1 00:00:01,200 --> 00:00:08,520 Speaker 1: The volume Hoops Tonight is presented by FanDuel. The NBA 2 00:00:08,680 --> 00:00:11,000 Speaker 1: is back, and there's no better place to get in 3 00:00:11,080 --> 00:00:13,600 Speaker 1: on the action than with fandel This is my favorite 4 00:00:13,640 --> 00:00:16,400 Speaker 1: sports betting app that is out there. It is safe 5 00:00:16,440 --> 00:00:18,880 Speaker 1: and easy to use, easy to get your money in 6 00:00:19,079 --> 00:00:21,840 Speaker 1: and out. I love that cash out feature, So if 7 00:00:21,840 --> 00:00:23,439 Speaker 1: you're in good shape with one of your bets and 8 00:00:23,520 --> 00:00:25,840 Speaker 1: you don't want to risk garbage time, you can get 9 00:00:25,840 --> 00:00:29,080 Speaker 1: your money out quickly. Use promo code Jason T and 10 00:00:29,160 --> 00:00:32,680 Speaker 1: download the FanDuel app today to make every moment more 11 00:00:33,040 --> 00:00:40,000 Speaker 1: This NBA Season twenty one plus in president Arizona, Colorado, Connecticut, Indiana, Louisiana. 12 00:00:40,400 --> 00:00:44,519 Speaker 1: Permitted parishes only, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Tennessee, Virginia 13 00:00:44,600 --> 00:00:48,120 Speaker 1: or West Virginia. First online real money wager only. Refund 14 00:00:48,159 --> 00:00:52,160 Speaker 1: issued as non withdrawable site credit that expires in fourteen days. 15 00:00:52,280 --> 00:00:56,360 Speaker 1: Restrictions apply. See terms at sports book dot FanDuel dot com. 16 00:00:56,400 --> 00:00:59,920 Speaker 1: Gambling problem called one eight hundred, next step or tech 17 00:01:00,400 --> 00:01:04,480 Speaker 1: next step to five three three four two in Arizona 18 00:01:04,880 --> 00:01:08,480 Speaker 1: one eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven 19 00:01:08,560 --> 00:01:13,560 Speaker 1: seven or visit CCPG dot org slash chat in Connecticut 20 00:01:13,680 --> 00:01:17,000 Speaker 1: one eight hundred gambler or visit FanDuel dot com slash 21 00:01:17,319 --> 00:01:21,920 Speaker 1: RG in Colorado, Indiana, New Jersey, in Virginia one eight 22 00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:26,640 Speaker 1: seven seven seven seven zero stop in Louisiana one eight 23 00:01:26,680 --> 00:01:30,920 Speaker 1: hundred to seven zero seven one one seven for confidential 24 00:01:30,920 --> 00:01:35,120 Speaker 1: help in Michigan one eight seven seven eight Hope and 25 00:01:35,319 --> 00:01:39,160 Speaker 1: why or text hope and Why to four six seven 26 00:01:39,280 --> 00:01:42,880 Speaker 1: three six nine in New York. In Tennessee redline dial 27 00:01:42,959 --> 00:01:46,839 Speaker 1: one eight hundred eight eight nine nine seven eight nine 28 00:01:46,880 --> 00:01:51,240 Speaker 1: in Tennessee, visit www one dot one eight hundred gambler 29 00:01:51,280 --> 00:02:14,600 Speaker 1: dot net in West Virginia. UM, believe it or not, 30 00:02:14,600 --> 00:02:15,960 Speaker 1: we've already made it a fourth of the way through 31 00:02:16,000 --> 00:02:17,720 Speaker 1: the season. So we're gonna take a look at m 32 00:02:17,760 --> 00:02:20,440 Speaker 1: v P Most Improved Player, Defensive Player of the Year, 33 00:02:20,840 --> 00:02:23,679 Speaker 1: and Rookie of the Year, and then tonight's slate of 34 00:02:23,760 --> 00:02:26,920 Speaker 1: games is jam packed. I'm gonna be recording an instant 35 00:02:26,919 --> 00:02:29,560 Speaker 1: reaction right after the games tonight. I'm not sure if 36 00:02:29,560 --> 00:02:31,359 Speaker 1: it will actually go up on the YouTube feed tonight 37 00:02:31,440 --> 00:02:33,120 Speaker 1: or tomorrow morning, but keep an eye on the feeds. 38 00:02:33,160 --> 00:02:35,920 Speaker 1: We will have an instant reaction there. Um, you guys 39 00:02:35,919 --> 00:02:37,400 Speaker 1: know the drill before we get started. Subscribe to the 40 00:02:37,440 --> 00:02:39,200 Speaker 1: Volumes YouTube channel so you don't miss any more of 41 00:02:39,200 --> 00:02:42,359 Speaker 1: our videos. Follow me on Twitter at underscore Jason lts 42 00:02:42,400 --> 00:02:44,920 Speaker 1: you guys don't miss any show announcements. And then, last 43 00:02:44,919 --> 00:02:46,560 Speaker 1: but not least it for whatever reason, you guys miss 44 00:02:46,560 --> 00:02:48,120 Speaker 1: one of these videos and you can't get back over 45 00:02:48,160 --> 00:02:50,400 Speaker 1: to YouTube to finish, you can find them wherever you 46 00:02:50,440 --> 00:02:55,280 Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Under Hoops tonight. So starting with m 47 00:02:55,360 --> 00:02:57,360 Speaker 1: v P, this is not my favorite award just because 48 00:02:57,400 --> 00:03:00,400 Speaker 1: of the inconsistencies over the years, but I wanted to 49 00:03:00,400 --> 00:03:03,639 Speaker 1: make sure that for me personally when I'm picking him 50 00:03:03,639 --> 00:03:06,040 Speaker 1: an m v P, that I was consistent with my criteria. 51 00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:08,560 Speaker 1: So a few years ago I nailed it down to 52 00:03:08,880 --> 00:03:11,840 Speaker 1: three specific criteria and then I kind of like combine 53 00:03:11,919 --> 00:03:14,679 Speaker 1: those three when I'm ranking the players. So those three 54 00:03:14,720 --> 00:03:17,480 Speaker 1: criteria that I use are who is the best player 55 00:03:17,480 --> 00:03:20,600 Speaker 1: in the world, like regardless of situation, who would be 56 00:03:20,639 --> 00:03:23,240 Speaker 1: the guy you'd want for a season and a playoff 57 00:03:23,320 --> 00:03:26,480 Speaker 1: run for instance, Like that's the rankings list that I 58 00:03:26,520 --> 00:03:29,240 Speaker 1: do over this over the summer. Where you land in 59 00:03:29,320 --> 00:03:31,560 Speaker 1: that list is one chunk of the pie for me, 60 00:03:32,240 --> 00:03:34,239 Speaker 1: and then the second chunk of the pie is who's 61 00:03:34,280 --> 00:03:36,680 Speaker 1: the best player on the best team. This is like 62 00:03:36,720 --> 00:03:39,160 Speaker 1: your stereotypical m vps that you've seen over the years, 63 00:03:39,200 --> 00:03:42,160 Speaker 1: like Steph in two thousand fifteen or James Harden in 64 00:03:42,200 --> 00:03:45,480 Speaker 1: two thousand eighteen, where maybe that guy wasn't necessarily considered 65 00:03:45,480 --> 00:03:47,200 Speaker 1: the best player in the world at that point, but 66 00:03:47,520 --> 00:03:50,040 Speaker 1: he was clearly the best player on the best team 67 00:03:50,200 --> 00:03:52,160 Speaker 1: in the league at that point. So that's the middle 68 00:03:52,240 --> 00:03:54,320 Speaker 1: chunk of the pie. And then the last chunk of 69 00:03:54,320 --> 00:03:57,120 Speaker 1: the pie for me is who is more directly valuable 70 00:03:57,360 --> 00:03:59,200 Speaker 1: to their team success. This is where I'm looking at 71 00:03:59,200 --> 00:04:01,640 Speaker 1: like point differential stuff like how good are they with 72 00:04:01,680 --> 00:04:03,680 Speaker 1: you on the floor versus when you're off the floor. 73 00:04:03,680 --> 00:04:06,920 Speaker 1: These are your stereotypical m v P cases like Nicola 74 00:04:06,960 --> 00:04:09,640 Speaker 1: Yokits last year, Russell Westbrook in two thousand and seventeen, 75 00:04:09,640 --> 00:04:12,240 Speaker 1: where they are a lower seed but they're playing extremely 76 00:04:12,240 --> 00:04:15,920 Speaker 1: good basketball and elevating an average supporting cast to a 77 00:04:15,920 --> 00:04:19,240 Speaker 1: mid level playoff birth. So I'm gonna factor all three 78 00:04:19,240 --> 00:04:21,280 Speaker 1: of those things in for all these players and kind 79 00:04:21,279 --> 00:04:24,640 Speaker 1: of combine them as I ranked the players. So number 80 00:04:24,640 --> 00:04:27,440 Speaker 1: one at this point in the season I think is 81 00:04:27,520 --> 00:04:31,800 Speaker 1: clearly Jason Tatum. So to keep it simple, Jason Tatum 82 00:04:31,880 --> 00:04:34,560 Speaker 1: is clearly in the conversation for best player in the world. 83 00:04:34,600 --> 00:04:37,000 Speaker 1: I wouldn't put him directly there right now. I think 84 00:04:37,000 --> 00:04:39,400 Speaker 1: Steph and Janice are clearly ahead of him, But he's 85 00:04:39,600 --> 00:04:42,479 Speaker 1: every like he has every case to be at the 86 00:04:42,520 --> 00:04:45,360 Speaker 1: top of the group of guys that's right behind them. 87 00:04:45,400 --> 00:04:48,359 Speaker 1: So this season, Tatum is averaging thirty two, eight and 88 00:04:48,400 --> 00:04:52,840 Speaker 1: five on shooting. If Kevin Durant was doing that, if 89 00:04:52,880 --> 00:04:55,280 Speaker 1: Steph Curry was doing that, if Lebron James was doing that, 90 00:04:55,320 --> 00:04:57,440 Speaker 1: we'd all be calling them the m v P. Once again, 91 00:04:57,760 --> 00:04:59,800 Speaker 1: he's paying like a Tatum tax. That's more like a 92 00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:03,120 Speaker 1: Austin Celtics tax, where people are underrating how good he's 93 00:05:03,160 --> 00:05:04,920 Speaker 1: been just simply because of who he is and who 94 00:05:04,960 --> 00:05:08,359 Speaker 1: he plays for. But he has unquestionably been one of 95 00:05:08,360 --> 00:05:10,159 Speaker 1: the best players in the league this year. So he's 96 00:05:10,160 --> 00:05:13,640 Speaker 1: doing really well in that first chunk, and then the 97 00:05:13,800 --> 00:05:16,840 Speaker 1: second chunk, which is team success. The Celtics are the 98 00:05:16,839 --> 00:05:18,520 Speaker 1: best team in the league by a mile. They're eighteen 99 00:05:18,520 --> 00:05:20,719 Speaker 1: and four, They're playing at a sixties seven win pace. 100 00:05:21,440 --> 00:05:22,880 Speaker 1: They have a two game lead on the rest of 101 00:05:22,920 --> 00:05:24,880 Speaker 1: the field. They have the best net rating in the 102 00:05:24,960 --> 00:05:27,839 Speaker 1: league by one point seven points per one hund possessions 103 00:05:27,839 --> 00:05:30,479 Speaker 1: over second place, and they're on a five game winning street. 104 00:05:30,600 --> 00:05:32,440 Speaker 1: So they're clearly the best team in the league, and 105 00:05:32,440 --> 00:05:34,839 Speaker 1: he's clearly in the conversation for best player in the world. 106 00:05:35,080 --> 00:05:37,040 Speaker 1: And then when we look at how valuable he is 107 00:05:37,080 --> 00:05:40,320 Speaker 1: to the Celtics, there plus twelve per one hundred possessions 108 00:05:40,320 --> 00:05:43,039 Speaker 1: with him on the floor and their plus four per 109 00:05:43,040 --> 00:05:45,000 Speaker 1: one hundred possessions with him off the four So to 110 00:05:45,000 --> 00:05:48,640 Speaker 1: simplify that, they're unbelievably good when he's on the floor 111 00:05:48,680 --> 00:05:51,240 Speaker 1: and they're just pretty good when he's off the floor. 112 00:05:51,279 --> 00:05:55,240 Speaker 1: That's a significant differential. So he's checking all three boxes 113 00:05:55,279 --> 00:05:59,320 Speaker 1: and resounding fashion. This is a classic m v P case. 114 00:06:00,160 --> 00:06:03,119 Speaker 1: Obviously he has to maintain it through another three fourth 115 00:06:03,200 --> 00:06:05,400 Speaker 1: so the season, but right now I think he's the 116 00:06:05,440 --> 00:06:09,719 Speaker 1: clear m v P at this point. Alright, number two, Janice, 117 00:06:09,920 --> 00:06:12,360 Speaker 1: So when we're talking about that first chunk best player 118 00:06:12,360 --> 00:06:15,040 Speaker 1: in the world, Janice is actually the best player in 119 00:06:15,040 --> 00:06:16,600 Speaker 1: the world. I had him number one on my list 120 00:06:16,640 --> 00:06:20,640 Speaker 1: coming in this year, So he's got that box completely checked. Um, 121 00:06:20,680 --> 00:06:22,920 Speaker 1: he's averaging a career high thirty one points per game 122 00:06:22,960 --> 00:06:25,360 Speaker 1: with twelve rebounds and six assists. His efficiency is down 123 00:06:25,400 --> 00:06:28,080 Speaker 1: a little bit this year. This is actually Janice's first 124 00:06:28,080 --> 00:06:31,320 Speaker 1: time being below sixty true shooting since two thousand eighteen. 125 00:06:32,120 --> 00:06:34,480 Speaker 1: But a big part of that is injuries, you know, 126 00:06:34,520 --> 00:06:36,760 Speaker 1: with Pat Conatson being out, with Chris Middleton being out, 127 00:06:36,760 --> 00:06:39,719 Speaker 1: even Drew Holidays miss some time. The spacing isn't quite 128 00:06:39,760 --> 00:06:41,839 Speaker 1: as good around your honest, and his usage is higher 129 00:06:42,160 --> 00:06:43,880 Speaker 1: as a result of the fact that they don't have 130 00:06:43,920 --> 00:06:46,400 Speaker 1: as much offensive creation, so that's typically going to cause 131 00:06:46,400 --> 00:06:50,719 Speaker 1: you some issues inefficiency. As we look at the team, 132 00:06:50,839 --> 00:06:53,000 Speaker 1: the Bucks are fifteen and five, only two games back 133 00:06:53,040 --> 00:06:56,560 Speaker 1: from Boston, so in the team success portion, he's also 134 00:06:56,600 --> 00:06:59,640 Speaker 1: got that pretty well checked. As far as differential goes, 135 00:06:59,680 --> 00:07:02,080 Speaker 1: there us nine points per one possessions when he's on 136 00:07:02,120 --> 00:07:04,720 Speaker 1: the floor, and then they're even when he's off the floor, 137 00:07:04,760 --> 00:07:07,520 Speaker 1: so it's a similar differential to Tatum. So as we 138 00:07:07,560 --> 00:07:10,640 Speaker 1: look out, his case is also very very good. I 139 00:07:10,640 --> 00:07:13,520 Speaker 1: think Tatum is just having a slightly better season, and 140 00:07:13,560 --> 00:07:16,640 Speaker 1: I think his team is slightly better, so that gives 141 00:07:16,640 --> 00:07:19,440 Speaker 1: Tatum the nod here, but it is close, and I 142 00:07:19,480 --> 00:07:22,840 Speaker 1: do think that Janice I predicted that Janice would win 143 00:07:22,880 --> 00:07:25,960 Speaker 1: the MVP before the season. Obviously, at this point, with 144 00:07:26,040 --> 00:07:27,840 Speaker 1: what we know about Joannest and with we with what 145 00:07:27,880 --> 00:07:30,520 Speaker 1: we know about Jayson Tatum, and given the small gap 146 00:07:30,600 --> 00:07:34,400 Speaker 1: between the two, I still predict that Janice will eventually 147 00:07:34,520 --> 00:07:36,440 Speaker 1: end up getting the m v P award, But I 148 00:07:36,480 --> 00:07:39,360 Speaker 1: do think if the season ended today, it would have 149 00:07:39,440 --> 00:07:44,640 Speaker 1: to go to Tatum alright. Number three Devin Booker, Is 150 00:07:44,680 --> 00:07:46,840 Speaker 1: he in the best player in the world conversation? No, 151 00:07:46,960 --> 00:07:49,040 Speaker 1: I'd say he's probably closer to ten than he is 152 00:07:49,080 --> 00:07:52,440 Speaker 1: to one. So that's the major week portion of his case. 153 00:07:52,520 --> 00:07:54,320 Speaker 1: But he is having by far the best season of 154 00:07:54,360 --> 00:07:56,120 Speaker 1: his career, and is he and he has taken a 155 00:07:56,160 --> 00:07:58,400 Speaker 1: leap from star to superstar in my opinion. I did 156 00:07:58,400 --> 00:08:00,560 Speaker 1: a whole video on him yesterday that you can find 157 00:08:00,560 --> 00:08:03,440 Speaker 1: on my Twitter feed at underscore json LT, breaking down 158 00:08:03,560 --> 00:08:08,200 Speaker 1: his high level offensive initiation that he demonstrated in a 159 00:08:08,280 --> 00:08:11,680 Speaker 1: comeback win over the Sacramento Kings earlier this week. He's 160 00:08:11,720 --> 00:08:14,080 Speaker 1: averaging a career high twenty nine points per game with 161 00:08:14,280 --> 00:08:17,400 Speaker 1: five rebounds and six assists. He's shooting, He's got a 162 00:08:17,400 --> 00:08:20,640 Speaker 1: sixty shooting percentage, which is insane, and I believe this 163 00:08:20,720 --> 00:08:23,680 Speaker 1: is the best playmaking season and best defensive season of 164 00:08:23,800 --> 00:08:26,800 Speaker 1: his career. Now, he's had seasons where he's averaged more assists, 165 00:08:26,800 --> 00:08:28,840 Speaker 1: but they were on really bad Sons teams where he's 166 00:08:28,840 --> 00:08:32,120 Speaker 1: a lot more heliocentric um. In this particular season, when 167 00:08:32,120 --> 00:08:35,120 Speaker 1: you factor in the stakes, the level of competition, and 168 00:08:35,200 --> 00:08:37,400 Speaker 1: just you know, with them being in a winning concept, 169 00:08:37,720 --> 00:08:40,360 Speaker 1: I think this has been the highest level playmaking I've 170 00:08:40,400 --> 00:08:44,240 Speaker 1: seen from him. So again, not not doing strong in 171 00:08:44,240 --> 00:08:46,959 Speaker 1: that specific criteria, but he's also a lot higher there 172 00:08:46,960 --> 00:08:49,640 Speaker 1: than people would probably realize. Looking at the team. The 173 00:08:49,640 --> 00:08:51,680 Speaker 1: Sons are fifteen and six, they're the top seed in 174 00:08:51,679 --> 00:08:55,480 Speaker 1: the West. They are plus nine point nine points per 175 00:08:55,480 --> 00:08:58,000 Speaker 1: one possessions with him on the floor and minus one 176 00:08:58,040 --> 00:09:00,640 Speaker 1: point four points per one hundred possess with him off. 177 00:09:00,640 --> 00:09:03,560 Speaker 1: That's an eleven point three point differential. That's m VP 178 00:09:03,720 --> 00:09:07,160 Speaker 1: level stuff. They're an outstanding team with him on the floor, 179 00:09:07,160 --> 00:09:09,760 Speaker 1: and they're a negative team with him off the floor. 180 00:09:09,920 --> 00:09:11,800 Speaker 1: So you know, as we look as we zoom out 181 00:09:11,840 --> 00:09:14,160 Speaker 1: with Devin Booker, he's got the team success thing, and 182 00:09:14,200 --> 00:09:16,920 Speaker 1: he's got the value to his team thing. He's just 183 00:09:16,960 --> 00:09:19,880 Speaker 1: a little week in that actual hierarchy of the NBA. 184 00:09:19,960 --> 00:09:22,840 Speaker 1: That's why I have him down at number three, number 185 00:09:22,840 --> 00:09:26,920 Speaker 1: four Steph Curry, so at a minimum, he's the second 186 00:09:26,960 --> 00:09:29,480 Speaker 1: best player alive. I used to think that there was 187 00:09:29,520 --> 00:09:31,840 Speaker 1: a chasm between Janice and the rest of the field, 188 00:09:32,360 --> 00:09:34,559 Speaker 1: in large part because Steph had a great playoff run. 189 00:09:34,559 --> 00:09:36,480 Speaker 1: But he didn't have a great regular season last year, 190 00:09:36,520 --> 00:09:38,520 Speaker 1: and he had some poor shooting at certain points during 191 00:09:38,520 --> 00:09:40,319 Speaker 1: the playoffs, so like it was one of those things 192 00:09:40,400 --> 00:09:43,560 Speaker 1: where you know you're you. You still view Steph in 193 00:09:43,760 --> 00:09:45,760 Speaker 1: great esteem, but you don't view him as the same 194 00:09:45,760 --> 00:09:49,320 Speaker 1: type of regular season weapon as Janice, right, But he 195 00:09:49,480 --> 00:09:53,040 Speaker 1: completely put that to rest this year. He's having just 196 00:09:53,160 --> 00:09:57,600 Speaker 1: a completely ludicrous offensive season that has he raised that chasm. 