WEBVTT - Tech News: Nvidia Loses an Arm

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you. I'm a little out

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of breath because if you listen to yesterday's episode you

0:00:25.239 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>might have heard I, despite all of my precautionary behaviors,

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>caught COVID apparently, and that's all sorts of fun. But

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the show, as they say, must keep going. I think

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'm on pain killer. Let's talk about

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the news for today, Tuesday, February eight, twenty twenty two,

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and let's start off with some updates to a few

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:55.319
<v Speaker 1>stories that I have talked about in recent episodes. First up,

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the Nvidio bid for the semiconductor company ARM is a

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>fish lee off the table in video had been pursuing

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>a sixties six billion dollar acquisition of ARM, the British

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor company, but encountered numerous regulatory obstacles along the way. Now,

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned last week that it looked like this deal

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>was falling apart, and now we can definitively say that

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the deal fell apart. Relatively recently, we've seen regulators in

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 1>regions like the European Union, the United States, and the

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>United Kingdom become more wary of large acquisitions and mergers,

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>particularly in the tech world, but not exclusively to tech,

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and the proposed acquisition appears to be a victim of

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>increased scrutiny of such proposed deals. I'm sure this comes

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>as something of a relief to companies like Microsoft and Qualcom,

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>both of which depend upon ARM manufactured chips, and neither

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of which would want to see in video get control

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of that part of the fly chain. As for ARM,

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>it's current owner, which is the Asian conglomerate soft Bank,

0:02:07.520 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>plans to prepare ARM for an initial public offering for

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>later in the year, that is, to spend it off

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>as a publicly traded company. Now we might see another

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>tug of war happen on that front, because in the

0:02:20.680 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>UK a lot of officials are really eager to see

0:02:24.200 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>ARM a British company listed on the UK's stock market,

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>but soft Bank seems inclined to instead list ARM on

0:02:34.480 --> 0:02:38.239
<v Speaker 1>the New York Stock Exchange, where you might see a

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>slightly better share price value listed initially so soft Bank

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>can make back some of the money it's spent acquiring

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>arm in the first place. Politics and business are fun,

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>continuing to update stories. Earlier this month, news broke that

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 1>the United States Internal Revenue Service or i r S,

0:02:56.120 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone's favorite department in the US, was planning to use

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>a third party company for the purposes of authenticating people

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:08.679
<v Speaker 1>who are trying to access some online i r S services,

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and they would be doing that through facial recognition technology.

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>The plan would have required people to submit a video

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>selfie of themselves and then use a camera either on

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>their phone or on a webcamp to verify their identity

0:03:22.639 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>before they would be able to use certain features on

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 1>the i r S website. Critics objected to this practice

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty quickly, pointing out that facial recognition technology has often

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>proven to be unreliable, particularly for anyone who doesn't happen

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to be male and white. There's a pervasive issue with

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>bias in facial recognition. Uh some products have more of

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a problem with this than others. In addition, critics argue

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.360
<v Speaker 1>that the requirement would put an unfair burden on people

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>who don't have the access to smartphones or webcams, and

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>thus create a deeper digital divide between the haves and

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the have nots, and because you know, everyone's supposed to

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:07.440
<v Speaker 1>file taxes, that's a real problem. And then there's the

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>concern for privacy and security that comes along with using

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a private, third party company to work so closely with,

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, a government service like internal Revenue. That seems

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to raise a few more concerns. And now the I

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>r S has walked back its decision, saying it's going

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>to transition away from using this facial recognition technology which

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>had already started to roll out, and that it will

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:35.080
<v Speaker 1>quote develop and bring online an additional authentication process that

0:04:35.160 --> 0:04:40.239
<v Speaker 1>does not involve facial recognition end quote. Not too long ago,

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I dedicated an episode of tech Stuff to talk about Peloton,

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the company best known for its connected exercise bikes, also

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>does treadmills and you take online spin classes from the

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:56.520
<v Speaker 1>comfort of your own basement, I mean home. And Peloton

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.839
<v Speaker 1>has had a pretty dramatic fall from grace over the

