WEBVTT - What will the Internet be like in 2021?

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Get a text technology with tech Stuff from stuff dot com.

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tex Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland, and we are going to do a brand

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 1>new Predictions episode. You may remember that the last episode

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:24.279
<v Speaker 1>I played was a rerun from two thousand eleven where

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris Pallette and I decided to kind of guess what

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the Internet would be like in about five years time. Well,

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>now we're gonna look another five years into the future.

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>And Chris could not be here, but I brought on

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a good friend of mine up here, a guy who

0:00:39.720 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>works for cen Net. Very clever dude, who's got it

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>all together. I as actor, How you doing, I'm doing

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 1>really well. Thanks for having me on today. Thanks for

0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>being on the show. And I as is sounding very formal,

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:55.279
<v Speaker 1>but trust us. We we're we're buddies. We often give

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>each other the business as it were. Of course, of course,

0:00:58.320 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Mr Strickland, we always give each other business. Uh. Those

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>those those plain envelopes filled with dollar bills will continue

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to come to you. I as, so we we wanted

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to take a look and kind of just have a

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 1>casual conversation of what we think the internet and our

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>interactions with the Internet might be like in another five years,

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>so in twenty twenty one, and uh, we're just kind

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of shooting from the hip here. We're not not really

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 1>consulting any gurus or anything like that, but we did

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>come up with a bunch of little questions that we

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>thought would be good starters for this kind of thing.

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>And one of the points we made in the two

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand eleven podcast that Chris and I did was that

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:44.440
<v Speaker 1>we both felt that mobile browsing was definitely going to

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:49.960
<v Speaker 1>be increasingly important, that we would see desktops and laptop

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>traffic on the Internet get surpassed by mobile devices. And

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in fact, that did happen. And uh, it wasn't like

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.120
<v Speaker 1>we were sticking our next really far out or anything.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>That it was pretty clear that that was the trend

0:02:03.120 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>even when we started back then. Now, I as, do

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you think that's gonna be something that we'll see continue

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>That will will mobile devices continue to be one of

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the most important, maybe the predominant way that we interact

0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Internet, at least on a on an active scale. Yeah,

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the mobile devices, I mean, they've shown how

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>important they've been over the years. And the thing is,

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people of their phone is their

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>first real personal computer. So what I'm expecting is essentially

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>laptops and desktops not as important, but we might actually

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to have in five years now where

0:02:36.919 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you have your phone, it's your brain for all your

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>other little systems, because I think other smart devices like

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>watching his glasses, other devices and form factors that we've

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>even thought up yet, those things will be around, but

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they're really gonna be powered by your phone, right, Yeah,

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:52.959
<v Speaker 1>So that that makes sense. Like even stuff with Google

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Glass that was something that you used a Bluetooth connection

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>with the phone. The phone ended up doing most of

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>the processing. The glass was just kind of a interface

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and display, and you still were relying upon the actual

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>connection with your phone to grab the data from the cloud.

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>And that does make sense. I mean you that way

0:03:09.840 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you remove the need for the more powerful processors and

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the various antenna that you would require to to tap

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.519
<v Speaker 1>into those networks. You can offload that. You just need

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that Bluetooth interface in order for it to to communicate

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>with the devices the real brain. Also, I'm noticing I

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>just notice recently a video that kind of blew my

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>mind because it reminded me of something we saw at

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>CS many years ago, and it was a video of

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a new product where you use your smartphone to act

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>as the processor for what was really just a terminal,

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>but it looks like, you know, a laptop computer and

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you dock your phone into it and that essentially ends

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 1>up being the brains behind your computer. And I can't

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>remember you you might I as I don't know, but

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember the name of the the thing that

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>was essentially that same idea from several years ago where

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>your your smartphone and uh could just dock into a

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>docking station and power a laptop. Um to me, it

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>was interesting to see that idea come back again because

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it didn't seem to go anywhere after that initial c

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>e S debut. But it does kind of fall into

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>that same idea that the the smartphone will be kind

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of the the center of a of a hub of devices,

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>all of which will rely very heavily on it. Yeah,

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>the device I think you're talking about the motto atrix,

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>a phone that were plug into a docking station that

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of makes it a laptop. It wasn't elegant at all.

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>It didn't work with every single docking station. Need to

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>get a proprietary thing, so that kind of takes people off,

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.359
<v Speaker 1>I know, the Kickstarter you're talking about or Indigogo. Not

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 1>sure which crowd funding site it is, but I mean, well, also,

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine in five years we would have more

0:04:55.920 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>smart devices that can be on their own. But I

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>still think that having a the power and all the

0:05:01.160 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>brains on a singular device driving the other the other

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 1>devices makes more sense because, like you were mentioning other radio's,

0:05:07.880 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>other antennas, other battery concerns. To have all of that

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and each self contained object you're talking about a lot

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>of items you have to keep charged all the time,

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>it seems like I don't know if five years is

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>enough time for this to really get mature. Maybe ten

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 1>years from now and now we're going too far. But

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>if battery technology moves ahead, maybe what we would see

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>these devices that are I guess cloud connected, So you're

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the brain is still a computer somewhere, it's just nowhere

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>near you, right, I think. Also another important element to

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>take into account is cost, and by having your phone

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 1>be the primary brains behind all these different devices, it

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 1>helps bring the cost down to each of those individual devices.

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 1>They don't need as many expensive components and that will

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.240
<v Speaker 1>make adoption um less difficult. Right, It's still gonna be

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a barrier, obviously. It's any time we're talking about technology,

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a barrier of intrigue that's there. Um. Not everyone

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>can afford to do it. But by going that that

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>route where your phone remains the primary processing unit of

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>all these different devices, you can at least create a

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 1>suite of technologies that aren't prohibitively expensive for all but

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 1>you know the top of the one per centers. Yeah,

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a lot of silos, right, you can

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>probably like an Apple silo, you'll have a Android silo

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>or Samsung silo. There's things that you can't just mix

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and match your accessories. You're just gonna have to get

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>one company's to make it work. Well, I still see

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that happening because sometimes I think about in the old days,

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.960
<v Speaker 1>how no standards were ever happened. I couldn't imagine actually

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>having one standard port or electrical outlets. If this is privatized,

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>weight is now it's like, well, USB A B C

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>about three point one. Just it seems so wonky. Yeah, yeah,

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a great point. I mean it's and that kind

0:06:57.120 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>of ties into The next question that I have on

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:03.039
<v Speaker 1>our list the idea of silos, and this whether you

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>have interoperability between different you know, families of technologies or

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>if it's all within one group. One of the things

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we've seen kind of come to prominence over the last

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>year or two is this idea of the digital personal assistant. Now.

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>In the two thousand eleven episode, Chris and I talked

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>about how voice recognition was going to become more important,

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>but it wouldn't take over as our primary means of

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>interacting with our technology for various reasons. I mean, if

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to search anything that's remotely personal in nature,

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you probably don't want to speak it out loud in public. Also,

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to make people think you're crazy as

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you're talking to absolutely no one visible at any rate. Um,

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>But we're starting to see them really get more more

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 1>traction these days, whether it's Apple's Sirie or Amazon's Alexa,

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>or Google's Assistant. You know, we have lots of different examples.

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you think those are going to continue to get

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>more sophisticated? Are are we going to see more integration

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:11.320
<v Speaker 1>into various devices, not just the standalonees or the smartphones,

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>but perhaps other things as well well. I could see

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>people getting very used to talking to the Internet in general.

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Like you might think, now you might look a little

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>crazy that you're talking to yourself. Although these days you

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>see somebody talking themselves in the street, you're like, do

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>they have a Bluetooth headset or not? Because it used

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to be twenty years ago you're like, oh, you're just nuts.

0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>Now it's like, oh, you might be having a conversation.

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 1>But there's a generation of kids growing up talking to

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>smart speakers like the Echo, like Google Home when that

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>comes out, and when Apple goes ahead, where there's that

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>rumor that they're going to have their own smart speaker.

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I see that kind of interface and that natural language

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>really being more important. Now maybe you're not necessarily talking

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>to your watch, but you might be writing the same

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>kinds of questions that you would say because the way

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>everything is changing with deep learning, the chance in five

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 1>years I'm really hoping to five years and you were

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>able to just ask a simple question without having to

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 1>have all of these modifiers that are search engine optimized,

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, right, Yeah, without having to

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>parse your language in a way that search engines know

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.840
<v Speaker 1>what it is. You're actually asking you to have that

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.240
<v Speaker 1>natural length language recognition. I think we've we've definitely come

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a far away over the last decade, definitely UH with

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>natural language where you know, it used to be that

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:30.839
<v Speaker 1>you could do a Google search for a particular string

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of terms and come up with a page of results

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and think, this isn't remotely what I was hoping to find.

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 1>And then you just go and rearrange the order of

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>words that were in your Google query and come up

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>with different results and see, oh this is I just

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>have to think the way the computer thinks. Once we

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>get away from that, where computers are able to interpret

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>the way we think and the way different people think

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>about the same thing, but still bring back relevant results,

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>then we see real advances in and and a seamless

0:10:01.640 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 1>experience when we start interacting with the Internet. I think

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.319
<v Speaker 1>that is definitely going to improve over the next five years.

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>We've already seen some amazing results as it stands now.

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I also hope to see more of One of the

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>things I really like the way Amazon has approached this

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Personal Digital Assistant UM model is their approach is all

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>about integrating with other systems so that you can control

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>different things within your home, even if they were not

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 1>originally designed to work together through a single interface, right

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Like Hugh light bulbs are an example. Let's say that

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I've got Hugh light bulbs in my house. Let's say

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I've got some sort of of Internet connected security system.

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I've got a couple of other appliances that are

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>also connected through my my home network and with Alexa,

0:10:56.320 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 1>assuming that the capability has been built in by developers,

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I would be able to interact with all of those

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to having to go through each proprietary system

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and interface, which gets extremely clunky. It's kind of like

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:11.960
<v Speaker 1>being in front of a a an entertainment system where

0:11:12.000 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>you have twelve different remote controls and trying to remember

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>which one goes to what component. Uh. I hope to

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>see more of that because, like you were saying, if

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>we go with the siloed approach, unless you're all in

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>with one provider, your experience is going to be really fragmented. Yeah.

