WEBVTT - The Sony Pictures Entertainment Hack

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tex Stuff from dot com.

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, welcome to tech Stuff. I'm Jonathan Strickland, and

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:19.080
<v Speaker 1>joining me in the studio today is my esteemed colleague

0:00:19.200 --> 0:00:21.799
<v Speaker 1>Ben Bullen, host of many shows, one of which is

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Stuff They Do Don't Want You To Know. Yes, thanks

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>for having me on. And of course by now listeners

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>are probably used to us hanging out here on tech

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff and in our various other endeavors. Yeah, yeah, Ben

0:00:36.880 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and I are thickest thieves. Ben is one of those

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>most valuable player types in her office who will jump

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>in at a moment's notice to help folks out, even

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>at the expense of his own sanity, which I don't value.

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>So I'm happy to have him here. Thanks man, that

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>might be the nicest thing you've ever said to me.

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 1>It could be. Ben also had me on his show

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Stuff They Don't Want You To Know, to talk about

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>today's topic, the Sony Hack, And at the time when

0:01:04.840 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>we were recording, it was still in December and the

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.400
<v Speaker 1>story was still unfolding. In fact, you could say that's

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>still unfolding now, although the news has certainly slowed down

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>significantly since the end of December. But we ended up

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about the story as far as we could at

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that point, and even made some predictions of our own,

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>some some theories of our own. So, uh, in order

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 1>to return the favor, Ben's joined me for this episode

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>so that we can revisit that topic, talk about the

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Sony hack, maybe talk a little bit about some of

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the information that came out after we had already recorded

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the episode, and uh, just kind of explain what happened

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and how it's different from some of the other big

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>stories we've heard, Like you know, all the stories about

0:01:48.560 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the Sony PlayStation network at the Xbox Live network getting

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>brought down, those were done through direct denial of service

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:59.280
<v Speaker 1>attacks or distributed denial of service attacks, I should say,

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 1>so they were just atributed denial of service attacks, which

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.800
<v Speaker 1>is really a brute force way of shutting up a server.

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Completely different in comparison to the original Sony hacks, wherein

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the various films were downloaded. But before we go any further,

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>I just have to say I really appreciate what you're

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>saying here, Jonathan. I'm blushing. Thank god I grew this

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>beard out so you can see it, and thank god

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:27.119
<v Speaker 1>as an audio podcast, but this is not entirely all

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>truism on my part. I come here also as a

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>representative of my co host Matt Frederick. UM, we had

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>such a great time doing this two part episode on

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Sony for stuff they want, you know, and uh we

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we actually went back and listened to it because we

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>liked some of the jokes that the three of us

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:49.640
<v Speaker 1>were doing. But we really wanted another crack at this

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:55.120
<v Speaker 1>just because other information is emerged. UM, and listeners out there,

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:59.959
<v Speaker 1>if you do check out Jonathan's earlier appearance, UM, spoiler alert,

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>some of those predictions that you and I made are

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>not that far off. Yeah yeah, And in fact that

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>again we don't We still don't have all the details.

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>We still have some conflicting information out there, stuff that

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>conflicts with the theories we have. It still hasn't changed

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>my theories yet, But I do acknowledge the fact that

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I the thing that I believe may not be true,

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and in fact is being said to be untrue by

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>certain entities that go by three letter initialisms, like the FBI.

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, let's start at the beginning, A very good

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>place to start. On November that was the day that

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the Sony hack was revealed, and I say revealed because

0:03:44.920 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the extent of this hack, the incredible amount of information

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that was stolen as part of this hack was so

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:58.480
<v Speaker 1>huge as to require months of time toensic research. I mean,

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about the initial story we got and was

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that the the hackers responsible claim to have stolen one

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.600
<v Speaker 1>terabytes of data. A terabyte of data is a huge amount, right,

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>And if you're thinking of a hacker that's accessing a

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>system remotely, so we're assuming that this person did not

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 1>dress themselves up as a Sony employee infiltrate the company.

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>If you're talking about remotely accessing this and siphoning off

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that data. Guys, you know, if you've ever downloaded a

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>big file, you know it takes time. Even if you

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>have a fast internet connection, it could take a while.

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you're trying to download let's say a

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>really big computer game that's maybe thirty or forty gigabytes,

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:47.239
<v Speaker 1>that takes time. Terabytes are enormous. A hundred terabytes is huge.

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:51.120
<v Speaker 1>It would take months to download that much information, and

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>only if the faucet is always on. Yeah, you and

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>also to be able to do it without raising anyone's attention,

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 1>because would see the activity over the connection. Yeah, you

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>would think at least someone would figure out something in

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that time. So all of this is to say that

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>it's the While November twenty was when we became aware

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of it, the actual activity had to have been happening

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>for at least a few months, if not longer. Right,

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.040
<v Speaker 1>So what what exactly happens? I love this description because

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it's so cinematic. Yeah, so imagine you are an employee

0:05:24.920 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>of Sony Pictures Entertainment, because we always say the Sony hack,

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>but we're specifically referring to Sony Pictures, so the movie

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>industry arm of Sony. So you're an employee of Sony

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Pictures Entertainment. You go into work on November. It's the

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>week of Thanksgiving. You're looking forward to having dinner with

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>your family, having a few days off. You come in,

0:05:46.480 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you turn on your computer to get your little work

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you work done, type of, type of, type of, and

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>then all of a sudden, like it was a nineteen

0:05:54.360 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>eighties computer thriller, a skull stylized skull all pops up

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>on your screen, and this feels like it. It feels

0:06:04.160 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>like a stupid movie already, Like you think about those

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.360
<v Speaker 1>movies like the net. You know, any movie where Hollywood

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>is trying to get across the idea of what hacking

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>is like, and they they visualize it where it's not

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>someone saying at a computer typing in code. No, it's

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>creeping through a dungeon. And then you see a skull

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and crossbones. That's firewall. That's what this was in real life.

0:06:27.000 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>The skulls pop up on everyone's screen and it has

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a phrase that essentially says, this is just the beginning.

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>We've obtained all your internal data, and it went on

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.039
<v Speaker 1>to warn that if the company did not quote obey

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the hackers demands end quote, that the internal information would

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 1>be shared with the world. And this had this included

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>everything from well, they didn't even know what it included yet,

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 1>so they didn't have any idea of the extent of

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that personal information that I that that sensitive info. As

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, it was incredibly sensitive information. And those

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:05.880
<v Speaker 1>demands we're going to get back to because the demands

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>are one of the keys I think to this mystery,

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>which is still sort is okay. So the way the

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.119
<v Speaker 1>way it works out, the news spreads quickly eleven am

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>same day November, it hits the media right, that's right,

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and so this is where, uh, different media outlets start

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to cover the story. Uh, the employees of Sony Pictures

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>have no access to their computers. Also, their email servers

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>are completely down, and even their phone systems because they

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>were using networked phones, which is you know, we we've

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>had network phones in this office in the past, so

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things that if your internet goes down,

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>suddenly you don't have phone service either, and that's kind

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of creepsy out a little bit. So they literally couldn't

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>do any work. They couldn't access any of their files,

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>any of those important documents, contracts, all that kind of stuff.

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>All of that was inaccessible. And uh, meanwhile, as the

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>story would go on, I'm gonna skip ahead a little bit,

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>but we're gonna go through a timeline, little little detail

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>this stuff as we go through. But eventually the hackers

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>refer to themselves as Guardians of Peace or GOP. Yeah.

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Also amuses me because to think when we're talking about

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the GOP and this, since it's not the Grand Old Party,

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the Guardians of Peace. Um, this is when they claim

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to have stolen one terabytes of data. Ten terabytes is

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>enough for all the information in the Library of Congress.

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 1>So they stole ten Libraries of Congress. Yes, they stole

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the Library of Congress ten times. Now right, Yeah, I

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>used to use UM. I used to use uh conquistadors

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>as an element as a unit of measurement for everything.

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>But now I'm I'm willing to go and switch to

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Library of Congress at least when it comes to data.

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, this and and of course some of that

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>information was in the form of high resolution digital film files.

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk more about that. And the second so on

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>top of all that, this is this is another like

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, kick once you're down. You've already been knocked

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>down because you've had your this hack stop your work.

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>You've been told that a lot of your information has

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.760
<v Speaker 1>been stolen. On top of all that, they also the

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>hackers also installed malware called Wiper And you can probably

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>guess what this does just based on the name. It

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>starts to erase all the data on these various machines.

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>So not only did you have all this information stolen,

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>but now it's truly inaccessible. It's been white from your computers.

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure some of it was probably UM. You were

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:43.080
<v Speaker 1>probably able to get back at some of it using

0:09:43.120 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>some I T. Expertise, like deleting a file off your

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>computer doesn't mean it's gone forever. Overwriting it does so

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>unless wiper and it may very well do this. Unless

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.559
<v Speaker 1>Wiper over was overwriting all the data as it was

0:09:56.600 --> 0:10:00.200
<v Speaker 1>erasing it, then you could in theory at least get

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>some of that. But at any rate, Uh, there were

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>even that UM reports that Sony account Twitter feeds were

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>being uh compromised, and so the Guardians of Peace were

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>able to tweet out using that. We actually saw something

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>similar to that recently here in the United States with

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>UM the Central Command Twitter feed. Did you see that? Yeah? Yeah, yeah.

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>The The thing is that Twitter is uh, from what

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>I understand, much easier to compromise than something that would

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 1>be a well protected, uh corporate level system of of

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>this magnitude. But it does tell us something really important, Jonathan,

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>because it tells us that this would have been a

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>multi tiered attack. Even if even if or rather a

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>multifront attacked, sir, even if Twitter was just uh the

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 1>sprinkle on the cupcake, this still shows us that this

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.199
<v Speaker 1>was well thought out, It was established in advance, so

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem to be an impulsive thing at all.

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Just just going back to how much memory and how

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>much time it would take to steal Yes, yeah, I

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>mean obviously, like you wouldn't be able to do that

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>all on a single day. So novemby was essentially the

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>day that the hackers decided, Okay, now we let them

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 1>know what we have done. Like, we've already done it.

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>It's it's that parts. So we're we're already scott away,

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 1>scott free, you know. Now we're just gonna set the

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the we're gonna make the world burn, and we're gonna

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:31.680
<v Speaker 1>walk away in slow motion. But Sony still has no

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.199
<v Speaker 1>idea what's going on? For like a week? Right? Yeah? Well,

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, it happened during Thanksgiving weeks, so this

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>was a time when a lot of people were planning

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>on being on vacation and suddenly, now you've got this

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>amazing crisis to deal with. Uh. And it would take

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>more than a week for for executives to start even

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>getting a hint at how bad this attack was. So

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:56.080
<v Speaker 1>on December one, that's when executives became aware that the

0:11:56.120 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>stolen data included personal information about employees and their depends,

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>such as social security numbers and financial information as well

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>as health information, like one of the leaks of documents

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>gave details to employees who had sought treatment for things

0:12:12.760 --> 0:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>like cirrhosis or cancer or there or had dependents who

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 1>had to seek treatments for such things. And so, I

0:12:20.880 --> 0:12:25.079
<v Speaker 1>mean that's a huge breach. Now are we talking, uh,

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>in terms of for sent injury numbers? How many employees?

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>About fifty thousand social Security numbers were stolen? Actually around

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 1>forty seven thousand. I rounded up round, I rounded up

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>for forty seven thousand and fifty. But yeah, more than

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>forty seven thousand social Security numbers were stolen. Now these

0:12:41.600 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>were both current and former Sony employees, because it was

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>just it was databasis full of information of the various

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>employees who had either worked there in the past or

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we're currently working. Not to downplay the gravity of this,

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 1>because it is very dangerous and it's an absolute nutter

0:12:56.400 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of violation and privacy. But not only is that not

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the end of what they stole, but they stole so

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>much that if you're okay, I'd like to infomercial this

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and maybe chime in with some but wait, there's more. Yeah,

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:13.079
<v Speaker 1>in fact, that is well warranted, right, because the first

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.520
<v Speaker 1>one the one that's probably the easiest for people to

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>latch onto, because it's a simple it's a simple story,

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the idea of stolen intellectual property, in this case, stolen movies. Right.

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So the theft included five movies that were scheduled for

0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Sony release, one which had already been released, which was

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a fury that one had already come out. But then

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>there was also Annie Mr Turner, Still Alice and to

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Write Love on Her Arms. Those had all been stolen

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. Uh okay, Yeah, So so those are the

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.199
<v Speaker 1>easy ones for people to latch onto. But then there

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>was all the internal communications, right, this is where you

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:04.439
<v Speaker 1>had information about salary, uh for top executives, like the

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>top seventeen executives, not to mention I think six thousand

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.880
<v Speaker 1>other Sony employees. Their information got leaked as well. Uh.

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:18.440
<v Speaker 1>There was also internal documents that uh that were the

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>records of people having complaints about Sony. Yeah, and there

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>were there were some fairly undiplomatic internal communications regarding regarding

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>coworkers or talent, yeah, or the President of the United States.

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>There were Yeah, no, there's we'll we'll touch on that

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>again in a moment. But out of all these you

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>probably heard the most about Adam Sandler. He got he

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>got raked over the coals quite a bit. And the

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>internal communications a lot of in place that they just

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't like the direction that the movie studio was going in,

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and they wanted to see if you were Adam Sandler comedies,

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>which is I guess okay, because Netflix picked him up

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>so for four films. Yeah, so Sony might be free

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of him. We're not. And that's not the only stuff

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that got leaked. Still, no, no, there's still more, right,

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's tons of information that got taken from this. Uh,

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>personal information about talent was leaked. Stuff like passports and visas,

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>like copies of this stuff that people needed to do. Uh,

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>there were so much things that so many things that

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>were stolen as a result of this. And uh, we're

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna go through the rest of the timeline to kind

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of give you an idea of how this all unfolded

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and what extent we begin to learn more and more

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>about the damages. Uh. Meanwhile, one other thing to mention

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>is that Sony employees have many of them, have filed

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits against the company for not protecting their personal information

0:15:57.760 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>well enough to prevent this from happen. Name so, there

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>are several class action lawsuits have been leveled against the

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>company as a result of this. Because people's lives have

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>been really impacted. We're not just talking about you know,

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>celebrities here. I mean that their lives have been impacted too.

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's not I personally don't think that that means

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that celebrities should be expected to deal with more crap

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 1>than the rest of us. I mean, sometimes that happens

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>because it's just one of those things that goes along

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>with all the fame and everything else. But regular employees,

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>people just normal folks like me and you who go

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>in to do their job every day and it may

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>not be glamorous, but it's it's an important part of

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the function of the company. They were impacted too, just

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>regular folks, and they will tend not to have the

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>financial wherewithal or the social safety net to help protect

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>themselves in the aftermath of such an event, right right.

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.840
<v Speaker 1>They don't have the benefit of that safety net like

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>people who might have of a lawyer on retainer or

0:17:02.200 --> 0:17:05.840
<v Speaker 1>enormous sums of money to lay in when you go

0:17:05.880 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>to sleep at night. You know, I have a I

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>have a very particular fantasy in my head of what

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood celebrities like, how they live. It's mostly Scrooge McDuck oriented. Yeah, yeah,

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>did you see that? This is totally unrelated, But did

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 1>you did you ever see the study of what what

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>would happen if you tried to swim through a vault

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:26.960
<v Speaker 1>full of gold? I imagine that you would not feel

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>very good. Yeah, it will. It will break you in

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>numerous ways. So maybe it's good that you were talking

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>about sleeping on paper money probably better for your back.

0:17:37.480 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of back, you went to Let's see where

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>where should we go next? Let's look at November twenty eight,

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>because we've been talking a lot about this hack. The

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the initial messages from the hackers didn't identify any particular

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:55.679
<v Speaker 1>motivation for the attack. They it was more of almost

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>like an extortion thing, like do what we tell you,

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>or you're gonna get it. You know. It was like

0:18:02.480 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and it essentially sounded like pay us off or we

0:18:06.560 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>will ruin you. Now. They didn't name a specific amount

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 1>of money at that initial point. They just said do

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:17.479
<v Speaker 1>what we say. Yeah, so they The reason why this

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>is important is because a lot of the discussion that

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>has followed has centered around a very specific topic that

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 1>we're about to touch on. But that all came after

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>the fact, which makes me a little cautious in actually

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>saying that that was the reason for the whole thing,

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the whole time. So November twenty, this is four days

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>after the initial attack was discovered. That's the first time

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>anyone floats the possibility that the attack was in response

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to Sony's plans to release the film. The interview, which

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I have we both seen it at this point. I

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>have not seen it. Did you watch it? I did

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>see it. What did you think? Well, I will I

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>will say that I enjoy uh, Seth Rogan and James

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Franco a bit more than you, which is which is

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>something we've talked about before. Yeah, and it's not hard

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy Seth Rogan and James Franco more than you do.

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>No offense. Right now, I have a very low you

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>own it. You own it, though, and I respect that. Um,

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 1>you know. I'll be I'll be candid here. It was

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>not my favorite film because I think that while I

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I enjoy a lot of a lot of what might

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>be termed low brow comedy, I'm not above it. You know,

0:19:34.160 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 1>one thing that I noticed sometimes is that it is

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>very convenient to conflate satire and racism, and I think

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 1>there's uh to me. There were moments in the film

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>that I that I thought were racist, and I and

0:19:48.440 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>also was talking with my girlfriend about this and said, okay,

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>well check me here, like my am I being two

0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.880
<v Speaker 1>PC and my and my getting my jim socks, I'll

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>punched up over something unnecessarily. And she came in and

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>watched part of it, and she said, no, I think

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty very racist. Yeah. No, there is definitely a

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>difference between using satire in order to point out things

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 1>that you see as being important or unequal or whatever.

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:24.439
<v Speaker 1>It's something that you are actually commenting on and bringing

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 1>attention to and starting a discussion over. And then there's

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 1>a totally different type where you're just making fun of

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:35.520
<v Speaker 1>something or or you know, especially in hurtful ways. Well,

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>here's a here's the question I have for you. I

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 1>don't want to derailist, but the question would be then, uh,

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 1>in comparison to let's say the South Park film also

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a work of satire in any ways, So what makes

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>these two different? You know? Is it because the south

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Park film is animated. I think part of it is

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that South Park is really about pointing out the uh,

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the the absolute ridiculousness of things like racism. I mean,

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 1>south Park used the movie used Canadians as the the

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:13.879
<v Speaker 1>great big enemy, you know, that's what all the people

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 1>they blame Canada. There's a whole song about it. It's yeah,

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a good song, actually was nominated for an Academy Award.

0:21:21.880 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>But at any rate, the you know, that was really

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to kind of poke fun saying like this is literally

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no difference between people like you know, you look

0:21:31.840 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>at Canadians and Americans, there's no difference there, just as

0:21:35.000 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>there's no difference with any people of any two nations,

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and therefore the concept of racism itself is utterly ridiculous.

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I see what you're saying. There's there's a method to

0:21:48.840 --> 0:21:51.480
<v Speaker 1>the prat falls, as you would say. But the I

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know if anyone's ever said that before. But the

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:58.200
<v Speaker 1>thing about the interview, despite that, I think it was enjoyable.

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I definitely laughed out loud a couple of times. But

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's received much much more, much more international

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>attention than ever would have had it not been associated

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>with this, and also, you know, for people who aren't

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>familiar with it, Uh, the entire film is about people

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 1>traveling to assassinate Kim Jong un, the current leader of

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>North Korea. Right, The whole idea about a host of

0:22:25.240 --> 0:22:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a celebrity talk show type program and his producer heading

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>over to North Korea because it turns out Kim jongun

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>is a big fan of the program, and then being

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>told by is the CIA, Yeah, yeah, the CIA to

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 1>take this opportunity to assassinate Kim Jong un and uh

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and of course, uh spoiler alert, the leader is killed

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 1>in the film. Uh. So this was November. Was the

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>first time anyone had even mentioned this as a possibility

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of a monovader. Yeah, there was. This was not from

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the attackers at all. This was all just kind of

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a I wonder if this thing that's coming out later

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 1>this month had anything to do with our actually next month,

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 1>because this was still in November. Um so, yeah, we

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't really have any evidence here. And now there was

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 1>a North Korean website that had referred to the interview

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>as quote an evil act of provocation end quote. So

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>you could say, well, they said that it was an

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:29.520
<v Speaker 1>evil act of provocation. We were they were provoked, so

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe this was the act they were provoked into doing.

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know, yeah, I mean, like I said, the

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the attack itself must have gone on for months, and

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 1>it was only in those last few months that the

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 1>interview was even getting the promotion of here's a movie

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that's coming out soon, and here's what it's all about.

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>So that would have meant that North Korea was just

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to this film for longer than the American

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>public was, and that that the attack began months in advance,

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>in anticipation for this December release. All that being said,

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>December one, that's when the top seventeen Sony executive salaries

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>were leaked. Uh, the information had already been stolen, but

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the information that had then been leaked publicly. A lot

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of these leaks happened on an app that allows for

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:20.360
<v Speaker 1>anonymous text dumps, so you can just put things up

0:24:20.440 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>on that app and not leave a trace of who

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you are, and that's how a lot of this information

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>got distributed, also, including that same file where the salaries

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of more than six thousand Sony employees. One of the

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 1>big things that came out about this was a disparity

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in pay depending upon gender and race. And so this

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:45.000
<v Speaker 1>also makes me think the nature of the leak. The

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>first stuff that's leaked here, here's a bread crumb for

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>bread crumb later on, the nature of the stuff that

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>was leaked first was incredibly harmful to Sony the company

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 1>uh in an industry perspective, but had nothing to do

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 1>with any sort of like it didn't have anything to

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>do with the interview directly anyway. So that to me

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:14.919
<v Speaker 1>suggests that there's a very specific motivation behind the attack.

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>But we'll get into that when we get towards the end.

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So December three was when the Adam Sandler PDF dump happened.

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>There's a big dump of Adam Sandler information. And I'm

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>using that word in a couple of different ways. It

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>could have been a little bit of editorializing. This is

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>also when the data including a passport information, visa information,

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 1>other private information about celebrities who had worked on various

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Sonny films, actors, actresses, directors, that kind of thing got leaked.

0:25:47.840 --> 0:25:51.000
<v Speaker 1>So this is where people were getting copies of Angelina

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Jolie's passport, for example. Um they also included confidential information

0:25:56.040 --> 0:26:01.119
<v Speaker 1>about film contracts, and budgets. So again, very industry specific

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff and very very damaging because Okay, first off, this

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>breeds such dissension amidst the employees, you know, each other's salaries,

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and huge morale issue. Huge and then also the idea

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:18.120
<v Speaker 1>about finding numbers and film contracts and budgets, that's a

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>massive amount of leverage lost on Sony's part. Well, and

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, these are industry secrets, like if you've

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>ever heard stories about how miraculously no movie ever released

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>makes money, like you know, if you have, if you

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>have the inside look on these budgets, the actual numbers,

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the real thing, then suddenly you know how much actual

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 1>money was being spent producing it versus how much was

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>made in revenue. And then you've got some really tough

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 1>tax questions that you need to answer. So again, very

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:54.439
<v Speaker 1>much a very savvy attack. This is gonna be trouble

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>for Sony down the road. Yeah, it's gonna be troull

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:01.359
<v Speaker 1>for a while. So December four, when the Associated Press

0:27:01.400 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>reports that cybersecurity experts found similarities in the code used

0:27:05.080 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in the Sony hacks of with another attack that targeted

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>South Korean companies in two thou and you remember the

0:27:14.119 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>name of that attack, right, Oh, I do remember reading it.

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 1>What was it? Dark Soul, spelled like the capital of

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>South Korea. Oh, that's so brilliant. Nah, I was thinking

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of something else too, so I didn't. I didn't even

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>hear of it called dark Soul. That's awesome, but it's

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 1>so again. This was sort of a a uh a

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:38.159
<v Speaker 1>hint that perhaps North Korea was behind it, because Korea

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 1>was was very much believed to be behind the two

0:27:41.359 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand thirteen attacks against South Korea. Yeah, so uh, but

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>no one's come out and said anything yet. December five

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>was when messages allegedly from Guardians of Peace threatened Sony

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 1>executives that they don't condemn their own company, but they're

0:27:55.640 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>really poorly constructed. They actually don't read the same way

0:27:58.920 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>as the initial messages did in the attack reveal back

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>on Nowyo. So one of the things we need to

0:28:06.119 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind is that the various communications to Sony

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and to others may or may not have come from

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the hackers. We don't necessarily know. It's kind of like

0:28:16.320 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>when you hear about anonymous targeting someone, you don't know

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>what to what extent The the overall group of Anonymous

0:28:26.240 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>feels that way right, Because Anonymous is made up of

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 1>a huge number of people with different ideologies, different motivations.

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes a splinter group will end up targeting somebody, whereas

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the group either doesn't care actively saying hey,

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. But that's the thing is that it's

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>impossible that like you say, I got a message from Anonymous,

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and maybe technically that's true, but you're gonna have people

0:28:52.160 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in Anonymous saying, hey, whoa dude, I'm totally not that

0:28:55.200 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was not us. That was not us. That that people

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>create factions within Anonymous that are oriented towards a specific

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>project that sort, and I think we even mentioned it.

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I might have brought it up in our

0:29:10.760 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Sony Hack episodes for stuff they don't want you to know. Then,

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 1>this reminds me a lot of the Jack the Ripper letters,

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>because when Jack the Ripper was active, there were letters

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>written to the police, the London police that was the

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>were essentially taunting the police, and a lot of ripperologists

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>experts in the field believe that many of those, if

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>not all of them, are fakes. They weren't written by

0:29:37.240 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the killer, and it could be that some of the

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>messages that are attributed to Guardians the piece we're not

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>written at all by anyone remotely involved. We don't know, right,

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:54.480
<v Speaker 1>because there's no way to verify now. On December seven,

0:29:55.040 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>North Korea officially says they had nothing to do with

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>this attack. On December eight, another alleged Guardians of Peace

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>message demands that Sony stop immediately showing the movie of Terrorism,

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>which can break regional peace and caused the war. Um,

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>they don't specifically name the interview, although I guess, you know,

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what other films. I don't think they

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>were talking about Annie, So if they did, it was

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>The Hard Knock Life for us. But uh no, I

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:29.720
<v Speaker 1>think they meant the interview, but that wasn't specifically named.

0:30:31.480 --> 0:30:35.560
<v Speaker 1>And uh these events continue though, because the hackers, now

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.960
<v Speaker 1>after a little bit of silence, are communicating semi regularly

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>or at least leaking information there. There's someone is communicating

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.400
<v Speaker 1>semi regularly. Whether it's the actual hackers or not, we

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>don't really know. Um. Also, it's kind of interesting that,

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>uh that you know, we had that that previous message

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>supposedly from the Guardians of Peace saying, you know, condemn

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>your own company, which is a very odd request. It's

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that's another breadcrumb force, I think. Yeah, to say, like,

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>please sign a paper that says your company stinks. That's

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>essentially what they were saying. It just seems seems a

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>little odd. It seems a bit childish and personal. Yeah,

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a little weird, all right. So December night through eleventh,

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>now we get a little bit more activity with more

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:24.600
<v Speaker 1>leaked material. The hackers release emails that reveal some pretty

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>ugly conversations about various actors, directors, and even the President

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of the United States, including some remarks that you could

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.840
<v Speaker 1>at least say are racially insensitive, if not outright racist.

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh and Sony executive Scott Ruden actually with an issue

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:44.400
<v Speaker 1>an apology on the on December eleventh for the messages

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>that he claims were written in just with no offense

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>intended and um yeah, saying that was just a joke.

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mean any offense. It really meant like I

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't expect any one of that race to ever read

0:31:56.560 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>this email that I wrote. That's what it comes across

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to me. Maybe I'm I'm sorry, I got caught. Yeah,

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I love I love the I'm sorry, I'm sorry if

0:32:06.080 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I offended you. Not I'm sorry I offended you. Not

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry I said that thing, but I'm sorry that

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you felt this way in response to something I said. Well,

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry that you're upset. Yeah exactly. I'm like, well,

0:32:18.600 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you can just keep your apologies then, Mr. Now this

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 1>isn't this is an interesting thing that comes next, because

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 1>this is something I did not know about until you

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>told me. Yeah. So, December fifte Aaron Sorkin publishes an

0:32:30.320 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>open editorial column in The New York Times. Now, Sorkin

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:36.400
<v Speaker 1>had had some of his emails revealed in a process

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of this, some of which ended up having Sorkin being

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>a little uh uncharitable towards certain Hollywood personalities. Yeah, like

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 1>saying that certain actors are not a draw and therefore

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason to ever have them in one of

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 1>his movies. That kind of thing. Anyway, in the open editorial,

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 1>he did not say that, because how would be crazy? Uh. Instead,

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>he actually said that journalists were being just as uh

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>just as destructive as the hackers were by sharing this

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>confidential information, that they were essentially enabling the hackers in

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:16.960
<v Speaker 1>their attack to cause damage to the company by taking

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that same info. He says, you know, I imagine that

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the hackers are sorting through that mountain of information they stole,

0:33:23.560 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>looking for the most harmful pieces of information. Meanwhile, the

0:33:26.680 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>journalists are next door doing the exact same thing with

0:33:29.520 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff that's been leaked. And he drew a differentiation, however,

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>between the two. Well, yeah, I mean, he was saying

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that the hackers are at least doing it out of

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the sense of ideology, but the journalists are just doing

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it to make a make a nickel is essentially what

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I said. He actually did say make a nickel? Uh

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>no word if he was walking and talking as he

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>wrote this. Um, that's the only way I imagined Sorkin.

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 1>But anyway, so it's an interesting point, And honestly, one

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.239
<v Speaker 1>of the things that's really important to me reporting on

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>this stuff is that we're reporting on the incidents, but

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 1>we're not sharing any of that information that was linked.

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I haven't sought it out, I haven't downloaded a in it.

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not interested in the contents, uh Like, I'm not

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>interested in the specifics. I'm interested in the impact. I

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:22.279
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you partially, I'm ultimately interested in the

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:27.280
<v Speaker 1>big mystery and in the final answer, the stuff about

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>people's salaries, people's medical records, things like that. As strange

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 1>as it is to say, it comes down to an

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:42.080
<v Speaker 1>issue of you know, your personal opinion of what is

0:34:42.280 --> 0:34:44.040
<v Speaker 1>what is right and wrong to look at because a

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 1>lot of people nowadays, with the cost of information and

0:34:46.760 --> 0:34:49.840
<v Speaker 1>communication being so low, there are a lot of people

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>who will simply hoard information to collect it. You know, um,

0:34:54.200 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I because I would not really want anybody reading my

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:03.800
<v Speaker 1>medical It's not that I'm like secretly awarewolf or something secret. No,

0:35:03.880 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty open about it. Where your like candor part

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:09.520
<v Speaker 1>on your sleeve when you when you're able to wear sleeves,

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>when I'm able to wear sleeves indeed. But but the

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 1>point is that, uh, you know, I think both you

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and I kind of go on a golden rule basis

0:35:18.040 --> 0:35:21.719
<v Speaker 1>for this stuff. I'm very much a proponent of compassion

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and understanding as much as possible in general, not just

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 1>in this case. But yeah, I mean, I think it's

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 1>newsworthy that it happened. I think taking that information and

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:36.240
<v Speaker 1>actually disseminating what was inside it apart from a generalization,

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>like you could say it was salary information without going

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>into the details of what that salary information was. Right.

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>So Sorkin was specifically pointing out the journalists who are

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:49.600
<v Speaker 1>sharing this information and essentially doing what the hackers wanted

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 1>them to do in the first place, right, essentially making

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:57.239
<v Speaker 1>the hackers threats work. Yeah. Yeah, it's like now you

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>guys are carrying out the second part of that plan essentially. Um.

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 1>So you know, on the other hand, there are some

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 1>very important issues that have been talked about, like the

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:13.759
<v Speaker 1>pay disparity that clearly should be addressed. Uh. And so

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to just be completely like hands off on

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:18.879
<v Speaker 1>this because there are some things that have come out

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of this that, you know, you want to say, like,

0:36:21.160 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 1>all right, some of you, some of you may be

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>terrible people, and some of your policies may be very

0:36:28.160 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 1>terrible as well, and maybe we need to take a

0:36:30.400 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>look at that. This is not the way I would

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.799
<v Speaker 1>have preferred us to have this conversation. Absolutely, that's a

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:39.120
<v Speaker 1>really good point. And and uh, it's weird because although

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the Guardians of Peace do not directly respond, I guess

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to media members, we do see that they are clearly

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 1>listening to. As much as I loathe the term Jonathan

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 1>to the narrative. Yes, So December sixteenth, that narrative gets

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:02.320
<v Speaker 1>pushed forward with another message allegedly from Guardians of Peace

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that specifically mentions the interview. This is the first time

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the interview is mentioned by name December sixteen. November twenty

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 1>four was when the attack was revealed. December sixteenth is

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 1>when the interview is mentioned by name, and the message

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 1>contains threats saying that if the film is allowed to

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:21.280
<v Speaker 1>run in theaters, there will be a September eleventh style

0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:25.359
<v Speaker 1>terrorist attack as a response specifically against the New York

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:29.320
<v Speaker 1>theater where it would have premiered, but also uh nationwide

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:33.760
<v Speaker 1>um incidents if it were to run in local theaters.

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Sony ends up canceling the premiere and pulls the film

0:37:36.719 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 1>from theaters, but they really pull the film for theaters

0:37:39.920 --> 0:37:42.359
<v Speaker 1>after several theater chains have already said that they will

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>not show the movie. Right, and these are the big

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:50.399
<v Speaker 1>the big names, Yeah, so these are That's exactly right.

0:37:50.480 --> 0:37:53.399
<v Speaker 1>So once I mean, if if the major chains say

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to show your movie, then canceling it

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:59.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of makes sense. So we'll come back to that.

0:37:59.560 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Because Tony story about this removing of the movie and

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>then returning the film is not totally coherent. Yeah, that's

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's a charitable way to put it. So at

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 1>this time people say, well, you should release it in

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:22.399
<v Speaker 1>video on demand somehow, right, or independent theaters right, And

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 1>Sony says, nope, dada, We're not releasing it in any form. Now,

0:38:27.400 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>this is an important thing to remember that Sony has

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:32.839
<v Speaker 1>said they do not want to release the movie in

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 1>any format. And uh so, December seventeenth, the U. S Government,

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:39.960
<v Speaker 1>in the form mostly of the FBI, state that they

0:38:39.960 --> 0:38:43.359
<v Speaker 1>believe North Korea was centrally involved in the hacking, although

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the FBI has not officially said that at this point,

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:48.640
<v Speaker 1>it was really a government official saying we believe that

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 1>North Korea was involved. This was not when the FBI

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 1>specifically came out, but on December eighteen, messages again allegedly

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:59.600
<v Speaker 1>from Guardians of Peace went to Sony executives and said

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that if the film was never released in any format,

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 1>then Guardians of Peace would not release any more damaging

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:09.959
<v Speaker 1>information stolen in the hack. So presumably they still had

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 1>some that was at least as damaging as the mountain

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of stuff they had already released, but they were holding

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it in check. And if that movie didn't come out

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>at all, it would never see the light of day.

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:24.359
<v Speaker 1>But a second message on the web application paste band,

0:39:24.440 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 1>that's the one I was talking about. That text, it's

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:31.080
<v Speaker 1>supposedly also was from Guardians of Peace and had a

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:34.720
<v Speaker 1>different message in it, saying that Sony had suffered enough

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and the company could release the movie if Kim Jong

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:42.799
<v Speaker 1>UN's death wasn't quote too happy, And I guess that

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 1>if it wasn't like a big emotionally uplifting moment in

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the film, like you weren't supposed to stand up and

0:39:50.719 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 1>cheer and go yea when Kim jong un dies, and

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that would be okay. I feel fairly confident and saying

0:39:59.239 --> 0:40:02.399
<v Speaker 1>that this is not the same group, or at least

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:04.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not a group representing North Korea, because that seems

0:40:04.960 --> 0:40:08.839
<v Speaker 1>completely antithetical to everything else that's been said. It's even

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:12.040
<v Speaker 1>antithetical to the other message that was released that very day,

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>Like one message says, never released the movie and we'll stop,

0:40:15.680 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and the other message says, go ahead and release the

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.320
<v Speaker 1>movie as long as it's not celebrating the death of

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Kim jongoon, then you you've suffered enough and you've learned

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:27.840
<v Speaker 1>your Lesson. Clearly, these can't be the same people unless

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>they're just message with Sony. In that case that it

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:33.120
<v Speaker 1>could be the same people, but now they're cruel mischief makers.

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Now there's one other thing though, that's that's a pretty

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:41.160
<v Speaker 1>big deal that was unearthed during the leaks of the

0:40:41.200 --> 0:40:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Sony hats. Yeah, this is one that has become a

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:46.800
<v Speaker 1>separate issue all on its own, and it's one that

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I would really need to look into further to to

0:40:49.040 --> 0:40:53.280
<v Speaker 1>do a full rundown on it. But in the future

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:55.719
<v Speaker 1>I think so. Yeah, I've been trying to give it

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 1>some more space so I can get more information on it.

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:01.400
<v Speaker 1>But this was where we also saw as part of

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:05.239
<v Speaker 1>the leaked information that came out that there was this

0:41:05.400 --> 0:41:10.240
<v Speaker 1>um kind of a conspiracy really among movie studios about

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Project Goliath, which everyone is pretty sure means Google and

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Google in the m p a A, the Motion Picture

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Association of America ended up having some um some very

0:41:23.120 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>public spats about the information contained in the leak regarding

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Project Goliath, Google, saying that the m p A was

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>essentially trying to reinstate policies that were under the SOAPA

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 1>umbrella but had been defeated because SOAPA was not adopted. Meanwhile,

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the m p a A Is saying Google being talking

0:41:43.520 --> 0:41:46.200
<v Speaker 1>about self as a champion of free speech is a joke.

0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 1>It got brutal. Uh yeah, very ugly. It's definitely worth

0:41:52.440 --> 0:41:54.719
<v Speaker 1>looking further into, but we won't. You know, I just

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:56.879
<v Speaker 1>wanted to mention it because again, it's like, that's not

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that this story wasn't big enough, but other big stories

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>came up to like because of it. December nineteenth, that's

0:42:03.040 --> 0:42:06.240
<v Speaker 1>when the FBI announces it has connected the North Korean

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:09.839
<v Speaker 1>government to the attacks, citing unreleased evidence as well as

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:12.560
<v Speaker 1>clues such as hacking tools that have been used by

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>North Korean hackers in the past. They also cite that

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 1>the attacks seemed to originate from IP addresses within North Korea,

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:22.439
<v Speaker 1>and later stated that they believed it would have been

0:42:22.480 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 1>really difficult for anyone else to have used or spoofed

0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 1>those particular IP addresses. Is my favorite part coming up. Yeah,

0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:31.719
<v Speaker 1>and then North Korea says it was not involved in

0:42:31.719 --> 0:42:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the hacks, but praises the hackers as sympathizers and that

0:42:34.640 --> 0:42:38.200
<v Speaker 1>the hack was quote a righteous deed unquote. They basically said,

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 1>we didn't do it, but we should have Yeah, I

0:42:41.520 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 1>like that they say it was a righteous deed, but

0:42:42.960 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I like to think of him saying it was a

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:48.720
<v Speaker 1>righteous deed, you know, like kind of Surfer de mutant

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Ninja Turtles version of righteous. I don't know how popular

0:42:51.120 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Hawaiian shirts are there, but that would have been good,

0:42:53.480 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>good costume. If they're really popular, then I've got my

0:42:56.160 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>wardrobe should I ever visit North Korea, I've got a

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>ton of those. President Obama also on December nineteenth, spoke

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:05.400
<v Speaker 1>out about the hack and said he felt that Sony

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:08.280
<v Speaker 1>made a mistake pulling the movie from theaters, and also

0:43:08.320 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 1>said that the US would respond proportionately to the attack.

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:15.120
<v Speaker 1>What that specifically meant, no one was really sure at

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the time. Yeah, I've even gotta I forgot to put

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the note in, but I'll mention it when we get

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a little further in about the something that happened in

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 1>North Korea that some wonder perhaps was the proportionate attack.

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:30.600
<v Speaker 1>We don't write the response now that that same day,

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Sony came out and this is where the this is

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 1>where their message evolves. Yeah, evolves is good. Changes makes

0:43:39.760 --> 0:43:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a degree turn. So this is the CEO Michael Lynton

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:48.520
<v Speaker 1>came out and said that the decision to cancel the

0:43:48.560 --> 0:43:51.879
<v Speaker 1>film was merely in response to theater's refusing to show it,

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 1>and not a sign that the company was bowing to

0:43:54.960 --> 0:43:58.600
<v Speaker 1>terrorist threats. If that's the case, I don't know why

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 1>they refused to release it in any format. If they

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:05.359
<v Speaker 1>said we're never releasing this movie. Ever, how could that

0:44:05.400 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 1>be only because the theaters refused to show it, Because

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:11.759
<v Speaker 1>you would assume that the company wouldn't want to just

0:44:11.880 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 1>eat the expenses of producing and marketing a film. Gigantic

0:44:17.080 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>expenses not many millions of dollars, So if you want

0:44:21.480 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 1>to recapture at least some of that, you could release

0:44:24.440 --> 0:44:27.560
<v Speaker 1>it online. I mean, if you're truly not scared of

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 1>the threats, then why not why not release it online?

0:44:32.920 --> 0:44:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Or allow independent theaters that say, look, we'll still show it.

0:44:37.520 --> 0:44:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Why not allow them to do it? And that was

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:41.960
<v Speaker 1>that was the thing is that this response to me

0:44:42.080 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>did not ring true because the actions that Sony had

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:49.120
<v Speaker 1>taken just a couple of days earlier, U spoke very

0:44:49.200 --> 0:44:51.839
<v Speaker 1>differently than what they were saying. However, of course, they

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 1>want to save face. They want to say, hey, we

0:44:53.560 --> 0:44:56.279
<v Speaker 1>weren't scared. It's just that there was no place to

0:44:56.320 --> 0:44:59.080
<v Speaker 1>show it, so that's why we pulled it, which is

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>patently else because there were several in the city of

0:45:05.560 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta that was ready to show it. Uh. There are

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:13.280
<v Speaker 1>two theaters in general that are specific, rather too specific

0:45:13.320 --> 0:45:16.279
<v Speaker 1>theaters that said they wanted to show the film. One

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:19.399
<v Speaker 1>is in Atlanta called the Plaza, which is just down

0:45:19.480 --> 0:45:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the street from where I live. Independent theater, yeah, a

0:45:22.040 --> 0:45:25.560
<v Speaker 1>little tiny independent theater. Uh, and they said we'll show it.

0:45:25.640 --> 0:45:28.640
<v Speaker 1>And then there was the other one in Texas, Alamo Drafthouse.

0:45:28.840 --> 0:45:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, yeah, which are which are too um unforeseen

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:37.240
<v Speaker 1>champions there. We we do know though. This is another

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:40.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that's really interesting to me because all this stuff

0:45:40.760 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 1>takes place after you and I and Matt did the

0:45:43.960 --> 0:45:47.839
<v Speaker 1>earlier show. So what happens on December twenty That's when

0:45:47.840 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 1>North Korea offers to take part in a joint investigation

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of the hack and the U. S Government declines. So

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:57.200
<v Speaker 1>North Korea says, hey, we weren't responsible, but we will

0:45:57.239 --> 0:45:59.920
<v Speaker 1>totally help you try and track down who was responsible

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>for this thing that we approve of but totally didn't do.

0:46:03.480 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 1>And the United States said, Uh, here's what's interesting to

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:10.080
<v Speaker 1>mean though, if North Korea is telling the truth, right,

0:46:10.120 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 1>and if they were in no way involved in that hack, right,

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:19.239
<v Speaker 1>this this uh, these bits of code that somehow could

0:46:19.280 --> 0:46:23.760
<v Speaker 1>have come from them. I'm wondering if maybe maybe their

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:29.279
<v Speaker 1>willingness to investigate was seen as uh disingenuous. Maybe they

0:46:29.320 --> 0:46:33.680
<v Speaker 1>were looking to find out how their how their work

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:36.520
<v Speaker 1>got out there, how he got found, or maybe they were.

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:39.839
<v Speaker 1>It could also possibly be that North Korea is saying, hey,

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, we didn't um, we didn't allow for this

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:46.319
<v Speaker 1>to happen. We didn't, we didn't designate someone to go

0:46:46.360 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and do this on our behalf. We would like to

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 1>track down the person responsible for reasons of our own right, Yeah, exactly.

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Or it could be that they totally did it, and

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that's one thing that we should point out, Like I

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:05.279
<v Speaker 1>have pretty strong skepticism about this, but they totally could

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:07.840
<v Speaker 1>have done it. Right now, it's just not enough information.

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:10.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to we'll get to the biggest, the biggest

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:13.680
<v Speaker 1>problem in the information gap here pretty soon, I think.

0:47:13.760 --> 0:47:16.319
<v Speaker 1>But then on that same day, December twentie that's when

0:47:16.360 --> 0:47:19.120
<v Speaker 1>North Korea also warned that there would be serious consequences

0:47:19.120 --> 0:47:22.440
<v Speaker 1>should the United States attack North Korea if this retaliation

0:47:22.440 --> 0:47:25.640
<v Speaker 1>were to happen, right, whatever that would be. Yeah, So

0:47:25.840 --> 0:47:29.719
<v Speaker 1>essentially like whatever proportionate response you're thinking of, better not

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 1>be against us, because boy haality, we will we And

0:47:33.560 --> 0:47:37.280
<v Speaker 1>and they were very like, very militant, not big surprise,

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:40.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean North Korea, very angry. North Korea has got

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a long history of of you know, beating the drama

0:47:44.760 --> 0:47:49.320
<v Speaker 1>and saying that they will take severe action without backing

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:52.160
<v Speaker 1>it up. That you would ever want them to back

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it up. But the United States and North Korea remember

0:47:55.120 --> 0:47:58.879
<v Speaker 1>still technically in a ceasefire with the war that never ended. Yes,

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:01.319
<v Speaker 1>North Korea has never acknowledge the end of the war.

0:48:01.480 --> 0:48:05.840
<v Speaker 1>So December twenty three, Sony would authorize three theaters to

0:48:05.880 --> 0:48:09.080
<v Speaker 1>show the interview on Christmas Day, and they also released

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the film to streaming options late on the Christmas Eve.

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And there were no further attacks. Despite that fact that

0:48:17.200 --> 0:48:19.279
<v Speaker 1>you know, you had those messages earlier saying that if

0:48:19.320 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you ever show this, we will attack more, there weren't

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:27.879
<v Speaker 1>any There were no real life violent consequences. December seven,

0:48:28.000 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 1>North Korea condemns the release of the film, and they're

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:37.279
<v Speaker 1>real jerks about it. They used a racially insensitive term

0:48:37.360 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to describe our president, which was pretty ugly and I

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of people up in arms. But I

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 1>mean the most important thing is obviously that there wasn't

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 1>any kind of physical retaliation for the release of the movie.

0:48:50.920 --> 0:48:56.040
<v Speaker 1>It was just a really nasty worded message from people

0:48:56.120 --> 0:49:00.200
<v Speaker 1>who were upset about it. Well and the film itself.

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Of course, given we talked about this a little bit,

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:08.560
<v Speaker 1>but given the political environment and ideology of the Democratic

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 1>People's Republic of Career North Korea, this is this is

0:49:12.040 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a profoundly offensive thing. It's it's similar to a film

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that came out featuring Mohammed from you know, from the

0:49:23.000 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Muslim faith, uh, which depicting Mohammed is already supposed to

0:49:27.600 --> 0:49:32.399
<v Speaker 1>be a profound defense, and then having him killed. It's

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:35.640
<v Speaker 1>similar to that because of the deification of the leadership

0:49:35.640 --> 0:49:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of North Korea. Sure, yeah, it's it's it's a very

0:49:38.719 --> 0:49:41.719
<v Speaker 1>much a kind of divine right sort of thing. Yeah,

0:49:41.719 --> 0:49:45.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a good phrase, and so a nastily worded statement,

0:49:45.680 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 1>uh with with added racism, I guess, just to make

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:53.920
<v Speaker 1>it really pop, is uh the least you could expect.

0:49:54.000 --> 0:49:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Ye Uh. Sony also has threatened media companies that are

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:01.960
<v Speaker 1>covering the hack with legal action saying they will sue

0:50:02.520 --> 0:50:07.160
<v Speaker 1>companies that specifically companies that are sharing the leaked information.

0:50:07.280 --> 0:50:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, reporting on something is one thing. Obviously, Sony

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:13.200
<v Speaker 1>suing a company for reporting on the story would be

0:50:14.600 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty difficult to win. I mean, you know, no one

0:50:17.239 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 1>wants to get sued. It's an expensive endeavor. But you know,

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 1>most most media outlets are going to say, like, well,

0:50:24.040 --> 0:50:26.319
<v Speaker 1>we're just covering the news. This is news, and that's

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:30.640
<v Speaker 1>what we do. A government, you can't claim that this

0:50:30.760 --> 0:50:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is a national security issue. Yeah. Now if if in

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:38.120
<v Speaker 1>fact they were releasing private like corporate secrets that kind

0:50:38.160 --> 0:50:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of thing, then you get into sort of a murky ground.

0:50:41.360 --> 0:50:44.520
<v Speaker 1>And I can see why Sony definitely wanted to to

0:50:44.640 --> 0:50:48.440
<v Speaker 1>try and cut down on people sharing this information and

0:50:48.480 --> 0:50:52.280
<v Speaker 1>disseminating it further, which is another reason why I report

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:56.919
<v Speaker 1>about the story but not go into it. Uh, there's

0:50:56.960 --> 0:51:00.359
<v Speaker 1>not always altruistic. Now, there's one other thing you that

0:51:00.400 --> 0:51:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you were going to mention as well about this, which

0:51:03.520 --> 0:51:07.359
<v Speaker 1>is something funny happened in North Korea's internet. Yeah, their

0:51:07.400 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 1>internet um had a real slow down and eventually just

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a complete halt of operations in late December, and there

0:51:17.200 --> 0:51:18.960
<v Speaker 1>was some question about whether or not that was in

0:51:19.000 --> 0:51:22.040
<v Speaker 1>fact the proportionate response that the United States was going

0:51:22.080 --> 0:51:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to take against whomever perpetrated the hack um and we

0:51:26.920 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know. We don't know if it was. In fact.

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>There's so few nodes in North Korea, and it's all

0:51:35.360 --> 0:51:37.759
<v Speaker 1>stuff that the government and military can have access to,

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:41.240
<v Speaker 1>but no one else outside of those organizations has access

0:51:41.239 --> 0:51:45.839
<v Speaker 1>to the Internet. So but those those nodes that all

0:51:45.880 --> 0:51:49.359
<v Speaker 1>the connections were essentially shut down, like the Internet went

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:52.360
<v Speaker 1>dark in North Korea. It led some people to wonder

0:51:52.440 --> 0:51:54.719
<v Speaker 1>if perhaps there was an attack, if it was a

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:58.560
<v Speaker 1>state sponsored attack like the United States proportionate response, if

0:51:58.600 --> 0:52:01.279
<v Speaker 1>that was it, or if it was just as an

0:52:01.320 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 1>example of infrastructure breaking down, which could have been the case.

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:08.080
<v Speaker 1>It could have been that it was as simple as

0:52:08.120 --> 0:52:11.080
<v Speaker 1>someone needed to go and reboot a machine in order

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:14.520
<v Speaker 1>for it to reconnect to the Internet at large. So uh,

0:52:14.560 --> 0:52:16.880
<v Speaker 1>there just wasn't any answer to that. Of course, you know,

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you had a lot of speculation around it, but since

0:52:20.280 --> 0:52:23.200
<v Speaker 1>there's not enough information, I don't want to speculate right

0:52:23.320 --> 0:52:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the We're just saying that the issue of antiquated or

0:52:26.640 --> 0:52:30.879
<v Speaker 1>malfunctioning equipment is at least as likely a culprit as

0:52:31.360 --> 0:52:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a state sponsored attack, if not more likely in my opinion.

0:52:34.960 --> 0:52:38.279
<v Speaker 1>But so happy New Year, Sony. You made it to

0:52:39.760 --> 0:52:44.880
<v Speaker 1>uh the and that's January second. There's a funny thing, Jonathan,

0:52:44.920 --> 0:52:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you and I have talked about this off air before,

0:52:46.840 --> 0:52:51.480
<v Speaker 1>but there's this funny way that stories drop. Uh, some

0:52:51.560 --> 0:52:55.360
<v Speaker 1>big stories drop on Friday afternoon. Listeners will recall that

0:52:55.440 --> 0:52:59.000
<v Speaker 1>January two was a Friday. There's a great subreddit about

0:52:59.480 --> 0:53:02.520
<v Speaker 1>important news that drops on Friday. Yeah. The hope that

0:53:03.280 --> 0:53:05.839
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of companies that will released like

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:08.719
<v Speaker 1>unpleasant news on a Friday, hoping that it just gets

0:53:08.760 --> 0:53:11.520
<v Speaker 1>buried and then by the time everyone's ready to talk

0:53:11.520 --> 0:53:13.560
<v Speaker 1>about it again on Monday, it's old news, so no

0:53:13.600 --> 0:53:17.520
<v Speaker 1>one talks about it, right, Yeah, exactly, And so this is, uh,

0:53:17.560 --> 0:53:21.880
<v Speaker 1>this is a pretty big Friday to drop some disappearing

0:53:21.960 --> 0:53:25.760
<v Speaker 1>news because it's the day after New Year's Day. Everyone's hungover,

0:53:26.040 --> 0:53:28.200
<v Speaker 1>no one can no one can remember what their name is,

0:53:28.360 --> 0:53:31.279
<v Speaker 1>let alone read a press release right right, And like,

0:53:31.400 --> 0:53:34.279
<v Speaker 1>you don't drink, and you're probably just hungover from having

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:36.959
<v Speaker 1>to deal with all the people drinking. It's mostly made

0:53:36.960 --> 0:53:39.960
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the immense frustration of all my drunk friends

0:53:39.960 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 1>who are who are texting me as they're like, dude,

0:53:43.040 --> 0:53:45.000
<v Speaker 1>did I call you last night? And if I did,

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:48.879
<v Speaker 1>don't remember the things I said? Check the message. Yes

0:53:48.960 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you know your your co host Matt Frederick has done

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that to me. At one thirty in the morning, I

0:53:54.880 --> 0:53:57.000
<v Speaker 1>got a call from him. That was a few years

0:53:57.040 --> 0:53:59.000
<v Speaker 1>ago though that was not this year. That was in

0:53:59.040 --> 0:54:02.240
<v Speaker 1>his checkered past. So here's what happens. On January second.

0:54:02.239 --> 0:54:05.239
<v Speaker 1>The White House announces a new round of sanctions on

0:54:05.320 --> 0:54:08.720
<v Speaker 1>North Korea, and they do this via executive order. Uh.

0:54:08.800 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>We've got a quotation here, uh, which we should say

0:54:13.239 --> 0:54:17.120
<v Speaker 1>also that as the US is releasing these new sanctions

0:54:17.400 --> 0:54:24.040
<v Speaker 1>of people are already raising um skeptical concern about this

0:54:24.239 --> 0:54:28.600
<v Speaker 1>North Korea allegation. And they're saying, you know, the FBI

0:54:28.800 --> 0:54:31.479
<v Speaker 1>or the CIA or the rest of the alphabet soup

0:54:31.560 --> 0:54:35.720
<v Speaker 1>seems convinced that North Korea was involved. And they're saying

0:54:36.520 --> 0:54:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that due to information we have, we know it was

0:54:40.560 --> 0:54:45.839
<v Speaker 1>North Korea. And people are saying, but how and why

0:54:46.080 --> 0:54:48.279
<v Speaker 1>what is this information that you have that is such

0:54:48.280 --> 0:54:53.000
<v Speaker 1>a convincing smoking gun, right, And uh, they that's why

0:54:53.200 --> 0:54:58.919
<v Speaker 1>we've got the exact quotation of why they are sanctioning this, Uh,

0:54:58.960 --> 0:55:00.960
<v Speaker 1>if if you could probably do a better voice to

0:55:01.400 --> 0:55:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the response. So, it's a response to ongoing provocative, destabilizing,

0:55:07.080 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and repressive actions and policies. Particularly it's destructive and coercive

0:55:11.000 --> 0:55:15.960
<v Speaker 1>cyber attacks on Sony Pictures Entertainment. So specifically, not not

0:55:16.080 --> 0:55:22.520
<v Speaker 1>just specifically cyber crime, but specifically Sony Pictures Entertainment. They're saying,

0:55:22.840 --> 0:55:25.120
<v Speaker 1>not only do we think he did it, this is

0:55:25.160 --> 0:55:29.040
<v Speaker 1>our official response to that. Yeah. So in this case,

0:55:29.080 --> 0:55:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's essentially saying, like cases closed, guys, this

0:55:32.520 --> 0:55:36.279
<v Speaker 1>is they did it. And uh, we're gonna kind of

0:55:36.320 --> 0:55:40.279
<v Speaker 1>segue into sort of the skepticism about this, including my

0:55:40.320 --> 0:55:43.920
<v Speaker 1>own personal skepticism, but I want to preface it with saying,

0:55:44.160 --> 0:55:46.279
<v Speaker 1>and we said this on on the stuff they don't

0:55:46.280 --> 0:55:48.719
<v Speaker 1>want you to know episode as well, that this is

0:55:48.760 --> 0:55:51.640
<v Speaker 1>based upon the information that we have available to us.

0:55:51.680 --> 0:55:54.919
<v Speaker 1>And it could be that the US government hasn't its

0:55:54.920 --> 0:55:59.759
<v Speaker 1>possession information that is damning evidence that proves that North

0:56:00.040 --> 0:56:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Rhea's government was in fact behind the attacks. Uh, And

0:56:03.880 --> 0:56:06.239
<v Speaker 1>it's just that we don't have access to that information,

0:56:06.239 --> 0:56:11.000
<v Speaker 1>and therefore that's why things look a little hokey to us. Uh.

0:56:11.120 --> 0:56:14.120
<v Speaker 1>That being said, things look a little hokey to us.

0:56:15.000 --> 0:56:17.359
<v Speaker 1>How so what what are some of the points that

0:56:17.400 --> 0:56:22.400
<v Speaker 1>make this not an iron clad theory? All right? So, first,

0:56:22.480 --> 0:56:25.719
<v Speaker 1>it's odd to have a state sponsored attack where you

0:56:25.760 --> 0:56:29.360
<v Speaker 1>have a hacker group claiming responsibility and giving itself a

0:56:29.400 --> 0:56:33.160
<v Speaker 1>cool name. Yes. So so having a group come out

0:56:33.160 --> 0:56:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and say, hey, we're guardians of peace. Were the ones

0:56:35.160 --> 0:56:37.000
<v Speaker 1>who did this, this is the reason we did it,

0:56:37.160 --> 0:56:39.560
<v Speaker 1>here's how you can stop it from happening, is a

0:56:39.560 --> 0:56:42.200
<v Speaker 1>lot different from a state sponsored attack. A state sponsored

0:56:42.239 --> 0:56:45.160
<v Speaker 1>attack usually one thing is they don't want to leave

0:56:45.200 --> 0:56:47.759
<v Speaker 1>any trace of who it was that did it. You know,

0:56:47.840 --> 0:56:51.399
<v Speaker 1>this is if you remember the episodes we've done about

0:56:51.440 --> 0:56:54.080
<v Speaker 1>stuck s net, then you know this is the case.

0:56:54.120 --> 0:56:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Like you want, you want to have the effect without

0:56:56.960 --> 0:57:02.600
<v Speaker 1>having it be autographed, you know, love North Korea. Next,

0:57:02.640 --> 0:57:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the amount of data stolen was huge, so we mentioned

0:57:05.640 --> 0:57:08.400
<v Speaker 1>this earlier. It takes a really long time to siphon

0:57:08.440 --> 0:57:12.279
<v Speaker 1>off a hundred terabytes of data, particularly if you're not

0:57:12.480 --> 0:57:17.400
<v Speaker 1>on site. So that is an enormous undertaking. It's not impossible,

0:57:17.560 --> 0:57:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it is something that could happen, but it would take months. Well,

0:57:22.240 --> 0:57:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it would suggest to me that if in fact this

0:57:24.200 --> 0:57:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is North Korea that's behind it, that they targeted Sony

0:57:29.280 --> 0:57:35.479
<v Speaker 1>essentially sometime mid two thousand and fourteen for a movie

0:57:35.520 --> 0:57:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't going to come out for six months at

0:57:37.520 --> 0:57:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the latest, because that's how long it's going to take

0:57:40.840 --> 0:57:43.439
<v Speaker 1>to steal that much information. Also, that they were able

0:57:43.480 --> 0:57:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to identify the information that would be most harmful to

0:57:46.240 --> 0:57:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the company, target it, take it, and not ever be noticed.

0:57:50.960 --> 0:57:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Now granted, when they're taking it, they're making copies. It's

0:57:53.240 --> 0:57:56.360
<v Speaker 1>not like stealing from a store where suddenly there's there's

0:57:56.360 --> 0:57:59.640
<v Speaker 1>an empty space where a TV used to be, right,

0:57:59.760 --> 0:58:02.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's a little different from physical theft, but still

0:58:03.000 --> 0:58:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you could end up being caught, you know, you could

0:58:05.080 --> 0:58:09.080
<v Speaker 1>at lead people could see unusual traffic in the Internet servers,

0:58:09.120 --> 0:58:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing. Um, so it's unusual. Also the

0:58:14.320 --> 0:58:17.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that the information that was released to harm the

0:58:17.600 --> 0:58:23.120
<v Speaker 1>company was incredibly savvy, like this speaks of someone who

0:58:23.120 --> 0:58:28.240
<v Speaker 1>has a real understanding of what is going to make

0:58:28.280 --> 0:58:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a company, specifically a media company vulnerable. Matter right, how

0:58:33.800 --> 0:58:37.560
<v Speaker 1>do I strike at the morale of the employees, how

0:58:37.600 --> 0:58:41.400
<v Speaker 1>do I strike at the relationship between the production company

0:58:41.440 --> 0:58:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and the other big players in the industry, how do

0:58:44.760 --> 0:58:48.240
<v Speaker 1>I strike at the American public's perception of that company.

0:58:48.320 --> 0:58:52.320
<v Speaker 1>This is incredibly savvy stuff. Not to say that there

0:58:52.360 --> 0:58:55.040
<v Speaker 1>are there aren't people in North Korea who are aware

0:58:55.080 --> 0:58:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of this. They very well maybe, but it seems to

0:58:58.040 --> 0:59:02.880
<v Speaker 1>me like it's a real in cider's insight to what

0:59:03.080 --> 0:59:06.400
<v Speaker 1>is important within the film industry in general and Sony

0:59:06.440 --> 0:59:12.080
<v Speaker 1>in particular. That's a nice turn of phrase. Yeah, it

0:59:12.160 --> 0:59:15.480
<v Speaker 1>was a little clunky myself, but okay. Also, the threats

0:59:15.520 --> 0:59:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to obey the hackers had nothing to do with the

0:59:18.120 --> 0:59:21.600
<v Speaker 1>interview for a really long time, like, so essentially they

0:59:21.600 --> 0:59:24.520
<v Speaker 1>were saying, obey us, do what we say, but they

0:59:24.520 --> 0:59:28.439
<v Speaker 1>weren't saying They weren't giving instructions, Like, they didn't give

0:59:28.560 --> 0:59:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Sony the chance to pull the interview. It was only

0:59:31.920 --> 0:59:36.040
<v Speaker 1>after leaking the information that the demand was even made.

0:59:36.520 --> 0:59:39.680
<v Speaker 1>So it's really odd that if the interview was in

0:59:39.720 --> 0:59:43.040
<v Speaker 1>fact the reason for the attack, and if the goal

0:59:43.120 --> 0:59:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of the attack was to have the interview pulled from

0:59:45.720 --> 0:59:49.520
<v Speaker 1>film from theaters, why not actually give the company a

0:59:49.640 --> 0:59:53.440
<v Speaker 1>chance to do that rather than just slash and burn

0:59:53.880 --> 0:59:56.840
<v Speaker 1>because the film was released anyway, yeah to me. That's

0:59:56.840 --> 0:59:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the most important parts. Let alone the

0:59:59.520 --> 1:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>fact that UH states don't typically attack other states for

1:00:06.720 --> 1:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>media like private films, you know, private sector films. UH.

1:00:11.560 --> 1:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>We've already talked about. You know something that ties into

1:00:15.080 --> 1:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>that earlier point you just made, which is, UH, how

1:00:18.520 --> 1:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to attribute who said what? Yeah? How do you How

1:00:21.080 --> 1:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>can you be sure that a message supposedly from the

1:00:23.880 --> 1:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>hackers was actually from the hackers? And you can't know.

1:00:27.160 --> 1:00:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, you might as well sit there

1:00:29.920 --> 1:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and go to four chan and try and say this

1:00:33.440 --> 1:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>particular message was from this particular person. It's all supposed

1:00:36.360 --> 1:00:40.480
<v Speaker 1>to be anonymously protected, so you don't know. Also, security

1:00:40.480 --> 1:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>firm Norse identified six former Sony employees who had the

1:00:45.240 --> 1:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>skills necessary to pull off something like this and had

1:00:49.040 --> 1:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>participated in chat room discussions revealing their negative feelings towards

1:00:53.120 --> 1:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the company, which wasn't anything incriminating, but they were clearly disgruntled.

1:00:57.520 --> 1:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>They were former employees, they were part of a layoff

1:01:00.440 --> 1:01:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that happened in two thousand fourteen. UM and the FBI

1:01:03.720 --> 1:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>rejected this information, which is interesting because one other thing

1:01:08.960 --> 1:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that I believe it was NORSE found when North submitted

1:01:12.760 --> 1:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>their stuff to the FBI. They they are big proponents

1:01:16.360 --> 1:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of this insider job argument because within the code they

1:01:20.120 --> 1:01:23.320
<v Speaker 1>found the credentials that you would need to access some

1:01:23.440 --> 1:01:28.919
<v Speaker 1>of these uh some of these compartmentalized basis of information, right. Yeah,

1:01:29.120 --> 1:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it seemed to a lot of cybersecurity experts that whomever

1:01:34.080 --> 1:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>pulled off this attack had access to passwords and other

1:01:38.600 --> 1:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>verification UH criteria that would allow them access to these

1:01:43.680 --> 1:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>very sensitive areas of information that would be challenging for

1:01:48.400 --> 1:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>an outsider to identify and use. But if you're if

1:01:52.160 --> 1:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you were familiar with the system already, then you would

1:01:54.640 --> 1:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>know what you needed before you did your attack. So

1:01:58.360 --> 1:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's one of those things where you're like, yeah,

1:02:00.040 --> 1:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not impossible for someone outside the group to have

1:02:03.160 --> 1:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>figured this out, but it's far more likely that there

1:02:06.840 --> 1:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>was at least some insider assistance because you know, they

1:02:11.440 --> 1:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>were able to target specific pieces of information. And perhaps

1:02:15.480 --> 1:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it's unwitting insider assistance too. It could be, you know,

1:02:18.720 --> 1:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it could just very well be a case of social

1:02:20.920 --> 1:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>engineering where UH, an outside hacker gets unwitting participation and

1:02:26.960 --> 1:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the people who handed over the information or the the

1:02:29.760 --> 1:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>access the keys to the Kingdom weren't aware of what

1:02:32.520 --> 1:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>they were doing at the time, that's possible. Um, I

1:02:35.480 --> 1:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>still think that the insider hypothesis is the most compelling

1:02:41.200 --> 1:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>based upon what was stolen, how it was leaked, and

1:02:45.560 --> 1:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the effect it had. But and also the fact that

1:02:48.880 --> 1:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>the demand for the film thing didn't come until after

1:02:52.200 --> 1:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the leaks had happened. But again that's that's just based

1:02:56.480 --> 1:02:58.480
<v Speaker 1>on the information have available to me. So what do

1:02:58.520 --> 1:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you think then about one of the early things presented

1:03:02.160 --> 1:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>as smoking gun evidence the idea that uh, certain pieces

1:03:07.120 --> 1:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of code that have been used in the attacks were

1:03:10.720 --> 1:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>present in these most recent attacks. Well, Ben, as you

1:03:13.600 --> 1:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>and I know, on the internet, um, all code is

1:03:18.360 --> 1:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>incredibly proprietary and can't be spread around or tweaked or

1:03:22.560 --> 1:03:26.640
<v Speaker 1>changed or altered or added to or taken away from.

1:03:26.760 --> 1:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if only we lived in a world where

1:03:29.920 --> 1:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you could take existing programs, change them and make them

1:03:33.640 --> 1:03:37.880
<v Speaker 1>do things for your on your own behalf, then we

1:03:37.920 --> 1:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>would live in a world where you can't attribute a

1:03:41.040 --> 1:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>source for a particular attack simply because of the code

1:03:43.680 --> 1:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that was Oh wait, that is the world we live in.

1:03:47.240 --> 1:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, here's the problem is that just because the

1:03:49.720 --> 1:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>code was found in attacks from a previous instance doesn't

1:03:54.120 --> 1:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>mean that that code only belongs to one group. A

1:03:58.600 --> 1:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of these tools get to be through various channels

1:04:01.920 --> 1:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>online hackers. When they create a really powerful tool, sometimes

1:04:05.880 --> 1:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>they love to share it. Not all the time. Some

1:04:08.320 --> 1:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of them are very jealous with what they create and

1:04:10.800 --> 1:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>they keep it for themselves. But some will go and say, hey,

1:04:14.520 --> 1:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I made this tool, it's perfect for cracking passwords. Have

1:04:17.840 --> 1:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>at it. And then the people who downloaded and use it,

1:04:21.360 --> 1:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we often call them script kiddies. They aren't the ones

1:04:23.640 --> 1:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>who developed the code. They're just making use of code

1:04:26.040 --> 1:04:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that was built to do a specific thing. So I

1:04:30.560 --> 1:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>hesitate to attribute an attack to us specific group simply

1:04:36.640 --> 1:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>because the code that was included. Yeah, I agree with

1:04:40.240 --> 1:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you there, because it's strange too. It's strange to think

1:04:44.840 --> 1:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>that someone could own a process, and especially when there's

1:04:50.680 --> 1:04:55.959
<v Speaker 1>so much sharing in the toolbox. And uh, if this

1:04:56.080 --> 1:05:01.840
<v Speaker 1>code was recognized right then, that already inherently tells us

1:05:02.160 --> 1:05:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that other people have seen it, which also means they

1:05:04.560 --> 1:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>could replicate it. It would be I think it's a

1:05:07.880 --> 1:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit movie thriller right now to say, uh that

1:05:13.360 --> 1:05:16.360
<v Speaker 1>someone purposely put it in his red herring but wouldn't

1:05:16.400 --> 1:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that be cool? No, I just think it's also movie

1:05:19.080 --> 1:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>thriller to say I recognize this code if it could

1:05:22.320 --> 1:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>only come from one place, and that's totally a movie. Yeah,

1:05:27.160 --> 1:05:30.200
<v Speaker 1>And and you're right about that. And one thing that

1:05:30.520 --> 1:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>we should also list that I think is important to

1:05:33.760 --> 1:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>note here is that I've seen several journalists UM reciting

1:05:38.120 --> 1:05:42.360
<v Speaker 1>these u S statements of North Korean involvement as fact,

1:05:42.880 --> 1:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and it is true. The problem with this is something

1:05:46.840 --> 1:05:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that you and I have have touched upon already in

1:05:49.200 --> 1:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the show, which is that we know that the United

1:05:52.200 --> 1:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>States and some of its cooperative countries have this vast

1:05:56.320 --> 1:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>array of sophisticated and in many plate cases classify UH

1:06:00.640 --> 1:06:04.720
<v Speaker 1>collection methods, right sure, And this means that it is

1:06:04.800 --> 1:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>fair to assume that the United States has access to

1:06:07.880 --> 1:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>information that civilians and journalists may not be able to analyze.

1:06:12.520 --> 1:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Right So so yeah, that leads you to the conclusion

1:06:16.280 --> 1:06:19.880
<v Speaker 1>that again, there could be a smoking gun sure that

1:06:19.960 --> 1:06:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I am completely unaware of that says no, it was

1:06:24.200 --> 1:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>North Korea. It was not some insider. Uh, it was not.

1:06:28.040 --> 1:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't a disgruntled employee. This was a very effective attack,

1:06:33.120 --> 1:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>which if that is here's the thing. If that's the

1:06:35.720 --> 1:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>real answer, if that really is the real answer, that's terrifying,

1:06:40.200 --> 1:06:42.040
<v Speaker 1>because not only does it mean that you have a

1:06:42.080 --> 1:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>country that has created an incredibly effective, invasive attack into

1:06:46.640 --> 1:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a major corporation, but they understand the culture and the

1:06:51.400 --> 1:06:55.760
<v Speaker 1>impact that corporation has and how to best attack it. It

1:06:55.120 --> 1:07:00.040
<v Speaker 1>It just doesn't make sense though to do so. I

1:07:00.080 --> 1:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>would be surprised to do something of that magnitude for

1:07:04.600 --> 1:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a work of fiction that honestly, honestly, and I say

1:07:09.120 --> 1:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>this as as a fan of Seth Rogan, it's not

1:07:12.400 --> 1:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to be his Oscar winning film. I

1:07:14.640 --> 1:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>had said that. Um when Sony first pulled the film,

1:07:19.280 --> 1:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I said, listen, I don't plan to see the interview,

1:07:23.600 --> 1:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>but I want that to be my option that I

1:07:26.160 --> 1:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>don't see the interview, right, you want it to be

1:07:28.280 --> 1:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>your choice. I don't don't want the choice made for

1:07:30.800 --> 1:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>me that I don't see the interview. And see, that's

1:07:33.480 --> 1:07:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the thing is that they released it, and again we

1:07:35.320 --> 1:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't see more attacks, at least not yet. I mean,

1:07:37.920 --> 1:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it could be by the time this podcast goes out

1:07:39.840 --> 1:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that in fact, more has developed the story, which we

1:07:42.520 --> 1:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>do have to be conscious of but going back to

1:07:44.920 --> 1:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that point of the missing information, this also means that

1:07:47.880 --> 1:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>without access to it, there's no way for someone to

1:07:51.640 --> 1:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>independently verify the accuracy of the statements on the part

1:07:58.120 --> 1:08:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of Uncle Sam, and it's been it's being used as

1:08:01.480 --> 1:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the proof, and the fact that their further sanctions really

1:08:05.160 --> 1:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>does show I think it indicates that there is some

1:08:08.280 --> 1:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of belief. Yeah. Yeah, I I am at least

1:08:11.160 --> 1:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>hopeful that they are sincere in the statement that they

1:08:14.800 --> 1:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>fully believe North Korea to be behind it, because otherwise

1:08:18.120 --> 1:08:22.559
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a very bizarre clancy like thriller, where

1:08:23.200 --> 1:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the US government is taking advantage of an insane hacking

1:08:27.920 --> 1:08:31.559
<v Speaker 1>attack on a media company as an excuse to step

1:08:31.640 --> 1:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>up sanctions against a hostile foreign power, which is such

1:08:37.439 --> 1:08:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a weird thing to even say. But what I love

1:08:40.800 --> 1:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>about the plan is that it's so straightforward. Right, step

1:08:45.880 --> 1:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>three profit. Yeah. So, so where does this leave us, Well,

1:08:49.920 --> 1:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it pretty much leaves us in the same place we

1:08:51.840 --> 1:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>were at the beginning. We don't really know you, and

1:08:55.400 --> 1:08:59.439
<v Speaker 1>I certainly don't know who. Yeah, and it may very

1:08:59.439 --> 1:09:02.320
<v Speaker 1>well be we said that in fact it is North Korea,

1:09:03.280 --> 1:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's just that that's such it's it stretches my

1:09:08.040 --> 1:09:10.639
<v Speaker 1>belief so much. That's why I really have trouble with it.

1:09:10.840 --> 1:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>But it could very well be true. I'm curious what

1:09:13.880 --> 1:09:16.439
<v Speaker 1>our listeners think. Guys, if you have any suggestions, If

1:09:16.479 --> 1:09:18.960
<v Speaker 1>you if you have an opinion on this, or you

1:09:19.000 --> 1:09:21.080
<v Speaker 1>have a suggestion for a future episode, you should write

1:09:21.120 --> 1:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in the addresses tech Stuff at how stuff works dot

1:09:24.080 --> 1:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>com or drop us a line on Facebook or Twitter.

1:09:27.400 --> 1:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>They handle it's tech stuff hs W ben Where can

1:09:30.160 --> 1:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>they find you? Ah? Yes, well you can find Jonathan

1:09:34.280 --> 1:09:37.519
<v Speaker 1>and I hanging out on several shows where I'm brain

1:09:37.600 --> 1:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Stuff together on YouTube and What the Stuff. We've got

1:09:40.080 --> 1:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>an upcoming episode of brain Stuff. Where were we both

1:09:43.360 --> 1:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>appear in the same episode? Oh, we do. Only one

1:09:46.160 --> 1:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of us talks and that's why. Yeah, you know on

1:09:49.400 --> 1:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>on that is What the Stuff. I believe it's uh,

1:09:51.960 --> 1:09:56.719
<v Speaker 1>it is What the Stuff technology spoilers. My bad, it's

1:09:57.160 --> 1:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it's that. That was a strange shoot. I hope listen

1:10:00.080 --> 1:10:02.160
<v Speaker 1>is enjoy. You can find my co host Matt and

1:10:02.200 --> 1:10:05.479
<v Speaker 1>I on stuff they don't want you to know. You

1:10:05.520 --> 1:10:09.880
<v Speaker 1>can find uh a former guest host or recurring guest

1:10:09.880 --> 1:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>host of tech Stuff, Scott Benjamin, who works works with

1:10:13.720 --> 1:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>me on car stuff next to me. Yeah, yeah, he does.

1:10:17.800 --> 1:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>You guys have some of the most interesting conversations in

1:10:20.120 --> 1:10:22.599
<v Speaker 1>the office. Yeah, you know Scott. I was peg Scott

1:10:22.640 --> 1:10:24.640
<v Speaker 1>as the super quiet guy in the office, but he

1:10:24.720 --> 1:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>really does enjoy a fun, bizarre, thoughtful conversation. He's a

1:10:29.880 --> 1:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>big true crime fan too, by the way. That's good

1:10:32.320 --> 1:10:35.479
<v Speaker 1>to know. It's good to know. It's more more risks

1:10:35.560 --> 1:10:38.479
<v Speaker 1>for the mill my friend. Uh. And if somebody, if

1:10:38.520 --> 1:10:42.679
<v Speaker 1>somebody wants to learn more about let's see the future

1:10:42.720 --> 1:10:45.000
<v Speaker 1>of technology and they haven't heard of your other show,

1:10:45.040 --> 1:10:47.559
<v Speaker 1>where would they go, Well, they would go to fw

1:10:47.680 --> 1:10:51.559
<v Speaker 1>thinking dot com for Forward Thinking. That's where Lauren Vogelbaum,

1:10:51.680 --> 1:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Joe McCormick and I will end up talking at nauseum

1:10:55.439 --> 1:10:58.200
<v Speaker 1>about all sorts of things from the future. Uh. It's

1:10:58.200 --> 1:11:01.320
<v Speaker 1>also the video series Forward Thinking. I the soul host

1:11:01.479 --> 1:11:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of that show and sometimes the writer. Uh. But you

1:11:06.439 --> 1:11:08.040
<v Speaker 1>should definitely check that out. If you haven't listened to

1:11:08.120 --> 1:11:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that podcast, you've got to check out the episodes that

1:11:11.080 --> 1:11:13.719
<v Speaker 1>just went live so you can find them. In the

1:11:13.720 --> 1:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>most recent ones, we did Back to Back to the

1:11:17.120 --> 1:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Future to part one, and then we did Back to

1:11:21.160 --> 1:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Future, to part two, where we looked

1:11:24.160 --> 1:11:27.439
<v Speaker 1>at the technology that Marty McFly encounters when he travels

1:11:27.479 --> 1:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand fifteen and see how it measures up

1:11:30.200 --> 1:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to the actual two thousand fifteen technology of today. Yeah,

1:11:33.240 --> 1:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if they're ever going to come out with

1:11:34.960 --> 1:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that Pepsi can Pepsi bottle. I can tell you that

1:11:37.720 --> 1:11:40.599
<v Speaker 1>the power laces are going to happen this year. Finally,

1:11:40.800 --> 1:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Nike's gonna bring us power laces sometime in twent to

1:11:44.120 --> 1:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>hear more check out that show. Yeah, and thanks so

1:11:46.960 --> 1:11:49.719
<v Speaker 1>much for having me back on, Jonathan. I look forward

1:11:49.720 --> 1:11:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to seeing how this situation develops, and I do hope

1:11:53.360 --> 1:11:55.320
<v Speaker 1>we get an answer. Yeah, me too. I mean, this

1:11:55.479 --> 1:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>could be one of the great mysteries where you know,

1:11:58.040 --> 1:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we have an official word, but there may always be

1:12:01.040 --> 1:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>lingering down. I'm not normally a conspiracy theory guy. It's

1:12:04.360 --> 1:12:05.840
<v Speaker 1>just sometimes there are things like, you know, you like,

1:12:06.000 --> 1:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>this just doesn't smell right, and it could very well

1:12:08.840 --> 1:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>be that just a stinky, stinky mess. So anyway, thanks

1:12:12.960 --> 1:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>again guys for listening, and we will talk to you

1:12:15.320 --> 1:12:21.760
<v Speaker 1>again really soon for more on this and thousands of

1:12:21.760 --> 1:12:33.720
<v Speaker 1>other topics. Does it have toff works dot com,