WEBVTT -  Kevin Landis on Technology Investments (Podcast)

0:00:02.200 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.400
<v Speaker 1>This week on the podcast, I have an extra special guest,

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:13.080
<v Speaker 1>and what can I tell you? Kevin Landis has been

0:00:13.119 --> 0:00:19.840
<v Speaker 1>investing in technology companies I don't know, thirty years, thirty years,

0:00:19.880 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>both public and private. He runs Firsthand Funds. They have

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>a number of different mutual funds that specialize in technology companies,

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:34.120
<v Speaker 1>including one that is one of the rare publicly traded

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>venture capital funds. Imagine an individual VC that itself is

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:45.480
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded. Kevin not only survived the dot com implosion

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>but thrived. The funds have put up really outstanding numbers

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>over the past fill in the blank, five, ten, fifteen years. Uh.

0:00:55.800 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>He really is super knowledgeable about startups and technology companies,

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>both both new and old. And one of the things

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that makes them so interesting is they're located right out

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>there in the heart of Silicon Valley. It's it's hard

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to imagine that before first Hand Funds opened up in

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety four, there were no mutual funds located right there

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of tech Land. Really quite interesting. He

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>grew up out there, he went to Berkeley, that's his backyard.

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Really a fascinating guy in a fascinating conversation about all

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 1>things technology related. I think you'll find this to be

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 1>an interesting conversation. I really enjoyed it. So with no

0:01:37.760 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>further ado, my interview of first Hand Funds Kevin Landis

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>vias is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholtz on Boomberg Radio.

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>My special guest this week is Kevin Landis. He is

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the c i O of first Hand Capital Management and

0:01:55.920 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>president and chairman of first Hand Funds. Founded in four

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>with five hundred million dollars in assets under management, Kevin

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>has specialized in technology. The first Hand Technology Opportunities Funds

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>has been up a hundred and two percent over the

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>past twelve months. Kevin Landis, Welcome to Bloomberg. Thank you

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>very much for having me. So you spent your life

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and are known as one of the

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>longest tenured technology investors. How did you find your way

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.960
<v Speaker 1>into tech investing? Well, there's a there's a long, boring

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>story of how I, you know, touched every stone along

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the path, or there's more of the moment in time

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>terable answer, And I'll give you the moment in time answer,

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and that is when I was in the fifth grade,

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>I told my parents that I wanted to be a

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>historian when I grew up. Now, my parents were both

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>children of the Great Suppression, and so they were immediately

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:02.520
<v Speaker 1>horrified that I was um unwittingly, I was pointing to

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 1>a profession that wouldn't make me very financially successful or secure.

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>And they really tried hard to talk me out of it,

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and finally one of them said, you know, Kevin, if

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you can figure out the history that hasn't happened yet,

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>then you're gonna be all right son, and the other

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.839
<v Speaker 1>quickly agreed. And I thought about that on and off

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>ever since, that if you configure out the history that

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 1>hasn't happened, that's a really good thing. And I think

0:03:30.280 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that's that's a pretty good encapsulation of what I do.

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>That's the definition of investing history that has yet to happen.

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So I'm kind of intrigued by your background. You have

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a BS degree. It looks like this is a double

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>degree in electrical engineering and computer science from UC Berkeley

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>before you got your m b A. The first question

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is why not go directly to a tech startup? Was

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>there any ever any lure to that? There was, and

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I considered that, but this was one of those moments

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>where fate sort of intervened. And my dad's business was

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 1>as a manufacturer's rep in Silicon Valley, meaning he was

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the customer facing office. He and his partner with the

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 1>customer facing office for tech companies based outside of Silicon

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Valley dealing with Silicon Valley customers. And his partner had

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>a heart attack and had to go in for cornery

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>bypass surgery during my senior year in college, and my

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>dad needed needed me to come and join the business

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>because he would have looked like a one man band otherwise.

0:04:34.400 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>So I spent the first four years of my professional career,

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.960
<v Speaker 1>instead of learning more things about engineering, learning a lot

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>about business and human nature and how to deal with people. So, Kevin,

0:04:46.400 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>your first experience in the field was not anything that

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>encouraged you to want to become a an insider at

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>some tech startup. Well, that's right, but it I mean

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it taught me a great deal about human nature and

0:05:02.160 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>about business and business strategy, and like you know that,

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>it led to the second job that I got out

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 1>after business school as an analyst at a high technology

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>market research firm which also began teaching me a lot

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things that that I had thought that I

0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>had learned in school that actually weren't true. Give us

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 1>an example of things you learned in school that turned

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>out to be not true. Well. One of the one

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of the explanations for um efficient markets is that there's

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of just incredibly brilliant, gifted people doing perfect research,

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>and that everything that can be known about a company

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 1>is already in the stock price. But when you're an

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>analyst at again, at a high tech market research firm,

0:05:46.720 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and somebody from a big name financial firm calls and

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>starts asking you a bunch of very naive questions, it

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>doesn't take you long to realize that the emperor has

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 1>no clothes, and that maybe you need to modify your

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 1>thought to realize that the world is not this perfectly

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 1>ordered place where everything's all worked out. There's actually a

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of confusion out there, uh, and that information is

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>not really evenly distributed. And all of the forces that

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>finance professors will teach you about why markets tend towards efficiency,

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>they're all valid arguments, but things are usually changing fast

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>enough and people are imperfect enough that markets don't really

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>always have it, have it just right. I couldn't agree

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>with you more. I find markets are kind of sort

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of eventually efficient, but that's the still leaves a lot

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of riddle room and and hence the opportunity for some

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>investors to outperform right. Right, So you're an analyst for

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a number of years. What else did you do before

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:59.159
<v Speaker 1>launching firsthand funds? In so after being you know, starting

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>out as an applications engineer customer facing with my dad's firm,

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>and then being a junior analyst in a market research firm,

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>then I spent a couple of years as a product

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>manager at a little chip company in Silicon Valley, And

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>again it was it was a great just an example

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 1>for myself, uh, to realize some of the nitty gritty

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I thought I understood as an analyst, but

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>even though I was close to the industry, it wasn't

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>in the industry. And that again, I just kept learning

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>more stuff that I thought I knew that I hadn't known,

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh and that was where uh frankly though, I

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I kind of realized one day that I was making

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>more money trading stocks than I was on my day job.

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>And maybe that was the wrong day job to have

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>h Maybe my crew calling was just to be a

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>detect investor. So you launched first Hand Funds in ninety four.

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>What was the process like of getting that off the ground. Well,

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that was really daunting because you know a lot of

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>times when your pick, when you're you're young, starting out,

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you have this feeling like you know the existing businesses,

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>there's some sort of a club and you need to

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>get an invite uh to get in, or somebody needs

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to give you a chance, and you have to make

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that leap that says you kind of have to make

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>your own looks and no one's going to hand it

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to you. And so my partner and I UH basically

0:08:20.480 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>figured out how to form a mutual funds. At that time,

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't believe there was no high tech neutral fund

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:31.440
<v Speaker 1>based in Silicon Valley, and I couldn't believe that that

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't find any examples of tech funds that were

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>run by engineers, and it seemed like, oh my gosh,

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 1>this is If I don't do this, I'm going to

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:40.679
<v Speaker 1>regret it for a really long time. So we need

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to do this, and then we

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:47.199
<v Speaker 1>basically just if we pulled a couple of million dollars

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 1>out of our address books, UH and and got in

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>touch with people that we had gotten to know who

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>believed in us, and said, here's this vehicle we're investing in,

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and let's let's see if we can make you some money.

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>And that was That was basically our little startup states there.

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the joke was that um our management see

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>was enough that uh we could each buy a sandwich

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>each day, and that was it. So what are the

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>advantages of running a tech mutual funds from right in

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the heart of Silicon Valley? You know, you can't bump

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 1>into people and chit chat without picking up UH industry

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>scuttle butt. I mean, I did the best. I had

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 1>an example just the other day. We my wife and

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>I were working with this uh a dog rescue organization,

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and and we took a rescue dog for a weekend

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>while the fosters were out of town. And you know,

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the guy came back to pick up the dog and

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:48.960
<v Speaker 1>we were chit chatting, and all of a sudden, before

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're talking about what's going on at vm

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>ware and what's the matter with this company? In that company?

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Where do you think about the CEO leaving there to

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:58.319
<v Speaker 1>go to Intel, and all of a sudden, I'm in

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the middle of a research meeting and I'm just handed.

0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>This guy is dog so uh and you know the

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 1>same thing, you bump into somebody you know they haven't

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.439
<v Speaker 1>seen in a few months at the grocery store. You

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you're always swimming in it, and uh so people aspect

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>what's your you know, what's your process for going out

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and and uh, you know, getting ideas and getting skulled button.

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>That's like saying, what's your process for getting wet when

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:29.600
<v Speaker 1>it's raining? Just go out sitting and shopping, right, yeah, right,

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty funny. You're also the CEO of the first

0:10:32.960 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Hand Technology Value Funds, which is really interesting. It's a

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>publicly traded venture capital funds, obviously focusing on emerging technologies.

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>You were pre i p O investors in Facebook, Twitter,

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Solar City, Yelp, Roku, leading to the obvious question, why

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a publicly traded venture capital firm? Well, that's so that

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>was a great That was a great moment in uh

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 1>in time here. I mean, you're probably well acquainted with

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>how easy it was for companies to go public in

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the late ninety nineties, and then the and then the

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>just the dramatic backlash against that. The pendulum swung really

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>hard the other direction. And it wasn't just people being

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:21.199
<v Speaker 1>skeptical of of startups uh and and of IPOs, but

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it was also Starbanes Oxley and a bunch of other

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>really draconian regulations that just made it really, really difficult.

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>That the I p O went from being uh, sort

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of this rite of passage that people were striving for

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to being just awful ordeal that people were avoiding at

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 1>all costs. And that's we just realized as we got

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:49.719
<v Speaker 1>into you know, uh, you know, oh seven oh eight

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>or nine, that companies, by the time they went public, uh,

0:11:54.400 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 1>they were so well known and so expensive that a

0:11:57.520 --> 0:12:00.599
<v Speaker 1>lot of those early returns had already been and you

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>just couldn't get them in the public market. So, you know,

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.719
<v Speaker 1>I had by this time already made a career out

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:11.719
<v Speaker 1>of mocking and ridiculing companies that failed to adapt um.

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>And you know, when we started out in the nineties,

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:16.439
<v Speaker 1>I made fun of Deck in data general, you know,

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and then uh, you know, by two thousands ten, we

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:22.079
<v Speaker 1>were all making fun of Yahoo and UH and and

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>plenty of others believe me. Uh. And I kind of

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 1>looked at that, and I said, well, I'm running a

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 1>what's a mutual fund, but in the industry is referred

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>to as a forty Act fund because that's the the

0:12:34.720 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Investment Company Act of nineteen forty. And so one day

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>I just sort of looked in the mirrors, said, right,

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm here in Silicon Valley making fun of people who

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>failed to revolve, and I'm running a nineteen forty Acts fund.

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh And and I thought about that a little bit, said,

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think we need to adapt. So um,

0:12:52.640 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>we realized that there was an obscure branch of the

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>forty Act that talked about business development companies b dcs,

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and that had kind of evolved into this odd kind

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.679
<v Speaker 1>of a credit granting model. But we went back to

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:10.439
<v Speaker 1>the original version of that, which is, no always a

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:14.359
<v Speaker 1>business development company. We can make this adventure capital portfolio.

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:18.959
<v Speaker 1>And that was right around the time that companies like

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.839
<v Speaker 1>SHA's Posts and Second Market, We're making it easier to

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>get shares in startup companies. So that was, uh, that

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 1>just sort of fell into place, and and we looked

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>around and said, Okay, we're just gonna buy Uh, we're

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna look at We're not changing how we look at companies.

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>We're still looking for the same things right place, right

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>time markets that we like, this looks like the winner.

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>And uh, that allowed us to really kind of go

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>back to doing what we've always done. I always pull people.

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, you don't need to pay me to go

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 1>buy Microsoft for you. You know you kind of already

0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>discovered that one. Uh just today, you know, nobody needs

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to pay me to go buy Apple. Uh, you can

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>buy it on your own. So but what you're looking

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.599
<v Speaker 1>for those companies you haven't heard of yet. And so

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.319
<v Speaker 1>that's why we made that shift. So why do that

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>in a vehicle that's publicly traded instead of just setting

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 1>up a separate venture capital fund that doesn't have to

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>go through all of the usual public listening things. Well,

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that we've always had a bit of a

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>egalitarian dance here where it should be available for everybody,

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and it shouldn't just see this, uh you know kind

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of I don't want to say elitist, but you shouldn't

0:14:33.880 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 1>just be an investment vehicle that's only available for the few.

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Should be available for everybody. And so I like the

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>idea of publicly listed vehicles. I mean, that's kind of

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the reason that we didn't start out with a hedge

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>fund to begin with. We wanted the doors open to everybody.

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>And of course, you know, we're unconventional enough that, um,

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we do very well on the on

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the standard public road show that you'd have to go

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>through to do institution fundraising, So we're not really adapted

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>at at that game. So last question on the public

0:15:07.960 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>private issue, what do you think of the line being

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>blurred between these pre public companies and publicly traded companies

0:15:16.960 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>and all of the SPACs that have come out as

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a sort of back doorway two I p O companies

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that don't go through that road show you were describing. Yeah,

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's first of all, I think it's a

0:15:30.360 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>good thing that people get in the habit of looking

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>at companies through the same lens. You know, a late

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>stage public company, you ought to look at it the

0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>same way you look at a public company. Uh. And

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think that would uh that that level of scrutiny.

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>That's a good thing. But I'm also I'm a really

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>big fan of competition. I think it really brings out

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the best in US, so I view direct listings and

0:15:58.080 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 1>fact as basic the other ideas coming in uh and

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>competing with the UH sort of this historical model of

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I pos the standard S one and you know, I

0:16:13.240 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>would I don't know if I would say the the

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>old style S one process is broken, but it's certainly

0:16:19.760 --> 0:16:23.440
<v Speaker 1>bend out of shape and and doesn't work that well

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 1>because it is it is just it is really onerous, uh,

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and it is really tough on the company. Uh. So

0:16:32.080 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you really need to be um big with a lot

0:16:35.240 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>of resources before you do it. And um, that's unfair

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of people. Uh. You should be able

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>to go public a little bit earlier, a little bit sooner,

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, you know today there's that spack process allows

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>you to talk a lot more about where you're going

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 1>instead of just being uh restricted and only being able

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to stay where you've been and where you're going is

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of what matters for stuff. Huh. That's interesting. I

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>know quite a few other people out in your part

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of the woods. Venture capitalists like Bill Gurley have been

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:13.399
<v Speaker 1>big champions of the direct listening exactly because the I

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>P O process has become increasingly difficult over the past

0:17:18.640 --> 0:17:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know twenty thirty years is that is most

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of this a post dot com implosion effect. Was it

0:17:26.160 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 1>easier in the nineties, Yes, absolutely absolutely going public Going

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 1>public in two thousand's was still really really easy. But

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you look at the scandals, if you

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 1>look at all all of the busted I pos, the

0:17:39.359 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 1>whole pet dot com generation. Uh, and then you combine

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that with some of the corporate scandals i e. World Calm, Tycho,

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>and Ron, those are kind of my big three. Um,

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you could say frauds. We're not afraid of the word

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>fraud here, right, those the reaction to those kind of

0:17:55.800 --> 0:18:00.040
<v Speaker 1>got conslated. Uh So corporate fraud and busted I. He

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>has kind of got conflated. And and everyone said, despite

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the fact that those management teams thought went to jail

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>under existing law, uh and Justice Serve people still said

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>there ought to be a law, and so they made

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Sarbanes Oxley. Um. And I think that's the equivalent of

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, going home and kicking the dog because you're

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>because your boss is mean to you. Um. So the

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>dog they kicked there was you know, the next twenty

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>years of tech companies wanted to go public. Um. But

0:18:27.160 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I'll say there is that you know,

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the direct listing and and the Spack merger are actually

0:18:33.880 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of converging on a on a similar UH path. Today.

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>UH there's usually a big pipe of public investment and

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a private or private investment in public equity, and that

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>pipe investment UH is highly supportive as back transactions, and

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>it's almost becoming a standard part of it, like a

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>required part of it. That's kind of like building your

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 1>book on the I P O figuring out who is

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>going to own that stock afterwards. And it has a

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of the lower costs associated with a direct listing.

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>So people are talking about the blended cost with your

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>pipe plus back transaction. So the market is trying to

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.639
<v Speaker 1>find the right the right mix of that makes a

0:19:17.720 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense in tech stocks. Right through the nineties

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.920
<v Speaker 1>really a unique period in history. I always kind of

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.440
<v Speaker 1>chuckle when I see some of the young guns compare

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the current market to the era or the dot com implosion,

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>although I'm chuckling a little less these days than I

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:41.159
<v Speaker 1>was a year or two ago. What's your taken on

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:45.639
<v Speaker 1>this comparison? How did the twenties match up against the

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>late nineties. Well, first, let's talk about how they're the same.

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>You know. I think the feeling that one gets here

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:58.399
<v Speaker 1>uh is we're reminded that a little optimism is a

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 1>great thing u uh and and too much optimism can

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you can drive right off the road, and that can

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>be a really bad thing. So uh, it's good to

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:13.479
<v Speaker 1>have people looking for looking towards the future, looking to see, well,

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>what could we do? What could this company do? Um?

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>What how do we change things for the better? Uh?

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And it should be about that. I think somewhere along

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the line, though, there's a segment that simply is saying, uh,

0:20:28.280 --> 0:20:31.920
<v Speaker 1>how do we just get rich? And uh? There's nothing

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:35.600
<v Speaker 1>wrong with the profit motives. It's great, I'm a capitalist,

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:39.280
<v Speaker 1>but um, you know it should be what how are you?

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>How are you making the world better? And what are you?

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>What are you really uh driving towards I'm actually kind

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of encouraged that a lot of the sort of the

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>the striving and and the looking forward what can we do?

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Has to do with solving really big problems. How do

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we go to space again? How do we? Uh? You

0:20:56.840 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>know Elon Musk wants to go to Mars. That's good

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>for him, you know, how do we send lots of

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>other people there, how do we bring people back and uh,

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>and how do we sell climate change? There's there's some

0:21:08.000 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>really big things there were there's are no quote a

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>few years ago somebody said we were promised flying cars

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.959
<v Speaker 1>and instead we got a hundred and forty characters. Uh.

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 1>To me, that was that was that was this great

0:21:18.920 --> 0:21:22.280
<v Speaker 1>encapsulation again of just how you can kind of get

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>off track if you're when you've got a bunch of

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 1>smart people working on something. You know. Uh, it's sort

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 1>of if you're working on on making crops grow on

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>some stupid online game, Uh, that has limited value. On

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, if you're actually working on making crops grow,

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's better. So I like that, uh. And I

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>like that people are are looking at companies and not saying, well,

0:21:45.359 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>what did you do over the last five years, but

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>what are you gonna do in the next five years.

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 1>That's the right way to look at It's the better

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.400
<v Speaker 1>way to look at it. Um. I just I guess

0:21:53.440 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I would cautume folks. A lot of these companies aren't

0:21:57.560 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna make it. A lot of these companies are gonna

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>fall short their lofty goals. That's probably okay. I mean,

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's okay that pets dot Com blew up because

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>now you've got Amazon. So for better or for worse,

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>you've got Amazon. Somebody made it. Somebody made it work. Uh,

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and somebody was actually right in all all the hype

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>that they were generating. And I think it'll be this

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:22.520
<v Speaker 1>way again. Uh. And in the meantime, markets will do

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>their damned this to give us lots of opportunities to

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 1>hurt ourselves financially. So two thoughts about that. One is

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 1>pets dot Com might have been a disaster, but today

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we have Chewy, which is doing really well. I'm intrigued

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>by the concept of genomic agriculture as the better bet

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>than Farmville. Discuss some of the things you see that

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>are really more along the flying cars progression than the

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred forty character progression right right, In other words, the

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:01.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of the John F. Kennedy called action momentum. It's

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 1>focused on duty instead of call of duty. So yeah,

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:14.119
<v Speaker 1>I guess, uh, you know, UM, electrification of transport is

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>a big deal. Yes, you're still using power, but I

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>think that the part that UM people are kind of

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.880
<v Speaker 1>learning from direct experience on their on their personal vehicles

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 1>is that the great thing about having an electric drive

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:29.239
<v Speaker 1>train is that you can harvest all the energy uh

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that's built up in your vehicle speed. And I always

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, tell people, go stand out in front of

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>your house on trash day and watch this big heavy

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>truck going from zero to ten miles and back down

0:23:43.080 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to zero, all the way up and down your block,

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 1>and think about all that wasted energy. And if if

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 1>that truck had an electric drive train, uh they wouldn't

0:23:52.160 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>have to hit the brakes, they they just ease off

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>the accelerator pedal and you would regenerate and store all

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>that energy each time they they come to a stop.

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, in other words, one of the biggest untapped

0:24:05.560 --> 0:24:09.440
<v Speaker 1>sources of energy out there is the momentum uh in

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 1>these vehicles. And uh so, the mania you electrify you

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you start to harvest that. Basic ideas like that are

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.000
<v Speaker 1>really a big thing. And um so, I think, yes,

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 1>taking a lot of the waste out of the system

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of the wasted energy that's going to

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>get us a long ways towards climate change. And there

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be a lot of other great examples. I

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:33.680
<v Speaker 1>think we go we go to space again, We're gonna

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>find better ways, uh and better materials for insulation. You know,

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>heat shields are serious business in uh in space, and

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think ten years from now we'll have

0:24:46.320 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>much better insulators. That means we're going to be much

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 1>more energy efficient and again that's going to help with

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>with global warming. So there there's a lot that we

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>can do. We have really, really some daunting challenges, but

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>we think it to work on them. Let me jump

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.119
<v Speaker 1>in here and ask you this question because I started

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>out trying to do a twenty twenties comparisons in the

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>nine nineties, and what I'm reading between the lines is

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>the technology that you're looking at today seems to be

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>much bigger, broader impact, more significant both politically, socially and

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:28.040
<v Speaker 1>economically than some of the let's call them more frivolous

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com technologies that were Investor Darling's in the nineties.

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that a fair compare and contrast. I think so.

0:25:37.400 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, UM, if you look back at the one

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite examples is uh, you know, sort of

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>creative destruction, was we disintermediated travel agents. If there were

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who worked in the as travel agents.

0:25:51.720 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>There are still a few, but they're really kind of

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>high end concierge folks. Everybody can go online and book

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>their own travel right. Uh. And in fact, you know,

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>when I fly on Southwest Airlines, I just intermediate Travelocity

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and just go straight to state to the southwest side.

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>So um, that's a great efficiency. But yeah, and it's

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>not just the late ninety nineties with everyone wanted a website,

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>having a website for certain things, that was really really good.

0:26:20.320 --> 0:26:23.080
<v Speaker 1>But even since then, you know, look at what the

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 1>tech industry did with transportation. The right hailing services lift

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in uber Um fix a really really daunting problem, which

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>was that there's nothing wrong with the cab. It's just

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>that it's not here. Uh, that the cab dispatch function

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 1>just never never evolved to wear it all to be.

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>So now that we have GPS in our phones, we

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>can we can we can hail a cab no matter

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>where we are. That's great, it solved some problems. But

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I I think a lot of us are

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.879
<v Speaker 1>just uncomfortable with the idea that a lot of this

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>amazing technology is really useful in keeping current on our

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Instagrams and posting selfies all over the place. That's not

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a good look. I mean, even if you look good

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>on your Instagram, that's not a good look. Just being

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>all about that makes a lot of sense. So let

0:27:10.600 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>me finished by circling back. Do you think the current

0:27:15.280 --> 0:27:22.159
<v Speaker 1>environment is a late nineties bubble like market? And if not,

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>do you see pockets of bubbles in any areas in particular?

0:27:27.160 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, somebody asked me the other day about do

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you see bubbles? And I, I well said, of course

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:36.119
<v Speaker 1>I do, And I realized, Uh, there's there's the Haley

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Joe Osman character in the movie The sixth Ens where

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>he finally contesses to uh. He says, I see dead people, right,

0:27:43.920 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's he's very scared as he says that I

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of feel like I see bubbles everywhere I look,

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and that that's what I'm realizing is that's just the

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>normal natural part of the environment. There are bubbles all

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the time everywhere, and um, you're just uh, you're you're

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>not noticing them because when they pop there, each one

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 1>isn't necessarily big enough to take down the whole system. Um,

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:16.280
<v Speaker 1>but you know, most companies fail, Most companies don't get there. Uh,

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the actual survival rate is a lot lower, uh than

0:28:21.440 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>then you think it is when you do the real

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 1>accounting of it, and working with startups teaches you that

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:31.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty quickly. That's okay. Lots of stocks are overpriced, That's okay,

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>because the benefit to getting a few companies to be

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>really successful in solving it, getting it right. Um, those

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>benefits are worth it. Quite fascinating. So let's talk a

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:48.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit about We'll start with the technology funds. Doubling

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>your benchmark is quite an achievement. But what I'm more

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>fascinated by is you're up that much without owning Amazon, Alphabet,

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple or Facebook. How did you? How do you accomplish that?

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought you had to be in the giant big

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>cap tech stocks to put up triple digit returns like that. Well,

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it turns out that a twenty billion dollar

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 1>market cap you can go to forty billion just as

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>easily as a one trillion market caps can go to

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>two trillions. Uh, and in fact, in some cases even

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit easier. Um. You know, it is true

0:29:29.280 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that there are moments, and you know, we saw these again,

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the nineties and at other times when

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>people just want to pile into tech and they pile

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>into the names that they already know, and because they

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>get comfort in those names, they feel like they understand

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>them because they're familiar with them. Um, turns up, those

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 1>aren't actually the same thing. But okay, fine, there are

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:56.080
<v Speaker 1>moments when when when people do that. But taking a

0:29:56.200 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>longer view, uh, there is a better moment when people

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>are craving growth and they're seeing that to go get

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>a company that has a robust growth for years to come. Um,

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 1>you can't take the people who are already worth a

0:30:13.400 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars or more and populate your portfolio just with

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 1>those names. Um, you need to find companies that you know.

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe they're maybe they're only only twenty billion in market cap,

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but they're on their way to a hundred billion. That's

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a better way to return. But you've got to be

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>comfortable that you've done your homework and it's not a

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>household name. And people might look at your funny if

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you tell them that you own this crazy stock named

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>cheg or roku h. And that's okay. What about Tesla?

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I know you owned it briefly, but it really was

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>never a significant part of this portfolio. Why not own

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a Tesla? Is it you mentioned earlier? Hey, you don't

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>need me to tell you to go buy Microsoft. Is

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Tesla in the in category? You know, test was a

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>great example of when you're right, even if you forget

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>why you're right. If if the stock is working, um,

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe the best thing for you to do is just

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 1>turn off your computer and go to the beach uh

0:31:16.400 --> 0:31:19.800
<v Speaker 1>and let it be working for you. Uh. And and

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>so you know, shame on me for thinking that I was,

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, overly clever when the market the market was

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:28.200
<v Speaker 1>really really frothy, and so I thought I'd get cute

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and on a really really down day, I would uh

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>buy some beaten up Tesla shares and then write some

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>covered calls against it. And the worst I could do is,

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:40.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, makes x percent. And and of course then

0:31:40.320 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>it rallied right past that, and I got taken out

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of the stuck. Um. And that was just me trying

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to prove to myself once again that I'm not a

0:31:48.400 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>very good trader. Uh. And I should stick with investing. Um.

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, when you see a company like this that

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>becomes just absolutely unsupportable on the valuation side, that the

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers just don't seem to work. Um, you can you know,

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you can pull your hair out. Uh. You can shake

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>your head, or you can just say, all right, well,

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>that's the power of optimists. That's the power of when

0:32:16.840 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>people really believe in something, they will really support the

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 1>hell out of it. And UM, find other examples of that,

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>uh that you could put in your portfolio that haven't

0:32:26.800 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>been discovered yet and that haven't gotten all of that

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 1>psychology behind them just yet. Huh. I love this quote

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of yours quote. I like to remind people that the

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>time to invest in Netflix was when you never heard

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of Netflix. Explain the thinking behind that. Well, you know,

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the the argument is that pick any great um investment

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in technology, and what you're going to see is that

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>those stocks performed best when people were just figuring it

0:32:57.440 --> 0:33:00.520
<v Speaker 1>out and adding it to their portfolio. There's a there

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>was a moment where somebody would stay in a ABC corporation,

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>never heard of him, and then I think I figured

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>them out. Oh yeah, I'm I'm in on that idea.

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>I like that, and I just if I look back

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>over the years, some of our best years performance wise

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>were when other people were following in love with this,

0:33:18.120 --> 0:33:20.040
<v Speaker 1>falling in love with the stocks that we already owned.

0:33:20.360 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 1>But we made those investments in years where we didn't

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>necessarily perform that well. So you know, you you you

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 1>make your best investments, you know, a year in year

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>two and maybe you get all the return out of

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it in year four when people catch up to your

0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>way of thinking and start to agree with you. Quite interesting.

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, you launched the tech funds some sometime late

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in that cycle, and the returns despite that timing, they've

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 1>been top decile for over ten years two percent a

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>year or for fifteen years a year And I'm looking

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:00.239
<v Speaker 1>at your five year return is a year. What are

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you doing that is garnering these sorts of returns? Is

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it simply finding these currently unloved but future loved tech companies?

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Is that the secret? Sauce? The shortest answer that I

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>can give you to that question is what are we

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>doing being right? Um? And that's going to happen a

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:23.359
<v Speaker 1>fair amount of time, a fair amount of the time anyhow. Um.

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I go back to my early days as

0:34:28.120 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>an analyst at a market research firm, and um, when

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 1>when people said, well, how big is this market going

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to be? And how do you just determine how big

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.959
<v Speaker 1>this market is going to be? Nobody knows? Nobody really

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>knows how big upside is and the markets that you

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:48.320
<v Speaker 1>can understand really really well are already establishment. Do you

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>want to know how big is the market for automobile tires,

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:53.120
<v Speaker 1>There's somebody who's got all that data. You want to

0:34:53.160 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>know how big is the market for dental floss and toothpaste.

0:34:55.840 --> 0:34:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Somebody's got all that data. And you know what, that's

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>not where you want to invest. It's really boring. Uh.

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>If you want to know the market for a new

0:35:05.080 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>generation of small satellite, nobody really knows, uh, And that's

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:14.000
<v Speaker 1>what makes it so interesting. And so having worked on

0:35:14.080 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the job many many years ago as a young kid

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 1>and realizing that I was supposed to come up with

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a number, I kind of understand now that, Uh, it's

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:27.399
<v Speaker 1>it's not all about buttoning up your spreadsheets. Sometimes it's

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:30.160
<v Speaker 1>about leaning back in your chair and staring up the

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:33.080
<v Speaker 1>ceiling and asking yourself, just how big could this market become?

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>How big is this opportunity? And um, that's that's the

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>key thing there. Where when you see a company that's

0:35:42.360 --> 0:35:44.239
<v Speaker 1>in the right place at the right time, they're on

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the right track, then the question is just how much

0:35:47.680 --> 0:35:51.440
<v Speaker 1>bigger could this market become? How much? How high is up.

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>And Um, if you've got a good feel for answering

0:35:56.000 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that question, Um, then you're gonna be in some really

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 1>promising stocks and a few of them are gonna work

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>well for you. And that's that's what's gonna make that difference.

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:11.760
<v Speaker 1>So so last of these questions. You're a board member

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 1>at several Silicon Valley startups. I have to think that

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.759
<v Speaker 1>helps you keep a close eye on trends that are

0:36:18.800 --> 0:36:24.040
<v Speaker 1>developing in the private sector. Does this translate directly to

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:28.719
<v Speaker 1>ownership in the public sector, Yes, absolutely, because in the

0:36:28.800 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 1>commercial world, Uh, it's not that you know, public companies

0:36:32.920 --> 0:36:36.200
<v Speaker 1>only transact with public companies and private companies only transact

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>with private companies. Right, it's all mixed together. And one

0:36:40.680 --> 0:36:42.239
<v Speaker 1>of the things, of course that being on a on

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>a startup board teaches you is that, well, it gives

0:36:46.000 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you sort of a peek behind the curtain and you

0:36:48.040 --> 0:36:52.800
<v Speaker 1>see how much chaos is actually president most companies, and

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 1>how you know, there how many fires they have to

0:36:56.120 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 1>put out every week while still focusing on the big pictures. Um.

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 1>And so you'll you'll you know, you'll learn a few

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a few things that are really important. Uh and uh,

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and then along the way. Yes, you will get valuable

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>scuttle buds. Um. You know, one of my one of

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:17.399
<v Speaker 1>my favorite is, um, my favorite observations is you ask

0:37:17.440 --> 0:37:20.360
<v Speaker 1>people their opinions on things, You'll get much more valuable

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:22.439
<v Speaker 1>information than if you're just ask them for a data point.

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:25.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, everyone thinks that insider inside is all about

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>who's going to make their quarter, who's gonna miss their quarters?

0:37:28.640 --> 0:37:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I really couldn't care less. Uh, that's that's that's the

0:37:32.480 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 1>wrong game to play, and get in trouble for playing

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that game. Anyway. What you really should be doing when

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you're talking to somebody is to ask yourself, this person

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is an expert, is something they know a lot of

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:45.120
<v Speaker 1>things that I don't know? Um, what can I learned

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>from this person? And usually it's not about them divolving

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:54.600
<v Speaker 1>some facts and figures, it's about them sincerely, honestly sharing

0:37:54.640 --> 0:37:57.800
<v Speaker 1>their opinions. Those guys over there are a bunch of bosos.

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 1>These guys over here are the right guys. By the way,

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the real talent is leaving company X and going to

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 1>company Y. That's the kind of stuff I like to get.

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:10.800
<v Speaker 1>And so yes, working close superstartup companies gets you that

0:38:11.960 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>quite fascinating. Let's talk specifics about some of your favorite

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>investments today. What sectors and types of businesses have you

0:38:21.600 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>most excited. Well, you know, there's always a collection of

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>revolutions that are sort of underway within tech, and you know,

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you hear about what's getting disrupted today and what's in

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 1>mid disruption and what's in early disruption. Um So, despite

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:42.799
<v Speaker 1>the fact that Netflix has been at it now for many,

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:46.320
<v Speaker 1>many years, um we're still kind of in maybe the

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 1>middle innings of streaming. And the fact that cable companies

0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:52.720
<v Speaker 1>are still in business and still pushing the old business

0:38:52.800 --> 0:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>model is evidence that there's more to come. You know,

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the the old thing is history doesn't repeat. But Ryan,

0:39:01.160 --> 0:39:05.080
<v Speaker 1>what I would say is that today Roku rhymes with Netflix.

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Roku was that company that when I talked about it

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.280
<v Speaker 1>three or four years ago, I got a blank stare.

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And today more and more people recognize the name and

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of understand what they do, and they fit that

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 1>pattern of the company that fights with no one and

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:24.200
<v Speaker 1>wants to be everybody's partner. Uh And it gets themselves

0:39:24.239 --> 0:39:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of that trend. It kind of find

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:33.359
<v Speaker 1>there their niche within that ecosystem. And uh So I'm

0:39:33.480 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>excited about the move too, sort of the on demand streaming,

0:39:37.920 --> 0:39:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and I'm excited about Roku's position on what's still a

0:39:42.920 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 1>really really big wave. So that's one example. Another great example,

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I think is when we look at e v S

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles. One of the things that you have to

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:55.360
<v Speaker 1>dig a little bit to get this appreciation is the voltage.