0:11:30.800 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>It just makes me think about the Internet of Things

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>because I have an Amazon Echo and I've had some

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.840
<v Speaker 1>smart technologies in my house and smart light bulbs and things,

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>and most people would ask me, like, why would you

0:11:39.920 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>need a smart light bulb, and these are just little

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:46.200
<v Speaker 1>fancy ways to make my apartment more personalized. But when

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you have an echo, you have a brain that can

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>talk to multiple devices, you start thinking what other devices

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you can get. So I'm expecting in five years a

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of people will be very aware of the good

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>uses or connected devices, because I connected life all began

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is a very strange idea at first, but when you

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:04.719
<v Speaker 1>get used to it, you're like, wait a minute, why

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't this happen before? So I'm expecting a lot more

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>dumb things to get a lot smarter five years. Yeah,

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>And and you know, we've we've seen this is a

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a progression that starts with some kind of you know,

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 1>uncertain moves. Again, going back to c e S. I

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>love talking about ce S because that's kind of like

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the proving grounds for these new technologies. Typically a technology

0:12:27.440 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>will start to kind of creep in, and then the

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>next year it will be almost everywhere, and then maybe

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>three more years it will be to a point where

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>people will actually want it. Right because we've seen the

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>smart technology move into various appliances for the better part

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>of the decade now, and in many cases, those early

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>implementations were either short sighted or not terribly useful. But

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>as people are learning how to interact, and as developers

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>are learning, you know, what people expect from their technologies,

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing that improve over time. I think in Internet

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of Things is going to continue going strong. It it

0:13:08.200 --> 0:13:11.839
<v Speaker 1>isn't just a fad or a buzzword. It is going

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to be a pervasive technology that UH surrounds us and

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>binds us like the force UM. It also has some

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>potential for some some negative stuff as well, not just

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the idea of making our lives easier, but we'll talk

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 1>about that UH in a little bit. So one of

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the other elements I have here on our list is

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>this question about again getting kind ofto that fragmented experience idea,

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the rise of the app. That was one of those

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>things that that Chris and I didn't really touch on.

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:48.560
<v Speaker 1>We didn't talk about apps. I don't think either of

0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>us had really figured out how important apps were going

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>to be UH in general, and apps on smart devices

0:13:56.440 --> 0:14:00.679
<v Speaker 1>on on smartphones and mobile devices in particular have become

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the most important stories in technology over the

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>last few years. UH companies can spring up overnight and

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>become incredibly successful with the right app a lot of

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.800
<v Speaker 1>companies out there are banking on that success. Many of

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>them are failing um and and it's weird because it

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 1>also creates this very siloed approach to how you access

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and interact with the Internet, particularly apps that are related

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to content, where you know you might ask the question,

0:14:29.560 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>why do I use this app versus use a more

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>universal interface like a browser. Do you think that we're

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to see, you know, a wide variety

0:14:41.160 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of apps moving forward, or do you think that's a

0:14:43.120 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 1>bubble that will burst sometime between now and I don't

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>see apps necessarily going away. I can see a lot

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of like hyper visor style apps, like we're talking about

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Echo, where it controls lots of different things.

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>I could see a lot more apps that control other apps,

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.080
<v Speaker 1>if that makes any sense. Like its like right now

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>we have things like hoot Suite, which can access to

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>different Twitter accounts, Facebook and all that other information. So

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I could see that happening, which is a little strange

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 1>if you think about it, because a browser should be

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>able to handle it. But apps on their own, they

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>offer so much control to the companies that I think

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>that that's not going anywhere. Because the other thing is

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you can create a lot of things that are offline

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that you couldn't do in a browser. I think that's

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the bigger things. Unless in five years the

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Internet wirelessly or is that connectivity is always around, you

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.600
<v Speaker 1>still have to deal with being offline, and if you

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have an app, there's a good chance there's no

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>way a browser is gonna work unless there's some kind

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of cash feature, which isn't something that really works so

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>well right now. That's a good point. Yeah. For example,

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I've got I've got an app that I used for

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>for podcatching too, to listen to the various podcasts I

0:15:49.080 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to, and I can either stream stuff directly from

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the Internet to my headphones and that way I can

0:15:57.680 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>listen live, or I can down load an episode and

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>listen to it even if I'm offline, which of course

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is useful if you're going to be like on a

0:16:04.720 --> 0:16:07.359
<v Speaker 1>long flight or something and you don't have in flight WiFi.

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a really useful, uh feature. So I didn't really

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>think of it that way, but that is interesting. I

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 1>would I would love to see some more experimentation with apps.

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it gets a little tricky, but you know, something

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that would um allow you to maximize the reach of

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>your various music services would be nice because not all

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>artists have work all in one or all in the

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>same music service. And being able to go through all

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of them simultaneously so that you can listen to what

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to listen to. Uh, you know, subscribing to

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>whichever services you want, but being able to search all

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of them at once would be really nice instead of

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.400
<v Speaker 1>having to you know, go into one and they oh, wait,

0:16:52.440 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that's right, that musicians label doesn't work with Spotify or

0:16:56.920 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Pandora or whatever it may be. Um, so yeah, it's interesting.

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:03.080
<v Speaker 1>I do think I do think there's going to be

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a reckoning between now and where we

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>will see a lot of apps, um, kind of collapse

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:13.199
<v Speaker 1>in on themselves. I think we're going to see on

0:17:13.200 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the investment front, some capitalists venture Catalyst being a little

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>more careful with which apps they jump in and back.

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see it as sustainable in the long

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>run for the kind of approach we're seeing right now.

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Where you know, it seems like every week you're getting

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>one or two stories about some brand new app debuting

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:43.199
<v Speaker 1>with incredible amounts of financial backing. Uh, and no business

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>plan to speak of that that cannot continue indefinitely. So

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I think there's probably gonna be a bit of a

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>shaky bubble kind of moment between now and hopefully by

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>one it will have settled back down so that we

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>can have product of useful apps continue. I don't I

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.960
<v Speaker 1>don't want to see anyone tank. I just don't think

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that the way things have been going is sustainable in

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the long run. The other thing I was thinking is

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>that the way I've seen companies talk to developers, the

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>idea that you write one app and runs on multiple platforms, Android, Chromos,

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>or if you run a Windows app it runs on

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 1>every Windows thing and iOS at some point has to

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 1>have some kind of ties to os ten or mac os.

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine in five years these apps that are

0:18:31.119 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 1>just kind of like, oh, it's only for my phone,

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>it's only from my watch, or it's only for whatever,

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>these these apps will actually be much more powerful than

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 1>when you can install them on full fledged computers, or

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 1>you can have the same experience or slightly modified experiences

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>for different screens. I think that's the future we're headed for.

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>So we're not gonna lose the apps. We might get

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>more productive apps, But I don't see it being this

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>world of the way it is now. It's definitely gonna

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:55.760
<v Speaker 1>be much more, kind of like the way the i

0:18:55.880 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>OS apps can be iPhone and iPad. I can imagine

0:18:59.400 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 1>this happened with all other kinds of apps as well. Yeah,

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that's something that Microsoft has been pushing for for a

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:08.360
<v Speaker 1>long time. I mean Windows eight was our first indication

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>that they really wanted to create this universal experience where

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the technology, the programs you depended upon would work across

0:19:17.840 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 1>multitude multiple platforms seamlessly. And we're we're seeing that with

0:19:22.720 --> 0:19:26.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways that apps are uh designed, you know,

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>like um, Netflix is a great example where you're watching

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 1>Netflix on one platform, you pause your viewing, you go,

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>you turn on a different platform, and you can pick

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:38.719
<v Speaker 1>up right where you left off. That that's sort of

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 1>that same idea, this idea that you can have a

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>persistent experience across whichever platform you want. It may be

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that the interaction with that platform has to be different

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>because it's just a it's you know, it doesn't have

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the same interface, but the experience you get is as

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 1>close to being universal as you can possibly get. Um.

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I agree that that's definitely gonna continue you and and

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 1>it will probably be very impressive, at least to the

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty sixteen versions of US. Maybe versions of US will

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 1>be you know, totally blase about it, but but right

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>now we'd be really we'd really be thrilled by that.

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the other things we did not talk about

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eleven, neither Chris nor I anticipated

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it was the rise of Google Fiber. Uh, and seeing

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:30.639
<v Speaker 1>Google Fiber come out. I'm in Atlanta and Google Fiber

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is currently deploying in Atlanta to the point where lots

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of different neighborhoods in the Atlanta area are eligible for

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>signing up for Google Fiber. Not me yet, but any

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:46.880
<v Speaker 1>day now. Um, So we didn't anticipate Google Fiber showing up.

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Google Fiber is actually going to have

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a disruptive effect on the industry as a whole or

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>do you see this as being something that might might

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>be beneficial for certain regions. But that's all we're going

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to see. We're not gonna get a wider effect than that.

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there's gonna be quite a wide effect. In

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>recent news, Versing went out and bought a o L

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and uh something else was the other one, Yahoo, right,

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 1>And essentially it makes it some kind of digital advertising

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>giant to take on Google. And I loved seeing the

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 1>news only for the reason that maybe it would get

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 1>like like light a fire under Google and go, wait

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a second, if those guys are going to be an

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I s P and they're going to have this kind

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of content management, why don't we do the same thing

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 1>considering we're competitors with them. So I'm expecting Google to

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.680
<v Speaker 1>be one of the first to just full on go

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 1>head to head against a horizon against the wireless carriers

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>out there, because Google Fiber, while it's good, the infrastructure

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:48.959
<v Speaker 1>layout just seems to take so long and then run

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>into a lot of regulation problems. But if they can

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>buy up you know, essentially the wireless last mile, if

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that's how this is going to go, I would think

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>they would be one of the companies to do it.

0:21:59.200 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>And I was trying to out, like, what other company

0:22:01.359 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 1>do I think in five years would actually have a

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>wireless service? I would say in the US anyway, Amazon

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>could easily become some kind of wireless carrier because their

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 1>whole model is just get you to buy products over

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and over and over again. So if they can stop

0:22:16.320 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>that one last barrier of well, I don't have a

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 1>connection to Amazon, I'm gonna do this. Why not do

0:22:20.720 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that with not only their fire devices but any device

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>because in the past they used to have wireless built

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>into their kindles through other services. There's really not a

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of reasons why a company like Amazon wouldn't enter

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.320
<v Speaker 1>that fray, especially in my future. By the way, Google

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>has already entered this, and it's gonna have enough of

0:22:38.359 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a disruption that other companies will no longer be afraid

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>to fight an a T and T Hoverizon and I

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>guess T Mobile at the time, because that's usually the

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>biggest fears, like if I go against these guys, they

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>won't carry my phones, and then that's going to cause

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>an issue. But when there's enough competition, it no longer

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 1>matters well, and it's just nice to see any competition

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>at all in that space, at least with the wireless side.

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>You could argue, particularly with the cellular and the LTE

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:08.639
<v Speaker 1>side of things, you could argue that there is at

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>least some competition here in the United States. When you

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>get to home internet access like wired internet access, that

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>level of competition starts to drop off dramatically. Depending on

0:23:20.320 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>where you live, you may not have any options other

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>than a single provider. Uh. In my case, I have

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:32.240
<v Speaker 1>one decent option at least from a data speed, although

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>anyone who listens to a show that I, as an

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I do knows that it's reliability is more than a

0:23:38.280 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>little questionable. By the way I asked, I don't know

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>if I'll be able to record this week. We'll find out,

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>uh the But but seeing actual competition there is really

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:53.719
<v Speaker 1>encouraging because it suddenly forces these major companies that haven't

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>had to worry about that kind of thing for more

0:23:56.320 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>than a decade to really seriously consider it. Especially seeing

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>is how ones like Comcast are in the business not

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 1>just of providing Internet service, but are also cable television companies,

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>and that business I didn't really think about touching on

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>that because it's not it's related to Internet, but it's

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>not truly Internet. That business has been really kind of

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>teetering on this edge of a precipitous drop for a

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, and we expect that to happen any

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>day now. Really, So seeing that kind of pressure come

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>up is encouraging to me because I hope that it

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 1>will ultimately benefit the consumer where you have real options,

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>not just options in name only for real good Internet

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>access like decent speeds. And it also be nice to

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:51.000
<v Speaker 1>not see any more data caps. I'm really hoping the

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>data caps go away. That was something we touched on

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in our two thousand and eleven episode, and UH turned

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>out that that ended up being a real big issue,

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:04.840
<v Speaker 1>particularly since we're seeing more and more streaming video these

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>days at higher qualities than ever before. You're talking about

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>things like four K and UM and perhaps even higher

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:17.120
<v Speaker 1>resolution video moving forward. Uh, data caps are a real problem.

