WEBVTT - Week 15 ULTIMATE PREVIEW,

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>And listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever Show. Start listening to us, or suffer the consequences. Listen,

0:00:16.280 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>Dee did did? Yeah? He Now welcome yours by Byron Right,

0:00:52.600 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>your co host. Bye bye, Spake bread Bright, Steffall, don't

0:00:59.480 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>go five eleven. Why, ladies and gentlemen in Yorks with that,

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>we will do you inside of Studio thirty four. This

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 1>is the BFFs. He's Frank Snaffle, He's e y Eric

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Young and I am gran friend you. What's happening man? Great?

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Happy Friday to you, and happy Friday to everybody out

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>there who did not bench Lamar Jackson. Everybody, because if

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you did, you're an idiot. I hope so Greg so

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you know not everything everybody. Kofi Kingston, Kobe Kingston has

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>sell these sweets this morning? What is Kobe doing? Why?

0:01:46.760 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>How do you not have Kofe Kingston watching the BFF.

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 1>What is Kobe doing not texting you? We're watching? Trust me?

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I reprimanded him. I mean, and the reality is is

0:01:56.960 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that I'm playing him in the w W E League.

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>So uh, he's got Jacoby Brissette filling in for Lamar

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Jackson with his it's not the smartest thing. And now

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>he keeps saying, UH, fantasy analysts someone told him to

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>do it. He won't give me the name. I offered

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to beat the guy up myself for him, even though

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm playing him. Uh Kofi one of the greatest human

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>beings of all time, big football guy, huge fantasy player. UM.

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I made it a point to stay in the crowd

0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 1>during his WrestleMania match last year. And I can tell

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you I'm an emotional person and I cried because often

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>good guys don't get rewarded in this business. And he's

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.359
<v Speaker 1>definitely one of the best human beings I've ever met

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in my life. And UH made a massive mistake and

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to reap the benefits. Uh sounds a great guy,

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>great wrestler. Like to watch him terrible, Are you kidding me?

0:02:57.560 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>He's in the semifinals. He led us gray by somebody

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that he was relying on, And I said, look, I mean,

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 1>even though I'm playing him, if he would have texted me,

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>I would have said, you can't sit Lamar Jackson. We

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>said it yesterday. I mean, I didn't have a pile

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>of questions, but a lot of questions on social media.

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>We had people writing in the show asking us about

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>people sat him. You don't understand how or why speaking

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of this, speaking of this, Alex Grey here in the

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you're in the room. Come here, well over there, come here,

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>come wake, come we come here. So right here is

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 1>a is Alex. Everybody knows there's the updates on Sunday

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>morning because the updates in the morning with us, right,

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So Alex asked me yesterday, as you guys heard, he's

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:42.119
<v Speaker 1>our video producer. Normally, um oh, man, can I mention

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I would love to reenact, as you don't mind? All right?

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>So he comes downstairs to his update, Can I mention,

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:51.760
<v Speaker 1>gottom out here? I have staying? Alex isn't downstairs. But

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>we got you know, we gotta continue doing the job

0:03:53.640 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>right there, keeps doing, keeps doing out, keeps doing there.

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 1>We got You're good now, all right? So Alex, okay, sorry,

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 1>try Vane Lamar Jackson. I literally you know everybody knows me, like,

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>are you an idiot? I told the story yesterday. He's

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>like pacing back and forth, back and one of his

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>five quarterbacks pacing back and forth. And then, as we

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>said yesterday, we bring you on the show today, tell

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>me to f myself if I was wrong. I'm gonna

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you. I did not receive a text

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>last night saying thanks. But first thing this morning, what

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>did you say to me? I was. I was like, yeah, yeah, Greg,

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.559
<v Speaker 1>you're right. He goes, don't do that, Alex. Don't because

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>then you know what he comes on the BFS. His

0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>head is already big enough. You know what he'd be

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>doing this. You know what he's hyping up. Greg. He goes,

0:04:40.640 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>he goes, you know mark Ingram had that first touchdown.

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I go what about the other five? And he goes, yeah,

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not like forty eight nothing after one player. I'm like,

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you damn right you are you know who's not King?

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>You're a smart player than Kobe Kigs. Then they got

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a gift to the at place, Alexa Son, I don't

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>think you just stim buy here you go. That is

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the excitement that you get, right for somebody that's smart

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>enough to start Lamar Jackson. The story you just heard

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.680
<v Speaker 1>from e y is what you get when you don't yep.

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:15.919
<v Speaker 1>And that's it all wrapped up bow and a ribbon. Greg.

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 1>We tried to tell you this. This man was averaging

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the most Fantasy points by a quarterback in NFL HIT history,

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>and he just added to that average. And the guy

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>put up in a six point passing touchdown league. I

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 1>play in the NFFC where I have Lamar Jackson High

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Stakes league. This guy put up forty nine fantasy points

0:05:37.279 --> 0:05:41.159
<v Speaker 1>last night, greg points in a six point passing touchdown league.

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's funny. And this is a typical you know

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>me conversation. But you know the survivor playoff, the survivor

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>pool that I do player pool and in the playoffs,

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 1>which is awesome. I'm guessing you use Lamar Jackson. Rein

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>much more excited. I do not use Lamar Jackson. We

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 1>have Lamar Jackson saved. We have them scheduled to play

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.600
<v Speaker 1>for us next week, and of who, my buddies just

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>like odd. Next week is the week he doesn't do anything. Well,

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm probably gonna take about at halftime once

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>they clinched the hole. Yeah, we have seen it. We

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.679
<v Speaker 1>have literally saved as we wanted to do that because

0:06:09.720 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>we thought, I think next week he plays like the

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Browns or something. I was like, all right, cool, Oh gosh, Greig,

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>should you should ask for PFF on this one. I

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>could have told you Lamar Jackson. Yess, the Jets, there's

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>no using this. It's Lamar Jacks we're using this week.

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfield, Yeah, that's pretty good. We could' will be

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 1>who breeze them on the night. It was good. I

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know how you had the patients to not using

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Jackson all season. You're You're insane. The way to do

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean again, the way to do it is just you.

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>The points reset in the playoffs, so you need to

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>have players set. Yeah, we restrained ourselves not used Lamar,

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and when we're using them next week with Mark Andrew's

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure. I hope he goes off next week. Greg,

0:06:48.120 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I hope you bring it home and four people use

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Lamar Jackson this week. Damn. That doesn't seem good for

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>your for your point total though it doesn't seem great.

0:06:57.560 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't seem great. Well, I hope you win, uh,

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>because if you win, then you have to buy us

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>all lunch called it. Uh. Sure I win. I love

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody hunch. I'm not gonna win that. How about those Jets, though, Greg,

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>they put don't fight like in the first quarter, right, Yeah,

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I saw a lot of texts about it. So a

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of texts about that. Sam Donald's good quarterback. I

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 1>don't care what anyone says, adowns just saying to him,

0:07:21.960 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>what's up about gaze? Where we're gonna around the NFL

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>this Sunday, you're BFS hanging out with you. NFL season

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>is now upon us, so you can become the eighth

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>person to win one million dollars in a Fandueler Draft

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Kings tournament. My setting their lineups using the Daily Order

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>dot Com DFS lot of optimizer. If you're playing Dailey

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports and not using Daily Order dot Com, you're

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>doing it wrong. Sign him down for the NFL Access

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:53.679
<v Speaker 1>with a faster optimizers, smarter DFS projections, and better results.

