the floor back to the top of

0:50:04.600 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 1>the bookshelf. That's useful energy, and that only happens when

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 1>you have energy localized somewhere, right, when you have low entropy,

0:50:12.280 --> 0:50:16.360
<v Speaker 1>when there's organization of stuff. Opposite of that is useless energy.

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Energy like heat. If everything is just hot and everything

0:50:19.440 --> 0:50:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is the same temperature, there's no temperature difference, there's no

0:50:22.560 --> 0:50:25.360
<v Speaker 1>energy gredients. You can't use that to power and engine.

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Like if you have an engine and you're in a

0:50:27.600 --> 0:50:30.440
<v Speaker 1>universe where everything is smooth but hot, there's no way

0:50:30.480 --> 0:50:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to take that energy in those motions of the particles

0:50:32.600 --> 0:50:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and turn that into something useful. So the key idea

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:38.960
<v Speaker 1>there's entropy. Entropy, right, Yeah, there's like everything is that

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a hot mess? What you're saying a bland, hot mess.

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:44.880
<v Speaker 1>But wouldn't I guess even invest in an area, wouldn't

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:49.680
<v Speaker 1>gravity eventually kind of bring stuff together, creating potential energy?

0:50:50.000 --> 0:50:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Or like, how does gravity disappear in this scenario? And

0:50:52.480 --> 0:50:55.040
<v Speaker 1>gravity doesn't disappear, but it can't do anything in that

0:50:55.080 --> 0:50:59.200
<v Speaker 1>scenario because everything is smooth and homogeneous. Gravity requires some

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:02.400
<v Speaker 1>clump to get things started. Like in the early universe,

0:51:02.560 --> 0:51:05.360
<v Speaker 1>we didn't have a smooth and homogeneous blob of stuff

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:08.359
<v Speaker 1>in the very beginning. We had little quantum fluctuations, little

0:51:08.360 --> 0:51:11.880
<v Speaker 1>bits of over density and under density that gravity grabbed

0:51:11.920 --> 0:51:15.160
<v Speaker 1>onto and exaggerated. But if you have the true heat

0:51:15.160 --> 0:51:17.400
<v Speaker 1>death of the universe, where everything is spread out equally,

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Speaker 1>then every particle feels the same gravitational pull in every direction,

0:51:21.280 --> 0:51:24.200
<v Speaker 1>so it basically cancels out. What is this idea of entropy?

0:51:24.640 --> 0:51:27.840
<v Speaker 1>How does that impact our definition of energy? Like maybe

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not real or something. Well, folks who love and

0:51:30.680 --> 0:51:33.760
<v Speaker 1>understand them, dynamics have different definitions of energy. There's energy

0:51:33.760 --> 0:51:36.640
<v Speaker 1>in general, and then there's free energy, which is sort

0:51:36.640 --> 0:51:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of like an energy available to do useful work. And

0:51:39.640 --> 0:51:43.240
<v Speaker 1>then there's also discount of energy and energy on sale.

0:51:43.440 --> 0:51:45.800
<v Speaker 1>And then there's free lunch, which apparently doesn't even exist

0:51:47.600 --> 0:51:49.319
<v Speaker 1>that we know of. But you, as you said, the

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:51.680
<v Speaker 1>universe is changing, Daniel. Maybe it will be free lunch

0:51:51.680 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>in the future for everyone. That's right, And these topics

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:57.160
<v Speaker 1>always make me uncomfortable. Thermodynamics is the topic of physics

0:51:57.280 --> 0:51:59.400
<v Speaker 1>that I avoided as much as possible when I was

0:51:59.440 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 1>taking class. Is right? That and zombie movies? Or maybe

0:52:03.120 --> 0:52:05.919
<v Speaker 1>they're about the same thing, right, Zombies are about decay

0:52:06.000 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and things breaking down. Maybe maybe this is all turned

0:52:10.680 --> 0:52:14.360
<v Speaker 1>out to be a deep psychological journey into daniel psyche.

0:52:14.520 --> 0:52:17.600
<v Speaker 1>That's right, but we're understanding the conservation of Daniel's decisions.

0:52:19.080 --> 0:52:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Zombies and entropy make you uncomfortable. Maybe we should dig

0:52:22.880 --> 0:52:25.759
<v Speaker 1>deeper into that day and did something happen in your childhood? Yes,

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a zombie came an intropute in my bedroom when I

0:52:28.080 --> 0:52:31.880
<v Speaker 1>was a kid that I'm scared. No. Thermodynamics to me

0:52:32.040 --> 0:52:34.600
<v Speaker 1>is complicated because you're just so many particles. It's all

0:52:34.600 --> 0:52:37.960
<v Speaker 1>about statistical statements of large systems of particles. For me,

0:52:38.000 --> 0:52:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it's easier to grapple with one particle bouncing off another particle,

0:52:41.440 --> 0:52:43.480
<v Speaker 1>because I would like to get down to the microscopic

0:52:43.520 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 1>picture what's really happening, and there amo dynamics is about

0:52:46.480 --> 0:52:48.840
<v Speaker 1>like zooming out and trying to make like broad statements

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:52.560
<v Speaker 1>about systems. It's not the same as philosophy though, Yeah,

0:52:52.640 --> 0:52:57.200
<v Speaker 1>but philosophy nobody has any wrong answers. That's right, it's

0:52:57.239 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 1>not verifiable, how convenient. Well, I think the overall picture

0:53:01.680 --> 0:53:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting is that to answer the question what is energy,

0:53:04.440 --> 0:53:07.880
<v Speaker 1>it's it's tough. You know, we have different labels for it.

0:53:07.920 --> 0:53:10.600
<v Speaker 1>There's kinetic energy, that it's potential energy. That seems to

0:53:10.640 --> 0:53:13.719
<v Speaker 1>be all about there is to it, but that's not

0:53:13.800 --> 0:53:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the full picture. Like it seems to be conserved, but

0:53:16.239 --> 0:53:18.759
<v Speaker 1>it's not really conserved in the universe, and so maybe

0:53:18.800 --> 0:53:20.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not even an important thing, or maybe it's not

0:53:20.640 --> 0:53:22.960
<v Speaker 1>even a thing. Like maybe in the future aliens will

0:53:22.960 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>be like, why do you guys were thinking about energy?

0:53:25.400 --> 0:53:28.440
<v Speaker 1>That's like thinking about the ether or thinking about you know,

0:53:28.600 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the soul or something like. That's that's a that's the

0:53:31.560 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 1>thing that doesn't make sense. Yeah, it definitely is driven

0:53:34.040 --> 0:53:36.879
<v Speaker 1>from an intuitive experience of the world, and then try

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:39.319
<v Speaker 1>to extrapolate that to physics and understand if it makes

0:53:39.320 --> 0:53:41.479
<v Speaker 1>sense and it's sort of kind of seems like it does,

0:53:41.560 --> 0:53:44.080
<v Speaker 1>but maybe it doesn't quite. We definitely still have work

0:53:44.120 --> 0:53:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to do. And you know, if you look into a

0:53:45.640 --> 0:53:48.160
<v Speaker 1>physics book or google this question, you might find some

0:53:48.200 --> 0:53:51.200
<v Speaker 1>confusing answers. Some of them are things like energy is

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the quantity that's conserved if the laws of physics don't change,

0:53:55.120 --> 0:53:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So they're like defining it to be the conserved thing,

0:53:58.440 --> 0:54:01.000
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't really tell you like what it is. It

0:54:01.080 --> 0:54:04.280
<v Speaker 1>just tells you how Nuther's theorem impacts these laws of physics.

0:54:04.280 --> 0:54:06.279
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't really tell you like what it is. I think

0:54:06.280 --> 0:54:09.839
<v Speaker 1>we're still struggling to figure out exactly what energy is, right,

0:54:09.920 --> 0:54:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it might need to be redefined now that we sort

0:54:12.080 --> 0:54:13.799
<v Speaker 1>of know and this is the only reason that we

0:54:13.840 --> 0:54:16.120
<v Speaker 1>know that the universe is changing and the laws of

0:54:16.120 --> 0:54:18.880
<v Speaker 1>physics are not constant. Ye, so the history of this

0:54:19.000 --> 0:54:21.600
<v Speaker 1>scene over a few hundred years is like discovery of

0:54:21.640 --> 0:54:24.279
<v Speaker 1>kinetic energy that seems to be conserved. Oops, no, it's

0:54:24.320 --> 0:54:27.799
<v Speaker 1>not only kinetic energy plus potential energy is conserved. And

0:54:27.800 --> 0:54:30.799
<v Speaker 1>then Einstein's general relativity as a whole new system for

0:54:30.840 --> 0:54:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the universe and not there says hold on a second,

0:54:33.400 --> 0:54:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't guarantee conservation of energy, so people like, oops,

0:54:36.360 --> 0:54:39.160
<v Speaker 1>better patch that up, make sure conserve energy, and then

0:54:39.160 --> 0:54:42.880
<v Speaker 1>we discover actually, it doesn't conserve energy. The universe disagrees

0:54:42.920 --> 0:54:45.200
<v Speaker 1>with that whole idea. So it's been a lot of

0:54:45.200 --> 0:54:48.040
<v Speaker 1>back and forth. Yeah, I'm amazing you guys still have

0:54:48.040 --> 0:54:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the energy to keep at it. Well, somebody keeps eating bananas,

0:54:50.880 --> 0:54:53.359
<v Speaker 1>and so we keep asking questions. Right, maybe we've been

0:54:53.400 --> 0:54:59.240
<v Speaker 1>as our concerned. Well, it seems like maybe we won't

0:54:59.239 --> 0:55:02.239
<v Speaker 1>define it any time soon. But I think it sort

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:04.439
<v Speaker 1>of points to the idea that there are these deep

0:55:04.840 --> 0:55:10.560
<v Speaker 1>relationships in the universe between motion and and potential and fields,

0:55:10.719 --> 0:55:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're still trying to figure out what those relationships

0:55:13.200 --> 0:55:15.360
<v Speaker 1>are because that kind of tells that's what's going to

0:55:15.440 --> 0:55:18.080
<v Speaker 1>tell us what the true nature of the universe is. Yeah,

0:55:18.120 --> 0:55:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and one of the deepest goals in physics is to

0:55:20.239 --> 0:55:23.360
<v Speaker 1>come up with a concise, mathematical story about how the

0:55:23.440 --> 0:55:26.560
<v Speaker 1>universe works in a way that makes sense to us.

0:55:27.080 --> 0:55:29.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we're struggling with here, is connecting these

0:55:29.200 --> 0:55:33.200
<v Speaker 1>mathematical concepts with intuitive ideas that gel with us, that

0:55:33.320 --> 0:55:36.239
<v Speaker 1>tell us something about the nature of the universe more

0:55:36.280 --> 0:55:38.680
<v Speaker 1>than just looking at the black and white equations on

0:55:38.719 --> 0:55:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a page. And that's what it's all about, jelling with

0:55:41.600 --> 0:55:45.279
<v Speaker 1>the universe and eat a banana and Jill and chill

0:55:45.280 --> 0:55:47.759
<v Speaker 1>out exactly, But don't eat the last banana because it's

0:55:47.800 --> 0:55:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a fixed number of them in the universe. And if

0:55:49.600 --> 0:55:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you eat the last one or he can't, and then

0:55:51.400 --> 0:55:53.399
<v Speaker 1>we won't have any more partner. Know, it's an ever

0:55:53.560 --> 0:55:56.560
<v Speaker 1>green quantity, right, that's what I thought. That's what we concluded. No,

0:55:57.000 --> 0:55:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I see, eat all the bananas you want, ran because

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:03.480
<v Speaker 1>somewhere or some unknown process is recreating them. That's a

0:56:03.560 --> 0:56:07.200
<v Speaker 1>nice universe to live in. Yeah, pretty bananas. All right. Well,

0:56:07.200 --> 0:56:09.560
<v Speaker 1>we hope you enjoyed that discussion. Thanks for joining us,

0:56:10.320 --> 0:56:20.319
<v Speaker 1>see you next time. Thanks for listening, and remember that

0:56:20.440 --> 0:56:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Jorge explained. The universe is a production of

0:56:23.280 --> 0:56:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio. For more podcast for my heart Radio,

0:56:26.800 --> 0:56:30.360
<v Speaker 1>visit the I heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:56:30.480 --> 0:56:37.919
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows. Yeah,