WEBVTT - Making Media Personal: Mix Tapes

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production of I Heart Radios,

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:14.120 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I am your host, Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:19.319
<v Speaker 1>with How Stuff Works and I heart Radio and I

0:00:19.400 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 1>love all things tech. And it has been about two

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>weeks since I've been in the studio, even though this

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:30.680
<v Speaker 1>episode is going to go right behind one that I

0:00:30.760 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>recorded two weeks ago. So in our last episode, which

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:37.880
<v Speaker 1>was ages ago for me, I teased a bit about

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the emergence of the audio cassette tape, and I think

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you could argue that the cassette split the path of

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>audio consumption into two sort of broad philosophies. On one side,

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you have the audiophile dream of a format and a

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>system capable of producing sound from a recording that would

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 1>be indistinguishable from the original performance. So would be as

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>if you, the listener, were actually in the recording studio

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 1>when the tracks were first laid down, or at the

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>very least, that you would be hearing the sound that

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the producers intended for you to hear, because if they

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:17.520
<v Speaker 1>put a lot of effects on it or anything like

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that in post production, then obviously you're not going to

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 1>hear exactly the thing that was performed when it was

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:26.720
<v Speaker 1>being recorded. But you get my point. The other philosophy

0:01:26.840 --> 0:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>would sacrifice some quality in return for added convenience. So

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 1>these this isn't just one format, but sort of a

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>group of formats that are not the highest in audio

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>quality compared to things like vinyl albums, for example. These

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>formats can't provide the fidelity of the ones that are

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>beloved by audio files, but they do allow for more

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>versatile listening experiences, such as portable devices capable of playing

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>back audio. These two philosophies would continue on from the

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixties through to today, and they have an impact

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>on the actual practices of audio recording. But we'll get

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>into all of that in this and future episodes. So first,

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about magnetic tape. I mentioned it a bit

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in the previous episode, like when I talked about recording

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>multiple tracks to the same tape, making it possible for

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>a single musician to accompany him or herself on different

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>instruments or even the same instrument, playing different parts of

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a song. With enough tracks and a versatile enough musician,

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 1>you could have one person play virtually all the instruments

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and provide lead and backing vocals on a single piece

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>of music. So, for example, this isn't a song, but

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a piece of music. In the piece tubular Bells, which

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:53.240
<v Speaker 1>was made famous in The Exorcist, Mike Oldfield played acoustic guitar,

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:59.920
<v Speaker 1>bass guitar, electric guitar, three different kinds of organs, fuzz guitars, glockenspiel, mandolin,

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:04.519
<v Speaker 1>and piano, and timpani. Oh, and also the tubular bells,

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>plus some other stuff. And obviously he wasn't playing all

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of that simultaneously during the recording session, he was able

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to lay that down track by track into a full piece.

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:18.680
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk a bit about the tech of magnetic

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 1>tape and how all of this is possible. So this

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>is gonna mean backtracking again through our history, but I

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>feel like this is easier to understand if we tackle

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>each topic individually, as opposed to going year by year

0:03:32.440 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>and kind of leap frogging back and forth between different

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>technologies evolving at different rates. Um, that was just the

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>call I made when I was building out these episodes. So, uh,

0:03:43.000 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you've gotta remember that the progress of magnetic tape is

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>also connected in many ways to other technologies. Including stuff

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>like the evolution of the microphone and the development of

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>amplification tubes and later amplification transistors. But we're gonna start

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>with a Danish engineer named valdam Our Poulson. Though some

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.800
<v Speaker 1>other smarty pants had already been theorizing that magnetic recording

0:04:05.840 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>could be a possibility, but it was Poulson's work that

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>would produce the first actual working devices. Everything else was

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:17.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of theoretical. Sometime around nine, Poulson developed a machine

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that could record sound onto a length of steel wire

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>through means a magnetism. He called it the telegraphone. I'm

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>guessing it's telegraphone perhaps, But how the heck does the

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>darn thing work? Let alone? How is it pronounced? Well,

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.200
<v Speaker 1>imagine you've got a ferro magnetic material. So this is like,

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, something like iron. This is a material that

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>if you expose it to a magnetic field, it will

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 1>remain magnetized by that field. You take the field away,

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the material still remains magnetized, so it doesn't just have

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.800
<v Speaker 1>magnetic effect in the presence of a magnetic field. The

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>magnetic field itself will magnetize the material, at least until

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>some other magnetic force acts upon it. Now before you

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>record anything onto a fresh strip of magnetic tape or

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>in the case of Poulson's device, steel wire, the material

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't magnetized. It's in its raw state, so it's just

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>waiting as a blank medium. You take a microphone and

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>you play sound into the microphone. Maybe you're singing into it,

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe you're playing an acoustic guitar. But the vibrations from

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the sound cause a small diaphragm inside the microphone to vibrate,

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and the diaphragm transfers those vibrations to other elements in

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:34.039
<v Speaker 1>the microphone. Those elements depend upon the type of microphones,

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>so not all microphones are exactly the same. They all

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>work on a similar principle, but the details are different. However,

0:05:40.560 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>for simplicity sake, let's talk about dynamic microphones for the

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>purposes of this discussion. The diaphragm would cause a coil

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of conductive wire to move around a magnetic core. So

0:05:53.480 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>imagine you've got a coil and the coil is uh

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is wrapped around a magnetic core loose wrapped around and

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the coil can move back and forth laterally along this core.