0:39:55.400 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And the current requirements for electric vehicles are different, and

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:05.800
<v Speaker 1>that requires UH different different materials technology, and so a

0:40:05.920 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of the more efficient UH electronics they're not built

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>on silicon, but they're built on silicon carbides. And it

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>just happens that there's this company that's been struggling since

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I kid you not the late nine It's called Cree

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 1>and based in North Carolina, and they have been struggling

0:40:26.360 --> 0:40:30.520
<v Speaker 1>their way down this really difficult learning curve of how

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 1>do you work with this exotic material, and they have

0:40:35.160 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>finally found themselves in the exact right place at the

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 1>exact right time. Because power electronics made with silicon carbides

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:46.920
<v Speaker 1>perform much better and give you better electric vehicles. So

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:49.279
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to decide if you want to buy

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Tesla or you want to buy Lucid Motors, where you

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:54.840
<v Speaker 1>want to buy Neo, you want to get exposure to

0:40:54.880 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>this trend, uh, you can buy Cree and we have,

0:40:58.600 --> 0:41:02.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's one of those stocks has performed really well

0:41:02.560 --> 0:41:05.200
<v Speaker 1>but still has a fairly modest market cap and still

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 1>has plenty of headroom. And we're really excited about that.

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I recall Cree is one of the big innovators in

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 1>LED lights. I don't know twenty years ago, is this

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:19.719
<v Speaker 1>the same company came up with the chip or or

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Absolutely right, So this falls into the

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 1>category of a solution in search of a problem. What

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Cree developed was the ability to work with silicon carbides,

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 1>and they struggled for years to try to figure out

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:37.240
<v Speaker 1>what's the end market. We're silicon carbide really really taste,

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and they thought it was l e eds for a while.

0:41:41.520 --> 0:41:44.320
<v Speaker 1>But then what they found was that you didn't have

0:41:44.440 --> 0:41:48.840
<v Speaker 1>to make the perfect LED using silicon carbides. UH, you

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:54.360
<v Speaker 1>could make a cheaper LED using other technologies and other materials,

0:41:54.920 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and you could do it in China and so never

0:41:57.719 --> 0:42:01.120
<v Speaker 1>mind all that. And that was a really daunting challenge

0:42:01.160 --> 0:42:05.120
<v Speaker 1>for them to get through that, but they did quite interesting.

0:42:05.760 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 1>So are all these changes that are coming slow iterative

0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:14.759
<v Speaker 1>changes or are some of these more revolutionary than evolution.

0:42:15.560 --> 0:42:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's somebody once called a successful startup company,

0:42:20.320 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 1>an overnight success, ten years in the making. Uh, this, this,

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:27.320
<v Speaker 1>this often. And if you think about how long we

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:30.360
<v Speaker 1>had cell phones before one day you look around and

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:34.080
<v Speaker 1>noticed that everybody had a cell phone. Um, you know,

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:37.759
<v Speaker 1>for me, that was uh gosh. You know, in the

0:42:37.840 --> 0:42:40.800
<v Speaker 1>early nineteen eighties when I was a college student, nobody

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 1>had a cell phone. By the end of the eighties,

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:45.160
<v Speaker 1>anybody in sales had a cell phone, but that was

0:42:45.200 --> 0:42:47.440
<v Speaker 1>about it. Um. And by the end of the nineties,

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:49.440
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like everybody had a cell phone, but all

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:51.320
<v Speaker 1>they were doing on their cell phones was talking. So

0:42:51.520 --> 0:42:54.279
<v Speaker 1>you can see that the big, big, important changes they

0:42:54.360 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 1>take years to unfold, but when you look back at

0:42:56.960 --> 0:43:00.919
<v Speaker 1>it or you can't believe just just different things were,

0:43:01.760 --> 0:43:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, from one decade to the next. So obviously

0:43:05.719 --> 0:43:09.920
<v Speaker 1>evs are a longstanding trend that has nothing to do

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:13.680
<v Speaker 1>with the pandemic. But you've mentioned some things that seem

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to be a little pandemic related, obviously streaming being one

0:43:17.200 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of them. What about things like distance learning and remote work?

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Are these pandemic trends or do they have legs? Are

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 1>they going to continue once things start getting back to normal.

0:43:30.760 --> 0:43:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I think those those examples are both trends that were

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:39.400
<v Speaker 1>happening already, UM, but the pandemic accelerated them. One of

0:43:39.440 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 1>the things that's happened here is that our daily lives

0:43:42.800 --> 0:43:47.520
<v Speaker 1>have been so disrupted that almost anything is on the table.

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:50.320
<v Speaker 1>We're willing to rethink things, and we're willing to go

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:55.400
<v Speaker 1>try new things. And so that's UM. Overcoming the inertia.

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, inertia is really that's really tough. You've got

0:43:58.880 --> 0:44:02.920
<v Speaker 1>something that's not broke, Why fix it? Uh? And and uh,

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:04.879
<v Speaker 1>you know that's why you pay your cable bill every

0:44:04.920 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 1>month and figure the next month, I'll work the other

0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:13.360
<v Speaker 1>thing out. Um. And you know that's really true with education. UM. Unfortunately,

0:44:14.320 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the state of education, it's such that you've got people

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:22.560
<v Speaker 1>who have, through no faults of their own, are our

0:44:22.680 --> 0:44:28.719
<v Speaker 1>great advocates of supporting education and find themselves being defenders

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 1>of the status quo. And so I guess one of

0:44:33.320 --> 0:44:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the one great commentary I heard about a company one time,

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:38.320
<v Speaker 1>as they said, the guy said, this was a great company,

0:44:38.400 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>they just forgot to evolve. UM. I would look at

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:44.160
<v Speaker 1>our educational system and say they kind of look like

0:44:44.280 --> 0:44:50.600
<v Speaker 1>they forgot to evolve, and this pandemic now is maybe

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:53.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe going to give them the necessary kick in the

0:44:53.560 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>pants to hurry up and evolve and and figure out

0:44:57.680 --> 0:44:59.799
<v Speaker 1>how to make it better. I mean, my old alma mater,

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:04.319
<v Speaker 1>UC Berkeley, they've got students living on campus or living

0:45:04.440 --> 0:45:08.880
<v Speaker 1>off campus close by, but doing distance learning from their apartment, um,

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 1>rather than moving back to their parents house. But that's

0:45:11.160 --> 0:45:14.680
<v Speaker 1>a little odd. It's clearly a workaround, uh, And I

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's causing a lot of people to ask some

0:45:18.920 --> 0:45:22.480
<v Speaker 1>very good questions and figure out what's the better way

0:45:22.520 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to do this and how are we are we just

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:26.920
<v Speaker 1>getting stuck in our old ways of doing things or

0:45:27.400 --> 0:45:32.360
<v Speaker 1>or not. I think with college there's the whole social,

0:45:33.040 --> 0:45:37.880
<v Speaker 1>physical interaction aspect of it that gets a little lost,

0:45:38.680 --> 0:45:43.399
<v Speaker 1>um with distance learning. But they're obviously room for both, right,

0:45:43.520 --> 0:45:46.839
<v Speaker 1>They're not mutually exclusive. Oh, absolutely right. You could argue

0:45:46.880 --> 0:45:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that the university experience a lot of it is about

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:51.480
<v Speaker 1>learning in the classroom, but a lot of it is

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:54.479
<v Speaker 1>about getting on with life and you know, leaving the nest.

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 1>You can also argue that for elementary school, a lot

0:45:59.520 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of it is about learning, but a lot of it

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is simply daycare so parents can go to work. Um,

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you could argue that in a lot of zip codes

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that it's actually about making sure kids are not food

0:46:14.520 --> 0:46:18.799
<v Speaker 1>insecure and and it's actually a great way to make

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:22.960
<v Speaker 1>sure that you're you're investing in more ways than one

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in the next generation. So one of the things that's

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:29.680
<v Speaker 1>happening is is people are stepping back and looking at

0:46:30.640 --> 0:46:32.960
<v Speaker 1>as the educational system and saying, well, there's more than

0:46:33.040 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>one function going on here. Which of these functions can

0:46:36.160 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 1>be done better and differently? And are these naturally bundled together?

0:46:40.120 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Is a right to bundle daycare and food with learning?

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Your ABC probably seems to work. Uh. Is it natural

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to bundle together learning differential equations and organic chemistry with

0:46:55.360 --> 0:46:57.040
<v Speaker 1>learning how to go out and do your own laundry

0:46:57.040 --> 0:47:00.279
<v Speaker 1>and shop for your own groceries? Maybe? But you know

0:47:00.480 --> 0:47:03.120
<v Speaker 1>just which part of this picture needs to be disrupted

0:47:03.160 --> 0:47:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and rethought and which part of this picture is working

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:10.680
<v Speaker 1>just fine and ought to be preserved. That's a great

0:47:10.880 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 1>exercise for all of us to go through. So let's

0:47:13.640 --> 0:47:18.240
<v Speaker 1>stay with that idea around remote work. Obviously they're slack

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and zoom and all the other technologies. The enterprise companies

0:47:22.840 --> 0:47:25.919
<v Speaker 1>like Google and Microsoft and even Apple for that matter,

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:30.680
<v Speaker 1>have been big winners in this space. But I personally

0:47:30.760 --> 0:47:35.320
<v Speaker 1>find the groundhog day effect of seeming every day is

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the same. You're not what you describe as the person

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:42.480
<v Speaker 1>who you're dog sitting for or going to the supermarket.

0:47:42.920 --> 0:47:45.319
<v Speaker 1>You very much miss that. And I think it's as

0:47:45.400 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>true for work as it is for school or your

0:47:48.480 --> 0:47:52.839
<v Speaker 1>local community. What do you think stays from the work

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:56.960
<v Speaker 1>from home phenomena once we get past the pandemic? What

0:47:57.280 --> 0:48:00.279
<v Speaker 1>changes are taking place and and how will the world

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:03.920
<v Speaker 1>look after things get back to quote unquote normal if

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:06.799
<v Speaker 1>if we ever do, we're certainly not going to return

0:48:06.880 --> 0:48:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to pre pandemic world. But what does normal look like

0:48:10.520 --> 0:48:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in the future. Well, one thing that I think changes

0:48:13.600 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that the you know I look for I'm looking for

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:17.880
<v Speaker 1>silver linings, right, So one thing that I think the changes,

0:48:17.960 --> 0:48:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a really good thing, is that people are focused

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot more now on deliverable. So when we're just

0:48:25.080 --> 0:48:26.480
<v Speaker 1>going to have a zoom meeting and we're going to

0:48:26.560 --> 0:48:28.239
<v Speaker 1>talk about X, Y and Z, we're gonna get to

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:29.879
<v Speaker 1>the end of that zoom meeting and we're just gonna say,

0:48:29.920 --> 0:48:32.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, we're gonna come back around, you know,

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 1>in three days and meet again. And this is exactly

0:48:35.200 --> 0:48:39.279
<v Speaker 1>what people need to have achieved or brought back to

0:48:39.360 --> 0:48:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the table here. So I guess the the co worker

0:48:43.400 --> 0:48:45.480
<v Speaker 1>who just sort of hangs around and ship chats with

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody and tries to look busy and tries to be

0:48:48.160 --> 0:48:51.839
<v Speaker 1>in meetings and all that doesn't actually contribute that much.

0:48:51.920 --> 0:48:54.319
<v Speaker 1>But it's just trying to make sure he gets his job.

0:48:55.120 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 1>That guy's in trouble because in the age of zoom

0:48:57.600 --> 0:49:01.360
<v Speaker 1>meetings and all of this, and and working from a distance,

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:04.759
<v Speaker 1>you can't hide the fact that you're not delivering the

0:49:04.840 --> 0:49:08.680
<v Speaker 1>good um or it's much harder to hide that. So

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 1>I like that, you know. I guess this kind came

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>partly from a conversation I had with a woman who

0:49:15.760 --> 0:49:18.760
<v Speaker 1>was they went from being a consultant to an employee,

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 1>and she said, you know, actually consultants do really well

0:49:21.239 --> 0:49:23.759
<v Speaker 1>when they get hired because every time that they have

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a meeting or a project, they're looking for what's the

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:28.440
<v Speaker 1>deliverable at the end that they always come through with

0:49:28.600 --> 0:49:31.040
<v Speaker 1>something and they forced people to define what it is

0:49:31.120 --> 0:49:32.640
<v Speaker 1>they need and what it is they want that. That's

0:49:32.640 --> 0:49:35.000
<v Speaker 1>not the only thing. Um, there's a lot of other

0:49:35.080 --> 0:49:39.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff that maybe the softer sides are more creative side. Um,

0:49:39.640 --> 0:49:42.440
<v Speaker 1>we're just hanging around other people and thinking about things

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:46.879
<v Speaker 1>and bouncing ideas off each other. That's really great. UM.

0:49:47.760 --> 0:49:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess that maybe the journalistic equivalent of that is

0:49:50.600 --> 0:49:53.719
<v Speaker 1>where the where the good story ideas come from. Um

0:49:54.719 --> 0:49:57.759
<v Speaker 1>they get you know, ideas get tossed around and people

0:49:57.800 --> 0:50:01.640
<v Speaker 1>think about things and magic some time somehow happened. But

0:50:01.880 --> 0:50:05.480
<v Speaker 1>that that takes place in any workspace where um, the

0:50:05.760 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 1>people make each other more creative by this sort of

0:50:09.719 --> 0:50:12.880
<v Speaker 1>relaxed interaction. That's the thing that I think we're going

0:50:12.920 --> 0:50:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to find has been missing. And all this work at

0:50:15.719 --> 0:50:18.560
<v Speaker 1>home stuff, so we need to get we need to

0:50:18.600 --> 0:50:21.480
<v Speaker 1>get the right mix of that. So I think there'll

0:50:21.480 --> 0:50:23.759
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of offices that'll tell you that you

0:50:23.840 --> 0:50:25.320
<v Speaker 1>only need to come in a couple of days a

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:27.080
<v Speaker 1>week and you can work from home some other days.

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Makes a lot of sense. Last pandemic related question, So

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 1>casinos are closed, sports scambling seems to have all but disappeared,

0:50:37.360 --> 0:50:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people are replacing it with trading.

0:50:41.640 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of the whole robin hood TikTok

0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:49.640
<v Speaker 1>reddit community actively day trading for lack of a better word,

0:50:49.760 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Is this anything significant within the market or is this

0:50:53.280 --> 0:50:58.600
<v Speaker 1>just a small niche of visible but not especially market

0:50:58.680 --> 0:51:03.360
<v Speaker 1>moving participants. Well, you know, first, I'll just comment that

0:51:03.719 --> 0:51:07.360
<v Speaker 1>as as an active investor. As active investors, we can't

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:11.319
<v Speaker 1>complain that the market gets gets it wrong from time

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to time. I mean, if markets were always right, then

0:51:15.760 --> 0:51:17.839
<v Speaker 1>we would have to go find a way to make

0:51:17.840 --> 0:51:23.400
<v Speaker 1>an honest living somehow. Uh So the a's for the

0:51:23.560 --> 0:51:26.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, the robin hood crowds. I love those guys

0:51:26.520 --> 0:51:29.680
<v Speaker 1>when they're buying stocks that I already owned. Um and

0:51:30.120 --> 0:51:31.719
<v Speaker 1>uh but you know, I don't get to have it

0:51:31.800 --> 0:51:35.680
<v Speaker 1>both ways. Uh. If people get over excited about something,

0:51:37.200 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 1>there could be a harm and you know the and

0:51:40.880 --> 0:51:43.880
<v Speaker 1>you could or you could pay in all sorts of scenarios. Right,

0:51:43.960 --> 0:51:47.239
<v Speaker 1>what if you what if the robin hood crowd did

0:51:48.000 --> 0:51:51.640
<v Speaker 1>your favorite stock right through the steeling up to a

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 1>point where you just absolutely can't justify it, and so

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you do the rational thing and sell it, and then

0:51:57.560 --> 0:52:00.879
<v Speaker 1>it keeps going up, so everyone thinks about like, oh,

0:52:01.000 --> 0:52:02.880
<v Speaker 1>this is gonna crash, It's gonna be terrible and all that.

0:52:03.400 --> 0:52:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I look at this and think how many people got

0:52:06.120 --> 0:52:09.800
<v Speaker 1>forced out of test Lack because that crowd pushed that

0:52:09.920 --> 0:52:12.759
<v Speaker 1>stock up so fast, and and they'd have been better

0:52:12.840 --> 0:52:15.920
<v Speaker 1>off if the stock didn't look so explosive to the upside,

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and they just made a lot, a lot of money

0:52:18.200 --> 0:52:22.200
<v Speaker 1>over time. You know. I I think we all look

0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:25.320
<v Speaker 1>back with certain things with regret. And I mean I

0:52:25.680 --> 0:52:28.480
<v Speaker 1>look back at Amazon. You know, that's been out of

0:52:28.520 --> 0:52:31.040
<v Speaker 1>my portfolio for the last ten years. You know, I

0:52:32.040 --> 0:52:36.279
<v Speaker 1>would be even even happier today if if if I

0:52:36.360 --> 0:52:38.920
<v Speaker 1>hadn't let that that stock just run right out up

0:52:39.000 --> 0:52:46.440
<v Speaker 1>from out of my grasp. Um. So yeah, one one

0:52:46.520 --> 0:52:49.880
<v Speaker 1>scenario here is that that crowd um takes some of

0:52:49.960 --> 0:52:52.279
<v Speaker 1>my best stocks out of my hands by making them

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:57.920
<v Speaker 1>too expensive. Interesting, let's talk about those downturns and those recessions.

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:01.600
<v Speaker 1>You've said those are usually seen as bad times for

0:53:01.719 --> 0:53:07.080
<v Speaker 1>growth stocks, but they also reveal the best opportunities for

0:53:07.239 --> 0:53:14.759
<v Speaker 1>what stocks are doing well and what's just been coasting explained. Well, look, um,

0:53:15.560 --> 0:53:20.920
<v Speaker 1>somebody said once that um, you know, calling something a

0:53:21.000 --> 0:53:24.160
<v Speaker 1>commodity that is not a dirty word. You know, certain

0:53:24.200 --> 0:53:27.560
<v Speaker 1>commodities you know, Uh, there were times when you really

0:53:27.600 --> 0:53:30.359
<v Speaker 1>wanted to own oil. There were times when you really

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted to own cotton futures. Um. If you think of

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:40.120
<v Speaker 1>growth as a commodity, then growth is most valuable. Like

0:53:40.239 --> 0:53:44.040
<v Speaker 1>any commodity, it's most valuable when it's scarce. Well, in

0:53:44.120 --> 0:53:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the midst of a recession, growth is really scarce. And

0:53:48.280 --> 0:53:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the mainstream companies, uh that were you know,

0:53:52.640 --> 0:53:55.839
<v Speaker 1>where a good year was when they grew uh four,

0:53:56.400 --> 0:53:58.359
<v Speaker 1>and a bad year was when they you know, didn't

0:53:58.360 --> 0:54:01.320
<v Speaker 1>grow at all. Those face might be shrinking, and a

0:54:01.400 --> 0:54:04.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of the other companies that you know, uh thought

0:54:04.120 --> 0:54:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that they could grow ten percent every year are struggling

0:54:06.080 --> 0:54:10.560
<v Speaker 1>to grow one or two percent um. That's that's when

0:54:10.600 --> 0:54:13.480
<v Speaker 1>growth really is the most valuable. And if you can

0:54:13.600 --> 0:54:18.200
<v Speaker 1>identify growth and see it where other people don't get appreciated,

0:54:19.239 --> 0:54:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be making some of the best investments

0:54:21.719 --> 0:54:26.759
<v Speaker 1>of your career right during those times. And so yeah,

0:54:27.080 --> 0:54:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you look at O eight No. Nine, that was probably

0:54:29.600 --> 0:54:31.759
<v Speaker 1>a really good time to get into Netflix, probably a

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:35.840
<v Speaker 1>really good time to get into Apple. Yeah, in in

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:40.000
<v Speaker 1>boom times, everybody looks like a growth story, and that's

0:54:40.239 --> 0:54:43.839
<v Speaker 1>that's wrong. And uh yeah, during a bust. It looks

0:54:43.880 --> 0:54:47.120
<v Speaker 1>like no one's growing. That's also wrong. Huh. Quite interesting.

0:54:47.719 --> 0:54:50.239
<v Speaker 1>So I only have you for a finite amount of time.

0:54:50.680 --> 0:54:53.719
<v Speaker 1>Let me jump to some of my favorite questions that

0:54:53.840 --> 0:54:57.000
<v Speaker 1>I ask all of my guests. And since we've been

0:54:57.040 --> 0:55:00.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about Netflix, let's discuss what have you been streaming

0:55:00.880 --> 0:55:06.400
<v Speaker 1>these days? Give us your favorite lockdown entertainment? You know, Um,

0:55:07.440 --> 0:55:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I have to say that, like a lot of people

0:55:09.440 --> 0:55:17.120
<v Speaker 1>who like complex business and drama and true crime stories, um,

0:55:18.120 --> 0:55:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that Breaking Bad put us all on a really dark path.

0:55:22.040 --> 0:55:25.360
<v Speaker 1>And for me, that path went from Breaking Bad to

0:55:25.600 --> 0:55:34.839
<v Speaker 1>Narcos to Ozark too uh zero zero zero two gomra uh.

0:55:34.960 --> 0:55:37.719
<v Speaker 1>And so currently I'm screaming Goma, which has got me

0:55:37.840 --> 0:55:40.759
<v Speaker 1>thinking of that I can almost speak Italians and and

0:55:41.840 --> 0:55:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just very dark. And so I need to break

0:55:45.160 --> 0:55:48.880
<v Speaker 1>out of that rent because because you know, um, that's

0:55:49.000 --> 0:55:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's not a good place to be. So the

0:55:51.000 --> 0:55:52.600
<v Speaker 1>other great thing that I saw the other day was

0:55:52.800 --> 0:55:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a biography on Ulysses S. Grant, and it was a

0:55:57.440 --> 0:55:59.759
<v Speaker 1>wonderful look. When most people look at that periody and

0:55:59.800 --> 0:56:02.640
<v Speaker 1>you have history, they focus on Lincoln Um. Grant was

0:56:02.719 --> 0:56:06.919
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful strategist, uh and um. It was a great

0:56:06.960 --> 0:56:10.680
<v Speaker 1>example two of of an individual who wasn't really a

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:14.880
<v Speaker 1>big success in life until he found his role. And

0:56:15.000 --> 0:56:17.960
<v Speaker 1>when he found his role, he became a U a

0:56:18.040 --> 0:56:21.600
<v Speaker 1>big success and that was that was wonderful. Man. I'm

0:56:21.680 --> 0:56:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a big fan of the Planet Money uh podcast over

0:56:26.560 --> 0:56:31.040
<v Speaker 1>over on NPR UM. But of course I did listen

0:56:31.160 --> 0:56:34.879
<v Speaker 1>to Odd Lots the other day on their their story

0:56:34.920 --> 0:56:36.759
<v Speaker 1>on t SMC and I thought that was well done.

0:56:37.840 --> 0:56:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And yeah and and I and I love there's one

0:56:43.200 --> 0:56:47.160
<v Speaker 1>called Cautionary Tales that talks about disasters and how they happened. Um.

0:56:47.360 --> 0:56:49.239
<v Speaker 1>And then finally, hardcore history is a kind of a

0:56:49.360 --> 0:56:53.479
<v Speaker 1>niche uh sort of a military history uh um game,

0:56:53.560 --> 0:56:57.160
<v Speaker 1>which is it's great too, you know, to to get

0:56:57.280 --> 0:57:02.239
<v Speaker 1>your strategic gears turning quite interesting. Tell us about your

0:57:02.239 --> 0:57:06.520
<v Speaker 1>mentors who helped to shape your career. Well, I you know,

0:57:06.640 --> 0:57:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't. I didn't work at uh you know, at

0:57:10.080 --> 0:57:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the elbow of Da Vinci or Nicolangelo or anything like that.

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:18.080
<v Speaker 1>But I did read a lot um from uh specifically

0:57:18.120 --> 0:57:21.720
<v Speaker 1>in investing from Peter Lynch and Warren Buffett. Um. You

0:57:21.800 --> 0:57:23.720
<v Speaker 1>know Peter Lynch when he wrote one up on Wall

0:57:23.760 --> 0:57:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Street kind of gave people permission to uh realize that

0:57:29.080 --> 0:57:31.240
<v Speaker 1>they have an edge. You're an expert at something, you

0:57:31.320 --> 0:57:33.680
<v Speaker 1>just need to figure out what it is. Uh. And

0:57:34.040 --> 0:57:37.440
<v Speaker 1>so as an engineer who was looking at tex stocks

0:57:37.480 --> 0:57:40.919
<v Speaker 1>and wondering about the efficient market hypothesis, that was a great,

0:57:42.080 --> 0:57:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a great way of a framing things. That was very helpful.

0:57:45.440 --> 0:57:51.280
<v Speaker 1>And I I just loved the home fund wisdom of Buffett.

0:57:51.520 --> 0:57:55.000
<v Speaker 1>He's great at actually being a bit of a disruptive

0:57:55.120 --> 0:58:00.440
<v Speaker 1>radical and disguising it as being a very conventional kind

0:58:00.440 --> 0:58:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of homespun of uncular guy. Um. But both of those

0:58:04.240 --> 0:58:08.560
<v Speaker 1>people gave really well reasoned explanations for why it was

0:58:08.720 --> 0:58:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that the Emperor has no clothes. And that's that's one

0:58:12.720 --> 0:58:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of those great lessons in life that they don't tell

0:58:14.600 --> 0:58:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you when you're a kid growing up, is that the

0:58:16.200 --> 0:58:17.880
<v Speaker 1>adults are kind of making a lot of this up

0:58:17.920 --> 0:58:20.680
<v Speaker 1>as they go. Um. And it's not quite such an

0:58:20.760 --> 0:58:23.600
<v Speaker 1>orderly place as you're led to belief, to say the

0:58:23.720 --> 0:58:27.520
<v Speaker 1>very least. Let's talk about everybody's favorite question. Tell us

0:58:27.840 --> 0:58:30.040
<v Speaker 1>some of your favorite books and what you might be

0:58:30.160 --> 0:58:34.200
<v Speaker 1>reading right now. A couple of books that are really

0:58:34.440 --> 0:58:38.160
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed early on had to do with individuals overcoming adversity.

0:58:38.320 --> 0:58:42.120
<v Speaker 1>So the Count of Monte Cristo and h The Old

0:58:42.200 --> 0:58:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Man in the Sea. The Old Man in the Sea

0:58:44.520 --> 0:58:47.480
<v Speaker 1>is still kind of my favorite, and uh made me

0:58:47.640 --> 0:58:50.200
<v Speaker 1>enough of a Hemingway fan that I later on I

0:58:50.320 --> 0:58:52.680
<v Speaker 1>read several of the other books and the one that

0:58:52.720 --> 0:58:55.160
<v Speaker 1>stuck with me was for Whom the Bell Tolls that

0:58:55.400 --> 0:58:58.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Spanish Civil War and had a great lesson

0:58:59.040 --> 0:59:00.960
<v Speaker 1>that there are times when you need to be decisive

0:59:01.040 --> 0:59:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and you're going to regret doing the thing you know

0:59:03.360 --> 0:59:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you need to do. I like reading strategy books, so

0:59:07.040 --> 0:59:10.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, Michael Porter's Competitive Strategy is a classic. You

0:59:10.640 --> 0:59:13.800
<v Speaker 1>know it. It provides a great framework for a lot

0:59:13.840 --> 0:59:17.000
<v Speaker 1>of your competitive thinking. But if you've already read that,

0:59:17.080 --> 0:59:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I recommend The Art of War, kind of a classic. Um.

0:59:22.040 --> 0:59:27.840
<v Speaker 1>And on the economic side, I think a great book

0:59:27.880 --> 0:59:32.160
<v Speaker 1>for me was UH, Free to Choose by Milton Freedman,

0:59:32.760 --> 0:59:37.160
<v Speaker 1>But I guess close runner up behind that is pre Economics,

0:59:37.360 --> 0:59:41.480
<v Speaker 1>which is just a wonderful way of of just being

0:59:41.640 --> 0:59:44.480
<v Speaker 1>being creative and how you frame the question is really

0:59:44.520 --> 0:59:46.200
<v Speaker 1>really important and I got a lot out of that. Now,

0:59:46.280 --> 0:59:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the next book, I have to tell you one of

0:59:48.840 --> 0:59:53.640
<v Speaker 1>those silver lining from the pandemic was, um, getting in

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a healthy habit of going for long walks and listening

0:59:55.760 --> 0:59:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to books on tape. Um. So I've listened to The

0:59:58.280 --> 1:00:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Great Gas Being Now finally, and UH enjoyed that a lot.

1:00:03.440 --> 1:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>But when I was a senior year in college, I

1:00:06.800 --> 1:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>got into an argument with a guy who was a

1:00:09.000 --> 1:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>sociology major and and you know, sciences versus humanities, and

1:00:13.520 --> 1:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I made the case that, um, you know, really you

1:00:18.120 --> 1:00:20.040
<v Speaker 1>couldn't if you're gonna learn the sciences you have to

1:00:20.080 --> 1:00:23.080
<v Speaker 1>do while you're at university. And I think the way

1:00:23.120 --> 1:00:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I won the won the argument, at least in my

1:00:24.800 --> 1:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>version I won the argument, uh, was that I said,

1:00:28.720 --> 1:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I can always go read Moby Dick. Good luck five

1:00:31.800 --> 1:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>years from now getting your head around quantum physics. Uh.

1:00:35.800 --> 1:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, I never went back and read

1:00:37.920 --> 1:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Moby Dick. And the next book I'm reading will be

1:00:40.080 --> 1:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a you know, going out for a walk, a long

1:00:42.640 --> 1:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>walk for a a podcast, and and Moby Dick is

1:00:46.800 --> 1:00:51.000
<v Speaker 1>up next. That's interesting, to be fair to the sociologist.

1:00:51.600 --> 1:00:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I recently took a course on astrophysics online. It's not

1:00:57.200 --> 1:01:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the same as having those exam coming up each quarter,

1:01:02.480 --> 1:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>but you do get broad exposure to an area you

1:01:07.840 --> 1:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>you might be interested in. Not the same as the class,

1:01:11.480 --> 1:01:16.840
<v Speaker 1>but but certainly uh intriguing. And I had the same

1:01:16.920 --> 1:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>experience with that you did with Old Man in the Sea.

1:01:20.240 --> 1:01:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I started reading it on a on a flight to Florida,

1:01:23.320 --> 1:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and by the time we landed, I was done and

1:01:25.080 --> 1:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>it was just an absolutely you know, you're it's one

1:01:28.680 --> 1:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of those books you're sad when it's over and you

1:01:31.400 --> 1:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>immediately want to reread. Yeah, yeah, and you really want

1:01:35.840 --> 1:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>to meet the great DiMaggio that was that was the great.

1:01:38.800 --> 1:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>But the hero of the story has his own hero

1:01:41.400 --> 1:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and this great DiMaggio that he hears about on radio.

1:01:44.560 --> 1:01:47.280
<v Speaker 1>What sort of advice would you give to a recent

1:01:47.480 --> 1:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>college grad who was interested in a career in either

1:01:52.400 --> 1:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>technology or investment management. Well, I think I would give

1:01:56.320 --> 1:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the same basic advice no matter what your career interest is.

1:02:00.040 --> 1:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>And that is so much of life, whether it's you

1:02:02.360 --> 1:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>know it is, you know your career and your in

1:02:06.040 --> 1:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>what business you're going to be in, it's not really

1:02:08.640 --> 1:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>about money. Money is a construct that any economics professor

1:02:14.880 --> 1:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>will tell you. It's only there to facilitate ever more

1:02:18.200 --> 1:02:22.920
<v Speaker 1>complex bartering and you're well, you're always bartering what it

1:02:23.080 --> 1:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>is you can do for somebody and what it is

1:02:25.320 --> 1:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>they can do for you, and you're making all of

1:02:27.400 --> 1:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>these trades. Uh. And so before you start sitting down

1:02:32.160 --> 1:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and figuring out how to barter, you need to understand

1:02:36.040 --> 1:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>what it is that you have to offer other people.

1:02:38.400 --> 1:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>You need to get to know yourself and figure out

1:02:40.960 --> 1:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>what it is that you can offer others. And if

1:02:44.760 --> 1:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it's not enough, then you need to cultivate that. You

1:02:47.200 --> 1:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>need to work on what can you become? Um And

1:02:53.480 --> 1:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>once you figured that out, then you can, uh, then

1:02:56.760 --> 1:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>you can make your way in life. So I think

1:02:58.160 --> 1:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot, a lot more effectively UM and I UM,

1:03:03.680 --> 1:03:06.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's not about finding a job that you can

1:03:06.600 --> 1:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>get that pays. Well, that's only one component, right. I mean,

1:03:10.520 --> 1:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the perfect job is one where or the perfect career

1:03:13.840 --> 1:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>is one where you you enjoy it um and uh

1:03:18.320 --> 1:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>So even when it's not paid, you still enjoy going

1:03:20.760 --> 1:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to work, you're good at it, and other people valuate

1:03:24.440 --> 1:03:26.160
<v Speaker 1>if you can if you can get those three things

1:03:26.240 --> 1:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to line up for you, um, it's going to click.

1:03:29.440 --> 1:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>But you can't do that unless you really know yourself.

1:03:32.800 --> 1:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's pretty good advice, and our final question,

1:03:36.280 --> 1:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you know about the world of investing in

1:03:38.640 --> 1:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>technology today that you wish you knew twenty five or

1:03:42.480 --> 1:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>so years ago when you were first getting started. Uh.

1:03:48.320 --> 1:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess what I would say is that the world

1:03:50.520 --> 1:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is a much bigger mess than you realize. Uh. It

1:03:54.400 --> 1:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>really is chaos out there, and there's a lot of

1:03:57.360 --> 1:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>things that are far from perfect. And that's actually a

1:04:01.760 --> 1:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>good thing because it means that you can go out

1:04:04.040 --> 1:04:07.040
<v Speaker 1>there and you can find ways to improve it. Uh.

1:04:07.160 --> 1:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the example that everyone can relate

1:04:10.080 --> 1:04:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is that um generations of people complained that they couldn't

1:04:14.040 --> 1:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>get a cab and then somebody created a right hailing

1:04:16.680 --> 1:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>service where you could and got rich doing it. So, yes,

1:04:22.560 --> 1:04:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it is. It is a big mess out there, and

1:04:25.200 --> 1:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>we can't complain about it. Our job is to say

1:04:27.720 --> 1:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to ourselves, with the conventional wisdom is usually wrong about something,

1:04:30.840 --> 1:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe more than one thing. Our job is to figure

1:04:33.640 --> 1:04:37.360
<v Speaker 1>out what they're prevailing with and is wrong about and

1:04:37.440 --> 1:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>then act on that. Quite intriguing Kevin, thank you for

1:04:40.840 --> 1:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>being so generous with your time. We have been speaking

1:04:43.880 --> 1:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>with Kevin Landis of Firsthand Funds. He is the c

1:04:47.520 --> 1:04:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I O. Of Firsthand Capital Management and President and chairman

1:04:50.640 --> 1:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of Firsthand Funds. If you enjoyed this conversation, well be

1:04:55.000 --> 1:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>sure and check out any of the other four hundred

1:04:57.960 --> 1:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>or so we've done over the past seven almost eight years. God,

1:05:02.280 --> 1:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty insane. Um. You can find that at iTunes, Spotify,

1:05:07.400 --> 1:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>wherever you find your favorite podcasts. We love your comments,

1:05:11.320 --> 1:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>feedback in suggestions right to us at m IB podcast

1:05:15.840 --> 1:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot net. Be sure and give us a

1:05:18.240 --> 1:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>review on Apple iTunes, and you can sign up from

1:05:21.480 --> 1:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>my daily reads at Dholts dot com. Check out my

1:05:25.000 --> 1:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>weekly column at Bloomberg dot com slash Opinion. Follow me

1:05:29.360 --> 1:05:33.040
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at rid Holts. I would be remiss if

1:05:33.080 --> 1:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I did not thank the crack staff that helps put

1:05:35.280 --> 1:05:39.720
<v Speaker 1>these conversations together each and every week. Reggie Bazil is

1:05:39.800 --> 1:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>my audio engineer. Attica val Bron is our project manager.

1:05:44.560 --> 1:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Michael Boyle is my producer. Michael bat Nick is my

1:05:47.760 --> 1:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>head of research. I'm Barry Reholts. You've been listening to

1:05:51.680 --> 1:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio