WEBVTT - Musk Says He Needs Bigger Tesla Stake to Avoid Being Ousted

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg business Week Inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:21.919
<v Speaker 2>We're keep it a close watch and shares of Tesla.

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:24.720
<v Speaker 2>Tim It is down about thirteen percent, just off its

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.160
<v Speaker 2>worst session or worst level I should say, of the session.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, lots of superlatives to go with here. It's the

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 3>top decliner in the Nasdaq one hundred, it's the biggest

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 3>drag in the S and P five hundred. It's down

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 3>the most in a year to its lowest and wow

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:39.639
<v Speaker 3>months at this point. Investors loved the stock last year,

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Carol sending it up one hundred and one percent. New

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Year New.

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 2>Tesla, absolutely, and that is really thanks to Elon Musk's

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 2>pitch for investors to look past lower sales growth that

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 2>fell flat Tesla narrowly missing Earning's estimates and warning its

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 2>rate of expansion will be notably lower this year. Their words,

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>the company spent all of twenty twenty three cutting prices

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 2>to boost sales, which eight in two profits. So we

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 2>knew in the interview today we wanted to get more

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 2>on Tesla.

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. For that we bring in Bloomberg business. We call

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:10.640
<v Speaker 3>him this Max chafkintributor to the Elon Inc. Podcast and

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 3>keep her too, along with a few other Bloomberg colleagues

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 3>of the Elon Musket Bingo card, which, by the way,

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:17.559
<v Speaker 3>there was no Bingo last night.

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:19.959
<v Speaker 4>No on for tim. Unfortunately, we did not hit Bingo.

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 4>We came very close, one square away. I believe it

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 4>was in the end column. If he had only said

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.399
<v Speaker 4>production is hard, which he often has used as a

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 4>sort of catchphrase to describe the difficulty manufacturing the cyber truck,

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.200
<v Speaker 4>we would have hit Bingo. But I think, possibly in

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 4>an effort to kind of try to not have told

0:01:37.720 --> 0:01:40.200
<v Speaker 4>tons of bad news, he soft peddled some of those

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 4>difficulties on the earning.

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:42.880
<v Speaker 5>BINGO card apparently.

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, one thing that wasn't on the Bingo card was

0:01:45.800 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 3>not providing guidance on the number of new vehicles for

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four, which I think surprised a lot of observers.

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 4>You know, and not only that, but you also had

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 4>him saying essentially we're in between two waves of growth.

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean in effect saying things that this is not

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 4>going to be a great time. He's saying sort of

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 4>two things going on. One is that they're struggling to

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 4>make cyber trucks. They've they've pursued this incredibly incredibly ambitious design.

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 4>First of all, not clear that anyone wants it, not

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 4>clear that the price is going to be right. And

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:15.079
<v Speaker 4>even if those things are true, it's going to take

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 4>some time to manufacture, and Tesla is sometime away from

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 4>another car, from this kind of magical, more affordable car

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 4>twenty five thousand dollars sedan rather than a you know,

0:02:26.080 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 4>thirty five to you know, the Model three can cost

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 4>way more than thirty five thousand dollars.

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 3>But originally it was supposed to do that was the

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 3>original car.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, don't want to be naive here, but you know,

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 2>so many times he's been counted out, you know, and

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:40.440
<v Speaker 2>then it just takes a few weeks or a few

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 2>months of sleeping on the factory floor and all of

0:02:42.160 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>a sudden they pull something out. So how do you,

0:02:44.360 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 2>as someone who has tracked Tesla Elon for a while,

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 2>kind of look at this situation. Are they maybe really

0:02:50.520 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 2>between two cycles?

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well I think, first of all, it's important to

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 4>say that Tesla swings around a lot, and we saw it.

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 4>We saw it drop a lot ahead of the beginning

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 4>of twenty twenty three. It then kind of bounced back.

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 4>It grew in this huge way, largely because as you

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.320
<v Speaker 4>were saying that, you know, they cut prices, sales went up,

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:11.760
<v Speaker 4>and investors were willing to bet that that wasn't going

0:03:11.800 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 4>to hurt margins that much.

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 5>And two things have happened.

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 4>Margins have gone down and the demand has not been there,

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 4>And so much of his stock trades on expectations on

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 4>what is Elon going to do next? And we saw

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 4>him yesterday kind of try to do that. He was

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 4>talking about optimists. That's this kind of robot. It feels

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 4>it's hard to say that it's a real product. Although

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk was out there saying, hey, this is going

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 4>to change the economics of everything.

0:03:35.160 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 5>And I think the question is who is going to

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 5>believe him?

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 4>How many people are going to really buy into that

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 4>as a near term possibility.

0:03:41.800 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 5>And then how do you value that?

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:47.119
<v Speaker 4>And I think the more Elon Musk promises and when

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.120
<v Speaker 4>he failures to meet those goals, then that hurts his

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 4>ability to spin these fantastical yarns.

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 3>I guess, I guess the question that I have is

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 3>really about control. Because Carol talked about this earlier, and

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 3>it's something that he tweeted about a couple of weeks ago.

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 3>We kind of knew this was was going to come up.

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 3>But this is a guy who has now now wants

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 3>more of his company. He wants you know, it's not

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:11.920
<v Speaker 3>a dual class share structure, so it's not like he

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 3>controls that like Mark Zuckerberg does, and you know, other

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 3>other leaders of tech put tech and quotes tech companies.

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 3>What did he say about more control? And and just

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 3>a remindered everybody he had a lot of control of

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 3>the company. He sold a lot of equity exactly to

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 3>buy Twitter.

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 4>Yes, so he sold down a bunch of his equity

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:30.720
<v Speaker 4>to buy Twitter, as you said, and in retrospect looks

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 4>like maybe not the what the best time to buy

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 4>a flailing social media company has lost a lot of value.

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:39.320
<v Speaker 4>And what he's saying now is that he feels he

0:04:39.360 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 4>needs to have twenty five percent of equity in Tesla

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.720
<v Speaker 4>in order to to sort of be sufficiently committed to this,

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 4>to this enterprise and not just committed but committed to

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 4>the innovation part of the enterprise.

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Is that a wild thing for an executive to say?

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:04:53.720 --> 0:04:54.719
<v Speaker 3>What where? What are I mean?

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 5>Are It would be a wild thing for any executive.

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Look at any executive in the S five hundred, you'd

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 3>be hard pressed to find one that doesn't isn't in

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 3>controlling a family owned company, or does not have dual

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.680
<v Speaker 3>class share structure that own that has that type of contrucy,

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:08.840
<v Speaker 3>you know.

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 4>And not only that, but things have not gone great

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 4>for Tesla over the past six months. Normally, when you

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 4>ask for a massive pay raise and pay raise that

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 4>could amount to you know, tens or even hundreds of

0:05:17.320 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 4>billions of dollars in equity, you know, normally, you'd expect

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 4>to do that on a high rather than at a

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 4>time when the stock is kind of has been falling

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 4>and and so on. The thing is Elon Musk has

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:30.719
<v Speaker 4>so much leverage over this company because so much of

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 4>the company's value is tied up in his own identity.