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:05.239
<v Speaker 1>last few months, with the company's sales slowing dramatically after

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a big spike early on in the pandemic. And then

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>there are reportedly warehouses filled with Peloton products that just

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't sold, And there are also some pr issues that

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>were exacerbated by a couple of fictional characters suffering fictional

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>heart attacks after working on the bikes. Because that's the

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of world we live in. I guess where fictional

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>character's death on a show can actually put a stigma

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>against a company anyway. John Foley, the founder of Peloton

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and now former CEO, announced that he was stepping down

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>from his leadership role. Um well, that leadership role fully

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>has led Peloton ever since he came up with the

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.239
<v Speaker 1>idea more than a decade ago, and he will instead

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>become the executive chair of the board of directors, so

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>still very much, you know, part of the company. And

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a man named Barry McCarthy, who had served as chief

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>financial officer of Spotify, another company that's been the hot

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>seat recently, will become the new president and CEO of Peloton.

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Peloton's current president, William Lynch, is also stepping down. Foley

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and Lynch aren't the only two people at Peloton who

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>will be updating their resumes. The Wall Street Journal reports

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that the company expects to cut about twenty percent of

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>its workforce. That's around two thousand, eight hundred jobs. There

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>have also been calls from activist shareholders to sell the

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>company in order to get a little money back for

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 1>those shareholders, because of course, share prices in Peloton have

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.719
<v Speaker 1>dropped more than fiftent this year. Although I saw a

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>headline just before I started recording that suggests a lot

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of movement on that front, so it may be different

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>by the time you hear this. Now. I just mentioned Spotify,

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 1>so let's let's talk about that for a moment. First

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 1>of all, Spotify and I Heart Radio or I Heart

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Media are competitors, and I work for I Heeart Media.

0:06:59.000 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that up front because context is important, and

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.600
<v Speaker 1>also to say I'm not speaking on behalf of my

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>employer in any way. I honestly don't know what anyone

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>official and my heart thinks about what's going on at Spotify,

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and there's certainly no official company position that I can

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>point to. So this is just me here, all right.

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>With that out of the way, Spotify has been trying

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to walk a tight rope over the last few weeks,

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>all thanks to Joe Rogan. Spotify famously signed Joe Rogan

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>to an exclusive deal for his podcast for the princely

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>sum of one hundred million dollars. It's a heck of

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a deal. So to get Rogan's podcast, you had to

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>use Spotify anyway. A couple of weeks ago, several musicians

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>began to pull their musical catalogs off of Spotify because

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>of Rogan's tendency to spread COVID misinformation on his show.

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>The musicians expressed concern about the dangers this post, considering

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Rogan's immense popularity. So Spotify's response was essentially, you know,

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.559
<v Speaker 1>it's it's Joe Rogan show. We just licensed the show

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>from him. We don't take a hand in shaping the content.

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>We're not editors. Who he chooses to have on his

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>show and what he talks about are all up to him.

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So we're just the platform and as long as he

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't violate our rules, the content stays. Those rules, by

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, weren't public facing, Like there was no way

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to see whether content was violent the rules if you

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>were outside Spotify, so you couldn't judge that. Uh. The

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>company subsequently then published those rules, so now they are

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 1>public facing, but at the time they weren't. And then

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>artists India are pulled her music off the platform because

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of Rogan's history of using racial slurs on his show.

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>She actually shared a video montage of him doing so

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>over the course of numerous episodes, and this time Spotify

0:08:50.960 --> 0:08:55.439
<v Speaker 1>swept in and had behind the scenes discussions with Rogan

0:08:55.520 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>on the matter, and subsequently Rogan pulled down more than

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>a hundred of his past up episodes. Now The Verge

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>published an article about this titled Spotify is more Confused

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>about Joe Rogan than Ever, and The Verge pointed out

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that the racial slurs, while horrible, don't actually seem to

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>violate Spotify's rules as they are written. It would take

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 1>some loose interpretation of the rules to say, oh, this

0:09:22.640 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>covers racial slurs as well, not that racial slurs aren't bad,

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>they're terrible, but rather that Spotify it didn't seem like

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a direct violation of what Spotify's rules were.

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>So the Verge poses, why can Spotify pressure Rogan to

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>pull down those episodes in that case but do nothing

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>in the case of COVID misinformation? And this is a

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>really tough situation. On the one hand, creators value having

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>freedom and authority over their own work. I get to

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>choose what topics I cover for my show and how

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I cover them. My heart does not pressure me to

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>do otherwise. You know, I might once in a while

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>get a Rik West like, Hey, would you do a

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>themed episode on such and such? But I can actually

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>say yes or no to that, and the time, whatever

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 1>the topic happens to be for that day is one

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that I just chose myself, and it's my own way

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of of expressing my thoughts on those topics. However, on

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, spreading this information and promoting harmful portrayals

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of people of color or giving white supremacists of platform,

0:10:26.160 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>which Rogan has done in the past, undeniably that causes harm.

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>And so you're left asking is it better to place

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>tighter restrictions on content and affect the creator's process, or

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>is it better to have the creator be free to

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>send out whatever message they want, even if that message

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>is harmful. Now, as a creator, I actually think tighter

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>restrictions are the better alternative. I mean, I value my

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>ability to say stuff, but I don't think that ability

0:10:53.800 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 1>is more important than the safety and dignity of other people.

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:00.319
<v Speaker 1>I think that's way more important than oh God, you're

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>not letting me say this word that I shouldn't say. Um,

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that's my own opinion, just my own personal opinion, not

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 1>again meant to be any kind of official stance on

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the matter. All Right, we've got some more news stories

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>to cover, but before we get to that, let's take

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. According to euro News, authorities in the

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>EU are looking at the concept of the metaverse with

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>regard to what, if any, regulations will need to be

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in place to protect citizens from what some call the

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:40.199
<v Speaker 1>future of the internet. In fact, Margreeth Vettiger, and I

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>apologize for butchering that name, she's an EU representative from Denmark,

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>went so far as to say, quote, the metaverse is

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>here already, so of course we want we start analyzing

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>what will be the role for a regulator, what is

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the role for our legislature end quote. I actually take

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>issue with her statement that the metaverse is here are

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>already because no one has really defined what the metaverse

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is or will be. There are a lot of kind

0:12:07.640 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of vague ideas and proposals of what metaverse will actually mean.

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Whenever we have something that we can definitively point to

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and say that is a metaverse, and there's some examples

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of stuff to have elements of some of those ideas,

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, minecraft roadblocks and even Second Life come to

0:12:26.320 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>mind as having some aspects of what people refer to

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 1>when they're talking about metaverse concepts, but none of those

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>seem to actually encompass everything that is brought to mind

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 1>when that vague term metaverse has mentioned. However, there are

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely a lot of companies rushing into the metaverse space

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>convinced that it is in fact going to be the

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>future of the Internet. I'm still skeptical about that personally,

0:12:50.920 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>but I have a long history of being wrong about

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>this kind of stuff, and besides, I'm getting older and

0:12:55.679 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>grouchier every day, so that could be affecting my perception anyway.

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:04.520
<v Speaker 1>It's clear that EU officials are looking ahead and trying

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to anticipate what sort of regulations will need to be

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:10.000
<v Speaker 1>in place in order to ensure that the meta verses,

0:13:10.559 --> 0:13:13.199
<v Speaker 1>whatever those turn out to be, played by the use

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>rules about citizen data, privacy and security. The EU has

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>been very forward on those pushing for stronger and stronger

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:28.560
<v Speaker 1>regulations and turning from the metaverse to meta You know,

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the company formerly known as Facebook. We have a few

0:13:32.080 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>more stories. For one, Meta has said it might actually

0:13:35.160 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>shut down operations in Europe for Facebook and Instagram that is,

0:13:40.080 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the folks in Europe may one day find they can

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>no longer access those platforms. Now why is that, Well,

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.319
<v Speaker 1>it all has to do with those data privacy laws

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and the EU I just referenced. See Facebook currently transfers

0:13:52.840 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>data back and forth between the UK and the United States,

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>or really the United States and everywhere else. Like if

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 1>you lived in Africa, that data would be making its

0:14:04.760 --> 0:14:07.559
<v Speaker 1>way back to the United States for processing and analyzing

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>um and so in the European Union there are these

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>transatlantic data transfers that happens so that Facebook can quote

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>unquote offers services to European users. And by offer services,

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I suspect we're not just talking about features on Facebook

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram, but stuff like you know, targeted advertising. That

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>that's part of what the data is being used for.

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>But the use data protection laws are closing off the

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>avenues that Facebook can legally use to transfer data from

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the European Union to the United States, largely because there

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>are concerns that such data transfers could end up being

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>mined by organizations like the National Security Agency or in

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:57.479
<v Speaker 1>essay here in the United States, and that EU citizens

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>should not be subjected to that, especially without their consent,

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.560
<v Speaker 1>so that's what's at the heart here. And the EU

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 1>has started to shut down some of the avenues that

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Facebook would use to send data back and forth, so

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that would mean Facebook would have to silo information in

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the European Union, it would have to set up operations

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>in the EU specifically to handle all that in order

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to keep you know, it's its services essentially the same

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>as they are now, rather than just having it shipped

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:35.040
<v Speaker 1>over to the United States that data. So they're essentially saying, Hey,

0:15:35.080 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>if we can't transfer data back to the United States

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>so that we can make use of it, we can't

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>operate in the U, so we're gonna shut down now.

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I should also add that REPS that Meta have said

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the company doesn't actually have plans to shut down operations

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in the EU. Instead, they're sending the message that there

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.600
<v Speaker 1>needs to be some sort of official structure in place

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>so that the company can continue on with business as usual. Meanwhile,

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>REPS and EU are essentially saying, you need us more

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>than we need you. And in fact, Meta pulls about

0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>its ad revenue from Europe. About half of all revenue

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>comes from North America and the remaining gets divvied up

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>around the rest of the world. So the United States

0:16:18.400 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>and Canada are the most important regions for Facebook when

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it comes to revenue, but the EU that's significant. So

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>if Meta were not to comply, it could face some

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty significant finds in Europe. And at the moment, the

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>matter is still one that's working its way through regulatory processes.

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So it may turn out this whole kerfuffle dies without

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>much happening, but we'll have to keep an eye on it. Okay.

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>Another story with Meta is that Peter Theel venture capitalist,

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>who has long maintained a seat at Meta's board of directors,

0:16:50.840 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>is stepping down from the board. Feel himself is a

0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:59.240
<v Speaker 1>controversial figure, having become a prominent supporter of conservative politicians

0:16:59.800 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in including former US President Donald Trump. Now I say

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>controversial because Trump of course got into hot water on

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and other online platforms by repeatedly violating policies of

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 1>those platforms, including facebooks, and that necessitated his removal from

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>those platforms. In fact, I think Facebook was the first

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 1>one to do it. So, you know, Peter Theel being

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a supporter of Donald Trump, there was this question about

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>whether his influence at the board level would cause Facebook

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>to make bad decisions regarding its content moderation policies, and

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:39.919
<v Speaker 1>there were critics who were calling upon CEO Mark Zuckerberg

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to cut tiles with feel but Mark Toads didn't do that. Anyway,

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>thel now appears to be interested in getting into politics himself,

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>so he has stepped down from Facebook's board, which would

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 1>absolutely be necessary before he could run for any kind

0:17:57.200 --> 0:18:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of office without you know, tons of people jump being

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>on his case for having conflicts of interest. Um. Yeah,

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 1>So the very important figure in Facebook's history and one

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>that has had an increasingly um prominent role in supporting

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:17.719
<v Speaker 1>politics in the United States. As for Meta's version of

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 1>the Metaverse, the company has recently made a change to

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>its virtual reality social space called Horizon. It's got a

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 1>couple of different Horizon products out there, like Horizon World,

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and the change now creates a virtual personal space perimeter

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>around each avatar. And you might wonder why, Well, it's

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>because people can be really awful, particularly in online spaces.