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>If you remember how electro magnetism works. You'll remember that

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>if you happen to move a conductor in and out

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>of a magnetic field, or you subject the conductive material

0:06:17.600 --> 0:06:21.279
<v Speaker 1>to a fluctuating magnetic field, it induces current to flow

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>through that conductor. The electric current is pretty weak coming

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>out of a microphone, but it represents the fluctuations of

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the diaphragm, which in turn are representations of the sound

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 1>vibrations that hit that diaphragm. So think of it this way.

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Sound hits the diaphragm, diaphragm vibrates, the vibrates cause vibrations,

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>cause this coil to move back and forth across this

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 1>magnetic core. That induces current to flow through the wire,

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and then you've got an electric current. You can use

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that current to drive a different electro magnet. Typically you

0:06:56.040 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 1>would wrap the wire around a ferromagnetic or iron lie core,

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and as the current flows through the wire coiled around

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>this core, the electro magnet generates a magnetic field. So

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of recreating the magnetic field that was uh

0:07:12.120 --> 0:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>fluctuating when the coil was vibrating in the microphone side.

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's sort of the same thing I just described earlier,

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>but in reverse magnetic recording devices use such an electro

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>magnet too imprint a magnetic recording onto the medium. So

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>typically the core is actually a disc or a ring.

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>It's very small, and there is a wire coiled around

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>one side of the ring. Think of like a washer,

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>like a washer that you would get from a hardware store,

0:07:45.200 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a little round disc. And imagine that you've wrapped this

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>particular little round disk happens to be magnet or at

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>least it's feral magnetic, and you've wrapped a wire, a

0:07:56.040 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>conductive wire, around one side of that disk, and then

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>you cut a gap at the bottom of that disk.

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>That that gap is what is going to be very

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>close to the recording medium. The gap actually causes the

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>magnetic field that will be generated when electric current flows

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>through the wire to fringe outward, and it's this that

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>magnetizes the recording medium passing below. So you've generated this

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>magnetic fluctuation by feeding an electrical signal that you had

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>generated with the microphone. And remember that electric signal represents

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the original sound. You need the recording medium to pass

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>by that electromagnet at a regular speed to get a clear,

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 1>undistorted recording. So it's very important that the speed at

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:48.599
<v Speaker 1>which the medium passes under this recording head is is

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>nice and regular. As the medium passes by this electromagnet,

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the material in the medium is magnetized according to those

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.920
<v Speaker 1>fluctuations from the magnetic field. When you're on you've got

0:09:00.920 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a length of that medium, whether it's tape or it's

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>steel wire that has imprinted on it, those magnetized particles,

0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and they will stay in those magnetic orientations unless you

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:15.200
<v Speaker 1>expose them to a more powerful magnetic field, in which

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>case they will re orient. This, by the way, is

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>why if you've ever worked with any sort of magnetic storage,

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:22.720
<v Speaker 1>people would tell you make sure you don't have any

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 1>powerful magnets nearby it. That's why, because the powerful magnets

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>could re orient the magnetic particles in that material and

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.839
<v Speaker 1>thus erase whatever was recorded on them. That's why if

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>you are destroying magnetic storage, you typically expose it to

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a very powerful magnet first. To play back recorded sound.

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>You would then take this medium where you've got these

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>magnetized particles, and you would run them under a tape head. Uh.

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>It's essentially it's exactly the same thing. In fact, it

0:09:56.440 --> 0:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>could be the same head as the recording tape head.

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>And in this case, you don't actually have a current

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 1>running through that wire. It's the ferromagnetic core and it's

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the coil wrapped around up. But the coil at the

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>moment is inert, there's no electricity running through it. When

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you run the magnetic material past this, then you create

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>those magnetic fluctuations which induce electricity to flow through the

0:10:23.960 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>wire wrapped around the ferro magnetic core, and you reproduce

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the electric current that was used to create the magnetic

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>fluctuations that were imprinted on the material in the first place.

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 1>So you're just you're reversing the whole process. And again

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it's because of that electromagnetic phenomena where you have the

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>magnetized material running past a conductor that's wrapped around ferro

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.960
<v Speaker 1>magnetic core. You technically don't even need the ferro magnetic

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>core to do this. It's just it makes it easier.

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>It kind of it almost acts like amplifier, so that's

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>really why it's there. And then that current that's generated

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.320
<v Speaker 1>can be then sent to amplifiers which will take in

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:12.079
<v Speaker 1>that signal and boost its strength so that that signal

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.120
<v Speaker 1>can then drive something like speakers and then you get

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the sound. So the steel wire approach worked, but it

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>produced recordings of pretty low sound quality. It was not

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>something you could use for music or for performance. Recorders

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>using magnetic wire did find their way into some products

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>with later innovators. They took that same idea that Pulson had,

0:11:35.960 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and mostly you would get dictation machines that were used

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>by hoity toity executive types who would dictate their words

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to be preserved on wire for later transcription. Then you

0:11:46.880 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>have a German businessman named Louis Blattner who wanted to

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.080
<v Speaker 1>take this technology and to develop it further. Well, not

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>not himself personally, he actually told the engineers in his

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>company to get to work on doing that. He wanted

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to try and have a product he could sell to

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:04.959
<v Speaker 1>the BBC. And they made the switch from steel wire

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>to steal tape, so it's flat piece of tape, but

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>it's made out of steel, and they produced a device

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that was called the Blattner Phone, which is probably the

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>most attractive name for a piece of technology I've ever heard.

