WEBVTT - Why President Trump's Move Against Huawei Is Such A Big Deal

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal. Uh. My co host Tracy Alloway. She's off.

0:00:20.280 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>She couldn't make today's episode. It's kind of an emergency

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>at last minute episode though, because we wanted to do

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>something very timely with just the right guest. Obviously, the

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>trade tensions with China continuing to ratchet up, and it's

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>really becoming less and less I would say about the

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>trade deficit and some of these classical topics that we

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:46.960
<v Speaker 1>think of in a trade war, and much more about

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>this sort of brewing technology cold war as people are

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>putting it, and the moves that the Trump administration has

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>taken against some of China's big tech companies. Today, I'm

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be speaking on the subject with a previous

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Odd Lots guest. Going to be talking with Dan Wong.

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>He's a technology analyst at gav Quel dragon Omics. He's

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>also a Bloomberg opinion columnist, which is very cool. You

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>might recall we spoke to Dan a while ago about

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the China Initiative, the endeavor on the part of the

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government to really sort of build its own domestic

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>leadership and all these big tech areas. So Dan is

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>really the perfect person to discuss these new developments with.

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Wanted to get him on, wanted to get his perspective

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>on the latest development. So without further ado, I want

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to bring in Uh Dan Dan Wong, thank you very

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. So obviously pretty uh, pretty interesting

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>moves we've seen over the last few weeks, a very

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 1>serious ratcheting up in the trade war talks as President

0:01:56.360 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump has moved to uh really uh put the pressure

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>on Huawei, major Chinese tech giant. What do you describe

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to us to start? What is Huahwei? What is their

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:12.239
<v Speaker 1>significant in the global or in the Chinese tech ecosystem?

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Where did they come from? How did they become so important?

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.519
<v Speaker 1>So I think Huawei is the most important technology company

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>in China uh, and it has a few major business lines.

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the two most important ones are it's smartphone

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 1>business UH and then it's a network equipment business. So

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>as a matter of comparison, Huawei sold about as many

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>smartphones as Apple did last year, although much lower profits UM.

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>But it is a major seller of smartphones around the world,

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>not just in China but also in Southeast Asia and

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>now increasingly UH in Europe. The other major business line

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>it has is network infrastructure equipment. So all of these

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>things that make mobile calling possible and for G or

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>LTE possible. This a lot of it, at least outside

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the US, is provided by Huawei, And as the world

0:03:01.680 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>is getting ready to transition to the next generation, the

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>fifth generation of mobile network technologies or five G, Huawei

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty major player in that ecosystem. How cutting

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 1>edge are they? I mean, if you look at the

0:03:16.000 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>company and I guess either on both lines, whether it's

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>smartphones or networking equipment, are they sort of a best

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of breed player on this stuff? I think the consensus

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>is that Huawei is very competent on both the smartphone

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:32.600
<v Speaker 1>business and then also the network business. So on the smartphones,

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I think people in the US don't really get to

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>see this, But a lot of the reason that Apple

0:03:38.840 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>has been doing not so well in China is that

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>basically Huawei and a few other players have made pretty

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 1>good phones at quite a bit lower prices than Apple does.

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Samsung has been almost completely squeezed out of

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the China market because Huawis phones are really good, and

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Huawei is giving a run for Samsung's money basically and

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.240
<v Speaker 1>many more kids in the world. But you know, plausibly,

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Huawei is a little bit behind, are quite a lot

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>behind Apple on the smartphone business. On the network equipment business,

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it is arguably really eating everything I hear

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:16.600
<v Speaker 1>is that basically the network equipment business. Uh. Not only

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.359
<v Speaker 1>is it selling as good or cutting edge equipment or

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>even better equipment than its competitors, which are mostly Ericson

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>and Nokia, it is also often significantly cheaper. Talk to

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:32.040
<v Speaker 1>us about the action that Trump took. Obviously, the companies

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>that supplied technology to Huahwei, including many American companies, are

0:04:36.240 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>now theoretically restricted from doing business with them. So how

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>existential is this to Huahwei's business? Uh, this move from

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration, I think it is a pretty existential threat. Now,

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.719
<v Speaker 1>what the Trump administration did was about two weeks ago

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:56.799
<v Speaker 1>it added Huawei to this UH list called the Entity List.

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:01.239
<v Speaker 1>And what this is effectively as this export blacklist, which

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:06.039
<v Speaker 1>doesn't allow US companies to export any equipment basically any

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>components or any technologies over to Huawei. And I think

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>this is a really big deal because Huawei depends very

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>significantly on US technology to make a lot of its

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>own systems function. So on the smartphone side, it needs

0:05:20.839 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different types of chips. On the network

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>equipment side, it also needs a lot of chips, and

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 1>then also some specialty laser products. Not only is the

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>US are the US chips companies prevented from selling to Huawei. Basically,

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the US is able to cut off Google's Android from

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>supplying to Huawei as well. This is another big risk

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>this to the company. This is able to Basically I

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:48.160
<v Speaker 1>think there's a good chance that Huawei's smartphone sales overseas

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 1>outside China could very well collapse this year because it

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:54.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have access to Android. And uh, there's just a

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of components that Huawei needs that are almost exclusively

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>supplied by the US. There's a lot of these types

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of chips, you know, if you have if you lack

0:06:03.760 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>even a single chip inside inn a system, the entire

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>thing may not work. And so I think this is

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big deal. And not only is the US

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>able to stop basically U S companies from supplying to Halweih,

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the US has a little bit of an extra territorial

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>reach as well. So the U S Department of Commerce

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>defines has this di Minimus threshold standard. If it takes

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a look at any foreign product sold by let's say

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>European or Japanese or Korean company, and if over the

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>value was generated in the US, then the U S

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Department of Commerce asserts that to be a US product.

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And so in this way, basically it can deny non

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>U S firms from selling to the Chinese UH controlled

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>entity in this case allway as well. And so from

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>news reports we've seen that basically in fine On, a

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>German semi conductor firm, arm a UK semi conductor firm,

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and then also Panasonic, a Japanese firm, all have announced

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that they are going to stop us supplying to Haalwei.

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>And as soon as this happened, the founder came out

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>saying that's basically this may not be too big of

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a deal. We have plenty of spare tires. I really

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:11.560
<v Speaker 1>don't buy that argument. I think that it is very

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>unlikely that while we can still survive basically being cut

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>off from almost all of its forts suppliers. So I mean,

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly right. I mean there had been reports and

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess Huawei itself saying that it had a stockpile

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of chips. Maybe it anticipated a potential action like this,

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>but ultimately, in your view, it just doesn't have many

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>cards to play as long as this action by the

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration remains in effect. That's right. It's really striking

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>just hearing you describe the severity of this, and to

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>think that a few months ago we were talking about

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>China is going to increase its purchase of US soybeans

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and that was going to help get a deal you

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>can just send. This is a very serious escalation. I

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>think it is a very serious escalation that basically the

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>US has this ability to turn off one of China's

0:08:08.400 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>most important companies period that this is a company that

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is really important domestically in China as one of the

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>few firms that really do have does have an international

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>presence selling smartphones all over the world outside of the US.

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Then also selling network equipment all over the world, but

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>again outside the US, just to illustrate a little bit

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of how important this company is. Basically, you know, if

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you ignore the smartphones and focus on the network equipment business,

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>it's become an incredibly consolidated market. So always main competitors

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>selling four gen now as soon to be five G

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>equipment are ericson in Nokia. Basically a lot of the

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>US position has pretty much vanished. These firms that used

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to be major US of phone technology mobile telephony technology

0:08:55.480 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>companies included names like Motorola, Lucent and in Canada based Nortel.

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Basically none of these are going independent concerns anymore, and

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.079
<v Speaker 1>a Huawei Arison and Nokia are really the big players

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>left in the game. You know, if you go is

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:15.120
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly consolidated market, and if the US is able

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to knock out the biggest player in a consolidated market,

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>bring the number of players from three to two. Basically

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the prices may not rise by only a few percentage points.

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:28.559
<v Speaker 1>For service providers let's say like Deutsche Telecom or Vota

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Phone or British Telecom, prices can may well double because

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 1>there's just so much less competition and there's just so

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>much more collusion when you have the world being supplied

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.560
<v Speaker 1>by this Nordic duopoly. And so, you know, I think

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>this is the actions are of the US are having

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>reverberations around the world on not just in the U

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>S and China as well. Is there something about the

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>telecom equipment industry that has naturally caused it to have

0:09:55.840 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>so many major flame outs. I mean you I forgot

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you know all these names that you mentioned, like Motorola, Lucent,

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:06.640
<v Speaker 1>nor Tell, all those companies like just sort of I

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>don't remember exactly. I think when a Motorola like selled

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a Google or something like that. Uh yeah, all these

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>companies sort of like evaporated as shelves of their former selves.

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Why has this business been so brutal and gotten to

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the point where there's just a few a few oleglopolistic players. Arguably, well, arguably,

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that is a lot of the story with

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the uh, you know, chech general technology sector and not

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>so much talking about the Internet companies here, although I

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>know that's a big debate. Basically, if you look at

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>something like chips, something really striking to me recently was

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that Apple had to settle very long running litigations with

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Qualcom firm. It's been embroiled with in litigation for a

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>really long time, mostly because a firm like Intel couldn't

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:55.920
<v Speaker 1>step up and be a credible supplier on something called

0:10:56.000 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>moting chips. And so just generally, I think the story

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>in this hardware space and technology is consolidation everywhere and uh,

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:09.120
<v Speaker 1>limited players in basically every segment of hardware technologies. Is

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it a situation where it's just really hard technologically to

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>produce this at scale? And so even you know, you

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned a giant like Intel. I think they're still the

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest semiconductor company in the world and they're unable to

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:26.439
<v Speaker 1>deliver these motive chips to Apple at scale. Is it

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>just because it's hard stuff to get right and get

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>good and doing high quantity? My understanding is that this

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is not one of the most difficult technologies that the

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>world can produce. UM. A lot of this is still

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>fairly low margin, and that's uh one of the reasons

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>why so many firms have accidented the market. So one

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of the things I mentioned it in the intro um.

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 1>But obviously last time you're on the podcast, we're talking

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>about the China Initiative and its efforts to become a

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 1>world leader at all these different areas like aerospace and

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor and medical equipment and robotics, transportation, things like that.

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>The fact that the US can, in theory still unilaterally

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>deliver a death penalty to a major Chinese player. It

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>can't do anything, I would imagine except remind the Chinese

0:12:18.880 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>leadership how important it is to build up their own

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.400
<v Speaker 1>domestic tech sector. I think that's exactly right. And I

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>think in an area like semiconductors is where the U

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>S power is clearest, that basically a lot of the

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>world has given up on semiconductors. A lot of the

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>European firms that used to be big have gone away,

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>the same ghost for Japan uh and China's trying to

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>work really hard to enter this technology space, in part

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>because it is just so owned by the US. And

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that, um, you know, the Chinese response to

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these actions really has to be to

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 1>try to double down on its efforts to develop all

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>of these different technologies. Not only can it basically not

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:03.400
<v Speaker 1>count on US supply, a lot of foreign supply may

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.559
<v Speaker 1>not be able to flow to China because of this

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the Minimus threshold. And you know, I think it is

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>politically intolerable for the Chinese that the US has this

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>at will ability to shut off a major technology company.

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.319
<v Speaker 1>This is not the first time over the last year

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that the US has done this. In fact, the US

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>has done this three times over the last twelve months.

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:26.839
<v Speaker 1>In April last year, the U s A. This is

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>z T, which is kind of like a small Quahwei

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:33.440
<v Speaker 1>with both smartphone presents and then also network equipment presence.

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>And also did this to a company called fusansin KLA,

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>which is a memory chip maker in Southeast China. And

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>now the US is doing this to Huawei, And so

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the Chinese leadership really feels that needs to

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>do a lot more to promote its own capabilities and

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>these trips. So is this always where it was inevitably headed?

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Because when Donald Trump decided to really change the US

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>trading polished your with China the start of administration, the

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>critique was that, you know, his complaints about the trade

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>deficit and how much we import from China were off

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the mark or maybe not clear economic thinking, but that

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>there really was some merit to this idea that on

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>areas like technology and intellectual privacy, China really did pose

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>some sort of threat and it didn't play by the rules,

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>arguably according to some people we've spoken with, So these

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:34.160
<v Speaker 1>moves against the Chinese tech sector, is this sort of

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>always what it was really about? I think that's a

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>really fair assessment. And basically, if you look at the

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>report that launched this trade war UH and referring specifically

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to the US Trade Representatives Section three or one report,

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Basically it lists a lot of these technology issues of

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>front and center and core, including basically the term that

0:14:55.040 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>they use force technology transfer UH and it mentions made

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in China. I believe over a hundred times in the

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>section three of one report basically that the US feels

0:15:06.280 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>challenged on a lot of these technology areas, that it

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>alleges that China doesn't play fair trying to compete against

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the US and a lot of these areas, and so

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>it really has to maintain its technological edge over the Chinese.

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Now as of right now when we're recording this UM,

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess people are still holding out some hope for

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a deal. If you talk to investors and traders, they're like, oh,

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll come to something. There's an upcoming G twenty meeting

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and Trump and she shouldn't paying or might meet. Maybe

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>they'll shake hands there and there will be a thought.

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you see any possibility of a thought on the

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>tensions here still at this point or have we sort

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of hit a point of no return in which the

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>book sides are really going to be dug in for

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a while, and the relationship between these two countries is

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of permanently and revocably changed. I think it is

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a permanent change in many ways. Now, I think it

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is really difficult to predict whether there will be a deal.

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it is at least still plausible that you

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>can read a lot of the actions in recent weeks,

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>ever since the Trump tweets on the tariffs on the

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>five to be basically this negotiating, you know, tactic to

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>get the Chinese to concede on a little bit more

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>basically at the end of the process um or you know,

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe it is the case that both sides are basically

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>walking away from a deal. And if you had to

0:16:57.840 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>push me, I would say it's a little bit of

0:16:59.880 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the ladder. It is um you know, especially with this

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>escalation on Huawei, I think it just makes it much

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.679
<v Speaker 1>more difficult for the On the one handed, you know,

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 1>taking down one of their major companies, it's really a

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>big deal, and Chinese diplomats are not willing to see

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>one of its major companies fail. On the other hand,

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, it just makes it much more difficult to

0:17:19.920 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>come to a deal. But one core point that I

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:24.840
<v Speaker 1>want to make is that regardless of whether there will

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:26.880
<v Speaker 1>be a trade deal, I think a lot of these

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>technology issues are permanently changed. Basically, by that, I mean

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that while the White House was prosecuting this trade war,

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Congress has handed a lot of tools so the rest

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>of the bureaucracy to deal with the tech sector, not

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 1>just in China but also in the US by passing

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:47.479
<v Speaker 1>various laws. Dan Agri go into that further, I hadn't

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>seen much or heard much about this. So what are

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the sort of uh, the specific laws that Congress has

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>passed to what you're referring. So I think this is

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.679
<v Speaker 1>the shows that the US has a really wide toolbox

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the Chinese and then also to some extent,

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the American tech sector. One recent legislative change is the

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act or FIRMA. So this

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is a bill that Congress passed last year that significantly

0:18:15.119 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 1>strengthens this fairly obscure government body called CIFIUS c f

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>i U S, which is the Committee for Foreign Investment

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:27.159
<v Speaker 1>into the United States. Previously, SIFIAS was scrutinizing acquisitions of

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:31.720
<v Speaker 1>US companies by foreigners for a national security review. And

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, if this uh interagency body, which is staffed

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 1>mostly by Treasury but also has representatives from Department of

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Defense and Department of Commerce and a few other places,

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>decides that a foreigner cannot own a US asset, then

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>it has the ability to uh, you know, block that acquisition.

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>And what firma the legislative act passed in August did

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>was expand the SIFEST power to scrutinize beyond acquisitions to

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 1>into non controlling investments. So basically, a deal now that

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:06.359
<v Speaker 1>involves a foreigner that is offers a foreigner any information

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>rights or decision making rights has the chance to be rejected.

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>And this is applies mostly to technology companies, even unlisted ones.

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>So I think the interesting news from last month was

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that siphias forced the divestment by a Chinese company of Grinder,

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>which is, uh, you know, I'm not sure if everybody

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg knows this, but it is a gay dating app.

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>This was a gay dating app that had been acquired

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>by a Chinese firm. The sifia's body has decided that

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>this is a national security risk for the Chinese to

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>own our gay dating apps and therefore must be divested.

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's because of the data and the information that

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>could be gleaned from that app presumably, but Siphias is

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 1>not very often open about publishing these opinions. But I

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>think that is the right idea. What are there Are

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>there any other tools that the US has available to

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Sifia's I've usually we talked about export controls

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 1>in the beginning. Are there any other tools in the

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 1>administration's toolbox at this point to further apply pressure on

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Chinese investors or Chinese tech or Chinese companies. Another tool

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 1>tool in the toolbox is um criminal prosecutions from the

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Department of Justice, and there is a formal named initiative here.

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Basically it is called the China Initiative. Right before Jeff Sessions,

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the previous Attorney General, departed from his post, he announced

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>this China Initiative, which is this political instruction on the

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>rest of the bureaucracy to scrutinized Chinese actions a lot

0:20:35.119 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>more closely. It includes a lot of things, but mostly

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 1>ideas like trade secret misappropriation. If a Chinese person or

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>firm has done that, then the US ought to really

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>bring it to prosecution. One interesting thing to note about

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the China initiative is that it designates five U S

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>attorneys as part of a working group to carry this out.

0:20:54.160 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>One of the five US attorneys is the U S

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, who is

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the person who issued the arrest warrant for Moment Show,

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>who is the CFO of Allway. This is a very

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:08.840
<v Speaker 1>novel sort of prosecution, basically nabbing the CFO of a

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>company alleged you to have broken sanctions and then also

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:15.199
<v Speaker 1>committed financial fraud while she wasn't transit in Canada. And

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>so this is creating basically a political issue as well.

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>But basically you can see how these types of fairly

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>novel prosecutions are now permissible in this new political environment.

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>After you know, something like the China Initiative has been announced,

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.280
<v Speaker 1>we just have a few minutes left, so let's talk

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 1>about what we should be watching for next. So from

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>China's perspective, obviously the moves against Huawei will encourage them to,

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, double down on building their domestic tech sector.

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 1>But you know that's an overnight thing that's gonna it's

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a long term project. You can't just snap your fingers

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and create domestic replacements for chip suppliers. So what else

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>might we see from the Chinese in your view, to

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>address the current tent and both in terms of their

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>own domestic needs and also from a retaliatory perspective. So

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>we believe that the Chinese retaliatory toolboxes quite weak. Um, Basically,

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's some news now that they may impose

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 1>rare earth bands. I think that is a temporary sort

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>of thing that will cause some pain. Our view is

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that it will not harass the U S companies too much,

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 1>mostly because the Chinese companies are not very entwined in

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the US, but US companies are very entwined in China.

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>So Apple employees something like, you know, a few hundred

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand young Chinese men uh making iPhones through Fox Con

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.440
<v Speaker 1>and basically the Chinese government would like to see these

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>people continue to be employed. A similar story goes for

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>major US firms like GM or even Starbucks and McDonald's.

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>It keeps a lot of people employed. So the Chinese

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, harassment tool basically also hurts itself quite a lot.

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>We really don't buy the idea that the Chinese will

0:22:59.760 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 1>sell US treasuries. That is not unnecessarily a very effective option.

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>But basically what they can do is to permit the

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>currency to depreciate, which is mostly a market driven process

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 1>that you know, if the U S imposes greater tariffs

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>than the currency should weaken, and the People's Bank of

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>China is not going to get in the way, uh

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>necessarily unless it is quite a steep fall from basically

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>allowing the currency to depreciate a little bit. Further, real

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>quickly on the rare Earth's questions, So it's literally just

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>as of this morning when we're recording it, and this is,

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 1>by the way, recording it on the twenty nine. There's

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of rare earth talk today because of something

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that was published in Peopil's Daily. Why is that people

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>hear that and I see rare earths and apparently they're

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>not even that rare, but they know that they're important

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>for all kinds of advanced technologies and that currently about

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of them come from China. Why is that

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>threat not really as big of a deal as maybe

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:00.199
<v Speaker 1>people might think it when they see the headlines. So

0:24:00.240 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>as you point out where earths doesn't turn out to

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>be all that rare, it seems like there are major

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>deposits also in Australia, Japan, California. It's just going to

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>take a little bit of time for that to come online.

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.639
<v Speaker 1>And actually this is sort of a similar point with

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, the um with US export controls trying to

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>mike export control rare earths. While in general as economists

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we believe that the supply curve slopes up, you know,

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 1>at higher price points, there will be more supplied come

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>supply this sort of thing. If the Chinese significantly raised

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the price, while there will be more processing overseas to

0:24:34.560 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>do something like this. And similarly, as the Americans raise

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the price of semi conductors in some cases to affinity

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>by totally banning them, while the Chinese also have more

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>incentive to try to figure out a lot of this

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff as well, It's just going to take a lot

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>more time for the Chinese to figure out most aspects

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>of semi conductors than for most of the rest of

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the world to develop their reserves of rare earths. And then,

0:24:57.680 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 1>so what would you be watching for next From the

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>West perspective again, I would come to export controls. That

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:06.359
<v Speaker 1>export controls is really, I think the most important tool

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in the U S toolbox to her China. I think

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>we've seen them being used to devastating effect with Chinese

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>firms with the ones I mentioned were Zte, Fudanti in

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Qua and now with Huawei. And I want to preview

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>a little bit that this is another legislative change that

0:25:19.840 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the US has offered. Basically concurrently with passing the bill

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:26.119
<v Speaker 1>on SIPHIUS, the US also passed the Export Control Reform

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Act in August of last year, and among several things,

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the Export Control Reform Act requires the Department of Commerce

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>to come up with several lists of technologies. One is

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 1>in UH Emerging List of Technologies, and others a Foundational

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>List of technologies. The Emerging List is something we have

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a proposal of. It hasn't been finalized yet. The Foundational

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>List hasn't been finalized yet, so we have a sense

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>of what the Emerging List looks like. It is UH.

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 1>It enumerates technologies like artificial intelligence, biotechnology, quantum computing. If

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you take a look at a lot of these items,

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>smart dust is in their M sensing whatever that is,

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it's in there. And these look like big science projects

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>rather than major pillars of US exports. But I think

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>they really are quite material, mostly because the US defines

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.639
<v Speaker 1>and export and extremely brought terms. It is not just

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the sale of a final good across borders. Any transfer

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of information to a foreign national is deemed and export.

0:26:20.160 --> 0:26:22.680
<v Speaker 1>It is a deemed export. So Joe, let's say that

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:24.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, you and I are sitting in a cafe

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 1>in Australia and I am a U S national and

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:32.199
<v Speaker 1>you are a French national, or Iranian national or Russian national, whatever.

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>And if I'm just talking to you, or if I'm

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.800
<v Speaker 1>sending you an email about a control technology, which right

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.399
<v Speaker 1>now is mostly things like munitions and weaponry, that is

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 1>deemed an export subject to control by the Department of Commerce.

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you think through the implications of that, plus

0:26:47.640 --> 0:26:50.720
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the US might control UH as something

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 1>as vague as artificial intelligence AI as a national security technology,

0:26:57.119 --> 0:27:00.879
<v Speaker 1>then you know, consider that US firm in the US,

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>like Microsoft, Amazon, Intel, Apple, Amazon, the employee substantial numbers

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of foreign nationals working on these technologies. And I've spoken

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 1>to people at these firms who say that, you know,

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 1>they have to really think about if they had to

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>sequester or even terminate portions of their staff, otherwise they

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>would be in violation of USX port control laws, So

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that is possibly the next shoot to drop,

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>just depending on how this regulatory process goes. This is

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 1>one of the risks that I think people ought to

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>be watching out for. I think it's going to create

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>basically a lot of havoc um if the rolemaking process

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:39.360
<v Speaker 1>posed as you know, the proposal, what it looks like

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>so people talk, I mean, you think about this term.

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>You hear a tech cold war, so to speak. But

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that's really what this sounds like when you think of

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>this idea that you know, US tech multinationals might not

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 1>even be able to allow collaboration between their US based

0:27:57.720 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>researchers and foreign nationals. You could really just sort of

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:06.720
<v Speaker 1>see how essentially disruptive to the way the world works

0:28:06.760 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that would be. I think it could be really disruptive

0:28:09.720 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that h Potentially the US might stop flows of knowledge

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>between people, and I think the you know, I I

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>am still not quite yet ready to call this a

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:24.360
<v Speaker 1>cold war. I think that is a fairly extreme scenario.

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>And in any case, basically China is much more entwined

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>with the US than the U S was with the

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Soviet Union. So how this exactly shakes out, I don't

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>even know. If the previous Cold War might be a

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>useful president. But yes, I think you are getting into

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>some interesting problems here. UH industry has pushed back a

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>lot against this deemed exports idea. One of the industries

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>has suggested that basically, you know, if you take this

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>steamed exports very seriously, an admitter of a technology, if

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>it had gone up a final list of control technologies

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>might be prevented from possessing it. And oh, you know,

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you get into these very odd situations where you know,

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things can be shaken up. Well, Dan,

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>on that note, I'm thinking we have to reschedule you again,

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe every six months or something like that, for the

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>next several years, because it feels like what you're describing

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 1>and as you say, it's not going away, and the

0:29:20.240 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>uh the ramifications of these moves are bewildering and kind

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of almost extremely hard to comprehend how they will really

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>play out. But really appreciate your perspective. The perfect guest

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>given the spade of news over the last few weeks.

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>So thank you very much for coming on. Well, thank you. Well,

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>here is where I would normally chat with Tracy and

0:29:53.680 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about what a great conversation that was and that

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.800
<v Speaker 1>one actually was really fantastic. But since she's not here,

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to wrap it up and obviously, uh,

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>this has been another episode of the Odd Lots podcast

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Joe Wi isn't though you can follow me

0:30:09.200 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at the Stalwart. Even though she wasn't here,

0:30:12.240 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>you should still follow Tracy on Twitter at Tracy Alloway,

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely follow our guest on Twitter, Dan Wong at Dan

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>w Wong, and be sure to follow our producer Laura Carlson.

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>She's at Laura M. Carlson, as well as the Bloomberg

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>head of podcast, Francesco Levie at Francesca Today. Thanks for

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>listening