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>It's promo code Action, first head percent discount, because that's

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>promo code action, first head percent discount, Daily Order dot

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Com where millionaires are made. All right, Well, well, well

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 1>back with you here on the bf Babs, Eric Young,

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Frank Snaffle, Greg Susman hanging out. Happy day here today

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>for all those Lamar Jackson starters out there, and happy

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:40.559
<v Speaker 1>day for all of us. We're gonna go game by

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>game as we do, get you everything you need to

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 1>know about this Sunday the most information that we can

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in just the next forty five minutes. So let's break

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>it down, Frank. Let me start with spy gay number

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>two with an even Patriots literally spying on the Bengals,

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and say, all right, I got they had their documentary

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>series do your Job. They're following a scout around fine,

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>getting why are they filming the Bengals sideline? We've been

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about this at all, but like, why are they

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:13.320
<v Speaker 1>filming the Bengal sideline? Mistake? Obviously you need an edge

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>to beat the Cincinnati Bengals greg any edge they can.

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>They're trying to see, like what Aja Green saying, Oh,

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>should we get this guy something like that? I don't know.

0:09:21.880 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to play with the Patriots next year, all right,

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots and Bengals, And I know, well, it's look

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot, of course about the Patriots and who you

0:09:29.240 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 1>can start and who you can't, specifically with the running backs,

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously start Julietelman and that's about it. What the Bengals.

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>A question I've gotten a lot this week is what

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>do I do about Tyler Boyd? Can I start Tyler Boyd?

0:09:40.600 --> 0:09:42.439
<v Speaker 1>So I'll throw this one to you do you a

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>comfortable starting? Um, I'm not New England's secondary has been really,

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:51.960
<v Speaker 1>really good. It's scary, scary matchup. Um, there's no one

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:54.319
<v Speaker 1>else really that I'm afraid of there that's going to

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>poke average away from him. They're going to double team him.

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Um and someone Actually I have been pushing kind of

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>all week. Women ask me. I think Mixing is actually

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>going to have a pretty good game here. Um there, Um,

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton loves to check the ball down. Mixing has

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>been good the last couple of weeks. Um, and they're

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>going to need him to do something, so I think

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 1>since then he makes this game pretty interesting. Um, and

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 1>probably losing the end to the Patriots. But I think

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Mixing is gonna have a pretty decent game. Yeah, I'm

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 1>with e Y on this one. I'm pretty much out

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>on Joe on Tyler Boyd in this matchup. I have

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>him as my wide receiver. Thirty six greg so low

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.120
<v Speaker 1>end wide receiver. Three of the production has been there

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>for in the past couple of weeks, seventy five yards

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>or a touchdown in three straight games. He has been

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:38.839
<v Speaker 1>uh the top target getter for Andy Dalton over the

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.920
<v Speaker 1>past two starts, so we know that Dalton's going to

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>look his way. But the Patriots secondary has just been

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 1>so tough all year. They are still number one in

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>past defense TV away on the season, they are six

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.559
<v Speaker 1>and run defense TV way, So if there is a

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:53.719
<v Speaker 1>way to attack them, it is on the ground. We've

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>seen some running backs have success against this Patriots defense,

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and Joe Mixon is the RB five in fantasy points

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>per game since Week eight. This is the running back

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that we were hoping for all season long. The offensive

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>line is playing better, They're giving him more touches. They're

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>throwing the ball to Joe Mixing a little bit more.

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he is a solid RB two in this spot. Craig,

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:16.079
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree with you, Frank, Joe Mixes really good

0:11:16.360 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>as of late. And also, would you like to read

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>my notes for Andy Dalton here? Greg, alright, least he

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>puts you a little a little all right? Uh, there

0:11:23.120 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 1>are the notes. Look at the notes for Andy Dalton.

0:11:25.520 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>It says, no, that's that's my note. My notes for

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots wide receivers start Edelman analysis especially. That's it.

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Like I said on Monday, you can't trust anybody else

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>in this Patriots offense, Greg, You're starting Julian Edelman. He's

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>been phenomenal. He's the go to guy for Tom Brady.

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.599
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady leads the league in passing attempts and a

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of those passing attempts are going towards Julian Edelman.

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Nobody else can create separation on this team. They obviously

0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:56.199
<v Speaker 1>have a report together. You want to trust one of

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the running backs here because the Bengals just get eaten

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.839
<v Speaker 1>alive by unning backs. But how can you do it?

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle? Greg, since Rex Burke had returned from injury

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 1>back in Week eight, is playing of the snaps. He

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>has not scored a touchdown during that span. Since Week eight,

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Sony Michelle does not have a touchdown. How can you

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>use him against the Bengals? You can't. And this is

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be the week that he scores three touchdown. Listen,

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I doe the same way as I felt last week.

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't love James White last week, but I'm

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing it. James White and Julian ed him and

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that's James White is used more in competitive games. Four

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:29.679
<v Speaker 1>unless you think this game is gonna be competitive, but

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, uh, ten point ten point spread right

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>now with the with the New England Patriots being favored

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>on the road. So I don't know how competitive this

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>game is actually gonna be in a full PPR league. Yes,

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.079
<v Speaker 1>James White is a flex option. Outside of that, I

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:44.839
<v Speaker 1>don't want anything to do with this offense outside of

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Julian Edelman. Fair enough, all right, Well you know Tom

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Brady as I love their defense obviously, and as you mentioned,

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady is like number twenty one or so in

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>You're right, so he's not really using Tom Brady if

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have to. Okay, let me move on to

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>other popular question we've gotten this week, Frank, and that's

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>here in New York's the Giants and the Dolphins. Ryan

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick lean the Dolphins into town, and there's a lot

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of questions about their wide receivers, Davante Parker, um Alert Wilson.

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>What were your cushion protocol? Have we seen anything about

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>their status for Sunday yet? So, the last that I

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>saw was Davanta Parker practice in full today. He is

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>still in the concussion protocol, but it is looking like

0:13:20.920 --> 0:13:23.000
<v Speaker 1>he's going to play. We also got that suite from

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:26.319
<v Speaker 1>Inside Injuries and it says it's trending in that direction,

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>which would be a huge get. I mean, we've already

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>lost so many wide receivers this week, from Mike Evans

0:13:31.320 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to d J HRC to Alston Jeffrey to Marvin Jones.

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>So if we can get Devanta Parker back in the lineup,

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Eric Young's DeVante Parker back in our fantasy lineups. He

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>is a legit, high end wide receiver, too low and

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver one in this match up against the Giants.

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Craig alright third upon Parker. Absolutely, he's been fantastic all

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, season long. To be honest with you, if

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>he's in there, get him back in the lineup. How

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>confident are you in Patrick Larry? Where is he in

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 1>your rankings? So Patrick Laird is right in the middle

0:13:59.440 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of my RB three flex rankings. You know, he did

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>not run efficiently like any Dolphins running back hasn't been

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>able to do so far this season, but he saw

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a massive workload last week. Greg nineteen touches two of

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the running back snaps. His snapshare was fourth most among

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>all running backs in Week fourteen. So you know that

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be on the field. He's going to catch passes.

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he is a solid RV three solid flex.

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>The Giants are better against the run because everyone just

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>throws against them, but I think that he'll catch anywhere

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>between three and five passes. I think Patrick Lare is

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a solid flex. I'm not ready to get his name

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>tattooed on my body anywhere like some other people on

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Twitter right now, and it's crazy, but I do like

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>him as a flex option alright, so we like right

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>if his Pastrick talks about him before as well as

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in your top twelve. Mike a Secki is just outside

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>my top twelve, but I think that he is a

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>fair streaming tight end. Zach er. It's two touchdowns last

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>week against this defense, and again, Ryan Fitzpatrick is myke

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>QB eleven. I would start him over Aaron Rodgers, Matt

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Kirk, Cousins, Tom Brady, a lot of big names,

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:04.360
<v Speaker 1>but have tough matchups this week. On the other side,

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the New York Giants e y popular. Quite other popular

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>question I've gotten, and I know we've talked about a

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit here. Narius Sleet certainly, Shephard is in there,

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Golden Teet is in there, Eli Manning is in there.

