WEBVTT - Mini Crush #123 0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:03.640 Welcome to Movie Crush, a production of I Heart Radio. 0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:33.640 Hey everybody, and welcome to Many Crush Monday. Chuck here. 0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:36.879 Noel I hope is joining us. He is not answering 0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.519 his skype call. So we're gonna go ahead and get 0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:43.600 going because I am on a tight schedule. So. Uh. 0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:46.000 I found this on the Movie Crushers page. This is 0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:48.800 pretty great. This is from one of our oldest pals, 0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:56.080 Alison Gallagher. She dug up an article from pop Sugar two. Well, 0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.520 let me qualify this. It does not say thest movies 0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:04.280 of all time. It says these are twenty two of 0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.200 the worst movies of all time. And this is from 0:01:07.280 --> 0:01:11.520 Karne Sullivan from February of this year from pop Sugar 0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.039 dot com. And I was kind of curious how they 0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:15.720 qualified this, and then they said it kind of right 0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:21.560 in the beginning, that these are films that have a 0:01:21.760 --> 0:01:27.240 zero rating on rotten Tomatoes, which is, uh, that's pretty bad. 0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:31.559 Zero percent. Uh. And you know, we've talked about rotten 0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:36.000 tomatoes on the show before and whether or not, uh, 0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:40.160 anyone should pay attention to something like rotten tomatoes. You know, 0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:45.120 here's what I think is rotten tomatoes is a you know, 0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:46.960 it's it's an O case starting point. It will give 0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:50.160 you sort of a level set on generally what like 0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.280 how good a movie might be. It is not scientific. 0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:57.120 It is just a bunch of people's opinions. Um but 0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.000 I will say this, they are not film critics. And 0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.480 sometimes it's nice just to see what we all us 0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:06.520 normies think about a movie. So sometimes I will go, 0:02:06.720 --> 0:02:09.000 if I'm not sure about a movie, check out a 0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.240 little Rotten Tomatoes action and if it's really low, then 0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:15.120 that probably means it's not great. So I will say that, 0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.000 but I wouldn't put like the most stock in it. 0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:20.680 Like it would never be the ultimate decider on whether 0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.360 or not I watched a movie. Um but the number 0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.399 one movie, well they're not in order, I guess because 0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:30.000 they obviously represent but number the first one on the 0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:35.079 list is Mac and Me, a movie that I did 0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:37.560 not see. And I'll go ahead, and we should just 0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:40.960 go through all these and see which one's that I've 0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.160 seen and I haven't seen. But I have not seen 0:02:44.240 --> 0:02:48.880 Mac and Me at all, and I will not I 0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:52.240 can say that for sure. Is that nol. Hey dude, 0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:57.600 welcome to the show. How's it going. Yes, I'm on 0:02:57.639 --> 0:03:00.600 a tight schedule, so I got started and figured you 0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:04.040 would join at some point. Everyone Noel is here. It's weird. 0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.000 Oh so you're not recording, so Noel is will be 0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:11.360 recording shortly. Hey, that's all right. This is great entertainment. 0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:15.440 So what we're talking about, Noel is the Rotten Tomatoes 0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:19.560 twenty two movies of a zero percent rating? Are you 0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.840 really truly telling me you've never seen mc and Me 0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.440 and you refuse to see mac and Me? Why would 0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:28.160 I see it now? I mean, because it's one of 0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:31.040 the great product placement movies of all time. It's like 0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.880 one of the great like McDonald's tie in movies of 0:03:33.919 --> 0:03:35.760 all time. And I guess all you really need to 0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.000 see is that Paul Red clip. Though once you've seen that, 0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:40.360 you've probably seen the whole movie. There's also a dance 0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.400 off in McDonald's with really bad creature makeup with these 0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.680 alien gritters. Um, but yeah, I support not seeing it. 0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.520 It's probably fine. I'm not gonna do it. Number the 0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:54.120 second one on the list is Problem Child, another movie 0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.200 I have not seen. This sorts my heart because John 0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.680 Ritter is great and it's about to say and I 0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:03.200 miss him being around but uh, he was in apparently 0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.560 a pretty bad movie. What how did Problem Child to 0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.960 do on Rotten Tomatoes? I have no idea. It says 0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.760 there's also a problem Child three colin junior in love. 0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:18.159 What I've never even heard of that. I didn't know 0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.520 there was a two. That's wild. Yeah, I remember in 0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:23.520 the theaters. I mean that was those were like big, 0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:26.320 Those were big theater movies. I remember seeing them when 0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:27.960 I was a kid. But this is news to me. 0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:31.839 Problem Child three junior in love. That's crazy. If you 0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:33.840 have a colin in your movie, then that's a bad sign. 0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:40.400 That's uh. You want to rethink that statement, which would 0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:47.760 name a good one? What about a colonoscope in your movie? Now? Okay, um? 0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:50.320 What else? I love this? I love this game. The 0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:54.359 third one is Look who's talking? Now? Not the original 0:04:55.560 --> 0:04:58.560 but the sequel. Well that's the third one. Look who's 0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:02.200 talking too? Was looking? Was talking? Also? A K A 0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:06.359 T O O? Looking? Now? What was this? What was 0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:08.520 that was that? The babies? That was one with babies 0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:13.520 right with with two children on the they're not babies there. 0:05:14.200 --> 0:05:17.839 They look like to be about four or five. The 0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:22.120 first one is babies. The second one they're a little older, 0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:25.280 and I guess what's going on? Is there? There there's 0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:30.520 two dogs, and they added dogs to the mix. That's 0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:33.720 exactly Yes, that's it. They added dogs. That's how they 0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:38.000 spiced it up. Because then look who's talking to I 0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.840 wonder if they should just do more sequels and be 0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.919 look who's really talking now, and it'll be like the 0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:49.440 appliances yep, and then the walls and then they all 0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:54.520 just drift slowly into insanity. Look who's also talking as well? 0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:59.680 That's a good title, colin every everything in the house. Yes, 0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.719 here's another Colon movie. This is proving my point very well. 0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:08.800 Ballistic Colon X versus sever Okay, is this some kind 0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:13.360 of action picture? Yeah? This was Antonio Benderis and Lucy Lou. 0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.400 I did not see this either. Turns out I have 0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.520 pretty good taste. They should have just called it ballistic 0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.560 because that's, you know, on the nose. But at least 0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:25.720 it's a real movie title. It's ex spelled e c 0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:32.000 K S. Yes, amazing. I have not heard of this. Yeah, 0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.680 it was like I said, something I've never seen. I 0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:39.320 haven't seen any of these. Directed by someone named Wike 0:06:40.440 --> 0:06:49.080 Chaos Sanada under the pseudonym chaos, Wow, chaos with a K. Yeah. 0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:52.760 I bet the person directed music videos before that. I 0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:57.760 bet you a thousand dollars. That's a music video director. One. Huh, 0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:02.360 I'll take that action, all right. Uh. Number five is Derailed, 0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.360 a movie I've never heard of, but it has Jean 0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:09.800 Claude van Dam in it. A train of course straight 0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:13.720 to video. There you have it. Number six is Pinocchio, 0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:16.640 and then on the Facebook page, people are like Pinocchio. 0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.080 How could Pinocchio be on it? They're talking about the 0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:25.840 live action Roberto what's his name Roberto Banini version? Yeah, 0:07:25.880 --> 0:07:27.800 which is crazy because that was like a real passion 0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.760 project for him and obviously a life is beautiful, like 0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.520 you know, Oscar City. And then his next big passion 0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:38.000 project was a weird Pinocchio where he plays a small 0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:44.720 child as an adult, weird Italian man and apparently unbearably bad. 0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:47.920 Just just like painful to watch is what I read. Yeah, 0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.760 not interested. I have not seen any of these killing 0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:54.280 me softly as on the on the seven Spot Heather 0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:59.440 Graham erotic thriller. Well what they're wrong with that? Yeah, 0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:05.040 that's not look good. The eighth one is Constellation has 0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.680 Billy d Williams, Gabrielle Union, Hill Harper, and Zoe Saldana. 0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:14.840 Good cast. Yeah, movie, though says I made for TV 0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:17.480 soap opera kind of thing with an A list cast, 0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:21.920 So not about space at all. No, it's not. I 0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:24.000 think it's probably about love. That's written in the stars 0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:28.400 would be my guess. Ray Don Chong, she's she's in 0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.280 it good. I mean, I haven't seen her in a while, 0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.840 but I'm glad you got work in two thousand five. 0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.480 It's got two stars on IMDb. Okay, I guess is 0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:42.160 about the equivalent of no stars on Rotten Tomato because 0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:45.520 IMDb is all user generated. So if people that actually 0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:49.520 watched the movie or this unkind to it, that's pretty bad. 0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:52.120 Maybe that was just Stoner's who thought it was Tommy 0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:56.280 Chong and just gave it a star or two ray 0:08:56.360 --> 0:09:07.200 Don Chong. The ninth one is one missed call. Another 0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.160 movie I've never heard of. It's a remake of a 0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:14.600 Japanese film starring ed Ed Burns. I don't know who 0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:19.200 that is. You know Ed Burns? Ed Burns, Mr Burns. 0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:23.160 He was in uh he directed films early on and 0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.280 wrote and directed these movies about you know kind of 0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:29.319 young Catholic men. Um, but he he wasn't saving private 0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.280 Ryan was kind of his biggest thing. You'd recognize him 0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:35.240 if you saw him. He was hot ship for a while. Okay, 0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:40.160 handsome man, got it? Let me see here, Tin is homecoming. 0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:44.640 Misha Barton in a so so I'm sorry, not so 0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:52.640 scary horror movie. Yeah, yeah, these straight to video things, 0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:54.000 I don't even know if you should count that. If 0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:57.000 you're gonna make a worst movie list, that's yeah. I 0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.680 feel like there should be a caveat that this should 0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:04.720 only include movies that actually were featured in cinemall cinemaar 0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:10.000 like The Nutcracker and three D l Fanning and Nathan Lane. 0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:16.680 I mean, come on, the Nutcracker is terrible anyway. Well, no, 0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.000 whoa chuck. That is a hot take, my friends, that's 0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:21.839 a hot take. Have you ever gone and seen The 0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.400 Nutcracker live and on stage? Now, Bob Ball, do you 0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:29.080 one better. I've run theater tech for The Nutcracker many 0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:31.640 years when I was when I was growing up, when 0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.560 I was in college, I worked as a sound guy 0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.360 at a theater, a local theater. And you know, if 0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:40.080 you're the sound guy, you still have to like be 0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.080 kind of a stage hand when they're setting up the 0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.560 sets and building all the stuff. And so, yes, I 0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:50.040 have seen The Nutcracker many times in a row and full. Yeah, 0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:54.720 I mean they do sort of an abbreviated version. So no, 0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:57.720 it's not very abbreviated. It's just slightly shortened for like 0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.600 school shows where they have like kids come for you know, 0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.319 the different elementary schools around town. Uh, and then they 0:11:03.360 --> 0:11:06.719 do the full version for the evening performances. So yeah, 0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:10.480 I've seen it in six different ways. Man. Yeah, My 0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:16.000 problem with The Nutcracker is that it's so long. Also, 0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.360 like the first the first half of it when they're 0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.079 actually like, you know, when all the magic starts, that's 0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:23.320 pretty charming. But then the second half when it's just 0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:27.920 all these bizarre dances and you know, it just goes 0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:29.720 on and on and on and on, and there's just 0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:34.000 it's just so meandering and boring. And yeah, I'm not 0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:36.400 into it either, Chuck. I'm with you. I'm with you 0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.199 on your hot take. The twelfth one on the list. 0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:41.719 This was in the theater because I remember it being 0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:47.680 a thing. She's in here, Emily, she's under the table. Uh, 0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:52.679 Bucky Larson Colin Born to be a star. That just 0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.679 looks terrible. Christina Ricci and Nick Swardson and Don Johnson. 0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:08.000 Uh thirteen is Dark Tide? My goodness, halle Berry, she's great, 0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.160 but dark tied. I think she kind of is is 0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:15.760 described as a sexy Jaws starring halle Berry. It wasn't 0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.640 Jaws sexy enough. Do we need a sexy Jaws? I mean, 0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:22.800 Roy Scheider was absolutely soldering and Jaws and that shark, 0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.000 I mean, talk about a sexy shark. We don't need 0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:30.240 a sexy Jaws. Dark Tide is it? Is? It feature 0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:33.520 some sort of okay? So the cover is Holly Berry 0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:36.640 in a bikini, and every still from the movie is 0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.400 Holly Berry in a bikini, and I see a shark 0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:43.079 fin So yeah, that's the sales point. It does appear 0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:48.400 to be sexy Jaws, all right? Who is? Oh my god, 0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:51.760 there's an amazing Japanese or a Korean cover where it's 0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.600 Holly Berry in the bikini and then the shark full 0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:58.920 mouth open bearing. It's really bad looking. C G I 0:12:58.960 --> 0:13:03.120 shark teeth toward her, away from her. Actually, but it's 0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:05.280 like the scale is all wrong. She's sort of like 0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.720 in the waves and the shark looks tiny in comparison 0:13:08.760 --> 0:13:13.520 to how giant Holly Berry is. Well, you know, she'll 0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:15.800 sell a movie better than that shark. I guarantee it. 0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:19.240 What happened to holly Berry? Chuck? She's around? What are 0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:21.360 you talking about? I mean, I'm sure she's around, But 0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.440 like you know, she went from Monster's Ball to Dark Tide, 0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:28.520 you know, I mean, well, you know, uh, I would 0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.320 agree that the quality of film that she's been in 0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:35.800 has gone down some. But that movie, the call was 0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:38.240 seven years ago. That was pretty good. She was in 0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:42.079 john Wick three. Oh, that's right. She was great in 0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.840 john Wick three. She was like his assassin, kind of 0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:48.280 ex flame. I believe, if I'm not mistaken, Yeah, I 0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:50.000 think you know what, I think halle Berry has taken 0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:54.640 work where she can get work. I I support that. No, 0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:56.840 you you reminded me, Chuck, she was she wasn't john 0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.000 Wick three. I heard a great little, uh little uh 0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:03.080 trivia about john Wick is that the only reason they 0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.720 called it john Wick is because Counters could never remember 0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:08.720 the actual name that they were going to give it, 0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:10.480 and when he was doing press, he just kept calling 0:14:10.480 --> 0:14:12.880 it john Wick. It was originally going to be called 0:14:12.960 --> 0:14:16.040 like avenged or something really stupid like that. And now 0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:18.120 you know, we can't imagine any other way. But that 0:14:18.160 --> 0:14:20.240 was literally why they changed the name of the movie 0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.960 to John Wick, because he kept making press rounds and 0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:27.400 referring to it as John Wick. Yeah, where you wonder? 0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:33.160 I read it somewhere? Are you gonna? Are you gonna refute? 0:14:33.640 --> 0:14:35.520 Do you have? No? I just I take that with 0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:37.080 a grain of salt. That sounds to me like a 0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.320 bit of a movie lore type of thing, but maybe not. 0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:43.760 You never know. I feel like it was kicking is 0:14:43.840 --> 0:14:47.640 really dumb. You can't remember a one word title? No, 0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:49.640 I don't know if he couldn't remember, that was the 0:14:49.680 --> 0:14:51.920 way the article kind of hedged it. But to me, 0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:53.840 he just I think he just liked the name of 0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:55.880 the character and that's what he always referred to it. 0:14:56.040 --> 0:15:03.960 Let's see John Wick name Kean remember? Uh, well press 0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.800 on while you're looking at Yeah we should. Fourteen is 0:15:07.840 --> 0:15:11.440 a thousand words. It's Eddie Murphy movie that Initially when 0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:13.840 I saw this, I did not remember, but now I do, 0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.600 And I think the whole deal is is that he's 0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:19.680 got a thousand words that he can say or something. 0:15:19.920 --> 0:15:23.600 He's got a daily word count not a good idea 0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:27.600 for a movie. Derek Colstead, who wrote the original John 0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.080 Wick as well as its two sequels, said that Reeves 0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:33.520 kept referring to the original film by the wrong name. 0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:38.320 It had previously been titled scorn Quote. The only reason 0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:40.880 it's called john Wick, he said, is that Kanu kept 0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:45.040 referring to it as John Wick. Okay, I can buy 0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:48.320 that from the Independent. That's slightly different than he couldn't 0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:53.840 remember the title. Okay, that's fair. Uh. Number fifteen is 0:15:53.880 --> 0:16:00.240 the Ridiculous six Yeah, that western Adam Sandler eight to 0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:04.240 Netflix deals. Oh was Sandler in it? That's his thing. 0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:06.760 It's one of his things. It's one of his uh 0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:11.760 whatever contract that he has to make ten Netflix movies 0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:16.320 a year. Oh goodness me, that doesn't look good. Taylor 0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:20.880 Lautner New Boy. Uh sixteen is Cabin Fever. And when 0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.600 I I first saw Alison Gallagher's abridged version, which was 0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:28.360 just the list typed out and not the link, I 0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.360 thought Kevin Fever was Okay. I kind of like that movie. 0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:35.120 The horror were people's skin sloughs off and stuff here. Yeah, 0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:38.800 but this is the remake, which I forgot. They did 0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:41.760 a remake to Cabin Fever, and why on earth did 0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:46.080 they remake Cabin Fever? That doesn't make any sense. No, 0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:49.680 I mean it doesn't at all. I guess the original 0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:56.520 was low budget and schlocky kind of But yeah, so 0:16:56.600 --> 0:16:59.400 I am realizing, Chuck, are these these are? Zero percent? 0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:02.640 Was out of dere So I am seeing that every 0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:04.680 one of these that I pull up on IMDb has 0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.159 two stars. So the the equivalent of zero percent on 0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.840 Rotten Tomatoes is two stars on IMDb. It would seem 0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:13.360 but it could be an interesting false equivalence. I'm gonna 0:17:13.440 --> 0:17:16.080 keep testing it, all right, we might have stumbled upon 0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:22.040 something great here. NOL seventeen is the Disappointment's Room. First 0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:26.480 of all, does not roll off the tongue. No, not 0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:30.080 at all. The disappointments Room. I will say this. So 0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:33.720 it's from the director of Disturbia, and I thought distributor 0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.159 was Okay, did you ever see that? I know what 0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.640 you're talking about, but I'm sorry, I hate to keep 0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:40.760 harping on this. Why not just call it the disappointment Room. 0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.280 That's easier to say. Adding that s at the end 0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:46.280 it makes it sound really clunky, and I don't understand 0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.159 what's going on that's weird. I'm sure that's explained in 0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:54.040 the movie somehow, but we'll never know. Yeah, I thought 0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:58.320 Distributor was all right. It wasn't great. I did a 0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:01.240 little uh rabbit hole I have in this some iTunes 0:18:01.280 --> 0:18:04.240 reviews the other day, and someone accused us of too 0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:08.040 often saying I haven't seen that, and that that's lazy 0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:12.000 film commentary. Yes, you're right, this show is all about 0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:19.200 lazy film commentary. Spot on four stars exactly, Uh, Max Steele, 0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:24.520 I've never looked at our ratings on iTunes. I don't care. No, 0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:26.960 you shouldn't care. But it's occasionally a fun way to 0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.879 either give yourself a nice little boost of confidence or 0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:33.720 like poor salt in a wound. Ah, I never I 0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:35.040 mean I used to read the Bad Ones and stuff 0:18:35.080 --> 0:18:38.040 you should know, just for frenzies. That stuff doesn't bother me. No, 0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.000 it doesn't bother me either. I'm totally joking. But it 0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:42.720 is fun to kind of occasionally you realize, like, oh, 0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:46.840 this is more about you than it is about me, buddy. Yeah, 0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.080 I think if I've learned one thing in life here 0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.800 at my ripe old ages, the one thing that doesn't 0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.479 bother me and shouldn't bother anyone is an internet opinion. 0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:59.720 M hm, you're setting yourself up for a frustrating life 0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:04.240 if that stuff gets to you. Max Steele Number eighteen. 0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.439 I don't think I even know this movie says it 0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:14.520 wanted to be the next Transformers. Yeah, that is not 0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:16.439 where I would have gone with that. It sounds to 0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:18.399 me immediately you say that, and I think it's like 0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:24.719 a porno assassin movie. Yeah, or or yeah exactly Max Steele. Okay, 0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.840 I think it started off as an animated series that 0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:31.280 was Transformers esque, and then they then made this into 0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:33.920 a movie that apparently did not do well again. Two 0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:38.199 stars on IMDb. All right, check this one, Nold Precious Cargo. 0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.399 Uh this straight to video starring Bruce Willis Claire for 0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:45.480 Lonnie and oh goodness, the great great to Mark Paul. 0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:51.200 How don't you know how to say his name? Casa Gossler, Gossler, 0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:53.360 I'll take I'll say I would take any of those 0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:58.760 Chuck that looks precious Cargo. Is it at some sort 0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.199 of treasure or is it about children? Like writing in 0:20:02.240 --> 0:20:07.919 a van? It's thieves in a murderous showdown with a 0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:14.000 lack of thrills and reliance on skimpy outfits Willis and 0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.800 his banana hammock. It's got to balance out. It can't 0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:19.600 be all skimpy outfits. You gotta have some thrills to chuck. 0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.439 You gotta have some thrills and some fully clothes humans, 0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:29.200 at least clothes, or at least twenty center the people 0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:35.480 with some clothes. Did you ever see Color of Night? No, 0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:37.800 I know the movie, never saw it. That was the 0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:41.760 sexy one, right st e me. Let me tell you 0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:48.600 all right, we're gonna finish this stuff. Dark Crimes with 0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.920 Jim Carey when he did that dark sort of drama 0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:57.119 misguided murder mystery is how it's described here on the 0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:00.680 Pop Sugar website. Poor Jim Carrey, that I mean, not 0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.600 poor Jim Carrige. I'm curious. I'm not gonna feel too sorry, born, 0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.800 but that does not look like a good movie or 0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:10.240 a good choice. Oh. If you look at the poster, uh, 0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:12.320 if you can chuck, I recommend you pulling it out, 0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:16.520 because he's just making the most sad sack face you 0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:22.800 could possibly make. He just looks really grumpy. It's probably 0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:26.840 because he was in that movie Dark Crimes. Oh, boy, 0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:31.000 and the tagline is it takes a dark mind to 0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:37.639 solve a twisted crime. Yet it's called dark crimes and 0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:47.840 not dark minds. All right, nol. So we're gonna move 0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:53.080 on to something that's actually worthwhile. Uh, in these charged 0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.480 times here in our country, I thought we would start 0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:59.879 a thread on movies or documentaries that have educated people 0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.760 on race relations and open their eyes on things. And 0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:04.280 I thought this would just serve as a good list, 0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.919 as a good reference point for people seeking this kind 0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:08.800 of stuff out, which we should all be doing right now. 0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:11.800 So I'm just gonna read through a bunch of these 0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:13.520 just to get as many of them out there as 0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:16.560 we can. Alicia Deats, one of our old friends, says, 0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:20.919 Hidden Figures focused on women of color and their struggle. Uh. 0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:25.040 Great movie. Amanda Karen says, when they see us about 0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:29.719 the Central Park five, I did. I don't what there 0:22:29.720 --> 0:22:33.760 were there too, Central Park five documentaries, because that's the 0:22:33.800 --> 0:22:35.520 one that I'm familiar with. You may there may have 0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.680 been an older one. I saw one, but I thought 0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:42.919 it was just called the Central Park five. Uh, let 0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.600 me look that up real quick. That I mean, that's 0:22:45.600 --> 0:22:48.880 a harrowing story and one that also figures into our 0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:52.720 current president. Yeah, there's one called the Central Park five. 0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:56.359 That's the one I saw. Imagine they're both great, but no, 0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:01.280 Donald Trump, the current president, called for their you know, 0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:07.080 uh he even when they're exonerated. He took out an 0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.800 ad in the paper that basically, you know, this is 0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.600 bullshit and they should be put away for life or worse. 0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:14.560 I don't even remember exactly what he said because I 0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:18.359 try not to pay attention. Let me see here, my 0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.040 kid watch Do the Right Thing as a teenager, and 0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:24.119 the scene where Spike Lee points out John Taturo's hypocrisy 0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:27.720 of being racist towards characters, towards least character but admiring 0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.400 famous people of color like Prince and Carl Lewis really 0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:33.280 stuck with me. H yeah, man, I remember. I mean 0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.560 that movie is just as relevant today, if not more so, 0:23:36.600 --> 0:23:38.800 than it ever was. That movie rocked my world. It 0:23:39.480 --> 0:23:41.439 comes up all the time. It could come up a 0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.800 bunch with us. I've still not seen it. I am 0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:48.560 going to see it. It's so so beloved by so 0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:50.719 many different people, and it's been recommended to me like 0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.399 ten times over. We gotta see it. Yeah, one of 0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:58.320 the great movies of all time. Uh. Katie Scott says 0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:00.159 it's not a movie, but the new HBO watch Man 0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:02.760 was the first time I've heard about the Tulsa race massacre. 0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.280 I live in northeastern Oklahoma and went to Oklahoma public 0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.000 school for twelve years, and it was never taught to us. 0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.119 I never thought anything like that would ever happen in Oklahoma. 0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.280 Very eye opening. Yeah, you know, even stuff like that 0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:18.399 can can educate and open people's eyes to dive deeper. 0:24:18.960 --> 0:24:21.680 Oh yeah, that's fabulous. Show. I just found out something 0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:25.639 pretty gross and weird and possibly not on purpose, but 0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.160 if very tone deaf either way. Apparently Trump's first big 0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:34.080 rally is going to be in Tulsa, and it's on 0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:38.040 June tenth, which many folks might not know about. But 0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:42.800 it's a big holiday, considered holiday in the African American community, 0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:48.080 and it celebrates the abolition of slavery. If I'm not mistaken, Uh, 0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:50.680 I don't know if there's intention there, but it's sure 0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:55.720