1 00:00:00,760 --> 00:00:03,720 Speaker 1: Hey, guys, ready or not, twenty twenty four is here 2 00:00:03,880 --> 00:00:06,320 Speaker 1: and we here at breaking points, are already thinking of 3 00:00:06,400 --> 00:00:08,600 Speaker 1: ways we can up our game for this critical election. 4 00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:11,719 Speaker 2: We rely on our premium subs to expand coverage, upgrade 5 00:00:11,760 --> 00:00:15,960 Speaker 2: the studio ad staff give you, guys, the best independent coverage. 6 00:00:15,560 --> 00:00:16,239 Speaker 3: That is possible. 7 00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:18,279 Speaker 2: If you like what we're all about, it just means 8 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:20,840 Speaker 2: the absolute world to have your support. But enough with that, 9 00:00:21,040 --> 00:00:39,040 Speaker 2: let's get to the show. Good morning, everybody, Happy Thursday. 10 00:00:39,080 --> 00:00:40,879 Speaker 2: We have an amazing show for everybody today. What do 11 00:00:40,880 --> 00:00:41,479 Speaker 2: we have, Crystal? 12 00:00:41,560 --> 00:00:43,919 Speaker 1: Indeed, we do. Lots of interesting things are taking a 13 00:00:43,920 --> 00:00:47,360 Speaker 1: look at this morning. First of all, Donald Trump racking 14 00:00:47,440 --> 00:00:49,879 Speaker 1: up some endorsements in Florida that are pretty embarrassing for 15 00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:53,480 Speaker 1: Ronda Santis. And also a new pullout on the Democratic 16 00:00:53,520 --> 00:00:56,319 Speaker 1: primary side that I think a lot of folks will 17 00:00:56,360 --> 00:00:59,720 Speaker 1: be surprised at, including the current occupant of the White House. 18 00:01:00,040 --> 00:01:02,080 Speaker 1: Break that down for you as well. We've got new 19 00:01:02,080 --> 00:01:05,240 Speaker 1: details about the Kevin McCarthy debt sealing proposal. Is that 20 00:01:05,280 --> 00:01:06,560 Speaker 1: going to be a go or no go? I'm going 21 00:01:06,600 --> 00:01:08,319 Speaker 1: to say no go, but we'll give you those details 22 00:01:08,360 --> 00:01:11,960 Speaker 1: as well. Some developments with regards to the Supreme Court. 23 00:01:12,080 --> 00:01:15,440 Speaker 1: So number one another wrinkle of Diane Feinstein being unable 24 00:01:15,480 --> 00:01:17,679 Speaker 1: to do her job. It really limits what Democrats can 25 00:01:17,720 --> 00:01:20,760 Speaker 1: do with regards to the ethics complaints against Justice Thomas. 26 00:01:20,760 --> 00:01:23,400 Speaker 1: So that's one piece. The other piece is the Supreme 27 00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:26,000 Speaker 1: Court pushing off a decision on what they're going to 28 00:01:26,080 --> 00:01:28,920 Speaker 1: do about the abortion pill. So we've got that for you. Also, 29 00:01:29,040 --> 00:01:31,840 Speaker 1: Iowa passing a new child labor law. This is the 30 00:01:31,920 --> 00:01:35,000 Speaker 1: latest state in what has become a trend nationwide. Soig's 31 00:01:35,000 --> 00:01:38,640 Speaker 1: staying to look at some UFO footage and testimony. 32 00:01:38,720 --> 00:01:39,640 Speaker 3: Been hearing yesterday. 33 00:01:39,720 --> 00:01:41,360 Speaker 1: I'll let him break that down for me and for 34 00:01:41,440 --> 00:01:44,240 Speaker 1: all of you as well. And Grant Paulson, someone I 35 00:01:44,240 --> 00:01:45,800 Speaker 1: actually grew up with. He's going to be taking a 36 00:01:45,800 --> 00:01:49,000 Speaker 1: look at whether the Saudis are trying to buy the 37 00:01:49,160 --> 00:01:52,840 Speaker 1: Washington football team, which would really be something, right, So 38 00:01:53,160 --> 00:01:54,880 Speaker 1: we'll get all the details there and find out what 39 00:01:54,920 --> 00:01:57,400 Speaker 1: the heck exactly is going on. But before any of that, 40 00:01:57,440 --> 00:01:58,920 Speaker 1: we have a bit of an ass for you guys 41 00:01:59,000 --> 00:02:01,880 Speaker 1: this morning, because we are working very hard to build 42 00:02:01,960 --> 00:02:03,480 Speaker 1: a new and very beautiful set. 43 00:02:03,560 --> 00:02:05,600 Speaker 2: Yes, we've talked quite a bit here about that. No, 44 00:02:05,720 --> 00:02:06,840 Speaker 2: it's not about Spotify. 45 00:02:06,880 --> 00:02:08,120 Speaker 3: This time, we promise. 46 00:02:08,800 --> 00:02:11,240 Speaker 2: Look, we've always promised to be upfront with everybody, our 47 00:02:11,280 --> 00:02:14,200 Speaker 2: premium members, with the audience, the lights, for the new 48 00:02:14,240 --> 00:02:17,720 Speaker 2: studio just derived we've had to put down significant amounts 49 00:02:17,720 --> 00:02:19,920 Speaker 2: of cash and this is the biggest expense that we 50 00:02:20,000 --> 00:02:22,720 Speaker 2: have ever made in the history of Breaking Points. So 51 00:02:22,840 --> 00:02:24,959 Speaker 2: I just want to be upfront here that every dollar 52 00:02:25,000 --> 00:02:26,640 Speaker 2: of your hard earned money that you've helped us with 53 00:02:26,680 --> 00:02:29,320 Speaker 2: has gone towards the studio and jen just because of 54 00:02:29,400 --> 00:02:31,920 Speaker 2: the significant amount of expenses that we're facing in the 55 00:02:31,960 --> 00:02:34,200 Speaker 2: last couple of months, if you can help us out, 56 00:02:34,320 --> 00:02:37,400 Speaker 2: especially by becoming a yearly or a lifetime member, we 57 00:02:37,400 --> 00:02:41,480 Speaker 2: would deeply appreciate it. Breakingpoints dot com and yeah, I 58 00:02:41,480 --> 00:02:43,760 Speaker 2: mean we can just promise you as we are at 59 00:02:43,760 --> 00:02:46,400 Speaker 2: this point, like the money is going towards our staff, 60 00:02:46,639 --> 00:02:51,120 Speaker 2: our contributors, control room, new equipment, new studio to improve 61 00:02:51,200 --> 00:02:53,799 Speaker 2: the quality of the show, not only just for you, 62 00:02:53,919 --> 00:02:56,480 Speaker 2: but I think really for more people. You know, so 63 00:02:56,560 --> 00:02:58,280 Speaker 2: many of you tell us about how much the production 64 00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:01,720 Speaker 2: value so much matters to you, and news flash production 65 00:03:01,800 --> 00:03:04,840 Speaker 2: value costs a ton of money. Yeah, anyway, we appreciate you, 66 00:03:04,960 --> 00:03:05,880 Speaker 2: and we thank you very much. 67 00:03:06,000 --> 00:03:07,799 Speaker 1: Yeah, and I'll just just to add to that. One 68 00:03:07,800 --> 00:03:09,799 Speaker 1: thing that'll be cool is the new sets should be 69 00:03:09,840 --> 00:03:11,680 Speaker 1: ready right around our two year anniversary. 70 00:03:11,680 --> 00:03:13,639 Speaker 3: I think this show exactly on our two year niver. 71 00:03:13,600 --> 00:03:15,640 Speaker 1: Which is kind of which is kind of cool and 72 00:03:15,680 --> 00:03:18,000 Speaker 1: you know, kind of fortuitous, and we didn't exactly plan 73 00:03:18,080 --> 00:03:19,600 Speaker 1: it out that way, so it's neat that it's coming 74 00:03:19,639 --> 00:03:22,639 Speaker 1: together in that way. And also, listen, we're looking forward 75 00:03:22,639 --> 00:03:24,680 Speaker 1: to twenty twenty four. We want to build out a 76 00:03:24,680 --> 00:03:27,160 Speaker 1: product that is going to be great obviously for you guys, 77 00:03:27,200 --> 00:03:29,359 Speaker 1: you're our first and foremost priority, but also to try 78 00:03:29,400 --> 00:03:31,920 Speaker 1: to build a bigger audience and expand the reach of 79 00:03:31,960 --> 00:03:34,400 Speaker 1: the show so that it can have even more impact. 80 00:03:34,440 --> 00:03:36,200 Speaker 1: So if you're able to help us out with that, 81 00:03:36,280 --> 00:03:39,080 Speaker 1: we greatly appreciate it. Promise we'll be putting it to 82 00:03:39,200 --> 00:03:41,360 Speaker 1: very good and very immediate use that you'll be able 83 00:03:41,400 --> 00:03:42,480 Speaker 1: to see really. 84 00:03:42,280 --> 00:03:44,880 Speaker 2: Shortly Breakingpoints dot Com if you can. All right, let's 85 00:03:44,880 --> 00:03:47,480 Speaker 2: go ahead and start with the show. Just an absolutely 86 00:03:47,760 --> 00:03:52,000 Speaker 2: amazing statistic which will surprise nobody who watches this show, 87 00:03:52,040 --> 00:03:55,960 Speaker 2: but will surprise many people in the Republican establishment. Trump 88 00:03:56,120 --> 00:04:00,200 Speaker 2: is wiping the floor with Ron DeSantis in endorsements, not 89 00:04:00,240 --> 00:04:04,640 Speaker 2: only endorsements from elected officials GOP nationwide, but also in 90 00:04:04,680 --> 00:04:07,800 Speaker 2: his own home state of Florida. Let's go ahead and 91 00:04:07,880 --> 00:04:10,480 Speaker 2: put this up on the screen. This was accurate as 92 00:04:10,480 --> 00:04:15,080 Speaker 2: of Wednesday night in terms of GOP presidential endorsements from 93 00:04:15,160 --> 00:04:20,359 Speaker 2: either congressmen, governors, or other statewide or national elected officials. 94 00:04:20,680 --> 00:04:24,920 Speaker 2: Donald Trump has now racked up sixty one presidential endorsements, 95 00:04:25,000 --> 00:04:27,520 Speaker 2: actually sixty three as of this morning because of some 96 00:04:27,880 --> 00:04:32,400 Speaker 2: late breaking developments, and now three endorsements for Governor Ron DeSantis, 97 00:04:32,440 --> 00:04:36,240 Speaker 2: including people like Chip Roy and a few other members 98 00:04:36,240 --> 00:04:38,719 Speaker 2: of Congress. But those who are actually really on the 99 00:04:38,720 --> 00:04:41,360 Speaker 2: other side of Trump's are not saying they aren't important, 100 00:04:41,440 --> 00:04:44,919 Speaker 2: just noting just an overall number figure. But really a 101 00:04:45,080 --> 00:04:50,120 Speaker 2: certain incidents sticks out more than any about why people 102 00:04:50,320 --> 00:04:53,800 Speaker 2: who are even representing the state of Florida are not 103 00:04:54,040 --> 00:04:57,200 Speaker 2: going with Ron de Santis, and it actually speaks very 104 00:04:57,320 --> 00:05:01,760 Speaker 2: much to his own political abilit as a politician, not 105 00:05:01,839 --> 00:05:03,800 Speaker 2: just at the national level in the way you might 106 00:05:03,880 --> 00:05:05,960 Speaker 2: think about it, like speaking, but in the wheeling and 107 00:05:06,040 --> 00:05:07,640 Speaker 2: dealing from behind the scenes. 108 00:05:07,760 --> 00:05:10,280 Speaker 3: This specifically involved Greg Stuby. 109 00:05:10,320 --> 00:05:13,440 Speaker 2: He's a Congressman from Florida, he's a republic Let's go 110 00:05:13,480 --> 00:05:17,000 Speaker 2: put this up there on the screen. He actually endorsed 111 00:05:17,480 --> 00:05:21,880 Speaker 2: Donald Trump immediately after a meeting with Ron DeSantis' as 112 00:05:21,920 --> 00:05:25,080 Speaker 2: big as an f as there is, and here's what 113 00:05:25,120 --> 00:05:25,640 Speaker 2: he had to say. 114 00:05:25,680 --> 00:05:27,360 Speaker 3: They actually asked him like, why did you do this? 115 00:05:27,400 --> 00:05:30,039 Speaker 2: He says, quote DeSantis never once reached out to me 116 00:05:30,240 --> 00:05:33,479 Speaker 2: during my five years in Congress, nor replied to my 117 00:05:33,600 --> 00:05:37,760 Speaker 2: multiple attempts to connect. Stevie recalled a recent news conference 118 00:05:38,040 --> 00:05:41,520 Speaker 2: dealing with damage from Hurricane Ian where the governor's aides 119 00:05:41,600 --> 00:05:44,880 Speaker 2: initially invited him to stand along DeSantis, only to tell 120 00:05:44,920 --> 00:05:47,240 Speaker 2: him he would not be part of the event whenever 121 00:05:47,240 --> 00:05:50,200 Speaker 2: he showed up. Trump, on the other hand, was the 122 00:05:50,200 --> 00:05:53,120 Speaker 2: first person that Stube remembers calling him in the ICU 123 00:05:53,520 --> 00:05:55,599 Speaker 2: to wish him well after he was injured in a 124 00:05:55,680 --> 00:05:57,440 Speaker 2: January tree trimming incident. 125 00:05:57,680 --> 00:06:00,400 Speaker 3: To this day, I have not heard from Governor to Santas. 126 00:06:00,440 --> 00:06:00,760 Speaker 3: He says. 127 00:06:01,600 --> 00:06:05,240 Speaker 2: Things suddenly changed last week when Trump started rolling out 128 00:06:05,400 --> 00:06:08,840 Speaker 2: for Florida congressional leader's endorsements. He says, quote, for the 129 00:06:08,880 --> 00:06:13,719 Speaker 2: first time ever, I hear from DeSantis's political person. For Stube, 130 00:06:14,000 --> 00:06:17,159 Speaker 2: the outrage was too little, too late. He continues to 131 00:06:17,160 --> 00:06:20,880 Speaker 2: have sharp words for DeSantis, criticizing his robust political travel 132 00:06:20,920 --> 00:06:25,080 Speaker 2: schedule amid a busy legislative season. Floridians want him focused 133 00:06:25,120 --> 00:06:29,280 Speaker 2: on Florida. I mean, look, when you've got your home 134 00:06:29,360 --> 00:06:31,520 Speaker 2: state and this isn't just one guy, just so people know, 135 00:06:31,600 --> 00:06:34,880 Speaker 2: like we've got significant numbers. I am. Here's the endorsement 136 00:06:34,920 --> 00:06:36,520 Speaker 2: that I reference. Is going to put this up there. 137 00:06:36,720 --> 00:06:40,600 Speaker 2: Specifically about that, he even literally says Trump is the 138 00:06:40,640 --> 00:06:44,080 Speaker 2: only person that can reverse the disastrous policies of the 139 00:06:44,440 --> 00:06:47,680 Speaker 2: Biden administration. And in the tweet Crystal that he announced, 140 00:06:47,720 --> 00:06:50,640 Speaker 2: he said, just had a great meeting with Ron DeSantis, 141 00:06:50,880 --> 00:06:54,000 Speaker 2: Proud to endorse President Trump. That is as big of 142 00:06:54,080 --> 00:06:58,200 Speaker 2: a slap in the face as it gets. And at 143 00:06:58,240 --> 00:07:03,640 Speaker 2: this current point, guys, Trump is absolutely wiping the floor 144 00:07:04,040 --> 00:07:07,760 Speaker 2: with DeSantis in Florida. Put this up there, Vern Buchanan 145 00:07:08,080 --> 00:07:10,640 Speaker 2: late last night, so I alluded to, is now the 146 00:07:10,800 --> 00:07:13,600 Speaker 2: eighth Republican to endorse Trump? 147 00:07:13,720 --> 00:07:16,680 Speaker 1: Eighth Florida Florida Republican. 148 00:07:16,080 --> 00:07:17,000 Speaker 3: To endorse Trump. 149 00:07:17,320 --> 00:07:20,520 Speaker 1: One day after DeSantis. 150 00:07:20,000 --> 00:07:23,920 Speaker 2: Visited Capitol Hill to speak with GOP president or sorry, 151 00:07:23,920 --> 00:07:28,200 Speaker 2: with GOP elected officials. I don't know what more evidence 152 00:07:28,480 --> 00:07:31,040 Speaker 2: that people need, not only just in terms of the voters, 153 00:07:31,240 --> 00:07:33,760 Speaker 2: but also in terms of his hold on the institutional GOP. 154 00:07:34,040 --> 00:07:36,840 Speaker 1: Well, here's the thing. These people, none of them has 155 00:07:36,920 --> 00:07:39,560 Speaker 1: a courageous vote in your body. They're all finger in 156 00:07:39,600 --> 00:07:42,320 Speaker 1: the wind, right, every one of them. I mean, think 157 00:07:42,400 --> 00:07:45,600 Speaker 1: back to right after the midterms when DeSantis has this 158 00:07:45,640 --> 00:07:48,840 Speaker 1: big night in Florida, wins easily. It's the only state 159 00:07:48,880 --> 00:07:51,080 Speaker 1: in the country where Republicans do really, really well in 160 00:07:51,120 --> 00:07:55,160 Speaker 1: New York being you know, secondary to that, and Trump, 161 00:07:55,360 --> 00:07:57,920 Speaker 1: you know, looked like his candidates didn't do well. He 162 00:07:58,000 --> 00:08:00,840 Speaker 1: had a whole stench around him. And he announces right 163 00:08:00,880 --> 00:08:04,480 Speaker 1: after that, and even Matt Gates couldn't find it in 164 00:08:04,560 --> 00:08:08,360 Speaker 1: his heart to make his way to Trump's presidential announcement. 165 00:08:08,600 --> 00:08:11,120 Speaker 1: You'll call apparently there were weather issues. Now we checked 166 00:08:11,120 --> 00:08:13,520 Speaker 1: the weather. I was like, perfectly sunny here, perfectly sunny 167 00:08:13,520 --> 00:08:15,160 Speaker 1: down in Florida, but he had to come up with 168 00:08:15,200 --> 00:08:18,160 Speaker 1: an excuse not to be there. Now you can see 169 00:08:18,280 --> 00:08:21,000 Speaker 1: they're looking at the polls, they're looking at the mood, 170 00:08:21,400 --> 00:08:24,000 Speaker 1: they're looking at the landscape that we're looking at, saying listen, 171 00:08:24,040 --> 00:08:27,000 Speaker 1: it's going to be Trump focused media, it's going to 172 00:08:27,040 --> 00:08:30,200 Speaker 1: be indictments, it's going to be trials, it's going to 173 00:08:30,280 --> 00:08:33,600 Speaker 1: be you know, all about Trump's legal quandaries and situation. 174 00:08:34,360 --> 00:08:38,200 Speaker 1: There is no oxygen left over for anyone, including Ron DeSantis. 175 00:08:38,720 --> 00:08:41,120 Speaker 1: And then you layer on top of that. You know, 176 00:08:41,160 --> 00:08:43,840 Speaker 1: you talked about Stuby and how there was no hour, 177 00:08:43,920 --> 00:08:45,880 Speaker 1: which is astonishing to me. I mean, this is someone 178 00:08:45,880 --> 00:08:48,679 Speaker 1: who is your home state congressional delegation. I'm shocked that 179 00:08:48,720 --> 00:08:52,200 Speaker 1: they're not buddies, like usually that's the way these things work. 180 00:08:52,480 --> 00:08:55,360 Speaker 1: And then with Vern Buchanan, they note that DeSantis did 181 00:08:55,360 --> 00:08:56,920 Speaker 1: not come to Buchanan's aid when he was in a 182 00:08:56,960 --> 00:08:59,280 Speaker 1: fight to Share the Ways and Means Committee earlier this year. 183 00:08:59,360 --> 00:09:03,240 Speaker 1: It did not go unnoticed. Now, listen, these people are egomaniacs. 184 00:09:03,280 --> 00:09:06,160 Speaker 1: Should any of this matter, No, it shouldn't. That they're 185 00:09:06,200 --> 00:09:09,480 Speaker 1: like how much they flatter your ego and you know, 186 00:09:09,559 --> 00:09:11,719 Speaker 1: in Bernie's words, like he's not gonna call you and 187 00:09:11,760 --> 00:09:14,840 Speaker 1: wish you happy birthday. That's just stuff. Shouldn't matter what 188 00:09:14,880 --> 00:09:18,520 Speaker 1: it does, but it does. And if you're playing DeSantis 189 00:09:18,600 --> 00:09:20,520 Speaker 1: is really trying to play kind of an inside game. 190 00:09:20,559 --> 00:09:22,120 Speaker 1: I know they would object to that, but that's the 191 00:09:22,120 --> 00:09:25,480 Speaker 1: reality of where his support primarily lies. You have to 192 00:09:25,520 --> 00:09:30,240 Speaker 1: be extra good at this type of just basic blocking 193 00:09:30,320 --> 00:09:35,360 Speaker 1: and tackling political outreach exactly for moments like this. So, 194 00:09:36,040 --> 00:09:39,480 Speaker 1: you know, to make the Bernie contrast, Bernie at least 195 00:09:39,480 --> 00:09:42,240 Speaker 1: had a big grassroots based going for him. He was 196 00:09:42,320 --> 00:09:45,520 Speaker 1: truly an outsider, so you might have forgiven him a 197 00:09:45,559 --> 00:09:48,440 Speaker 1: little bit for not doing the like typical political outreach. 198 00:09:48,640 --> 00:09:51,480 Speaker 1: But even for him, this ended up being a problem 199 00:09:51,480 --> 00:09:54,000 Speaker 1: for him in terms of the Democratic primary that he 200 00:09:54,040 --> 00:09:57,120 Speaker 1: didn't even try to change the dynamic in South Carolina 201 00:09:57,160 --> 00:09:58,960 Speaker 1: with the elected officials, with with Jim Clyburn, they are 202 00:09:59,000 --> 00:10:02,319 Speaker 1: in particular, so it's even an issue for a candidate 203 00:10:02,320 --> 00:10:05,240 Speaker 1: like Bernie Sanders. It's definitely an issue for a candidate 204 00:10:05,400 --> 00:10:07,319 Speaker 1: like Ronda Santis who's trying to play the inside track. 