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that's gonna be something that will persist?

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think companies are going to hold onto data

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:24.959
<v Speaker 1>caps for as long as they possibly can, or do

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you think that demand and competition will ultimately make data

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>caps a thing of the past by the year. There's

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>what I want to happen. When I think it's gonna happen. Okay,

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>let's let's hear what you want to happen. What I

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>want to happen is I would like there to be

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>enough bandwidth if there's basically these companies are auctioning off

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:46.000
<v Speaker 1>or selling to you various speeds. Okay, you can pay

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you know x amount of money for outter ten naka

0:25:48.000 --> 0:25:50.600
<v Speaker 1>bits per second. You can pay why for thirty you

0:25:50.600 --> 0:25:53.199
<v Speaker 1>can pay z for one gig a bit wireless, but

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.919
<v Speaker 1>that's not gonna happen. What's gonna happen is you're going

0:25:56.000 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to get this giant fire hose of speed, like we're

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna give you one gig a bit per sect it,

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>but your cap is five gigabytes. You through this now,

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 1>no gigabytes to gigabyte. There's there's obviously a change there,

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>but that's the thing that keeps making money. It's actually

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:14.359
<v Speaker 1>relatively simple to explain to people as well. When it

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>comes to caps um, I don't see that being changed unless,

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>like we talked about, other companies get into the game

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>where there's enough competition, maybe somebody can disrupt that marketing.

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:28.359
<v Speaker 1>But the way it is now, it seems like the

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.919
<v Speaker 1>old old ideas was unlimited, and we'll have unlimited and

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>then people would never let them go. Because of the

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>changes that have happened, I think caps are here to stay,

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.200
<v Speaker 1>at least only on the wireless space. On the wired side,

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the home based stuff, I still think if they have

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:43.720
<v Speaker 1>caps would all to be very very high kind of

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>a ludicrous number that's very hard to hit because that's

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>how it's sold at home. It's about speed, that's how

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you get home internet. So I still see wireless companies

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.640
<v Speaker 1>just sticking to caps. One particular wired company, I still

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>think we'll do caps. You know the company, Yeah, this

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is the same one I was ring too earlier. Yes, yeah, yeah,

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 1>now I know that company well too. Well, some might say,

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>uh yeah, I I really hope that the push from

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 1>Google Fiber will ultimately make the wired data caps a

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 1>thing of the past, as companies have to differentiate themselves

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:27.360
<v Speaker 1>more in order to win over customers rather than run

0:27:27.400 --> 0:27:31.439
<v Speaker 1>the risk of seeing their customer base deplete into nothing.

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:34.879
<v Speaker 1>That's my hope. My fear is that this is just

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:39.560
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to be an issue in and that people,

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>even though they'll have the access to much better um

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Internet service, will not be able to take full advantage

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of it because of those things, at least not without

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 1>paying a hefty fee for either the unlimited package, which

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure some companies will offer, or you know, overage

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 1>fees because you keep going over the amount that you're

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 1>allotted per month, uh, somewhat arbitrarily, if not entirely arbitraily.

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>That's the grumpy old man version of this episode. Uh,

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about something that gets me even more angry,

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 1>net neutrality. So net neutrality, we we've seen a lot

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of progress over the last five years. One of the

0:28:19.760 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>things that that happened that Chris and I didn't really

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>predict was the move on an official front to try

0:28:26.920 --> 0:28:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and reframe cable companies are are cable providers internet service

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>providers I should say um in a way that would

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>allow them to fall under rules that would ensure net

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:42.320
<v Speaker 1>neutrality would continue. And we've seen a lot of resistance

0:28:42.360 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of that to that idea over the last couple of years. Uh,

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, the companies are fighting this like crazy. What

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>do you think the status of net neutrality will be

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.720
<v Speaker 1>by I think it's gonna be so much for it

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is the way it is now. I think that the

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>T Mobile method that we've seen was basically what we're

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.400
<v Speaker 1>going to see by everybody. And what I mean by

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that is there's no prioritization of bits over other ones. However,

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>certain bits do not count against caps. It's almost like

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:16.920
<v Speaker 1>bending a rule like crazy without breaking it. So I

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>think that's how we're going to ride this line because

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:20.920
<v Speaker 1>I know, when it comes to net neutrality in the

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>United States, one of the ways that companies can say, hey, listen,

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>we can actually prioritize bits is based on network congestion

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>or network management. As long as you can come up

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 1>with the reason why you need to do this, a

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>legal reason, it'll make sense to do it that way.

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 1>But I'm assuming the tamabile method is actually the future

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of net neutrality. It's not. Again, it's not prioritization. It's

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>just not counting something towards a cap. So in other words, uh,

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not that you would get faster or more reliable service.

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's use a fictional approach. So let's say that

0:29:56.080 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I've got a a a video service. Uh we'll call it,

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, not Flicks. So I've got not Flicks,

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 1>but I also am Let's say a subscriber to Tim Warner.

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>So Tim Warner is my internet service provider, and Tim Warner,

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that guy Tim has got the own his his own

0:30:19.280 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>video service that is competing with not Flicks. And Tim

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Warner's service doesn't count against my data cap, but not

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Flix does. Now, if I were to watch the same

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>movie on either service, I would have, at least in theory,

0:30:35.000 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the exact same experience as a customer, the same same

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:42.200
<v Speaker 1>bit rate, all of that stuff, uh, no buffering, you know,

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>same quality of video. It wouldn't matter. But when it

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>came time for me to pay my bill, I wouldn't

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>have any danger of going over if I was relying

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:56.760
<v Speaker 1>on Tim Warner's service, then on not Flix, where I

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>might go over because that is still counted against my

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>data cap. Am I capturing what you're you're kind of

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>proposing here mostly except the concern becomes when Tim Warner

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>has its own content with it. With the current example

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I was making, I was talking about the Team Mobile,

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it isn't exactly they have skin in the game when

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it comes to music services or whatever. So when you're

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about a an i SP that also has a

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>content arm, that's when it gets a little murky. However,

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it's still not prioritization. It's simply not counting data against

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:34.560
<v Speaker 1>your cap and the cap there's nothing illegal about a cap. Yeah,

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:36.960
<v Speaker 1>So that's so I think that is something I think

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>we will continue to see and also as we keep

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing wireless companies or I s p s get into

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the content game and vice versa. This is going to

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>get pushed now that we're talking about this, This might

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>become the new fight. Can a company that has has

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>two different interests do this kind of not prioritization and

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>get away with it? Yeah? I mean the easy real

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.600
<v Speaker 1>world example of that is Comcast. I mean, Comcast definitely

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>has a vested interest with you know, NBC Universal and

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 1>all this. They have a huge content arm as well

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>as internet service provider business, and the two combined. You know,

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very easy to bring up the concern of

0:32:18.960 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>a conflict of interest if you were to prioritize in

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:28.440
<v Speaker 1>some way, shape or form the native content versus stuff

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that comes from other companies. Uh. I agree. I think

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see a lot of really messy fights,

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>some of which may end up being like big news

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that people like you and I pay a lot of

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.200
<v Speaker 1>attention to and the general public just grumbles about their

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>cable bill. Um, that's based upon past experience in my case.

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>One about the concept of privacy by one, we're already

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing some uh, some struggles out there. We've got so

0:33:03.640 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 1>many devices out in the hands of people that have cameras.

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>They're not only capable of shooting video and recording uh sound,

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>as well as just shooting images. They're not only capable

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of uploading that stuff later, they can stream it live

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 1>at this point, and we've had famous examples, recent examples

0:33:23.840 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 1>of that being used to great effect, uh, sometimes with

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>really disturbing consequences, important but disturbing consequences. But this is

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>also raising up questions of what will privacy be like?

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:42.479
<v Speaker 1>What is the expectation of privacy in a world where

0:33:42.520 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you are surrounded by potentially hundreds of live feed video

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>cameras that could broadcast to the entire world. What do

0:33:50.200 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you think it'll be dead privacy and in five years

0:33:55.840 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>dead dead dead dead dead. Uh. The idea of having

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable expectation of privacy, when could you possibly imagine

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in a space other than I guess maybe a bathroom,

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>where do you have a space where you think you

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 1>have a reasonable expectation that you will not be recorded,

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.560
<v Speaker 1>where you will not be seen by a camera or

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>live streamed. At this point, in this modern age, it's

0:34:18.719 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 1>getting more and more normal. Yeah, there's a chance that

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I could be walking around in a store, in a

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 1>mall or whatever and somebody's live streaming this on Facebook

0:34:25.480 --> 0:34:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Live in five years from now, people don't get way

0:34:28.200 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 1>more used to this concept. So this idea, I think

0:34:30.520 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 1>of the legal standard a reasonable expectation of privacy. That

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>changes when it comes to reasonability. So when it comes

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to your face showing up on a billboard for you know,

0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>not Flix as as a user because you were outside

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>on a phone and if somebody saw you on your

0:34:46.080 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>phone looking at knot Flix, that might be used. It

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:50.120
<v Speaker 1>could be in terms of service. Then we can use

0:34:50.160 --> 0:34:52.280
<v Speaker 1>your image if we get you on the street. There's

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:56.359
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of changes because cameras are everywhere. It used

0:34:56.360 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to be the fear of oh no big brothers watching me,

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 1>but everybody's watching each other. You can live stream anything

0:35:01.920 --> 0:35:05.680
<v Speaker 1>at any given time. I don't think privacy is going

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to be the same kind of great thing we held sacred,

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:10.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, years ago. Now it's just gonna then it's

0:35:10.880 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the future. This idea that well,

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, of course we're live stream This is just

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 1>how it is, you know, that's the way reality is now, right, Yeah,

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 1>And it gets even more complicated than that because you

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>also have organizations that are pushing back against this encroaching

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:33.840
<v Speaker 1>world of live video. I'm I'm thinking specifically various police

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 1>forces around the United States in particular. I mean, this

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:39.319
<v Speaker 1>is something that we've seen in other countries, but you're

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.760
<v Speaker 1>starting to see it in the US where you're seeing

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>more of an opposition to the idea of capturing this

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:48.880
<v Speaker 1>stuff on live video. There was a case in Pennsylvania

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 1>not too long ago in which I believe it was

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.960
<v Speaker 1>a college student who was using his phone to video

0:35:55.200 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>police that were gathered outside of a party, and he

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.919
<v Speaker 1>was detained for that, and there was this whole court case,

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and eventually the court said in their decision that the

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>right to video police police officers in a public space.

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 1>I guess maybe it wasn't a public space because it

0:36:14.320 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>might have been in front of a private house party,

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 1>but two video police like that is not protected under

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:24.319
<v Speaker 1>the First Amendment in the United States unless you are

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>specifically using it to provide meaningful commentary or critique of

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the police force. Which seems to be a pretty major

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 1>legal decision in my mind, one that I am sure

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to be contested over time. But but seeing

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>this kind of uncomfortable reaction where law enforcement groups, not

0:36:48.640 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 1>not universally but in pockets are opposing to opposing this

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of approach tells me that maybe by one will

0:36:58.600 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>have a point where privacy is dead dead dead dead

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 1>dead Mark Zuckerberg style. But it's not gonna be a

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 1>gentle pathway. We're gonna see lots of different reactions, both

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:15.399
<v Speaker 1>from official agencies and individuals who are going to protest this.

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, ultimately, as you say, fruitlessly, because I don't

0:37:20.800 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 1>think that I don't think you can stop this train now.

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:28.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's moving, it's not there's no way to derail it. Uh.

0:37:28.040 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>The question is just how long is it gonna take

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>to get to that destination where we've just you know,

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 1>come to the conclusion that that you're essentially always on camera.

0:37:37.960 --> 0:37:39.840
<v Speaker 1>But it'll be great, you know, the future everything that

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:41.960
<v Speaker 1>people who have like throwback parties, you know, like there's

0:37:42.000 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>nineties parties now, in the future, it'll be like privacy

0:37:45.080 --> 0:37:47.839
<v Speaker 1>parties and there's nobody's got got a phone. You gotta

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:50.319
<v Speaker 1>chill out, and you can't live stream, and it'll be

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:53.880
<v Speaker 1>like a thing that people like do kind of like camping.

0:37:54.080 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 1>They decided we're gonna go off the grid, or we're

0:37:56.680 --> 0:37:59.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna not live stream just for thirty minutes, I know,

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it's crazy, but we're going to be dark. It'll be

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:07.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the the advertising campaign for Las Vegas

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>about what what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. It's

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:12.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna be kind of like that, like, all right on

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:16.560
<v Speaker 1>this weekend, we're not broadcasting what's happening, it's you experience

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that when it happens. When it's over, it's over, and

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:22.879
<v Speaker 1>that's it. Uh. That does appeal to me, even as

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:26.280
<v Speaker 1>someone who seems to be surgically attached to his phone.

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I very like I go through that level of distress

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>if I don't have I realized I don't have my

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:36.120
<v Speaker 1>phone on me. I go through that panic mode. But

0:38:36.239 --> 0:38:38.400
<v Speaker 1>it does also sound nice to kind of get away

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>from that if you're making a conscious effort to do so.

0:38:41.960 --> 0:38:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't like it forced upon me. Um. So, what

0:38:45.400 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 1>about related to privacy? What about cybersecurity? Obviously we've seen

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:55.480
<v Speaker 1>lots of high profile cybersecurity risks and attacks. We've seen

0:38:55.520 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of information about various vulnerabilities being exploited. There are,

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 1>of course, major conferences that are dedicated to both uncovering

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 1>and demonstrating the power of exploiting vulnerabilities. I honestly think

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>because I've been asking you to answer every one of

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:16.200
<v Speaker 1>these questions before I do. It's kind of the safety

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 1>net version. I think, Uh, this is just gonna become

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the most important issues by and I have

0:39:27.600 --> 0:39:32.880
<v Speaker 1>no doubt that there will be several uh major, major

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:37.840
<v Speaker 1>stories that involve cybersecurity failures, possibly even a couple of

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:42.720
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic or a catastrophic I should say catastrophic stories thrown

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in there, and by catastrophic I mean things where either

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it's discovered that there have been uh foreign agencies spying

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 1>on very important material. We've already seen examples of that

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:57.400
<v Speaker 1>in the past, whether it's in the United States or

0:39:57.480 --> 0:39:59.879
<v Speaker 1>other countries. We're gonna see more of that come to light,

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 1>I think over the next few years, and also just

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:06.680
<v Speaker 1>other examples of things like corpiate corp corporate espionage or

0:40:07.680 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether it's something where one company is acting

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:15.200
<v Speaker 1>against another government against the company, or um disenchanted former

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:18.160
<v Speaker 1>employees against the company. I think we're gonna see a

0:40:18.160 --> 0:40:20.400
<v Speaker 1>lot more of this to a point where cybersecurity is

0:40:20.440 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 1>going to be one of the biggest and most important

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 1>industries by one. What are your thoughts. I think in

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>some areas it'll be really important for industry and just

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>in general, like when it comes to everyday security. If

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:38.280
<v Speaker 1>you work at the corporation, you work at a business,

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that kind of thing I just think as a but

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the public consciousness, it will remain as it as it

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.279
<v Speaker 1>has been. We have the whole here. Look at the

0:40:46.360 --> 0:40:49.960
<v Speaker 1>NSA has got everything on everybody at all times, and

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>it still didn't cause a shift in behavior. Now there

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:57.880
<v Speaker 1>might be some new interest in hey, is my phone?

0:40:58.239 --> 0:41:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Is its fingerprint scanner going to be used against me?

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:01.799
<v Speaker 1>Do I have to be conscious when you use my thumb?

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Or does my pass code? Can I not give a passcode?

0:41:04.440 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Those kinds of questions do come up for the general public.

0:41:07.320 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I just think the public consciousness, with the connectivity we

0:41:10.120 --> 0:41:13.799
<v Speaker 1>have now, there's a real ease in just turning off

0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 1>your brand and going yeah, I know that happened over there,

0:41:16.760 --> 0:41:18.239
<v Speaker 1>but you know, I really want to check on this

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:20.120
<v Speaker 1>live stream, I really want to mess with this app,

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to do this other thing. So while it

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:27.080
<v Speaker 1>should be really really important, and while your privacy and

0:41:27.120 --> 0:41:29.800
<v Speaker 1>your protect and being protected in your data being protected,

0:41:30.719 --> 0:41:33.680
<v Speaker 1>it should be important. We see stories all the time

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:39.000
<v Speaker 1>about breaches and overreaching by agencies and finding out there's

0:41:39.360 --> 0:41:43.839
<v Speaker 1>state sponsored attacks. Yet it's only those who are intrigued

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>or interested in security that are already reading the stories,

0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:51.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of feeding itself, not exactly touching hitting a chord

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>with the public. I don't know what it would take

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 1>if the n S A stuff didn't do it. I

0:41:57.360 --> 0:42:01.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it would take other than aliens showing

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:03.160
<v Speaker 1>up and think we have docs on you, and it's

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:06.200
<v Speaker 1>still be more in the aliens and the documents. I

0:42:06.239 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 1>agree with you in the sense that I think the

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:15.760
<v Speaker 1>general public will not be more attuned to the risks

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>and the the various problems of cybersecurity, and even the

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>or the advances and cybersecurity. I also think the general

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 1>population isn't necessarily going to be more um aware and

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>alert and and take proactive steps to better protect their

0:42:32.600 --> 0:42:35.919
<v Speaker 1>own systems. Whether that means, you know, something as simple

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:40.560
<v Speaker 1>as changing the password on your router to uh, making

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 1>certain that you're not using the same passwords for various services,

0:42:45.880 --> 0:42:48.879
<v Speaker 1>all that kind of stuff. Using encryption. I don't think

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be a big deal for most people. But

0:42:51.480 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I do think on the back end of things, on

0:42:53.719 --> 0:42:57.719
<v Speaker 1>the actual cybersecurity industry end of things, that's gonna be

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:03.120
<v Speaker 1>a huge, huge are of growth by one. Like if

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 1>someone were asking me, like they were interested in technology

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>and they were wondering what area would have you know,

0:43:10.000 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 1>good good growth, good potential, I would say cybersecurity is

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>way up there. Uh it's not. I don't think people

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 1>would necessarily consider it glamorous, and a lot of folks

0:43:20.160 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 1>just don't necessarily understand the importance of it. But based

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:26.360
<v Speaker 1>upon the things that have happened, I mean, you know,

0:43:26.400 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the stuff that's happened over the last five years,

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:33.880
<v Speaker 1>from stocks net to you've got the Sony hack, which

0:43:34.040 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 1>was huge news a couple of years ago, Um, the

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Ashley Madison hack where you had uh, you know, essentially

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:45.759
<v Speaker 1>blackmail rolled into hacking. These are big stories and I

0:43:45.800 --> 0:43:48.879
<v Speaker 1>think that's just going to continue over the next few years,

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:51.080
<v Speaker 1>which is that's why I feel like it's gonna be

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 1>even bigger by not bigger in the sense that people will,

0:43:55.320 --> 0:43:57.160
<v Speaker 1>like the average person was going to talk about it,

0:43:57.560 --> 0:44:00.200
<v Speaker 1>but bigger in the sense that more and more our

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 1>companies and and government agencies are going to pay a

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 1>lot more attention to that side of things. And the

0:44:06.680 --> 0:44:08.520
<v Speaker 1>other thing is there's a lot of technologies that can

0:44:08.560 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>take care of the cybersecurity end, even if the users

0:44:11.200 --> 0:44:13.279
<v Speaker 1>in paying attention, like biometrics, like you know mention the

0:44:13.320 --> 0:44:16.120
<v Speaker 1>fingerprint scanner, there's the note seven it's got it's new

0:44:16.160 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Irish scanner. You would think that with that kind of

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:22.239
<v Speaker 1>technology that might help the public might not care that

0:44:22.400 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh look, I can use a fingerprint or use my

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:26.840
<v Speaker 1>eyes to unlock something, but that will actually up to

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:30.080
<v Speaker 1>security in general because you're not using the same one, two, three,

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>four five password Because people do that. Yeah, yeah, I

0:44:36.080 --> 0:44:39.239
<v Speaker 1>mean there's a reason why a lot of brute force

0:44:39.280 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>attacks can be effective, and that's because a lot of

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:45.080
<v Speaker 1>people use the same week passwords. Their entire databases just

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:51.320
<v Speaker 1>filled with millions of common, simple passwords, and that's why

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:53.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those brute force attacks can be can

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:57.600
<v Speaker 1>be ultimately successful. It's because people are not practicing good

0:44:57.600 --> 0:45:02.200
<v Speaker 1>computer security. So using bio tricks as a means of

0:45:02.200 --> 0:45:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of of improving that is a step in the right direction.

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously no system is completely full proof, but um,

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:14.160
<v Speaker 1>this this is definitely a better step than one two,

0:45:14.200 --> 0:45:20.120
<v Speaker 1>three for five, which is on my luggage. Um, I've

0:45:20.120 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 1>got a question here that I'm just curious what your

0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:23.960
<v Speaker 1>thoughts are and some again something that we didn't really

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:28.279
<v Speaker 1>touch on the show. But do you think internet based currencies,

0:45:28.320 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm specifically thinking of like cryptocurrency like like bitcoin,

0:45:32.000 --> 0:45:34.319
<v Speaker 1>will play a large role in one or do you

0:45:34.360 --> 0:45:36.840
<v Speaker 1>think that that's just something that it's going to be

0:45:36.880 --> 0:45:39.600
<v Speaker 1>popular with a certain segment of the population but never

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 1>really grow beyond that. I'm curious about your thoughts on this.

0:45:45.760 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's gonna stay niche. I mean, there's nothing

0:45:50.000 --> 0:45:55.360
<v Speaker 1>demanding that we stop using dollars or euro or pounds.

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 1>So the idea of having this cryptocurrency or that you're

0:45:59.200 --> 0:46:01.640
<v Speaker 1>minding something like the like bitcoin particular, where you can

0:46:01.880 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 1>keep creating them, it takes a long time and it

0:46:04.840 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 1>figures itself out that Have you done an episode on bitcoin? Yes, okay,

0:46:08.920 --> 0:46:10.919
<v Speaker 1>so listen to that episode to fully explain it, because

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to do it justice here. But I

0:46:13.040 --> 0:46:16.399
<v Speaker 1>don't see it being something that would take over even

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:19.680
<v Speaker 1>though we have this increasing globalization. When it comes to

0:46:20.400 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, you can get anything from anywhere, any time

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:26.839
<v Speaker 1>with any device. That's awesome, but it took a lot

0:46:26.840 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of time to get that infrastructure in place. If you

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:31.920
<v Speaker 1>introduced a new currency that's gonna make it work. I

0:46:31.960 --> 0:46:34.400
<v Speaker 1>don't see that becoming a bigger deal. I still seeing

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:38.440
<v Speaker 1>see it having a minor interest for people who really

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:39.840
<v Speaker 1>want to get into it, But I don't see it

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 1>growing much larger than that. What do you think. I

0:46:42.520 --> 0:46:46.680
<v Speaker 1>think you're right. I think if there are any if

0:46:46.719 --> 0:46:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we see any major state backed cryptocurrencies, then there's the

0:46:50.920 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 1>possibility that that could take off. But then you start

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:56.000
<v Speaker 1>asking the asking questions of why bother going through the

0:46:56.040 --> 0:46:59.360
<v Speaker 1>trouble of creating a cryptocurrency when you could just create

0:47:00.000 --> 0:47:03.360
<v Speaker 1>areas services things like Google Wallet or Apple pay, the

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:07.319
<v Speaker 1>ideas of like the transaction services. So it has nothing

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:09.799
<v Speaker 1>to do really with currency other than the fact that

0:47:09.800 --> 0:47:12.279
<v Speaker 1>those are the units with which you know that you

0:47:12.360 --> 0:47:14.840
<v Speaker 1>use to determine how much you're paying for something. But

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it's actually a wealth transfer system, for lack of a

0:47:19.960 --> 0:47:22.839
<v Speaker 1>better phrase. I think that's what we're going to see

0:47:22.880 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 1>continue to grow. We're going to see those services get

0:47:26.960 --> 0:47:31.280
<v Speaker 1>more popular and used in and implemented in a variety

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of different products, including I mean wearables being a really

0:47:35.880 --> 0:47:38.840
<v Speaker 1>simple example. I can easily imagine a lot of wearables

0:47:38.880 --> 0:47:41.839
<v Speaker 1>having that particular capability built in as part of what

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it does. But I agree with you that the cryptocurrency

0:47:46.239 --> 0:47:50.719
<v Speaker 1>I think will remain the realm of a smaller population.

0:47:50.760 --> 0:47:54.279
<v Speaker 1>And I would also argue that it's those people who

0:47:54.840 --> 0:47:58.960
<v Speaker 1>they purposefully try to maintain that, right. I think that

0:47:59.040 --> 0:48:02.680
<v Speaker 1>those populations don't necessarily want to see a widespread adoption

0:48:02.719 --> 0:48:05.919
<v Speaker 1>of the currency that they like, because, for one thing,

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:08.880
<v Speaker 1>it allows that currency to be used for stuff that

0:48:10.840 --> 0:48:14.399
<v Speaker 1>they might not want more attention drawn toward, right, like

0:48:14.600 --> 0:48:18.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the more shady or possibly outright illegal things

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:23.480
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen bitcoin used for, and other cryptocurrencies as well. Yeah,

0:48:23.520 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea with with bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, it's essentially

0:48:27.280 --> 0:48:31.440
<v Speaker 1>cash online, an untraceable unit that can be passed from

0:48:31.480 --> 0:48:34.600
<v Speaker 1>one person to another without necessarily being caught with this

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:36.799
<v Speaker 1>kind of paper trail with credit cards, that kind of thing,

0:48:37.160 --> 0:48:39.160
<v Speaker 1>And like you're saying, it should stay I imagine staying

0:48:39.239 --> 0:48:44.560
<v Speaker 1>niche because it's almost in some respects cryptocurrency is a

0:48:44.600 --> 0:48:47.880
<v Speaker 1>solution and looking for a problem. Yeah, you don't really

0:48:47.920 --> 0:48:51.480
<v Speaker 1>need to do this, especially with all of the banking

0:48:51.680 --> 0:48:54.879
<v Speaker 1>structures out there to do a lot of I don't

0:48:54.880 --> 0:48:57.160
<v Speaker 1>want to say legitimate, but other business. You know, you

0:48:57.200 --> 0:48:59.400
<v Speaker 1>want to do regular business. You can do that so

0:48:59.440 --> 0:49:01.920
<v Speaker 1>many different ways. At this point, I remember your way

0:49:01.920 --> 0:49:03.319
<v Speaker 1>back when this is looking is it the wrong way

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:05.440
<v Speaker 1>of looking at the internet? But people were afraid to

0:49:05.520 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 1>bank online. But people have gotten very comfortable with it now,

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:12.120
<v Speaker 1>so maybe a little too comfortable in some cases could

0:49:12.160 --> 0:49:14.600
<v Speaker 1>be Yeah, yeah, I think I think a large part

0:49:14.600 --> 0:49:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of it is your philosophy. If you're if you're like

0:49:16.880 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a cryptoanarchist, then this type of currency would have a

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:25.640
<v Speaker 1>very strong appeal, right like, Uh, there, there's I think

0:49:25.680 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 1>there's an element with not not every but many bitcoin

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:34.279
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasts that the one of the strongest appeals is that

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:39.439
<v Speaker 1>it isn't a state backed, centralized unit of currency. Uh,

0:49:39.520 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 1>it has this other kind of mystique to it that

0:49:43.320 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't rely upon an authoritative force determining the value of

0:49:49.520 --> 0:49:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that currency. And there's that part of the appeal, and

0:49:53.880 --> 0:49:55.839
<v Speaker 1>I can understand that, But I also understand that that's

0:49:55.840 --> 0:49:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a part of the appeal that really just appeals to

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:02.400
<v Speaker 1>that small segment of the population. Not everyone shares those

0:50:02.560 --> 0:50:07.400
<v Speaker 1>same values. So I think that that by its nature,

0:50:07.440 --> 0:50:13.960
<v Speaker 1>will continue to limit cryptocurrency to its relatively small population. Well, um,

0:50:14.000 --> 0:50:15.960
<v Speaker 1>here's something that you and I have both worked in

0:50:16.760 --> 0:50:21.279
<v Speaker 1>YouTube videos. YouTube has changed a lot over the last

0:50:21.320 --> 0:50:24.319
<v Speaker 1>several years. Do you think the YouTube of one will

0:50:24.320 --> 0:50:27.160
<v Speaker 1>look remarkably different from the way it looks now? Are

0:50:27.160 --> 0:50:31.560
<v Speaker 1>we going to have thousands of multi channel networks out

0:50:31.560 --> 0:50:35.440
<v Speaker 1>there or will it even be possible for an independent

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:38.880
<v Speaker 1>artist to upload something and have it see an instance

0:50:39.000 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 1>any sort of traction whatsoever. I think independent arts will

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 1>still be able to upload things, and things will go

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:47.680
<v Speaker 1>viral when they do, or they'll be shared if it's good.

0:50:47.719 --> 0:50:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I always think that great content rises to the top

0:50:50.800 --> 0:50:54.600
<v Speaker 1>no matter what. But I was trying to figure out

0:50:54.680 --> 0:50:57.080
<v Speaker 1>what is the role of YouTube? This is separate. Didn't

0:50:57.080 --> 0:50:59.319
<v Speaker 1>even look at any of your notes or questions. I

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:01.239
<v Speaker 1>was thinking about YouTube in the future. I thought the

0:51:01.280 --> 0:51:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Internet and the future is going to be super fast.

0:51:03.520 --> 0:51:05.680
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have a lot of video, You're gonna see

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:08.160
<v Speaker 1>over the top solutions with cable companies, You're gonna have

0:51:08.200 --> 0:51:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this network television online, and then you

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:13.200
<v Speaker 1>have YouTube. And I was trying to figure out what

0:51:13.320 --> 0:51:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is it going to be And the closest thing I

0:51:15.440 --> 0:51:17.440
<v Speaker 1>could come up with is I could almost see YouTube

0:51:17.480 --> 0:51:21.640
<v Speaker 1>becoming a network of source. They already have their own channels,

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:26.640
<v Speaker 1>so it would be its own network with its own channels,

0:51:26.800 --> 0:51:28.480
<v Speaker 1>which is weird. I guess, kind of like HBO or

0:51:28.560 --> 0:51:31.399
<v Speaker 1>HBO has got one, two, three, they've got kids, all

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff. So I could see it going

0:51:34.239 --> 0:51:37.560
<v Speaker 1>that way where it's imagine or over the top service

0:51:37.600 --> 0:51:40.719
<v Speaker 1>that's bundling in YouTube, which should theoretically be free, but

0:51:40.760 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's YouTube read a premium version that has the

0:51:43.200 --> 0:51:46.040
<v Speaker 1>premium content available. That's where I really see it going,

0:51:46.120 --> 0:51:50.840
<v Speaker 1>because if television goes online entirely online, television should be

0:51:50.840 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a part of that. So I would think YouTube somewhat

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:58.000
<v Speaker 1>becomes a network where even though it's it's still generated

0:51:58.040 --> 0:52:01.279
<v Speaker 1>by a lot of independ it's there are obviously a

0:52:01.320 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of companies putting money into it. Every now and

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:05.759
<v Speaker 1>then you'll see a surprise hit, kind of like I

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:08.080
<v Speaker 1>guess if you think about it in the movie structure,

0:52:08.080 --> 0:52:12.000
<v Speaker 1>where you can have a low budget hit happen with movies,

0:52:12.239 --> 0:52:15.040
<v Speaker 1>why not with television. Yeah, I can see that. I mean,

0:52:15.120 --> 0:52:17.399
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a weird thing to think about because

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't have really anticipated the multi channel networks coming

0:52:21.200 --> 0:52:23.120
<v Speaker 1>up and multi channel network for those of you who

0:52:23.560 --> 0:52:27.720
<v Speaker 1>aren't familiar. Uh, It's the name pretty much gives it away.

0:52:27.719 --> 0:52:31.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a network of different YouTube channels that

0:52:31.440 --> 0:52:35.520
<v Speaker 1>have banded together to make kind of a unified business.

0:52:35.600 --> 0:52:39.880
<v Speaker 1>So you may have uh, six or seven different channels

0:52:39.920 --> 0:52:43.400
<v Speaker 1>all bundled together under one network where you can easily

0:52:43.760 --> 0:52:47.880
<v Speaker 1>see the different individual channels within that network. Each of

0:52:47.880 --> 0:52:50.400
<v Speaker 1>those individual channels might be very different from one another.

0:52:50.440 --> 0:52:54.120
<v Speaker 1>They may not be thematically linked at all. Uh. It

0:52:54.160 --> 0:52:56.960
<v Speaker 1>could just very well be that they've banded together and

0:52:57.120 --> 0:53:00.960
<v Speaker 1>mostly in an attempt to tap into the same promotional

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:06.719
<v Speaker 1>power so that one independent creator can take advantage of

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:11.480
<v Speaker 1>an audience built by another creator. Uh. And obviously ill

0:53:11.640 --> 0:53:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that the more closely aligned the various

0:53:15.280 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 1>channels are, at least in tone, if not content, the

0:53:19.320 --> 0:53:22.439
<v Speaker 1>easier it is to migrate some of that audience over

0:53:22.520 --> 0:53:26.000
<v Speaker 1>so that they also adopt the new platforms. I don't

0:53:26.000 --> 0:53:29.680
<v Speaker 1>know if that's gonna be as strong a presence in one.

0:53:30.960 --> 0:53:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I almost see this being like another bubble, kind of

0:53:33.520 --> 0:53:35.680
<v Speaker 1>like what I was saying with the app bubbles. I

0:53:35.719 --> 0:53:38.920
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna see some multi channel networks do just fine,

0:53:39.120 --> 0:53:42.480
<v Speaker 1>they'll stick around, they may even grow, they may incorporate others,

0:53:43.120 --> 0:53:45.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think we're gonna see a lot of them collapse.

0:53:45.520 --> 0:53:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think the online business is hard. Creating

0:53:49.719 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 1>online content is not easy. It's not easy to do,

0:53:53.280 --> 0:53:57.359
<v Speaker 1>and it's really not easy to do successfully. Right, Like,

0:53:57.400 --> 0:54:00.840
<v Speaker 1>it's already it's already got a barrier. The technology barrier

0:54:00.880 --> 0:54:04.640
<v Speaker 1>has come way down. But to do high quality content

0:54:04.800 --> 0:54:07.319
<v Speaker 1>is already challenging, and then to have that content be

0:54:07.360 --> 0:54:14.200
<v Speaker 1>discovered is growing increasingly challenging over time. Uh, particularly when

0:54:14.200 --> 0:54:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it comes to video. I mean, we've heard the stats

0:54:16.400 --> 0:54:18.279
<v Speaker 1>about how there it's more than I don't know what

0:54:18.360 --> 0:54:20.239
<v Speaker 1>it's up to now. Last I looked, and this was

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:22.799
<v Speaker 1>months ago, so I know it's update was something like

0:54:22.840 --> 0:54:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and eight hours of video or uploaded to

0:54:25.680 --> 0:54:29.240
<v Speaker 1>YouTube every minute. So when you start looking at that volume,

0:54:29.280 --> 0:54:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you realize the chances of being discovered out of that

0:54:32.680 --> 0:54:35.320
<v Speaker 1>massive amount of stuff being put up every single minute

0:54:35.760 --> 0:54:39.640
<v Speaker 1>are are pretty pretty low. It's really really a challenge.

0:54:39.920 --> 0:54:44.120
<v Speaker 1>So I'm curious to see in one if that shakes

0:54:44.120 --> 0:54:48.200
<v Speaker 1>out at all, If either people abandon YouTube, you know,

0:54:48.239 --> 0:54:50.720
<v Speaker 1>people who are spending a lot of time and effort

0:54:50.760 --> 0:54:54.400
<v Speaker 1>to try and get something discovered end up walking away

0:54:54.400 --> 0:54:56.960
<v Speaker 1>from it if they don't meet with any success or

0:54:56.960 --> 0:54:59.399
<v Speaker 1>if it will just be even crazier than it is now,

0:54:59.440 --> 0:55:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and I on se don't know, I can see it

0:55:01.680 --> 0:55:05.160
<v Speaker 1>go either way. You just spark my imagination here because

0:55:05.160 --> 0:55:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking the way Google has invested in deep

0:55:07.680 --> 0:55:10.000
<v Speaker 1>machine learning, the way Facebook has done the same thing.

0:55:10.440 --> 0:55:12.719
<v Speaker 1>This idea that you just said, you know, hundreds of

0:55:12.719 --> 0:55:16.240
<v Speaker 1>hours of being uploaded like every minute, the the idea

0:55:16.320 --> 0:55:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that there's all of this content and discover ability is

0:55:18.960 --> 0:55:21.480
<v Speaker 1>really low. That's where all this deep machine learning makes

0:55:21.480 --> 0:55:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of sense on the back end. So if

0:55:23.160 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you're done watching a YouTube video on whatever, you're watching

0:55:26.080 --> 0:55:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it on the future, it will actually recommend something similar

0:55:29.680 --> 0:55:33.680
<v Speaker 1>or something maybe in style, maybe in comedy, maybe just

0:55:33.719 --> 0:55:37.879
<v Speaker 1>an appearance, maybe something like that, because the analysis of

0:55:37.920 --> 0:55:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the content should be greater at that point where this

0:55:42.120 --> 0:55:44.200
<v Speaker 1>is actually a good problem to have. Having too much

0:55:44.239 --> 0:55:48.080
<v Speaker 1>content to go through is actually awesome. From I would

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:50.120
<v Speaker 1>think any viewers like what do I pick? I could

0:55:50.120 --> 0:55:54.400
<v Speaker 1>pick anything that that it does become very paralyzing in

0:55:54.400 --> 0:55:56.399
<v Speaker 1>the fact you don't know what to pick. But if

0:55:56.440 --> 0:55:59.680
<v Speaker 1>these algorithms get better. If deep machine learning has figured out,

0:56:00.040 --> 0:56:03.080
<v Speaker 1>how what are the parts and components of this thing

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:05.839
<v Speaker 1>that you enjoyed, we can give you another one. I

0:56:05.880 --> 0:56:08.719
<v Speaker 1>think that maybe that's the future of YouTube networks that

0:56:08.800 --> 0:56:13.879
<v Speaker 1>they have built at these these playlists essentially for you

0:56:14.040 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and your interests based on your interests, because as fast

0:56:18.200 --> 0:56:20.320
<v Speaker 1>as the internet will get in five years, and whether

0:56:20.360 --> 0:56:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you have net neutrality being a problem or not, and

0:56:23.120 --> 0:56:26.120
<v Speaker 1>all these other problem concerns when you're trying to consume it,

0:56:26.440 --> 0:56:28.759
<v Speaker 1>if you can't find anything, it's a problem. I really

0:56:28.800 --> 0:56:32.520
<v Speaker 1>think when that happens, we'll see an improvement on this

0:56:32.600 --> 0:56:35.759
<v Speaker 1>deep machine learning where you will get content that makes

0:56:35.800 --> 0:56:39.560
<v Speaker 1>sense for you at that time. Yeah, curation is a

0:56:39.719 --> 0:56:44.480
<v Speaker 1>huge problem, right, like a like a challenge curation curating

0:56:44.719 --> 0:56:47.759
<v Speaker 1>huge amounts of or going through an enormous amount of

0:56:47.840 --> 0:56:50.600
<v Speaker 1>information in order to curate it and get the stuff

0:56:50.600 --> 0:56:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that's most relevant to you. This is one of the

0:56:52.680 --> 0:56:55.720
<v Speaker 1>biggest challenges that come with big data. Uh, the idea

0:56:55.800 --> 0:56:58.239
<v Speaker 1>that yeah, you've got tons of information out there, and

0:56:58.360 --> 0:57:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it is potentially useful in many different ways,

0:57:01.400 --> 0:57:04.200
<v Speaker 1>but how do you actually sort through all of that

0:57:04.239 --> 0:57:06.879
<v Speaker 1>to get the best out of what you have, same

0:57:06.920 --> 0:57:08.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing here that we're talking about, trying to

0:57:08.960 --> 0:57:12.880
<v Speaker 1>find the videos that are most going to resonate with you,

0:57:12.960 --> 0:57:16.400
<v Speaker 1>whether it's from an entertainment perspective or being thought provoking,

0:57:16.400 --> 0:57:18.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever it might be. It also reminds me a lot

0:57:18.880 --> 0:57:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of a patent Oswald routine where he talks about his

0:57:21.160 --> 0:57:24.360
<v Speaker 1>TiVo going crazy because he he used his tvo to

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:26.720
<v Speaker 1>record a Western and then his TiVo went nuts and

0:57:26.720 --> 0:57:29.520
<v Speaker 1>started recording all the different programs that have horses in them.

0:57:30.280 --> 0:57:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh because because it came to the conclusion that he

0:57:32.600 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 1>must really like horses, and just shows you that machine

0:57:36.320 --> 0:57:40.760
<v Speaker 1>learning there is a process. It's not always perfect right

0:57:40.760 --> 0:57:44.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the gate. Uh So, a couple of other

0:57:44.920 --> 0:57:47.400
<v Speaker 1>things I wanted to ask before we conclude this episode.

0:57:47.960 --> 0:57:50.360
<v Speaker 1>This kind of ties into again something that we're both

0:57:50.680 --> 0:57:54.480
<v Speaker 1>concerned with as as content creators on the Internet. What

0:57:54.560 --> 0:57:57.200
<v Speaker 1>do you think the monetization of the Internet is going

0:57:57.240 --> 0:57:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to look like? In five years? We've been seeing web

0:58:00.000 --> 0:58:05.120
<v Speaker 1>advertising as the primary way for at least large companies

0:58:05.480 --> 0:58:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to earn money off of creating content for the Internet,

0:58:09.120 --> 0:58:11.640
<v Speaker 1>but we've also seen a lot of different reactions to

0:58:11.680 --> 0:58:15.880
<v Speaker 1>web advertising from the rise of ad blockers to UH

0:58:15.920 --> 0:58:18.240
<v Speaker 1>discussions about what are the best practices. Do you think

0:58:18.280 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 1>web advertising is going to remain the way that that

0:58:22.440 --> 0:58:26.640
<v Speaker 1>large UH intent content creators are going to go. Do

0:58:26.720 --> 0:58:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you think other methods like the Patreon method, like a

0:58:30.280 --> 0:58:33.840
<v Speaker 1>subscriber method are going to actually grow over the years

0:58:33.960 --> 0:58:36.480
<v Speaker 1>or is there going to be something else? Like how

0:58:36.520 --> 0:58:40.880
<v Speaker 1>are we going to make sure that we can pay

0:58:40.920 --> 0:58:43.680
<v Speaker 1>for stuff so that people keep making the stuff we like?

