1 00:00:00,560 --> 00:00:03,200 Speaker 1: This is the Fread Show. We have your chance to 2 00:00:03,240 --> 00:00:05,360 Speaker 1: win a trip for two to see Kelly Clarkson's return 3 00:00:05,440 --> 00:00:09,039 Speaker 1: to Las Vegas for her brand new residency Studio Sessions 4 00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:12,399 Speaker 1: Live at the Coliseum at Caesar's Palace on August first. 5 00:00:12,800 --> 00:00:16,520 Speaker 1: Text Vegas to three seven three three seven now for 6 00:00:16,560 --> 00:00:19,720 Speaker 1: a chance to win two tickets to the August first show, 7 00:00:19,960 --> 00:00:23,360 Speaker 1: two nights hotel day July thirty first to August second 8 00:00:23,480 --> 00:00:26,040 Speaker 1: at the Flamingo, Las Vegas and round trip airfare, a 9 00:00:26,120 --> 00:00:29,000 Speaker 1: confirmation text that we sent. Standard message of data rates apply. 10 00:00:29,360 --> 00:00:30,600 Speaker 1: All thanks to the Live Nation. 11 00:00:31,440 --> 00:00:35,080 Speaker 2: The Fread Show is on Friend's Fun Fact. 12 00:00:34,840 --> 00:00:44,599 Speaker 3: Fred's Fun. 13 00:00:43,120 --> 00:00:47,680 Speaker 1: So much guys. Today's factor is about weddings. Did you 14 00:00:47,760 --> 00:00:51,280 Speaker 1: know that there is an inverse correlation between the amount 15 00:00:51,320 --> 00:00:54,000 Speaker 1: of money spent on a wedding and how long the 16 00:00:54,080 --> 00:00:57,760 Speaker 1: marriage lasts. The more a couple spends on the ceremony, 17 00:00:58,000 --> 00:01:00,880 Speaker 1: the more likely they already get divorced. Ording to Facts Daily, 18 00:01:02,160 --> 00:01:04,840 Speaker 1: there's an inverse correlation between the amount of money spent 19 00:01:04,920 --> 00:01:07,120 Speaker 1: on a wedding and how long the marriage will last. 20 00:01:07,160 --> 00:01:10,000 Speaker 1: The more a couple spends on the ceremony, the more 21 00:01:10,280 --> 00:01:11,720 Speaker 1: likely they are to get divorced. 22 00:01:11,800 --> 00:01:15,960 Speaker 2: My channel sounds really good right about now that it's 23 00:01:15,959 --> 00:01:18,720 Speaker 2: an excellent choice. It wasn't. But it could be a 24 00:01:18,720 --> 00:01:20,800 Speaker 2: lot worse. Yeah, it could be a lot worse. 25 00:01:20,800 --> 00:01:22,320 Speaker 1: Well, you're right, I guess you could have like had 26 00:01:22,360 --> 00:01:26,080 Speaker 1: you know, the whole Gordon ramsay come and cook all 27 00:01:26,120 --> 00:01:28,600 Speaker 1: the food, or you know, yeah you could, you could, 28 00:01:28,600 --> 00:01:33,400 Speaker 1: I suppose yeah, you could could have dug up Elvis right, 29 00:01:33,560 --> 00:01:37,280 Speaker 1: and that would have been very specive, more fresh show next.