197 00:09:57,640 --> 00:09:59,480 Speaker 1: In my opinion, I still give a slight nod to 198 00:09:59,600 --> 00:10:01,840 Speaker 1: Jannice is the best player in the world, but Steff 199 00:10:01,880 --> 00:10:05,160 Speaker 1: is clearly a better offensive player than your Honice. He's 200 00:10:05,280 --> 00:10:08,080 Speaker 1: arguably the best offensive player that's ever played, and he's 201 00:10:08,240 --> 00:10:11,120 Speaker 1: arguably having the best offensive season that any player has 202 00:10:11,160 --> 00:10:13,559 Speaker 1: ever had. And that might be enough for some folks 203 00:10:13,600 --> 00:10:15,480 Speaker 1: to put him up at number one. I just have 204 00:10:15,600 --> 00:10:18,240 Speaker 1: him barely behind Janice at number two, So he's doing 205 00:10:18,280 --> 00:10:21,280 Speaker 1: really well. In that first criteria, the Warriors are eleven 206 00:10:21,280 --> 00:10:24,200 Speaker 1: and eleven. This is where Steph is gonna lose a 207 00:10:24,240 --> 00:10:27,720 Speaker 1: ton of ground in these rankings. They didn't defend nearly 208 00:10:27,720 --> 00:10:29,680 Speaker 1: well enough during that five game road trip on the 209 00:10:29,679 --> 00:10:31,400 Speaker 1: East Coast and they went oh and five and it 210 00:10:31,520 --> 00:10:33,920 Speaker 1: dug them in a big hole. But the team does 211 00:10:33,960 --> 00:10:36,040 Speaker 1: appear to be putting some things together and he could 212 00:10:36,080 --> 00:10:40,079 Speaker 1: move up this list if the Warriors move up the standings. 213 00:10:40,120 --> 00:10:43,840 Speaker 1: The differential is where Steph is completely insane, and this 214 00:10:43,880 --> 00:10:46,840 Speaker 1: is his long shot to win m v P. So 215 00:10:46,920 --> 00:10:49,600 Speaker 1: the Warriors are plus eleven point two points per one 216 00:10:49,640 --> 00:10:52,559 Speaker 1: hun possessions with step on the floor, and they are 217 00:10:52,679 --> 00:10:57,520 Speaker 1: minus sixteen point five points per one hund possessions with 218 00:10:57,600 --> 00:11:00,640 Speaker 1: him off the floor. That is a twenty seven point 219 00:11:00,760 --> 00:11:04,600 Speaker 1: seven point differential with stap on versus when he's off. 220 00:11:04,760 --> 00:11:08,280 Speaker 1: He is so vital to everything they do offensively in 221 00:11:08,400 --> 00:11:11,960 Speaker 1: terms of pure value that third chunk, he has a 222 00:11:12,080 --> 00:11:15,360 Speaker 1: chasm between him and the rest of the field. So 223 00:11:15,400 --> 00:11:17,360 Speaker 1: in a year like last year, he probably would have 224 00:11:17,360 --> 00:11:19,760 Speaker 1: won m v P. But the problem is that you 225 00:11:19,760 --> 00:11:22,040 Speaker 1: have some more clear cut candidates this year, So the 226 00:11:22,080 --> 00:11:25,000 Speaker 1: Warriors are definitely going to have to win more games 227 00:11:25,240 --> 00:11:27,800 Speaker 1: in order for Steff to get it. But if it's close, 228 00:11:28,960 --> 00:11:31,360 Speaker 1: if the Warriors are a two set out West and 229 00:11:31,440 --> 00:11:34,200 Speaker 1: He's got a twenty eight point differential and Tatum's got 230 00:11:34,240 --> 00:11:37,640 Speaker 1: an eight point differential, I could see some voters gravitating 231 00:11:37,640 --> 00:11:40,080 Speaker 1: back towards step especially with the legitimacy of him having 232 00:11:40,120 --> 00:11:45,319 Speaker 1: just won his first finals MVP and his fourth championship. Alright, 233 00:11:45,400 --> 00:11:48,720 Speaker 1: Number five, I have Luca don Chet. He's kind of 234 00:11:48,720 --> 00:11:51,240 Speaker 1: similar to uh to Jayson Tatum in the sense that 235 00:11:51,320 --> 00:11:53,480 Speaker 1: like he's in that group of players that's right below 236 00:11:53,559 --> 00:11:56,960 Speaker 1: Janis and Steph clearly in the conversation for best player 237 00:11:56,960 --> 00:11:59,640 Speaker 1: in the world, but also clearly not the best player 238 00:12:00,240 --> 00:12:02,520 Speaker 1: in the world. He's averaging a career high thirty four 239 00:12:02,559 --> 00:12:05,560 Speaker 1: points per game with nine rebounds and nine assists, a 240 00:12:05,600 --> 00:12:09,040 Speaker 1: career high sixtry shooting percentage. He's also been defending a 241 00:12:09,040 --> 00:12:11,520 Speaker 1: lot better as of late after a pretty rough start 242 00:12:11,600 --> 00:12:14,319 Speaker 1: to the season. But the team, once again not his fault. 243 00:12:14,400 --> 00:12:16,679 Speaker 1: It's a supporting cast thing, similar to the step thing. 244 00:12:17,400 --> 00:12:19,120 Speaker 1: But the Mavericks are ten and eleven and that's just 245 00:12:19,160 --> 00:12:20,960 Speaker 1: not gonna get it done. That's where he's getting hurt. 246 00:12:21,480 --> 00:12:24,640 Speaker 1: On the differential side of things, the Mavericks are plus 247 00:12:24,679 --> 00:12:27,080 Speaker 1: four point three points per one Hunter possessions with Luca 248 00:12:27,160 --> 00:12:29,760 Speaker 1: on the floor, and they are minus five point two 249 00:12:29,800 --> 00:12:32,360 Speaker 1: points per one Hunter possessions with him off. That is 250 00:12:32,400 --> 00:12:35,520 Speaker 1: a nine and a half point swing. So he's playing 251 00:12:35,640 --> 00:12:39,600 Speaker 1: m VP level basketball, and um, you know, he's he's 252 00:12:39,640 --> 00:12:41,880 Speaker 1: good enough in the hierarchy of the league. But the 253 00:12:41,880 --> 00:12:43,679 Speaker 1: Mavericks are just gonna have to win more games for 254 00:12:43,800 --> 00:12:45,880 Speaker 1: him to ever be considered, which is why when I 255 00:12:45,880 --> 00:12:48,400 Speaker 1: saw him as the preseason favorite on fan Duel, I 256 00:12:48,440 --> 00:12:50,120 Speaker 1: just didn't understand that, and I thought it was a 257 00:12:50,120 --> 00:12:52,520 Speaker 1: bad bet. I just never thought the Mavericks would be 258 00:12:52,559 --> 00:12:54,600 Speaker 1: able to win enough games. And you know, one last 259 00:12:54,600 --> 00:12:56,599 Speaker 1: note on the Luca thing, and I talked about this 260 00:12:56,640 --> 00:12:59,280 Speaker 1: a little bit in our Technical Difficulties episode on Tuesday. 261 00:12:59,320 --> 00:13:01,240 Speaker 1: That's why I'm gonna rehash it here a little bit. 262 00:13:01,600 --> 00:13:04,400 Speaker 1: But it bothers me that we have a tendency to 263 00:13:04,600 --> 00:13:08,440 Speaker 1: jump down and denigrate players when their team struggles when 264 00:13:08,440 --> 00:13:11,800 Speaker 1: it was an obvious roster situation, like it's basically the 265 00:13:11,840 --> 00:13:15,480 Speaker 1: same roster except for without Jalen Brunson and last year 266 00:13:15,480 --> 00:13:17,880 Speaker 1: with Jalen Brunson. They were three wins away from the finals, 267 00:13:18,000 --> 00:13:20,199 Speaker 1: and the role players fell apart in that series. Luca 268 00:13:20,200 --> 00:13:23,000 Speaker 1: also didn't play very well. But those things are intecrate, 269 00:13:23,280 --> 00:13:26,560 Speaker 1: intricately related to each other. My point there is is 270 00:13:26,640 --> 00:13:30,240 Speaker 1: like it's clearly a roster issue and everyone's jumping down Luca, 271 00:13:30,559 --> 00:13:33,640 Speaker 1: and the thing is is, like I get it as 272 00:13:33,679 --> 00:13:37,600 Speaker 1: it pertains to his play style and how aesthetically it 273 00:13:37,640 --> 00:13:41,839 Speaker 1: can be not the most attractive style of basketball. We 274 00:13:41,920 --> 00:13:44,520 Speaker 1: used to say, you know, I say we basketball media 275 00:13:44,600 --> 00:13:46,480 Speaker 1: used to to say a lot of similar things about 276 00:13:46,559 --> 00:13:49,560 Speaker 1: Lebron in the Spurs and like the two thousand two 277 00:13:49,880 --> 00:13:52,400 Speaker 1: fourteen range, it was like the Spurs were playing the 278 00:13:52,440 --> 00:13:56,440 Speaker 1: beautiful game and then the Miami Heat was like really 279 00:13:56,440 --> 00:13:59,360 Speaker 1: good defense and Lebron James creating everything and a lot 280 00:13:59,440 --> 00:14:01,640 Speaker 1: of like basketball fans would talk about how you know, 281 00:14:01,679 --> 00:14:04,160 Speaker 1: they preferred the player movement, they preferred the ball movement. 282 00:14:04,600 --> 00:14:06,400 Speaker 1: And we've also heard it. We've heard that with James 283 00:14:06,400 --> 00:14:08,040 Speaker 1: Harden over the years. We've heard that with Tray Young 284 00:14:08,080 --> 00:14:10,080 Speaker 1: over the years. We've heard that with Luca Dontage over 285 00:14:10,080 --> 00:14:13,000 Speaker 1: the years, and Luca just gets lumped in with Trey 286 00:14:13,080 --> 00:14:16,160 Speaker 1: and James harden as those like heliocentric, ugly style of 287 00:14:16,240 --> 00:14:20,520 Speaker 1: play players, but he's so much better than them with 288 00:14:20,640 --> 00:14:24,360 Speaker 1: his versatility offensively, which is why he actually goes up 289 00:14:24,360 --> 00:14:27,400 Speaker 1: a level in the playoffs rather than you know, declining 290 00:14:27,440 --> 00:14:29,640 Speaker 1: like most players have, like Trey Young has, like James 291 00:14:29,680 --> 00:14:33,200 Speaker 1: harden has, And so I don't like good. If you 292 00:14:33,200 --> 00:14:35,040 Speaker 1: want to talk about how you don't like the way 293 00:14:35,240 --> 00:14:39,560 Speaker 1: Luca Dontech plays, that's fine, but the actual impact you 294 00:14:39,640 --> 00:14:42,960 Speaker 1: can't overlook that. That's unassailable. Luca don Che is a 295 00:14:43,080 --> 00:14:47,080 Speaker 1: proven playoff performer and he's in his early twenties. Like 296 00:14:47,280 --> 00:14:50,680 Speaker 1: where was Lebron at four? You know, where was Michael 297 00:14:50,720 --> 00:14:55,040 Speaker 1: Jordan four? I I don't think he's discussed fairly. Um, 298 00:14:55,080 --> 00:14:56,920 Speaker 1: And this is gonna be a crap season because the 299 00:14:56,920 --> 00:14:58,800 Speaker 1: maps are gonna suck and everyone's gonna use it as 300 00:14:58,800 --> 00:15:02,080 Speaker 1: an opportunity to act as though Luca Dunch doesn't play 301 00:15:02,120 --> 00:15:06,560 Speaker 1: the right way and then watch what happens. He'll be 302 00:15:06,560 --> 00:15:08,720 Speaker 1: playing on some team with a legit costar, you know, 303 00:15:08,960 --> 00:15:11,360 Speaker 1: the legit co stars that every other NBA champion in 304 00:15:11,440 --> 00:15:14,880 Speaker 1: NBA history has had, you know, like Kawhi Leonard doing 305 00:15:14,920 --> 00:15:17,920 Speaker 1: it with Pascal Siakam in that ridiculous team, or you know, 306 00:15:18,160 --> 00:15:21,440 Speaker 1: uh Janic's doing it with Chris Middleton and Drew Holiday, 307 00:15:21,560 --> 00:15:24,000 Speaker 1: or Lebron doing it with Anthony Davis, or Steph doing 308 00:15:24,000 --> 00:15:27,280 Speaker 1: it with Kevin Durant. Everyone's playing with great players, and 309 00:15:27,360 --> 00:15:30,760 Speaker 1: yet you're judging Luca for losing games with Spencer Dinwoodie 310 00:15:31,080 --> 00:15:34,000 Speaker 1: and off the streets, Kemba Walker coming in to try 311 00:15:34,000 --> 00:15:35,800 Speaker 1: to save their offense. Like, I don't think that's fair. 312 00:15:35,800 --> 00:15:37,920 Speaker 1: Should he be the m v P. No, But that's 313 00:15:37,920 --> 00:15:40,080 Speaker 1: why I have him down at five. But let's let's 314 00:15:40,080 --> 00:15:42,280 Speaker 1: cut him some slack for what's happening with the Mavericks. 315 00:15:42,880 --> 00:15:45,760 Speaker 1: All right, moving on, Defensive Player of the Year. So 316 00:15:45,800 --> 00:15:47,800 Speaker 1: there's gonna ruffle some feathers, but hear me out. I 317 00:15:47,880 --> 00:15:50,800 Speaker 1: think Anthony Davis is the clear choice for Defense Player 318 00:15:50,800 --> 00:15:53,720 Speaker 1: of the Year at this point. So obviously, the Lakers 319 00:15:53,720 --> 00:15:56,480 Speaker 1: as a team have underperformed, but their defense has been excellent. 320 00:15:56,480 --> 00:15:59,160 Speaker 1: Their seventh and defensive rating in their second In half 321 00:15:59,160 --> 00:16:03,040 Speaker 1: court defense, Anthony Davis is fourth in the league and blocks. 322 00:16:03,080 --> 00:16:06,120 Speaker 1: He's the only player in the entire NBA averaging over 323 00:16:06,120 --> 00:16:08,040 Speaker 1: one and a half steals and one and a half blocks, 324 00:16:08,400 --> 00:16:10,240 Speaker 1: and the big difference between him and the other guys 325 00:16:10,280 --> 00:16:12,960 Speaker 1: we're gonna talk about on this list um which I 326 00:16:13,000 --> 00:16:14,800 Speaker 1: won't reveal at this exact moment in time, but the 327 00:16:14,840 --> 00:16:17,560 Speaker 1: biggest difference between him and the other two guys that 328 00:16:17,600 --> 00:16:20,240 Speaker 1: I have in this list is Anthony Davis is not 329 00:16:20,320 --> 00:16:24,680 Speaker 1: just a rim protector. He's also an outstanding UH interior defender. 330 00:16:24,720 --> 00:16:28,040 Speaker 1: As it pertains to defending passes. He keeps his hands 331 00:16:28,120 --> 00:16:32,640 Speaker 1: high and low to disrupt pocket passes, to disrupt kickout passes, 332 00:16:32,680 --> 00:16:36,320 Speaker 1: to disrupt drop off passes to the dunker spot, or 333 00:16:36,360 --> 00:16:38,920 Speaker 1: things along those lines, which is why he's the only 334 00:16:38,960 --> 00:16:41,240 Speaker 1: player in the league that's averaging over one and a 335 00:16:41,240 --> 00:16:44,040 Speaker 1: half steals and one and a half blocks. It kick 336 00:16:44,120 --> 00:16:47,560 Speaker 1: starts everything the Lakers do in transition, and he leads 337 00:16:47,600 --> 00:16:51,760 Speaker 1: the entire league and rebounding, so he's finishing defensive possessions 338 00:16:51,800 --> 00:16:54,040 Speaker 1: for the Lakers at an astounding rate, which is a 339 00:16:54,080 --> 00:16:56,720 Speaker 1: big part of defense. If you can't finish the defensive possession, 340 00:16:56,920 --> 00:16:59,640 Speaker 1: you have to play defense. Again, rebounding is part of 341 00:16:59,720 --> 00:17:02,360 Speaker 1: defen it. So Anthony Davis, if you especially when you 342 00:17:02,400 --> 00:17:06,919 Speaker 1: look at the supporting cast, he's not being flanked by 343 00:17:07,040 --> 00:17:10,240 Speaker 1: Janis Antenna Coupo and Drew Holiday. Sorry, like he's just 344 00:17:10,640 --> 00:17:13,680 Speaker 1: he's got Lebron James, who, yeah, when he tries hard 345 00:17:13,720 --> 00:17:15,960 Speaker 1: like he did on Wednesday, is an above average defender, 346 00:17:16,000 --> 00:17:18,720 Speaker 1: in fact, a good defender when he tries hard. But 347 00:17:18,760 --> 00:17:21,159 Speaker 1: then on Monday night he was an absolute disaster and 348 00:17:21,160 --> 00:17:23,560 Speaker 1: gave really poor effort and it arguably costs his team 349 00:17:23,680 --> 00:17:27,359 Speaker 1: the win. Right, So, like, the Lakers are playing with 350 00:17:27,680 --> 00:17:32,280 Speaker 1: an average defensive supporting cast at best, and Anthony Davis 351 00:17:32,359 --> 00:17:35,280 Speaker 1: is just about single handedly anchoring them as the seventh 352 00:17:35,359 --> 00:17:37,880 Speaker 1: best defense in the NBA and the second best half 353 00:17:37,880 --> 00:17:40,840 Speaker 1: court defense in the NBA. It's it's just him in 354 00:17:40,880 --> 00:17:43,520 Speaker 1: a bunch of veteran minimum contracts and a Lebron James 355 00:17:43,520 --> 00:17:46,000 Speaker 1: that only plays hard when he feels like it's on 356 00:17:46,080 --> 00:17:48,800 Speaker 1: the defensive end, A D makes it all work, and he, 357 00:17:48,960 --> 00:17:50,920 Speaker 1: to me, he's the clear cut defensive player of the year. 358 00:17:50,960 --> 00:17:53,440 Speaker 1: If you were if you were let's say a Brook 359 00:17:53,520 --> 00:17:56,520 Speaker 1: Lopez fan, and you were griping with this specific take, 360 00:17:57,000 --> 00:17:58,520 Speaker 1: the big thing that you would hone in on his 361 00:17:58,600 --> 00:18:01,000 Speaker 1: A D S transition defense. The Lakers have the worst 362 00:18:01,000 --> 00:18:04,080 Speaker 1: transition defense in the league, and Anthony Davis has been 363 00:18:04,320 --> 00:18:06,480 Speaker 1: one of the culprits for that, although he's been better 364 00:18:06,480 --> 00:18:09,560 Speaker 1: in the last couple of weeks. Number two, I've Brook Lopez. 365 00:18:10,760 --> 00:18:13,160 Speaker 1: So he is the rim protector in the Bucks drop 366 00:18:13,240 --> 00:18:15,679 Speaker 1: coverage scheme, and he is protecting the hell out of 367 00:18:15,680 --> 00:18:18,440 Speaker 1: the rim. He is averaging two point nine blocks per game, 368 00:18:18,480 --> 00:18:20,639 Speaker 1: which is second in the league. And the Bucks have 369 00:18:20,720 --> 00:18:22,760 Speaker 1: the best paint defense in the league. They're allowing just 370 00:18:22,840 --> 00:18:24,800 Speaker 1: forty four and a half points in the paint per 371 00:18:24,800 --> 00:18:27,840 Speaker 1: one possessions, which, like I said, is first place in 372 00:18:27,880 --> 00:18:30,399 Speaker 1: the league. He's doing an incredible job. I don't want 373 00:18:30,400 --> 00:18:33,040 Speaker 1: to undercut that, but guys, just let's be honest. Like 374 00:18:33,800 --> 00:18:38,159 Speaker 1: playing defense at the rim next to janis Antenna Kompo, 375 00:18:38,280 --> 00:18:40,199 Speaker 1: who is the best defensive player in the world in 376 00:18:40,240 --> 00:18:43,600 Speaker 1: my opinion, he's just saving resources for his job over 377 00:18:43,640 --> 00:18:46,560 Speaker 1: the course of the season. Andrew Holiday, who is one 378 00:18:46,600 --> 00:18:49,000 Speaker 1: of the top six or seven defensive players in the 379 00:18:49,160 --> 00:18:52,520 Speaker 1: entire world. It's just a different level of work than 380 00:18:52,640 --> 00:18:55,800 Speaker 1: Lebron James cleaning up for Lonnie Walker, who has been 381 00:18:55,800 --> 00:18:59,080 Speaker 1: a career bad defensive player. Right, you know guys that 382 00:18:59,119 --> 00:19:01,560 Speaker 1: are old and us their prime, like Russell Westbrook and 383 00:19:01,640 --> 00:19:04,120 Speaker 1: Lebron James and a bunch of Editan minimum guys. It's 384 00:19:04,119 --> 00:19:06,640 Speaker 1: just a different level of challenge that Anthony Davis has, 385 00:19:07,040 --> 00:19:09,359 Speaker 1: and he has turned them into a good defense in 386 00:19:09,440 --> 00:19:11,720 Speaker 1: spite of all of that. Number three, I have Joel 387 00:19:11,760 --> 00:19:14,840 Speaker 1: embid He's also been one of the best defensive anchors 388 00:19:14,880 --> 00:19:16,920 Speaker 1: in the league this year. He just hasn't played often enough. 389 00:19:16,920 --> 00:19:19,280 Speaker 1: I think he's only played in fourteen games this year 390 00:19:19,320 --> 00:19:22,080 Speaker 1: because of injuries. Among players who are playing at least 391 00:19:22,119 --> 00:19:24,880 Speaker 1: thirty four minutes per game, no player in the entire 392 00:19:24,960 --> 00:19:28,160 Speaker 1: NBA has posted a better defensive rating than Joel Embiid 393 00:19:28,560 --> 00:19:31,160 Speaker 1: at one oh three point seven, which is two points 394 00:19:31,200 --> 00:19:33,280 Speaker 1: better than the second place. If he could play sixty 395 00:19:33,280 --> 00:19:36,639 Speaker 1: five plus game um uh, sixty five plus games, he 396 00:19:36,680 --> 00:19:40,199 Speaker 1: does have an outside chance of getting this award. All Right, 397 00:19:40,240 --> 00:19:44,200 Speaker 1: Rookie of the Year Number one, I have Pala bunkro 398 00:19:45,119 --> 00:19:48,119 Speaker 1: He's already an incredibly gifted NBA score He's averaging twenty 399 00:19:48,119 --> 00:19:51,120 Speaker 1: three points on fifty five cent try shooting. He's also 400 00:19:51,160 --> 00:19:53,919 Speaker 1: scoring zero point nine eight points per isolation, which is 401 00:19:53,920 --> 00:19:57,080 Speaker 1: slightly above average, which is really impressive for essentially a teenager. 402 00:19:57,880 --> 00:20:01,160 Speaker 1: UM He's scoring one point to one points proposed up though, 403 00:20:01,160 --> 00:20:04,679 Speaker 1: which is in the ninety one percentile counting passes. So 404 00:20:04,960 --> 00:20:07,320 Speaker 1: he's when we talked to I did a breakdown a 405 00:20:07,320 --> 00:20:10,479 Speaker 1: Palabant Carol like two weeks ago. But it's like his 406 00:20:10,520 --> 00:20:13,200 Speaker 1: ability to use hesitation dribbles to get defenders at a 407 00:20:13,240 --> 00:20:15,120 Speaker 1: position because he has a decent pull up jump shot, 408 00:20:15,119 --> 00:20:17,879 Speaker 1: although that's his biggest area of opportunity right now. But 409 00:20:17,960 --> 00:20:20,600 Speaker 1: then he's so big and strong. It's insane for a 410 00:20:20,640 --> 00:20:24,600 Speaker 1: guy his age, a rookie to have a combination of strength, 411 00:20:24,960 --> 00:20:28,040 Speaker 1: size and skill that is already causing problems for the 412 00:20:28,080 --> 00:20:30,639 Speaker 1: vast majority of NBA defenders. Is super impressive and like 413 00:20:31,000 --> 00:20:33,719 Speaker 1: he waits to have little gaps appear, and then he 414 00:20:33,760 --> 00:20:36,159 Speaker 1: plays a super physical brand of basketball. He'll hit that 415 00:20:36,200 --> 00:20:38,679 Speaker 1: gap with his right shoulder and just punched through with 416 00:20:38,760 --> 00:20:40,760 Speaker 1: strength and go all the way to the rim. He's 417 00:20:40,760 --> 00:20:43,240 Speaker 1: really gifted in the post, going over both shoulders, and 418 00:20:43,280 --> 00:20:46,480 Speaker 1: he passes surprisingly well for a young player as well. 419 00:20:47,080 --> 00:20:49,280 Speaker 1: Um number two and number number two I have Jade 420 00:20:49,280 --> 00:20:52,720 Speaker 1: and Nivy and number three, I've Ben mathurin their numbers. 421 00:20:52,720 --> 00:20:55,680 Speaker 1: Aren't that far apart. Ben's actually been a little bit 422 00:20:55,720 --> 00:20:57,920 Speaker 1: better statistically but I just think Jade and Ivy is 423 00:20:57,920 --> 00:21:01,240 Speaker 1: a better player. His role is a different The Detroit 424 00:21:01,280 --> 00:21:03,960 Speaker 1: Pistons are actually having him create a lot more, whereas 425 00:21:04,200 --> 00:21:06,280 Speaker 1: Ben Mathurins and more of a play finishing type of 426 00:21:06,400 --> 00:21:09,479 Speaker 1: role um with Indiana. And if you actually look at 427 00:21:09,480 --> 00:21:12,040 Speaker 1: their self creation numbers, I vs are way better. So 428 00:21:12,119 --> 00:21:14,480 Speaker 1: and pick and roll including passes, Jade and Ivy's given 429 00:21:14,520 --> 00:21:17,440 Speaker 1: U zero point nine points per possession. Ben Mathurins given 430 00:21:17,520 --> 00:21:20,160 Speaker 1: USE zero point six six. That's a pretty significant gap. 431 00:21:20,520 --> 00:21:23,760 Speaker 1: That's like average for Ivy, too bad for Ben Mathin 432 00:21:24,240 --> 00:21:26,000 Speaker 1: and I so Jad and Ivy is giving U zero 433 00:21:26,080 --> 00:21:29,040 Speaker 1: point eight nine. Mathen's given you zero point eight. So 434 00:21:29,240 --> 00:21:30,840 Speaker 1: you know, shout outs have been Matthren. We talked about 435 00:21:30,920 --> 00:21:32,880 Speaker 1: him a lot on Monday or Wednesday when we talked 436 00:21:32,880 --> 00:21:34,879 Speaker 1: about the Pacers. He's been a lot better than I 437 00:21:34,880 --> 00:21:37,040 Speaker 1: expected him to be, especially as a jump shooter. But 438 00:21:37,080 --> 00:21:38,920 Speaker 1: I just think Ivy is a better player for now, 439 00:21:38,960 --> 00:21:41,640 Speaker 1: and I think Ivy has more like high end superstar 440 00:21:41,680 --> 00:21:44,760 Speaker 1: potential as well. All right, last, but not least before 441 00:21:44,760 --> 00:21:48,840 Speaker 1: we get out of here tonight, most improved player. So 442 00:21:49,000 --> 00:21:51,320 Speaker 1: I have Lori markin in at number one. I know 443 00:21:51,359 --> 00:21:52,800 Speaker 1: there's been a lot of hype around Bull Bull, and 444 00:21:52,800 --> 00:21:54,159 Speaker 1: we're gonna talk about him in a second, but I 445 00:21:54,200 --> 00:21:57,200 Speaker 1: think Lori markin In deserves the award through one fourth 446 00:21:57,240 --> 00:22:00,280 Speaker 1: of the season. Obviously, he's averaging a career high two 447 00:22:00,320 --> 00:22:02,800 Speaker 1: points and nine rebounds, is shooting a career high sixty 448 00:22:03,440 --> 00:22:06,879 Speaker 1: true shooting percentage. He's taking a d jump shots this 449 00:22:06,960 --> 00:22:10,080 Speaker 1: year for two D eight points, which is five percentile. 450 00:22:10,280 --> 00:22:13,159 Speaker 1: He's also shooting off the dribble, which is kind of 451 00:22:13,160 --> 00:22:16,000 Speaker 1: a new part of his game. He's scoring efficiently out 452 00:22:16,040 --> 00:22:17,920 Speaker 1: of the post and out of ice so and he's 453 00:22:17,920 --> 00:22:20,479 Speaker 1: been really solid in crunch time as well. He's been 454 00:22:20,640 --> 00:22:23,320 Speaker 1: one of the highest scorers this season. I think he's 455 00:22:23,359 --> 00:22:26,040 Speaker 1: like thirteen in the entire NBA when the game is 456 00:22:26,080 --> 00:22:29,359 Speaker 1: within five points with less than five minutes left. He 457 00:22:29,400 --> 00:22:34,760 Speaker 1: went from inconsistent role player to legitimate foundational piece for 458 00:22:34,800 --> 00:22:37,199 Speaker 1: a franchise in one summer, which to me is what 459 00:22:37,280 --> 00:22:39,639 Speaker 1: deserves the award now. Kind of similar to the MVP thing. 460 00:22:39,640 --> 00:22:42,720 Speaker 1: There's a bunch of different interpretations of this rule, because 461 00:22:42,760 --> 00:22:45,560 Speaker 1: like bow Bowl, the actual gap between what bo Bo 462 00:22:45,800 --> 00:22:49,199 Speaker 1: was and now is bigger. But I prefer to reward 463 00:22:49,240 --> 00:22:53,399 Speaker 1: players who go from role player to star, then players 464 00:22:53,400 --> 00:22:55,119 Speaker 1: who go from end of the bench to role player. 465 00:22:55,160 --> 00:22:58,720 Speaker 1: I just think that's what the awards specifically should be targeting. Um. 466 00:22:58,760 --> 00:23:01,800 Speaker 1: I did have bow Bull at secon it uh. He 467 00:23:01,920 --> 00:23:04,760 Speaker 1: averaged a two point seven points per game for his 468 00:23:04,920 --> 00:23:07,879 Speaker 1: career in three seasons in Denver, and now he's averaging 469 00:23:07,920 --> 00:23:10,639 Speaker 1: thirteen point one points per game with the Orlando Magic 470 00:23:10,680 --> 00:23:13,760 Speaker 1: on sixty seven percent true shooting and with some good 471 00:23:13,800 --> 00:23:16,400 Speaker 1: jump shooting in there as well. Um And more importantly, 472 00:23:16,440 --> 00:23:19,040 Speaker 1: he's actually been pretty productive for the Magic on the scoreboard. 473 00:23:19,040 --> 00:23:22,480 Speaker 1: His net rating, meaning the point differential per one hunter possessions, 474 00:23:22,560 --> 00:23:26,320 Speaker 1: is fourth on the team among rotation players. He's got 475 00:23:26,359 --> 00:23:28,480 Speaker 1: a really good handle for his size. That's the big 476 00:23:28,480 --> 00:23:30,040 Speaker 1: thing that stands out to me when I was watching 477 00:23:30,080 --> 00:23:32,800 Speaker 1: film this morning. He also plays relatively well in the 478 00:23:32,800 --> 00:23:35,520 Speaker 1: physicality for being a really thin player. Kind of reminds 479 00:23:35,520 --> 00:23:37,280 Speaker 1: me of Katie a little bit, where like, even though 480 00:23:37,320 --> 00:23:40,680 Speaker 1: he is thin, by being the physical aggressor, he gets 481 00:23:40,760 --> 00:23:45,040 Speaker 1: himself UM through those physical scenarios pretty well. I I 482 00:23:45,119 --> 00:23:47,760 Speaker 1: just think, you know, and this is where, because as 483 00:23:47,880 --> 00:23:49,639 Speaker 1: is always the case, when stuff like this happens, we 484 00:23:49,680 --> 00:23:52,320 Speaker 1: all go off the rails and you know, I saw 485 00:23:52,359 --> 00:23:55,639 Speaker 1: Stephon Marbury, and Stephon Marbury's famously says all sorts of 486 00:23:55,640 --> 00:23:58,720 Speaker 1: crazy stuff. Um, but Steven Marbury is like, oh, he's 487 00:23:58,720 --> 00:24:01,359 Speaker 1: gonna be a top tier star and next two years. Okay, 488 00:24:01,440 --> 00:24:04,040 Speaker 1: let's slow down a little bit. You know everyone was 489 00:24:04,080 --> 00:24:07,880 Speaker 1: talking about you know why is why is uh Victor 490 00:24:07,880 --> 00:24:11,600 Speaker 1: Wemban Yama getting all this attention when bull Bowl is 491 00:24:11,640 --> 00:24:14,280 Speaker 1: doing all the same things. No, he's not. Okay, Like, 492 00:24:14,359 --> 00:24:18,280 Speaker 1: let's let's calm down. I really enjoyed watching that film 493 00:24:18,280 --> 00:24:21,879 Speaker 1: on bull Bowl this morning. He has absolutely taken a 494 00:24:21,920 --> 00:24:24,800 Speaker 1: significant leap. It's good to see him getting a legit 495 00:24:25,280 --> 00:24:28,200 Speaker 1: green light in an opportunity to actually show what he 496 00:24:28,240 --> 00:24:31,320 Speaker 1: can do without fear of making mistakes. I'm on board 497 00:24:31,320 --> 00:24:34,040 Speaker 1: just like everyone else's, but let's slow down a little bit. 498 00:24:34,160 --> 00:24:39,160 Speaker 1: I do not think that he has enough fluidity, especially 499 00:24:39,160 --> 00:24:42,560 Speaker 1: going from handle to jumper, to be a top tier 500 00:24:42,600 --> 00:24:45,199 Speaker 1: superstar or even really anything close to that. And you 501 00:24:45,240 --> 00:24:47,600 Speaker 1: know the other thing too, is like Victor woman Yama, 502 00:24:47,600 --> 00:24:49,240 Speaker 1: you can see the difference. Like just go look at 503 00:24:49,280 --> 00:24:52,160 Speaker 1: like five or six pull up jump shots from bow Bowl, 504 00:24:52,640 --> 00:24:54,280 Speaker 1: and then go look at five or six pull up 505 00:24:54,359 --> 00:24:57,640 Speaker 1: jump shots from Victor wemban Yama. Bow Bowl looks like 506 00:24:57,800 --> 00:25:00,280 Speaker 1: a big man who's shooting a pull up jumps shot. 507 00:25:00,600 --> 00:25:03,640 Speaker 1: Victor wembon Yama looks like a two guard. He's got 508 00:25:03,640 --> 00:25:07,200 Speaker 1: an incredibly fluid and quick and confident release, which is 509 00:25:07,240 --> 00:25:09,480 Speaker 1: the like for instance, Bobo has only taken two threes 510 00:25:09,520 --> 00:25:12,199 Speaker 1: per game this year, Victor women Yama is going to 511 00:25:12,200 --> 00:25:15,320 Speaker 1: attempt seven threes per game as a rookie. In all likelihood, 512 00:25:15,359 --> 00:25:18,000 Speaker 1: he's going to be a high volume three point shooter 513 00:25:18,080 --> 00:25:21,199 Speaker 1: because of the fluidity and quickness of his release. And 514 00:25:21,240 --> 00:25:23,280 Speaker 1: then again, like, you want to know why there's more 515 00:25:23,320 --> 00:25:26,600 Speaker 1: hype around Victor women Yama. He's an eighteen year old 516 00:25:26,960 --> 00:25:29,119 Speaker 1: dude who's not in the league yet and bow Bo 517 00:25:29,240 --> 00:25:30,960 Speaker 1: is a twenty three year old who's in his fourth 518 00:25:31,040 --> 00:25:34,399 Speaker 1: NBA season. Like, it's totally different prospects in terms of 519 00:25:34,400 --> 00:25:37,200 Speaker 1: future development for both of those two guys. So let's 520 00:25:37,280 --> 00:25:40,360 Speaker 1: just enjoy Bobo's game like normal people and not make 521 00:25:40,359 --> 00:25:43,640 Speaker 1: outrageous comparisons. Um. And then the last guy I wanted 522 00:25:43,640 --> 00:25:45,600 Speaker 1: to shout out on the most improved player I put 523 00:25:45,600 --> 00:25:48,639 Speaker 1: third on my list was Anthony Simons. He's up from 524 00:25:48,720 --> 00:25:50,600 Speaker 1: last so last year he had average a career high 525 00:25:50,640 --> 00:25:52,960 Speaker 1: seventeen points per game. This year, he's bumped that up 526 00:25:53,000 --> 00:25:55,720 Speaker 1: to twenty four points per game. And most importantly, he's 527 00:25:55,760 --> 00:25:58,359 Speaker 1: actually generating a lot of quality shots. He's turned himself 528 00:25:58,359 --> 00:26:01,800 Speaker 1: into a legit NBA shot creator. The Blazers have scored 529 00:26:01,800 --> 00:26:04,960 Speaker 1: three D fourteen points on three hundred and six of 530 00:26:05,040 --> 00:26:07,679 Speaker 1: his pick and rolls, which is in the sixty nine percentile. 531 00:26:08,080 --> 00:26:10,960 Speaker 1: He's also run ninety ISOs for ninety six points, which 532 00:26:10,960 --> 00:26:13,560 Speaker 1: is in the seventy percentile. You could actually make the 533 00:26:13,600 --> 00:26:17,080 Speaker 1: case that Anthony Simmons is like legitimately better than c. J. 534 00:26:17,200 --> 00:26:19,480 Speaker 1: McCollum at this point. So yeah, only a quarter of 535 00:26:19,480 --> 00:26:21,640 Speaker 1: the way through the season, a lot can change. We'll 536 00:26:21,680 --> 00:26:23,560 Speaker 1: probably touch based on this again here in about a 537 00:26:23,560 --> 00:26:25,960 Speaker 1: month and a half. But that's all I have for today. 538 00:26:26,040 --> 00:27:29,680 Speaker 1: Is always I sincerely appreciate your guys. The volume