WEBVTT - We Read The Dilbert Guy's Attempt to Make Trump into a Religion

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, I just want to say I don't know

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>what we're getting into.

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what you and I want to apologize

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 2>to Garrison Davis Midvan.

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:17.240
<v Speaker 3>That's right, motherfucker's it's a book episode of Behind the Bastards,

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:20.200
<v Speaker 3>the only podcast that's right.

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 4>What we are?

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>What? What?

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 4>What?

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.119
<v Speaker 1>What have you done to us?

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm having a great day, Sophie. I'm I'm feeling good.

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm sitting down, I'm having my first cafe ola made

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 3>with milk from my You're making good for you. I

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 3>think that just means coffee with milk. If not, don't

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 3>tell me. I don't care anyway, Garrison, how are you

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 3>doing today?

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 4>I'm doing fine. I'm having I'm having a Chai tea

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 4>of Brave. They also just said to make everyone mad

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 4>about seeing thing.

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, I'm drinking some of this Cuban coffee that I

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 3>smuggled into the country to support the Castro regime, specifically

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 3>to make people in Florida angry. And yeah, it's it's delightful,

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 3>It's wonderful. I'll get you some when you come over

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 3>next to watch that Nazi movie.

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 4>We're going to watch Jesus Christ.

0:01:12.480 --> 0:01:15.560
<v Speaker 3>But speaking of Nazis. Do you know what we have

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 3>to read today? Though not quite It's a book by

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:21.399
<v Speaker 3>Dilbert creator Scott Adams.

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 4>No why, I just saw the fucking dil Brito on

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 4>Twitter today. I'm like, oh, god, man, yeah, the.

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 3>Dil Burrito is a fun story.

0:01:33.040 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 4>I am.

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:35.759
<v Speaker 3>I am currently writing. I just finished part one last

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 3>night and I'm starting on part two today. The Scott

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:42.479
<v Speaker 3>Adams episodes which will Jesus Christ soon with someone else

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 3>a cartoonist as the guest. But I wanted to sit

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 3>down with you and go over a Scott Adams book, Garrison,

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 3>because when I was was a wee lad, like literally

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 3>like ten or eleven, I read some of Scott Adams's

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 3>books and I felt like this would be an a

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 3>bonding experience for all of us and for Sophie too.

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 3>Why the book we're reading today is Win Bigley Persuasion

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 3>in a world where facts don't matter. Some versions of

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.320
<v Speaker 3>the book, I think he credits Donald Trump as a

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 3>co author, even though he's not. It's his it's his

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 3>book about So for a little bit of context, Gare

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 3>Scott starts this comic called Dilbert in the late night

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 3>the right at the tail end of the nineteen eighties,

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 3>kind of the end of the Reagan era, and it

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 3>gets really big around nineteen ninety five, so early in

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:35.880
<v Speaker 3>the Clinton era, right at the start of the dot

0:02:35.919 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 3>com boom, right after kind of a bunch of companies

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:41.399
<v Speaker 3>of you know, these big companies like ge did huge

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 3>rounds of layoffs.

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh no, oh, no, I looked at the cover. Oh no,

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>oh oh.

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Sophie, why don't you show Garrison that For a

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 3>while people thought Scott Adams liberal or maybe even kind

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 3>of stealth left wing guy because Dilbert was. Some people

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 3>saw it as kind of like an antivity.

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Establishment or something.

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it's a lot of it's about how stupid

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 3>these like mainstream like management tactics are and these things

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:11.800
<v Speaker 3>that like all of these corporate leaders doing, how like

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 3>fucked up and often cruel they were. The reality is

0:03:15.360 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 3>that like Scott was just bitching about things that annoyed

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 3>him personally and is absolutely in no way anti capitalist

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 3>or anti any really anti any of the bad things

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 3>that he used to write about.

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 4>Christ the hardcover's thirty two dollars.

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's it's it's not I didn't pay for it.

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 3>Don't worry. So I'm looking at the cover. I have

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 3>to read. I have to beak cagy about how I

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 3>don't pay for books now because the last time I

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 3>told people, Amazon closed the loophole. Oh really really yeah,

0:03:51.240 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 3>that they won't let you return a book when it's

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 3>past ten percent read or something like that.

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 4>Now, Ah damn, they caught me.

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 3>So I've had to get creative. But don't worry everyone.

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm still in compliance with the law as far as

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 3>you know.

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I bet sure I've never seen you I legally

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 4>firaatemedia before.

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 3>No, of course you haven't, Garrison. I would never do

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 3>anything like.

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 2>That, can I Can I just say before we get

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 2>into more of your alleged crimes. Uh, really nailed the

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 2>hands on this cover.

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:24.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh you've seen it yet, Garrison?

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, looking at it, it's.

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's a he's good at hands.

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 4>Yeah he's yeah, all three fingers on, so they're very puffy.

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 1>It was was uh, king Charles the the goal for

0:04:43.640 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 1>the hand model for this.

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 3>It was probably just Scott Adams himself.

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 2>Does he also have really really really really swollen hands?

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 4>Maybe he sees the world he draws Dilbert like what if?

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 4>What if? What if that's not just how he like

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 4>like interprets realities just through these Dilbert trawings.

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 3>It would have to have an impact on your brain

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:10.680
<v Speaker 3>after a while, and not a positive way. Clearly it hasn't.

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so his brain's not working correct From what I

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 4>can tell.

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Scott, one of the things that we all learned from

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.039
<v Speaker 3>the great Bill Watterson is that the best thing you

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 3>can do as a creator of popular art is never

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.920
<v Speaker 3>let anyone know anything about you. Quit at the height

0:05:28.920 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 3>of your fame, and then spend the rest of your

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:34.680
<v Speaker 3>days as a hermit in the woods painting landscapes. Yeah,

0:05:34.720 --> 0:05:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Scott did not do that. He started a blog, which

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 3>was a terrible mistake.

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 4>And then he took the Twitter approach.

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 3>And then he got on Twitter, which was an even

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:46.239
<v Speaker 3>worse mistake. And over time people became aware that Scott

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 3>had some pretty regressive opinions, specifically around women. He starts

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 3>posting some like insel adjacent shit, and then when Trump

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 3>comes around, everyone is kind of surprised who hasn't been

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 3>following him closely that he gets like super in to Trump.

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 3>And at first he takes this like Weasley approach where

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 3>he's like, well, I don't agree with him, about a

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of stuff. But I'm really impressed by what a

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 3>master persuader he is. He's like a super genius communicator,

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 3>and he's playing He's one of these three D chess people.

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 3>He's like one of the first. Trump's playing a game

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 3>of three D Chess on all of you, and I

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:20.800
<v Speaker 3>think one of the funniest things. So Scott, when you

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 3>really dig into all of his claims, is wrong about

0:06:22.920 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 3>nearly everything. Like Trump wasn't a master persuader, like he

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 3>took it. His first election was largely a product of

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 3>taking advantage of the way the electoral college works. He

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.239
<v Speaker 3>never got most of the country on board with his ideas.

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 3>He's not good at persuading people. He was good at

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:42.520
<v Speaker 3>speaking to the bigotry and the anger of a chunk

0:06:42.520 --> 0:06:45.839
<v Speaker 3>of people who are already bigoted and angry. But Scott

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 3>gets convinced that Donald Trump is basically like a magician,

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 3>like a psychic magician, taking over people's minds. Yeah, and

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 3>thinks that this is a good thing, because Scott is

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 3>into hypnosis and he's also into affirmations.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 4>In interesting I've actually read a there is a there's

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 4>a whole book about Trump's ties to like to a

0:07:07.680 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 4>to a New Thought church back in back in like

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 4>the sixties and seventies that focuss a lot on how

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 4>how like hypnosis became popular and like this weird like

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 4>New York business scene that Trump was in as a kid,

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 4>and how it kind of informs the way that he

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 4>goes about in in like interactions and the way he

0:07:27.200 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 4>does affirmation. Yeah.

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's the kind of guys that he's super that

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Trump is kind of inspired by are sort of like

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 3>a mix of kind of quasi prosperity gospel dudes and

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 3>like Napoleon Hill think and grow rich kind of people. Yeah,

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 3>where it's it's talking about, like, yeah, the power of

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 3>positive thinking and all this sort of stuff in creating

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 3>wealth and opportunities for yourself. Scott's really into that stuff too,

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 3>And I noticed this as a kid. It was really interesting.

0:07:55.840 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 3>His first book, or not his first book, but the

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 3>first one I read, had some like pretty reasonable stuff

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 3>in it. Like he's very he was early on very

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 3>motivated by what's called the Peter principle, which is this

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:09.840
<v Speaker 3>idea and like business theory that people tend to get

0:08:09.880 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 3>promoted past their level of competence and that this is

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 3>like a problem, right, that like people who are good

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 3>at jobs, who are good at their job, get promoted

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 3>to a point where they're no longer good at what

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:21.480
<v Speaker 3>they're doing, and that this is what causes a lot,

0:08:21.600 --> 0:08:23.800
<v Speaker 3>which is, as far as I've seen, quite quite an

0:08:23.840 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 3>accurate thing. And Scott takes from this this idea that, like,

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 3>you should always be aware that at any given time

0:08:31.480 --> 0:08:34.439
<v Speaker 3>in the world, like most people are are idiots, right,

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 3>most people don't know what they're doing, don't understand the

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 3>world around them, are kind of like in over their heads.

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 3>And then he uses that to kind of pivot to like,

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 3>so I developed the system of affirmations, and you know,

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:49.839
<v Speaker 3>I can't explain why it works, but it clearly does.

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 3>And if you develop, like adopt this system for yourself,

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 3>you know, maybe you'll be able to achieve things that

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:58.360
<v Speaker 3>would otherwise be impossible, which struck me as odd as

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 3>a little kid. And as Scott gets kind of older,

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 3>he gets more and more into this stuff, and it's

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 3>it's interesting. He talks a lot about how, like, when

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 3>he was young, he took mushrooms and it was this

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 3>wonderful experience for him and it changed his life. But

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 3>people shouldn't do. It changed his life, specifically because it

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 3>showed him that like reality was largely a product of

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 3>thought and of like the perception. But then he came

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 3>to the conclusion that, like no one else should do drugs,

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 3>you should just read my books because I'm going to

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 3>recreate the psychedelic experience only enough to be able to

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 3>do this. Yeah, by my books, and I'll explain it

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 3>to you. So I'm gonna I'm gonna start by reading

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 3>the preamble, which he's called the day my reality split

0:09:43.440 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 3>into two.

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 4>Which is horrible. Oh boy, Carrison. I I have the

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 4>Amazon of Like preview, so I can look at all

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 4>the different names of all the different chapters and parts.

0:09:55.679 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, and there's some there's some wild titles throughout

0:09:59.280 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 4>this book.

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 3>You can once we get through this preamble, you can

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 3>let me know which ones you most want to hear about,

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:06.719
<v Speaker 3>and we'll go into him. But I feel like we

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 3>should start where he does.

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 4>Yes. Yeah.

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 3>In February of twenty sixteen, I began to experience two

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 3>separate realities at the same time. In one reality, candidate

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:17.959
<v Speaker 3>for President Donald Trump had just ended his chances of

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 3>becoming president of the United States by refusing to disavow

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.200
<v Speaker 3>the KKK and David Duke on a c In an

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 3>interview with Jake Tapper, Trump said he didn't hear the question.

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 3>This was a big problem for candidate Trump, and it

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 3>was also a big problem for me. I was one

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 3>of the earliest public figures to have predicted Trump's win,

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 3>and I was in the middle of an unplanned career

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 3>pivot from guy who created the Dilbert comic to something

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 3>like a political pundit. Sure, sure, yes, sure, funny that

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 3>is that is how people see you.

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 4>I'll chake it. Look, let's check it all that in

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty three. Let's see. Let's let's see how good

0:10:50.480 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 4>that's going. Oh oh boy.

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 3>I have an unfortunate like fact dump for you, Scott,

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 3>and it's that, for till the day you die, the

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 3>only way people will refer to you is the Dilbert guy.

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 4>Like they call you.

0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:05.679
<v Speaker 3>Someone will say like, have you heard what Scott Adams said?

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 3>And inevitably, who's Scott Adams? And then you say the

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Delbert guy. So everyone talks about you. As I've been

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 3>writing this, the Scott Adams episodes, I've had that conversation

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:20.440
<v Speaker 3>like eleven times. Yeah, I'm writing a piece about Scott Adams,

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 3>who you know, the delvert guy. Oh boy, My blog

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 3>traffic went through the roof whenever I wrote about Trump's

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 3>skill is a persuader. I don't know much about politics,

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 3>but I know skillful persuasion when I see it. As

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 3>it turned out, there was a big demand for what

0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 3>I called my persuasion filter on the race. Producers for

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 3>news outlets both large and small were scrambling to get

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 3>me on their shows. I wrote and spoke so much

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 3>about Trump's persuasion skills that people labeled me a Trump supporter,

0:11:49.240 --> 0:11:51.959
<v Speaker 3>although not in the sense of supporting his policies. By then,

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 3>my writing about Trump had already cost me half of

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 3>my friends, my lucrative speaking career had dropped to zero,

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 3>and I didn't expect any new Dilbert licensing deals. I

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 3>had become toxic for any kind of mixed crowd. But

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 3>I was okay with my situation because I expected to

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 3>be right in my prediction that Trump would win it all.

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 3>Winning fixes most problems.

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 4>So true, So true, buddy.

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, You've only hit Your popularity only increased after Trump won.

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Although the polls disagreed with me. I thought my prediction

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 3>of a Trump one was looking good until a Jake

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Tapper interview on CNN. In this version of reality, I

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 3>had foolishly alienated my friends, annihilated my professional reputation, and

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:32.000
<v Speaker 3>cut my income in half, and all I would get

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 3>in return was a Wikipedia entry under my name saying

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 3>I had supported an alleged racist for president. The situation

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.080
<v Speaker 3>was less than ideal. I publicly disavowed Trump because of

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 3>his see in an interview, just to get out of

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 3>the blast zone. But by then it was too late

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 3>to salvage everything I had already lost. Like an idiot,

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 3>I had managed to turn a respected career as one

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 3>of the top cartoonists in the country into a grimy

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 3>embarrassment that wouldn't wash off. That was one version of reality.

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 3>I experienced a second version of reality at the same time.

0:12:58.400 --> 0:13:01.640
<v Speaker 3>This version involved Trump brushing off the cn NKKK controversy

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 3>and going on to win the presidency, and that version

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:06.480
<v Speaker 3>of reality I would be redeemed in the end, at

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 3>least in terms of being a credible political forecaster.

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 4>Winning always feels good.

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 3>So it's interesting because, like I went through a period

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 3>of thinking, oh my god, Trump's going to win and

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 3>then oh my god, maybe Trump won't win, and then

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 3>oh my god, Trump's going to win during the twenty

0:13:22.040 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 3>sixteen election, and I did. I never interpreted it as

0:13:25.000 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 3>I was living in two different realities. I interpreted it

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 3>as American politics is very unpredictable. Almost anything can and

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 3>does happen, and I didn't know what was going to occur,

0:13:34.720 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 3>which is how most people would would put that, like

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 3>describe that. I think it's interesting his obsession with like

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 3>clearly he views predicting the presidential race as a win,

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 3>which I think probably is part of why he went

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 3>so crazy when Trump lost, because he takes it deeply

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 3>personally that Trump lost.

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:56.400
<v Speaker 4>Anyway.

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Interesting interesting stuff, Yeah.

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 4>Especially because his prediction seemed to go hand in hand

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 4>with his own like affirmations. Yeah, so you kind of

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 4>need them both to come true order for your system

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 4>to make any kind of internal logic. Yeah.

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:11.839
<v Speaker 3>Part of this is because again he's like he's really

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 3>he's convinced, not just that like cold. He's not saying

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.559
<v Speaker 3>what Trump is doing is a credible political election strategy,

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 3>which I think any honest person has to admit it

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 3>was obviously he won. What he's saying is that Trump

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:27.320
<v Speaker 3>is a master persuader, and so for that to happen,

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 3>he needs to be actually convincing people he's the best

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 3>choice for president, as opposed to again kind of feeding

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 3>into this grievance politics that the right had been stoking

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 3>for forever and becoming the avatar of it, which is

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 3>a different thing. But Scott had to believe that. He

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 3>had to kind of buy into the idea that, like

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:47.880
<v Speaker 3>the mass of Americans had come around to Trump's I

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 3>like political ideology, which was never the case. And so

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 3>he's got to like leap into contortions in order to

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 3>justify kind of what happens. Yeah, it's it's good stuff, Scott,

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 3>when's this this little chapter by saying, for the next

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 3>several months, I lived both realities, but I trusted only

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 3>one of them. I double down in my prediction of

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.160
<v Speaker 3>a Trump win. If that sounds crazy to you, well

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 3>that's nothing. We're just getting started. There's plenty more crazy

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 3>in this book.

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Oh boy. Sure is buddy.

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Introduction, where I prime you for the rest. I'm a

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 3>trained hypnotist and I'm going to take book close book

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 3>return that shut. The only person I want to hear

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 3>talk about their hypnotism training is Werner Herzog because he's

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:37.200
<v Speaker 3>going to hypnotize a chicken, and that is that was

0:15:37.240 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 3>a great time for everybody.

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 4>I do not, I do not think that the Dilbert

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 4>guy could be a successful hypnotist. I'm sorry, I don't.

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:49.080
<v Speaker 3>No, No, for one thing, he has his eyes are

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 3>as lively as a Dilbert comic. Yes, like, it's just unsettling.

0:15:54.960 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 3>I'm not going to look into them. So here's Scott again.

0:15:57.760 --> 0:15:59.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to tell you about the spookiest year of

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 3>my life.

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 4>Life.

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 3>It happened between June twenty fifteen and November twenty sixteen. Okay,

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 3>that's a little more than a year. Everything you are

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 3>about to read in this book is true as far

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 3>as I know. I don't expect you to believe all

0:16:10.320 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 3>of it, but I promise it's true to the best

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 3>of my knowledge. I've waited decades to deliver the message

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:16.960
<v Speaker 3>in this book. I waited because the world wasn't ready,

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 3>but also because the messenger, yours truly, didn't have the

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 3>skill to deliver it right. The story was too hard

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 3>to tell.

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, this just wants to remove from a religion. This

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 4>is so yeah.

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 3>No, well that's the thing. So when Scott talks about

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 3>and this is in a book that he wrote a

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:35.440
<v Speaker 3>fucking twenty years before this one's almost like fifteen sixteen years,

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 3>he talks about how, like as a kid, he realized

0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 3>that like prayer didn't work, and so he became an atheist,

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 3>but he didn't like atheism, and interestingly, like the thing

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 3>he didn't like about atheism is it didn't let him

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 3>predict the future like that that was where's his issue

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 3>with it? So like he developed this personal belief system

0:16:55.840 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 3>that aliens had like were like managing life on Earth,

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 3>and that he was like the child of an alien

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 3>sent to Earth for some like special purpose and lived

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 3>under that belief system for some period of time.

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 4>I met a few people like that at the Oregon

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 4>Ghost Conference a few months Yeah, yeaheah.

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:23.679
<v Speaker 3>He's kind of always been a kook. So so he

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:25.960
<v Speaker 3>talks about how he waited and waited and waited, and

0:17:26.000 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 3>he wasn't ready and he was learning and preparing to

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 3>deliver this important message. And then in twenty fifteen, Trump

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 3>rides his golden elevator down to announce his candidacy for president.

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 3>Like most observers at the time, I didn't fully understand

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 3>what I was seeing. It wasn't until the first Republican

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 3>primary debate that I realized what was happening right before

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:46.119
<v Speaker 3>our eyes. Trump was no ordinary politician. He was no

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 3>ordinary business person either. In fact, he wasn't ordinary in

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.360
<v Speaker 3>any sense of the world. Trump is what I call,

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 3>in bold letters, master persuader. That means he has weapons

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:59.719
<v Speaker 3>grade persuasion skills. Based on my background in that field,

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 3>I recognized his talents early after watching him in action

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 3>during the election. I have to say that Trump is

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 3>the most persuasive human I have ever observed.

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 4>I have to, I have to. I have to check

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 4>my persuasion skills when I when I'm at the airport,

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 4>they will they will not let me go in the

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 4>carry on with.

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.960
<v Speaker 3>Your because their weapons grade. You're not allowed to take

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 3>those on t s A. Oh, catch it. It's an

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:24.240
<v Speaker 3>easy way to They've got those dogs to sniffer weapons

0:18:24.280 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 3>grade persuasion skills. Scot's gonna drive everywhere.

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 4>This is so many problems. This is the same thing

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:33.639
<v Speaker 4>with all of with all, like the with all, like

0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 4>the esoteric fascists and stuff. So many problems we solved

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 4>if we just force people to play d and d

0:18:39.080 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 4>we would just you just gotta get you gotta get

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:43.800
<v Speaker 4>that out. You got to give his people like an

0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 4>outlet for this ship. And if you're talking about like

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:50.159
<v Speaker 4>weapons grade persuasion, you're just talking about D and D.

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 4>Just roll, roll some dice, get some friends together, have

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:55.040
<v Speaker 4>a dinner party.

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Cast charm like, for the love of God, they can

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 3>take a will save Jesus Christ. Yeah, it is. It

0:19:04.840 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 3>is remarkable. President Trump carried those persuasion skills into the

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 3>White House, where his supporters say he has gotten a

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 3>lot done and his critics say he hasn't. Oh boy,

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 3>no one says any like. Yeah, his supporters love the

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:22.920
<v Speaker 3>stuff he does. His his his detractors don't say he

0:19:22.960 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 3>didn't get a lot done. They say he did a

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 3>lot of bad things that he did, Like.

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 4>He was just sitting here there, he was just playing

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 4>golf every day. It's such a weird because he like

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 4>describes as like his supporters say, he did all of

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:38.719
<v Speaker 4>you know, he fall vices and he did this, and

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.880
<v Speaker 4>his detractors say he was it was a chaotic administration

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 4>that didn't get anyone. No is his detractors say he

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 4>did a lot of stuff that hurt people and like, yeah,

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 4>his the fact that his administration had a lot of

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 4>leaks and like internal chaos was kind of evidence of

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.919
<v Speaker 4>the fundamentally bad people that were involved in it. But

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.679
<v Speaker 4>like his no one was like nothing got done by Trump,

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 4>Like a lot of bad things were done by Trump anyway.

0:20:05.680 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 3>President Trump's critics and mine in brackets asked me how

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 3>I could call the president a master persuasion. He capitalizes

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 3>the M and the P every time he says master persuader.

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 4>He's tried to make it impro renown.

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, he's trying. Yeah, he wants people to take this

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 3>very seriously, and like it's for one thing, a silly

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 3>thing to call somebody. We already have the term like charismatic,

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 3>we have the term demagogue. Like those those work, like charming,

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 3>that works, You don't need master persuader. Just is so

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 3>inherently silly that I'm not gonna take anything else that

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 3>you're saying very seriously. But you know what I do

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 3>take seriously?

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 4>Garrison? Oh, is it is it the very very brave

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 4>and stunning products that allow us to continue this show?

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yes, the heroic products some people are too scared

0:20:58.600 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 3>to advertise on this show.

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 4>That's right. They want. They do not want you to

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 4>hear the truth.

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.399
<v Speaker 3>No, they don't want you to hear the wisdom of

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 3>a master persuader like me. Who's who's gonna gonna convince

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 3>you to You know, they don't want you to, but

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:15.719
<v Speaker 3>they don't money into Blue Apron.

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:15.960
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 4>They don't want you to eye surgery do it all.

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 4>They don't want you to hear what's on page one

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven, how to design a linguistic kill shot. They

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 4>don't want you to know.

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 3>They don't want Scott Adams. It is so easy to

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 3>write a stupid book, Like writing a good book is

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 3>really hard, but writing this book, this is like forty

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 3>five minutes, Like this is a this is a solid

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 3>light afternoon of work. You knock this out while finishing

0:21:42.480 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 3>a Frene press of coffee. Anyway, here's ads. We're back.

0:21:54.960 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 3>And I just persuaded Garrison to support dominating the capital

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 3>gains tax using my weapons grade persuasion skills. I rolled

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 3>a NAT twenty.

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 4>You know, I think I think we should just have

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 4>a federal sales tax and that's evenly distributed aggressive all

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 4>the money spent. Yeah, and that's that is the way

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 4>to solve all of our economic problems. That's right, that's right.

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 3>A lot of a lot of people who get paid

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 3>by the Heritage Foundation are saying that. So President Trump's

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 3>critics and mine asked me how I could call the

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 3>president a master persuader when his public approval levels were

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 3>in the cellar. The quick answer is that low approval

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 3>didn't stop him from winning the presidency. No, but you're

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.120
<v Speaker 3>you're not saying he's a master winner of the presidency.

0:22:42.160 --> 0:22:45.560
<v Speaker 3>You're saying he persuaded people. And the evidence is most

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 3>people never liked him anyway. Whatever, it's it's it's it's

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 3>not that he's so obsessed with the idea that Trump

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 3>is persuading people and that like, that's what the debate

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 3>is about, when really, like, nobody's nobody's arguing that, like,

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 3>the people who like him are saying that, like, the

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 3>folks who are against him are engaged in an evil

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:08.359
<v Speaker 3>conspiracy against America, and the folks who hate him are like,

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 3>he's shitty and he took advantage of of fucked up

0:23:12.080 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 3>and archaic election system in order to win, Like nobody's

0:23:16.119 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 3>nobody's nobody reasonable thinks that Trump is good at convincing

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 3>the masses of things like, that's just not what he did. Anyway,

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 3>that's what Scott's convinced that he did. But here's the

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.919
<v Speaker 3>fun part. I also believe that Trump, the master persuader,

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 3>keeps using that term, was going to do far more

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 3>than win the presidency. I expected Trump to rip a

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 3>hole in the fabric of reality so we can well

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 3>through it to a deeper truth about the human experience. Well,

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:43.159
<v Speaker 3>that may have happened.

0:23:43.240 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 4>That did actually happened, that is true. Oops.

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:53.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, either either that or a series of decisions that

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 3>were made that included the development of a parallel digital

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:03.640
<v Speaker 3>culture driven by algorithm like faded the divisions between realities

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 3>and a fucking homunculi was able to creep through a

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:10.959
<v Speaker 3>political shock oth if you will, broke into our reality.

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 4>And most of that is probably Zuckerberg's fault, but someone

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:16.959
<v Speaker 4>was going to do it.

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Somebody was going to do it, and it was Donald Trump.

0:24:19.760 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, we'll give Scott that one. Okay, we'll give

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 3>Scott that one.

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, he he does title his next section why

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 4>facts are Overrated? So yeah, I don't think that.

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Is that is true. We'll skip right to that one

0:24:33.400 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 3>after we finish this little bit the common worldview shared

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 3>by most humans is that there is one objective reality.

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:42.239
<v Speaker 3>None of the most humans actually agree about that, and

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 3>we humans can understand that reality through a rigorous application

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 3>of facts and reason. I definitely don't think human being

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 3>all human beings agree on that for one thing like

0:24:50.040 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 3>religions exist. This view of the world imagines that some

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 3>people have already achieved a fact based type of enlightenment

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 3>that is compatible with science and logic, and they are

0:24:58.320 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 3>trying to help the rest of us see the world

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 3>right way. As far as I can tell, most people

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 3>share that interpretation of the world. The only wrinkle with

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:08.159
<v Speaker 3>that worldview is is that we all think we are

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.360
<v Speaker 3>the enlightened ones, and we assume the people who disagree

0:25:10.359 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 3>with us just need better facts or perhaps better brains

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 3>in order to agree with us. That filter on life

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 3>makes most of us happy because we see ourselves as

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:18.679
<v Speaker 3>the smart ones, and it does a good job of

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 3>predicting the future only, but only, because confirmation bias will

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:24.160
<v Speaker 3>make the future look any way we want it to look.