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Lou would present this gadget to the BBC and they

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:26.640
<v Speaker 1>decided it's good enough for recording speech, but it was

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>not good enough to record sound of other stuff like

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>like music, and a high enough quality to be considered broadcastable.

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 1>The tape was, or at least the original machines the

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 1>first two use tape that was six millimeters wide, so

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>not very wide at all, and it ran through the

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>machine at a rate of five ft per second. That's

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>about a meter and a half per second, which is

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty darn fast. Think about this. You've got this thin

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>steel tape moving at that speed. You might be thinking, oh, my,

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Drew gees, that's pretty darn dangerous, and you would be right.

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>You would not want to get too close to this thing,

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>or you could get pretty badly cut. And it didn't

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>get much better. When Blattner's team created a version that

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 1>used tape. It was only three millimeters wide, but the

0:13:15.440 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 1>tape was actually better than steel wire. You've got better

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>quality recordings, but still not to the level that could

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>be used for broadcast, and certainly a far cry from

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>anything that could be used for consumers. Now. While the

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 1>Blatner phone was terrorizing the BBC, there was a German

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Austrian engineer named Dr Fritz Floimer, and he had been

0:13:34.960 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 1>experimenting with a paper tape coated with lacquer and an

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>iron oxide powder. So iron oxide is ferro magnetic and

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.679
<v Speaker 1>would serve as the actual recording medium, and iron eyed

0:13:48.720 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 1>oxide for a very very long time would become the

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>go to material. There were different iron oxides that different

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>inventors would use over the years to get better and

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>better results, but iron oxide became kind of ve go

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to powder that you would use to create this kind

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of magnetic tape. So the A E. G Company in

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Berlin negotiated with floim Er Uh to develop a device

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.160
<v Speaker 1>based off of his work back in ninety two, and

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>they also collaborated with a different company called B A

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:26.080
<v Speaker 1>SF to create a magnetic recording materials and equipment. This

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 1>collaboration led to a tape made from cellulose acetate rather

0:14:30.320 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>than papers, still coated with lacquer and iron oxide, and

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>using another cellulos acetate type of material to act as

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a binder agent. The two companies presented their collaboration, which

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>they called the Magneto Phone, which is not something you

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 1>used to call the head of evil mutants, and they

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>showed it off at the nineteen thirty five Radio Fair

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>in Berlin. Now floim er had a bit of a

0:14:56.440 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>sad outcome to this whole thing. Everything was done on

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the up and up, but his patents were later overturned

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>by the German National Court. They court determined that the

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>ideas he had patented had already been presented way back

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in the late eighteen hundreds by none other than Valdemar Poulson,

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the guy who came up with that steel wire contraption

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that he had already described a tape based system. It's

0:15:23.200 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>just that he wasn't able to make that one work

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>during his lifetime. But because there was prior art, the

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>patents that Floeimer had had registered were overturned. German engineers

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>continued to improve the technology, and by the early nineteen

0:15:40.120 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>forties it was at the point where it was a

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>legitimate alternative to the other recording methods of the time.

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Magnetic tape made a huge impact on that recording industry. So,

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for one thing, you could record way more information on

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.760
<v Speaker 1>a reel of tape than you could on a wax

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 1>cylinder or a shellack disc, which of the other media

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>at the time. For another, with tape, you could edit

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're recording to a wax disc or a shell

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>act disc, and you make a mistake, it's there and

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you pretty much have to scrap everything and start over,

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>or you have to live with the mistake. With tape,

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you could actually record and you could literally cut and

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>paste if you needed to the tape so that you

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:30.000
<v Speaker 1>could get rid of accidents. You could loop things if

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to. There are a lot of different tricks

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you could do. And as we listened to the last episode,

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you could do multi track recordings. You could put multiple

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>tracks side by side on the same length of tape.

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, imagine you've got a piece of tape and

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it's several feet long and it's maybe a couple of

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>inches wide. You could actually fit multiple tracks side by side,

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>and each track is a different recording, and they're all

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>synchronized by just being next to each other on this tape.

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>So that allowed for a lot of versatility in the

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 1>recording process and it really freed things up. Shifting the

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>recording head over slightly allows you to record a second

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>track or a third track. Um you could even record

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>tracks for specific speakers. That's what allowed for stereo sound.

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>And like I said in the last episode, Less Paul

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 1>played a really big part in getting multi track recording

0:17:24.320 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 1>off the ground running. Uh Ampex would actually build the

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 1>device based on less Paul's requests, and they built the

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>first eight track recording system. So soon you had the

0:17:35.960 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>entire recording industry relying on magnetic tape for recording, mixing,

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and mastering. At the time, they were mostly relying on

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.440
<v Speaker 1>three track systems, and then a little bit later four

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>track systems. The eight track actually didn't come into play

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>until a bit later, but people began to figure out

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>how to work with those, Like you could record four

0:17:54.119 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>tracks onto a tape, then you can take that tape

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of four tracks and transfer the recording to one track

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 1>of another four track recorder, and thus you could start

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>to build a piece that way. It was more time consuming,

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:11.959
<v Speaker 1>but it was also still more versatile than the you know,

0:18:12.000 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>just getting everybody in the same room at the same

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>time and hope that no one makes a mistake. So

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the real impact of magnetic tape I want to feature

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 1>on this episode hit consumers, and we're gonna talk about

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that in just a second, But first let's take a

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:37.120
<v Speaker 1>quick break from the nineteen thirties to the early nineteen sixties,

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the format of the tape recorder was huge. It was

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.119
<v Speaker 1>a big, big machine. You are working with real to

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 1>real tapes. That meant that you would have one reel

0:18:47.200 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that would have all of your audio stored on magnetic tape.

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>It's wrapped around this reel, and then you have a

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:55.120
<v Speaker 1>second empty reel, and you would put both of those

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 1>reels on spokes on your tape recorder. Then you would

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>take the magnetic tape from the main reel. You would

0:19:02.840 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>carefully feed the magnetic tape through the machine so that

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the tape is going to pass under the tape head

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>or over the tape head, depending upon the design of

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the machine, but that the tape head would it would

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>pass across it. Then you would feed it continuing through

0:19:19.240 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>the machine until you could wrap it and tuck it

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>into the secondary reel. You turn on the machine, and

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.119
<v Speaker 1>then the secondary reel starts to turn and starts to

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>pull the tape through the recorder. And that meant that

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the magnetic tape would pass over or under the tape head,

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and that would create that electrical signal in the tape

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>head that could be amplified to drive a speaker and

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you could play it back. It was big, it was bulky.

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>It required deft hands to thread the tape, and it

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>meant it was not typically very user friendly for most people,

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and it was pretty expensive. There were consumer models of

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>reel to reel tape players. You could out and buy

0:20:00.640 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>one yourself, but very few people actually owned one, just

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>because it was kind of a hassle to use them

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and they were very expensive. Also, the reels took up

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of space, and depending upon which model you got,

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you might be stuck with specific types of reels that

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you could use, and you couldn't use other ones because

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>they weren't compatible. Our c A, the Radio Corporation of

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>America that has factored so heavily in these histories, developed

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a reversible cassette tape as early as the late nineteen fifties,

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't look like the cassette tapes that were

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>all the rage in the nineteen eighties. The r C

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.159
<v Speaker 1>A cassette tape was much larger. It was about the

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>size of a video cassette. And now I'm realizing that

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm comparing one obsolete technology against a different obsolete technology,

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and some of you may have no idea what I'm

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about. But the cassettes were about the size of

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>your average paperback book. They were big and the form

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>factor didn't really catch on, so our ci A would

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>scrap it. After a short while, the company Phillips created

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>the format that would become the cassette tape that those

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>of us who grew up in the eighties no and love.

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>It was called a compact cassette in the early days,

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and Phillips developed these much smaller cassettes filled with magnetic

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>storage back in nineteen sixty two. They unveiled the technology

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>at the nineteen sixty three Berlin radio show, the same

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>radio show where we got to see the earlier forms

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of magnetic tape playback. So these cassettes were about the

0:21:33.359 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 1>size of a credit card, much much smaller than our

0:21:36.000 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Cier's version. At the time, there were other magnetic storage

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>formats that were vying for the top spot in the market,

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:49.560
<v Speaker 1>and the early versions of the Phillips cassette weren't able

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to produce very high quality recordings, and so they were

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>marketed more as something to record speech to rather than music.

0:21:56.160 --> 0:21:59.240
<v Speaker 1>You would buy a tape recorder and you would buy

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.959
<v Speaker 1>the cassettes and you would use it to dictate, very

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>much like the steel wire devices from decades earlier. So

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 1>how the heck did the cassette become the standard with

0:22:09.359 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>these kind of drawbacks, Well, it was largely because Phillips

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>made a very shrewd move. The company licensed the technology

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 1>to other companies for free. So if you had the

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>means to manufacture cassettes, you could get a free license

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 1>from Phillips and then you could do it. Phillips wasn't

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 1>going to take any sort of licensing fee or royalties.

0:22:30.280 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>That way, they could make money selling machines capable of

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>recording and playing back the stuff on tapes. And it

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>was a savvy move that paid off, and the cassette,

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>despite its early limitations, received widespread adoption. Engineers would continue

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to work on the technology and it didn't take terribly

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>long for the recording quality to improve to the point

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>where it was at least feasible to use cassettes to

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:56.440
<v Speaker 1>record music. By nineteen sixty five, European companies were doing that,

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and the following year in sixty six, saw the United

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>States doing the same, and right away companies were selling

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.200
<v Speaker 1>machines that could not only play a cassette, but also

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:08.560
<v Speaker 1>record to blank cassettes. And this would be another thing

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that would make an enormous impact on the recording industry.

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:17.159
<v Speaker 1>For two decades, Vinyl would still hold out over prerecorded cassettes.

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>It's not like prerecorded cassettes immediately displaced vinyl records, but

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 1>in the nighties, prerecorded music cassettes overtook vinyl sales and

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>things changed dramatically. The compact cassettes quality was pretty much

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>always held up as inferior to a good vinyl album.

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 1>Cheap cassettes had a lot of tape hiss, and tape

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>hiss is produced by the magnetic particles that are on

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the tape. The larger the particles are, the more hiss

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you will hear during a recording. It's kind of the

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:51.520
<v Speaker 1>base level or the the room noise of a tape.

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>And you can reduce tape hiss a couple of different ways.

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>One is by recording sound at a higher tape speed,

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>which effectively uses more tape to cord the same amount

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>of sounds. So instead of saying, let's say that one

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>version would have a second equals you know, let's say

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>eight inches of tape, which is pretty fast, and another

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>one a second equal sixteen inches of tape, Well, you're

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>using twice as much tape to record the same amount

0:24:21.359 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>of sound, and you also reduce hiss that way. You

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 1>can also reduce hiss by reducing the size of the

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>magnetic particles themselves. If you get finer grains of iron

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:37.120
<v Speaker 1>oxide than it brings down hiss, and then other technologies

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:40.640
<v Speaker 1>later on would reduce hiss further. But early in the time,

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:43.919
<v Speaker 1>the early days of cassette tapes, hiss was one of

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 1>those issues, and cheaper tapes would still kind of create

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>a hissing sound even late in the cassette tape era.

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>That sound quality issue allowed another type of tape cassette

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to emerge as a contender for a relatively short while.

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>So you had the compact cassette that was pretty versatile

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:09.440
<v Speaker 1>but not giving you the best sound quality. This rival

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>had much better sound quality but less versatility, and that

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>was the famed eight track tape. The eight track was

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:19.040
<v Speaker 1>able to take a spot the cassette wasn't quite ready

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:24.439
<v Speaker 1>for in nineteen as a format for prerecorded content, specifically music,

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>and it was the product of an odd collaboration. The

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.439
<v Speaker 1>partners of that collaboration included Ampex. That was the company

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 1>that made the eight track recorder for Les Paul, and

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:37.600
<v Speaker 1>it also included r C A Records as a prime contributor.

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 1>And then there was the Lear Jet Company, which, yeah,

0:25:42.359 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of weird, right, company known for making jets,

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>played a major role in developing a magnetic tape technology

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>for music, and William Lear, the head of the company,

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 1>used his connections to convince executives at Ford Motors to

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:58.119
<v Speaker 1>come on board and make an eight track player and

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 1>option on every single nineteen sixties six Ford model, and

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 1>that was a huge boost for the eight track, and

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>it was considered a great solution. You could take your

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>music with you and you could listen to it in

0:26:12.600 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>the car. So there's something else that I gotta talk about,

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>just briefly before I get into more about the eight tracks,

0:26:19.200 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>which was that in the nineteen fifties and the nineteen sixties,

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:24.959
<v Speaker 1>leading up to the introduction of the eight track, a

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:29.199
<v Speaker 1>few companies had experimented with vinyl turntable systems for cars,

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>which sounds crazy for understandable reasons. It was not an

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>easy thing to do. You have to rely on a

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>format that has a physical needle or stylus moving through

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>a tiny groove on a spinning disk. Meanwhile, you're driving

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a vehicle on different surfaces, it's probably not the most

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>reliable way of hearing high fidelity tunes. So while some

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>companies tried that, including CBS, which introduced a record format

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>just for cars that spun at sixteen and two thirds

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>rp ms than a specific player that spun at that speed,

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>which meant that you had to have discs recorded at

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that speed to be able to use it. They these

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 1>systems never got much momentum, and that's a pun. So

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:16.680
<v Speaker 1>eight track tapes are portable. You could have a few

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 1>in your car. You can plug them into your system

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to tunes, and that came in handy if your

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>radio wasn't picking up any strong signals, or if the

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>stuff playing in your area didn't meet your personal musical tastes.

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And this was a time when FM stereo wasn't really

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.520
<v Speaker 1>widely available in the nineteen sixties. You know, you couldn't

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:36.480
<v Speaker 1>get it everywhere, So there was a niche to be

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 1>filled for for higher quality sound in cars, and the

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 1>eight track one out over another format, the four track.

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>There was a four track tape as well, but the

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 1>quality of an eight track was far superior to cassettes

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 1>of the same era, and it would take more advances

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>in cassette technology for the cassette format to surpass that

0:27:56.000 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>of the eight track, and music labels jumped on board.

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>They gave a lot of port for eight track tapes

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in the early days, and it had a pretty strong

0:28:03.160 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>run for about a decade. But by the mid nineteen seventies,

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:11.920
<v Speaker 1>improvements in cassette technology, including reducing tape hiss and Dolby

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>invented a noise reduction approach, along with the introduction of

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:19.359
<v Speaker 1>high bias tape coding UH that really made cassettes viable

0:28:19.440 --> 0:28:23.120
<v Speaker 1>against eight tracks. Plus, cassette tapes were easy to record on.

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>If you wanted, you could buy blank tapes, put them

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>in a tape recorder and take music from some other

0:28:28.560 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>source like the radio, which is what I used to

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:34.199
<v Speaker 1>do as a kid. And man, did I hate it

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.920
<v Speaker 1>when DJs would start talking at the end or beginning

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of songs and ruining my song. Man, shut up, does

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>let it play? The eight track faded from the consumer

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>space over the course of another decade, so cassettes took

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>over after about ten years, but the eight track held on.

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>It didn't just disappear immediately. By the mid nineteen seventies,

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>the major companies had stopped making eight track players, but

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the format itself hung on a little bit longer than that.

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Companies were still produced seeing eight track albums for several

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>years after that. Um though, it was actually a challenge

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to find a store that would carry eight tracks while

0:29:08.360 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the cassette was taking off because stores loved cassettes. They

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>took up very little space, so you can have a

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty wide selection of music without requiring an enormous amount

0:29:16.400 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>of physical store space, and cassettes didn't have some of

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the capacity limitations that eight track tapes had. An eight

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>track typically divided up an album into four stretches of

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>tape called programs, and there was an audible gap between programs.

