WEBVTT - September Return to Normal Proves Elusive

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanibek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world to business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all furnishing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Clobal News. Well, two explosions we know

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>outside of Cobbles International Airport. We've talked about deaths Americans

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>as well of as Afghanis. Let's get an update on

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 1>this continuously unfolding situation in crisis with us. Right now

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg News National Security Team Leader Bill Ferries, along

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>with Katherine Zimmerman, fellow at the Conservative Thing Tank American

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Enterprise Institute. She covers terrorism and foreign and defense policy

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>both on the phone in d C. And we should

0:00:56.760 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>remind you that we are awaiting a briefing from the

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>White House as well. As the Pentagon as soon as

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:04.320
<v Speaker 1>they do begin we will take you there live in

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the meantime. Bill, thanks for being here with Tim and myself.

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>What's the latest that we know in terms of the

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>situation in Afghanistan as well as the casualties. Well, we

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>know that several US troops have been killed in the blast,

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and we believe more wounded. And obviously, um the Taliban

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.639
<v Speaker 1>have said that there were at least thirteen Afghans killed

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and several dozen wounded in the blast, and I think

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>we all expect those um, those numbers to rise in

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 1>the coming hours. We have had reports that planes are

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>still leaving the Kabo airport, but obviously, UH, this this

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>UH puts a big hold on efforts by US and

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>NATO forces to get more people out of the country. UM,

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and we're expecting it, as he said, a White House

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>and Pentagon briefing, within the next thirty minutes to an

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>hour here, so we should get an update on how

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>this is affecting UH, what the latest numbers are, and

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>and how this may affect President Item's plans to withdraw

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>by August thirty one. Hey, Bill, what do we know

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>about potentially the group or groups behind this and their

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>relationship with the Taliban. Well, the Taliban, the Taliban themselves

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>have come out and said that they think that one

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of the ISIS offshoots is possibly responsible for this. They

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>say they're investigating. I mean, these lasts happened in you know,

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 1>outside of the airport perimeter, in the area now controlled

0:02:26.000 --> 0:02:29.640
<v Speaker 1>by the Taliban UH And throughout the conflict over the

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>last decade, you have had that Taliban UH, You've had

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Taliban bombings in Afghanistan. You've had ISIS bombings in Afghanistan,

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and some of those ISIS bombings have been against Taliban targets.

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's a it's been a complicated picture there. But

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the Taliban and ISIS have been at each other at

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the same time they go I have been going after

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>foreign forces. Katherine, want to bring you into the conversation here. Um,

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you cover terrorism, you cover foreign defense policy. Was any

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 1>withdrawal American U S forces going to be difficult from Afghanistan?

0:03:04.120 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>No matter what the timing, it was certainly going to

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:10.959
<v Speaker 1>be difficult. But as we look back at how the

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>withdraw always done, there was a lot that could have

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>been done better. Well, why don't you expand upon that?

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>We were looking at a situation where the US drew

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>down in a matter of months troops to next nothing, uh,

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and we still had American civilian personnel on the ground,

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and we're really placing our hands on in the our

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>safe game in the hands of the Afghan National Security

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>forces UM and those, as we well know, collapsed very rapidly.

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>But what was missed in all of that is, of course,

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the enabling capabilities that the United States provided the Afghans

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that were yanked as the United States pulled back. Well,

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we certainly can't go back in time. And the deadline

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that's looming right now is August thirty one, and that's

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the date that the United States has agreed to with

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>the Taliban to remove the American presence there. I'm wondering how, Katherine,

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:09.640
<v Speaker 1>what happened there today not changes that deadline, but changes

0:04:09.680 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>what happens over the next few days and the thousands

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of people who still remain in Afghanistan that need to

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>get out. The attack today will certainly make it more

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>challenging for the people who need to get out of

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Afghanistan to get out. The United States had already changed

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>how it was bringing Americans to the airport because of

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>fears that the soft target, the crowds unprotected outside of

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the airport perimeter, would be targeted by the Islamic State

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Corps one as we saw UH, and that had certainly

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>slowed down how how we're getting people to the airport.

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And so if we're looking at the August thirty one deadline,

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 1>there are things that we need to keep in mind.

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And the first is that our European partners have already

0:04:53.800 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>said that they're basically pacing down evacuations because the U. S.

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Militaries won't be able to promise security. Uh. And certainly,

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>as we're looking at the security situation today, even the

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>security of the US military brooch was very kind of

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>uh tenuous bill ferries, you know, with this situation rapidly deteriorating,

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:20.160
<v Speaker 1>what can we expect? Are you hearing anything from uh

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the from U S. Officials when it comes to potentially

0:05:23.520 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>upping once again the amount of American troops in Afghanistan.

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>We're not hearing anything like that. I think, UM, I

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>think there's gonna be a calculus uh at the White

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>House about you know. UH. They've been saying for days

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that the longer troops are there, the more the more

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>at risk they are, the more dangerous the situation becomes.

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>UM So I wouldn't. I wouldn't for now expect them

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:53.359
<v Speaker 1>to stick with that August thirty first deadline to try

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to get everybody out. And but I agree, it's made

0:05:56.880 --> 0:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>it much more difficult to try to get any Americans

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>who remain in Afghanistan who wants to leave. Uh And

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>we really don't know the universe of those people, whether

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>it's five hundred or more. Um, but it will make

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.600
<v Speaker 1>it much more difficult to get them out, especially if

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>they're not already in cobble. All Right, we're going to

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:18.680
<v Speaker 1>continue this conversation. Bill. I know you've got a lot

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 1>on your play today. UM So we're gonna let you go.

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Bill Ferries, he's National Security team leader at Bloomberg News,

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>keeping us up to date on the moving situation in Afghanistan.

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Joiningist on the phone from Washington, d C. We're gonna

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>come back though with Katherine Zimmerman. She's fellow at the

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>American Enterprise Institute, a conservative think tank based there in

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the nation's capital. She's joining us from d C. You

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>are listening to Bloomberg Business Week Carol Master along with

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stanivik in our Interactive Broker studio. A reminder that

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>we are expected to hear a briefing from the White

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>House as well as the Pentagon on Afghanistan. We will

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 1>take you their live as soon as it happens. This

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Radio. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim sten It on Bloomberg Radio,

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 1>crossing the Bloomberg terminal headline from the Associated Press. Eleven

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>marines and a Navy medic killed in the Afghanistan. Uh,

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>those explosions in that country. So continuing to get some

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>updates Tim on the situation there, and we'll continue to

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>bring those updates as soon as we get them. As

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Carol mentioned moments ago, we are waiting a press conference

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>from the White House and also one at the Pentagon.

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Will bring those to you live when we get them

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>as well. In the meantime, let's get back to Katherine Zimmerman,

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a fellow at the Conservative American Enterprise Institute, joining us

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>on the phone from Washington, d C. Katherine, Uh, I

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>want to try to understand from you to what extent

0:07:35.960 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>you think the President Biden's hands were tied at least

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>in the UH withdrawal, not necessarily the timing, but the

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that the United States had to withdraw from Afghanistan,

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>given that the U. S And Taliban signed a deal

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>UH back in the early part of in order to

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 1>end this war, and for the US to ultimately withdraw,

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that of course happened under the Trump administration. President Biden

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>made his own decision to withdraw, and I think that

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:05.679
<v Speaker 1>that has been missed in all of this. The Trump

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.440
<v Speaker 1>administration did sign a deal, but the Taliban was not

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>upholding its end of the deal. And the two key

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:17.120
<v Speaker 1>points that the Taliban weren't executing was breaking ties with

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.320
<v Speaker 1>al Qaeda. We actually saw the Taliban continuing to support

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>al Qaeda and al Qaeda spreading in the country after

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>it had signed the deal. And the second point was

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>reducing the level of violence inside of Afghanistan. And certainly

0:08:30.560 --> 0:08:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the idea was to make space for a political negotiation

0:08:35.720 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 1>that would have allowed some sort of transitionary government, and

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>the Taliban simply escalated and we know the impact of

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that now. So, Catherine, what would you say the the

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:50.599
<v Speaker 1>what would you rather have had the Biden administration do

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>when it when it entered office in January of this year.