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:26.919
<v Speaker 3>Within reason. When I saw what I saw with Trump's

0:25:26.960 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 3>candidacy for president is that the within reason part of

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 3>our understanding about reality was about to change bigly. I

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 3>knew that candidate Trump's persuasion skills were about to annihilate

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 3>the public's ability to understand what they were seeing because

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 3>their observations wouldn't fit their mental model of living in

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 3>a rational world. But this is interesting because, for one thing,

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 3>I think the first accurate like warning about Trump, which

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 3>came out before or right around the time when Scott

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 3>started making his posts, was by my former colleague Cracked

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Adam Todd Brown, who wrote a whole article about how

0:25:57.280 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 3>Trump was like very influenced specific by old fascist political

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.040
<v Speaker 3>leaders and was using a lot of those tactics in

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 3>order to build a base of support within the Republican

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Party and that he would indeed win the Republican primary.

0:26:10.720 --> 0:26:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Adam called that months before any of this happened, and

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:15.679
<v Speaker 3>there were a lot of other people, and particularly a

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of actual like scholars of fascism who were warning

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 3>about him well prior to him winning the.

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 4>Primaries.

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 3>And these were not people who were, like say, like

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 3>the attitude that like people were saying he can't possibly win.

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 3>It just doesn't gel to me with what a lot

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 3>of people who were paying attention were saying. I think

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:38.719
<v Speaker 3>a lot of the And that's different from saying like, well,

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if he's likely to win in like

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 3>say January or like December of twenty fifteen, but yeah,

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. It's and I think he's silly here.

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 4>The difference between what Scott's doing is right. Scott's saying

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.280
<v Speaker 4>that the reason why this worked is because there's like

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 4>this magical thinking aspect where Trump is just like naturally

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 4>better at being this like mystical persua versus actual like

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:08.119
<v Speaker 4>scholars identifying and like identifying the use of a playbook.

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 4>And those are those are two very very different things.

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it's it's again, he's kind of he's obsessed

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 3>with this framing that he's put together of Trump as

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 3>a persuader, and it's I think kind of leading him

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 3>to lose what could be kind of some of the

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 3>actual useful conclusions that you could draw based on some

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 3>of this stuff. A lot of people's belief in normalcy

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 3>and like the in like political normalcy is what caused

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 3>them to not see Trump coming and not see the danger.

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 3>This was particularly a problem for a lot of establishment

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Republicans who did not think that something like this could happen.

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:48.720
<v Speaker 3>He didn't think like an outsider like this could one.

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:52.280
<v Speaker 3>And I think most most people observing kind of looked

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 3>at the past of Trump's previous runs for president, and

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 3>generally of the long history of like weirdo candidates, and

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 3>thought that it was likely to go that way. That's

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 3>not like a belief about like I wouldn't call that

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 3>confirmation bias. That's kind of because again, like reality didn't

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 3>wind up bearing that way. And most people rightly saw

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 3>this as a problem right away. They didn't think, like

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 3>reality has broken. They were like, oh, American politics is

0:28:20.680 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 3>more broken than I had thought. The American electorate is

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 3>more fucked up than I had thought. The electoral College

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 3>is a worse system than I had realized. Which is

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of like a reasonable way to translate this. But

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Scott's got to make it all about like how Trump

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 3>like cunningly manipulated reality as opposed to Trump kind of

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 3>taking advantage to flaws within the system that people didn't realize.

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 3>A lot of people didn't realize were as flawed as

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:49.800
<v Speaker 3>it was, but a lot of people in fact did

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.560
<v Speaker 3>realize and warn about it and recognize what was happening here.

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 3>He's again kind of got to make himself the only

0:28:56.120 --> 0:29:00.280
<v Speaker 3>person who thought that Trump could win, which he clearly wasn't.

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.480
<v Speaker 3>But anyway, whatever, it's it's fun.

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, uh d think we were we were we

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 4>were in Did we get to watch it? Yeah?

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 3>No, I've got his next here. So he's he's talking

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:17.480
<v Speaker 3>about where what he where he lands Politically? I label

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 3>myself an ultraliberal, and by that I mean liberals seem

0:29:20.400 --> 0:29:24.000
<v Speaker 3>too conservative to me. I'll give you some examples. Generally speaking,

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:26.640
<v Speaker 3>conservatives want to ban abortion, while liberals want it to

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:29.479
<v Speaker 3>be to remain legal. I go one step further and

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 3>say that men should sideline themselves from the question and

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 3>follow the lead on the of women on the topic

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 3>of reproductive health, men should still be in the conversation

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 3>about their own money. Of course, what does that mean, Scott?

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 4>Like?

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 3>What what is what does that line mean? What are

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 3>you talking about?

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 4>Means? Are they're not going to pay for an abortion? Yeah?

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Are you saying that, like men should not have a

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 3>be compelled to pay child support?

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 4>Ever?

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 3>Is that the statement? Because I'm I'm kind of trying

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 3>to interpret that, and I don't know where where men's

0:29:58.240 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 3>money comes up in the conversation of like reproductive rights,

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 3>other than if you're bringing up the fact that, like

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 3>you don't think men should be have to be compelled

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 3>to pay child support if they get someone pregnant because

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 3>it's the woman's choice. Is that I think that's kind

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 3>of where Scott's.

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 4>Coming in on this. I guess so.

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's interesting. My personal sense of ethics says that

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:20.680
<v Speaker 3>the people who take the most responsibility for important societal

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 3>outcomes should also have the strongest say. My male opinion

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 3>on women's reproductive health adds nothing to the quality of

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 3>the decision. That Part's fine. Women have it covered. The

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 3>most credible laws and abortion to the ones that most

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 3>women support, and while life or death issues are on

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 3>the table, credibility is essential to the smooth operation of society.

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 3>That's great, Good, Good for you, Scott. He says that

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 3>he is legal for or he is for legalizing marijuana,

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 3>and he also thinks doctors should prescribe recreational drugs for

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 3>old people. Yeah, I'm alright with that. That's fine. That's fine, Scott.

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 3>When it comes to complicated affairs about economics and foreign affairs,

0:30:58.200 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 3>my opinion is that I never have enough data to

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 3>form competent opinions neither does anyone else. Well that Scott

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 3>now actually have to have an opinion do have, especially

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 3>on like foreign affairs. It's like, well, actually, Scott, there's

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 3>people who's like entire lives are understanding the interaction of

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 3>for example, the United States and other foreign countries, or

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 3>understanding what countries that are having problems with like food

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 3>and security or like not lack of access to clean water,

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 3>or you know, difficulties like dealing with the AIDS virus.

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 3>There are people who dedicate their whole lives to understanding

0:31:33.000 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 3>those issues in the context of other countries. There are

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:37.719
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people who have understandings about what are

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 3>good policy is there That's a very silly statement, Scott. Anyway,

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 3>that's that's the It's fine whatever, Scott generally speak, what

0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 3>chapter is this? Then this is an introduction? Still okay,

0:31:52.000 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 3>over still an instruction? Yeah, yeah, we're still an introduction.

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 3>Generally speaking, Conservatives think we live in a country where

0:31:57.400 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 3>everyone always has already has equal opportunity. I don't know

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 3>that's what they say, though.

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 4>I'll give him that.

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 3>I'll give him that. That is a statement that gets made.

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 3>Liberals generally think the government should do more to a

0:32:07.080 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 3>guarantee equal opportunity. I go one step further and suggest

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 3>considering slavery reparations for African Americans in the form of

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 3>free college and job training funded by a twenty five

0:32:16.680 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 3>year tax in the top one percent. Hey, that's fine.

0:32:21.280 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 4>Although I wonder if he still has this opinion. I

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 4>don't know that he does.

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 3>It's also interesting that he's like, I'm not going to

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 3>state an opinion on abortion, because as a man, I

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't have one. But he is like, here is exactly

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 3>how I think reparations for Black Americans should work.

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, that is.

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 3>Interesting, Scott. Maybe you could just say I support reparations

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 3>and let someone else figure out how it's supposed to

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:44.400
<v Speaker 3>go the plan.

0:32:44.720 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 4>But.

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 3>As a reparations plan. But hey, look, at least he's

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 3>closer to the right on that side than I think

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 3>you would have expected, given his most recent racist statements

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 3>that got the Delbert comic cancel. Yes, okay, so I

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 3>guess that's the end of the things that make him

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 3>an uber liberal. Fine, fine enough, So I think we're

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 3>going to move on to Why Facts Are Overrated, Part

0:33:11.840 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 3>one of his book, The Most Important Perceptual Perceptual Shift

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 3>in History My spooky Year was fun for me, but

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 3>was also a dangerous time for the world's collective mental health.

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Enlightenment can be a risky business when your old worldview

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 3>pulse apart. It can trigger all kinds of irrational behavior

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 3>before your brain rewrites the movie in your head to

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 3>make it consistent with your new worldview. We all have

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 3>movies in our heads that we believe are accurate views

0:33:34.440 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 3>of reality, and those movies are very different. Normally, we

0:33:37.160 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 3>don't notice the differences in our personal movies or we

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:42.320
<v Speaker 3>don't care. But when politics are involved the stakes are higher,

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 3>then we notice. Emotions are already raw in election years,

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 3>and millions of people are focused on the same topics

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 3>at the same time. That's a barrel of gasoline and

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.240
<v Speaker 3>a lot of matches in one place. The last thing

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 3>the country needed was millions of people simultaneously going nuts.

0:33:55.680 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 3>I hope it could reduce that risk by writing about

0:33:57.720 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 3>Trump's persuasion talents and preparing the public or what I

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 3>saw coming. It's interesting he is. There's a degree this

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 3>In some other parts of the book. He's like kind

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 3>of trying to repackage Robert Anton Wilson's ideas about like

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 3>reality tunnels and doing it number one in a way

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of like overly simplistic, and also doing it

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:23.200
<v Speaker 3>in a way where the goal is to bring people

0:34:23.280 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 3>to a specific understanding of reality rather than understand the

0:34:27.160 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 3>different kind of realities that people live in, and being

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:33.319
<v Speaker 3>able to kind of move through different reality tunnels as

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 3>that's kind of advantageous for the things that you're trying

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 3>to do. YEA, Like, his attitude on this is so

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 3>much more brittle than I think the kind of elegant

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:45.360
<v Speaker 3>concepts that Robert Anton Wilson brings up when he talks about,

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:50.000
<v Speaker 3>like how kind of inhabiting letting yourself and figuring out

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:52.240
<v Speaker 3>how to kind of like metaprogram your mind to inhabit

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 3>different realities can allow you to deal with stuff like

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:58.799
<v Speaker 3>addiction can allow you to like become, you know, more

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 3>artistically productive. Certain ways can allow you to like achieve

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 3>things that you would otherwise have difficulty achieving. Because perception

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 3>dictates to a substantial extent, how we how we like

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:14.279
<v Speaker 3>interface and experience reality. What Scott's talking about is like

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:17.080
<v Speaker 3>so much more brittle than that, And you also get

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 3>the feeling that he believes that he and the master

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 3>persuaders are the only ones who can actually like see

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 3>the tunnels people are moving through. And and it's about

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of manipulation of large groups of people as opposed

0:35:28.960 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 3>to understanding yourself and taking more control over your own

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:34.720
<v Speaker 3>interactions in the world.

0:35:35.160 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and I because he's he's also he's like promoting

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 4>himself as like this figure that's like seen like I've

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 4>like seen the divine prophecy when Trump comes down the

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 4>Golden elevator and now I will distill the secrets onto you.

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.400
<v Speaker 4>And it's all this like it is, it is, it

0:35:51.440 --> 0:35:54.600
<v Speaker 4>is a very it is it's from completely different ends

0:35:54.600 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 4>than what someone like Roberton Wilson's doing. It's also like

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure how I I'm not sure if the

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 4>dilver guy can recognize how far into a reality tunnel

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 4>he is in. Yeah, and how much like so, how

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:11.279
<v Speaker 4>much of that like self awareness can to extend out

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 4>to other people you.

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Scott talks a lot about his own ignorance of certain things,

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:21.200
<v Speaker 3>like I think history, and it's kind of evident here

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:25.400
<v Speaker 3>because he talks about how like you know, if you

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 3>watch the entire election and concluded that Trump was nothing

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 3>but a lucky clown you missed one of the most

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 3>important perceptual shifts in the history of humankind. And I

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 3>agree it's wrong to view Trump as just a lucky clown.

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Trump is an authoritarian utilizing very time worn tactics to

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 3>take advantage of the worst aspects of American culture, which

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 3>have been evident as long as this country has existed.

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 3>Scott like, I don't think has a I either is

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:54.160
<v Speaker 3>pretending not to have any kind of understanding of like

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:58.359
<v Speaker 3>American political history and some of the different figures that

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Trump learned from. He doesn't know about kind of the

0:37:01.960 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 3>history of of of I don't know how Nixon got elected,

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:08.480
<v Speaker 3>of the the kind of the the Southern strategy, all

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 3>this kind of shit that you see echoes of in

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 3>the way Trump did his campaigning and is going to

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 3>do his campaigning for the next election. Scott, I hes certainly,

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 3>like I don't know if it's that he doesn't know

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.439
<v Speaker 3>this or he doesn't think that it's profitable to bring

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 3>it up, but like the completely the framing of this

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 3>is like Trump hacked the human brain somehow and that's

0:37:31.719 --> 0:37:35.160
<v Speaker 3>how he run one, rather than like it's always been

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:39.320
<v Speaker 3>profitable to trade on bigotry and fear in American politics,

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 3>and Trump figured out how to take advantage of social

0:37:42.640 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 3>media to do that extremely efficiently. But you know that's

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:49.920
<v Speaker 3>not the way Scott describes this as happening.

0:37:51.840 --> 0:37:55.000
<v Speaker 4>Instead, Trump can then be seen as this like a

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:58.560
<v Speaker 4>like a like a like a mystical persuader. Yeah, as

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 4>opposed to someone using like a very a very tried

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 4>and true playbook for gaining political power.

0:38:05.280 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. It's interesting, like when you when you talk about uh,

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 3>like this kind of stuff. It reminds me a little

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:17.960
<v Speaker 3>bit about how people talked about and still does some

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 3>extint do talked about like Hitler's rise a lot where

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:23.440
<v Speaker 3>they you know, they described it as like he he

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 3>kind of like brainwashed the German people and he was

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 3>somehow able to like gain this deep degree of control

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 3>over their minds using these almost like his his mythical

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 3>charisma and persuasion techniques.

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:37.839
<v Speaker 4>It was a it was a mass hypnosis. Yeah. No.

0:38:37.960 --> 0:38:41.080
<v Speaker 3>He he engaged in a number of time worn like

0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:46.760
<v Speaker 3>campaign traditions, and he also understood new technologies like radio

0:38:46.880 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 3>and the airplane and their application in a democratic election

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 3>in a way that other people didn't yet. And so

0:38:53.760 --> 0:38:57.680
<v Speaker 3>as a result, there was kind of less immunity from

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 3>his political opponents to those strategies, he's in less understanding

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:02.960
<v Speaker 3>of how to counter them, and he was able to

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:06.239
<v Speaker 3>combine that with kind of the venal cowardice of a

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:09.799
<v Speaker 3>number of folks who were, you know, his political opponents

0:39:09.880 --> 0:39:13.680
<v Speaker 3>but not diametrically politically opposed to his attitudes, and able

0:39:13.719 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 3>to sneak into power that way, Like like Hitler's there's

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 3>nothing like hard to explain about how Hitler took power.

0:39:20.560 --> 0:39:25.080
<v Speaker 3>It was a mixture of like savvy political techniques and

0:39:25.120 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 3>then social engineering and basically bribery. And it's it's you know,

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:32.359
<v Speaker 3>with Trump, that's less on the bribery side of thing,

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 3>but it's like, yeah, he won election, Like there's not

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 3>much of a difference between how he came to power

0:39:39.120 --> 0:39:40.239
<v Speaker 3>and how George W.

0:39:40.280 --> 0:39:41.280
<v Speaker 4>Bush came to power.

0:39:41.560 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, Like it's it's yeah, but anyway, he's a

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:50.319
<v Speaker 3>master persuader. So if you seek enlightenment, these are two

0:39:50.360 --> 0:39:53.640
<v Speaker 3>of the most important concepts you will ever learn. Cognitive dissonance.

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:56.200
<v Speaker 3>This is a mental condition in which people rationalize why

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:59.360
<v Speaker 3>their actions are inconsistent with their thoughts and beliefs. For example,

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:01.280
<v Speaker 3>if you think you are smart, but you notice yourself

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 3>doing something that is clearly dumb, you might spontaneously hallucinate

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 3>that that was a good reason for it. Now, Scott,

0:40:06.480 --> 0:40:08.880
<v Speaker 3>you might want to read that part again. You might

0:40:08.880 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 3>want to go over that sentence a couple of times, Buddy. Yeah,

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:16.160
<v Speaker 3>this is a common phenomenon in all normal humans, but

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 3>we generally believe it applies only to other people. I

0:40:19.280 --> 0:40:22.360
<v Speaker 3>think you're revealing a lot about yourself there, Scott. I

0:40:22.360 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 3>actually think most people are humble enough to be like, Yeah,

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:27.799
<v Speaker 3>I often fall short of like how I believe I

0:40:27.840 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 3>should be acting or behaving. You know, I am not

0:40:31.520 --> 0:40:34.239
<v Speaker 3>always consistent with the things that I know are right.

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes I'm dishonest, Like most people I know are capable

0:40:38.000 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 3>of admitting that they're flawed people. I think Scott is

0:40:41.960 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 3>it's interesting that he has this attitude that like, I'm

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:47.120
<v Speaker 3>the only one who understands that cognitive dissonance is a

0:40:47.120 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 3>factor in my life. Like, no, I think most of

0:40:50.000 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 3>us are aware it's hard to be consistent with the

0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 3>versions of ourselves that theoretically are the best anyway.

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 4>Whatever.

0:40:57.239 --> 0:41:01.239
<v Speaker 3>He talks about confirmation bias, which he all so describes

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:04.000
<v Speaker 3>as a common phenomenon that we believe only happens to

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:08.280
<v Speaker 3>other people. I saw in the election of twenty sixteen

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 3>a dangerous situation forming if the public misunderstood Trump's methods

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 3>and intentions, and that seemed likely, things could turn ugly worse. Yet,

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:18.359
<v Speaker 3>the public might not appreciate the extraordinary richness of their

0:41:18.440 --> 0:41:20.640
<v Speaker 3>choice in the election. No matter what you thought of

0:41:20.680 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 3>Trump or his policies, he certainly was different, and he

0:41:23.040 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 3>certainly knew how to make things happen. I thought the

0:41:25.880 --> 0:41:28.800
<v Speaker 3>public deserved to see the Trump candidacy as clearly as possible,

0:41:28.800 --> 0:41:32.000
<v Speaker 3>without the biased framing that his adversaries were applying. You

0:41:32.080 --> 0:41:34.280
<v Speaker 3>might be wondering how confident I was about my prediction

0:41:34.320 --> 0:41:36.279
<v Speaker 3>that Trump would win. Well, no one is psychic. I

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:39.120
<v Speaker 3>can't say no with total certainty what the future holds.

0:41:39.400 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 3>For example, I couldn't predict what types of scandals would

0:41:42.200 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 3>pop up along the way. But I do know persuasion.

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 3>I know its power in a way that few people do,

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 3>and I recognize that with Trump's level of persuasion skill,

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 3>he was bringing a flamethrower to a stick fight.

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Speaking of there's a in part for there's a section

0:41:57.040 --> 0:42:01.920
<v Speaker 4>called how a trained persuader Ofugh was it how a

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 4>trained persuader evaluates scandals.

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:08.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Scott starts talking about how good he is at

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:11.200
<v Speaker 3>predicting here, and he brings up his two thousand and

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 3>four book The Religion War. Now Garrison, this is one

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:18.040
<v Speaker 3>of the worst books ever written. And you're inested in

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 3>reading some reviews of this and one of his other

0:42:20.880 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 3>terrible fiction books. The podcast House of Decline Haus has

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:28.360
<v Speaker 3>been doing a read through that includes my friend and

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 3>cartoonist Rory Blank. That's quite good, but it Scott. Here's

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 3>how Scott describes it. I predicted the rise of an

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 3>Islamic caliphate in the Middle East and their use of

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.680
<v Speaker 3>hobby sized drones for terror attacks. That happens to be

0:42:39.760 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 3>a good description of isis in twenty seventeen. Now, that's

0:42:43.680 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 3>not what Scott writes in this book. In this book,

0:42:46.680 --> 0:42:49.279
<v Speaker 3>he's writing about like a fictional war between like all

0:42:49.320 --> 0:42:52.640
<v Speaker 3>of the Western countries, like out like unite under this,

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:56.360
<v Speaker 3>like Christian you know, democratic military alliance to fight the

0:42:56.440 --> 0:43:01.680
<v Speaker 3>Muslim world, which in this book, a Palacedinean man engineers

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:04.799
<v Speaker 3>the destruction of Israel and then unites all of the

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Arab countries. And also I think like Iran and stuff,

0:43:08.200 --> 0:43:11.759
<v Speaker 3>So like not just Arab countries, but like Sunni and

0:43:11.800 --> 0:43:15.240
<v Speaker 3>Shia all get together in this Islamic Caliphate and launch

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:18.320
<v Speaker 3>a long term terrorist attack against the West that includes

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:22.560
<v Speaker 3>like constant suicide drone bombings of like like Western cities.

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 3>That's actually not a good description of ISIS. ISIS, for

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 3>one thing, didn't destroy Israel. They didn't actually overthrow any state.

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 3>And while ISIS did use hobby drones, they didn't use

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 3>them for terrorist attacks. They used them as part of

0:43:37.920 --> 0:43:42.160
<v Speaker 3>a military like strategy, like they use them as spotters

0:43:42.239 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 3>for their mortars, they used them to drop bombs on soldiers.

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 3>In other words, Scott kind of imagined the use of

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 3>like this kind of like perpetual terror war against the

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 3>West by this evil Muslim empire created by a Palestinian

0:43:57.719 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 3>man who had used democracy to destroy Israel. And he's

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:05.240
<v Speaker 3>saying that's exactly like what happened with ISIS in twenty seventeen.

0:44:05.320 --> 0:44:07.319
<v Speaker 3>It is not Scott, your predict this is not you

0:44:07.320 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 3>did not predict Isis.

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:12.520
<v Speaker 4>Are you saying Gilbert is not an ISIS understander?

0:44:13.000 --> 0:44:19.240
<v Speaker 3>I I don't think that he is anyway, Uh, yeah,

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:20.719
<v Speaker 3>what do you what do you want to go through

0:44:20.760 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 3>next here Master Persuader.

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 4>There's there's a funny section called about facts. But I

0:44:26.560 --> 0:44:28.719
<v Speaker 4>mean a lot of these are pretty good. I mean,

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:31.400
<v Speaker 4>there's the myth of the rational mind.

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Pretty funny. Yeah, we'll probably check that out.

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:39.719
<v Speaker 4>Mass delusions, when reality bifurcated, which is it not a

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:42.080
<v Speaker 4>cent when bifurcated?

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:45.719
<v Speaker 3>I guess it? No, yeah, because when reality yes, yeah,

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:47.200
<v Speaker 3>okay works.

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 4>I see what he means. Now. Yeah, anyway, Trump's rosy

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 4>O'Donnell moment.

0:44:53.920 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 3>You know what Bifer, Well, we're gonna have to check

0:44:56.160 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 3>that one out.

0:44:57.000 --> 0:45:00.960
<v Speaker 2>But you know what kated is well that he's also

0:45:01.000 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 2>a Casey Anthony Truther.

0:45:04.120 --> 0:45:08.040
<v Speaker 3>I hope so, because because I am, you know who

0:45:08.040 --> 0:45:10.600
<v Speaker 3>else is a Casey Anthony Truther or Sophie?

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:15.319
<v Speaker 1>Uh this ad for the podcast that might come up,

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:16.680
<v Speaker 1>but there was.

0:45:16.680 --> 0:45:19.360
<v Speaker 3>A non zero chance that we get an ad for

0:45:19.400 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 3>the podcast. Here we go, Ah, we're back. I hope

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:32.960
<v Speaker 3>the subreddits having a good time figuring out what was bleeped.

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:34.879
<v Speaker 3>That's a real bleep. That's not one of the ones

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:37.920
<v Speaker 3>where I like put in a fake like that was

0:45:37.960 --> 0:45:38.920
<v Speaker 3>a real bleep.

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:42.160
<v Speaker 4>And that about it. I don't yeah, I don't. I

0:45:42.200 --> 0:45:44.800
<v Speaker 4>don't sure how how much do we have to bleep

0:45:44.920 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 4>up there? It is really uncy.

0:45:46.360 --> 0:45:48.279
<v Speaker 3>It's gonna be quite a bit because we can get

0:45:48.320 --> 0:45:49.280
<v Speaker 3>in trouble for that one.

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 2>But I'm super pissed off about it because I'm so

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:53.239
<v Speaker 2>fucking right.

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:55.920
<v Speaker 4>Are we gonna have to bleep Trumb's roso Donald the

0:45:55.960 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 4>moment to justice to just be Trump's bleep?

0:46:00.120 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 3>No? No, we can say that. We can say Rosie

0:46:02.040 --> 0:46:06.799
<v Speaker 3>O'Donnell in that context. It's fine anyway, someone on the

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:09.960
<v Speaker 3>subredd it'll figure out what we what we probably said,

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 3>But as long as we don't say no.

0:46:11.719 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 1>I was really fucking proud of it.

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:18.520
<v Speaker 3>It was very funny. So about facts. On August thirteenth,

0:46:18.600 --> 0:46:21.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty fifteen, I predicted my blog that Donald Trump had

0:46:21.480 --> 0:46:23.960
<v Speaker 3>a ninety eight percent chance of winning the presidency based

0:46:23.960 --> 0:46:25.320
<v Speaker 3>on his persuasion skills.

0:46:25.719 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 4>Wait, why did he think ninety eight percent?

0:46:28.960 --> 0:46:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, first off, that's a nonsense number, and it's funny,

0:46:32.239 --> 0:46:34.279
<v Speaker 3>he says. A week earlier, he talks about like Nate

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:37.120
<v Speaker 3>Silver had put, the most respected political forecaster in the

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 3>United States, had put Trump's odds of winning their Republican

0:46:39.640 --> 0:46:44.120
<v Speaker 3>nomination at two percent in his five thirty eight blog yeah,

0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:47.240
<v Speaker 3>which is like, yeah, I guess it's fair that people

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:50.439
<v Speaker 3>didn't note that he was going enough people didn't note

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 3>that he was likely to win the primaries early on,

0:46:54.080 --> 0:46:56.360
<v Speaker 3>although it also is worth noting that Nate Silver is

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 3>one of the people who actually accurately called the way

0:46:59.560 --> 0:47:02.480
<v Speaker 3>in which Trump was going to win, like when he

0:47:02.920 --> 0:47:05.360
<v Speaker 3>gave him like a thirty something percent chance, which was

0:47:05.440 --> 0:47:07.359
<v Speaker 3>higher than any of the other posters, and he laid

0:47:07.400 --> 0:47:12.680
<v Speaker 3>out basically the collapse of the Democrat firewall in kind

0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:14.520
<v Speaker 3>of the Midwest and how that could lead to an

0:47:14.520 --> 0:47:18.120
<v Speaker 3>electoral victory and was pretty much correct, which is more

0:47:18.120 --> 0:47:23.279
<v Speaker 3>impressive than Scott saying nine eight percent. Oh boy. Some

0:47:23.320 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 3>of the rare and notable predictors of Trump's win included

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Mike Cernovich and Colter Stefan Malinu, Milo Ianopolis, Bill Mitchell.

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:43.320
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely horrible. There's a bad yeah, just all terrible people,

0:47:46.280 --> 0:47:49.960
<v Speaker 3>good stuff, good stuff. In California where I lived, it lived,

0:47:50.040 --> 0:47:52.399
<v Speaker 3>it seemed as if most Trump supporters weren't hiding because

0:47:52.400 --> 0:47:57.480
<v Speaker 3>of the social and career risks of publicly supporting him.

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:55.880
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:47:57.560 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 3>Luckily he was wrong. Trump's Twitter followers had adopted him

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:03.319
<v Speaker 3>immediately and have my back every step of the way.

0:48:03.760 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 3>And the critics he came after me on Twitter and elsewhere.

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:08.799
<v Speaker 3>Trump supporters flooded into back me. I didn't ask them

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:09.919
<v Speaker 3>to do it, they just did.

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:11.400
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:48:11.840 --> 0:48:13.680
<v Speaker 3>So that's why he wrote this book. He did it

0:48:13.719 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 3>to as he did it of solidarity with Trump's Twitter followers.

0:48:19.400 --> 0:48:22.560
<v Speaker 4>Oh that's great, that's good.

0:48:23.200 --> 0:48:26.680
<v Speaker 3>It's it's good stuff. Okay, Well there suasion tips, some

0:48:26.719 --> 0:48:28.000
<v Speaker 3>great persuasion tips.

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:28.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:48:29.160 --> 0:48:32.399
<v Speaker 3>One is reciprocity. If you're nice to people, they want

0:48:32.400 --> 0:48:34.399
<v Speaker 3>to be nice to you in return. That's a really

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:39.399
<v Speaker 3>tip for you, Garrison. Yeah really yeah, yeah, that tip

0:48:39.520 --> 0:48:44.279
<v Speaker 3>number three. All of these his brilliant techniques, like being

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 3>nice to people work even if people know what you're doing.

0:48:48.200 --> 0:48:50.919
<v Speaker 3>That's that's good. This is all like very basic shit

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:54.160
<v Speaker 3>like that. There's been scientific studies about how stuff like

0:48:54.239 --> 0:48:58.600
<v Speaker 3>reciprocity works. Like, none of this is like new. All

0:48:58.640 --> 0:49:00.560
<v Speaker 3>of this is stuff you can find in a different

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:05.000
<v Speaker 3>books about like how to negotiate and shit, it's it's

0:49:05.560 --> 0:49:08.120
<v Speaker 3>it is pretty boring. Uh yeah, let's move on to

0:49:08.160 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 3>another chapter that's less boring than this. That's the next

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:14.359
<v Speaker 3>third grade fucking persuasion tactic shit.

0:49:14.640 --> 0:49:17.360
<v Speaker 4>The next section is how to see reality in a

0:49:17.400 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 4>more useful way? Which? Which? Which? Which? Starts off with

0:49:22.080 --> 0:49:23.800
<v Speaker 4>the myth of the rational mind?

0:49:24.280 --> 0:49:26.879
<v Speaker 3>Okay, wait, Garrison, I gotta, I gotta give you this.

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:29.680
<v Speaker 3>He keeps talking about Nate Silver later in this chapter.

0:49:29.760 --> 0:49:34.520
<v Speaker 3>I gotta go into this here. Yeah, Okay, this is telling.

0:49:34.880 --> 0:49:37.400
<v Speaker 3>I picked ninety eight percent as my Trump prediction because

0:49:37.440 --> 0:49:39.760
<v Speaker 3>Nate Silver of five point thirty eight was saying two percent.

0:49:39.840 --> 0:49:42.480
<v Speaker 3>I did that for branding and persuasion purposes. It is

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:44.520
<v Speaker 3>easy to remember my prediction both because of the way

0:49:44.520 --> 0:49:47.319
<v Speaker 3>it fits with Silver's prediction and for its audacity, which

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:51.080
<v Speaker 3>people perceived as wrongness. The prediction was designed to attract attention,

0:49:51.200 --> 0:49:53.160
<v Speaker 3>and it did. It was also designed to pair my

0:49:53.239 --> 0:49:56.399
<v Speaker 3>name with Nate Silver's name to raise my profile by association.

0:49:56.880 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 3>That worked too. Social media folks mentioned me in the

0:49:59.560 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 3>same sense with Silver countless times during the election, exactly

0:50:03.160 --> 0:50:05.680
<v Speaker 3>as I had hoped, and every mention raised my importance

0:50:05.719 --> 0:50:08.480
<v Speaker 3>as a political observer because I was being compared with

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:11.040
<v Speaker 3>someone already important in that field. Keep in mind that

0:50:11.080 --> 0:50:12.759
<v Speaker 3>at this point in our story, I was playing the

0:50:12.800 --> 0:50:16.239
<v Speaker 3>wrong sport. I was a cartoonist writing about politics and persuasion.

0:50:16.440 --> 0:50:18.719
<v Speaker 3>I needed whatever credibility I could get to build an

0:50:18.760 --> 0:50:21.239
<v Speaker 3>audience for my Trump blog. It's interesting because he's talking

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:24.279
<v Speaker 3>about how like I subtly hacked people's brains to make

0:50:24.360 --> 0:50:27.680
<v Speaker 3>myself seem more credible. No, the people who it wasn't

0:50:27.719 --> 0:50:31.280
<v Speaker 3>like serious political pollsters who were taking Scott Adam seriously.

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 3>It was like Rando Trump supporters on Twitter who liked

0:50:35.239 --> 0:50:38.240
<v Speaker 3>you because you were saying what they already believed. Again,

0:50:38.800 --> 0:50:41.880
<v Speaker 3>Scott could consistently talks about what he's doing is persuasion.

0:50:42.160 --> 0:50:45.640
<v Speaker 3>You didn't persuade anybody. You joined a crowd of people

0:50:45.719 --> 0:50:48.120
<v Speaker 3>all cheering for a guy, and they liked that you

0:50:48.160 --> 0:50:49.719
<v Speaker 3>were cheering for the same guy.

0:50:50.239 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 4>Like in the same sentence where he talks about yeah,

0:50:53.280 --> 0:50:55.319
<v Speaker 4>confirmation bias.

0:50:55.160 --> 0:50:58.240
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting because again it's like yeah credit where it's new. Scott,

0:50:58.280 --> 0:51:01.840
<v Speaker 3>you said before Trump one uh the primary, that he

0:51:01.880 --> 0:51:03.600
<v Speaker 3>was gonna win the primary. You know, I'll give you

0:51:03.920 --> 0:51:06.200
<v Speaker 3>give you a credit for being right there, But you're

0:51:06.200 --> 0:51:09.920
<v Speaker 3>talking about persuasion. You didn't persuade people. You went to

0:51:10.000 --> 0:51:12.040
<v Speaker 3>a group of people who all thought Trump was going

0:51:12.080 --> 0:51:15.080
<v Speaker 3>to win because they were Trump's supporters on Twitter and

0:51:15.120 --> 0:51:17.640
<v Speaker 3>they liked you because you were also a Trump supporter

0:51:17.760 --> 0:51:22.359
<v Speaker 3>on Twitter. That's not persuasion, Scott. Okay, now we can

0:51:22.400 --> 0:51:23.719
<v Speaker 3>move on. What is it you wanted me to get

0:51:23.760 --> 0:51:24.360
<v Speaker 3>into next?

0:51:25.360 --> 0:51:27.440
<v Speaker 4>The Myth of the rational The Myth of the Rational

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:30.520
<v Speaker 4>Mind on page thirty three looks pretty good, And then

0:51:30.520 --> 0:51:33.680
<v Speaker 4>there's then there is then there's mass delusions on sixty two.

0:51:34.280 --> 0:51:39.040
<v Speaker 3>God, there are so many fucking chapters. It's this is horrible.

0:51:40.840 --> 0:51:42.880
<v Speaker 3>Uh wait, where the fuck is the Myth of the

0:51:42.960 --> 0:51:45.600
<v Speaker 3>Rational Mind? Thirty three thirty three?

0:51:45.800 --> 0:51:47.319
<v Speaker 2>How many chapters are there?

0:51:47.920 --> 0:51:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:51:48.120 --> 0:51:50.960
<v Speaker 4>I don't Well, there's like, there's like five parts, but

0:51:51.040 --> 0:51:54.200
<v Speaker 4>each part has its own little like sub grouping.

0:51:54.800 --> 0:51:57.840
<v Speaker 3>He has a bunch of like short, shitty chapters and

0:51:57.880 --> 0:52:01.960
<v Speaker 3>they all have like dog shittle weird stupid titles.

0:52:01.640 --> 0:52:04.400
<v Speaker 4>Go Bigley or go Home great great titles.

0:52:04.800 --> 0:52:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Wait, but what was what was Donald Trump's real Donald moment?

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:12.880
<v Speaker 5>We'll find out that there are so many little chapters

0:52:12.920 --> 0:52:15.560
<v Speaker 5>I want to read here, the making of a hypnotist

0:52:15.680 --> 0:52:21.000
<v Speaker 5>who could be hypnotized, hypnosis superpowers, finding a hypnosis school.

0:52:23.160 --> 0:52:29.760
<v Speaker 3>Oh fuck, all right, The Myth of the Rational Mind.

0:52:30.280 --> 0:52:37.920
<v Speaker 3>Students of philosophy, remember that Plato Jesus Christ. Remember that

0:52:37.960 --> 0:52:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Plato talked about the subjective nature of our personal realities

0:52:41.560 --> 0:52:44.759
<v Speaker 3>In the Allegory of the Cave. Plato asked, us, Oh God,

0:52:45.360 --> 0:52:48.600
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to go.

0:52:51.640 --> 0:52:54.200
<v Speaker 4>We don't need to explain the allegory of the cave

0:52:54.239 --> 0:52:55.359
<v Speaker 4>to us. I'm sorry, No, you.

0:52:55.320 --> 0:52:57.319
<v Speaker 3>All learned about this in a high school, right, which

0:52:57.320 --> 0:52:59.200
<v Speaker 3>is the last time Scott learned anything?

0:52:59.600 --> 0:53:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Or matrix? Who cares? Matrix?

0:53:02.000 --> 0:53:02.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:53:02.400 --> 0:53:06.680
<v Speaker 4>Who carey?

0:53:06.880 --> 0:53:10.440
<v Speaker 3>The points of Plato's allegory is that, figuratively speaking, the

0:53:10.600 --> 0:53:12.960
<v Speaker 3>humans might be chained to a cave created by our

0:53:13.000 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 3>own faulty brains and senses, experiencing a shadow world that

0:53:16.200 --> 0:53:20.760
<v Speaker 3>is entirely different from objective reality. Other famous philosophers, notably

0:53:20.880 --> 0:53:24.279
<v Speaker 3>David Hume, have questioned the nature cause the existence of

0:53:24.320 --> 0:53:27.319
<v Speaker 3>free will. If, as some philosophers claim, humans have no

0:53:27.400 --> 0:53:29.279
<v Speaker 3>free will and we are nothing but victims of cause

0:53:29.320 --> 0:53:32.200
<v Speaker 3>and effect, that means our common view of reality is absurd.

0:53:32.600 --> 0:53:34.319
<v Speaker 3>In this model of the world, we are little more

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:37.080
<v Speaker 3>than meat robots who wrongly believe we control our own

0:53:37.120 --> 0:53:41.040
<v Speaker 3>decisions and actions. He's now, he's now, he's talking. He's

0:53:41.080 --> 0:53:44.640
<v Speaker 3>just this is like he's like summarizing, like Wikipedia pages

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:47.400
<v Speaker 3>for four guys. It's about comp next just like Google,

0:53:48.440 --> 0:53:50.560
<v Speaker 3>cause than him talking about a manual.

0:53:51.520 --> 0:53:54.400
<v Speaker 4>No, we have to read at least one sentence of Skull.

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:57.879
<v Speaker 3>Uses a lot of words to say reality isn't necessarily

0:53:57.920 --> 0:54:03.600
<v Speaker 3>anything like the way we perceive it, laughing. Kant uses

0:54:03.640 --> 0:54:05.879
<v Speaker 3>a lot of words. You have to give him that.

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:11.560
<v Speaker 4>I just like that. That's his abbreviated version for CON's philosophy.

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Well, he does say he have explained that our brains

0:54:15.480 --> 0:54:17.880
<v Speaker 3>don't have direct access to base reality. We have to

0:54:17.920 --> 0:54:21.760
<v Speaker 3>settle for interpreting the input from our faulty senses. Okay,

0:54:22.440 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 3>there you go, there you go. I only mentioned yeah.

0:54:27.880 --> 0:54:29.839
<v Speaker 4>Mas de dilutions on page sixty two.

0:54:30.640 --> 0:54:32.960
<v Speaker 3>I only mention them to show that smart people throughout

0:54:33.000 --> 0:54:35.600
<v Speaker 3>history have made arguments about the subjective nature reality that

0:54:35.640 --> 0:54:37.760
<v Speaker 3>are compatible with what you will read in these pages.

0:54:37.920 --> 0:54:38.120
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:54:39.000 --> 0:54:40.760
<v Speaker 3>Now not the case, Scott.

0:54:42.239 --> 0:54:46.880
<v Speaker 4>That is, you're saying, like Plato, Plato, David Hume, and

0:54:47.080 --> 0:54:48.319
<v Speaker 4>Kant agree.

0:54:48.000 --> 0:54:51.560
<v Speaker 3>With me, because for one thing, what Scott's been building

0:54:51.600 --> 0:54:54.720
<v Speaker 3>to this whole time is not like reality is entirely

0:54:54.800 --> 0:54:58.160
<v Speaker 3>subjective in the response and like the result of like

0:54:58.239 --> 0:55:02.200
<v Speaker 3>flawed senses. It's I Scott atoms understand reality and the

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:04.640
<v Speaker 3>only one did I was the right one, and you

0:55:04.719 --> 0:55:08.080
<v Speaker 3>need to understand how I'm right about reality in this

0:55:08.200 --> 0:55:17.040
<v Speaker 3>weird specific way, like great I a manual count appreciateor.

0:55:16.360 --> 0:55:18.480
<v Speaker 4>Scott Adams, Jesus, fuck.

0:55:19.200 --> 0:55:22.040
<v Speaker 3>It's good stuff. What are we what are we looking at? Next?

0:55:22.280 --> 0:55:26.840
<v Speaker 4>Mass Illusions on page sixty two. Yeah, okay, and that

0:55:26.920 --> 0:55:30.399
<v Speaker 4>one is back to back with when when reality bifurcated?

0:55:30.640 --> 0:55:33.239
<v Speaker 4>So you know, good stuff. But then within those like

0:55:33.360 --> 0:55:36.560
<v Speaker 4>nine pages, I am excited to get into that. I

0:55:36.600 --> 0:55:38.759
<v Speaker 4>do like that Mass Delusions is a little like five

0:55:38.840 --> 0:55:39.560
<v Speaker 4>pages long.

0:55:40.480 --> 0:55:42.759
<v Speaker 3>No, no, you don't need that much space to talk

0:55:42.760 --> 0:55:44.360
<v Speaker 3>about mass illusions. You know.

0:55:44.920 --> 0:55:47.360
<v Speaker 4>It's after confirmation bias.

0:55:48.880 --> 0:55:52.200
<v Speaker 3>There we go, and right before Salem witch trials and

0:55:52.360 --> 0:55:54.080
<v Speaker 3>orson Wells is more of the world.

0:56:00.400 --> 0:56:04.319
<v Speaker 2>I feel like Robert, like the word searches you could

0:56:04.360 --> 0:56:07.120
<v Speaker 2>do to find things in this book would be incredible.

0:56:08.000 --> 0:56:10.880
<v Speaker 3>I might do our good, old, our old stand by

0:56:10.960 --> 0:56:13.120
<v Speaker 3>word search and just see what he has to say

0:56:13.120 --> 0:56:14.880
<v Speaker 3>about the Jewish people.

0:56:16.120 --> 0:56:17.160
<v Speaker 4>Control f Jew?

0:56:18.040 --> 0:56:22.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, control f Jew. If you don't know how frequently

0:56:22.360 --> 0:56:25.359
<v Speaker 3>mass illusions occur in your daily experience, many of your

0:56:25.360 --> 0:56:27.759
<v Speaker 3>opinions about the world are likely to be nonsense in

0:56:27.840 --> 0:56:32.799
<v Speaker 3>your daily experience. Yeah, that's because mass illusions are the

0:56:32.800 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 3>norm for humanity, not the exception. Don't believe me. It's

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:38.400
<v Speaker 3>easy to check. Just ask your neighbors about the religious

0:56:38.440 --> 0:56:42.000
<v Speaker 3>and political views. You'll find plenty of disagreement with your worldview.

0:56:42.200 --> 0:56:44.040
<v Speaker 3>And so, according to you, your neighbors and all the

0:56:44.040 --> 0:56:45.680
<v Speaker 3>people who agree with them must be living in some

0:56:45.719 --> 0:56:49.200
<v Speaker 3>sort of hallucion. No, they're not, are you talking about?

0:56:50.400 --> 0:56:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Like my dad is a conservative and believes different things

0:56:54.640 --> 0:56:56.719
<v Speaker 3>about the way rich people should be tact I don't

0:56:56.719 --> 0:56:59.920
<v Speaker 3>think he's hallucinating. I think he has a series of

0:57:00.160 --> 0:57:03.960
<v Speaker 3>opinions based on a mix of like things propaganda that

0:57:04.000 --> 0:57:07.000
<v Speaker 3>he's consumed, and what's financially best for him. But that's

0:57:07.040 --> 0:57:08.839
<v Speaker 3>not a hallucination, you can tell.

0:57:08.880 --> 0:57:11.560
<v Speaker 4>And this MAT's never read a single page of Plato,

0:57:11.680 --> 0:57:16.760
<v Speaker 4>David Hume, or Cot and only read the Wikipedia Submary, because.

0:57:17.320 --> 0:57:21.120
<v Speaker 3>Like when I when I encounter somebody in my community

0:57:21.200 --> 0:57:24.400
<v Speaker 3>who expresses a racist view or drops a slur, I

0:57:24.400 --> 0:57:27.800
<v Speaker 3>don't think they're hallucinating. I think they're a shitty person.

0:57:28.400 --> 0:57:31.680
<v Speaker 3>Like that's that, Like there's a there's a difference between

0:57:31.720 --> 0:57:34.680
<v Speaker 3>those two things, Like it's it's like saying that, like

0:57:35.240 --> 0:57:38.000
<v Speaker 3>you have to believe if somebody disagrees with your worldview

0:57:38.040 --> 0:57:40.680
<v Speaker 3>that they're engaged in a hallucination. Like for one thing,

0:57:41.040 --> 0:57:44.200
<v Speaker 3>just a lot of times you encounter people who feel different,

0:57:44.240 --> 0:57:46.680
<v Speaker 3>Like when I encounter someone who is not a bad

0:57:46.760 --> 0:57:49.200
<v Speaker 3>person or not expressing anything mean, but is like I

0:57:49.200 --> 0:57:52.080
<v Speaker 3>don't know a Muslim or a Christian or something else

0:57:52.120 --> 0:57:53.880
<v Speaker 3>that I'm not. I don't think that they are a

0:57:53.960 --> 0:57:56.560
<v Speaker 3>Muslim or a Christian or whatever because they're engaged in

0:57:56.560 --> 0:57:59.280
<v Speaker 3>a mass hallucination. Like I didn't go to India and

0:57:59.280 --> 0:58:01.080
<v Speaker 3>meet a bunch of hind people and go, wow, look

0:58:01.080 --> 0:58:03.720
<v Speaker 3>at all these hallucinating people. Like no, it's just a

0:58:03.760 --> 0:58:06.440
<v Speaker 3>religion that's not my own. That's the way the world is.

0:58:06.560 --> 0:58:10.960
<v Speaker 3>Lots of people believe things I don't. It's like the

0:58:11.520 --> 0:58:14.120
<v Speaker 3>weird way to go about the world, so weird, like

0:58:14.160 --> 0:58:17.439
<v Speaker 3>that he believes everyone else thinks this way. Like there's

0:58:17.480 --> 0:58:20.280
<v Speaker 3>certainly like bigots who think that way, but like I

0:58:20.280 --> 0:58:22.560
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I've had a lot of conversations with people

0:58:22.640 --> 0:58:27.000
<v Speaker 3>of different religions and philosophical stances and political stances and

0:58:27.120 --> 0:58:30.040
<v Speaker 3>disagreed with them or not just felt the same way,

0:58:30.240 --> 0:58:32.200
<v Speaker 3>and neither of us walked away being like, well, that

0:58:32.240 --> 0:58:35.600
<v Speaker 3>guy's fucking tripping balls, Like that's such a strange way

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:36.640
<v Speaker 3>to describe this.

0:58:38.640 --> 0:58:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Anyway. Whatever.

0:58:40.080 --> 0:58:43.080
<v Speaker 3>Do you remember when millions of Americans believed President Obama

0:58:43.160 --> 0:58:45.680
<v Speaker 3>was a secret Muslim? That was a mass illusion? Now,

0:58:46.080 --> 0:58:50.000
<v Speaker 3>who was pushing that massed illusion? Scott? Was it Donald Trump?

0:58:50.040 --> 0:58:51.320
<v Speaker 3>The master persuader?

0:58:52.640 --> 0:58:54.600
<v Speaker 4>I guess he didn't persuade enough people.

0:58:54.960 --> 0:58:58.600
<v Speaker 3>No, he didn't persuade Scott. Do you remember when President

0:58:58.640 --> 0:59:01.000
<v Speaker 3>Trump got arrested and there were protests in the street

0:59:01.000 --> 0:59:03.040
<v Speaker 3>because they thought he was the next Hitler? That was

0:59:03.040 --> 0:59:05.920
<v Speaker 3>a mass delusion. He did try to coop the government

0:59:06.000 --> 0:59:08.120
<v Speaker 3>and put himself in as a dictator Scott.

0:59:08.360 --> 0:59:10.760
<v Speaker 4>To me, to be fair, this was what in twenty

0:59:10.800 --> 0:59:13.960
<v Speaker 4>seventeen when this book came out. Yeah, something like that.

0:59:14.120 --> 0:59:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but also that is just evidence the people who

0:59:17.400 --> 0:59:22.240
<v Speaker 3>protested may have caught something that Scott didn't, although I

0:59:22.280 --> 0:59:25.920
<v Speaker 3>don't think he thinks J six was bad, So it's fine.

0:59:26.640 --> 0:59:28.560
<v Speaker 3>Do you remember the dot com bubble that was based

0:59:28.600 --> 0:59:31.400
<v Speaker 3>on mass illusions about the value of money losing startups?

0:59:31.440 --> 0:59:35.880
<v Speaker 3>Every other financial bubble was also a mass illusion. Well, partly,

0:59:35.960 --> 0:59:38.120
<v Speaker 3>but they were also largely cons like a lot of

0:59:38.160 --> 0:59:40.240
<v Speaker 3>the people who made money on the dot com bubble

0:59:40.560 --> 0:59:44.520
<v Speaker 3>knew it was going to collapse and very intelligently figured

0:59:44.520 --> 0:59:46.360
<v Speaker 3>out how to make as much money as they could

0:59:46.600 --> 0:59:49.640
<v Speaker 3>by taking advantage of dumb people, much like people did

0:59:49.640 --> 0:59:53.120
<v Speaker 3>with crypto or every other financial bubble. Like he's only

0:59:53.160 --> 0:59:55.680
<v Speaker 3>focusing on like the side that's delusion and of the

0:59:55.760 --> 0:59:58.440
<v Speaker 3>side that's bad people trying to take advantage of other

0:59:58.480 --> 1:00:00.280
<v Speaker 3>people also interesting to me.

1:00:01.960 --> 1:00:02.560
<v Speaker 4>Oh, here we go.

1:00:02.600 --> 1:00:04.920
<v Speaker 3>Below is a starter list of more than thirty notable

1:00:05.000 --> 1:00:09.600
<v Speaker 3>mass delutions. Wikipedia lists over thirty examples of mass hysteria

1:00:09.640 --> 1:00:10.440
<v Speaker 3>through years.

1:00:12.000 --> 1:00:18.320
<v Speaker 4>Did he say that his quote Wikipedia? In this Wikipedia

1:00:18.800 --> 1:00:19.600
<v Speaker 4>and now he's.

1:00:19.480 --> 1:00:21.520
<v Speaker 3>Just like, yeah, he's going through the same he's just

1:00:21.600 --> 1:00:25.240
<v Speaker 3>dropping the list he found a Honestly, this is extra.

1:00:25.040 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 4>English Dictionary describes mass solutions.

1:00:27.920 --> 1:00:30.960
<v Speaker 3>I do have some respect for Scott here because this

1:00:31.040 --> 1:00:34.160
<v Speaker 3>is a really like the next like mini pages of

1:00:34.200 --> 1:00:37.720
<v Speaker 3>the book are just him like summarizing the Wikipedia entry

1:00:37.800 --> 1:00:38.720
<v Speaker 3>for mass illusion.

1:00:39.120 --> 1:00:39.960
<v Speaker 4>And that's an.

1:00:39.760 --> 1:00:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Easy way to write a book. It's hard to write

1:00:42.040 --> 1:00:43.560
<v Speaker 3>a book when you do real research.

1:00:43.960 --> 1:00:47.960
<v Speaker 4>This would get like this would be like like if

1:00:48.000 --> 1:00:49.800
<v Speaker 4>you're trying to submit this in school, it would be

1:00:49.840 --> 1:00:52.520
<v Speaker 4>like sent back. You're like, no, you have to find

1:00:52.520 --> 1:00:57.080
<v Speaker 4>a real You can't cite Wikipedia. You can't. You can't

1:00:57.120 --> 1:00:59.960
<v Speaker 4>explicitly say I got this list from Wikipedia.

1:01:00.080 --> 1:01:05.280
<v Speaker 3>Uh yeah, Uh, it's it's funny anyway. This chunk of

1:01:05.320 --> 1:01:08.200
<v Speaker 3>the book ends on him saying Trump was wrong to

1:01:08.240 --> 1:01:11.080
<v Speaker 3>call climate change a hoax, but he was also right

1:01:11.240 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>because he called out the Paris Climate Accord and it

1:01:13.640 --> 1:01:16.600
<v Speaker 3>was expensive for the US and wouldn't lower temperatures. So

1:01:17.040 --> 1:01:19.320
<v Speaker 3>the fact that Trump said climate change was wrong is

1:01:19.360 --> 1:01:22.520
<v Speaker 3>fine because the Paris Accord was a lie that would

1:01:22.520 --> 1:01:27.160
<v Speaker 3>have benefited China. That's That's Scott Adams's opinion on the

1:01:27.160 --> 1:01:28.160
<v Speaker 3>Paris Climate Accord.

1:01:28.720 --> 1:01:30.760
<v Speaker 4>I'm glad he's changed from being a cartoonist into a

1:01:30.760 --> 1:01:33.040
<v Speaker 4>political anist again.

1:01:33.280 --> 1:01:36.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad. I love like switching from Scott being like

1:01:36.760 --> 1:01:39.400
<v Speaker 3>nobody understands politics, which is why I don't give my

1:01:39.440 --> 1:01:42.760
<v Speaker 3>opinions on politics too. The Paris Climate Accord couldn't lower

1:01:42.880 --> 1:01:45.280
<v Speaker 3>like Scott, I don't know, man like his stands. His

1:01:45.880 --> 1:01:48.000
<v Speaker 3>argument is that like no one disagrees with it any

1:01:48.000 --> 1:01:51.360
<v Speaker 3>of this, I don't know. I bet they do. Scott,

1:01:51.960 --> 1:01:54.960
<v Speaker 3>you haven't cited anything here. You just say I agree

1:01:55.000 --> 1:01:56.640
<v Speaker 3>on this, There's there's no citation.

1:01:57.000 --> 1:02:00.120
<v Speaker 4>He's like, yes, side of Wikipedia.

1:01:59.600 --> 1:02:06.920
<v Speaker 3>He did previously site Wikipedia on a separate topic. Okay,

1:02:07.040 --> 1:02:09.360
<v Speaker 3>So what do we want to close out on here?

1:02:10.600 --> 1:02:15.400
<v Speaker 4>Zo? There's so many good ones, Like.

1:02:16.400 --> 1:02:18.560
<v Speaker 3>I do want to know what isis in the Vatican

1:02:18.720 --> 1:02:25.520
<v Speaker 3>means oh God, which is what immediately precedes ros O'Donnell i.

1:02:25.720 --> 1:02:27.960
<v Speaker 4>Also, I also want to briefly look at how to

1:02:28.000 --> 1:02:29.520
<v Speaker 4>design a linguistic kill shot.

1:02:29.760 --> 1:02:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Just oh, you know what I think that this is.

1:02:32.520 --> 1:02:36.320
<v Speaker 3>So this is trump o Trump's Rosio o'donald moment. Okay,

1:02:36.360 --> 1:02:40.000
<v Speaker 3>so yeah, this is like him explaining how Trump's genius

1:02:40.000 --> 1:02:45.440
<v Speaker 3>strategy of like insulting people works. As the election started

1:02:45.480 --> 1:02:47.360
<v Speaker 3>getting traction in all of our minds in the summer

1:02:47.400 --> 1:02:49.760
<v Speaker 3>of twenty fifteen, I was experimenting with a new comic

1:02:49.800 --> 1:02:52.160
<v Speaker 3>that featured a talking robot that never moves, he just

1:02:52.200 --> 1:02:54.280
<v Speaker 3>reads the news. You can see in this comic that

1:02:54.320 --> 1:02:56.880
<v Speaker 3>I had already noticed Trump's successful use of persuasion that

1:02:56.960 --> 1:03:02.360
<v Speaker 3>was confusing the prop the public. And this is Robots

1:03:02.440 --> 1:03:04.919
<v Speaker 3>Read News by Scott Adams, And it is in fact

1:03:04.920 --> 1:03:08.400
<v Speaker 3>a poorly drawn robot reading the news. Donald Trump keeps

1:03:08.440 --> 1:03:11.280
<v Speaker 3>saying dumb things because he is so darned dumb, unlike you.

1:03:11.440 --> 1:03:13.640
<v Speaker 3>He is also surging in the polls while putting almost

1:03:13.640 --> 1:03:16.160
<v Speaker 3>no effort into it. So how is smart working out

1:03:16.200 --> 1:03:18.840
<v Speaker 3>for you? I don't know, man, It does seem like

1:03:18.920 --> 1:03:22.200
<v Speaker 3>he was constantly touring the country and doing events. I

1:03:22.240 --> 1:03:24.480
<v Speaker 3>don't think anyone thought he wasn't putting effort into it.

1:03:26.320 --> 1:03:28.960
<v Speaker 3>I guess this is a real own on the people

1:03:29.000 --> 1:03:32.440
<v Speaker 3>who said that Trump was dumb, which, you know, to

1:03:32.480 --> 1:03:34.800
<v Speaker 3>be fair, I have always thought was a mistake on

1:03:34.840 --> 1:03:36.120
<v Speaker 3>behalf of some Democrats.

1:03:36.160 --> 1:03:37.160
<v Speaker 4>But I don't know.

1:03:38.280 --> 1:03:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Whatever, Scott, it's not really a joke, but we'll give

1:03:42.840 --> 1:03:45.240
<v Speaker 3>you that one. So but I didn't know how big

1:03:45.280 --> 1:03:47.120
<v Speaker 3>a deal this was until what I now called the

1:03:47.240 --> 1:03:50.600
<v Speaker 3>Rosi O'Donnell moment. In the first Republican debate on August sixth,

1:03:50.640 --> 1:03:53.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty fifteen. Megan Kelly was moderating, and her first question

1:03:53.400 --> 1:03:55.400
<v Speaker 3>to Trump should have ended his campaign on the spot.

1:03:55.720 --> 1:03:58.080
<v Speaker 3>Only a few people in the world could have escaped

1:03:58.120 --> 1:04:00.440
<v Speaker 3>her trap started.

1:04:00.520 --> 1:04:03.120
<v Speaker 4>Okay, okay, yeah.

1:04:03.000 --> 1:04:05.120
<v Speaker 3>So what Megan Kelly was like, you call women you

1:04:05.160 --> 1:04:08.080
<v Speaker 3>don't like fat pigs, slogs or disgusting animals, and Trump

1:04:08.080 --> 1:04:13.240
<v Speaker 3>said only Rosie o'donald, right or o'donald. Sorry.

1:04:13.440 --> 1:04:14.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. Uh.

1:04:15.320 --> 1:04:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Scott calls this a master stroke of persuasion executed perfectly

1:04:19.840 --> 1:04:23.800
<v Speaker 3>in front of the world. He got goosebumps. Oh what

1:04:24.200 --> 1:04:27.840
<v Speaker 3>the mask? He insulted somebody he like, made a mean joke.

1:04:28.040 --> 1:04:31.880
<v Speaker 3>People do that all the time. I got they don't

1:04:31.920 --> 1:04:34.120
<v Speaker 3>usually do it while running for president, but they do

1:04:34.200 --> 1:04:34.880
<v Speaker 3>it all the time.

1:04:36.800 --> 1:04:38.560
<v Speaker 4>I like that. I guess Scott describes this as like

1:04:38.640 --> 1:04:40.680
<v Speaker 4>as like a transcendent experience for him.

1:04:41.000 --> 1:04:45.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Yeah, he's like full body orgasming over Donald Trump

1:04:45.080 --> 1:04:49.600
<v Speaker 3>making a mean comment about Rosio Donald thinking of his joke. Yeah,

1:04:50.120 --> 1:04:55.840
<v Speaker 3>it's uh, it's it's it's fun. So yeah, that's Trump's

1:04:55.840 --> 1:04:59.360
<v Speaker 3>weapons grade persuasion is insulting Rosy o'donald during an interview

1:04:59.360 --> 1:05:03.560
<v Speaker 3>with Megan Kell, an interview largely made for people who

1:05:03.640 --> 1:05:07.720
<v Speaker 3>were already voting for him, that I don't know if

1:05:07.720 --> 1:05:11.480
<v Speaker 3>I think actually convinced anybody of anything, but you know, again,

1:05:11.600 --> 1:05:14.320
<v Speaker 3>there's always like pieces of accuracy here. Yeah. One of

1:05:14.360 --> 1:05:16.880
<v Speaker 3>the things about Trump's political strategy was effective was that

1:05:16.920 --> 1:05:19.400
<v Speaker 3>he didn't do the normal thing of like apologizing and

1:05:19.520 --> 1:05:24.160
<v Speaker 3>backtracking when criticized, which is you know, effective. It allows

1:05:24.160 --> 1:05:27.160
<v Speaker 3>you to spend less time dealing with like the the

1:05:27.200 --> 1:05:31.200
<v Speaker 3>critiques of your of your political opponents. It's again also

1:05:31.320 --> 1:05:36.080
<v Speaker 3>a pretty well worn political strategy, particularly for authoritarians. It's

1:05:36.120 --> 1:05:41.720
<v Speaker 3>not wildly new, but there you go. That's that's Scott

1:05:41.760 --> 1:05:47.080
<v Speaker 3>Adams explaining how Trump persuaded America by calling Rose O'Donnell fat,

1:05:47.520 --> 1:05:50.640
<v Speaker 3>a thing no no other comedian had ever done before.

1:05:51.040 --> 1:05:53.720
<v Speaker 3>I think that multiple South Park episodes never did.

1:05:55.200 --> 1:05:57.240
<v Speaker 4>Oh there, there is there is an index at the

1:05:57.320 --> 1:05:59.000
<v Speaker 4>very end of the book that I have access to.

1:05:59.760 --> 1:06:05.880
<v Speaker 4>They they cite black Swan, So that's good. That's it's good. Yeah,

1:06:05.920 --> 1:06:09.480
<v Speaker 4>he's index. Yeah, is a mix to the back. He

1:06:09.560 --> 1:06:13.800
<v Speaker 4>cites Delvert one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve,

1:06:13.800 --> 1:06:17.320
<v Speaker 4>thirty forty. He sites Delbert fourteen times.

1:06:17.840 --> 1:06:18.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that makes sense.

1:06:20.200 --> 1:06:22.840
<v Speaker 4>He cites Donald Duck and trying to swap back to back.

1:06:22.920 --> 1:06:27.200
<v Speaker 4>That's good. The KKKA has a few shoutouts. The last

1:06:27.200 --> 1:06:29.880
<v Speaker 4>thing I do want to see is, let me is

1:06:30.120 --> 1:06:33.200
<v Speaker 4>is the how to design a linguistic kill shop? Because

1:06:33.240 --> 1:06:36.480
<v Speaker 4>I think we should at least give listeners one piece

1:06:36.520 --> 1:06:38.320
<v Speaker 4>of actionable advice.

1:06:38.680 --> 1:06:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so they can do that so that you can

1:06:40.720 --> 1:06:44.120
<v Speaker 3>keep a linguistic kill shop loaded up, and can somebody

1:06:44.160 --> 1:06:45.480
<v Speaker 3>like mugs you on the street.

1:06:45.720 --> 1:06:50.919
<v Speaker 4>You can conceal carry it actually fairly easily shoulder. That's

1:06:50.920 --> 1:06:53.560
<v Speaker 4>on page one. Okay.

1:06:55.000 --> 1:06:57.200
<v Speaker 3>Over the course of the election, we saw Trump assign

1:06:57.280 --> 1:07:00.480
<v Speaker 3>one sticky nickname after another to his opponents. It seems

1:07:00.480 --> 1:07:02.840
<v Speaker 3>as if each new nickname was a winner. Clinton's team

1:07:02.840 --> 1:07:05.400
<v Speaker 3>tried a few nicknames for Trump, but they failed badly.

1:07:05.760 --> 1:07:08.920
<v Speaker 3>None of this is a coincidence. Trump's nicknames are deeply engineered,

1:07:08.960 --> 1:07:11.480
<v Speaker 3>and they were tested in front of life audiences. And

1:07:11.520 --> 1:07:14.240
<v Speaker 3>then he goes and like, I do think actually, if

1:07:14.280 --> 1:07:16.200
<v Speaker 3>you're looking at like, what are things that Trump did

1:07:16.200 --> 1:07:18.920
<v Speaker 3>that made him a successful campaigner? His ability to like,

1:07:19.000 --> 1:07:21.640
<v Speaker 3>that's part of why I don't think that Ron DeSantis

1:07:21.720 --> 1:07:23.800
<v Speaker 3>has any chance of beating him.

1:07:23.920 --> 1:07:25.200
<v Speaker 4>Is putting putting her on?

1:07:26.080 --> 1:07:31.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, putting her on, and then it's over. Then it's done. Yeah,

1:07:31.960 --> 1:07:33.720
<v Speaker 3>So let's let's let's let's give him here.

1:07:34.920 --> 1:07:35.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:07:36.120 --> 1:07:39.600
<v Speaker 3>It's also like the most obvious tactic that he engages in.

1:07:40.400 --> 1:07:41.400
<v Speaker 4>But here we go.

1:07:42.640 --> 1:07:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Wow, he has two Elizabeth Warren nicknames on here.

1:07:45.920 --> 1:07:52.480
<v Speaker 4>Oh, No, that's good. I bet you. I bet they's

1:07:52.560 --> 1:07:53.560
<v Speaker 4>somehow racist.

1:07:54.280 --> 1:07:56.280
<v Speaker 3>It is interesting he doesn't have any of his nicknames

1:07:56.280 --> 1:08:00.680
<v Speaker 3>for Biden on here, maybe because against Biden.

1:08:00.960 --> 1:08:03.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Biden was not a big player in twenty seventeen.

1:08:03.480 --> 1:08:06.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Anna, I think you're right. Uh yeah, if you

1:08:06.760 --> 1:08:08.800
<v Speaker 3>thought the names were nothing more than common insults, you

1:08:08.840 --> 1:08:11.200
<v Speaker 3>missed a lot of his persuasion engineering. I'll walk you

1:08:11.240 --> 1:08:14.000
<v Speaker 3>through it in this chapter. How powerful were Trump's nicknames?

1:08:14.280 --> 1:08:16.800
<v Speaker 3>So powerful that the day I heard Trump say low energy,

1:08:16.880 --> 1:08:19.479
<v Speaker 3>Jeb I predicted Bush was done and blogged that opinion

1:08:19.520 --> 1:08:22.720
<v Speaker 3>in August twenty seventh. Keep in mind that literally no

1:08:22.800 --> 1:08:25.000
<v Speaker 3>other pundits saw this nickname as important to the like

1:08:25.120 --> 1:08:29.040
<v Speaker 3>now that lady is true, but also everyone who saw

1:08:29.240 --> 1:08:32.080
<v Speaker 3>from the moment I saw Jeb Bush on the fucking

1:08:32.080 --> 1:08:33.880
<v Speaker 3>debate stage, I said, well, this is a guy who

1:08:33.880 --> 1:08:37.640
<v Speaker 3>can't be president. He was like everyone knew, he was pitiful.

1:08:37.960 --> 1:08:41.120
<v Speaker 3>I liked there were some I like that he raims.

1:08:41.439 --> 1:08:45.600
<v Speaker 4>I like I like that he frames like listening to

1:08:45.680 --> 1:08:47.799
<v Speaker 4>Trump as like reading tarot carts.

1:08:48.240 --> 1:08:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it is interesting because again, there's a reasonable case

1:08:51.760 --> 1:08:53.679
<v Speaker 3>to be made for talking about the way in which

1:08:53.760 --> 1:08:57.640
<v Speaker 3>Trump uses insults and mockery as a political strategy, but

1:08:58.360 --> 1:09:01.439
<v Speaker 3>like being like, and that's why Jim Bush isn't the president. No,

1:09:01.520 --> 1:09:03.679
<v Speaker 3>Jeb Bush is the president because he was never going

1:09:03.720 --> 1:09:06.759
<v Speaker 3>to be the president. That was never in the cars

1:09:07.160 --> 1:09:12.799
<v Speaker 3>because he is jib Bush. It's that's that's so funny.

1:09:13.200 --> 1:09:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Uh uh.

1:09:15.760 --> 1:09:21.439
<v Speaker 3>He just talks about why the nicknames are accurate nicknames. Okay, yeah,

1:09:22.040 --> 1:09:23.360
<v Speaker 3>that's that's that's good.

1:09:26.280 --> 1:09:30.479
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

1:09:30.600 --> 1:09:33.599
<v Speaker 3>Do you want him to read him analyzing lion Ted

1:09:33.760 --> 1:09:35.080
<v Speaker 3>for three pages?

1:09:36.520 --> 1:09:39.240
<v Speaker 4>He does. He does a three page analysis of lying

1:09:39.320 --> 1:09:40.679
<v Speaker 4>Ted lying Ted?

1:09:43.479 --> 1:09:47.840
<v Speaker 3>What does include the sentence lion Ted simply looked like

1:09:47.920 --> 1:09:53.599
<v Speaker 3>a liar. Look, he's not always wrong. And I saw

1:09:53.680 --> 1:09:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Ted Cruz, I was like, that guy is a liar.

1:09:56.160 --> 1:09:58.080
<v Speaker 4>I like him. We can always turn to Scott Adams

1:09:58.120 --> 1:10:01.160
<v Speaker 4>for this cutting edge political analysis.

1:10:01.240 --> 1:10:08.960
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely, yeah, it's it's also funny. Like part of what's

1:10:08.960 --> 1:10:13.520
<v Speaker 3>fun about these nicknames isn't that like they're they're super complex,

1:10:13.680 --> 1:10:17.360
<v Speaker 3>and it isn't that they engineer opinion. It's that it's

1:10:17.439 --> 1:10:21.200
<v Speaker 3>so easy to like cut people who are kind of

1:10:21.240 --> 1:10:26.800
<v Speaker 3>obsessed with the like playing at being at the politests

1:10:26.880 --> 1:10:32.679
<v Speaker 3>of like a political etiquette and just being a dick

1:10:32.960 --> 1:10:35.240
<v Speaker 3>is powerful, right, if you're playing a different game than

1:10:35.280 --> 1:10:39.120
<v Speaker 3>everyone else. Yeah, that's powerful, but also like it only

1:10:39.160 --> 1:10:41.960
<v Speaker 3>worked the one time. He tried all of this again

1:10:42.120 --> 1:10:44.840
<v Speaker 3>in twenty twenty, and he lost by the most that

1:10:44.920 --> 1:10:47.559
<v Speaker 3>any president has ever lost in terms of like like

1:10:47.760 --> 1:10:48.639
<v Speaker 3>actual votes.

1:10:48.960 --> 1:10:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Okay, I'm at the end of the book now. I

1:10:52.400 --> 1:10:56.519
<v Speaker 4>just found I just found three amazing, amazing things back

1:10:56.560 --> 1:10:59.240
<v Speaker 4>to back. So at the very end, after the acknowledgments,

1:10:59.280 --> 1:11:03.720
<v Speaker 4>there is there's like four appendixes, but the first three

1:11:03.760 --> 1:11:05.920
<v Speaker 4>are the ones that I think are really interesting. The

1:11:05.960 --> 1:11:09.200
<v Speaker 4>first one is the Persuasion Reading List, which might have

1:11:09.280 --> 1:11:12.920
<v Speaker 4>some really funny finds. At the end, there's also the

1:11:13.320 --> 1:11:15.880
<v Speaker 4>Appendix B is how to be a better writer. It's

1:11:15.880 --> 1:11:23.040
<v Speaker 4>two pages long. And then Appendix C is how to

1:11:23.240 --> 1:11:25.320
<v Speaker 4>find out if you are in a simulation.

1:11:26.080 --> 1:11:28.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, I was looking at that just a second ago.

1:11:31.000 --> 1:11:33.599
<v Speaker 4>So you can first of all, get a get get

1:11:33.640 --> 1:11:35.680
<v Speaker 4>a list of books to read, become a become a

1:11:35.680 --> 1:11:37.960
<v Speaker 4>better writer, and then find out if you're living in

1:11:37.960 --> 1:11:41.960
<v Speaker 4>a computer. All within the span of seven fass.

1:11:41.960 --> 1:11:47.599
<v Speaker 3>Ikun approached writing a fucking non fiction book, I think,

1:11:47.600 --> 1:11:49.920
<v Speaker 3>and I think he literally Appendix C is just one

1:11:49.960 --> 1:11:52.880
<v Speaker 3>of his old blog posts that he's quoting, he talks about,

1:11:53.080 --> 1:12:00.760
<v Speaker 3>he talks about simulation theory. Man, oh god, yeah, I'm

1:12:00.840 --> 1:12:05.080
<v Speaker 3>not interested in anything less than I am fucking brained

1:12:05.120 --> 1:12:09.200
<v Speaker 3>idiots talking about the theory that we live in a simulation.

1:12:10.160 --> 1:12:15.920
<v Speaker 3>Uh you know what's simulated, your fucking dick, Scott, this podcast,

1:12:15.960 --> 1:12:17.000
<v Speaker 3>your weird.

1:12:16.840 --> 1:12:18.160
<v Speaker 4>Penis is a simulation.

1:12:20.000 --> 1:12:22.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's that's That's what I gotta say.

1:12:22.000 --> 1:12:23.679
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think I think I think you should find

1:12:23.760 --> 1:12:27.280
<v Speaker 4>one book on on the reading list that we should recommend,

1:12:27.320 --> 1:12:30.799
<v Speaker 4>and then give one one writing tip via Scott Adams,

1:12:30.800 --> 1:12:32.719
<v Speaker 4>and then we can call it a day. Okay.

1:12:33.200 --> 1:12:35.720
<v Speaker 3>His writing tip is to write whatever you're writing the

1:12:35.720 --> 1:12:37.880
<v Speaker 3>way Trump writes things, because are you writer?

1:12:37.960 --> 1:12:43.439
<v Speaker 4>Are you serious? Yes? Trump's not a good writer.

1:12:45.280 --> 1:12:48.679
<v Speaker 3>I think there is like a difference between like Trump

1:12:48.960 --> 1:12:52.240
<v Speaker 3>was effective at a good ship poster on Twitter and

1:12:52.280 --> 1:12:54.479
<v Speaker 3>Trump was objectively a great ship.

1:12:54.280 --> 1:12:55.880
<v Speaker 4>Post yea, but not on purpose.

1:12:57.640 --> 1:13:00.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know we can debate that. But also I

1:13:00.800 --> 1:13:04.519
<v Speaker 3>don't think like it's kind of like saying like how

1:13:04.520 --> 1:13:06.000
<v Speaker 3>to be a better right now, how to be a

1:13:06.040 --> 1:13:09.160
<v Speaker 3>better poster on Twitter? Like I would take you can

1:13:09.160 --> 1:13:13.000
<v Speaker 3>take you can take Donald Trump's advice on that writing

1:13:13.200 --> 1:13:16.240
<v Speaker 3>is a little bit wider of a discipline, and you

1:13:16.320 --> 1:13:18.840
<v Speaker 3>might wind up having some difficulty if you if you

1:13:18.880 --> 1:13:21.639
<v Speaker 3>try to take the Donald Trump approach to I don't know,

1:13:22.560 --> 1:13:25.880
<v Speaker 3>becoming an editor on Wikipedia so that Scott Adams will

1:13:25.880 --> 1:13:30.760
<v Speaker 3>appreciate your work. Nothing against Wikipedia, it's just funny that

1:13:30.760 --> 1:13:37.280
<v Speaker 3>that's the only source he's cited other than Plato. Okay,

1:13:37.280 --> 1:13:42.760
<v Speaker 3>here's some other advice that he has. Uh, your first

1:13:42.760 --> 1:13:44.920
<v Speaker 3>sentence needs to grab the reader. Go back and read

1:13:44.960 --> 1:13:46.880
<v Speaker 3>my first sentence in this post. I rewrote it a

1:13:46.880 --> 1:13:48.519
<v Speaker 3>dozen times. It makes you curious.

1:13:48.560 --> 1:13:49.080
<v Speaker 4>That's the key.

1:13:49.120 --> 1:13:52.400
<v Speaker 3>His first sentence is good writing is also persuasive writing.

1:13:52.800 --> 1:13:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Jesus Christ, Scott, that's the dry shit I've ever heard.

1:13:59.200 --> 1:13:59.800
<v Speaker 4>Oh my god.

1:14:01.479 --> 1:14:05.080
<v Speaker 3>So for his his on his persuasion reading list, I

1:14:05.160 --> 1:14:08.680
<v Speaker 3>accidentally wound up on this, but it includes how to

1:14:08.760 --> 1:14:12.920
<v Speaker 3>Hypnotize Anyone, Confessions of a Rogue Hypnotist, and then in brackets,

1:14:13.120 --> 1:14:18.240
<v Speaker 3>I have not read this book, but what it probably

1:14:18.320 --> 1:14:20.559
<v Speaker 3>gives you a good taste of the topic.

1:14:24.800 --> 1:14:28.439
<v Speaker 4>That's so funny. He's recommending a book he hasn't read

1:14:29.520 --> 1:14:37.880
<v Speaker 4>and he admits it. Yeah, he didn't even read reading list.

1:14:37.960 --> 1:14:39.639
<v Speaker 4>It's probably a good idea. I don't know.

1:14:40.479 --> 1:14:45.080
<v Speaker 3>He admits there's a Tony Robbins book on here. Yeah,

1:14:46.080 --> 1:14:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Trump The Art of the Deal, of course, Yeah, tells

1:14:50.080 --> 1:14:52.559
<v Speaker 3>you to take a fucking Dale Carnegie class.

1:14:53.600 --> 1:14:58.400
<v Speaker 4>Uh great, Yeah, that that tracks.

1:14:58.439 --> 1:15:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, good stuff. So yeah, I think that's that's a

1:15:05.320 --> 1:15:07.160
<v Speaker 3>good look at Scott Adams's book.

1:15:08.120 --> 1:15:10.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think, I think I think that is a

1:15:10.320 --> 1:15:13.840
<v Speaker 4>that is a decent a decent dive into the mind

1:15:13.880 --> 1:15:14.880
<v Speaker 4>of Scott Adams.

1:15:14.960 --> 1:15:17.439
<v Speaker 3>Are you ready to go into the world now, Garrison

1:15:17.479 --> 1:15:19.160
<v Speaker 3>and become a master persuader?

1:15:20.120 --> 1:15:23.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, I'm gonna be working on my I think,

1:15:23.160 --> 1:15:26.080
<v Speaker 4>I I think if I get I mean organ does

1:15:26.120 --> 1:15:29.360
<v Speaker 4>not have the does not have the round capacity limit yet,

1:15:29.360 --> 1:15:31.800
<v Speaker 4>because I'm trying to figure out how many linguistic kill

1:15:31.800 --> 1:15:34.719
<v Speaker 4>shots I'm allowed to carry with me at at any

1:15:34.760 --> 1:15:35.360
<v Speaker 4>point in time.

1:15:36.560 --> 1:15:38.519
<v Speaker 3>But once Yeah, yes, I think you can still have

1:15:38.600 --> 1:15:43.240
<v Speaker 3>thirty linguistic kills loaded and in violation of state law.

1:15:44.320 --> 1:15:46.800
<v Speaker 4>So I'll spend it. I'll spend it. I'll spend a

1:15:46.800 --> 1:15:48.400
<v Speaker 4>few hours coming up with those so I can just

1:15:48.439 --> 1:15:53.200
<v Speaker 4>have them at the ready. Yeah.

1:15:53.520 --> 1:15:56.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm just gonna call people low energy, Jeb, even if

1:15:56.320 --> 1:15:57.040
<v Speaker 3>they're not named.

1:16:02.240 --> 1:16:02.360
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

1:16:02.880 --> 1:16:09.000
<v Speaker 3>That was the that that that was pretty funny. Okay,

1:16:09.400 --> 1:16:12.320
<v Speaker 3>so uh yeah, that's uh, that's our man.

1:16:12.640 --> 1:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Garrison, you would like to plug.

1:16:16.840 --> 1:16:18.920
<v Speaker 4>I guess the one thing I could plug is I

1:16:19.120 --> 1:16:22.040
<v Speaker 4>recently on It could Happen Here, I finished a shocking

1:16:22.960 --> 1:16:27.360
<v Speaker 4>five episodes worth of content about about the the last

1:16:27.439 --> 1:16:30.400
<v Speaker 4>week of action in Atlanta to stop cop City. I

1:16:30.400 --> 1:16:32.559
<v Speaker 4>believe we should have that put into a compilation as

1:16:32.560 --> 1:16:35.559
<v Speaker 4>well by now. But yeah, that that is. That is

1:16:35.720 --> 1:16:37.720
<v Speaker 4>on the you could Happen Here feed for the last

1:16:37.720 --> 1:16:40.559
<v Speaker 4>week of action. And uh, I mean as of as

1:16:40.600 --> 1:16:44.799
<v Speaker 4>of recording, the the city council process to to approve

1:16:44.800 --> 1:16:47.120
<v Speaker 4>the funding for that is ongoing. There's been there was

1:16:47.120 --> 1:16:49.479
<v Speaker 4>like five hundred people showing up I think like just

1:16:49.520 --> 1:16:52.880
<v Speaker 4>like two days ago as of time of recording to

1:16:53.120 --> 1:16:56.439
<v Speaker 4>give public comment. And that's that process is gonna last

1:16:56.479 --> 1:16:58.559
<v Speaker 4>a few more weeks, so we will see, we will

1:16:58.600 --> 1:17:01.639
<v Speaker 4>see how how that goes. You can you can keep

1:17:01.720 --> 1:17:03.920
<v Speaker 4>up to date with that with the with the Atlantic

1:17:03.960 --> 1:17:07.439
<v Speaker 4>Community Press Collective. So yeah, that is that is it?

1:17:08.360 --> 1:17:16.960
<v Speaker 3>Excellent? Well you can find me, yeah we can mm hmmm.

1:17:18.960 --> 1:17:24.479
<v Speaker 1>Bye. Behind the Bastards is a production of cool Zone Media.

1:17:24.800 --> 1:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>For more from cool Zone Media. Visit our website coolzonemedia

1:17:28.280 --> 1:17:31.479
<v Speaker 1>dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

1:17:31.560 --> 1:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.