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Once again no Evan Ingram for the New York Giants.

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about Darius Sleeton this week? I

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>mean him and Eli showed a legitimate connection last week. UM,

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>actually in the Dynasty League, the fact that Slayton caught

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>those touchdowns and got all the yards and Shepherd didn't

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:32.920
<v Speaker 1>knock me out of the playoffs. UM. And I think

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Slaton is a nut guy that I mean, until they

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>prove as wrong, as a guy that you can trust

0:15:37.680 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in your lineup wide receiver, you know, low wide receiver

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to top end wide receiver, three territory. UM, Miami's defense

0:15:45.120 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't changing the world in any way. UM. I think

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Fitzpatrick is going to score and Eli is going to

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>be forced to throw the ball, and he obviously likes

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to throw it to Slayton, So I think you can

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 1>trust him this week. Again, I agree, I have him

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>inside my top thirty six. Greg and I put out

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the poll before the show on Fantasy BFF Twitter, which

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>one of these fringe wide receiver threes you like most

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>between Zach Pascal, Darius Slayton, Terry McLaurin, and Chris Conley.

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>The leading vote getter as of now, forty of the

0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 1>vote has gone to Darius Slayton. I like both him

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and Sterling Shepherd. I know you know you've been on Shepherd.

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that it's a one or the other.

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I think both can actually be successful in this spot

0:16:21.200 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>here Greg, which means I guess Elim Henning is on

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>our radar as a super flex quarterback. But ultimately I

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>do like Slayton. Uh. He had the most UH targets

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>last week. He took advantage, he had targets down the field,

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and Miami has allowed the most wider the most touchdowns

0:16:36.240 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>to wide receivers so far this season. I like Darius

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Layton quite a bit. Right, Darius Slatine will be in there.

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>The last wide receiver that was in this mix from

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the question I got, it was a good one. That's

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>why I keep bringing it up. Uh, it's in this

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Washington Philly matchup, and specifically it's scary. Terry mclauren. McLaurin,

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.160
<v Speaker 1>he's good, he's good. Dwayne Haskey's, as I said yesterday

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the day before, bad exactly. That's correct. Who would you

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:04.320
<v Speaker 1>take Terry McLaurin or Darius let Man this is or

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Boyd. That's how I got here too. This This

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>is a tough one. I do have Tyler Boyd rank

0:17:08.160 --> 0:17:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the lowest of all of them, So I think I

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>would lean with Slayton. And I think it is a

0:17:14.760 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 1>risky proposition because look, you're putting faith in Eli Manning

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>or Dwayne Haskins. Either way, you know you don't want

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>to put faith in that quarterback to come through. But

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 1>we at least saw it last week. We saw a

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>blow up game out of Darius Layton. Terry McLaurin was fine,

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.159
<v Speaker 1>he scored a touchdown circus catch for him, but it

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>was still a terrible throw by Dwayne Haskins. It came

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in garbage time. He hadn't really done anything before that.

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 1>But that Philadelphia Eagles secondary is bad. I like both

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of these guys as wide receiver threes. I lean slightly

0:17:42.200 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 1>towards Slate. What about you, Terry McLaurin or Darius laden

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with McLaurin. I think he's just the

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>superior athlete. Haskins and him do have a connection. Um,

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>he was pretty decent last week and and against Philadelphia. UM,

0:17:57.600 --> 0:17:59.639
<v Speaker 1>they haven't been able to stop anybody. Their secondary is

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>is is brutal, my lean also Terry McLaurin more in

0:18:02.880 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>this game. On the other side, NFL Season is now

0:18:05.480 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>upon us, so you can become the eighth person away

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 1>one million dollars in a Fandueler Draft Kings tournament by

0:18:10.760 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>setting their lineups using the Daily Roder dot Com DFS

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>lineup Optimizer. If you're playing daily Fantasy sports and not

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>using Daily Order dot Com, you're doing it wrong. Sign

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.159
<v Speaker 1>him now for the NFL Access with a faster optimizer,

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>smarter DFS projections, and better results. Into Promo Code action

0:18:26.200 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>first ten percent discount. And that's promo Code Action, first

0:18:29.359 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>ten per cent discount. Daily Order dot Com where millionaires

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>are made, all all runny Friday, get all the grid.

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 1>If you want to light the lab on draft Kicks

0:18:52.240 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>and fan Nuelist and hl DFS season, enjoy Daily Roder

0:18:56.480 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>dot Com liver for the best daily Fantasy sports players

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>and get updated fantasy hockey objections for NHL DFS lie

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 1>combinations and build snacks the tournaments in the Daily Road

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to n h L d f S lat up Optimizer.

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 1>You're playing daily Fantasy hockey without using Daily Road dot Com,

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it wrong. Code Actually for a deeper cent discount.

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 1>That's from a code actually for dempercent discount dailor order

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com where millionaires are made. Back here with you,

0:19:20.920 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>your BFFs, Eric Young, Frank Stanfell, and myself. Um, I'm

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna get into a question in a moment, but I

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to these Eagles and Washington game. Frankie,

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:32.120
<v Speaker 1>we talked a lot about Terry McLaurin there and where

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>you see him. What about Adrian Peterson? Is he in

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>your top twenty four this week? He is not inside

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 1>my top twenty four. I do like him as a

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 1>flex option in RB three. I worry a little bit

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>about the match up here. The Eagles have been great

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>against running backs, even going back to last year. They're

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>allowing just three point six yards per carry to running

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>backs this season, so I worry about the matchup. I

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>do like the volume here obviously, so that makes a

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>p a solid RB three flex option. You know, he's

0:19:57.520 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>not gonna do anything in the past game, but he

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:01.719
<v Speaker 1>is going to see carries. You know, since Bill Callahan

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>is taken over, they want to run the football. And

0:20:03.960 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in the four games without Darius guys, with Bill Callahan

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.640
<v Speaker 1>as the insterim head coach Adrian Peterson average eight teen

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 1>point eight carries per game and nearly nineties six rushing

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>yards per games. So I think that he's in that

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>mix once again. And if they get down near the

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 1>goal line, you know that AP is going to be

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the guy. So I think he's a solid flex option.

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Chris Thompson also a solid flex option here this week.

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>You I feel like I do have a weird feeling

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>about him this week. Um, he could catch a ton

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:34.199
<v Speaker 1>of balls. Haskins loves to check the ball down. Um

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that they're not going to be able to run the

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:40.919
<v Speaker 1>ball very effectively a field. Philadelphia's run defense is pretty good. Um,

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>so they're gonna throw the ball and I think the

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>short intermediate routes Thompson's you know, that's that's his thing.

0:20:46.800 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, And this guy could catch a ton of

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:52.640
<v Speaker 1>balls and be highly used this week. Yeah, Chris Thompson

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:54.840
<v Speaker 1>led this team and targets and receptions a week ago.

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as we've said with Dwayne Haskins, he

0:20:56.960 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to take chances down the field. While that's

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>what the massive says he should do against Philly, ultimately

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>he has thrown a lot more short passes and a

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:06.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of checkdowns to running back. So if you are desperate,

0:21:06.720 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this is more of a desperation play Greg.

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>But in PPR leagues, I can see using Chris Thompson

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.119
<v Speaker 1>as like one or you know, your second flex if

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>you play in you know, one of those deeper line

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>up leagues. All right, let me go to the other

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:20.879
<v Speaker 1>side of the Philadelphia Eagles, where I've got a lot

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>of questions frank about Boston Scott, who had a huge

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Mother and Night football game. Can you do it again? Yeah?

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>This is a tougher one to figure out because you're

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to evaluate how much of last week was

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>for real and how much of it was all right. Well,

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Boston Scott was only on the field because Miles Sanders

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.680
<v Speaker 1>was dealing with cramping, so you have to weigh those things.

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I still think that if Miles Sanders is healthy and

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>good to go, which by all accounts he is, h

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Howard doesn't look like he's gonna play again. I

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 1>literally looked it up during the break. His Rordal world

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.879
<v Speaker 1>just says no change. So I don't know what's going

0:21:52.960 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 1>on with with Jordan Howard. It might just be one

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.959
<v Speaker 1>of those injuries you know, where the where they want

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>to see what they have in their younger players. But

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I still do like Miles Sanders is lowan RB two here, Greg,

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>we saw Washington get ran all over by Aaron Jones

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>last week. I think they can be taking advantage of again.

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>I think Boston Scott is in that similar territory as

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Chris Thompson. I think it's like a really really desperate flex.

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I would go with Chris Thompson just because I trust

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>his role more in this offense. But it is a

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 1>good matchup. I just don't know how much we can

0:22:25.119 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>trust him, especially you know in Week fifteen Fantasy semifinals,

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to be really really desperate obviously know about

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>zach Ertz here. Would you start any Philadelphia wide receiver?

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh no, unless they bring Tarrell Owens back? All right?

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh our buddy, this guy right here, all right, young

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 1>he has a question for us, right Randolf on the air,

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:46.879
<v Speaker 1>and it's some not disimilar to the question I have,

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>as you know for my last flex. It's Patrick Laird

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:57.080
<v Speaker 1>or Emmanuel Sanders, which isn't really a question, Greg, fair enough, Well,

0:22:57.119 --> 0:22:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know your answer is, but excited to hear

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:03.120
<v Speaker 1>more about Emmanuel Sanders if he um carlois Hide James

0:23:03.240 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Conner are also in the mix for e Y. He

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>needs one of those four. So I do think it's

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 1>James Connor is really interesting and I'm happy that we

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>bring this up because he is. He's been one of

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the more tougher running backs to rank this week, just

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:19.840
<v Speaker 1>because you don't know what his workload is going to

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 1>look like. It's a solid matchup against Buffalo. The way

0:23:22.400 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to attack Buffalo is obviously by running the football. Uh.

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Their secondary is amazing, but you don't know if Connor

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to see a full workload. Benny Snell has

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>been adequate for the team. I'm not gonna say he's

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>been great. Uh. And there's only a chance of re

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>injury for James Conner. You know, the last time we

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>saw him, he he hurt himself in the first quarter

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>again and didn't play the rest of that game. So

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a tougher call than than it normally should be

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to James Connor. But I do lean

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>that way. Greg playing at home, you know, normally primetime

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>games at home, Pittsburgh very competitive in these spots. James

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Connor has had a lot of weeks off. We spoke

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to Virginia yesterday about him. He said, she's said that,

0:24:00.680 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, he should be good to go, like his

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Optimore recovery time in his past, like he's he's ready

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to come back. I would trust James Connor over Carlis Hide.

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>You trust James Connor over Manuel Sanders. No, I would

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>go with Emmanuel Sanders, And so I'm going with the

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>e y. I'm going with the Manuel Sanders over Patrick Laird.

0:24:16.359 --> 0:24:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a really good spot against Atlanta. I

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>am a little concerned that's gonna run reemost Sert all

0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 1>day long and will be enough for Mannie Sanders. Um

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>is this the first time Coyle Shanahan has played against

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons since he's probably not right, probably since he's

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>been in San Francisco, probably, so there might be a little,

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, a little extra oomp in this game. Great

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 1>and obviously a great matchup for Emmanuel Sanders coming off

0:24:36.840 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that great week last week. You don't have to worry

0:24:38.560 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>about the snaps anymore. But concerned we had last week

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:42.879
<v Speaker 1>was we didn't know how healthy he was because the

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>two weeks before that he didn't have big production. He

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't seeing big targets, but then obviously inside the dome

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 1>last week, comes out and has a monster game. I

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>think going back home San Francisco has been on the road.

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I think they're in for a big performance here against

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Falcons, and I think it starts and ends

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 1>with Jimmy Garoppolo, Emmanuel Sanders and Deebo Samuel. Both of

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>those guys are saw My Top twenty wide. Like both

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>of them here this week as well. James Conner one

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>e y is really really interesting. You know, with Duck Hodges,

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>they just want to run the football. That's all they

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>want to do. So maybe a lot of James connerist

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I kind of like them. I kind of knew. It's

0:25:16.200 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 1>really really tough to say if you have to set

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the over under for James Conner touches this week, Greg, Yeah,

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:22.600
<v Speaker 1>what would you say? What I said that touches at

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>fifteen fifteen? Yeah, I was thinking like thirteen and a half,

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>fourteen and a half something around there were too far off. Yeah,

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and look, even if they use Benny Snow like you said,

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't want Duck Hodges throwing the ball a ton

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>against this Buffalo Bill Secondary. So we can have a

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.240
<v Speaker 1>game where James Conner touches the ball fifteen times and

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Benny Snow also touches the ball tend to twelve times exactly.

0:25:41.800 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>That's not insurmounting, not at all. Yeah, So there you go.

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 1>I hope we helped you. Um, and it was Miles Sanders,

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>not a man. No Sanders the question. That's why I

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>put it out because we just talked about Laird. We

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>talked about Miles Sanders. My answer that is a little

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>bit closer. My answers gonna be James Conner still over

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Miles Sanders. Huh Landers, James Conner. It's just you know,

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in week fifteen, it's risky. It is risky for sure.

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>I I think I would leave with Miles Sanders. It's

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:16.479
<v Speaker 1>a good spot against Washington, good matchup. Aaron Jones ran

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>all over them. I like the matchup for James Connor.

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>But I just think there's a little bit more risk involved.

0:26:22.040 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I trust the workload right now that Miles Sanders is

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>going to see all right, I mentioned Emmanuel Sanders. Let's

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>get to the San Francisco four now a little bit.

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 1>You talked about Devo, you talked about Manny sanders Hew,

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Hi is rahe Mos Dirt in your running back rankings

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 1>this week? So I have Raheem Mostirt. He is inside

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 1>my top twenty. He is a legit RB two. I

0:26:41.520 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>have him as my RB nineteen, one spot ahead of

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Devin Singletary, and I think that he has earned this

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.240
<v Speaker 1>much like everything Kyle Shanahan has said about Raheem Mostirt,

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 1>how can he go away from him? Right now? How

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:53.400
<v Speaker 1>can you go away from him in fantasy? It's it's

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty hard to do. I mean the touches that he's getting,

0:26:55.520 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>how efficiently he's running. He has explosiveness, and I know

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>on paper the Falcons look like they're a good run defense.

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>That's because everyone just throws on them. So I think

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 1>they're playing with the lead in this game. I really

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>do like the forty Niners in this spot. I think

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we see another game out of Raheemost where he sees

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>fifteen plus touches behind this offensive line, uh, really good offense.

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:15.199
<v Speaker 1>I think he gets in the end zone again as well.

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a solid RV two. Can you start

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Matt Brida this week? I think that he is kind

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of in that range of desperation flexes that we've been

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 1>talking about Chris Thompson, Boston Scott. You don't know how

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 1>many touches he's gonna be, how many snaps he's going

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:33.360
<v Speaker 1>to play Greg again. He has explosiveness much like where

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 1>he mostert, but you don't know what the workload is

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be. So I think he's in that range

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:41.119
<v Speaker 1>with Chris Thompson and Boston Scott, but I would trust

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>him over those players. On the other side, e y,

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you do not have Calvin Ridley in the lineup for

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons? Is weis de Fonte Freeman is expected to play. Obviously,

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones is out there as well. How do you

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>feel about someone like Matt Ryan who always go back

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:56.920
<v Speaker 1>to all this show? How do you feel about Matt Ryan?

