1 00:00:04,240 --> 00:00:12,200 Speaker 1: Get a text technology with tech Stuff from stuff dot com. 2 00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:14,800 Speaker 1: Hey there, and welcome to tex Stuff. I'm your host, 3 00:00:14,880 --> 00:00:18,080 Speaker 1: Jonathan Strickland, and we are going to do a brand 4 00:00:18,079 --> 00:00:21,919 Speaker 1: new Predictions episode. You may remember that the last episode 5 00:00:21,960 --> 00:00:24,279 Speaker 1: I played was a rerun from two thousand eleven where 6 00:00:24,320 --> 00:00:27,000 Speaker 1: Chris Pallette and I decided to kind of guess what 7 00:00:27,080 --> 00:00:30,680 Speaker 1: the Internet would be like in about five years time. Well, 8 00:00:30,720 --> 00:00:33,320 Speaker 1: now we're gonna look another five years into the future. 9 00:00:33,360 --> 00:00:36,240 Speaker 1: And Chris could not be here, but I brought on 10 00:00:36,479 --> 00:00:39,640 Speaker 1: a good friend of mine up here, a guy who 11 00:00:39,720 --> 00:00:43,320 Speaker 1: works for cen Net. Very clever dude, who's got it 12 00:00:43,400 --> 00:00:46,680 Speaker 1: all together. I as actor, How you doing, I'm doing 13 00:00:46,680 --> 00:00:48,600 Speaker 1: really well. Thanks for having me on today. Thanks for 14 00:00:48,760 --> 00:00:51,880 Speaker 1: being on the show. And I as is sounding very formal, 15 00:00:51,960 --> 00:00:55,279 Speaker 1: but trust us. We we're we're buddies. We often give 16 00:00:55,320 --> 00:00:58,240 Speaker 1: each other the business as it were. Of course, of course, 17 00:00:58,320 --> 00:01:02,440 Speaker 1: Mr Strickland, we always give each other business. Uh. Those 18 00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:06,040 Speaker 1: those those plain envelopes filled with dollar bills will continue 19 00:01:06,080 --> 00:01:08,680 Speaker 1: to come to you. I as, so we we wanted 20 00:01:08,720 --> 00:01:10,760 Speaker 1: to take a look and kind of just have a 21 00:01:10,800 --> 00:01:14,840 Speaker 1: casual conversation of what we think the internet and our 22 00:01:14,880 --> 00:01:18,560 Speaker 1: interactions with the Internet might be like in another five years, 23 00:01:18,560 --> 00:01:22,840 Speaker 1: so in twenty twenty one, and uh, we're just kind 24 00:01:22,880 --> 00:01:25,520 Speaker 1: of shooting from the hip here. We're not not really 25 00:01:26,000 --> 00:01:29,440 Speaker 1: consulting any gurus or anything like that, but we did 26 00:01:29,480 --> 00:01:31,840 Speaker 1: come up with a bunch of little questions that we 27 00:01:31,959 --> 00:01:34,640 Speaker 1: thought would be good starters for this kind of thing. 28 00:01:34,720 --> 00:01:37,400 Speaker 1: And one of the points we made in the two 29 00:01:37,400 --> 00:01:40,800 Speaker 1: thousand eleven podcast that Chris and I did was that 30 00:01:41,200 --> 00:01:44,440 Speaker 1: we both felt that mobile browsing was definitely going to 31 00:01:44,680 --> 00:01:49,960 Speaker 1: be increasingly important, that we would see desktops and laptop 32 00:01:50,040 --> 00:01:54,280 Speaker 1: traffic on the Internet get surpassed by mobile devices. And 33 00:01:54,280 --> 00:01:57,600 Speaker 1: in fact, that did happen. And uh, it wasn't like 34 00:01:57,680 --> 00:02:00,120 Speaker 1: we were sticking our next really far out or anything. 35 00:02:00,120 --> 00:02:02,320 Speaker 1: That it was pretty clear that that was the trend 36 00:02:03,120 --> 00:02:06,240 Speaker 1: even when we started back then. Now, I as, do 37 00:02:06,280 --> 00:02:08,320 Speaker 1: you think that's gonna be something that we'll see continue 38 00:02:08,400 --> 00:02:12,320 Speaker 1: That will will mobile devices continue to be one of 39 00:02:12,360 --> 00:02:16,080 Speaker 1: the most important, maybe the predominant way that we interact 40 00:02:16,120 --> 00:02:20,000 Speaker 1: with the Internet, at least on a on an active scale. Yeah, 41 00:02:20,000 --> 00:02:21,960 Speaker 1: I think the mobile devices, I mean, they've shown how 42 00:02:22,000 --> 00:02:24,200 Speaker 1: important they've been over the years. And the thing is, 43 00:02:24,320 --> 00:02:25,960 Speaker 1: for a lot of people of their phone is their 44 00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:29,960 Speaker 1: first real personal computer. So what I'm expecting is essentially 45 00:02:30,080 --> 00:02:34,120 Speaker 1: laptops and desktops not as important, but we might actually 46 00:02:34,120 --> 00:02:36,920 Speaker 1: have the ability to have in five years now where 47 00:02:36,919 --> 00:02:39,040 Speaker 1: you have your phone, it's your brain for all your 48 00:02:39,040 --> 00:02:42,080 Speaker 1: other little systems, because I think other smart devices like 49 00:02:42,120 --> 00:02:45,320 Speaker 1: watching his glasses, other devices and form factors that we've 50 00:02:45,360 --> 00:02:47,840 Speaker 1: even thought up yet, those things will be around, but 51 00:02:47,880 --> 00:02:51,000 Speaker 1: they're really gonna be powered by your phone, right, Yeah, 52 00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:52,959 Speaker 1: So that that makes sense. Like even stuff with Google 53 00:02:53,000 --> 00:02:55,880 Speaker 1: Glass that was something that you used a Bluetooth connection 54 00:02:55,919 --> 00:02:57,480 Speaker 1: with the phone. The phone ended up doing most of 55 00:02:57,480 --> 00:03:00,680 Speaker 1: the processing. The glass was just kind of a interface 56 00:03:00,720 --> 00:03:04,720 Speaker 1: and display, and you still were relying upon the actual 57 00:03:04,720 --> 00:03:07,440 Speaker 1: connection with your phone to grab the data from the cloud. 58 00:03:07,760 --> 00:03:09,799 Speaker 1: And that does make sense. I mean you that way 59 00:03:09,840 --> 00:03:14,080 Speaker 1: you remove the need for the more powerful processors and 60 00:03:14,160 --> 00:03:17,720 Speaker 1: the various antenna that you would require to to tap 61 00:03:17,760 --> 00:03:20,519 Speaker 1: into those networks. You can offload that. You just need 62 00:03:20,560 --> 00:03:24,960 Speaker 1: that Bluetooth interface in order for it to to communicate 63 00:03:25,040 --> 00:03:29,520 Speaker 1: with the devices the real brain. Also, I'm noticing I 64 00:03:29,560 --> 00:03:32,960 Speaker 1: just notice recently a video that kind of blew my 65 00:03:33,000 --> 00:03:34,920 Speaker 1: mind because it reminded me of something we saw at 66 00:03:35,000 --> 00:03:38,080 Speaker 1: CS many years ago, and it was a video of 67 00:03:38,240 --> 00:03:42,560 Speaker 1: a new product where you use your smartphone to act 68 00:03:42,640 --> 00:03:46,640 Speaker 1: as the processor for what was really just a terminal, 69 00:03:46,720 --> 00:03:49,560 Speaker 1: but it looks like, you know, a laptop computer and 70 00:03:49,600 --> 00:03:52,600 Speaker 1: you dock your phone into it and that essentially ends 71 00:03:52,680 --> 00:03:55,920 Speaker 1: up being the brains behind your computer. And I can't 72 00:03:55,920 --> 00:03:58,720 Speaker 1: remember you you might I as I don't know, but 73 00:03:58,800 --> 00:04:01,520 Speaker 1: I can't remember the name of the the thing that 74 00:04:01,680 --> 00:04:05,720 Speaker 1: was essentially that same idea from several years ago where 75 00:04:06,080 --> 00:04:09,800 Speaker 1: your your smartphone and uh could just dock into a 76 00:04:09,880 --> 00:04:13,960 Speaker 1: docking station and power a laptop. Um to me, it 77 00:04:14,040 --> 00:04:16,599 Speaker 1: was interesting to see that idea come back again because 78 00:04:16,720 --> 00:04:19,560 Speaker 1: it didn't seem to go anywhere after that initial c 79 00:04:19,720 --> 00:04:24,200 Speaker 1: e S debut. But it does kind of fall into 80 00:04:24,240 --> 00:04:28,000 Speaker 1: that same idea that the the smartphone will be kind 81 00:04:28,040 --> 00:04:31,520 Speaker 1: of the the center of a of a hub of devices, 82 00:04:31,680 --> 00:04:34,960 Speaker 1: all of which will rely very heavily on it. Yeah, 83 00:04:34,960 --> 00:04:36,920 Speaker 1: the device I think you're talking about the motto atrix, 84 00:04:37,920 --> 00:04:40,200 Speaker 1: a phone that were plug into a docking station that 85 00:04:40,240 --> 00:04:42,760 Speaker 1: kind of makes it a laptop. It wasn't elegant at all. 86 00:04:42,839 --> 00:04:45,600 Speaker 1: It didn't work with every single docking station. Need to 87 00:04:45,600 --> 00:04:47,880 Speaker 1: get a proprietary thing, so that kind of takes people off, 88 00:04:48,120 --> 00:04:50,359 Speaker 1: I know, the Kickstarter you're talking about or Indigogo. Not 89 00:04:50,400 --> 00:04:53,440 Speaker 1: sure which crowd funding site it is, but I mean, well, also, 90 00:04:53,440 --> 00:04:55,880 Speaker 1: I would imagine in five years we would have more 91 00:04:55,920 --> 00:04:58,200 Speaker 1: smart devices that can be on their own. But I 92 00:04:58,240 --> 00:05:01,080 Speaker 1: still think that having a the power and all the 93 00:05:01,160 --> 00:05:04,360 Speaker 1: brains on a singular device driving the other the other 94 00:05:04,400 --> 00:05:07,880 Speaker 1: devices makes more sense because, like you were mentioning other radio's, 95 00:05:07,880 --> 00:05:11,080 Speaker 1: other antennas, other battery concerns. To have all of that 96 00:05:11,320 --> 00:05:14,720 Speaker 1: and each self contained object you're talking about a lot 97 00:05:14,720 --> 00:05:16,520 Speaker 1: of items you have to keep charged all the time, 98 00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:18,719 Speaker 1: it seems like I don't know if five years is 99 00:05:18,800 --> 00:05:21,520 Speaker 1: enough time for this to really get mature. Maybe ten 100 00:05:21,600 --> 00:05:23,560 Speaker 1: years from now and now we're going too far. But 101 00:05:23,640 --> 00:05:27,200 Speaker 1: if battery technology moves ahead, maybe what we would see 102 00:05:27,440 --> 00:05:30,920 Speaker 1: these devices that are I guess cloud connected, So you're 103 00:05:31,000 --> 00:05:33,520 Speaker 1: the brain is still a computer somewhere, it's just nowhere 104 00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:37,560 Speaker 1: near you, right, I think. Also another important element to 105 00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:41,400 Speaker 1: take into account is cost, and by having your phone 106 00:05:41,480 --> 00:05:45,400 Speaker 1: be the primary brains behind all these different devices, it 107 00:05:45,440 --> 00:05:48,279 Speaker 1: helps bring the cost down to each of those individual devices. 108 00:05:48,279 --> 00:05:52,280 Speaker 1: They don't need as many expensive components and that will 109 00:05:52,320 --> 00:05:56,240 Speaker 1: make adoption um less difficult. Right, It's still gonna be 110 00:05:56,320 --> 00:05:59,920 Speaker 1: a barrier, obviously. It's any time we're talking about technology, 111 00:06:00,320 --> 00:06:03,440 Speaker 1: there's a barrier of intrigue that's there. Um. Not everyone 112 00:06:03,480 --> 00:06:06,719 Speaker 1: can afford to do it. But by going that that 113 00:06:06,839 --> 00:06:11,159 Speaker 1: route where your phone remains the primary processing unit of 114 00:06:11,200 --> 00:06:14,200 Speaker 1: all these different devices, you can at least create a 115 00:06:14,279 --> 00:06:18,880 Speaker 1: suite of technologies that aren't prohibitively expensive for all but 116 00:06:19,000 --> 00:06:22,599 Speaker 1: you know the top of the one per centers. Yeah, 117 00:06:22,600 --> 00:06:24,440 Speaker 1: we're talking about a lot of silos, right, you can 118 00:06:24,440 --> 00:06:27,159 Speaker 1: probably like an Apple silo, you'll have a Android silo 119 00:06:27,240 --> 00:06:30,320 Speaker 1: or Samsung silo. There's things that you can't just mix 120 00:06:30,360 --> 00:06:32,520 Speaker 1: and match your accessories. You're just gonna have to get 121 00:06:33,240 --> 00:06:36,200 Speaker 1: one company's to make it work. Well, I still see 122 00:06:36,240 --> 00:06:39,360 Speaker 1: that happening because sometimes I think about in the old days, 123 00:06:39,400 --> 00:06:42,960 Speaker 1: how no standards were ever happened. I couldn't imagine actually 124 00:06:42,960 --> 00:06:47,120 Speaker 1: having one standard port or electrical outlets. If this is privatized, 125 00:06:47,160 --> 00:06:50,240 Speaker 1: weight is now it's like, well, USB A B C 126 00:06:50,880 --> 00:06:54,440 Speaker 1: about three point one. Just it seems so wonky. Yeah, yeah, 127 00:06:54,880 --> 00:06:57,080 Speaker 1: that's a great point. I mean it's and that kind 128 00:06:57,120 --> 00:06:59,599 Speaker 1: of ties into The next question that I have on 129 00:06:59,600 --> 00:07:03,039 Speaker 1: our list the idea of silos, and this whether you 130 00:07:03,080 --> 00:07:07,520 Speaker 1: have interoperability between different you know, families of technologies or 131 00:07:07,520 --> 00:07:10,120 Speaker 1: if it's all within one group. One of the things 132 00:07:10,200 --> 00:07:13,040 Speaker 1: we've seen kind of come to prominence over the last 133 00:07:13,440 --> 00:07:17,720 Speaker 1: year or two is this idea of the digital personal assistant. Now. 134 00:07:18,120 --> 00:07:20,360 Speaker 1: In the two thousand eleven episode, Chris and I talked 135 00:07:20,400 --> 00:07:23,600 Speaker 1: about how voice recognition was going to become more important, 136 00:07:24,360 --> 00:07:27,760 Speaker 1: but it wouldn't take over as our primary means of 137 00:07:27,760 --> 00:07:31,040 Speaker 1: interacting with our technology for various reasons. I mean, if 138 00:07:31,080 --> 00:07:34,320 Speaker 1: you want to search anything that's remotely personal in nature, 139 00:07:34,320 --> 00:07:38,040 Speaker 1: you probably don't want to speak it out loud in public. Also, 140 00:07:38,360 --> 00:07:40,840 Speaker 1: you don't want to make people think you're crazy as 141 00:07:40,840 --> 00:07:45,640 Speaker 1: you're talking to absolutely no one visible at any rate. Um, 142 00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:49,200 Speaker 1: But we're starting to see them really get more more 143 00:07:49,280 --> 00:07:54,240 Speaker 1: traction these days, whether it's Apple's Sirie or Amazon's Alexa, 144 00:07:54,440 --> 00:07:59,360 Speaker 1: or Google's Assistant. You know, we have lots of different examples. 145 00:07:59,640 --> 00:08:02,560 Speaker 1: Do you think those are going to continue to get 146 00:08:02,680 --> 00:08:07,040 Speaker 1: more sophisticated? Are are we going to see more integration 147 00:08:07,120 --> 00:08:11,320 Speaker 1: into various devices, not just the standalonees or the smartphones, 148 00:08:11,360 --> 00:08:14,160 Speaker 1: but perhaps other things as well well. I could see 149 00:08:14,240 --> 00:08:17,360 Speaker 1: people getting very used to talking to the Internet in general. 150 00:08:17,760 --> 00:08:19,600 Speaker 1: Like you might think, now you might look a little 151 00:08:19,640 --> 00:08:22,640 Speaker 1: crazy that you're talking to yourself. Although these days you 152 00:08:22,680 --> 00:08:24,840 Speaker 1: see somebody talking themselves in the street, you're like, do 153 00:08:24,880 --> 00:08:27,000 Speaker 1: they have a Bluetooth headset or not? Because it used 154 00:08:27,000 --> 00:08:29,200 Speaker 1: to be twenty years ago you're like, oh, you're just nuts. 155 00:08:29,200 --> 00:08:31,240 Speaker 1: Now it's like, oh, you might be having a conversation. 156 00:08:31,480 --> 00:08:34,559 Speaker 1: But there's a generation of kids growing up talking to 157 00:08:34,760 --> 00:08:37,680 Speaker 1: smart speakers like the Echo, like Google Home when that 158 00:08:37,720 --> 00:08:39,800 Speaker 1: comes out, and when Apple goes ahead, where there's that 159 00:08:39,880 --> 00:08:41,800 Speaker 1: rumor that they're going to have their own smart speaker. 160 00:08:42,400 --> 00:08:46,200 Speaker 1: I see that kind of interface and that natural language 161 00:08:46,200 --> 00:08:50,280 Speaker 1: really being more important. Now maybe you're not necessarily talking 162 00:08:50,320 --> 00:08:53,080 Speaker 1: to your watch, but you might be writing the same 163 00:08:53,160 --> 00:08:57,120 Speaker 1: kinds of questions that you would say because the way 164 00:08:57,160 --> 00:09:00,120 Speaker 1: everything is changing with deep learning, the chance in five 165 00:09:00,160 --> 00:09:01,960 Speaker 1: years I'm really hoping to five years and you were 166 00:09:02,000 --> 00:09:04,760 Speaker 1: able to just ask a simple question without having to 167 00:09:04,840 --> 00:09:08,680 Speaker 1: have all of these modifiers that are search engine optimized, 168 00:09:08,720 --> 00:09:10,400 Speaker 1: you know what I mean, right, Yeah, without having to 169 00:09:10,480 --> 00:09:13,400 Speaker 1: parse your language in a way that search engines know 170 00:09:13,600 --> 00:09:16,840 Speaker 1: what it is. You're actually asking you to have that 171 00:09:17,200 --> 00:09:20,240 Speaker 1: natural length language recognition. I think we've we've definitely come 172 00:09:20,280 --> 00:09:24,160 Speaker 1: a far away over the last decade, definitely UH with 173 00:09:24,320 --> 00:09:26,440 Speaker 1: natural language where you know, it used to be that 174 00:09:27,200 --> 00:09:30,839 Speaker 1: you could do a Google search for a particular string 175 00:09:30,880 --> 00:09:33,040 Speaker 1: of terms and come up with a page of results 176 00:09:33,040 --> 00:09:37,320 Speaker 1: and think, this isn't remotely what I was hoping to find. 177 00:09:37,400 --> 00:09:39,680 Speaker 1: And then you just go and rearrange the order of 178 00:09:39,720 --> 00:09:42,240 Speaker 1: words that were in your Google query and come up 179 00:09:42,280 --> 00:09:45,080 Speaker 1: with different results and see, oh this is I just 180 00:09:45,120 --> 00:09:47,800 Speaker 1: have to think the way the computer thinks. Once we 181 00:09:47,840 --> 00:09:51,120 Speaker 1: get away from that, where computers are able to interpret 182 00:09:51,120 --> 00:09:53,640 Speaker 1: the way we think and the way different people think 183 00:09:53,679 --> 00:09:57,200 Speaker 1: about the same thing, but still bring back relevant results, 184 00:09:57,640 --> 00:10:01,560 Speaker 1: then we see real advances in and and a seamless 185 00:10:01,640 --> 00:10:04,840 Speaker 1: experience when we start interacting with the Internet. I think 186 00:10:04,880 --> 00:10:08,319 Speaker 1: that is definitely going to improve over the next five years. 187 00:10:08,360 --> 00:10:12,720 Speaker 1: We've already seen some amazing results as it stands now. 188 00:10:13,160 --> 00:10:16,840 Speaker 1: I also hope to see more of One of the 189 00:10:16,840 --> 00:10:19,480 Speaker 1: things I really like the way Amazon has approached this 190 00:10:19,520 --> 00:10:25,680 Speaker 1: Personal Digital Assistant UM model is their approach is all 191 00:10:25,760 --> 00:10:29,880 Speaker 1: about integrating with other systems so that you can control 192 00:10:30,240 --> 00:10:33,280 Speaker 1: different things within your home, even if they were not 193 00:10:33,320 --> 00:10:37,920 Speaker 1: originally designed to work together through a single interface, right 194 00:10:38,040 --> 00:10:41,120 Speaker 1: Like Hugh light bulbs are an example. Let's say that 195 00:10:41,160 --> 00:10:43,800 Speaker 1: I've got Hugh light bulbs in my house. Let's say 196 00:10:43,960 --> 00:10:50,040 Speaker 1: I've got some sort of of Internet connected security system. 197 00:10:50,080 --> 00:10:52,319 Speaker 1: Maybe I've got a couple of other appliances that are 198 00:10:52,320 --> 00:10:56,240 Speaker 1: also connected through my my home network and with Alexa, 199 00:10:56,320 --> 00:10:59,000 Speaker 1: assuming that the capability has been built in by developers, 200 00:10:59,200 --> 00:11:01,160 Speaker 1: I would be able to interact with all of those 201 00:11:01,240 --> 00:11:04,760 Speaker 1: as opposed to having to go through each proprietary system 202 00:11:04,800 --> 00:11:08,440 Speaker 1: and interface, which gets extremely clunky. It's kind of like 203 00:11:08,800 --> 00:11:11,960 Speaker 1: being in front of a a an entertainment system where 204 00:11:12,000 --> 00:11:15,440 Speaker 1: you have twelve different remote controls and trying to remember 205 00:11:15,480 --> 00:11:18,880 Speaker 1: which one goes to what component. Uh. I hope to 206 00:11:18,920 --> 00:11:21,720 Speaker 1: see more of that because, like you were saying, if 207 00:11:21,800 --> 00:11:24,480 Speaker 1: we go with the siloed approach, unless you're all in 208 00:11:25,320 --> 00:11:30,800 Speaker 1: with one provider, your experience is going to be really fragmented. Yeah. 209 00:11:30,800 --> 00:11:32,680 Speaker 1: It just makes me think about the Internet of Things 210 00:11:32,760 --> 00:11:35,400 Speaker 1: because I have an Amazon Echo and I've had some 211 00:11:35,440 --> 00:11:37,840 Speaker 1: smart technologies in my house and smart light bulbs and things, 212 00:11:38,000 --> 00:11:39,880 Speaker 1: and most people would ask me, like, why would you 213 00:11:39,920 --> 00:11:42,400 Speaker 1: need a smart light bulb, and these are just little 214 00:11:42,400 --> 00:11:46,200 Speaker 1: fancy ways to make my apartment more personalized. But when 215 00:11:46,280 --> 00:11:48,320 Speaker 1: you have an echo, you have a brain that can 216 00:11:48,360 --> 00:11:51,480 Speaker 1: talk to multiple devices, you start thinking what other devices 217 00:11:51,520 --> 00:11:53,800 Speaker 1: you can get. So I'm expecting in five years a 218 00:11:53,800 --> 00:11:56,800 Speaker 1: lot of people will be very aware of the good 219 00:11:56,920 --> 00:12:00,360 Speaker 1: uses or connected devices, because I connected life all began 220 00:12:00,520 --> 00:12:03,040 Speaker 1: is a very strange idea at first, but when you 221 00:12:03,080 --> 00:12:04,719 Speaker 1: get used to it, you're like, wait a minute, why 222 00:12:04,720 --> 00:12:07,680 Speaker 1: didn't this happen before? So I'm expecting a lot more 223 00:12:08,040 --> 00:12:10,680 Speaker 1: dumb things to get a lot smarter five years. Yeah, 224 00:12:10,720 --> 00:12:13,400 Speaker 1: And and you know, we've we've seen this is a 225 00:12:14,040 --> 00:12:18,080 Speaker 1: a progression that starts with some kind of you know, 226 00:12:18,200 --> 00:12:21,360 Speaker 1: uncertain moves. Again, going back to c e S. I 227 00:12:21,400 --> 00:12:23,160 Speaker 1: love talking about ce S because that's kind of like 228 00:12:23,200 --> 00:12:27,400 Speaker 1: the proving grounds for these new technologies. Typically a technology 229 00:12:27,440 --> 00:12:30,240 Speaker 1: will start to kind of creep in, and then the 230 00:12:30,280 --> 00:12:34,200 Speaker 1: next year it will be almost everywhere, and then maybe 231 00:12:34,240 --> 00:12:36,120 Speaker 1: three more years it will be to a point where 232 00:12:36,120 --> 00:12:39,440 Speaker 1: people will actually want it. Right because we've seen the 233 00:12:39,520 --> 00:12:44,160 Speaker 1: smart technology move into various appliances for the better part 234 00:12:44,160 --> 00:12:47,439 Speaker 1: of the decade now, and in many cases, those early 235 00:12:47,520 --> 00:12:52,920 Speaker 1: implementations were either short sighted or not terribly useful. But 236 00:12:53,280 --> 00:12:56,160 Speaker 1: as people are learning how to interact, and as developers 237 00:12:56,160 --> 00:12:59,559 Speaker 1: are learning, you know, what people expect from their technologies, 238 00:13:00,040 --> 00:13:04,640 Speaker 1: we're seeing that improve over time. I think in Internet 239 00:13:04,679 --> 00:13:08,160 Speaker 1: of Things is going to continue going strong. It it 240 00:13:08,200 --> 00:13:11,839 Speaker 1: isn't just a fad or a buzzword. It is going 241 00:13:11,920 --> 00:13:16,560 Speaker 1: to be a pervasive technology that UH surrounds us and 242 00:13:16,600 --> 00:13:20,440 Speaker 1: binds us like the force UM. It also has some 243 00:13:20,480 --> 00:13:24,880 Speaker 1: potential for some some negative stuff as well, not just 244 00:13:24,960 --> 00:13:27,680 Speaker 1: the idea of making our lives easier, but we'll talk 245 00:13:27,720 --> 00:13:31,920 Speaker 1: about that UH in a little bit. So one of 246 00:13:31,960 --> 00:13:34,680 Speaker 1: the other elements I have here on our list is 247 00:13:34,720 --> 00:13:40,000 Speaker 1: this question about again getting kind ofto that fragmented experience idea, 248 00:13:40,720 --> 00:13:42,480 Speaker 1: the rise of the app. That was one of those 249 00:13:42,480 --> 00:13:44,840 Speaker 1: things that that Chris and I didn't really touch on. 250 00:13:44,880 --> 00:13:48,560 Speaker 1: We didn't talk about apps. I don't think either of 251 00:13:48,679 --> 00:13:52,160 Speaker 1: us had really figured out how important apps were going 252 00:13:52,240 --> 00:13:56,319 Speaker 1: to be UH in general, and apps on smart devices 253 00:13:56,440 --> 00:14:00,679 Speaker 1: on on smartphones and mobile devices in particular have become 254 00:14:01,679 --> 00:14:05,160 Speaker 1: one of the most important stories in technology over the 255 00:14:05,240 --> 00:14:09,480 Speaker 1: last few years. UH companies can spring up overnight and 256 00:14:09,520 --> 00:14:13,679 Speaker 1: become incredibly successful with the right app a lot of 257 00:14:13,720 --> 00:14:16,800 Speaker 1: companies out there are banking on that success. Many of 258 00:14:16,800 --> 00:14:20,000 Speaker 1: them are failing um and and it's weird because it 259 00:14:20,040 --> 00:14:24,000 Speaker 1: also creates this very siloed approach to how you access 260 00:14:24,040 --> 00:14:27,280 Speaker 1: and interact with the Internet, particularly apps that are related 261 00:14:27,280 --> 00:14:29,520 Speaker 1: to content, where you know you might ask the question, 262 00:14:29,560 --> 00:14:33,960 Speaker 1: why do I use this app versus use a more 263 00:14:34,120 --> 00:14:37,680 Speaker 1: universal interface like a browser. Do you think that we're 264 00:14:37,720 --> 00:14:41,160 Speaker 1: going to continue to see, you know, a wide variety 265 00:14:41,160 --> 00:14:43,040 Speaker 1: of apps moving forward, or do you think that's a 266 00:14:43,120 --> 00:14:47,360 Speaker 1: bubble that will burst sometime between now and I don't 267 00:14:47,400 --> 00:14:49,920 Speaker 1: see apps necessarily going away. I can see a lot 268 00:14:49,960 --> 00:14:52,320 Speaker 1: of like hyper visor style apps, like we're talking about 269 00:14:52,360 --> 00:14:54,760 Speaker 1: with the Echo, where it controls lots of different things. 270 00:14:54,880 --> 00:14:57,920 Speaker 1: I could see a lot more apps that control other apps, 271 00:14:57,960 --> 00:15:00,080 Speaker 1: if that makes any sense. Like its like right now 272 00:15:00,120 --> 00:15:02,360 Speaker 1: we have things like hoot Suite, which can access to 273 00:15:02,440 --> 00:15:05,560 Speaker 1: different Twitter accounts, Facebook and all that other information. So 274 00:15:05,600 --> 00:15:07,760 Speaker 1: I could see that happening, which is a little strange 275 00:15:07,800 --> 00:15:09,600 Speaker 1: if you think about it, because a browser should be 276 00:15:09,640 --> 00:15:13,360 Speaker 1: able to handle it. But apps on their own, they 277 00:15:13,520 --> 00:15:16,400 Speaker 1: offer so much control to the companies that I think 278 00:15:16,440 --> 00:15:18,640 Speaker 1: that that's not going anywhere. Because the other thing is 279 00:15:18,880 --> 00:15:20,920 Speaker 1: you can create a lot of things that are offline 280 00:15:21,400 --> 00:15:23,040 Speaker 1: that you couldn't do in a browser. I think that's 281 00:15:23,040 --> 00:15:25,160 Speaker 1: one of the bigger things. Unless in five years the 282 00:15:25,200 --> 00:15:29,480 Speaker 1: Internet wirelessly or is that connectivity is always around, you 283 00:15:29,560 --> 00:15:32,600 Speaker 1: still have to deal with being offline, and if you 284 00:15:32,640 --> 00:15:34,680 Speaker 1: don't have an app, there's a good chance there's no 285 00:15:34,720 --> 00:15:36,840 Speaker 1: way a browser is gonna work unless there's some kind 286 00:15:36,880 --> 00:15:39,640 Speaker 1: of cash feature, which isn't something that really works so 287 00:15:39,680 --> 00:15:43,320 Speaker 1: well right now. That's a good point. Yeah. For example, 288 00:15:43,360 --> 00:15:45,920 Speaker 1: I've got I've got an app that I used for 289 00:15:45,920 --> 00:15:49,000 Speaker 1: for podcatching too, to listen to the various podcasts I 290 00:15:49,080 --> 00:15:54,920 Speaker 1: subscribe to, and I can either stream stuff directly from 291 00:15:54,960 --> 00:15:57,600 Speaker 1: the Internet to my headphones and that way I can 292 00:15:57,680 --> 00:16:00,960 Speaker 1: listen live, or I can down load an episode and 293 00:16:01,000 --> 00:16:02,920 Speaker 1: listen to it even if I'm offline, which of course 294 00:16:03,000 --> 00:16:04,720 Speaker 1: is useful if you're going to be like on a 295 00:16:04,720 --> 00:16:07,359 Speaker 1: long flight or something and you don't have in flight WiFi. 296 00:16:08,200 --> 00:16:12,320 Speaker 1: That's a really useful, uh feature. So I didn't really 297 00:16:12,320 --> 00:16:14,040 Speaker 1: think of it that way, but that is interesting. I 298 00:16:14,040 --> 00:16:17,200 Speaker 1: would I would love to see some more experimentation with apps. 299 00:16:17,200 --> 00:16:19,480 Speaker 1: Sometimes it gets a little tricky, but you know, something 300 00:16:19,480 --> 00:16:24,840 Speaker 1: that would um allow you to maximize the reach of 301 00:16:24,840 --> 00:16:29,360 Speaker 1: your various music services would be nice because not all 302 00:16:29,520 --> 00:16:33,840 Speaker 1: artists have work all in one or all in the 303 00:16:33,920 --> 00:16:38,240 Speaker 1: same music service. And being able to go through all 304 00:16:38,280 --> 00:16:40,680 Speaker 1: of them simultaneously so that you can listen to what 305 00:16:40,760 --> 00:16:44,080 Speaker 1: you want to listen to. Uh, you know, subscribing to 306 00:16:44,120 --> 00:16:47,280 Speaker 1: whichever services you want, but being able to search all 307 00:16:47,320 --> 00:16:49,840 Speaker 1: of them at once would be really nice instead of 308 00:16:49,840 --> 00:16:52,400 Speaker 1: having to you know, go into one and they oh, wait, 309 00:16:52,440 --> 00:16:56,880 Speaker 1: that's right, that musicians label doesn't work with Spotify or 310 00:16:56,920 --> 00:17:01,080 Speaker 1: Pandora or whatever it may be. Um, so yeah, it's interesting. 311 00:17:01,120 --> 00:17:03,080 Speaker 1: I do think I do think there's going to be 312 00:17:03,120 --> 00:17:07,520 Speaker 1: a bit of a reckoning between now and where we 313 00:17:07,560 --> 00:17:11,600 Speaker 1: will see a lot of apps, um, kind of collapse 314 00:17:11,640 --> 00:17:13,199 Speaker 1: in on themselves. I think we're going to see on 315 00:17:13,200 --> 00:17:18,040 Speaker 1: the investment front, some capitalists venture Catalyst being a little 316 00:17:18,080 --> 00:17:21,680 Speaker 1: more careful with which apps they jump in and back. 317 00:17:22,560 --> 00:17:25,880 Speaker 1: I just don't see it as sustainable in the long 318 00:17:26,000 --> 00:17:29,080 Speaker 1: run for the kind of approach we're seeing right now. 319 00:17:29,160 --> 00:17:33,040 Speaker 1: Where you know, it seems like every week you're getting 320 00:17:33,080 --> 00:17:37,720 Speaker 1: one or two stories about some brand new app debuting 321 00:17:37,800 --> 00:17:43,199 Speaker 1: with incredible amounts of financial backing. Uh, and no business 322 00:17:43,280 --> 00:17:47,240 Speaker 1: plan to speak of that that cannot continue indefinitely. So 323 00:17:47,320 --> 00:17:49,560 Speaker 1: I think there's probably gonna be a bit of a 324 00:17:49,560 --> 00:17:54,600 Speaker 1: shaky bubble kind of moment between now and hopefully by 325 00:17:55,359 --> 00:17:58,280 Speaker 1: one it will have settled back down so that we 326 00:17:58,320 --> 00:18:03,320 Speaker 1: can have product of useful apps continue. I don't I 327 00:18:03,400 --> 00:18:06,960 Speaker 1: don't want to see anyone tank. I just don't think 328 00:18:07,000 --> 00:18:10,560 Speaker 1: that the way things have been going is sustainable in 329 00:18:10,600 --> 00:18:12,560 Speaker 1: the long run. The other thing I was thinking is 330 00:18:12,600 --> 00:18:16,639 Speaker 1: that the way I've seen companies talk to developers, the 331 00:18:16,680 --> 00:18:20,280 Speaker 1: idea that you write one app and runs on multiple platforms, Android, Chromos, 332 00:18:20,800 --> 00:18:22,520 Speaker 1: or if you run a Windows app it runs on 333 00:18:22,560 --> 00:18:25,159 Speaker 1: every Windows thing and iOS at some point has to 334 00:18:25,280 --> 00:18:27,919 Speaker 1: have some kind of ties to os ten or mac os. 335 00:18:28,320 --> 00:18:31,080 Speaker 1: I would imagine in five years these apps that are 336 00:18:31,119 --> 00:18:32,600 Speaker 1: just kind of like, oh, it's only for my phone, 337 00:18:32,600 --> 00:18:34,359 Speaker 1: it's only from my watch, or it's only for whatever, 338 00:18:34,760 --> 00:18:37,840 Speaker 1: these these apps will actually be much more powerful than 339 00:18:37,840 --> 00:18:40,240 Speaker 1: when you can install them on full fledged computers, or 340 00:18:40,280 --> 00:18:43,640 Speaker 1: you can have the same experience or slightly modified experiences 341 00:18:43,640 --> 00:18:45,800 Speaker 1: for different screens. I think that's the future we're headed for. 342 00:18:46,040 --> 00:18:47,800 Speaker 1: So we're not gonna lose the apps. We might get 343 00:18:47,840 --> 00:18:51,720 Speaker 1: more productive apps, But I don't see it being this 344 00:18:51,840 --> 00:18:53,920 Speaker 1: world of the way it is now. It's definitely gonna 345 00:18:53,960 --> 00:18:55,760 Speaker 1: be much more, kind of like the way the i 346 00:18:55,880 --> 00:18:59,200 Speaker 1: OS apps can be iPhone and iPad. I can imagine 347 00:18:59,400 --> 00:19:02,440 Speaker 1: this happened with all other kinds of apps as well. Yeah, 348 00:19:02,480 --> 00:19:04,800 Speaker 1: that's something that Microsoft has been pushing for for a 349 00:19:04,800 --> 00:19:08,360 Speaker 1: long time. I mean Windows eight was our first indication 350 00:19:08,440 --> 00:19:13,000 Speaker 1: that they really wanted to create this universal experience where 351 00:19:13,560 --> 00:19:17,680 Speaker 1: the technology, the programs you depended upon would work across 352 00:19:17,840 --> 00:19:22,639 Speaker 1: multitude multiple platforms seamlessly. And we're we're seeing that with 353 00:19:22,720 --> 00:19:26,320 Speaker 1: a lot of ways that apps are uh designed, you know, 354 00:19:26,440 --> 00:19:29,600 Speaker 1: like um, Netflix is a great example where you're watching 355 00:19:29,600 --> 00:19:33,679 Speaker 1: Netflix on one platform, you pause your viewing, you go, 356 00:19:33,840 --> 00:19:35,920 Speaker 1: you turn on a different platform, and you can pick 357 00:19:36,000 --> 00:19:38,719 Speaker 1: up right where you left off. That that's sort of 358 00:19:38,760 --> 00:19:41,159 Speaker 1: that same idea, this idea that you can have a 359 00:19:41,200 --> 00:19:44,560 Speaker 1: persistent experience across whichever platform you want. It may be 360 00:19:44,720 --> 00:19:47,560 Speaker 1: that the interaction with that platform has to be different 361 00:19:47,600 --> 00:19:50,359 Speaker 1: because it's just a it's you know, it doesn't have 362 00:19:50,400 --> 00:19:53,560 Speaker 1: the same interface, but the experience you get is as 363 00:19:53,640 --> 00:19:57,680 Speaker 1: close to being universal as you can possibly get. Um. 364 00:19:57,720 --> 00:20:00,600 Speaker 1: I agree that that's definitely gonna continue you and and 365 00:20:02,160 --> 00:20:05,159 Speaker 1: it will probably be very impressive, at least to the 366 00:20:05,160 --> 00:20:09,240 Speaker 1: twenty sixteen versions of US. Maybe versions of US will 367 00:20:09,280 --> 00:20:13,320 Speaker 1: be you know, totally blase about it, but but right 368 00:20:13,359 --> 00:20:15,560 Speaker 1: now we'd be really we'd really be thrilled by that. 369 00:20:16,760 --> 00:20:19,240 Speaker 1: One of the other things we did not talk about 370 00:20:19,359 --> 00:20:22,320 Speaker 1: in two thousand and eleven, neither Chris nor I anticipated 371 00:20:22,359 --> 00:20:26,760 Speaker 1: it was the rise of Google Fiber. Uh, and seeing 372 00:20:26,760 --> 00:20:30,639 Speaker 1: Google Fiber come out. I'm in Atlanta and Google Fiber 373 00:20:30,720 --> 00:20:34,800 Speaker 1: is currently deploying in Atlanta to the point where lots 374 00:20:34,840 --> 00:20:38,240 Speaker 1: of different neighborhoods in the Atlanta area are eligible for 375 00:20:38,320 --> 00:20:42,160 Speaker 1: signing up for Google Fiber. Not me yet, but any 376 00:20:42,200 --> 00:20:46,880 Speaker 1: day now. Um, So we didn't anticipate Google Fiber showing up. 377 00:20:47,320 --> 00:20:49,880 Speaker 1: Do you think Google Fiber is actually going to have 378 00:20:50,320 --> 00:20:53,680 Speaker 1: a disruptive effect on the industry as a whole or 379 00:20:53,720 --> 00:20:56,480 Speaker 1: do you see this as being something that might might 380 00:20:56,520 --> 00:21:02,280 Speaker 1: be beneficial for certain regions. But that's all we're going 381 00:21:02,320 --> 00:21:05,440 Speaker 1: to see. We're not gonna get a wider effect than that. 382 00:21:06,160 --> 00:21:08,280 Speaker 1: I think there's gonna be quite a wide effect. In 383 00:21:08,359 --> 00:21:11,240 Speaker 1: recent news, Versing went out and bought a o L 384 00:21:11,400 --> 00:21:13,840 Speaker 1: and uh something else was the other one, Yahoo, right, 385 00:21:14,080 --> 00:21:16,399 Speaker 1: And essentially it makes it some kind of digital advertising 386 00:21:16,440 --> 00:21:19,080 Speaker 1: giant to take on Google. And I loved seeing the 387 00:21:19,080 --> 00:21:21,679 Speaker 1: news only for the reason that maybe it would get 388 00:21:21,720 --> 00:21:25,120 Speaker 1: like like light a fire under Google and go, wait 389 00:21:25,160 --> 00:21:27,960 Speaker 1: a second, if those guys are going to be an 390 00:21:27,960 --> 00:21:30,560 Speaker 1: I s P and they're going to have this kind 391 00:21:30,600 --> 00:21:32,800 Speaker 1: of content management, why don't we do the same thing 392 00:21:32,840 --> 00:21:36,040 Speaker 1: considering we're competitors with them. So I'm expecting Google to 393 00:21:36,080 --> 00:21:38,680 Speaker 1: be one of the first to just full on go 394 00:21:38,840 --> 00:21:42,640 Speaker 1: head to head against a horizon against the wireless carriers 395 00:21:42,640 --> 00:21:46,400 Speaker 1: out there, because Google Fiber, while it's good, the infrastructure 396 00:21:46,480 --> 00:21:48,959 Speaker 1: layout just seems to take so long and then run 397 00:21:49,000 --> 00:21:52,040 Speaker 1: into a lot of regulation problems. But if they can 398 00:21:52,080 --> 00:21:55,439 Speaker 1: buy up you know, essentially the wireless last mile, if 399 00:21:55,440 --> 00:21:57,280 Speaker 1: that's how this is going to go, I would think 400 00:21:57,320 --> 00:21:58,879 Speaker 1: they would be one of the companies to do it. 401 00:21:59,200 --> 00:22:01,320 Speaker 1: And I was trying to out, like, what other company 402 00:22:01,359 --> 00:22:04,399 Speaker 1: do I think in five years would actually have a 403 00:22:04,400 --> 00:22:07,960 Speaker 1: wireless service? I would say in the US anyway, Amazon 404 00:22:08,680 --> 00:22:12,000 Speaker 1: could easily become some kind of wireless carrier because their 405 00:22:12,040 --> 00:22:14,120 Speaker 1: whole model is just get you to buy products over 406 00:22:14,119 --> 00:22:16,280 Speaker 1: and over and over again. So if they can stop 407 00:22:16,320 --> 00:22:18,240 Speaker 1: that one last barrier of well, I don't have a 408 00:22:18,240 --> 00:22:20,639 Speaker 1: connection to Amazon, I'm gonna do this. Why not do 409 00:22:20,720 --> 00:22:23,760 Speaker 1: that with not only their fire devices but any device 410 00:22:24,080 --> 00:22:27,040 Speaker 1: because in the past they used to have wireless built 411 00:22:27,080 --> 00:22:30,720 Speaker 1: into their kindles through other services. There's really not a 412 00:22:30,720 --> 00:22:33,480 Speaker 1: lot of reasons why a company like Amazon wouldn't enter 413 00:22:33,520 --> 00:22:36,320 Speaker 1: that fray, especially in my future. By the way, Google 414 00:22:36,320 --> 00:22:38,359 Speaker 1: has already entered this, and it's gonna have enough of 415 00:22:38,359 --> 00:22:40,960 Speaker 1: a disruption that other companies will no longer be afraid 416 00:22:41,440 --> 00:22:45,200 Speaker 1: to fight an a T and T Hoverizon and I 417 00:22:45,240 --> 00:22:47,560 Speaker 1: guess T Mobile at the time, because that's usually the 418 00:22:47,560 --> 00:22:49,639 Speaker 1: biggest fears, like if I go against these guys, they 419 00:22:49,680 --> 00:22:51,320 Speaker 1: won't carry my phones, and then that's going to cause 420 00:22:51,320 --> 00:22:54,320 Speaker 1: an issue. But when there's enough competition, it no longer 421 00:22:54,359 --> 00:22:57,679 Speaker 1: matters well, and it's just nice to see any competition 422 00:22:57,720 --> 00:23:01,000 Speaker 1: at all in that space, at least with the wireless side. 423 00:23:01,000 --> 00:23:05,800 Speaker 1: You could argue, particularly with the cellular and the LTE 424 00:23:05,960 --> 00:23:08,639 Speaker 1: side of things, you could argue that there is at 425 00:23:08,680 --> 00:23:11,159 Speaker 1: least some competition here in the United States. When you 426 00:23:11,200 --> 00:23:16,920 Speaker 1: get to home internet access like wired internet access, that 427 00:23:17,080 --> 00:23:20,320 Speaker 1: level of competition starts to drop off dramatically. Depending on 428 00:23:20,320 --> 00:23:23,320 Speaker 1: where you live, you may not have any options other 429 00:23:23,359 --> 00:23:26,480 Speaker 1: than a single provider. Uh. In my case, I have 430 00:23:27,200 --> 00:23:32,240 Speaker 1: one decent option at least from a data speed, although 431 00:23:32,240 --> 00:23:34,280 Speaker 1: anyone who listens to a show that I, as an 432 00:23:34,320 --> 00:23:38,280 Speaker 1: I do knows that it's reliability is more than a 433 00:23:38,280 --> 00:23:41,240 Speaker 1: little questionable. By the way I asked, I don't know 434 00:23:41,280 --> 00:23:43,280 Speaker 1: if I'll be able to record this week. We'll find out, 435 00:23:43,840 --> 00:23:47,840 Speaker 1: uh the But but seeing actual competition there is really 436 00:23:47,920 --> 00:23:53,719 Speaker 1: encouraging because it suddenly forces these major companies that haven't 437 00:23:53,720 --> 00:23:56,280 Speaker 1: had to worry about that kind of thing for more 438 00:23:56,320 --> 00:24:00,240 Speaker 1: than a decade to really seriously consider it. Especially seeing 439 00:24:00,320 --> 00:24:03,639 Speaker 1: is how ones like Comcast are in the business not 440 00:24:03,720 --> 00:24:07,879 Speaker 1: just of providing Internet service, but are also cable television companies, 441 00:24:08,240 --> 00:24:11,119 Speaker 1: and that business I didn't really think about touching on 442 00:24:11,160 --> 00:24:13,400 Speaker 1: that because it's not it's related to Internet, but it's 443 00:24:13,400 --> 00:24:18,359 Speaker 1: not truly Internet. That business has been really kind of 444 00:24:18,359 --> 00:24:23,080 Speaker 1: teetering on this edge of a precipitous drop for a 445 00:24:23,119 --> 00:24:26,320 Speaker 1: couple of years, and we expect that to happen any 446 00:24:26,400 --> 00:24:30,960 Speaker 1: day now. Really, So seeing that kind of pressure come 447 00:24:31,040 --> 00:24:33,560 Speaker 1: up is encouraging to me because I hope that it 448 00:24:33,560 --> 00:24:37,840 Speaker 1: will ultimately benefit the consumer where you have real options, 449 00:24:38,000 --> 00:24:43,680 Speaker 1: not just options in name only for real good Internet 450 00:24:43,720 --> 00:24:48,119 Speaker 1: access like decent speeds. And it also be nice to 451 00:24:48,160 --> 00:24:51,000 Speaker 1: not see any more data caps. I'm really hoping the 452 00:24:51,080 --> 00:24:53,399 Speaker 1: data caps go away. That was something we touched on 453 00:24:53,440 --> 00:24:56,760 Speaker 1: in our two thousand and eleven episode, and UH turned 454 00:24:56,800 --> 00:24:58,720 Speaker 1: out that that ended up being a real big issue, 455 00:24:58,760 --> 00:25:04,840 Speaker 1: particularly since we're seeing more and more streaming video these 456 00:25:04,920 --> 00:25:08,000 Speaker 1: days at higher qualities than ever before. You're talking about 457 00:25:08,040 --> 00:25:12,520 Speaker 1: things like four K and UM and perhaps even higher 458 00:25:12,560 --> 00:25:17,120 Speaker 1: resolution video moving forward. Uh, data caps are a real problem. 459 00:25:17,280 --> 00:25:19,919 Speaker 1: Do you think that's gonna be something that will persist? 460 00:25:20,040 --> 00:25:22,200 Speaker 1: Do you think companies are going to hold onto data 461 00:25:22,240 --> 00:25:24,959 Speaker 1: caps for as long as they possibly can, or do 462 00:25:24,960 --> 00:25:29,680 Speaker 1: you think that demand and competition will ultimately make data 463 00:25:29,720 --> 00:25:32,760 Speaker 1: caps a thing of the past by the year. There's 464 00:25:32,800 --> 00:25:34,720 Speaker 1: what I want to happen. When I think it's gonna happen. Okay, 465 00:25:34,760 --> 00:25:36,840 Speaker 1: let's let's hear what you want to happen. What I 466 00:25:36,880 --> 00:25:38,600 Speaker 1: want to happen is I would like there to be 467 00:25:38,720 --> 00:25:41,760 Speaker 1: enough bandwidth if there's basically these companies are auctioning off 468 00:25:42,000 --> 00:25:46,000 Speaker 1: or selling to you various speeds. Okay, you can pay 469 00:25:46,040 --> 00:25:47,960 Speaker 1: you know x amount of money for outter ten naka 470 00:25:48,000 --> 00:25:50,600 Speaker 1: bits per second. You can pay why for thirty you 471 00:25:50,600 --> 00:25:53,199 Speaker 1: can pay z for one gig a bit wireless, but 472 00:25:53,240 --> 00:25:55,919 Speaker 1: that's not gonna happen. What's gonna happen is you're going 473 00:25:56,000 --> 00:25:58,720 Speaker 1: to get this giant fire hose of speed, like we're 474 00:25:58,720 --> 00:26:00,119 Speaker 1: gonna give you one gig a bit per sect it, 475 00:26:00,359 --> 00:26:05,040 Speaker 1: but your cap is five gigabytes. You through this now, 476 00:26:05,080 --> 00:26:07,480 Speaker 1: no gigabytes to gigabyte. There's there's obviously a change there, 477 00:26:07,720 --> 00:26:11,720 Speaker 1: but that's the thing that keeps making money. It's actually 478 00:26:11,720 --> 00:26:14,359 Speaker 1: relatively simple to explain to people as well. When it 479 00:26:14,400 --> 00:26:19,280 Speaker 1: comes to caps um, I don't see that being changed unless, 480 00:26:19,400 --> 00:26:21,560 Speaker 1: like we talked about, other companies get into the game 481 00:26:21,560 --> 00:26:24,960 Speaker 1: where there's enough competition, maybe somebody can disrupt that marketing. 482 00:26:25,200 --> 00:26:28,359 Speaker 1: But the way it is now, it seems like the 483 00:26:28,400 --> 00:26:31,919 Speaker 1: old old ideas was unlimited, and we'll have unlimited and 484 00:26:31,920 --> 00:26:33,480 Speaker 1: then people would never let them go. Because of the 485 00:26:33,560 --> 00:26:35,880 Speaker 1: changes that have happened, I think caps are here to stay, 486 00:26:35,920 --> 00:26:39,200 Speaker 1: at least only on the wireless space. On the wired side, 487 00:26:39,240 --> 00:26:41,840 Speaker 1: the home based stuff, I still think if they have 488 00:26:41,960 --> 00:26:43,720 Speaker 1: caps would all to be very very high kind of 489 00:26:43,760 --> 00:26:46,800 Speaker 1: a ludicrous number that's very hard to hit because that's 490 00:26:46,840 --> 00:26:49,400 Speaker 1: how it's sold at home. It's about speed, that's how 491 00:26:49,440 --> 00:26:52,680 Speaker 1: you get home internet. So I still see wireless companies 492 00:26:53,000 --> 00:26:56,640 Speaker 1: just sticking to caps. One particular wired company, I still 493 00:26:56,640 --> 00:26:59,000 Speaker 1: think we'll do caps. You know the company, Yeah, this 494 00:26:59,040 --> 00:27:03,200 Speaker 1: is the same one I was ring too earlier. Yes, yeah, yeah, 495 00:27:03,400 --> 00:27:06,879 Speaker 1: now I know that company well too. Well, some might say, 496 00:27:07,000 --> 00:27:13,280 Speaker 1: uh yeah, I I really hope that the push from 497 00:27:13,280 --> 00:27:18,919 Speaker 1: Google Fiber will ultimately make the wired data caps a 498 00:27:19,040 --> 00:27:22,879 Speaker 1: thing of the past, as companies have to differentiate themselves 499 00:27:22,920 --> 00:27:27,360 Speaker 1: more in order to win over customers rather than run 500 00:27:27,400 --> 00:27:31,439 Speaker 1: the risk of seeing their customer base deplete into nothing. 501 00:27:32,119 --> 00:27:34,879 Speaker 1: That's my hope. My fear is that this is just 502 00:27:34,960 --> 00:27:39,560 Speaker 1: going to continue to be an issue in and that people, 503 00:27:39,840 --> 00:27:43,359 Speaker 1: even though they'll have the access to much better um 504 00:27:43,520 --> 00:27:46,680 Speaker 1: Internet service, will not be able to take full advantage 505 00:27:46,680 --> 00:27:49,320 Speaker 1: of it because of those things, at least not without 506 00:27:49,440 --> 00:27:54,320 Speaker 1: paying a hefty fee for either the unlimited package, which 507 00:27:54,359 --> 00:27:58,200 Speaker 1: I'm sure some companies will offer, or you know, overage 508 00:27:58,240 --> 00:28:00,720 Speaker 1: fees because you keep going over the amount that you're 509 00:28:01,520 --> 00:28:06,639 Speaker 1: allotted per month, uh, somewhat arbitrarily, if not entirely arbitraily. 510 00:28:06,920 --> 00:28:10,320 Speaker 1: That's the grumpy old man version of this episode. Uh, 511 00:28:10,400 --> 00:28:12,840 Speaker 1: let's talk about something that gets me even more angry, 512 00:28:12,880 --> 00:28:16,400 Speaker 1: net neutrality. So net neutrality, we we've seen a lot 513 00:28:16,400 --> 00:28:19,760 Speaker 1: of progress over the last five years. One of the 514 00:28:19,760 --> 00:28:23,600 Speaker 1: things that that happened that Chris and I didn't really 515 00:28:23,600 --> 00:28:26,840 Speaker 1: predict was the move on an official front to try 516 00:28:26,920 --> 00:28:31,560 Speaker 1: and reframe cable companies are are cable providers internet service 517 00:28:31,640 --> 00:28:34,600 Speaker 1: providers I should say um in a way that would 518 00:28:34,640 --> 00:28:38,960 Speaker 1: allow them to fall under rules that would ensure net 519 00:28:38,960 --> 00:28:42,320 Speaker 1: neutrality would continue. And we've seen a lot of resistance 520 00:28:42,360 --> 00:28:46,240 Speaker 1: of that to that idea over the last couple of years. Uh, 521 00:28:46,440 --> 00:28:49,960 Speaker 1: you know, the companies are fighting this like crazy. What 522 00:28:50,040 --> 00:28:52,640 Speaker 1: do you think the status of net neutrality will be 523 00:28:52,840 --> 00:28:55,720 Speaker 1: by I think it's gonna be so much for it 524 00:28:55,800 --> 00:28:58,320 Speaker 1: is the way it is now. I think that the 525 00:28:58,360 --> 00:29:01,160 Speaker 1: T Mobile method that we've seen was basically what we're 526 00:29:01,160 --> 00:29:03,400 Speaker 1: going to see by everybody. And what I mean by 527 00:29:03,440 --> 00:29:08,640 Speaker 1: that is there's no prioritization of bits over other ones. However, 528 00:29:09,000 --> 00:29:12,440 Speaker 1: certain bits do not count against caps. It's almost like 529 00:29:12,840 --> 00:29:16,920 Speaker 1: bending a rule like crazy without breaking it. So I 530 00:29:16,960 --> 00:29:19,480 Speaker 1: think that's how we're going to ride this line because 531 00:29:19,520 --> 00:29:20,920 Speaker 1: I know, when it comes to net neutrality in the 532 00:29:21,000 --> 00:29:24,960 Speaker 1: United States, one of the ways that companies can say, hey, listen, 533 00:29:25,000 --> 00:29:29,760 Speaker 1: we can actually prioritize bits is based on network congestion 534 00:29:29,920 --> 00:29:32,120 Speaker 1: or network management. As long as you can come up 535 00:29:32,120 --> 00:29:34,360 Speaker 1: with the reason why you need to do this, a 536 00:29:34,440 --> 00:29:36,720 Speaker 1: legal reason, it'll make sense to do it that way. 537 00:29:36,960 --> 00:29:40,000 Speaker 1: But I'm assuming the tamabile method is actually the future 538 00:29:40,440 --> 00:29:44,040 Speaker 1: of net neutrality. It's not. Again, it's not prioritization. It's 539 00:29:44,120 --> 00:29:47,880 Speaker 1: just not counting something towards a cap. So in other words, uh, 540 00:29:48,000 --> 00:29:52,200 Speaker 1: it's not that you would get faster or more reliable service. 541 00:29:52,280 --> 00:29:56,040 Speaker 1: Let's let's use a fictional approach. So let's say that 542 00:29:56,080 --> 00:30:02,720 Speaker 1: I've got a a a video service. Uh we'll call it, 543 00:30:02,840 --> 00:30:06,640 Speaker 1: I don't know, not Flicks. So I've got not Flicks, 544 00:30:07,240 --> 00:30:11,720 Speaker 1: but I also am Let's say a subscriber to Tim Warner. 545 00:30:11,960 --> 00:30:15,240 Speaker 1: So Tim Warner is my internet service provider, and Tim Warner, 546 00:30:15,800 --> 00:30:19,000 Speaker 1: that guy Tim has got the own his his own 547 00:30:19,280 --> 00:30:24,360 Speaker 1: video service that is competing with not Flicks. And Tim 548 00:30:24,440 --> 00:30:28,720 Speaker 1: Warner's service doesn't count against my data cap, but not 549 00:30:28,880 --> 00:30:31,320 Speaker 1: Flix does. Now, if I were to watch the same 550 00:30:31,360 --> 00:30:34,880 Speaker 1: movie on either service, I would have, at least in theory, 551 00:30:35,000 --> 00:30:38,560 Speaker 1: the exact same experience as a customer, the same same 552 00:30:38,600 --> 00:30:42,200 Speaker 1: bit rate, all of that stuff, uh, no buffering, you know, 553 00:30:42,360 --> 00:30:46,680 Speaker 1: same quality of video. It wouldn't matter. But when it 554 00:30:46,760 --> 00:30:49,600 Speaker 1: came time for me to pay my bill, I wouldn't 555 00:30:49,600 --> 00:30:52,840 Speaker 1: have any danger of going over if I was relying 556 00:30:52,840 --> 00:30:56,760 Speaker 1: on Tim Warner's service, then on not Flix, where I 557 00:30:56,880 --> 00:30:59,880 Speaker 1: might go over because that is still counted against my 558 00:31:00,040 --> 00:31:02,360 Speaker 1: data cap. Am I capturing what you're you're kind of 559 00:31:03,040 --> 00:31:07,880 Speaker 1: proposing here mostly except the concern becomes when Tim Warner 560 00:31:07,920 --> 00:31:10,120 Speaker 1: has its own content with it. With the current example 561 00:31:10,160 --> 00:31:12,600 Speaker 1: I was making, I was talking about the Team Mobile, 562 00:31:12,600 --> 00:31:14,360 Speaker 1: it isn't exactly they have skin in the game when 563 00:31:14,360 --> 00:31:17,200 Speaker 1: it comes to music services or whatever. So when you're 564 00:31:17,200 --> 00:31:22,600 Speaker 1: talking about a an i SP that also has a 565 00:31:22,680 --> 00:31:25,960 Speaker 1: content arm, that's when it gets a little murky. However, 566 00:31:26,200 --> 00:31:30,840 Speaker 1: it's still not prioritization. It's simply not counting data against 567 00:31:30,920 --> 00:31:34,560 Speaker 1: your cap and the cap there's nothing illegal about a cap. Yeah, 568 00:31:34,680 --> 00:31:36,960 Speaker 1: So that's so I think that is something I think 569 00:31:37,000 --> 00:31:39,360 Speaker 1: we will continue to see and also as we keep 570 00:31:39,360 --> 00:31:41,720 Speaker 1: seeing wireless companies or I s p s get into 571 00:31:41,720 --> 00:31:44,520 Speaker 1: the content game and vice versa. This is going to 572 00:31:44,560 --> 00:31:47,080 Speaker 1: get pushed now that we're talking about this, This might 573 00:31:47,120 --> 00:31:50,760 Speaker 1: become the new fight. Can a company that has has 574 00:31:50,960 --> 00:31:55,880 Speaker 1: two different interests do this kind of not prioritization and 575 00:31:55,960 --> 00:31:59,400 Speaker 1: get away with it? Yeah? I mean the easy real 576 00:31:59,440 --> 00:32:02,600 Speaker 1: world example of that is Comcast. I mean, Comcast definitely 577 00:32:03,200 --> 00:32:06,360 Speaker 1: has a vested interest with you know, NBC Universal and 578 00:32:06,400 --> 00:32:10,400 Speaker 1: all this. They have a huge content arm as well 579 00:32:10,440 --> 00:32:14,920 Speaker 1: as internet service provider business, and the two combined. You know, 580 00:32:15,000 --> 00:32:18,920 Speaker 1: it's it's very easy to bring up the concern of 581 00:32:18,960 --> 00:32:22,560 Speaker 1: a conflict of interest if you were to prioritize in 582 00:32:22,640 --> 00:32:28,440 Speaker 1: some way, shape or form the native content versus stuff 583 00:32:28,480 --> 00:32:31,600 Speaker 1: that comes from other companies. Uh. I agree. I think 584 00:32:31,600 --> 00:32:34,440 Speaker 1: we're going to see a lot of really messy fights, 585 00:32:34,440 --> 00:32:38,080 Speaker 1: some of which may end up being like big news 586 00:32:38,080 --> 00:32:40,000 Speaker 1: that people like you and I pay a lot of 587 00:32:40,000 --> 00:32:43,200 Speaker 1: attention to and the general public just grumbles about their 588 00:32:43,280 --> 00:32:48,360 Speaker 1: cable bill. Um, that's based upon past experience in my case. 589 00:32:52,880 --> 00:32:57,080 Speaker 1: One about the concept of privacy by one, we're already 590 00:32:58,040 --> 00:33:03,520 Speaker 1: seeing some uh, some struggles out there. We've got so 591 00:33:03,640 --> 00:33:07,440 Speaker 1: many devices out in the hands of people that have cameras. 592 00:33:07,840 --> 00:33:12,560 Speaker 1: They're not only capable of shooting video and recording uh sound, 593 00:33:12,640 --> 00:33:16,240 Speaker 1: as well as just shooting images. They're not only capable 594 00:33:16,280 --> 00:33:19,360 Speaker 1: of uploading that stuff later, they can stream it live 595 00:33:19,440 --> 00:33:23,760 Speaker 1: at this point, and we've had famous examples, recent examples 596 00:33:23,840 --> 00:33:28,120 Speaker 1: of that being used to great effect, uh, sometimes with 597 00:33:28,280 --> 00:33:34,400 Speaker 1: really disturbing consequences, important but disturbing consequences. But this is 598 00:33:34,440 --> 00:33:38,240 Speaker 1: also raising up questions of what will privacy be like? 599 00:33:38,320 --> 00:33:42,479 Speaker 1: What is the expectation of privacy in a world where 600 00:33:42,520 --> 00:33:47,520 Speaker 1: you are surrounded by potentially hundreds of live feed video 601 00:33:47,600 --> 00:33:50,160 Speaker 1: cameras that could broadcast to the entire world. What do 602 00:33:50,200 --> 00:33:55,600 Speaker 1: you think it'll be dead privacy and in five years 603 00:33:55,840 --> 00:33:58,400 Speaker 1: dead dead dead dead dead. Uh. The idea of having 604 00:33:58,440 --> 00:34:03,480 Speaker 1: a reasonable expectation of privacy, when could you possibly imagine 605 00:34:03,320 --> 00:34:06,600 Speaker 1: in a space other than I guess maybe a bathroom, 606 00:34:06,600 --> 00:34:08,920 Speaker 1: where do you have a space where you think you 607 00:34:09,000 --> 00:34:12,400 Speaker 1: have a reasonable expectation that you will not be recorded, 608 00:34:12,440 --> 00:34:14,560 Speaker 1: where you will not be seen by a camera or 609 00:34:14,680 --> 00:34:18,719 Speaker 1: live streamed. At this point, in this modern age, it's 610 00:34:18,719 --> 00:34:20,400 Speaker 1: getting more and more normal. Yeah, there's a chance that 611 00:34:20,440 --> 00:34:22,160 Speaker 1: I could be walking around in a store, in a 612 00:34:22,239 --> 00:34:25,400 Speaker 1: mall or whatever and somebody's live streaming this on Facebook 613 00:34:25,480 --> 00:34:28,160 Speaker 1: Live in five years from now, people don't get way 614 00:34:28,200 --> 00:34:30,480 Speaker 1: more used to this concept. So this idea, I think 615 00:34:30,520 --> 00:34:34,160 Speaker 1: of the legal standard a reasonable expectation of privacy. That 616 00:34:34,239 --> 00:34:37,920 Speaker 1: changes when it comes to reasonability. So when it comes 617 00:34:37,920 --> 00:34:41,160 Speaker 1: to your face showing up on a billboard for you know, 618 00:34:41,239 --> 00:34:44,080 Speaker 1: not Flix as as a user because you were outside 619 00:34:44,120 --> 00:34:46,080 Speaker 1: on a phone and if somebody saw you on your 620 00:34:46,080 --> 00:34:48,600 Speaker 1: phone looking at knot Flix, that might be used. It 621 00:34:48,600 --> 00:34:50,120 Speaker 1: could be in terms of service. Then we can use 622 00:34:50,160 --> 00:34:52,280 Speaker 1: your image if we get you on the street. There's 623 00:34:52,360 --> 00:34:56,359 Speaker 1: all kinds of changes because cameras are everywhere. It used 624 00:34:56,360 --> 00:34:58,640 Speaker 1: to be the fear of oh no big brothers watching me, 625 00:34:59,000 --> 00:35:01,920 Speaker 1: but everybody's watching each other. You can live stream anything 626 00:35:01,920 --> 00:35:05,680 Speaker 1: at any given time. I don't think privacy is going 627 00:35:05,719 --> 00:35:09,120 Speaker 1: to be the same kind of great thing we held sacred, 628 00:35:09,160 --> 00:35:10,879 Speaker 1: you know, years ago. Now it's just gonna then it's 629 00:35:10,880 --> 00:35:13,480 Speaker 1: going to be in the future. This idea that well, 630 00:35:13,520 --> 00:35:15,640 Speaker 1: of course, of course we're live stream This is just 631 00:35:15,680 --> 00:35:18,799 Speaker 1: how it is, you know, that's the way reality is now, right, Yeah, 632 00:35:18,880 --> 00:35:22,000 Speaker 1: And it gets even more complicated than that because you 633 00:35:22,080 --> 00:35:28,680 Speaker 1: also have organizations that are pushing back against this encroaching 634 00:35:28,680 --> 00:35:33,840 Speaker 1: world of live video. I'm I'm thinking specifically various police 635 00:35:33,880 --> 00:35:37,319 Speaker 1: forces around the United States in particular. I mean, this 636 00:35:37,360 --> 00:35:39,319 Speaker 1: is something that we've seen in other countries, but you're 637 00:35:39,320 --> 00:35:41,760 Speaker 1: starting to see it in the US where you're seeing 638 00:35:41,760 --> 00:35:45,480 Speaker 1: more of an opposition to the idea of capturing this 639 00:35:45,560 --> 00:35:48,880 Speaker 1: stuff on live video. There was a case in Pennsylvania 640 00:35:49,000 --> 00:35:51,200 Speaker 1: not too long ago in which I believe it was 641 00:35:51,239 --> 00:35:54,960 Speaker 1: a college student who was using his phone to video 642 00:35:55,200 --> 00:36:00,400 Speaker 1: police that were gathered outside of a party, and he 643 00:36:00,480 --> 00:36:02,919 Speaker 1: was detained for that, and there was this whole court case, 644 00:36:02,920 --> 00:36:08,200 Speaker 1: and eventually the court said in their decision that the 645 00:36:08,320 --> 00:36:12,759 Speaker 1: right to video police police officers in a public space. 646 00:36:12,800 --> 00:36:14,279 Speaker 1: I guess maybe it wasn't a public space because it 647 00:36:14,320 --> 00:36:16,120 Speaker 1: might have been in front of a private house party, 648 00:36:16,200 --> 00:36:21,640 Speaker 1: but two video police like that is not protected under 649 00:36:21,680 --> 00:36:24,319 Speaker 1: the First Amendment in the United States unless you are 650 00:36:24,320 --> 00:36:30,120 Speaker 1: specifically using it to provide meaningful commentary or critique of 651 00:36:30,160 --> 00:36:33,520 Speaker 1: the police force. Which seems to be a pretty major 652 00:36:35,120 --> 00:36:38,319 Speaker 1: legal decision in my mind, one that I am sure 653 00:36:38,440 --> 00:36:41,800 Speaker 1: is going to be contested over time. But but seeing 654 00:36:41,880 --> 00:36:48,640 Speaker 1: this kind of uncomfortable reaction where law enforcement groups, not 655 00:36:48,640 --> 00:36:54,480 Speaker 1: not universally but in pockets are opposing to opposing this 656 00:36:54,560 --> 00:36:58,560 Speaker 1: kind of approach tells me that maybe by one will 657 00:36:58,600 --> 00:37:00,759 Speaker 1: have a point where privacy is dead dead dead dead 658 00:37:00,760 --> 00:37:05,200 Speaker 1: dead Mark Zuckerberg style. But it's not gonna be a 659 00:37:05,280 --> 00:37:09,440 Speaker 1: gentle pathway. We're gonna see lots of different reactions, both 660 00:37:09,480 --> 00:37:15,399 Speaker 1: from official agencies and individuals who are going to protest this. 661 00:37:16,000 --> 00:37:20,760 Speaker 1: I think, ultimately, as you say, fruitlessly, because I don't 662 00:37:20,800 --> 00:37:23,319 Speaker 1: think that I don't think you can stop this train now. 663 00:37:23,760 --> 00:37:28,000 Speaker 1: It's it's moving, it's not there's no way to derail it. Uh. 664 00:37:28,040 --> 00:37:29,960 Speaker 1: The question is just how long is it gonna take 665 00:37:29,960 --> 00:37:32,920 Speaker 1: to get to that destination where we've just you know, 666 00:37:33,000 --> 00:37:36,840 Speaker 1: come to the conclusion that that you're essentially always on camera. 667 00:37:37,960 --> 00:37:39,840 Speaker 1: But it'll be great, you know, the future everything that 668 00:37:39,840 --> 00:37:41,960 Speaker 1: people who have like throwback parties, you know, like there's 669 00:37:42,000 --> 00:37:45,040 Speaker 1: nineties parties now, in the future, it'll be like privacy 670 00:37:45,080 --> 00:37:47,839 Speaker 1: parties and there's nobody's got got a phone. You gotta 671 00:37:47,920 --> 00:37:50,319 Speaker 1: chill out, and you can't live stream, and it'll be 672 00:37:50,360 --> 00:37:53,880 Speaker 1: like a thing that people like do kind of like camping. 673 00:37:54,080 --> 00:37:56,640 Speaker 1: They decided we're gonna go off the grid, or we're 674 00:37:56,680 --> 00:37:59,239 Speaker 1: gonna not live stream just for thirty minutes, I know, 675 00:37:59,280 --> 00:38:04,040 Speaker 1: it's crazy, but we're going to be dark. It'll be 676 00:38:04,120 --> 00:38:07,320 Speaker 1: kind of like the the advertising campaign for Las Vegas 677 00:38:07,360 --> 00:38:10,480 Speaker 1: about what what happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. It's 678 00:38:10,520 --> 00:38:12,279 Speaker 1: gonna be kind of like that, like, all right on 679 00:38:12,320 --> 00:38:16,560 Speaker 1: this weekend, we're not broadcasting what's happening, it's you experience 680 00:38:16,640 --> 00:38:19,040 Speaker 1: that when it happens. When it's over, it's over, and 681 00:38:19,080 --> 00:38:22,879 Speaker 1: that's it. Uh. That does appeal to me, even as 682 00:38:22,920 --> 00:38:26,280 Speaker 1: someone who seems to be surgically attached to his phone. 683 00:38:26,480 --> 00:38:30,480 Speaker 1: I very like I go through that level of distress 684 00:38:30,960 --> 00:38:32,640 Speaker 1: if I don't have I realized I don't have my 685 00:38:32,680 --> 00:38:36,120 Speaker 1: phone on me. I go through that panic mode. But 686 00:38:36,239 --> 00:38:38,400 Speaker 1: it does also sound nice to kind of get away 687 00:38:38,400 --> 00:38:41,440 Speaker 1: from that if you're making a conscious effort to do so. 688 00:38:41,960 --> 00:38:45,360 Speaker 1: I don't like it forced upon me. Um. So, what 689 00:38:45,400 --> 00:38:50,160 Speaker 1: about related to privacy? What about cybersecurity? Obviously we've seen 690 00:38:50,640 --> 00:38:55,480 Speaker 1: lots of high profile cybersecurity risks and attacks. We've seen 691 00:38:55,520 --> 00:39:00,160 Speaker 1: a lot of information about various vulnerabilities being exploited. There are, 692 00:39:00,200 --> 00:39:04,719 Speaker 1: of course, major conferences that are dedicated to both uncovering 693 00:39:04,920 --> 00:39:11,719 Speaker 1: and demonstrating the power of exploiting vulnerabilities. I honestly think 694 00:39:11,800 --> 00:39:14,000 Speaker 1: because I've been asking you to answer every one of 695 00:39:14,000 --> 00:39:16,200 Speaker 1: these questions before I do. It's kind of the safety 696 00:39:17,120 --> 00:39:20,840 Speaker 1: net version. I think, Uh, this is just gonna become 697 00:39:22,160 --> 00:39:27,440 Speaker 1: one of the most important issues by and I have 698 00:39:27,600 --> 00:39:32,880 Speaker 1: no doubt that there will be several uh major, major 699 00:39:33,080 --> 00:39:37,840 Speaker 1: stories that involve cybersecurity failures, possibly even a couple of 700 00:39:37,920 --> 00:39:42,720 Speaker 1: catastrophic or a catastrophic I should say catastrophic stories thrown 701 00:39:42,840 --> 00:39:46,240 Speaker 1: in there, and by catastrophic I mean things where either 702 00:39:46,400 --> 00:39:52,200 Speaker 1: it's discovered that there have been uh foreign agencies spying 703 00:39:52,400 --> 00:39:55,480 Speaker 1: on very important material. We've already seen examples of that 704 00:39:55,520 --> 00:39:57,400 Speaker 1: in the past, whether it's in the United States or 705 00:39:57,480 --> 00:39:59,879 Speaker 1: other countries. We're gonna see more of that come to light, 706 00:40:00,000 --> 00:40:02,319 Speaker 1: I think over the next few years, and also just 707 00:40:02,760 --> 00:40:06,680 Speaker 1: other examples of things like corpiate corp corporate espionage or 708 00:40:07,680 --> 00:40:10,120 Speaker 1: you know, whether it's something where one company is acting 709 00:40:10,160 --> 00:40:15,200 Speaker 1: against another government against the company, or um disenchanted former 710 00:40:15,239 --> 00:40:18,160 Speaker 1: employees against the company. I think we're gonna see a 711 00:40:18,160 --> 00:40:20,400 Speaker 1: lot more of this to a point where cybersecurity is 712 00:40:20,440 --> 00:40:24,239 Speaker 1: going to be one of the biggest and most important 713 00:40:24,440 --> 00:40:29,520 Speaker 1: industries by one. What are your thoughts. I think in 714 00:40:29,640 --> 00:40:33,000 Speaker 1: some areas it'll be really important for industry and just 715 00:40:33,080 --> 00:40:36,640 Speaker 1: in general, like when it comes to everyday security. If 716 00:40:36,640 --> 00:40:38,280 Speaker 1: you work at the corporation, you work at a business, 717 00:40:38,280 --> 00:40:40,960 Speaker 1: that kind of thing I just think as a but 718 00:40:41,040 --> 00:40:43,839 Speaker 1: the public consciousness, it will remain as it as it 719 00:40:43,920 --> 00:40:46,279 Speaker 1: has been. We have the whole here. Look at the 720 00:40:46,360 --> 00:40:49,960 Speaker 1: NSA has got everything on everybody at all times, and 721 00:40:50,040 --> 00:40:54,600 Speaker 1: it still didn't cause a shift in behavior. Now there 722 00:40:54,680 --> 00:40:57,880 Speaker 1: might be some new interest in hey, is my phone? 723 00:40:58,239 --> 00:41:00,120 Speaker 1: Is its fingerprint scanner going to be used against me? 724 00:41:00,160 --> 00:41:01,799 Speaker 1: Do I have to be conscious when you use my thumb? 725 00:41:01,920 --> 00:41:04,240 Speaker 1: Or does my pass code? Can I not give a passcode? 726 00:41:04,440 --> 00:41:07,239 Speaker 1: Those kinds of questions do come up for the general public. 727 00:41:07,320 --> 00:41:10,040 Speaker 1: I just think the public consciousness, with the connectivity we 728 00:41:10,120 --> 00:41:13,799 Speaker 1: have now, there's a real ease in just turning off 729 00:41:13,840 --> 00:41:16,680 Speaker 1: your brand and going yeah, I know that happened over there, 730 00:41:16,760 --> 00:41:18,239 Speaker 1: but you know, I really want to check on this 731 00:41:18,360 --> 00:41:20,120 Speaker 1: live stream, I really want to mess with this app, 732 00:41:20,160 --> 00:41:22,600 Speaker 1: I want to do this other thing. So while it 733 00:41:22,719 --> 00:41:27,080 Speaker 1: should be really really important, and while your privacy and 734 00:41:27,120 --> 00:41:29,800 Speaker 1: your protect and being protected in your data being protected, 735 00:41:30,719 --> 00:41:33,680 Speaker 1: it should be important. We see stories all the time 736 00:41:33,680 --> 00:41:39,000 Speaker 1: about breaches and overreaching by agencies and finding out there's 737 00:41:39,360 --> 00:41:43,839 Speaker 1: state sponsored attacks. Yet it's only those who are intrigued 738 00:41:44,000 --> 00:41:47,640 Speaker 1: or interested in security that are already reading the stories, 739 00:41:47,719 --> 00:41:51,560 Speaker 1: kind of feeding itself, not exactly touching hitting a chord 740 00:41:52,200 --> 00:41:54,560 Speaker 1: with the public. I don't know what it would take 741 00:41:54,600 --> 00:41:57,319 Speaker 1: if the n S A stuff didn't do it. I 742 00:41:57,360 --> 00:42:01,040 Speaker 1: don't know what it would take other than aliens showing 743 00:42:01,120 --> 00:42:03,160 Speaker 1: up and think we have docs on you, and it's 744 00:42:03,160 --> 00:42:06,200 Speaker 1: still be more in the aliens and the documents. I 745 00:42:06,239 --> 00:42:08,920 Speaker 1: agree with you in the sense that I think the 746 00:42:09,200 --> 00:42:15,760 Speaker 1: general public will not be more attuned to the risks 747 00:42:15,960 --> 00:42:20,239 Speaker 1: and the the various problems of cybersecurity, and even the 748 00:42:20,520 --> 00:42:23,360 Speaker 1: or the advances and cybersecurity. I also think the general 749 00:42:23,400 --> 00:42:27,960 Speaker 1: population isn't necessarily going to be more um aware and 750 00:42:28,040 --> 00:42:32,560 Speaker 1: alert and and take proactive steps to better protect their 751 00:42:32,600 --> 00:42:35,919 Speaker 1: own systems. Whether that means, you know, something as simple 752 00:42:35,960 --> 00:42:40,560 Speaker 1: as changing the password on your router to uh, making 753 00:42:40,560 --> 00:42:44,440 Speaker 1: certain that you're not using the same passwords for various services, 754 00:42:45,880 --> 00:42:48,879 Speaker 1: all that kind of stuff. Using encryption. I don't think 755 00:42:48,880 --> 00:42:51,360 Speaker 1: that's gonna be a big deal for most people. But 756 00:42:51,480 --> 00:42:53,680 Speaker 1: I do think on the back end of things, on 757 00:42:53,719 --> 00:42:57,719 Speaker 1: the actual cybersecurity industry end of things, that's gonna be 758 00:42:58,200 --> 00:43:03,120 Speaker 1: a huge, huge are of growth by one. Like if 759 00:43:03,120 --> 00:43:06,200 Speaker 1: someone were asking me, like they were interested in technology 760 00:43:06,280 --> 00:43:09,880 Speaker 1: and they were wondering what area would have you know, 761 00:43:10,000 --> 00:43:13,640 Speaker 1: good good growth, good potential, I would say cybersecurity is 762 00:43:13,680 --> 00:43:16,640 Speaker 1: way up there. Uh it's not. I don't think people 763 00:43:16,640 --> 00:43:20,120 Speaker 1: would necessarily consider it glamorous, and a lot of folks 764 00:43:20,160 --> 00:43:24,440 Speaker 1: just don't necessarily understand the importance of it. But based 765 00:43:24,520 --> 00:43:26,360 Speaker 1: upon the things that have happened, I mean, you know, 766 00:43:26,400 --> 00:43:28,640 Speaker 1: look at the stuff that's happened over the last five years, 767 00:43:29,000 --> 00:43:33,880 Speaker 1: from stocks net to you've got the Sony hack, which 768 00:43:34,040 --> 00:43:37,040 Speaker 1: was huge news a couple of years ago, Um, the 769 00:43:37,120 --> 00:43:41,360 Speaker 1: Ashley Madison hack where you had uh, you know, essentially 770 00:43:41,360 --> 00:43:45,759 Speaker 1: blackmail rolled into hacking. These are big stories and I 771 00:43:45,800 --> 00:43:48,879 Speaker 1: think that's just going to continue over the next few years, 772 00:43:48,880 --> 00:43:51,080 Speaker 1: which is that's why I feel like it's gonna be 773 00:43:51,160 --> 00:43:54,960 Speaker 1: even bigger by not bigger in the sense that people will, 774 00:43:55,320 --> 00:43:57,160 Speaker 1: like the average person was going to talk about it, 775 00:43:57,560 --> 00:44:00,200 Speaker 1: but bigger in the sense that more and more our 776 00:44:00,200 --> 00:44:03,120 Speaker 1: companies and and government agencies are going to pay a 777 00:44:03,160 --> 00:44:06,680 Speaker 1: lot more attention to that side of things. And the 778 00:44:06,680 --> 00:44:08,520 Speaker 1: other thing is there's a lot of technologies that can 779 00:44:08,560 --> 00:44:11,200 Speaker 1: take care of the cybersecurity end, even if the users 780 00:44:11,200 --> 00:44:13,279 Speaker 1: in paying attention, like biometrics, like you know mention the 781 00:44:13,320 --> 00:44:16,120 Speaker 1: fingerprint scanner, there's the note seven it's got it's new 782 00:44:16,160 --> 00:44:18,640 Speaker 1: Irish scanner. You would think that with that kind of 783 00:44:18,640 --> 00:44:22,239 Speaker 1: technology that might help the public might not care that 784 00:44:22,400 --> 00:44:24,520 Speaker 1: Oh look, I can use a fingerprint or use my 785 00:44:24,560 --> 00:44:26,840 Speaker 1: eyes to unlock something, but that will actually up to 786 00:44:26,920 --> 00:44:30,080 Speaker 1: security in general because you're not using the same one, two, three, 787 00:44:30,160 --> 00:44:36,080 Speaker 1: four five password Because people do that. Yeah, yeah, I 788 00:44:36,080 --> 00:44:39,239 Speaker 1: mean there's a reason why a lot of brute force 789 00:44:39,280 --> 00:44:41,680 Speaker 1: attacks can be effective, and that's because a lot of 790 00:44:41,680 --> 00:44:45,080 Speaker 1: people use the same week passwords. Their entire databases just 791 00:44:45,200 --> 00:44:51,320 Speaker 1: filled with millions of common, simple passwords, and that's why 792 00:44:51,360 --> 00:44:53,799 Speaker 1: a lot of those brute force attacks can be can 793 00:44:53,840 --> 00:44:57,600 Speaker 1: be ultimately successful. It's because people are not practicing good 794 00:44:57,600 --> 00:45:02,200 Speaker 1: computer security. So using bio tricks as a means of 795 00:45:02,200 --> 00:45:05,720 Speaker 1: of of improving that is a step in the right direction. 796 00:45:05,760 --> 00:45:11,160 Speaker 1: I mean, obviously no system is completely full proof, but um, 797 00:45:11,320 --> 00:45:14,160 Speaker 1: this this is definitely a better step than one two, 798 00:45:14,200 --> 00:45:20,120 Speaker 1: three for five, which is on my luggage. Um, I've 799 00:45:20,120 --> 00:45:22,160 Speaker 1: got a question here that I'm just curious what your 800 00:45:22,160 --> 00:45:23,960 Speaker 1: thoughts are and some again something that we didn't really 801 00:45:24,000 --> 00:45:28,279 Speaker 1: touch on the show. But do you think internet based currencies, 802 00:45:28,320 --> 00:45:31,600 Speaker 1: and I'm specifically thinking of like cryptocurrency like like bitcoin, 803 00:45:32,000 --> 00:45:34,319 Speaker 1: will play a large role in one or do you 804 00:45:34,360 --> 00:45:36,840 Speaker 1: think that that's just something that it's going to be 805 00:45:36,880 --> 00:45:39,600 Speaker 1: popular with a certain segment of the population but never 806 00:45:39,719 --> 00:45:44,960 Speaker 1: really grow beyond that. I'm curious about your thoughts on this. 807 00:45:45,760 --> 00:45:49,040 Speaker 1: I think it's gonna stay niche. I mean, there's nothing 808 00:45:50,000 --> 00:45:55,360 Speaker 1: demanding that we stop using dollars or euro or pounds. 809 00:45:55,719 --> 00:45:59,120 Speaker 1: So the idea of having this cryptocurrency or that you're 810 00:45:59,200 --> 00:46:01,640 Speaker 1: minding something like the like bitcoin particular, where you can 811 00:46:01,880 --> 00:46:04,600 Speaker 1: keep creating them, it takes a long time and it 812 00:46:04,840 --> 00:46:08,920 Speaker 1: figures itself out that Have you done an episode on bitcoin? Yes, okay, 813 00:46:08,920 --> 00:46:10,919 Speaker 1: so listen to that episode to fully explain it, because 814 00:46:10,920 --> 00:46:13,000 Speaker 1: I'm not going to do it justice here. But I 815 00:46:13,040 --> 00:46:16,399 Speaker 1: don't see it being something that would take over even 816 00:46:16,440 --> 00:46:19,680 Speaker 1: though we have this increasing globalization. When it comes to 817 00:46:20,400 --> 00:46:23,120 Speaker 1: the Internet, you can get anything from anywhere, any time 818 00:46:23,160 --> 00:46:26,839 Speaker 1: with any device. That's awesome, but it took a lot 819 00:46:26,840 --> 00:46:29,000 Speaker 1: of time to get that infrastructure in place. If you 820 00:46:29,040 --> 00:46:31,920 Speaker 1: introduced a new currency that's gonna make it work. I 821 00:46:31,960 --> 00:46:34,400 Speaker 1: don't see that becoming a bigger deal. I still seeing 822 00:46:34,600 --> 00:46:38,440 Speaker 1: see it having a minor interest for people who really 823 00:46:38,440 --> 00:46:39,840 Speaker 1: want to get into it, But I don't see it 824 00:46:39,880 --> 00:46:42,480 Speaker 1: growing much larger than that. What do you think. I 825 00:46:42,520 --> 00:46:46,680 Speaker 1: think you're right. I think if there are any if 826 00:46:46,719 --> 00:46:50,880 Speaker 1: we see any major state backed cryptocurrencies, then there's the 827 00:46:50,920 --> 00:46:53,200 Speaker 1: possibility that that could take off. But then you start 828 00:46:53,239 --> 00:46:56,000 Speaker 1: asking the asking questions of why bother going through the 829 00:46:56,040 --> 00:46:59,360 Speaker 1: trouble of creating a cryptocurrency when you could just create 830 00:47:00,000 --> 00:47:03,360 Speaker 1: areas services things like Google Wallet or Apple pay, the 831 00:47:03,520 --> 00:47:07,319 Speaker 1: ideas of like the transaction services. So it has nothing 832 00:47:07,360 --> 00:47:09,799 Speaker 1: to do really with currency other than the fact that 833 00:47:09,800 --> 00:47:12,279 Speaker 1: those are the units with which you know that you 834 00:47:12,360 --> 00:47:14,840 Speaker 1: use to determine how much you're paying for something. But 835 00:47:15,080 --> 00:47:19,920 Speaker 1: it's actually a wealth transfer system, for lack of a 836 00:47:19,960 --> 00:47:22,839 Speaker 1: better phrase. I think that's what we're going to see 837 00:47:22,880 --> 00:47:26,520 Speaker 1: continue to grow. We're going to see those services get 838 00:47:26,960 --> 00:47:31,280 Speaker 1: more popular and used in and implemented in a variety 839 00:47:31,360 --> 00:47:35,080 Speaker 1: of different products, including I mean wearables being a really 840 00:47:35,880 --> 00:47:38,840 Speaker 1: simple example. I can easily imagine a lot of wearables 841 00:47:38,880 --> 00:47:41,839 Speaker 1: having that particular capability built in as part of what 842 00:47:41,880 --> 00:47:45,760 Speaker 1: it does. But I agree with you that the cryptocurrency 843 00:47:46,239 --> 00:47:50,719 Speaker 1: I think will remain the realm of a smaller population. 844 00:47:50,760 --> 00:47:54,279 Speaker 1: And I would also argue that it's those people who 845 00:47:54,840 --> 00:47:58,960 Speaker 1: they purposefully try to maintain that, right. I think that 846 00:47:59,040 --> 00:48:02,680 Speaker 1: those populations don't necessarily want to see a widespread adoption 847 00:48:02,719 --> 00:48:05,919 Speaker 1: of the currency that they like, because, for one thing, 848 00:48:06,360 --> 00:48:08,880 Speaker 1: it allows that currency to be used for stuff that 849 00:48:10,840 --> 00:48:14,399 Speaker 1: they might not want more attention drawn toward, right, like 850 00:48:14,600 --> 00:48:18,080 Speaker 1: some of the more shady or possibly outright illegal things 851 00:48:18,520 --> 00:48:23,480 Speaker 1: that we've seen bitcoin used for, and other cryptocurrencies as well. Yeah, 852 00:48:23,520 --> 00:48:27,000 Speaker 1: the idea with with bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, it's essentially 853 00:48:27,280 --> 00:48:31,440 Speaker 1: cash online, an untraceable unit that can be passed from 854 00:48:31,480 --> 00:48:34,600 Speaker 1: one person to another without necessarily being caught with this 855 00:48:34,719 --> 00:48:36,799 Speaker 1: kind of paper trail with credit cards, that kind of thing, 856 00:48:37,160 --> 00:48:39,160 Speaker 1: And like you're saying, it should stay I imagine staying 857 00:48:39,239 --> 00:48:44,560 Speaker 1: niche because it's almost in some respects cryptocurrency is a 858 00:48:44,600 --> 00:48:47,880 Speaker 1: solution and looking for a problem. Yeah, you don't really 859 00:48:47,920 --> 00:48:51,480 Speaker 1: need to do this, especially with all of the banking 860 00:48:51,680 --> 00:48:54,879 Speaker 1: structures out there to do a lot of I don't 861 00:48:54,880 --> 00:48:57,160 Speaker 1: want to say legitimate, but other business. You know, you 862 00:48:57,200 --> 00:48:59,400 Speaker 1: want to do regular business. You can do that so 863 00:48:59,440 --> 00:49:01,920 Speaker 1: many different ways. At this point, I remember your way 864 00:49:01,920 --> 00:49:03,319 Speaker 1: back when this is looking is it the wrong way 865 00:49:03,320 --> 00:49:05,440 Speaker 1: of looking at the internet? But people were afraid to 866 00:49:05,520 --> 00:49:08,520 Speaker 1: bank online. But people have gotten very comfortable with it now, 867 00:49:09,000 --> 00:49:12,120 Speaker 1: so maybe a little too comfortable in some cases could 868 00:49:12,160 --> 00:49:14,600 Speaker 1: be Yeah, yeah, I think I think a large part 869 00:49:14,600 --> 00:49:16,840 Speaker 1: of it is your philosophy. If you're if you're like 870 00:49:16,880 --> 00:49:20,680 Speaker 1: a cryptoanarchist, then this type of currency would have a 871 00:49:20,800 --> 00:49:25,640 Speaker 1: very strong appeal, right like, Uh, there, there's I think 872 00:49:25,680 --> 00:49:30,080 Speaker 1: there's an element with not not every but many bitcoin 873 00:49:30,200 --> 00:49:34,279 Speaker 1: enthusiasts that the one of the strongest appeals is that 874 00:49:34,320 --> 00:49:39,439 Speaker 1: it isn't a state backed, centralized unit of currency. Uh, 875 00:49:39,520 --> 00:49:43,160 Speaker 1: it has this other kind of mystique to it that 876 00:49:43,320 --> 00:49:49,480 Speaker 1: doesn't rely upon an authoritative force determining the value of 877 00:49:49,520 --> 00:49:53,840 Speaker 1: that currency. And there's that part of the appeal, and 878 00:49:53,880 --> 00:49:55,839 Speaker 1: I can understand that, But I also understand that that's 879 00:49:55,840 --> 00:49:57,960 Speaker 1: a part of the appeal that really just appeals to 880 00:49:58,040 --> 00:50:02,400 Speaker 1: that small segment of the population. Not everyone shares those 881 00:50:02,560 --> 00:50:07,400 Speaker 1: same values. So I think that that by its nature, 882 00:50:07,440 --> 00:50:13,960 Speaker 1: will continue to limit cryptocurrency to its relatively small population. Well, um, 883 00:50:14,000 --> 00:50:15,960 Speaker 1: here's something that you and I have both worked in 884 00:50:16,760 --> 00:50:21,279 Speaker 1: YouTube videos. YouTube has changed a lot over the last 885 00:50:21,320 --> 00:50:24,319 Speaker 1: several years. Do you think the YouTube of one will 886 00:50:24,320 --> 00:50:27,160 Speaker 1: look remarkably different from the way it looks now? Are 887 00:50:27,160 --> 00:50:31,560 Speaker 1: we going to have thousands of multi channel networks out 888 00:50:31,560 --> 00:50:35,440 Speaker 1: there or will it even be possible for an independent 889 00:50:35,600 --> 00:50:38,880 Speaker 1: artist to upload something and have it see an instance 890 00:50:39,000 --> 00:50:42,600 Speaker 1: any sort of traction whatsoever. I think independent arts will 891 00:50:42,640 --> 00:50:44,680 Speaker 1: still be able to upload things, and things will go 892 00:50:44,800 --> 00:50:47,680 Speaker 1: viral when they do, or they'll be shared if it's good. 893 00:50:47,719 --> 00:50:50,680 Speaker 1: I always think that great content rises to the top 894 00:50:50,800 --> 00:50:54,600 Speaker 1: no matter what. But I was trying to figure out 895 00:50:54,680 --> 00:50:57,080 Speaker 1: what is the role of YouTube? This is separate. Didn't 896 00:50:57,080 --> 00:50:59,319 Speaker 1: even look at any of your notes or questions. I 897 00:50:59,360 --> 00:51:01,239 Speaker 1: was thinking about YouTube in the future. I thought the 898 00:51:01,280 --> 00:51:03,480 Speaker 1: Internet and the future is going to be super fast. 899 00:51:03,520 --> 00:51:05,680 Speaker 1: You're gonna have a lot of video, You're gonna see 900 00:51:05,960 --> 00:51:08,160 Speaker 1: over the top solutions with cable companies, You're gonna have 901 00:51:08,200 --> 00:51:11,400 Speaker 1: a lot of this network television online, and then you 902 00:51:11,400 --> 00:51:13,200 Speaker 1: have YouTube. And I was trying to figure out what 903 00:51:13,320 --> 00:51:15,400 Speaker 1: is it going to be And the closest thing I 904 00:51:15,440 --> 00:51:17,440 Speaker 1: could come up with is I could almost see YouTube 905 00:51:17,480 --> 00:51:21,640 Speaker 1: becoming a network of source. They already have their own channels, 906 00:51:22,680 --> 00:51:26,640 Speaker 1: so it would be its own network with its own channels, 907 00:51:26,800 --> 00:51:28,480 Speaker 1: which is weird. I guess, kind of like HBO or 908 00:51:28,560 --> 00:51:31,399 Speaker 1: HBO has got one, two, three, they've got kids, all 909 00:51:31,400 --> 00:51:34,120 Speaker 1: that kind of stuff. So I could see it going 910 00:51:34,239 --> 00:51:37,560 Speaker 1: that way where it's imagine or over the top service 911 00:51:37,600 --> 00:51:40,719 Speaker 1: that's bundling in YouTube, which should theoretically be free, but 912 00:51:40,760 --> 00:51:43,200 Speaker 1: maybe it's YouTube read a premium version that has the 913 00:51:43,200 --> 00:51:46,040 Speaker 1: premium content available. That's where I really see it going, 914 00:51:46,120 --> 00:51:50,840 Speaker 1: because if television goes online entirely online, television should be 915 00:51:50,840 --> 00:51:54,160 Speaker 1: a part of that. So I would think YouTube somewhat 916 00:51:54,200 --> 00:51:58,000 Speaker 1: becomes a network where even though it's it's still generated 917 00:51:58,040 --> 00:52:01,279 Speaker 1: by a lot of independ it's there are obviously a 918 00:52:01,320 --> 00:52:03,520 Speaker 1: lot of companies putting money into it. Every now and 919 00:52:03,560 --> 00:52:05,759 Speaker 1: then you'll see a surprise hit, kind of like I 920 00:52:05,800 --> 00:52:08,080 Speaker 1: guess if you think about it in the movie structure, 921 00:52:08,080 --> 00:52:12,000 Speaker 1: where you can have a low budget hit happen with movies, 922 00:52:12,239 --> 00:52:15,040 Speaker 1: why not with television. Yeah, I can see that. I mean, 923 00:52:15,120 --> 00:52:17,399 Speaker 1: it's a it's a weird thing to think about because 924 00:52:17,440 --> 00:52:21,120 Speaker 1: I wouldn't have really anticipated the multi channel networks coming 925 00:52:21,200 --> 00:52:23,120 Speaker 1: up and multi channel network for those of you who 926 00:52:23,560 --> 00:52:27,720 Speaker 1: aren't familiar. Uh, It's the name pretty much gives it away. 927 00:52:27,719 --> 00:52:31,400 Speaker 1: It's a it's a network of different YouTube channels that 928 00:52:31,440 --> 00:52:35,520 Speaker 1: have banded together to make kind of a unified business. 929 00:52:35,600 --> 00:52:39,880 Speaker 1: So you may have uh, six or seven different channels 930 00:52:39,920 --> 00:52:43,400 Speaker 1: all bundled together under one network where you can easily 931 00:52:43,760 --> 00:52:47,880 Speaker 1: see the different individual channels within that network. Each of 932 00:52:47,880 --> 00:52:50,400 Speaker 1: those individual channels might be very different from one another. 933 00:52:50,440 --> 00:52:54,120 Speaker 1: They may not be thematically linked at all. Uh. It 934 00:52:54,160 --> 00:52:56,960 Speaker 1: could just very well be that they've banded together and 935 00:52:57,120 --> 00:53:00,960 Speaker 1: mostly in an attempt to tap into the same promotional 936 00:53:01,040 --> 00:53:06,719 Speaker 1: power so that one independent creator can take advantage of 937 00:53:06,800 --> 00:53:11,480 Speaker 1: an audience built by another creator. Uh. And obviously ill 938 00:53:11,640 --> 00:53:15,160 Speaker 1: I would argue that the more closely aligned the various 939 00:53:15,280 --> 00:53:19,200 Speaker 1: channels are, at least in tone, if not content, the 940 00:53:19,320 --> 00:53:22,439 Speaker 1: easier it is to migrate some of that audience over 941 00:53:22,520 --> 00:53:26,000 Speaker 1: so that they also adopt the new platforms. I don't 942 00:53:26,000 --> 00:53:29,680 Speaker 1: know if that's gonna be as strong a presence in one. 943 00:53:30,960 --> 00:53:33,520 Speaker 1: I almost see this being like another bubble, kind of 944 00:53:33,520 --> 00:53:35,680 Speaker 1: like what I was saying with the app bubbles. I 945 00:53:35,719 --> 00:53:38,920 Speaker 1: think we're gonna see some multi channel networks do just fine, 946 00:53:39,120 --> 00:53:42,480 Speaker 1: they'll stick around, they may even grow, they may incorporate others, 947 00:53:43,120 --> 00:53:45,480 Speaker 1: But I think we're gonna see a lot of them collapse. 948 00:53:45,520 --> 00:53:49,680 Speaker 1: I just don't think the online business is hard. Creating 949 00:53:49,719 --> 00:53:53,040 Speaker 1: online content is not easy. It's not easy to do, 950 00:53:53,280 --> 00:53:57,359 Speaker 1: and it's really not easy to do successfully. Right, Like, 951 00:53:57,400 --> 00:54:00,840 Speaker 1: it's already it's already got a barrier. The technology barrier 952 00:54:00,880 --> 00:54:04,640 Speaker 1: has come way down. But to do high quality content 953 00:54:04,800 --> 00:54:07,319 Speaker 1: is already challenging, and then to have that content be 954 00:54:07,360 --> 00:54:14,200 Speaker 1: discovered is growing increasingly challenging over time. Uh, particularly when 955 00:54:14,200 --> 00:54:16,360 Speaker 1: it comes to video. I mean, we've heard the stats 956 00:54:16,400 --> 00:54:18,279 Speaker 1: about how there it's more than I don't know what 957 00:54:18,360 --> 00:54:20,239 Speaker 1: it's up to now. Last I looked, and this was 958 00:54:20,360 --> 00:54:22,799 Speaker 1: months ago, so I know it's update was something like 959 00:54:22,840 --> 00:54:25,640 Speaker 1: a hundred and eight hours of video or uploaded to 960 00:54:25,680 --> 00:54:29,240 Speaker 1: YouTube every minute. So when you start looking at that volume, 961 00:54:29,280 --> 00:54:32,120 Speaker 1: you realize the chances of being discovered out of that 962 00:54:32,680 --> 00:54:35,320 Speaker 1: massive amount of stuff being put up every single minute 963 00:54:35,760 --> 00:54:39,640 Speaker 1: are are pretty pretty low. It's really really a challenge. 964 00:54:39,920 --> 00:54:44,120 Speaker 1: So I'm curious to see in one if that shakes 965 00:54:44,120 --> 00:54:48,200 Speaker 1: out at all, If either people abandon YouTube, you know, 966 00:54:48,239 --> 00:54:50,720 Speaker 1: people who are spending a lot of time and effort 967 00:54:50,760 --> 00:54:54,400 Speaker 1: to try and get something discovered end up walking away 968 00:54:54,400 --> 00:54:56,960 Speaker 1: from it if they don't meet with any success or 969 00:54:56,960 --> 00:54:59,399 Speaker 1: if it will just be even crazier than it is now, 970 00:54:59,440 --> 00:55:01,640 Speaker 1: and I on se don't know, I can see it 971 00:55:01,680 --> 00:55:05,160 Speaker 1: go either way. You just spark my imagination here because 972 00:55:05,160 --> 00:55:07,600 Speaker 1: I was thinking the way Google has invested in deep 973 00:55:07,680 --> 00:55:10,000 Speaker 1: machine learning, the way Facebook has done the same thing. 