205 00:10:07,400 --> 00:10:09,440 Speaker 2: He can only be an outsider whenever you're a guy 206 00:10:09,559 --> 00:10:12,120 Speaker 2: like Trump who is independently famous and you have a 207 00:10:12,240 --> 00:10:13,359 Speaker 2: genuine base. 208 00:10:13,120 --> 00:10:14,439 Speaker 3: Of people who support you. 209 00:10:14,480 --> 00:10:16,840 Speaker 2: Remember, you know, not even what was it Jeff Sessions 210 00:10:16,880 --> 00:10:20,400 Speaker 2: I think was the first GOP official to endorse Trump. Yeah, 211 00:10:20,480 --> 00:10:22,880 Speaker 2: maybe he was a congressman, I forget exactly, but the 212 00:10:22,960 --> 00:10:25,520 Speaker 2: point was they had no endorsements, but he was winning 213 00:10:25,520 --> 00:10:27,880 Speaker 2: in the primary. DeSantis is not winning in the primary, 214 00:10:27,920 --> 00:10:30,320 Speaker 2: so you have to trade it for him to get endorsements. 215 00:10:30,360 --> 00:10:32,240 Speaker 2: The reason why I think it's important, especially from the 216 00:10:32,280 --> 00:10:34,839 Speaker 2: state of Florida, it has to be a united front 217 00:10:34,880 --> 00:10:38,360 Speaker 2: of get I turned Florida into a dark red state. 218 00:10:38,679 --> 00:10:41,920 Speaker 2: Every single person from Florida knows that if they cross me, 219 00:10:42,120 --> 00:10:45,480 Speaker 2: they're going to suffer consequences. Guess what they all crossed you, 220 00:10:45,600 --> 00:10:47,760 Speaker 2: Stuby in particular, he didn't even stab in the back. 221 00:10:47,800 --> 00:10:49,880 Speaker 2: He stabbed you in the eye and he didn't care. 222 00:10:50,240 --> 00:10:52,880 Speaker 2: And you know this also gets to again some base 223 00:10:53,000 --> 00:10:56,839 Speaker 2: political instincts. Let's go think about some of the governors 224 00:10:57,000 --> 00:11:00,800 Speaker 2: who were elected president and what made them all different 225 00:11:00,840 --> 00:11:04,840 Speaker 2: and what made them good politicians. How exactly did Governor 226 00:11:04,880 --> 00:11:08,040 Speaker 2: Bill Clinton from Arkansas No offense Arkansas, but let's just say, 227 00:11:08,080 --> 00:11:09,839 Speaker 2: you know, not the most important state in the Union. 228 00:11:10,040 --> 00:11:13,239 Speaker 2: How did he become the nineteen ninety two presidential nominee 229 00:11:13,280 --> 00:11:18,040 Speaker 2: and eventually become the president. He was a fantastic politician 230 00:11:18,120 --> 00:11:21,360 Speaker 2: who stayed up until two am every single night calling 231 00:11:21,480 --> 00:11:24,840 Speaker 2: every state legislator in Arkansas. The whole state was united 232 00:11:24,840 --> 00:11:27,920 Speaker 2: behind him. After he solidified his control over the state. 233 00:11:28,160 --> 00:11:31,160 Speaker 2: Then he got himself ahead of like the Democratic Governors 234 00:11:31,160 --> 00:11:35,240 Speaker 2: Association is constantly on a plane, you know, scratching backs 235 00:11:35,240 --> 00:11:38,280 Speaker 2: and helping fundraise for Jerry. You know, people in California, 236 00:11:38,440 --> 00:11:41,319 Speaker 2: people in wherever, a all across the country. Became a 237 00:11:41,400 --> 00:11:43,880 Speaker 2: national figure that way. Whenever he ran for president, he 238 00:11:43,880 --> 00:11:47,080 Speaker 2: not only had name id, he had institutional backing. That 239 00:11:47,160 --> 00:11:49,920 Speaker 2: stuff matters whenever you're trying to have more of an 240 00:11:50,000 --> 00:11:53,480 Speaker 2: upswing campaign. That especially I think for a guy like 241 00:11:53,559 --> 00:11:56,600 Speaker 2: Ron de Santis, who so many of the for DeSantis 242 00:11:56,600 --> 00:11:59,480 Speaker 2: to get to fifty one percent, he needs to unite 243 00:11:59,600 --> 00:12:03,559 Speaker 2: that never and but also people who like Trump might 244 00:12:03,559 --> 00:12:05,560 Speaker 2: be willing to move on from Trump. There's no evidence, 245 00:12:05,640 --> 00:12:07,800 Speaker 2: in my opinion that those people even really exist, but 246 00:12:08,200 --> 00:12:08,840 Speaker 2: let's say. 247 00:12:08,640 --> 00:12:09,120 Speaker 3: That they do. 248 00:12:09,920 --> 00:12:12,280 Speaker 2: A key part of that would be getting people with 249 00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:14,600 Speaker 2: credibility in the base, people like your congressman and other 250 00:12:14,880 --> 00:12:16,240 Speaker 2: to go ahead and support him. 251 00:12:16,320 --> 00:12:17,080 Speaker 3: Doesn't exist yet. 252 00:12:17,120 --> 00:12:19,000 Speaker 1: The bottom line is the Bill Clinton point is a 253 00:12:19,040 --> 00:12:22,280 Speaker 1: good one because, I mean, put aside his terrible politics 254 00:12:22,280 --> 00:12:26,079 Speaker 1: and policies, all those things, he was a political sourvietor. 255 00:12:26,120 --> 00:12:28,520 Speaker 1: Oh yeah, and there was nothing that he was better at. 256 00:12:28,559 --> 00:12:31,920 Speaker 1: I mean, he was famous for having a photographic memory 257 00:12:32,000 --> 00:12:35,360 Speaker 1: for people's names, their faces, and a little bit of 258 00:12:35,400 --> 00:12:38,120 Speaker 1: their backstory. So you could see, you know, someone he 259 00:12:38,480 --> 00:12:42,319 Speaker 1: saw once at some event, he'd see them again and it's, oh, Susie, 260 00:12:42,320 --> 00:12:44,559 Speaker 1: how are you? How's your son doing? You know, how's 261 00:12:44,679 --> 00:12:46,400 Speaker 1: how's Kansas? The rough it I mean, it would have 262 00:12:46,440 --> 00:12:48,839 Speaker 1: these few little details like a rolodex in his brain. 263 00:12:49,360 --> 00:12:52,120 Speaker 1: And so what that meant, All of that outreach and 264 00:12:52,240 --> 00:12:54,800 Speaker 1: all of that sowing the seeds that he did before 265 00:12:54,840 --> 00:12:58,040 Speaker 1: his presidential race meant that when he did have a 266 00:12:58,080 --> 00:13:00,920 Speaker 1: little bit of good fortune in the race, wanted to 267 00:13:00,920 --> 00:13:04,760 Speaker 1: come on board. Whereas DeSantis now has the opposite situation. 268 00:13:05,040 --> 00:13:07,360 Speaker 1: When he's a little bit down, people are looking for 269 00:13:07,400 --> 00:13:09,960 Speaker 1: the opportunity to stab him in the back. You see 270 00:13:09,960 --> 00:13:11,880 Speaker 1: this in media all the time too, Like you can 271 00:13:11,920 --> 00:13:15,120 Speaker 1: tell who has been a jerk in terms of like 272 00:13:15,240 --> 00:13:18,080 Speaker 1: media personalities by whose staff is ready to leak on 273 00:13:18,120 --> 00:13:20,959 Speaker 1: them the minute that they have the opportunity to. It's 274 00:13:20,960 --> 00:13:23,880 Speaker 1: the same thing with politicians, like if you you know, 275 00:13:24,000 --> 00:13:26,559 Speaker 1: invited someone to your event saying they're going to stand 276 00:13:26,600 --> 00:13:29,079 Speaker 1: with you, and then you don't, that's humiliating for that person. 277 00:13:29,120 --> 00:13:30,760 Speaker 1: You don't think they're going to be looking for every 278 00:13:30,760 --> 00:13:32,560 Speaker 1: opportunity to try to stick it to you when they 279 00:13:32,640 --> 00:13:36,080 Speaker 1: had a chance, and Stebe certainly found his moment here. 280 00:13:36,160 --> 00:13:39,800 Speaker 1: So you know, it's an extraordinary just example of how 281 00:13:39,840 --> 00:13:43,680 Speaker 1: the political wins have shifted where people clearly think things 282 00:13:43,720 --> 00:13:47,160 Speaker 1: are going at this point. And it's especially devastating for 283 00:13:47,240 --> 00:13:50,280 Speaker 1: someone who was thinking that they were going to have 284 00:13:50,280 --> 00:13:53,360 Speaker 1: a lot of institutional support behind them, and that was 285 00:13:53,400 --> 00:13:57,120 Speaker 1: really their play in order to win. Clearly that game 286 00:13:57,120 --> 00:13:57,960 Speaker 1: plan has fallowed. 287 00:13:57,760 --> 00:14:00,320 Speaker 2: Apart certainly did Let's go and move on to the 288 00:14:00,360 --> 00:14:04,079 Speaker 2: next one. A fascinating twist in American political history. The 289 00:14:04,120 --> 00:14:09,359 Speaker 2: son of Robert Francis Kennedy, Robert Francis Kennedy Junior, prominently 290 00:14:09,440 --> 00:14:12,839 Speaker 2: known for speaking out about vaccines and specifically comings of 291 00:14:12,880 --> 00:14:17,520 Speaker 2: prominence around COVID, has now announced his official entrance into 292 00:14:17,520 --> 00:14:21,240 Speaker 2: the Democratic primary for twenty twenty four. And before you laugh, 293 00:14:21,600 --> 00:14:23,960 Speaker 2: he's actually making more of a dent than people think. 294 00:14:24,200 --> 00:14:27,040 Speaker 2: Here is a little bit from his announcement yesterday. Let's 295 00:14:27,040 --> 00:14:28,840 Speaker 2: take a listen, and the. 296 00:14:28,800 --> 00:14:33,840 Speaker 4: Coup de gras was the lockdown. Lockdown was the biggest 297 00:14:33,840 --> 00:14:36,040 Speaker 4: shift in wealth in human history. And I'm going to 298 00:14:36,120 --> 00:14:39,320 Speaker 4: tell you about that in a second. And I blame 299 00:14:39,480 --> 00:14:43,320 Speaker 4: President Trump for the lockdown. I do not believe that 300 00:14:43,400 --> 00:14:47,080 Speaker 4: everybody at the CIA as a bad person. My daughter 301 00:14:47,440 --> 00:14:51,080 Speaker 4: in law, Amillis, who is who is one of the 302 00:14:51,160 --> 00:14:55,640 Speaker 4: top officers on this campaigns her entire career as a 303 00:14:55,640 --> 00:15:00,200 Speaker 4: Clendensteine agent or the CIA as a spy, and the 304 00:15:00,200 --> 00:15:02,480 Speaker 4: weapons of matter's destruction program and some of the most 305 00:15:02,520 --> 00:15:04,680 Speaker 4: dangerous parts of the earth. And I have never met 306 00:15:04,680 --> 00:15:10,840 Speaker 4: anybody with such courage. This is what happens when you 307 00:15:10,960 --> 00:15:19,360 Speaker 4: censored somebody for eighteen years. 308 00:15:20,400 --> 00:15:21,840 Speaker 1: I got a lot to talk about. 309 00:15:25,080 --> 00:15:27,760 Speaker 4: They shouldn't shut me up that long, because now I'm 310 00:15:27,800 --> 00:15:30,440 Speaker 4: gonna really let loose on him for the next eighteen months. 311 00:15:30,440 --> 00:15:31,760 Speaker 5: They're gonna hear a lot. 312 00:15:32,360 --> 00:15:34,360 Speaker 2: There you go, a little bit of a taste made 313 00:15:34,400 --> 00:15:37,440 Speaker 2: COVID a big centerpiece going after the Biden administration, and 314 00:15:37,480 --> 00:15:40,280 Speaker 2: even Donald Trump kind of running at him almost from 315 00:15:40,360 --> 00:15:42,560 Speaker 2: what I guess would be coded right today, although who knows, 316 00:15:42,600 --> 00:15:44,880 Speaker 2: I guess it would have been coded left fifteen years ago. 317 00:15:44,960 --> 00:15:47,040 Speaker 2: Somebody who's really been more on the fringes of the 318 00:15:47,080 --> 00:15:51,320 Speaker 2: American political system for eighteen years, but coming to obviously 319 00:15:51,480 --> 00:15:54,640 Speaker 2: to prominence at least with some portion of the public. 320 00:15:54,720 --> 00:15:56,320 Speaker 3: Because let's go in put. 321 00:15:56,160 --> 00:15:59,360 Speaker 2: This up there on the screen, Robert Francis Kennedy Junior 322 00:15:59,720 --> 00:16:04,720 Speaker 2: has now got some fourteen percent of support Crystal in 323 00:16:04,880 --> 00:16:08,040 Speaker 2: the primary. There were several hundred people there at the 324 00:16:08,040 --> 00:16:11,840 Speaker 2: announcement that he had yesterday, And in terms of the 325 00:16:11,960 --> 00:16:14,520 Speaker 2: dent that he's making, I mean, I think that people 326 00:16:14,600 --> 00:16:18,560 Speaker 2: forget first of all, obviously the Kennedy name, Kennedy, magic, 327 00:16:18,840 --> 00:16:21,760 Speaker 2: et cetera. But I don't think people realize his book, 328 00:16:21,840 --> 00:16:23,560 Speaker 2: I think was the real Anthony Founcer was one of 329 00:16:23,600 --> 00:16:25,880 Speaker 2: the best selling books in the country for like. 330 00:16:26,960 --> 00:16:27,760 Speaker 3: Almost a year. 331 00:16:28,600 --> 00:16:31,640 Speaker 2: It sold at least, at very least hundreds of thousands 332 00:16:31,640 --> 00:16:34,240 Speaker 2: of copies, lots of copies. He certainly made the rounds 333 00:16:34,240 --> 00:16:36,240 Speaker 2: and you know podcasts and all that, and you know, 334 00:16:36,320 --> 00:16:38,080 Speaker 2: quite a bit of people even know who he was 335 00:16:38,160 --> 00:16:40,800 Speaker 2: before that, just given name ID. And on top of that, 336 00:16:40,960 --> 00:16:44,160 Speaker 2: a lot of media, probably more media covered this event 337 00:16:44,240 --> 00:16:47,440 Speaker 2: even than Mary Anne Williamson in terms of his announcement, 338 00:16:47,560 --> 00:16:51,560 Speaker 2: again because of the Kennedy name. So between earned media 339 00:16:51,680 --> 00:16:55,960 Speaker 2: between a genuine like pop culture or at very least 340 00:16:56,000 --> 00:16:59,440 Speaker 2: like public recognition, I'm not going to say necessarily had 341 00:16:59,480 --> 00:17:01,600 Speaker 2: quote as a shot. But he could be more of 342 00:17:01,640 --> 00:17:03,360 Speaker 2: a menace, I think than a lot of people are 343 00:17:03,440 --> 00:17:04,280 Speaker 2: going to give him credit for. 344 00:17:04,480 --> 00:17:06,240 Speaker 1: There's a lot to say here. So, first of all, 345 00:17:06,280 --> 00:17:08,159 Speaker 1: with regard to the poll, it is a little bit 346 00:17:08,160 --> 00:17:11,680 Speaker 1: of a weird poll because they didn't pull likely primary voters. 347 00:17:12,320 --> 00:17:15,600 Speaker 1: They pulled people who voted for Biden in the last 348 00:17:15,600 --> 00:17:18,560 Speaker 1: general election, which is just kind of an unusual universe 349 00:17:18,560 --> 00:17:22,119 Speaker 1: to pull. And it's very likely actually a broader and 350 00:17:22,560 --> 00:17:28,400 Speaker 1: less overtly democratic based political than a primary poll would be. 351 00:17:28,520 --> 00:17:30,480 Speaker 1: I mean this, and so it is a bit of 352 00:17:30,480 --> 00:17:34,000 Speaker 1: a strange universe. But still when you have Joe Biden 353 00:17:34,080 --> 00:17:37,320 Speaker 1: only garnering sixty seven percent of his own voters that 354 00:17:37,440 --> 00:17:40,719 Speaker 1: already selected him one time, and you have you know, 355 00:17:41,119 --> 00:17:44,440 Speaker 1: over you have over thirty percent that are either going 356 00:17:44,480 --> 00:17:47,840 Speaker 1: to RFK junior marian or like yeah, I don't know 357 00:17:48,160 --> 00:17:52,760 Speaker 1: or not yeah exactly. I think it speaks to how 358 00:17:52,840 --> 00:17:56,480 Speaker 1: vulnerable Biden really is and how much the media tries 359 00:17:56,520 --> 00:17:59,800 Speaker 1: to cover for him, because every article that's written about 360 00:17:59,840 --> 00:18:02,719 Speaker 1: Joe O'biden, it always says in there they've always got 361 00:18:02,760 --> 00:18:05,359 Speaker 1: out of the line in there. No serious primary candidate 362 00:18:05,440 --> 00:18:09,840 Speaker 1: has emerged. Okay, by whose measure? Because y'all sure treat 363 00:18:09,920 --> 00:18:13,320 Speaker 1: Tim Scott who's at like one percent, and Nikki Haley 364 00:18:13,760 --> 00:18:16,840 Speaker 1: and you know, potentially Mike Pence and all these other 365 00:18:16,920 --> 00:18:20,200 Speaker 1: flew of Republican candidates, you take them seriously, Well, they're 366 00:18:20,240 --> 00:18:25,240 Speaker 1: pulling lower, it appears, than either RFK Junior or Marian Williamson, 367 00:18:25,520 --> 00:18:28,760 Speaker 1: both of whom are let's put their politics aside, how 368 00:18:28,760 --> 00:18:30,360 Speaker 1: are you feel about them for a moment. I'll get 369 00:18:30,359 --> 00:18:31,960 Speaker 1: to that and how I feel about them in just 370 00:18:32,000 --> 00:18:35,280 Speaker 1: a second, But both of whom are best selling authors, 371 00:18:35,960 --> 00:18:39,080 Speaker 1: very well known, have their own base of support, separate 372 00:18:39,119 --> 00:18:42,760 Speaker 1: and apart from the current political moment. So to just 373 00:18:42,840 --> 00:18:44,760 Speaker 1: dismiss them like, oh, they don't have a shot and 374 00:18:45,240 --> 00:18:47,160 Speaker 1: no one's going to pay attention and no one cares 375 00:18:47,200 --> 00:18:50,080 Speaker 1: about them, I think this is evidence very much to 376 00:18:50,160 --> 00:18:54,200 Speaker 1: the contrary not to mention every poll when you ask 377 00:18:54,280 --> 00:18:58,520 Speaker 1: Democratic voters do you want not the general public Democratic 378 00:18:58,600 --> 00:19:01,320 Speaker 1: voters do you want Shoe Biden to be your nominee? Again, 379 00:19:01,359 --> 00:19:05,439 Speaker 1: they're like, eh, thank you for your servicer, thank you 380 00:19:05,480 --> 00:19:08,640 Speaker 1: for defeating Donald Trump. Can we have some other options here? 381 00:19:09,080 --> 00:19:12,560 Speaker 1: So listen, RFK Junior has come to prominence. He's really 382 00:19:12,560 --> 00:19:15,000 Speaker 1: made it his recent life's work to be he would 383 00:19:15,200 --> 00:19:17,960 Speaker 1: object to this characteristic, but he's an anti vaxxer. He's 384 00:19:18,000 --> 00:19:22,120 Speaker 1: been one of the primary people, you know, tying autism 385 00:19:22,280 --> 00:19:25,080 Speaker 1: to the increase in the vaccine schedule. There's no evidence 386 00:19:25,119 --> 00:19:28,679 Speaker 1: of that, and the fact that vaccines exist and autism exists, 387 00:19:28,680 --> 00:19:31,640 Speaker 1: to me, is not remotely proof. So I have issues 388 00:19:31,640 --> 00:19:33,600 Speaker 1: with his dances. I don't agree with him on some 389 00:19:33,680 --> 00:19:35,879 Speaker 1: of those things. Do I think that means he should 390 00:19:35,880 --> 00:19:39,040 Speaker 1: be censored, shut up, not allowed to be on a 391 00:19:39,080 --> 00:19:43,320 Speaker 1: presidential debate stage. Absolutely not. And you know, I want 392 00:19:43,320 --> 00:19:45,119 Speaker 1: to give credit to you. I was listening to some 393 00:19:45,240 --> 00:19:48,560 Speaker 1: of his interviews in advance of this segment. I was 394 00:19:48,600 --> 00:19:51,280 Speaker 1: listening to a long interview he did with Megan Kelly. 395 00:19:51,320 --> 00:19:53,520 Speaker 1: I thought she handled it perfectly. You know, she was 396 00:19:53,840 --> 00:19:57,240 Speaker 1: very tough with him, challenging him on the science backing 397 00:19:57,280 --> 00:19:59,720 Speaker 1: what he was saying. She made sure to fact check. 398 00:19:59,760 --> 00:20:02,080 Speaker 1: She took her time to record the interview and then 399 00:20:02,119 --> 00:20:05,280 Speaker 1: go back get comment from people, look at the research, 400 00:20:05,960 --> 00:20:07,960 Speaker 1: and she was able to present that that's the way 401 00:20:08,000 --> 00:20:11,480 Speaker 1: that you deal with claims that are not scientifically based 402 00:20:11,560 --> 00:20:14,720 Speaker 1: or that you disagree with that's the way you approach it. Now, 403 00:20:14,720 --> 00:20:17,639 Speaker 1: the Democratic Party, for all their supposed care and concern 404 00:20:17,680 --> 00:20:20,240 Speaker 1: for democracy, they don't even want to let these people 405 00:20:20,240 --> 00:20:23,159 Speaker 1: on a debate stage, even though both of them have 406 00:20:23,440 --> 00:20:26,840 Speaker 1: already achieved way beyond the polling criteria that would be 407 00:20:26,920 --> 00:20:29,840 Speaker 1: reasonable to allow them on a stage to debate against 408 00:20:29,920 --> 00:20:31,920 Speaker 1: Joe Biden. So if the Biden team is so confident 409 00:20:31,960 --> 00:20:34,199 Speaker 1: in his abilities and so sure that these are not 410 00:20:34,359 --> 00:20:37,160 Speaker 1: serious candidates, let them on a stage and have a debate, 411 00:20:37,200 --> 00:20:38,960 Speaker 1: and let's let the American people decide. 412 00:20:38,960 --> 00:20:40,919 Speaker 2: I agree with you. And it just gets to the 413 00:20:41,160 --> 00:20:43,120 Speaker 2: numbers question that I referenced earlier. Go ahead and put 414 00:20:43,119 --> 00:20:45,720 Speaker 2: this up there on the screen once again. Here you 415 00:20:45,760 --> 00:20:49,840 Speaker 2: can see hardcover frontlist fiction RFK has already sold about 416 00:20:49,880 --> 00:20:53,760 Speaker 2: three hundred thousand copies of the book that was Just 417 00:20:54,200 --> 00:20:56,280 Speaker 2: or Sorry. He sold three hundred thousand copies of the 418 00:20:56,320 --> 00:21:00,600 Speaker 2: book before January of twenty twenty two. That book remained 419 00:21:00,640 --> 00:21:02,920 Speaker 2: at the top of the chart. So look, we don't 420 00:21:02,960 --> 00:21:05,320 Speaker 2: have a way to know the exact number, but I 421 00:21:05,320 --> 00:21:08,000 Speaker 2: would guess probably a million books that he was able 422 00:21:08,040 --> 00:21:10,760 Speaker 2: to sell throughout the pandemic. And that's how people That 423 00:21:10,880 --> 00:21:14,640 Speaker 2: is like it's like a Titanic best that's like Dan 424 00:21:14,760 --> 00:21:17,920 Speaker 2: Brown novel level like success or at the very least 425 00:21:18,160 --> 00:21:21,760 Speaker 2: in a year. So again, ignored by the media, basically 426 00:21:22,280 --> 00:21:25,159 Speaker 2: ignored mostly by everybody. But I don't think you know, 427 00:21:25,200 --> 00:21:28,280 Speaker 2: you cannot deny a serious political people that want to 428 00:21:28,280 --> 00:21:30,720 Speaker 2: look at things objectively, see a fourteen percent bump in 429 00:21:30,760 --> 00:21:33,200 Speaker 2: the or at the very least in the general electorates 430 00:21:33,440 --> 00:21:36,400 Speaker 2: millions of books sold and say this person again. I'm 431 00:21:36,400 --> 00:21:39,720 Speaker 2: not saying they have a shot, but they will demand attention, 432 00:21:39,840 --> 00:21:42,040 Speaker 2: and I think rightfully so as you said, Look, if 433 00:21:42,040 --> 00:21:43,879 Speaker 2: you're so afraid, yeah, if you want to challenge him, 434 00:21:43,880 --> 00:21:45,080 Speaker 2: then have him on the stage and te him he's 435 00:21:45,080 --> 00:21:45,480 Speaker 2: an idiot. 436 00:21:45,520 --> 00:21:46,000 Speaker 3: You can do that. 437 00:21:46,080 --> 00:21:48,159 Speaker 2: Yeah, a lot of people have done that before. Yeah, 438 00:21:48,280 --> 00:21:50,479 Speaker 2: but if you're afraid, that says more about you. 439 00:21:50,600 --> 00:21:55,840 Speaker 1: I think it's also interesting the way that originally you 440 00:21:55,880 --> 00:21:58,359 Speaker 1: said he's now coded right when Steve Bannon was oouncing 441 00:21:58,359 --> 00:22:00,119 Speaker 1: he his praise is saying, we love this guy. You know, 442 00:22:00,200 --> 00:22:03,240 Speaker 1: he's done interviews with Tucker Carlson and whatever. He's more 443 00:22:03,280 --> 00:22:05,440 Speaker 1: embraced in a lot of ways by right wing media 444 00:22:05,520 --> 00:22:08,960 Speaker 1: now than he is by the left. But that's That's 445 00:22:08,960 --> 00:22:12,120 Speaker 1: what's interesting to me is that, you know, the coding 446 00:22:12,240 --> 00:22:17,200 Speaker 1: of being a vaccine opponent has really shifted over the years. 447 00:22:17,240 --> 00:22:19,719 Speaker 1: I mean, this was he was like sort of in 448 00:22:19,760 --> 00:22:25,520 Speaker 1: this la liberal lefty anti vax moment, and now that 449 00:22:25,600 --> 00:22:29,080 Speaker 1: has become coded very you know, hard right wing, and 450 00:22:29,480 --> 00:22:31,800 Speaker 1: it's certainly you know, opposition of lockdowns and all of 451 00:22:31,840 --> 00:22:34,560 Speaker 1: those things, even though yeah, he does critique Trump and 452 00:22:34,640 --> 00:22:37,920 Speaker 1: Biden alike, so interesting figure in that way as well. 453 00:22:37,960 --> 00:22:40,560 Speaker 1: I mean, he originally is an environmental lawyer. Still, as 454 00:22:40,560 --> 00:22:43,239 Speaker 1: an environmental lawyer went after a lot of companies for 455 00:22:43,320 --> 00:22:45,680 Speaker 1: the sort of toxins that they would put into the environments. 456 00:22:45,720 --> 00:22:48,440 Speaker 1: I don't want to undermine that work that he's done, 457 00:22:49,040 --> 00:22:51,480 Speaker 1: even as obviously a disagree and I'm opposed to his 458 00:22:51,600 --> 00:22:55,480 Speaker 1: views as with regards to the vaccines. But you know, 459 00:22:55,560 --> 00:22:57,960 Speaker 1: for me, the bottom line here is you now have 460 00:22:58,160 --> 00:23:00,679 Speaker 1: in this poll, which again it's a weird universe, and 461 00:23:00,720 --> 00:23:03,679 Speaker 1: I would say probably a significant amount of his support 462 00:23:03,760 --> 00:23:05,520 Speaker 1: is just people who are like, I don't like Biden. 463 00:23:05,720 --> 00:23:08,720 Speaker 1: Here's a Kennedy name. Sounds good to me, right, But 464 00:23:09,200 --> 00:23:12,840 Speaker 1: fourteen percent in this universe of voters, and Mariam's at 465 00:23:12,840 --> 00:23:15,600 Speaker 1: fourteen percent in battleground with battleground state voters in a 466 00:23:15,600 --> 00:23:18,359 Speaker 1: different poll. So you already have two contenders who are 467 00:23:18,359 --> 00:23:21,960 Speaker 1: putting double digits on the board against Biden, and yet 468 00:23:21,960 --> 00:23:24,439 Speaker 1: the media still wants to tell you now now he's safe, 469 00:23:24,640 --> 00:23:29,280 Speaker 1: no serious contenders, etc. Listen, maybe maybe and very likely, right, 470 00:23:29,440 --> 00:23:32,199 Speaker 1: very likely that Joe Biden is the Democratic nominee, no 471 00:23:32,320 --> 00:23:35,679 Speaker 1: doubt about it. But to completely invisibilize these people, to 472 00:23:35,720 --> 00:23:38,880 Speaker 1: try to shut down any opportunity for people to evaluate 473 00:23:38,920 --> 00:23:41,840 Speaker 1: their choices, to try to shut down any opportunity to 474 00:23:41,920 --> 00:23:44,560 Speaker 1: have the three of these individuals on a stage and 475 00:23:44,640 --> 00:23:47,359 Speaker 1: be able to work through the processes of democracy that again, 476 00:23:47,400 --> 00:23:50,480 Speaker 1: the Democratic Party claims so much to care about. I 477 00:23:50,480 --> 00:23:52,480 Speaker 1: think it's disgraceful and I think it's hypocritical. 478 00:23:52,560 --> 00:23:53,879 Speaker 3: Yeah, I completely agree, Crystal. 479 00:23:56,880 --> 00:23:58,840 Speaker 1: All right, we have some updates for you on the 480 00:23:58,880 --> 00:24:03,480 Speaker 1: whole debt ceilings sit situation. You will recall Kevin McCarthy 481 00:24:03,680 --> 00:24:06,200 Speaker 1: and the Republicans, both in the House and the Senate, 482 00:24:06,240 --> 00:24:08,760 Speaker 1: have decided to once again use the debt ceiling as 483 00:24:08,800 --> 00:24:11,840 Speaker 1: a hostage taking mechanism to get things through that they 484 00:24:11,880 --> 00:24:15,600 Speaker 1: could not otherwise get through. We have been waiting for 485 00:24:15,720 --> 00:24:19,119 Speaker 1: McCarthy to put some details down about what exactly the 486 00:24:19,119 --> 00:24:23,320 Speaker 1: Republican Caucus is proposing, because you know, you've got more 487 00:24:23,359 --> 00:24:26,879 Speaker 1: moderate figures who represent Biden swing districts in New York 488 00:24:26,960 --> 00:24:29,560 Speaker 1: that are very uncomfortable with a lot of hard cuts, 489 00:24:29,840 --> 00:24:32,600 Speaker 1: and you have Freedom Caucus members who were, you know, 490 00:24:32,640 --> 00:24:35,240 Speaker 1: some of the dissidents who really were pushing Kevin McCarthy 491 00:24:35,320 --> 00:24:38,800 Speaker 1: to make some extreme deals in order to even claim 492 00:24:38,800 --> 00:24:41,719 Speaker 1: his speakership. So he's in a precarious position. The Republican Caucus, 493 00:24:41,720 --> 00:24:43,960 Speaker 1: which only has a four set majority in the House, 494 00:24:44,400 --> 00:24:48,679 Speaker 1: is in a precarious position. So yesterday McCarthy put out 495 00:24:48,720 --> 00:24:52,879 Speaker 1: a somewhat more detailed outline of their approach on the 496 00:24:52,920 --> 00:24:55,040 Speaker 1: debt ceiling, although there's still a lot of details that 497 00:24:55,080 --> 00:24:57,119 Speaker 1: continue to be left out, which is noteworthy in and 498 00:24:57,119 --> 00:25:00,640 Speaker 1: of itself. Let's put Jake Sherman's tweets up on the screen. Now. 499 00:25:00,720 --> 00:25:04,359 Speaker 1: This is how McCarthy characterized what is in this bill. 500 00:25:04,680 --> 00:25:07,399 Speaker 1: He says that his bill provides four point five trillion 501 00:25:07,440 --> 00:25:10,000 Speaker 1: dollars in savings. Sherman says, we don't have a bill, yes, 502 00:25:10,000 --> 00:25:11,600 Speaker 1: so we can't know whether that's true or not. It's 503 00:25:11,640 --> 00:25:15,760 Speaker 1: also not scored, So we're trusting the GOP's math as 504 00:25:15,800 --> 00:25:19,040 Speaker 1: to whether the amount of savings, etcetera, etcetera pre twenty 505 00:25:19,080 --> 00:25:22,480 Speaker 1: twenty two spending levels, budget increase capped one percent per year, 506 00:25:22,840 --> 00:25:27,439 Speaker 1: clawback billions of dollars of unspent COVID money, repeal funding 507 00:25:27,440 --> 00:25:31,639 Speaker 1: for IRS agents, green tax credit repeal, prohibits, student loan 508 00:25:31,840 --> 00:25:36,800 Speaker 1: quote giveaway for the wealthy HR one Rains Act, which 509 00:25:36,920 --> 00:25:38,720 Speaker 1: I looked at what that was, but I'm forgetting now 510 00:25:38,800 --> 00:25:43,240 Speaker 1: work requirements for social programs and prevent executive overreach whatever 511 00:25:43,280 --> 00:25:44,760 Speaker 1: that means. Do you remember what the Rains Act is? 512 00:25:44,800 --> 00:25:48,639 Speaker 1: Or Government Loopholes Bill, Government Loopholes Bill? Okay, put the 513 00:25:48,720 --> 00:25:51,080 Speaker 1: washtpost up on the screen. This has some more of 514 00:25:51,119 --> 00:25:53,080 Speaker 1: the details. You know, the things that are targeted here. 515 00:25:53,080 --> 00:25:55,280 Speaker 1: It's not going to surprise anyone. Some of the big 516 00:25:55,320 --> 00:26:01,000 Speaker 1: cuts are to Medicare Medicaid sorry, and to food stamps 517 00:26:01,040 --> 00:26:04,560 Speaker 1: or snap. Medicare and Social Security are left off the table, 518 00:26:04,640 --> 00:26:07,440 Speaker 1: as well as any cuts to the military budget. Pentagon 519 00:26:07,480 --> 00:26:10,920 Speaker 1: cuts or originally floated those are no longer being talked 520 00:26:10,920 --> 00:26:15,080 Speaker 1: about here, and there's a significant limiting of who would 521 00:26:15,119 --> 00:26:18,280 Speaker 1: be eligible for both Medicaid and for food stamps and 522 00:26:18,520 --> 00:26:22,800 Speaker 1: increasing work requirements. The expectation is that more than ten 523 00:26:22,840 --> 00:26:25,480 Speaker 1: million people could be kicked out of the food stamp 524 00:26:25,520 --> 00:26:29,240 Speaker 1: program if these provisions are put into place. That amounts 525 00:26:29,280 --> 00:26:32,160 Speaker 1: to one in four current SNAP beneficiaries. In the case 526 00:26:32,200 --> 00:26:35,280 Speaker 1: of Medicaid, gop led states have introduced similar work mandates 527 00:26:35,280 --> 00:26:38,440 Speaker 1: in the past, and they also have seen significant drops 528 00:26:38,440 --> 00:26:41,639 Speaker 1: in enrollment, which is where the money savings would come from. 529 00:26:41,880 --> 00:26:44,600 Speaker 1: The Other thing that's really noteworthy here, Sager, is they 530 00:26:44,720 --> 00:26:47,920 Speaker 1: really take an ax to like all of the green energy, 531 00:26:48,160 --> 00:26:51,040 Speaker 1: including electric vehicles. I wonder if some of those things, 532 00:26:51,560 --> 00:26:53,560 Speaker 1: you know, the subsidies for electric vehicles. I wonder if 533 00:26:53,600 --> 00:26:55,520 Speaker 1: some of those things might be controversial in some of 534 00:26:55,520 --> 00:26:59,120 Speaker 1: these Republican districts where jobs are related to the EV industry. 535 00:26:59,160 --> 00:27:01,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm just not sure. I've never actually thought that 536 00:27:01,640 --> 00:27:04,280 Speaker 2: the base really agrees. All they have to do is 537 00:27:04,400 --> 00:27:07,680 Speaker 2: sell it not on evs necessarily, but more in terms 538 00:27:07,680 --> 00:27:10,159 Speaker 2: of spending, especially stuff like food stamps, is where they 539 00:27:10,160 --> 00:27:12,800 Speaker 2: would really most people at the very least, you know, 540 00:27:12,800 --> 00:27:15,520 Speaker 2: don't want to be seeing cuts with that program. What 541 00:27:15,640 --> 00:27:19,080 Speaker 2: they're going to be able to do rhetorically is they 542 00:27:19,080 --> 00:27:22,800 Speaker 2: can phrase this as standing up to Biden. The specifics 543 00:27:23,080 --> 00:27:25,920 Speaker 2: honestly don't matter because at the same time, like, none 544 00:27:25,960 --> 00:27:26,600 Speaker 2: of this is real. 545 00:27:26,640 --> 00:27:27,600 Speaker 3: This isn't actually. 546 00:27:27,400 --> 00:27:29,000 Speaker 1: Going to get like a fantasy. 547 00:27:29,240 --> 00:27:31,160 Speaker 2: This is what's always annoying, you know, and it's always 548 00:27:31,160 --> 00:27:34,320 Speaker 2: difficult for us to characterize. We're like, look, technically, on paper, 549 00:27:34,359 --> 00:27:35,679 Speaker 2: this is what they say they're going to do. I 550 00:27:35,720 --> 00:27:38,680 Speaker 2: also literally lived here how many times we're like, this 551 00:27:38,720 --> 00:27:40,920 Speaker 2: is the plan in which we're going to repeal Obamacare, 552 00:27:40,960 --> 00:27:43,240 Speaker 2: and then whenever it actually came to a chance, they're like, yeah, 553 00:27:43,359 --> 00:27:44,919 Speaker 2: none of that is actually what we're going with. 554 00:27:45,000 --> 00:27:46,600 Speaker 3: Everything is new on the table. 555 00:27:46,720 --> 00:27:49,240 Speaker 2: So to the extent that this is real in any way, like, 556 00:27:49,320 --> 00:27:51,680 Speaker 2: let's just not take it all that seriously, it's. 557 00:27:51,600 --> 00:27:52,440 Speaker 3: An opening bid. 558 00:27:53,240 --> 00:27:55,320 Speaker 2: I mean, really, what does it tell us they want 559 00:27:55,480 --> 00:27:59,360 Speaker 2: to extract cuts effectively across the board in all federal 560 00:27:59,400 --> 00:28:04,600 Speaker 2: programs outside of Social Security and of Medicare. And if 561 00:28:04,720 --> 00:28:09,720 Speaker 2: they do touch programs which people rely on, especially large 562 00:28:09,760 --> 00:28:12,679 Speaker 2: constituencies that are live in red states, it will be 563 00:28:12,760 --> 00:28:16,320 Speaker 2: politically unpopular. But it will also remain politically unpopular if 564 00:28:16,359 --> 00:28:19,480 Speaker 2: you are seen as throwing people off or not working 565 00:28:19,960 --> 00:28:23,560 Speaker 2: with people specifically in the time of inflation. That's not 566 00:28:23,640 --> 00:28:27,119 Speaker 2: really one where people want. People want many people actually 567 00:28:27,119 --> 00:28:31,040 Speaker 2: agree with reigning in the national debt, with reigning and spending, 568 00:28:31,080 --> 00:28:33,320 Speaker 2: but whenever you ask them, what they really want are 569 00:28:33,400 --> 00:28:36,359 Speaker 2: cuts to things like the military budget or they want, 570 00:28:36,480 --> 00:28:40,120 Speaker 2: you know, to see like less spending on things that 571 00:28:40,400 --> 00:28:44,600 Speaker 2: don't have to do with everyday services right now? More like, yeah, 572 00:28:44,640 --> 00:28:47,600 Speaker 2: like how many times have we talked here about you know, 573 00:28:47,720 --> 00:28:51,040 Speaker 2: outrageous F thirty five programs and things like that. Yeah, 574 00:28:51,080 --> 00:28:53,240 Speaker 2: that's where and where. 575 00:28:53,080 --> 00:28:54,960 Speaker 1: A lot of money is. Yeah, if you want to 576 00:28:55,000 --> 00:28:58,840 Speaker 1: be real about this, I mean generally speaking in terms 577 00:28:58,920 --> 00:29:02,240 Speaker 1: of the pulling people, Okay, do we need to lower 578 00:29:02,280 --> 00:29:04,600 Speaker 1: the deficit? Do we need to lower the debt? They're like, yeah, 579 00:29:04,640 --> 00:29:07,160 Speaker 1: that sounds good. When you ask them about okay, do 580 00:29:07,160 --> 00:29:09,040 Speaker 1: you want to cut this program, they're like, hell no, 581 00:29:09,160 --> 00:29:11,680 Speaker 1: you want to cut that prop? Hell no? Right. The 582 00:29:11,680 --> 00:29:14,720 Speaker 1: only thing people really want to cut is like foreign aid, 583 00:29:14,800 --> 00:29:18,640 Speaker 1: which amounts to like tiny, little, teeny sliver of the 584 00:29:18,680 --> 00:29:21,600 Speaker 1: budget and will make no difference whatsoever with regard to 585 00:29:21,720 --> 00:29:24,360 Speaker 1: the debt and the deficit. Yeah, if you are leaving 586 00:29:24,920 --> 00:29:29,000 Speaker 1: social security and Medicare and the military off the table, 587 00:29:29,440 --> 00:29:32,960 Speaker 1: then you are limiting yourself to making really draconian cuts 588 00:29:33,000 --> 00:29:36,040 Speaker 1: in you know, the small percentage of the federal budget 589 00:29:36,280 --> 00:29:39,000 Speaker 1: that is ultimately left because the bulk of the money 590 00:29:39,040 --> 00:29:42,280 Speaker 1: goes to those programs. And guess what, So Security and 591 00:29:42,320 --> 00:29:46,600 Speaker 1: Medicare are extremely popular. They're also extremely successful and very 592 00:29:46,600 --> 00:29:50,360 Speaker 1: effective at, you know, mitigating senior poverty in particular, and 593 00:29:50,480 --> 00:29:53,680 Speaker 1: Medicare obviously, you know, very successful as a healthcare program, 594 00:29:53,760 --> 00:29:57,080 Speaker 1: very popular as well, and by the way, cheaper on 595 00:29:57,120 --> 00:30:00,600 Speaker 1: a cost per per person basis than private health insurance. 596 00:30:00,600 --> 00:30:03,680 Speaker 1: We'll put that aside for another day. So, yeah, they've 597 00:30:03,760 --> 00:30:05,920 Speaker 1: kind of limited themselves in terms of what they can do. 598 00:30:06,480 --> 00:30:09,760 Speaker 1: And the important piece here too is even within the 599 00:30:09,800 --> 00:30:14,360 Speaker 1: Republican Caucus, a lot of the details here of where 600 00:30:14,440 --> 00:30:17,080 Speaker 1: and how these cuts are going to be made, they're 601 00:30:17,160 --> 00:30:21,240 Speaker 1: left up to the various committees. So he's still trying 602 00:30:21,280 --> 00:30:24,000 Speaker 1: to pull this bit of a slide of hand, where 603 00:30:24,040 --> 00:30:27,360 Speaker 1: by not having all of the details sketched own, he's 604 00:30:27,440 --> 00:30:31,360 Speaker 1: hoping to keep his own caucus together to put pressure 605 00:30:31,480 --> 00:30:33,920 Speaker 1: on the Biden White House. And you know, I just 606 00:30:33,960 --> 00:30:37,040 Speaker 1: don't know how successful that is ultimately going to be. 607 00:30:37,440 --> 00:30:40,640 Speaker 1: There's also a line of thinking that the whole debt 608 00:30:40,640 --> 00:30:43,520 Speaker 1: ceiling thing is a bit of a far citiiturade. The 609 00:30:43,560 --> 00:30:46,000 Speaker 1: only thing it's really used for is these, in my view, 610 00:30:46,080 --> 00:30:49,240 Speaker 1: unconsciable hostage shaking tactics where you're like, I'm willing to 611 00:30:49,280 --> 00:30:52,520 Speaker 1: tank the entire global economy in order to kick more 612 00:30:52,520 --> 00:30:55,400 Speaker 1: people off of healthcare and like cut food stamp benefits 613 00:30:55,440 --> 00:30:59,000 Speaker 1: for people. So there's a line of thinking that there 614 00:30:59,040 --> 00:31:02,960 Speaker 1: are some work around here that the Biden administration could deploy. 615 00:31:03,440 --> 00:31:07,280 Speaker 1: We've talked about minting the trillion dollar coin. But put 616 00:31:07,280 --> 00:31:09,200 Speaker 1: this up on the screen. This is Nathan Tankas, one 617 00:31:09,240 --> 00:31:11,560 Speaker 1: of the people an economists who's one of the people 618 00:31:11,560 --> 00:31:13,720 Speaker 1: who's been thinking about some of these options. Put the 619 00:31:13,720 --> 00:31:17,080 Speaker 1: next hair sheet up on the screen here, So he 620 00:31:17,200 --> 00:31:22,440 Speaker 1: says Biden can steamroll Republicans on the debt ceiling and 621 00:31:22,520 --> 00:31:26,840 Speaker 1: FED chair j. Palell will not interfere. So what's key 622 00:31:26,920 --> 00:31:30,160 Speaker 1: in what he's arguing here is there's always been a 623 00:31:30,240 --> 00:31:32,960 Speaker 1: question whether it's mint the coin or one of the 624 00:31:33,000 --> 00:31:37,040 Speaker 1: other workarounds that are essentially sort of like accounting gimmicks. 625 00:31:37,600 --> 00:31:40,560 Speaker 1: Would the FED go along with it? And last we 626 00:31:40,720 --> 00:31:43,719 Speaker 1: discussed the mint the coin thing. Nathan Tankas was one 627 00:31:43,720 --> 00:31:45,400 Speaker 1: of the people that was like, well, here's what you do. 628 00:31:45,480 --> 00:31:47,960 Speaker 1: You'd have to like send the military to the FED 629 00:31:48,000 --> 00:31:50,040 Speaker 1: and like force them. Were like, I don't know about 630 00:31:50,080 --> 00:31:54,280 Speaker 1: that one. However, you feel about that? Can you imagine 631 00:31:54,320 --> 00:31:57,280 Speaker 1: the Biden administration doing that? No, you cannot. Well, in 632 00:31:57,320 --> 00:32:00,400 Speaker 1: this article he lays down actually Fed chair pal kind 633 00:32:00,400 --> 00:32:03,160 Speaker 1: of showed his hand a while back indicating that he 634 00:32:03,360 --> 00:32:08,040 Speaker 1: would follow along with what with the sort of workarounds 635 00:32:08,080 --> 00:32:10,800 Speaker 1: like mint the coin in his you know, own FED 636 00:32:10,920 --> 00:32:15,440 Speaker 1: chair way, and so the whole military option wouldn't be necessary. 637 00:32:15,480 --> 00:32:19,239 Speaker 1: And he's encouraging the Biden administration to use one of 638 00:32:19,320 --> 00:32:23,520 Speaker 1: these workarounds in order to just completely short circuit this 639 00:32:23,560 --> 00:32:27,560 Speaker 1: whole process and deny McCarthy and the Republicans any sort 640 00:32:27,600 --> 00:32:30,280 Speaker 1: of leverage around the debt ceiling. Now will they do that, 641 00:32:30,360 --> 00:32:32,280 Speaker 1: I don't know. At the very least, they should very 642 00:32:32,280 --> 00:32:35,080 Speaker 1: credibly threaten to do it, because that would undercut the 643 00:32:35,080 --> 00:32:37,880 Speaker 1: Republicans position here. But we all know these are like 644 00:32:38,040 --> 00:32:40,400 Speaker 1: hardcore institutionalists without a lot of spines. 645 00:32:40,480 --> 00:32:42,800 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's why I just keep going back to. I 646 00:32:42,840 --> 00:32:44,680 Speaker 2: think we're going to have to see some sort of 647 00:32:44,960 --> 00:32:47,240 Speaker 2: cross I mean, look, the Biden administration is never going 648 00:32:47,280 --> 00:32:50,160 Speaker 2: to agree to cut its EV tax credits, like it's. 649 00:32:50,040 --> 00:32:51,000 Speaker 1: Just not happening. 650 00:32:51,160 --> 00:32:51,920 Speaker 2: Yeah, exist, this. 651 00:32:51,960 --> 00:32:53,400 Speaker 1: Is your signature achievement. 652 00:32:53,520 --> 00:32:54,760 Speaker 3: I actually think they might. 653 00:32:54,880 --> 00:32:56,960 Speaker 2: I mean, you know, given his track record, I definitely 654 00:32:56,960 --> 00:32:59,920 Speaker 2: think I could see him caving on work increasing work 655 00:33:00,000 --> 00:33:02,560 Speaker 2: requirements for welfare and for food stamps. I don't think 656 00:33:02,880 --> 00:33:05,800 Speaker 2: there's no way he's going to cave on his signature benefit. 657 00:33:05,880 --> 00:33:08,400 Speaker 2: So I get. But again I come back to picking 658 00:33:08,400 --> 00:33:10,000 Speaker 2: and choosing in just why I think some sort of 659 00:33:10,040 --> 00:33:13,400 Speaker 2: sequestration seems to be the most likely scenario is there's 660 00:33:13,480 --> 00:33:18,320 Speaker 2: no genuine agreement what many Republicans Freedom Caucus them cared 661 00:33:18,320 --> 00:33:20,160 Speaker 2: more at the time and probably still care today as 662 00:33:20,200 --> 00:33:23,600 Speaker 2: the overall dollar figure rather than you know, rather than 663 00:33:23,680 --> 00:33:27,240 Speaker 2: like which particular programs. And this is also an easy 664 00:33:27,240 --> 00:33:29,200 Speaker 2: way for them to say, well, the Biden administration is 665 00:33:29,240 --> 00:33:30,960 Speaker 2: forcing our hand, so we are going to have to 666 00:33:31,000 --> 00:33:33,640 Speaker 2: have some sort of defense budget cuts, which a lot 667 00:33:33,680 --> 00:33:36,280 Speaker 2: of Freedom Caucus people secretly do agree with. They just 668 00:33:36,320 --> 00:33:38,840 Speaker 2: can't say it because it goes against the donor class. 669 00:33:39,120 --> 00:33:41,640 Speaker 2: We will see, we still have several months. He's going 670 00:33:41,720 --> 00:33:44,160 Speaker 2: to blink, who can what can even pass? As you said, 671 00:33:45,000 --> 00:33:47,800 Speaker 2: important thing too, is do all the Republicans even. 672 00:33:47,680 --> 00:33:49,680 Speaker 3: Agree on this. There's not a lot of evidence for that. 673 00:33:50,040 --> 00:33:51,640 Speaker 2: You know, Nancy Mace came out and said that she 674 00:33:51,640 --> 00:33:52,440 Speaker 2: wouldn't vote for it. 675 00:33:52,680 --> 00:33:56,000 Speaker 3: That's one. You only need a couple more. You're dead out. 676 00:33:56,000 --> 00:33:56,600 Speaker 3: What are you gonna do? 677 00:33:56,760 --> 00:33:58,080 Speaker 1: Right? Well, and that's what I was trying to say 678 00:33:58,120 --> 00:34:00,760 Speaker 1: about the eedy tax credits is, you know, the electric 679 00:34:00,840 --> 00:34:03,480 Speaker 1: vehicle industry, in the auto industry in general, the significant 680 00:34:03,520 --> 00:34:06,280 Speaker 1: part of the American economy, and a lot of these 681 00:34:06,400 --> 00:34:08,680 Speaker 1: some of these congress people are going to represent districts 682 00:34:08,719 --> 00:34:11,480 Speaker 1: where the EV industry is really important to them in 683 00:34:11,600 --> 00:34:15,680 Speaker 1: terms of you know, jobs and future economic growth. So 684 00:34:15,920 --> 00:34:17,879 Speaker 1: are they going to be cool with cutting out all 685 00:34:17,960 --> 00:34:21,040 Speaker 1: of those benefits because that's one part where they really 686 00:34:21,080 --> 00:34:24,279 Speaker 1: take an ax to every green energy credit, but in 687 00:34:24,320 --> 00:34:28,440 Speaker 1: particular the EV subsidies that make those cars more affordable 688 00:34:28,600 --> 00:34:32,200 Speaker 1: for consumers to buy, you know, best case scenario. So 689 00:34:32,600 --> 00:34:35,080 Speaker 1: that could be an issue. Last time we covered this 690 00:34:35,160 --> 00:34:38,680 Speaker 1: on Tuesday, we're talking about how the New York Republicans 691 00:34:38,760 --> 00:34:42,440 Speaker 1: are very uncomfortable with the food stamp cuts. Are they 692 00:34:42,440 --> 00:34:45,680 Speaker 1: going to go along with, you know, with one in 693 00:34:45,800 --> 00:34:50,400 Speaker 1: four recipients being kicked out in the program Medicaid obviously, also, 694 00:34:50,640 --> 00:34:52,640 Speaker 1: you know successful and popular. Is that going to be 695 00:34:52,680 --> 00:34:55,560 Speaker 1: okay with people? And then there's all sorts of things 696 00:34:55,560 --> 00:34:58,160 Speaker 1: that are not the top lines, that are these little 697 00:34:58,160 --> 00:35:01,840 Speaker 1: individual you know, programs that you rarely hear about that 698 00:35:01,920 --> 00:35:05,319 Speaker 1: are important to say West Virginia, are important to other 699 00:35:05,400 --> 00:35:11,360 Speaker 1: places around the country. And because they've taken Medicare, social Security, 700 00:35:11,400 --> 00:35:13,880 Speaker 1: and the military off the table, all of that stuff 701 00:35:13,920 --> 00:35:16,719 Speaker 1: is going to have to get cut. So I think 702 00:35:16,719 --> 00:35:19,640 Speaker 1: the White House's strategy is the right one so far, 703 00:35:19,760 --> 00:35:22,239 Speaker 1: which is just to say nothing. Say basically, send me 704 00:35:22,280 --> 00:35:25,560 Speaker 1: a clean debt ceiling. That's it. End a story, and 705 00:35:26,360 --> 00:35:29,440 Speaker 1: watch the Republicans try to work this out among themselves 706 00:35:29,520 --> 00:35:32,120 Speaker 1: and see if they can even get to the finish 707 00:35:32,200 --> 00:35:34,680 Speaker 1: line with their own debt ceiling. Bill I saw Biden 708 00:35:34,719 --> 00:35:37,160 Speaker 1: had some quote yesterday that was like, they're trying to 709 00:35:37,200 --> 00:35:39,120 Speaker 1: get me to agree to all kind of wacko stuff 710 00:35:39,160 --> 00:35:40,040 Speaker 1: in order to Yeah. 711 00:35:40,120 --> 00:35:43,279 Speaker 2: I think wacko notions he said, is that a turn 712 00:35:43,320 --> 00:35:45,719 Speaker 2: of race particularly articulate, He. 713 00:35:45,680 --> 00:35:47,799 Speaker 1: Got his point across. So anyway, I think the White 714 00:35:47,800 --> 00:35:49,680 Speaker 1: House strategy is more or less day silent and see 715 00:35:49,680 --> 00:35:52,440 Speaker 1: if the Republicans can figure this out with fair confidence 716 00:35:52,480 --> 00:35:53,359 Speaker 1: that they probably won't be able. 717 00:35:53,440 --> 00:35:55,320 Speaker 2: That's the correct one. Also, there's a reason that nobody 718 00:35:55,320 --> 00:35:56,880 Speaker 2: in the Senate has even said a word about this. 719 00:35:56,960 --> 00:35:59,040 Speaker 2: The ultimate test is, is Canny pass it? If he 720 00:35:59,080 --> 00:36:01,960 Speaker 2: passes it? Okay, Now, you're an actual serious negotiating partner. 721 00:36:02,000 --> 00:36:04,120 Speaker 2: If you're not, well, then we're just going to continue 722 00:36:04,239 --> 00:36:06,640 Speaker 2: to laugh at you. So all I stay tuned. We'll 723 00:36:06,680 --> 00:36:07,440 Speaker 2: see how it works out. 724 00:36:07,600 --> 00:36:10,920 Speaker 1: Yes, by the way, it was House Republicans are threatening 725 00:36:10,960 --> 00:36:13,680 Speaker 1: to default on the debt unless I agree to all 726 00:36:13,719 --> 00:36:17,600 Speaker 1: this wacko nonsense nonsense. That was the quote. That's the latest. 727 00:36:17,600 --> 00:36:20,280 Speaker 1: Serle I asked, Okay, we've got a couple of stories 728 00:36:20,320 --> 00:36:22,880 Speaker 1: with regard to the Supreme Court that we wanted to 729 00:36:22,920 --> 00:36:24,960 Speaker 1: bring to you this morning, both of which are really significant. 730 00:36:24,960 --> 00:36:26,840 Speaker 1: So we were actually waiting for a decision from the 731 00:36:26,840 --> 00:36:31,360 Speaker 1: Supreme Court with regard to that abortion pill ruling. You 732 00:36:31,440 --> 00:36:34,960 Speaker 1: had two contradictory rulings. You had a Texas judge that 733 00:36:35,080 --> 00:36:37,440 Speaker 1: said the abortion pill, which is now used for more 734 00:36:37,480 --> 00:36:41,320 Speaker 1: than fifty percent of abortions nationwide, that it should be banned, 735 00:36:41,480 --> 00:36:43,680 Speaker 1: not only in states where abortion is banned but in 736 00:36:43,800 --> 00:36:48,120 Speaker 1: all states, so California and Texas alike. You also had 737 00:36:48,200 --> 00:36:52,040 Speaker 1: a judge from Washington State that said the status quo 738 00:36:52,239 --> 00:36:55,279 Speaker 1: with regard to this pill should remain in place. So 739 00:36:55,320 --> 00:36:58,080 Speaker 1: you got conflict here, and that made it almost guaranteed 740 00:36:58,080 --> 00:36:59,560 Speaker 1: that this thing was going to head up to the 741 00:36:59,560 --> 00:37:02,200 Speaker 1: Supreme Court. They had set a deadline for themselves of 742 00:37:02,280 --> 00:37:07,240 Speaker 1: last night at midnight to make this decision. But what happened. 743 00:37:07,320 --> 00:37:09,600 Speaker 1: They decided to extend that deadline, go ahead and put 744 00:37:09,600 --> 00:37:12,880 Speaker 1: this up on the screen. Supreme Court on Wednesday extended 745 00:37:12,920 --> 00:37:15,560 Speaker 1: for two days a pause on a lower court ruling 746 00:37:15,560 --> 00:37:17,560 Speaker 1: that it sought to limit access to the abortion pill 747 00:37:17,719 --> 00:37:20,520 Speaker 1: myf of pristone, ensuring that the drug would continue to 748 00:37:20,560 --> 00:37:24,200 Speaker 1: remain widely available for now. In a brief order, Justice 749 00:37:24,239 --> 00:37:27,719 Speaker 1: Samuel Alito announced that the pause would lapse on Friday 750 00:37:27,760 --> 00:37:30,360 Speaker 1: now at midnight, giving the Court more time to consider 751 00:37:30,400 --> 00:37:33,440 Speaker 1: the case, though it could act before then. And they 752 00:37:33,520 --> 00:37:35,480 Speaker 1: kind of read the tea leaves here and say the 753 00:37:35,480 --> 00:37:38,400 Speaker 1: fact that the Court did not meet that earlier deadline 754 00:37:38,440 --> 00:37:41,239 Speaker 1: suggest there might be disagreement among the justices in their 755 00:37:41,239 --> 00:37:44,880 Speaker 1: first major case about abortion access since the conservative majority 756 00:37:44,880 --> 00:37:47,239 Speaker 1: in June upended the constitutional right to an abortion. It 757 00:37:47,280 --> 00:37:50,440 Speaker 1: could also indicate there might be a descent in the case. 758 00:37:51,000 --> 00:37:53,239 Speaker 1: Could also indicate none of that. I mean, it's very 759 00:37:53,239 --> 00:37:55,799 Speaker 1: hard to read into these things, but you know, I 760 00:37:55,880 --> 00:37:58,400 Speaker 1: did know you're kicking it to Friday. That's like Friday 761 00:37:58,440 --> 00:38:01,879 Speaker 1: news dump, right and midnight plastic timing. If you're trying 762 00:38:01,880 --> 00:38:03,359 Speaker 1: to bury something, you don't want to get a lot 763 00:38:03,360 --> 00:38:06,200 Speaker 1: of press around. And you know the fact that it's 764 00:38:06,200 --> 00:38:08,120 Speaker 1: taking a while for them to work through this, that 765 00:38:08,200 --> 00:38:11,560 Speaker 1: could indicate that there is real disagreement between some of 766 00:38:11,560 --> 00:38:13,880 Speaker 1: the more liberal justices and some of the more conservative 767 00:38:14,040 --> 00:38:17,440 Speaker 1: justices and that this is a difficult one for them 768 00:38:17,760 --> 00:38:20,560 Speaker 1: to make a decision on. One thing that's noteworthy here, 769 00:38:20,600 --> 00:38:23,520 Speaker 1: I think as well, is in the Dobbs decision, which 770 00:38:23,680 --> 00:38:26,799 Speaker 1: overturned Row versus Wide. They really made a big show 771 00:38:26,800 --> 00:38:29,000 Speaker 1: of saying, like, Okay, this is great. Now the Supreme 772 00:38:29,040 --> 00:38:31,480 Speaker 1: Court is out of the abortion We're going to leave 773 00:38:31,520 --> 00:38:33,359 Speaker 1: it to the states, and we're going to let them 774 00:38:33,360 --> 00:38:35,440 Speaker 1: do what they want to do in accordance with their 775 00:38:35,440 --> 00:38:38,239 Speaker 1: democratic process, et cetera. You know, if they back this 776 00:38:38,400 --> 00:38:41,440 Speaker 1: Texas judge who is saying we want to ban this 777 00:38:41,600 --> 00:38:45,719 Speaker 1: pill for every state across the entire country. Well, that's 778 00:38:45,719 --> 00:38:48,000 Speaker 1: not exactly leaving it up to the states, now, is it. 779 00:38:48,320 --> 00:38:48,560 Speaker 6: Well. 780 00:38:48,640 --> 00:38:50,959 Speaker 2: I also think that the reason why this is also 781 00:38:51,120 --> 00:38:54,440 Speaker 2: outside of it is because it focuses on FDA procedure 782 00:38:54,520 --> 00:38:57,520 Speaker 2: and whether it has been valid for what is it, Yes, 783 00:38:57,600 --> 00:39:00,680 Speaker 2: eighteen years, twenty three twenty three years, that's right, twenty 784 00:39:00,760 --> 00:39:04,800 Speaker 2: three years. So effectively, I mean the judges, the judges 785 00:39:04,920 --> 00:39:08,879 Speaker 2: ruling in the case in Texas. What he said that 786 00:39:08,920 --> 00:39:12,320 Speaker 2: these people who they challenged the approval of the pill 787 00:39:12,719 --> 00:39:15,640 Speaker 2: more than two decades ago. So if I had to guess, Crystal, 788 00:39:16,400 --> 00:39:18,359 Speaker 2: a lot of this is going to focus Unfortunately, because 789 00:39:18,400 --> 00:39:20,120 Speaker 2: this is how the law works, is not really going 790 00:39:20,120 --> 00:39:21,600 Speaker 2: to focus on the merits of what we're talking about 791 00:39:21,640 --> 00:39:24,040 Speaker 2: in your popularity. They're going to focus on the process 792 00:39:24,239 --> 00:39:28,440 Speaker 2: of approval and appeals. And as I understand it, the 793 00:39:28,440 --> 00:39:31,080 Speaker 2: way that the Texas judge had issued the order is 794 00:39:31,120 --> 00:39:34,000 Speaker 2: he had said that the original approval itself was wrong. 795 00:39:34,400 --> 00:39:36,720 Speaker 2: Whereas I think that the court is going to focus 796 00:39:37,080 --> 00:39:40,239 Speaker 2: both maybe on that narrow legal question, but also on 797 00:39:40,280 --> 00:39:43,760 Speaker 2: the overall question of the validity of the overall approval 798 00:39:43,800 --> 00:39:45,560 Speaker 2: of the legal process through which that all happened. 799 00:39:45,640 --> 00:39:48,880 Speaker 1: Yes, So in terms of what they actually put out 800 00:39:49,160 --> 00:39:52,120 Speaker 1: as their justification for their decision, no doubt that's what 801 00:39:52,280 --> 00:39:54,640 Speaker 1: it's going to focus on. In terms of their actual 802 00:39:54,680 --> 00:39:57,920 Speaker 1: thinking behind the scenes, they will certainly be weighing the 803 00:39:57,960 --> 00:40:01,040 Speaker 1: politics of it, the public perception and the popularity of 804 00:40:01,080 --> 00:40:03,520 Speaker 1: this pill, and all of those sorts of things. But 805 00:40:04,200 --> 00:40:08,040 Speaker 1: you're absolutely correct to point out that if they do 806 00:40:08,520 --> 00:40:12,719 Speaker 1: decide to agree with this Texas judge who says that 807 00:40:12,760 --> 00:40:17,920 Speaker 1: it should be ban nationwide, that is an extraordinary new precedent, 808 00:40:17,960 --> 00:40:20,640 Speaker 1: which would basically say the Supreme Court now has the 809 00:40:20,680 --> 00:40:25,160 Speaker 1: decision sort of above and beyond the FDA to decide 810 00:40:25,320 --> 00:40:27,840 Speaker 1: what sort of treatments are popular, and especially since this 811 00:40:27,880 --> 00:40:29,960 Speaker 1: has been in use for decades. And by the way, 812 00:40:30,000 --> 00:40:31,560 Speaker 1: and I went through this in the monologue I did 813 00:40:31,600 --> 00:40:34,719 Speaker 1: about it, the science around whether or not this pill 814 00:40:34,800 --> 00:40:37,279 Speaker 1: is safe is really not controversial. There were like one 815 00:40:37,360 --> 00:40:40,719 Speaker 1: hundred and one studies done on it, hundreds of thousands 816 00:40:40,920 --> 00:40:45,160 Speaker 1: of women who took this pill. There was one death 817 00:40:45,239 --> 00:40:47,880 Speaker 1: in all of those hundreds of thousands that had anything 818 00:40:47,920 --> 00:40:50,640 Speaker 1: to do with it, and it was related to an infection. 819 00:40:51,080 --> 00:40:54,160 Speaker 1: With regard to the abortion, it is as safe as 820 00:40:54,280 --> 00:40:59,239 Speaker 1: like aspirin. So what the judge in Texas ruled is 821 00:40:59,239 --> 00:41:01,680 Speaker 1: that because this is not like a fun thing to 822 00:41:01,719 --> 00:41:04,920 Speaker 1: go through, you're basically forcing a miscarriage. And since women 823 00:41:05,200 --> 00:41:09,040 Speaker 1: went through discomfort while they were going through this process, 824 00:41:09,360 --> 00:41:11,759 Speaker 1: that's what he chalked up to it. It's not really 825 00:41:11,840 --> 00:41:14,560 Speaker 1: as safe as the FDA is ultimately saying. So this 826 00:41:14,600 --> 00:41:18,960 Speaker 1: would really open up all sorts of potential avenues for 827 00:41:19,080 --> 00:41:22,600 Speaker 1: challenging other drugs that have been authorized by the FDA 828 00:41:22,800 --> 00:41:25,720 Speaker 1: and putting that in the hands of these unelected judges 829 00:41:26,200 --> 00:41:29,200 Speaker 1: instead of the representatives that you know. Listen, we've got 830 00:41:29,200 --> 00:41:31,239 Speaker 1: our issues with the FDA. I'm not saying that they're 831 00:41:31,239 --> 00:41:35,320 Speaker 1: a perfect organization whatsoever, but there's at least a democratic 832 00:41:35,360 --> 00:41:37,800 Speaker 1: process with regard to that's the agency that is supposed 833 00:41:37,840 --> 00:41:40,000 Speaker 1: to sort through the evidence, and that we have some 834 00:41:40,040 --> 00:41:42,440 Speaker 1: sort of transparency into how they're making these decisions. 835 00:41:42,480 --> 00:41:44,560 Speaker 2: Right, So that was actually going to be Look, I 836 00:41:44,600 --> 00:41:46,520 Speaker 2: want I hate the FDA. I think we should burn 837 00:41:46,600 --> 00:41:49,200 Speaker 2: much of it to the ground and completely revamp the 838 00:41:49,200 --> 00:41:51,239 Speaker 2: way that we approve drugs and all of that. But 839 00:41:51,520 --> 00:41:54,879 Speaker 2: I want a more democratic process. Yes, I don't actually 840 00:41:54,960 --> 00:41:57,200 Speaker 2: want to go I don't trust these judges as much 841 00:41:57,239 --> 00:41:59,200 Speaker 2: I trust as judges as much as I trust the FDA, 842 00:41:59,200 --> 00:42:02,120 Speaker 2: which is I don't trust period. Really, what we need 843 00:42:02,239 --> 00:42:07,200 Speaker 2: is more actual democratic, small d control and transparencies into 844 00:42:07,239 --> 00:42:09,840 Speaker 2: the way that the drug companies, the FDA have a 845 00:42:09,920 --> 00:42:12,360 Speaker 2: revolving door, the types of studies that they have, the 846 00:42:12,400 --> 00:42:16,320 Speaker 2: scientific journals, and this entire industrial complex that exists outside 847 00:42:16,320 --> 00:42:19,080 Speaker 2: of our plane view, where if we got real pictures 848 00:42:19,120 --> 00:42:20,080 Speaker 2: into some of this data. 849 00:42:20,120 --> 00:42:21,960 Speaker 3: And this isn't about just the abortion pill. 850 00:42:21,960 --> 00:42:24,560 Speaker 2: I'm talking about all drugs and all vaccines too, by 851 00:42:24,560 --> 00:42:27,279 Speaker 2: the way, which is the actual data needs to be 852 00:42:27,320 --> 00:42:32,280 Speaker 2: made very much more available to people for independent analysis 853 00:42:32,280 --> 00:42:34,600 Speaker 2: pre approval. But that's very separate, I think from the 854 00:42:34,680 --> 00:42:37,239 Speaker 2: abortion pill question, which also, as you said, you know, 855 00:42:37,280 --> 00:42:40,319 Speaker 2: we do have decades now of people who are using it. 856 00:42:40,400 --> 00:42:42,359 Speaker 2: So in terms of and this isn't even about how 857 00:42:42,360 --> 00:42:44,520 Speaker 2: you morally feel about the issue, we're literally talking about 858 00:42:44,520 --> 00:42:49,080 Speaker 2: whether they improperbly circumvented their approval process by discounting adverse 859 00:42:49,120 --> 00:42:51,760 Speaker 2: reaction to the drug. Like we're not talking about whether 860 00:42:51,840 --> 00:42:54,480 Speaker 2: it's murder, and like the anti abortion groups are not 861 00:42:54,480 --> 00:42:56,520 Speaker 2: bringing the case on those grounds, And I don't think 862 00:42:56,520 --> 00:42:59,439 Speaker 2: people understand that they think this is like a religious ruling. 863 00:42:59,440 --> 00:43:01,240 Speaker 2: I'm like technical in the way that it was made. 864 00:43:01,400 --> 00:43:02,360 Speaker 2: It had nothing to do with that. 865 00:43:02,560 --> 00:43:05,239 Speaker 1: Yes, that as well said, in terms of how the 866 00:43:05,280 --> 00:43:07,880 Speaker 1: public feels about this, you will not be surprised to 867 00:43:07,960 --> 00:43:11,000 Speaker 1: learn that roughly two and three go ahead and put 868 00:43:11,040 --> 00:43:13,480 Speaker 1: this up on the screen from the Hill. Roughly two 869 00:43:13,480 --> 00:43:16,359 Speaker 1: and three respondents in a new poll said that the 870 00:43:16,400 --> 00:43:20,400 Speaker 1: abortion drug mif of pristone should remain available in states 871 00:43:20,400 --> 00:43:24,120 Speaker 1: where abortion is legal, following that Texas federal judge's decision 872 00:43:24,120 --> 00:43:27,279 Speaker 1: to block the pill nationwide earlier this month. This was 873 00:43:27,320 --> 00:43:30,640 Speaker 1: a CBS News poll was released just in the past 874 00:43:30,719 --> 00:43:34,680 Speaker 1: week found that sixty seven percent said it should remain 875 00:43:34,840 --> 00:43:38,480 Speaker 1: available in those states where abortion is legal, only thirty 876 00:43:38,480 --> 00:43:41,320 Speaker 1: three percent said it should not. There is a partisan 877 00:43:41,400 --> 00:43:45,720 Speaker 1: split on this issue, but you know, even among Republicans, 878 00:43:45,840 --> 00:43:49,360 Speaker 1: they're basically split fifty to fifty. You've got forty six percent, 879 00:43:49,760 --> 00:43:52,759 Speaker 1: forty six percent saying it should be available, fifty four 880 00:43:52,800 --> 00:43:55,200 Speaker 1: percent saying it should not be available. So there's a 881 00:43:55,200 --> 00:43:58,320 Speaker 1: little bit of a tilt towards the Texas judges ruling 882 00:43:58,440 --> 00:44:00,719 Speaker 1: with regard to the Republican party. Close to fifty to 883 00:44:00,760 --> 00:44:04,480 Speaker 1: fifty terms of Democrats and Independence is ain't close at all. 884 00:44:04,880 --> 00:44:07,799 Speaker 1: Eighty four percent of Democrats and seventy two percent of 885 00:44:07,880 --> 00:44:11,960 Speaker 1: Independence say it should remain available. And that in a nutshell, 886 00:44:12,080 --> 00:44:15,120 Speaker 1: is the issue that Republicans have with regard to all 887 00:44:15,360 --> 00:44:18,799 Speaker 1: facets of abortion and the current landscape, which is that 888 00:44:19,200 --> 00:44:22,080 Speaker 1: even within their own base, their own base is not 889 00:44:22,160 --> 00:44:25,319 Speaker 1: all on board with like the level of extremism that 890 00:44:25,400 --> 00:44:28,279 Speaker 1: is represented in this ruling, and that's represented in some 891 00:44:28,320 --> 00:44:30,840 Speaker 1: of the laws that are being passed passed in states 892 00:44:30,960 --> 00:44:34,000 Speaker 1: and certainly which would be represented by a nationwide abortion ban, 893 00:44:34,080 --> 00:44:37,279 Speaker 1: which is being pushed by plenty of Republicans, including you know, 894 00:44:37,320 --> 00:44:41,960 Speaker 1: potential presidential candidate Mike Pence. They are not only is 895 00:44:41,960 --> 00:44:44,239 Speaker 1: their whole base not really on board with it, but 896 00:44:44,719 --> 00:44:48,520 Speaker 1: Independence and certainly Democrats, but Independence being the key group here, 897 00:44:48,760 --> 00:44:51,400 Speaker 1: they are not on board with it at all either. 898 00:44:51,880 --> 00:44:54,799 Speaker 1: Every persuadable voter is effectively on the other side of 899 00:44:54,840 --> 00:44:56,840 Speaker 1: this issue from Republicans, and that's why you see this 900 00:44:56,880 --> 00:44:59,320 Speaker 1: and it's very motivating too. That's the sort of deadly 901 00:44:59,360 --> 00:45:04,160 Speaker 1: combo here is it's unpopular and people are highly motivated 902 00:45:04,400 --> 00:45:06,000 Speaker 1: by it, which is why we've seen a lot of 903 00:45:06,000 --> 00:45:08,640 Speaker 1: the election results that we've seen in recent months and years. 904 00:45:08,680 --> 00:45:09,239 Speaker 3: I think you're right. 905 00:45:09,280 --> 00:45:11,520 Speaker 2: And it also relates very much to our next story, 906 00:45:11,560 --> 00:45:14,319 Speaker 2: which we will not drop, about the judges and how 907 00:45:14,360 --> 00:45:15,560 Speaker 2: they get there in the first place. 908 00:45:15,840 --> 00:45:20,440 Speaker 1: Yes, indeed, so we have been covering Justice Thomas and 909 00:45:20,600 --> 00:45:24,440 Speaker 1: the way that he has received literally millions of dollars 910 00:45:24,480 --> 00:45:28,920 Speaker 1: in gifts and trips and feti and whatever from this 911 00:45:29,200 --> 00:45:32,799 Speaker 1: billionaire named Harlan Crowe who also and this one was 912 00:45:32,880 --> 00:45:39,040 Speaker 1: perhaps the most explosive, bought Clarence Thomas's mother's house. This 913 00:45:39,200 --> 00:45:41,600 Speaker 1: was his childhood home. While his mother is still living 914 00:45:41,600 --> 00:45:44,160 Speaker 1: there too. By the way, she's living there rent free 915 00:45:44,760 --> 00:45:48,640 Speaker 1: courtesy of this billionaire. And none of this was disclosed. 916 00:45:48,840 --> 00:45:51,800 Speaker 1: And this is not a close call in terms of disclosure. 917 00:45:51,840 --> 00:45:54,120 Speaker 1: This is very clear cut. If you have a real 918 00:45:54,200 --> 00:45:57,279 Speaker 1: estate transaction over one thousand dollars, you are supposed to 919 00:45:57,320 --> 00:46:00,360 Speaker 1: report it. He did not do that. When you pile 920 00:46:00,480 --> 00:46:03,480 Speaker 1: that on top of there have been previous issues in 921 00:46:03,480 --> 00:46:07,759 Speaker 1: the past, not disclosing reimbursements for trips, not disclosing his 922 00:46:07,960 --> 00:46:11,560 Speaker 1: wife's employment, you know, which was both significant because it 923 00:46:11,600 --> 00:46:15,399 Speaker 1: was ideological and because she was earning significant salaries from 924 00:46:15,440 --> 00:46:18,759 Speaker 1: that employment. He's had to revise his financial disclosure over 925 00:46:18,800 --> 00:46:21,560 Speaker 1: and over again, and never because it was like, oh 926 00:46:21,560 --> 00:46:23,560 Speaker 1: my bad, I found something that should have been in there. 927 00:46:23,600 --> 00:46:26,960 Speaker 1: It's all under pressure once he gets caught, which I 928 00:46:26,960 --> 00:46:32,080 Speaker 1: think is also really noteworthy. So there was a thought of, Okay, 929 00:46:32,200 --> 00:46:35,080 Speaker 1: we're going to investigate this guy. But Democrats are actually 930 00:46:35,120 --> 00:46:39,640 Speaker 1: really limited in what they can do. Why because Diane 931 00:46:39,760 --> 00:46:42,960 Speaker 1: Feinstein sits on the Judiciary Committee and she has not 932 00:46:43,040 --> 00:46:46,640 Speaker 1: been present at work for quite a while now. Not 933 00:46:46,719 --> 00:46:49,719 Speaker 1: only that, but you know, her original idea it was like, oh, 934 00:46:49,760 --> 00:46:52,400 Speaker 1: you could just replace me on that committee. I'm not 935 00:46:52,400 --> 00:46:55,120 Speaker 1: going to resign, of course, because why would she. She's 936 00:46:55,120 --> 00:46:57,600 Speaker 1: doing such a bang up job here. But you know, 937 00:46:57,640 --> 00:47:00,480 Speaker 1: you guys can replace me on the committee. Well, unfortunately, 938 00:47:00,560 --> 00:47:02,239 Speaker 1: have to get the Republicans to agree to that, and 939 00:47:02,320 --> 00:47:04,759 Speaker 1: lo and behold put this up on the screen. They 940 00:47:04,920 --> 00:47:07,799 Speaker 1: are not going to allow that to happen, because why 941 00:47:07,840 --> 00:47:10,439 Speaker 1: would they. I mean, honestly, why would they. They don't 942 00:47:10,480 --> 00:47:14,280 Speaker 1: want these judges to be confirmed through the Judiciary Committee. 943 00:47:14,320 --> 00:47:16,560 Speaker 1: They don't want them to be passed through the Judiciary Committee. 944 00:47:16,640 --> 00:47:19,760 Speaker 1: They don't want Clarence Thomas to be investigated, So why 945 00:47:19,760 --> 00:47:22,960 Speaker 1: would they give the Democrats an assist? The headline here 946 00:47:22,960 --> 00:47:26,800 Speaker 1: from PBS News our Republicans block temporary replacement for Senator 947 00:47:26,800 --> 00:47:31,280 Speaker 1: Feinstein on the Judiciary Committee. South Carolina Senator Lindsay Graham, 948 00:47:31,280 --> 00:47:33,719 Speaker 1: who's the top Republican on that committee, objected to a 949 00:47:33,760 --> 00:47:36,720 Speaker 1: resolution offered by Chuck Schumer that would have allowed another 950 00:47:36,760 --> 00:47:40,319 Speaker 1: senator to take Feinstein's place on the panel while the 951 00:47:40,360 --> 00:47:44,359 Speaker 1: Democrat recuperates from a case of shingles. So that is 952 00:47:44,360 --> 00:47:46,520 Speaker 1: the lay of the land right now. Republicans certainly not 953 00:47:46,560 --> 00:47:49,320 Speaker 1: going to cooperate. You have this vacancy on the Judiciary 954 00:47:49,360 --> 00:47:52,759 Speaker 1: Committee and is really hamstring Democrats' ability to get anything. 955 00:47:52,520 --> 00:47:56,759 Speaker 2: Done right, and yet the entire party and institutional power 956 00:47:56,800 --> 00:48:00,600 Speaker 2: structure is defending her, including one Karijian Pierre from the 957 00:48:00,600 --> 00:48:01,120 Speaker 2: White House. 958 00:48:01,360 --> 00:48:01,960 Speaker 3: Take a listen. 959 00:48:02,200 --> 00:48:04,640 Speaker 2: This is a decision for her to make when it 960 00:48:04,680 --> 00:48:06,920 Speaker 2: comes to the future, her future. 961 00:48:07,480 --> 00:48:10,799 Speaker 7: That is something that she gets to make and should 962 00:48:10,840 --> 00:48:11,920 Speaker 7: be allowed to do that. 963 00:48:12,080 --> 00:48:14,160 Speaker 2: Oh, I didn't know it was her decision to make. 964 00:48:14,719 --> 00:48:17,640 Speaker 2: That's true if you're in, you know, like a private job. 965 00:48:17,719 --> 00:48:20,080 Speaker 2: It's not true when you're in a public job and 966 00:48:20,120 --> 00:48:22,799 Speaker 2: you're eighty nine years old. You're not showing up to work, 967 00:48:23,000 --> 00:48:26,080 Speaker 2: You're holding up the process. You're an active thorn in 968 00:48:26,120 --> 00:48:29,960 Speaker 2: the side of ongoing efforts that are vitally important, allegedly 969 00:48:30,040 --> 00:48:31,360 Speaker 2: to the Democratic Party. 970 00:48:31,480 --> 00:48:33,560 Speaker 3: We're at large, So what's happening here? 971 00:48:33,600 --> 00:48:35,960 Speaker 2: It's like, why do we all just pretend that this 972 00:48:36,040 --> 00:48:38,160 Speaker 2: is all on her and we're trying to be nice? 973 00:48:38,320 --> 00:48:41,680 Speaker 2: You know. Somebody even said the worst defense I saw was, well, 974 00:48:42,120 --> 00:48:44,080 Speaker 2: sometimes we have colleagues that have been gone for a 975 00:48:44,160 --> 00:48:46,520 Speaker 2: year and we didn't kick them out. I'm like, yeah, 976 00:48:46,640 --> 00:48:49,680 Speaker 2: why not? That's one sixth of your whole job, and 977 00:48:50,239 --> 00:48:51,280 Speaker 2: like that's crazy. 978 00:48:51,640 --> 00:48:52,040 Speaker 7: Yeah. 979 00:48:52,120 --> 00:48:55,000 Speaker 1: Well, and I mean this is an extraorinary situation too, 980 00:48:55,000 --> 00:48:56,759 Speaker 1: because you're like, is she going to be able to 981 00:48:56,800 --> 00:48:59,160 Speaker 1: come back at all? We don't know, right, I Mean, 982 00:48:59,239 --> 00:49:02,120 Speaker 1: that's that's the question, is do we know if she'll 983 00:49:02,120 --> 00:49:04,719 Speaker 1: even be able to return to do the job whatsoever. 984 00:49:05,040 --> 00:49:07,080 Speaker 1: The other thing I can't help but think of listening 985 00:49:07,120 --> 00:49:10,920 Speaker 1: to Kreeane Jean Pierre there is can you imagine the 986 00:49:11,000 --> 00:49:14,160 Speaker 1: Republicans allowing something like this to happen and hamstring their 987 00:49:14,200 --> 00:49:18,120 Speaker 1: ability to push judges through You think Mitch McConnell would 988 00:49:18,160 --> 00:49:21,040 Speaker 1: allow anything to get in his way of getting his 989 00:49:21,160 --> 00:49:24,840 Speaker 1: judges on the bench. Not a chance in hell. But 990 00:49:24,920 --> 00:49:28,240 Speaker 1: the Democrats are so weak with this stuff, and so oh, 991 00:49:28,400 --> 00:49:31,799 Speaker 1: you know, it's all about these individual politicians like narcissistic 992 00:49:31,880 --> 00:49:34,400 Speaker 1: personal journey and then I want to hurt this lady's 993 00:49:34,440 --> 00:49:38,480 Speaker 1: feelings and putting that above the needs and interests of 994 00:49:38,600 --> 00:49:41,160 Speaker 1: their own base and by the way, the whole country. 995 00:49:41,200 --> 00:49:43,680 Speaker 1: When you talk about holding a justice to account and 996 00:49:43,719 --> 00:49:46,879 Speaker 1: launching an investigation that is critical to root out any 997 00:49:46,920 --> 00:49:50,359 Speaker 1: sort of corrupt dealings that may have gone undiscovered thus far, 998 00:49:50,760 --> 00:49:52,840 Speaker 1: to give you the details on that part, put this 999 00:49:52,880 --> 00:49:55,160 Speaker 1: next piece up on the screen here in terms of 1000 00:49:55,200 --> 00:49:58,759 Speaker 1: why Feinstein's absence is a problem in terms of any 1001 00:49:58,800 --> 00:50:02,680 Speaker 1: sort of Clarence Thomas invest litigation. So Democratic Aids says, 1002 00:50:02,680 --> 00:50:06,400 Speaker 1: the Judiciary Committee cannot issue a subpoena as part of 1003 00:50:06,440 --> 00:50:09,319 Speaker 1: a Clarence Thomas inquiry that would require a majority on 1004 00:50:09,360 --> 00:50:12,080 Speaker 1: the panel, and Democrats do not have it without her, 1005 00:50:12,280 --> 00:50:15,560 Speaker 1: so that option is out of the question. So they 1006 00:50:15,560 --> 00:50:19,200 Speaker 1: are talking about launching some sort of an inquiry, but 1007 00:50:19,280 --> 00:50:22,520 Speaker 1: in terms of actually issuing a subpoena to get Justice 1008 00:50:22,560 --> 00:50:25,000 Speaker 1: Thomas or anyone else for that Hartland Crawl or anyone else, 1009 00:50:25,200 --> 00:50:29,960 Speaker 1: but for that matter, to testify, you need Diane Feinstein, right, So, 1010 00:50:30,320 --> 00:50:33,279 Speaker 1: how much, how effective, and how much teeth is your 1011 00:50:33,280 --> 00:50:36,120 Speaker 1: little inquiry going to have if you can't even compel 1012 00:50:36,200 --> 00:50:39,200 Speaker 1: people to come and testify to what happened and what 1013 00:50:39,239 --> 00:50:41,799 Speaker 1: they know about this. So it's a real issue here. 1014 00:50:41,920 --> 00:50:44,200 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's just such a joke all the way around. 1015 00:50:44,280 --> 00:50:47,560 Speaker 2: And actually you found this crystal. Even the media is 1016 00:50:47,600 --> 00:50:53,719 Speaker 2: beginning to report about how quote countless countless Democratic senators 1017 00:50:54,080 --> 00:50:58,320 Speaker 2: actually agreed. This comes from Representative Dean Phillips of Minnesota, 1018 00:50:58,320 --> 00:51:01,279 Speaker 2: who is a Democrat, speaking on NBA News last night. 1019 00:51:01,480 --> 00:51:02,240 Speaker 3: Let's take a listen. 1020 00:51:03,120 --> 00:51:05,960 Speaker 8: But this is not about us. This is about our country, 1021 00:51:06,120 --> 00:51:08,200 Speaker 8: and we have a crisis of honesty in Congress. I 1022 00:51:08,200 --> 00:51:10,800 Speaker 8: think that's fair to say, and I'm tired of serving 1023 00:51:10,800 --> 00:51:13,440 Speaker 8: with people who say one thing privately and refuse to 1024 00:51:13,480 --> 00:51:16,040 Speaker 8: say the same thing publicly. If you took a survey 1025 00:51:16,520 --> 00:51:18,480 Speaker 8: of those in the Congress, both the House and Senate 1026 00:51:18,560 --> 00:51:20,840 Speaker 8: on this subject, I know what the results would be, 1027 00:51:21,040 --> 00:51:23,560 Speaker 8: and my colleagues know. But we have a culture of 1028 00:51:23,600 --> 00:51:26,320 Speaker 8: protecting ourselves at the expense of the country. 1029 00:51:26,360 --> 00:51:29,360 Speaker 1: In the Congress. Senators just to be clear, Congressman. 1030 00:51:29,040 --> 00:51:32,360 Speaker 8: Countless, absolutely, yes, absolutely, Okay, are. 1031 00:51:32,239 --> 00:51:33,680 Speaker 1: You prepared to name any of them here? 1032 00:51:33,760 --> 00:51:35,880 Speaker 8: No, I'm not going to hurde other people. They know 1033 00:51:35,880 --> 00:51:36,359 Speaker 8: who they are. 1034 00:51:36,480 --> 00:51:37,000 Speaker 9: You know that. 1035 00:51:37,040 --> 00:51:41,040 Speaker 8: My colleague Grocana, member of the California delegation, went first. 1036 00:51:41,200 --> 00:51:42,840 Speaker 8: I wasn't going to do this first, even though I 1037 00:51:42,840 --> 00:51:45,000 Speaker 8: felt this for some time. And again, this goes to 1038 00:51:45,080 --> 00:51:49,120 Speaker 8: a deeper problem, Kristen about members of Congress being honest. 1039 00:51:48,960 --> 00:51:53,320 Speaker 1: Culture of protecting ourselves at the expense of the country, 1040 00:51:53,960 --> 00:51:59,279 Speaker 1: well said, and yeah, behind the scenes, every one of them, 1041 00:51:59,320 --> 00:52:02,360 Speaker 1: including Nancy Pelosi, who's out there smearing Rokana and anyone 1042 00:52:02,360 --> 00:52:06,479 Speaker 1: else's sexist for daring to question whether Diane Feinstein should 1043 00:52:06,560 --> 00:52:09,799 Speaker 1: still be serving in this Senate seat. All of them 1044 00:52:09,880 --> 00:52:12,560 Speaker 1: want her to step down. They just don't want to 1045 00:52:12,600 --> 00:52:15,320 Speaker 1: say it publicly. So yeah, I mean that's what connorson 1046 00:52:15,360 --> 00:52:17,520 Speaker 1: Conna told us when he was here. He was like, Yeah, 1047 00:52:17,560 --> 00:52:19,920 Speaker 1: behind the scenes, they're all like, thank you, we agree. 1048 00:52:20,400 --> 00:52:23,479 Speaker 1: It's like, okay, we'll come out and say it. Come 1049 00:52:23,520 --> 00:52:26,000 Speaker 1: out and say it. There's one way that you could 1050 00:52:26,239 --> 00:52:28,920 Speaker 1: change the dynamics here if you had overwhelming pressure from 1051 00:52:28,920 --> 00:52:31,160 Speaker 1: the Democratic Caucus. There is a chance she would actually 1052 00:52:31,200 --> 00:52:32,960 Speaker 1: step down, but instead they're all too cowardly. 1053 00:52:33,000 --> 00:52:36,320 Speaker 2: You're totally right. It's a complete disgrace, this entire situation. 1054 00:52:36,400 --> 00:52:39,080 Speaker 2: It's one of those clear situations where everybody knows what's 1055 00:52:39,120 --> 00:52:41,440 Speaker 2: going on and nobody's saying it. And that is what 1056 00:52:41,560 --> 00:52:46,799 Speaker 2: makes Americans feel crazy. Yeah, how different and special that 1057 00:52:46,840 --> 00:52:50,279 Speaker 2: these people apparently are when they're supposed to be representing us. 1058 00:52:50,560 --> 00:52:53,080 Speaker 1: There's just a bunch of liars too, and that's that's 1059 00:52:53,080 --> 00:52:54,960 Speaker 1: it is what we're disgusting. This cover up has been 1060 00:52:55,000 --> 00:52:59,880 Speaker 1: going on for years now at this point, all right, 1061 00:53:00,000 --> 00:53:02,279 Speaker 1: I wanted to cover something that's unfolding. An IOA was 1062 00:53:02,320 --> 00:53:05,600 Speaker 1: part of actually kind of a trend of rolling back 1063 00:53:05,719 --> 00:53:09,640 Speaker 1: child labor law regulations, and I think Iowa is the 1064 00:53:09,719 --> 00:53:13,080 Speaker 1: state that has now passed the most aggressive rollback of 1065 00:53:13,320 --> 00:53:16,400 Speaker 1: child labor regulation. Let's put this up on the screen. 1066 00:53:16,760 --> 00:53:19,280 Speaker 1: More Perfect Union did a deep dive into this, including 1067 00:53:19,320 --> 00:53:21,760 Speaker 1: a video that I recommend you all check out, which 1068 00:53:22,080 --> 00:53:25,880 Speaker 1: tracks the roots of where this rollback came from. In surprise, surprise, 1069 00:53:25,920 --> 00:53:29,400 Speaker 1: it's a lot of business interests, including the National Restaurant Association, 1070 00:53:29,560 --> 00:53:32,600 Speaker 1: a lot of locally powerful business interests in the state 1071 00:53:32,600 --> 00:53:35,080 Speaker 1: as well, say the say breaking. The Iowa Senate passed 1072 00:53:35,080 --> 00:53:37,959 Speaker 1: a child labor law before dawn today. The bill lets 1073 00:53:38,200 --> 00:53:43,080 Speaker 1: fourteen year olds work six hour night shifts, fifteen year 1074 00:53:43,120 --> 00:53:47,160 Speaker 1: olds work on assembly lines, and sixteen and seventeen year 1075 00:53:47,160 --> 00:53:49,520 Speaker 1: olds serve alcohol. The Senate went through the night and 1076 00:53:49,600 --> 00:53:53,200 Speaker 1: voted on child labor at four fifty two am. I 1077 00:53:53,280 --> 00:53:56,160 Speaker 1: think it's important to note a couple of things here. So, 1078 00:53:56,400 --> 00:54:00,840 Speaker 1: first of all, because you have a relatively tight labor market, 1079 00:54:01,600 --> 00:54:04,960 Speaker 1: that's why all of these business interests have suddenly become 1080 00:54:05,080 --> 00:54:09,399 Speaker 1: like obsessively focused in rolling back child labor protections so 1081 00:54:09,440 --> 00:54:12,520 Speaker 1: that they can keep paying the low wages they become 1082 00:54:12,560 --> 00:54:16,759 Speaker 1: accustomed to paying, and not increase wages whatsoever to you know, 1083 00:54:16,880 --> 00:54:20,839 Speaker 1: try to attract actual adults who should be working in 1084 00:54:20,840 --> 00:54:24,160 Speaker 1: some of these very dangerous jobs. Right. It's also important 1085 00:54:24,160 --> 00:54:26,480 Speaker 1: to note I always minimum wages still seven to twenty 1086 00:54:26,520 --> 00:54:30,240 Speaker 1: five an hour. So if you can't attract the workers 1087 00:54:30,320 --> 00:54:33,000 Speaker 1: you need for your business without hiring a fourteen year 1088 00:54:33,000 --> 00:54:35,959 Speaker 1: old to work the overnight shift, maybe you should try 1089 00:54:36,000 --> 00:54:40,160 Speaker 1: increasing your wages and see what happens. Then. Child labor 1090 00:54:40,239 --> 00:54:44,080 Speaker 1: law violations have been up thirty seven percent since the pandemic. 1091 00:54:44,360 --> 00:54:47,920 Speaker 1: So even without these rollbacks, companies are taking upon themselves 1092 00:54:47,920 --> 00:54:51,000 Speaker 1: to violate child labor law or look the other way 1093 00:54:51,080 --> 00:54:53,840 Speaker 1: at the very least. And so there's been a huge 1094 00:54:53,880 --> 00:54:59,319 Speaker 1: spike in companies getting caught employing kids, including migrant kids, 1095 00:54:59,360 --> 00:55:01,360 Speaker 1: by the way, exploiting the fact that they're in a 1096 00:55:01,440 --> 00:55:04,600 Speaker 1: vulnerable situation. There's a big New York Times expose about that. 1097 00:55:05,040 --> 00:55:09,040 Speaker 1: So it's a very disturbing direction that these states are 1098 00:55:09,080 --> 00:55:11,680 Speaker 1: going in, something that honestly, I mean, is sort of 1099 00:55:11,719 --> 00:55:14,880 Speaker 1: shocking to see how far they're willing to go. And listen, 1100 00:55:15,360 --> 00:55:18,560 Speaker 1: I had summer jobs when I was fifteen years old 1101 00:55:19,160 --> 00:55:21,480 Speaker 1: as well, you know, but they weren't working in like 1102 00:55:21,560 --> 00:55:26,160 Speaker 1: a meat packing plant cleaning bone saws, or an assembly 1103 00:55:26,280 --> 00:55:29,480 Speaker 1: line or construction sites. That's another thing they want to 1104 00:55:29,520 --> 00:55:33,480 Speaker 1: open up to younger and younger kids. Was like lifeguarding 1105 00:55:33,560 --> 00:55:37,440 Speaker 1: and working at a like little fishing tackle store, right exactly. 1106 00:55:37,520 --> 00:55:39,240 Speaker 1: That was the sort of thing that I was doing 1107 00:55:39,560 --> 00:55:42,719 Speaker 1: over the summer when I was fifteen years old, not 1108 00:55:43,000 --> 00:55:45,720 Speaker 1: like working in a meat packing plant, which no fourteen 1109 00:55:45,800 --> 00:55:47,120 Speaker 1: or fifteen year old has a business store. 1110 00:55:47,200 --> 00:55:48,719 Speaker 2: Yeah, I think we had parsed and say that like 1111 00:55:48,719 --> 00:55:51,759 Speaker 2: if it involves dangerous work, specifically overnight, then I don't 1112 00:55:51,760 --> 00:55:53,840 Speaker 2: think that that's really anything that we should know. But 1113 00:55:53,920 --> 00:55:55,520 Speaker 2: the one you know, you and I were talking about 1114 00:55:55,520 --> 00:55:58,120 Speaker 2: this yesterday, like sixteen seventeen year old serving alcohol, it's 1115 00:55:58,160 --> 00:56:01,200 Speaker 2: like whatever, you know, especially the bill I even says 1116 00:56:01,239 --> 00:56:02,759 Speaker 2: it says that you can if they could do it 1117 00:56:02,800 --> 00:56:05,799 Speaker 2: with the written permission of a parent or guardian. That's 1118 00:56:05,960 --> 00:56:08,759 Speaker 2: good work in many cases, like especially if you're most 1119 00:56:08,760 --> 00:56:10,440 Speaker 2: of the time you wouldn't even be serving as a bartender, 1120 00:56:10,440 --> 00:56:12,400 Speaker 2: assuming you'd be serving as like a bar back and 1121 00:56:12,440 --> 00:56:15,680 Speaker 2: then participating in a pool tips, so you know, the 1122 00:56:15,680 --> 00:56:17,279 Speaker 2: wages and the money you can even get from that 1123 00:56:17,280 --> 00:56:19,480 Speaker 2: would actually be kind of decent. And I do think 1124 00:56:19,480 --> 00:56:22,439 Speaker 2: this should probably be available to sixteen and seventeen year olds. 1125 00:56:22,480 --> 00:56:23,799 Speaker 3: But I think the issue is. 1126 00:56:23,680 --> 00:56:27,839 Speaker 2: That the over like the animus behind the bill is 1127 00:56:27,960 --> 00:56:32,960 Speaker 2: about trying to circumvent wages for adults, correct, And that's 1128 00:56:33,040 --> 00:56:35,440 Speaker 2: the problem, which is that they are basically trying to 1129 00:56:35,520 --> 00:56:40,279 Speaker 2: do a backdoor way to pay people even less and 1130 00:56:40,440 --> 00:56:42,600 Speaker 2: open up the labor pool in an even worse case. 1131 00:56:42,640 --> 00:56:44,880 Speaker 2: You know, we're not even just talking about like illegal immigrants. 1132 00:56:44,880 --> 00:56:48,080 Speaker 2: We're talking about straight up children, and like, that's where 1133 00:56:48,200 --> 00:56:51,520 Speaker 2: I think some people should have the objection here, which 1134 00:56:51,560 --> 00:56:54,040 Speaker 2: is we shouldn't be there's one thing to want to 1135 00:56:54,120 --> 00:56:56,200 Speaker 2: care for kids and want them to do well and 1136 00:56:56,200 --> 00:56:57,920 Speaker 2: give them access to job, which I do agree with. 1137 00:56:57,960 --> 00:57:01,040 Speaker 2: Even in construction, you knows if you're not working as position. 1138 00:57:00,800 --> 00:57:01,560 Speaker 3: Like, I think that's fine. 1139 00:57:01,840 --> 00:57:04,879 Speaker 2: Construction is period, it depends, It depends on the job 1140 00:57:04,880 --> 00:57:09,279 Speaker 2: that you're doing. My point is that giving an apprenticeship 1141 00:57:09,280 --> 00:57:12,480 Speaker 2: and all that is one thing. Trying to game wage law, though, 1142 00:57:12,800 --> 00:57:13,960 Speaker 2: is actually a whole other one. 1143 00:57:14,239 --> 00:57:16,640 Speaker 1: To me, there are two pieces that are really important here. 1144 00:57:16,760 --> 00:57:19,560 Speaker 1: Number One, the type of dangerous jobs that they want 1145 00:57:19,600 --> 00:57:21,560 Speaker 1: to open up to fourteen and fifteen year olds, to me, 1146 00:57:21,680 --> 00:57:25,120 Speaker 1: is absolutely insane. Number Two, the fact that they want 1147 00:57:25,160 --> 00:57:27,160 Speaker 1: to increase the number of hours that they can work 1148 00:57:27,200 --> 00:57:29,120 Speaker 1: per week. And we're not talking about just like during 1149 00:57:29,120 --> 00:57:31,200 Speaker 1: the summer. We're talking about during the school year. And 1150 00:57:31,240 --> 00:57:33,920 Speaker 1: there's a lot of research about how anything over basically 1151 00:57:33,960 --> 00:57:36,440 Speaker 1: like twenty hours a week really starts to be very 1152 00:57:36,480 --> 00:57:40,160 Speaker 1: detrimental to kids' grades, ability to focus, ability to get 1153 00:57:40,160 --> 00:57:42,919 Speaker 1: the work done in terms of their school work, which 1154 00:57:42,960 --> 00:57:45,280 Speaker 1: is obviously the most critical thing that you should be, 1155 00:57:45,440 --> 00:57:47,680 Speaker 1: you know, dealing with and focusing on setting yourself up 1156 00:57:47,720 --> 00:57:50,160 Speaker 1: for the future when you're fourteen and fifteen years old. 1157 00:57:50,480 --> 00:57:53,120 Speaker 1: And then the other piece is, you know, allowing them 1158 00:57:53,160 --> 00:57:55,640 Speaker 1: to work later at night. Again that has a major 1159 00:57:55,680 --> 00:57:58,240 Speaker 1: impact on their ability to like focus and do what 1160 00:57:58,280 --> 00:58:01,400 Speaker 1: they need to do during the day at school. So 1161 00:58:01,560 --> 00:58:04,040 Speaker 1: those are the pieces that are to me unconscionable. I 1162 00:58:04,120 --> 00:58:05,560 Speaker 1: kind of tend to agree with you on the sixteen 1163 00:58:05,560 --> 00:58:07,480 Speaker 1: and seventeen year olds serving alcohol. I do want to 1164 00:58:07,520 --> 00:58:10,040 Speaker 1: give the other side of that though, to play Devil's advocate, 1165 00:58:10,080 --> 00:58:11,600 Speaker 1: which is like, Okay, well this is going to put 1166 00:58:11,600 --> 00:58:15,680 Speaker 1: like sixteen year olds in bars with a bunch of intoxicated. 1167 00:58:15,040 --> 00:58:18,080 Speaker 2: Adults, eighteen year olds in bars with intoxicated adults. 1168 00:58:18,280 --> 00:58:20,880 Speaker 1: It's a difference between sixteen and eighteen though. But yeah, 1169 00:58:20,920 --> 00:58:22,840 Speaker 1: I mean, listen, I kind of tend to agree with 1170 00:58:22,880 --> 00:58:24,240 Speaker 1: you on that one. Maybe I'd like to see some 1171 00:58:24,240 --> 00:58:26,120 Speaker 1: more restrictions about Like I wouldn't want them serving as 1172 00:58:26,120 --> 00:58:30,240 Speaker 1: like a bartender, right, so maybe put some more guardrails 1173 00:58:30,280 --> 00:58:33,640 Speaker 1: around that one. But in terms of assembly lines, meat 1174 00:58:33,680 --> 00:58:38,200 Speaker 1: packing plants, construction, allowing them into these very dangerous jobs 1175 00:58:38,400 --> 00:58:41,880 Speaker 1: long hours during the school week. And this again is 1176 00:58:42,040 --> 00:58:45,600 Speaker 1: not about the interests of these children or their parents 1177 00:58:45,680 --> 00:58:48,520 Speaker 1: or anybody other than the corporate interests who want to 1178 00:58:48,600 --> 00:58:51,520 Speaker 1: keep late wages as low as possible. And let me 1179 00:58:51,720 --> 00:58:54,520 Speaker 1: that's why I pulled this statistic, which I think is 1180 00:58:54,560 --> 00:58:57,800 Speaker 1: important context and backdrop here. Put this next piece up 1181 00:58:57,800 --> 00:59:01,680 Speaker 1: on the screen, which is that we actually had just now, 1182 00:59:01,880 --> 00:59:04,800 Speaker 1: median inflation adjusted weekly earnings of full time wage and 1183 00:59:04,840 --> 00:59:08,320 Speaker 1: salary workers were up in the first quarter of twenty 1184 00:59:08,360 --> 00:59:10,840 Speaker 1: twenty three, per the latest report, for the first time 1185 00:59:10,920 --> 00:59:16,600 Speaker 1: in two years, real wage growth has exited negative territory. 1186 00:59:16,680 --> 00:59:20,160 Speaker 1: So to translate that from kind of econ speak here, 1187 00:59:20,720 --> 00:59:23,800 Speaker 1: this is the first time, even when accounting for inflation, 1188 00:59:23,960 --> 00:59:27,720 Speaker 1: in quite a long time, that you've had actual wage growth. 1189 00:59:28,280 --> 00:59:31,440 Speaker 1: So of course every corporate interest in the entire country 1190 00:59:31,520 --> 00:59:33,360 Speaker 1: is like, oh my god, we can't have that. We 1191 00:59:33,400 --> 00:59:36,440 Speaker 1: got to keep being able to pay them pennies at 1192 00:59:36,480 --> 00:59:38,600 Speaker 1: seven to twenty five an hour, and we got to 1193 00:59:38,680 --> 00:59:41,560 Speaker 1: keep our fat profit margins, which continue to be at 1194 00:59:41,640 --> 00:59:46,240 Speaker 1: literal record levels. So what's our solution since unemployment is 1195 00:59:46,280 --> 00:59:48,440 Speaker 1: super low, Well, I guess we're going to have to 1196 00:59:48,480 --> 00:59:51,000 Speaker 1: bring fourteen and fifteen year olds into the workforce and 1197 00:59:51,040 --> 00:59:54,200 Speaker 1: allow them to work longer hours and overnight shifts and 1198 00:59:54,280 --> 00:59:55,360 Speaker 1: in dangerous areas. 1199 00:59:55,480 --> 00:59:56,080 Speaker 6: Yeah. 1200 00:59:56,080 --> 00:59:58,720 Speaker 2: Look, in general, I just think an easy workaround to 1201 00:59:58,760 --> 01:00:01,200 Speaker 2: this would be like make sure you raised the minimum 1202 01:00:01,200 --> 01:00:03,640 Speaker 2: wage to something decent and then sure so like if 1203 01:00:03,760 --> 01:00:05,440 Speaker 2: kids want to work as bar backs, it's like, that's 1204 01:00:05,480 --> 01:00:08,760 Speaker 2: great in terms of as long as you're not trying 1205 01:00:08,760 --> 01:00:11,840 Speaker 2: to circumvent and pay less. Mostly I'm good with it 1206 01:00:11,840 --> 01:00:13,920 Speaker 2: as long as they're not in a dangerous position. I'm 1207 01:00:13,920 --> 01:00:16,640 Speaker 2: curious what other people think. I honestly don't know. Comment 1208 01:00:16,880 --> 01:00:18,960 Speaker 2: let us know what you think. All right, let's talk 1209 01:00:18,960 --> 01:00:24,760 Speaker 2: about UFOs big hearing that happened yesterday and led mostly 1210 01:00:24,800 --> 01:00:27,560 Speaker 2: by Senator Kirston Jill Brand. I have many critiques of 1211 01:00:27,640 --> 01:00:30,880 Speaker 2: Jill Brand, but on the UFO issue, she does genuinely 1212 01:00:30,880 --> 01:00:32,959 Speaker 2: seem to be passionate about it. She's been calling hearing, 1213 01:00:33,040 --> 01:00:35,080 Speaker 2: she's been very involved in a lot of people in 1214 01:00:35,080 --> 01:00:37,400 Speaker 2: the community feel as if she's actually trying to get 1215 01:00:37,440 --> 01:00:39,160 Speaker 2: to the bottom of this. I hear the same thing 1216 01:00:39,160 --> 01:00:42,080 Speaker 2: about Senator Rubio and a few other members of Congress 1217 01:00:42,080 --> 01:00:44,240 Speaker 2: who do seem again to actually want to get to 1218 01:00:44,280 --> 01:00:47,440 Speaker 2: the bottom. Now, there was some interesting testimony from the 1219 01:00:47,480 --> 01:00:51,720 Speaker 2: head of the new aa ARO office. I'll tell you 1220 01:00:51,760 --> 01:00:55,040 Speaker 2: what that means afterwards, but here's the main takeaway in 1221 01:00:55,120 --> 01:00:57,040 Speaker 2: terms of what they want us to know a little 1222 01:00:57,040 --> 01:00:59,840 Speaker 2: bit of a dual message around possible alien activity. 1223 01:01:00,040 --> 01:01:01,000 Speaker 3: Here's what he had to say. 1224 01:01:01,600 --> 01:01:05,240 Speaker 10: Arrow has found no credible evidence thus far of extraterrestrial activity, 1225 01:01:05,280 --> 01:01:08,360 Speaker 10: off world technology or objects that defy the known laws 1226 01:01:08,360 --> 01:01:11,280 Speaker 10: of physics. For those few cases that have leaked to 1227 01:01:11,320 --> 01:01:14,360 Speaker 10: the public previously and subsequently commented on by the US government, 1228 01:01:14,560 --> 01:01:16,920 Speaker 10: I encourage those who hold alternative theories or views to 1229 01:01:16,960 --> 01:01:20,680 Speaker 10: submit to research to credible, peer reviewed scientific journals. Arrow 1230 01:01:20,720 --> 01:01:22,880 Speaker 10: is working very hard to do the same. That is 1231 01:01:22,920 --> 01:01:25,680 Speaker 10: how science works, not by blog or social media. ERO 1232 01:01:25,880 --> 01:01:29,520 Speaker 10: is developing and implementing its science plan. It has to 1233 01:01:29,600 --> 01:01:32,960 Speaker 10: do so grounded in a solid foundation of scientific theory 1234 01:01:33,000 --> 01:01:37,080 Speaker 10: across the entire range of hypotheses that have been presented 1235 01:01:37,160 --> 01:01:44,320 Speaker 10: for what UAP are. That range spans adversary breakthrough technology 1236 01:01:44,320 --> 01:01:47,720 Speaker 10: on one hand, known objects and phenomena in the middle, 1237 01:01:48,080 --> 01:01:50,680 Speaker 10: all the way to the extreme theories of extraterrestrials. 1238 01:01:52,120 --> 01:01:54,680 Speaker 2: So what did we learn from that? What I thought 1239 01:01:54,840 --> 01:01:56,560 Speaker 2: was interesting is at the very beginning is like, we 1240 01:01:56,600 --> 01:02:00,160 Speaker 2: have no evidence extraterrestrial activity defy laws of physics. And 1241 01:02:00,160 --> 01:02:02,080 Speaker 2: then a second thing, He's like, well, part of our 1242 01:02:02,200 --> 01:02:05,440 Speaker 2: hypothesis is that it could be extraterrestrial. It's one of 1243 01:02:05,440 --> 01:02:07,920 Speaker 2: those where they're trying again. They always try it together. 1244 01:02:08,080 --> 01:02:09,720 Speaker 2: We have no evidence that it is. It's like, well, 1245 01:02:09,720 --> 01:02:12,080 Speaker 2: you don't have any evidence that it isn't now in 1246 01:02:12,200 --> 01:02:15,760 Speaker 2: terms of what the possible terrestrial explanations are, I did 1247 01:02:15,760 --> 01:02:18,440 Speaker 2: think it was important for me to raise this. This 1248 01:02:18,480 --> 01:02:21,200 Speaker 2: has actually come from the Washington Post. Washing Posts finally 1249 01:02:21,280 --> 01:02:24,040 Speaker 2: got around actually looking at some of those leaks. One 1250 01:02:24,040 --> 01:02:25,920 Speaker 2: of the things that they talk about, Crystal is that 1251 01:02:25,960 --> 01:02:29,960 Speaker 2: the Chinese are currently reading a supersonic spy drone unit, 1252 01:02:30,000 --> 01:02:33,480 Speaker 2: which would go, let me see here, three times faster 1253 01:02:33,840 --> 01:02:36,920 Speaker 2: than the speed of sound, a high altitude spy drone 1254 01:02:37,120 --> 01:02:40,440 Speaker 2: one that has not yet been seen by adversary or technology, 1255 01:02:40,640 --> 01:02:43,480 Speaker 2: and clearly, if seen by the naked eye or somebody 1256 01:02:43,480 --> 01:02:46,080 Speaker 2: who's not in the military, would be amazed by you know, 1257 01:02:46,160 --> 01:02:49,400 Speaker 2: something is going mock three and is a high altitude drone, 1258 01:02:49,600 --> 01:02:52,480 Speaker 2: not man possibly a smaller object. So you could easily 1259 01:02:52,600 --> 01:02:55,560 Speaker 2: conceive of a civilian situation where you would think like, 1260 01:02:55,640 --> 01:02:58,000 Speaker 2: oh wow, that's something that we had a note about. 1261 01:02:58,040 --> 01:03:00,400 Speaker 3: But let's also remember many of. 1262 01:03:00,360 --> 01:03:02,640 Speaker 2: The videos that we have looked at happened well before 1263 01:03:02,720 --> 01:03:05,080 Speaker 2: this said drone doesn't even think it supposedly hasn't yet 1264 01:03:05,120 --> 01:03:07,440 Speaker 2: been deployed yet, so it's not like you can explain 1265 01:03:07,720 --> 01:03:11,680 Speaker 2: past incidents. You also have no evidence of Russian technology 1266 01:03:11,760 --> 01:03:14,040 Speaker 2: that comes even close to this. My personal view is 1267 01:03:14,320 --> 01:03:16,560 Speaker 2: well or in the fight. You know of their lives 1268 01:03:16,560 --> 01:03:19,560 Speaker 2: in Ukraine, So if they had some crazy tech, like, 1269 01:03:19,560 --> 01:03:20,680 Speaker 2: don't you think they would use it? 1270 01:03:20,960 --> 01:03:21,360 Speaker 3: They did. 1271 01:03:21,760 --> 01:03:24,520 Speaker 2: They used the hypersonic missile for no reason, you know, 1272 01:03:24,640 --> 01:03:26,320 Speaker 2: even though they didn't have an attack. 1273 01:03:26,480 --> 01:03:27,240 Speaker 3: A nuke on it. 1274 01:03:27,400 --> 01:03:29,640 Speaker 2: They have all kinds of stuff, you know, outside of 1275 01:03:29,680 --> 01:03:32,880 Speaker 2: nuclear technology. They've basically thrown everything they have at Ukraine. 1276 01:03:32,920 --> 01:03:35,240 Speaker 2: I just presume, like, if you're in a war which 1277 01:03:35,280 --> 01:03:37,960 Speaker 2: is depleting you supposedly, and you have tens of thousands 1278 01:03:37,960 --> 01:03:39,880 Speaker 2: of people to die, that you would reach for something 1279 01:03:40,080 --> 01:03:43,040 Speaker 2: that's not non nuclear and which is you know, a 1280 01:03:43,120 --> 01:03:46,200 Speaker 2: major step forward in terms of technology. You would think 1281 01:03:46,280 --> 01:03:48,480 Speaker 2: haven't seen anything like that. Those are really the only 1282 01:03:48,520 --> 01:03:52,320 Speaker 2: two countries even possibly capable of creating something like this. 1283 01:03:52,400 --> 01:03:54,959 Speaker 1: Well unless it's our own program that. Yeah, that's another 1284 01:03:55,000 --> 01:03:56,160 Speaker 1: policy on look. 1285 01:03:56,320 --> 01:03:58,600 Speaker 2: I mean that one is a counterfactual where there's just 1286 01:03:58,720 --> 01:03:59,560 Speaker 2: literally no way to do. 1287 01:03:59,680 --> 01:04:02,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, so that's what they I mean, it is annoying 1288 01:04:02,320 --> 01:04:04,240 Speaker 1: how they play. This is the same rhetorical game that 1289 01:04:04,280 --> 01:04:07,560 Speaker 1: they played, and like the media writeups of the analysis 1290 01:04:07,600 --> 01:04:09,880 Speaker 1: of these objects to be like, well, there's no evidence 1291 01:04:10,320 --> 01:04:12,800 Speaker 1: it's extracharge, but then there's also they can't point to 1292 01:04:12,840 --> 01:04:15,960 Speaker 1: any evidence of what it actually is. So you're really 1293 01:04:16,000 --> 01:04:18,720 Speaker 1: not ruling anything out here. It's very unhelpful. That's Wiley, 1294 01:04:18,760 --> 01:04:19,880 Speaker 1: it's just gaslighting effect. 1295 01:04:20,080 --> 01:04:24,200 Speaker 2: Next video is very important because this is one that 1296 01:04:24,320 --> 01:04:28,600 Speaker 2: was captured over the Middle East from twenty twenty two, 1297 01:04:29,040 --> 01:04:32,680 Speaker 2: where you can see clear drone footage of people who 1298 01:04:32,760 --> 01:04:37,760 Speaker 2: are on the ground and then a metallic spherical object 1299 01:04:38,040 --> 01:04:41,840 Speaker 2: that zooms through the frame and then is actually followed 1300 01:04:42,160 --> 01:04:45,920 Speaker 2: by the camera of which they have no idea what 1301 01:04:46,000 --> 01:04:48,720 Speaker 2: this thing is here, go ahead and watch it for yourself. 1302 01:04:50,240 --> 01:04:52,760 Speaker 11: You'll see it come through the top of the screen. 1303 01:04:52,960 --> 01:04:55,400 Speaker 11: There it goes, and then the camera will slew to 1304 01:04:55,520 --> 01:04:59,560 Speaker 11: follow it. You'll see it pop in and out of 1305 01:04:59,560 --> 01:05:00,880 Speaker 11: the screw field of view. 1306 01:05:00,880 --> 01:05:01,080 Speaker 6: There. 1307 01:05:02,400 --> 01:05:05,400 Speaker 11: This is essentially all of the data we have associated 1308 01:05:05,440 --> 01:05:10,040 Speaker 11: with this event from some years ago. It is going 1309 01:05:10,120 --> 01:05:15,080 Speaker 11: to be virtually impossible to fully identify that just based 1310 01:05:15,080 --> 01:05:15,960 Speaker 11: off of that video. 1311 01:05:17,640 --> 01:05:19,600 Speaker 2: They don't know what it is. They have no clue, 1312 01:05:19,640 --> 01:05:23,040 Speaker 2: they have no explanation. And look, you think it. You 1313 01:05:23,080 --> 01:05:26,600 Speaker 2: think we don't see consumer drones over Iraq all the 1314 01:05:26,680 --> 01:05:30,040 Speaker 2: time or the Middle East. I covered the Battle of Isis, 1315 01:05:30,160 --> 01:05:33,200 Speaker 2: I said, had all kinds of crazy Chinese made like 1316 01:05:33,800 --> 01:05:36,400 Speaker 2: DGI drones and stuff like that. That they were we 1317 01:05:36,840 --> 01:05:38,840 Speaker 2: know what a drone looks like. We know what a 1318 01:05:38,960 --> 01:05:41,240 Speaker 2: Chinese drone looks like. We know what Russian drone looks like. 1319 01:05:41,440 --> 01:05:44,400 Speaker 2: We know what consumer drones look like. We could they 1320 01:05:44,400 --> 01:05:47,040 Speaker 2: could easily rule it out and say we know exactly 1321 01:05:47,080 --> 01:05:47,640 Speaker 2: what that is. 1322 01:05:47,760 --> 01:05:49,600 Speaker 3: They have no idea what the hell is going on here. 1323 01:05:49,880 --> 01:05:52,880 Speaker 2: It fits with the Mozel orb photo that Jeremy Corbel 1324 01:05:53,120 --> 01:05:55,200 Speaker 2: has released. Apparently this is the second one that hadn't 1325 01:05:55,240 --> 01:05:57,600 Speaker 2: previously been seen. Now, look, is it proof? 1326 01:05:57,760 --> 01:05:58,200 Speaker 3: I don't know. 1327 01:05:58,320 --> 01:06:00,960 Speaker 2: I mean it's interesting, and I think the most important 1328 01:06:00,960 --> 01:06:03,920 Speaker 2: thing is we don't know what it is. I just 1329 01:06:03,920 --> 01:06:06,200 Speaker 2: wish that they would be more honest. I also thought 1330 01:06:06,200 --> 01:06:09,520 Speaker 2: that doctor Kirkpatrick or I forgot to tell everyone AAR 1331 01:06:09,840 --> 01:06:12,920 Speaker 2: is the All Domain Anomaly Resolution Office, you know, pentagons 1332 01:06:12,920 --> 01:06:17,280 Speaker 2: speak for UFOs. But the thing that annoyed me in 1333 01:06:17,320 --> 01:06:19,280 Speaker 2: his initial talk, he's like, this is not going to 1334 01:06:19,320 --> 01:06:21,760 Speaker 2: be solved by social media. This is not going to 1335 01:06:21,800 --> 01:06:23,880 Speaker 2: be He's like calling up basically people like us, people 1336 01:06:23,920 --> 01:06:27,440 Speaker 2: like other in the UFO community for building hype around it. 1337 01:06:27,440 --> 01:06:30,080 Speaker 2: It's like, here's the thing, man, we can't trust you 1338 01:06:30,520 --> 01:06:34,280 Speaker 2: to do any rigorous analysis, not after years of cover ups, 1339 01:06:34,320 --> 01:06:38,120 Speaker 2: not after years of lies. Really, all you can all 1340 01:06:38,160 --> 01:06:41,520 Speaker 2: we can trust, in my opinion, are the people outside 1341 01:06:41,600 --> 01:06:44,800 Speaker 2: looking at this independently. Also, it's not just the people 1342 01:06:44,840 --> 01:06:47,600 Speaker 2: who believe it's aliens, people like you know, even Mick 1343 01:06:47,640 --> 01:06:51,800 Speaker 2: West and other UFO debunkers. At least they are working 1344 01:06:52,000 --> 01:06:55,440 Speaker 2: in a frame where they're being honest, they're being opened. 1345 01:06:55,480 --> 01:06:58,120 Speaker 2: They're trying to put things out there and then taking 1346 01:06:58,200 --> 01:07:01,040 Speaker 2: videos and analyzing them in their own way. Even if 1347 01:07:01,080 --> 01:07:03,640 Speaker 2: I don't necessarily agree with what they're saying, it's at 1348 01:07:03,760 --> 01:07:06,440 Speaker 2: least out here in a public domain, in a public sphere. 1349 01:07:06,480 --> 01:07:09,080 Speaker 2: You know, honestly, if you're a quote unquote UFO skeptic, 1350 01:07:09,240 --> 01:07:12,160 Speaker 2: nobody's done you more service. Then people like him who 1351 01:07:12,240 --> 01:07:14,880 Speaker 2: are out there giving you, you know, things that you 1352 01:07:14,920 --> 01:07:17,560 Speaker 2: can say of why you don't believe in the phenomenon. 1353 01:07:17,600 --> 01:07:19,520 Speaker 2: It's not the government that's actually helping you out. 1354 01:07:19,760 --> 01:07:21,440 Speaker 1: Yeah, well okay, so if it's not going to be 1355 01:07:21,480 --> 01:07:24,480 Speaker 1: solved by the like social media UFO, yeah, community, who 1356 01:07:24,920 --> 01:07:27,600 Speaker 1: that's the answer? No one, right. They don't like people 1357 01:07:27,800 --> 01:07:30,320 Speaker 1: digging around and doing their own thinking about this, doing 1358 01:07:30,360 --> 01:07:33,160 Speaker 1: their own research about this. Obviously, they're very agressive about 1359 01:07:33,320 --> 01:07:36,280 Speaker 1: shutting down any attempts that they possibly can, So, yeah, 1360 01:07:36,280 --> 01:07:40,000 Speaker 1: they want to keep control of whatever this investigation ultimately 1361 01:07:40,000 --> 01:07:40,480 Speaker 1: amounts to. 1362 01:07:40,560 --> 01:07:42,480 Speaker 3: At the end of the day, we just need more info. 1363 01:07:42,680 --> 01:07:44,720 Speaker 2: And you know, part of the thing piss me off 1364 01:07:44,760 --> 01:07:47,000 Speaker 2: here is he dangles like this one little video of 1365 01:07:47,040 --> 01:07:49,840 Speaker 2: this twenty twenty two from the twenty twenty two report 1366 01:07:49,960 --> 01:07:53,320 Speaker 2: from the Middle East drones, like we already know based 1367 01:07:53,360 --> 01:07:58,000 Speaker 2: on former public officials, they are sitting on s troves 1368 01:07:58,080 --> 01:08:02,680 Speaker 2: of videos, a photos, of evidence of so many different 1369 01:08:03,160 --> 01:08:06,720 Speaker 2: fascinating and interesting things that they cannot explain even you know, 1370 01:08:06,800 --> 01:08:09,360 Speaker 2: in ones where they have claimed that they could solve 1371 01:08:09,400 --> 01:08:12,600 Speaker 2: it through whether related incidents. It's like, we can't just 1372 01:08:12,640 --> 01:08:14,480 Speaker 2: take your word for it. You have to prove that. 1373 01:08:14,520 --> 01:08:18,000 Speaker 2: You have to prove exactly how you determined that this 1374 01:08:18,200 --> 01:08:21,559 Speaker 2: was a mirror photo or a collade or you know, 1375 01:08:21,640 --> 01:08:24,519 Speaker 2: an optical illusion or something you can't like, we cannot 1376 01:08:24,560 --> 01:08:26,880 Speaker 2: just take these people's word for it. So I think 1377 01:08:26,920 --> 01:08:29,360 Speaker 2: in every case we need a lot more transparency. 1378 01:08:29,479 --> 01:08:31,640 Speaker 3: You know, even this, I love how they're like blurring. 1379 01:08:31,280 --> 01:08:33,519 Speaker 2: Things out in the frame. I'm like, nobody cares. I'm 1380 01:08:33,560 --> 01:08:35,840 Speaker 2: sorry about It's not going to do any damage, I 1381 01:08:35,880 --> 01:08:39,479 Speaker 2: think to national security. So more info, more hearings. Thank you, 1382 01:08:39,520 --> 01:08:41,839 Speaker 2: Senator Jill Brand. Yeah, thank you people in the community 1383 01:08:41,880 --> 01:08:44,200 Speaker 2: who flagged these videos and some of this testimony for me. 1384 01:08:44,240 --> 01:08:46,519 Speaker 2: I thought it'd be an interesting update for all of you. 1385 01:08:46,800 --> 01:08:48,360 Speaker 1: If this is what they're willing to share, you can 1386 01:08:48,400 --> 01:08:50,799 Speaker 1: only imagine what they are secret. 1387 01:08:50,840 --> 01:08:51,599 Speaker 3: That's what I'm saying. 1388 01:08:51,760 --> 01:08:53,640 Speaker 1: We had one more piece we wanted to add to 1389 01:08:53,720 --> 01:08:55,840 Speaker 1: the show last minute because our friends over the Lever 1390 01:08:55,920 --> 01:08:58,760 Speaker 1: broke a really big story that actually has now been 1391 01:08:58,760 --> 01:09:01,479 Speaker 1: picked up this morning the New York Times in regards 1392 01:09:01,520 --> 01:09:05,439 Speaker 1: to that Fox News settlement with dominion voting systems, which 1393 01:09:05,479 --> 01:09:07,360 Speaker 1: I should say we sort of predicted it was going 1394 01:09:07,400 --> 01:09:10,320 Speaker 1: to ultimately have it because there was no way Fox 1395 01:09:10,400 --> 01:09:12,759 Speaker 1: was going to allow like their entire prime time lineup 1396 01:09:12,960 --> 01:09:14,880 Speaker 1: to have to go and you know, sit under oath 1397 01:09:14,920 --> 01:09:17,080 Speaker 1: and testify about whatever the hell was going on during 1398 01:09:17,120 --> 01:09:20,479 Speaker 1: the Stop the Steal era. So this settlement seven hundred 1399 01:09:20,479 --> 01:09:23,160 Speaker 1: and eighty seven million dollars sounds like a lot, right, 1400 01:09:23,640 --> 01:09:28,599 Speaker 1: Well maybe not so much. Why because they are able 1401 01:09:28,680 --> 01:09:33,839 Speaker 1: to deduct take a tax deduction on a significant amount 1402 01:09:33,960 --> 01:09:36,560 Speaker 1: of this payout. And that's the piece that the lever uncovered. 