WEBVTT - Boris Johnson, The Yen, And The Fed (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:24.919
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Lots of interesting news

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the UK. Prime Minister Boris Johnson steps down,

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>so of course my question is what's next? And I

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>honestly don't know, but our next guest does. John Author's

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>senior editor for Bloomberg Opinion. John. It's not like they

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>got a vice premiere just sitting there waiting to take over.

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>They do. Do they have a vice premiere? And what

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:49.560
<v Speaker 1>does this vice premiere? Do you want me to answer

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>that question that there's a there is a title of

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:57.279
<v Speaker 1>depty prime Minister which has no constitutional significance. Okay, well,

0:00:58.560 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>given in the PA, there's a stop too disappointed office seekers.

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>In this case, Dominic rob who at one point got

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:15.960
<v Speaker 1>as far as in the Foreign Secretary, was named as

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>his deputy by Boris two or three years ago and

0:01:20.080 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>then did actually formally act up when, as he remembered,

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>U Boris had to go to the ICU with COVID.

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>He has says he's not running. He really wouldn't, Dominic

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>rob has, and he would have very little chance of

0:01:34.200 --> 0:01:40.920
<v Speaker 1>winning anyway. So there is this availability of he is

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a convenient guy that they can tap to be a

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>caretaker prime minister, given that a lot of Conservatives now

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>one Boris out of swift leest by the way it possible, John,

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 1>at this point we should make clear to those who

0:01:56.040 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>aren't Brits or political scientists that it's a system where

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you vote for the party, not the person. Right. So um, yes,

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>someone asked me earlier, how can Boris leave and be

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>replaced by a Tory leader. Doesn't the opposition get to

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>step in now or don't they have a general election?

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.919
<v Speaker 1>And that's not the case. No, no, no, he's been arguing,

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think this shows personally who chose that he

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>really doesn't quite understand the ways his own country's political

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>way of doing things. That he has a mandate. Certainly,

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>his popularity his personality helped the Conservatives win the nineteen

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>general election. That's true, but no, he does not have

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a personal mandate each individual MP has a mandate to

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>vote for somebody to be prime minister as they see fixed.

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty of examples in British history of prime ministers resigning,

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>standing down between elections and their the MP's in their party.

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday somebody, it was one of the most famous ones,

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Blair and pretty Blair standing there for Gordon Brown and

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>then both the last two Conservative prime ministers took over

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:18.240
<v Speaker 1>in mid term without general electure, both to reason and

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and Boris himself. So there's nothing there's nothing unusual about

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>about about a prime minister standing down and being replaced

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:28.359
<v Speaker 1>by his party. How about the whole concept of the

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>caretaker prime minister? Is that just a function of what

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>popularity you have left whether you can remain a caretaker

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>p m ntil there's another election. I know he's Rob

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is not going to be a leader to to go

0:03:44.600 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>into the election. No, I think Paul means Johnson wants

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to stay as the prime minister Protram until yes he does.

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>And I my opinion, my judgment from you know, from Afar,

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think he's going to be allowed to

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>do that. UM. Basically the problem for him and the

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that he showed really no contrition. Never used the

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>word sorry in his speech earlier. The problem for him

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>is that this isn't about some policy disagreement or some

0:04:20.120 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 1>political defeat. It's about the over majority of his colleagues saying,

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't trust you. You are not personally honest enough

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>to be our leader. It's not even the economy is stupid.

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>They just think he's a liar. Exactly we we we

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 1>don't trust you, You're a liar. Go And in these circumstances,

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>if the basis f you're saying, Theresa May can carry

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>on until they chosen a new leader. If she's resigned

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:52.360
<v Speaker 1>because they know people don't trust her to to make

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>a Brexit deal, so she's a terribly weakened position, but

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>she can carry on being the Prime minister until the

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>new guy gets David Cameron can announce his resigning as

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>soon as the referendum happens, but not actually stand down

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>until they've chosen somebody new. But in this case it's

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>not clear that you can do that because it's nothing

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 1>about politics per se. It's about you personally shouldn't be

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the Prime minister. You are not for this job, and

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>we don't trust you, which is a remarkable state of affairs,

0:05:26.560 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>but it does make it difficult for conservative in peace

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 1>to serve answer and for the for a matter of months,

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.600
<v Speaker 1>especially if THEE doesn't want to step up. Now you've

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:37.480
<v Speaker 1>got to figure out who. So it leaves a lot

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of questions, um unanswered, John, just quickly on the market.

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:43.880
<v Speaker 1>We've only got about thirty seconds, are we Is this

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>rally like a reverse ferret here? What's going on? But

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>rally in the pounds or no? No? In in markets?

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean do we just don't. We don't believe the

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>FED is going to fight inflation more than a recession.

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I think basically there was an immense shock created by

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, which has created a much shorter economic cycle

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.360
<v Speaker 1>than usual, And there is an immense shock created by

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact that at this point nobody is sure they

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 1>really do believe the feds guidance after two reverse ferrets

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>by the FED uh in quick succession. Therefore, it's a

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.559
<v Speaker 1>natural consequence of the market will gine call over the place?

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:29.599
<v Speaker 1>All right? I don't. I don't think there is any

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>clear cut reason to think that, yeah, the FED will

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>fold any more than there was for respect. I recommend

0:06:37.560 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>to listeners who are wondering what the heck a reverse

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>faret is. Yes, to go on Bloomberg dot com and

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>read John's column. Or if you have a Bloomberg terminal

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>in front of you, type ni authors and you can

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>read a reverse ferret gets up markets trousers by John Authors.

0:06:57.240 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Now we're bringing Massa Takeda. He's a portfolio manager for

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the Hennessy Japan Fund and this has been, uh, to

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>my mind, one of the most interesting stories that doesn't

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>get the coverage it deserves. Let's give it. The Bank

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of Japan is insistent that it's gonna hold rates to

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a quarter percent or lower, and the market mr market

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is testing them out. Now traditionally this trade is called

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the widow maker. You short jgbs, you short the end,

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and so many investors have gotten burned that it's earned

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>that moniker Massa Takeda, Are you one of those investors

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that's trying this again? Uh No, I'm just make fenty

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 1>vibes to conclupanies. Well, what do you think about the

0:07:50.480 --> 0:07:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Japan's will to hold out against the market?

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can they keep it uh pegged it a

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>quarter percent? Or will they have to let it slide

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>like the Swiss National Ank did a couple of years ago.

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Um well, it's hard to tell, but it seems like

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>a plank of plan is they're very much committed to

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the zero right policy and we have to control um.

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Now they're in a dilemma. Obviously, if they choose to

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>raise rates, then of course it's going to hurt the economy.

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>We're just you know, coming out of the pandemic. Um.

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>So it's there's still their fragile um if they don't

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>choose to raise rates. But then um, the yam will

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>continue to depreciate on lightening interest rate differential, and that's

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>going to also drive inflation for the so and that

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that inflation isn't going to be good for the equality either.

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>So a BAN, I think it is a very tricky

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>situation right now. Um So that's that's that's my take

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:47.719
<v Speaker 1>on just just pointing out right now we're at a

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred thirty five seventy two, which is we're having around

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the low. The last time we saw this was you know,

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>long term capital management, yep, exactly. I'm looking at the

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>one year chart for the Japanese end. We started the

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>year are year ago twelve months ago. What about one

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>ten UH now are one thirty five such as significant weakening?

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Must I love to get just your overview based upon

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 1>your experience of the folks you talked to in Japan.

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>How has the pandemic impacted Japan just broadly defined, and

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>how has it impacted the economy and and how are

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>folks they're dealing um. Obviously economy was severely damaged and UM.

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>And also it has been not as resilient as as

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:33.680
<v Speaker 1>we hoped it as we hoped UM and still enhanced.