0:18:41.640 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>We've already seen early users of Horizon come forward with

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 1>complaints that they were being harassed in virtual spaces, some

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 1>of them saying that others were attempting to virtually grope

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>at them. And you know that might sound odd or

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe even funny to you, but you know, when you

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>think about it, really is disturbing. Like first, I mean,

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you have no idea what someone else has been through

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in their life, and a virtual action like that could

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>be triggering. Like if someone actually has been the target

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>of sexual harassment or assault in their past, a virtual

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>representation of that is incredibly distressing. Beyond that, a good

0:19:21.440 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>virtual experience is really immersive. I mean, you know, they're

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 1>there therapists out there who use virtual reality to help

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>treat people who have various phobias as a kind of

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:37.439
<v Speaker 1>immersion therapy where the the person who has like the

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:42.080
<v Speaker 1>phobia can be exposed to a virtual representation of whatever

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it is that triggers the fear and get more accustomed

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to it without having to actually go in person and

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:53.439
<v Speaker 1>experience that firsthand. Like they have that safety net of

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:56.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a virtual experience. But I can tell you people

0:19:56.640 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>have had their bodies react just as if they were

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 1>in the real situation. So we know that these virtual

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>experiences can have real psychological effects on us. So if

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 1>you are the victim of assault, it can have a

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:17.440
<v Speaker 1>real psychological effect. Even though you know You're ostensibly safely

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>at home in say your game room or office or whatever,

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and nothing quote unquote real is happening to you. Um,

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, having people blatantly deny you your personal space

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is just awful. So this new system in Horizon creates

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>a two ft radius perimeter around every avatar by default,

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and that is meant to set the stage for behavioral

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>norms within the metaverse. Now, keep in mind, this is

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:50.480
<v Speaker 1>just one way people could harass one another in virtual space,

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>right to get all up into someone else's personal space.

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>That's one way that you could really harass somebody, But

0:20:57.400 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of other ones, and Meta executive have

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>already indicated that moderating the metaverse to counteract toxicity will

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 1>be difficult, and actually, according to Andrew Bosworth of Meta,

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're talking about metaverse at scale, it will be

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>practically impossible, which does not sound particularly fun to me. Okay,

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>we've got a few more news stories to cover before

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>we close out, but let's take another quick break. Let

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 1>us turn our attention now to Apple. The company is

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>also coming under fire recently, as eight state treasurers in

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the United States have contacted the Securities and Exchange Commission

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:46.680
<v Speaker 1>or SEC over allegations that Apple has been forcing employees

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to sign non disclosure agreements more commonly referred to as

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 1>in DA's and use them as quote unquote concealment clauses. So,

0:21:56.440 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>in other words, the allegation is that Apple co versus

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>employees to sign an agreement that says the employee will

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.920
<v Speaker 1>not reveal the existence of unlawful acts committed by people

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>within the company or facilitated by the company itself, that

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you are not allowed to talk about that outside of

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>specific uh contexts within the company itself. You could not

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>go to a lawyer, you could not go to the press.

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>You weren't supposed to talk about to anyone. And the

0:22:26.920 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>letter from these state treasurers urge urges the SEC to

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>form rules that expressly forbid companies from using India's in

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>order to silence employees and prevent reports of discrimination, harassment,

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and other illegal activities from being exposed outside the company. Further,

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the treasurers are accusing Apple of not just using India's

0:22:49.880 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in this way, but also then lying about that practice

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>because Apple has said that it does not require employees

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>to agree to concealment clauses, and so these allegations are

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>stating that that's categorically false, and that Apple then misrepresented

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that when talking to official US regulators. The Treasurers are

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>now calling for an investigation and potentially action against Apple

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>should those allegations prove to be true. So that's still,

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, again, working its way through that process. We

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>don't have anything hard to report on that yet, but

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it does seem to be an escalation of what has

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>been called the Apple two movement t oo like me too.