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 4>It's you know, you have investors from time to time say,

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 4>oh we should you know, we should consider a different CEO,

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 4>But no one ever takes that seriously. No matter what

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 4>Elon tweets no matter, you know, how weird he behaves

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 4>on social media, because it's pretty clear that a lot

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:49.680
<v Speaker 4>of the value is tied up in investors belief that

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 4>he is going to be able to pull an extrabbit

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 4>out of the hat, whether it's optimists or full self driving,

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, Tesla's driverless car thing or something else.

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 5>And he has proved that time and again.

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 4>But but of course, you know, nothing lasts forever, and

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 4>at some point it's not going to work, and we're

0:06:03.880 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 4>going to see a real test for Elon Muski, you.

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:07.520
<v Speaker 5>Know, Max.

0:06:07.560 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 2>It's so interesting though, when we talk about Elon, we

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 2>talk so much, of course, about Tesla. We talk about SpaceX,

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 2>we talk about Twitter, We talked about the boring company.

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 5>We talk about what was it, Neuralink. I'm going through

0:06:16.400 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 5>my list.

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about Elon, the person, the disruptor, the provocteur,

0:06:20.640 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, who can say something and shake things up.

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, we've got a great chart just to show that,

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's standing has been kind of weakening. Among

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the world's largest megacaps Apple, Microsoft, way up top. You know,

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 2>Tesla's there, number nine, but it's a lot smaller than

0:06:36.760 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 2>some of its other tech. I guess, brethren, if you will,

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.279
<v Speaker 2>Having said that, I mean Tesla is really the core

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 2>of his wealth, correct.

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 6>And kind of his power seat.

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 4>Yes, and I do think you know one of the

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.159
<v Speaker 4>big mysteries, you know, what is Elon doing with Twitter?

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 4>Why is he starting an anti woke AI company that's

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.679
<v Speaker 4>that's this thing called Xai and their product is grock.

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 4>It's sort of a chat GBT but supposedly, you know,

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 4>politically incorrect and like one thing he's done here is

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 4>created a reasonable threat that he can make because the

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 4>truth is he can say, yeah, I might, I might

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 4>go and work for a different company, because look he's

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 4>already doing it, and and the board has overlooked that

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 4>before and has has sort of gone along with it.

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 4>But you do wonder, you know, at what point it

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 4>becomes too much or the other thing we should say

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 4>is there is this issue of his old compensation package,

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 4>which is still being over fifty.

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 2>The ev story, though, to be fair, GM struggling, Ford struggling.

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 2>We've talked how many times at nauseum, but for a

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 2>good reason about yep, people are still buying evs, but

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the growth rate is slower, So is he getting kind

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 2>of stuck in that also, well.

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 4>Sure, and not only just getting suck in that, but

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 4>getting something in the fact that that Tesla sells a

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 4>lot of cars now and when you want to have

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, he he's they've seem to have backed off

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 4>their growth promises. But if you want to have fifty

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 4>percent annual growth, that gets hard when the numbers get

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.080
<v Speaker 4>big and and investors have sort of come up with

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 4>stories that they've they've told to explain why that would

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 4>be possible. So one option is, hey, these cars are

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 4>all going to become robotaxes are going to be driving

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 4>twenty four to seven, and Tesla is going to get

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 4>a huge chunk not just of the automotive market, but

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 4>of the transportation market at large. You know, none of

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 4>that's happened. It's not clear that it will happen anytime soon.

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 4>It's not clear that you.

0:08:14.680 --> 0:08:17.520
<v Speaker 5>Know, many people outside of the Tesla enthusiast.

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 4>Community buy it. So that's kind of the challenge. You

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 4>got to give credit where it's due, which is in

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 4>some sense, these challenges are a product of Elon Musk's success.

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:29.760
<v Speaker 4>Because Elon Musk set out to make electric cars mainstream,

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 4>and he has done that. I mean, they are selling

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 4>a lot of Model wise that's the suv version of

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 4>the Model three mentioned earlier.

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Kind of betting against him.

0:08:37.600 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and not only that, but he's but but there

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 4>are many other companies who are also in this market.

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 4>There is a lot of there's consumer demand, but there's

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:48.200
<v Speaker 4>arguably more companies trying to meet that demand than there

0:08:48.240 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 4>is demand.

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:50.959
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Max thirty seconds left byd is one of those

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 3>companies that's not struggling right now, and a big part

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 3>of that is because they're selling cars in China twenty

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 3>five thousand dollars price point for a future less expensive

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Tesla that's still too expensive compete with a lot of

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 3>the companies in China.

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 4>Now, well, yeah, I mean, and and then there's the

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.880
<v Speaker 4>question of how what what China.

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:08.720
<v Speaker 5>Of course, there are a lot of potential restrictions.

0:09:08.760 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk has had a very i'd say positive relationship

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 4>with Beijing to date, but it does seem like the

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 4>goal of China, of course, is to help its domestic companies,

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 4>and at some point you wonder how how that's going

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 4>to play long term in China. Is there other potential

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 4>restrictions that Elon mushould be worried about you know, he's

0:09:27.480 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 4>had a really easy time opening up factories. Does that always?

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 4>Is that always the case? So I think there are

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 4>lots of open questions there. I mean, he definitely has to,

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, play diplomat in China.

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 5>All right.

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Max Chaffin, colmnist, Bloomberg Business Week, Thank you so much,

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:44.080
<v Speaker 2>contributor to the Elon Inc. Podcast. The latest episode of

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 2>the podcast on the Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot com

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 2>slash Elon Inc.

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.320
<v Speaker 1>on applecar Play and then brought auto with a Bloomberg

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Business app or wanted us live on YouTube.

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 3>So addition to the gdp AT initial job list gams

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 3>data that we got this morning, we also got a

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 3>real estate update. Sales of new homes in the US

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 3>exceeding forecast in December. This is a drop in mortgage

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 3>rates entice prospective buyers. That news shows that some momentum

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 3>heading into twenty twenty four is underscored by the first

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 3>pickup in annual sales when it comes to three years.

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:23.439
<v Speaker 2>All right, so we knew we wanted to get a

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 2>real estate update for that. Return to Michael Levy. He's

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 2>CEO at Crow Holdings. It's the Dallas based privately owned

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 2>real estate investment and development firm, about thirty one billion

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 2>in assets under management. And Michael kind enough to join

0:10:35.960 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 2>us here in studio.

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 5>Hello, Hello, welcome here.

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 7>Thanks great to be here.

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 5>You're are New Yorker.

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 7>H I am a lifelong New Yorker and it's nice

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 7>to be in Bloomberg's fabulous studios here.

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 8>Thank you, Thank you.

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.480
<v Speaker 2>We want to talk about your business because you guys

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 2>do it all. You've got multifamily, residential, industrial, office, So

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 2>talk to us about the different verticals of real estate,

0:10:57.320 --> 0:10:59.680
<v Speaker 2>and then geography, what you are seeing in terms of

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 2>trent and sure where the strength is and where there's

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:03.040
<v Speaker 2>some weaknesses.

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 7>Sure well, let me try and answer in a little

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 7>higher level than what we do. But you know, I'd

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 7>boil down to three things.

