WEBVTT - I, Tonya

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>On the Bell Cast, the questions asked if movies have

0:00:03.920 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>women in um, are all their discussions just boyfriends and husbands,

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>or do they have individualism? The patriarchy zef in best

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>start changing it with the Bechdel Cast. Hello, and welcome

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to the Bechtel Cast. My name is Caitlin Dronte, my

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>name is Jamie Loftz, and it's your birthday episode, Jamie

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the episode. I'm so excited. Oh and boy do we

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:35.199
<v Speaker 1>have my favorite movie of all time for you today.

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So what we are doing today on the Bechtel Cast

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and we will get you up to speed. If you've

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 1>never listened before, welcome, It's my birthday. We're gonna tell

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you what the podcast is about in a second. But

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>for for returning listeners, we are unlocking an episode from

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>our patreon ak Matreon back from eighteen yeah early, which,

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>as we'll discuss, was in a way five thousand years ago.

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, it's an episode about Titania, one of

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>my faves. And so if you're not a member of

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the Matreon, this will be your first time. And if

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you also, if you're not a member of the Matreon,

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, think about joining us. It's a great little

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>space for for everybody, beautiful community. But yes, uh, it

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>is Italian Day on the cast. But first we have

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to tell everybody what our podcast is about, because we

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>don't do that in Patreon episodes. If you're on the Matreon,

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you already know what you're getting into. But this, but

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>on the main fade, we have to We have to

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>be respectful of the fact that maybe it's your first

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>time here because you're just an itonia stand and you

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>couldn't help but click so true. So what we do

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Bechtel Cast is examine film through an intersectional

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>feminist lens, focusing on the representation of women, but extending

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the conversation further to other topics. And we use the

0:02:08.040 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Bechdel Test as a just inspiration jumping off point, if

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you will. And that is a media metric created by

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>queer cartoonist Alison Bechdel, sometimes called the Bechtel Wallace Test,

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and it requires that for our purposes, are version of

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the test that too, people of any marginalized gender. They

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>have to have names, they have to speak to each

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>other about something other than a man for at least

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>two lines of dialogue. Let's try it, Okay, let's do it. Okay,

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey Caitlin, Yes, Jamie. Um, do you ever feel like

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:53.359
<v Speaker 1>in a biopic you're like, this biopic is so amazing,

0:02:53.480 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and then you learn about the subject of the biopic

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, oh, jeez um, yes, I have done

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that before, especially when the biopic is about a woman.

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>It makes you think and then it passes the Bechtel test. Yeah,

0:03:11.200 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have to be perfect, doesn't have to make sense,

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:18.480
<v Speaker 1>just really some bare minimum stuff. Most movies don't do it.

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>You will not be shocked to know this movie is

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>an exception. It's true. But yes, so we're gonna get

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the episode started up. We're gonna kind of cut you

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in at the recap, right, yeah, slightly before the recap.

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.320
<v Speaker 1>So what I was thinking, because since we've recorded this

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.800
<v Speaker 1>two and a half years two and a half years ago, right,

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:43.640
<v Speaker 1>so a little um, a little peek behind the curtain everyone.

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>We recorded this early. It was when we were still

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>recording our Matreon Patreon episodes on my iPhone. In my

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>bed was the one that was on your eye. They're

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>usually pre COVID. They were all in your bed, but

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>not all on your I've uh, there's a clear timeline

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>if if you're right, we the early UM Patreon episodes

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we recorded on my iPhone, so the sound quality is

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>not bad. But if it doesn't sound top notch, that

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is why it was early days in the in the majors,

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>then we upgraded to some fancier equipment, but in any case,

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>so that if you're like, this doesn't sound as good

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>as it normally does, that's why UM. Also before we

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>jump into the episode, we wanted to address something that

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>we have had the habit of doing in the past,

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>but we have been we've become more aware of this

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>thing that we're doing and we have been phasing it out.

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>And what it is is the use of certain phrases

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>or just certain language that is disparaging of mental illness

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 1>and is able list and what I mean what we

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>mean by that is we use in this episode and

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:04.040
<v Speaker 1>others passed phrases like oh, that's crazy or that's insane

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>or um etcetera. From from that line of thinking, this

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>is still very common language that a lot of people use,

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and we would encourage you to try to scale back

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>on it, get rid of it, not include that in

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>your language anymore, because like we said, it is disparaging

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of mental illness and is able list. And so if

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you are interested, we will leave some uh some links

0:05:28.760 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in the notes of this episode, UM in case you

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>have any questions about um certain words, uses of words.

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>We want to UM educate our listeners just as our

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>listeners have educated us. These are words that have since

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>been worked out of the show and our lives, and

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>we hope to continue to do better. And you know,

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>if if these are still words in your daily rotation, uh,

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 1>there are so many wonderful substitutes. That's the thing about words.

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>You don't need to use uh, words that are disparaging

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to be well because guess what, there's other words. It's

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.559
<v Speaker 1>true synonyms exist, so we wanted to acknowledge that as well.

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Oh and another thing we want to be better about

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>doing moving forward is to include content warnings for episodes

0:06:12.560 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in which we discuss topics that are sensitive and potentially triggering.

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>So in this episode, we'd like to include a content

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:27.239
<v Speaker 1>warning regarding our discussion of physical and emotional abuse. So

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:32.480
<v Speaker 1>there's that, And and we also wanted to update our

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>history with the movie because we uh we recorded this

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>episode just a couple months, I mean the two maybe

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.159
<v Speaker 1>months after this movie came out. Um, and so you

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>know the the movie has like whatever eight couples in

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>age that we talked about eight couple that's not even

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:56.479
<v Speaker 1>accurate or whatever. It's older. It's much older, right, And

0:06:56.480 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 1>and you're especially your relationship with that Jamie has grown

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and gotten more special, grown and deepened. Yeah. So for me,

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean we both saw the movie in theaters a

0:07:07.200 --> 0:07:10.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of times. I really enjoyed it. I haven't watched

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>it though since we recorded the episode, aside from when

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I rewatched it a couple of days ago, just too

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>because I know we were doing this episode and wanted

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.600
<v Speaker 1>to refresh my memory. Um. But for you, Jamie, the

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>reason so you're releasing this as your birthday episode because

0:07:26.360 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>it's become such an important movie for you, So tell

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>us about that. It's well, I guess when this movie

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.679
<v Speaker 1>came out, I knew it was one of my favorite

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>movies already because I saw it nine times in theaters,

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.559
<v Speaker 1>which I have never done before and never did since

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>this episode Slash. This movie came out during this wonderful

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>time where movie pass was a thing that worked and

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it actually cost ten dollars, and so the only thing

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I used my movie pass for was to see I

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Tania at nine times and I unsubscribed and then movie passed.

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.679
<v Speaker 1>Employ did and no one has heard from her since.

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>But so I saw this movie nine times within two months.

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>I think I just loved it. There is like I've

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>always been very attached to the Tanya Harding myth. Basically

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a culture, you know, an American myth. At this point.

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I my first cartoon I ever made was about Tanya Harding.

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Remember that. Really it was like, yeah, it was forever ago,

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>but I really always I'm sure to talk about in

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 1>the episode two, but I was always very attached to her,

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>just kind of as like someone who came from like

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.319
<v Speaker 1>the lower middle class. I think Tanya came up from

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 1>an even lower class than than I was from. But

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I just was really, I really it really spoke to

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:50.559
<v Speaker 1>me how determined she was and how she didn't take

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:54.080
<v Speaker 1>shipped from people, and kind of how that attitude results

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>in being punished by the culture that you live in,

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>especially at the time that she was skating. And I

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 1>think the movie is so well done. It's written and

0:09:04.920 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>directed by a man, and yet I like it and

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it's sometimes men don't do horrible work. Really, they really

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>figured it out this time. I I rewatched this movie

0:09:16.040 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>last week, and I still love it so much. It

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>makes me cry a lot. It's the only time I've

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:26.319
<v Speaker 1>ever been impressed by Sebastian stan Uh, Margot Robbie's at

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>her best. I just I think it is such a

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:32.840
<v Speaker 1>fun and engaging movie that manages to make I think,

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>like takes a lot of very serious topics and treats

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>them with the weight and the respect they deserve, but

0:09:39.000 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 1>also don't make it like a depression experience. I think

0:09:43.520 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it's still like a super engaging and fun movie. And

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 1>after the last time I saw this movie in a theater,

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I was seeing this movie in theaters as late as July. Wow,

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>because I think you remember this when I say it's

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>because as they did a rooftop screening of Ae Tania

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in downtown Los Angeles and Tanya Harding was there, And

0:10:07.440 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>it's here that I wanted to just acknowledge because it's

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>just interesting, I guess of like, I mean, obviously, never

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>meet your heroes, but this one stung a little Like

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Tanya Harding very sweet, but she gave kind of like

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>some opening statements and I actually I'm going to cite

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>myself here. I wrote a piece about it at the

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.679
<v Speaker 1>time for a paste magazine called Falling out of Love

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a Tanya Harding, and that kind of says what I'm

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 1>saying now. Just like Tanya Harding was a kind of

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>a hero of mine, and like she overcame so much

0:10:41.120 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and was like, you know, maintained her dignity through a

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:47.079
<v Speaker 1>really difficult experience. But then when you hear her talk

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:53.079
<v Speaker 1>about her political views, you're like, oh, dear, she didn't

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>get explicitly into her political views in that, but there

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>was enough. There was some uh so bat signaling to

0:11:01.320 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>some things I really don't agree with, and it I mean,

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure like our our listeners, everyone at some

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 1>point in their life realizes that you have to idolize

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the idea and the message and not the person. But

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>this was one of those moments for me where I

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>was just like I wanted, you know, I wanted to

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>agree with Tanya Harding on everything. I wanted her to

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>have like views that I aligned with, but um simply

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the way it went. But I still really love

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>the movie. I feel like it is just my favorite

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>movie ever. I watch it all the time I wanted

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to fall asleep. I watch it to call like, I

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:46.320
<v Speaker 1>just it's my movie. I love it. Yeah. Cool, Well,

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I think with that we can just launch into you know,

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>in a movie when they do like kind of like

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's some sort of call that effect. It's like transition

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>is like a ripple, like like the ripple effect, like

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the dream, like the flashbacks. It's imagine that whatever the

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:17.480
<v Speaker 1>audio version of that is. We that's so okay. I

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Tania is if You're not aware? Is the new Tanya

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 1>Harding biopic starring Margot Robbie as Tanya Harding and Alison

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Janney as Tanya Harding's mother, and a guy from Gossip

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Girl as Jeff Lally hot hot hot Jeff really hot

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>hot hot in this movie distracting, can't deal with it,

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and I'm very upset that I think he's hot because

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>his character is horrible. His character is and as a person,

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>he's a horrible person, and real life Jeff really not hot.

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>Basically everyone real life in this story not hot. But

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a movie so hot. Sorry, I just explained how

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>movies worked like regular but like way hotter. So So

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>it's about for Olympics, where a media frenzy surrounding Tanya

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Hardening when she allegedly was involved with whacking Nancy Kerrigan,

0:13:08.720 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>who is barely addressed in this story very intentionally and

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll get there too. But so it's got a lot

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of buns of Marco Robbie. People loved her performance, Alison

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Janny queer icon, Alison Jenny's character Janson Janny and Jenny

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>queer icon, but I would argue Alison Janny and a

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:34.480
<v Speaker 1>fur coat with a parent queer icon like easily. So yeah,

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the movie. If you haven't seen it, I would

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>highly recommend sing it. I think it's such a fun,

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>well done movie. I love it. Are The one thing

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:46.439
<v Speaker 1>I was surprised about with this movie is I mean

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.560
<v Speaker 1>when they say I Tanya, they're not kidding. Nancy Kerrigan

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>is like left out of this story, which I think.

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think she has any lines except for

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>when she's like why after she gets hit exactly yeah no.

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.440
<v Speaker 1>And then they have whoever the actress that was on

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>set for two or three days playing the part of

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Karen, They just have her basically reenacting news footage,

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>which is weird because it's like in all like the

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>more recent documentaries about this, there's a lot of talk

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>about how like Nancy was also done a huge disservice

0:14:20.480 --> 0:14:23.600
<v Speaker 1>by the media and not I mean, not as significant

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>as Tanya obviously, but you know, Nancy didn't do anything.

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Nancy often gets framed as like this,

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>like prissy bitch when Nancy, which they this was like

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the thing that I was like, Oh, they're really not

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>going to mention this in the movie at all. Nancy

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>was just as poor as Tanya Harding. She was not

0:14:41.520 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>from an abusive family, but she was also like a

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>blue collar gal who was reframed by the media to

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>not seem like that and was like held accountable for like, oh,

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>look at this rich bitch when she wasn't. And so

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:57.400
<v Speaker 1>that's all I have to say. I just thought it

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>was she she's really glossed over. I mean, this movie

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is we're seeing it through Tanya's eyes, and so I

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>guess it's like Nancy's a pressy bitch. But I thought

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>a little more could have been done to just acknowledge that.

0:15:08.560 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>May I posit a theory sure that this movie is

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the first of a figure skating extended universe cinematic universe

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and there's going to be and I Nancy. Could I

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>play Nancy Kerrigan? Yes, I cast you rememb Burnett from Massachusetts.

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I could do it. Yeah, you've done ballet figure skating.

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>His ballet on ice, right, dude, exactly. Don't send me

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>hate mail for saying so. I feel like there's someone

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>out there. No, it's I mean figures hard. I could not.

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't hang. I tried it when I was little,

0:15:47.320 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>couldn't do it. I got really good at roller skating

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>as a kid, and not roller blades roller skates. Oh sorry,

0:15:56.120 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>yeah they're different. Sorry didn't but I never I never

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>ice skated until like a couple of years ago. Uh,

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and some of the skills do transfer over. Because all

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>my friends were like falling because I've never like roller

0:16:11.520 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>skated or ice skated before. But I was like pretty

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>good beginner and they were like, Caitlin, how are you

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>so good at this? I'm like, bitch, I roller skated.

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 1>You're you have a lot of interesting hidden talent. You

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>really do. Thank you. Recap. Yeah, let's recap Tania. So

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>it's this cast of actors reenacting both interviews that are

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 1>like direct to camera and then also the story events

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>as they unfold. So every actor we see, we see

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>they're basically playing the same character over the course of

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.480
<v Speaker 1>almost three decades. Like I think Margot Robbie plays Tanya

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>between ages fifteen and forty and then yeah, so you

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>see like older Tanya played by Margot Robbie in interview style,

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:04.480
<v Speaker 1>same thing with what's his name, Stan Sebastian Stan Stan

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 1>hot hot Okay, I know he's so hot as young

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Gluely, as older Jeff Gluey without weird goatee horrible.