0:09:33.679 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>The economy is in a very fraudule the state. So

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>as a call photo manager, I mean I'm a I'm

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a japan UM photo manager. But my UH investment style

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.479
<v Speaker 1>is to invest in great companies that have global footprints.

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>So trying not to put all our eggs in one basket, um,

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, one geography UM and they loven't great companies

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>out there in Japan that have a strong presence UM worldwide.

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>And if if there's going to be you know, a

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 1>strong uptake in Japan, our port companies should also benefit

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>from it. So that's my sort of defensive investment strategy

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. So talk to us about maybe some

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>names that might fit that. Uh, you know the kind

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of framework that you're you and your team are doing

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 1>some work on right now. Yeah. So you know, our

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>our investment mantra is to invest in great business with

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>exceptional management attractive class. So, um, you know we uh

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>growth growth manager. We're in the growth management bucket. And

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:35.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously a market rotation from growth of value has been

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>has taken a toll on us. Um that we continuously

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>remain invested in in our long term holdings and growth needs.

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:45.760
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, we've been actively searching for

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 1>what I would call growth names in disguise, and what

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean by that is companies whose growth prospects are

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>just as strong as any pure growth name. We're talking

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>about learning, throw a Group, Campus and plus, but they're

0:10:58.000 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 1>trading out of value stuff about multiples due to its

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>perceptions in the market. And I would highlight the Touch

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.640
<v Speaker 1>as an example. And then there's another example, another type

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of growth in disguise where growth growth earn if growth

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>rate might be in the med single digits, but they

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:16.839
<v Speaker 1>come with significant ability to buy back shares and sub

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>division news and if you add am all up, you

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>can plus return as a showholder. And I would highlight

0:11:22.120 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>general insurance companies as as as primary example. I just

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 1>want to quickly ask you about the election House of

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Counselor's election on Sunday. What are the market implications of that? Uh?

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 1>What could they be? Well, it seems like the ruling

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>party is going to win the majority ships um and UM.

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I think you know right now Prime Minister Kishi Daum

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>he's been promoting the so called Japan's New capitalism and

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:55.599
<v Speaker 1>the market was once in spooks by the prospects of

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Kishida potentially introducing not to shareholder not extridly. Um. Policing

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is just like higher how about the games tax ridge

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and middle on bridge hikes. Um. So depending on what

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>policy imagers will will come out going forward, they may

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>have some many percussions in the market, but I would

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:15.959
<v Speaker 1>look at it more positively. There. You know, this is

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>really a mark to shift from showhold of friendly capitalism

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to sustainable growth capitalism. So um, you know we should

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>take it as a positive movement. All right, Massa, thank

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us there. Massa takeda portfolio

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>manager for the Hennessy Japan Fund, getting an update on

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the developments out of Japan, and again elections matches pointed

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>out coming up out in sun Valley, Idaho at this

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:47.160
<v Speaker 1>time of year. Every year, the good friends at Allen

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and Company, the investment bank hold their conference. Were all

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the big tech media, telecom, really cool kids gather uh

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.599
<v Speaker 1>to just talk deals, talk business, talk, what's going on

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and of course we send out our

0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>ace reporter. Ed Ludlow is a West Coast correspondent for

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News. Ed, you're in sun Valley. You probably went

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to the Soul last night for a couple of cocktails.

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully you bumped into some media moguls. But what are

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.719
<v Speaker 1>you hearing out there in beautiful sun Valley? What's the

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 1>theme kind of this year? Yeah, you know, Tom Keating

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>just framed it as the Ludlow Humility Meter there television,

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:28.319
<v Speaker 1>and at first I thought, oh goodness, here we go.

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 1>But then you know, that is pretty appropriate that all

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the conversations I'm having on the record on boom Bow

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Television and in the corridors behind the scenes, is that

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>there's kind of dis acceptance of the world is very

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 1>different from twelve months ago and pre pandemic. There's public

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>market volatility, you know, there's zeroed in on the inflation story, recession.

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 1>But you know, everyone is quite bullish here. You know,

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of optimism. They're clearly enjoying each other's company.

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>But remember this is a TMT conference where the focus

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is deals and meeting your clients, your customers, your bankers,

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 1>and everyone is kind of acknowledging the problems out in

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the world but saying there are real opportunities in these

0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>sectors to deploy capital. And I think that's really interesting.

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So what are the biggest deals that we're looking at

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 1>right now? What are people talking about there? You know,

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I think the valuations have come down a lot, particular

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in media and telecoms companies, right you know, the big

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:23.800
<v Speaker 1>king of the hill is the phrase I used this

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:27.760
<v Speaker 1>year is is Warner Brow's Discovery CEO David Doust laugh,

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you know that merger was successful. Um, he is kind

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of point and optimistic. And it's funny because last year Netflix,

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Read Hasting S Sanda Rose were kind of those star

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>people that everyone wanted to be too. But there's this

0:14:41.720 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>idea that valuations have come down. The consumer has so

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>much choice on the streaming side, and you do wonder

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>whether there will be further consolidation. One really interesting point

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>some sources made me last night, and by the way,

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>I did go to the Pioneer Saloon. It was excellent. Saturday,

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.040
<v Speaker 1>according to sources, is the day that a lot of

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the smallest startups and interesting founders have been invited present.

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:07.760
<v Speaker 1>And one source, a long time attendy and investor, said

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to me that he actually invested, has invested over the

0:15:11.640 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>years in many of those startups that present on the Saturday.

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're all kinds of people from healthcare, biotech, transport, mobility, tech,

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and they get an opportunity to stand in front of

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>this just incredible room of people and make their pitch

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>behind closed doors. And I'm told with absolute certainty that

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the twelve months that follow a lot of those guys

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>do receive investments, you know. And one of the speakers

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that I think a lot of folks are in participating

0:15:39.520 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>hearing from, assuming he shows up as Elon Musk because

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a big, big m and a trade out there

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that he's involved in with Twitter, that is really you know,

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>nobody knows whether this thing is going to go through

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>or not, and nobody really knows what he's thinking anywhere.

0:15:54.600 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know, So we'd love to hear

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>from Mr musk Is that's still the plan to as

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a former m and a banker in the TMT space,

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>if someone if the richest man in the world made

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>an offer for a company at would you expect it

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to be trading at thirty nine? No? Absolutely not, And

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>so that kind of tells you the market's telling you're

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>right there that it's they don't view it as a

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>credible deal. But what do you expect to hear ed

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>from Elon musk Iffen when he shows up? So sources

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>tell me that he is showing up. We're not sure

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>when we thought it would be today Thursday. Sources also

0:16:29.920 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>tell me that he is making the Saturday prime time

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>address and now that's that's a slot usually reserved for

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>one Warren Buffett traditionally at the Allen and Co. Conference.

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>So I thought that was interesting. Um, wait, Warren Buffett

0:16:45.480 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>like always does it. Warren Buffett traditionally speaks on the

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Saturday and you know the Oracle of Omaha, it's his

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>moment where he gives his world view behind closed doors.

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>You know a lot of Allen and Co. Attendees I've

0:16:57.640 --> 0:16:59.440
<v Speaker 1>spoken to in private say, you know, this is why

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>people stay through the weekend. You know this is this year.

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>By the way attendees are allows bring their families. You

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.120
<v Speaker 1>have the extra added issue of childcare and keeping people

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>entertained in one of the most beautiful spots on Earth.

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>It's very hard. It's a serious issue for Elon Musk,

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>now right with nine childious issue. We'll get to that

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>that basically, you know, I have spoken to people about it.

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:22.720
<v Speaker 1>They are talking about it in the corridors. Ned SEAgel

0:17:22.760 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Twitter CFO is here. I asked him. I shouted at him, frankly,

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>are you going to meet with Elon? And he smiled

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and put his index finger in the air showing one digit.

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>But and you know I took that to mean one

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>time he'll meet with him. I have no idea what

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>he was saying. We haven't seen Tara Gagl who's the

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Twitter CEO. I have had a number of conversations people

0:17:44.440 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>that say Elon Musk can't get out of this. The

0:17:48.000 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>reverse termination fee is a distraction. You can't bank on

0:17:51.760 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 1>him just being able to pay a billions dollars to

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:56.959
<v Speaker 1>walk away. One source made a really interesting point. If

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>your Twitter and you want to fight this. To Belon

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Musk walks away, you really going to go to court

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for a decade, you know, because that's how long it

0:18:03.520 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>could take. So I think the consensus here is that

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>he could come in with a lower offer price. And

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>if your Twitter share if you're an existing Twitter shareholder,

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you would bite somebody's hand off for that deal any

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>time in the last two years, right, you just would

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>like So I think that a lower price for those involved,

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:23.959
<v Speaker 1>just to get it done would be a good outcome

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>based on what you know, the conversations I'm having. So,

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk has another set of twins that we didn't

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 1>know about, and apparently one of his kids has like

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>disowned him. Really, so how many I guess nine unless

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't count um his one of his kids just

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>changed her name you know, and gender and said she

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>wants nothing to do with her father. Probably is this

0:18:56.520 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>getting to no? Okay, So a lot to back here,

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:02.520
<v Speaker 1>But there was a business inside a report that Elon

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Musk had twins who are now eight months old, with

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the Neuralink employee, and that was discovered through court filings

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>where the NEURALNK employee and Masque wanted to have the

0:19:14.480 --> 0:19:17.160
<v Speaker 1>names changed so that it reflected the Musque name as well.

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>But why didn't they just put that on the birth certificate.

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't get that. Usually when the kid's born, you

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:25.720
<v Speaker 1>just put the father's name down. And well, two things.

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm yet to be a father, But I also don't

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 1>pretend to know what is going on inside. Elon must

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:35.120
<v Speaker 1>mind and the actions that he takes at any time. Um.

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>But according if this report is to be believed them,

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we've asked Musque about it. He hasn't replied.

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:43.640
<v Speaker 1>We've asked Neural Link about it, they haven't replied. Then

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Musk does currently technically have nine children? All right, We've

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:49.800
<v Speaker 1>got to keep up to date on that stuff. But

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>that just came across. I mean, we don't, Actually we don't.

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>It's silly, gossipy stuff. And I guess CEOs can have

0:19:56.440 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>as many children as they want, just like a normal person. Um.

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>And he has certainly got the money to support them. Well,

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>he's got a he's got a policy. It's just fun

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to keep up with Elon. He thinks there needs to

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>be more people on the planet, right, he says, yeah,

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Yet I saw a tweet from him today that said

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the US has been underpopulated for like fifty years, so

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it's against consensus. I think. All right, all right, Ed Ludlow,

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>West Coast, corresponding Bloomberg News. He is our reporter on

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the ground in sun Valley. We get talked about Rivivian.

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Next time we get on, we gotta talk about Rivian.

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 1>Yesterday they boosted their UH production target for the second quarter. Right,

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>stop us up? Not good stuff, ed Lolo out there

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>at sun Valley, Idaho. Let's get right to it. Danielle

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>DeMartino Booth, CEO of Quill Intelligence, also at the Dallas

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>FED for a while. So when we talk interest rates,

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>when we talk FED, boom our go to choice here

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and daniel nothing says that we're getting back to normal

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.280
<v Speaker 1>than Danielle DeMartino Booth in our Bloomberg, in our actor

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>broker studio. So what is the Fed? Wait? How was

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the flight? First of all, how is you travel? Because

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.280
<v Speaker 1>last time Paul came here from Texas, his flight was canceled.

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>He was forced to stay at a water park all day. Yes, well,

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:11.399
<v Speaker 1>knock on wood because I've got to get on another

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 1>flight tomorrow. But it was seamless now, but one in

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>front of me was canceled because of no crew. That's

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the thing's all right. So what let's assume that there's

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:21.399
<v Speaker 1>a crew at the Federal Reserve. Are they going to

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 1>raise fifty basis points? Seventy five basis points? What are

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you thinking? So two days after the FED announces, we're

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>probably going to get our second negative print on personal consumption, expenditures,

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>personal income, and spending comes out the Friday. At it's important,

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 1>it's very important for it. In fact, they're likely to

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>have that data in hand when they announced, and if

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it's negative, I would argue, counterintuitively that they're gonna go

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 1>for seventy five basis points to get it into the can. Yeah.

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I actually have a bet right now with Paul and

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Ira Jersey. If they do seventy five, Paul has to

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>drive me down to Princeton and Ira has to buy

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>us dinner. I started feeling, honestly a little bit nervous

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 1>about that bet yesterday reading these fedman it's that everyone

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 1>said we're hawkish, and I got this feeling in my

0:22:04.119 --> 0:22:06.440
<v Speaker 1>stomach like I could lose this bet. I don't know why,

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>but it's not a sure thing. It's nothing is a

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:14.479
<v Speaker 1>sure thing, and I think that markets interpreted the minutes

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>as being a time stamp, which sometimes markets don't. Sometimes

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>markets read in that the Fed is massage the minutes

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 1>after the fact if they have a reason to do so.

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>But I think a lot of people said, you know

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>what those minutes were time stamp before the Atlanta Fed

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>printed negative two point one percent for the second quarter,

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>before SMP Global said the second quarter was gonna be

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 1>negative one point five um. And that's telling you something actually,

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:39.120
<v Speaker 1>because the Atlanta Fed GDP now model kind of broke

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>down during COVID, and now that we've got all the

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.040
<v Speaker 1>COVID noise out of the data, it's coming right back

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.280
<v Speaker 1>up to where some of the best models on the

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>street are and they're converging. And that that tells you

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:51.479
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of it tells you why a lot

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of cell side, if it's economist right now, are saying

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a technical recession but not a

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>real one. I mean, it would have to be really

0:22:57.160 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>far off for there to be growth though, right We're

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.119
<v Speaker 1>very likely to see two quarters of contraction, right, I mean,

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that's a recession, but it's a it's a

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>technical one, but not not a real one, everybody argues

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 1>with the Gary Shillings. No, no, NBR has to come

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>out and say it's a recession. And I think nb

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:16.399
<v Speaker 1>ER will come out and say it's a recession like

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>in twelve months or so, because there's a typical twelve

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen month leg. That's when they timestamped these puppies.

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:26.360
<v Speaker 1>But again, we've had credit card spending very strong, We've

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>had we've had consumers blow through their savings, so we've

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:34.439
<v Speaker 1>propped up consumption some would say somewhat artificially, and now

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.760
<v Speaker 1>we're heading for a consumption cliff that's just now starting,

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>so that that can prolong the recession. I have a listener,

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.360
<v Speaker 1>writes in I think he's watched you speak a few times,

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:49.800
<v Speaker 1>so he's a big fan. And he points out that

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>are forecasts have been all over the map about what

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the Fed is gonna do, about whether we're gonna have

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>a recession, how shallow it's going to be, how short,

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>And he points out we haven't see seeing a quantitative

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>tightening yet, which is a huge question mark. We haven't

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:06.920
<v Speaker 1>seen the downward revisions and earnings right analysts on the

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:10.200
<v Speaker 1>sales side have still left um their revisions are their

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>forecast sky high. We haven't seen inflation come down, we

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't really seen job losses. This is all too comma,

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>it is, and it's all building up in this system.

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And yet when you follow every Friday after the close,

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve publishes the highth eight and in in

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:29.959
<v Speaker 1>there there is a very good, reliable gauge of liquidity

0:24:30.480 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>and it has been negative for three months in a

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>row prior to QT, and that people need to understand.

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 1>And Muhammadarian has done a very good job of articulating

0:24:40.040 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>where we are right now in the cycle, that we're

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>heading from recession shock to a liquidity shock, and that

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 1>really changes the game. So right now I think that

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 1>we're still in the midst of yet another bearer market rally. Alright,

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>So is this Federal Reserve. I've always thought of it

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>as kind of a balancing act between fighting and inflation,

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>yet not pushing it into a action. But now some

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 1>people are saying they're really focused on inflation, but yet

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>some people say they're really focused on keeping us out

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of a recession. Is it a balancing act or do

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>you feel like they have a bias. It is a

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>balancing act, but it's a less balanced act headed into

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>this close to an election, and so federals are officials

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>are really there's an existential crisis going on as it

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 1>pertains to September because it's so close to the election.

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>But surely this independent body for Heaven won't risk its

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 1>credibility for the political status quo rights not. It's only

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>been politicized since Greenspan started leaking information on TERMP to

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 1>bond trading desk. But other than that, the play, the

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 1>play was great, Mrs Lincoln, I uh, yeah, it's pretty crazy.

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>By the way, why isn't Mohammed running the Fed? Why

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:50.440
<v Speaker 1>isn't somebody he made the right calls for the last

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of years and no one was listening. Apparently he's

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in England, He's not that far away, and his voice

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>is pretty loud and his point. He's had some pretty

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>important as well, and he's had some great calls, and

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>he really has lined up the domino as well and

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>warned us one step after another. We've got an inflation shock.

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Now we're gonna have a recession shock. Now we're gonna

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:16.040
<v Speaker 1>have a liquidity shock. He's been there the whole time,

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and actually because j Powell founded the Industrials Group at

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 1>the Carlisle. He speaks to people in this world. He

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>speaks to people in private equity. He knows that banks

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>are sitting on north of fifty billion dollars of loans

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:28.560
<v Speaker 1>that they can't get priced. J. Powe speaks to these people.

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:30.760
<v Speaker 1>He knows that liquidity in the system is seizing up.

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's why they treat quantitative tightening like

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>the boldem word. It's like, don't talk about it, just

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 1>don't don't, don't talk, don't bring it up. So don't

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 1>we see it's Bruno, It's Bruno. Now we don't talk

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>about Bruno. We don't know, no, no, what does Liudo

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>look like to every day folks like me? Liquidity shocks

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>looks like four out of five people saying they're afraid

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>of losing their job. They start to see bankruptcies, and

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.920
<v Speaker 1>we are starting to see bankruptcies. We're starting to see

0:26:58.960 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>some of the vestiges of the industrial recession that we're in.

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>In fact, if you looked at today's jobless claims, the

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:10.440
<v Speaker 1>state with the fastest rising and the greatest extent is Michigan. Michigan,

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:13.400
<v Speaker 1>we've and you know what there's apparently a semiconductor glut

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in the making, So we're gonna have tell that to

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>my Chevy Silverado sitting in I have ordered a Shelvy Silverado.

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 1>I've been waiting months and months for it. It's built

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>at a factory in Mexico, but they won't ship it

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.359
<v Speaker 1>to me because it doesn't have the right chips. They're coming,

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>They're coming, and we're gonna be talking about life, housing

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and oversupply of cars in a year. All right, Danielle,

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. Daniel DeMartino Booth

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:39.479
<v Speaker 1>should let's take a picture and we'll tweet that. We'll

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>do that. CEO Chief Strategist Quill Intelligence, also form advisor

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 1>at the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. Thanks for listening

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:27:52.640 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to interviews of Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:27:57.320 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Leer in

0:28:00.280 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy three and on ball Sweeney I'm on Twitter

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 1>us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio