WEBVTT - Tech News: Harder, Better, Faster, Bye Bye

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and a love of all things tech. And this is

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the tech news for Tuesday, February twenty three, twenty one. Yesterday,

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Spotify announced a ton of stuff that I would like

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to touch on. Before I get to that, I should

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 1>give you all a disclaimer. I'm an employee of I

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Heart Media and Spotify is a competing company in a

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of ways. Also, what I say here is from

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>my own perspective. It doesn't reflect any sort of official

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I heart stance, mostly because I'm not important enough to

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>even know if there is an official stance, let alone

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever it might be. So let's get to those announcements.

0:00:59.320 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>One of them is that Spotify is launching a Hi

0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:07.839
<v Speaker 1>Fi or high fidelity premium subscription service later this year.

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 1>The service will give subscribers access to lossless streaming audio

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>quality and a quick word on that. Back when data

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 1>throughput had a lot less behind it, it was really

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 1>important to compress file sizes so that downloads wouldn't take

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>sadar and long. But many of those compression strategies meant

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that this process would also give the boot to some

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of the files data stuff that was deemed unnecessary. When

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it came to audio, this meant that you would end

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:41.080
<v Speaker 1>up with lossy audio files like m P three's. These

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:45.119
<v Speaker 1>were ones that had shed some of the information and

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>thus some of the depth and vibrancy of the audio recording. Now,

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Spotify is not the first to go with a lossless

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 1>audio streaming service. Deezer, Title and Amazon Music all have

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>loss lists options for premium subscribers. Now, I honestly don't

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>know how big this is in general. I don't have

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>a good finger on the pulse of the average consumer.

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>My sense is that most people really like the convenience

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of streaming services and portable music options in general, and

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that they don't really care quite as much about the

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>actual fidelity of the music they listen to. But I

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>could be totally in the wrong here. That's just from

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>my own, you know, feeling. I still like listening to

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>music on high quality now and again, but that tends

0:02:35.160 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to be on a home system using outdated media. At

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>this point, most of the time, I'm actually just listening

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to stuff without worrying about the fidelity as much I'm

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>a monster, I know. Spotify has also been making some

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>really big moves and podcasting, and has been for a

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:56.399
<v Speaker 1>little while now. They have launched several podcasts that are

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>exclusive to the platform, and they've brought on others and

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>made them exclusive to Spotify. That exclusivity approach is a

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>tough one. You're trying to lure people over to using

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a specific platform with content that's unique to that platform,

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>which is a different approach from how we do things

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>over at my Heart, for example, our shows appear on

0:03:18.280 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>all platforms, from my tunes to Spotify, to the I

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Heart app and everything. Now, there's nothing necessarily wrong with

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>launching an exclusive show for your platform, except that you

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>run into the danger of limiting that shows audience. We

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>learned through the experience of Microsoft Mixer, for example, that

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't always work to try and bring over heavy

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>hitters to create exclusive content and thus grow your audience

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that way. That doesn't always work out the best. If

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the creator of the show is getting paid truckloads of

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 1>cash in return for their agreement, they might not really

0:03:54.720 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>care so much if their audience isn't as huge. But

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>for smaller creators, exclusivity can sometimes mean that you never

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>get your feet under you. Still, Spotify does have some

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 1>truly heavy hitters in the space. The company has signed

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 1>a deal with d C Comics and there will be

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>numerous podcasts set in the d C Comic universe. The

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>first of those will be Batman Unburied. And Spotify also

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.320
<v Speaker 1>signed a deal with the A G. Bio production company

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>founded by the Russo brothers. That's the pair behind Avengers

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:29.599
<v Speaker 1>Infinity War and Avengers in the Game, so they've got

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>some serious star power behind them. It remains to be

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>seen if that is going to pull uh significantly more

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>users over onto that platform. Not long ago, Spotify acquired

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the podcast hosting platform Megaphone, which includes a feature called

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:49.480
<v Speaker 1>streaming ad Insertion. Now, if you've ever listened to an

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 1>old episode of Tech Stuff or Stuff you Should Know,

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.520
<v Speaker 1>or Stuff you missed in history class or something like that,

0:04:55.040 --> 0:04:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you might have noticed that the ads that run on

0:04:58.640 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>any show, whether it's from the Deep Archives or not,

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>are their recent ads. So the episodes could be several

0:05:05.400 --> 0:05:07.559
<v Speaker 1>years old, but the ads are new, and that's because

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>of tools like streaming ad Insertion. Essentially that let's podcasters

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>designate specific tagged segments like time codes within a podcast,

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and ads can swap out dynamically in those spots. This

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>gives podcasters the chance to leverage their whole back catalog

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>for ad deals, not just the most recent episodes. So

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>it also means you're not going to hear a five

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>year old advertisement for a toothbrush or a mattress and

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 1>has a code that doesn't work anymore. Spotify is building

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:42.359
<v Speaker 1>out its ad capabilities for podcasters was something called the

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Spotify Audience Network. Details are a little scarce, but the

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>company says that the service will help podcasters monetize their

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>shows more effectively. The plan is to first roll out

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the service to Spotify's exclusive podcasts, and then sometime further

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>down the line, they will roll it out to third

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>party podcasts that are on the Spotify platform. The company

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:09.359
<v Speaker 1>also announced new creator tools during its live event for

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>musical artists. These tools are meant to help with discovery

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.039
<v Speaker 1>and making sales to new customers. The artists will be

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:19.359
<v Speaker 1>able to select which tracks they want to prioritize for

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 1>discovery purposes, and Spotify will use a pop up notification

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:28.039
<v Speaker 1>called Marquis to get attention from users. Markie was actually

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>introduced last year in twenty twenties. Just now it's going

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to have some new features in it and get rolled

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>out to a larger number of artists, and that means

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 1>that we're gonna see a lot more artists potentially get

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.279
<v Speaker 1>discovered through this tool. I think that's really cool. I

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>think discovery remains one of the toughest challenges for any

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>content creator, regardless of what medium they're working within and

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>what platform they're using. Discovery is just tough. We know

0:06:55.920 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>that more people than ever are creating awesome stuff and

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>putting it up online, and it is really challenging to

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:09.160
<v Speaker 1>find the really good stuff among everything else that's being uploaded.

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So I'm all four tools that allow creators to get

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>more eyeballs or ears as the case may be, on

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 1>their work and in non Spotify news, because believe me,

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>we actually have some. Google is lifting its ban on

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>political ads starting tomorrow. Google first put a ban on

0:07:30.080 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>political advertising following the insurrection at the nation's capital on

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>January six. Though Google only started the ban on January,

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that particular ban expires tomorrow, that being Wednesday, and it

0:07:44.320 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>will mean that Google will accept political ads, including those

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that focus on specific people whether those are candidates or

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>an elected official, as well as ballot measures. So if

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you're in the United States, you might be groaning a

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit at the thought of all this, because as

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.480
<v Speaker 1>we just went through a truly tumultuous election, and the

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>thought of having another round of political ads hit us

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>so soon afterward is a bit disheartening. I would say. Facebook,

0:08:11.480 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>for the record, also has a ban on political ads

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in place, and at least as of the time of

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>this recording, that ban is still in place. It will

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see if Google's decision will affect Facebook

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.400
<v Speaker 1>or if this will just be a diverging path with

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Google accepting ads and Facebook continuing to ban them. By

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the time this episode goes out, we might know more

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>than maybe that Facebook will have already changed its own path.

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. If you've got Netflix running on an

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Android device, you might have some new stuff to watch.

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:50.640
<v Speaker 1>The company has a feature called Downloads for You, and

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the idea is that Netflix will select content based on

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 1>your viewing habits, and it will pre download stuff you

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>haven't watched yet for you, so you can watch it whenever,

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>even if you don't have a current Internet connection. You know,

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>like we used to have to do on airplanes. I

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>vaguely remember flying on airplanes. Anyway, you get to choose

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 1>the data limit for this feature if you even wanted

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 1>on at all. It's an opt in, so you can

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:21.120
<v Speaker 1>go and turn on this option if you do want it.

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.559
<v Speaker 1>You can choose to limit the data to one gigabyte,

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:29.440
<v Speaker 1>three gigabytes, or five gigabytes. Also, the service will only

0:09:29.520 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>download content when it's over a WiFi connection, so you

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about it eating up all of

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the data on your cellular plan. I don't think I

0:09:39.559 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>would opt into this, but only because I tend to

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>watch really really bad movies on Netflix so that I

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>can talk about them with my buddies Eric and I

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>as and I don't need Netflix judging me more than

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it already does, or providing me the next Shark Nado

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>movie before I'm really emotionally prepared for it. We do

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 1>know that this same service is coming to the iOS

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>versions of Netflix later on. I'm curious to see how

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>many people actually use it. Again, this gets into discovery,

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the idea that Netflix is looking at the sort of

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>stuff you tend to view, drawing conclusions, and then selecting

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>stuff for you that it thinks you're going to like

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>based on your previous behaviors. Another version of AI knowing

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>ourselves better than we do. A study funded by the

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Jane and Autos Erko Foundation and the Academy of Finland

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>found that the more human robot appears, the more harshly

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we judge that robots actions, at least under a very

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>specific hypothetical situation. So the team gave this hypothetical situation

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:54.040
<v Speaker 1>two people and had different versions of the scenario and

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 1>ask them to kind of grade the morality of a

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 1>person or robots to decision. And the problem was a

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>classic one, the trolley problem. You probably know this one generally.

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>They it's presented as the Other's a trolley that's hurtling

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>down a track and it's about to collide with a

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>group of five people, and if it does, it will

0:11:15.320 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>kill all five. You happen to be standing next to

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a rail switch, and if you throw the switch, the

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>trolley will change to a new track of rails, and

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it will definitely kill one person who's on that track,

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>but the five people on the other track will all

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 1>be spared. So would you do nothing and thus allow

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>five people to die through your inaction, or would you

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>throw the switch, thus dooming that one person on the

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:46.079
<v Speaker 1>other track to die. I mean effectively you're killing someone, right,

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:48.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean you're either killing someone by not acting at all,

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>or killing five people by not acting at all, or

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you're actively killing someone by throwing a switch. It's almost

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>like having a loaded gun and you pull the trigger

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>in that case. So my point is there's not necessarily

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a right answer to this question, or maybe not a

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>single right answer. It all depends upon your perspective and

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 1>whether you think that saving five people is worth dooming

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>someone else to death, or if you think somehow by

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>not acting absolves you of the responsibility. Well, the study

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>found that when people were presented with this scenario in

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>which a human had to make the decision or a

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:31.119
<v Speaker 1>very utilitarian robot had to make the decision, the response

0:12:31.200 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to those decisions were essentially that both that human and

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that robot were making morally sound choices. However, the more

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>human the robot was supposed to be, the more harshly

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>people judged it. The more they said, oh, that's not

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a moral choice, which is weird, right, because they would

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>give a pass to the regular robot and they would

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>give a pass to the human, but a human looking

0:12:56.520 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>robot suddenly seemed like that was different somehow, even though

0:13:01.320 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it's the same situations. Now. This is just one study,

0:13:05.160 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>mind you, but it does show how the field of

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>robotics hinges not just on technology but also human psychology,

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and the field of human and robot interactions is one

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I really find fascinating. And our last story is after

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight years, daft Punk has split up and retired.

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>They were incredibly influential in the house and techno music genres.

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:33.200
<v Speaker 1>They were known for not just their music, but their

0:13:33.280 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>live performances, which became increasingly rare over the years. I

0:13:37.960 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>think Harder, Better, Faster, Stronger gets rediscovered every few years,

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>which just shows how amazing their ability was to craft music.

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>They also created the incredible soundtrack to Tron Legacy, and

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:55.680
<v Speaker 1>I maintained that that score and Michael Shean's performance were

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>really the two standouts of that movie. Their last album

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 1>came out in so long daft Punk, thanks for all

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the tunes, And that wraps up the headlines for today, Tuesday,

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>February one. We'll be back tomorrow with a full episode

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of tech Stuff. If you guys have suggestions, for things

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I should cover in future episodes of tech Stuff, give

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>me a shout let me know on Twitter. The handle

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>we use is text stuff hs W and I'll talk

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon. Text Stuff is an I

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from My Heart Radio,

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:41.880
<v Speaker 1>visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.