Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunch. Trump unloads on a
Speaker 1: loaded question. Nick Cannon has thoughts on white people, is
Speaker 1: the gya boycott backfiring? And Hong Kong special status is gone.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexon Show where the mission where
Speaker 1: mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence.
Speaker 1: Make no mistake, You're a great American. Again, the Buck
Speaker 1: Sexon Show begins. He's a great guy. No, welcome everybody
Speaker 1: to the Buck Sexton Show. Thank you for being here. My,
Speaker 1: oh my, I cannot believe it is the middle of summer.
Speaker 1: You know. I don't know if it's technically the actual midpoint,
Speaker 1: but it feels like the middle of July is the
Speaker 1: middle of summer. This thing is Is it flying by?
Speaker 1: I don't know. Every day feels like an eternity with
Speaker 1: the COVID situation across the across the country, and around
Speaker 1: the world, and yet the time still flies by. In
Speaker 1: some way, we have much to get to. I wanted
Speaker 1: to start, if I could, with what was a bit
Speaker 1: of a stunning question and an even better answer from
Speaker 1: the President of the United States yesterday, because, as you know,
Speaker 1: the two primary battlegrounds for politics right now, it's not. Oh,
Speaker 1: they're not over just general healthcare. I know COVID obviously
Speaker 1: relates to healthcare, but it's not over how we're going
Speaker 1: to pay for healthcare. It's not over the border or
Speaker 1: even taxes or national security abroad. No, we're fighting over
Speaker 1: issues of racial division and quote systemic racism and COVID
Speaker 1: nineteen and the response to it. That's where all of
Speaker 1: the media narrative and energy is currently going, really on
Speaker 1: both sides, and certainly with COVID. It's understandable why that's
Speaker 1: the case. It's not as clear to a lot of
Speaker 1: folks why we should be spending so much time talking
Speaker 1: about police reform and defunding cops when we all know
Speaker 1: that it's already backfiring as a strategy for making communities safer.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's not backfiring as a Democrat mobilization tool. But
Speaker 1: the President was asked by Catherine Herriage over at CBS
Speaker 1: a question that you gotta wonder why now. I think
Speaker 1: she's just reflecting the liberal journo consensus out there, which
Speaker 1: is that they still believe that people, that black people
Speaker 1: in particular in this country, are dying at the hands
Speaker 1: of evil cops every day when as we know, it's
Speaker 1: actually quite rare. It's very rare that a law enforcement
Speaker 1: officer kills a black American for reasons of racism or
Speaker 1: excessive force, or whatever elicit reason. We maybe, under the circumstances,
Speaker 1: we know that. But Trump was asked this question. I
Speaker 1: want you to hear how you responded. Play clip one.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about George Floyd. You said, George Floyd's death
Speaker 1: was a terrible thing, terrible. Why are African Americans still
Speaker 1: dying at the hands of law enforcement in this country?
Speaker 1: And so are white people? So are white people? What
Speaker 1: a terrible question to ask. So are white people? More
Speaker 1: white people, by the way, more white people. Now, what
Speaker 1: was stunning wasn't just that the president here, You're starting
Speaker 1: to see glimpses of who this guy was in twenty
Speaker 1: sixteen and for most of his presidency. And I understand.
Speaker 1: I think he's been just beset on all sides with
Speaker 1: this COVID thing and then the BLM protests and anti
Speaker 1: fund the statue toppling. He's been under a lot of
Speaker 1: dress and doesn't get a whole lot of help. And
Speaker 1: I gotta say it feels like much of the establishment
Speaker 1: conservative media, much of the establishment conservative media has been
Speaker 1: just ineffective in their messaging on this, ineffective, not willing
Speaker 1: to really take the fight to the other side. I
Speaker 1: think there are people who want to make sure that
Speaker 1: they don't get too deep in their Trump support this time,
Speaker 1: so that if Trump loses, they still are corporate friendly,
Speaker 1: they still can hold on to their privileged purchase, which
Speaker 1: is obviously not about the movement and not about the country. First,
Speaker 1: it's about some people aligning in their pocketbooks. But I
Speaker 1: also saw right after the President said this, there were
Speaker 1: media I trying to remember who it was, I think
Speaker 1: was Reuters, suggested that he presented without evidence that more
Speaker 1: white people are killed every year by cops than black
Speaker 1: people are. No, this is just a fact that we
Speaker 1: all know. Everyone knows. This has been a part The
Speaker 1: President doesn't have to cite the page of the study
Speaker 1: or the FBI report. This is known. This is a
Speaker 1: known fact, right, This is These are two different things
Speaker 1: that people already know. The statistics show that more white
Speaker 1: people are killed every year than black people by cops,
Speaker 1: and yet there's no movement out there. We'm like, I
Speaker 1: know why. This is where all the social justice warriors
Speaker 1: would start screaming out systemic racism and all the stuff. Okay,
Speaker 1: but the truth is the truth, and we need to
Speaker 1: start digging in deep on this. We need to find
Speaker 1: those facts that undermine the leftist narrative and just keep
Speaker 1: repeating it and saying it and staring into the faces
Speaker 1: of the leftist mob when they chant their slogans that
Speaker 1: are loaded with political implication, but are either misdirections from
Speaker 1: the facts, misrepresentations, or just outright fabrications. That's what we're
Speaker 1: up against in this debate. And so I was happy
Speaker 1: to see the President just say, look, this is crazy.
Speaker 1: Why are you asking me this question? How could somebody,
Speaker 1: how could someone answer that, why are black people still
Speaker 1: killed by cops in America? How could you have a
Speaker 1: satisfactory answer from the commander in chief? I mean, in
Speaker 1: keeping with what a journalist is looking for here. I
Speaker 1: mean Katherine Harriage. People think of her as usually pretty
Speaker 1: squared away. You know. I'll leave that for you to
Speaker 1: decide on your own. But I'm looking at this, I'm
Speaker 1: watching this as it happens, and I say to myself,
Speaker 1: what are they What is the answer they're looking for here?
Speaker 1: And they're not looking for any answer they're just this
Speaker 1: is virtue signaling. This is what journos do. Why do
Speaker 1: black people still die at the hands of police in America? Well,
Speaker 1: why does anyone die at the hands of police in America?
Speaker 1: Sometimes the cops, because cops are human beings, They have
Speaker 1: their own their own you know, temperament issues, prejudices. Occasionally,
Speaker 1: rarely they criminally kill somebody. Right, we used to call
Speaker 1: them purps and uniform in the NYPD. But usually when
Speaker 1: the cops kill somebody, this is just the truth, by
Speaker 1: the statistics, that person deserve the use of violent force
Speaker 1: against them, right. That is the overwhelming majority of cases,
Speaker 1: the cops kill somebody because the person pulls a gun
Speaker 1: on them, or the cops kill somebody because he's running
Speaker 1: at them with a knife. And so why ask this
Speaker 1: question in such an open ended fashion. It's to just
Speaker 1: play upon, to really prey upon the fear that is
Speaker 1: growing and the anxiety across the country that we aren't
Speaker 1: as racially racially tolerant and as decent to each other
Speaker 1: as all of us have thought for some time now,
Speaker 1: that racial division is much worse than any of us
Speaker 1: are willing to say out loud. And you know, we're
Speaker 1: getting this constant lecture from the left wing intelligency or
Speaker 1: a bunch of frauds on this issue. Of course, you know,
Speaker 1: they don't spend time in impoverished minority neighborhoods. They're not
Speaker 1: worried that the millionaire journals on CNN and MSNBC and
Speaker 1: ABC and you name it. They're not worried about what's
Speaker 1: happening in their neighborhood at night. If anything, they're out
Speaker 1: in the Hamptons on the weekends while they're shooting sprees
Speaker 1: here in New York City. But the President gave an
Speaker 1: answer that rattled the media. We're not going to keep
Speaker 1: playing along with whatever propaganda they're throwing out there. Why
Speaker 1: do black people still die in this country at the
Speaker 1: hands of police? It depends, and you can ask the
Speaker 1: same question about why any person of any color dies
Speaker 1: at the hands of police in this country. Here's a question,
Speaker 1: why is it that Asian Americans die at substantially lower
Speaker 1: rates per capita than white people in America. I'm just
Speaker 1: wondering why more white people are killed than Asian people
Speaker 1: by cops on a per capita interaction with police basis
Speaker 1: a lot more. Does that mean that cops are biased
Speaker 1: against white people. You know, they're setting up all these
Speaker 1: constructs for these discussions, and they're all only allowed to
Speaker 1: come to certain conclusions, and everything around the construct, the
Speaker 1: logic that is used, the facts that they're picking for
Speaker 1: one individual application, are never allowed to be you know,
Speaker 1: we're never allowed to look at this and say, you're
Speaker 1: making a claim based upon this set of data. But
Speaker 1: why isn't that claim true about another set of data?
Speaker 1: Or how do you explain that? They won't answer. They
Speaker 1: won't answer, No, racism, racism. And really, now we've reached
Speaker 1: a point where white people are supposed to be humiliated
Speaker 1: by their whiteness. Liberals have adopted this as a strategy.
Speaker 1: They like this, and a white liberal in particular love
Speaker 1: to publicly debase their whiteness. They derive a feeling of virtue,
Speaker 1: a feeling of pleasure from this, of righteousness self righteousness.
Speaker 1: Of course, I've been thinking recently about writing a Jonathan
Speaker 1: Swift style essay about how I want to purge my
Speaker 1: horrific whiteness from myself, just to see if I could
Speaker 1: get it. I get it. I bet you get it.
Speaker 1: Published in top peer reviewed academic journals about the training
Speaker 1: and steps necessary to purge one's whiteness. This is insanity.
Speaker 1: This undermines not just the rule of law, but our
Speaker 1: moral order, our sense of individual dignity and worth and responsibility.
Speaker 1: Why should anyone's skin color determine anything about them? The
Speaker 1: conservative position is it does not. The conservative point of
Speaker 1: view is whether you're white, black, brown, whether you're Asian, Latino,
Speaker 1: you know, Arab name, it doesn't matter. All that does
Speaker 1: matter is who you are as a person, what you do,
Speaker 1: and the law treats you as a human being. Period.
Speaker 1: That's it. That's our position. That is the rights position
Speaker 1: on this issue. What is the left's position? Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: how much time do you have? White people now are
Speaker 1: supposed to treat their whiteness as though it is a handicap.
Speaker 1: They're supposed to apologize for it. They're supposed to grovel.
Speaker 1: And if you don't grovel, you're treated like you're a
Speaker 1: white nationalist. Oh why why aren't you apologizing for your whiteness?
Speaker 1: Why aren't you apologizing for you know, your ancestors or whatever.
Speaker 1: First of all, to treat people from you know, southern
Speaker 1: Italy like they've had the same experience as people from Belarus,
Speaker 1: and act like everyone's history is the same. You know
Speaker 1: they if you're in America now, it's all the same.
Speaker 1: This is completely a historical garbage. But liberals, their minds
Speaker 1: have been infected with this poison, and they're infecting as
Speaker 1: many other people as they can with their designations about
Speaker 1: racial attitudes, racial history, all of this, and we're supposed
Speaker 1: to accept it or else. No, we're going to have
Speaker 1: to meet them on this battlefield of ideas. We're going
Speaker 1: to have to say, no, I reject this concept that
Speaker 1: whiteness is something that all of a sudden you can degrade, denigrade, hate,
Speaker 1: You can hate whiteness and get away with it. In
Speaker 1: elite culture in America, you can. There is no such
Speaker 1: thing as a joke about white people that you can't tell.
Speaker 1: There's no such thing as a historical claim about white
Speaker 1: people raping and murdering and pillaging, and you know, all
Speaker 1: these things. You go out there and say that, and
Speaker 1: you will be fine. Some people might point out that
Speaker 1: that's a little bit crazy, and so on and so forth.
Speaker 1: But you can say all these things, and if you're
Speaker 1: a leftist, and particularly if you're a leftist who is
Speaker 1: a person of color, get away with it. It's fine. No,
Speaker 1: it's not fun, it's not acceptable. I'm not playing this
Speaker 1: game anymore. I'm not okay with this that being white
Speaker 1: is to be treated as a bad thing. Unless you're
Speaker 1: somebody who will constantly talk about how bad your whiteness is,
Speaker 1: then you're okay. This is a false premise, it's an
Speaker 1: immoral premise, and it needs to be rejected. And the
Speaker 1: legions of leftist idiots out there need to know that
Speaker 1: they're arguments. They're intellectually vapid, self contradictory, and worthless arguments
Speaker 1: about race in America today, like whiteness is somehow something
Speaker 1: to be ashamed of, is not going to continue in
Speaker 1: the public sphere without pushback, no attitude. It's about an
Speaker 1: individual's race and their dignity and worth tied to that
Speaker 1: are consistent morally and acceptable socially. This should not be
Speaker 1: the case. We should not allow this. And the constant
Speaker 1: denigration of whiteness has just reached a point now where
Speaker 1: I mean, the people who say this, people who talk about,
Speaker 1: you know, suppressing whiteness and white privilege and white supremacy,
Speaker 1: they're just morons. They're really they're really just morons. And
Speaker 1: we have to now explain to them that their ideas
Speaker 1: are stupid. You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sex and Show podcast. But Buck, you might say,
Speaker 1: this seems a bit extreme. Nobody would really get away
Speaker 1: with saying horrible things about white people. No no public figure,
Speaker 1: no no millionaire celebrity would think that it was in
Speaker 1: any way appropriate to truly to denigrate white people as
Speaker 1: subhuman savages. Quote barbarians who rape, murder and kill. Oh,
Speaker 1: I bring you former husband I believe of Mariah Carey
Speaker 1: and TV host for a show I can't remember, Nick
Speaker 1: Cannon playli play clip four. Melani comes with compassion. Melanie
Speaker 1: comes with soul that we call it. We call it soul.
Speaker 1: We soul brothers and sisters. That's the melan in that connection.
Speaker 1: The people that don't have it have are are a
Speaker 1: little and I'm gonna say this carefully, are a little
Speaker 1: less and and and where the term actually comes from,
Speaker 1: because I'm bringing it all the way back around to
Speaker 1: Minister far Con to where they may not have the
Speaker 1: compassion or the when they were sent to the mountains
Speaker 1: of Caucasus, when they when they didn't have the power
Speaker 1: of the sun, that was that the sun then started
Speaker 1: to deteriorate him. So then they're acting out of fear,
Speaker 1: they're acting out of low self esteem, they're acting out
Speaker 1: of a deficiency. So therefore the only way that they
Speaker 1: can act is evil. The only way they can act
Speaker 1: is evil. He goes on to say in that same
Speaker 1: clip that they rape and kill and are barbarians. Here
Speaker 1: you have someone who has four point seven million Twitter followers. Okay,
Speaker 1: so this is not some rando we found on the
Speaker 1: internet who had a relationship until today with CBS Viacom,
Speaker 1: one of the biggest entertainment companies in the world. Who's
Speaker 1: a multi millionaire celebrity who's on a show, who's just saying,
Speaker 1: straight up, white people have less pigment and are less
Speaker 1: than people with more pigment, and they are evil. That's
Speaker 1: what he said, the word evil, and effectively there are
Speaker 1: subhuman barbarians who are upset that they're not as awesome
Speaker 1: as people with more pigment. This is the definition of racism.
Speaker 1: But you know what the left says about stuff like this, Right,
Speaker 1: it's not really possible for Nick Cannon who is black,
Speaker 1: to be racist because of structural inequality. Well, if that's
Speaker 1: the case, what's wrong with what he said? Is there
Speaker 1: any You should really ask any leftist you know, is
Speaker 1: there anything wrong with what Nick Cannon said? Does that?
Speaker 1: Does it bother you that a multi millionaire celebrity who's
Speaker 1: who's a radio host? I don't even I didn't even
Speaker 1: realize as a radio host. Wow, fellow radio host. My god,
Speaker 1: it's it's stunning. It's stunning. This guy has been embraced
Speaker 1: by corporate America. He's rich, he's famous, And I want
Speaker 1: to ask you this. Do you think he's the only
Speaker 1: he's the only celebrity who thinks this way? I gar
Speaker 1: to you, there are whites. There are white celebrities who
Speaker 1: feel that everything he said is true. I can speak
Speaker 1: to that. Oh for sure, that they that they have
Speaker 1: been so saturated with self loathing for their whiteness that
Speaker 1: they will say that Nick Cannon is not the only prominent,
Speaker 1: influential person who has this kind of resentment toward whiteness.
Speaker 1: I guarantee it. Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson
Speaker 1: Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart
Speaker 1: Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Oh, it
Speaker 1: wasn't just white people in general that Nick Cannon, who
Speaker 1: I've also producer Mark. He is a TV host as well.
Speaker 1: I know him as Mariah I'm being serious. I know
Speaker 1: him mostly because he married Mariah Carey, and I know
Speaker 1: that he also is like a celebrity, but I never
Speaker 1: really know what he's doing. He has TV shows too, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean he's been on Nickelodeon, he started Nickelodeon, He's
Speaker 1: been on MTV. He's the host of The mess Singer
Speaker 1: on five. He's been everywhere for a long time. Huh. Interesting, Well,
Speaker 1: I wonder how much longer he's going to be doing
Speaker 1: all those things. My guesses, you'll probably just have to
Speaker 1: come out and give some kind of some kind of
Speaker 1: half half apology or something. I don't know. Maybe he
Speaker 1: already has for all I know. Um, but it wasn't
Speaker 1: because it wasn't just white people in general that Nick
Speaker 1: Cannon weighed in on. Um. It was also more specifically,
Speaker 1: and I know not all Jews are white, but it
Speaker 1: was the Jewish people who also received some Nick Cannon
Speaker 1: Annali pretty ser Mark, where was a play play clip? Five?
Speaker 1: Please about Nick Cannon's thoughts on Jews? Who are they
Speaker 1: when we when we speak up? Because this is where
Speaker 1: it truly is. And when we talk about those the
Speaker 1: six corporations, when we talk when we go as deep
Speaker 1: as the Rothchild, centralized banking, the thirteen families, the bloodlines
Speaker 1: that control everything even outside of America, right, talk about
Speaker 1: the people who if we were truly the children of Israel,
Speaker 1: and we're defining who the Jewish people are, because I
Speaker 1: feel like if we actually can understand that construct, then
Speaker 1: we can see that there is no hate involved. When
Speaker 1: we talk about the lies, the deceit, the how the
Speaker 1: fake dollar controls all of this, then maybe we can
Speaker 1: get to the reason why they wanted to silence you,
Speaker 1: why they wanted silence Minister fair Kind. And they want
Speaker 1: to throw that we are having hate speech when it's
Speaker 1: never hate speech, when it's not. You can't be anti Semitic,
Speaker 1: when the semitic, When when we are the Semitic people,
Speaker 1: when we are the same people that you who they
Speaker 1: want to be. Oh, okay, producer Mark, you are you
Speaker 1: are Jewish? Um? How one to ten? How anti semitic
Speaker 1: do you find this? Around the ten it's almost hard
Speaker 1: to follow what he thinks he's saying. I catch onto
Speaker 1: this that the real that he seems to be saying
Speaker 1: that the real Jews are black and what we know
Speaker 1: of today, and there are Ethiopian Jews, so there are
Speaker 1: real Jews who are black, but what we in America
Speaker 1: often associate with judaism um, they're all not Jewish. Is
Speaker 1: that is that where he's going sounds like it's a
Speaker 1: common thing that you've heard from people like Stephen Jackson,
Speaker 1: the former NBA player, DeShawn Jackson, the current NFL player
Speaker 1: who was in hot Water last week or the week
Speaker 1: before about semanti semitic comments. It's a common thing you
Speaker 1: see coming out all Just search on Twitter, what was
Speaker 1: the what was the the the basics of what Deshaun
Speaker 1: Jackson said. Again, just so, DeShawn Jackson on his Instagram
Speaker 1: story posted comments that he thought were from Hitler. They
Speaker 1: ended up not being Hitler comments, but he thought they
Speaker 1: were and was trying to spread comments like that in
Speaker 1: defense of his BLM stuff. And he is still with
Speaker 1: an NFL team. Yeah, he's on the Philadelphia Eagles. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: oh yeah? Oh so you mean you can you could
Speaker 1: be if you are a person of color today and
Speaker 1: you decide to say something that's so anti Semitic that
Speaker 1: you thought it was from Hitler. He thought it was
Speaker 1: from Hitler or was he thought it was from him?
Speaker 1: He thought it was a Hitler quote. Yes, we share that,
Speaker 1: and people are like, hey, hey, don't do that. Don't
Speaker 1: be super don't be super hateful towards Jews. That's not good. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: if you say, hey, there's no disparity on a per
Speaker 1: capita basis between the shootings of black and white men
Speaker 1: in America. When you account for the per capita meaning
Speaker 1: how many instances of contact, how many possible crimes are
Speaker 1: being committed by each community, everyone goes, oh, how dare
Speaker 1: You're like, well, this is we're talking about law enforcement.
Speaker 1: These are just facts. We're talking about facts, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: this is I'm here. I'm here in New York City,
Speaker 1: and there is always this discussion about crime and policing
Speaker 1: in law enforcement. And what often gets oh, what gets
Speaker 1: left out of the discussion is that Riker's Island, which
Speaker 1: is the prison for New York City, is over ninety
Speaker 1: percent black and Hispanic, and the city is obviously a
Speaker 1: much lesser percentage black and Hispanic. So when they talk
Speaker 1: about stops by cops, and when you know, people will
Speaker 1: use these statistics and they'll be very sloppy about it
Speaker 1: because I'll just say, well, you know, cops arrested this
Speaker 1: many individuals from the from the black community in New York,
Speaker 1: and therefore it's racist. Well, the question you'd have to ask,
Speaker 1: you'd have to right away want to know, well, how
Speaker 1: many crimes are being committed within in any individual community
Speaker 1: and is that what's causing the greater interaction with police
Speaker 1: or is it racism? You know, these are these are
Speaker 1: the ways that you have to frame these issues. But
Speaker 1: it's a fascinating situation to see Nick Cannon saying incredibly
Speaker 1: anti Semitic stuff and to call it anti white, I
Speaker 1: think is that's an understatement. He's actually telling people that
Speaker 1: because your skin is lighter, you are less valuable, you
Speaker 1: were worse as a human being. That is what Nick
Speaker 1: Cannon is saying. And from what I understand a lot
Speaker 1: of this is coming from, and he mentioned Minister Farikon
Speaker 1: numerous times. There's that there's just a pass that's given
Speaker 1: in the media, a pass given to those who kiss
Speaker 1: up to Farrakon, a pass given to those who are
Speaker 1: adherents of Farrakon, and we're all supposed to just turn
Speaker 1: a blind eye of this say, oh, you know, there's
Speaker 1: nothing really going on there. Barack Obama had a handshake
Speaker 1: with Farrakon, a very warm handshake. There was a photograph
Speaker 1: of it. That photographer, who was a journalist, decided not
Speaker 1: to share that photograph before the election. That was a
Speaker 1: photograph with somebody who is a vile bigot. Farrakhan is
Speaker 1: a vile bigot, but he's still allowed to be, you know, involved.
Speaker 1: Certain people are allowed to say that he's okay, and
Speaker 1: they believe him. And we're gonna you know, this is
Speaker 1: where we're heading now. As as society continues to fix
Speaker 1: it and focus on this, we're gonna have to deal
Speaker 1: with what's really happening, where the animosities really are, and
Speaker 1: who's really a bigot? That's what's that's what's coming. That's
Speaker 1: the next phase of this. Where are where are bigotries
Speaker 1: allowed really out of the open in our society, but
Speaker 1: we're not supposed to talk about it. The Nation of
Speaker 1: Islam and Farrakhan against Jews, that's certainly one place. But
Speaker 1: also the anti whiteness that, as I've said, is so
Speaker 1: prominent now among white liberals, not only among white liberals,
Speaker 1: but so prominent prominent among white liberals is stunning. And
Speaker 1: if you're wondering what we're also going to be finding
Speaker 1: out because now there's all this discussion about schools and
Speaker 1: what we should be teaching in schools, would it comes
Speaker 1: to race and all of this. Here you have Byron
Speaker 1: York who shared this. I mean, this is stunning. Hattip
Speaker 1: Byron York on Twitter for this when the National Museum
Speaker 1: of African American History and Culture wants to make you
Speaker 1: aware of certain signs of whiteness, this is all quote individualism,
Speaker 1: hard work, objectivity, the nuclear family, progress, respect for authority,
Speaker 1: and delayed gratification and he shared these. Then this is
Speaker 1: a Smithsonian museum. This is like the gold standard of
Speaker 1: American museums, right the Smithsonian, the National Museum of African
Speaker 1: American History and Culture, has posters up and it's posted
Speaker 1: on their website that talk about it's talking about race,
Speaker 1: assumptions and aspects of whiteness and white culture in the
Speaker 1: United States. And this is how it reads. White dominant
Speaker 1: culture or whiteness refers to the ways white people in
Speaker 1: their traditions, attitudes, and ways of life have been normalized
Speaker 1: over time and are now considered standard practice. In the
Speaker 1: United States, and since white people still hold most of
Speaker 1: the institutional power in America, we have all internalized some
Speaker 1: aspects of white culture, including people of color. I can't
Speaker 1: read all this to you, but it's it's fascinating. These
Speaker 1: are the things that are identified as whiteness, that have
Speaker 1: been internalized, and I suppose we're now going to question
Speaker 1: whether these are good things. First of all, I question
Speaker 1: that these are white things. They're saying they're white things.
Speaker 1: But then are we allowed to say that these things
Speaker 1: are just inherently virtuous and praiseworthy or is that now
Speaker 1: white supremacist. It's it's not even clear. How are you
Speaker 1: supposed to talk about this? This is from the Smithsonian.
Speaker 1: Do you think that it's any better what your your
Speaker 1: kids are being taught in public schools or at university?
Speaker 1: All universities is even worse. Nick Cannon's probably going to
Speaker 1: get a professorship at Harvard. Just wait, rugged individualism. The
Speaker 1: Smithsonian says about white culture, family structure, emphasis on scientific method,
Speaker 1: Protestant work ethic, and they go through all all of
Speaker 1: these things. Justice is based on English common law, protect
Speaker 1: property and entitlements, intent counts. Yeah, that's right. Those are
Speaker 1: all true about justice, stunning status, power, and authority. Your
Speaker 1: job is who you are. That's that's not a white virtue.
Speaker 1: That's not a virtue period. It's not true. Respect authority, well,
Speaker 1: respect authority that deserves respect. Heavy value on ownership of
Speaker 1: good space and property. I don't think it's a white
Speaker 1: thing to value property. I think everyone values property. It's
Speaker 1: you gotta go. I mean, you could go through this
Speaker 1: in detail. Religion Christianity is the norm. Anything other than
Speaker 1: judaeo Christian tradition is foreign. No tolerance for deviation from
Speaker 1: single God concept. That's this again, this is not this
Speaker 1: is not based in reality. There's a ton of white atheists,
Speaker 1: for one thing, running around the country. And I know
Speaker 1: there are a lot of they're white atheists who listen
Speaker 1: to this show. Aightis of all colors who listen to
Speaker 1: this show. I mean this is but you see the
Speaker 1: problem that we have is that no one ever wants
Speaker 1: to delve into this stuff. One because if you truly,
Speaker 1: and I mean this, if you misspeak in any way,
Speaker 1: the woke mob doesn't. They don't care about intent. They've
Speaker 1: told you this in the Smithsonian. Intent doesn't matter if
Speaker 1: you misspeak about these very complicated and often convoluted issues
Speaker 1: and the way that they're projected by the dominant left
Speaker 1: wing narrative. If you do that, you're destroyed. So people
Speaker 1: don't want to talk about it. And so what happens
Speaker 1: is that these narratives largely go unopposed, and they end
Speaker 1: up on posters. They have, you know, celebrities with enormous,
Speaker 1: you know, multi multimillion person followings saying insanely racist stuff.
Speaker 1: And he's gonna he's still gonna be he will be
Speaker 1: a rich celebrity in a year. I guarantee you he
Speaker 1: might have to apologize a little bit. Now. CBS Viacom
Speaker 1: has severed their relationship with Nick Cannon because of the
Speaker 1: anti Semitic stuff. They said, I gotta say yes, Producer Mark.
Speaker 1: Not not that I asked producer Mark to speak for
Speaker 1: the entire Jewish community, but it's somebody who's Jewish. He's like, yeah,
Speaker 1: it's really it is really anti semitic. It clearly is.
Speaker 1: I know that too. But also the anti white stuff
Speaker 1: was pretty gross, wasn't it. Or CBS didn't mention that
Speaker 1: in the statement that I saw, which I thought was
Speaker 1: kind of strange. So we've got it. We've got to
Speaker 1: address these things. People. What you and I recognize, which
Speaker 1: is individual value. We're all equal in God's eyes. We
Speaker 1: all should be equal in the eyes of the law.
Speaker 1: We should be treated the same way where all human beings.
Speaker 1: We're doing our best. We all have our own struggles.
Speaker 1: We should be kind and decent and supportive of each other,
Speaker 1: irrespective of race, creed, religion, color, you name it. That's
Speaker 1: how I approach life every day. That's how I know
Speaker 1: you approach life every day. That's not what the perception,
Speaker 1: the vision, the narrative of you and me and the
Speaker 1: rest of America is. According to the left, we are
Speaker 1: all in this constant state of warring factions. Not just
Speaker 1: political factions, racial factions, gender factions. This is identity politics.
Speaker 1: They want to keep us all at each other's throats
Speaker 1: all the time, when at the end of the day, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, White Americans, Black Americans, Asian Americans, Latino Americans.
Speaker 1: We want security, freedom, prosperity. We want our kids to
Speaker 1: have good schools. We want to live in a nice,
Speaker 1: comfortable place. We want to have good food to eat.
Speaker 1: We want to be safe on the streets. We want
Speaker 1: to be able to pursue our dreams. We want the
Speaker 1: same things, and that's what America is really supposed to
Speaker 1: be about. We've created a system that allows us to
Speaker 1: pursue those same things. But it is a system where
Speaker 1: there's also accountability and where there's individual responsibility, and blaming
Speaker 1: the system all the time is not going to make
Speaker 1: anything better. Changing the system where it's deficient, fine overthrowing
Speaker 1: the system, which is what we're being told now, has
Speaker 1: to happen. No, that's just rage. That's just rage. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Who are we really as Americans? Who are
Speaker 1: we supporting? When we say we support cops? Something will
Speaker 1: come to your mind when I say that, right when
Speaker 1: I ask these questions, you'll have a projection in your
Speaker 1: own you know, of your own perception. When I think
Speaker 1: of cops, I think of people doing a critical job
Speaker 1: and doing it well. And I'm thankful that there are
Speaker 1: people that put on the badge and that make sure
Speaker 1: that we sleep soundly at night to the best of
Speaker 1: their ability. I'm thankful for that. And I also know
Speaker 1: that they do things across the country for all communities,
Speaker 1: and also our law enforcement community is itself very diverse,
Speaker 1: particularly in large cities. So you have police officers who
Speaker 1: are black and brown and Asian and white, who are
Speaker 1: doing God's work every day. An example of this was
Speaker 1: up in Michigan. There was a cop and we will
Speaker 1: play the audio for it has a happy ending. So
Speaker 1: the mother is hysterical, understandably, She's got a three week
Speaker 1: old infant who is choking to death and her mother
Speaker 1: is watching completely distraught. Understandably, cop is on the scene,
Speaker 1: and this is how the circumstance. I believe it's an
Speaker 1: The officer is Asian, not that that matters Asian American,
Speaker 1: but I'm just saying we do a very diverse police
Speaker 1: forces across the country. UM, play clip two. Hold on,
Speaker 1: can you see the baby. He's still blinking. He's blinking.
Speaker 1: Hold on, yes, Okay, he's crying. He's crying. Okay, he's crying.
Speaker 1: He's fine. The baby was all right. The officer performed
Speaker 1: was essentially a Heimlich maneuver for infants, got the obstruction
Speaker 1: out of the baby's throat, turned the baby upside down,
Speaker 1: did exactly what the officer was trained to do, saved
Speaker 1: that three week old's life. Defund cops, the libs screen
Speaker 1: defund cops. Yeah, because if maybe there was a group
Speaker 1: of angry protesters there, things would have turned out better.
Speaker 1: It's time that we show respect in the societies of
Speaker 1: people who deserve it, and it's time that we tell
Speaker 1: those who are disrespectful out of their own personal animus
Speaker 1: and desire for power, that we're not going to tolerate
Speaker 1: it anymore. We support our cops, back the blue. This
Speaker 1: CoP's a hero. Thanks for listening to The bus Essen
Speaker 1: Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. For the most part,
Speaker 1: I believe, for the most part, you can trust respected
Speaker 1: medical authorities. You know, I believe I'm one of them,
Speaker 1: so I think you can trust me. But I would
Speaker 1: stick with respected medical authorities who have a track record
Speaker 1: of telling the truth, who have a track record of
Speaker 1: giving information and policy and recommendations based on scientific evidence
Speaker 1: and good data. So if I were to give advice
Speaker 1: to you and your family and your friends of your family,
Speaker 1: I would say that's the safest bit to do to
Speaker 1: listen to the recommendations from that category of people. But
Speaker 1: it's entirely understandable how the public can get mixed messages
Speaker 1: and then get a bit confused about what they should do.
Speaker 1: So basically, doctor Fouchi's like, look, I'm the man. Listen
Speaker 1: to me. I know what's up. That's how we roll.
Speaker 1: Don't listen to the other. Listen to the vouch. The
Speaker 1: voucher is here for you. The vouchers got you covered. Yep,
Speaker 1: that's right. You know that the fouch has got to
Speaker 1: be about Bernie Sanders Age. They're both from Brooklyn here
Speaker 1: in New York. They must have lived pretty close to you.
Speaker 1: I just was thinking about this the other day. You
Speaker 1: think of how many people in you know, in the
Speaker 1: public eye had to be crossing paths at some point,
Speaker 1: you know, especially if they've been in public public eye
Speaker 1: for as many decades as some of the people we
Speaker 1: see currently out there are. But you know, those are
Speaker 1: two of my favorite I'm just thinking about two of
Speaker 1: my favorite Brooklyn characters, Fauci and Bertie Feathers. Yeah, and
Speaker 1: Fauci went to my high school. So he went to
Speaker 1: went to a Jesuit school here in New York. In
Speaker 1: my school, I'm sure they love him. I'm sure they don't.
Speaker 1: They don't celebrate notable alumni, Buck Sexton. I doubt that
Speaker 1: the Jesuits are kind of commies, but anyway, some of
Speaker 1: them are great. Now we have uh Fouci out there
Speaker 1: telling you the mitigation a mask. You got to wear
Speaker 1: a mask? Purduce a mark? Are you wearing a mask?
Speaker 1: The fouch wants to know rarely, but I never leave
Speaker 1: the house. What about indoors? What about when missus Mark
Speaker 1: is making you some uh, you know, some feruccini? Are
Speaker 1: you wearing a mask in my own apartment? Yeah? No,
Speaker 1: what about the mitigation? I'll think I'll be fine, Thank you,
Speaker 1: doctor Fauci. All Right, Well I'm not sure about that yet.
Speaker 1: We'll see. The science is not settled about mask wearing
Speaker 1: indoors alone, because you could breathe. What if you breathe
Speaker 1: in air that you breathed out and the virus came
Speaker 1: in through a window. Let's say the virus it's like
Speaker 1: a heat seeking missile. It comes from anywhere. All right.
Speaker 1: So Fauci is telling you listen to him because he's
Speaker 1: he's a guy who's an expert, and he's so right.
Speaker 1: I will tell you that if you look back at
Speaker 1: his record. He has been working in public health for
Speaker 1: a very long time. He was also very wrong about
Speaker 1: which communities and the degree of risk different communities in
Speaker 1: this country had from the HIV virus. Now, we didn't
Speaker 1: know a lot about the virus in the early days.
Speaker 1: I understand that, but he had that very wrong. And look,
Speaker 1: science is supposed to be a process of constantly testing
Speaker 1: and re testing assumptions based on data. And we will
Speaker 1: have to see. But let's see what we have now
Speaker 1: from doctor Fauci here. Oh, we have not Fauci, but
Speaker 1: Peter Navarro, the trade representative to the Trump for the
Speaker 1: Trump administration, the trade expert for the Trump administration, I
Speaker 1: should say. He put out a USA Today column where
Speaker 1: he wrote the following. It's short, by the way, I
Speaker 1: could read this whole idea, because this is not a
Speaker 1: long one at all. He writes. The title says a lot.
Speaker 1: Anthony Fauci has been wrong about everything I have interacted
Speaker 1: with him. On Peter Navarro, When you ask me whether
Speaker 1: I listen to his advice, my only answer, my answer
Speaker 1: is only with skepticism and caution. And he writes the following,
Speaker 1: Doctor Anthony Fauci has a good bedside manner with the public,
Speaker 1: but he has been wrong about everything I have interacted
Speaker 1: with him on. In late January, when I was making
Speaker 1: the case on behalf of the President to take down
Speaker 1: the flights from China, Fauci fought against the President's courageous decision,
Speaker 1: which might well have saved hundreds of thousands of American lives.
Speaker 1: When I warned in late January in a memo of
Speaker 1: a possibly deadly pandemic, the director of the National Institute
Speaker 1: of Allergy and Infectious Diseases was telling the news media
Speaker 1: not to worry. When I was working feverishly on behalf
Speaker 1: of the President in February to help engineer the fastest
Speaker 1: industrial mobilization of the healthcare sector in our history, Fauci
Speaker 1: was still telling the public that China virus was low risk.
Speaker 1: When we were building new mask capacity and record time,
Speaker 1: Fauci was flip flopping on the use of masks. And
Speaker 1: when Fauci was telling the White House Coronavirus Task Force
Speaker 1: that there was only anecdotal evidence in support of hydroxychloroquin
Speaker 1: to fight the virus, I confronted him with scientific studies
Speaker 1: providing evidence of safety and efficacy. A recent Detroit hospital
Speaker 1: study showed a fifty percent reduction in the mortality rate
Speaker 1: when the medicine is used in early treatment. Now, Fauci
Speaker 1: says a falling mortality rate doesn't matter when it is
Speaker 1: the single most important statistic to help guide the pace
Speaker 1: of our economic reopening. The lower than more tality rate,
Speaker 1: the faster and more we can reopen. So when you
Speaker 1: ask me whether I listen to doctor Fauci's advice, my
Speaker 1: answer is only with skepticism and caution. Oh boy, not
Speaker 1: allowed to say, not allowed to say that, not allowed,
Speaker 1: not allowed. No, Saint Fouci, you don't. You don't criticize,
Speaker 1: you don't ask questions. You do what he says. You
Speaker 1: do it a mitigation, that's what you do. Yep. Trust
Speaker 1: medical authorities like me at least. Look, Navarro is not
Speaker 1: a medical authority, but this is he's not saying he is.
Speaker 1: He's not saying he is a medical authority. He's just
Speaker 1: saying that he's been told things many times that aren't
Speaker 1: true by the guy who is the authority. Shouldn't you
Speaker 1: be able to pay attention to that? Shouldn't that matter?
Speaker 1: You would you would think so, You would think that
Speaker 1: would be the case. But sure enough, mm, now we
Speaker 1: have more hysteria all over the place, more hysteria, more insanity.
Speaker 1: And for example, you have the mayor of Chicago, Lori Lightfoot,
Speaker 1: who is demanding that you wear masks even when you're
Speaker 1: not near anybody. Play fourteen here, you know. But I
Speaker 1: talk to young people that I see out that don't
Speaker 1: have masks. They said to me, well, I wear it
Speaker 1: in the grocery store, I wear it in you know,
Speaker 1: other kinds of stores. But we really need them to
Speaker 1: be wearing face coverings everywhere anytime they walk instead of
Speaker 1: their home, and they really need to religiously practice social
Speaker 1: distancing outside your home, got to wear a mask all
Speaker 1: the time. Mask wearing has been pretty much a religion
Speaker 1: in California, and yet they've had a huge spike in
Speaker 1: cases in California. There is certainly an argument. We don't
Speaker 1: know because it's hard to get all the data, and
Speaker 1: in fact, some of the data we see is wrong.
Speaker 1: Oh wait, here's here's something I meant to mention to
Speaker 1: you all before, and it's that there has been at
Speaker 1: least a few cases here we go of hospitals in Florida,
Speaker 1: and this is from the Fox affiliate in Orlando. Florida
Speaker 1: Department of Health says some labs have not reported negative
Speaker 1: COVID results, and the Florida Department of Health that said
Speaker 1: laboratories not Countless labs have reported a one hundred percent
Speaker 1: positivity rate, which means every single person tested was positive.
Speaker 1: Other labs had very high positivity rates. Fox thirty five
Speaker 1: News found that testing sites like one local Centric Care
Speaker 1: reported that eighty three people tested an all tested positive.
Speaker 1: Another one NCF Diagnostics reported eighty eight percent were positive.
Speaker 1: How could that be when they looked into it? Or
Speaker 1: Endo Health had a ninety eight percent positivity rate and
Speaker 1: then when they finally contacted the hospital, guess what they
Speaker 1: found out? The positivity rate wasn't ninety eight percent as
Speaker 1: was in the initial report put out to the public.
Speaker 1: The positivity rate for COVID nineteen was nine point four percent.
Speaker 1: People who tell you that anyone who questions some of
Speaker 1: the numbers and the accuracy of the numbers is being
Speaker 1: in conspiracy. Theorist can't read or don't read clearly. With
Speaker 1: all the data coming in, all the uncertainties about is
Speaker 1: you know, is this a COVID patient? Is this somebody
Speaker 1: who came in that tested negative who might be positive later?
Speaker 1: And there's so many different ways that the data has
Speaker 1: to be assessed and sifted through, and look, the top
Speaker 1: priority of the hospitals and any medical centers just going
Speaker 1: to be making sure that patients get the best care.
Speaker 1: But that's not what anybody talks about. I don't know.
Speaker 1: We're just looking at the numbers every day, and we're
Speaker 1: all supposed to be terrified. We're all supposed to be
Speaker 1: constantly in fear of the future, and that's Look, it's
Speaker 1: just no way to live. I mean, that's that's all along.
Speaker 1: I've been trying to I've been trying to take the
Speaker 1: position here that no matter what, Okay, here we go.
Speaker 1: July fourteenth updated, all right, I don't have the fifteenth
Speaker 1: number in frot of me. That's July fourteenth, three hundred,
Speaker 1: three hundred and fifty one new deaths, fifty eight thousand,
Speaker 1: eight hundred and fifty eight new cases, three hundred fifty
Speaker 1: one new deaths. That's down from at least two thousand
Speaker 1: a day at the peak. It's a fraction, and yet
Speaker 1: we have more cases we've ever had before. So what's
Speaker 1: really going on here? There are a lot of moving pieces,
Speaker 1: a lot of things going on, But you don't shut
Speaker 1: down the country because of a virus that has already
Speaker 1: spread all across the nation, that is in every major city,
Speaker 1: that has been in every large community. You don't shut
Speaker 1: down the country because of a virus like this that
Speaker 1: you cannot stop. And that's just that. That should be
Speaker 1: the end of it. At some point, right people have
Speaker 1: to realize this. But look, the same people who are
Speaker 1: telling us that the that the marches, the BLM marches
Speaker 1: that were going on were justified even if they were
Speaker 1: risking public health because they were so important for public health,
Speaker 1: those same people are now saying that schools can't be
Speaker 1: open even though all the evidence, all the science, all
Speaker 1: of that shows quite clearly that it's safe for kids
Speaker 1: to be in school. Other countries have done it and
Speaker 1: it's fine. And when you hear Democrats on TV trying,
Speaker 1: oh but what about this? What about that? No, no, no,
Speaker 1: I thought this was about the science, not about the
Speaker 1: what about But as we all know, what's it really
Speaker 1: about Joe Biden winning the election? No surprise, there you're
Speaker 1: in the freedom of This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Speaking of Joe Biden. Here's what that third
Speaker 1: tier intellect and second tier politician has to say. About
Speaker 1: Republican policies and how they're holding us back. Play clip eleven.
Speaker 1: This is all the Donald Trump and the Republicans offered
Speaker 1: backward looking policies, So will harm the environment, make communities
Speaker 1: less healthy, hold back economic promise other countries race ahead.
Speaker 1: It's a mindset that doesn't have any faith in the
Speaker 1: capacity of American people to compete, to innovate, and to win.
Speaker 1: It's never been a good bet to bet against the
Speaker 1: American people, and when you do, will exact the deadly cost.
Speaker 1: What is he what does he even think he's saying?
Speaker 1: I mean, that's what I end up having to ask
Speaker 1: a lot about Biden. What it's like Politician mad lives here.
Speaker 1: They look back instead of looking into the future, and
Speaker 1: never bet against a bird in the hand is worth
Speaker 1: you know, two bumblebees on a tree, and I'm tired.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's really really, that's where we are with
Speaker 1: this guy. What is he talking about? What is he saying?
Speaker 1: What are the policies that Republicans are looking back or
Speaker 1: what usage of fossil fuels we're gonna Oh no, of
Speaker 1: course that's probably one of them, these complete maniacs. Just
Speaker 1: when we're already still in the grip as a nation
Speaker 1: of the COVID nineteen panic and hysteria. Biden's out there
Speaker 1: pulling the old We've only got nine years or who
Speaker 1: were all gonna die from climate change? Plate ten. We're
Speaker 1: going to get back into the Paris Agreement, back into
Speaker 1: the business of leading the world. We're gonna lock in
Speaker 1: progress that no future president can roll back cut to
Speaker 1: take us backward again. Science requires a timetable for measuring
Speaker 1: progress on climate that isn't three decades or even two.
Speaker 1: Science tells us we have nine years before the damage
Speaker 1: is irreversible. So my timetable results is my first four
Speaker 1: years as president. The jobs will create, the investments will make,
Speaker 1: and the irreversible steps will take to mitigate and adapt
Speaker 1: to the climate change and put our nation on the
Speaker 1: road to net zero emissions. No later than twenty fifty.
Speaker 1: No later than twenty fifty. I think he said, Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's not gonna last that long. Look, I'm just the
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's not gonna be in charge in twenty fifty.
Speaker 1: I think that's safe to say. I mean, I wish
Speaker 1: the man good health at all, but I don't think
Speaker 1: I think I think that's pretty good. I mean it's
Speaker 1: not wait is it. No, it's pretty much completely it's
Speaker 1: pretty much completely impossible. Obviously, not not that he'd be president,
Speaker 1: but even that Joe Biden would be worried about the
Speaker 1: world in twenty fifty This is blather. We have real problems,
Speaker 1: things that are affecting us all today, real challenges and concerns,
Speaker 1: including China, which we'll be talking about shortly. And Joe
Speaker 1: Biden's focused on getting us to net zero emissions in
Speaker 1: thirty years. Yeah, that's right, that's what we need to
Speaker 1: be hearing about. Now. This is a religious belief, my friends.
Speaker 1: This whole the world is going to end unless we
Speaker 1: have green jobs. This is a religious belief. This is
Speaker 1: not reality. Notice that they've gone back from the world.
Speaker 1: Will effectively be over nine years to save the world,
Speaker 1: is what we've been told in the past by prominent Democrats.
Speaker 1: Now it's the damage is irreversible, that's not an unimportant shift.
Speaker 1: What's the damage, Well, whatever the climate is and whatever
Speaker 1: weather storms and earthquakes and things happen between now and
Speaker 1: nine years from now. And guess what, the World's not
Speaker 1: gonna end because of climate change. They'll say, Oh, but
Speaker 1: if if we had just done more, we would be
Speaker 1: in a we'd be in a better place, and we
Speaker 1: wouldn't have you know, all this stuff. Make sure that
Speaker 1: the targets that they have, make sure they cannot be evaluated. Honestly,
Speaker 1: that's that's central to the climate change movement. Well, what
Speaker 1: do they really think the people that don't believe this,
Speaker 1: they must they believe it. They're the loops. Think they're
Speaker 1: so much smarter than everybody who doesn't believe this. I
Speaker 1: think that's the only way to explain it, because otherwise
Speaker 1: can't they can't They at least agree that we don't
Speaker 1: want the world to end too. I don't. I don't
Speaker 1: want the world to end. The liberal belief system is
Speaker 1: premised on they know how to save the planet, and
Speaker 1: I just don't care. And I'm not smart enough to
Speaker 1: figure You know, al Gore is smarter than al Gore
Speaker 1: is a moron. But you know al Gore is smart
Speaker 1: enough to figure this out. Sure he is. That's right.
Speaker 1: They want Biden to be the leader of the free world.
Speaker 1: You know, I've actually been watching I shouldn't do this
Speaker 1: for myself. I've been watching The West Wing because it's
Speaker 1: on Netflix, and I just wanted something to kind of
Speaker 1: zone out too. I've never really watched it before. It's
Speaker 1: just so funny. It's just such smug, trite nineties liberalism,
Speaker 1: you know, you know, it's just all about we just
Speaker 1: want to save lives by banning these different guns, and
Speaker 1: we banned the most saved lives. It's it's all, it's
Speaker 1: all of it's ah man, makes you kind of missed
Speaker 1: some of the political arguments of the nineties. But that show,
Speaker 1: if you watch it, you can see part of the
Speaker 1: evolution of the liberal mindset in this country because it
Speaker 1: went from sanctimonious and pleading in the nineties to now
Speaker 1: fast forward twenty years and it is psychotic and authoritarian.
Speaker 1: So you can actually look at the progression over time
Speaker 1: and it all kind of makes sense. It went from
Speaker 1: came on, we just want to save the world, man,
Speaker 1: and like we just we just want everyone to be
Speaker 1: happy and things be better. Or so why don't you
Speaker 1: listen to our dumb ideas to now it you will
Speaker 1: obey our stupid ideas, or we will fire you and
Speaker 1: deplatform you and ruin you. That has been the progression
Speaker 1: of American liberalism. And no, no liberty, no liberty allowed.
Speaker 1: That's what liberals are into now. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Is
Speaker 1: the Goya boycott backfiring? Trump certainly says it is. He
Speaker 1: says Goya Foods is doing great. I gotta say, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna have to go buy some Goya. This is one
Speaker 1: of these moments. This is one of these times when
Speaker 1: you can put your money where your mouth is kind
Speaker 1: of literally in a sense, or not not really your money,
Speaker 1: but you know what I mean, So it's not People
Speaker 1: misuse the word literally more than any other word. I
Speaker 1: think there's things I'm like, literally the most upset person
Speaker 1: in the earth right now. I mean, I guess that's
Speaker 1: not even I literally just said something that's not literally true.
Speaker 1: You have that all the time. I hear well educated
Speaker 1: adults saying that on a regular basis. I try not
Speaker 1: to do it. We all have our verbal ticks. I
Speaker 1: have mine. Some of you are aware of them too,
Speaker 1: and you send them to me, and it's like, the guys,
Speaker 1: I'm trying, Okay, at least I don't do the constant
Speaker 1: that I hear in a lot of other radio shows,
Speaker 1: nor do I have a voice that sounds like Alvin
Speaker 1: and the Chipmunks played on high speed. So where was I?
Speaker 1: Goya of Foods. Goy of Foods is under fire because
Speaker 1: the CEO stood up and said that he thinks Trump
Speaker 1: is doing good things, and so they tried to come
Speaker 1: after him. And now we are seeing the results of this,
Speaker 1: or we are in the process of finding out the
Speaker 1: results of this. And I certainly hope that everybody will
Speaker 1: take the position that they want to help Goya Foods
Speaker 1: at this point in time. If they can't, I mean, look,
Speaker 1: I know money it's tied right now for people. But
Speaker 1: you know, I'm not saying buy the food and throw
Speaker 1: it out. Obviously, buy the food and need it. It's
Speaker 1: good food. Goya has been a good company for a
Speaker 1: long time. This, this is what we need to see.
Speaker 1: We need more people who will do what they say
Speaker 1: they will do by supporting businesses, by supporting those entities
Speaker 1: that are under fire from the boycott left. I know,
Speaker 1: Ivanka Trump put out a photo of her with, you know,
Speaker 1: with a Goya Foods can, and now now the libs
Speaker 1: are all, oh my gosh, you know, it's a Hatchack
Speaker 1: violation and corruption and all this stuff. God, she doesn't
Speaker 1: own stock and Goya Foods, she's allowed to say. You know,
Speaker 1: if a member of the president's family says that they
Speaker 1: really like oranges, is that a Is that a giveaway
Speaker 1: to the citrus growers in Florida? I mean, I'm sure
Speaker 1: libs would say it probably is. Actually, now they think
Speaker 1: about it, I'm sure that would be their position. That
Speaker 1: would be there their view of it. So I want
Speaker 1: people to do what they can to support this company
Speaker 1: at this point in time, because this is how we
Speaker 1: could start. You people ask me, how do we push back,
Speaker 1: How do we gain background that has been lost against
Speaker 1: the lunatic Libs. One way is for companies to see
Speaker 1: every time a company gets boycotted for taking a pro
Speaker 1: conservative or Republican position, that conservatives across the country make
Speaker 1: sure that they have a great Remember the boycott never
Speaker 1: lasts long. The boycotts are very short term things. People
Speaker 1: have short memories, they forget. But there's a culture now
Speaker 1: in the Libs know, and there's this horrifying Twitter account
Speaker 1: of morons called the Sleeping Giants, and all they do
Speaker 1: is try to create the perception. It's a bunch of
Speaker 1: libs who create the perception of true widespread public outrage
Speaker 1: at a conservative and goes after that conservative sponsors and
Speaker 1: tries to get them de sponsored and then hopefully get
Speaker 1: them d platformed. And they're doing this. They're doing this
Speaker 1: against against Tucker Carlson. I mean, they've done this against
Speaker 1: many people, these movements to d platform But it always
Speaker 1: lasts a very short period of time. They're never boycotting
Speaker 1: for a year, because no one even remembers in two
Speaker 1: weeks what the boycott was about. But if executives of
Speaker 1: a company are all, oh, gosh, I saw some mean
Speaker 1: things about this person on Twitter, and we don't want
Speaker 1: to be associated with them, and they pull their funds,
Speaker 1: and that they can create a snowball effect. They get
Speaker 1: people shut down. So we need to make sure that
Speaker 1: that is not a successful tactic for the left. And
Speaker 1: one way to do that is to give them a
Speaker 1: boost in the stock price. Look, Colin Kaepernick, on the
Speaker 1: other side, is an example of the power of politics
Speaker 1: in consumer markets, because you know, Nike stock went up
Speaker 1: after Kaepernick came out as a big Nike spokesperson, right,
Speaker 1: I mean, so you know, I see that decision, and
Speaker 1: I think that Colin Kaepernick is basically a fraud. But
Speaker 1: nonetheless Nike looks at that and says, well made us money,
Speaker 1: and we feel good about ourselves. So Conservatives, we need
Speaker 1: to start thinking more strategically about this. And I have
Speaker 1: no shame in telling you, you know, if you care
Speaker 1: about this show and what I do and what I say.
Speaker 1: Every time you hear one of those live reads where
Speaker 1: I'm saying, you know, here's a sponsor, drink this coffee,
Speaker 1: try this supplement, you know, use this service, whatever it
Speaker 1: may be. The more you that are willing and I
Speaker 1: know money's tight, and I'm not anybody you know, everyone
Speaker 1: has to make their own decisions about what they can
Speaker 1: afford to do and spending all the rest. But the
Speaker 1: more that you buy those products, the more we stay
Speaker 1: on the air, and the more secure we are for
Speaker 1: when the boycott monsters come after us, because they will.
Speaker 1: They will inevitably, inevitably, So just know that you ask
Speaker 1: how we how you can. And I don't know if
Speaker 1: there's other conservatives you think do really important work, the
Speaker 1: same goes, same goes for them. I mean, clearly not
Speaker 1: as important as the work we do. Here. But I'm
Speaker 1: just saying same goes for them. So I do hope
Speaker 1: that there is a surgeon buying of Goya and I
Speaker 1: will um, I will go out and get some Goya,
Speaker 1: but I can't. I do not cook any Latino food,
Speaker 1: particularly producer Mark Are you are you? Are you like
Speaker 1: you like Mexican food? Right? Of course Chipola is like
Speaker 1: my favorite food group. Yeah, I need to learn to
Speaker 1: make some of the some of that. I just I'm
Speaker 1: not as familiar with someone like people talk about Sofrito
Speaker 1: and I'm always like, what, you know, it's like a
Speaker 1: spice mixture. I don't know much about. No, I've never
Speaker 1: made I have. I just realized this as them here,
Speaker 1: and only have I never bought Goya products before. I've
Speaker 1: never made let Latin inspired or you know, Latin inspired food.
Speaker 1: You know how easy it is to make tacos? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean I probably. Look I'm not saying I can't
Speaker 1: do it. I love to. I just order Mexican food
Speaker 1: or go out to eat at a Mexican restaurant. I
Speaker 1: don't or you know there's actually in New York we
Speaker 1: have Puerto Rican restaurant, Dominican restaurants, we have all all
Speaker 1: kinds of Latina, Peruvian, particularly Peruvian chicken rochestrie chicken restaurants.
Speaker 1: You come across a fair amount of New York, or
Speaker 1: at least you did before we were all shut down
Speaker 1: because people are losing their minds again. But yeah, I
Speaker 1: want people people should support if they're willing support the
Speaker 1: freedom hunt obviously by going to our sponsors when you
Speaker 1: hear me talking about that on the show. But also
Speaker 1: and every single by the way, every that's one instance
Speaker 1: where every single thing you do. Every time you go
Speaker 1: to a site and buy a product and use code
Speaker 1: buck for example, or go to a site that's set
Speaker 1: up with slash buck, it's just it's like a vote.
Speaker 1: You're clicking the keep buck on the air. Keep Buck
Speaker 1: on the air. But Goya, being Stewa, I'll have to
Speaker 1: I'll have to check this out. I think my favorite
Speaker 1: thing is I love the Molay sauce. But from what
Speaker 1: I understand, that's like a red sipe that usually passed
Speaker 1: down from generation or generation and takes like a ton
Speaker 1: of ingredients and you have to let it simmer for
Speaker 1: like forty eight hours at least more like four months.
Speaker 1: I don't know, like that's what I've heard about Molay
Speaker 1: sauce very complicated. I'm more of a canned sauce kind
Speaker 1: of guy. Sauces is where the chef separates himself from
Speaker 1: the masses. I'm just gonna say it. Sauces is really,
Speaker 1: you know, because it's so easy to mess up your sauce,
Speaker 1: and the sauce is the first flavor profile you really
Speaker 1: get from a dish when you eat it. So just
Speaker 1: say it. Man. If I can buy a jar of
Speaker 1: Taco bellt sauce, why am I gonna make my own? Yeah?
Speaker 1: It is. It is convenient. You're in the freedom hud.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Who gets credit
Speaker 1: for their COVID response as a politician and who gets
Speaker 1: berated by the media. You think then it would be
Speaker 1: based upaul in the stats, the numbers, because we have
Speaker 1: very clear, very clear understanding of which places have been
Speaker 1: hit the worst by this and where they have been
Speaker 1: the greatest challenges. Let me remind you I'm gonna talk
Speaker 1: about China in just in just a few minutes. I
Speaker 1: know I'd mentioned that before. We'll do a deep dive
Speaker 1: onto China and what's going on though China. That's my
Speaker 1: two favorite Trump words to say are China and probably.
Speaker 1: He always say, I've never heard of it. I'll say
Speaker 1: like that probably I know you think Buck, that's you're
Speaker 1: That's not No, he does listen to. He always says
Speaker 1: that word that way. Anyway, So Cuomo is out there
Speaker 1: well before before I get to Cuomo, actually CNN is
Speaker 1: bashing Trump, saying that he's well here Anderson Cooper is
Speaker 1: that even I don't know why. I guess people are
Speaker 1: in a habit and they think Anderson Cooper is something
Speaker 1: special for reasons that are completely I don't I don't
Speaker 1: know why they think that the Cooper is so good
Speaker 1: at his job or whatever whatever. They think so good
Speaker 1: at what exactly reading off a prompter or A million
Speaker 1: people can do that job, and a million people do
Speaker 1: do that job. But anyway, here he is talking about
Speaker 1: Trump in the victory lap play seven, more than one
Speaker 1: hundred and thirty six thousand of our brothers and sisters,
Speaker 1: our moms and dads, grandparents and friends are dead. The
Speaker 1: President did briefly mention them, but only to boast about
Speaker 1: how many more people would have died had it not
Speaker 1: been for his actions. He calls it leadership, But to
Speaker 1: call it that would be misleading. The largest single peacetime
Speaker 1: loss of life in this country since the nineteen eighteen
Speaker 1: influenza pandemic and no end in sight. And today the
Speaker 1: President was taking another victory lap yet again. The graves
Speaker 1: are still fresh, but this president ignores them. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: the president ignores the graves. Anderson, that's wow. The President
Speaker 1: is waking up every day dealing with this all day,
Speaker 1: all the time, and has been the subject of journos
Speaker 1: trying to undermine attack and just you know, slow down.
Speaker 1: The president in his response, I mean, he spends so
Speaker 1: much time just fending off the lunatic left wing, you know,
Speaker 1: attacks on his ability to handle this, and it's it's
Speaker 1: never enough. Is he supposed to go on TV every
Speaker 1: day and just be solemn and say that we're losing,
Speaker 1: We're losing this battle against COVID nineteen. I've done a
Speaker 1: terrible job. Let's put Joe Biden in charge. Unless he
Speaker 1: said that you could always do this while the graves
Speaker 1: are still fresh. While the graves are still fresh. We
Speaker 1: all are aware of this. It's a terrible situation with
Speaker 1: COVID nineteen. It has been for months. It is taking lives,
Speaker 1: it's ruining lives, it's ruining businesses, and it comes from China.
Speaker 1: We don't talk about that as much of these days,
Speaker 1: but this could have been avoided if the Chinese government
Speaker 1: was not so concerned first and foremost with maintaining its
Speaker 1: iron it's iron and illegitimate grip on power in that country.
Speaker 1: But to say that the president is not paying attention
Speaker 1: or doesn't care about the bodies is just a reckless slander,
Speaker 1: it really is. But that's what they'll continue to say.
Speaker 1: I mean, I talked to the President about this issue.
Speaker 1: He was grave and solemn when I was speaking about
Speaker 1: the Oval office. He's like, this has been a horrible situation.
Speaker 1: You know, we're doing the best we can. We're fighting
Speaker 1: through it. We're going to get through it. Do we
Speaker 1: want a president who's an optimist while we're in this battle,
Speaker 1: while we're fighting this war against a virus? Or do
Speaker 1: you want a president who is just constantly telling us
Speaker 1: that we're screwed no matter what the end is near,
Speaker 1: we're all gonna die. And until Joe Biden's in charge,
Speaker 1: everything's going to be terrible. Joe Biden's a moron, all right.
Speaker 1: The limbs can play these games all day about how
Speaker 1: much they don't like Trump and he's so awful and
Speaker 1: he's so evil. They're alternative to Trump's leadership is laughable,
Speaker 1: laughable if they put up a serious candidate. But I
Speaker 1: don't want I say serious. I don't mean has a
Speaker 1: serious shot of winning. I think Joe Biden, unfortunately does
Speaker 1: I mean a serious human being, a person that anybody
Speaker 1: should listen to about any Joe Biden doesn't know squat
Speaker 1: about squat. But there's still all the sanctimony, there's still
Speaker 1: all of the the pretense that the real problem here
Speaker 1: is Trump. I go back to. This reminds me of
Speaker 1: when I was on the Bill Marshow right before the pandemic,
Speaker 1: and I was asking the panel which I should not
Speaker 1: have asked. Ques. You know, it's just it's like dealing
Speaker 1: with a with a swarm of bees and you got
Speaker 1: four people blah blah blah Trump, it's horrible, blah blah
Speaker 1: blah blah, and they can curse and a haha, that's
Speaker 1: all funny. When they're cursing about the stuff and you're
Speaker 1: sitting there like trying to have a real conversation. It's
Speaker 1: not an easy deal. Drust me um but I kept asking,
Speaker 1: what do you want him to do differently? And they
Speaker 1: take it seriously. He's taking it seriously. It's a stupid
Speaker 1: thing to say, well, what do you want him to do?
Speaker 1: Wear a mask? Oh, if Trump wears a mask, then
Speaker 1: the whole thing goes away. I mean, these are un
Speaker 1: serious points they make because they hate Trump, they hate
Speaker 1: the Republican Party and his leadership, and they're just pretending
Speaker 1: that this is really about failures of policy and decision
Speaker 1: making at the highest levels of the government that would
Speaker 1: have been better if a Democrat were in charge, no
Speaker 1: matter who the president was. Here's the reality, no matter
Speaker 1: who the president United States was, we were going to
Speaker 1: be put through hell with this. The question that we
Speaker 1: do faces is it going to be longer and is
Speaker 1: it going to be worse? But it was always going
Speaker 1: to be hell, And I think the lockdown Libs are
Speaker 1: certainly making this whole thing. They're dragging this out, making
Speaker 1: it longer and more costly than it should be. But
Speaker 1: that's the central fight that we're going through right now. Cuomo,
Speaker 1: the fact that he has the support he does, the
Speaker 1: numbers he does is just stunning. Plack clip bait. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: no not eight not eight. Play Oh no, this is CNA.
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. I get a brother's quoma is the thing?
Speaker 1: I get the brothers Cuomo confused? Hey he is pro
Speaker 1: Quomo over at CNN. Hey, play Cliff six. He keeps
Speaker 1: saying the only reason we have cases is because we're testing.
Speaker 1: Like that's a bad thing, that the testing is the problem.
Speaker 1: You know, As I said earlier on the show, it's like, hey,
Speaker 1: don I just figured out the cure to cancer. Let's
Speaker 1: stop counting the cases. Yeah, that's what he's recommending. And
Speaker 1: all that lets, you know is unless literally he is
Speaker 1: diseased of the mind, like COVID has taken his IQ away.
Speaker 1: He's only saying this because he wants you to mitigate
Speaker 1: the relevance of the pandemic, because he wants it to
Speaker 1: go away so the economy can come back faster. What
Speaker 1: he doesn't seem to get is if you don't deal
Speaker 1: with the reality of the pandemic, you won't get the
Speaker 1: economy back. That's why twenty seven states are having a
Speaker 1: step backwards. Oh my god, deal with the reality of
Speaker 1: the pandemic. How what are we going to do? We're
Speaker 1: gonna just when there's more cases and this whole thing
Speaker 1: that he says, no testing means you've dealt with it.
Speaker 1: That's not what he's saying. There's clearly a rise in
Speaker 1: cases with a rise in testing. When a disease has
Speaker 1: spread through the whole community. The issue is not cases.
Speaker 1: The issue is hospitalizations, serious illness, and death. Those are
Speaker 1: the factors we have to And there are some hospitals
Speaker 1: where there are a lot of COVID patients right now.
Speaker 1: Houston has a lot. There's some hospitals in Florida that
Speaker 1: I have a lot. None of them have been overwhelmed.
Speaker 1: And I just read you the most recent death rate.
Speaker 1: It's in the three hundreds. That death rate is a
Speaker 1: fraction of what it was at the peak. And we've
Speaker 1: had states that are that have been reopened for months.
Speaker 1: So what is the lesson that we take from this? Well,
Speaker 1: the lesson the libs take from this is that we
Speaker 1: should lockdown again until I don't know, I don't know
Speaker 1: how long should we really lockdown again? And oh, November
Speaker 1: sounds about right. It's gonna be safe in November or
Speaker 1: to start to live life again, or maybe not till
Speaker 1: January of twenty twenty one. When Joe Biden they think
Speaker 1: will be president. Thanks for listening to the Bus and
Speaker 1: Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts at the
Speaker 1: iHeart Radio app or wherever you get your podcasts. Let's
Speaker 1: talk about China. China. Some of you have been asking
Speaker 1: me why haven't we been getting this morning the Show,
Speaker 1: And you're right, i haven't spent time on China recently,
Speaker 1: and I've been meaning to because things are things are
Speaker 1: heating up. We have some pretty major policy stuff happening,
Speaker 1: and let's just drill down into a few of them.
Speaker 1: First of all, in the State Department has been working
Speaker 1: on this. Pompeo has been very diligent on these issues.
Speaker 1: The big thing that's some people are is going to
Speaker 1: lead to even bigger stuff down the line. This is
Speaker 1: not minor. This is not quite Taiwan level sensitivity for
Speaker 1: Hong Kong, I mean for China quite yet. But Hong
Speaker 1: Kong status when economic status is pretty close to some
Speaker 1: of the Taiwan issues that China uses as a real
Speaker 1: red line. And maybe maybe some China experts would say
Speaker 1: it actually is right alongside it. But there's this national
Speaker 1: security law we know, we we gotta step back for
Speaker 1: a second. There were these protests in Hong Kong that
Speaker 1: went on for months and that was last year, and
Speaker 1: especially on social media, you may have seen that at
Speaker 1: some of these protests they were singing the US national anthem,
Speaker 1: waving American flags Hong Kong. As part of the transfer
Speaker 1: from the British to the Chinese Communist Party was promised
Speaker 1: certain freedoms and certain autonomy, and that was the deal.
Speaker 1: And then the Chinese Communist Party came along recently and
Speaker 1: pass this National Secure Past instituted. They don't pass laws
Speaker 1: right institute of this National security law that effectively means
Speaker 1: that there'll be extradition of anyone in Hong Kong to
Speaker 1: the Chinese mainland for a whole range of offenses that
Speaker 1: has to do with speaking basically speaking out against the government.
Speaker 1: If you do anything like that, you could be sent.
Speaker 1: And if you get sent the Chinese mainland and you're
Speaker 1: a political target, you're done. There's no there's no real trial,
Speaker 1: you have no rights. It's a communist state. Now it
Speaker 1: doesn't operate as a truly communist economy, but it is
Speaker 1: an authoritarian, an authoritarian and really totalitarian regime that operates
Speaker 1: under principles of just pure thugocracy, right, the biggest, strongest,
Speaker 1: most willing to use force wins. They're about a thousand
Speaker 1: people in the Chinese Communist Party that really matter and
Speaker 1: make decisions for the whole country of a billion people.
Speaker 1: So that law created. They're a huge surge of anti
Speaker 1: government activity, anti Communist Party activity in Hong Kong. And
Speaker 1: we saw these protests and I mean it was amazing,
Speaker 1: and those are brave protesters. Guys, take a moment to
Speaker 1: separate out. You're not a brave protester when you're graving
Speaker 1: in the faith of police. Offer thirds next to laffi
Speaker 1: at square, and then you're gonna go drink a latte
Speaker 1: and be like, ah, my Wellesley professor was right, this
Speaker 1: country is so racist. No, No, that's not brave, right,
Speaker 1: because our cops are incredibly patient and decent and respect
Speaker 1: the rules of engagement well with protesters and are usually
Speaker 1: there ninety nine percent of the time to just make
Speaker 1: sure that protesters are not blocking traffic, not getting hit
Speaker 1: by cars, and no one's you know, no fights are
Speaker 1: breaking out, so on and so forth. You protest the
Speaker 1: Communist Party in Hong Kong, you are bible to get beaten,
Speaker 1: put in a dark cell and executed, right, I mean
Speaker 1: really bad. That's it's brave to be a pro freedom
Speaker 1: protester in Hong Kong. And many people who are watching
Speaker 1: this issue, and we have been talking about international relations
Speaker 1: as much on the show because we got problems in
Speaker 1: the homeland right now, obviously, but many people who've been
Speaker 1: watching what's happening in China point to the global distraction
Speaker 1: that's going on right now as an opportunity for China
Speaker 1: to do the worst stuff that we're always complaining about
Speaker 1: with the sending of Weigers to concentration camps. Remember, Weigers
Speaker 1: are a Muslim ethnically distinct from Chinese minority in Western China.
Speaker 1: I believe it's pronounced Xinjiang province in Western China. And
Speaker 1: they're being sent by the million, you know million, there's
Speaker 1: a million I believe right now in the concentration camps
Speaker 1: for re education. And this is old school, scary Communist
Speaker 1: Party ideological, bare fisted stuff. So that's happening. The Wagers
Speaker 1: are being you know, viciously oppressed human rights violations. It's terrible,
Speaker 1: and you have this crackdown in Hong Kong, and Hong
Speaker 1: Kong has this not only the promise of greater freedoms
Speaker 1: because of the transfer from the from the British to
Speaker 1: the Chinese, but also has a special economic status well
Speaker 1: because of the Now they've now instituted this National Security law.
Speaker 1: They said they were going to, then they kind of
Speaker 1: backed off, and now they're going. Now they're they're going
Speaker 1: full throttle with this National Security Law, which just means
Speaker 1: at all descent in Hong Kong against and not even
Speaker 1: just ascent, anyone who doesn't do the bidding of Beijing
Speaker 1: in Hong Kong of the central government is subject to
Speaker 1: being sent to the mainland, tried in a court where
Speaker 1: they have no rule, no rights, no rules whatsoever, and
Speaker 1: never heard from again, or you know, put in it
Speaker 1: or put in of terrible prison for ten years or
Speaker 1: who knows how long. So Trump is taking action on
Speaker 1: this one. And here's what he says about It's unfortunate
Speaker 1: because a lot, you know, Hong Kong has been a dynamic,
Speaker 1: a booming, dynamic economy for a long time. Here's what
Speaker 1: the President says about what we're doing in response to
Speaker 1: the Communist Party instituting the National Security of all play seventeen. Today,
Speaker 1: I signed legislation and an executive order to hold China
Speaker 1: accountable for its oppressive actions against the people of Hong Kong.
Speaker 1: The Hong Kong Autonomy Act, which I signed this afternoon,
Speaker 1: passed unanimously through Congress. This law gives my administration powerful
Speaker 1: new tools so hold responsible the individuals and the entities
Speaker 1: involved in extinguishing Hong Kong's freedom. We've all watched what happened.
Speaker 1: Not a good situation. Their freedom has been taken away,
Speaker 1: their rights have been taken away, and with it goes
Speaker 1: Hong Kong. In my opinion, because it will no longer
Speaker 1: be able to compete with three markets, A lot of
Speaker 1: people will be leaving Hong Kong. I suspect. Today I
Speaker 1: also signed an executive order ending US preferential treatment for
Speaker 1: Hong Kong. Hong Kong will now be treated the same
Speaker 1: as mainland China. No special privileges, no special economic treatment,
Speaker 1: and no export of sensitive technologies. In addition to that,
Speaker 1: as you know, we're placing massive tariffs and help list
Speaker 1: very large tariffs on China. First time that's ever happened
Speaker 1: to China. Trump is confronting China with all the stuff
Speaker 1: going on here. He is staying true to this mission
Speaker 1: and he does not get enough credit for this because
Speaker 1: this president was way ahead of the foreign policy consensus
Speaker 1: on the economic as well as national security threats posed
Speaker 1: by the Chinese Communist Party. We've had now almost thirty
Speaker 1: years of failed policy from the Intelligencia and DCNE in
Speaker 1: the think tanks. Their claim was that there would be
Speaker 1: a liberalization that occurred in China as a result of
Speaker 1: economic growth and wealth that as effectively as China was
Speaker 1: more intertwined with the global economy and China became a
Speaker 1: wealthier country with wealthier people now has a middle class
Speaker 1: in China that didn't exist before, that it would become
Speaker 1: you know, what started out with Big Max and Coca
Speaker 1: Cola would turn into representative democracy and a constitution and
Speaker 1: so on. So that was the idea, and that's the
Speaker 1: opposite of what has happened. It's gotten wealthier, and it's
Speaker 1: gotten more aggressive and more authoritarian, more aggressive internally and externally.
Speaker 1: And that's where we get to the other part of this. Now,
Speaker 1: the President has also said, or the State Department has
Speaker 1: also said obviously on behalf of the President, that there
Speaker 1: could be additional action as a result of Chinese claims
Speaker 1: in the South China See, the US could in fact
Speaker 1: sanction could in fact sanctionities on that. So now if
Speaker 1: you're part of the crackdown in Hong Kong, the US
Speaker 1: could freeze your bank accounts. The US could take really
Speaker 1: and that's and now we're talking about freeing the ban
Speaker 1: account of Chinese Communist Party members, people that matter to
Speaker 1: the CCP. And the claims in the South China See.
Speaker 1: I mean, you have trillions of dollars of commerce that
Speaker 1: are flowing through the South China See in a regular basis.
Speaker 1: If you pull it up and look at the South
Speaker 1: China See in a map, you very quickly understand that
Speaker 1: you've got China, Taiwan, Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei, all
Speaker 1: these countries that have claims to some of these island chains. Now,
Speaker 1: there are a number of reasons that the islands in
Speaker 1: the South China Sea, and there's also a certain in
Speaker 1: the East China Sea with claims between China and Japan,
Speaker 1: notably the Senkaku or dai Yu island chain. But the
Speaker 1: South China Sea is where there's real that that's because
Speaker 1: there's so much commerce that flows through there. The claim
Speaker 1: about who will control that is, this is the most likely,
Speaker 1: this is the most likely flashpoint for armed conflict involving
Speaker 1: the Chinese Communist Party in the in the whole world
Speaker 1: that will result in full scale war. Because some of
Speaker 1: you are thinking, wait, hold on a second buck. In
Speaker 1: recent weeks, we had Chinese soldiers and Indian soldiers coming
Speaker 1: to blows quite literally, hand to hand combat way up
Speaker 1: in the in the mountains that separate, you know, at
Speaker 1: high altitude that separates China from from India. And that's
Speaker 1: just over that's effectively though a border dispute, unlikely to
Speaker 1: spill over into a full out con full on conflict
Speaker 1: between India and China. India is a country that the US,
Speaker 1: in my opinion, we need to be making as many
Speaker 1: you know, we need India to be as close to
Speaker 1: us as Japan post World War two has come to
Speaker 1: us just on policy, and I mean, and we've made
Speaker 1: a lot of strides. The problem with the US relationship
Speaker 1: with India stretches back to the Cold War when India
Speaker 1: was under the was very close to the Soviets and
Speaker 1: was socialist, and so we were using Pakistan as our
Speaker 1: proxy in the region. And so there was this great
Speaker 1: game global great game politics playing out where where we
Speaker 1: were close to. If you've seen Charlie Wilson's War, you
Speaker 1: have some understanding that we were close to Zea l
Speaker 1: Hawk running Pakistan, and there was some bad feeling among
Speaker 1: the Indian nationalists and the Indian government with the US
Speaker 1: lingered from that era anyway, because Indian Pakistan completely hate
Speaker 1: each other, as we know as countries. And if you're
Speaker 1: looking for a place that's most likely to have a
Speaker 1: nuclear exchange, that's where it would be Indian Pakistan. Still,
Speaker 1: but in the South China Sea, you have these different
Speaker 1: island chains. And these island chains not only are useful
Speaker 1: because China has shown us that they will build out
Speaker 1: what is a very small, a very small coral island
Speaker 1: chain effectively, they'll build that out or to being airfields.
Speaker 1: They'll use this for strategic military purposes. And on top
Speaker 1: of that, there's also the claim to resources and fishing
Speaker 1: and mineral rights surrounding. So you know, if you're China,
Speaker 1: you say this is our territory, this little island, and
Speaker 1: you're saying that's mainland China now, or I should say
Speaker 1: that that's a part of mainland China. It's obviously not
Speaker 1: the mainland. You're then going to draw on a map,
Speaker 1: you know, a radius and say and these are our
Speaker 1: territorial waters around this island. So this is where you
Speaker 1: have a real possibility of continued conflict. And the Fiery
Speaker 1: Cross Reef, that's the place you've seen where there's imagery
Speaker 1: of airfields that have been built up from what was
Speaker 1: just a almost a nothing island chain. So these are
Speaker 1: the places where you're you're going to see continuing tension
Speaker 1: rise of China. Oh and then there's five G. Let's
Speaker 1: talk about five G baby, Let's talk about you and me.
Speaker 1: Let's talk about all the good things and the bad
Speaker 1: things five G will be. You're in the Freedom Hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Joe Biden's entire
Speaker 1: career has been a gift to the China's Communist Party
Speaker 1: into the calamity of errors that they've made. They made
Speaker 1: so many errors, and it's been devastating for the American worker.
Speaker 1: China has taken out hundreds of billions of dollars a
Speaker 1: year from our country, and we rebuilt China. Give them
Speaker 1: all the credit in the world. I don't give the
Speaker 1: credit for the people that used to stand here. Because
Speaker 1: they allowed this to happen, where hundreds of millions of
Speaker 1: dollars were taken out of the United States Treasury in
Speaker 1: order to rebuild China. Trump's right, Biden was wrong on
Speaker 1: China all along, been in Washington over forty years and
Speaker 1: wrong on China every step of the way. Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: been wrong in every foreign policy challenge, every step of
Speaker 1: the way. But you're supposed to forget about all that
Speaker 1: because Trump is the Orange Man and he's bad. But
Speaker 1: I mentioned five G a second ago, and I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna skip past that. So here's where we are on
Speaker 1: five G. The US has said no, Huawei, no way,
Speaker 1: kind of like that on our networks now five G.
Speaker 1: First of all, Huawei is a major Chinese telecom company
Speaker 1: with the backing of the Chinese Communist Party. It's it's huge,
Speaker 1: and they are advanced in five G technology, and some
Speaker 1: countries are allowing Huawe to install five G networks. Five G.
Speaker 1: You're used to four G on your phone right now.
Speaker 1: Most likely it just has to do with the speed,
Speaker 1: the data speed that you have. Five G networks are coming,
Speaker 1: but it's a little bit slow because you have to
Speaker 1: you have to be within with the phone technologies it
Speaker 1: is right now, you've got to be in direct really
Speaker 1: line of sight to these five G little mini towers
Speaker 1: that you can see sometimes. So they're building an outplace
Speaker 1: by place in this country. It's coming along its slowly.
Speaker 1: What would five G mean you could upload a movie
Speaker 1: in a few seconds? I mean, what would a two gigabit?
Speaker 1: Three gigabit movie would be a matter of seconds before
Speaker 1: you'd have the whole thing uploaded. Why does this matter
Speaker 1: so much? Because in the Internet of Things, autonomous driving vehicles,
Speaker 1: all kinds of constant device, computations and algorithms running, everything
Speaker 1: just moves faster, and it moves at a speed where
Speaker 1: much more is possible and much more there's much greater capability.
Speaker 1: So and for our purposes, it would just mean that
Speaker 1: you could probably do virtual reality in real time. I mean,
Speaker 1: there's all kinds of applications that people are expecting in
Speaker 1: the future, but it's being built out slowly. What's the
Speaker 1: problem with Huawei. Huawei is a one of these state
Speaker 1: supported enterprises, state backed enterprises in China that they use
Speaker 1: for strategic national interests, and they want them to be
Speaker 1: helping to build They want China to be building infrastructure
Speaker 1: in countries the UK just joined along with Australia in
Speaker 1: the US and saying no, huawe not going to do it.
Speaker 1: The reason for this is if we have five G
Speaker 1: networks become embedded in our way of life, think of
Speaker 1: all of the data that will be running over there,
Speaker 1: and then of this in a national security context. What
Speaker 1: if they can create backdoors in the software or even
Speaker 1: just weak points in the software that they know about
Speaker 1: that they can then exploit to either take data or
Speaker 1: in a worst case scenario, shut down our systems during
Speaker 1: an attack. That's what the real concern is. If we
Speaker 1: do have a military exchange with China, the worry is
Speaker 1: that we would have to We don't want to be
Speaker 1: in a position where the Chinese Communist Party can say, oh, okay,
Speaker 1: well we're going to shut off all of your electric
Speaker 1: stuff that works right now because of the backdoor we've
Speaker 1: built into your five G network that's in shorthand. The
Speaker 1: concern some people say they're still going to do this
Speaker 1: any you know, they're still trying to do this anyway.
Speaker 1: Some people say this is overblown. I think it's the
Speaker 1: right move. We need to start viewing China as the
Speaker 1: as the competitor and opposition force that it is for
Speaker 1: US national interests are not. We are now in a
Speaker 1: zero sum game with China on a lot of issues,
Speaker 1: and we need to act accordingly. We should not be
Speaker 1: thinking of how we can help the Chinese become wealthier
Speaker 1: and stronger as a country. That was US policy, bipartisan
Speaker 1: policy for decades, including from failures like Biden. Now in
Speaker 1: the Trump era, with the sanctions, the tariffs, with these
Speaker 1: different policies that are put in place, we're finally treating
Speaker 1: China the way that China has been treating us, which
Speaker 1: is as a power to be overcome. This is the
Speaker 1: right move. Thanks for listening to The bus Essen Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Feel those funky beats. It's
Speaker 1: time for role. Indeed, it is the role. Call time
Speaker 1: producer Mark loves it when I sing to him before
Speaker 1: the show. By that's his favorite thing. He doesn't threaten
Speaker 1: to shut off his microphone and stop working for the
Speaker 1: day when I sing to him. Just so you know
Speaker 1: that that does not I have a best of ready
Speaker 1: for next time you do it. Oh Man oh boy,
Speaker 1: all right, here we go. Let's get to a Facebook
Speaker 1: dot com slash Buck Sex and Team Buck at iHeartMedia
Speaker 1: dot com and let's see we got here in the oh.
Speaker 1: And don't forget, we're post posting the Buck Brief every
Speaker 1: day on Facebook, so please like and share to your
Speaker 1: page and check it out. It's a four minute quick
Speaker 1: rundown of everything you need to know from today and
Speaker 1: it's a great way to get people to know about
Speaker 1: our show. So if you share it on your page,
Speaker 1: other people will see it, and then Team Buck rows,
Speaker 1: and then we can get producer Mark a nice holiday
Speaker 1: bonus this year, and so on and so forth. So
Speaker 1: we want that to happen. That's a good joke, there's guy,
Speaker 1: Well what you don't know? You don't know? It could
Speaker 1: be all right, we'll see. Yeah, all right. First up
Speaker 1: here we have or and just for that, I'm gonna
Speaker 1: go rogue and go into the the Instagram inbox for
Speaker 1: you know, freedom Patriot ninety nine seven's message it is.
Speaker 1: Read it in real time and hope that it doesn't
Speaker 1: have a lot of profanity in it. All right, we
Speaker 1: got this, let's get to it. We have Randy, I
Speaker 1: got really excited saying that name. I don't know why, Um,
Speaker 1: you know, did the macho Man Randy Savage pass away
Speaker 1: or think so? Well? I feel I can't remember with
Speaker 1: wrestlers for some reason, I can't remember who's still with
Speaker 1: us and who's not. Hulk Hogan's still around, right, Hogan
Speaker 1: is still around? Randy Savage had pass away in twenty eleven. Uh, yeah,
Speaker 1: I thought I thought we lost the mott macho man
Speaker 1: Randy Savage. That's a shame. He was a great he
Speaker 1: was a great professional wrestler. I went through a phase where, actually, really,
Speaker 1: when I was a kid, I really like professional wrestling.
Speaker 1: That was back in the Iron Shake and uh who
Speaker 1: uh oh super Fly Jimmy Snooker that didn't end well.
Speaker 1: Trying to think of some other when I was a kid,
Speaker 1: there were a lot of wrestling, a lot of wrestling
Speaker 1: casualties from the WWF days. Well, yeah, they put a
Speaker 1: lot of stress on their bodies before everyone knew what
Speaker 1: it was actually like, what it was actually doing to
Speaker 1: their bodies. If we know, yes it is fake, it's scripted,
Speaker 1: the physical toll in their bodies is still very real. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's that's for sure. And yeah, also you know, putting
Speaker 1: on you know, if you're six feet tall and you
Speaker 1: put on one hundred pounds of muscle. Um, the hormones
Speaker 1: and things that you will often take, let's just say,
Speaker 1: to do that are not good for people usually. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: back then they took the roids like they did water.
Speaker 1: Yeah yeah. I mean if you see some of those
Speaker 1: wrestlers back in the day, they're is you know, people
Speaker 1: don't look like that anymore. I mean, you don't get
Speaker 1: that big because that's just not natural. All right, um, well,
Speaker 1: also true about bodybuilding bodybuilders back then, there was a
Speaker 1: phase in the eighties where bodybuilding there were guys who
Speaker 1: did you ever see the Ronnie I don't know if well,
Speaker 1: I've never read that he used any of these substances
Speaker 1: or not. But Ronnie Coleman, you've seen the Ronnie Coleman documentary.
Speaker 1: I have not don't even know who that is. Oh,
Speaker 1: he's like the most famous bodybuilder of all time. It's
Speaker 1: just unbelievable to see a guy who is that much
Speaker 1: muscle walking around is like nothing is there's it's crazy.
Speaker 1: The documentary on them is actually pretty interesting. It's on
Speaker 1: Netflix anyway, all right, Randy not Manchamnrandy Savage, hey Buck, shieldsay,
Speaker 1: you've mentioned that the president seems to have lost the
Speaker 1: fire in his belly recently and is not fighting back
Speaker 1: the way he used to. My personal opinion is that
Speaker 1: when he threatened using the military to quell the riots,
Speaker 1: but Secretary Esper and General Millie publicly came out and
Speaker 1: said they would not order the military to go against
Speaker 1: American civilians, even just to help calm things down, that
Speaker 1: seemed to take the oh, that seemed to take the
Speaker 1: wind out of Trump's sales. Yeah, look, I the president.
Speaker 1: The President had a terrible June, no question, terrible June. Politically,
Speaker 1: it just was a mess, a mess. So was it
Speaker 1: that party? I think there were a lot of things, Randy.
Speaker 1: I think your analysis is it is certainly in line
Speaker 1: with what the case is. What was the single biggest issue?
Speaker 1: I think it's tough to say. Matthew, hey Buck, just
Speaker 1: heard your review of Midway good stuff. I wanted to
Speaker 1: ask you did you see Dunkirk when it came out?
Speaker 1: I love Christopher Nolan and all his movies and would
Speaker 1: love to know your opinion if you have one. Keep
Speaker 1: it up, Shields High. Matthew, first of all. Thank you
Speaker 1: so much for writing in and I appreciate the question.
Speaker 1: Did I like dun Kirk? It was okay. I thought
Speaker 1: it was a little boring. I thought it was a
Speaker 1: little boring. I thought they should have made more of
Speaker 1: I think it was to hold out at I think
Speaker 1: it was at Calais. Pardon me, I might be messing
Speaker 1: up my World War two off the cuff history now,
Speaker 1: but where the units were told to basically fight to
Speaker 1: the last man so they could hold off. I just
Speaker 1: think there was more they could have done with that
Speaker 1: aspect of the story to see, because yeah, I get it,
Speaker 1: they're on the beach. There's tension, but it's a lot
Speaker 1: of like guys on boats, kind of going slowly, like oh,
Speaker 1: this is all duty. We're going to do this and
Speaker 1: hopefully those chaps will get right on the boat and
Speaker 1: we'll go back, you know, and you're like, all right.
Speaker 1: I mean, I don't know. I thought it was a
Speaker 1: little slow, a little slow, which a movie about a war,
Speaker 1: and that war in particular in that situation, shouldn't feel slow.
Speaker 1: It was very tense, though it was very taught, not
Speaker 1: quite as tense as the movie that producer Mark likes
Speaker 1: about the guys selling gems, which still I just think
Speaker 1: about and it raises my blood pressure and I might
Speaker 1: have a heart attack from it, which was one makes
Speaker 1: it a good thriller suspense movie. We're just we're just
Speaker 1: never gonna We're just never gonna agree on this one.
Speaker 1: But there you have it, Kelvin, Kelvin interesting buck. I
Speaker 1: know you focus on you're just staying for public sector unions.
Speaker 1: But I have been in the IBEW for my entire
Speaker 1: adult life, and we are lumped into public and private sectors,
Speaker 1: spread across everything from municipalities, military, corporate builders, private ten
Speaker 1: ninety nine ventures, co ops and residential I love me
Speaker 1: some coop utilities. They cut out the big payout to
Speaker 1: the mayor's favorite SJW projects and stockholding investors. They pay
Speaker 1: the employees well and provide great services. How do you
Speaker 1: feel about unions like mine that are blended into private
Speaker 1: and public sectors, Well, my friend, as I've said before,
Speaker 1: there are there are good unions. You know, there are
Speaker 1: good unions and unions. You know, the International Brotherhood of
Speaker 1: Electrical Workers the IBW is critical and you know, I
Speaker 1: mean the people that are doing that work that's essential work.
Speaker 1: Private sector stuff, but that but that's still private sector
Speaker 1: labor that maybe does some work for the public sector.
Speaker 1: So you're talking about a blended union that does some
Speaker 1: public sector stuff, but you're still doing a private sector
Speaker 1: job in my mind. Whereas if you're working like in
Speaker 1: the state capitol as a secretary or something that's public sector. Right,
Speaker 1: if you're working in a public school, that's public sector,
Speaker 1: you're not also doing private sector work, or at least
Speaker 1: not under the auspices of your union. So I think
Speaker 1: that there's some distinction to be had there. But you know, Kelvin,
Speaker 1: you know the ib EW, it sounds like it does
Speaker 1: well for its employers, I mean for it for the
Speaker 1: employees rather who were under its ages. And I think
Speaker 1: that unions have unions have had benefits in the past
Speaker 1: for people. And you know, so it's all about which
Speaker 1: when we're talking about and when we're talking about it.
Speaker 1: But like I said, coal miners unionizing, yeah, I get it.
Speaker 1: People who are part of the bureaucracy of a state
Speaker 1: government unionizing, now, no, I don't get it. Stephen Mark,
Speaker 1: you beautiful son of a Listening to that clip of
Speaker 1: the real Hillary was more painful than listening to Buck's
Speaker 1: impression of her, and that impression is as enjoyable as
Speaker 1: listening to Gilbert Godfrey's reading the IRS Tax Code while
Speaker 1: having ants crawling on my ear drums. I've never believed
Speaker 1: in trigger warnings until now, Producer Mark, would you like
Speaker 1: to tell Stephen you're sorry? I'm so sorry, Stephen, but
Speaker 1: I would be interested in hearing Gilbert Godfrey read the
Speaker 1: tax code. I think they'd just be funny. I think
Speaker 1: so too. It would be the only time I'd ever
Speaker 1: want to hear the tax code. What was the last
Speaker 1: thing Gilbert Godfrey did? Yeah? Can you think of it?
Speaker 1: I mean, I know he was a half half flack,
Speaker 1: like like the duck, right, that was him. Yeah, he does.
Speaker 1: He just pops up here and there. Yeah, he You
Speaker 1: know what his greatest thing ever was, in my opinion,
Speaker 1: Iago in a Latin. That was the That was the
Speaker 1: Gilbert Godfried pinnacle. I think he actually when I was
Speaker 1: working with the New York Mets broadcast, he went into
Speaker 1: the booth of the announcers and he knows nothing about baseball,
Speaker 1: but he was promoting something. So you know how you're
Speaker 1: not good with baseball, but you know how a strikeout
Speaker 1: is called a K. Yes, So they have a board
Speaker 1: with a bunch of k's up and I guess the
Speaker 1: pitcher had three strikeouts. So he goes, what is it?
Speaker 1: What is it? Why does it say K K K
Speaker 1: in left field? Obviously a joke, but he had no
Speaker 1: idea what KSE stood for. But to an outsider or
Speaker 1: it is a worthwhile question. Yeah that's true to someone
Speaker 1: who's nothing about baseball, sure, But to most baseball people
Speaker 1: listening to that broadcast, they know you're in the freedom hud.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. All right, more
Speaker 1: roll call Jeff Rights, Hey, Mark and Buck. Pretty sure
Speaker 1: if y'all moving on in New York and New Jersey,
Speaker 1: y'all need to warm up your grill skills down here
Speaker 1: in the summer. The grill goes more than the oven. Yeah,
Speaker 1: if I, if I could, I would certainly be doing
Speaker 1: more grilling. The grill is a lot of fun. I
Speaker 1: will say that I made something yesterday that I saw
Speaker 1: a recipe for this online. I thought maybe this would
Speaker 1: be worth doing. I made rosemary salt. So it was rosemary.
Speaker 1: It was some rosemary sage, a little bit of crushed garlic,
Speaker 1: and some lemon zest. Just effectively or essentially puade with salt,
Speaker 1: and then you use that as a special It is
Speaker 1: bonkers level good on meat, fish, whatever I say, go
Speaker 1: of war it. And you also really save a lot
Speaker 1: of time because you're not constantly. You do one big
Speaker 1: batch of it and for a week or two for
Speaker 1: all of your meats, you've got this seasoned salt. But
Speaker 1: it's fresh seasonings in your salt. And I'm a big
Speaker 1: fan and producer market is not complicated, so if you
Speaker 1: wanted to give a shot, you could. I think once
Speaker 1: I'm able to grill often, I'll get better at cooking. Yeah,
Speaker 1: grilling is great because grilling also the smell as you're
Speaker 1: doing it, and the being outdoors and all this is
Speaker 1: really really something special. But yeah, in New York, because
Speaker 1: we don't have most of you listening to this probably
Speaker 1: have some kind of a yard or outdoor space that's
Speaker 1: your own. In New York, if you have outdoor space,
Speaker 1: you probably walk around with a top hat of a
Speaker 1: monocle and talk about how all the poor people are
Speaker 1: getting in the way today. You know, it's really tough
Speaker 1: to have in Manhattan a yard. Some people do, but
Speaker 1: it's not an easy thing to pull off right now,
Speaker 1: I can't even see her steak without the smoke alarm
Speaker 1: going off. I have the same problem, and I don't
Speaker 1: know why. I think there's a way to push it,
Speaker 1: so maybe it goes into hush mode so it won't
Speaker 1: do that for fifteen minutes or something. But my smoke
Speaker 1: alarm constantly goes off. But it's worth it for that tasty,
Speaker 1: tasty steak. My wife just tells me I'm a bad cook. Well,
Speaker 1: that's you're just you're just out of practice, producer Mark,
Speaker 1: that's all. Sure, We'll got that, Tyler. If you're looking
Speaker 1: to refer to those of us on the right instead
Speaker 1: of conservative or even classic liberal, it's patriot Tyler. I
Speaker 1: like that. Libs will complain and say they're patriots too,
Speaker 1: but yeah, I like that. I think that I agree Richer.
Speaker 1: Oh you know, there's a there's a new a new
Speaker 1: contender for the name of the Redskins team. And I
Speaker 1: really mean this. I think one day they're going to
Speaker 1: go back and bleep the Redskins name even from broadcasts.
Speaker 1: I think that you're not even will it's the name
Speaker 1: of the team. I don't know what else to say,
Speaker 1: but that's I think that they're gonna or rather what
Speaker 1: they're talking about name. Do you know this one, producer, Mark,
Speaker 1: do you hear this? I don't. They're they the Navajo Nation,
Speaker 1: which I believe is the largest Native American actual official
Speaker 1: tribe in the United States. The Navajo Nations has suggested
Speaker 1: to the team that they call them the Washington code Talkers,
Speaker 1: a reference to those uh Navajo Navajo Nation individuals who
Speaker 1: fought for America in the Second World War. There's actually
Speaker 1: a movie with Nicholas Cage about this called wind Talkers,
Speaker 1: but they were, I think more often referred to as
Speaker 1: the code talkers. Not a not a not a bad name.
Speaker 1: I mean I was like, okay, you know, pretty cool. Actually, man,
Speaker 1: it's interesting. Yeah, I mean two it's two words. It's
Speaker 1: a shame. It's not just like one. You know, one
Speaker 1: word would be better for it. Do we are there
Speaker 1: any two name? Obviously there's the you know, like the
Speaker 1: the Buffalo Bills, but I mean the actual name of
Speaker 1: the team, not the plays. Are there any two name teams?
Speaker 1: You're two were I'm sorry, two words? Blue Jackets, the
Speaker 1: Blue Jackets. Yeah, that's that's the first one off the
Speaker 1: top of my head. Oh, the Blue Jays. Right, that's
Speaker 1: a team, the Blue Jays or the Toronto baseball team.
Speaker 1: Yeah right, see look at that with the baseball knowledge
Speaker 1: from buck Um. Used to be in Tampa Bay the
Speaker 1: Devil Raised, but now it's just the Raise. Yeah. See
Speaker 1: if if people want one for branding purposes, they really
Speaker 1: want But look, code talkers respect the coach. It's that's
Speaker 1: that's cool, and that's honoring people that deserve to be honored.
Speaker 1: So I I gotta say, I was like, Okay, that's
Speaker 1: a pretty you know that would be pretty cool. Um anyway, stee, wait, no,
Speaker 1: we got Richard book. Everyone's painting slogans on streets. There's
Speaker 1: a Chinese embassy in Houston. Why doesn't Ted Cruise or
Speaker 1: some other patriots go down and paint weager Lives Matter
Speaker 1: in front of the embassy or stand with Hong Kong.
Speaker 1: It would be nice to see us poke these commies
Speaker 1: and watch the libs say how it's wrong to graffiti
Speaker 1: the street when they painted BLM on two streets in
Speaker 1: Houston shields and paintbrush is high. Well, Richard, what we
Speaker 1: know is that painting things on the streets doesn't change
Speaker 1: anything really, So but I hear what you're saying, and
Speaker 1: I understand the point, and it's well taken that there
Speaker 1: would be all of a sudden, the Libs would would
Speaker 1: be very concerned about vandalism. We're very concerned about politicization
Speaker 1: of our streets, even for something as worthwhile as as
Speaker 1: you know, a freedom for Hong Kong. But I don't
Speaker 1: think that that's I don't think it's gonna happen anytime soon.
Speaker 1: So but thank you for writing in. My friend, Steve Buck,
Speaker 1: I really enjoy your show. I followed you closely for
Speaker 1: the last couple of years. Your voice is among the
Speaker 1: few fighting against the crazy liberal narrative, the misinformation, and
Speaker 1: lame stream media these days. I thank you for it.
Speaker 1: With the virus running rampant again, it's clear the lockdown
Speaker 1: approach has not worked. As if we've shot ourselves in
Speaker 1: the foot with the damage caused the economy, why do
Speaker 1: Democrats continue to push for unloading the whole clip via
Speaker 1: another lockdown. It's completely asinine. We cannot and should not
Speaker 1: hide and cower and fear from this virus, but those
Speaker 1: in high risk categories should take extra precautions. Lastly, you're
Speaker 1: absolutely crushing it at impressions lately, your infusion of humor
Speaker 1: into the show every day has set it apart from
Speaker 1: other conservative podcasts. Fauci and his mitigation has me laughing
Speaker 1: every time. Thank you again for your time and the
Speaker 1: work you do every day, and I'll continue to share
Speaker 1: your show with friends at family that will listen. Surrounded
Speaker 1: by liberals out here Shields hie Hey, thank you, Steve.
Speaker 1: Great great message. Appreciate it. Team. Check in on bucksx
Speaker 1: and dot com and you can talk to you tomorrow.
Speaker 1: She'll tie