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>There was a limited amount of tape that the eight

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>track could hold, and it usually meant that at least

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>one song on an album wouldn't make it onto the

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 1>eight track version, and some songs would fall right on

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that break between two programs. Typically that would mean that

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the song you were listening to would fade out, then

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 1>there would be an audible click, then there would be

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>a pause of silence while the next program was getting

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 1>pulled through the player, and then the song would fade

0:29:57.520 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>up again, essentially where it left off, which wasn't ideal.

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Cassettes had a bit more versatility, allowing record labels to

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:07.400
<v Speaker 1>fit an entire side of a vinyl album onto one

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>side of a cassette tape. Cassettes were also seen as

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>more portable than eight tracks. It was possible to have

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a cassette player in a car or stereo system, or

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a boom box, or a portable cassette player like the

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>famed Sony Walkman. People could have their music on the go.

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 1>They could jog while listening to music. The convenience and portability,

0:30:28.040 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>paired with the capability of recording stuff of your own

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>choosing onto tape whether it was someone else's stuff or

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 1>your own, that made cassettes the clear winner over eight tracks,

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 1>And while those early cassettes still weren't necessarily viewed by

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>audio files as being particularly good, they also were winning

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>out over vinyl for those same reasons with the general consumer.

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:55.479
<v Speaker 1>The philosophy of convenience and accessibility over fidelity was winning

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in the mainstream public, much to the chagrin of many

0:30:58.440 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>audio files out there, and the cassette gave opportunities to

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>independent musicians that they otherwise never would have had more

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>about that in just a second. But first let's take

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 1>another quick break. So the recording industry typically works like this.

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>You're a musician, or you're in a band or something.

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>You play gigs whenever you can, You practice, you write songs,

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you practice some more, you get better over time, you

0:31:29.880 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 1>develop your sound, your style, your voice, and generally you

0:31:33.360 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>figure out who the heck you are musically speaking. You

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:40.160
<v Speaker 1>might submit your music to record labels, you might hire

0:31:40.160 --> 0:31:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a manager to try and take care of that for you,

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>or maybe you're super lucky and someone influential sees one

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of your shows and you get a meeting with a

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>record label representative. Then you negotiate, you sign a deal,

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and now bam, you get yourself a record contract, which

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>is a great fairy tale, and for some people it

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>does work out that way. But you've got thousands of

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>people for every success story who make music, but they're

0:32:03.000 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 1>not being heard by record labels, and that's not necessarily

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 1>out of malice or anything like that. And then there

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>are musicians who would rather stay independent than sign on

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>with a record company in the first place, since the

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>company might dictate what the musician can or can't record

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:19.440
<v Speaker 1>or what they should sound like. The cassette tape gave

0:32:19.480 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>people but that were in that category a lot of

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>new chances. The recording equipment was relatively inexpensive. Blake cassettes

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>were likewise pretty darn cheap, and they also are pretty rugged.

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:34.840
<v Speaker 1>You could record music to a cassette, you could duplicate

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the cassette, and then you can mail off the duplicates

0:32:37.360 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to people in the mail and the tape was probably

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:43.959
<v Speaker 1>gonna survive because it's it's pretty hardy stuff. And indie

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>culture developed around this practice, with different musicians and music

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasts trading tapes back and forth and spreading music that

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>way outside the recording industry system. So you had this

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of thriving independent scene that was growing because of

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the cassette tape. The cassette and the introduction of sound

0:33:00.120 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>systems like the boombox also allowed people to share music

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 1>with others in an unprecedented way. It was easy to

0:33:06.160 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>bring a boombox to a location, popping a cassette and

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>then blast out the tunes, so people nearby could hear

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the music, you know, whether they wanted to or not.

0:33:14.240 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>But it allowed for the development of music communities and

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>cultures like hip hop, so whole new genres of music

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>we're growing out of the adoption and use of this

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:27.800
<v Speaker 1>recorded medium. At first, the recording industry was totally on

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>board with cassette culture, but this gradually changed as executives

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:35.880
<v Speaker 1>realized the format allowed people to easily reproduce prerecorded cassettes.

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 1>They feared a hit to the bottom line. So here's

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 1>how their doomsday scenario might play out. A music fan

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>let's call him Jonathan, decides to purchase a brand new

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>cassette copy of the album Speaking in Tongues by Talking

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Heads because he really digs the song this must be

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:55.520
<v Speaker 1>the Place, which is pretty much all true because that

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>song is perfect, okay, But Jonathan, loving this song, gets

0:33:59.400 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>an idea. He bought this cassette for let's say the

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>princely sum of twelve dollars, and he goes out and

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>buys a whole bunch of blank cassettes for twenty bucks,

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.720
<v Speaker 1>so he's brought his investment up to thirty two dollars.

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Then he starts duplicating his copy of Speaking in Tongues

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 1>and then sells the copies for just five dollars each.

0:34:19.239 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And after selling seven copies he's recaptured all the costs

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.799
<v Speaker 1>of both the blank cassettes and the original tape, and

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:31.240
<v Speaker 1>undercutting local music stores and the recording label. Sire Records,

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.279
<v Speaker 1>which was the recording label doesn't get the benefit from

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>all those copies that Jonathan is selling. So music industry

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 1>executives were understandably concerned. They hated this idea with a

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:46.719
<v Speaker 1>passion hotter than a thousand exploding suns. Several companies than

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 1>the British Phonographic Industry Trade Group decided to launch a

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:53.760
<v Speaker 1>pr campaign against the practice, with a claim that quote

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 1>home taping is killing music end quote music, by the way,

0:34:57.920 --> 0:35:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is still alive and well today, just in case were worried,

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure this argument sounds familiar to you. If

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:05.760
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't, it will by the end of the series,

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 1>because it's gonna come up again and again in different forms.

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 1>So while the record labels were freaking out, lots of

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>musicians were actually encouraging the practice of copying music and

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:18.839
<v Speaker 1>sharing it with others. Lots of musicians were concerned more

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>with their music being heard by a larger number of

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>people than with the actual record sales numbers, and the

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:27.400
<v Speaker 1>slogan home taping is killing music became sort of a

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>joke among a certain set of musicians, particularly in the

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:34.399
<v Speaker 1>punk rock music scene, which was just really taking off

0:35:34.400 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>in the in the late seventies, and that was already

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:41.760
<v Speaker 1>firmly in the anti establishment headspace. Dead Kennedy's were famous

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 1>for doing this. Now, music piracy was possible, it could happen,

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't really rampant in the cassette days. In

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:53.720
<v Speaker 1>most places, hired in music still took money and time

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and effort. You had to get hold of a copy

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of the music. You had to get hold of blank cassettes,

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and then you had to spend the time record hoarding

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:04.279
<v Speaker 1>from the original onto a copy, and most recorders would

0:36:04.320 --> 0:36:07.239
<v Speaker 1>only allow you to do that at playback speed, So

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>if you have an hour long album, it would take

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:12.240
<v Speaker 1>an hour for you to copy it onto a single

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>blank cassette. So it wasn't exactly uh, something that was

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:21.080
<v Speaker 1>easy to mass manufacture, and I think most of those

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 1>fears were largely unwarranted. Something that happened more frequently were

0:36:25.160 --> 0:36:28.720
<v Speaker 1>mixtapes made recently famous by the guardians of the Galaxy movies.

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>People began to rifle through their music collections and put

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>together a series of songs for folks they knew, and

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 1>there was a real art to this. According to some people,

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:39.880
<v Speaker 1>there were even rules you should absolutely follow to get

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the best result. For example, some officionados will tell you

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that a mix tape should never feature the same artist

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>or group on it twice, no repeats. So if you

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>open with the Kinks All Day and All of the Night,

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 1>which came out in nineteen sixty five, and then you

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>ended the mixtape with the Kinks song Apeman, which came

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>out in you would technically be breaking that rule. Now, personally,

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:05.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's silly because some bands like the Kinks

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:09.320
<v Speaker 1>can change their sound dramatically over the course of their careers.

0:37:09.360 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It almost sounds like two totally different bands. But never

0:37:12.120 --> 0:37:15.320
<v Speaker 1>mind all that. Anyway, you can search the internet to

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:18.319
<v Speaker 1>find out about the rules of making mixtapes. Everyone has

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:21.800
<v Speaker 1>their own set, and these days those same rules carry

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 1>over into making playlists, so it still has relevance. The

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:29.279
<v Speaker 1>mixtape culture became an important social interaction. It provided a

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>new way to clue people in as to what kind

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of person you are, and it gave folks a chance

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to put something together for someone else, showing that they

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 1>were thinking about them. So if you received a mixtape,

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:43.800
<v Speaker 1>particularly a really good one, it was a huge thrill

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:46.439
<v Speaker 1>because it showed that someone else was thinking about you

0:37:46.719 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and trying to craft an experience that you would really enjoy.

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So the eight track had a rain of around nineteen

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty six to nineteen seventy, and then the compact cassette.

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 1>The cassette tape took over from there and really caught

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 1>on in the nineteen eighties, but it too would have

0:38:02.880 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>a short run as the king of media, because the

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:08.960
<v Speaker 1>compact disc would debut in the late nineteen eighties and

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 1>by the following decade would all but annihilate the compact cassette.

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:16.480
<v Speaker 1>During this same era, there was another huge change that

0:38:16.520 --> 0:38:18.400
<v Speaker 1>was taking place in the United States as well as

0:38:18.400 --> 0:38:20.400
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the world, but I'm mainly going to

0:38:20.480 --> 0:38:22.880
<v Speaker 1>focus on the US, and that was the nature of

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 1>copyright law. In the US. The government had passed a

0:38:26.280 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Copyright Act way back in nineteen o nine, but it

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:33.360
<v Speaker 1>hadn't really touched it since. But in the decades following

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:35.919
<v Speaker 1>nineteen o nine, it became clear that copyright law would

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:38.920
<v Speaker 1>need an update. Technology was allowing for the broadcast and

0:38:38.960 --> 0:38:43.239
<v Speaker 1>preservation of intellectual property in new ways, from radio to television,

0:38:43.280 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 1>two recorded media like vinyl albums and cassettes, and the

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Universal Copyright Convention and International Agreement on Copyright had debuted

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 1>back in nineteen fifty two in Switzerland, and the United

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>States joined that convention in nineteen fifty five, but it

0:38:57.760 --> 0:39:01.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't until nineteen seventies six that the US government was

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>ready to pass some new copyright rules in the nineteen

0:39:05.200 --> 0:39:09.160
<v Speaker 1>seventy six Copyright Act. The new act created protections of

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of intellectual property, and it also extended the

0:39:13.440 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 1>terms of protection. Under the nineteen o nine Act, a

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>copyrighted work would receive protection for twenty eight years since

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:25.000
<v Speaker 1>from the date of its origin, with the possibility of

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a twenty eight year extension, so ultimately you could protect

0:39:29.000 --> 0:39:32.040
<v Speaker 1>it for fifty six years total. The nineteen seventy six

0:39:32.080 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Act changed that. Under the nineteen seventy six Act, a

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:38.560
<v Speaker 1>work is protected by copyright for the length of the

0:39:38.600 --> 0:39:42.600
<v Speaker 1>author's life plus fifty years. That would get changed again

0:39:42.640 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen with the Copyright Term Extension Act that pushed

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it to the author's life plus seventy years, and for

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 1>works created before nineteen seventy eight. The rules are a

0:39:53.360 --> 0:39:56.719
<v Speaker 1>little different. There are several factors that determine the length

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:59.919
<v Speaker 1>of copyright protection, but many works were given seventy six

0:40:00.080 --> 0:40:03.160
<v Speaker 1>years of protection from the year of their creation or publication.

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 1>The extension would push that to ninety five years. And

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're wondering why is this happening, what what's important

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:12.480
<v Speaker 1>about this? And and how is or how are all

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>these changes happening, Well, it's largely because of really big

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>companies that rely on intellectual property for their value. For example,

0:40:22.000 --> 0:40:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the Walt Disney Company. A lot of people refer to

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:28.240
<v Speaker 1>these extensions as Walt Disney extensions. The Walt Disney Company

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:32.120
<v Speaker 1>certainly does not want it's it's formative works falling into

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the public domain if it can help it, because then

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 1>once they're in the public domain, anyone can use them

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:41.360
<v Speaker 1>under certain circumstances. There are other protections that are in

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:44.520
<v Speaker 1>place as well, but you know, copyrights goes into public

0:40:44.600 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 1>domain and then anyone can can show this stuff without

0:40:49.000 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>any fear of the mouse House coming down on them.

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.799
<v Speaker 1>So without the extension, Mickey Mouse would have gone into

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the public domain in two thousand four. Under the Original

0:41:00.080 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Copyright Act of nineteen seventy six. Now he's set to

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 1>skip off into the public domain in twenty twenty four,

0:41:06.600 --> 0:41:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and as of right now, there has not been another

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>change to copyright law to change that date. So we're

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at mickeymails going into the public domain unless something

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:20.359
<v Speaker 1>changes within the next few years. My point with all

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of that is to say, the changing technology from the

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:27.439
<v Speaker 1>nineteenth and twentieth centuries meant that suddenly things that used

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 1>to be ephemeral, you know, like a performance, could now

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>be made permanent. People could have a permanent record of that,

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a permanent way of recreating those performances, when before you

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:40.560
<v Speaker 1>just had to be there when it happened, and and

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:43.880
<v Speaker 1>if you weren't, you missed it. And these things have

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 1>value not just to the creators, but to the audiences

0:41:46.719 --> 0:41:50.840
<v Speaker 1>as well, and that this drove changes in technology, in culture,

0:41:51.000 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and in law. But we're not done yet. In our

0:41:54.680 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 1>next episode, I'm going to talk a bit about how

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the videotape made a similar impact in film and television

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 1>as the cassette did in the music industry, and we'll

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:07.680
<v Speaker 1>also look at the rise of the compact disc. Still

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:11.359
<v Speaker 1>to come is the transition to digital formats and then

0:42:12.200 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 1>beyond DVDs and things of that nature, and blue rays.

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:17.680
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about digital files, and then we're

0:42:17.680 --> 0:42:19.799
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about different ways of delivering it, from

0:42:19.840 --> 0:42:22.680
<v Speaker 1>downloading it to streaming it, and how all of this

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>has affected our behaviors, business, and even the process of

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 1>creating the entertainment in the first place. I hope you

0:42:29.560 --> 0:42:33.320
<v Speaker 1>guys are enjoying this series of episodes. I've really enjoyed

0:42:33.719 --> 0:42:36.080
<v Speaker 1>jumping into it. I like doing the sort of thematic

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 1>approach and a deep dive on a specific topic. But

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 1>once we're done with these, will be going back to

0:42:42.560 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 1>lots of other kind of one off tech stuffs, So

0:42:44.960 --> 0:42:47.279
<v Speaker 1>don't worry if this wasn't your cup of tea, we're

0:42:47.280 --> 0:42:49.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna be getting back to other tech stuff stuff in

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the near future. Tech stuff stuff, I should make a

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:55.279
<v Speaker 1>sure about that. Meanwhile, if you guys want to get

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:56.680
<v Speaker 1>in touch with me, you can send me an email

0:42:56.760 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the addresses tech stuff at how stuff works dot com,

0:43:00.239 --> 0:43:02.479
<v Speaker 1>or you can pop on over to our website that's

0:43:02.520 --> 0:43:05.319
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff podcast dot com. You'll find links to our

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:09.279
<v Speaker 1>social media presence as well as to the store and

0:43:09.400 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 1>an archive of all of our past episodes. I hope

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:14.160
<v Speaker 1>you guys can go check that out. I look forward

0:43:14.160 --> 0:43:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to hearing from you, and I'll talk to you again

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 1>really soon. Y tech Stuff is a production of I

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio's How Stuff Works. For more podcasts from my

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:30.879
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio, visit the I heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:43:30.960 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.