Speaker 1: All right, news round up in information overload hour. Write
Speaker 1: down our toll free telephone number if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. IT'SAY eight hundred and
Speaker 1: ninety four one, Sean if you want to join us.
Speaker 1: You know, I've kind of had it, and even some
Speaker 1: conservatives have been sucked into this, or people that identify
Speaker 1: as MAGA conservatives that are vacillating constantly back and forth.
Speaker 1: But you know, act as though the biggest MAGA champions
Speaker 1: in the world late to the You know, I like
Speaker 1: the last ones to join the movement, the first ones
Speaker 1: to jump off. But you know, this smear campaign surrounding
Speaker 1: Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein has not factored in a
Speaker 1: number of major things. One is, in spectacular fashion, twenty
Speaker 1: twenty five years ago, I forget the exact period of time.
Speaker 1: It was a long long time ago. Jeffrey Epstein was
Speaker 1: spectacularly thrown out of mar A Lago. Now. I know
Speaker 1: some of you have nothing to do with country clubs
Speaker 1: and don't want anything to do with country clubs, and
Speaker 1: frankly so my experiences with them have not been particularly
Speaker 1: great in my life. As you know, I get nasty
Speaker 1: looks from people and I really can't stand it. And
Speaker 1: then you know, other times people are lovely, but if
Speaker 1: you get thrown out of a prestigious club in such
Speaker 1: a high profile way, it is a devastating blow to
Speaker 1: a member. And that's what Donald Trump did to Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein because of his behavior with young women. That's what
Speaker 1: happened in Palm Beach, Florida, where society is kind of
Speaker 1: important to a lot of people in Palm Beach, Florida.
Speaker 1: That part I understand, and that's real. For four long years,
Speaker 1: Joe Biden and the Biden administration and the Biden DOJ
Speaker 1: had all of the Epstein files, whatever they are, and
Speaker 1: they never released them. Now we are learning a lot
Speaker 1: more about it as time has gone on, and now
Speaker 1: they've voted to release all the guvernment and files, etc. Etc.
Speaker 1: But what we're finding out is not what Democrats obviously
Speaker 1: had hoped for. Now, David Shoan, who's been on this
Speaker 1: program talking about this very topic, you know, put out
Speaker 1: on X yesterday exactly what he said on this program.
Speaker 1: If Jeffrey Epstein, he asked him, you have any dirt
Speaker 1: on Donald Trump? And he made the case, he said
Speaker 1: he would have had great leverage in the criminal case
Speaker 1: against him at the time that he died, and he
Speaker 1: spent the final week of his life talking to Jeffrey
Speaker 1: about it, and he was very clear he had nothing
Speaker 1: on Donald Trump because it would have been invented him
Speaker 1: in terms of the sentencing that was going on and
Speaker 1: him being in jail, et cetera, et cetera. The fact
Speaker 1: that he unequivocally said he had none ought to shut
Speaker 1: down the false claims otherwise. So in terms of the
Speaker 1: people being involved, it really is somewhat meaningless to me.
Speaker 1: But Democrats they just want to smear Trump anyway they can. Now. Interestingly,
Speaker 1: since this all came out, we are learning some things,
Speaker 1: and if you go back to nineteen ninety, we find
Speaker 1: out that Epstein gave Democrats seven times more campaign cash
Speaker 1: than he did Republicans. The disparity left Democrats struggling to
Speaker 1: explain why members of their party, including the leader in
Speaker 1: name only, Hakim Jeffries, was reaching out to Epstein even
Speaker 1: after he was convicted of soliciting prostitution from a minor
Speaker 1: in Florida and ordered to register as a sex offender.
Speaker 1: Hakim Jeffries was reaching out to him, Can I have
Speaker 1: more money I'd like some more money, and they denounced
Speaker 1: the measures censuring. Now we'll get to this issue of
Speaker 1: this congresswoman who was actually taking direct questions from Jeffrey
Speaker 1: Epstein during the hearing. We'll get to that in a second.
Speaker 1: But you know, House Republicans are saying that a back
Speaker 1: room deal was cut to save Epstein, cocluding Congresswoman Stacey
Speaker 1: Plaskett from censure, and multiple House Republican lawmakers seething over
Speaker 1: this failed effort to on censure for this Delaware congresswoman
Speaker 1: over her twenty nineteen text exchange with the late sex
Speaker 1: predator Jeffrey Epstein, accusing leadership of cutting a backroom deal
Speaker 1: with Democrats to spare Corey Mills. The same rebuke Republicans
Speaker 1: stuck together beat back the initial effort to kill the
Speaker 1: censure resolution. However, the measure was rejected hours later, with
Speaker 1: three Republicans voting against punishing Plasket and three more voting
Speaker 1: present and for sitting out the vote entirely. Now we
Speaker 1: also know that Haavid has launched an investigation into Laurence Summers,
Speaker 1: and the review found that Harvard accepted nine point one
Speaker 1: million dollars in gifts from mister Epstein between nineteen ninety
Speaker 1: eight in two thousand and seven. Yes, that would include
Speaker 1: the time, according to this timeline, after he had been
Speaker 1: convicted of in this case, of being a sexual predator
Speaker 1: in Florida and seeking prostitution. You know, from underage women.
Speaker 1: There's nothing more repulsive, is there? I can't think of
Speaker 1: anything off the top of my head, and you know
Speaker 1: it's And now Larry Summers has resigned from the top
Speaker 1: Tech Tech Group as other institutions now are cutting ties
Speaker 1: from him. Now it's interesting as you listen to democrats
Speaker 1: in all of this, Larry. Here's Larry Summers addressing his
Speaker 1: link to Epstein to Harvard students before class.
Speaker 2: Some of you will have seen my statement ar regret
Speaker 2: expressing my shame with respect to what I did communication
Speaker 2: with mister Epstein, and.
Speaker 1: That I've said I'm going to step back on publishing.
Speaker 3: For a time, but that I have discarded importing my
Speaker 3: teaching obligation.
Speaker 2: And so with your information on, we're going to go
Speaker 2: forward and talking about material.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, Now, the congresswoman that I mentioned, Stacy Plaskett,
Speaker 1: says she has no regrets taking direct questions from Epstein
Speaker 1: in the middle of a hearing. Here's what she said.
Speaker 4: Do you think that it was an error in judgment
Speaker 4: to be communicating with time at all?
Speaker 5: Do you have any regrets?
Speaker 6: Well, listen, I think Jeffrey Epstein is a reprehensible person,
Speaker 6: absolutely disgusting. I lived in a house, lived in a
Speaker 6: house during childhood with a mother who had been sexually
Speaker 6: abused by her dad, and I know the effect that
Speaker 6: that had on her as well as us as her family,
Speaker 6: and so I understand what the victims are going through
Speaker 6: and I want them to get their relevant, their justice,
Speaker 6: their peace out of this. I believe that Jeffrey Epstein
Speaker 6: had information and I was going to get information to
Speaker 6: get it the truth. Having a friendship with him is
Speaker 6: not something that that I would deem to have, and
Speaker 6: so I'm just looking forward. I'm moving forward.
Speaker 2: Wait, let me just better understand that what is that point?
Speaker 5: Because at the time, he was an sex offender and
Speaker 5: it had been detailed all the sexual There are.
Speaker 6: A lot of people who have done a lot of crimes,
Speaker 6: and as a prosecutor, you get information from people where
Speaker 6: you can. I've interviewed confidential informants, I've interviewed narcotics, drug traffickers,
Speaker 6: and others, And that doesn't mean that I'm their friend.
Speaker 6: That doesn't mean that they are friendly with me. It
Speaker 6: means that they have information that I need and that
Speaker 6: I'm trying to get it the truth, and that's.
Speaker 3: What I do.
Speaker 5: So no regrets, basically is what you're saying.
Speaker 6: I'm moving forward.
Speaker 1: I'm moving forward. Now we've learned from these documents revealed
Speaker 1: that these exchange texts with Epstein in twenty nineteen again
Speaker 1: convicted sex offender soliciting underage prostitution during a congressional hearing
Speaker 1: that featured Michael Kohne allowing the convicted heedophile to dictate
Speaker 1: her questions almost word for word. And what was a
Speaker 1: coordinated attempt to smear Donald J. Trump badly just the
Speaker 1: tip of the iceberg. We can get into Bill Clinton
Speaker 1: and his flights on the Lolita Express, or as I said,
Speaker 1: the you know, disgraceful revelations about Obama's chief economic advisor
Speaker 1: Larry Summers forcing him to resign from public life and
Speaker 1: disgrace and go on and on, or the fact that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. Now, if Jeffrey Epstein had all this leverage
Speaker 1: on Donald Trump, would do you think Donald Trump would
Speaker 1: have humiliated him and spectacularly and publicly thrown him out
Speaker 1: of his club as loudly as he did. I don't know.
Speaker 1: I tend to doubt it. Joining us now is Congressman
Speaker 1: Ralph Norman. He introduced a House freedom called his back
Speaker 1: Censure against this particular congresswoman. Welcome back, sir, How are
Speaker 1: you good?
Speaker 2: Fine?
Speaker 3: Fine, Sean. I'm glad to be with you.
Speaker 1: All right? What am I missing? Because I don't trust
Speaker 1: that anything that Jeffrey Epstein has to say about Donald
Speaker 1: Trump because of the way Donald Trump treated him. And
Speaker 1: I think a lot of this has been one big distraction.
Speaker 1: And now we know why the Biden administration had accessed
Speaker 1: all this information for four years. They didn't release the thing.
Speaker 3: Now they sat on it, Sean Cricket, no one, there
Speaker 3: was not even an interest in it. And now because
Speaker 3: the only issue they have is going to try to
Speaker 3: get Donald Trump at any cost. And you know, miss Plaski,
Speaker 3: who introduced a sensor resolution, failed to mention during her
Speaker 3: when she got up to try to defend herself, was
Speaker 3: the fact that she took money to the tune of
Speaker 3: well over limits involved. From what we hear over time
Speaker 3: from a convicted felon a pedophile who had been convicted
Speaker 3: in twenty eighteen that we're talking about that Cohen was
Speaker 3: conducting to try to discredit Donald Trump. I was hearing
Speaker 3: that she was using her whole All congress people get
Speaker 3: five minutes during the hearing, and she mentioned that she
Speaker 3: had had many other people who weighed in on questions. Well,
Speaker 3: the whole five minutes, she basically reverberated exactly what Epstein
Speaker 3: had told her. So it doesn't add up. It's a
Speaker 3: she should have been censored. I'm very disappointed in my
Speaker 3: Republican colleagues. And it failed, as you mentioned, because three
Speaker 3: votes present and three voted to not censor her, which
Speaker 3: is incomprehensible to me, but you know, it is what
Speaker 3: it is. And they allowed a woman, a sitting congressman
Speaker 3: who is has been there for eleven years. She should
Speaker 3: know better, and she sits on the Intel Committee, she
Speaker 3: gets things that other congressmen don't don't get. They allow
Speaker 3: her to keep her seat there and ically just get
Speaker 3: by with it. And it's it's a tragedy, to be
Speaker 3: honest with you.
Speaker 1: The only thing I think this is a huge distraction,
Speaker 1: and I think that the Democrats got the blame. They
Speaker 1: deserved for all the pain they inflicted with the shutdown,
Speaker 1: and they wanted to change the narrative in the country.
Speaker 1: If there's one saving grace in the vote, thank god
Speaker 1: that these poor victims whose lives I don't know. If
Speaker 1: you're a child and you go through this, I don't
Speaker 1: know if you are ever able to fully recover from
Speaker 1: that kind of evil and trauma, because that's how I
Speaker 1: view it as evil and trauma. But I did read
Speaker 1: that the Attorney General is able to withhold or redact
Speaker 1: material that would shield identifiable information of victims, because that
Speaker 1: would be an invasion, that is, you know of, It
Speaker 1: would constitute an a warranted invasion of their personal privacy. Now,
Speaker 1: if they want to come forward, and they do so
Speaker 1: of their own volition, that's up to them. Otherwise they
Speaker 1: have suffered enough because of this guy. My understanding is
Speaker 1: over a thousand victims we believe.
Speaker 3: Over a thousand and probably more that we don't even
Speaker 3: know about, that don't want to get their names out there,
Speaker 3: that don't want to involve their families. Many of them
Speaker 3: are forty years plus in age and they don't want
Speaker 3: any type of published. So you don't see any books out
Speaker 3: on this other than maybe a few, but for the
Speaker 3: people that he violated, for the young girls he violated,
Speaker 3: the vast majority don't even want to be brought up.
Speaker 3: They want to forget it. And as you mentioned, it's
Speaker 3: tough enough dealing with it, and that's all they want
Speaker 3: to do. But I think now that it's behind us,
Speaker 3: Democrats won't have this to go on and we've got
Speaker 3: more important things like health care, solve, like you know,
Speaker 3: finishing the immigration issue that President Trump is dealing with
Speaker 3: so greatly. And you know, it's it has been a distraction,
Speaker 3: It's just what the Democrats wanted.
Speaker 1: I My heart in this case goes out to the victims.
Speaker 1: And it is heartbreaking that any any individual has been
Speaker 1: subjected to this, and this guy was allowed to get
Speaker 1: away with it. Then he got a sweetheart deal the
Speaker 1: first time. And I find the whole thing, you know, nauseating, repulsively,
Speaker 1: evil and disgusting. And I think that, you know, is
Speaker 1: there any way that Joe Biden and his team would
Speaker 1: have sat on information that was damaging to Trump all
Speaker 1: these years? And Donald Trump threw this guy the hell
Speaker 1: out of his club and did it publicly, loudly, and spectacularly.
Speaker 3: Absolutely not. And if he looked at other things that
Speaker 3: they went after, Donald Trump owned, they weaponized the judicial system.
Speaker 3: They went after not just President Trump, but look at
Speaker 3: what cash Ptaelent went through, look at what markin matters
Speaker 3: went through, the legal bills that they had, so they
Speaker 3: would have done anything, and they're still continuing to do that, Sean.
Speaker 3: They hate this presence so much that the only good
Speaker 3: thing about it he occupies rent free in their minds
Speaker 3: and they can't find anything. And the American people get
Speaker 3: what they're trying to do, and it's not going to work,
Speaker 3: but it is.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you who I'm praying for in all of this.
Speaker 1: I'm praying for all those victims. I'm praying for them.
Speaker 1: They're the people that matter. And there were young victims
Speaker 1: and older people that were victims and put in horrible
Speaker 1: situations by a predator. And I can't think of anything
Speaker 1: more evil. I think it's disgusting. We appreciate your time, sir,
Speaker 1: thank you. All right, quick break rape by all right, Linda,
Speaker 1: I've got a special topic just for you before we
Speaker 1: get to the callers. You says right. The caller number
Speaker 1: is eight hundred and ninety four one shoe. If you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program, say that.
Speaker 5: See now you're starting to sound normal again. Good for you.
Speaker 5: Find your way back to your roots and you'll be
Speaker 5: just fine.
Speaker 1: Is a part of me that thinks you're not going
Speaker 1: to believe this story, okay, A part of me that
Speaker 1: thinks that, okay, okay. So we've been through a lot
Speaker 1: of woke stories, d I stories. You know, liberals champion
Speaker 1: in the rights of men to play women's sports and
Speaker 1: being women men being in women's locker rooms, and uh,
Speaker 1: let's see, uh, you know, guys like Tim Walls, you know,
Speaker 1: wanting uh, you know, all sorts of bizarre things in
Speaker 1: his state, even you know, offering gender affirming care without
Speaker 1: parental consent, which I think is absolutely a violation of
Speaker 1: the highest order. Parents are not potted plants. We've gone
Speaker 1: through all of that before. There's a new story out.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, it comes from a very
Speaker 1: prestigious university. I'll give you that up front. And according
Speaker 1: to these experts, in their conclusion, new parents should be
Speaker 1: asking their little babies or consent before they change the
Speaker 1: baby's diaper. Now, the researchers come from Australia's Deacon University.
Speaker 1: They explain that they want parents to do this, advising
Speaker 1: them to ensure that their child knows what is happening.
Speaker 1: The little infant knows what's happening, and explain I'm about
Speaker 1: to clean the poop from your backside. Are you okay
Speaker 1: with that? You've peed in your pants. It's uncomfortable, that's
Speaker 1: why you're crying. I'm going to change the diaper so
Speaker 1: you are more comfortable, and then monitor the infant's facial expressions,
Speaker 1: watch their body language to check if they understand what
Speaker 1: is happening. They probably won't because we're talking about infants,
Speaker 1: we're talking about babies. You don't believe that, do you.
Speaker 5: I have to assume that the people that are doing
Speaker 5: this are the same people wearing a mask while driving
Speaker 5: alone in their own car. I have to believe that
Speaker 5: in my deepest, deepest heart.
Speaker 1: Now, that was some of the more bizarre moments during COVID.
Speaker 1: I'd look over. I'd be driving my car and I
Speaker 1: look over and there's a guy in a car. Woman
Speaker 1: are in a car alone and they have their masks
Speaker 1: fully on. I didn't be like alone alone crazy. You
Speaker 1: can't get COVID from a car no, but maybe there's
Speaker 1: something to this. Maybe you're rushing to judgment. Maybe you
Speaker 1: need to open your mind and expand your horizons a
Speaker 1: little bit.
Speaker 5: I assure you I am not rushing. I have a arrived.
Speaker 5: These people are insane. You gotta wipe your baby's ass,
Speaker 5: and you wipe your baby's ass and you keep it moving,
Speaker 5: and if you're a normal mother, you're probably doing that
Speaker 5: twelve times a day, where you can't even count at
Speaker 5: the end of the day how many diapers you went through.
Speaker 5: If you're actually doing your job.
Speaker 1: If you're doing your job, and baby poops and you
Speaker 1: clean the poop up, and you clean the pee up,
Speaker 1: and the baby's happy again and more comfortable and probably
Speaker 1: stops crying. Right, that's the way I would think it
Speaker 1: would work. Right, Yes, I'm just checking. These people are nuts.
Speaker 5: These are These people are just a bunch of dumb ass,
Speaker 5: rich losers who are trying to find things to irritate
Speaker 5: other regular people that are going to work and paying
Speaker 5: their mortgage. It's all the same crap all the time.
Speaker 5: It irritates me. I'll tell you I got a story.
Speaker 5: I'd say I got a story for you. You want
Speaker 5: to hear it? You're gonna love it. This is a
Speaker 5: this is a local this story. You can't I definitely can't.
Speaker 5: You win for idiocy of the day like that, forget
Speaker 5: about it. But this story, we have a public administration,
Speaker 5: So just hold that in the back of your heads.
Speaker 5: These are taxpayer dollars because it's the Bucks County Administration
Speaker 5: building and they are inviting the public to honor trans
Speaker 5: lives lost to violence in a vigil on the lawn.
Speaker 5: So at first I thought, Oh, they're holding a vigil
Speaker 5: for all the lawn. Yeah, on the loan on the lawn, Okay, whatever.
Speaker 5: My point is all of these attacks that we have
Speaker 5: by these trans people that are on these drugs, and
Speaker 5: they have all this confusion and YadA, YadA, YadA. I
Speaker 5: mean we have lists of them from the past.
Speaker 1: Talking about transitioning medications. Yeah, yes, all that crap.
Speaker 5: And then they they're holding they're holding the vigil for
Speaker 5: the trans people, not the people have been victims of transcrime.
Speaker 5: It's insane. I'm like, I'm sorry, should we show up
Speaker 5: with signs that say have you seen this person? These
Speaker 5: this guy murdered how many kids in a church? It's
Speaker 5: there's no common time.
Speaker 1: You're going to go to like every time you get
Speaker 1: to go to like a parent teacher meeting. I think
Speaker 1: it would be great, and I think we ought to
Speaker 1: start filming your appearances and maybe running out on TV.
Speaker 5: Let me tell you, I already have one run in
Speaker 5: with one teacher this year. He's fully aware of how
Speaker 5: much I don't like him.
Speaker 1: All right, So when you go to these parent teacher
Speaker 1: meetings and the school board sees you walk in the room,
Speaker 1: I'm sure it's like, oh no, it's gonna be one
Speaker 1: of those nights I.
Speaker 5: Definitely have had. Listen, I have teachers that are very quiet,
Speaker 5: and they come up to me and they'll say, we
Speaker 5: totally agree with you. It's so great that you're speaking out.
Speaker 5: And I'm like, could you please grow a pair and
Speaker 5: join me? Like, everybody stop cowering, we can say it out. Wow, guys,
Speaker 5: conservative Christian not afraid, keep it moving.
Speaker 2: You know.
Speaker 5: It's like what happened in Michigan yesterday. You see them
Speaker 5: out there marching as Christians, and if anybody else was
Speaker 5: marching in the street, they would have protected them, but
Speaker 5: because they were Christians, they allowed them to be attacked
Speaker 5: by people who hate Christians. It's just an ongoing theme.
Speaker 5: Everybody's got to just grow a pair and start speaking
Speaker 5: up for themselves, period, end of sentence. We got to
Speaker 5: stop letting Antifa win and all these other lunatics.
Speaker 1: Well I didn't see it. Well, thank you, I believe you.
Speaker 5: And no in Michigan, Dearborn.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, dearborn. Anthony in Rhode Island, what's going on?
Speaker 7: A Hi, Sean, It's always great to talk to you.
Speaker 7: I love your show and get a great staff there. Listen.
Speaker 7: I got to say that I was reading a new speed.
Speaker 7: Mark Epstein came out publicly and well, let's put it
Speaker 7: this way, this is going to be the beginning of
Speaker 7: the new conspiracy Mark Epstein.
Speaker 1: Do you mean Jeffrey Epstein?
Speaker 7: Mark Epstein is Jeffrey. I'm sorry, Jeffrey. Yeah, the files
Speaker 7: are going to are scrubbed, so right there, I know
Speaker 7: off the bat that if they don't mention anything about
Speaker 7: Donald Trump, that's what they're all going to go by big.
Speaker 1: But even if it does, I mean between Epstein and
Speaker 1: the people that he was hanging out with. And I'm
Speaker 1: not talking about the victims, because there are a lot
Speaker 1: of victims here. They are in my prayers. I promise you.
Speaker 1: I feel so bad for them. Sure, you know, you know,
Speaker 1: but is there anything Epstein's going to say about Donald
Speaker 1: Trump that you're going to believe?
Speaker 7: Because I won't let me let me say this. Also
Speaker 7: for the people that they say, is the ones that
Speaker 7: believe that Donald Trump was part of this. Joe Biden
Speaker 7: and company had these records for four years. Nothing absolutely
Speaker 7: nothing came out publicly. Why wouldn't they if they had
Speaker 7: dirt on on Donald Trump? They were to come out
Speaker 7: publicly to just literally call well learning why?
Speaker 1: I mean, guys like Hakeem Jefferies were begging Epstein for
Speaker 1: money even after he was a convicted you know, for
Speaker 1: soliciting prostitution of a minor. People like this woman Plasket
Speaker 1: was taking, you know, questions from Epstein anti Trump, questions
Speaker 1: to ask Michael Cohne. Then you have, of course you
Speaker 1: know this, you know, former Treasury guy Lawrence Summers. I mean,
Speaker 1: how did Democrats mentioned and caught up in this whole thing?
Speaker 1: I wonder why they didn't want it out.
Speaker 7: I have a monthly movie subscription on TV. They have
Speaker 7: a documentary on Jeffrey Epstein. I'll tell you, I encourage
Speaker 7: everybody if you want to know about this guy, what
Speaker 7: he did. It's absolutely abhorrent what he did and the
Speaker 7: people that he surrounded himself with and personally, I think
Speaker 7: they should anybody that received any monetary donations from Jeffrey,
Speaker 7: they should get to be returned.
Speaker 1: Democrats won't return them. They will not return look.
Speaker 7: Shame on them, Shame on them. But it should be.
Speaker 7: It should be returned. Absolutely.
Speaker 1: But anyway, thank you, Anthony, appreciate it, buddy, eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine four one Sean, if you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. Robert and Tennessee, Robert, glad
Speaker 1: you called. Thanks for checking in.
Speaker 8: Good afternoon. Thank you for taking my call. I was
Speaker 8: just feeling bad for the people in the Palisades fires.
Speaker 8: We went through it in the campfires up in Paradise,
Speaker 8: and the insurance companies will sit there and switch adjusters
Speaker 8: every two months on you to try to mess you
Speaker 8: up and frustrate you. And it is very hard time.
Speaker 7: To go through.
Speaker 8: But we are still not rebuilt in Paradise. I had
Speaker 8: to move to Tennessee, but they're still not rebuilding the
Speaker 8: town and they're not being able to succeed and move
Speaker 8: forward in any way, shape or form.
Speaker 1: Did you get a fair settlement, one that was adequate.
Speaker 8: Yes, not compared to what I've lost. No, But I
Speaker 8: mean I've been blessed because I've moved out of California
Speaker 8: and I've moved on to my life. But there are
Speaker 8: people that cannot survive there anymore. I appreciate Rick Scott
Speaker 8: taking care the people in the Palisades, but there's still
Speaker 8: people up in Paradise that need help to move on
Speaker 8: with their lives up there, and they need help their
Speaker 8: elderly people as an elderly community, and they can't afford
Speaker 8: four hundred thousand dollars homes up there, and that's what
Speaker 8: they're charging and rebuild their one hundred and twenty thousand
Speaker 8: dollars homes they bought. And so people need to look
Speaker 8: into what's going on up there and try to help
Speaker 8: those people up there try to put that town back together.
Speaker 8: It was a beautiful place.
Speaker 1: On top of them not permitting people to rebuild that,
Speaker 1: they're also charging in property taxes. They're also having to
Speaker 1: have insurance on homes that don't exist in case somebody
Speaker 1: trips on their property that they shouldn't be there. I mean,
Speaker 1: the guy yesterday we had on the program eleven five
Speaker 1: hundred dollars a year for a property he can't even
Speaker 1: step foot on or rebuild on. It's unreal. It is
Speaker 1: so wrong on so many levels. And you know, this
Speaker 1: goes to my narrative. What do I always say to
Speaker 1: this audience. Don't ever think the government is going to
Speaker 1: be there to help you. They're not. Don't trust the government.
Speaker 1: And if you need any evidence, look at Obamacare, look
Speaker 1: at the Social security lock box, look at law and order,
Speaker 1: safety security, you know, look at the fundamentals, look at
Speaker 1: your educational system, and ask yourself, what does government do
Speaker 1: so well that you want to trust them with more
Speaker 1: of your money and more responsibility. That should be the
Speaker 1: definitive argument. And this is just this is it on
Speaker 1: steroids and human growth hormone and lives are ruined. Lives
Speaker 1: are ruined. And these insurance companies, you know, piss me
Speaker 1: off too. I mean, you pay a fortunate insurance. If
Speaker 1: your house burns down, whatever your insurance is, you should
Speaker 1: get the money for your your house, and you should
Speaker 1: get it expeditiously. You shouldn't have to go, you know,
Speaker 1: fight with them for ten months. Anyway, I appreciate the call.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred and ninety four. One show is a number.
Speaker 1: If you want to be a part of the program,
Speaker 1: let us say hi to Karen in Ohio. Hey, Karen,
Speaker 1: how are you?
Speaker 4: I'm great, Sean, how are you good? What you think
Speaker 4: about this? I think Congress could be so much more
Speaker 4: effective for America if they outlawed political campaigns all of them,
Speaker 4: require all the candidates to just do a number of debates,
Speaker 4: and there'd be so many benefits. But like the top
Speaker 4: four might be, it would give politicians way more time
Speaker 4: to do their actual jobs. You know, forget about the fundraising,
Speaker 4: the luxury travel, the rallies, broch est, all that junk.
Speaker 4: It would eliminate all the fame.
Speaker 1: The problem, Here's what the problem is, is that you
Speaker 1: can't stop individuals and stifle their freedom of speech. And
Speaker 1: one way to express yourself is if you want to
Speaker 1: spend money on a particular candidate you like and buy
Speaker 1: an ad. They'll they'll get around that five thousand different
Speaker 1: ways in sideways. There's no way you can stop it.
Speaker 1: They just can't.
Speaker 4: Seems like special interests would have no place to give
Speaker 4: their money if it's against the law to have a campaign.
Speaker 1: No, they'll just start their own little, you know, campaign
Speaker 1: on their own and say I'm Sean Hannity and I'm
Speaker 1: for the candidate A, B or C. And I pay
Speaker 1: the money myself. And you got a campaign going on,
Speaker 1: and everyone else will do the same thing. The money's
Speaker 1: going to be spent. You know. It's it's unfortunate.
Speaker 4: Shame how little they get done once they get elected.
Speaker 4: Two days later, they're on the campaign trail.
Speaker 1: Listen. The best way to get re elected, in my view,
Speaker 1: is to be great at the job you have and
Speaker 1: to do the job for the people in your district
Speaker 1: and let them know. You know. Unfortunately, with the environment
Speaker 1: we live in, I mean, it's difficult for a lot
Speaker 1: of elected officials now because of astroturfing and paid protesters
Speaker 1: and everything in between. It's hard for them to even
Speaker 1: get before their constituents, you know, to express what it
Speaker 1: is that they have been doing, because now they're putting
Speaker 1: their lives in jeopardy. It's scary. It's a very scary time.
Speaker 1: Appreciate the call, good call. Right. That's going to wrap
Speaker 1: things up with today, full coverage more crazy, NonStop protests
Speaker 1: against ice that's going on in North Carolina. We'll have
Speaker 1: live reports on the ground. Governor Greg Abbott taking on
Speaker 1: radicals in his state, will update you on all that's
Speaker 1: happening there. Jim Jordan, Todd Blanche number two at the
Speaker 1: DOJ will join us as well, and much more. DVR
Speaker 1: nine Eastern Hannity on Fox will see you tonight. Great
Speaker 1: show tonight, back here tomorrow. Thank you for making the
Speaker 1: show possible.