0:58:44.560 --> 0:58:46.640
<v Speaker 1>And this is this one is a really hard question

0:58:46.680 --> 0:58:49.960
<v Speaker 1>because for years people have been conditioned that you can

0:58:49.960 --> 0:58:53.000
<v Speaker 1>get content online for free, and then it's because there

0:58:53.000 --> 0:58:55.120
<v Speaker 1>were ads on there, and then after that it's like,

0:58:55.120 --> 0:58:56.720
<v Speaker 1>wait a second, we don't need to see ads because

0:58:56.760 --> 0:58:58.440
<v Speaker 1>we can use ad block And then you realize, wait

0:58:58.480 --> 0:59:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a second, this company isn't get money, but I like

0:59:00.680 --> 0:59:03.880
<v Speaker 1>this this company. Can I just white list them? Should

0:59:03.880 --> 0:59:05.479
<v Speaker 1>I do that? Or do I go to another site

0:59:05.480 --> 0:59:08.760
<v Speaker 1>that reblogs it or not? So in the future, I'm

0:59:08.800 --> 0:59:14.520
<v Speaker 1>expecting advertising isn't going anywhere the old style, you know, adds,

0:59:14.640 --> 0:59:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the actual banner ads takeovers that kind of stuff that's

0:59:18.360 --> 0:59:20.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be there no matter what. I'd imagine you'd see

0:59:21.000 --> 0:59:25.880
<v Speaker 1>much more sponsored content, uh content that's somewhat harder for

0:59:25.920 --> 0:59:29.840
<v Speaker 1>ad blockers to find as ads. I know Facebook's doing

0:59:29.840 --> 0:59:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a push with that right now where they're trying to

0:59:31.520 --> 0:59:34.040
<v Speaker 1>fight ad block plus trying to make sure that they

0:59:34.040 --> 0:59:36.680
<v Speaker 1>have as much ads that they can on their sites. Also,

0:59:36.800 --> 0:59:40.120
<v Speaker 1>like we were talking about with mobile apps, that's an

0:59:40.160 --> 0:59:43.520
<v Speaker 1>area where you can have a siloed application that an

0:59:43.560 --> 0:59:46.440
<v Speaker 1>ad blocker wouldn't work on in theory, so you might

0:59:46.480 --> 0:59:49.160
<v Speaker 1>see it that way, I would hope, and I'm actually

0:59:49.200 --> 0:59:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I hope. I actually think of a throwback concept of

0:59:52.360 --> 0:59:55.440
<v Speaker 1>micro transactions where you are paying a couple of sense

0:59:55.480 --> 0:59:57.760
<v Speaker 1>instead of having a subscription. But I see this this

0:59:57.880 --> 1:00:01.880
<v Speaker 1>being the model for contents in the future. With advertising.

1:00:02.040 --> 1:00:04.760
<v Speaker 1>You'll have your standard advertising, you also have your Patreon

1:00:04.840 --> 1:00:07.400
<v Speaker 1>method of basically paying per month what you want. I

1:00:07.400 --> 1:00:09.280
<v Speaker 1>could see a subscription thing on top of that and

1:00:09.480 --> 1:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>micro payments, in other words, allowing any single way to

1:00:14.000 --> 1:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>break the paywall with this either turn off your ad blocker,

1:00:17.080 --> 1:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>or pay us two cents for this, or give us

1:00:19.240 --> 1:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a subscription for the year. I just see a lot

1:00:21.360 --> 1:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of companies being very, very open to how their content

1:00:24.440 --> 1:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>is going to be received and not just sticking forever

1:00:27.520 --> 1:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to this. You must look at our Betterer ad and

1:00:29.760 --> 1:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>here is a nice little other ad that says you

1:00:31.920 --> 1:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>can't read this until you pay more money. Paywalls that

1:00:34.920 --> 1:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>work for other bigger companies out there. I don't think

1:00:38.240 --> 1:00:41.480
<v Speaker 1>that they should be as high for smaller places. Yeah,

1:00:41.600 --> 1:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. I think uh. I think we're

1:00:43.920 --> 1:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna see the Patreon method get adopted by more and

1:00:46.840 --> 1:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>more smaller content creators. UM, particularly those that are working

1:00:52.520 --> 1:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>on this as a passion project as opposed to it

1:00:55.840 --> 1:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>being like a a a business business. This right like

1:01:00.920 --> 1:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it's they want to make money off of it, but

1:01:03.560 --> 1:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>they also are in it because this is something they

1:01:06.320 --> 1:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>truly want to do. UM. I see a lot of

1:01:09.840 --> 1:01:13.320
<v Speaker 1>more people going down that route. UM. I agree that

1:01:13.320 --> 1:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see a lot of companies say, look,

1:01:15.880 --> 1:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>here are all the different ways that you can support us.

1:01:19.880 --> 1:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>Pick whichever way works best for you, and then we

1:01:23.320 --> 1:01:26.320
<v Speaker 1>will continue creating the stuff you like. I think that

1:01:26.480 --> 1:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>is probably the I think it's gonna take us a

1:01:28.760 --> 1:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>while to get there, but I think this is the

1:01:30.120 --> 1:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>best approach again, to just give those options to the consumer.

1:01:35.440 --> 1:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>And I agree with you that we have conditioned people

1:01:38.960 --> 1:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to think that stuff on the Internet is free. Somehow

1:01:44.320 --> 1:01:47.960
<v Speaker 1>like it it We just magically create it, and somehow

1:01:48.160 --> 1:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>we're also able to pay rent and buy food, uh,

1:01:52.680 --> 1:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and that it's all wonderful and we will continue to

1:01:56.040 --> 1:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>do so in perpetuity and we're never going to get

1:01:58.840 --> 1:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>evicted or star to death. That's not the way the

1:02:01.280 --> 1:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>world works, unfortunately. So I think we're definitely gonna see

1:02:05.440 --> 1:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot more sponsored content. We're gonna see some branded

1:02:08.520 --> 1:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>content stuff that uh, you know, We're gonna see some

1:02:12.080 --> 1:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>growing pains with people experimenting with how do I create

1:02:15.560 --> 1:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>something that serves the brand that's sponsoring me, but also

1:02:19.920 --> 1:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>is of genuine value to the people listening, so it

1:02:23.040 --> 1:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't end up becoming a very long commercial that people

1:02:26.640 --> 1:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>feel like they're fooled into consuming because they hate that.

1:02:30.640 --> 1:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you know that. I asked, people

1:02:32.960 --> 1:02:35.680
<v Speaker 1>hate being tricked into watching a commercial? What's that? I

1:02:35.680 --> 1:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>couldn't hear you over, my beautiful citizen. What I just kidding?

1:02:39.080 --> 1:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Right right? I was thinking a while ago, we lived

1:02:42.880 --> 1:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>in a world where paying for music online sounded like

1:02:45.320 --> 1:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the craziest thing. You could get it as much as

1:02:47.520 --> 1:02:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you want, you could find it anywhere. But if the

1:02:49.960 --> 1:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>cost gets low enough then people you saw that people

1:02:53.920 --> 1:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>change their methods to pay per song. Now the subcription

1:02:57.160 --> 1:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>services are completely the way to go. So I think

1:03:00.640 --> 1:03:04.439
<v Speaker 1>if the if the business side figures it out and goes, look,

1:03:04.440 --> 1:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>we can't keep it going the way it is now.

1:03:06.200 --> 1:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>It's just not not sustainable. There's a chance that people

1:03:09.440 --> 1:03:12.640
<v Speaker 1>will relearn this and then go, yes, I wouldn't. I

1:03:12.680 --> 1:03:14.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't take this. And I really hate saying this, but

1:03:14.640 --> 1:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't just swipe a newspaper right, And there's content

1:03:17.720 --> 1:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>there and there's nothing wrong with charging for content that

1:03:20.320 --> 1:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you make. And I'm just saying this as a content producer.

1:03:23.080 --> 1:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I say this as a content consumer that I do

1:03:25.560 --> 1:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>pay for this stuff I want to see Otherwise, how

1:03:29.800 --> 1:03:32.080
<v Speaker 1>will people know you basically vote with your dollars? Is

1:03:32.120 --> 1:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>my idea on that, which is like people's idea, But

1:03:35.560 --> 1:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's going to take some time. It does. There's

1:03:38.240 --> 1:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>just such inertia to not change anything. Yeah, but well,

1:03:42.440 --> 1:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean you've got you've got billions of dollars wrapped

1:03:45.960 --> 1:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>up in an industry that is not known to be

1:03:50.040 --> 1:03:52.800
<v Speaker 1>fast to react to changes. And I'm talking about the

1:03:53.080 --> 1:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>marketing industry in general, advertising industry um which has it's

1:03:57.720 --> 1:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's linked to pretty much everything we're talking about

1:04:00.760 --> 1:04:04.640
<v Speaker 1>in this little little discussion. Uh And and yeah, you

1:04:04.720 --> 1:04:08.959
<v Speaker 1>can't expect it to change very quickly. And yet the

1:04:08.960 --> 1:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the wants of the customers are changing, and and that

1:04:13.120 --> 1:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>what they are willing to do changes and you have

1:04:16.680 --> 1:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to react to that. I think, uh you really hit

1:04:20.120 --> 1:04:22.120
<v Speaker 1>on it. The idea that if you're if the price

1:04:22.240 --> 1:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is right and if it's easy enough to get, like

1:04:28.080 --> 1:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to have both of those things.

1:04:29.680 --> 1:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>You have to have the right price, and you have

1:04:31.120 --> 1:04:33.439
<v Speaker 1>to make it really really easy for people to buy

1:04:33.440 --> 1:04:37.600
<v Speaker 1>your stuff. Uh. DRM was a huge problem that I

1:04:37.640 --> 1:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>think ended up being a big negative for a lot

1:04:41.240 --> 1:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of people, for lots of different stuff, not just music,

1:04:43.440 --> 1:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>but you know, various software packages, that kind of thing

1:04:46.840 --> 1:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that as you make it more difficult for people to

1:04:50.800 --> 1:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>buy a legitimate copy of your product, they're going to

1:04:54.360 --> 1:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>go further to get illegitimate copies because they don't have

1:04:57.680 --> 1:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to deal with all the mess that comes along with

1:05:00.600 --> 1:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to buy something legally. Uh So, making making it

1:05:04.280 --> 1:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>is easy to get and at the right price, I

1:05:07.800 --> 1:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>think Urondo something like I think there I think there

1:05:10.720 --> 1:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>might be money in that um, and people are willing

1:05:14.160 --> 1:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to support the stuff that they love if they feel

1:05:16.640 --> 1:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>like the value they get back is of of equal

1:05:21.360 --> 1:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>amount to what they're putting into it. You can't just

1:05:23.680 --> 1:05:26.360
<v Speaker 1>ask people to pay for junk and expect it to

1:05:26.480 --> 1:05:29.160
<v Speaker 1>go on forever. Um. I mean, it might work for

1:05:29.320 --> 1:05:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the short term, but it's not really a long term strategy.

1:05:33.320 --> 1:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>You know. I have a lot of other questions that

1:05:35.160 --> 1:05:37.440
<v Speaker 1>we wrote down, but this episode is going pretty long,

1:05:37.520 --> 1:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>so I just think of gonna uh to to kind

1:05:40.920 --> 1:05:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of end on one big question, which is about accessibility.

1:05:46.480 --> 1:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>We've seen accessibility of the Internet improve quite a bit

1:05:49.840 --> 1:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>over the last five years, but we still have a

1:05:51.440 --> 1:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>long way to go. More than half of the world's

1:05:54.120 --> 1:05:57.720
<v Speaker 1>population does not really have access to the Internet, so

1:05:57.800 --> 1:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>there are billions of people who do not have at

1:06:00.920 --> 1:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>least easy access to the Internet. Some of them might

1:06:03.360 --> 1:06:06.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to get access with a great deal of effort,

1:06:06.480 --> 1:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know, the more effort you have to spend,

1:06:09.280 --> 1:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>the smaller the returns are on actually getting that access.

1:06:13.800 --> 1:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>But we're seeing a lot of projects trying to change that.

1:06:16.240 --> 1:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So things like Google having a project Loon, and Facebook

1:06:20.000 --> 1:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>having its proposed satellite and drone program to supply uh

1:06:24.560 --> 1:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Internet to lots of different parts of the world. Both

1:06:26.640 --> 1:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of these companies have a vested interest in people getting

1:06:29.680 --> 1:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>access to the Internet. It's not like it's purely altruistic.

1:06:33.240 --> 1:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>But do you think that we're going to see near

1:06:37.320 --> 1:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>universal access to the Internet. Eric Schmidt of Google fame

1:06:41.800 --> 1:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>said back in two thousand and thirteen he thought by

1:06:44.320 --> 1:06:46.720
<v Speaker 1>everyone would have access. Do you think that's a little

1:06:47.240 --> 1:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Do you think it's realistic or is that a little ambitious?

1:06:50.520 --> 1:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's both. And considering how Google it is

1:06:53.680 --> 1:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>a company in Facebook, and as you mentioned, they're vested

1:06:56.200 --> 1:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting being relatively strong on this, I'm gonna boldly say

1:06:59.880 --> 1:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>by there's going to be universal accents whether it's the

1:07:04.520 --> 1:07:07.280
<v Speaker 1>thing is about receiving it, so you can have the

1:07:07.320 --> 1:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>earth covered an Internet via balloon or satellite wherever you

1:07:10.920 --> 1:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>want to use. The fact that hardware has gotten so cheap,

1:07:14.040 --> 1:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>like Android one phones, we're seeing stories about five dollar

1:07:16.880 --> 1:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>cell phones. It wasn't so long ago that I was

1:07:19.240 --> 1:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>excited reading about the one laptop per child projects, which

1:07:22.640 --> 1:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>at this point seems kind of not antiquated but kind

1:07:25.240 --> 1:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of silly because how you, yeah, you can get so

1:07:28.440 --> 1:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>much more power now with phones and low end phones

1:07:32.080 --> 1:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>these days, like oh well this is this is a

1:07:33.960 --> 1:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>piece of junk phone. I wouldn't buy this, But they

1:07:36.320 --> 1:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>have gotten so cheap and so available to so many

1:07:39.640 --> 1:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>different areas that it's the other half of the equation.

1:07:42.680 --> 1:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Just having wireless and some kind of access to it

1:07:45.680 --> 1:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>is one thing, but having the hardware out there, I

1:07:48.160 --> 1:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>think that is going to get there by Maybe I

1:07:52.560 --> 1:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>could see that happening where these devices are so cheap

1:07:55.560 --> 1:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that it's just something you have. You should have this.

1:07:57.800 --> 1:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>At this point, it's almost like a hand or this

1:08:01.440 --> 1:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>could be talking about because it's like a hand you

1:08:03.200 --> 1:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>want to make sure you have this device with you

1:08:04.840 --> 1:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>at all times, or Swiss army knife. You have to

1:08:07.120 --> 1:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>have it. And with Google and Facebook consistently going ahead now,

1:08:12.560 --> 1:08:15.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't see Google and Facebook being like all the

1:08:15.320 --> 1:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>Vista and my Space. They seem to have enough power

1:08:20.000 --> 1:08:21.680
<v Speaker 1>behind them that they can keep going for a good

1:08:21.680 --> 1:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>another five years. You would say they're too big to fail. No,

1:08:25.080 --> 1:08:27.599
<v Speaker 1>that's not what I'm saying. I think I think they're

1:08:27.640 --> 1:08:31.559
<v Speaker 1>they're motivated enough, and they are. There's another There's that

1:08:31.560 --> 1:08:34.519
<v Speaker 1>company we talked about, Comcast, that's a rag on that much.

1:08:34.800 --> 1:08:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Their method of change isn't what I see from Google

1:08:37.840 --> 1:08:41.519
<v Speaker 1>or Facebook. Those two companies work to get more and

1:08:41.560 --> 1:08:44.960
<v Speaker 1>more coverage and they're going for bigger goals than just

1:08:45.080 --> 1:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the short term shareholder uh numbers. Right, Because with Comcast,

1:08:49.640 --> 1:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>what what their strategy was, and this isn't a secret.

1:08:52.000 --> 1:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I covered this in in a deep episode

1:08:55.160 --> 1:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>series about how Comcast works. The Comcast story. The way

1:08:59.240 --> 1:09:02.519
<v Speaker 1>that they're company traditionally would grow is they would go

1:09:02.560 --> 1:09:07.520
<v Speaker 1>out and buy other companies. They weren't creating new markets.

1:09:07.520 --> 1:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>They were purchasing the companies that were serving markets they

1:09:12.000 --> 1:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>weren't in yet. So that's a very different strategy, as

1:09:16.400 --> 1:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you point out, right, because once you get to a

1:09:18.080 --> 1:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>point where you bought up pretty much everyone you can

1:09:20.040 --> 1:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>buy without facing massive resistance on a on a regulatory side,

1:09:25.720 --> 1:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't you can't grow anymore. You have to create,

1:09:29.760 --> 1:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't just buy other stuff. And really the Comcast

1:09:34.360 --> 1:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>history was pretty much uh just stuck in that mentality

1:09:40.560 --> 1:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of buy other companies that are already doing what we do,

1:09:43.960 --> 1:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and now we that those customers become our customers. That's

1:09:47.080 --> 1:09:49.720
<v Speaker 1>how you grow your customer base. This is a very

1:09:49.760 --> 1:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>different approach. I I love the idea of everyone having

1:09:54.800 --> 1:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>access by one. I mean, the implications of that are

1:09:58.080 --> 1:10:02.320
<v Speaker 1>so far beyond just having the ability to finally access

1:10:02.320 --> 1:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. We've seen the Internet play a an incredibly

1:10:06.320 --> 1:10:13.639
<v Speaker 1>important part in massive historical moments throughout the last five years.

1:10:13.640 --> 1:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Arab spring alone was such a huge story,

1:10:18.200 --> 1:10:20.639
<v Speaker 1>and I imagine that we'll see more stories like that,

1:10:20.920 --> 1:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly as access to the Internet becomes closer to being universal,

1:10:27.320 --> 1:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and I find that encouraging. I think there's going to

1:10:30.720 --> 1:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of tumultuous problems along the way, but

1:10:34.680 --> 1:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I find that when you get this level of communication,

1:10:37.560 --> 1:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this incredibly powerful tool in people's hands, then amazing things

1:10:44.320 --> 1:10:48.720
<v Speaker 1>can happen. Uh not all of them involving videos of

1:10:48.840 --> 1:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>cute cats. That's just a bonus. But that's my own

1:10:54.000 --> 1:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>personal kind of optimistic view. Um. I as, thank you

1:10:59.080 --> 1:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining the show today and and sticking

1:11:03.320 --> 1:11:05.680
<v Speaker 1>your neck out to look out and say, what's it

1:11:05.720 --> 1:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like in five years. I look forward in

1:11:09.200 --> 1:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to calling you up and going over these results wherever

1:11:12.920 --> 1:11:15.599
<v Speaker 1>I wherever I'll be, I'll have access to the Internet.

1:11:15.600 --> 1:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>So it will be a problem, that's true. Yeah, it

1:11:17.080 --> 1:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>won't matter like if you're taking a vacation in Antarctica,

1:11:21.160 --> 1:11:24.719
<v Speaker 1>I know that I'll be able to have you chat,

1:11:24.840 --> 1:11:26.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe have a couple of penguins in the background, and

1:11:26.880 --> 1:11:31.240
<v Speaker 1>we'll have a Hopefully my connection doesn't freeze. Yeah, that's

1:11:32.080 --> 1:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>that's great. That's great. Leave the puns to me, chuckle heads,

1:11:35.600 --> 1:11:38.639
<v Speaker 1>all right, Yes, please tell people where they can find

1:11:38.720 --> 1:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>your work, you guys, go to see net dot com.

1:11:42.160 --> 1:11:44.919
<v Speaker 1>We've got lots of great news how to use reviews.

1:11:45.439 --> 1:11:47.639
<v Speaker 1>You can also check out top five dot net dot com.

1:11:47.640 --> 1:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>If I want to promote top five, which I do,

1:11:50.000 --> 1:11:53.479
<v Speaker 1>count down a fun see netlist every week at top

1:11:53.520 --> 1:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>five dots net dot com. And if you want to

1:11:55.960 --> 1:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>hear I as talk about stuff with me uh and

1:12:00.120 --> 1:12:04.240
<v Speaker 1>uh in a format that's not safe for work, you

1:12:04.240 --> 1:12:07.120
<v Speaker 1>can always check out our podcast Without Pretense with Eric

1:12:07.200 --> 1:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>sandean Our, our our third host. Um. But it is

1:12:10.960 --> 1:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>not It is not not a polite show at all.

1:12:15.880 --> 1:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>But but it does exist. It is a thing that happens. Uh. Yeah,

1:12:23.840 --> 1:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>we we named it this year in two thousand and sixteen,

1:12:26.439 --> 1:12:28.559
<v Speaker 1>we named it the best podcast for two thousand fourteen.

1:12:28.600 --> 1:12:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So that tells you all you need to know about

1:12:30.000 --> 1:12:33.799
<v Speaker 1>that show. Alright, so, guys, if you have any questions, comments,

1:12:33.800 --> 1:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>suggestions for future episodes, please get in touch with me.

1:12:37.200 --> 1:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>The email address is tech stuff at how stuff works

1:12:40.040 --> 1:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com, or drop me a line on Facebook or Twitter.

1:12:43.240 --> 1:12:45.799
<v Speaker 1>The handle at both of those locations is tech stuff

1:12:46.160 --> 1:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>H s W and I'll talk to you again really soon.

1:12:55.400 --> 1:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>For more on this and bothands of other topics is

1:12:57.960 --> 1:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com w w W