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Over in Europe, Apple is facing more fines. The Authority

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 1>for Consumers and Markets Department in the Netherlands has issued

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>a fine for five million euros for the third week

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>in a row, stating that Apple has failed to comply

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 1>with an order to allow dating apps to offer alternative

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>payment systems to Apple's own in app system. This ties

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>in with a global story of Apple racing pressure to

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>relinquish some control of the in app experience in iOS. So,

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.479
<v Speaker 1>in case you're not familiar with that, Apple's policy was

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that developers who created apps for iOS devices had and

0:24:12.880 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 1>any of them that included in app purchases would have

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>to use Apple's payment structure. So, in other words, let's

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>say I create a game for iOS devices, and within

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the game, players can purchase different skins for their character

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>so that they have a different appearance. Well, I would

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>have to use apples in app payment structure for that,

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and that would give Apple a cut of each transaction,

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>which ranged from fifteen depending upon the size of the

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:45.959
<v Speaker 1>developer that was, you know, submitting the app app. And

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>because Apple controls the entire ecosystem for iOS apps, you

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 1>either played by Apple's rules or your app would not

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>get carried by Apple. And of course, you know, people

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 1>know that the folks who own iPhones are more prone

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to in app purchases than other platforms, like even though

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 1>there are way more Android systems out there, the people

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>who spend the most money are those who have iOS systems.

0:25:13.080 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>So that would represent a pretty lucrative vein of revenue

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>for Apple. So Apple does not want to move away

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 1>from that, obviously, because that revenue is an important stream

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>for the company. So Apple has been resisting the push

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:33.120
<v Speaker 1>in various regions. They've been appealing court decisions that have

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>ruled against Apple, commanding the company to allow alternative payment systems,

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>and the company has been trying to reverse this trend

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>with even the CEO making personal calls to lawmakers, but

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:50.719
<v Speaker 1>over in the EU, regulators are not budging, and they

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>continue to levy fines on Apple for not complying or

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 1>failing to show evidence that the company is complying. The

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.400
<v Speaker 1>current boutafines is, as I mentioned, five million euros a week,

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 1>which has a maximum of fifty million euros, which is

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money, but for Apple it's kind of not.

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Apple's revenue in one was a reported three

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred sixty five point eight billion dollars and the profit

0:26:16.800 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>was nearly nine billion dollars. So I'm not sure how

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>seriously Apple is taking this just yet, or if the

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>company is just more focused on fighting the legal battle

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to push back against this trend and an Apple future

0:26:30.720 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>news The company has long been rumored to be working

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 1>on a vehicle design sometimes called the Apple Car we're

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>cheekily sometimes the I Car, and recently an Apple patent

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:45.720
<v Speaker 1>revealed that the company intends to incorporate machine learning into

0:26:45.760 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the design of the vehicle for the purposes of autonomous operation.

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>So essentially, the conclusion is that the processors of today

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 1>are just not up to the task of handling situations

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>that can arise while driving. They're not fast enough to

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 1>react properly for every kind of driving situation that you know.

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.320
<v Speaker 1>It's one thing to program for, say, collision detection or

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, lane assist and that kind of stuff, but

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>it's another thing entirely to deal with all the possible

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>scenarios that can pop up when you're on the road.

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>If you are a driver, chances are there has been

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a situation at one point or another that you've never

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>encountered before. Humans can typically react to those things in

0:27:30.040 --> 0:27:34.320
<v Speaker 1>an instinctive way that you know can be successful, but

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:39.119
<v Speaker 1>a car that is following more you know, strict programming

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 1>may not be able to and that's a problem. So

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>machine learning could allow for a fleet of cars to

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>share their collective experiences with one another. So let's just imagine,

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a hypothetical. Imagine you've got a

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand autonomous cars on the road, and most of those

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>cars are going to have relatively uneventful drives where nothing

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly unexpected happens, so they're not learning anything. Uh, there

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>might be a few that have something that's a little

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>out of the ordinary, so they have the potential to

0:28:11.400 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 1>learn from those experiences, and you'll have a few, very

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:18.880
<v Speaker 1>few outliers, they will have truly unusual experiences. Uh those

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>experiences and the car's reaction to those experiences can then

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>build into the overall fleet's knowledge base. So Car number

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>one can learn from the mistakes of Car one thousand,

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and that means cars wouldn't be learning just from their

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:36.520
<v Speaker 1>own mistakes, but from the mistakes and successes of all

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the other cars in the fleet. Now, this gets a

0:28:38.800 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>little scary to think about because we're talking about large, heavy,

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>fast moving vehicles here, and the word mistake is not

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>much fun when you're thinking about it in those terms, right, Like,

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a mistake can be you know, life altering, it could

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>be fatal. But on the other hand, this represents a

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>way to build out how cars will react in different

0:28:59.760 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>stations that can evolve far faster than if you were

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>just programming each scenario independently, which would take you forever

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:10.320
<v Speaker 1>because you would never be able to account for every

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>single possibility on the road. Is just that's just not feasible. Now,

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I should add that Apple is not the only company

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that has looked into this kind of approach where you're

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>using machine learning and a fleet of vehicles to kind

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of improve individual car responses, but the patent does give

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>us a rare glimpse into the ultra secret project of

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:38.200
<v Speaker 1>an Apple Car. Finally, some Australian researchers have bad news

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 1>for alien lovers out there. The researchers used a powerful

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>radio telescope array to focus on the galactic center of

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the Milky Way and they listened out for any signals

0:29:49.480 --> 0:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that could indicate alien activity. In other words, they were

0:29:52.600 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>looking for stuff what doesn't fit into the natural radio

0:29:55.640 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>signals you would expect to find from the galactic center. Uh.

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.240
<v Speaker 1>They listen for around seven hours, and the report is

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that all is quiet on the galactic front. Their search

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>was within a region known to have at least a

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred forty four exo planets in it. An exo planet

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>is a planet that exists outside of our own Solar system.

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Now note, an exoplanet is not necessarily a planet that

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 1>exists within the so called Goldilux zone. Uh. Those are

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 1>planets that are known to be in a distance that's

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:33.240
<v Speaker 1>not too far nor too close from the host star

0:30:33.560 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of that planet's system, and so could potentially support life

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:41.360
<v Speaker 1>at least as we know it here on Earth. I

0:30:41.400 --> 0:30:43.040
<v Speaker 1>mean a lot of other factors would have to be

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 1>present too for that to be true. But one of

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>them is that, well, the planet has to be the

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>right distance from the star, else it's going to be

0:30:50.200 --> 0:30:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, too hot and too radiated to support life

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>as we know it, or too cold and too dark

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to support life as we know it. Has to be

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>just right. But anyway, these researchers have looked around in

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>different sectors of the galaxy over the last decade with

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>occasional glimpses of time on radio telescopes is really precious,

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>so it's not like these radio telescopes are just scanning

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the galaxy for signs of life. They're doing all sorts

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of important scientific work. So it's only been here and

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:20.960
<v Speaker 1>there that the researchers have been able to make use

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 1>of radio telescopes for this. But so far they have

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>come up with bup kiss. Now does that mean we're

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>all alone out here in the Milky Way? Well, not necessarily. Uh.

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>The astronomers have to listen in a specific ranges of

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>radio frequencies, which means, you know, potentially you could have

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>communications and different radio frequency ranges and we wouldn't pick

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>it up because we were tuned in it's like being

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:48.040
<v Speaker 1>tuned into the wrong radio station, Like you're not going

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to hear the song you want because you're on the

0:31:49.600 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>wrong station. Kind of like that. But you know, we're

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about massive ranges of radio frequencies, and then there

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>are tons of other variables to consider, a lot of

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>them were pop arized by the Drake equation as proposed

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:07.720
<v Speaker 1>by Dr Frank Drake. That equation frames the variables that

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>have to line up in order for there to actually

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>be a radio communicative species out there apart from our own,

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and it includes stuff like you have to

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>figure out the rate at which stars form within our galaxy,

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>the fraction of the stars that are out there that

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>have planets orbiting them, Then the average number of orbiting

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:33.640
<v Speaker 1>planets per star that could potentially support life, Like does

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the average star have that has plants? Have one too

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>point five planets that can support life depending upon you know,

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the number of stars that have orbiting plants and such.

0:32:45.560 --> 0:32:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Then you have to figure out the fraction of those

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>planets that actually develop life on them. They're not just

0:32:50.560 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>capable of supporting life, but life actually evolved. Then the

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:57.479
<v Speaker 1>fraction of those planets where the life evolved into at

0:32:57.520 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>least one intelligent species, the fraction of those planets where

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the intelligent life then develops some form of communication that

0:33:05.840 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we would be able to detect, and then the length

0:33:09.000 --> 0:33:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of time at which such civilizations exist before they're no

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:15.959
<v Speaker 1>longer able to communicate. So, in other words, like you

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>could have an intelligent species evolved to the point of

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>being able to communicate with radio waves, but then maybe

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>after a certain amount of time, that species wipes itself out.

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>It would be easy to imagine, considering the amount of

0:33:30.560 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>conflict that we see here on Earth, it's possible that

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that is something that is not unique to our planet.

0:33:37.280 --> 0:33:39.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of our our science fiction deals

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>with alien races that don't have that kind of internal

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:46.480
<v Speaker 1>conflict within their own home worlds. We don't know if

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a thing. Well, we don't even know if the

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 1>alien races exist, let alone you know how harmonious they

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 1>are within their own species. So we don't really know

0:33:57.600 --> 0:33:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the values of all those variables I just mentioned. By

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the way, the best we can do is make various guesses,

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and those guesses changed dramatically as we learn new information

0:34:06.360 --> 0:34:10.080
<v Speaker 1>about our galaxy. What I think those variables do that

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>is useful as it gives us a way to kind

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of conceptualize what we're up against when it comes to

0:34:15.480 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>figuring out if there is anyone to phone home too

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:23.800
<v Speaker 1>out there. So far, sadly, it seems like the aliens

0:34:23.840 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>are maintaining radio silence. Maybe all of our calls are

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 1>going to voicemail. But you know, again, it doesn't This

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:34.839
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that there is no intelligent alien life within

0:34:34.840 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>our galaxy, just that we have not found a way

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of detecting it if it does exist. Uh. Personally, I

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>think it's entirely possible. There could be. I'm sure that

0:34:45.760 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>there has to be life somewhere else. I don't think

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:52.720
<v Speaker 1>we're that special. I think that that's that. Statistically speaking,

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 1>it's almost certain that there is life on other planets

0:34:58.480 --> 0:35:01.399
<v Speaker 1>within our universe, certainly if not within our galaxy. I mean,

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>just the odds seem to suggest that that has to

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>be the case. That some of that life may have

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>evolved into intelligence I think is also pretty likely. But

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:14.879
<v Speaker 1>we're also talking about such vast distances here that our

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:17.840
<v Speaker 1>ability to pick up on it and the time frame

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 1>at which we could pick up on it, Because I

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>remember the further out something is the more into the

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:27.319
<v Speaker 1>past we are looking when we observe that, because it

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>takes light years to travel to us, and radio communication

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 1>is traveling effectively, you know the speed of light. You know,

0:35:35.480 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that means that we're looking back in the past, the

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:39.840
<v Speaker 1>further out we look, and so it could mean that

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:43.280
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at a time before the intelligent life started

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 1>to communicate via radio waves. Maybe it's doing it now,

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>but we won't know that for thousands of years. So

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>there's all these different variables to take into account. So

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>do not lose hope, alien lovers. Just know that we

0:35:55.120 --> 0:36:01.560
<v Speaker 1>haven't found the smoking flying saucer yet. That's it for

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:05.320
<v Speaker 1>this episode of tech Stuff. The news for Tuesday, February

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>eighty two. I hope you are all well. If you

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have suggestions for topics I should cover in future episodes

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of tech Stuff, please reach out to me. The best

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>way is on Twitter. The handle for the show is

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>text Stuff H s W and I'll talk to you again.

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Releasing Text Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>more podcasts from I Heart Radio, visit the i Heart

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows.