WEBVTT - Talkin’ Cowboys: Revenant Reality 0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:03.040 The following. 0:00:03.080 --> 0:00:05.040 He is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com and 0:00:05.080 --> 0:00:06.800 the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. 0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:11.840 Cowboys. 0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:16.160 This he's Talking Cowboys Straining live. 0:00:16.000 --> 0:00:19.400 From the Dallas Cowboys World Course at the Star in Frisco. 0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:25.880 Touch don't tek burgers here, that's got tigsacks any pay today, 0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:27.479 touchdown and. 0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:33.920 Now your hosts Isaiah Standback, Patrick Walker, Josh Rodriguez and 0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:35.279 Kyle Yeomans. 0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:41.120 It's a Monday morning edition of Talking Cowboys, presented by 0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:43.080 Black Rifle Coffee Company, live. 0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:46.360 From the Star in Frisco, Texas, in the SWBC Studios. 0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:47.120 Welcome in, everybody. 0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:48.680 We've got the whole cast and crew ready for you 0:00:48.760 --> 0:00:52.639 to rock today with Patrick Noci Walker, Josh Rodriguez, Isaiah 0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.720 standback with Chris Beam in the back of Kyle Yeomans. 0:00:55.840 --> 0:01:01.320 The Cowboys fall in Week three, thirty one fourteen, and 0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:03.800 I don't know if it was just classified as a fall. 0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:06.640 It felt like it was a stumble that led into 0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:10.560 a face plant that led into tuck and roll that 0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:12.319 maybe went downhill. 0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:12.400 A little bit. 0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:13.800 Drawers are down the whole time. 0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:18.880 Yeah, like you got pants by a team that was winless. Yeah, 0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:19.360 not good. 0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:24.480 Not good in GB not in gb not great, bob uh. 0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:26.680 We're gonna break it down here over the next hour. 0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.040 First off, before we even get there, I would like 0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.720 to say thank you for listening, because we know you're 0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.640 frustrated too, but we're frustrated with you because it was 0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:37.200 frust embarrassing and frustrating. 0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:41.120 Loss, just plain and simple. It felt like you gave up. 0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:47.000 It felt like you man. Scheme wise was rough, execution 0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:51.000 wise was maybe even rougher, and yet here we are. 0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:51.680 I feel like No. 0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.280 C has a lot to say to dude. I'm I 0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.520 told you yesterday afterwards, I said, I think No C's 0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:01.360 gonna go Hamm on a Monday more name, especially after 0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.320 getting off the flight. What times y'all get back last night? 0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:04.040 Wasn't too bad? 0:02:04.240 --> 0:02:07.240 Too bad little after midnight? That's crazy trip. The trip 0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:12.680 started off weird and ominous. There was a two hour 0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.320 plus delay getting off the tarmac or even getting on 0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.280 the tarmac because we didn't have an airplane. An airplane 0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:23.000 for those didn't one of those to kind of get 0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:26.679 so was everybody just kind of chilling chartered right, you charted. 0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:31.200 Yeah, waiting in the But to be fair, it was 0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:35.919 an issue with DFW as a whole. So everybody grounded. 0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.280 Everybody got grounded, and I mean it was it was 0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:44.239 apropos because one thing that DFWS and Airport and the 0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.960 Dallas Cowboys had in common this weekend is. 0:02:47.240 --> 0:02:48.280 They didn't know how to communicate. 0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:54.120 So no takeoff either, couldn't get off the tarad so 0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:57.560 no air traffic control either, and no touchdown. 0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:01.080 Would you say that they were grounded? They we grounded 0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:03.239 the grounded. Yeah, rooted, rooted. 0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:09.919 That was last year, last years sorry, different different this year. Yeah, 0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.840 bottom line for the to avoid a fine. Let's just 0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:19.639 say it was a crap show. Crap show. Wow, what's 0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.640 what's because I know Cal's general question is what's your 0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:23.400 biggest takeaway? 0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:26.160 My takeaway is that I don't have a positive takeaway. 0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:32.080 Oh and the game started with a takeaway for the Bears, 0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:33.880 and it kind of went from there. You saw the 0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:36.920 defense get off to a quick three and our start. 0:03:37.320 --> 0:03:40.600 Javonte Williams gets the ball twenty six yard game, looking 0:03:40.720 --> 0:03:43.320 very much like Javante and then he gets his lunch 0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:47.120 money taken very uncharacteristic, and then what happens from there 0:03:47.200 --> 0:03:50.280 the next sequence of events that then lead to the 0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.400 first Bears touchdown it just all cascaded from there. 0:03:53.920 --> 0:03:56.520 Do you know why he had his lunch money taken? 0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:58.600 Talk by Zach. Allow people to go watch the film 0:03:58.640 --> 0:03:59.320 and figure out why. 0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:03.360 But I'll tell you there's one reason. One, yes, there 0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.560 is certain wide receiver did not finish his block. 0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.920 And let this is why we watch film. We do 0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.600 watch film. We watch film here Riguez was on it. 0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:14.280 We had not talked about this prior to the show, 0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:15.560 by the way at all. 0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:21.080 To your point, but my bull's eyes on a particular 0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:21.560 wide receiver. 0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.360 He ran good routes yesterday. He ran goo routes yesterday. 0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.040 But we talked about it last week. I believe it 0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:31.520 was we did the receiving group the running game. 0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.440 Big plays are dependent on the receiving group blocking downfield, 0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:39.640 and it is a decision two or not to based 0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:42.880 upon the effort. That's that's exerted, whether or not you 0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.760 want to engage in that smoke or not. And if 0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:49.200 you choose not to engage in that smoke and just 0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:51.760 kind of check the box and say, okay, I've got 0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:53.840 my hands on my guy. Now the running backs past 0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.040 me and I could just now let up. Hey, play 0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.120 still going, by the way, play still going. There are 0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:02.839 individuals who the thing called hustle. What's hustle? Effort? Yeah, 0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.120 there's effort. So certain plays, certain players are like, Okay, yeah, 0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.200 you might have quote unquote done your job, but I 0:05:08.480 --> 0:05:10.320 still see that there's an opportunity to go and make 0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:10.680 a play. 0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.280 So since you didn't finish me, I'm going to go 0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.359 take the ball. And that's what happened on that particular play. Now, 0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:18.800 we could point to a whole lot of things, but 0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:20.720 we're talking about a point that play. 0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.320 Javonte Williams did lose the ball. That's his responsibility to 0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.080 keep the ball. But I could tell you had somebody 0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.880 else finished their job, that person would not have been 0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.400 in position to take the ball away from Javontey. When 0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.320 this was a team thing, you saw the same thing, Josh, Yes, absolutely. 0:05:36.320 --> 0:05:39.880 It was Jalen Tolbert. And this is a criticism that 0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:42.600 we've had from week one. I mean even in the 0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.839 preseason and in training camp as far as like finishing 0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:51.920 those blocks, being able to be physical against your defensive 0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:54.520 player in front of you. He did not finish the play. 0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:58.039 That same player went out and snatched the ball away 0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:00.640 from Javontay Williams, who had an amazing game. I mean 0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.279 despite the fumble, he took his lunch money, like you said, 0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:06.680 going out of bounds. I was like that that was 0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:08.160 aut of bounds, that was out of bounds and it 0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:13.000 was not. But unfortunately it was that block from Jalen 0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:16.840 Tolbert that led to the fumble. So you say, but 0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.960 the takeaway really so they took it away from you. 0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:24.400 So you say, oh, that play notwithstanding your running back 0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:25.760 was having another great game. 0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:28.839 It was a great game, an amazing game. Ten carries, 0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:29.560 seventy six. 0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:33.039 Yards, ten carries seventy six yards, seven point six yards 0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.400 per carry, and he only had ten carries on the day. 0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:38.600 Okay, well that's because you were playing from behind the 0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:40.520 game started. How many carries did you have from the 0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.599 one yard line? Hold on? Still? Hold on? No, no, no, yeah, 0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:44.240 but hold on. 0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:49.400 Your running back is having another great day. So let's 0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.600 use your franchise wide receiver running back. 0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:54.720 Oh we're going back. You want to go to that? 0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:57.080 Hear me out? 0:06:58.279 --> 0:06:59.000 Did we talk about this? 0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:03.280 We talked about this on Talking Tuesday, Talking Tuesday. I 0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:04.880 forgot who who made that call. 0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:07.760 I blame that was No, it's not. 0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.760 I know you call in every Tuesday Yeah, talked about 0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.160 this to but he did ask the question. 0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:17.920 He asked the question, asked the question, I want to 0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:20.280 see more CD Lamb in the run game, And I 0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:24.840 think all of us looked at it and said not Na, no, no, 0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:26.520 you were. 0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:28.600 All if you wanted to mix it up. That's why 0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.960 you have the Cavante Turpin package. And Cavante was fully cleared. 0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:33.800 You should have used him on that package if that's 0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.280 what you were going to do. Why why why why 0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.320 why why? For the most part, coming into this game, 0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.800 I've loved how Shody has called plays. 0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:46.360 Okay, this was not a mistake when it came to 0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:47.640 that CD Lamb handoff. 0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:51.360 This was a gaff of monumental proportions that could have 0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.360 resulted in you losing your all Pro record setting wide 0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:56.800 receiver for the entire season. Because if you look at 0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:58.960 how his leg was rolled up on it is the 0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.600 grace of every almighty being that his leg did not 0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:06.080 snap James connor the fact that he was able to 0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.240 even come back in the game and test the ankle out. 0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.520 The willingness, the willingness which he showed his great and 0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.400 toughness from last year playing through that shoulder. 0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:15.320 There was there were there were. 0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.640 There were examples of willingness in that game, of coming 0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:20.200 wanting to come back in the game, and there was 0:08:21.000 --> 0:08:22.040 examples of not. 0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:24.920 Gentlemen, we'll get to that in a second. Gentleman. 0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.360 When you so, if you could have seen me in 0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.040 the press box in Chicago, when I saw Cede Lamb 0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.079 in the single back formation, I said, he better motion out, 0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.240 snapped the ball and handed him the ball. And as 0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.840 soon as he started running and I saw the trailer, 0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.000 I said, please no, And then he went down with 0:08:45.160 --> 0:08:48.600 the tackle, and I'm just like, oh my god. 0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:49.400 We didn't get up. 0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:51.160 We did not get up to the to the linebacker 0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:53.559 because our old line didn't get up to the linebacker 0:08:53.600 --> 0:08:54.120 that linebacker. 0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:58.000 That was another sequence of a lemony snicket, a sequence 0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.800 of a series of unfortunate events. Ced Lamb should not 0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:02.600 have been the ball carrier in the first place. 0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:03.920 And it's not like it was a wrinkle. 0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.719 He lined up, he lined up, he lined up, and 0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:11.480 your running back is running seven yards a carry. 0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:17.120 What are you doing, louder? Please? What are you doing again? 0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.240 All several things can be true at the same time. 0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:21.120 Come to this game. 0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.760 I love how Sharty was calling the game. We said 0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.559 on Tuesday, though you have a running back that is 0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:30.199 doing numbers. He is leading the league in yards per carry. 0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.320 You have the top three rushing defense. You have an offense, 0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.760 you have a package specifically for Cavante Turpin at running 0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:38.880 back that you have practiced time and time again in 0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:43.319 training camp. Why for the for in the name of 0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:47.760 all that is holy and good, would you risk ceed Lamb? 0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:49.719 So now you lose CD Lamb for the rest of 0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:54.920 the game, and your identity went with him. You couldn't 0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:58.000 get a chunk play to save your life. Jake Ferguson 0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:01.760 shout out to Jay fergus tried his best to contribute. 0:10:01.920 --> 0:10:05.000 I think, yeah, thirteen receptions on fourteen targets, but he 0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.600 averaged a little more than six yards. They you played 0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.200 right into their hands because now they shaded all their 0:10:11.200 --> 0:10:12.640 coverage to George Pickens and they said, you. 0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:14.800 Can have the underneath, you can have it. 0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.559 Come on, no, no, no, Now, I need that that 0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:23.000 facial expression. Give me what's behind that facial EXPRESSI because 0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:23.760 I know where you're going with it. 0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:29.840 Come on with it. There's so much are we doing. 0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:34.120 On Monday said after a loss like that, So I 0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:35.000 am I too? 0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.439 Am upset that they utilize CD in the backfield. I 0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:40.559 don't think it gives you an advantage in any regard. 0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.319 No, I just there's no situation where I find it. 0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:48.160 In other ways, that doesn't put yourself in a procular situation. 0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.079 Coaches, And even with that, it's. 0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.360 One play, and that one play turned out in a 0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:57.360 negative fashion. It very easily could have been a normal tax. Absolutely, 0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.800 but I think you learned your last year. You still 0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:00.600 I agree. 0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:02.839 We said it before the stat the reward is not 0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:06.120 worth the risk, he said exactly one orbatim on this 0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:06.920 show last week. 0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.559 But again, so that is what it is. Unfortunately, players 0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:10.520 get hurt in football. 0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.319 We would have not have liked to see him in 0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.480 that position, to be hurt from that position, right from 0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:19.520 that alignment, from that position, from that responsibility. All right, 0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:24.640 that's done. I am more bothered as we fast forward 0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:29.760 towards the end of the game. You have five plays 0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.559 from the eleven yard lining in, and then you have 0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.800 four plays from the five yard lining in. How many 0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:36.640 yards are we running for? 0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:36.920 Again? 0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.120 Seven point six for him, six yard average for the 0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:44.320 team right from the one yard line. Yeah, how many run. 0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:48.319 Attempts from the inside the two they had zero, So 0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:50.439 it was two plays from the five, and then it 0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:51.440 was two plays from the one. 0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:56.680 Yes, four straight passes, yeah, zero run attempts. Yeah, that's 0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:57.360 my problem. 0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.839 And I understand, I feel and I know that coach 0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:03.800 Scheinheimer is going to go back and wish that he 0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:06.160 did things differently. And we're playing Monday morning. I agree 0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:07.640 with this, absolutely, we're playing Monday morning. 0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:08.520 Quarterback. I get it. 0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:14.000 However, your identity right now, truly is you're running the 0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:18.800 ball effectively and your offensive line is blocking their butts 0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.800 off in the run game. I don't understand how you 0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:28.000 don't allow them that opportunity, the chance to put the 0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.200 ball in the end zone on the backs of your 0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.400 offensive line. That's what I can't comprehenmpletely agree. It's it's 0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:37.120 to me, it's it's very similar to you know, you 0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:39.760 go back to Seattle with Marshawn Lynch, is like, well, 0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:41.400 you got Marshawn Lynch and the old line has been 0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:42.640 doing good and you're on the one. You're out and 0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:44.920 give give them the ball. It's like, you know, giving 0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:49.520 all that play, give them the ball? You know who 0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:50.240 called that play? 0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:52.040 I do? 0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:56.160 I do? He looks familiar give them the ball. 0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.400 It was shades of that truceive thoughts is what I 0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:01.920 put on Twitter last night or act. Yes, but I 0:13:02.000 --> 0:13:03.679 said intrusive thoughts came in. 0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:05.160 There's some overthinking. 0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.360 Is there a reason why why I mentioned that? Yeah, 0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:09.280 I don't understand. 0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:12.520 I can't comprehend when you're winning the line of scrimmage, 0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.959 why you do not while you line up five yards 0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.800 away from the one yard from the goal line and 0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.679 then you then in turn proceed to pass it numerous times. Now, 0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:26.240 the interception that Dak had, there's an individual who did 0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:30.800 not get their block. They got beat on that particular 0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:33.439 play was bro Kaffman. Brock Kaffman lost his one on 0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:36.959 one assignment. The nose tackle beat him, put pressure in 0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:40.000 Dak's face. Dak threw the ball up. Nobody was open anyway. 0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:42.040 It was four down interception. 0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:43.959 Hence no EyeBlack today exactly. 0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.160 So that's what bothered me more than anything. There was 0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:48.679 a bunch of other things that I could point you 0:13:48.679 --> 0:13:49.280 to another one. 0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:54.520 Here's another one. Okay, go ahead, Matty Refleus. Your defense 0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:01.720 is three weeks in. It had a stellar outing against 0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:04.480 the Philadelphia Eagles week one, Week one, and we had 0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.600 some high hopes. Yep, two consecutive weeks in a row. 0:14:07.840 --> 0:14:09.640 How about how many safeties did they play in that game? 0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:14.559 Primarily say safeties one high or too high. I have 0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:16.440 the gout camera. It was two years. 0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:18.160 It was the receivers did nothing. 0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:25.080 Two weeks beyond that game, You've now played a wildly 0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:30.240 underperforming Giants offense that you may look like a historic 0:14:30.360 --> 0:14:34.560 Giants passing offense. And you've now played a historically bad 0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.120 through the first two weeks offense and Caleb Williams and 0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:42.080 the Bears, and you let them look fantastic. Caleb Williams 0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:45.560 left yesterday's game for the first time in his NFL 0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:47.080 career without. 0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:53.440 Being sacked a single solitary time. His quarterback rating was 0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:57.840 one forty two point six a single sack. 0:14:57.800 --> 0:14:58.680 Not a single sack. 0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.800 And as I was told that we could scheme pressure. 0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:04.800 I was told that we could scheme pressure. 0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:07.640 I was told we could scheme pressure, and it's it's 0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:12.360 not happened through those two games. I was also told 0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.680 that Jade was brought here to contribute, but he was 0:15:15.720 --> 0:15:17.080 in a track suit yesterday. 0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:22.080 I don't I don't fault that you don't spend a 0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.160 week he hasn't had training camp. 0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:26.800 If the Cowboys had had let him go with his 0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.440 first visit without without a contract. 0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.440 Been a rep count, maybe maybe maybe maybe even then I. 0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.120 Think, Okay, so I'm next week. I'm not going to 0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.560 speak to the what what Jadevian could have brought to 0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:39.120 this game? I'm not going to bring that conversation. But 0:15:39.320 --> 0:15:41.040 what I what I will address is that you've given 0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:42.800 up seven passing touchdowns in two weeks. 0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:48.360 That's that to who? Everybody the issue? No? 0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:48.680 No, no, no? 0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:50.080 Who are the quarterbacks? 0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:54.800 Can the Bears and the and did you see what 0:15:54.920 --> 0:15:57.360 did Russell Wilson do against the Chiefs yesterday? What did 0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.480 maliite neighbors do against the Chiefs yesterday? Elite neighbors barely 0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:04.440 clocked in yesterday. Okay, can I give you the difference 0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:07.440 Week one? I mentioned it was too high safety. Primarily 0:16:07.520 --> 0:16:09.880 you took away their ability to throw the. 0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:11.760 Ball down the field. Did you get a pass rush? No, 0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:13.280 but you took away the receivers. 0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:14.760 And I said, you have to make a decision on 0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:16.400 whether or not you want to stop their ability to 0:16:16.440 --> 0:16:18.240 pass the ball or you want to allow Jalen Hurts 0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:18.600 to hurt you. 0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:20.800 Every now and then by running the ball in front 0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:21.360 of you. 0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.440 Sure pregame show yesterday, I mentioned if you had to 0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:26.720 make a decision on what approach you want to take, 0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.480 I said, I would much rather you take the bend, 0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.800 but don't break method while you keep everybody in front 0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:33.360 of you, because they have a lot of weapons that 0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.000 can hurt you, both at tight end and at receiver. 0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.520 I said, And if you give Caleb Williams time, he 0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:40.640 can't hurt you. He could throw the ball. There's not 0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.080 a pass that he can't make. So you have to 0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.680 make a decision. Take away the receiver threat or take 0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:49.560 away Caleb Williams threat. They went single high, right, I 0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:51.320 mean I said it many times. I said, go to 0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:54.200 do what you did week one. Last week you tried 0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.720 the single high thing that did not work at all. 0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.240 This week you tried the single high thing again and 0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:05.600 in the two high zones. Your guys seemingly don't understand 0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:09.560 what to do. And that I also cannot comprehend because 0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:12.680 those coverage calls that Iberflus is calling, and I know 0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:14.879 the finger's going to get pointed at him because he's 0:17:14.920 --> 0:17:18.320 responsible for the men that's touched the field. Those coverage 0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:19.680 calls are not difficult. 0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:22.080 He is not. 0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:24.600 And I say this just this is me backing him 0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:30.320 in this regard. He's not calling complex coverages. This is 0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:31.800 very simple. 0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:36.640 Now simple for your defenders also means simple to dissect 0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:40.320 for the opposing offenses. Yes, but he has to find 0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:45.200 some kind of effective way to communicate responsibilities to primarily 0:17:45.200 --> 0:17:47.920 I'm speaking to his safeties because that's where a lot 0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.000 of these issues the last two weeks have lied. There's 0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.800 been a Donovan Wilson issue, has been a Bleak Hooker issue. 0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:55.920 But what you're asking Donovan Wilson to do is not 0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:56.960 play last week. 0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.080 That was last week, and this week changed up as 0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:00.760 we could change it up. 0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:03.159 He was going downfield a little more, he. 0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:06.159 Was carrying because they were playing single high, right, So 0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:09.600 he has a responsibility for certain zones, right versus if 0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:12.359 you're playing too high, but everything's coming towards you. 0:18:13.000 --> 0:18:13.920 So that's what I'm saying. 0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.479 You're asking guys to do things outside on themselves when 0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:18.800 you try to go to single high. When they went 0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.560 too high yesterday, when they did, and when they went 0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.760 too high yesterday in one of the red ze situations, 0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.159 Malik Hooker had his eyes on DeAndre Swift in the 0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.280 backfield going to a flat route when that's not even 0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.200 his responsibility. That's where I had the criticism was Malie 0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:36.120 Hooker looked lost multiple occasions yesterday. 0:18:36.200 --> 0:18:37.000 And I mean. 0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:40.040 It's notable to have a bad game as a safety, 0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.800 but to look lost in a system with a defensive 0:18:43.840 --> 0:18:46.600 coordinator as one of the few players on this defense 0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:50.440 that have actually played with this defensive coordinator. 0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:53.560 Because remember before Malie Cooker was here, where was he? 0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.399 He was an Indianapolis who was his defensive coordinator and 0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:01.960 passing game coordinator during his time in Indianapolis, Matt. 0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:05.560 Eberflus, So out of anybody on that defense. 0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.600 You should be able to know where to communicate, where 0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:09.880 to be, what type of coverages you're playing, and whether 0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.320 it's two high or one high, I don't care. You 0:19:12.400 --> 0:19:13.880 should be in the right place at the right time, 0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:15.320 and there were too many times where he was not 0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:16.800 in the right place at the right time. 0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.000 You're absolutely and I will back up your statements by 0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:22.760 giving two examples, two touchdown examples from yesterday, one of 0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:25.919 which was the touchdown to DJ Moore in the back 0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.440 in the end zone. That was that was that was 0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.000 a match zone right where if somebody comes in your area, 0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:33.879 you're responsible for taking them. 0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:35.200