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>The mustache is better. He's got somehow, he's got a

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.360
<v Speaker 1>face that works for a real life Jeff Gluly did

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>look like straight up disgusting with the mustache. But I

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 1>mean this again, it's like movie hotness of just like

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess you can just wear that and it's hot.

0:17:30.600 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Well shit, Okay, my favorite performance in this movie. Margot

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Robbie is awesome. Alison Jenny is awesome. My favorite performance

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 1>in this movie. I have to look at this guy's

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>name because he is like, I think this is his

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>big first like the guy who plays s Yeah, unbelieving

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Paul Walter Houser. I hope he's in everything. He was

0:17:49.320 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>so good. This is a breakout role for him. I hope. So, dude,

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>he was so fucking funny. I know, and I wasn't.

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize that I've never done like a real

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>deep dive on Sean Ekart and I didn't realize how

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 1>fully delusional he was. And then when they do at

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:06.439
<v Speaker 1>the end, they do like the side by side to

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 1>see how exactly they re enacted interviews. The Sean card

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>interviews are crazy. He's like, probably work in covert ops,

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 1>counter terrorism, like espionage, and you're like, what, They're like, Sean,

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:23.399
<v Speaker 1>but you don't. He goes but he's like, but we

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>checked in, you don't. He's like, oh, but I do.

0:18:25.440 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I do? And I He's so fucking funny, and like,

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I just shout out to Paul walter Hauser wherever you are.

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you're listening. I just thought he was like brilliant,

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and I hope he's in everything now. Yeah, he was.

0:18:41.520 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So he was so great. So I Tania the story.

0:18:44.760 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>We follow Iitania through her ice skating Iania harding, how

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>are we going to record another episode after this? It's

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna be great. We followed Tania where I think she

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>is named through her finger skating career, which starts when

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 1>she's a soft four, which means three. So we meet

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>her mother, Lavanna, who is how to describe her, She's overbearing,

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>she is emotionally abusive, she's physically abusive. She is one

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>of those parents who look at all the sacrifices I've

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 1>made for you and you don't appreciate anything. And she's

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a very bad parent. We'll hit on this in a

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>bunch of different places, but this movie. People have differing

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>opinions on how this movie does with the topic of class.

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it does pretty well, especially based on the

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>fact that from what I get, and if you know differently,

0:19:48.280 --> 0:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>please hit us up. But pretty much every event described

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 1>in this movie is based on anecdotal evidence and interviews.

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of tricky to make the argument of

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 1>like they're making these white trash people look like a joke,

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, well, they did confirm that this is

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 1>what they did down to like that guy Derek's like

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.720
<v Speaker 1>running through a fucking pane of glass to get like

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that really happened. There's footage of that happening. Yeah, Like

0:20:16.640 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff in the movie basically is stuff that

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 1>real life idiots. Did Wait, did it happen where he

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>bash just head through it? Because he had the baton,

0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>he could have broken the glass with I guess that's possible.

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anyways, the way this movie deals with class,

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>because it does make a commentary without changing the story.

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know. I mean, I was fortunate to

0:20:37.359 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>have parents that were not abusive and are great. They're

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>my problematic faiths, But I do think it was like

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>interesting setting up this dynamic and showing this dynamic that

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I saw in a lot of my friends growing up,

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>of like parents in poor communities being too hard on

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>their kids, with the implied logic being like I needed

0:20:59.880 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>toffen you up for the world, or you're going to

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>end up just like me, which is kind of the

0:21:04.080 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>message that's kind of Tanya's fear throughout the movie is

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>that she's going to be exactly like her mom and

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>be a waitress, which she is for a while, and

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>it seems like and it's never explicitly stated, but my

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.959
<v Speaker 1>takeaway was that like Levana was basically like, I'm going

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to be really, really really hard on you to the

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>point where it is illegal abusive. I'm gonna throw a

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>knife at you, but the overarching thing to be like,

0:21:29.400 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I have to toughen you up because you're being set

0:21:32.520 --> 0:21:35.239
<v Speaker 1>up to fail by the world, and that is like

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:40.879
<v Speaker 1>a parent child dynamic I've seen before, and I feel

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:44.159
<v Speaker 1>like I haven't seen a ton on screen, so I

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>thought it was I mean, it was like scary, but like,

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:50.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know it worked for me or if you

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>do see it on screen, it's I feel like it's

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>often not the main character. It will be like the

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>main character's friend who who needs rescuing. Yeah. An example

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that comes to mind as the craft where sure right right,

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And I'm if I thought about it, I'm sure I

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 1>could come up with others, but yeah, I don't know. Like,

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 1>so there were certain moments with her. I was like, oh,

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that seems like my aunt or like my friend's mom

0:22:14.240 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>of like some lines I wrote down where like you

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>were soft nice makes you ship like basically these repeated

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.800
<v Speaker 1>enforcements like you have to be really tough on yourself

0:22:24.840 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and on everyone in your life or you're not going

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to survive um, which is you know, I see where

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>she's coming from. I don't hard disagree with our approach

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to literally everything, but but I think the more common

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:40.919
<v Speaker 1>depiction in media over arch, Like there's so many FU

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>movies about like rich children and their distant parents, not

0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 1>poor children, and they're overbearing to the point of abusive parents.

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 1>But I think in the real world those are just

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>as common. I mean, so there's I think it'll take

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.199
<v Speaker 1>me the whole episode to get through the recap, but

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:02.439
<v Speaker 1>essentially it just it follows Tanya and her figure skating career,

0:23:02.520 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>starting from a very early age. She's a standout. She's

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>very good, even if like she's a she's a stand

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>up comic Harshly Season three, Tiny Harding story, the marvelous

0:23:14.280 --> 0:23:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Mrs Harden. So she is great, she trains a ton,

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>her mom does pay for all of her lessons, and

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.679
<v Speaker 1>is supportive in her pursuit of becoming a figure skater.

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 1>But again, that's like kind of like another class commentary thing,

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>where like I think we're like children of poor families

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 1>often feel like they are an investment if they're doing

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:40.719
<v Speaker 1>anything extra, where like kids who are from wealthier backgrounds

0:23:40.880 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 1>are able to try more extracurriculars and and there's less

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.160
<v Speaker 1>of like a pressure to be like, well, you better

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>have fucking fun. Supportive in the sense that she was

0:23:49.320 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 1>paying for it, that she was there, but also inflicting

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot of psychological warfare on Tanya. It was

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:00.719
<v Speaker 1>like it was basically a contract for abuse of Like,

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in order for you to do the thing that makes

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>you happy, I have to be able to fucking be

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>all out abusive to you at all times. And that's

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the only way she could keep doing it. Right. So

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>we see Tanya's progress as a figure skater into her

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>teens in early twenties, and this is also around the

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>time that she meets Jeff Galuley. I don't know how

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:21.800
<v Speaker 1>old he is when they meet, but she's only fifteen

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and he's probably I think he's I think he's supposed

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to be nineteen or twenty. Well, that's upsetting. So they

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:33.159
<v Speaker 1>start dating and then he starts becoming abusive toward her

0:24:33.160 --> 0:24:38.440
<v Speaker 1>as well, both physically and emotionally. Her career starts to

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:41.359
<v Speaker 1>take off. She starts winning a lot of competitions. She

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>moves out of Lavana's home because she's had it up

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to here with her, so she moves out with Jeff.

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 1>The abuse continues with him. Like she's winning national competitions

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and the Olympics are on the horizon and then she

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>gets a death threat called on her, and so this

0:24:59.880 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>is there was like a weird and this is all historical.

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not weird because it you know, happened, but like

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>there's like, she goes to the Olympics and two she

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>does not deliver. It's implied it's because she's like maybe

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>like drinking too much and like got out of shape,

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>which you know, is a little shamy, but also seemed

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>like there was some truth in that and that was

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.680
<v Speaker 1>like had to do with why she which ties into

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 1>her abusive relationship with Jeff. But she was in an

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>abusive relationship and was not medicating exactly, like she didn't

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:40.080
<v Speaker 1>she didn't deliver at the first Olympics, which would normally

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>be a death sentence because by the time the next

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>one Olympics come around four years later, she would be,

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in theory too old, which is crazy. She would have

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>been twenty five, but I guess an ice skater years

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 1>too old. But then there's this thing that really happened

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>where they're like, actually, I don't know what the rationalists,

0:25:57.840 --> 0:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>but they're like, we're going to have the Winter Olympics

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 1>again in two years, which would be like perfect timing,

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 1>and so there's kind of this there's a bunch of

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>great montages in this movie again, just like a series

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of really stellar training montages that I really loved to

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>having handed music. It was great. So she trains, she

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:22.760
<v Speaker 1>starts training again, and she's kind of like she got

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it back. She dumped Jeff. She's like on a tear.

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>She's doing great, and then she takes Jeff back and

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 1>then okay, right exactly, So she takes Jeff back because

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>she's doing competitions and the judges are like, you're just

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>not the image we want to project. We want a

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:41.439
<v Speaker 1>wholesome American family, and she's like, I don't have that.

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 1>So she gets back with Jeff to basically placate the

0:26:46.320 --> 0:26:48.320
<v Speaker 1>judges and be like, look look at this family I

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>have because they get married at one point earlier in

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the story. Yeah, yeah, I mean, it's it's like to basically,

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 1>yea project the image that they're going for. And then

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>there's like this big competition and that if you place,

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I forget exactly what it's called. It's like, if you

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>place in this competition, you are considered for the Olympic team.

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 1>But if you don't place in the competition, you can't

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>be considered for the Olympic team, so high stake ship.

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>And prior to this, a death threat is called on

0:27:15.760 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Tanya and it freaks her out and they're like, oh crap,

0:27:18.920 --> 0:27:21.399
<v Speaker 1>like this is going to ruin my chances. And then

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:25.360
<v Speaker 1>this is where you know the stories where Paul walter

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Hauser really starts to fucking shine. But he has this

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>idea where basically Jeff wants to impress Tanya or somehow,

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:39.360
<v Speaker 1>like I think, honestly, like get her to be indebted

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to him a little more so she won't leave him,

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>because that's how he thinks, because he's a manipulates, a manipulator,

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.560
<v Speaker 1>but he's so stupid that he's not even good at it.

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>But so he's saying like, oh, it'll approve Chania chances

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.560
<v Speaker 1>if we call it a death threat on Nancy. And

0:27:55.600 --> 0:27:58.560
<v Speaker 1>then Sean, who also called in the death threat Antania,

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 1>we learned later and that's true. Sean has literally he's

0:28:02.040 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>just so fucking like he was just smart enough to

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 1>be extremely infuriating because he's like just smart enough to

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>be like you should have known better. But whatever he's smarted,

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't like, is he Sean smarter than Jeff, but

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>that's saying nothing. Jeff's literally dumb as a rock. So

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Sean's like, because I think that the movie goes way

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 1>out of its way to be like toxic, toxic, toxic.

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.639
<v Speaker 1>This character, Sean, especially his toxic masculinity, is kind of

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:31.640
<v Speaker 1>uses a punch line over and over in this movie,

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 1>which I hadn't seen it portrayed in other places. But

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I thought it was funny, and I

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>thought it's good to make toxic masculinity, you know, projected.

0:28:39.720 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you look like a fucking idiot. But so

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>He's like, oh, we need to do something to Nancy,

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and Jeff said, okay, let's mail in letters snail, which

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is like, you're a snail mail a death threat. Incredible idea. Anyways,

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Sean takes matters into his own hands and plans the

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>fucking whack that the whack hurt around the world, right,

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>which is carried out by people who are somehow even stupider.

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>It's just a well of stupidity that just a gaping

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>mom of idiots, and how involved Tanny was in the

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>planning and execution of these letter death threats. Question, you know,

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not even going to bother positing my own theories.

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll never know. We can hit on this later too,

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>But like, I don't think Tanya Harding is like a

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>good or nice person, and I don't think that she's

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>like completely telling the truth. But I don't think that

0:29:41.560 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>that makes her story any less valid or interesting or

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>worth telling. But it's like I don't know, I mean,

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>she it's it's clear that she knew about some portion

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of it. I think this movie plays it down press

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a little too much, but like we'll never know. Sure,

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>So the attack on Nancy Kerrigan's knee happens, and then

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that the sequence of events is that Nancy

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously can't compete after she's whacked. At these trials. Tanya

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>does really well at the trials places it looks like

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>she's going to be on the Olympic team. The question

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>is will Nancy be allowed to be on the Olympic

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>team since she couldn't compete in the pre limbs And

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that part is like it makes sense that it's left

0:30:24.840 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>out of this movie, but it is pretty like incredible

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>how she completely I'm like crying, she like she like

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>totally buckled down, did not pay attention to any of

0:30:36.360 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the media coming out and just like had her her

0:30:39.400 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>like family and support system totally blackballed everyone who was like,

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>she's training, she's getting better, and in six weeks went

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>from like whacked me to like that recovery time was insane.

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It shouldn't have been like it is. Pretty I just

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think Nancy gets enough credit. I think she's also

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>she's not as interesting historical figure as Tanya Harding, but

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>she was pretty fucking cool. So because Nancy is able

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to do this amazing turnaround, she's allowed on the Olympic team.

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>And also because and then I think that this is

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>explicitly stated in the movie too, and has been said

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>by Tanya Harding and interviews. It's like the media who's

0:31:13.800 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 1>been like investing all this time and energy into this story,

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>is not just going to be like, we're not gonna

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>let Nancy compete like people wanted a huge event. Yeah yeah.

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>And then the movie ends with they both compete in

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the Olympics, both Tanya Tanya and Nancy. Tanya does not place.

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Kerrigan gets the silver medal. Tanya's skating career is

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>over also because she goes to court and the judge

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>is like, you're never allowed to skate in any sort

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of competitions ever. Again, She's like pleading with the judge,

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>please you have like, this is my whole life. This

0:31:47.520 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>is the only thing I know want to do. I

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>don't have an education. That was like the most impactful

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>part of the entire movie for I did not see that.

0:31:54.800 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>That was like I felt like one of the big

0:31:57.120 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>successes of them because I knew that that was how

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the story ended, but it never really occurred to me

0:32:02.600 --> 0:32:06.479
<v Speaker 1>exactly how devastating that was for her. Where that was

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like truly all she had. So if her involvement was

0:32:10.240 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>as low as the movie would have you believe, that's

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>horrible and it's like it does show how women are punished. Yeah,

0:32:18.120 --> 0:32:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that was That was such a gut wrenching moment to

0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>watch of like that would be I was thinking, I

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>was like, that would be like if someone told me

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that could never do stand up again. But then I

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>was like, yeah, it's like would be the worst day.

0:32:32.560 --> 0:32:35.960
<v Speaker 1>I would be like, you know what, I wouldn't cry.

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't cry and offered to do jail time instead

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 1>when the people are that's so fun. It was like

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather go to jail than not be able to

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>go to an open like ever again open jail. So

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. So then she becomes we see her like

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:59.960
<v Speaker 1>stint as a lady boxer. I have an autographed picture

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 1>or of Tanya Harding during her boxing days. Yeah, I really,

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm deep into it. And I only say lady boxer

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>because that's what she calls herself. She's just a boxer,

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:13.440
<v Speaker 1>ay for her. Yes, So that's the story. Let's take

0:33:13.440 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>a quick break and then we'll come right back. There's

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:24.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot to digest here. There's a lot to discuss.

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>One of the main points I wanted to bring up

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>was the kind of ongoing theme she's talking about, how

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>figure skating is this sport where like the judges want

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>you to be this old timey version of what a

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 1>woman is supposed to be, and her sort of recognition

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of how she was never going to be that because

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>she didn't have the money to afford all the pretty

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:53.200
<v Speaker 1>costumes and she chopped wood every morning, so like she

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:56.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't have just sort of like a little delicate frame

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and everything like that. That was one thing that I

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 1>thought could have been touched on a little more. I

0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>aggree with me that I was surprised it didn't because

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>that is such a big that informed the direction of

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:08.239
<v Speaker 1>her career. So Mutch and I think that that was

0:34:08.280 --> 0:34:11.600
<v Speaker 1>like why the people who liked Tiny Harding really liked her,

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 1>because she, like, she was so athletically good that there

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 1>was no you know, like even though she was not

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 1>traditionally feminine and like had an athletic build, which makes

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>fucking sense for an athlete, but you weren't supposed to uh,

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:29.319
<v Speaker 1>and didn't have a ton of money, but she was

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:34.799
<v Speaker 1>so good that people like could not deny her, you know,

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>like that was cool, but it's we see we see

0:34:37.560 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>it a few times. She gets into an argument with

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 1>judges and says, I'm making my costumes, which is true,

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:48.799
<v Speaker 1>she was making. She had so many disadvantages, but they're

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.080
<v Speaker 1>just like, yeah, we're not really well we're looking for

0:34:51.560 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>but you're so good that we can't tell you to

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.160
<v Speaker 1>go funk yourself until they found the first excuse to

0:34:56.200 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>tell her to go funcker. And I think that that

0:34:57.760 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>also directly ties into how she's treated. You know, she

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>was characterized right away. It's like white trash who they

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:08.920
<v Speaker 1>were looking for an excuse to get rid of her,

0:35:09.040 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and the second they found one, they got rid of

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:16.480
<v Speaker 1>her forever. And not only her sort of like appearance

0:35:16.520 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and the way she presented herself physically. It was also

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 1>like from what I gathered, like her music choices, you know,

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:24.760
<v Speaker 1>she did a lot of like hard rock and metal.

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:28.319
<v Speaker 1>She like wore the blue nail polish that her coach

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>was like, no more of that. Like DAR say, she

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>was a product of her fucking environment, you know, but

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that's not an environment that that sport respects, right exactly.

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So watching this, I mean I related to her because

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:44.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a part where she's talking about how she operates

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:47.399
<v Speaker 1>a forklift, chops wood and works at a hardware store

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 1>and some like that, And I didn't read that exact

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:52.240
<v Speaker 1>same experience. But I grew up in a blue collar family,

0:35:52.560 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, working class. My dad had a forklift and

0:35:55.640 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 1>a bacco. Part of my chores were to go into

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.959
<v Speaker 1>the woods and Sylvan because we lived in the middle

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of the woods. We would gone in the woods, we

0:36:03.200 --> 0:36:06.480
<v Speaker 1>would gather firewood. I'd have to like load it onto

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this like wagon that was hooked up to the tractor.

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I had to drive the tractor like a farm girl.

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:14.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a well, I'm a wood's girl. We didn't

0:36:14.920 --> 0:36:17.839
<v Speaker 1>have a far that we had a wood wood There's

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>there's one. I had to fucking break leaves all the time.

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I had to mow grass all the time. I had

0:36:24.120 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to plow our driveway with a We had a pickup

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:36.360
<v Speaker 1>truck that my dad attached to snowplow too, So I

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>had so many physical chores that I had to do

0:36:38.760 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 1>all the time growing up, and I resented the hell

0:36:41.040 --> 0:36:43.839
<v Speaker 1>out of it. Was like at school, I was like

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to be friends with like the popular kids whose

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:49.960
<v Speaker 1>parents were doctors and who didn't have to do like

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:53.959
<v Speaker 1>shovel dirt all the time. I was just like, please,

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>no one find out about my home life. You know.

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 1>I was kind of I was trying to fit in

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 1>with like the quote unquote like what women are supposed

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to be and what you know, teen girls are supposed

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to be interested in and all that stuff. And I

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:08.399
<v Speaker 1>was just like like there was just like this whole

0:37:08.440 --> 0:37:11.319
<v Speaker 1>internal struggle that I was like going through. But I

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:13.239
<v Speaker 1>also was like it's cool that I can like do

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:16.440
<v Speaker 1>all this stuff and like, but but that's not the

0:37:16.480 --> 0:37:18.879
<v Speaker 1>message the world was sending you. No, no, no, no.

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>At that time. I was city poor person, so we

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't do a ton of outside things. But like like

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:29.799
<v Speaker 1>a city mouse in a country mouse, we really are

0:37:29.960 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>I forget what a country mouse to were, Like, I

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>have no outdoor skills. But my first like full understanding

0:37:37.920 --> 0:37:41.399
<v Speaker 1>of class in a meaningful way, it was. It was weird.

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't that aware of it growing up because everyone

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>was poor and I'm kind of grateful for that, where

0:37:46.120 --> 0:37:49.680
<v Speaker 1>there really wasn't. There was a class divide that I

0:37:49.719 --> 0:37:52.000
<v Speaker 1>thought about a lot when I was watching Lady Bird

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of like there are people who had like more money

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 1>than us that my parents would be like, Oh, just

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>don't act like a fucking idiot around that. You know.

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 1>There's little stuff like that. But I largely didn't become

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 1>aware of my upbringing being poor until I was in

0:38:09.160 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>college with a ton of rich Camerson richies. Yeah, and

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:15.919
<v Speaker 1>that was like that was like an upsetting experience where

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:19.239
<v Speaker 1>for my entire college experience I started out by like

0:38:19.239 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 1>I had to work full time through college or I

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>would have had to drop out. And for the first

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 1>half I would not tell anybody, and I was like

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:28.560
<v Speaker 1>very embarrassed about it, you know, I would just be

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:30.799
<v Speaker 1>like I'm busy. I can't like go to whatever. But

0:38:30.800 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 1>it's because I was working till three am at the

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:36.959
<v Speaker 1>scary pizza place run by a sexual predator. I called

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the police on but like but and then in the

0:38:39.480 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 1>second half of college, I I'm really glad that I did.

0:38:42.360 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 1>But it's like I just was like, you know what,

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>rich people are actually trash and I'm working really hard

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:50.319
<v Speaker 1>and I don't want to be like it sucks enough

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:52.840
<v Speaker 1>having to work these awful jobs, so I'm not like

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 1>hide the fact that I'm doing it on like whatever,

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm working harder than you. Fuck you. All I had

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to say is like she had so much exs stuff

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to have to do and she was still one of

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 1>the best, that's so the best, and they still didn't

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 1>want to give it to her and I and I

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 1>totally get that. That is like, a that's fucking frustrating

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>to be like, I am working against so much more

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 1>than the average person and you're still not you still

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 1>won't give it to me, which is a thing that

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is Poised is more of a class

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:27.720
<v Speaker 1>struggle than a gender one in this movie, at least

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:31.439
<v Speaker 1>because we were only seeing women figure skaters in this movie.

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:33.920
<v Speaker 1>There are certainly gender specific things to talk about in

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:35.440
<v Speaker 1>this movie, but for her it was more of a

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:39.560
<v Speaker 1>class struggle thing. But I think it is still very

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 1>much like a parallel situation where women have to work

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot harder to get recognition, to be taken seriously

0:39:47.800 --> 0:39:50.920
<v Speaker 1>than their male counterparts a lot of the time. Right,

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and then just like every time you're in a marginalized group,

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and then you add another marginalization on top of that, right,

0:39:56.719 --> 0:40:04.800
<v Speaker 1>it gets infinitely we call that intersection, yes, Queen. So

0:40:05.000 --> 0:40:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed that this movie at least posed this theme

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of like a woman, her background, her appearance, the way

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>she presents herself, the way she talks, her tastes and

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:20.440
<v Speaker 1>things doesn't align with the quote unquote old timey version

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>of what a woman is supposed to be. As for

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the judges of this sport, and how that was a

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:28.600
<v Speaker 1>struggle for her, and how she sort of had to

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 1>like suppress who she was to be able to fit in,

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>but also how she was kind of like unapologetically being

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:36.759
<v Speaker 1>like fuck, there's that scene where that's the best she

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>tells the judges, like how am I going to get

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to her a chance? Like why do you hate me?

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.240
<v Speaker 1>So much, and they keep saying like we also judge

0:40:43.239 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 1>on presentation, and then she says like suck my dick,

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 1>and it's like like you're like, oh no, but you're

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 1>also like that so cool, like and she really did

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:58.759
<v Speaker 1>that do just like so cool. I mean, yeah, I

0:40:58.840 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>wish that that was dug into a little bit more,

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>but I do love that she I mean, she had

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and it comes up a million times. The triple axel

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>is like her secret weapon to be able to stay

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 1>in skating because she was the only one that could

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:13.680
<v Speaker 1>do it. Yeah, the movie makes a point several times

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:16.360
<v Speaker 1>to say that she was the first woman to attempt

0:41:16.560 --> 0:41:20.239
<v Speaker 1>and complete it and be really good at it, Like

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:26.040
<v Speaker 1>ever right, her secret weapons weapon. Um, Okay, we would

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>be remiss to not talk about the two central abusive

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>relationships in this movie, one between Tanya and her mother,

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the other between Tanya and Jeff. We touched on her

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 1>mother already, but I did think it was like kind

0:41:41.800 --> 0:41:45.319
<v Speaker 1>of a different, unusual And again, it's a biopics, so

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 1>they are just sort of displaying real alleged events and

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:54.920
<v Speaker 1>interactions with them. But it was interesting seeing a relationship

0:41:54.960 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 1>between two women where I think that like it's a

0:41:58.040 --> 0:42:02.200
<v Speaker 1>trope basically where it's like the older character is going

0:42:02.280 --> 0:42:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to bully their student, as it were, into greatness. Whiplash

0:42:09.080 --> 0:42:12.760
<v Speaker 1>is that exact thing. There's a I mean that there's

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:15.200
<v Speaker 1>other I had some written down, but I feel like

0:42:15.200 --> 0:42:18.279
<v Speaker 1>it's usually it's either between like a male coach and

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 1>a male student, or it's between like a male coach

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:24.799
<v Speaker 1>and a female student, and it's a sexualized relationship, which

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 1>we see in Black Swan. Another example of a male

0:42:28.360 --> 0:42:31.240
<v Speaker 1>coach and a female student is A Million Dollar Baby.

0:42:31.480 --> 0:42:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I don't remember that movie super well.

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:36.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any sexual component of their relationship.

0:42:37.239 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But at first he's like, I don't trying girls, and

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:42.399
<v Speaker 1>she's like, I'm the best though, I'm really good. He's like, okay, fine,

0:42:42.440 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm Clanniswood and or whatever, boring Clanniswood, fun clanny, but

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:49.160
<v Speaker 1>like yeah, but he like kind of you know, they

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 1>develop a friendship, but it's like he a lot of

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:54.799
<v Speaker 1>that movie is him bullying her into getting really good.

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:57.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a dynamic we've seen a lot, I just we

0:42:57.680 --> 0:43:01.840
<v Speaker 1>rarely see it between two men. And that is a

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:07.000
<v Speaker 1>component of Tanya and her mom's relationship, and it's abusive.

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I think it's like more of you see a more

0:43:09.280 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 1>whiplet she kind of relationship. That was the closest parallel

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 1>I could think of. There's a couple of different scenes

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:19.879
<v Speaker 1>where Levana just as like Tanya did her best when

0:43:19.960 --> 0:43:23.280
<v Speaker 1>she was angry, and so we see Lavanna paying people

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to tell Tanya she sucks before she gets on the ice,

0:43:27.000 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 1>like all this fucking sadistic, manipulative ship with the goal

0:43:32.600 --> 0:43:34.960
<v Speaker 1>being in that way she'll do really good. And the

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:37.880
<v Speaker 1>other way that she would do that is by withholding

0:43:37.960 --> 0:43:42.880
<v Speaker 1>praise at any cost. Where even when you know Tanya's

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 1>landing triple actuals, doing stuff no one else can do,

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it's always well, this is what you did wrong. And

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Levana is abusive on so many different levels. It's just like, well,

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:54.960
<v Speaker 1>which do we pick. She is abusive on like a

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:58.120
<v Speaker 1>coachy kind of level, which is crazy because she can't

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>fucking skate. But I think even more so than Tanya's

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 1>actual coach Diane, who is not great and is very

0:44:07.360 --> 0:44:09.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that she falls more in the bucket of

0:44:09.160 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 1>like Tanya, you're not feminine enough, right, That's sort of

0:44:12.760 --> 0:44:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the space she occupies. But Levana is like, you suck

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:18.680
<v Speaker 1>you're bad, and I'm going to tell you you're bad

0:44:18.719 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 1>because that will make it good. And she gets enough

0:44:21.040 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 1>results by doing that that she continues to do it

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 1>and and it's bad. We sort of already touched on

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:30.799
<v Speaker 1>the class component of her abuse of like making it

0:44:30.840 --> 0:44:35.759
<v Speaker 1>feel like Tanya owed her something, which is I think

0:44:35.800 --> 0:44:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it's very common with kids in parents. Yeah, just like

0:44:38.880 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a kid feeling like an investment and like they have

0:44:41.080 --> 0:44:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to do well because their parents are struggling in order

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:47.319
<v Speaker 1>for them to be able to do anything, which is

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:50.719
<v Speaker 1>an unfair pressure to put on a kid. I don't know.

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is so complicated, the issue of class

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in America. If you can believe no one, that's a

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 1>complicated thing. But they're is that element, there's also just

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:05.520
<v Speaker 1>the element of like Levana is a fucking bad person

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:09.960
<v Speaker 1>who wants everyone around her to suffer and and I'd

0:45:09.960 --> 0:45:12.720
<v Speaker 1>be curious. I mean, we see very little of Tanya's

0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:16.359
<v Speaker 1>dad in this movie. It seems like they had a

0:45:16.400 --> 0:45:19.640
<v Speaker 1>good relationship and that he was kind of the beta

0:45:20.000 --> 0:45:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to Levana's alpha, to the way where twenty says later

0:45:23.040 --> 0:45:25.480
<v Speaker 1>in the movie, well you hit dad, was like, Oh

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:29.920
<v Speaker 1>she hit dad? Okay, that's you know, an unusual abuse dynamic,

0:45:31.080 --> 0:45:33.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's it seemed Levana is framed in the movie

0:45:33.840 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 1>as a character who, for a number of reasons that

0:45:36.480 --> 0:45:40.880
<v Speaker 1>are explained, wants everyone around her to suffer. And Tanya

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly suffered, and and also Levana is completely aware that

0:45:45.120 --> 0:45:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Jeff is abusive towards Tanya and does basically nothing to

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:52.640
<v Speaker 1>stop it. And and it really just makes that one

0:45:52.719 --> 0:45:55.640
<v Speaker 1>comment in that scene they have together where she says, like,

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:58.640
<v Speaker 1>what I forget The exact wording is like, um, you're

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:00.879
<v Speaker 1>done piece of ship who thinks she'd deserves to get hit?

0:46:01.320 --> 0:46:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Right where you know, we can get the subtypes of

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:07.200
<v Speaker 1>what she's saying, which is that you don't deserve to

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:10.839
<v Speaker 1>get hit, but she's leading with you're a dumb piece

0:46:10.920 --> 0:46:14.719
<v Speaker 1>of ship, but also she's hitting Tanya exactly and then

0:46:14.920 --> 0:46:16.839
<v Speaker 1>and then Tanya responds by being like, well, where did

0:46:16.840 --> 0:46:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I get that idea? The implications of that are obviously like, oh,

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:22.319
<v Speaker 1>I think I deserve to get hit because you hit

0:46:22.360 --> 0:46:25.400
<v Speaker 1>me my entire life. There's yeah, and there's no subtlety

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>in the way that issues presented. Yeah, but that's like good.

0:46:28.680 --> 0:46:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that there should be like shades of

0:46:30.480 --> 0:46:34.640
<v Speaker 1>gray presented like should this be? But it is interesting

0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to me And Jeff is the less fleshed out character

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of the two between him and LaVona, but it is

0:46:40.600 --> 0:46:44.200
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see, I think as of right now, I

0:46:44.200 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like, ultimately it is an interesting and I think

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of impactful choice to characterize an abuser a little bit.

0:46:51.719 --> 0:46:55.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Alice and Jenny, there is a part

0:46:55.640 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in the movie where she says, like, my mom was

0:46:57.719 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 1>nice and nothing happened, you know, and like, and that's why,

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 1>that's why I amounted to nothing. I think was the

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:10.359
<v Speaker 1>implication of like, nice parents in poor communities raise unremarkable

0:47:10.440 --> 0:47:13.880
<v Speaker 1>children seems to be her belief and that is a

0:47:13.920 --> 0:47:16.640
<v Speaker 1>moment that reveals so much about that character and who

0:47:16.680 --> 0:47:19.120
<v Speaker 1>she is. And it's like, do we want to see

0:47:19.680 --> 0:47:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a three dimensional depiction of an abuser? In some ways,

0:47:23.360 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 1>it's like you don't really want to introduce so like

0:47:26.880 --> 0:47:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be able to empathize with this person.

0:47:29.760 --> 0:47:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But real life abusers have motivations and have elements and

0:47:35.680 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 1>probably you know, not every single thing they have done

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in their entire life is the worst thing ever. And

0:47:42.920 --> 0:47:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that is something that you struggle with, and that's part

0:47:46.040 --> 0:47:48.239
<v Speaker 1>of the reason why abusive relationships are so hard to

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:53.440
<v Speaker 1>get out of because people are in them and people, right,

0:47:53.680 --> 0:47:58.279
<v Speaker 1>I think it's dangerous to depict an abuser in a

0:47:58.320 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>way that we might be empathetic or sympathetic. It's hard

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to them. I think it is though important to present

0:48:06.120 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 1>them as kind of like three dimensional people, because then

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 1>we can kind of start to learn, Okay, why are

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:15.839
<v Speaker 1>you this way? Is there anything about you that can

0:48:15.880 --> 0:48:19.400
<v Speaker 1>be helped and made to not be that way? Like?

0:48:19.520 --> 0:48:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Because oftentimes, yeah, and abuser depicted in media is just

0:48:23.640 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 1>like very one dimensional. They just are sort of like

0:48:25.800 --> 0:48:29.719
<v Speaker 1>pure evil kind of thing, and we don't understand why

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:31.840
<v Speaker 1>they're that way, or if we do, it's, you know,

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:35.719
<v Speaker 1>be an interesting villain character, but it doesn't if the

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 1>objective is to get people to recognize people like this

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 1>who may exist in their own life, that is not

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the way to go, right, Yeah, So I think it's

0:48:42.680 --> 0:48:44.960
<v Speaker 1>it was actually like pretty responsible in the movie's part

0:48:45.040 --> 0:48:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to depict Levana the way that she was, because she

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:52.080
<v Speaker 1>is a fleshed out character, But the movie also doesn't

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:55.919
<v Speaker 1>absolve her of anything, which is important and I thought

0:48:56.040 --> 0:48:59.160
<v Speaker 1>was also effectively do I think there was one moment

0:48:59.200 --> 0:49:02.680
<v Speaker 1>where I was like, giving this abusive women laugh lines,

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:05.880
<v Speaker 1>oh right, especially that part where she it's like whenever

0:49:06.200 --> 0:49:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Tanya and Jeff's relationship has kind of like taken off

0:49:09.040 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and we don't see a while, and she's like, my

0:49:12.120 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 1>fucking storylines disappearing right about now, and we're all like

0:49:15.480 --> 0:49:19.399
<v Speaker 1>big laugh line. It's like, I don't know, there's some

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 1>shades of gray there that I'm not totally comfortable with.

0:49:22.840 --> 0:49:25.359
<v Speaker 1>But by and large, how she's treated in the in

0:49:25.400 --> 0:49:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the movie narrative wise, I thought was interesting. And if

0:49:30.400 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the choice they're making to have a three dimensional abuser,

0:49:33.880 --> 0:49:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the movie doesn't absolve her. It's clear that what she's

0:49:36.600 --> 0:49:39.320
<v Speaker 1>doing isn't the wrong, but it offers some insight into

0:49:39.480 --> 0:49:42.640
<v Speaker 1>why that maybe, and I thought that was an interesting choice.

0:49:42.840 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 1>We don't get that as much with Jeff. I don't

0:49:45.200 --> 0:49:50.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly care. Another element of the abusive relationship that I

0:49:50.600 --> 0:49:57.480
<v Speaker 1>thought was very interesting and ultimately pretty effective was Tanya

0:49:58.000 --> 0:50:02.400
<v Speaker 1>is the abused in both of these relationships. She's on

0:50:02.440 --> 0:50:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the receiving end with her mother from the second she

0:50:05.280 --> 0:50:08.480
<v Speaker 1>emerges from the womb, and then you know, shortly after

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it seems like she and Jeff had like three weeks

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:13.959
<v Speaker 1>that were really pleasant and then seven or eight years

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:18.279
<v Speaker 1>that we're fucking nightmare. But I think that and I

0:50:18.320 --> 0:50:20.719
<v Speaker 1>need to do more thinking on this, and I want

0:50:20.719 --> 0:50:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to bring more effective examples to the table in the future.

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like in general, there is this media

0:50:28.120 --> 0:50:32.000
<v Speaker 1>trend of when women are portrayed as being an abusive

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:36.720
<v Speaker 1>relationships on screen. And I think actually a recent example

0:50:36.719 --> 0:50:39.879
<v Speaker 1>with be Nicole Kidman's character in Big Little Lies. She's

0:50:39.920 --> 0:50:43.319
<v Speaker 1>abused by her husband pretty brutally in that show, but

0:50:43.440 --> 0:50:47.360
<v Speaker 1>her character is presented as kind of a perfect character

0:50:47.800 --> 0:50:51.080
<v Speaker 1>of like, here's this woman who works really hard, does

0:50:51.120 --> 0:50:54.880
<v Speaker 1>all of her domestic chores, is basically bringing her husband

0:50:55.280 --> 0:50:57.399
<v Speaker 1>his meal and he wax it out of her hand

0:50:57.520 --> 0:51:01.239
<v Speaker 1>and hits her. That sort of thing where we are

0:51:01.320 --> 0:51:04.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing a depiction of abuse that is like hard. I mean,

0:51:04.640 --> 0:51:06.440
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to watch, and and it is I'm

0:51:06.480 --> 0:51:11.160
<v Speaker 1>sure realistic to some people's experience, But these flawless women

0:51:11.560 --> 0:51:14.720
<v Speaker 1>in abusive relationships, I think it's kind of a media

0:51:14.760 --> 0:51:17.360
<v Speaker 1>trend where it's like, and she never did a whole

0:51:17.440 --> 0:51:20.920
<v Speaker 1>thing wrong in her entire life, how could this person

0:51:20.960 --> 0:51:25.480
<v Speaker 1>abuse her? Whereas in Tanya's abusive relationships. Tanya is a

0:51:25.600 --> 0:51:29.239
<v Speaker 1>very flawed character. She focks up a lot, and and

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 1>there are examples of times where she focks up in

0:51:32.520 --> 0:51:34.719
<v Speaker 1>ways that have nothing to do with Jeff, for her mother.

0:51:34.840 --> 0:51:39.319
<v Speaker 1>She fox up independently like a person would. So again,

0:51:39.360 --> 0:51:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just like showing real people in abusive relationships. There's

0:51:42.840 --> 0:51:45.279
<v Speaker 1>examples of Yeah, like Tanya fox up a lot in

0:51:45.280 --> 0:51:48.080
<v Speaker 1>this movie and in her life, and like, it couldn't

0:51:48.080 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 1>be more clear that just because you don't even have

0:51:50.200 --> 0:51:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to like her to recognize that she doesn't deserve this abuse.

0:51:54.800 --> 0:51:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And I just thought that that was something that I

0:51:58.080 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>really haven't seen that much of, Like especially a woman

0:52:01.160 --> 0:52:04.399
<v Speaker 1>in an abusive relationship where she can be a funk

0:52:04.480 --> 0:52:07.040
<v Speaker 1>up and she is doing stuff. She's not a perfect

0:52:07.080 --> 0:52:10.719
<v Speaker 1>person and she's receiving abuse and she doesn't deserve that.

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Where Yeah, seeing a seeing a character like that just

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:15.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of drew my attention to how rare it is

0:52:15.880 --> 0:52:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to see a flawed character receive abuse in a way

0:52:19.480 --> 0:52:22.239
<v Speaker 1>that it's still very clear that it's like, Yeah, that

0:52:22.320 --> 0:52:23.799
<v Speaker 1>was something I thought about a lot. You know, that's

0:52:23.800 --> 0:52:27.200
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. I think that's a symptom of so many

0:52:27.239 --> 0:52:31.800
<v Speaker 1>movies that do depict an abusive relationship. It's caricatures almost.

0:52:31.840 --> 0:52:34.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of like archetypes. It's you know, not

0:52:34.120 --> 0:52:37.440
<v Speaker 1>real people who are the characters of the story. So

0:52:37.719 --> 0:52:41.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't seem as fleshed out or they it's you know,

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you see the writer being well, I want to make

0:52:43.239 --> 0:52:45.960
<v Speaker 1>my character this way and and to me in some

0:52:46.080 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 1>crazy way that justifies or doesn't the abuse they receive

0:52:50.239 --> 0:52:52.759
<v Speaker 1>sort of things. So they're just like these not real

0:52:52.840 --> 0:52:57.560
<v Speaker 1>people who the storyteller designs in the way that they

0:52:57.560 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 1>think is going to serve their story bests. And oftentimes,

0:53:00.640 --> 0:53:03.160
<v Speaker 1>like you said, it is like the what's the show called,

0:53:03.200 --> 0:53:10.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty Little Little, Pretty pretty much? Yeah, I like to

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:14.799
<v Speaker 1>call it the Laura Dernan and I patch our. I'm

0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:17.280
<v Speaker 1>never going to know the difference between Pretty Little Liars

0:53:17.360 --> 0:53:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and Big Little Lies, two amazing shows. It's all you

0:53:21.560 --> 0:53:24.920
<v Speaker 1>need to know. So it often we do see you know,

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a very kind of like perfect, prim proper woman who

0:53:30.080 --> 0:53:34.400
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really have any flaws is the victim of abuse.

0:53:34.760 --> 0:53:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's almost like another way to justify

0:53:38.000 --> 0:53:43.719
<v Speaker 1>writing a female character that's unrealistically passive. Yeah, yeah, where

0:53:43.840 --> 0:53:47.240
<v Speaker 1>like the female character receiving abuse is not doing anything

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:51.160
<v Speaker 1>wrong in any area of her life and she's punished.

0:53:51.200 --> 0:53:53.120
<v Speaker 1>But and I think the writers of stories like that

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:55.640
<v Speaker 1>are like, look how tragic this is. They're like, look

0:53:55.640 --> 0:53:59.000
<v Speaker 1>how much she doesn't deserve this, Whereas I think like

0:53:59.320 --> 0:54:01.080
<v Speaker 1>those same people would be like, oh, but if the

0:54:01.160 --> 0:54:04.160
<v Speaker 1>character's flawed, it makes her somehow deserve it a little

0:54:04.200 --> 0:54:06.480
<v Speaker 1>bit more. And that's obviously not the message that anyone

0:54:06.520 --> 0:54:09.040
<v Speaker 1>should be sending. So yeah, I think it is really

0:54:09.040 --> 0:54:13.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting that Tanya is depicted as a flawed character and

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that does not make her deserve abuse. Just that was

0:54:16.480 --> 0:54:18.960
<v Speaker 1>like something that really struck me with this movie. Or

0:54:19.000 --> 0:54:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like that is so cool that And also I

0:54:22.280 --> 0:54:25.480
<v Speaker 1>think that, like I'm saying, it's trumpe writing, like the

0:54:26.360 --> 0:54:30.960
<v Speaker 1>perfect woman who is abused is also just like lazy writing. Yeah,

0:54:31.280 --> 0:54:34.759
<v Speaker 1>it's easier to not write a character that behaves like

0:54:34.800 --> 0:54:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a human, but but in this, in this movie, I

0:54:38.960 --> 0:54:42.319
<v Speaker 1>just that was like one of my favorite elements of it.

0:54:42.400 --> 0:54:46.520
<v Speaker 1>That was cool. Not that I want to see abusive

0:54:46.840 --> 0:54:50.520
<v Speaker 1>relationships on screen every second of my life, but that

0:54:50.640 --> 0:54:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was I thought, like really effectively done. Yeah, And and

0:54:54.600 --> 0:54:57.000
<v Speaker 1>they really they don't spare the audience in the way

0:54:57.040 --> 0:54:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the abuse is depicted. I mean, it's it's it's hard

0:54:59.760 --> 0:55:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to it's yeah, it's hard. Let's take another break and

0:55:03.960 --> 0:55:12.200
<v Speaker 1>then we'll come back for a more discussion. But speaking

0:55:12.239 --> 0:55:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of real people, which is what this movie is about.

0:55:15.680 --> 0:55:17.960
<v Speaker 1>That brings me to something I wanted to talk about

0:55:18.360 --> 0:55:24.520
<v Speaker 1>regarding biopics and how most biopics are about men. Some

0:55:24.640 --> 0:55:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of them are tortured geniuses. Other ones are about fucking

0:55:28.080 --> 0:55:33.520
<v Speaker 1>mediocre as Helmet, including The Disaster Artist and Edward. Throw

0:55:33.560 --> 0:55:36.319
<v Speaker 1>a fucking stick and you'll hit a man who has

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:40.080
<v Speaker 1>somehow had a movie made about his unremarkable life. So

0:55:40.320 --> 0:55:44.239
<v Speaker 1>few biopics are about women. I did some quick googling

0:55:44.800 --> 0:55:49.279
<v Speaker 1>and found a list of about twenty or so that

0:55:49.440 --> 0:55:53.680
<v Speaker 1>people have heard of. There's more of film history. Yeah.

0:55:54.440 --> 0:55:57.160
<v Speaker 1>A few of the more notable ones include this one

0:55:57.200 --> 0:56:02.680
<v Speaker 1>Aitania FRIEDA hidden figure is Elizabeth the Iron Lady. A

0:56:02.680 --> 0:56:06.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of these are kind of recent to Jackie, Lena, Queen,

0:56:07.000 --> 0:56:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Julie and Julianne. And there's also What's Love Got to

0:56:09.200 --> 0:56:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Do with It? Selena Gia, Aaron Brockovich, Monster Monster, Anternet,

0:56:15.800 --> 0:56:20.600
<v Speaker 1>propoliss Love, Vien Rose, The Passion of Jona Ark, which

0:56:20.640 --> 0:56:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is a long time ago that was a coal miner's daughter.

0:56:24.200 --> 0:56:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So there's only there's a small handful of biopics about

0:56:27.719 --> 0:56:30.360
<v Speaker 1>women and every other I mean, and the biopics is

0:56:30.400 --> 0:56:34.359
<v Speaker 1>such a massive genre. There are so many. Oh, just

0:56:34.760 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 1>any loser can have a movie made about their life

0:56:37.120 --> 0:56:40.839
<v Speaker 1>and they're they're a man, and often in the case

0:56:40.880 --> 0:56:44.239
<v Speaker 1>of Steve Jobs, which oh my god, if you have

0:56:44.400 --> 0:56:47.560
<v Speaker 1>not seen the Ashton Kutcher Jobs vehicle, I saw it

0:56:47.600 --> 0:56:51.760
<v Speaker 1>on my twenty first birthday and it was it's truly

0:56:52.239 --> 0:56:55.160
<v Speaker 1>so remarkably bad that you have to see it, you

0:56:55.200 --> 0:56:58.839
<v Speaker 1>would be you're just if you don't watch Jobs and

0:56:59.280 --> 0:57:01.520
<v Speaker 1>figure out what the rules to the drinking game is.

0:57:01.680 --> 0:57:04.440
<v Speaker 1>It just the movie basically gives it to you. Like,

0:57:04.640 --> 0:57:08.000
<v Speaker 1>but if Auschers in a field talking about computer, like,

0:57:08.120 --> 0:57:11.080
<v Speaker 1>what is happening? There's a time where Acton Gutcher is

0:57:11.160 --> 0:57:14.400
<v Speaker 1>having an argument through a beated curtain, You're just like,

0:57:14.680 --> 0:57:19.920
<v Speaker 1>what is happening? Yes, you gotta watch it, but but

0:57:19.960 --> 0:57:22.760
<v Speaker 1>if you if you look at the list of biopics

0:57:22.760 --> 0:57:27.240
<v Speaker 1>about women, by and large, they're about white women by

0:57:27.280 --> 0:57:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and large. They're about straight women by and large. They're

0:57:30.840 --> 0:57:36.600
<v Speaker 1>about women who have had massive success that have led

0:57:36.640 --> 0:57:40.040
<v Speaker 1>these amazing last from what I can pick out, you know,

0:57:40.080 --> 0:57:43.280
<v Speaker 1>like they're mostly triumph tales, with the exception of Titania

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and Monster. Those are the two I can see on

0:57:47.360 --> 0:57:52.640
<v Speaker 1>on this list that involves a woman failing. Right, pretty bleak, Yeah,

0:57:53.000 --> 0:57:56.479
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty weak. And one might argue that, oh, well,

0:57:56.520 --> 0:57:59.120
<v Speaker 1>there aren't more biopics about women because there aren't more

0:57:59.480 --> 0:58:05.560
<v Speaker 1>no figures in history, And well, I would argue, yeah,

0:58:05.840 --> 0:58:10.200
<v Speaker 1>history is written by the victors, which are there men? Yeah,

0:58:10.720 --> 0:58:20.880
<v Speaker 1>people named Victor, written by metal bitch named Victor, So

0:58:21.520 --> 0:58:24.000
<v Speaker 1>there are plenty of And if it seems like there

0:58:24.040 --> 0:58:28.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't more notable figures from history who are women, it's

0:58:28.040 --> 0:58:30.800
<v Speaker 1>because they don't get talked about, they don't get written about.

0:58:30.800 --> 0:58:35.520
<v Speaker 1>I've been written. Or if there are actually fewer, it's

0:58:35.520 --> 0:58:38.880
<v Speaker 1>because women haven't been allowed to be fucking politicians until

0:58:39.240 --> 0:58:42.760
<v Speaker 1>two seconds ago. It's because women weren't allowed to be

0:58:43.120 --> 0:58:46.480
<v Speaker 1>any like so many things, leaders of any industry or

0:58:46.520 --> 0:58:49.800
<v Speaker 1>even allowed in the industry can't wait for I RBG.

0:58:50.000 --> 0:58:52.680
<v Speaker 1>The RBG movie is gonna be fucking tight. Also, there

0:58:52.760 --> 0:58:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is sort of a weird trend in some of these

0:58:55.040 --> 0:58:58.360
<v Speaker 1>biopics where it's like, and this is I think this

0:58:58.400 --> 0:59:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is a biopic trend overall, but it is maybe because

0:59:02.240 --> 0:59:05.000
<v Speaker 1>there's so few about women. It's like, come on, there

0:59:05.120 --> 0:59:07.960
<v Speaker 1>is some that it's like and at the end she's murdered,

0:59:08.680 --> 0:59:11.800
<v Speaker 1>where that's that is several on this list of like

0:59:11.840 --> 0:59:15.160
<v Speaker 1>what made her life so remarkable was that she died

0:59:15.200 --> 0:59:19.360
<v Speaker 1>in a gross sexy way, and you're just like, fuck,

0:59:19.560 --> 0:59:22.840
<v Speaker 1>we come on, we got watch James Franco saw his

0:59:22.960 --> 0:59:27.040
<v Speaker 1>leg off, and you can't have a movie about Ruth

0:59:27.040 --> 0:59:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Bader Ginsburg grow up. There's movies about sucking civil like

0:59:32.600 --> 0:59:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the Wrong Side of the Civil War, and there's biopics

0:59:36.160 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 1>about Southern generals and the come on, what do you

0:59:40.160 --> 0:59:43.520
<v Speaker 1>how many times is Leonardo DiCaprio going to play someone

0:59:43.520 --> 0:59:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen twenties Before I get my Ruth Bader

0:59:47.080 --> 0:59:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Ginsberg movie, I'm now married to it. There there's not

0:59:51.880 --> 0:59:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to say that there's not good biopics about men. There are,

0:59:54.920 --> 0:59:57.680
<v Speaker 1>but the fact that there are so many male figures

0:59:57.720 --> 1:00:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that have more than one biopic about them that is

1:00:00.680 --> 1:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>not a problem that the female equivalent has. You're not

1:00:04.120 --> 1:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>finding like God, which Steve John's biopics should I watch?

1:00:08.800 --> 1:00:11.919
<v Speaker 1>You could? Literally there's three of them. There's three of them.

1:00:12.000 --> 1:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Should I watch Lincoln or should I watch Young Mr Lincoln?

1:00:17.360 --> 1:00:20.760
<v Speaker 1>And all of them? And this doesn't even include all

1:00:20.760 --> 1:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>the fucking stupid like History Channel documentaries blah blah blah,

1:00:24.440 --> 1:00:26.320
<v Speaker 1>what or whatever like And I mean, if we just

1:00:26.960 --> 1:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>major release rainstream Hollywood biopics, if we go before n

1:00:32.000 --> 1:00:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a million male biopics about the random

1:00:35.000 --> 1:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>ist men in existence, like a randomized video game character.

1:00:39.760 --> 1:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>They're like, we have to have a three hour epic

1:00:41.840 --> 1:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>about this amazing man's journey. ACTO. Just take this opportunity

1:00:46.200 --> 1:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to say that Citizen Kane, which is loosely based on

1:00:49.080 --> 1:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>such a drag William Randolph Hurst, Yes, it is the

1:00:52.680 --> 1:00:55.400
<v Speaker 1>worst movie I've ever seen. I hate Citizen Kane. Funk

1:00:55.480 --> 1:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that movie. It's so fucking bother your sucking sled, get

1:01:01.320 --> 1:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>over it and suck off. I don't like Citizen King.

1:01:08.000 --> 1:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's not that I don't think it's

1:01:09.360 --> 1:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>the worst babe of all time. I dated a guy

1:01:10.840 --> 1:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>who's really into Citizen Kane for a while, to the

1:01:13.200 --> 1:01:16.960
<v Speaker 1>point where he tried to remake Citizens with with and

1:01:17.080 --> 1:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you're exactly we're talking about with prop comedy oh, and

1:01:22.240 --> 1:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>it was halfway shot before someone told him it was

1:01:24.480 --> 1:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a fucking terrible idea, which is like one of my

1:01:30.000 --> 1:01:32.680
<v Speaker 1>favorite anecdotes of all time because I was I was

1:01:32.760 --> 1:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>complicit and being like everyone thought it was a bad idea.

1:01:37.360 --> 1:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>But people hate telling men that their idea is the

1:01:40.680 --> 1:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>worst idea of all time. And that's why so much

1:01:43.840 --> 1:01:46.560
<v Speaker 1>mediocre mill art is out there because people love telling

1:01:46.560 --> 1:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>women their ideas are bad, but men they're like, yeah,

1:01:52.200 --> 1:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>remixt fucking idiot. Oh well a few other things. Yeah,

1:02:00.720 --> 1:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to mention, we see what has become a

1:02:03.560 --> 1:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>trope of Oh I noticed the cal a woman being

1:02:06.720 --> 1:02:09.080
<v Speaker 1>good at fixing cars as a way to show her

1:02:09.200 --> 1:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is that I'm not like the other girls. But in

1:02:11.800 --> 1:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>this movie, yes, and there are examples of this where

1:02:15.200 --> 1:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't feel tropy or it doesn't feel like it's

1:02:17.400 --> 1:02:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a weird tact on trait to make her feel I'm

1:02:19.920 --> 1:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>not like one of the other girls. This is an

1:02:22.240 --> 1:02:23.880
<v Speaker 1>example of a movie that does it well. But like

1:02:24.400 --> 1:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Tanya walks up to Jeff, he's like fiddling around with

1:02:27.880 --> 1:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>his truck and she's like, oh, you gotta do this

1:02:30.280 --> 1:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>thing or blah blah blah, and she like reaches in

1:02:32.160 --> 1:02:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and she also has braces. It's so cute. He's like, okay,

1:02:38.920 --> 1:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>um yeah, this scene and it's like, you don't know

1:02:41.560 --> 1:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what to do. She's just like he's the part where

1:02:44.800 --> 1:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and you and you know, like if you didn't know

1:02:47.240 --> 1:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>he was about to become a historically notorious piece of ship.

1:02:51.080 --> 1:02:54.800
<v Speaker 1>That story beat when the very heavy handed Romeo and

1:02:54.880 --> 1:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Juliet begins to play, when he's like so pretty yeah,

1:02:59.360 --> 1:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and she's like no, I'm not, you're and you're just

1:03:02.440 --> 1:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>like kiss and then end of the movie and then

1:03:07.680 --> 1:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>break up immediately. But that was a nice moment. But yeah, no,

1:03:11.040 --> 1:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I totally believe that she was good at fixing cars,

1:03:14.720 --> 1:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>just based on her background, but the fact that they

1:03:16.960 --> 1:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>show it, yeah, yeah, because it happens again in a

1:03:20.760 --> 1:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in an episode that we've either just done or is

1:03:22.680 --> 1:03:26.320
<v Speaker 1>about to come out as Josie and the Pussycats, where

1:03:26.320 --> 1:03:29.080
<v Speaker 1>it's like that one, Hey, that one doesn't make sense

1:03:29.080 --> 1:03:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in the context of the story. No, not at all,

1:03:31.680 --> 1:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Like why but Alan Cumming does give a break the

1:03:35.840 --> 1:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>fourth wall glanced at the camera at one point in

1:03:38.400 --> 1:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the movie, and I can't a wait to record that episode.

1:03:41.600 --> 1:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna explad like and it's to a meat low song.

1:03:45.760 --> 1:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like that was designed with me in mind. I

1:03:48.200 --> 1:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>can't even believe anyway, okay, I'm shifting like I'm getting okay,

1:03:53.800 --> 1:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>But but that's going off of the fact that that trope.

1:03:57.120 --> 1:03:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I would agree that trope is present because that was

1:03:58.960 --> 1:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>intentionally shown. But a wait, this movie, it would have

1:04:01.600 --> 1:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>been very easy. I wonder if the director of photography

1:04:04.520 --> 1:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>for this movie was a man or a woman. I

1:04:06.080 --> 1:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know. This movie is directed and written by a man,

1:04:08.680 --> 1:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>which I was surprised at two different Yeah, but this movie,

1:04:12.960 --> 1:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean a movie about figure skaters in general, it

1:04:15.200 --> 1:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>would have been a very easy choice to sexualize the

1:04:18.520 --> 1:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>way the movie is shot, and it's not shot that

1:04:21.120 --> 1:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>way at all. And when you see figure skating scenes,

1:04:24.120 --> 1:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at either Tanya's face to communicate how she's

1:04:27.760 --> 1:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>feeling about herself, or you're seeing the athletic focus you

1:04:30.960 --> 1:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>see like the triple actual a million times. So I

1:04:33.240 --> 1:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>thought that was really al wostly impressive because that's just

1:04:35.880 --> 1:04:38.080
<v Speaker 1>how it should be. But I agree, yeah, I mean, yeah,

1:04:38.120 --> 1:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>that's what it should default too. And yet so many

1:04:40.880 --> 1:04:43.720
<v Speaker 1>movies and it's shot in such a way where it's Hey,

1:04:43.840 --> 1:04:47.360
<v Speaker 1>we're shooting this with the male gaze cameras, which has

1:04:47.440 --> 1:04:52.440
<v Speaker 1>magnets that are just on the German right. And and

1:04:52.480 --> 1:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the and the way that I mean skaters were sexualized

1:04:55.560 --> 1:04:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in this time would have made it a very easy,

1:04:59.440 --> 1:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>cheap choice. And they don't make that choice in a

1:05:02.520 --> 1:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>cinematography by Nicholas know that last name, but I'm gonna

1:05:07.520 --> 1:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>try Karro Kansas Arts US film Editing by Tatiana Tatiana Regal. Yeah,

1:05:19.560 --> 1:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>she eded large and the real girl I just learned anyways,

1:05:24.600 --> 1:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I hope she I I genuinely just based on I

1:05:27.440 --> 1:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen all the Oscar front Runners, but this was

1:05:29.280 --> 1:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>like the best editing I saw in any It was shot,

1:05:32.240 --> 1:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>very well, edited, very Yes, it is a terrific movie.

1:05:36.280 --> 1:05:38.360
<v Speaker 1>It is so good. I mean, not as good as

1:05:38.360 --> 1:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Paddington too, but I mean I wanted to talk really

1:05:42.320 --> 1:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>quickly about the role of toxic masculinity in this story

1:05:45.920 --> 1:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>as it pertains to Jeff. I think we've we've already

1:05:48.520 --> 1:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of covered that relationship a little bit. We don't

1:05:51.480 --> 1:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>get to know Jeff very well in this movie, and

1:05:53.320 --> 1:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't bother me, but of the two abusers, we

1:05:56.040 --> 1:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>know Jeff far less well, but what we know about

1:05:59.440 --> 1:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Jeff that when Tanya doesn't behave the way he wants,

1:06:03.840 --> 1:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>he hits her and he you know, it's a pretty

1:06:07.440 --> 1:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>cut and dry dynamic, and we see that over and

1:06:09.520 --> 1:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>over and over. But the moment in the relationship where

1:06:12.160 --> 1:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>and they both acknowledged this in interviews, and I thought

1:06:14.800 --> 1:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the way it was portrayed, like there's that moment where

1:06:16.760 --> 1:06:21.360
<v Speaker 1>they're like after the triple axle, everything changed where to me,

1:06:21.520 --> 1:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that indicated a shift in the power dynamic of like

1:06:24.920 --> 1:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>when Tanya basically was just growing more confident in her

1:06:30.120 --> 1:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>abilities and ability to succeed, their relationship worsens. And to me,

1:06:35.640 --> 1:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I felt like that was a response to a man

1:06:38.120 --> 1:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>not feeling in control of the relationship any Yeah, feeling

1:06:42.200 --> 1:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>inadequate or like, oh, this woman is more successful than me,

1:06:45.560 --> 1:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>she's better than me. And because he doesn't really have

1:06:48.720 --> 1:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't have he's a job, but he doesn't have

1:06:50.920 --> 1:06:54.680
<v Speaker 1>special skills the way that Tanya do is right, And

1:06:54.840 --> 1:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>so we see examples of like he's very on paper,

1:06:58.560 --> 1:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>would appear to be supportive in that he is present,

1:07:01.360 --> 1:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>he's there, but he you see him taking credit a

1:07:04.200 --> 1:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>lot for stuff, and you see him repeatedly asking to

1:07:08.040 --> 1:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>be noticed and appreciated for you know, it's not wrong

1:07:11.680 --> 1:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to want to be appreciated, but it's absolutely wrong to

1:07:14.120 --> 1:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>hit your wife. So, you know, I think I think

1:07:16.520 --> 1:07:19.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's it wasn't a brand of toxic masculinity that

1:07:20.080 --> 1:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen displayed, but I thought it was whatever

1:07:23.520 --> 1:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>effectively presented, especially for a character we don't know that

1:07:26.520 --> 1:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>much about in terms of his background. We know that

1:07:28.240 --> 1:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>he's poor. He says a little bit about himself, but

1:07:30.360 --> 1:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that's basically you know, Sean. I think it's a more

1:07:32.720 --> 1:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting case study here, and I love I want to

1:07:36.960 --> 1:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>be his best friend. Sean is a different kind. It

1:07:41.640 --> 1:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>reminds me of that pop culture detective essay about like

1:07:45.240 --> 1:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the toxic masculinity of like nerdy guys of how sort

1:07:50.160 --> 1:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>of for years and movies like Weird Science, where it's

1:07:52.480 --> 1:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>like the nerds will rise up and fuck every woman where.

1:07:57.440 --> 1:08:01.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's presented that narrative of like nerds don't

1:08:01.440 --> 1:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>get to have sex with girls, and what a massive travesty,

1:08:06.200 --> 1:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and they should be allowed to enact. They should allowed

1:08:08.320 --> 1:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>to be just a shitty women as popular guys. I

1:08:11.440 --> 1:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>just watched sixteen Candles last night for the first time,

1:08:13.880 --> 1:08:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you won't get But my God, is not the worst

1:08:16.960 --> 1:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>movie I've ever seen. I think we should do it.

1:08:18.760 --> 1:08:23.559
<v Speaker 1>We should done special because it's despicable. But presenting toxic

1:08:23.600 --> 1:08:27.080
<v Speaker 1>masculinity as a punch line was like another very deliberate

1:08:27.120 --> 1:08:31.439
<v Speaker 1>choice this movie makes that I thought worked really well.

1:08:31.600 --> 1:08:35.799
<v Speaker 1>There were some moments where I was like, he's doing violent,

1:08:36.000 --> 1:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>terrible stuff, but by and large, I think presenting that

1:08:40.479 --> 1:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>character as a fucking joke. Who literally, I mean, he's

1:08:44.280 --> 1:08:48.200
<v Speaker 1>he's speaking in like pretty broad strokes of like I

1:08:48.400 --> 1:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>never do anything wrong, cut to like him doing something wrong.

1:08:52.280 --> 1:08:54.640
<v Speaker 1>That was another great follow that when he's in the

1:08:54.680 --> 1:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>back of the car, he's like, they'll never break me,

1:08:58.040 --> 1:09:01.840
<v Speaker 1>cut to a montage of him just bragging about Nancy

1:09:01.880 --> 1:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>care Think, yeah, that was me and my crew, and

1:09:03.880 --> 1:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>it's like and also he lies like five dys like

1:09:06.520 --> 1:09:09.599
<v Speaker 1>I got page sixty dollars, Like did it were you

1:09:09.640 --> 1:09:12.719
<v Speaker 1>talking about? It? Was just like it was, Oh God.

1:09:12.760 --> 1:09:15.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think that that the way that character

1:09:15.600 --> 1:09:19.639
<v Speaker 1>is presented was really interesting choice that maybe won't work

1:09:19.640 --> 1:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>for everyone, but I thought it was a way that

1:09:22.000 --> 1:09:25.559
<v Speaker 1>we don't see toxic masculinity displayed a lot that can

1:09:25.680 --> 1:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>be effective. True, Yeah, I agree to. Another couple of

1:09:29.720 --> 1:09:32.960
<v Speaker 1>things I wanted to point out about her abusive relationship

1:09:33.040 --> 1:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>with Jeff is that at one point, you know, she says,

1:09:36.560 --> 1:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, I thought it was my fault that he

1:09:38.760 --> 1:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>was hitting me. Then I just thought it was interesting

1:09:41.640 --> 1:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>just to have it be pointed out, because that's such

1:09:44.880 --> 1:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>a common thing for abuse victims to feel, because their

1:09:49.400 --> 1:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>abuser is often also extremely manipulating and makes them feel

1:09:53.080 --> 1:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>as though it is their fault. And the fact that

1:09:55.680 --> 1:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>it even gets said I thought was important. Moments like that,

1:10:00.040 --> 1:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>like this is weird to say about. I wish that

1:10:02.360 --> 1:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>this movie had come out when I was a teenager

1:10:05.120 --> 1:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>because there's so much presented here that is presented really

1:10:09.360 --> 1:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>explicitly and directly, even when they're like painful truths to

1:10:13.720 --> 1:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>be very direct about. But I'm excited for like young

1:10:16.800 --> 1:10:19.519
<v Speaker 1>girls who are seeing in this movie and and can

1:10:19.680 --> 1:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>hear these messages stated so clearly, like that's awesome. Another

1:10:24.000 --> 1:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>good message that I think the movie sends is it

1:10:26.680 --> 1:10:30.599
<v Speaker 1>starts with you see like a tiny, tiny scene of

1:10:30.640 --> 1:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>her stepbrother, creepy Chris's this guy was living with me

1:10:34.680 --> 1:10:36.720
<v Speaker 1>at the time, and I remember my first date with

1:10:36.800 --> 1:10:40.439
<v Speaker 1>Jeff because I had my my creepy stepbrother arrested that

1:10:40.520 --> 1:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>day because you see a scene where he comes up

1:10:42.560 --> 1:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and gropes her and like fondles her breast, and then

1:10:44.960 --> 1:10:48.559
<v Speaker 1>she blings him down and calls the cops on him

1:10:48.560 --> 1:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and like has him basically arrested and kicked out of

1:10:51.040 --> 1:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the house. And then there's a number of other times

1:10:53.960 --> 1:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in the movie where she calls the cops on Jeff

1:10:57.439 --> 1:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and nothing is and has restraining orders violent and against him.

1:11:01.600 --> 1:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>He often violates them. They even get divorced because they

1:11:05.400 --> 1:11:08.000
<v Speaker 1>get married and then divorced, but she takes them back

1:11:08.040 --> 1:11:12.200
<v Speaker 1>after that. When you shoots her, he shoots her co

1:11:12.400 --> 1:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a cop pulls them over, pretending to her bloody face. Yeah.

1:11:16.160 --> 1:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>And then and then while he's kind of talking his

1:11:19.439 --> 1:11:21.479
<v Speaker 1>way out of it in the background with a cop,

1:11:21.560 --> 1:11:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you see another scene where Tany is directly addressing the

1:11:24.360 --> 1:11:26.719
<v Speaker 1>camera seeing like you can talk this way and anything.

1:11:27.080 --> 1:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>The cop has left me there like it was I mean, yeah,

1:11:32.200 --> 1:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>how women are disserviced when you can't make the argument

1:11:36.040 --> 1:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that she didn't try to get out. She did. She did,

1:11:38.240 --> 1:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>but you know the abuse cycle. It's Yeah, the last

1:11:43.160 --> 1:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>thing I wanted to talk about was the media aspect

1:11:46.560 --> 1:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of it, which feels especially relevant right now. Of a

1:11:52.160 --> 1:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of the reason this story unfolded the way it

1:11:56.400 --> 1:12:01.080
<v Speaker 1>was was four ratings and four you know, there is

1:12:01.120 --> 1:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that side of it, But ultimately it was that people

1:12:04.120 --> 1:12:07.599
<v Speaker 1>just didn't believe Dan yet, Like they did not believe

1:12:07.640 --> 1:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>what she was saying. I think this movie makes a

1:12:09.720 --> 1:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>really great point of like her whole life, no one

1:12:12.840 --> 1:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>believed her, even when she was saying over and over

1:12:16.160 --> 1:12:19.519
<v Speaker 1>like this is the abusive relationship I'm in. This is

1:12:19.560 --> 1:12:21.160
<v Speaker 1>how my class is getting in the way of me

1:12:21.160 --> 1:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>achieving my goals. Say what Juel about her? She's a

1:12:23.600 --> 1:12:27.120
<v Speaker 1>very direct character for in person, and and she's just

1:12:27.200 --> 1:12:30.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of shoved aside, and reasons are found to dismiss her,

1:12:30.760 --> 1:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes even including like the fact that she's very

1:12:33.400 --> 1:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>direct is used as a reason to discredit her. It's

1:12:36.120 --> 1:12:40.639
<v Speaker 1>like you're too blunt, like we it's trashy, did not classy, right,

1:12:41.160 --> 1:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>And the ultimate message being that, like people just didn't

1:12:44.960 --> 1:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>believe what she was saying. And there was a lot

1:12:47.439 --> 1:12:51.559
<v Speaker 1>of ways that people were biased and prejudiced against her

1:12:51.920 --> 1:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that informed that reaction. You know, like there's a lot

1:12:56.040 --> 1:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>there's certainly a lot of gray area in this story,

1:12:58.160 --> 1:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>but that she was done a huge disservice by the

1:13:02.920 --> 1:13:05.479
<v Speaker 1>media that ended up robbing her of a career, that

1:13:05.520 --> 1:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like people always wanted to rob her up anyways. Yeah,

1:13:09.160 --> 1:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>um it just yeah. There's a line that she says

1:13:11.400 --> 1:13:14.439
<v Speaker 1>in the movie. She's talking about Nancy Karrigan, and she says,

1:13:14.479 --> 1:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the press wanted Nancy to be the princess and I

1:13:16.960 --> 1:13:19.599
<v Speaker 1>to be the pile of crap to sell papers. So

1:13:19.720 --> 1:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>basically they had decided even though they came from similar

1:13:22.520 --> 1:13:26.479
<v Speaker 1>economic backgrounds Nancy and Tanya, which is the movie should

1:13:26.520 --> 1:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>have said, I should have said, but because Nancy was

1:13:29.200 --> 1:13:31.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe not his crass and maybe a little bit more

1:13:31.360 --> 1:13:35.519
<v Speaker 1>refined in her appearance, and the press just held onto

1:13:35.560 --> 1:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that and we're like, yeah, Tanya is white trash, forklift

1:13:40.640 --> 1:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>driving welder lady who was like gross and her competitor.

1:13:45.840 --> 1:13:48.439
<v Speaker 1>Of course they were. Well, the thing is like that sucks,

1:13:48.520 --> 1:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is like Nancy was from a similar background, but she

1:13:51.200 --> 1:13:54.599
<v Speaker 1>just she was willing to play ball, as it were,

1:13:55.080 --> 1:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>by not really saying anything about her background. She was

1:13:59.479 --> 1:14:02.519
<v Speaker 1>very like old interviews with her, they're just you know,

1:14:02.600 --> 1:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>in the way that you see a lot of teenagers

1:14:05.200 --> 1:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>who come to prominence and stay there. She's not really

1:14:07.960 --> 1:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>saying that much. She's saying like she's thanking people. She

1:14:12.479 --> 1:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, she's not stating her opinions as much as

1:14:15.680 --> 1:14:18.240
<v Speaker 1>Tanya is. And I think that, like there is a

1:14:18.240 --> 1:14:23.000
<v Speaker 1>big element of like people wanting her to apologize for

1:14:23.120 --> 1:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>something that she she she's an unapologetic person and people

1:14:28.120 --> 1:14:31.439
<v Speaker 1>did not like that, and I it's I mean, we've

1:14:31.840 --> 1:14:35.439
<v Speaker 1>hit on this before, just like an unapologetic man Sky

1:14:35.560 --> 1:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is the limit for those types of characters, and a

1:14:37.680 --> 1:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of biopics that is like the center of it.

1:14:41.080 --> 1:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Like he never apologized for doing what he thought was right,

1:14:45.640 --> 1:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we see Tanya doing. And you know,

1:14:48.160 --> 1:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you can see the real historical result is that her

1:14:50.880 --> 1:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>life was ruined because she wasn't willing to play ball

1:14:54.000 --> 1:14:57.519
<v Speaker 1>and was unapologetic about who she was. I don't know

1:14:57.560 --> 1:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>if this is an appropriate parallel to draw, but remember

1:15:02.000 --> 1:15:06.599
<v Speaker 1>when Mike Tyson bid off someone's ear and everyone's like, oh,

1:15:06.680 --> 1:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Mike Tyson, Oh this slap on the wrist. But actually

1:15:11.320 --> 1:15:14.479
<v Speaker 1>you can still be in the public eye and you're like,

1:15:14.800 --> 1:15:16.920
<v Speaker 1>what a silly guy, and did it? And I think

1:15:16.960 --> 1:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that ties back to the femininity issue of like the

1:15:19.360 --> 1:15:22.599
<v Speaker 1>sports she was in it, just like she wasn't supposed

1:15:22.600 --> 1:15:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to be tough and that sports she's supposed to be

1:15:25.360 --> 1:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>traditionally feminine, and there was no wage room. But then

1:15:29.880 --> 1:15:32.479
<v Speaker 1>also just the way that like the press and media

1:15:32.520 --> 1:15:36.240
<v Speaker 1>treated both cases, where like Tanya was to some degree

1:15:36.280 --> 1:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>involved in violence against Nancy Karragan and Mike Tyson was

1:15:41.120 --> 1:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>no doubt involved with violence around there's an apanage of

1:15:47.360 --> 1:15:51.519
<v Speaker 1>it by fighting his ear off, but he got some

1:15:51.600 --> 1:15:54.479
<v Speaker 1>ship for a while, I remember. But now, like Mike Tyson,

1:15:54.880 --> 1:15:58.519
<v Speaker 1>you can see him in movies like he's still check out,

1:15:58.840 --> 1:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Please God, don't watch the overr but like exactly like huge,

1:16:02.400 --> 1:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>he's still a person that people. Yeah, and often he's

1:16:05.280 --> 1:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the butt of a joke, but the fact that he's

1:16:06.760 --> 1:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>still But honestly, that was then I ended. I'd argue

1:16:09.360 --> 1:16:11.719
<v Speaker 1>that ultimately that was a boon to his career. Yeah,

1:16:11.720 --> 1:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>whereas with Tanya it was easier to villainize her because

1:16:16.040 --> 1:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of the patriarchy, that little shifty patriarchy. Back again, he

1:16:22.240 --> 1:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>thought we got it last time, recommended viewing for people

1:16:26.439 --> 1:16:30.599
<v Speaker 1>who enjoyed Itonia first of all, watched the documentary it's

1:16:30.600 --> 1:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>made by I forget what her name is, but a

1:16:32.320 --> 1:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>really great documentary. And also I think it is relevant

1:16:35.400 --> 1:16:38.559
<v Speaker 1>that the source material for this movie was curated and

1:16:38.640 --> 1:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>presented by a female filmmaker, really really, really good. And

1:16:42.360 --> 1:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>then follow up, I would watch the Netflix documentary about

1:16:46.400 --> 1:16:51.639
<v Speaker 1>Amanda Knox, where you'll find a similar story of I mean,

1:16:51.680 --> 1:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no limit to the stories of women being victimized

1:16:54.200 --> 1:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in media. That's why our Shall exists. But in terms

1:16:57.200 --> 1:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of like real life stuff, Amanda Knox the I mean

1:17:01.080 --> 1:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the story being that she was accused of murder when

1:17:05.200 --> 1:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it was clear very early on that she did not

1:17:07.880 --> 1:17:09.680
<v Speaker 1>do it and it was done by someone else who

1:17:09.760 --> 1:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>admitted to it. But for years it was like did

1:17:12.680 --> 1:17:14.519
<v Speaker 1>she do it? And was pushed by the media. And

1:17:15.200 --> 1:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that this movie pulls from that a little

1:17:17.840 --> 1:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>bit because there's that shitty media guy that we see

1:17:20.320 --> 1:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>in the talking heads over and over who's like he

1:17:23.400 --> 1:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and I popped her tires like the that seemed like

1:17:27.800 --> 1:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>almost directly pulled from There's like this British tabloid journalist

1:17:32.439 --> 1:17:35.679
<v Speaker 1>in the Amanda Knox documentary who couldn't be more thrilled

1:17:35.680 --> 1:17:37.559
<v Speaker 1>with himself for ruining her life and I just want

1:17:37.560 --> 1:17:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to shoot him. But recommended viewing. Hey does this movie

1:17:41.720 --> 1:17:44.719
<v Speaker 1>about the bachtel Pst. I wonder it certainly does. For sure.

1:17:45.320 --> 1:17:48.919
<v Speaker 1>You've got Livona and the coach talking, You've got Tanya

1:17:48.960 --> 1:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and the coach talking. You've got Lavanna and Tanya talking

1:17:52.040 --> 1:17:54.920
<v Speaker 1>to each other. You've got we didn't talk about this character,

1:17:54.960 --> 1:17:58.559
<v Speaker 1>but Tanya fires Diane her first coach, and then hire

1:17:58.640 --> 1:18:02.400
<v Speaker 1>someone named Dottie or something. And then when she sucks

1:18:02.479 --> 1:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>up the ninety two Olympics, Diana ends up coming back

1:18:05.880 --> 1:18:09.880
<v Speaker 1>with that great scene at the diner where Time was like, well,

1:18:09.960 --> 1:18:13.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like my mom. I'm a waitress, I'm poor,

1:18:14.080 --> 1:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm out of shape, and the good news is I

1:18:16.880 --> 1:18:20.240
<v Speaker 1>also am on skilled. It's like that was fun. That

1:18:20.320 --> 1:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>was fun. But yeah, I mean the movie passes dozens

1:18:23.120 --> 1:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of times. It's not even worth counting how many, because

1:18:26.000 --> 1:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it knows this movie is from moment when women take

1:18:29.880 --> 1:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>up the screen for the majority of the movie, and

1:18:32.320 --> 1:18:37.519
<v Speaker 1>again it is worth saying, it's white women again. Tricky,

1:18:37.840 --> 1:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a biopic. Tricky. We're in Oregon for most of

1:18:40.840 --> 1:18:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the movie, but worth staying. Oregon, which was founded as

1:18:43.760 --> 1:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a white supremacy state. If you didn't know, I didn't know. Horrible. Yeah,

1:18:48.680 --> 1:18:52.759
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't even let black people live there until sometime

1:18:52.800 --> 1:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen twenties. I want to say, well, that explains,

1:18:56.880 --> 1:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and it was like a white state. It was found

1:18:59.640 --> 1:19:02.360
<v Speaker 1>like this is going to be a white haven for

1:19:02.400 --> 1:19:04.479
<v Speaker 1>any white people who want to live here and not

1:19:04.560 --> 1:19:08.400
<v Speaker 1>be around any people. Not know that. That makes sense

1:19:08.439 --> 1:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>of every place I've ever seen an Oregon well, very white,

1:19:13.320 --> 1:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>fucked up man. She'll be right the movie. Yes, I'm

1:19:17.080 --> 1:19:19.519
<v Speaker 1>going to give it a five nipple. I think I

1:19:19.520 --> 1:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>think I am to No, No, I'm gonna give it

1:19:22.280 --> 1:19:26.519
<v Speaker 1>four because and I know it's about Atonia Harding. But

1:19:26.640 --> 1:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I do think that Nancy was robbed, was was villainized.

1:19:33.760 --> 1:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>She was Margo Robbie. I think she was, and I

1:19:39.040 --> 1:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>understand why this choice was made, but I don't like it.

1:19:41.360 --> 1:19:44.519
<v Speaker 1>She was villainized in this story that she was not.

1:19:44.960 --> 1:19:47.519
<v Speaker 1>She couldn't be less of a villain or even a

1:19:47.520 --> 1:19:51.880
<v Speaker 1>willing participant in I thought that there were several small

1:19:51.920 --> 1:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to flesh her out a little bit, but the

1:19:55.160 --> 1:19:58.960
<v Speaker 1>movie shows no interest in giving Nancy's character any to mention,

1:19:59.040 --> 1:20:03.559
<v Speaker 1>which I that really did bother me. However, every other

1:20:03.960 --> 1:20:09.599
<v Speaker 1>woman we see on screen is flawed, has motivation just

1:20:09.800 --> 1:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, just like a lot of human women

1:20:12.520 --> 1:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>are shown in this movie and are shown together and

1:20:14.800 --> 1:20:17.120
<v Speaker 1>are shown in conflict, are shown not in conflict. There's

1:20:17.360 --> 1:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of everyone in this movie is in conflict

1:20:20.160 --> 1:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>at all times, regardless of gender, pretty much without exception,

1:20:25.400 --> 1:20:27.719
<v Speaker 1>down to the fucking we didn't talk about this where

1:20:28.080 --> 1:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we think we're getting a reconciliation scene with Tanya and

1:20:30.280 --> 1:20:33.599
<v Speaker 1>her mom and they're like, nope, she's being paid by

1:20:33.760 --> 1:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>someone to get to admit she did something that she

1:20:37.280 --> 1:20:40.479
<v Speaker 1>may not have actually done. Amazing, but yeah, I mean,

1:20:40.880 --> 1:20:43.519
<v Speaker 1>I think that this movie is terrific. I just wish

1:20:43.800 --> 1:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>justice for Nancy. Baby. Nancy, to her credit slash to

1:20:47.840 --> 1:20:51.360
<v Speaker 1>my low key fury, still to this day, has no

1:20:51.439 --> 1:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>interest in talking about it. They're like, have you seen Titania.

1:20:54.080 --> 1:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>She's like, nope, she will not talk about it. She

1:20:57.439 --> 1:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>has no interest. I mean, is weird because Nancy Kerrigan

1:21:01.360 --> 1:21:03.599
<v Speaker 1>ended up kind of making a killing off of this incident,

1:21:03.800 --> 1:21:06.439
<v Speaker 1>although obviously she was not. Again, she's not a willing

1:21:06.479 --> 1:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>participant in this, but she did make that amazing comeback

1:21:10.320 --> 1:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and then off of that amazing comeback, she one second

1:21:13.320 --> 1:21:17.280
<v Speaker 1>place made a face, which I'm just like, that's the

1:21:17.320 --> 1:21:21.519
<v Speaker 1>only time we've seen Nancy Kerrigan behave human is that

1:21:21.560 --> 1:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>because she was so like conscious and perfect and then

1:21:24.400 --> 1:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>when she was just like kind of There is like

1:21:26.280 --> 1:21:28.599
<v Speaker 1>a great clip when Nancy Kergan gets the silver medal

1:21:28.600 --> 1:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>in the Olympics where the girl who wins it was

1:21:32.439 --> 1:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>like a Russian girl is like taking a while to

1:21:35.040 --> 1:21:36.880
<v Speaker 1>get off the ice because she's crying so much, and

1:21:36.960 --> 1:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Nancy is just like, there's like a clip of Nancy

1:21:39.000 --> 1:21:40.920
<v Speaker 1>kirk and be like, why are we gonna just We're

1:21:40.920 --> 1:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>just gonna keep filming her crying. I was like, okay, fine,

1:21:45.040 --> 1:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>she's a person, you know. In fact, I like that.

1:21:48.439 --> 1:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I make faces all the time. I

1:21:50.080 --> 1:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>always have a scowl on my face. So and also

1:21:53.000 --> 1:21:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that's basically telling telling a woman to smile smiling when

1:21:56.960 --> 1:22:02.120
<v Speaker 1>he smiled. She lost, after all, she there like she frowned.

1:22:03.040 --> 1:22:05.200
<v Speaker 1>But but the movie cast her as in I mean,

1:22:05.240 --> 1:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Tanya cast her is in the wrong for doing that,

1:22:07.760 --> 1:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and the movie makes no commentary. And the fact that

1:22:10.040 --> 1:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that is probably a little petty of her, because you know,

1:22:14.120 --> 1:22:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Anyways, clearly I'm a Nancy stand I love her,

1:22:19.120 --> 1:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I love Tanya too, I love this movie. Yeah, I'm

1:22:21.720 --> 1:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm gonna stick with my five just because I

1:22:24.280 --> 1:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have the same emotional attachment to Nancy Carrigan as

1:22:28.720 --> 1:22:30.559
<v Speaker 1>you do. So I just thought it was great that

1:22:30.600 --> 1:22:35.839
<v Speaker 1>we what feels like because they actually are real people depicted,

1:22:35.880 --> 1:22:40.479
<v Speaker 1>because other biopics will be about a historical figure and

1:22:40.600 --> 1:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>totally glass over them and make them not that Tom

1:22:45.240 --> 1:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Hanks movie about Walt Disney. Also that Tom Hanks biopics

1:22:49.040 --> 1:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>are fucking problematic. Charlie Wilson's War is an atrocity to nature.

1:22:54.200 --> 1:22:57.519
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Wilson was like a senator I'm pretty sure who.

1:22:57.760 --> 1:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>Literally the whole movie is like he's a using women

1:23:00.760 --> 1:23:03.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's sucking cool. Tom Hanks. Some biopics no more

1:23:04.240 --> 1:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the post funk off. Well. An example I saw recently

1:23:08.520 --> 1:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>was the Greatest Showman, which is the worst movie I've

1:23:11.040 --> 1:23:13.360
<v Speaker 1>ever seen. I did go to see it because zac

1:23:13.360 --> 1:23:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Efron is in it, and that's my cross to bear,

1:23:16.320 --> 1:23:20.360
<v Speaker 1>but that movie totally glossed over all the horrible ship P. T.

1:23:20.520 --> 1:23:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Barnum did in his life and does not depict him

1:23:23.680 --> 1:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>as an interesting or compelling or multidimensional character the way

1:23:26.720 --> 1:23:29.519
<v Speaker 1>that Ionia does. So, I Tany was very responsible in

1:23:29.640 --> 1:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>presenting these characters, flawed as they may be, as dynamic,

1:23:34.560 --> 1:23:41.360
<v Speaker 1>multidimensional characters and people, and exploring things that movies don't

1:23:41.400 --> 1:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>often if they do explore, they don't go into enough

1:23:44.400 --> 1:23:48.360
<v Speaker 1>depth about or make any real statement about, which is

1:23:48.680 --> 1:23:53.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, class struggles and abuse and the media's portrayal

1:23:53.840 --> 1:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of women and things like that. So it tackles a lot.

1:23:56.520 --> 1:23:58.479
<v Speaker 1>It tackles a lot, and I think it does it

1:23:58.520 --> 1:24:01.800
<v Speaker 1>all for the most part, pretty responsibly. And on top

1:24:01.800 --> 1:24:04.840
<v Speaker 1>of that, it's just, you know, a woman's story. It's

1:24:04.880 --> 1:24:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a woman driving this story. It's a fun movie. It's

1:24:08.280 --> 1:24:11.160
<v Speaker 1>good because there is kind of like sometimes a tendency

1:24:11.200 --> 1:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of even in movies that farewell with the Beachtel tests,

1:24:13.439 --> 1:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>in portrayal of women of like, yeah, we're seeing strong

1:24:16.400 --> 1:24:19.120
<v Speaker 1>female characters, but we're not seeing a strong, flawed female characters,

1:24:19.600 --> 1:24:21.799
<v Speaker 1>and that's something this movie does very well. Yes indeed,

1:24:22.400 --> 1:24:25.920
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, I give it a five nipple and my

1:24:26.160 --> 1:24:31.519
<v Speaker 1>nipples go to I think that Sean Eckart has eight nipples.

1:24:32.320 --> 1:24:35.679
<v Speaker 1>You think it's a cat he's a cat. How great

1:24:35.720 --> 1:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>would it have been if Alfred Willina was in this movie?

1:24:38.280 --> 1:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I gonna say there's not really any older male parts

1:24:41.080 --> 1:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in this movie though, so it might have been impossible.

1:24:43.479 --> 1:24:46.400
<v Speaker 1>And also how amazing is it that there's no older

1:24:46.439 --> 1:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>male parts in this movie? Um? So ali from Willina? Unfortunately,

1:24:51.040 --> 1:24:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I think, I mean he's a feminist icon. He posted

1:24:53.200 --> 1:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>a first trap along with a caption that's like donate

1:24:56.120 --> 1:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to Times up and it's like, um, what bitch, But

1:24:58.840 --> 1:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>like I love it, You're get So you're giving Sean

1:25:01.360 --> 1:25:05.599
<v Speaker 1>Akhart five nipples? Nipples, I'll give him two of mine,

1:25:05.640 --> 1:25:10.360
<v Speaker 1>which brings up his count to seven. So maybe he's

1:25:10.400 --> 1:25:14.439
<v Speaker 1>just like he's got like a spare time. Because I

1:25:14.520 --> 1:25:17.559
<v Speaker 1>love I can't wait to see Paul Walter Hauser in

1:25:17.640 --> 1:25:20.759
<v Speaker 1>every movie that comes up from now on. I literally

1:25:20.760 --> 1:25:23.680
<v Speaker 1>can't wait to be tired of him. Um, and am

1:25:23.720 --> 1:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>giving my other two nipples to Nancy? Sorry? Yeah, that's great. Yeah,

1:25:27.439 --> 1:25:29.679
<v Speaker 1>And I also think that I look more like Nancy

1:25:29.720 --> 1:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Kerrigan than the girl who played her in the movie.

1:25:31.240 --> 1:25:33.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm just throwing it out. So like all the casting

1:25:33.880 --> 1:25:40.719
<v Speaker 1>agents were patrons on are you can't wait to play Nancy? Karrigan. Well,

1:25:40.920 --> 1:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that was the episode, folks, thanks for listening. I had

1:25:47.840 --> 1:25:50.719
<v Speaker 1>given the I didn't remember this, but I had given

1:25:50.760 --> 1:25:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the movie five nipples, um and and Jamie you had

1:25:54.280 --> 1:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>given it four. I think I wouldn't necessarily give it

1:25:58.120 --> 1:26:03.839
<v Speaker 1>five if we like to backpedaling on her nipple writing again,

1:26:05.200 --> 1:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Caitlin backpedal, Durante strikes again. I don't know. Maybe I

1:26:09.800 --> 1:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>would still give it. I might. I might even scored

1:26:12.320 --> 1:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a little lower. I don't know, maybe it would still

1:26:14.320 --> 1:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>be around of four for me. I think I think

1:26:17.080 --> 1:26:19.559
<v Speaker 1>I would drop it down to like a four point five.

1:26:19.840 --> 1:26:23.120
<v Speaker 1>For the reasons that you cited in the episode. I

1:26:23.160 --> 1:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>was just too I was too gung ho about it.

1:26:26.280 --> 1:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess I was just like Ed had just come

1:26:28.760 --> 1:26:31.559
<v Speaker 1>out and we were all excited. We were like Alice

1:26:31.600 --> 1:26:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and Janny's gonna win that Oscar and then she did.

1:26:35.000 --> 1:26:38.400
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I feel like, oh, and I was a

1:26:39.040 --> 1:26:41.439
<v Speaker 1>final note that I think in the two and a

1:26:41.479 --> 1:26:44.960
<v Speaker 1>half years since, this movie has kind of slipped out

1:26:44.960 --> 1:26:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of the zeitgeist in a way. I do not like.

1:26:47.360 --> 1:26:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I feel like people don't talk about Titania really at all,

1:26:50.720 --> 1:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like it's it's you and dummy A

1:26:54.120 --> 1:26:57.680
<v Speaker 1>did Jewey bay or the only people talking about Titania

1:26:57.760 --> 1:27:00.479
<v Speaker 1>and we need to fix that. Me and Demi's thread

1:27:00.600 --> 1:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>is pretty much all about Itoni, like it's just like

1:27:03.479 --> 1:27:07.160
<v Speaker 1>watching it again, Like it's just we're both watching it

1:27:07.200 --> 1:27:09.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot. He and I have a similar text thread

1:27:09.680 --> 1:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>about Paddington's, so that makes sense. Demi is that friend

1:27:13.600 --> 1:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>because he's a man of passion. Um. But I would

1:27:19.080 --> 1:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>encourage you if you like Titania, tell someone who hasn't.

1:27:23.120 --> 1:27:25.679
<v Speaker 1>It's on Hulu. For crying out loud, It's not hard

1:27:25.720 --> 1:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to watch Titania. It's so accessible. Just bring it to

1:27:28.760 --> 1:27:32.920
<v Speaker 1>your friends, bring it to your loved ones. They deserve it. Okay,

1:27:32.960 --> 1:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that's I'm getting off my subbox. Also, Jamie, I can't

1:27:36.840 --> 1:27:39.679
<v Speaker 1>believe we went through that entire episode and you never

1:27:39.840 --> 1:27:44.880
<v Speaker 1>mentioned anything about Zamboni's which is I mean, that is

1:27:44.880 --> 1:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>for a reason one of my one of my only notes,

1:27:47.760 --> 1:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>not a Zamboni in the whole movie, not a damn Zamboni,

1:27:51.920 --> 1:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>which is first of all, erasure, Bodi Erasure, there's for sure.

1:27:58.840 --> 1:28:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And like Tanya heart thing is like she's like a

1:28:01.160 --> 1:28:04.120
<v Speaker 1>working class hero. She would be talking to the Zamboni

1:28:04.240 --> 1:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>drivers she would be forging lifelong friendships to the zamboni drivers.

1:28:07.960 --> 1:28:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I bet she knows how to drive a zamboni and

1:28:10.439 --> 1:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>like everything. Now I want to just quote the whole

1:28:13.960 --> 1:28:18.599
<v Speaker 1>movie again. She does chop on every day, she does

1:28:18.680 --> 1:28:22.240
<v Speaker 1>drive the zamboni every day. Yeah, that would be. I mean,

1:28:22.240 --> 1:28:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that would just be if this were a fictional story.

1:28:24.439 --> 1:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>They're like, well, yeah, Tanya pays for her lessons by

1:28:27.120 --> 1:28:29.599
<v Speaker 1>driving the zamboni, which is something that I would do

1:28:30.000 --> 1:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>for anything for free. Oh sure. Like to refer to

1:28:34.320 --> 1:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>a recent episode on The Cheetah Girls when the one

1:28:37.120 --> 1:28:40.519
<v Speaker 1>character works at the community center to pay for her

1:28:41.040 --> 1:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>for her dance lessons, it could be just like that.

1:28:43.840 --> 1:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a very common way to get children to do

1:28:47.400 --> 1:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>labor they shouldn't necessarily be doing. Um was my I

1:28:51.920 --> 1:28:54.639
<v Speaker 1>did the same thing for dance classes in in uh

1:28:54.720 --> 1:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>in high school. They're like, oh, to help teach the

1:28:56.840 --> 1:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>little kids. And then we'll look the other way, and

1:28:59.240 --> 1:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you're like, look the other way, I'm doing a job. Anyways,

1:29:04.680 --> 1:29:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Titon your rocks. She should have been on a zamboni. Also,

1:29:07.920 --> 1:29:15.559
<v Speaker 1>I've written a zamboni and we seen. Um. Well, thanks

1:29:15.600 --> 1:29:19.799
<v Speaker 1>for listening everyone, Um you can follow us on social

1:29:19.840 --> 1:29:24.040
<v Speaker 1>media at Specto Cast on Twitter and Instagram. Really be

1:29:24.080 --> 1:29:26.519
<v Speaker 1>sure to follow those accounts because that's where we post,

1:29:26.640 --> 1:29:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, certain events that we have. Maybe you were

1:29:29.880 --> 1:29:32.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe you were hanging out on our Titanic live stream

1:29:32.360 --> 1:29:34.640
<v Speaker 1>last week. We're hoping to do more of those. So

1:29:34.840 --> 1:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>just stay in touch, don't be a stranger. You can

1:29:38.720 --> 1:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>join our the The episode you heard unlocked today was

1:29:42.280 --> 1:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>from our patreon a k a. Matreon where for five

1:29:45.439 --> 1:29:48.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month you can get to bonus episodes a month,

1:29:48.600 --> 1:29:51.439
<v Speaker 1>as well as access to our back catalog, which is

1:29:51.479 --> 1:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>over seventy episodes I think at this point. Um, so

1:29:55.360 --> 1:29:57.880
<v Speaker 1>there's just if you're running low on main feet, it's

1:29:57.920 --> 1:29:59.519
<v Speaker 1>a great place to go. And it's also a great

1:29:59.560 --> 1:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>commune any You can get our march at t public

1:30:02.200 --> 1:30:05.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com, slash the Bechtel Cast. There's just options upon

1:30:06.040 --> 1:30:09.639
<v Speaker 1>options upon options of ways for you to form paras

1:30:09.640 --> 1:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>social relationships with us. You should, um make an Itonia

1:30:13.840 --> 1:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>design for okay, don't tend to be Also, I wanted

1:30:20.360 --> 1:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to pitch this go for it a crossover of Ionia

1:30:26.320 --> 1:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>and I Frankenstein. What if they exist in the same universe.

1:30:31.160 --> 1:30:35.240
<v Speaker 1>We should honestly, I now I'm like, should I change

1:30:35.280 --> 1:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>my other birthday? Patreon episode two I Frankenstein? Honestly, something

1:30:43.160 --> 1:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>good thin I fregate side is there was two perfect

1:30:48.080 --> 1:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>movies combined. It couldn't be done. Oh god, I love

1:30:52.320 --> 1:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I freak it said so much like the scene where

1:30:55.960 --> 1:30:58.360
<v Speaker 1>he's on top of the mountain and he's just swinging

1:30:58.360 --> 1:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>around nun chucks, but there's no when there. I love it.

1:31:01.560 --> 1:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I simply don't remember. I think I've seen it, but

1:31:04.400 --> 1:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember anything about it. Aaron Eckhart really wishes

1:31:08.000 --> 1:31:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that you didn't remember anything about it. I would I

1:31:12.000 --> 1:31:15.880
<v Speaker 1>would gladly record a bonus episode on it, though, if

1:31:15.920 --> 1:31:18.759
<v Speaker 1>that was your birthday wish. Maybe that's the move about

1:31:18.760 --> 1:31:23.719
<v Speaker 1>to make my wishes come true. All right, Well, thanks

1:31:23.760 --> 1:31:27.439
<v Speaker 1>again everyone, and we'll see you next week. Bye.