974 00:55:10,440 --> 00:55:12,719 Speaker 1: This idea that you just said, you know, hundreds of 975 00:55:12,719 --> 00:55:16,240 Speaker 1: hours of being uploaded like every minute, the the idea 976 00:55:16,320 --> 00:55:18,880 Speaker 1: that there's all of this content and discover ability is 977 00:55:18,960 --> 00:55:21,480 Speaker 1: really low. That's where all this deep machine learning makes 978 00:55:21,480 --> 00:55:23,160 Speaker 1: a lot of sense on the back end. So if 979 00:55:23,160 --> 00:55:26,080 Speaker 1: you're done watching a YouTube video on whatever, you're watching 980 00:55:26,080 --> 00:55:29,560 Speaker 1: it on the future, it will actually recommend something similar 981 00:55:29,680 --> 00:55:33,680 Speaker 1: or something maybe in style, maybe in comedy, maybe just 982 00:55:33,719 --> 00:55:37,879 Speaker 1: an appearance, maybe something like that, because the analysis of 983 00:55:37,920 --> 00:55:42,040 Speaker 1: the content should be greater at that point where this 984 00:55:42,120 --> 00:55:44,200 Speaker 1: is actually a good problem to have. Having too much 985 00:55:44,239 --> 00:55:48,080 Speaker 1: content to go through is actually awesome. From I would 986 00:55:48,080 --> 00:55:50,120 Speaker 1: think any viewers like what do I pick? I could 987 00:55:50,120 --> 00:55:54,400 Speaker 1: pick anything that that it does become very paralyzing in 988 00:55:54,400 --> 00:55:56,399 Speaker 1: the fact you don't know what to pick. But if 989 00:55:56,440 --> 00:55:59,680 Speaker 1: these algorithms get better. If deep machine learning has figured out, 990 00:56:00,040 --> 00:56:03,080 Speaker 1: how what are the parts and components of this thing 991 00:56:03,120 --> 00:56:05,839 Speaker 1: that you enjoyed, we can give you another one. I 992 00:56:05,880 --> 00:56:08,719 Speaker 1: think that maybe that's the future of YouTube networks that 993 00:56:08,800 --> 00:56:13,879 Speaker 1: they have built at these these playlists essentially for you 994 00:56:14,040 --> 00:56:18,160 Speaker 1: and your interests based on your interests, because as fast 995 00:56:18,200 --> 00:56:20,320 Speaker 1: as the internet will get in five years, and whether 996 00:56:20,360 --> 00:56:23,040 Speaker 1: you have net neutrality being a problem or not, and 997 00:56:23,120 --> 00:56:26,120 Speaker 1: all these other problem concerns when you're trying to consume it, 998 00:56:26,440 --> 00:56:28,759 Speaker 1: if you can't find anything, it's a problem. I really 999 00:56:28,800 --> 00:56:32,520 Speaker 1: think when that happens, we'll see an improvement on this 1000 00:56:32,600 --> 00:56:35,759 Speaker 1: deep machine learning where you will get content that makes 1001 00:56:35,800 --> 00:56:39,560 Speaker 1: sense for you at that time. Yeah, curation is a 1002 00:56:39,719 --> 00:56:44,480 Speaker 1: huge problem, right, like a like a challenge curation curating 1003 00:56:44,719 --> 00:56:47,759 Speaker 1: huge amounts of or going through an enormous amount of 1004 00:56:47,840 --> 00:56:50,600 Speaker 1: information in order to curate it and get the stuff 1005 00:56:50,600 --> 00:56:52,680 Speaker 1: that's most relevant to you. This is one of the 1006 00:56:52,680 --> 00:56:55,720 Speaker 1: biggest challenges that come with big data. Uh, the idea 1007 00:56:55,800 --> 00:56:58,239 Speaker 1: that yeah, you've got tons of information out there, and 1008 00:56:58,360 --> 00:57:01,400 Speaker 1: a lot of it is potentially useful in many different ways, 1009 00:57:01,400 --> 00:57:04,200 Speaker 1: but how do you actually sort through all of that 1010 00:57:04,239 --> 00:57:06,879 Speaker 1: to get the best out of what you have, same 1011 00:57:06,920 --> 00:57:08,920 Speaker 1: sort of thing here that we're talking about, trying to 1012 00:57:08,960 --> 00:57:12,880 Speaker 1: find the videos that are most going to resonate with you, 1013 00:57:12,960 --> 00:57:16,400 Speaker 1: whether it's from an entertainment perspective or being thought provoking, 1014 00:57:16,400 --> 00:57:18,840 Speaker 1: whatever it might be. It also reminds me a lot 1015 00:57:18,880 --> 00:57:21,120 Speaker 1: of a patent Oswald routine where he talks about his 1016 00:57:21,160 --> 00:57:24,360 Speaker 1: TiVo going crazy because he he used his tvo to 1017 00:57:24,400 --> 00:57:26,720 Speaker 1: record a Western and then his TiVo went nuts and 1018 00:57:26,720 --> 00:57:29,520 Speaker 1: started recording all the different programs that have horses in them. 1019 00:57:30,280 --> 00:57:32,520 Speaker 1: Uh because because it came to the conclusion that he 1020 00:57:32,600 --> 00:57:36,240 Speaker 1: must really like horses, and just shows you that machine 1021 00:57:36,320 --> 00:57:40,760 Speaker 1: learning there is a process. It's not always perfect right 1022 00:57:40,760 --> 00:57:44,880 Speaker 1: out of the gate. Uh So, a couple of other 1023 00:57:44,920 --> 00:57:47,400 Speaker 1: things I wanted to ask before we conclude this episode. 1024 00:57:47,960 --> 00:57:50,360 Speaker 1: This kind of ties into again something that we're both 1025 00:57:50,680 --> 00:57:54,480 Speaker 1: concerned with as as content creators on the Internet. What 1026 00:57:54,560 --> 00:57:57,200 Speaker 1: do you think the monetization of the Internet is going 1027 00:57:57,240 --> 00:57:59,840 Speaker 1: to look like? In five years? We've been seeing web 1028 00:58:00,000 --> 00:58:05,120 Speaker 1: advertising as the primary way for at least large companies 1029 00:58:05,480 --> 00:58:08,960 Speaker 1: to earn money off of creating content for the Internet, 1030 00:58:09,120 --> 00:58:11,640 Speaker 1: but we've also seen a lot of different reactions to 1031 00:58:11,680 --> 00:58:15,880 Speaker 1: web advertising from the rise of ad blockers to UH 1032 00:58:15,920 --> 00:58:18,240 Speaker 1: discussions about what are the best practices. Do you think 1033 00:58:18,280 --> 00:58:22,200 Speaker 1: web advertising is going to remain the way that that 1034 00:58:22,440 --> 00:58:26,640 Speaker 1: large UH intent content creators are going to go. Do 1035 00:58:26,720 --> 00:58:30,240 Speaker 1: you think other methods like the Patreon method, like a 1036 00:58:30,280 --> 00:58:33,840 Speaker 1: subscriber method are going to actually grow over the years 1037 00:58:33,960 --> 00:58:36,480 Speaker 1: or is there going to be something else? Like how 1038 00:58:36,520 --> 00:58:40,880 Speaker 1: are we going to make sure that we can pay 1039 00:58:40,920 --> 00:58:43,680 Speaker 1: for stuff so that people keep making the stuff we like? 1040 00:58:44,560 --> 00:58:46,640 Speaker 1: And this is this one is a really hard question 1041 00:58:46,680 --> 00:58:49,960 Speaker 1: because for years people have been conditioned that you can 1042 00:58:49,960 --> 00:58:53,000 Speaker 1: get content online for free, and then it's because there 1043 00:58:53,000 --> 00:58:55,120 Speaker 1: were ads on there, and then after that it's like, 1044 00:58:55,120 --> 00:58:56,720 Speaker 1: wait a second, we don't need to see ads because 1045 00:58:56,760 --> 00:58:58,440 Speaker 1: we can use ad block And then you realize, wait 1046 00:58:58,480 --> 00:59:00,600 Speaker 1: a second, this company isn't get money, but I like 1047 00:59:00,680 --> 00:59:03,880 Speaker 1: this this company. Can I just white list them? Should 1048 00:59:03,880 --> 00:59:05,479 Speaker 1: I do that? Or do I go to another site 1049 00:59:05,480 --> 00:59:08,760 Speaker 1: that reblogs it or not? So in the future, I'm 1050 00:59:08,800 --> 00:59:14,520 Speaker 1: expecting advertising isn't going anywhere the old style, you know, adds, 1051 00:59:14,640 --> 00:59:18,320 Speaker 1: the actual banner ads takeovers that kind of stuff that's 1052 00:59:18,360 --> 00:59:20,920 Speaker 1: gonna be there no matter what. I'd imagine you'd see 1053 00:59:21,000 --> 00:59:25,880 Speaker 1: much more sponsored content, uh content that's somewhat harder for 1054 00:59:25,920 --> 00:59:29,840 Speaker 1: ad blockers to find as ads. I know Facebook's doing 1055 00:59:29,840 --> 00:59:31,440 Speaker 1: a push with that right now where they're trying to 1056 00:59:31,520 --> 00:59:34,040 Speaker 1: fight ad block plus trying to make sure that they 1057 00:59:34,040 --> 00:59:36,680 Speaker 1: have as much ads that they can on their sites. Also, 1058 00:59:36,800 --> 00:59:40,120 Speaker 1: like we were talking about with mobile apps, that's an 1059 00:59:40,160 --> 00:59:43,520 Speaker 1: area where you can have a siloed application that an 1060 00:59:43,560 --> 00:59:46,440 Speaker 1: ad blocker wouldn't work on in theory, so you might 1061 00:59:46,480 --> 00:59:49,160 Speaker 1: see it that way, I would hope, and I'm actually 1062 00:59:49,200 --> 00:59:52,160 Speaker 1: I hope. I actually think of a throwback concept of 1063 00:59:52,360 --> 00:59:55,440 Speaker 1: micro transactions where you are paying a couple of sense 1064 00:59:55,480 --> 00:59:57,760 Speaker 1: instead of having a subscription. But I see this this 1065 00:59:57,880 --> 01:00:01,880 Speaker 1: being the model for contents in the future. With advertising. 1066 01:00:02,040 --> 01:00:04,760 Speaker 1: You'll have your standard advertising, you also have your Patreon 1067 01:00:04,840 --> 01:00:07,400 Speaker 1: method of basically paying per month what you want. I 1068 01:00:07,400 --> 01:00:09,280 Speaker 1: could see a subscription thing on top of that and 1069 01:00:09,480 --> 01:00:13,800 Speaker 1: micro payments, in other words, allowing any single way to 1070 01:00:14,000 --> 01:00:16,640 Speaker 1: break the paywall with this either turn off your ad blocker, 1071 01:00:17,080 --> 01:00:19,240 Speaker 1: or pay us two cents for this, or give us 1072 01:00:19,240 --> 01:00:21,360 Speaker 1: a subscription for the year. I just see a lot 1073 01:00:21,360 --> 01:00:24,360 Speaker 1: of companies being very, very open to how their content 1074 01:00:24,440 --> 01:00:27,440 Speaker 1: is going to be received and not just sticking forever 1075 01:00:27,520 --> 01:00:29,720 Speaker 1: to this. You must look at our Betterer ad and 1076 01:00:29,760 --> 01:00:31,880 Speaker 1: here is a nice little other ad that says you 1077 01:00:31,920 --> 01:00:34,800 Speaker 1: can't read this until you pay more money. Paywalls that 1078 01:00:34,920 --> 01:00:38,200 Speaker 1: work for other bigger companies out there. I don't think 1079 01:00:38,240 --> 01:00:41,480 Speaker 1: that they should be as high for smaller places. Yeah, 1080 01:00:41,600 --> 01:00:43,920 Speaker 1: I agree with you. I think uh. I think we're 1081 01:00:43,920 --> 01:00:46,760 Speaker 1: gonna see the Patreon method get adopted by more and 1082 01:00:46,840 --> 01:00:52,440 Speaker 1: more smaller content creators. UM, particularly those that are working 1083 01:00:52,520 --> 01:00:55,720 Speaker 1: on this as a passion project as opposed to it 1084 01:00:55,840 --> 01:01:00,840 Speaker 1: being like a a a business business. This right like 1085 01:01:00,920 --> 01:01:03,440 Speaker 1: it's they want to make money off of it, but 1086 01:01:03,560 --> 01:01:06,240 Speaker 1: they also are in it because this is something they 1087 01:01:06,320 --> 01:01:09,640 Speaker 1: truly want to do. UM. I see a lot of 1088 01:01:09,840 --> 01:01:13,320 Speaker 1: more people going down that route. UM. I agree that 1089 01:01:13,320 --> 01:01:15,800 Speaker 1: we're going to see a lot of companies say, look, 1090 01:01:15,880 --> 01:01:19,000 Speaker 1: here are all the different ways that you can support us. 1091 01:01:19,880 --> 01:01:23,280 Speaker 1: Pick whichever way works best for you, and then we 1092 01:01:23,320 --> 01:01:26,320 Speaker 1: will continue creating the stuff you like. I think that 1093 01:01:26,480 --> 01:01:28,760 Speaker 1: is probably the I think it's gonna take us a 1094 01:01:28,760 --> 01:01:30,040 Speaker 1: while to get there, but I think this is the 1095 01:01:30,120 --> 01:01:34,720 Speaker 1: best approach again, to just give those options to the consumer. 1096 01:01:35,440 --> 01:01:38,920 Speaker 1: And I agree with you that we have conditioned people 1097 01:01:38,960 --> 01:01:44,200 Speaker 1: to think that stuff on the Internet is free. Somehow 1098 01:01:44,320 --> 01:01:47,960 Speaker 1: like it it We just magically create it, and somehow 1099 01:01:48,160 --> 01:01:52,640 Speaker 1: we're also able to pay rent and buy food, uh, 1100 01:01:52,680 --> 01:01:56,040 Speaker 1: and that it's all wonderful and we will continue to 1101 01:01:56,040 --> 01:01:58,840 Speaker 1: do so in perpetuity and we're never going to get 1102 01:01:58,840 --> 01:02:01,240 Speaker 1: evicted or star to death. That's not the way the 1103 01:02:01,280 --> 01:02:05,440 Speaker 1: world works, unfortunately. So I think we're definitely gonna see 1104 01:02:05,440 --> 01:02:08,120 Speaker 1: a lot more sponsored content. We're gonna see some branded 1105 01:02:08,520 --> 01:02:12,000 Speaker 1: content stuff that uh, you know, We're gonna see some 1106 01:02:12,080 --> 01:02:15,480 Speaker 1: growing pains with people experimenting with how do I create 1107 01:02:15,560 --> 01:02:19,160 Speaker 1: something that serves the brand that's sponsoring me, but also 1108 01:02:19,920 --> 01:02:22,960 Speaker 1: is of genuine value to the people listening, so it 1109 01:02:23,040 --> 01:02:26,600 Speaker 1: doesn't end up becoming a very long commercial that people 1110 01:02:26,640 --> 01:02:30,440 Speaker 1: feel like they're fooled into consuming because they hate that. 1111 01:02:30,640 --> 01:02:32,880 Speaker 1: I don't know if you know that. I asked, people 1112 01:02:32,960 --> 01:02:35,680 Speaker 1: hate being tricked into watching a commercial? What's that? I 1113 01:02:35,680 --> 01:02:38,640 Speaker 1: couldn't hear you over, my beautiful citizen. What I just kidding? 1114 01:02:39,080 --> 01:02:42,880 Speaker 1: Right right? I was thinking a while ago, we lived 1115 01:02:42,880 --> 01:02:45,280 Speaker 1: in a world where paying for music online sounded like 1116 01:02:45,320 --> 01:02:47,480 Speaker 1: the craziest thing. You could get it as much as 1117 01:02:47,520 --> 01:02:49,920 Speaker 1: you want, you could find it anywhere. But if the 1118 01:02:49,960 --> 01:02:53,840 Speaker 1: cost gets low enough then people you saw that people 1119 01:02:53,920 --> 01:02:57,120 Speaker 1: change their methods to pay per song. Now the subcription 1120 01:02:57,160 --> 01:03:00,280 Speaker 1: services are completely the way to go. So I think 1121 01:03:00,640 --> 01:03:04,439 Speaker 1: if the if the business side figures it out and goes, look, 1122 01:03:04,440 --> 01:03:06,160 Speaker 1: we can't keep it going the way it is now. 1123 01:03:06,200 --> 01:03:09,400 Speaker 1: It's just not not sustainable. There's a chance that people 1124 01:03:09,440 --> 01:03:12,640 Speaker 1: will relearn this and then go, yes, I wouldn't. I 1125 01:03:12,680 --> 01:03:14,600 Speaker 1: wouldn't take this. And I really hate saying this, but 1126 01:03:14,640 --> 01:03:17,680 Speaker 1: I wouldn't just swipe a newspaper right, And there's content 1127 01:03:17,720 --> 01:03:20,240 Speaker 1: there and there's nothing wrong with charging for content that 1128 01:03:20,320 --> 01:03:23,040 Speaker 1: you make. And I'm just saying this as a content producer. 1129 01:03:23,080 --> 01:03:25,480 Speaker 1: I say this as a content consumer that I do 1130 01:03:25,560 --> 01:03:29,760 Speaker 1: pay for this stuff I want to see Otherwise, how 1131 01:03:29,800 --> 01:03:32,080 Speaker 1: will people know you basically vote with your dollars? Is 1132 01:03:32,120 --> 01:03:34,680 Speaker 1: my idea on that, which is like people's idea, But 1133 01:03:35,560 --> 01:03:38,160 Speaker 1: it's it's going to take some time. It does. There's 1134 01:03:38,240 --> 01:03:42,400 Speaker 1: just such inertia to not change anything. Yeah, but well, 1135 01:03:42,440 --> 01:03:45,840 Speaker 1: I mean you've got you've got billions of dollars wrapped 1136 01:03:45,960 --> 01:03:49,920 Speaker 1: up in an industry that is not known to be 1137 01:03:50,040 --> 01:03:52,800 Speaker 1: fast to react to changes. And I'm talking about the 1138 01:03:53,080 --> 01:03:57,720 Speaker 1: marketing industry in general, advertising industry um which has it's 1139 01:03:57,720 --> 01:04:00,720 Speaker 1: it's it's linked to pretty much everything we're talking about 1140 01:04:00,760 --> 01:04:04,640 Speaker 1: in this little little discussion. Uh And and yeah, you 1141 01:04:04,720 --> 01:04:08,959 Speaker 1: can't expect it to change very quickly. And yet the 1142 01:04:08,960 --> 01:04:12,880 Speaker 1: the wants of the customers are changing, and and that 1143 01:04:13,120 --> 01:04:16,640 Speaker 1: what they are willing to do changes and you have 1144 01:04:16,680 --> 01:04:20,080 Speaker 1: to react to that. I think, uh you really hit 1145 01:04:20,120 --> 01:04:22,120 Speaker 1: on it. The idea that if you're if the price 1146 01:04:22,240 --> 01:04:27,400 Speaker 1: is right and if it's easy enough to get, like 1147 01:04:28,080 --> 01:04:29,680 Speaker 1: I think you have to have both of those things. 1148 01:04:29,680 --> 01:04:31,080 Speaker 1: You have to have the right price, and you have 1149 01:04:31,120 --> 01:04:33,439 Speaker 1: to make it really really easy for people to buy 1150 01:04:33,440 --> 01:04:37,600 Speaker 1: your stuff. Uh. DRM was a huge problem that I 1151 01:04:37,640 --> 01:04:41,240 Speaker 1: think ended up being a big negative for a lot 1152 01:04:41,240 --> 01:04:43,400 Speaker 1: of people, for lots of different stuff, not just music, 1153 01:04:43,440 --> 01:04:46,760 Speaker 1: but you know, various software packages, that kind of thing 1154 01:04:46,840 --> 01:04:50,720 Speaker 1: that as you make it more difficult for people to 1155 01:04:50,800 --> 01:04:54,240 Speaker 1: buy a legitimate copy of your product, they're going to 1156 01:04:54,360 --> 01:04:57,680 Speaker 1: go further to get illegitimate copies because they don't have 1157 01:04:57,680 --> 01:05:00,280 Speaker 1: to deal with all the mess that comes along with 1158 01:05:00,600 --> 01:05:04,240 Speaker 1: trying to buy something legally. Uh So, making making it 1159 01:05:04,280 --> 01:05:07,760 Speaker 1: is easy to get and at the right price, I 1160 01:05:07,800 --> 01:05:10,640 Speaker 1: think Urondo something like I think there I think there 1161 01:05:10,720 --> 01:05:14,080 Speaker 1: might be money in that um, and people are willing 1162 01:05:14,160 --> 01:05:16,520 Speaker 1: to support the stuff that they love if they feel 1163 01:05:16,640 --> 01:05:21,360 Speaker 1: like the value they get back is of of equal 1164 01:05:21,360 --> 01:05:23,600 Speaker 1: amount to what they're putting into it. You can't just 1165 01:05:23,680 --> 01:05:26,360 Speaker 1: ask people to pay for junk and expect it to 1166 01:05:26,480 --> 01:05:29,160 Speaker 1: go on forever. Um. I mean, it might work for 1167 01:05:29,320 --> 01:05:33,000 Speaker 1: the short term, but it's not really a long term strategy. 1168 01:05:33,320 --> 01:05:35,120 Speaker 1: You know. I have a lot of other questions that 1169 01:05:35,160 --> 01:05:37,440 Speaker 1: we wrote down, but this episode is going pretty long, 1170 01:05:37,520 --> 01:05:40,920 Speaker 1: so I just think of gonna uh to to kind 1171 01:05:40,920 --> 01:05:45,840 Speaker 1: of end on one big question, which is about accessibility. 1172 01:05:46,480 --> 01:05:49,840 Speaker 1: We've seen accessibility of the Internet improve quite a bit 1173 01:05:49,840 --> 01:05:51,400 Speaker 1: over the last five years, but we still have a 1174 01:05:51,440 --> 01:05:54,120 Speaker 1: long way to go. More than half of the world's 1175 01:05:54,120 --> 01:05:57,720 Speaker 1: population does not really have access to the Internet, so 1176 01:05:57,800 --> 01:06:00,840 Speaker 1: there are billions of people who do not have at 1177 01:06:00,920 --> 01:06:03,320 Speaker 1: least easy access to the Internet. Some of them might 1178 01:06:03,360 --> 01:06:06,400 Speaker 1: be able to get access with a great deal of effort, 1179 01:06:06,480 --> 01:06:09,000 Speaker 1: but you know, the more effort you have to spend, 1180 01:06:09,280 --> 01:06:13,360 Speaker 1: the smaller the returns are on actually getting that access. 1181 01:06:13,800 --> 01:06:16,080 Speaker 1: But we're seeing a lot of projects trying to change that. 1182 01:06:16,240 --> 01:06:20,000 Speaker 1: So things like Google having a project Loon, and Facebook 1183 01:06:20,000 --> 01:06:24,480 Speaker 1: having its proposed satellite and drone program to supply uh 1184 01:06:24,560 --> 01:06:26,640 Speaker 1: Internet to lots of different parts of the world. Both 1185 01:06:26,640 --> 01:06:29,640 Speaker 1: of these companies have a vested interest in people getting 1186 01:06:29,680 --> 01:06:32,600 Speaker 1: access to the Internet. It's not like it's purely altruistic. 1187 01:06:33,240 --> 01:06:37,160 Speaker 1: But do you think that we're going to see near 1188 01:06:37,320 --> 01:06:41,480 Speaker 1: universal access to the Internet. Eric Schmidt of Google fame 1189 01:06:41,800 --> 01:06:43,560 Speaker 1: said back in two thousand and thirteen he thought by 1190 01:06:44,320 --> 01:06:46,720 Speaker 1: everyone would have access. Do you think that's a little 1191 01:06:47,240 --> 01:06:49,440 Speaker 1: Do you think it's realistic or is that a little ambitious? 1192 01:06:50,520 --> 01:06:53,520 Speaker 1: I think it's both. And considering how Google it is 1193 01:06:53,680 --> 01:06:56,200 Speaker 1: a company in Facebook, and as you mentioned, they're vested 1194 01:06:56,200 --> 01:06:59,840 Speaker 1: interesting being relatively strong on this, I'm gonna boldly say 1195 01:06:59,880 --> 01:07:04,440 Speaker 1: by there's going to be universal accents whether it's the 1196 01:07:04,520 --> 01:07:07,280 Speaker 1: thing is about receiving it, so you can have the 1197 01:07:07,320 --> 01:07:10,920 Speaker 1: earth covered an Internet via balloon or satellite wherever you 1198 01:07:10,920 --> 01:07:14,040 Speaker 1: want to use. The fact that hardware has gotten so cheap, 1199 01:07:14,040 --> 01:07:16,800 Speaker 1: like Android one phones, we're seeing stories about five dollar 1200 01:07:16,880 --> 01:07:19,200 Speaker 1: cell phones. It wasn't so long ago that I was 1201 01:07:19,240 --> 01:07:22,600 Speaker 1: excited reading about the one laptop per child projects, which 1202 01:07:22,640 --> 01:07:25,240 Speaker 1: at this point seems kind of not antiquated but kind 1203 01:07:25,240 --> 01:07:28,360 Speaker 1: of silly because how you, yeah, you can get so 1204 01:07:28,440 --> 01:07:32,000 Speaker 1: much more power now with phones and low end phones 1205 01:07:32,080 --> 01:07:33,920 Speaker 1: these days, like oh well this is this is a 1206 01:07:33,960 --> 01:07:36,280 Speaker 1: piece of junk phone. I wouldn't buy this, But they 1207 01:07:36,320 --> 01:07:39,640 Speaker 1: have gotten so cheap and so available to so many 1208 01:07:39,640 --> 01:07:42,600 Speaker 1: different areas that it's the other half of the equation. 1209 01:07:42,680 --> 01:07:45,640 Speaker 1: Just having wireless and some kind of access to it 1210 01:07:45,680 --> 01:07:48,120 Speaker 1: is one thing, but having the hardware out there, I 1211 01:07:48,160 --> 01:07:52,520 Speaker 1: think that is going to get there by Maybe I 1212 01:07:52,560 --> 01:07:55,200 Speaker 1: could see that happening where these devices are so cheap 1213 01:07:55,560 --> 01:07:57,720 Speaker 1: that it's just something you have. You should have this. 1214 01:07:57,800 --> 01:08:01,360 Speaker 1: At this point, it's almost like a hand or this 1215 01:08:01,440 --> 01:08:03,200 Speaker 1: could be talking about because it's like a hand you 1216 01:08:03,200 --> 01:08:04,760 Speaker 1: want to make sure you have this device with you 1217 01:08:04,840 --> 01:08:07,120 Speaker 1: at all times, or Swiss army knife. You have to 1218 01:08:07,120 --> 01:08:12,520 Speaker 1: have it. And with Google and Facebook consistently going ahead now, 1219 01:08:12,560 --> 01:08:15,120 Speaker 1: I don't see Google and Facebook being like all the 1220 01:08:15,320 --> 01:08:19,880 Speaker 1: Vista and my Space. They seem to have enough power 1221 01:08:20,000 --> 01:08:21,680 Speaker 1: behind them that they can keep going for a good 1222 01:08:21,680 --> 01:08:24,960 Speaker 1: another five years. You would say they're too big to fail. No, 1223 01:08:25,080 --> 01:08:27,599 Speaker 1: that's not what I'm saying. I think I think they're 1224 01:08:27,640 --> 01:08:31,559 Speaker 1: they're motivated enough, and they are. There's another There's that 1225 01:08:31,560 --> 01:08:34,519 Speaker 1: company we talked about, Comcast, that's a rag on that much. 1226 01:08:34,800 --> 01:08:37,759 Speaker 1: Their method of change isn't what I see from Google 1227 01:08:37,840 --> 01:08:41,519 Speaker 1: or Facebook. Those two companies work to get more and 1228 01:08:41,560 --> 01:08:44,960 Speaker 1: more coverage and they're going for bigger goals than just 1229 01:08:45,080 --> 01:08:49,520 Speaker 1: the short term shareholder uh numbers. Right, Because with Comcast, 1230 01:08:49,640 --> 01:08:51,960 Speaker 1: what what their strategy was, and this isn't a secret. 1231 01:08:52,000 --> 01:08:55,120 Speaker 1: I mean I covered this in in a deep episode 1232 01:08:55,160 --> 01:08:59,240 Speaker 1: series about how Comcast works. The Comcast story. The way 1233 01:08:59,240 --> 01:09:02,519 Speaker 1: that they're company traditionally would grow is they would go 1234 01:09:02,560 --> 01:09:07,520 Speaker 1: out and buy other companies. They weren't creating new markets. 1235 01:09:07,520 --> 01:09:11,960 Speaker 1: They were purchasing the companies that were serving markets they 1236 01:09:12,000 --> 01:09:16,400 Speaker 1: weren't in yet. So that's a very different strategy, as 1237 01:09:16,400 --> 01:09:18,080 Speaker 1: you point out, right, because once you get to a 1238 01:09:18,080 --> 01:09:20,040 Speaker 1: point where you bought up pretty much everyone you can 1239 01:09:20,040 --> 01:09:25,160 Speaker 1: buy without facing massive resistance on a on a regulatory side, 1240 01:09:25,720 --> 01:09:29,160 Speaker 1: you can't you can't grow anymore. You have to create, 1241 01:09:29,760 --> 01:09:34,320 Speaker 1: you can't just buy other stuff. And really the Comcast 1242 01:09:34,360 --> 01:09:40,520 Speaker 1: history was pretty much uh just stuck in that mentality 1243 01:09:40,560 --> 01:09:43,400 Speaker 1: of buy other companies that are already doing what we do, 1244 01:09:43,960 --> 01:09:47,080 Speaker 1: and now we that those customers become our customers. That's 1245 01:09:47,080 --> 01:09:49,720 Speaker 1: how you grow your customer base. This is a very 1246 01:09:49,760 --> 01:09:54,800 Speaker 1: different approach. I I love the idea of everyone having 1247 01:09:54,800 --> 01:09:57,960 Speaker 1: access by one. I mean, the implications of that are 1248 01:09:58,080 --> 01:10:02,320 Speaker 1: so far beyond just having the ability to finally access 1249 01:10:02,320 --> 01:10:06,280 Speaker 1: the Internet. We've seen the Internet play a an incredibly 1250 01:10:06,320 --> 01:10:13,639 Speaker 1: important part in massive historical moments throughout the last five years. 1251 01:10:13,640 --> 01:10:17,240 Speaker 1: I mean, the Arab spring alone was such a huge story, 1252 01:10:18,200 --> 01:10:20,639 Speaker 1: and I imagine that we'll see more stories like that, 1253 01:10:20,920 --> 01:10:26,720 Speaker 1: particularly as access to the Internet becomes closer to being universal, 1254 01:10:27,320 --> 01:10:30,720 Speaker 1: and I find that encouraging. I think there's going to 1255 01:10:30,720 --> 01:10:34,120 Speaker 1: be a lot of tumultuous problems along the way, but 1256 01:10:34,680 --> 01:10:37,480 Speaker 1: I find that when you get this level of communication, 1257 01:10:37,560 --> 01:10:44,280 Speaker 1: this incredibly powerful tool in people's hands, then amazing things 1258 01:10:44,320 --> 01:10:48,720 Speaker 1: can happen. Uh not all of them involving videos of 1259 01:10:48,840 --> 01:10:53,960 Speaker 1: cute cats. That's just a bonus. But that's my own 1260 01:10:54,000 --> 01:10:58,920 Speaker 1: personal kind of optimistic view. Um. I as, thank you 1261 01:10:59,080 --> 01:11:03,320 Speaker 1: so much for joining the show today and and sticking 1262 01:11:03,320 --> 01:11:05,680 Speaker 1: your neck out to look out and say, what's it 1263 01:11:05,720 --> 01:11:08,200 Speaker 1: gonna be like in five years. I look forward in 1264 01:11:09,200 --> 01:11:12,920 Speaker 1: to calling you up and going over these results wherever 1265 01:11:12,920 --> 01:11:15,599 Speaker 1: I wherever I'll be, I'll have access to the Internet. 1266 01:11:15,600 --> 01:11:17,080 Speaker 1: So it will be a problem, that's true. Yeah, it 1267 01:11:17,080 --> 01:11:20,920 Speaker 1: won't matter like if you're taking a vacation in Antarctica, 1268 01:11:21,160 --> 01:11:24,719 Speaker 1: I know that I'll be able to have you chat, 1269 01:11:24,840 --> 01:11:26,800 Speaker 1: maybe have a couple of penguins in the background, and 1270 01:11:26,880 --> 01:11:31,240 Speaker 1: we'll have a Hopefully my connection doesn't freeze. Yeah, that's 1271 01:11:32,080 --> 01:11:35,559 Speaker 1: that's great. That's great. Leave the puns to me, chuckle heads, 1272 01:11:35,600 --> 01:11:38,639 Speaker 1: all right, Yes, please tell people where they can find 1273 01:11:38,720 --> 01:11:42,040 Speaker 1: your work, you guys, go to see net dot com. 1274 01:11:42,160 --> 01:11:44,919 Speaker 1: We've got lots of great news how to use reviews. 1275 01:11:45,439 --> 01:11:47,639 Speaker 1: You can also check out top five dot net dot com. 1276 01:11:47,640 --> 01:11:49,840 Speaker 1: If I want to promote top five, which I do, 1277 01:11:50,000 --> 01:11:53,479 Speaker 1: count down a fun see netlist every week at top 1278 01:11:53,520 --> 01:11:55,920 Speaker 1: five dots net dot com. And if you want to 1279 01:11:55,960 --> 01:11:59,800 Speaker 1: hear I as talk about stuff with me uh and 1280 01:12:00,120 --> 01:12:04,240 Speaker 1: uh in a format that's not safe for work, you 1281 01:12:04,240 --> 01:12:07,120 Speaker 1: can always check out our podcast Without Pretense with Eric 1282 01:12:07,200 --> 01:12:10,920 Speaker 1: sandean Our, our our third host. Um. But it is 1283 01:12:10,960 --> 01:12:14,800 Speaker 1: not It is not not a polite show at all. 1284 01:12:15,880 --> 01:12:23,800 Speaker 1: But but it does exist. It is a thing that happens. Uh. Yeah, 1285 01:12:23,840 --> 01:12:26,400 Speaker 1: we we named it this year in two thousand and sixteen, 1286 01:12:26,439 --> 01:12:28,559 Speaker 1: we named it the best podcast for two thousand fourteen. 1287 01:12:28,600 --> 01:12:29,960 Speaker 1: So that tells you all you need to know about 1288 01:12:30,000 --> 01:12:33,799 Speaker 1: that show. Alright, so, guys, if you have any questions, comments, 1289 01:12:33,800 --> 01:12:37,120 Speaker 1: suggestions for future episodes, please get in touch with me. 1290 01:12:37,200 --> 01:12:40,040 Speaker 1: The email address is tech stuff at how stuff works 1291 01:12:40,040 --> 01:12:42,880 Speaker 1: dot com, or drop me a line on Facebook or Twitter. 1292 01:12:43,240 --> 01:12:45,799 Speaker 1: The handle at both of those locations is tech stuff 1293 01:12:46,160 --> 01:12:50,120 Speaker 1: H s W and I'll talk to you again really soon. 1294 01:12:55,400 --> 01:12:57,840 Speaker 1: For more on this and bothands of other topics is 1295 01:12:57,960 --> 01:13:04,400 Speaker 1: how stuff works dot com w w W