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel about Russell Gage? He's gonna start

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:03.159
<v Speaker 1>and blazing? How really where are you with those guys? Uh?

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan is It's scary right San Francisco's defenses for real? Um,

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And the reality is I think San Francisco is going

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>to run the ball, They're going to get up and

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Matt Ryan is going to have to throw. Uh. Not

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:17.600
<v Speaker 1>having Calvin Ridley there is going to affect things. Cages

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 1>just not as good as of an option. Um, but

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>there could be a ton of checkdowns and I think

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones is still a little banged up, so that

0:28:26.520 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 1>worries me. So, I mean, there could be a massive

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 1>workload for Cage this week and he could be a

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.919
<v Speaker 1>really sneaky pick if they can move the football Frankie

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:37.639
<v Speaker 1>obviously everyone was able to. If Atlantic and rustle gauge,

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>then could be potentially sneaky. Yeah. I think this is

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>just a bad spot for them, you know, going across

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the country to play on the West coast. Here San

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Francisco gets back home again. I really like San Francisco

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in this spot. I don't know, you know which Falcon

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>team is gonna show up. They've been very Doctor jekylin

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Mr Hidish where you don't know which team is going

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to be there. I think Devontae Freeman is a flex option,

0:28:58.560 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>nothing more than that. He had seen sixty seven percent

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of the snaps each of the past two games since

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>he's returned from injury. But again, if they fall behind,

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I think you can trust him for targets and receptions,

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>especially with no Calvin Ridley. But outside of that, I

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know that DeVonta Freeman is going to get back

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in the end zone this week, or that he's going

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to be able to run efficiently. And I think if

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you own Austin Hooper, Greg uh likely bounced back spot

0:29:21.320 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>for him. You know, if you have him, you're likely

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>using him. As you're starting said in this you probably are.

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 1>He'll be active this week. There's no worries on him

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 1>this week, which is that right might get killed in

0:29:31.360 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>this game for real, like San Francisco's pass rushes legit

0:29:34.920 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 1>greg And this offensive line for Matt Ryan has not

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 1>been good all seasons. Speaking of players that are expected

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to play with all a minute to go to the break,

0:29:40.680 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>But Adam Feeling is going to play as long as

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:46.480
<v Speaker 1>nothing out of nowhere pops up before the game. Will

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>he be healthy enough Frank to give it a whole game.

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Last time he tried this, he didn't even last a quarter. Yeah,

0:29:52.160 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>much like what we said about James Conner. We had

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Virginia on yesterday. She spoke about Adam Feeling. She said

0:29:56.760 --> 0:29:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that he is good to go. I mean he's passed

0:29:58.800 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 1>his optimal recovery time him. It's tricky with the hamstrings

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>with wide receivers. I understand that. And the last time

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>we saw him he reinjured himself much like James Conner,

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>but he has had adequate time to heal from this. Greg,

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think again, he's not the wide receiver one

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that he normally is not even high and wide receiver too.

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>He's on that wide receiver to wide receiver three kind

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>of fringe this week, and you know what he's capable of.

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>So I think more often than not, if you own

0:30:24.680 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Adam Feeling, you're likely getting him in your line. Right there,

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you go war on Minnesota and the rest of the

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:34.440
<v Speaker 1>NFL this week. NFL season is now upon us, so

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you can become the eighth person away one million dollars

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in a fandueler Draft Kings tournament. My setting their lineups

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>using the Daily Order dot Com DFS a lot of optimizer.

0:30:42.880 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>If you're playing daily Fantasy Sports and not using Daily

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Order dot Com, you're doing it wrong. Sign him now

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>for the NFL Access with a faster optimizers, smarter DFS projections,

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and better results. It's a promo code action first head

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.120
<v Speaker 1>vercent discount is that's promo code action, first head per

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>cent discount. Daily Order dot Com where millionaires are made

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>doing nothing. Do you what do you have this record

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>from the Wonders? Uh? Do you know what? I might have? It?

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Actually have to look? Yeah, well I've got over. I

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:30.280
<v Speaker 1>understand that this is from movie, a movie soundtrack. I've

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>got some movie soundtrack down there for I might have it.

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 1>That's awesome to you next time I come over. That's

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>my request. It's listening to The Wonders. I was just

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, I'm surprised you guys didn't didn't break that

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>out when was there? Thing was I didn't want to

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:44.840
<v Speaker 1>be you know, the lot of question. It was like

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to let Judy requested, Sarah request what a

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:51.719
<v Speaker 1>gentleman you are? You know what my taste going on there?

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 1>You know you want me to be like, all right, dude,

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 1>let's let's play some third eye lines. I also was

0:31:56.000 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 1>about to say, you know, by doing the show, by

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>doing the show with you, and Gabe has pointed this

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>out before, people kind of just lumping my musical interest

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>with yours. But we got a lot of Gregg's Susman

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>music here on the BFS. That doesn't necessarily mean that

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that's music that I enjoy. You want the game resume music. Well,

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily that either, but yeah, somewhere in between, you know.

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.280
<v Speaker 1>That's that's basically where I lie. I wouldn't say that

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I am the nineties alternative buff that Greg is. I

0:32:23.440 --> 0:32:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I do like some of it, for sure, but not

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>nearly as much as you buddy. All Right, man, that's

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 1>it's fine. We need more Metallica here on the Show's alright, um,

0:32:33.960 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 1>let me get back here too this week, and we're

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:38.400
<v Speaker 1>talking about Minnesota in particular with Adam Feeling being back,

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:40.960
<v Speaker 1>um getting him back into your lineup? Does that make

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>sense to you? What I said, like low and wide

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>receiver two, high and wide receiver three? Does that make

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>sense for Feeling? Who would you rather start this week?

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Adam Feeling or t Y Hilton? Definitely Feeling. I'm telling

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you I don't want to do the t Y Hilton thing.

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you you like Terry McLaurin and Darius Layton over

0:32:55.320 --> 0:33:00.040
<v Speaker 1>to Wy Hilton? Yes? Does that all make sense? I

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I guess we'll find out on Sunday or Monday. Monday, Yeah,

0:33:05.520 --> 0:33:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think it does. And they like

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to Hilton more. It's just too risky for me man,

0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it's so risky UM one Minnesota alex Alexander Madison has

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:17.000
<v Speaker 1>been ruled out in this one, which he's either a

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Mirabdula or my Boon or a combination of the two

0:33:19.400 --> 0:33:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of them, will be the backup with Dowmond Cook. You're

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a whole lot of Dialmond Cook this week.

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>The feeling of the Dowmond Cook owners. That's my finals. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:33:28.360 --> 0:33:30.360
<v Speaker 1>and this is what we've been waiting for. We knew

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that it was a great Fantasy playoff schedule for Dalvin Cook.

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh So you're not going away from him at this point,

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:37.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's going to be a very popular

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:40.320
<v Speaker 1>DFS target this week as well. With no Alexander Madison,

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>we could see even more snaps and touches for Dalvin

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Cook than we normally do. We spoke about Adam Feeling.

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:47.600
<v Speaker 1>I think Stefon Diggs is in a similar range. Have

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:49.920
<v Speaker 1>him a little bit higher than Feeling, just because he's

0:33:49.920 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>been on the field. We know he's healthy. He has

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:54.560
<v Speaker 1>developed that connection with Kirk Cousins throughout the course of

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the year. But let's not discount that this is a

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 1>tougher matchup man The Chargers have been really really good

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>against wide receivers. They got Derwin James back recently as well.

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>That's a really strong secondary. Again, I think they lean

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>on Dalvin Cook a lot. The way to attack this

0:34:08.400 --> 0:34:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Chargers defense is by running the football. The Los Angeles Chargers.

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of running the football, they're good at it and

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Austin Ekeler is better at it than Melvin Gordon. How

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 1>high is l Austin Ekeler in your Army rankings this week? Yeah? So,

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I have Austin Ekeler as a solid RB two. It

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 1>looks at a tougher matchup against Minnesota, but I think

0:34:27.480 --> 0:34:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you just kind of have to throw matchups out the

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 1>window when it comes to Austin Ekela. At this point,

0:34:31.120 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I have him as my RB seventeen. You could probably

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:35.800
<v Speaker 1>argue that he should be even higher than that, but

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>his efficiency, what he's able to do on a per

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>touch basis, they use him a ton in the passing game.

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can get away from the upside

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>of Austin Ekela here. Great, I agree Austler has to

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 1>be in your lineup given what he has done over

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of weeks. You want, I can start

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:54.440
<v Speaker 1>big Mike Williams this week. I feel like it's a reach. Um,

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the guy who gotta score touchdowns at some point, right,

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>Like I think I said that every week at the

0:35:01.280 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 1>start of the season, the way through draft season. I mean,

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:05.560
<v Speaker 1>he had a pile of him last year and he

0:35:05.640 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>was banged up. He's been mostly healthy this year. Um,

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he missed a game or two, but uh,

0:35:11.560 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>he's healthy, and I mean they're just not getting it done.

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:16.359
<v Speaker 1>As I think Philip Rivers is definitely on the back nine.

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:18.600
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't been as efficient or as good as a

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:20.960
<v Speaker 1>quarterback as he's been in the past. And that's a

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>guy like you've been able to trust him for how long,

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like ten years. He's been one of those

0:35:25.239 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 1>guys that you know he's just going to produce and

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and score touchdowns. Obviously he's not gonna run or do

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>anything like that, but but has been a very good

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>fantasy quarterback, a guy that you could get late. But

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams, it's scary because he hasn't done it all year.

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>But I mean just odds of averages. I feel like

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:43.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like he scores a touchdown this week. I

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 1>think so too. I'm actually you know Mike Williams and

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>have him as a high end wide receiver. Three. You know,

0:35:47.960 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdown regression is real and we know that, but it

0:35:50.960 --> 0:35:53.280
<v Speaker 1>has swung too far the other way for Mike Williams

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:56.280
<v Speaker 1>this season. He had ten touchdowns on just sixty six targets.

0:35:56.400 --> 0:35:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Last year. We knew that regression was going to hit him.

0:35:59.120 --> 0:36:01.319
<v Speaker 1>It took him twelve of weeks to score his first

0:36:01.360 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>touchdown this season, and he's actually been good in terms

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of his yardage. You know, Greg, He's averaging seventy point

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:09.440
<v Speaker 1>one receiving yards per game. That is twenty one in

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. That's not a bad mark among all pass catchers.

0:36:12.600 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 1>That's running backs, wide receivers, tight ends. He's twenty first

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. So the yards have been there for

0:36:17.280 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams, and the Vikings are allowing the fourth most

0:36:19.840 --> 0:36:23.840
<v Speaker 1>receptions to wide receivers and the fifth most touchdowns. I

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 1>like Mike Williams is a high end wide receiver. Three.

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Greig Mike Williams in a spot to to see here

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>this week against Minnesota, who's been burned repeatedly here this season.

0:36:32.600 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll see what he can do with Jacksonville and Oakland.

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:37.680
<v Speaker 1>He's talked a lot about DJ Shark not being able

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to play this week, has a practice al he's out

0:36:40.120 --> 0:36:42.800
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. Haven't seen what's going on with D D. Westbrookly,

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>your boy has been Chris Connley. D D. Westbrook has

0:36:45.239 --> 0:36:48.399
<v Speaker 1>been cleared. He's fully ready to play in this game

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:51.000
<v Speaker 1>heading into Week fifteen against the Oakland Raiders. So I

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:53.479
<v Speaker 1>do like DDI Westbrook. He's my wide receiver twenty seven.

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 1>I have. Chris Connley is my wide receiver thirty four.

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:58.920
<v Speaker 1>He is legit wide receiver three. UM. I know that

0:36:59.239 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Leonard four Nett is going to see a big workload

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>like he has all season. But it's easier to attack

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the Oakland Raiders through with the pass than it is

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:09.200
<v Speaker 1>with the run. And I think because of that, we're

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna see a lot of concentrated targets on d D.

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Westbrook and on Chris Connley here in this spot, Greg, So,

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 1>if you're lost out on d J hr or Mike Evans,

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you've been scrambling for the Darius Layton's. Um, you know

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the Zach Pascal's If you missed out on those guys,

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Chris Conley is a fine fallback option as

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:27.279
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver. Thread, I agree with you. I like

0:37:27.400 --> 0:37:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Chris Conney this week. I think it's a desperation option,

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>no doubt. But in this matchup I like it a lot. Man.

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:34.760
<v Speaker 1>I like Chris Connley, like in this spot with Gardner

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Minshew who I don't hate this week either Um against

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Oakland e y Chris Connley or we haven't gotten to

0:37:40.800 --> 0:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>this game yet Danny Ammond Dola. I think both guys

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>are in a really good spot in terms of their matchups. Yeah,

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's going to be more opportunity for

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:52.839
<v Speaker 1>Connley there. Um. Oakland Raiders are are are bad, very

0:37:52.960 --> 0:37:54.719
<v Speaker 1>very bad defense, and they are on a bit of

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a slide right now. So I think I would trust

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:59.759
<v Speaker 1>trust Connelly Moore. But it wouldn't surprise me if Danny

0:37:59.880 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>m Mandola this week catches a ton of balls. Um,

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:05.239
<v Speaker 1>a guy that's managed to stay healthy all year, I

0:38:05.400 --> 0:38:08.080
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been on that ever in my life. Um,

0:38:08.640 --> 0:38:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and uh, he's been pretty efficient. The fact that they've

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:14.840
<v Speaker 1>got Gladay and Jones there, I feel like he's definitely

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the third option. But it's just going to depend on

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:21.719
<v Speaker 1>what Detroit decides to do offensively. Speaking of that year

0:38:21.760 --> 0:38:23.680
<v Speaker 1>he wrote it up. Franks, Let's dive in here because

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Dandy Amdola's matches obviously also awesome. I guess him by

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Buccaneers team. The question is, is David Winson playing best?

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Question number one? Yes, he's good to go. He's already

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>been fully cleared. He's he's ready, He's in there all right.

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Question two? Is both Scarborough playing? Question three? Follow up

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. It doesn't look good for both Scarborough. He's

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:45.320
<v Speaker 1>been banged up all week. He's barely been barely practiced.

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that he's officially been ruled out of

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>this game, but I don't think that it matters anyway.

0:38:49.560 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Really tough matchup going up against Tampa Bay run defense.

0:38:52.360 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>And even if he doesn't play, I don't want to

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 1>get involved with anybody else there. J D. McKissick, Ty

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Johnson been there, done that, spent all my fab on

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:00.879
<v Speaker 1>thy Johnson Ey made fun of me for it. Let's

0:39:00.960 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>move on. When it comes to the Detroit Lions, Kenny

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Golladay inside my top twelve wide receivers this week, Greg

0:39:07.200 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Marvin Jones lands On I R I think that Kenny

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Golladay is going to see a massive target share in

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:14.800
<v Speaker 1>this game. I don't hate Danny Amendola either. I do

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:17.360
<v Speaker 1>prefer Chris Conley over him, but I think a Mendola

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is one of those. You know, if you're desperate for

0:39:19.680 --> 0:39:21.960
<v Speaker 1>a flex or or a wide receiver three, you can

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>do worse than Danny Amendola this week, and then I

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.239
<v Speaker 1>expect a ton of targets for Chris Godwin. On the

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:29.840
<v Speaker 1>other side, Greg no more Mike Evans. He's been the

0:39:29.880 --> 0:39:32.360
<v Speaker 1>go to guy for Jamis Winston all season long. I

0:39:32.400 --> 0:39:34.279
<v Speaker 1>think if you're desperate for a tight end, you know,

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 1>with those targets now gone, with Mike Evans being out,

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I think O. J. Howard is back in the mix.

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I do like Ian Thomas over him as a stream,

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 1>but O J. Howard, I think again, if you're desperate

0:39:45.960 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 1>for a tight end, I think he's in this mix.

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna see some targets. I agree with you, He's

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.000
<v Speaker 1>absolutely in the mix here this week without like Evans.

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>We've been trying to figure out who's gonna replace Mike Evans,

0:39:54.040 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Like which these wide receivers, the Scotty Millers in the world.

0:39:56.480 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Howard's probably the easy answer. Yeah, you're probably right. And

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:01.080
<v Speaker 1>we were trying to figure out earlier in the week

0:40:01.080 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Brashad Perryman, uh and Justin Watson. I was like Watson,

0:40:04.800 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>but Perryman was on the field more, and now you

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 1>have to decide was going to see more targets and

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Scotty Miller back in the mix too, if you're desperate again,

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:16.359
<v Speaker 1>like in a deeper league, I think that you can

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 1>look at Perryman and Watson really good matchup going up

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 1>against his Detroit Lion secondary. The Lions defenses in general

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is very bad. But I think the easy answer, like

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 1>you said, Greg is is OJ Howard's probably gonna see

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>uh the most consistent upticking imagined Ian Thomas E. Thomas

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 1>starting this week once again for Carolina. Greg Olsen has

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 1>been ruled out with his concussion, So Carolina going up

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>against the Seattle team that has a lot of points

0:40:39.520 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in the tight end position. Ian Thomas certainly in the

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 1>mix here this week for the Carolina Panthers. I've had

0:40:45.600 --> 0:40:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions about Curtis Samuel. What do you

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 1>think of hit him this week? UM, I feel like

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 1>this was I mean massive, massive offseason Darling. Everyone thought

0:40:54.800 --> 0:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>he was going um to to get past and the

0:40:58.080 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>production wise of um oh my god U d J Moore.

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:06.160
<v Speaker 1>D J Moore is the number one receiver there. I

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:09.439
<v Speaker 1>never bought into the Curtis Samuel hype. I think he could,

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:12.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, he he could be effective, but I don't

0:41:12.440 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 1>think I would trust him this week. I think Ian

0:41:14.440 --> 0:41:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Thomas has a possibility of having a decent game and

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>d J. Moore is the guy that you want to

0:41:18.640 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 1>trust there. I think Curtis Samuel is a solid wide

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:24.719
<v Speaker 1>receiver three, low and wide receiver three in this spot.

0:41:24.800 --> 0:41:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really scared of the Seattle Seahawks secondary greg

0:41:27.560 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 1>or their defense in general. Seattle is a six and

0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a half point favorite in this game, and the Caroline

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Panthers are home dogs. I think that they're chasing points,

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:38.040
<v Speaker 1>which is gonna lead to more throwing. Obviously, love d J. Moore,

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>get him in your lineups. Christian McCaffrey is gonna be

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey. But I do like Curtis Samuel and I

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>like Ian Thomas. You mentioned the Seattle Seahawks have allowed

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the second most fantasy points too tight ends all season long.

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Greg Olsen has been ruled out of this game. I

0:41:51.440 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 1>think Ian Thomas is a fine stream. He is my

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:55.880
<v Speaker 1>tight end twelve. I picked him up, I'm starting him

0:41:55.880 --> 0:41:58.439
<v Speaker 1>in the league. Let's go, Ian Thomas. Would you prefer

0:41:58.520 --> 0:42:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Curtis Samuel over any of those fringe e other wide

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:04.160
<v Speaker 1>receivers we've been talking about, like the Danny Amendola's, the

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris Conleys. What do you think probably would prefer Samuel

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to them? Yes, I have Chris Conley ranked slightly higher

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:15.400
<v Speaker 1>than Curtis Samuel, so and then I have Amendola behind Samuel,

0:42:15.440 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 1>but they're all They're right this whole range for me,

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Like wide receiver thirty to forty is Terry mcclaurin, Zach Pascal,

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:28.759
<v Speaker 1>Darius late In, Sterling Shepherd, all players that have solid matchups, Greg,

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 1>but you have concerns over their quarterback play or just

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:35.880
<v Speaker 1>in general, you know, like they've been inconsistent. A lot

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 1>of those players have been in consistent this year, so

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a tougher spot. But check out my rankings to

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Express dot com if if you're stuck in a pickle here,

0:42:44.600 --> 0:42:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Greg Ding, Indeed, Ding, Indeed, Frankie, Okay, we're just going minutes.

0:42:49.640 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to you again as many games

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:52.920
<v Speaker 1>as possibly get a couple of yesterday so we can

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:55.600
<v Speaker 1>get to your game today. We probably did yesterday Denver

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and k C. E Y. This is a big spot

0:42:57.800 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's Drew Lock against his ex girlfriend. Talk that

0:43:01.719 --> 0:43:05.319
<v Speaker 1>earlier in the week. Man it is Lamar Clark Hunt's daughter,

0:43:05.840 --> 0:43:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Gracie Haunt is Drelock's ex girlfriend. Roll that extra motivation

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:14.880
<v Speaker 1>due for Drew Luck nothing, but I mean he is

0:43:14.880 --> 0:43:18.320
<v Speaker 1>playing against Kansas City's defense. Um. I think I was

0:43:18.360 --> 0:43:20.400
<v Speaker 1>reading a thing the other day that that they blit

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot um and that's just I think because they're

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:25.239
<v Speaker 1>just trying to put pressure on the quarterback. So it

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:28.440
<v Speaker 1>will be interesting to see how Drew Lock does here.

0:43:28.520 --> 0:43:31.200
<v Speaker 1>He has looked pretty decent or he comes into the

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:34.439
<v Speaker 1>gate pretty decent, kind of falls away as the game goes.

0:43:34.560 --> 0:43:38.480
<v Speaker 1>But but his UH is really interesting. I like Sutton here, um,

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 1>I like Philip Lindsay and Noah Fan. Um. If you're

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 1>looking for a tight end, I feel like this could

0:43:43.480 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 1>be the week that you can really trust him. Yeah.

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 1>We saw a big game out of Noah fan last week.

0:43:48.880 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Just have to make sure he's healthy. Greg. If you

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:53.279
<v Speaker 1>can look up what the latest is on Noah Fant,

0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that would help us out. It is a good matchup

0:43:54.920 --> 0:43:58.000
<v Speaker 1>for him. The six most fantasy points too tight ends

0:43:58.040 --> 0:44:00.080
<v Speaker 1>this year, that is what the Chiefs are allowing. I

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:02.600
<v Speaker 1>like Courtland Sutton as e I mentioned, Philip Lindsay should

0:44:02.640 --> 0:44:04.839
<v Speaker 1>be able to get going here in this spot. All

0:44:04.880 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the Chiefs have allowed the second most fantasy points to

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:09.359
<v Speaker 1>running backs so far this season. On the other side,

0:44:09.440 --> 0:44:12.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get involved with the Kansas City

0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs running backs. They haven't been able to run the

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:16.879
<v Speaker 1>football effectively. There's three running backs in the mix here.

0:44:17.000 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that Damian Williams is going to play

0:44:19.000 --> 0:44:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in this game. You're using Tyreek Hill, You're using Patrick Mahomes,

0:44:22.440 --> 0:44:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you're using Travis Kelsey. And man, you'd have to be

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 1>really desperate, but Sammy Watkins had eight targets last week,

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:34.240
<v Speaker 1>trending in the right direction despite being listed as questionable.

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:37.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get the two games. It's the Arizona Cardos

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in Cleveland Browns Rams and them bow the Lincoln Riley Bull.

0:44:42.440 --> 0:44:44.279
<v Speaker 1>I do like Baker Mayfield a lot this week. He

0:44:44.440 --> 0:44:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is my QB nine, Davis Landry inside my top twelve. Please,

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:49.759
<v Speaker 1>I know he's burned you all year. Go back to

0:44:49.800 --> 0:44:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Odell Beckham. All right, there you go. There you have it.

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:54.879
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully leibacos list on Monday as a winner and headed

0:44:54.880 --> 0:44:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to your Fantasy finals for riyy on Frank example, I'm

0:44:57.080 --> 0:45:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Gray Susman. Do it all get on Monday? We are oh.

0:45:00.640 --> 0:45:02.919
<v Speaker 1>NFL season is now pat us so you can become

0:45:03.000 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the eighth person to win one million dollars in a

0:45:05.600 --> 0:45:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Fandueler Draft Kings tournament. My setinger lineups using the Daily

0:45:08.680 --> 0:45:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Order dot Com DFS line of optimizer. If you're playing

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 1>daily Fantasy sports and not using Daily Order dot Com,

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it wrong. Sign up now for the NFL

0:45:16.960 --> 0:45:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Access with a faster optimizer, smarter DFS projections, and better

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:23.800
<v Speaker 1>results into Promo Code Action first hend per cent discount

0:45:23.960 --> 0:45:26.960
<v Speaker 1>is as Promo Code Action first hend percent discount Daily

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Order dot Com where millionaires are made. What did happen?

0:45:36.360 --> 0:45:40.359
<v Speaker 1>What did happens? Here's what you miss on the BFx

0:45:41.120 --> 0:45:43.840
<v Speaker 1>The Bears at the Packers. Gregg the Green Bay Packers

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>five point favorites, a forty one point total in this game, Greg,

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I have Aaron Rodgers ranked as my q B twelve

0:45:53.280 --> 0:45:54.799
<v Speaker 1>on the week. He is at home where he has

0:45:54.800 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 1>played better in his career, He's been very inconsistent this year.

0:45:57.880 --> 0:46:00.640
<v Speaker 1>He's got five games over nineteen Fantasy points this year.

0:46:00.960 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 1>The other eight games he has been held under fifteen

0:46:04.360 --> 0:46:07.399
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy points. So he's had some big games, but he's

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 1>really had some clunkers because they've been running the ball more.

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:12.480
<v Speaker 1>What say you? Yeah? So for me, if I had

0:46:12.520 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 1>another option Ryan Tannehills of the world, have Ryan Tannehills

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 1>my QB four? What can go wrong? In Week fifteen?

0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I haven't ranked the head of Patrick Mahomes. That seems dangerous.

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I like to live on the edge here, Greg, clearly

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:31.640
<v Speaker 1>do um starting him in the pit league? Boys, I'm

0:46:31.640 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the only BFF left. Let's let's get behind this. Too soon?

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Too soon? Man? Do come? I do have Baker and

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick. Fitzpatrick ranked ahead of Aaron Rodgers. Um, what

0:46:43.600 --> 0:46:46.880
<v Speaker 1>do you where? He said? Baker and Ryan's Patrick right

0:46:46.920 --> 0:46:49.759
<v Speaker 1>acres my QB nine against the Cardinals Fitzpatrick QB eleven,

0:46:49.840 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 1>one spot a hit. So I agree with that. Um,

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I I'm looking at Aaron Rodgers game log into somebody

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that has not really had Aaron Rodgers this year. I

0:46:57.320 --> 0:47:01.520
<v Speaker 1>had him in one spot, but It's been very annoying.

0:47:01.640 --> 0:47:03.960
<v Speaker 1>He has not thrown for three hundred yards in like

0:47:04.080 --> 0:47:07.359
<v Speaker 1>six weeks. That's a really long time. Not through three

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:10.239
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards if you're Aaron Rodgers. Um previously this year

0:47:10.239 --> 0:47:14.440
<v Speaker 1>against Chicago that was the opening day georgian yards, one touchdown,

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's like kind of what I expected on a

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:19.280
<v Speaker 1>weekly basis for Aaron Rodgers, right about two hundred yards

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:22.319
<v Speaker 1>one to do touchdowns. In fact, he hasn't been thrown more.

0:47:22.400 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 1>He's thrown more than one touchdown just once in the

0:47:25.680 --> 0:47:28.280
<v Speaker 1>last six weeks. It was four touchdowns against the Giants,

0:47:28.320 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't really count. So to me, I don't love

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers. I think the other guys you could choose

0:47:34.480 --> 0:47:39.520
<v Speaker 1>from Tannehill, Fitzpatrick, Mayfield, I'm much more interested. I have

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:42.279
<v Speaker 1>no problem bending Aaron Rodgers. Why do you agree? Are

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:45.040
<v Speaker 1>you starting Baker Mayfield at the Cardinals who have allowed

0:47:45.200 --> 0:47:47.799
<v Speaker 1>the most fantasy points and most passing touchdowns this year?

0:47:48.080 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Fitzpatrick going up against the Giants, even through Kyler Murray.

0:47:51.239 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 1>And this makes because I haven't ranked one spot behind

0:47:53.120 --> 0:47:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers. Kyler Murray going up against Baker Mayfield. Here,

0:47:56.520 --> 0:47:59.720
<v Speaker 1>we've got the clash of the past two Heisman Trophy winners.

0:48:00.000 --> 0:48:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Would you use Kyler Murray over Aaron Rodgers this week? Eway,

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I just want to let you know your shot looks good.

0:48:05.040 --> 0:48:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I would seriously think about it that that

0:48:07.320 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>offense has kind of got it done and doesn't really matter.

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:14.880
<v Speaker 1>They're playing at home, uh indoors. Cleveland. Um hasn't been

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the defense. I think a lot of people thought they

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:18.879
<v Speaker 1>were going to be, and I think the Baker's gonna

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:20.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to move the ball. I've got an interesting decision.

0:48:21.440 --> 0:48:24.719
<v Speaker 1>I've got Mayfield and went so I'm not sure what

0:48:24.880 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to do there, but out of out of Murray and Mayfield,

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I think I probably probably lean Baker. I think sports

0:48:35.280 --> 0:48:42.320
<v Speaker 1>grade news update in the NFL the Giants will not

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:44.840
<v Speaker 1>have Evan Ingram on the field Sunday, but tonight End

0:48:44.920 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is out with that foot injury. The Giants also released

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:50.279
<v Speaker 1>quarterback to Norris Jenkins. Did you just miss? Schuster of

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the Fensburst Dealers is unlikely to play Sunday night. That

0:48:52.680 --> 0:48:55.720
<v Speaker 1>was announced late on Thursday. Jamis Winston of the Tampa

0:48:55.719 --> 0:48:58.239
<v Speaker 1>Bay Buccaneers deep zoom throwing in football on Friday. He's

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:00.680
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the broken thumb Colonel's ms each time would

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:04.080
<v Speaker 1>not commit to bringing Bank David Johnson in twenty in

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the NBA. A couple of notes for the Orlando Magic.

0:49:06.680 --> 0:49:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Mikola Buchavisch went through shoot around. Is quote hopeful of

0:49:09.480 --> 0:49:11.879
<v Speaker 1>playing Friday versus Houston, but he will be a game

0:49:11.960 --> 0:49:14.800
<v Speaker 1>time decision. Marskal Folts went through shoot around on Friday.