0:11:09.240 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 7>The first is the market is highly bifurcated in terms

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 7>of haves and have nots, and today the have nots

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 7>as office buildings, and the have nots is a lot

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 7>of the downtown urban cores that are impacted by the

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 7>flexible workforce and not having as many people there in

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 7>the issues. There's a lot of halves in the business today,

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 7>which is the industrial sector and the residential rental sector,

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 7>the data center sector. So it's a highly bifurcated not

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 7>painting with a single brush across real estate in anyway.

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 3>But you guys have some commercial office we have very little.

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 7>We do have were building a fabulous mass timber building,

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 7>the largest mass timber office building. We have a fabulous

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 7>office campus in Dallas at the very upper end of

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 7>the office sector. Buildings like this, they're very attractive to people,

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 7>they meet the modern needs. They're well leased. So the

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 7>top third of offices great. The bottom third is going

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 7>to be dirt. It just doesn't know it.

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 3>I just want to make sure I get this right.

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 3>You're actually actively building.

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 5>We're active.

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 7>We have a development company.

0:12:09.080 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 3>But an office building.

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 9>Correct.

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:12.599
<v Speaker 5>It's the largest Jallas.

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 7>It's in Frisco, which is effectively Dallas Fort Worth metroplex.

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:17.760
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So when did you start, When did you make

0:12:17.760 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 3>the plans for that? Versus and right after COVID, right

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 3>after right after So how are you designing that in

0:12:23.440 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 3>this flexible work environment that you described?

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 7>First of all, the building is not made of steel,

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 7>it's made of timber using a construction technology. So from

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:34.360
<v Speaker 7>a sustainability perspective, you know, it's a much more sustainable building,

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 7>which appeals to lots of corporations and individuals today. It's

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 7>also physically beautiful because the interiors would so the structure

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 7>is shown and the layout is just big, open, collaborative

0:12:46.080 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 7>spaces and amenities, and it'll be in a neighborhood with

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:52.400
<v Speaker 7>a hotel ultimately and other amenities, and people will be

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 7>able to live, work, play in this area and that's

0:12:55.960 --> 0:12:56.560
<v Speaker 7>what people.

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:57.000
<v Speaker 5>Want, all right.

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:59.120
<v Speaker 2>So you are in New Yorker, you understand this market

0:12:59.200 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 2>really really well. I'm assuming you play in the commercial

0:13:03.040 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 2>real estate space. Would you not want to be someone

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:08.719
<v Speaker 2>here in New York who owns maybe that's second or

0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:10.800
<v Speaker 2>third to your office property right now.

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 7>Like most things, it's all about what your basis, your cost.

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 7>But yes, as a general rule, let's just call it

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 7>the bottom third of office buildings. A lot of these

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 7>buildings you see, for example, on Third Avenue, for example,

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 7>these are really tough properties that are likely to wind

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 7>up in the hands of people who buy them at

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 7>huge discounts to their value of just a few years

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 7>ago and ultimately look to repurpose them. But this is

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:38.120
<v Speaker 7>a multi decade problem. This is not going to be

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 7>resolved in the next two or three years.

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 2>So no crisis.

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 7>There's not a broader real estate crisis. There is distress

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 7>in the office space, but if you really look at

0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 7>the percentage of disposure that people have to this asset

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 7>class in the totality of the real estate sector, it's

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 7>relatively small. If you talk to the banks and their exposure.

0:13:56.280 --> 0:13:58.959
<v Speaker 7>It's not going to take the financial system down, it's

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 7>not going to take the real estate industry down. But

0:14:01.160 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 7>those lower third of office buildings across the country, they

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 7>are very difficult assets and people are going to lose them.

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Why do you think it's going to be such a

0:14:08.720 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 3>multi decade long turnaround or at least experience.

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 7>Well, one, you can look at things that have already happened,

0:14:14.920 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 7>like the mall sector, which started to get disintermediated in

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 7>the early two thousands, and you can see lots of

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 7>dormant malls all over America. The issue is one it

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 7>needs to from a price perspective, get down to ultimately

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 7>the value of the land so someone can redevelop it

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 7>and it makes sense. And secondly, the entitlement process, you know,

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 7>going from zoning and entitlements. You know, communities and neighborhoods

0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 7>don't necessarily want to entitle you for apartments, for example,

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:41.680
<v Speaker 7>if you were zoned for office and so this takes decades,

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 7>and it's going to take decades.

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Michael, your company's seventy five years years old. Obviously you

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 2>haven't been there the whole time. But you guys have

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 2>seen a lot of different cycles. I mean, if you

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.880
<v Speaker 2>had one word two words to describe the real estate

0:14:54.920 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 2>cycle right now, how would you And I know that's

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 2>hard because different geographies, but would how would you describe it?

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 7>Sure, I would describe it as we are just beginning

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 7>to merge because of the interest rate cycle and inflation.

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 7>We are just becoming beginning to emerge, literally just beginning

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 7>to emerge from a very contracted, frozen period of time.

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 7>Twenty twenty four, it looks like in terms of the

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 7>capital markets and lending, because of inflation and interest rates,

0:15:23.080 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 7>the friction that's been in the business is beginning to

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 7>be alleviated. So there's a capital market cycle that's been

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 7>destructive with respective valuation levels and transaction levels. But the

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 7>fundamentals rental growth, occupancy, with the exception of the office sector,

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:46.120
<v Speaker 7>have been great generally across the country in most major markets.

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 2>You are obviously watching the rate cycle very carefully. Does

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 2>it matter if the FED does two rate cuts, three

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 2>rate cuts, five rate cuts this year in terms of

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 2>what it means for your business?

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 7>I I don't think there's a very direct course. I

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 7>certainly would not speculate the two is bad and five

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 7>is good. I can just say in general, for our

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 7>levered asset class, don't fight the FED. And the FED

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 7>is relaxing rates and they're coming down. That's going to

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 7>be good for our industry in terms of transaction, activity, financing,

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 7>valuation levels, the you know, the grease that allows the

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 7>industry to move forward.

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 3>We recently spoke about a Bloomberg big take by our

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 3>own Sean Donn and about how Americans are moving around,

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 3>especially in swing states, and that could impact the presidential

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 3>election outcome. You have people all over the country, you

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:33.480
<v Speaker 3>have businesses and properties all over the country. Give us

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 3>some color about the demographic trends that you're seeing.

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, look, there is no doubt America is moving to

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 7>the southeast and southwest, now at one level, that's a set,

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 7>you know, seventy five year trend when air conditioning started,

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 7>but it is accelerated, it's sustaining itself, and it's it's

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 7>a virtuous cycle. Cities that thirty years ago, as someone

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 7>from New York you may not wanted to have lived

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:59.120
<v Speaker 7>in today are vibrant and with restaurants and culture and food,

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 7>and so this trend is continuing.

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 3>Does that make you barish on New York?

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 6>I think be careful. There's a lot of New Yorkers right.

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 7>I understand New York has some very significant challenges, not

0:17:09.960 --> 0:17:12.159
<v Speaker 7>as difficult as some other cities such as San Francisco.

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 7>But the reality is our office buildings. This was a

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 7>city that forever has been first work, second play, third live. Well,

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 7>people are coming into the office a lot less. And

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:26.439
<v Speaker 7>if they come into the office a lot less, that

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 7>means not only the offices occupied less, the retailers have less.

0:17:30.160 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 7>It's hurting on top of people are not only people,

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.399
<v Speaker 7>but wealth is and business is leaving the city and

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 7>the state. You can look at the data for lower cost,

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 7>higher quality of life markets.

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 2>We got to run really a great perspective. Michael Levy,

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 2>Chief executive Officer of cro Holdings, joining us here at

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 2>our New York studio. This is Bloomberg Business Week.

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 5>Michael.

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Thank you.

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Listen live

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>each weekdays starting a two pm Eastern on Apple car

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business And you

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:08.400
<v Speaker 1>can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>New York station, Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 3>So last week I get any email from my insurance

0:18:15.600 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 3>company about renewing my auto insurance. You get this every

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 3>six months. We were can I buy a year of insurance?

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 3>By the way, this happens every six You can't buy

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 3>a year of insurany make me do it every six months.

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 3>This email was different though. One thousand, nine hundred and

0:18:26.720 --> 0:18:28.840
<v Speaker 3>eighty four dollars and sixty five cents for six months

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 3>of auto insurance. Yeah, okay, three hundred and thirty dollars

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 3>a month, up from seventeen to fifty just six months ago.

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 3>That's a thirteen percent increase in just six months. Okay,

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 3>that's crazy. I email my insurance agent asked him what

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 3>I could do change my coverage, raise my deductibles, anything

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 3>to get the price down. A few minutes later he

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.160
<v Speaker 3>emails me back and he says, Yeah, it's ugly out there.

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:48.440
<v Speaker 2>I think you need a new insurance.

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 3>He's a broker though, like he has he has the

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 3>view everywhere in the market's.

0:18:52.320 --> 0:18:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Telling you I could buy a policy for a year.

0:18:54.680 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 3>No, there are companies now in New York that don't

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:58.640
<v Speaker 3>even they don't even write insurance in New York.

0:18:59.080 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 8>New Jersey.

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 3>It's out there, all right. So the couse of auto

0:19:02.000 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 3>insurance in the US rose more than twenty percent in

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three. It's the biggest annual jump since nineteen

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 3>seventy six. That's according to data from the US Bureau

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.760
<v Speaker 3>of Labor Statistics. Rates are up with thirty seven percent

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 3>carrol since January of twenty twenty.

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 5>All right, Well.

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 2>In the forthcoming issue Bloomberg Business Week, which is at

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 2>on newstands tomorrow, already online at Bloomberg dot com Slash

0:19:19.040 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 2>BusinessWeek also on the Bloomberg Bloomberg News, auto reporter Keith

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.199
<v Speaker 2>Naughton gets at the reasons why insurance has gone up

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:27.239
<v Speaker 2>so much in such a short time. He joins us

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 2>on Zoom from Detroit, so glad you are back with

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 2>us to talk about this story. What the heck is

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 2>going on?

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 3>And how can we help him? No, but what can't

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 3>help me?

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 10>What's going on?

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.240
<v Speaker 11>Well, there isn't much hope for any of us on

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:46.639
<v Speaker 11>the auto insurance front. To complement Ten's story, I was

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 11>talking to another editor at Bloomberg Today who lives in

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 11>New York, and he said, the insurance premium quotes he

0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:55.439
<v Speaker 11>was getting on his new car were five hundred dollars

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 11>a month. So it's like having two car payments on

0:19:58.200 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 11>the same car.

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 6>Oh my god, why yeah?

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>So yes.

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 11>So the why here is that cars are just loaded

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 11>with more technology now to help you avoid accidents, and

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:18.680
<v Speaker 11>those technological bits it's cameras and sensors and sonar from

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:22.000
<v Speaker 11>bumper to bumper on the car, really drives.

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 10>Up repair costs.

0:20:23.480 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 11>And then those repair costs are being passed on through

0:20:27.480 --> 0:20:30.200
<v Speaker 11>your auto insurance rates, which are skyrocket.

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.679
<v Speaker 3>If you have Keith Starry tired interrupt. I just want

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 3>to make sure I get this point. If our cars

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 3>are filled with this technology that helps us avoid accidents,

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't we be getting in fewer accidents and therefore there

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 3>should be fewer repairs and insurance companies wouldn't have to

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 3>pay out as much.

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Basically drives itself.

0:20:47.000 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 5>It's so much safer.

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Than rather me driving it.

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 10>To be quite honest, yes that's way too logical.

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 11>That's exactly what should be happening but is not happening.

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 11>And in fact, what's been happening since twenty twenty is

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 11>auto insurance claims are going up, not down, despite all

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 11>this whiz bang crash avoidance technology that today's cars are

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 11>laden with. The reason behind that has something to do

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:22.520
<v Speaker 11>with distracted driving. We all have our phones in the car,

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:24.879
<v Speaker 11>or if you're not looking at your phone, which is

0:21:24.880 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 11>illegal in New York and many other states while you're driving,

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 11>then you have this big touch screen in the middle

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 11>of your dashboard that you're glancing over at or touching

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 11>or you know, focused on instead of the road. So

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:47.040
<v Speaker 11>accidents are up, fatalities are up. It's the safety technology.

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 11>It might be helping us survive crashes, but it's not

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 11>reducing crash I'm just going.

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:53.960
<v Speaker 2>To tell you guys, I even get a dividend check

0:21:54.000 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 2>at the end of the year from my insurance company,

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:59.119
<v Speaker 2>which I've been with for almost thirty years since I

0:21:59.240 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 2>was a teenage driver on my dad's policy and I

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 2>kept it, and then when they have a good year,

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 2>we get a dividend check.

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 3>So I'm going to.

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:09.840
<v Speaker 5>Oh, it's just I'm sorry.

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 3>You should check to see how much you're paying though,

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 3>because I bet it's a lot.

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 2>No, I do look, but I will check again. It's

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of wild and you know what I'm worried about

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 2>is and well, wait a minit I'm going to go

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 2>on my soapbox for a little bit more here, Keith,

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 2>because I do feel like I wish I wish like

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 2>traffic cops actually police driving too, because I do feel

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 2>like driving has gotten more aggressive. People fly through stop signs,

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Like I just feel like there's some stuff going on

0:22:33.880 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 2>that it's kind of the wild wild West on the road.

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know that that relates to your story,

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 2>but I just feel like people are a little crazy

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 2>on the roads today. And maybe that's why when an

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 2>AX they get in an accident and they're also distracted.

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot going on, and so then it's just

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 2>going to cost more.

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:52.880
<v Speaker 11>I don't know, And that's why auto insurance companies now,

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 11>some of them offer you the option of you know,

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 11>attaching and device to your car so they can monitor

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:02.920
<v Speaker 11>your driving, and if you prove to be a good driver,

0:23:03.040 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 11>like I'm sure you would, Carol, then you actually get

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:07.400
<v Speaker 11>a reduction in rates.

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.720
<v Speaker 10>But that raises sort of privacy concerns.

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 11>Lots of folks don't want their insurance company knowing everywhere

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 11>they're going at all hours, so people decline that. But

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 11>that is one way to try and reduce your rates.

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.320
<v Speaker 11>But rates are climbing. I did the same thing Tim

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 11>did last year. I looked at what I was paying

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.959
<v Speaker 11>and I couldn't believe it, and so I started shopping

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 11>around and found a cheaper rate.

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 10>But it's getting.

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 11>Harder and harder to find a lower rate because all

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 11>of them are going up. And the insurance companies are

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 11>not only doing it because they have higher repair and

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.919
<v Speaker 11>crash costs, but also because they are now making a

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 11>lot more money doing that.

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad you bring up the more money part, because

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:54.280
<v Speaker 3>it turns out that insurance companies are doing pretty well

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 3>right now. So Travelers closed at an all time high

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 3>earlier this week. We learned from Progressive earlier this week

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 3>that profit for the most recent quarter more than doubled

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 3>from a year.

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.359
<v Speaker 2>Earlier, so maybe they're charging too much. If their profit

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 2>is going up that much, that means obviously, even when

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:14.680
<v Speaker 2>we have an accident, it's not clusting that much.

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 5>Even whatever they.

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 3>Pay out, I don't know, I mean, what are we logically?

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 3>It turns out that you know, we're all paying for like,

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 3>it's pretty good to be an investor in some of

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 3>these companies, Keith, And perhaps not so good because we're

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 3>paying so much as customers, right, And it's.

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.880
<v Speaker 11>Not just that the insurance companies are gouging us. There

0:24:35.920 --> 0:24:40.199
<v Speaker 11>really are goodness reasons that it costs more. Let me

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 11>give you one example from my story, and that is

0:24:43.880 --> 0:24:47.240
<v Speaker 11>the Toyota camera. So that was the best selling Current

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 11>America for decades, and in twenty eighteen, Toyota redesigned it

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:58.480
<v Speaker 11>and added a whole bunch of driver assist features technology

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 11>Radar sonar camera is throughout the car, but just looking

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 11>at the front bumper assembly, it went from having eighteen

0:25:07.480 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 11>parts to forty three parts. And so as a result,

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 11>you get into a relatively minor fender bender with.

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 10>A Toileta came. And I'm not picking on Toyota.

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:18.520
<v Speaker 9>This is.

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 10>Strong cars.

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.080
<v Speaker 11>But this particular example given to me by the folks

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 11>at Mitchell International said, what that did is it drove

0:25:28.600 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 11>repair costs for the camera when you get in a

0:25:31.200 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 11>front end collision. It drove them up by forty three percent.

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 5>That makes sense, Yeah, Keith.

0:25:35.800 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 3>One thing that was so shocking to me about your

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 3>story was the difference with EV's and you bring up

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 3>the Hurts issue. We only have about a minute left,

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 3>but talk to us about how much more complicated evs

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:49.640
<v Speaker 3>are to repair and why that's also driving uprates.

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 11>Right, and Hurts is selling off a big chunk of

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 11>its EV fleet and one of the reasons they cited

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 11>is that eve's cost twice as much to repair as

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 11>regular cars. One of the reasons is that big battery

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 11>tim that's in every EV. You have to disconnected, power

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:07.959
<v Speaker 11>it down, or in some cases remove it all together

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 11>to avoid injury to the technicians, to avoid fire risk.

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 10>And this just adds time in the repair shop.

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 2>And cost unbelievable. There's also an interesting part of your

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 2>story where you talk about a new all this new

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.520
<v Speaker 2>technologies also added a costing step to the repair process.

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 2>It has to do with calibration, which is you just understand,

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, I've.

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:31.760
<v Speaker 3>Got to calibrate the sensors. It costs five hundred bucks

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 3>more to do that. When you get a right, it's

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 3>amazing it. Thank you for this story. I sent it

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 3>to my whole family because I was complaining to them

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 3>about insurance recently. So it turns out I said a

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 3>lot of key stories to my whole family. This is

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 3>a street Yeah, it's like he writes about cool stuff.

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 7>It does and it makes so much sense.

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 2>Keith, Thank you, Bloomberg News Auto reporter Keith Not as

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 2>we said. This is in the upcoming new issue of

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Business Week. It's going to be a newstands tomorrow,

0:26:58.480 --> 0:27:01.600
<v Speaker 2>but it's already at Bloomberg dot com and on the

0:27:01.640 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg turbil Actually think the news Dan today.

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, go check go check out how much you're paying

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 3>for insurance?

0:27:07.119 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 5>Thank you for insurance.

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 2>I know I just saw the bill come in.

0:27:09.920 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, husband just kind of slides it away, so maybe

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 2>maybe wait.

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:19.680
<v Speaker 1>To see it. This is Bloomberg BusinessWeek inside from the

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>reporters and editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine,

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>plus global business, finance and tech news as it happens.

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Caro Messer and Tim Stenebek on

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 2>All Right, everybody, as you just heard, Intel earnings are out.

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 2>The stock is down about six percent in the aftermarket.

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Some concerns in terms of the outlook. So we want

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 2>to get to a breakdown the quarter even more.

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we got Dan Morgan, with a senior portfolio manager

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 3>at Sonovis Trust, joining us on Zoom from Atlanta. We

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 3>check in with Dan. In the wake of many a company,

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:54.879
<v Speaker 3>including Intel, Snovis Trust Company has about eighteen point eight

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars in assets under management. That was as of

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 3>last month. Dan, you have had about five minutes. That's generous,

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 3>about three minutes to look at these time for usually

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 3>give me. Yeah, it is a of a time frame

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.440
<v Speaker 3>than to usually give you. As Carol mentioned, we're seeing

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.640
<v Speaker 3>shares move lower in the after hours before the call.

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 3>We should note what is your instant reaction to these numbers?

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 12>Well, obviously, Timmy Carroll, the guidance going into the first

0:28:18.119 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 12>quarter is disappointing. Even if you look at the midpoint

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 12>of that range at they gave in revenues and the

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 12>came at twelve point seven billion, Street was at fourteen

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 12>point two billion, and then that EPs number was a

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 12>big miss. You know, when you look at the area

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 12>I was kind of focusing on, which was client computing,

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 12>which is their chips that they sell to lapsetops and PCs.

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 9>That pretty much came in with expectations eight point eighty four.

0:28:44.800 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 3>Why are you watching the sorry? Why are you watching?

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Why are you watching that segment?

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 12>Well, Tim, I was really looking for a little bit

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 12>of a rebound here in regards to PC chips. We

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:01.960
<v Speaker 12>know that Intel is behind both AMD in Nvidia in

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 12>regards to AI we can talk about a little bit

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 12>later in terms of the chips that they have, but

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 12>they had a pretty strong quarter last quarter in terms

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 12>of that client computing group. So I was expecting that

0:29:13.640 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 12>momentum to kind of carry over and maybe and get

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 12>a beat. But they came in line, which was fine,

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.760
<v Speaker 12>But obviously the guidance Tim McCarroll for the first quarter

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 12>was very disappointing, or hopeful.

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 9>A little bit better than that.

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, yeah, it kind of hap to blow out their quarter.

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Well, what's interesting too, and I'm looking at our right

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 2>through by our own semiconductor king, and that is Ian King,

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 2>and he says that the chip maker's PC business is recovering.

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 2>You were talking about this, it has been losing ground

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 2>in the lucrative market for data center chips. Tim and

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I were talking earlier about you know, and even kind

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 2>of on the residential side or commercial real estate side,

0:29:46.280 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean data centers. People continue to build, they continue

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.240
<v Speaker 2>to need, they use a lot of energy. Does that

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 2>worry you that they are losing ground in that market specifically, Well.

0:29:57.320 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 12>That's been the condundrum for Intel is that we know

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 12>that we've talked about Nvidia before on the show. There's

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 12>been a huge adoption of their GPU chips A one

0:30:07.160 --> 0:30:10.000
<v Speaker 12>hundred and the H one hundred, which are their key.

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 9>AI chips.

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 12>We know that for example, Events micro Devices has their

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 12>three hundred X and I three hundred A that's both

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 12>going to be coming out. They're going to be in

0:30:20.320 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 12>that same space which is the most lucrative so far,

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 12>which has been data center for AI. Now, Intel does

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 12>have some products coming out. They have their Falcon Shores.

0:30:30.960 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 12>They also have their Habana Gandhi. I'm hoping I'm pronouncing

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 12>that correctly. Three those are their key chips that should

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:39.719
<v Speaker 12>help them in that space, but they're not coming out

0:30:39.800 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 12>till later this year or maybe next year, and that

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:45.200
<v Speaker 12>I think, Carolyn Tim has been really the hurdle for

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 12>Intel competing in that data center space is that they

0:30:48.720 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 12>just don't have the same offerings right now as AMD

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 12>and Nvideo.

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 3>How's Pat Gelsinger doing with turning the company around with

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 3>the transition.

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 9>Well, Tim, that's exactly what this is as a turnaround.

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:05.239
<v Speaker 12>As they moved towards becoming a foundry, they actually had

0:31:05.280 --> 0:31:07.360
<v Speaker 12>some revenues they posted on this quarter from that.

0:31:08.560 --> 0:31:12.160
<v Speaker 9>So in terms of getting back on top, I mean.

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 12>Intel was the top player over AMD forever just in

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 12>terms of performance and everything, and they've kind of climbing

0:31:19.920 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 12>a staircase back.

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 9>To get back to where they were before. So he's

0:31:23.320 --> 0:31:24.880
<v Speaker 9>got a lot of moving parts.

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 12>Right, and it's just you know, getting AI chips out,

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 12>getting the founderies up and running, getting that performance and

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 12>so forth back to what it was to compete against AMD.

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 9>So just a lot of moving parts for them to

0:31:36.560 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 9>execute on.

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:39.200
<v Speaker 12>And I think that's kind of coming out here, guys

0:31:39.800 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 12>in this upcoming guidance that we're seeing for the first quarter,

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:44.520
<v Speaker 12>where you are kind of seeing some of those doubts

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 12>come to fruition with the blow the estimates in terms

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 12>of what the street was looking for.

0:31:49.560 --> 0:31:51.800
<v Speaker 2>So, Net Net Dan, I mean, do you see signs

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 2>that the transformation that Pat Keelsinger is doing to kind

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 2>of restore Intel's might that it had for so long

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 2>and so many years, do you see signs of those

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 2>changes kind of paying off?

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 9>I think so, Carol.

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 12>I mean, if you reported on the Electronics show in

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 12>Vegas a couple of weeks ago, we know that Intel

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 12>came out introduced two new chips, AIPC chips. They're targeting

0:32:16.480 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 12>one hundred million of those chips to be sold going forward,

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:24.320
<v Speaker 12>and aipcs. They're very you know, feeling really good about that.

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 12>They had some really good, strong performance coming from those two.

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 12>I believe one is called Lunar and one is called

0:32:30.800 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 12>arrow Lake. Which are they always come up these interesting

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 12>names now used to be Intel and Pentium. Now it's

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 12>all these different geographical locations. But so they do have

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 12>things coming up. So I do think they're on the

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:44.040
<v Speaker 12>right track. It's just that it's going to take more time.

0:32:44.240 --> 0:32:46.239
<v Speaker 3>Like how much time should investors expect here?

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 9>Well, probably the next quarter, Tim, I'm just kidding.

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean I would have seen the different guidance.

0:32:52.280 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 9>That's the case, right, Yeah, Yeah, the street has no patients.

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 12>I think we have to bear in mind too that

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 12>even though we were looking for encouraging numbers in that

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 12>client computing group, if you look at the overall framework

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 12>of what's happening in the semiconductor industry, you know, we've

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 12>been in an ever present increase in terms of turnaround

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 12>since the first quarter of twenty three, roughly around February

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 12>of twenty three. I've had ten consecutive quarters of consecutive

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 12>sales growth in that overall industry. So I would expect

0:33:22.960 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 12>Intel to continue to move forward and prosper as the

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 12>overall industry rebounds. But again, Tim and Carroll, you know,

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 12>we've got AMD coming out with numbers, we'll have Qualcomm

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:35.959
<v Speaker 12>next week, we already had TI which is a little disappointing,

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 12>and then we'll get in Vidia, and everyone's going to

0:33:38.960 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 12>measure up those reports versus the Intel numbers. And you know,

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:43.960
<v Speaker 12>as I said, the streets never patient.

0:33:45.240 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, no doubt. It's like, what have you done

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 2>for me yesterday? So having said that, I'm looking at

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, some of the actually corporate releases from Intel,

0:33:54.760 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 2>and they talk about, you know, efficiencies in the fourth

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 2>quarter comfortably achieved our commitment to deliver three billion cost

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 2>savings in twenty twenty three. We expect to unlock further

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:08.040
<v Speaker 2>efficiencies in twenty twenty four and beyond as we continue

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 2>to or we as we implement our new internal foundry model,

0:34:11.120 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 2>which is designed to drive greater transparency and accountability and

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 2>higher returns on our owner's capital. Is that still a

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 2>question in your mind?

0:34:19.640 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 12>You know what's interesting, Carol, is that I followed have

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 12>followed Intel stock for over thirty years, and they had

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 12>a standard gross margin that was between sixty and sixty

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 12>five percent for like, until more recently. Now their margins

0:34:32.360 --> 0:34:34.600
<v Speaker 12>are around forty six percent. So I think what they're

0:34:34.640 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 12>trying to do is they're trying to get their margins

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 12>back right through these efficiencies, trying to basically, you know,

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 12>cost cut, try to retool. You know, they cut their

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 12>dividend about a year ago. You guys probably reported that

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.600
<v Speaker 12>pretty significantly. So they have done things to you know,

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 12>change their overall use of capital, trying to use it

0:34:54.680 --> 0:34:57.960
<v Speaker 12>more towards newer products, foundaries and so forth, getting their

0:34:58.000 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 12>margins back.

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 9>So again, it's just it's it's a it's a it's

0:35:02.239 --> 0:35:03.640
<v Speaker 9>going to be a challenge for them to do it.

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:05.799
<v Speaker 3>But that's the goals, Tim, What would you ask Pat

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Gelsinger tonight.

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 12>Again, the street is going to really focus on the

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:14.239
<v Speaker 12>timing of these upcoming AI chips, Tim, I mean, really,

0:35:14.320 --> 0:35:17.839
<v Speaker 12>they are in a different situation because the AI chips

0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 12>that they produce are under a CPU technology. The Nvidia

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:25.719
<v Speaker 12>chips are using GPU their graphic processors, where they're using

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:28.719
<v Speaker 12>computer processing units. It's a little bit of different way

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:30.800
<v Speaker 12>of approaching things. So there's are going to be a

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 12>lot of questions not only on the new AI PC

0:35:33.480 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 12>chips that I mentioned, but also in terms of this

0:35:36.440 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 12>roadmap that they have to compete directly against am AMD

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 12>and Nvidia, and the timing of Falcon Shores and Haban

0:35:43.800 --> 0:35:46.719
<v Speaker 12>Habana gion day if I'm pronouncing that correct number three,

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 12>So it'll be you know again, guys, every conference call

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:52.839
<v Speaker 12>is a million questions on AI. We're going to get

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 12>it next week with with alphabet and that and all

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:56.319
<v Speaker 12>those guys too.

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Hey, real real quickly, thirty seconds you know ASML hit

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.120
<v Speaker 2>record as orders for its high end chip machine sore.

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 2>You've got the Intel news today KLA Core coming out too.

0:36:06.840 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 2>They're down about six percent in the aftermarket following their earnings.

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 2>It's not just the same for everyone. Is there some

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:15.320
<v Speaker 2>story that you're you're getting from the semi industry about

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 2>the overall economy and just got forgive me twenty seconds for.

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 12>You, Yeah, Carol, I mean t I, as you know,

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 12>reported numbers that didn't meet expectations. They're mostly auto and industrial.

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, you mentioned ASML and the equipment space. They get

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 9>kind of subdued forecast, but I expect them to beat that.

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 11>Yeah.

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:34.399
<v Speaker 9>So I guess there's just a lot of moving things

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 9>happening right now in chips. It's very exciting. We'll getting

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 9>a lot of different contradictory information, not.

0:36:39.040 --> 0:36:41.759
<v Speaker 2>Cross currents, Dan Morgan, but you make sense of it all,

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Senior portfolio manager at so Novas on Zoom in Atlanta.

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:53.359
<v Speaker 3>This is bluebarbalymuck.

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:53.440
<v Speaker 2>The journal about you.

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Let me drive.

0:36:54.320 --> 0:36:58.719
<v Speaker 7>Oh no, no, no, no, honey, please, I'll do the

0:36:58.800 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 7>driving gravel right, I want to try.

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 9>It's a good question.

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 3>This is the drive to the globes on Bloomberg Radio.

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody definitely grind on Wall Street. I mean

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 2>we're in the green across the board, but just barely

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 2>on the Nasdaq could be another record though it could.

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Be in the green exactly.

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that works right, exactly and likely.

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:31.320
<v Speaker 3>For the S and P five hund But we're in

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:31.680
<v Speaker 3>the red.

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:34.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, what do you mean for the year?

0:37:35.040 --> 0:37:36.800
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, no, just for today.

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Well we're not We're up three points.

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:44.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking at the Nasdaq one hundred. Yeah, I'm sorry, Okay, all.

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 6>Right, you're right about that.

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Uh and then doubt really the opper former we heard

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Charlie just bringing down the number is just an interesting trade.

0:37:49.760 --> 0:37:50.959
<v Speaker 1>Here we're off our lows.

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 2>So let's get to with Greg Halter, see what he

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 2>has to say, Director of research at Carnegie Investment Council.

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 2>They got about four billion in assets under management. He's

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:02.399
<v Speaker 2>with us on Zoom from Cleveland, Ohio. Hey, Greg, nice

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 2>to have you here with us. I am curious among

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 2>the investors that you deal with, institutional or otherwise, what's

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 2>top of mind when they pick up the phone and

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 2>give you a call or shoot you a message.

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 6>Again, thanks you, thanks for having me on the program.

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:19.200
<v Speaker 9>Again.

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 8>I would say top of mind is the disbelief that

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 8>the market did as well as it did in twenty

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 8>twenty three.

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 6>When they're looking at their statements and their.

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 8>Returns and of course wondering what that leads us into

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 8>for twenty twenty four.

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Well, past performance is no guarantee of future results. I've

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 3>heard that. I've heard that somewhere before. Where does it

0:38:42.640 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 3>lead us in twenty twenty four?

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 6>Greg, Well, we're we haven't an election year. We have

0:38:48.200 --> 0:38:51.080
<v Speaker 6>the potential for FED, the FED to cut rates.

0:38:52.520 --> 0:38:56.520
<v Speaker 8>Our belief is in long term investing, and our general

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 8>long term belief is the market goes up, not every year,

0:39:00.120 --> 0:39:02.880
<v Speaker 8>but goes up over time eight to ten percent. We

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:05.120
<v Speaker 8>do think twenty twenty four is going to be a

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 8>decent year for the market, certainly not as strong as

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty three, but we think.

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 3>It'll be up all right.

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 2>So if you think it's going to be up, though,

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:15.120
<v Speaker 2>what do you think is going to get it there?

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 2>And where do you think that investors should commit money to?

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:19.280
<v Speaker 10>Sure?

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:23.880
<v Speaker 8>I think the larger names excluding Tesla today will continue

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 8>to do well. I mean this is not like two thousand.

0:39:26.280 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 8>You have companies like Microsoft at three trillion dollar market cap, Apple, Meta, Google, Amazon,

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:36.280
<v Speaker 8>These are large companies that are just producing huge amounts

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:39.359
<v Speaker 8>of free cash flow allows them to do so much

0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 8>with that, And besides that we think the market will

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 8>broaden out where some of these smaller names and small

0:39:46.640 --> 0:39:48.400
<v Speaker 8>might be one hundred billion, but some of these smaller

0:39:48.520 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 8>names will participate more in twenty twenty four than they

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:52.879
<v Speaker 8>did last year.

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, let's talk about some of those smaller names

0:39:55.120 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 3>that you've got your eye on. I mean, well, not

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 3>actually that small. Strikers are pretty huge company, medical device maker.

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 3>It's on our radar because one of the I don't

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:09.759
<v Speaker 3>want to say Air, but I guess we would say

0:40:09.840 --> 0:40:12.399
<v Speaker 3>Air of the Striker Fortune just made a huge gift

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 3>to Spelman College. So far, it's up three percent year

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:17.200
<v Speaker 3>to date. You're bullish on the company moving forward?

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Why?

0:40:19.000 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 6>We are definitely bullish long term.

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:24.600
<v Speaker 8>They have a medical business and then of course the

0:40:25.000 --> 0:40:28.800
<v Speaker 8>orthopedic implants, shoulders, knees, hips.

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 6>I can speak from an experience.

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:35.279
<v Speaker 8>It's two months ago today I had my hip replace wow,

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 8>and it's been actually quite amazing.

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:39.440
<v Speaker 10>The pain is gone.

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 8>Obviously there's a recovery, but I've done all the work

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 8>that you need to do. But it's quite incredible what

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 8>can happen when you get these implants and the change

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 8>in your life and lifestyle where I couldn't walk half

0:40:53.160 --> 0:40:57.359
<v Speaker 8>a mile non walking three miles cycling thirty miles. It's

0:40:57.480 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 8>huge difference. And we're talking only two months so far.

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 8>So we think Striker will continue to do well. People

0:41:03.760 --> 0:41:06.960
<v Speaker 8>are looking for those types of implants. I can't tell

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:09.279
<v Speaker 8>you how many people when I did my research said

0:41:09.360 --> 0:41:12.480
<v Speaker 8>why did I wait so long? And a Striker has

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:15.680
<v Speaker 8>a top of the top of the line robotic system

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 8>called the Mako, which they bought ten years ago for

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:19.440
<v Speaker 8>I think a billion dollars.

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 6>People laughed at them. They're not laughing now.

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 8>I think it's still early early innings for that, and

0:41:25.200 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 8>certainly for that internationally.

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 3>Hey Greg, just real quick. First of all, it's great

0:41:29.680 --> 0:41:31.839
<v Speaker 3>to hear that you're doing so well after such an

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 3>invasive surgery, So congratulations, and yeah, we're sending you our

0:41:34.960 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 3>best wishes. Before you went and did that, did you

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:41.279
<v Speaker 3>know you wanted to use a Striker product? Like take

0:41:41.320 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 3>me through the decision making process as a patient here

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:45.040
<v Speaker 3>if you don't mind me asking, because I don't know

0:41:45.160 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 3>if if it's really up to patience, right, is it?

0:41:48.040 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 3>It's the provider who chooses this stuff.

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:50.240
<v Speaker 6>Now, correct?

0:41:50.600 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 8>And in fact, I did not have a Striker I'm

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 8>just speaking generally interesting because orthopedic implants. Mine's a JNJ,

0:41:57.360 --> 0:41:59.719
<v Speaker 8>which is depew And you're right, it is up to

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:02.279
<v Speaker 8>the surgeon, so I could not go in and say, oh,

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 8>mis or missus, surgeon, please use Striker. You know they're

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:10.120
<v Speaker 8>going to use what they're comfortable with. So obviously there's

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:14.800
<v Speaker 8>there's maybe different variations, but I think a hip en

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 8>plant is kind of a hip and plant at this point.

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:19.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, it's interesting. You get a little bit of

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 2>a dividend play too. I was just kind of looking

0:42:20.640 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 2>at it. It was up about twenty two percent last year.

0:42:23.400 --> 0:42:25.719
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it really plays into we're all getting older

0:42:25.760 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 2>and someday you and I Tim will need one as well.

0:42:28.320 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 2>I know no, but it makes sense, right And I

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:32.160
<v Speaker 2>hear that from a lot of people who finally get

0:42:32.239 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 2>surgery and like a hip replacement, and they're like, oh

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 2>my god, game changer, Like I can kind of go

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:40.360
<v Speaker 2>back to living my life. We want to go to

0:42:40.560 --> 0:42:43.279
<v Speaker 2>the other side of things because I think AI is

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.759
<v Speaker 2>something in general and technology that's on your radar. How

0:42:46.840 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 2>are you what's the smart thinking in your view about

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:52.000
<v Speaker 2>that and the investible thought around that.

0:42:53.520 --> 0:42:55.120
<v Speaker 6>Yes, it's a great question.

0:42:55.400 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 8>There's lots of interest given what happened last year and

0:42:59.480 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 8>is continue and so far this year, at least from

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:05.839
<v Speaker 8>the on the semiconductor side with AI chips, I'm calling

0:43:05.920 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 8>this the chip ripper market so far. I mean, you've

0:43:08.560 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 8>got Nvidia up another twenty five percent this year, Yeah, AMD, Broadcom.

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:15.560
<v Speaker 8>I mean, there's so many of these chip names that

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:18.120
<v Speaker 8>are doing well. So we think it's going to be

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 8>those types of companies as well as again the Microsofts

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:25.719
<v Speaker 8>of the world that have this AI technology.

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:26.280
<v Speaker 6>Google.

0:43:26.440 --> 0:43:29.879
<v Speaker 8>Again, these are not small companies. They're spending I can't

0:43:29.920 --> 0:43:32.399
<v Speaker 8>remember what the number was that I looked at. Maybe

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:36.040
<v Speaker 8>it was on Google or Amazon. Seventy five billion in

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:39.960
<v Speaker 8>R and D in a year. That's incredible. That's more

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 8>than the GDP of some company countries.

0:43:42.200 --> 0:43:43.959
<v Speaker 2>You're probably not going to be surprised, but the second

0:43:44.000 --> 0:43:46.360
<v Speaker 2>best performing stock in the S and P five hundred

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:49.239
<v Speaker 2>was the number one top stock performing name in the

0:43:49.360 --> 0:43:52.280
<v Speaker 2>S and P five hundred last year. We're talking about Nvidia.

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:54.759
<v Speaker 2>It's already up about twenty four percent so far this year,

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:57.160
<v Speaker 2>and I know it's something We're going to watch Intel

0:43:57.320 --> 0:43:59.160
<v Speaker 2>to see whether or not they are making any kind

0:43:59.160 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 2>of gains on video. Everybody's gunning for envideo.

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 3>So Greig, thirty seconds left. Do you see any frothiness

0:44:04.480 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to this AI?

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:07.440
<v Speaker 6>Definitely.

0:44:07.880 --> 0:44:09.800
<v Speaker 8>Again, you look at some of these stock charts and

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:13.120
<v Speaker 8>they're just spiking, you know, in a flag pattern, if

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:15.239
<v Speaker 8>you will. That gets us a little nervous when you

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 8>get so far away from the two hundred day moving average.

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 8>So there may be some weakness or softening there or pullback.

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 8>But over the long term, it certainly seems to be

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 8>a place to be.

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Not chef, we can jam this in, but we did

0:44:26.600 --> 0:44:29.759
<v Speaker 2>have a story today Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, they're going they

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:32.399
<v Speaker 2>have to provide information to the us FTC on their

0:44:32.440 --> 0:44:36.480
<v Speaker 2>investments and partnerships with AI startups like open ai and

0:44:36.560 --> 0:44:39.560
<v Speaker 2>some others. Twenty seconds Is that anything to be concerned about?

0:44:39.600 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Any thought on that?

0:44:40.480 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 7>Real quickly?

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:42.160
<v Speaker 10>Sure?

0:44:43.520 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 6>This has been going on for a decade probably at least.

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, with Microsoft and all these others relative to the

0:44:50.800 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 8>regulatory side and whether or not they're too large, it's

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 8>going to continue, whether or not they break these companies up,

0:44:57.280 --> 0:44:57.719
<v Speaker 8>who knows.

0:44:58.320 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they're definitely different approaches from the FDC on that. Hey, Greg,

0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:05.040
<v Speaker 2>really great to catch up with you. And we hope

0:45:05.040 --> 0:45:07.840
<v Speaker 2>your recovery continues to go well. Greg Halter, he's director

0:45:07.880 --> 0:45:11.360
<v Speaker 2>of Research at Carnegie Investment Council. Joining us on zoom

0:45:11.480 --> 0:45:15.239
<v Speaker 2>from Cleveland, Ohio. You're listening and watching Bloomberg Radio.

0:45:17.880 --> 0:45:21.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast of a little

0:45:21.160 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 1>on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts.

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Listen live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and

0:45:32.120 --> 0:45:34.839
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. You can also watch us live

0:45:34.960 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 1>every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal