WEBVTT - GDP, UAW, Morgan Stanley, and UPS

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to get to these markets here. The store's been.

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:27.639
<v Speaker 1>It feels to this simple investor over here that the

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.479
<v Speaker 1>interest rates out there in the marketplace have really been

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>impacting stocks. And that's my take. Vince Signorella, he joins us.

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:36.919
<v Speaker 1>He's a pro global macro strategist for Bloomberg News. New

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>knee or just a repaired knee replacement replace harsh, replacing

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the He's walking just fine. He found his way into

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg and Director Broker studio. We left from crumbs

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 1>out for him. Vince, what do you make of these

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>markets here?

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 3>Uh?

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:52.120
<v Speaker 4>You know, the equity market's looking really sick. I mean

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 4>if you look at longer term charts.

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Sick as in bed like the kids say, look ill,

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 2>not like beastie boys ill, but like unwell unwell.

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 4>Yes, there's a level to watch it around forty one

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 4>to fifty. It's a TD sequential level. If that breaks,

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.399
<v Speaker 4>it actually opens up a major move down of four thousand.

0:01:12.160 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 4>We're looking at a potential major move lower inequity markets

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 4>if these levels don't hold, and we're gonna need to

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 4>see some help from probably Amazon and the like going

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 4>forward to lift this higher, because it's not going to

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 4>come from interest rights.

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.320
<v Speaker 2>I look, Abigail, do little yesterday it showed me. Oh

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.679
<v Speaker 2>y no, no, not rs high.

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:32.800
<v Speaker 1>That is back. That is awesome. Look at the rs

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I for SPX. We are right there. You buy him

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>right here, unless, as you say, it breaks through that

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>little green lines colors and everything. Get me a break.

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you what, though it did. It did move

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:45.440
<v Speaker 2>below the two hundred the SMP move below the two

0:01:45.480 --> 0:01:47.520
<v Speaker 2>hundred day moving average, and the last time we've seen

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 2>it that blow you know, in that in those terms,

0:01:50.480 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 2>was March, and.

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 4>It's well below the two hundred day, which is around

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 4>forty two to thirty five, so we're well below that.

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 4>So forty one seventy interestingly enough, is the average closing

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 4>price for the last year, So between this forty one

0:02:02.720 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 4>fifty forty one seventy level. I'd love to see it

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 4>hold and maybe catch a bid, but so far it's

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:10.120
<v Speaker 4>looking a little bit of a dead cat bounce here.

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 2>If I see rates up, as Paul said, you know,

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 2>rates have been a huge driver. I feel like if

0:02:15.960 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>I see rates up, if I see dollar strength, if

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 2>I see oil up, that's all bad for equities, right yeah.

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, And you know what rates aren't really there's not

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 4>much of an infinite impetus for rates to go substantially lower.

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, we need to see really super low inflation

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 4>numbers to turn rates at the moment. You know, we're

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 4>saying a little bit of a reprieve in the treasury market.

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, Acman's trade helped a little bit.

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 2>It got some Americans want to buy treasures, but who else?

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 4>Pretty much there.

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Is Japanese foreign buyers. They don't want to hold this paper.

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 4>No, no, what else.

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:50.959
<v Speaker 1>Are you gonna buy?

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, that's actually a good point though, But the

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 4>upside for it, you know, you're just buying if you're yield,

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 4>you're not looking at for a capital.

0:02:57.000 --> 0:02:58.959
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's the first time in almost a generation you

0:02:59.000 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>could get yield.

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 4>Oh no, I mean a lot of people loving and

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.079
<v Speaker 4>you're looking at see these at five and a half percent.

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that's these are great rates, especially for fixed

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 4>income or or seniors on a on a fixed income.

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 4>A lot of folks out there doing that. I mean

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 4>I've done a little bit myself. I'm kind of a

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:17.240
<v Speaker 4>senior actually these days. But you know, I mean I

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 4>could see rates staying here. You know, I'm not really

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 4>going down a lot, not really going up a lot.

0:03:22.480 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 4>But that's not going to help the equity market. It's

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 4>going to need it from somewhere else.

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>So when a guy like Bill Ackman says I closed

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:32.440
<v Speaker 1>my short in the treasury markets, a does that mean

0:03:32.480 --> 0:03:33.560
<v Speaker 1>anything to pros out there?

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 4>Is not just a name, And if you think about it,

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 4>the size of his fund it was like a one

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 4>percent game.

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 2>So he was long too, right, wasn't he talking about.

0:03:40.800 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 4>A thirty year Yeah? Yeah, yeah, but he had a

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 4>one percent gain on the assets under management.

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean he wasn't the only bill. You know Bill

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Gross also what is he long or short? Going long treasuries?

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:03:52.240 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, so's Warren Buffet closing short at least?

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 4>Okay, yeah, you know they put a position on a

0:03:57.440 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 4>Monday and tell you on Wednesday what they did. So

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 4>you'll goin in and money.

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Do those names. The other day, our producer Eric Molo,

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:07.839
<v Speaker 2>he had a mask on and I said, hey, dude,

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 2>where's Tonto. He had no idea what I was talking about,

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 2>and I was I said, you know what, like the

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 2>Lone Ranger? And he was like, no, sorry, don't get it.

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 2>He did not know who the Lone Ranger was. And

0:04:18.080 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 2>do these kids today do they know Bill Gross? Do

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>they know Warren Buffett? Like in a real way?

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.600
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you know the program the the Algo programmers

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 4>do because they take those names and they program it

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 4>into their into their trading venues. But you know, actually,

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 4>the only iconic name from from that era that is

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 4>actually incredibly well known Lassie. Everyone knows who Lassie is.

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 4>This is not in the markets, yeah, well, in the

0:04:43.880 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 4>world in general, yeah, markets I mean, but yeah, I

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 4>mean in the all the years I trade.

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you think Eric Molo knows who Lassie was?

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 4>I think so we'll have to test him on the

0:04:51.480 --> 0:04:52.480
<v Speaker 4>way out, check him out.

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, what's the most interesting trade for you out there?

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Just in the markets? I know, you look at currency, stocks, bonds,

0:04:57.480 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of stuff out there. What are you looking

0:04:59.000 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>at it to me?

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, going back to interest rates, I still like

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 4>the short term. I still like two year treasuries. I mean,

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 4>that's the one that's really going to catch a bid

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:10.679
<v Speaker 4>when the FED decides to turn or the FED says

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 4>I stopped because you could, you would more likely than

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 4>not see the yield curve steepend if inflation expectations remain,

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 4>that's not going to affect the short end as much.

0:05:19.800 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 4>So if you see steepening, it's going to be a

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 4>sell off in the back end. I think the short

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 4>end is the place to be because inevitably that's got

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 4>to come your way the FED.

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, Matt's been telling me not to crowd into

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that two year because I gonna have an interest rate

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>risk reinvestment reinvestments. Now the thirty year five point zero seven,

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you were right negative by.

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying, first of all, I don't give investment advice.

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I loaded up on them, and if I do, you

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.839
<v Speaker 2>should run the other direction. But no, I'm not saying

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 2>you want duration right now. I'm just I just look

0:05:51.200 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 2>at the interest as sorry, the reinvestment risk as something

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 2>that is better dealt with by you know, you have

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 2>like very sophisticated advisors. I just look at an ETF.

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 2>I would rather T bill and chill.

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, T build chill. I get Yankee tickets, and

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you do T bill and chill. All right, So what

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>are we doing here, Vince? I mean, is the next

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>move for this Federal Reserve to just stay or to

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>still talk tough? We hear Christine Lagard to ECB today,

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:22.159
<v Speaker 1>still talking tough.

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, I take that with a grain of salt.

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 4>They're saying what they have to say. I mean, the

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 4>guard's been You know, if you go back ten years

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 4>when inflation in the Eurozone was below one percent, well

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 4>you heard from the ECB central bankers was HRCP inflation

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 4>is moving towards target. It didn't move for five years,

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 4>but they said that at every meeting. So now at

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 4>every meeting they're going to say we can still raise,

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 4>but they have no real intention of raising. Neither does

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 4>the Fed. I think, I mean, the Federal talk a

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 4>tough book potentially raising one more. I have absolutely no

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 4>idea why there's really no reason to raise at this point.

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Isn't moving down quickly enough? Well, what's counter fiscal spending?

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it needs to be two like last week.

0:06:59.440 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 4>But I would argue this, the idea of getting inflation

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 4>to two percent goal is ridiculous. The two percent goal

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 4>was at a time when there was a balance sheet

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 4>of what a trillion now we have Now we have

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 4>a federal deficit of thirty three trillion. The balance sheet

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 4>at the Fed is off the charts. You're not going

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 4>to see two percent inflation. You're going to see two

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:19.920
<v Speaker 4>percent inflation if you have a disaster.

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 2>You don't think they're going to get there.

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 4>No, I think that if they're lucky, they get to

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 4>three three and a half and they should be happy

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 4>if they do.

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm in that camp. I don't know what's so

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>special about two percent. They made it up?

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they would all be made up. But the point

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:38.520
<v Speaker 2>is inflation is just thievery right. You're just robbing from savers.

0:07:38.560 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 2>So it's their duty to get it down to near

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 2>as damn it to zero.

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say, well, I mean.

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 4>You're robbing savers if you don't have real interest rates higher.

0:07:46.920 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 4>But we now have real interest rates starting to come

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 4>to the positive. If you get inflation down to three

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 4>three and a half percent, you're not going to see

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 4>a ten ure yield of three percent, so you're still

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 4>going to have a positive, positive carry and people are

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 4>going to be earning. I mean the other side of

0:08:01.560 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 4>the corner is you get inflation into three three and

0:08:03.080 --> 0:08:05.040
<v Speaker 4>a half percent. Where does that put the SMP? Probably

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:07.560
<v Speaker 4>around forty five forty eight hundred, So you're gonna have

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:09.720
<v Speaker 4>a positive return somewhere. It's just a matter of where

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 4>you go.

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, what do we do? I mean, all right,

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I think my fed's gonna stay put next time.

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 4>I think so too. And I think I look at

0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 4>tech and I'm always the one where I joke with people.

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 4>So you're not going to get your next iPhone from

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 4>Campbell's soup. So you know, whatever they're selling whenever they

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 4>sell tech disaggressively, to me, it looks like an opportunity.

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>To buy the big tech.

0:08:28.040 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 4>I would buy the big tag. But you know, just

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 4>get my feet wet here and there my toes.

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Buying the iPhone fifteen my daughter. I just looked at

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 1>it yesterday. It's got a new plug. You got to

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 1>replace all your plugs. I thought, my plug is strategically

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:46.360
<v Speaker 1>located everywhere. None is more than an arm length away. Dude,

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I feel now I got to replace everything. I feel

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you that you explain the European sect.

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 4>Because they made Apple bye by their.

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a regulation move, but I'm happy they finally got

0:08:57.320 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 2>to it.

0:08:57.559 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>But you're right, we have to.

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 2>Buy all new cables and it's all right.

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Vincey Garell. Thank you so much. We appreciate it.

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the teenth Ken's Are Live program Bloomberg

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.720
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot com,

0:09:10.840 --> 0:09:13.960
<v Speaker 5>the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 5>on demand wherever you get your podcast.

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 2>I want to get to the end of the strike.

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean I want to get to it. I'm sure

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 2>the union members want to get to it. I know

0:09:24.559 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 2>the car makers want to get to it. Let's talk

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 2>on the telephone on Zoom actually with Keith Noughton.

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>He covered on Zoom.

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:34.199
<v Speaker 2>Look at him going on Ford in the Big three

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 2>for US at a motor city, and it looks like

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 2>at least Ford has got a tentative agreement with the UAW.

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 2>Keith walk us through it.

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so it's an agreement that includes a twenty five

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 6>percent raise and the restoration of cost of living allowances.

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 6>Those two combined mean that the actual pay increase for

0:09:57.160 --> 0:10:01.080
<v Speaker 6>the top way journers is actually thirty three percent and

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 6>means they'll be making over forty dollars an hour. There's

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 6>improvements especially.

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 3>For new workers.

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 6>They're getting even larger raises. Temp workers are being converted

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 6>to full time, they're doing increasing the multiplier on pensions

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 6>and four one ks. So there's a whole bunch of

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 6>of good economic enhancements that are in the agreement.

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 3>Now you have you used the murder.

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Pensions Keith, I imagine you're talking about people who already had pensions,

0:10:34.440 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 2>who what have been working there since pre two thousand

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 2>and seven. Because I know that Sean Fain, you know

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 2>he wanted a pay increase. He also wanted pensions for

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 2>all the union workers to find benefit pensions.

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And he wanted.

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 2>A four day work week or a thirty two hour

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 2>work week.

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So did he get two out of three?

0:10:54.720 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I just if you want to talk about this stuff,

0:10:57.400 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 6>he didn't. He didn't get Matt, He did not get

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 6>at the thirty two hour work week of the four

0:11:02.800 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 6>day work week. He did not get a return to

0:11:05.840 --> 0:11:09.719
<v Speaker 6>traditional pensions. What he got instead is a larger contribution

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 6>from the company to your four h one k or

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 6>to your pension. All those before, as you said two

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 6>thousand and seven, do have traditional pension, so it's the

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 6>it's the workers hired in the last fifteen years that don't.

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 6>So they instead are going to have a greater contribution,

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 6>greater multiplier.

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I'm guessing this puts the pressure really

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>on GM and Stalantis. What's the how does this playoff

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>from here?

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:11:35.840 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 6>I mean, you know, so the analysts are already crunching

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:43.200
<v Speaker 6>the numbers, and the Emmanuel Rosner over at Dolja Bank

0:11:43.320 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 6>is saying that this would cost Ford six point two

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:49.920
<v Speaker 6>billion over the life of the contract, but it actually

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 6>would cost GM and Stillantis more GM and be over

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 6>seven billion, Stalantis higher in the six billions because they

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.760
<v Speaker 6>have more temporary workers, so there's more temps to give

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 6>raises to, there's more tempts to convert to full time.

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 6>So you know, by going first, Ford was able to

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 6>tailor the agreement to their specific situation. They only have

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 6>two to three percent of the workforce that is temps,

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 6>whereas GM and Stlantis are gms close to closer to

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 6>ten and Stilantis's origin.

0:12:23.320 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 2>Interesting, so does this mean, I mean Ford workers are

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 2>going to go back to the Kentucky plant. They're going

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 2>to start building the bronco again. In Michion and Dearborn.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna, they're gonna, they're gonna put the pressure, in

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 2>that sense, further pressure on GM and Stilantis.

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Do you expect agreements from the other two by the

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>end of the day.

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.320
<v Speaker 6>I don't, actually, I think there's still work to be done.

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.959
<v Speaker 6>And that's an important point that you just made. That

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 6>because back in twenty nineteen when the UAW struck GM,

0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:58.440
<v Speaker 6>when they reached a tentative agreement, the workers did not

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.240
<v Speaker 6>go back to the plants. They didn't open the plants

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 6>again until after that agreement had been ratified by the

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 6>full membership, which took weeks. But in this case, the

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 6>OW is sending the workers forward back to the plants immediately.

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 6>The plants are cranking up today because they want to

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:21.120
<v Speaker 6>do put pressure on GM and Stillantis. You know, the

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 6>losses for each of those companies just from this strike

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 6>are approaching a billion dollars. So and just this week

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 6>the two of them, GM and Stillants had their most

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 6>profitable plants go out on strike. So the costs are

0:13:34.520 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 6>going to escalate more rapidly.

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Now, Oh, so catch us up, Keith, catch us up

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 2>on who's so the Bronco is made of the truck

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 2>assembly plant right in Wayne, Michigan.

0:13:45.280 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 6>Actually, yeah, so what's coming back online? Is that what

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 6>you're asking you at?

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 2>And what's still off? Because I know on Tuesday they

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:56.520
<v Speaker 2>struck the GM plant that makes like the Escalade and

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 2>the Tahoe, right at least one of them, right.

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 6>Yep, yeah at GM. The big plant struck this week

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 6>as the Arlington, Texas plant that makes all the big SUVs,

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 6>Suburban Tahoe, Yukon and Escalade, and that at Stalantis. This

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 6>week it was the RAM pickup truck plant in Sterling Heights, Michigan,

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 6>and that is their most profitable plant for Ford. The

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 6>ones coming back are the Bronco and the Ranger plant.

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 6>That was the one that went down immediately. The one

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 6>that was more recently taken down on October eleventh is

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 6>Kentucky Truck that makes the biggest F series trucks and

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 6>the biggest SUVs, the Lincoln Navigator and the Ford Expedition

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 6>super Duties.

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, twenty five percent seems like a lot to me,

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>even though it's over a number of years. What are

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the auto companies getting here.

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 6>Well, they're getting labor peace, which you know costs something,

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.400
<v Speaker 6>but they're getting richer contracts and they already had the

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 6>highest labor costs, you know, in the industry. So what

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 6>GM said, Mary Barrow, the CEO of GM said during

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 6>their earnings call this week, is they're going to try

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 6>and find offset. They're going to try and do cost

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 6>cuts to you know, make up for this. But you

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 6>know it's, uh, these are expensive deals and and you

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 6>know they're going to have to find a way. So

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 6>what's their costs competitive?

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:15.440
<v Speaker 3>That makes me.

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Worry about the vehicles?

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Ouch, you're going to start So what putting in like

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 2>lower quality parts?

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Is that? That's what I worry about.

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 2>That's what everyone who's buying these cars and trucks. Keith

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 2>I spend a lot of time on the forums right

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.480
<v Speaker 2>of many different brands and they're all like, oh, stay

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 2>away from that.

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Company because they're going to strike.

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 2>And even if they didn't strike, maybe they will and

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 2>workers are going to be unhappy and not do it

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 2>as screw it up. Yeah, but if they cut cost,

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 2>does that mean we're going to have lower quality components.

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 6>Uh, not necessarily. I mean in companies as large as these,

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 6>there's all kinds of waste and redundancy that you can

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 6>work on. I mean they cut by the billions when

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 6>they're cutting costs, and obviously people is one of the

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 6>ways they cut costs. Let's not forget Jim Farley said

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 6>just a year ago that Ford had twenty five percent

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 6>more engineers than its competitors. He's been cutting salaried staff

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 6>by the thousands, so you know there's still probably people

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 6>that he will cut as they continue to move into

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 6>their ev future from their internal combustion engine present.

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>So I know, Keith for the unions, you know, one

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of the ass or demands was something nebulous to me

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>at least, which is, hey, can you guarantee you we're

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 1>going to still have the same number of positions in

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>an evy world that we have in an ice world.

0:16:39.840 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Did they get any language to that effect?

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 6>There is some job security in this and Ford had

0:16:45.000 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 6>told them that they would not lay off anyone during

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.920
<v Speaker 6>the term of this contract, which is four years and

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 6>eight months. In fact, would add to workers, but it's

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 6>not an idle concern by the union. It takes forty

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 6>percent less labor to assemble the power rain of an

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 6>electric vehicle. Then it does an internal combustion engine vehicle,

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:06.359
<v Speaker 6>which has thousands of parts versus about twenty in an

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 6>electric vehicle. So you know that is coming and they

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 6>got to figure out how that's all going to work out.

0:17:12.680 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 2>What do you think this deal looks like to non

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 2>union shops, Keith? Yeah, I think of you know, the

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 2>the BMW plant in Spartanburg or the Tesla plants. My

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 2>X ray was made, your X three was made in

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Spartan Work. Yes, okay, in fact it was very good,

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 2>very cool plant and cool truck.

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I like it a lot.

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 2>But what do you think about those shops? Are they

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 2>going to look at this deal and say, you know,

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 2>we should have a union too, We should be in

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:39.040
<v Speaker 2>the UAW.

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 6>That is what the UAW is counting on. So it

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 6>depends on when you say what does it mean for

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.359
<v Speaker 6>those plants? It depends on who you're talking about. If

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:50.640
<v Speaker 6>you're talking about the companies themselves, the CEOs, I think

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 6>what it means to them is the price of poker

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 6>just went up, and the way they've kept unions out

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 6>of their plants is they've offered you know, equivalent wages

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 6>and benefits. So if the CEOs want to keep the

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 6>unions out of their plans, they're going to have to

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.400
<v Speaker 6>give everybody a raise of those non union plants. If

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 6>they don't, the UAW has a big opening to go

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 6>in and organize them.

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.199
<v Speaker 1>All right, Very good, Keith Anton, thanks so much. We

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that. Keithnton. He is a reporter for Bloomberg News

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in Detroit. He is our go to voice there, and

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:22.680
<v Speaker 1>again we get a deal from Ford and presumably Matt

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>That means Stalantis and GM a little pressure on them

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 1>to get something done because Ford is back out cranking

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>out the trucks.

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 5>Here, you're listening to the tape. Catch a our live program,

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 5>the tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 5>Business App. You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 5>from our flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg eleven thirty dans.

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 7>Welcome to our Bloomberg television and radio audiences. I'm standing

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 7>by now with Morgan Stanley, CEO and Chairman James Gorman

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 7>and incoming CEO Ted pick big moment for morgan Stown.

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 7>Only fourteen years at the home. How does it feel

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 7>to be passing.

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 3>On the baton? Feels great, you know, for several reasons. One,

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 3>it's time organizations grow because you have change. I mean,

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 3>you're not going to grow by doing the same thing

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 3>again and again. And I feel like we set this

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 3>up several years ago with the board. We've had a

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 3>very very intentional process and we ended up with a

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 3>phenomenal outcome, which is Ted. And we've got other unbelievably

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 3>good executives who are taking leadership roles as co presidents

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 3>Andy Sapsin and Dan Sancret. So it's sort of what

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 3>you hope for. I mean, you try and drive strategy,

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 3>you try and put together a team, You try and

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 3>deal with the inevitable knocks that you get from the

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 3>market and the disappointments that come in times in any

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 3>complex business. But at the end of the day, you're

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 3>also trying to hand it off for the next next generation.

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 3>So it feels great and it feels right.

0:19:55.160 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 7>You've been rumored to be a CEO contender for oh

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:59.640
<v Speaker 7>so long, Ted, How does it finally feel to step

0:19:59.640 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 7>into the.

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 8>Next year Shinali. Morgan Stanley was the first place that

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 8>I worked out of college, and thirty three years later,

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 8>I'm sitting next to mister James Gorman.

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.360
<v Speaker 3>It's the thrill of a lifetime. I'm so excited.

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 7>Now you've really inherited a gift here, a massive transformation

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 7>over fourteen years, one of the best valuations here in

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 7>global banking. But there are investors who are worried this

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 7>is as good as it gets.

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 1>What do you tell them?

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 3>There's more to come.

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 8>There's more to come. We look at the five year chart,

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 8>the ten year chart, the fifteen year chart. The wealth

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 8>and ASCID management businesses have these remarkable, durable earnings. The

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 8>Global Investment Bank has lots of miles to go. So

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 8>we're thrilled about the business strategy we have in place

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 8>and it's going to continue to deliver a long term

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 8>value for Sheerald.

0:20:45.520 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 7>Now for both of you, we've been in such a

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 7>prolongedble market that has hit such volatile times as of late.

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 7>Do you expect the next couple of years from Morgan

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 7>Stanley to be a little more choppy?

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 3>You know, I don't know. It's I thought this year

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.880
<v Speaker 3>would be tough than it was a lot of what's

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:04.879
<v Speaker 3>going in the market conspires against our particular business mix.

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Some of the more commercial retail banks mortgage banks very

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 3>different business model. But our term will come. I think,

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, I personally think the US has dodged a recession.

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 3>I think the FED is very close to being final

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 3>within probably twenty five bases points. We're starting to see activity.

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 3>Look at the Chevron deal we just announced the other day.

0:21:25.960 --> 0:21:29.360
<v Speaker 3>I'm in phenomenal, so we're seeing activity in different sectors.

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 3>It's coming alive now. So no, I think the next

0:21:32.359 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 3>couple of years will be great. But what I care

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 3>about is over the really long run. When we set

0:21:37.119 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 3>about on this journey, we weren't focused on a quarter,

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:41.560
<v Speaker 3>and if the stock takes a dip in a quarter,

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:44.400
<v Speaker 3>I say, that's kind of good news because we're buying

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 3>back stock and every share you buy back, you're retiring

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 3>a dividend. So shareholders who hang tough at getting a

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 3>four and a half percent yield and we're buying back

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 3>stock and the stock's cheap, so it's it's kind of

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 3>a good situation being But medium term, no, I think

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 3>we're I think the film is going to do great.

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 7>Ted, what are the biggest challenges for you as you

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:04.400
<v Speaker 7>navigate this environment.

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 8>There's just so much opportunity. We're definitely a new paradigm.

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 8>Interest rates are going to be higher for longer, and

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 8>the world's gotten smaller, which means the clients need advice.

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 8>They need in the wealth and ask and management space,

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 8>they need in the institutional space our corporate clients, and

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:23.359
<v Speaker 8>we're going to have lots of activity around those clients.

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 8>So I just want to make sure that we are

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 8>completely aligned in the business s rategy we have in place.

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:33.679
<v Speaker 8>It's something that James is painstakingly put together for fourteen years.

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 8>The market knows we want to do, so I'm incredibly

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 8>optimistic over the next couple of years.

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 7>A lot of lessons have been learned in this building

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:44.679
<v Speaker 7>over the last several decades. Really what to do, what

0:22:44.760 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 7>not to do? What is the Morgan Stanley playbook of

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.359
<v Speaker 7>what not to do in twenty twenty four as you

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 7>navigate this new environment, Well, I.

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 8>Think it's to continue to do what we've been doing,

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 8>which is to treat each other with respect. This process

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 8>that James and the board ran was intentional, it was respectful.

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 8>I couldn't be more thrilled to be working with Andy

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:08.360
<v Speaker 8>Sappersin and Dan Simkowitz, two of my closest friends. They

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 8>are extraordinary leaders. They're going to drive these businesses. The

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 8>fact that we've worked so collegially, this is the kind

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 8>of Morgan Stanley that we've known and loved, the blue

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 8>Morgan Stanley of respect and focusing on clients. And during

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:24.560
<v Speaker 8>this painstaking process, there's been no loss of focus when

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 8>focused on our shareholders, on our clients. And the fact

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 8>that today we had a celebration with our partners and

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 8>it was really quite a wonderful experience shows that we

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 8>are on the ball and sticking with the future.

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 7>I'm glad you mentioned Andy and Dan because a lot

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 7>of questions here around. You know, they were two CEO candidates.

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.639
<v Speaker 7>Now they're going to be the co president's. How do

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 7>you keep them around? Are you holding them to any

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 7>lock up periods?

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.200
<v Speaker 3>No, They've got phenomenal job opportunities. Andy's co president. He's

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 3>now running not just wealth management which included d Trade,

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 3>but asset management, which includes Seaton Vance. So he's overseen

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.640
<v Speaker 3>the biggest wealth and asset manager in the world at

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 3>what I believe is the most prestigious and best investment

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 3>bank in the world. Dan came out of capital markets

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 3>and is now going back there after a great stint

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:10.040
<v Speaker 3>running asset management, and he's going to be running all

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:16.000
<v Speaker 3>of global trading banking, capital markets his old home turf research,

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 3>and most importantly, the two of them are going to

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 3>work with Ted and helping to manage a firm. So now,

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 3>these are phenomenal opportunities. They're high quality people. These are

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 3>some of the best jobs on the planet, and you know,

0:24:26.600 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 3>we delighted to have them.

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 7>Now, I'm glad you brought up the institutional securities business

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 7>that is your old home as you move to the

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 7>new spot. But you know what's interesting. You've long been

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 7>the number one in equities trading. Lately Goldman has to

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.880
<v Speaker 7>pass Morgan Stanly in a couple of quarters, while JP

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 7>Morgan and Goldman have been fearing better in various forms

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 7>of M and A and underwriting. Do you have a

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 7>plan to be number one again?

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 8>Listen, we have some great competitors, as you know, in

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 8>the global investment bank in equities and fixed income and

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:58.280
<v Speaker 8>then across investment banking. We're focused on being number one.

0:24:58.400 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 8>We want to have the right people in place We've

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 8>been investing for the next cycle. That next cycle is

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 8>going to be investment banking led, and it means that inequities.

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 8>You want to be one or two every quarter as

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 8>we have in for the last decade. We have fixed

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 8>income business, we were structured, it's now top five business

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.479
<v Speaker 8>and investment banking is going to lead the next cycle.

0:25:15.720 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 8>There's going to be a lot of m and a consolidation.

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 8>It's going to be across industry groups. The world's gotten smaller,

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 8>there's a new cost of capital. We want to be

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 8>a leader, a global leader in all those spaces.

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 7>Now, James has hinted before to the possibility of more

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 7>murders and acquisitions for Morgan Stanley moving forward. You've already

0:25:32.600 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 7>done some very transformative ones. Do you feel said that

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 7>it's a matter of time in the CEO seat before

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 7>you can do a significant deal or do you feel

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 7>like you can jump right in.

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think we now have done three major acquisitions

0:25:46.320 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 8>over the last fifteen years, all of which were in

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 8>James's vision. Smith Barney shortly after the financial crisis, e

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:55.400
<v Speaker 8>Trade at the dawn of the pandemic, and they eat

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 8>in advance. Those are three major integrations we like what

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 8>we have, the business strategies in places. Let's execute on

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.359
<v Speaker 8>what we have, keep the strategy in place. We always

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 8>talk about acquisition candidates, but that's that's often to the future.

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 7>The other thing, James has said that there are a

0:26:12.320 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 7>few things you'd rather get out of the way before

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 7>stepping down, including the US investigation into Morgan Stanley's role

0:26:18.840 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 7>into the block trading market. Is this something that can

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 7>be resolved before you step down.

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm going to stay, as you know, Shnali as

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 3>executive chairman for a period of time. We'll see how long.

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 3>You know. Frankly, I shouldn't stay too long because it's

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 3>Ted's job to run the firm now, so I'm going

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:39.440
<v Speaker 3>to be there just to help him in whatever way,

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:42.880
<v Speaker 3>and obviously meet with regulators around the globe. I've got

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 3>to know over the last decade plus and key clients,

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 3>and also in that period there are a few things

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:50.880
<v Speaker 3>I want to still clean up. I want to hand

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 3>I said, as clean a plate as possible. These are

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 3>monster jobs and enormously complex. You travel a lot, there's

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 3>a lot that comes out, so I think it's nice

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 3>to start with a clean plate. We wouldn't have announced

0:27:05.560 --> 0:27:07.919
<v Speaker 3>I was stepping down if we didn't think whatever we

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.280
<v Speaker 3>still have left isn't manageable. I mean, I wanted to

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 3>see seeka through. We came out of that actually with

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 3>a better capital ration than we went into it. Twelve

0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 3>point nine CT one requirement, we're at fifteen to five.

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 3>I want to see the initial BUZZLE proposal. We've seen that.

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it will end up where it is,

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 3>and we're working very closely with regulators. I want to

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 3>see the sort of summer months, obviously difficult quarter. We

0:27:30.680 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 3>knew that was coming, so I wanted to just see

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 3>the firm through that and then through this transitional leadership.

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.119
<v Speaker 3>So no, we're very comfortable with where we are in

0:27:38.160 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 3>the process, and I'll do everything I can to help

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 3>help Ted and help Dan and Andy.

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 7>Now, one large issue that has been plaguing Wall Street

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 7>is the lack of gender and ethnic diversity at the

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.960
<v Speaker 7>top ranks, and when the CEO search had come to

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 7>its final steps, there were no women or people of

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 7>color that were considered for the CEO ranks. What is

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 7>your plan to increase representation in the top ranks of

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:01.880
<v Speaker 7>Morgan Stanley?

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:06.120
<v Speaker 8>The next generation has lots of representation of all types.

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 3>It's a priority. It'll continue to be a priority.

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:11.880
<v Speaker 7>Do you have specific goals over the next few years

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:12.879
<v Speaker 7>to make sure that's.

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 8>You know, Well, we in Oceanize it's a good question.

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 8>We run a meritocracy and diversity comes in all types,

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 8>and we have fantastic women and men from all backgrounds

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 8>in senior positions on operating committees throughout the firm. And

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:29.719
<v Speaker 8>I couldn't be more excited about the look of the

0:28:29.760 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 8>firm in the next five ten years.

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Now.

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 7>I know you've said also that you know largely the

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 7>strategies in place, and it will be continued on into

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 7>the new leadership. There is one thing that is very

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 7>much in the mind of CEOs lately, and that's technological

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:45.959
<v Speaker 7>disruption happening at a rabid clip. How are you thinking

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 7>about how this could change Morgan Stanley and its positioning

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 7>in the future.

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, so, you know, Walda Riston said it best the

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 3>he said the most. I don't think he's totally right

0:28:54.720 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 3>on this, but he observed the most important technological evolution

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 3>for the financial services industry the ATM machine, and each

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 3>generation if you look at it, has embraced technology into

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 3>the businesses to make them better. What Ted did with

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 3>the electronic Trading and Equities so called MSET phenomenal and

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 3>that basically fed all of our trading apparatus that have

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.959
<v Speaker 3>supported that business being again number one or two depending

0:29:19.960 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 3>on the quarter. But right up there what we've done

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 3>with each trade. Each trade's a technology company with a brand.

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:27.440
<v Speaker 3>What we did with share works and what is now

0:29:27.480 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 3>Morgan Santic work the electronic stock plan business and Soling

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 3>we bought Soluing is a company of programmers in Calgary, Canada,

0:29:35.280 --> 0:29:37.719
<v Speaker 3>and that became the birth of the stock plan business.

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 3>So there's always technological revolution. What any Sabastine is now

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 3>doing in the AA space sort of building off the

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 3>early machine learning we did to create virtual financial advisors.

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.320
<v Speaker 3>It's endless. We just had a presentation the board on it.

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 3>So it's in everything we do. We have nearly twenty

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:59.280
<v Speaker 3>thousand employees, direct or consultants working for us in technology.

0:29:59.320 --> 0:30:02.560
<v Speaker 7>Now, before I let you guys go, what is the

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 7>one biggest piece of advice that you have to Ted

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 7>as you pass over the rank.

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Enjoy it. It's an incredible privilege to be able to

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 3>make the call, to make decisions. Sometimes you'll be wrong,

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:17.760
<v Speaker 3>the only way to be right is not to make

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 3>any So I took the approach of I was looking

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 3>for I don't know what the analogy is something at

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 3>bad So I'm not really a baseball player, but I

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 3>wanted to make enough decisions where we got a lot

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 3>of things right and along the way a few things

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 3>mightn't go away, but that's okay. Just enjoy the journey,

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:36.080
<v Speaker 3>embrace the good bits and the bad bits. As you know,

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Kipling said, an if and those imposts of success and failure,

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.479
<v Speaker 3>and you know, keep yourself focused on the long term.

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 3>You're going to have great quarters and you're gonna have

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 3>disappointing quarters. You're going to think the stock should be

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 3>up when it's down and down when it's up. None

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 3>of that matters. What matters is the long term health

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 3>of the franchise, the values, and your own stability in

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 3>that role. And part of that is building a team.

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 3>He's off to a phenomenal start in twenty four hours.

0:31:00.000 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 3>We got a standing ovation from the board. Last night,

0:31:02.760 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 3>we had a wonderful dinner with directors. We had all

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 3>partners live in this building today and broadcast around to

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 3>our eighty three thousand employees. So you know, enjoy the moment.

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 3>It's an incredible privilege.

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 7>Ted James, it was a pleasure to spend time with

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 7>you on such a landmark day. From Morgan Stanley and

0:31:19.520 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 7>hope to see you at the turn of the year

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:21.760
<v Speaker 7>when you take your new job.

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:23.400
<v Speaker 3>Thank you so much. Thanks to note.

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the team Ken's are Live program Bloomberg

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:35.000
<v Speaker 5>the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business app, or listening

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 5>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Stuner heads to Washington, DC. Why because we kind of

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>have to Jen Flinton, she is head of US Government

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Affairs at Invesco joins US. So Jess we I'm sorry, Jen,

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Jen.

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Jen.

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>We actually have a Speaker of the House now. I

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>guess that's a good thing. What are you taking away

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>from I know you're based down in Washington. What are

0:31:57.320 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you taking away from the last couple of days of

0:31:58.840 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen in the House.

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, it's been particularly difficult for House Republicans. It's

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 9>been a rather embarrassing twenty two days, and so I

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 9>think a series of frustrations and blood letting in the

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:21.520
<v Speaker 9>family meetings finally resulted in complete exhaustion, and Mike Johnson,

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 9>who is a fairly well liked member of Congress, although

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 9>relatively unknown outside of Washington, there was unanimous, unanimous can support.

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 9>So I think he came in at the right time,

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 9>and I think a lot is going to be said

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 9>for his ability to move forward. Hopefully he'll be able

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 9>to take that unanimous support and move it into the legislature.

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 2>So does this mean that Donald Trump is now back

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 2>to holding the most sway of the Republican Party, Because

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:58.479
<v Speaker 2>what we do know Mike Johnson for is leading the

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 2>way on that amicus brief to overturn the election results.

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Mike Johnson is an election denier. He doesn't believe that

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 2>American democracy worked in twenty twenty.

0:33:08.840 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't believe that President.

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Biden fairly won the election, and all of the people

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 2>in his party supported a person like that for Speaker

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 2>of the House. Does that mean, well, either none of

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 2>them believe in the US democracy or they're all sort

0:33:22.880 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 2>of heeding the Trumpian call. Well, first, I'll.

0:33:25.720 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 9>Say Donald Trump is the de facto leader of the

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 9>Republican Party. There is no doubt about that. He is

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 9>the former president. He's running for re election, right, and

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 9>he is the leaning candidate in the primary. So you know,

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 9>there's little doubt that Donald Trump is the leader of

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 9>the Republican Party. That being said, he did have some

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 9>sort of force within the last twenty two days putting

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 9>in his support first for Jordan, who failed quite frankly,

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 9>then opposition to Tom Emmer, who had already had about

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 9>twenty six votes against him already. So whether that Sankum

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:04.640
<v Speaker 9>or whether that sort of sealed the deal, I think

0:34:04.760 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 9>is sort of an open question. But moving forward, I

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 9>into twenty twenty four, into an election year, I have

0:34:13.120 --> 0:34:16.720
<v Speaker 9>no doubt that this Republican Conference will be united behind

0:34:16.880 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 9>whoever is the Republican primary candidate, and right now Donald

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 9>Trump is taking a heavy lead there.

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, So where does the Republican Party go?

0:34:26.880 --> 0:34:27.040
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:34:27.080 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Where does the House go? Now? From a legislative perspective, Well, two.

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 9>Things, right, So first, they have to get appropriations bills

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 9>across the House floor, and they need their appropriations bills

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 9>because they are marking to f y twenty two levels.

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:47.240
<v Speaker 9>The Senate is marking to f y twenty three levels.

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:51.319
<v Speaker 9>That is a big disagreement, right, So over the next

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 9>several weeks, you're going to see the House Republicans moving

0:34:55.280 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 9>their House Appropriations bills across the table. That will be

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 9>quite a feat on some of these bills which are

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:08.640
<v Speaker 9>rather controversial to keep that Republican majority united because they

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:10.959
<v Speaker 9>only have a four vote margin, they can only lose

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 9>four or five votes depending on the day, depending on

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:17.439
<v Speaker 9>how many members are in town, and so that will

0:35:17.440 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 9>put them in the negotiating position that they'll need to

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 9>have in order to negotiate with the Senate on government

0:35:22.640 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 9>funding going forward. And then of course there is the

0:35:25.520 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 9>Defense supplemental that the White House sent to the Senate

0:35:28.080 --> 0:35:31.839
<v Speaker 9>last week. It's currently being debated, discussed through hearings, through

0:35:31.880 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 9>regular process in the Senate. I expect the same to

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 9>happen in the House, but that's going to take a

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 9>little bit of time. And that's funding Israel, Ukraine, Indo Pacific,

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 9>the border, and there are going to be a lot

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 9>of disagreements, a lot of controversies around the policy that

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:49.000
<v Speaker 9>surrounds that.

0:35:49.080 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Money in terms of cutting spending. Is there any hope that.

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:59.279
<v Speaker 2>These Republicans, Republicans are going to be able to rein

0:35:59.360 --> 0:36:02.760
<v Speaker 2>it in after we've seen you know, basically deficits. Since

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Bill Clinton, say what you will about the flandering of

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 2>William Jefferson, Clinton, at least he balanced the budget, right,

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Is there any hope that something like that happens ever

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 2>again in our lifetimes? Jen, that's right.

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 9>And Bill Clinton came together with House Republicans with Nuke

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:24.720
<v Speaker 9>Gingrich and was able to do that really in a

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:32.760
<v Speaker 9>bipartisan way. I don't necessarily see that sort of work

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:37.840
<v Speaker 9>being done between the White House and this Republican conference

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:42.280
<v Speaker 9>in the House. I do think, though, we will see

0:36:43.280 --> 0:36:46.839
<v Speaker 9>it's going to naturally happen because of the debt ceiling deal.

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 9>The parameter set forth. Either there was a one percent

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:54.879
<v Speaker 9>cut across the board starting January first, or they are

0:36:54.920 --> 0:36:58.160
<v Speaker 9>able to come to some sort of agreement on appropriations

0:36:58.360 --> 0:37:00.960
<v Speaker 9>that is going to lower the life levels of spending.

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 9>Because you're right, we're facing a thirty three trillion dollar

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 9>national debt, over one billion dollars a day in interest payments.

0:37:09.160 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 9>The numbers came in on our deficit this year, it's

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 9>about two trillion dollars. That's more than we are two

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:19.799
<v Speaker 9>trillion more than we're bringing in, right, We're spending that's

0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:20.640
<v Speaker 9>a real problem.

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Much more than reticipated overs Yes, exactly, wow into a

0:37:26.680 --> 0:37:29.440
<v Speaker 2>five percent gdp Q three exactly. It's not like we're

0:37:29.440 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 2>trying to spend ourselves out of a recession here. I mean,

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 2>this economy is on Faija in.

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Feego, so jen, is there any reason to believe that

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this new speaker will have any more success than the

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:43.439
<v Speaker 1>prior speaker in terms of dealing with the extreme right

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in the party, whether it's those you know, six seven

0:37:45.640 --> 0:37:47.720
<v Speaker 1>people whoever there are. He's just dealing with himself.

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Yeah, that's a.

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 9>Sixty four thousand dollars question, right. I mean, this member

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:54.799
<v Speaker 9>has only ever had to speak for himself and for

0:37:54.920 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 9>his constituencies in Louisiana. He has held a leadership position

0:38:00.160 --> 0:38:03.200
<v Speaker 9>in the sense he was vice chair prior to the speakership.

0:38:03.440 --> 0:38:06.960
<v Speaker 9>So he's been at the leadership table, He's heard the strategy,

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:10.879
<v Speaker 9>he's been part of that discussion. So he's coming in

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:15.319
<v Speaker 9>with some context, some awareness, and he certainly had to

0:38:15.440 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 9>understand the factions and what he needed to do in

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 9>order to bring together the members of this conference in

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 9>order to get to the speakership. I think going forward,

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 9>he has suggested in his run for speakership earlier this

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:33.399
<v Speaker 9>week with the conference, he has suggested that he wants

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 9>to pass a CR into January or April April fifteenth,

0:38:38.600 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 9>which is another magic deadline as regards to budget, in

0:38:42.960 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 9>order to get that leverage for Republicans in the House

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:49.319
<v Speaker 9>to really negotiate with the Senate. This is going to

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:52.799
<v Speaker 9>be his first test. This will be key to show

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 9>whether or not he can bring this conference together.

0:38:55.880 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Jen, thank you so much for joining us.

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Really appreciate getting your insight. Jenny for Flinton, head of

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>US Government Affairs for Invesco. Before joining Invesco, she spent

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time in Congress as working for actually

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a Congressman Patrick McHenry in his office, so lots of

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:14.759
<v Speaker 1>experience there.

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:18.160
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape catch are live program Bloomberg

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 5>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:39:33.719 --> 0:39:35.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, here's some economics for you. We had the

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 1>GDP print today. Matt Right, four point nine percent thinks great,

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>But then you go look ahead and you see a

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 1>company like United Parcel Service. These folks, they see the

0:39:45.239 --> 0:39:48.359
<v Speaker 1>economy every single day on the ground, they put up

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:52.520
<v Speaker 1>disappointing numbers. Cut the forecast again. To me, that's the

0:39:52.600 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 1>number to before. I mean, you don't even have to

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 1>look ahead.

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:39:54.800 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 2>They did cut their outlook for the second time in

0:39:58.200 --> 0:40:01.600
<v Speaker 2>less than three months, but even backward looking, it was horrible.

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Annual EPs came in at a dollar fifty seven, down

0:40:05.680 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 2>forty seven percent from a year ago.

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, they got to pay their pilots more now, right,

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:11.279
<v Speaker 1>didn't they have that new contract? I don't think let's

0:40:11.320 --> 0:40:12.880
<v Speaker 1>bring it. So many of those about this, like Lee Clasical,

0:40:13.000 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 1>he covers all the transportation stuff. We blamed him for

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain thing back a couple of years ago.

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Now he got to fix that. He's with Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:24.960
<v Speaker 1>joining us live here in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker's studio

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a lead. What did you really hear from UPS and

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:29.840
<v Speaker 1>their earnings and kind of their outlook?

0:40:30.160 --> 0:40:31.719
<v Speaker 10>Well, I mean, at the end of the day, they

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 10>had a tough slog with their labor negotiation. They lost

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 10>a lot of business to FedEx and another carriers. They're

0:40:39.120 --> 0:40:42.319
<v Speaker 10>in the process of winning that business back. You know,

0:40:42.320 --> 0:40:46.839
<v Speaker 10>they've won probably around six hundred thousand packages per day

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 10>back of what they lost and it's going to take

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 10>some time for them to get it all back. The

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 10>good news is that some of the sequential changes that

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:58.719
<v Speaker 10>they saw from August to October, which August was the

0:40:58.760 --> 0:41:01.080
<v Speaker 10>hardest hit from that labor even in terms of volumes

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:05.240
<v Speaker 10>going away, you know, they're seeing seasonal trends well above

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 10>what they normal normally see. They said that that volume

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 10>during that time period sequentially was up round two point

0:41:11.680 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 10>seven million packages a day. In last year that was

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 10>around one point five million packages a day. So it's

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 10>definitely they're they're definitely turning in the right direction. But

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:24.240
<v Speaker 10>you know, the streets got to readjust their models. Fourth

0:41:24.280 --> 0:41:27.560
<v Speaker 10>quarter expectations are definitely going to have to come in.

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:32.479
<v Speaker 10>You know, they provide full year guidance, which, as you mentioned, they.

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 1>Had to lower it again.

0:41:34.360 --> 0:41:37.160
<v Speaker 10>But when you look at the imply what that means

0:41:37.160 --> 0:41:40.240
<v Speaker 10>for the fourth quarter earnings expectations and the EPs bases

0:41:40.280 --> 0:41:42.840
<v Speaker 10>are going to have to come down anywhere between twenty five.

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And thirty cents.

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 2>Well we care about I mean you care about UPS

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 2>for the sake of UPS and their competition. We care

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 2>about it mostly, I would say, for their view on

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:56.839
<v Speaker 2>the economy, right, because if things are going well, we're

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:59.439
<v Speaker 2>going to be shipping packages back and forth. If they're

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:02.759
<v Speaker 2>losing out to competitors, that's one thing. But if they

0:42:02.760 --> 0:42:06.160
<v Speaker 2>have a dour outlook because they expect the economy to slow,

0:42:06.480 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 2>that's another.

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Which is it? Yeah?

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:11.279
<v Speaker 10>I think you know, UPS is obviously about weather for

0:42:11.320 --> 0:42:15.120
<v Speaker 10>the global economy. They have businesses everywhere around the world.

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 10>They ship everything you can imagine, and probably things you

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:18.879
<v Speaker 10>can imagine.

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:20.719
<v Speaker 2>But I think I would love to hear the like

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:22.960
<v Speaker 2>top ten craziest things UPS shipped?

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, why don't we do a top ten list? Ever, Paul, Yeah,

0:42:27.000 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been done before. Yeah.

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, anyhow, I.

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 10>Think the weakness that you're seeing in the fourth quarter,

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 10>about a third of it is probably macro driven and

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:38.120
<v Speaker 10>two thirds of it is UPS specific.

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Excellent, That's exactly what I was wondering. So two thirds

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 2>of it is company specific or industry specific, and a

0:42:44.719 --> 0:42:46.320
<v Speaker 2>third of it is the economy.

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:46.719
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:49.360
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, because I mean they're really dealing with the loss

0:42:49.360 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 10>share that they had. I mean, you have these huge networks.

0:42:51.760 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 10>There's a huge there's a dally averaging effect, right, So

0:42:54.560 --> 0:42:57.839
<v Speaker 10>the less density you have, the more expensive it is

0:42:57.880 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 10>per package.

0:42:59.360 --> 0:43:01.920
<v Speaker 1>So how do you win back business just on price

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 1>price service?

0:43:05.200 --> 0:43:07.800
<v Speaker 10>You know, the company during their call was very adamant

0:43:07.800 --> 0:43:10.440
<v Speaker 10>about the fact that they are not using price to

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 10>entice people back. Maybe they're giving a slight discount, but

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:17.239
<v Speaker 10>they're not going into a deep discount because the end

0:43:17.280 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 10>of the day, they have to pay for that new

0:43:19.239 --> 0:43:22.799
<v Speaker 10>labor agreement. It's a five year deal. A lot of

0:43:22.840 --> 0:43:26.160
<v Speaker 10>it is it's front loaded, something like forty five forty

0:43:26.200 --> 0:43:29.600
<v Speaker 10>eight percent of it is in the first year, so

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:33.120
<v Speaker 10>you know they need to really offset that cost and

0:43:33.160 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 10>that's going to be a headwind for them going through

0:43:35.960 --> 0:43:37.560
<v Speaker 10>the first half of next year.

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 2>How how does their labor costs look compared to others?

0:43:42.040 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 2>And the reason I'm asking is you mentioned service, right,

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:47.960
<v Speaker 2>They're going to deliver better service if their employees are

0:43:47.960 --> 0:43:53.120
<v Speaker 2>better paid. And you know, in less stressful working conditions,

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 2>have air conditioning in their trucks or heating in the winter,

0:43:57.080 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 2>are they in a good setup in that way?

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 10>You know, when you look at ups and you look

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:05.279
<v Speaker 10>at FedEx, there are two different models. FedEx as the

0:44:05.280 --> 0:44:07.920
<v Speaker 10>independent contractor model. Even if you look at Amazon, Amazon

0:44:07.920 --> 0:44:11.880
<v Speaker 10>has an independent contract model. You know what it benefits

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 10>UPS is they have stability in their workforce. They have

0:44:15.120 --> 0:44:17.719
<v Speaker 10>a place where people probably want to come because they're

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:20.360
<v Speaker 10>making more and now and maybe they're not making so

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:22.919
<v Speaker 10>much more from a dollar standpoint, but when it's all

0:44:23.239 --> 0:44:26.600
<v Speaker 10>said and done and benefits pension all that stuff, it's

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 10>a place where people not only want to work, but

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 10>they probably want to work their whole careers. Versus a

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 10>FedEx or an Amazon where the employees are really it's

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:39.520
<v Speaker 10>really a track transaction, if you will. They're just there

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 10>for the paycheck and if they find something better, they're

0:44:42.120 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 10>off to the highest bidder.

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:45.840
<v Speaker 2>To me, that would I mean as a customer, I

0:44:45.840 --> 0:44:48.040
<v Speaker 2>would rather than use UPS, you know.

0:44:48.160 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you get a relationship with your delivery guy exactly. Yeah.

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:54.840
<v Speaker 1>And they have a cool uniform. Yeah, I like the

0:44:54.840 --> 0:44:57.680
<v Speaker 1>brown So are we going to put air conditioning in

0:44:57.719 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the trucks now?

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:02.760
<v Speaker 10>They're putting the fans air conditioning all that sort of stuff.

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Why didn't they in the past.

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 10>They just you see them on the road. They just

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 10>to open the doors, you know, and and you know.

0:45:10.800 --> 0:45:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Listen, it's at the end of the discuys are down

0:45:12.480 --> 0:45:14.719
<v Speaker 1>in Texas where it's like three hundred degrees out. I mean,

0:45:14.800 --> 0:45:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't care changing it. They're changing.

0:45:17.120 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, they expect global warming to happen like this.

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 2>Nobody told them it was going to happen like that.

0:45:22.080 --> 0:45:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Who knew exactly?

0:45:23.440 --> 0:45:25.359
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's let's step back a little bit from

0:45:25.400 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>ups just kind of your space in general. You do

0:45:28.120 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the big ocean shipping container, the railroads, the trucks,

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 1>everything in between. Talk to us about just how is

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it out there in the transportation space. Are you guys,

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 1>are your companies seeing a slow down? And if so,

0:45:41.160 --> 0:45:41.800
<v Speaker 1>how pronounced?

0:45:41.920 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 10>Well, we've been in a freight recession for for over

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:45.120
<v Speaker 10>a year now.

0:45:45.320 --> 0:45:48.319
<v Speaker 1>Now, that was just tough comps. Tough comps.

0:45:49.360 --> 0:45:51.719
<v Speaker 10>You know, there were certain aspects of the market that

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 10>were down a lot more. You know, what we're seeing

0:45:54.560 --> 0:45:58.000
<v Speaker 10>now is that, you know, the freight recovery will probably

0:45:58.080 --> 0:46:01.960
<v Speaker 10>lead the economic recovery, and the freight recession should probably

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:04.800
<v Speaker 10>come nearer to an end in the first quarter because

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:07.880
<v Speaker 10>of easier comps, assuming we have some sort of GDP growth.

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 10>You know, it doesn't have to be stellar growth. It

0:46:09.800 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 10>could be low single digit growth. You know, assuming that's

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:15.880
<v Speaker 10>the case, we should come out of this funk. And

0:46:15.920 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 10>what's this done. What this is done is really of

0:46:18.719 --> 0:46:22.080
<v Speaker 10>depressed rates across the board. So if you're looking at

0:46:22.120 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 10>trucking rates, liner rates there are, they are very very

0:46:25.360 --> 0:46:27.320
<v Speaker 10>very very low. And it's you know, for some of

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:31.040
<v Speaker 10>these markets, especially trucking and the container liner market, it's

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:33.200
<v Speaker 10>really hard to figure out what's going to bring rates

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:36.399
<v Speaker 10>up because there's a lot of downward pressure because there's

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:39.000
<v Speaker 10>just so much supply out there. Why is there supplying

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 10>I mean, well on the ocean liner.

0:46:41.600 --> 0:46:43.880
<v Speaker 1>On everybody wanted capacity, right everybody.

0:46:43.920 --> 0:46:48.840
<v Speaker 10>People are buying capacity. You know, capacity growth is expected

0:46:48.880 --> 0:46:52.080
<v Speaker 10>to outpace demand growth by something like five hundred to

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:55.480
<v Speaker 10>six hundred basis points this year and next year. And

0:46:55.520 --> 0:46:58.400
<v Speaker 10>then you know you have rates that were you know,

0:46:58.400 --> 0:46:59.880
<v Speaker 10>they're down like seventy percent.

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:01.600
<v Speaker 1>If you wanted to ship.

0:47:01.320 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Your car now now is no problem now, Yeah, but

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:07.600
<v Speaker 2>I had to sell it. Yes, it's a horrible it's

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 2>and if you wait.

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 10>You'll probably if you want to wait, you probably get

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:12.720
<v Speaker 10>even a better rate because because liner rates, there's really

0:47:12.920 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 10>no net for liner rates right now, trucking is a

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:18.080
<v Speaker 10>different story of supply is coming out of the market,

0:47:18.120 --> 0:47:19.640
<v Speaker 10>which should go well for truck rates.

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:21.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, Lee, great stuff. As always Lee clasical. He

0:47:21.960 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 1>is a senior transportation analyst logistics all that could stuff

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence based on in Prince University, been making

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:30.600
<v Speaker 1>his way here to New York. We appreciate that.

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape. Cans are live program Bloomberg

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:37.640
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:47:37.680 --> 0:47:40.879
<v Speaker 5>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:47:40.960 --> 0:47:43.759
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:47:43.800 --> 0:47:48.800
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa, play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:47:49.880 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>A lot of I'd say you, here's the story that's

0:47:51.640 --> 0:47:53.560
<v Speaker 1>got my attention of the past couple of days. This

0:47:53.600 --> 0:47:57.279
<v Speaker 1>is going to be fascinating. Sam bankmin Freed, He's going

0:47:57.360 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to testify in his trial on on behalf to try to,

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:04.279
<v Speaker 1>I guess, counteract some of the negative testimony from some

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of his former colleagues and friends and girlfriends. I don't

0:48:06.960 --> 0:48:08.879
<v Speaker 1>know what's going on there, but Max Chaffckin he knows.

0:48:09.040 --> 0:48:11.800
<v Speaker 1>He's a calmnist for Bloomberg Business Week, Max, this sounds

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:15.120
<v Speaker 1>really risky from my perspective. What do you make of it?

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:17.680
<v Speaker 11>Well, so, you know, as you say, and as you're

0:48:17.719 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 11>hinting at, criminal defense attorneys generally do not advise their

0:48:21.520 --> 0:48:24.120
<v Speaker 11>clients to testify in their own defense, especially in a

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:29.360
<v Speaker 11>case like this. Sam Bankminfried, though, is not a traditional client,

0:48:29.480 --> 0:48:32.000
<v Speaker 11>and as we know, anyone who's followed this story knows

0:48:32.280 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 11>that he spent a lot of the weeks after the

0:48:35.480 --> 0:48:39.320
<v Speaker 11>fall of FTX and even after his own arrest, giving

0:48:39.400 --> 0:48:42.520
<v Speaker 11>interviews talking to pretty much anyone under the sun, saying

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 11>all kinds of sort of half cocked, probably legally ill

0:48:47.320 --> 0:48:50.719
<v Speaker 11>advised things, including that he you know, fed up and

0:48:51.520 --> 0:48:54.880
<v Speaker 11>I'm quoting there and so. So again, this is not

0:48:54.960 --> 0:48:58.200
<v Speaker 11>a traditional client, and we're probably not going to see

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:00.919
<v Speaker 11>a traditional defense or traditional testimony from him.

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:03.520
<v Speaker 2>What have we seen so far? I mean, has the

0:49:03.640 --> 0:49:07.360
<v Speaker 2>testimony been so damning that putting himself on the stand,

0:49:07.480 --> 0:49:09.319
<v Speaker 2>or that a lawyer putting him on the stand is

0:49:09.320 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 2>the best the defense team can do?

0:49:10.840 --> 0:49:13.120
<v Speaker 11>I mean, I think again, I'm not on the jury,

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:16.960
<v Speaker 11>and so it's always hard to speculate, but it has

0:49:16.960 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 11>seemed from the outside to be pretty damning. I mean,

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:24.879
<v Speaker 11>we've seen basically his closest friends and senior executive team

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 11>all get up there on the stand and talk not

0:49:27.880 --> 0:49:31.480
<v Speaker 11>just in detail, saying that yes, the crimes that the

0:49:31.760 --> 0:49:34.200
<v Speaker 11>you know, that the state is charging did occur, Sam

0:49:34.239 --> 0:49:37.960
<v Speaker 11>Banganfreed did them, but producing essentially mountains of evidence showing

0:49:38.120 --> 0:49:41.839
<v Speaker 11>Bankman Fried's direct involvement. So we've seen messages, we've seen

0:49:41.880 --> 0:49:46.239
<v Speaker 11>Google docs, we've seen these very specific accounts, particularly from

0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:49.680
<v Speaker 11>Caroline Ellison, who was the CEO of Allimeter Research that

0:49:49.719 --> 0:49:52.799
<v Speaker 11>was Bankman Freed's hedge fund and his ex girlfriend. You

0:49:52.840 --> 0:49:55.400
<v Speaker 11>know that they produced this kind of chain of balance

0:49:55.440 --> 0:50:00.279
<v Speaker 11>sheets that Sam Bankwetfried was was very active in. So yeah, yeah,

0:50:00.440 --> 0:50:02.279
<v Speaker 11>it has not looked good for what.

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Has been his I guess defense in this what's he

0:50:07.200 --> 0:50:08.520
<v Speaker 1>claiming or what's I don't know?

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Well already told us up there.

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:13.759
<v Speaker 11>There are aspects of the defense that look like a

0:50:13.800 --> 0:50:15.600
<v Speaker 11>traditional white collar defense. You know a lot of times

0:50:15.640 --> 0:50:18.280
<v Speaker 11>in white collar defense is what the person who's accused

0:50:18.280 --> 0:50:20.560
<v Speaker 11>will try to do is present is very complicated. There's

0:50:20.600 --> 0:50:22.239
<v Speaker 11>a lot of ins, a lot of outs. You know,

0:50:22.600 --> 0:50:24.600
<v Speaker 11>this is you know, complicated stuff. And I was doing

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:28.399
<v Speaker 11>my best, didn't mean to commit fraud. There is some

0:50:28.480 --> 0:50:31.000
<v Speaker 11>of that here, but there's also been an effort to

0:50:31.080 --> 0:50:33.560
<v Speaker 11>essentially blame everybody other than him, And that's the part

0:50:33.640 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 11>that I'd say is probably legally, you.

0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Know, less well advised.

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:38.920
<v Speaker 11>He spent a lot of time in interviews ahead of this,

0:50:39.000 --> 0:50:41.080
<v Speaker 11>and we've seen some of this come out during the trial,

0:50:41.280 --> 0:50:43.520
<v Speaker 11>essentially blaming Carolyn Ellison.

0:50:43.480 --> 0:50:44.880
<v Speaker 1>For for the for the fraud.

0:50:44.760 --> 0:50:48.160
<v Speaker 11>Or blaming his lawyers, or blaming you know, outside counsel

0:50:48.440 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 11>and so on, and again it hasn't seemed especially credible

0:50:51.680 --> 0:50:54.719
<v Speaker 11>because the prosecutors have been able to produce you know,

0:50:54.800 --> 0:50:57.200
<v Speaker 11>emails and so on showing that he was very involved.

0:50:57.320 --> 0:50:59.160
<v Speaker 11>And also, you know, it's not exactly a good look

0:50:59.160 --> 0:51:01.400
<v Speaker 11>when the CEO is saying, oh no, this is just

0:51:01.400 --> 0:51:04.160
<v Speaker 11>my underling's fault, especially the CEO who at one time

0:51:04.239 --> 0:51:06.759
<v Speaker 11>you know, had personally enriched himself to the extent that

0:51:06.800 --> 0:51:08.920
<v Speaker 11>Sam bankman Fried had done. So he you know, we've

0:51:09.000 --> 0:51:11.640
<v Speaker 11>learned of a billion dollars in personal loans, you know,

0:51:11.640 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 11>three hundred million dollars in luxury real estate, and the

0:51:15.040 --> 0:51:16.040
<v Speaker 11>list kind of goes on and on.

0:51:16.680 --> 0:51:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Is there any chance and I don't know that this

0:51:19.040 --> 0:51:22.040
<v Speaker 2>matters in terms of this current court decision, But is

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:25.840
<v Speaker 2>there is there a chance that people who lost money

0:51:25.880 --> 0:51:29.680
<v Speaker 2>in FTX or made whole because of you know, moonshot

0:51:29.920 --> 0:51:32.719
<v Speaker 2>investments that they made that now look like they may

0:51:32.760 --> 0:51:33.239
<v Speaker 2>pay off.

0:51:33.480 --> 0:51:36.359
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I mean, I think it's it's definitely too soon

0:51:36.440 --> 0:51:39.440
<v Speaker 11>to say made whole. I think it's looking increasingly likely

0:51:39.960 --> 0:51:42.799
<v Speaker 11>that some money at least will be recovered. You're I

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:45.160
<v Speaker 11>think you're alluding to Anthropic, which was this kind of

0:51:45.520 --> 0:51:48.560
<v Speaker 11>moonshot AI investment is now you know, there are rumors

0:51:49.080 --> 0:51:51.239
<v Speaker 11>valuations being tossed around in the in the tens of

0:51:51.239 --> 0:51:55.279
<v Speaker 11>billions of dollars. The issue is that there's a lot

0:51:55.320 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 11>of these assets are not highly traded, so it's it's

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:01.480
<v Speaker 11>sort of hard to know, like if they started selling them,

0:52:01.800 --> 0:52:02.759
<v Speaker 11>what would happen to the price?

0:52:02.840 --> 0:52:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Where were they go?

0:52:03.440 --> 0:52:06.360
<v Speaker 11>And even even with a case of anthropic, right, you

0:52:06.400 --> 0:52:08.840
<v Speaker 11>can't just go and sell that stake on the open market.

0:52:09.000 --> 0:52:10.680
<v Speaker 11>A lot of this stuff will take a long time

0:52:10.719 --> 0:52:13.520
<v Speaker 11>to unwind, the economy can change and so on.

0:52:13.680 --> 0:52:15.360
<v Speaker 1>The other thing is the question.

0:52:15.160 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 11>Of whether or not investors can be made whole isn't

0:52:17.560 --> 0:52:19.120
<v Speaker 11>really relevant to Sam bankman.

0:52:18.880 --> 0:52:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Free, it's not relevant. But yeah, I mean Matt Levine

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:25.200
<v Speaker 2>has written about if you defraud somebody and that person

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:29.120
<v Speaker 2>never gets her money back, you know you're gonna be

0:52:29.160 --> 0:52:31.719
<v Speaker 2>in trouble. But if you defraud someone and she does

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:35.120
<v Speaker 2>get her money back, it's gonna be less bad. Yeah.

0:52:35.200 --> 0:52:38.319
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, And and perhaps you know that will impact how

0:52:38.360 --> 0:52:41.480
<v Speaker 11>Sam bankman Free's legacy, you know, is perceived and so on.

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:43.799
<v Speaker 11>I don't think it's gonna have an impact on this

0:52:43.880 --> 0:52:48.319
<v Speaker 11>case because again, the jury isn't hearing this stuff. And

0:52:48.600 --> 0:52:51.800
<v Speaker 11>again the charges are did Sam bankman Free take customer

0:52:51.840 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 11>money and gamble it?

0:52:52.680 --> 0:52:54.799
<v Speaker 1>The fact that you gambled it, and maybe.

0:52:54.480 --> 0:52:59.279
<v Speaker 11>One doesn't necessarily you know, address the central allegation. And

0:52:59.320 --> 0:53:01.680
<v Speaker 11>again there are allegations here. You know, we're going to

0:53:01.760 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 11>have a second trial around campaign finance violations that stuff.

0:53:05.719 --> 0:53:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Can you know, he could go to jail for a

0:53:07.200 --> 0:53:07.520
<v Speaker 1>long time.

0:53:07.560 --> 0:53:09.600
<v Speaker 11>There's the Chinese bribery allegation.

0:53:09.760 --> 0:53:12.120
<v Speaker 2>So there's a bunch of these are separate trials.

0:53:12.239 --> 0:53:13.400
<v Speaker 1>There are two separate trials.

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Yes, so what's the timeline look like for this one?

0:53:17.200 --> 0:53:20.520
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So we're gonna see Bank and Freed likely start

0:53:20.560 --> 0:53:25.560
<v Speaker 11>testifying today, that'll go into tomorrow, probably early next week.

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:29.160
<v Speaker 11>I mean, we the jury could begin deliberating next week.

0:53:29.200 --> 0:53:31.719
<v Speaker 11>We could have a verdict as as early as next week,

0:53:31.719 --> 0:53:34.880
<v Speaker 11>although it seems possible it could go onto our reporters

0:53:34.920 --> 0:53:37.680
<v Speaker 11>allowed in the courtroom, Yes, okay, public is allowed in

0:53:37.680 --> 0:53:39.640
<v Speaker 11>the courtroom. We have we have a team of people

0:53:40.280 --> 0:53:43.480
<v Speaker 11>down there there. They've been reporting on this, you know, relentlessly.

0:53:44.360 --> 0:53:46.880
<v Speaker 11>You can read it on on Bloomergeck Tom at the terminal.

0:53:47.640 --> 0:53:49.680
<v Speaker 11>General Public's also in there. So we've seen kind of

0:53:49.680 --> 0:53:54.799
<v Speaker 11>a weird rotating list of kind of crypto figures and influencers.

0:53:54.880 --> 0:53:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Martin Screlly was was there early on.

0:53:57.560 --> 0:53:59.680
<v Speaker 11>You know, it's it's it's sort of been a you know,

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:01.040
<v Speaker 11>a of weird reality.

0:54:01.440 --> 0:54:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is really to a certain then I wonder,

0:54:04.520 --> 0:54:07.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, crypto is this in a to what extent?

0:54:07.840 --> 0:54:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Is this an indictment or of the crypto space? I mean,

0:54:11.320 --> 0:54:12.720
<v Speaker 1>is it seen that way by people?

0:54:13.080 --> 0:54:13.239
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:54:13.280 --> 0:54:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's you know, it depends what you talk to.

0:54:15.000 --> 0:54:16.640
<v Speaker 11>You So you talk to people in the industry, right,

0:54:16.680 --> 0:54:18.800
<v Speaker 11>they have been very keen and you've seen the industry

0:54:19.000 --> 0:54:21.319
<v Speaker 11>really like they have been some of the most aggressive

0:54:21.320 --> 0:54:23.600
<v Speaker 11>people in calling out Sam Bankman free because because they

0:54:23.600 --> 0:54:25.120
<v Speaker 11>want to make an effort to say, hey, look, this

0:54:25.239 --> 0:54:28.479
<v Speaker 11>was a bad actor, you know, bad apple, He's making

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:29.200
<v Speaker 11>us look bad.

0:54:29.920 --> 0:54:30.920
<v Speaker 2>I think in the minds.

0:54:30.719 --> 0:54:33.279
<v Speaker 11>Of normal investors, in the minds of the public, right

0:54:33.360 --> 0:54:35.040
<v Speaker 11>that arguments a little harder because.

0:54:34.760 --> 0:54:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bankman freed.

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:39.120
<v Speaker 11>His whole thing was that he was the most law abiding,

0:54:39.680 --> 0:54:41.879
<v Speaker 11>least sketchy. I mean, this is a world that has

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:44.600
<v Speaker 11>operated kind of on the edges of various laws in

0:54:45.040 --> 0:54:47.040
<v Speaker 11>all over the world. So so again it's I think

0:54:47.080 --> 0:54:50.000
<v Speaker 11>it's really too early to know how the what the

0:54:50.040 --> 0:54:52.000
<v Speaker 11>impact is going to be on crypto broadly, and I

0:54:52.000 --> 0:54:53.640
<v Speaker 11>think some of that has to do with, frankly, the

0:54:53.760 --> 0:54:56.640
<v Speaker 11>verdict and and and depending on what the jury says,

0:54:56.680 --> 0:54:58.919
<v Speaker 11>I think will will affect how people probably, I mean, can.

0:54:58.840 --> 0:55:01.440
<v Speaker 2>He dude, you got to think that, you know, just

0:55:01.440 --> 0:55:04.600
<v Speaker 2>because Bernie Madoff committed a big sixty five billion dollar

0:55:05.000 --> 0:55:08.720
<v Speaker 2>fraud with an investment Ponzi scheme, that's not an indictment

0:55:08.800 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 2>of the US stock market and certainly not of the

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:14.800
<v Speaker 2>US dollar, right right, right exactly, although I could see

0:55:15.040 --> 0:55:18.839
<v Speaker 2>that because crypto is so difficult to understand, because it's

0:55:18.880 --> 0:55:23.239
<v Speaker 2>not clear yet whether much or even any of these

0:55:23.280 --> 0:55:25.520
<v Speaker 2>coins are gonna be worth something in five or ten years.

0:55:25.640 --> 0:55:29.359
<v Speaker 2>People might very easily conflate the two.

0:55:29.719 --> 0:55:32.439
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, absolutely, I mean it was an indictment of Ponzi schemes, right,

0:55:32.520 --> 0:55:35.000
<v Speaker 11>And and the UH and the crypto critics are gonna

0:55:35.080 --> 0:55:37.960
<v Speaker 11>are gonna essentially say that there there are businesses out

0:55:37.960 --> 0:55:40.640
<v Speaker 11>there that are operating in ways that aren't necessarily that

0:55:40.840 --> 0:55:43.960
<v Speaker 11>different from UH from the way ftx's offer.

0:55:44.040 --> 0:55:46.480
<v Speaker 1>And this guy's facing real jail time, right, what it's.

0:55:46.600 --> 0:55:49.359
<v Speaker 11>I mean, it's he faces a potential life sentence. Wow,

0:55:49.800 --> 0:55:52.239
<v Speaker 11>the I mean effective life sentence. It's gonna be so

0:55:52.320 --> 0:55:54.080
<v Speaker 11>many years that it would be, you know, he'd be

0:55:54.239 --> 0:55:56.319
<v Speaker 11>old or deceased by the time he got out.

0:55:56.880 --> 0:55:58.080
<v Speaker 1>We don't really know, you know.

0:55:58.120 --> 0:56:01.680
<v Speaker 11>Of course, there's there's a wide potential range of potential sentences.

0:56:02.640 --> 0:56:04.759
<v Speaker 11>You're talking about anywhere from years to decades. And of

0:56:04.800 --> 0:56:08.000
<v Speaker 11>course he could be acquitted. Whatever happens with this case,

0:56:08.040 --> 0:56:10.719
<v Speaker 11>I think they're definitely gonna be appeals. And there is

0:56:10.840 --> 0:56:14.040
<v Speaker 11>this second trial, the second criminal trial, which also carries

0:56:14.040 --> 0:56:15.480
<v Speaker 11>significant jail.

0:56:15.280 --> 0:56:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Tourn all right, man, great stuff, Max, Thanks for joining

0:56:17.560 --> 0:56:20.000
<v Speaker 1>us here. Max Chaffick he's a columnist for Bloomberg BusinessWeek.

0:56:21.440 --> 0:56:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:56:24.600 --> 0:56:28.360
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:56:28.440 --> 0:56:32.160
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:56:32.360 --> 0:56:35.480
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three and on ball.

0:56:35.280 --> 0:56:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Sweeney, I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:56:38.200 --> 0:56:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.