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Would you like to have seen US troops stay there?

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I have advocated for the ongoing light footprints that the

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 1>US had gotten to by the by the point that

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration took office, we had troops inside of Afghanistan,

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>which sounds like a lot except when you look at

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>what they were doing, which was primarily supporting the Afghan

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>national security forces who were doing the brunch of the

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>fighting against the Taliban. And then, of course the part

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>that matters for the United States, our troops were the

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>ones with the high end counter terrorism capabilities going after

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the Taliban, uh and and al Kaina and Islamic state

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:39.079
<v Speaker 1>elements that that we're posing terror threats. But I want

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to go back to Katherine. You know, there are so

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>many uh different groups within Afghanistan. Um. I think fourteen

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 1>different ethnicities. Uh, There's just so many different groups. Would

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>it have been impossible to ultimately get an ideal situation

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>there um and with the Taliban kind of following through

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>on its commitment and in order for the US to

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>withdraw anytime soon. Yes, I think when the Trump administration

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>negotiated the deal, it was very clear that there wasn't

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be a political resolution for the reasons that

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you lay out, and the fact fundamentally that the United

0:10:17.559 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>States had shifted years prior from engaging on on the

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>the ongoing civil war in Afghanistan. And I think that's

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>something that we don't actually separate in our heads enough.

0:10:29.400 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Is the counter terrorism fight that the United States has

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 1>an Afghanistan and the civil war against the Taliban that

0:10:36.520 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>was ongoing. You understand this situation, You understand this region

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:44.320
<v Speaker 1>of the world. Thomas Friedman of the New York Times recently,

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>writing in an opinion piece, you know, but citing how

0:10:47.760 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 1>more than seventy Afghanistan's population is under twenty five years old,

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Most of them, he writes, know nothing about the Taliban um.

0:10:56.080 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>How will that create the future of Afghanistan. It's a

0:11:05.200 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>great question. And as we're looking at what the future

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:11.079
<v Speaker 1>of Afghanistan looks like, you know, the Taliban have taken

0:11:11.120 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>power again. But the Afghanistan today is are different from

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the one twenty years ago. And as you mentioned, the

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 1>most of the population have very different expectations than the

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>population did when the Taliban was in power in through

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:30.480
<v Speaker 1>two thousand one. So there are much higher demands on

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>any government of Afghanistan today where where people in the

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>urban centers in Kabul and and other major cities do

0:11:39.240 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>expect government service to be provided. So that's one of

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why we we're watching the Taliban's actions carefully

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and why the Taliban are so worried about the economic

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>collapse that has followed their takeover of the country. What

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of economic pressure can the international community put on

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the Taliban in order to use sticks more so than carrots,

0:12:02.559 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>or perhaps even carrots to push the Taliban in a

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>direction that the Afghan people want. We've already seen the

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.280
<v Speaker 1>international community try to use some of those those sticks

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>where of course, UH, the I m F has has

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of frozen ongoing relations until the situation with the

0:12:20.480 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Afghan government is settled. UH, and the amount of assistance

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that has been provided by the international community to Afghanistan

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>has helped to prop up the government that was in power,

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>and so almost all Western nations have frozen that for

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the time being. My big concern is that we are

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at a growing humanitarian situation, and of course there

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>is a careful balance between our national security and UH,

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, helping precipitate a humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan, and

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 1>so you know what we might see is humanitarian assistance

0:12:56.240 --> 0:13:00.240
<v Speaker 1>needing to flow into Afghanistan, which the Taliban was only

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>used to build their own legitimate say, Katherine, thank you

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:04.959
<v Speaker 1>so much for being with us. Katherine Zimmerman, fellow at

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.959
<v Speaker 1>the American Enterprise Institute, with us on the phone from

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>d C. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stenovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>The international cover Bloomberg Business Week this week. It's about

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>September next month. How it promised a return to normal, Tim,

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>But we're just a few days away and it's not

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen. It's not I was gonna say you got

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to travel outside of the United States, perhaps North America

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>to see this cover, but you actually don't, because it's

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>available at Bloomberg dot com slash business Week, and also

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:39.320
<v Speaker 1>available of course on the Bloomberg termittal. It is a

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 1>fantastic cover to the international edition. It's a calendar of September.

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>All these dates are circled but scribbled out. And that's

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly how I think a lot of employees and certainly

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>offices and managers feel about the return to work. We're

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 1>still dealing with the health pandemic, and you know, Afghanistan,

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that crisis also reminding us that things are not normal

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>as well. So let's get into it. The story by

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News US economic reporter read pick her to m.

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg US economy reporter Olivia Rockman read she joins us

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>now on the phone in Washington. It is such a

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>smart story. Read. We really thought, if you go back

0:14:09.480 --> 0:14:12.760
<v Speaker 1>six eight months, we thought September it was going to

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>be quote unquote normal. Yes, so thank you so much

0:14:17.280 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 1>for having me. So Yeah. The idea for this story

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>mainly came from the fact that back several months ago,

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I think May is kind of when I think of

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it as being the main moment where um, we were

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>all kind of looking to September and the fall more

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>generally to be um a little bit more normal and

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>at least a turning point point of some kind for

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the US economy. And and back then, I mean, with

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the data that we had it it looks like vaccinations

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 1>were rising rapidly, and it looks like that we'd reached

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that seventy five threshold of vaccination of the population in

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>September it looks like schools, we're going to be back

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>in person and be normal. Um end A lot of

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 1>companies firmed up their return to office dates, and I

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>think the whole point of this story was pointing out

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that that is not the circumstances that we're dealing with

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>as we're rolling into September now. Insteada has thrown a

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>huge risk in that right, companies, as you write, like Alphabet's,

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Google black Rock, they've pushed returned to office states to October.

0:15:20.840 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Delta has disrupted already strained supply chains, China temporarily close

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 1>to terminal at one of the world's busiest ports to

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>quarantine dock workers. That delayed shipments of materials that businesses

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and factories needs. So take us into the economic impact

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>of this. The economic implications of this, we talked a

0:15:36.440 --> 0:15:37.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit about them a few minutes ago. If we're

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>not you know, then just very minorly right, if we're

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>not commuting in, we're not hitting tolls and in municipalities,

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 1>were not spending money on lunches outside of the office.

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>But beyond that, what are the bigger implications? So I

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.560
<v Speaker 1>think the bigger implications for now is that we don't

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.720
<v Speaker 1>really know. I mean, we won't start getting a lot

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of the data that starts to show us, um what

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Aug looks like until we get into September. And we

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.720
<v Speaker 1>also don't know if the delta wave is going to

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>follow a similar kind of peak as the UK did,

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>or if it will follow a different path. Um. But

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>we pointed this out in the story. But some of

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the high frequency indicators are starting to show some signs

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that consumer behavior is changing a little bit. And I

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>think when we think about the impact of consumer behavior changing, UM,

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>we need to keep in mind of what the profile

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>for economic growth is right now. So for a huge

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>portion of the pandemic from consumer spending was based on

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>goods UM. But now consumer spending is um wholly dependent

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>on the snap back and services spending, and even just

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>some changes in consumers behavior not dining out as much,

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>not traveling, those kind of things that we we thought

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna continue, um really hot into the fall. Um

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that could have UM pretty big implications, all right. So

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>as we all keep crossing our fingers and our legs

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and our arms in hopes of getting back to normal

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>sooner rather than later, what visibility do we have because

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>it certainly feels different read than where we were, of

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>course a year ago or even eight months ago. I

0:17:18.600 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>think that's what you know. Powell has talked about this before,

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think it was in the July press conference

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>when he talked about how with every kind of new

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 1>wave of delta, there there seems to be a little

0:17:30.280 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>bit less reaction in terms of the consumer response. And

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>I think we're certainly seeing that now because you know,

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>when I walk around DC as people restaurants, I see

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 1>UM a lot of people who are UM vaccinated and

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:49.680
<v Speaker 1>feel great about the risks that they're taking UM to

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>part taking these activities. But then I also know people

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>who are canceling their trips and are really nervous about

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>sending their kids back to school. And so I think

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>we're all so seeing this divergence as we've seen throughout

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the course of the pandemic, but we're really seeing a

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>divergence in terms of risk assessment UM. And I think

0:18:09.080 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 1>you know how we fall on that really depends on

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 1>people's own comfort levels rather than you know, geography or

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.280
<v Speaker 1>UM whatever it may be. Okay, So enter fed chair

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:24.560
<v Speaker 1>at your own Powell. That's his enter music tomorrow, Jack,

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 1>essentially his virtual entrance. Look, you know, if we had

0:18:28.160 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a cowboy hat for every time we talked about the FETE,

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>as Carol said earlier than we'd have you know, we'd

0:18:31.920 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we have spent seven million dollars on cowboy hats this year.

0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>But the fact is is investors are awaiting what he

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>says tomorrow, and I'm wondering how the high frequency data,

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>how the decline of passengers going through t s A

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>checkpoints or people in hotspots who are not dining out

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:50.400
<v Speaker 1>with open table um, how that changes. Among other things,

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>the way that the FETE is thinking about tapering are

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the way that the FETE is thinking about pulling back

0:18:54.480 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on some of the stimulus. I think from the perspective

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of tapering, it doesn't seemed to have had a huge impact.

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the biggest clear impact that the delta has

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>had on the FED recently is the fact that Jackson

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.199
<v Speaker 1>Hole shifts to being shifted to being virtual from in

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>person and um a very short amount of time and

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>right before it was actually happening. UM. But in terms

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of what that means for keeping I think, UM, there's

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of FED speak out recently, UM where

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 1>where folks are encouraging on papering sooner rather than later.

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know how much Delta is playing into

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that decision, but I'm definitely curious to see how Powell

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>talks about that in his Jackson Hole speech, since he

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely got peppered with a lot of questions about Delta

0:19:36.240 --> 0:19:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in the last press conference. Well, here's a number for

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>for us, and you've got it in your story. You

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about the progressive think tank, the Century Foundation, estimates

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half million workers will lose all unemployment

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>benefits on September six, when the main pandemic programs. And

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:51.359
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of Americans, it is. And how do

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the ripple effects that it has throughout the economy and

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>also what does it do for job for the jobless

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>who exactly potentially do you go and start working again?

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, it's a great story, a great read, and

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of information in it. Read. Thank you so much,

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>really appreciated. Of course, that's Bloomberg News US economic reporter

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Read Pickard jointing us on the phone from Washington, d C.

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>It is the international cover store, but as you said,

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>you can find it at Bloomberg dot com. Ro Marco

0:20:18.320 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Journal Now, but you let me drive. No, no, no

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>night please, I'll do the riding drivel. I want to drive,

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>just drive baby, good questions, drying This is the drive

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to the globe. Give me thanks, We'll drying us down

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. Is it is time for the drive

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to the clothes And I'm just looking at the equity

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 1>trade Doug of course, just breaking down the numbers. We're

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>hovering near or loads of this session, as Doug mentioned,

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>about half a percent on the S and P dow

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>down a hundred seventy two points, also down a half percent.

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>Same thing for the NASTAC on a percentage basis, but

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.160
<v Speaker 1>again hovering near our highs on a day where we've

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>seen several couple of explosions in Afghanistan. Let's get to

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it with Randy Watts, Randy Watts's chief investment strategist at

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.600
<v Speaker 1>O'Neil Global Advisors, joining us once again on the phone

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>from Miami. Wow, Randy, you heard me, And take a

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.000
<v Speaker 1>deep breath a big side there, because that's the type

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:28.199
<v Speaker 1>of day it has certainly been. Like. Uh, when we

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about macro, we often talk about what's happening with

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>trade and what's happening, of course with the Federal Reserve

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and with the virus. But today it was a different

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>story with those two explosions in Afghanistan. We did see

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:43.959
<v Speaker 1>the equity markets reach session lows just following that news. Um,

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>how did you watch it? Well? First off, thanks for

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>having me back. And I do want to say my

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>thoughts and prayers go out to the families of the

0:21:50.960 --> 0:21:53.680
<v Speaker 1>servicemen and women and others who were killed in those

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>two bombings today in Kabul. Obviously, it's a very bad

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.359
<v Speaker 1>situation my understanding, as they have over five thousand people

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>at the airport right now. They're still trying to get out,

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>so it's a very tenuous situation and our thoughts and

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>prayers are with those people and hoping get them evacuated safely.

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I think what's happening in the Afghanistan is a big deal.

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:13.159
<v Speaker 1>I think it raises the specter that there is going

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to be more terrorist activity the US is going to

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:19.879
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with, uh that Afghanistan is not stabilized

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's not going to be as quick and easy

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and exitus that maybe some of the some of the

0:22:24.640 --> 0:22:28.720
<v Speaker 1>procrastinator procrastinators thought. So I do. I am a little

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 1>worried about that, and I think anytime there's geopolitical instability,

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>that's bad for marketing. So yeah, let me just jump

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>into that a little more randy. Does that mean that

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>that you see this playing out as a market story

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>as well? Like, what what effect does that instability actually

0:22:41.200 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>have on on equity markets and financial markets? I think

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>it just adds another kind of negative element to some

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of the other macro negative elements we're dealing with with COVID.

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's the dominant story. I think the

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.360
<v Speaker 1>dominant story remains COVID and how we're going to get

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>through that and recover from that. But I think it

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>does just remind people up the world's a dangerous place,

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and when the US withdraws from places, oftentimes bad things happen.

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>And I think we maybe haven't heard the end of

0:23:08.400 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>of things that are going to affect the US and Afghanistan.

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Just because we leave doesn't mean there can't be other

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:17.040
<v Speaker 1>negative occurrences there like crop up well. And what's interesting

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:19.000
<v Speaker 1>is I was thinking about this as I watched the

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>market trade um branding and good to be talking with

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you again. I was kind of comparing it to the

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:28.879
<v Speaker 1>First Persian Gulf War, where we saw a huge market impact,

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:32.400
<v Speaker 1>obviously in the energy markets. I think about after nine eleven,

0:23:32.480 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>to have a terrorism incident right here on US domestic soil,

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a much more severe market impact initially. And I'm not

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 1>saying and I agree with you. My heart's uh and

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>thoughts are going out to those friends and families of

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 1>anyone who has lost their lives in Afghanistan. But I

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:52.760
<v Speaker 1>do feel like the market decline has not been uncontrollable,

0:23:52.800 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>if you will, It's been very measured, and I'm trying

0:23:55.200 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to understand what that tells us. I think right now

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 1>the mark it still isn't sure exactly how Afghanistan is

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>going to play out over the over the longer run.

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I think the fear is does that become a country

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that becomes a breeding ground for further terrorist activity or

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>does it stabilize. I think that is obviously a question

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that's up in the air, and whether or not we're

0:24:16.280 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>going to really meet this August thirty first deadline which

0:24:18.800 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>we've imposed on ourselves to to get all of our

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>personnel and people out of there. So I think I

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 1>think that remains to be seen. I think this just

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>does remind people though that the again the world's a

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>dangerous place, and when the US withdraws from places oftentimes

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that let's uh negative parties of faster or grow. All right,

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>So we can separate ourselves from this, and I understand

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not so easy to do, but if we can

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>think about, um, what else is going on? And I

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>do want to mention a headline crossing present bind to

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>speak about Afghanistan from the White House today, So we're

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>monitoring that as well. If we separate out what's going

0:24:55.200 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>on in Afghanistan right now, the major talking point this week, Grandy,

0:24:59.280 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>as you would guess, has been about Jackson Hall and

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>what we might get from j Powell. What are you anticipating, uh,

0:25:05.520 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 1>if anything, and how it might maybe impact your market. Think. So,

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I think we're still going to hear from Powell, and

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and again I do another crystal ball. I'm often wrong,

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think we're still going to hear from him

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that the taper is going to start at some time

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter this year, and the FED, I think,

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:25.160
<v Speaker 1>really wants to be done by the end of next year.

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.959
<v Speaker 1>And so the question is really the pace of that. Obviously,

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>U St. Louis of Federal Reserve Bank President Bullard today

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>talked about a quicker taper where they would be done

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>by the end of Q one. I think that's unlikely.

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>I think, especially given what's going on with the delta

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>variant of COVID, that that they're not going to move

0:25:43.760 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that quickly. If you remember the last time around they

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:50.160
<v Speaker 1>did this, they did it in in two thousand and thirteen.

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>They started in January of two thou and fourteen, and

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>they finished in October of two thousand and fourtune, they

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:58.320
<v Speaker 1>took ten months. They were buying about eighty five billion

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a month back then. Right now we're doing about a

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty billion a month. I do think it's

0:26:02.800 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>going to be more of like that kind of a

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 1>pace of taper. Then it's going to be one where

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>they try to do it all in six months. But

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>I think the Fed does want it to finish in

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>two because I think they want the flexibility to raise

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:18.720
<v Speaker 1>rates if they need to. In So, what is the

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 1>what is the what is the market listening for? With

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Fed Chair Powell's virtual remarks tomorrow? Right now, the mark

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>is expecting that the taper starts in December and that

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.640
<v Speaker 1>they do about ten billion a month in reductions, So

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>it takes them twelve months, and they finished kind of

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>December next year November next year. I think if if

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>if the rate is different than that, or if it

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>starts earlier and later, that can affect the market. I

0:26:46.000 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>think if it starts much later, that could have set

0:26:48.480 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>market participants because they feel like inflation continues to get

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit out of hand. If it's a lot

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 1>faster than people expected, that could also cause a little

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.359
<v Speaker 1>bit of a dislocation. One thing that's important for everyone

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to look at is, remember tomorrow we're going to get

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the personal consumption price index for July. If we go

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>back and remember the June one was up four percent,

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>which was the largest increase since July two thousand and eight.

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>The forecast for July is up four point one. So

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 1>it's possible that we're going to get a negative number

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>there tomorrow, and that's gonna make market participants anxious about

0:27:21.960 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>when the set does start to taper so they can

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>try to maybe eventually move ahead on the inflation. So

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:30.959
<v Speaker 1>having said that, we have talked a lot randy about

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>investors coming in and buying the dip here, how constructive

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:37.600
<v Speaker 1>is this market to be a buyer right now? Would

0:27:37.640 --> 0:27:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you rather be a seller. I think that the thing

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.479
<v Speaker 1>about the market is it's not quite as good as

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:47.159
<v Speaker 1>it appears on the surface. Only sixty of the SMP

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.119
<v Speaker 1>is above it's fifty day, but only thirty six percent

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>of the NAS deck is above it's fifty days, so

0:27:52.400 --> 0:27:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that's actually not a great number. I think the issues

0:27:55.520 --> 0:27:59.160
<v Speaker 1>are are really twofold. First is when is delta peak?

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>And the second is what kind of stimulus we're gonna

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 1>get out of Washington and we're going to get both

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of those bills out of out of the out of Congress.

0:28:06.520 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 1>Are we're just going to get one of them? And

0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>how that's going to impact the economy. I think people

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>are a little in a little bit of a weight

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and C mode on both of these issues, and that's

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 1>why they've been moving into some of the bigger, more

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>stable names, particularly tech. All Right, wait, you have to

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>repeat that again because Tim and I are going to

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 1>want to say this, it's only the s andps above

0:28:25.119 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it's fifty day, and how much of the NASDAC. Only

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 1>thirty six of the nastic is above its fifty day

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 1>moving average. That means breadth has not been good, particularly

0:28:34.040 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in the nastack investors are rotating into larger cap, more

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>defensive stocks, particularly in technology, while they try to get

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a handle on what's going to happen with all three

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>things you mentioned, the FED, the delta, and what kind

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of stimulus we're gonna get out of Washington. I think

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:52.520
<v Speaker 1>investors are maybe holding some money back until they see

0:28:52.520 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that so they can then make better, more informed decisions.

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Gotta run always wish we had more time. Randy B. Woll,

0:28:58.120 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Randy Watt's chief investment Strategies that own Neil Global Advisors,

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>on the phone in Miami. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>dot com, and you can also listen to our radio

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News