WEBVTT - MLB: Leading Off July 20th, 2022 (Ep. 556)

0:00:00.400 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>A Stantonian blast. Let's play ball. Welcome in everybody to

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>fantasy pros. This is leading off brought to by bet MGM.

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>The King of sports books is be Joey p Joe

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>pi Zepeda with me today, as always is the Welsh,

0:00:24.840 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and of course it's you. And today we're gonna recap

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>what happened in the All Star Game. We're gonna look

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>ahead to our rest of season ranks, our top twenty

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>five starting pitchers. We're also gonna talk about maybe the

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>top ten to fifteen who knows how many assets in

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Major League Baseball that we want on our fantasy teams

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.599
<v Speaker 1>for keeper leagues and or dynasty. Will dive into that.

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll also dive into some rest of season home run

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>props that are out there too. And tomorrow's gonna be

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>a fun show because Welsh. Tomorrow we're gonna take a

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>heavy look at all the betting stuff still out there

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 1>for the second half. And I know you're like me,

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that's an exciting thing. Now we're in the stretch run.

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>We know who teams are, are we kind of a

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>sense of who teams are not and also who might

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>be buyers and sellers. So are you excited about the

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 1>week of wagering we've got here before games kick up again.

0:01:09.680 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 2>I am, I am, because if you like to wager

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 2>at all, you've been a little devoid of all of

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 2>the major fun. There's maybe a few things missing in

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 2>your life, like all the bets in the world, and

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 2>you're just hyper focused on one spot and you were

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:26.119
<v Speaker 2>forced to go nut soar, just go a little bit

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>on that All Star game, which I don't believe featured

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 2>a run or many hits after the fifth inning. So yes,

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm excited about the second half. I'm excited about finding

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 2>some values too, because those are kind of gone, like

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the big guys that you and I have been jumping on,

0:01:40.200 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 2>like show Hey Atani at MVP. Those are gone. So

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna have to re establish and see where you

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:46.960
<v Speaker 2>can get some values, whether it's to win or maybe

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 2>even hopefully make a couple bucks on sites that pay

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 2>you back like fan Duel.

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, I think for the Otani's don Julio's done.

0:01:54.000 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>You can't you know, vote, you know can't vote. You

0:01:57.160 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>should vote, you can vote, you can't. You can't bet

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>on the Yankees or the Astros to win their divisions,

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>But we'll do odds about the remaining divisions, also teams

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to make the playoffs, not make the playoffs Tomorrow. Today's

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more fancy focus, tomorrow a little bit

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>more wagering focus. So if you'd like to do both,

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>this is the show for you, and we're going to

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>be going straight through here. So let's kick things off

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>here with the All Star Game. We have young Carlos

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Stanton taking on the MVP. I feel like the under

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>with the the combination of so many relief pitchers every inning,

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>with the strikeout rates, as you were saying, the lack

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of runs and hits and created runs, I feel like

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the under in the All Star Game is becoming like

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>an automatic smash button. Do you feel the same.

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Way, Well, I mean I didn't yesterday. I was like

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 2>seven and a half. I like the over at seven

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 2>and a half with all of the relief pitchers coming

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:46.800
<v Speaker 2>on the back end. The NL two was kind of

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 2>littered with even more relief guys. I mean I think

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 2>Joe Mantiply came in and like the fifth or something like.

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>That like that, Actually we Mantiply.

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:57.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but yeah, I know you're becoming You're right, it

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 2>is becoming much much more. I wonder I haven't tracked

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 2>the downturn of it, but I mean, it was seven

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 2>and a half this year, and what's it going to

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 2>be six next year? Like, well, probably starts to.

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Go to six. That's when you start to go O

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>get with seven and a half. I still felt like

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>I still feel like that that's a good under. You know.

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>It's on Scotti Farros Show yesterday after dooneying we were

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about All Star Game and he's like, what do

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you what do you think about it?

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 2>Joe?

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, look, I think, uh, you know,

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it's America League. I think it's the under,

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>and I think you take a shot on somebody an MVP.

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, whoever hits a home run is gonna be

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>MVP and your boy bucks in at home run. But

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Stanton was the guy. By the way, I love the

0:03:32.919 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>h I love the All Star Game MVP award itself,

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that Crystal bad or where the heck is? I think

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to see Stanton hit a ball with it

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>just for S's and g's. Is that does that make

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 1>so weird?

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 2>No? No, I actually want them to continue like going

0:03:46.400 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 2>balls to the wall on that type of stuff like

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 2>the home run derby chain. They should be doing cool,

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 2>unique things. It gets players to want to come. I mean,

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 2>whatever they got to do. I mean, at some point,

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 2>don't be surprised if they start doing like some type

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 2>of all star ringer or something for everybody. Whatever you

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 2>got to do to get these players excited to want

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 2>to win, to get out there and to compete.

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And Julio made more money in the home run Derby

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I saw than he's going to make all season.

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 2>So that's a one hundred and seven hundred and fifty

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.480
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars for second place. He was making seven hundred

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 2>thousand as a major leaguer this year.

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Very very touching moment. By the way. Also, did you

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:25.039
<v Speaker 1>see the Clayton Kershaw with the young kid whose granddad

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>passed away but wanted to meet Clayton Kershaw before he died. Oh,

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, you're not crying. I'm crying. It's a lot.

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Kershaw did a nice job. There was very nice, so good.

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Kirshaw is really good about all of that stuff. Like

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 2>he's very very tuned into kids. I've been over at Dodgers.

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Unlike Mike Mayor. Could you imagine Mike Mahyor is like, hey,

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>my granddad wanted to meet you, Mike Mayor before he

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>died of cancer. Mike Maher is like, kid, I don't

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.440
<v Speaker 1>have time for this, Like we're all gonna die, kid, Well,

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 1>it looks like we missed our opportunity. That would be

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Mike Mahyor like he'd be like, well, what am I

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>good was supposed to do it?

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>What am I supposed to do about it? I feel

0:04:58.120 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>like that.

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 2>You know. One of my biggest regrets of of all

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 2>the things with athletes, is the picture I have a

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>picture with Clayton Kershaw because I've I t l famously

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 2>told the story. I don't need to tell it here,

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 2>but where I met him at a Whole Foods and

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 2>my pictures like blurry because I was trying to do

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 2>it quick because I felt bad about doing it. I

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 2>was like this, I read how often are you going

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 2>to be around Clayton Kersher? I take it and he

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 2>couldn't have been nicer. He could not have been nicer

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:25.919
<v Speaker 2>about it. But I got a blurry picture with the

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 2>cy young winner.

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.400
<v Speaker 1>That's awesome. Well there you go. That's that's something you

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>can always take with you Cosse struck out the side

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>for the All Star Game. Alec Manoa very entertaining too

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>on the microphone yesterday. God, I love that Hoss, I do.

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>I Just why am I such a sucker for the

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Big Hoss pictures? I don't know, just love that guy.

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:43.839
<v Speaker 1>He's a good time interest stuff.

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Oh it's my favorite thing. But interesting

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 2>you keep me in Bogman around You're like, Oh, I

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 2>love these Big Hoss pictures. They're a connection little Hoss

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 2>so I look up to. I've been saying this for

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 2>a while. I don't know when baseball is going to

0:05:57.680 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 2>take like the forefront and wanting to really really improve

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 2>the game. You know, they do so many things to

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 2>hurt themselves. As small as some of this stuff is,

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 2>I think.

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I get it.

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 3>I love custom bats like the bat that Julio under so,

0:06:13.839 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 3>I honestly think it would be such a huge improvement

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 3>if they even allowed something like that in games to

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 3>start having.

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 2>But I love the micd up. I think that's a

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 2>way to get more personal with players. I think people

0:06:25.440 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 2>lack connections sometimes. I think every single.

0:06:29.279 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Television like, I don't get what's the problem, but they.

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:34.599
<v Speaker 2>Don't let them do the they don't let them go

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 2>crazy with cleats. They have two. That's the stuff you do, like,

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 2>let let the guys bat flip let there be really

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 2>cool custom things that kids can see and get excited about.

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:47.119
<v Speaker 2>Whether it's cleats, whether it's bats. Get these guys miked

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.159
<v Speaker 2>up in every single game that could be televised. I

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 2>think it's the best thing to do. I want to

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 2>see more of it. I want to see more of

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 2>the things that we love in the personality that moment

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 2>with with David Ortiz where David Ortiz is like, how

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 2>would you pitch me? And he starts to tell alec

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 2>Mino starts to go through it, and then Pobby's like,

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:06.840
<v Speaker 2>get out of here. He's like and he just walks off.

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:08.799
<v Speaker 2>He's like, you're not gonna strike me out. Like those

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 2>type of things like that is all really really good

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 2>for baseball. It's just a shame that we only celebrate

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:17.000
<v Speaker 2>it in a all starter or championship type of way.

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 2>We should do it all the time.

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, and not everybody has got a personality. Let's be honest,

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>here's a lot of guys that are duller than dirt.

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>You know that you just don't want to you know

0:07:24.200 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>put that.

0:07:24.640 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, we're not gonna make those guys up. We don't

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 2>have to worry about that. For every one of those guys,

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 2>there's a Mookie bets, you know, right, like we don't.

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I remember back in the day, my favorite micd up

0:07:32.120 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>thing ever was Jason Kipness when he was still playing

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>on the Cleveland Indians at the time, singing Adele playing

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>second base, and he was like, yep, I'm singing Adele

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>right now. He was in spring training ahead of my

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>dump and he was just singing Adell songs. That was

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 1>my favorite thing ever.

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm surprised the MLB network hasn't, or just

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 2>MLB in general, it hasn't created some type of like

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 2>special miked up feed. I mean, be a little dicey,

0:07:57.000 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 2>but I'd like to see some of that.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, let's some really funny things that the

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>chat to. By the way, about Mike Mayor being mean

0:08:03.800 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to some kid, I think it's just great, but it's

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>not here to defend him.

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 2>What a gimmick he gets to have and people will.

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Know full heel Mike Mayor. The MLB and MLBPA is

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>discussing the rule changes for next year. They have forty

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>five days to agree upon. The big giant bas is

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the pitch clock. All that stuff. Now, I went to

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the game where the pitchclock in summer set. When I

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>saw a Volpie play a couple weeks ago, I loved it.

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>It was great, kept the game moving, and there we

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 1>was a crap ton of runs. I think there were

0:08:29.760 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>sixteen runs in that game and it's still finished under

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>three hours. And I'm like, tell you, this is great.

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know.

0:08:35.600 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 2>I've been seeing the pitchclock for quite some time. They've

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 2>done it in the AFL, they've done it at the

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 2>lower level.

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>What a big deal, Like, it's just well when a

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>guy shows down.

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 2>This is what people get pissed off about, though, is

0:08:45.400 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 2>when when the guys don't move it along and it

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 2>throws a ball on the count and everyone's like what

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 2>And you get fans pissed off because a guy is,

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, slowing down the game or whatever. I think

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 2>it's great. I think it's fine. I think I've seen

0:08:58.720 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 2>players adjust to it perfect. Okay, it's very very little

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 2>impact on the game outside of speeding it up.

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Agreed, all right, also impactful. Drew Jones agrees to an

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>eight point nine eight point one night. It's using million

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>dollar bonus. Not too bad for mister Jones and me

0:09:13.760 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be big star as well. She can be.

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:19.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm keeping my eyes open in the bushes or

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 2>when Drew Jones comes here to Phoenix. I don't know

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 2>when exactly it's going to be. It could be Thursday.

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 2>Complex Level starts back up tomorrow that I do think

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 2>it wouldn't be in a game at this moment, though

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 2>we would say it's been quite a few days in between.

0:09:33.000 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 2>But they got Thursday, Friday, Saturday. I think next week

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 2>is a real high possibility. I'm gonna watch though, because

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 2>he could pop up and be a round camp and

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 2>then he probably is gonna start getting in games. My

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 2>assumption would be starting next week as easy as it goes.

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 2>But these guys, you know what they always like to do.

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 2>They like to bring the guys in, like parade them

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 2>around town a little bit at a home game, and

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't know why they do that whole thing before

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 2>they play. But him signing first is a huge, huge win,

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 2>and I will be out, I can promise you if

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 2>I know the day of the debut, as long as

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 2>it's not this Saturday late. I will be at Salt

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 2>River Fields and I will be there for his debut,

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 2>and I will be there for quite a few games

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:14.840
<v Speaker 2>to watch Drew Jones as a diamondback.

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>He's quite a talent. The question is, are we gonna

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>see the talent of Jacob de Gram again? Simulated game

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 1>moved to Thursday. He was apparently there being overly cautious

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>with the shoulder soreness or whatever is going on here.

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, shall we get to see Jaob bagram pitcheon

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>ending this year?

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I'm not gonna do this. Wow, I can't. I'm

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 2>not gonna fall for this. I'm not gonna have this.

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 2>I will not have this blasphemy. We've had enough. I've

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.839
<v Speaker 2>had enough of the injury thing where I'm like, oh,

0:10:42.880 --> 0:10:45.199
<v Speaker 2>this guy could come back, and then he gets I

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:47.719
<v Speaker 2>can't be wrong about this one. I can't have the

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 2>injury bug bite me on this one. He will be fine.

0:10:51.360 --> 0:10:55.319
<v Speaker 2>They were being overly cautious. The big big marker here

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 2>is is if he has this last little you know,

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 2>start on Thursday, which they moved it to Thursday, as

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 2>long as everything is okay and as long as he's

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 2>not feeling any any more, soreness. He should go out

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 2>have his last throw, and then we would get him

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 2>most likely next week. If he doesn't do the Thursday one,

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna have a little bit more worry because there's

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 2>only so much more we can do with this. But

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna say this is a very isolated situation and

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:24.080
<v Speaker 2>not absolutely panic and freak out on all my fantasy teams.

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>And Walkee brings up a goo Pointyo should have traded

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>him when they said he'd be back. Yeah, But the

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>problem is, like I don't know what you can get

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for de Grom at this point, Like I don't know

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the market value for him is just all over the place,

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>depending on this very eye of the beholder. I just

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:38.679
<v Speaker 1>wish the Mets would start to lie to me at

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>this point, like just say he had a stomach flu

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 1>or something and they pushed it back. I don't I

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 1>would have nice, I just just lie to me, don't.

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't care, I don't. This is the one circumstance

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>where I don't want the truth anymore about Jacob Grom

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>because the truth is just depressing.

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 2>The smart fantasy play. We can kind of like make

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 2>this an overarching thing, like what Wonk's saying, the smart

0:11:55.800 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 2>fantasy play is take these guys who have had some

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:03.199
<v Speaker 2>type of injury or you know, these super hype pushed

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 2>up prospects. Anytime there is buzz around a player, and

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 2>if your risk averse, one of the best things to

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:12.480
<v Speaker 2>possibly do is just go out and make the trade

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 2>and get what you can. Maybe you win, maybe you lose,

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 2>but at the end of the day, like you know,

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 2>maybe you win in that they get hurt and you've

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 2>got a bunch of assets. Maybe you lose in that

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 2>they you know, come back and are really good. But

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:26.679
<v Speaker 2>either way you've minimize that win and loss. In this case,

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 2>for me, this is just one I just don't agree.

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't have done. I would take the risk. I

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 2>don't think what you can acquire for Jacob to grom

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 2>is I mean, I could be wrong. If someone would,

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, sell you the moon. I just don't think

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:42.079
<v Speaker 2>what you can get is worth giving up the risk

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 2>of the potential number.

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Jacob being healthy. Is it worth trading him for Sean Manaiah.

0:12:49.520 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Not even remotely close. In my mind, I think that

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 2>risk and if I'm wrong, I'm wrong, I'll take that

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 2>because GM I mean even projections, which you know are

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 2>gonna want to be a little bit stabilized, are incredibly

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 2>aggressive on the back half of the year for Jacob

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 2>de Grom. Looking over at the Bat, you can go

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 2>take a look at Ariol's ATC. They're aggressive on maybe

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 2>his a little bit less, but the Bat is very

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 2>aggressive on Jacob d Grom rest of the season. And

0:13:14.960 --> 0:13:17.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna stick with that. And you know what, if anything,

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 2>maybe I take this approach. I'm getting a tiny bit

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.200
<v Speaker 2>of a value. Maybe you have an owner that's absolutely gone,

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god, I can't do this. This is gonna

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.079
<v Speaker 2>be bad. Maybe I'm poking around, but I sure do

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.599
<v Speaker 2>want to see what happens on Thursday, maybe before.

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Any Lance mccolors. Also, by the way, Lance mccolor sighting

0:13:33.880 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Lily in his rehab assignment on Friday. I couldn't believe

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>this one interesting because there's no room at the end

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 1>anymore from the Colors in my opinion. So if you're

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at this rotation, you've got Verlander, he's pretty good.

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.320
<v Speaker 1>He ain't coming out. I know, You've got fran ber Valdez,

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.439
<v Speaker 1>You've got Garcia, You've had Oderezi come back, You've had

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Christian Xavier be excellent up until these last few starts.

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 2>Or easy, he's easy to move out of that rotation from.

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>The guy who's gonna pitch out of the bullpen.

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, you know what, here would be my one argument,

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 2>with the amount of injuries that McCullers has had, why

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 2>not put him in the bullpen for the rest of.

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.000
<v Speaker 1>The Well, I think that's what you're gonna see. I

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.319
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna see mccullors and Christian Haavey are in

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the bullpen. And I think that is the reason why

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>on tomorrow show, I'm going to be very bulsh about

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the Houston Astros getting to the World Series, because I

0:14:20.240 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>think there's very few teams that are gonna be able

0:14:22.680 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to throw out those kind of arms. After throwing at

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Justin Verlander at you like, that's that's tough, man.

0:14:29.040 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 2>I gotta agree with you on that too, especially if

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 2>they can just maybe go get a little bit more

0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 2>thump in that lineup. Maybe there's a first basement that's

0:14:36.240 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 2>out there available you get a tiny bit more thump

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 2>to add to it with what is already. I mean,

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:43.880
<v Speaker 2>if you've put a five man rotation, there's much better.

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 2>But if you lock them down into like the three

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 2>spot and you got you know, Verlander and Framber and

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's Luis Garcia and then you're throwing out bullpens

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 2>of you know, McCullers to Javier to Presley, they're gonna

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 2>be really, really tough to be. They're a really good

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 2>bet on the back half of it this year for sure,

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 2>unfortunately for us.

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>And they got an easy schedule too, Like I mean, look,

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>it's always you can never have too much starting pitching.

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>But I also wonder if mccolor's at this point is

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>more a headache than he's worth. Like I wonder if

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>he becomes a trade chip, like he comes back and

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>then look good for a week and then you you know,

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it is something else.

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 2>If he's one of those guys that's like mindesty with

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 2>the Kansas City Royals where they're just like, you know, hey,

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 2>we love him. But that is the perfect sat analogy,

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 2>like we can't count on him, Like we can't count

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 2>on him. I don't think they can. And that's why

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 2>that's a guy that you can throw in the bullpen,

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 2>get you two strong innings. Maybe be a back half guy,

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe you piggyback like a Luis Garcia, and.

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe he's maybe he's a reliever like his daddy is.

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Daddy was a heck of a reliever for many years.

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Daddy braves, Yeah, Daddy and mccullors, I like this.

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 2>Rizzi is a this idea right here, Josh Bell to Houston,

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 2>that's the type of thing I'm talking about, Houston, go

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 2>and get a bat like that and put in I

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 2>like that scenario.

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>That would definitely help both sides there. All right, let's

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about the top twenty five starting pitchers we have

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>rest of season now, mine skewed. I have Otani as

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the number one overall player rest of season because if

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you have him as a pitcher and a hitter, how

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>is he not the number one overall player? He is.

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>So you'll see my ranks have Altani first, then a

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 1>starting pitcher because I can't undo that they connect to

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>each other. But rest of season, Welsh, I've got Garret

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Cole Verlander, Corbyn Burns, al Contra, Shane McClanahan, then Scherzer,

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Musgrove Woodruff, Max Fried, Kevin Gossman. So that's like the well,

0:16:26.240 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>Otani's in that mix too. So Otani I believe is

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a pitcher. I had him right around the right. I

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>think I had him at seven or eight. I actually

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>might have been nine now that I'm looking at it.

0:16:35.960 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>So those are basically the top ten when you throw

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Atani in there, who are your top ten guys rest

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>of season?

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 3>There?

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 2>And I also tear them out on my ranks over

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 2>it in this league. But I've got McClanahan at number one.

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 2>I made that push quite a while ago. McClanahan number one.

0:16:49.200 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>So you're not concerned at all about the second half

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>fade at all. See that's the thing for me. I

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>keep coming back to the second half fade of McClanahan

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>as a distinct possibility. But you don't seem to a

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of people don't seem to be worried about that.

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Why well, I mean, of qualified highest K percentage, I

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 2>don't see anything at this current moment outside of you

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 2>could argue maybe any I don't know, I don't want

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 2>to say shut shutdowns, not the word I'm trying to say,

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 2>but like a management you on the back half.

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:22.919
<v Speaker 1>And maybe unsustainable ridiculously good numbers like that combination I

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 1>think is a little scary. That's why I have down five, not.

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.680
<v Speaker 2>And to be fair, like got like Garrett Cole. Going

0:17:28.720 --> 0:17:31.880
<v Speaker 2>back to the projections, Garrett Cole has the most projected

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.359
<v Speaker 2>strikeouts in the second half of this year according to

0:17:35.400 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the bat which is a big number, which could put

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 2>him at the top. But my point when I said

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:42.520
<v Speaker 2>tears is he's a part of a tier, so you

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 2>could move them around. I have a plan to hand

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 2>at number one because I think he's been so dominant

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 2>and he hasn't really shown any true signs of coming back.

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Number one strikeout picture. I love me some strikeouts, but

0:17:53.760 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 2>I've got him, I've got Burns, and I've got coal,

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 2>and that's an interchangeable tier in my eye.

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>So I agree with that. I agree they are the three. Yeah,

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I have says my three as well. I got Cole,

0:18:04.280 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Burns Verlander as well, but I have a cold Verlander

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Burns right now.

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not one hundred percent concerned with Like, if

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 2>you want to argue Cole is number one, I'm not

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 2>going to disagree with you because at the end of

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 2>the day, like, you're not trading one for one of

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 2>those guys. And if I guess all it comes down

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 2>to is if you were, let's say, going to do

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.720
<v Speaker 2>like a trade package, and you could acquire either Coal

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 2>or McClanahan at the same cost. Then my valuation, you know,

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 2>I probably would still leave McClanahan, though I'm with Cole. Four.

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 2>I got Sandie o Contra five, I've got show Heyo

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 2>Tani must grow Verlander, Max Schers, You're at eight, and

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.440
<v Speaker 2>I did make I put Jacob de Gram tentatively down

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 2>at nine. With Dylan C said, I've.

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Got da Gram at twenty two until he gets on

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the mount.

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 2>So we're on the other side of this.

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>On the other side, nine is correct, But to me

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.239
<v Speaker 1>it's twenty two because even if he goes out there

0:18:57.280 --> 0:18:58.719
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season, it makes three starts and then

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>he gets hurt again. That's what I'm building into the ranking.

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm building in injured again because I think I have

0:19:05.400 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to at this point with Jacob, I think it's it

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 1>would be somehow I would be doing a disservice to

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the audience if I didn't build that into the ranking

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>rest of the season of him, and I think it sucks.

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I hate doing it. I feel like it's a fact

0:19:17.240 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of life at this work.

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I don't feel like it's a disservice

0:19:20.680 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 2>because if he is out there and plays, you are

0:19:23.800 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 2>going to see wildly under ranked parts for him, and

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:32.400
<v Speaker 2>he is going to insanely outperform. If he plays you

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 2>at twenty two and me at nine is too low.

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 2>If he plays the entire second half. The only marker

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 2>we have right now is he missed obviously the first

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 2>half and there's a little bit of shoulder soreness, and

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 2>that is something that should make us hesitate. I moved

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 2>it back before we started this because of the shoulder,

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 2>but I don't again you say it's a disservice. I don't.

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:53.679
<v Speaker 2>You should know the implied risk. The implied risk is

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 2>both sides. What's the biggest risk he gets hurt again,

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:57.439
<v Speaker 2>you lose him for the rest of the year, and

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 2>we're all banging our heads against the table. What's the upside?

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.359
<v Speaker 2>He's the number one pitcher the back half of the

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 2>year who was in minor league, starts throwing one hundred

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 2>plus coming off of this injury, so he is tough.

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.200
<v Speaker 2>I think he's the most difficult of all of these

0:20:10.280 --> 0:20:12.720
<v Speaker 2>to manage. And whatever side you want to be on,

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 2>that's totally okay. I'm jumping in front because I am

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 2>just way less risk averse. I play on the edge.

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 2>I put my foot over the edge of the cliff

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:24.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot more than Joe or Wonky or anybody does.

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>Here you go, that's a good conversation. All right, Let's

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:27.919
<v Speaker 1>go to the rest of your tiers here too, because

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 1>after this you have Dylan Sees, Kevin Gossman, Aaron Nola Manoa,

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Wheeler Kershaw, Gielito Woodruff, Rodin Rodand's a little lower for you,

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:39.760
<v Speaker 1>which is interesting in Bieber. Why is Rodond so much lower?

0:20:39.800 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Is that just because injury history?

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 2>Injury history, well, a little bit of injury history. There

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.760
<v Speaker 2>was some early inconsistency. He's been awesome as of recent

0:20:48.320 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 2>The strikeouts have been there as well. He's a little

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 2>bit walk especially if you look at like some of

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 2>the top guys in performance. So you know San die

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:59.479
<v Speaker 2>al Contra rocking a two walk per nine. You got

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 2>this huge, huge barrage of guys too, by the way,

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 2>between like Nola, Freed, McClanahan, that are all those sub

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 2>two walks. He's an over three.

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 2>The two top guys, the two top pitchers on this

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 2>list that have an over three walk per nine are

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Dylan ceason him and that worries me as far as

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 2>consistency goes just a tiny bit. I guess it's one

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 2>of those things where it's like, I don't realize I

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 2>hate him as much as like my rank does when

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 2>I do it at the end of the day. But

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 2>this is just once I put it out, I was like, oh, yeah,

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 2>I guess I do have him a little bit lower.

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 2>I'd moved a couple I have free.

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>You've got him at twenty five. I got him at ten.

0:21:33.920 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a big difference.

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 2>That's a bit. I mean, he's had a solid season.

0:21:37.320 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 2>I just think it's continuously performing on the backup of

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 2>the year. It's low strikeouts, I mean the under nine

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 2>k per nine, which is something that's a little bit

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 2>of a worry, a really really low home run total

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 2>that I think could pop just a tiny bit. And

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 2>he's got one of the few a lot of these

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 2>guys you're gonna see with some inflated x fips. He's

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 2>just another one of those. It's an over three x

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 2>FIP from his two eras. So I don't know. I

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.640
<v Speaker 2>think there's some potential implied push back on the back

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 2>half of this year. But again, this is one of

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 2>those things where it's like I pushed him down, probably

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.399
<v Speaker 2>because I don't I pushed him down, by the way,

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 2>He's in a tier of guys that are up from

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty to twenty five. It's a lack of strikeouts. I'm

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 2>still a really good pitcher. I just think I'm a

0:22:14.440 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 2>little bit off. Wonky has him at seventeen. I think

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm kind of close, but I guess so're

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 2>just between us. I'm the lower ish man on him.

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's funny. The biggest riser I have is Jonathan

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Gray at twenty six. Overall, he likes strikeouts.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 2>That dude, that's a really big move for the second

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 2>half of the year. You don't have any concerns with

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 2>just the inconsistency of.

0:22:34.119 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 1>The Roger concerns. But you know what, I watched them

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 1>pitch and I just like what I'm seeing and I

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 1>was waiting for this to happen. I felt like the

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>early season, with all the injuries and the stop and

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>start for him, he just never got into a groove.

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like he's getting to a groove and

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I think mentally for him, that's the biggest thing, Like

0:22:48.960 --> 0:22:52.720
<v Speaker 1>he needs to mentally break into a confident kind of place,

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and if he does, I think we're gonna see the

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 1>guy who was selected number two overall and how good

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>of a pitcher he could. Because I was always in

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.600
<v Speaker 1>fine of John Gray, So this is very exciting looking

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 1>at the overall ranks too.

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 2>Real quick, cold, I want to actually ask you, I'm sorry,

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know if you were going to move out

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 2>to this or whatnot. Talk to me real quick about Peralta.

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 2>You threw Peralta back on this list. We obviously have

0:23:13.000 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 2>questions on it. I'm just curious about that because, like,

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:18.879
<v Speaker 2>you've got major injuries there and you shot him as

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 2>a top twenty five starting pittures is so.

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Major healthy and all the reports have been good, so

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>he's working his way back. So I'm at twenty five,

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So like twenty five, twenty six, twenty seven, I got Peralta,

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>John Gray, Manaia, and Chris Bassett. Like that's the grouping

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of pictures right there where I like all those guys.

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel good about them. But the upside, like you said,

0:23:35.880 --> 0:23:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the upside of the Grom, the upside of Peralta for me, Like, OK,

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>last year, how good he was this year? After those

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>first shaky starter. Two he was so good, and then

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the injury came unfortunately, so fingers crossed and we're not

0:23:46.760 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>worrying about innings anymore. Overall players again, if Otani is

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>a hitter and a pitcher, he's number one. I have

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Soto to Josey Ramirez, three, Judge a Kunya Alvarez. Julio

0:23:57.359 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>has made it all the way up to seven for

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>me because I am in love with Julio, you guys,

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>and I don't care who knows. Raphael Devers bets Cole.

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Then you have the Verlander, Turner, Burns, the pitchers and

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>all that stuff. I have Lad all the way at sixteen.

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather have McClanahan rest of the season than Flat.

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that weird?

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Hmmm, I don't know, it's not weird. It's just who

0:24:16.680 --> 0:24:18.160
<v Speaker 2>did you say, who'd you say you rather.

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Have than Flaid McClanahan.

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, not having mcclanahan's not weird. But you haven't

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:26.159
<v Speaker 2>done at sixty. What's like a hitter that you have?

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, the next one is now. I mean the closest

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 1>hitter is Trey Turner at twelve, I have, and then

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Lad at sixteen. Then there in between I think that

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>feels right. It's gonna show me a little bit right now,

0:24:36.680 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Lad's in that, like, okay, let's let's show it. I'm

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>always low on Trey Turner. Everybody knows this. It's yeah.

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I looked at your stuff. I was like, you're a

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 2>little bit low.

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:45.919
<v Speaker 1>That's always me. That just he doesn't do it for me.

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 2>I am quite a bit higher. I didn't. I don't

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 2>have an overall to go through though. I was looking

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 2>through my top ten.

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, maybe tomorrow. We're short on time anyway, maybe tomorrow

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>will do your dynasty top ten or something like that.

0:24:57.359 --> 0:24:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh, either one. I have a dynasty one all set

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:01.919
<v Speaker 2>up on overall. My positional ranks I do are my

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.960
<v Speaker 2>rest of season ranks are all positional, not necessarily overall.

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 2>But one of the things I noticed is I was

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 2>going to try to do this beforehand I put Turner in.

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 2>I was like, wow, you and I are just astronomically

0:25:11.760 --> 0:25:13.880
<v Speaker 2>different than Turner. I will say just I might.

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Have to revisit it, but I mean I'm always like this.

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm true.

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Now I am with you. On the Julio front,

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 2>I have him as the number two outfielder or number

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 2>four outfielder rest of season, and you and I share

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 2>a whole lot of these. I don't necessarily share the

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 2>really really high one Soto front with everything that's going

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 2>on with him, but I agree on the Alvarez, the

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 2>Julio Rodriguez front. It's just Turner I think belongs in there.

0:25:37.520 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to bet MGM, the king of sportsbooks.

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Bet ten dollars, not two dollars. Ten dollars. I went

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 1>two hundred on anything, regardless of the outcome. And look,

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:47.959
<v Speaker 1>we've got all kinds of fun things and props. We're

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about a BETMGM, So you should go make

0:25:49.720 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that deposit when you sign up. Use that promo code

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>leading off. That's what I did. I use our own

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>promo code because I'm not stupid. I had ten dollars

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and I got my two hundred because they said I

0:25:59.080 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>could do it, so I did it. I don't know

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>why you guys have it yet, but again, free money

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.119
<v Speaker 1>is good. Download the BETMGM app or go to betmgm

0:26:07.160 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Also, I thought these were fun things here.

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Rest of season, we have some home run leader things.

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Judge is at minus one ninety five to lead

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>the league in home runs, Kyle Schwarber at plus three fifty,

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Austin Riley is at plus fifteen hundred, which I thought

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>was fascinating. Pete Alonzo at twenty to one trout and

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Stanton at twenty five. But I thought that the Alonzo

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 1>twenty to one was fascinating number because we all know

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.439
<v Speaker 1>the polar Bear can go on a run. Austin Riley

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting, could sneak in there because I feel

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 1>like Judge is going, look, can't make money on Judge,

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 1>so if you want to bet this, you gotta pick

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody else.

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Riley is interesting because he's close. The problem with Alonzo

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:47.480
<v Speaker 2>is he's nine off right now, So if you're gonna

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.439
<v Speaker 2>think you're done, you know, if you're if what was it?

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.479
<v Speaker 2>We were just looking at this the other day. I

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 2>think it's eighteen homers projected second half almost in every

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 2>single projection, sit eighteen to nineteen homers for Judge. So

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.000
<v Speaker 2>if you are already nine off, you would have to

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 2>be looking. And let's say he comes back just a

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 2>tiny bit, it's fifteen. You would have to get like

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty five home or second half for Alonzos. I don't

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 2>like that one The Riley one is interesting. I don't

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 2>view him quite as the same bopper, but he is

0:27:14.680 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 2>six off from Judge. Schwarber has twenty nine to Judge's

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 2>thirty three. That's probably Alvarez time.

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 1>But like, if there's a guy who can go on

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a run, it's Alvarez, you know, Alvarez? Yeah, five bucks

0:27:26.040 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 1>on this. Speaking of which, there's some individual props too.

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>These are from FanDuel. You have Aaron Judge over under

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>forty nine and a half home runs minus one ten

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>is the juice you want to go over or under

0:27:36.240 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the forty nine and.

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 2>A half absolutely smashing that over.

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Here's another one thirty seven.

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Who has that one? I'm gonna go bet that one.

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>We're dandel right now.

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna go bet that one when we're done with this.

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>For Jordan Alvarez or or Don Alvarez. How do we

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>say it now?

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Because I'm old, Listen, it's it's supposed to be said

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 2>like a Jordan, but nobody cares that it's that, and

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:02.639
<v Speaker 2>every human being says Jordan. I think this is turning

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:04.360
<v Speaker 2>into I haven't heard him talk on it. I think

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 2>it's turning into an Eloy situation where like he doesn't care.

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.119
<v Speaker 2>Eloy is like it's technically Alloy, but I like Eloi

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 2>as well. I don't mind. I hear nobody respect the

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 2>Jordan Alvarez and everybody just wise it to hell. They're

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:19.200
<v Speaker 2>like Jordan Alvarez, So.

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>They say, I've heard Alvarez number thirty seven and a half,

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>also with the minus one ten over under on Alvarez.

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Ooh, thirty seven and a half. You're currently at twenty six,

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 2>so you're saying eleven second half ones with a three

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 2>forty seven.

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I like this one better than two.

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:38.680
<v Speaker 2>I do too. I like both of these. These would

0:28:38.720 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 2>actually be too. I would jump on.

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>This last one too. Mike Trout thirty three and a half.

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>I like the under on this. What do you think?

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I just I don't think I touch it. This

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 2>is one of the This is one of those things.

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I'm uh I suck at because like I want

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 2>to Pat GM, well, yeah, no, I understand you are.

0:28:56.200 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 2>But it's like I look at a guy like Ja

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Gram and I'm like, holy crap, he's gonna be amazing

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.720
<v Speaker 2>when he's I want to play talent instead of holding

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:04.920
<v Speaker 2>back the same thing with Trout when he's there. I

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 2>don't want to bet against him, but there's so much

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 2>going on with him. I get your logic. I just

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 2>won't mess with it because my brain would go, well,

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 2>he's going to smash this type of stuff, but the injuries,

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 2>inconsistency is how garbage that team is right now. I

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 2>would pass on Trout. But I do like your logic.

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:21.400
<v Speaker 1>See I like the under. You're so negative and you're

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 1>basically setting up my argument for the under. It's like yes, yes, no, no, no, no.

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm totally agree with it.

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't want to make money on the negative.

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>That's nothing. When I see something that's overinflated, I go, yep,

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:34.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to happen.

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, he has twenty four and what's the number thirty three?

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 2>So no, that is he would need ten homers on this.

0:29:40.280 --> 0:29:43.080
<v Speaker 2>So you're betting nine homers or less.

0:29:42.920 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Fort I'm betting on the back of my trout not

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>being a good thing.

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 2>That's what I'm going It's not it's notts. Is it important?

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Is it?

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Alvarez?

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Alvarez is my favorite of the three without I think

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>it's smash over.

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I think I agree with you on that one.

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>You could do that next month. I feel like you

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 1>know you can hit eleven on runs in a month

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>like that.

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Dude, get ready, fandule account. Money's coming your way.

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Go. But again, go to bed MGM and make your

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>bets to get the ten for two hundred. There you go,

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>let's go, let's get it in tomorrow. Tomorrow, we're gonna

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>be looking at the divisions. We're gonna be looking at

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. We're gonna be looking at World Series odds

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and all that stuff as we preview. We have games

0:30:22.640 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>coming back tomorrow, so there'll be a light schedule. I

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>believe right, it's not a full schedule Thursday. It's light schedule.

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it's yeah. I think you're right about that.

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a light schedule. We want to ease our way back,

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.720
<v Speaker 1>take our time. But again, this is gonna be a

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>great show because if you recall, this was the show

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>last year where I went on the Bryce Harper rant

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>at thirty to one for MVP and we're ran.

0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:45.719
<v Speaker 2>Do you anticipate a rant tomorrow?

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I can't see a world where there isn't a rant.

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's gotta it's gonna it's gonna.

0:30:50.840 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Be about Jacob de gram is shut down tomorrow and

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 2>doesn't do his start. I'm gonna rant here.

0:30:56.520 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Here's tomorrow's day. Jacob de Gram gets shut down. I

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 1>come on the show, I'm miserable, and then Juan Soto

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:06.960
<v Speaker 1>gets traded to the Mets. Later that afternoon we do

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:10.680
<v Speaker 1>we do a special addition of leading off where I'm at.

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 2>He gets traded to the San Diego Potters. By the way, Bagman,

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I do the livestream on our twitch twitch dot tv slash.

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:20.239
<v Speaker 2>In this league, we have a Tuesday episode we call

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Fantasy Predictor. I broke down and we could even do

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 2>it here. I've actually got some new additions to it.

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 2>I broke down five to one Soto trade scenarios on

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.640
<v Speaker 2>that show, and I did all the prospects. I think

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:32.479
<v Speaker 2>that can be involved, so you can go back and

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:34.680
<v Speaker 2>watch and see what I did. But I think there

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:37.520
<v Speaker 2>are some new alterations by some new information that's come

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 2>out that I might have some new adjustments to a

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 2>few of them, and I'd be glad to do that

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 2>as well.

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.480
<v Speaker 1>All the adjustments. Check out it TL for all that

0:31:44.520 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff for the Patreon and in this league, good stuff

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>with Bogman and Welsh. All right, that'll do it. For us,

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 1>but the story of the game goes on for the Welsh.

0:31:51.240 --> 0:31:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joey P Well see you next time kids.

0:31:54.600 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Peace, SI the the Thing