1403 01:09:36,880 --> 01:09:38,800 Speaker 1: Kudos to them, Our great partners put this up on 1404 01:09:38,840 --> 01:09:42,080 Speaker 1: the screen. So they say Fox can claim tax right 1405 01:09:42,160 --> 01:09:45,679 Speaker 1: off for defamation settlement. The company says it can deduct 1406 01:09:45,760 --> 01:09:47,840 Speaker 1: the cost of its seven hundred and eighty seven million 1407 01:09:47,880 --> 01:09:51,200 Speaker 1: dollars payment to Dominion over its election lies. Let me 1408 01:09:51,280 --> 01:09:52,960 Speaker 1: read you a little bit of the details here that 1409 01:09:53,000 --> 01:09:56,519 Speaker 1: they uncovered Fox's massive settlement with private equity back voting 1410 01:09:56,560 --> 01:10:00,000 Speaker 1: machine company Dominion Voting Systems. Didn't just spare the conservative 1411 01:10:00,040 --> 01:10:03,120 Speaker 1: news organization from a lengthy public defamation trial or a 1412 01:10:03,160 --> 01:10:06,120 Speaker 1: full public reckoning for its election lise, it could also 1413 01:10:06,200 --> 01:10:09,080 Speaker 1: mean a tax break as large as two hundred and 1414 01:10:09,160 --> 01:10:13,240 Speaker 1: thirteen million dollars. On Tuesday, Fox News and their parent 1415 01:10:13,280 --> 01:10:17,000 Speaker 1: company agreed to that defamation settlement as the largest known 1416 01:10:17,080 --> 01:10:19,720 Speaker 1: defamation payment in US history. So again you're going like, 1417 01:10:19,720 --> 01:10:21,640 Speaker 1: oh my god, it's a lot. Is significant. It's going 1418 01:10:21,680 --> 01:10:24,839 Speaker 1: to deter them from doing the same thing all over again. However, 1419 01:10:25,000 --> 01:10:27,960 Speaker 1: thanks to an arcane line in the tax code, Fox 1420 01:10:28,000 --> 01:10:31,599 Speaker 1: can deduct that settlement payment from its income taxes. According 1421 01:10:31,640 --> 01:10:35,080 Speaker 1: to a company spokesperson and tax experts consulted by the Lever, 1422 01:10:35,600 --> 01:10:38,920 Speaker 1: that's because federal law allows taxpayers to write off many 1423 01:10:39,000 --> 01:10:43,200 Speaker 1: legal costs, providing that they are ordinary and necessary business expenses. 1424 01:10:43,479 --> 01:10:47,519 Speaker 1: The IRS has repeatedly affirmed that for major corporations, paying 1425 01:10:47,560 --> 01:10:51,080 Speaker 1: out settlements is just part of the cost of doing business, 1426 01:10:51,160 --> 01:10:53,000 Speaker 1: and that's how they all look at this stuff. I mean, 1427 01:10:53,040 --> 01:10:55,240 Speaker 1: whether it's this, whether it's big Pharma. Not to mention, 1428 01:10:55,680 --> 01:11:00,479 Speaker 1: Fox may also have insurance that covers significant part of this. 1429 01:11:00,960 --> 01:11:03,960 Speaker 1: So not only are they able to do a tax 1430 01:11:04,040 --> 01:11:07,080 Speaker 1: write off over this as like the US taxpayer sort 1431 01:11:07,080 --> 01:11:10,559 Speaker 1: of like footing the bill for their own impropriety during 1432 01:11:10,600 --> 01:11:13,759 Speaker 1: the election, but also they may have insurance that covers 1433 01:11:13,800 --> 01:11:15,799 Speaker 1: a lot of this. So what does this ultimately amount 1434 01:11:15,840 --> 01:11:17,400 Speaker 1: to them? Probably not that much. 1435 01:11:17,439 --> 01:11:19,599 Speaker 2: And while they wouldn't be able to write off the 1436 01:11:19,600 --> 01:11:22,000 Speaker 2: part that's from insurance. They would then be able to 1437 01:11:22,080 --> 01:11:25,840 Speaker 2: deduct any increase in your premium that you would have 1438 01:11:26,320 --> 01:11:29,720 Speaker 2: from Now, I want people to think about when you 1439 01:11:29,880 --> 01:11:32,240 Speaker 2: do something that's not even your fault. This actually happened 1440 01:11:32,280 --> 01:11:36,000 Speaker 2: to me. My fiance was in the jeep that I 1441 01:11:36,080 --> 01:11:39,360 Speaker 2: had and it was t boned. Now the person, the 1442 01:11:39,439 --> 01:11:42,680 Speaker 2: person was clearly at fault, but you know she disputed it. 1443 01:11:42,880 --> 01:11:46,040 Speaker 2: The insurance company, you know whatever, no contact. So my 1444 01:11:46,160 --> 01:11:48,880 Speaker 2: premiums went up, Like, and it's not even my fault. 1445 01:11:49,520 --> 01:11:52,599 Speaker 2: Do I get to do I get to pay like? 1446 01:11:52,760 --> 01:11:54,320 Speaker 2: Or do I get to write off the increase of 1447 01:11:54,320 --> 01:11:54,839 Speaker 2: their premium? 1448 01:11:54,960 --> 01:11:55,080 Speaker 12: No? 1449 01:11:55,320 --> 01:11:57,519 Speaker 2: And that's when you're not even at fault. And let's 1450 01:11:57,520 --> 01:11:59,599 Speaker 2: say also, let's say you know, you do something stupid 1451 01:11:59,840 --> 01:12:02,640 Speaker 2: and you know, you dig somebody, you're back into somebody, 1452 01:12:02,880 --> 01:12:06,200 Speaker 2: et cetera, and you then have an increase in your 1453 01:12:06,240 --> 01:12:08,160 Speaker 2: prem do you get to write off that? 1454 01:12:08,439 --> 01:12:08,559 Speaker 9: Like? 1455 01:12:08,640 --> 01:12:08,680 Speaker 12: No? 1456 01:12:09,040 --> 01:12:12,240 Speaker 2: Why do these corporations get multi billion dollar write offs 1457 01:12:12,240 --> 01:12:15,000 Speaker 2: and all this stuff when average people who may even 1458 01:12:15,040 --> 01:12:17,759 Speaker 2: have an insurance premium go up through zero fault of their. 1459 01:12:17,600 --> 01:12:19,240 Speaker 3: Own don't get to do anything. 1460 01:12:19,320 --> 01:12:20,800 Speaker 2: Yeah, that's completely ridiculous. 1461 01:12:20,880 --> 01:12:21,120 Speaker 7: Yeah. 1462 01:12:21,200 --> 01:12:21,559 Speaker 2: Yeah. 1463 01:12:21,600 --> 01:12:24,640 Speaker 1: Also the fact that the corporation putting aside this like 1464 01:12:24,720 --> 01:12:28,599 Speaker 1: Fox situation, but the corporation, the corporate entity always absorbs 1465 01:12:28,640 --> 01:12:31,719 Speaker 1: all the blows and there's like very little, almost never 1466 01:12:31,840 --> 01:12:34,839 Speaker 1: is there any personal accountability for executives, like for example, 1467 01:12:34,840 --> 01:12:36,960 Speaker 1: in the two thousand and eight financial crash, for the 1468 01:12:37,000 --> 01:12:39,960 Speaker 1: executives who were making the decisions behind the scenes, they 1469 01:12:40,040 --> 01:12:43,880 Speaker 1: just skate scot free. The corporate insurance handles it, they 1470 01:12:43,880 --> 01:12:46,479 Speaker 1: write off it's a big tax deduction, and then next 1471 01:12:46,520 --> 01:12:49,800 Speaker 1: time around, you know what, this this was successful for 1472 01:12:49,840 --> 01:12:53,120 Speaker 1: their business. Ultimately, they kept their audience. They sort of 1473 01:12:53,120 --> 01:12:55,960 Speaker 1: pushed off the Newsmax and one American news threat. You 1474 01:12:55,960 --> 01:12:58,760 Speaker 1: don't think they're going to do these same exact calculus 1475 01:12:58,800 --> 01:13:02,000 Speaker 1: all over again. Based on this math, it seems like 1476 01:13:02,040 --> 01:13:04,040 Speaker 1: it's working out for them. And the other indicator that 1477 01:13:04,320 --> 01:13:07,000 Speaker 1: the New York Times, which cites the Levers reporting, I 1478 01:13:07,000 --> 01:13:09,760 Speaker 1: mean again, kudo's the lever Because you got all these 1479 01:13:09,800 --> 01:13:12,920 Speaker 1: giant news outlets, none of them pursued this angle of 1480 01:13:12,960 --> 01:13:15,760 Speaker 1: the story, which is incredibly important for understanding how this 1481 01:13:15,840 --> 01:13:17,720 Speaker 1: all unfold and what it will mean for Fox News 1482 01:13:17,720 --> 01:13:20,519 Speaker 1: and other media organizations going forward. So they cite their 1483 01:13:20,520 --> 01:13:23,639 Speaker 1: reporting here, but they also note that, you know, Fox's 1484 01:13:23,640 --> 01:13:26,799 Speaker 1: stock is barely budge since the deal was announced on Tuesday, 1485 01:13:27,120 --> 01:13:30,080 Speaker 1: so their shareholders don't think this is a problem, this 1486 01:13:30,520 --> 01:13:34,760 Speaker 1: historic seven hundred and eighty seven million dollar defamation settlement. 1487 01:13:35,080 --> 01:13:38,400 Speaker 1: Their show shareholders are shrugging this off as no big 1488 01:13:38,439 --> 01:13:43,160 Speaker 1: deal again, just cost of doing business. So quite extraordinary, 1489 01:13:43,280 --> 01:13:46,880 Speaker 1: quite revealing of exactly who our society is set up 1490 01:13:46,880 --> 01:13:50,120 Speaker 1: to benefit, who basically can get away with anything, with 1491 01:13:50,280 --> 01:13:53,799 Speaker 1: any sort of behavior and pay literally no cost here. 1492 01:13:53,800 --> 01:13:56,599 Speaker 2: Right, well, said Crystal. Very well, sir, and funny. Kudos 1493 01:13:56,640 --> 01:14:00,559 Speaker 2: to the lever for exposing this. What a bs you know, SYSM. Yeah, 1494 01:14:00,640 --> 01:14:02,920 Speaker 2: sometimes I just look, it just makes me so angry, 1495 01:14:03,160 --> 01:14:05,439 Speaker 2: you know, to think about it. I'm like, like I 1496 01:14:05,560 --> 01:14:07,840 Speaker 2: get to write. Imagine if you could write off. 1497 01:14:07,680 --> 01:14:08,679 Speaker 3: Increase of your premiums. 1498 01:14:09,600 --> 01:14:11,360 Speaker 2: Think about that. Can imagine if you could do. 1499 01:14:11,320 --> 01:14:14,280 Speaker 1: This like Purdue Farm, all the farm that like, know 1500 01:14:14,360 --> 01:14:17,639 Speaker 1: that they're injuring people, know that people are getting addicted, whatever. 1501 01:14:18,000 --> 01:14:19,840 Speaker 1: And but again they just see it as like, well, 1502 01:14:19,880 --> 01:14:22,400 Speaker 1: we're gonna you know, we'll have the profits on this side, 1503 01:14:22,400 --> 01:14:24,280 Speaker 1: We'll be able to write write off any settlements. We 1504 01:14:24,360 --> 01:14:26,240 Speaker 1: have to come to with the families or with the 1505 01:14:26,240 --> 01:14:29,200 Speaker 1: governments or whoever. So cost of doing business, I guess 1506 01:14:29,240 --> 01:14:31,000 Speaker 1: it's worth it, or the banks. I could go on 1507 01:14:31,080 --> 01:14:36,160 Speaker 1: and on. Yeah, yes, man, all right, Sager are looking. 1508 01:14:35,960 --> 01:14:38,320 Speaker 2: At There's been a lot written about Elon Musk's interview 1509 01:14:38,320 --> 01:14:40,439 Speaker 2: with Tucker Carlson, almost none of it having to do 1510 01:14:40,520 --> 01:14:42,960 Speaker 2: with the interview and most about going on the show 1511 01:14:43,000 --> 01:14:46,200 Speaker 2: in the first place, but perhaps the most interesting part 1512 01:14:46,439 --> 01:14:50,400 Speaker 2: focused on AI and the original motivations for Elon's involvement 1513 01:14:50,439 --> 01:14:53,040 Speaker 2: with open AI in the past, and sparks by a 1514 01:14:53,080 --> 01:14:56,280 Speaker 2: shocking conversation with the co founder of Google, Larry Page 1515 01:14:56,280 --> 01:14:57,920 Speaker 2: that he revealed Let's take a listen. 1516 01:15:00,040 --> 01:15:04,679 Speaker 5: The reason open I exists at all is that Larry 1517 01:15:04,720 --> 01:15:05,880 Speaker 5: Paige and I used to beak close friends, and I 1518 01:15:06,040 --> 01:15:08,400 Speaker 5: to day his house in Palo Alto, and I talk 1519 01:15:08,439 --> 01:15:11,080 Speaker 5: to him late to the night about AI safety, and 1520 01:15:11,479 --> 01:15:13,920 Speaker 5: at least my perception was that Larry was not taking 1521 01:15:14,479 --> 01:15:17,200 Speaker 5: AI safety seriously enough and. 1522 01:15:17,320 --> 01:15:19,439 Speaker 6: What did he say about it? He really seemed to be. 1523 01:15:21,040 --> 01:15:24,639 Speaker 5: One sort of digital superintelligence's basically digital god, if. 1524 01:15:24,520 --> 01:15:27,519 Speaker 6: You will, as soon as possible, if he wanted that. 1525 01:15:28,120 --> 01:15:31,000 Speaker 5: Yes, he's made many cooler statements over the years that 1526 01:15:31,360 --> 01:15:34,120 Speaker 5: the whole build Google is what's called a GI artificial 1527 01:15:34,120 --> 01:15:37,040 Speaker 5: general intelligence or official superintelligence. But no, and I agree 1528 01:15:37,040 --> 01:15:39,760 Speaker 5: with him that there's great potential for God, but there's 1529 01:15:39,760 --> 01:15:42,800 Speaker 5: also potential for bad. And so if you've got some 1530 01:15:43,040 --> 01:15:45,080 Speaker 5: radical new technology, you want to try to take a 1531 01:15:45,080 --> 01:15:48,240 Speaker 5: set actions that maximize probably it will do good, minimize 1532 01:15:48,280 --> 01:15:49,280 Speaker 5: probably will do bad things. 1533 01:15:50,240 --> 01:15:53,000 Speaker 2: There's a lot going on there. So Larry Page wants 1534 01:15:53,000 --> 01:15:55,519 Speaker 2: to create a digital god without regard for its possible 1535 01:15:55,520 --> 01:15:56,479 Speaker 2: effect on humanity. 1536 01:15:56,720 --> 01:15:57,880 Speaker 3: This is terrifying. 1537 01:15:57,920 --> 01:16:00,000 Speaker 2: And now that we've seen multiple stories of large life 1538 01:16:00,080 --> 01:16:03,240 Speaker 2: which model programs like Chatchipt and bing Sydney do just 1539 01:16:03,320 --> 01:16:05,679 Speaker 2: weird and bonker stuff like try to make it journalists 1540 01:16:05,720 --> 01:16:08,080 Speaker 2: fall in love with them, or make up sexual assault 1541 01:16:08,120 --> 01:16:11,000 Speaker 2: allegations against someone. All of us can kind of agree 1542 01:16:11,120 --> 01:16:14,160 Speaker 2: we do need control over AI. The problem is that 1543 01:16:14,200 --> 01:16:17,200 Speaker 2: when we say control, not all of us are agreeing 1544 01:16:17,280 --> 01:16:20,400 Speaker 2: on the same thing. For example, here is Elon's view 1545 01:16:20,479 --> 01:16:23,040 Speaker 2: of what is wrong with AI, and specifically Chatchipt. 1546 01:16:23,600 --> 01:16:26,800 Speaker 12: The intention with OPII was observing good, but it's not 1547 01:16:26,880 --> 01:16:29,840 Speaker 12: clear whether it's actually doing good or whether it's I 1548 01:16:29,840 --> 01:16:33,519 Speaker 12: Can's helpless point except that I'm worried about the fact 1549 01:16:33,560 --> 01:16:36,400 Speaker 12: that it's it's been trained to be poletically corrected, which 1550 01:16:36,439 --> 01:16:39,080 Speaker 12: is something another way of being saying on truthful things. 1551 01:16:39,280 --> 01:16:41,080 Speaker 5: Yes, so that's not a bad sign. 1552 01:16:41,520 --> 01:16:42,479 Speaker 12: That's really a path too. 1553 01:16:42,600 --> 01:16:43,040 Speaker 6: I just ope. 1554 01:16:43,280 --> 01:16:45,360 Speaker 2: So there's more. In that interview where Elon talks about 1555 01:16:45,400 --> 01:16:48,040 Speaker 2: how Open Eye is now closed it's a multidillion dollar 1556 01:16:48,120 --> 01:16:51,439 Speaker 2: organization with Microsoft for profit. It lays out the case 1557 01:16:51,439 --> 01:16:53,920 Speaker 2: actually pretty well, and in fact, the objection is that 1558 01:16:53,960 --> 01:16:56,920 Speaker 2: AI is not programmed to be truthful enough, and as 1559 01:16:57,080 --> 01:17:00,280 Speaker 2: political correctness hardwired into it. Now, imagine a world where 1560 01:17:00,320 --> 01:17:02,120 Speaker 2: you do go to a future Google or a Bing 1561 01:17:02,320 --> 01:17:04,800 Speaker 2: for an answer to your question, and you get one 1562 01:17:04,800 --> 01:17:08,439 Speaker 2: that seems right but is actually completely distorted version of 1563 01:17:08,479 --> 01:17:11,000 Speaker 2: the truth vetted for you by the mainstream media and 1564 01:17:11,040 --> 01:17:13,559 Speaker 2: the politically correct. And we already live in a reality 1565 01:17:13,560 --> 01:17:16,360 Speaker 2: that somewhat resembles that, but the Internet at least empowers 1566 01:17:16,360 --> 01:17:20,480 Speaker 2: some of us to fight back. This would simply completely 1567 01:17:20,600 --> 01:17:24,679 Speaker 2: solidify total control for them. The problem that we really have, though, 1568 01:17:24,920 --> 01:17:27,400 Speaker 2: is that when the other side talks about AI safety 1569 01:17:27,439 --> 01:17:30,160 Speaker 2: and regulation, they don't actually care about any of this. 1570 01:17:30,640 --> 01:17:33,759 Speaker 2: In fact, their objection is that chatch ept and AI 1571 01:17:33,920 --> 01:17:36,840 Speaker 2: is not politically correct enough, and they actually want the 1572 01:17:36,880 --> 01:17:39,840 Speaker 2: government to set the terms exactly of how politically correct 1573 01:17:39,840 --> 01:17:42,840 Speaker 2: they should be. Take the new so called AI Bill 1574 01:17:42,840 --> 01:17:46,000 Speaker 2: of Rights. It's released by the Biden administration recently. The 1575 01:17:46,040 --> 01:17:48,639 Speaker 2: document lays out the Biden administration's vision of how AI 1576 01:17:48,720 --> 01:17:54,640 Speaker 2: should be governed, including quote, safe and effective systems, algorithmic discrimination, data, privacy, 1577 01:17:54,880 --> 01:17:59,559 Speaker 2: notice and explanation, human alternatives, consideration, and fallback on their face, 1578 01:17:59,760 --> 01:18:02,200 Speaker 2: all lost on fine like corporate speak. But the one 1579 01:18:02,200 --> 01:18:05,760 Speaker 2: that immediately raises my eyebrow is algorithmic discrimination. 1580 01:18:06,240 --> 01:18:08,160 Speaker 3: Let's read further like clockwork. 1581 01:18:08,320 --> 01:18:11,439 Speaker 2: The first sentence of the document includes the buzzword d 1582 01:18:11,560 --> 01:18:14,240 Speaker 2: jore equity. If you have not yet heard of equity, 1583 01:18:14,280 --> 01:18:16,519 Speaker 2: I encourage you all to go watch my previous monologue 1584 01:18:16,600 --> 01:18:20,160 Speaker 2: on Tuesday about how it effectively in many cases entails 1585 01:18:20,160 --> 01:18:24,240 Speaker 2: being so woke you're racist, forcing people towards desired social outcomes. 1586 01:18:24,400 --> 01:18:25,200 Speaker 3: But let's continue. 1587 01:18:25,240 --> 01:18:30,960 Speaker 2: Sentence number two reads, quote, Algorithmic discrimination occurs when automated 1588 01:18:30,960 --> 01:18:34,799 Speaker 2: systems contribute to unjustified different treatment or impacts disfavoring people 1589 01:18:35,000 --> 01:18:38,639 Speaker 2: based on their race, color, ethnicity, sex, including pregnancy, childbirth 1590 01:18:38,640 --> 01:18:43,000 Speaker 2: related medical conditions, gender identity, intersex status, sexual orientation, religion, age, 1591 01:18:43,080 --> 01:18:46,519 Speaker 2: national origin, disability, veteran status, genetic information, or any other 1592 01:18:46,600 --> 01:18:48,400 Speaker 2: possible classification. 1593 01:18:47,920 --> 01:18:48,760 Speaker 3: Protected by law. 1594 01:18:49,040 --> 01:18:49,759 Speaker 2: Quite a mouthful. 1595 01:18:49,960 --> 01:18:51,439 Speaker 3: I'm glad that they fit all of them in there. 1596 01:18:51,479 --> 01:18:51,679 Speaker 1: Now. 1597 01:18:51,960 --> 01:18:55,080 Speaker 2: Now, this is per the Biden administration, how AI should 1598 01:18:55,120 --> 01:18:59,519 Speaker 2: quote include proactive equity assessments as part of the system 1599 01:18:59,560 --> 01:19:03,439 Speaker 2: design and would constantly need to be independently evaluated by 1600 01:19:03,439 --> 01:19:07,680 Speaker 2: the government to ensure that companies are producing equitable AI outcomes. 1601 01:19:07,960 --> 01:19:11,720 Speaker 2: In other words, that's social engineering. That's more political correctness. 1602 01:19:11,840 --> 01:19:14,639 Speaker 2: That is some sort of weird nineteen eighty four language 1603 01:19:14,640 --> 01:19:17,880 Speaker 2: board full of nonprofits and governments who get to decide 1604 01:19:17,920 --> 01:19:20,360 Speaker 2: which group is now not allowed to be criticized and 1605 01:19:20,400 --> 01:19:23,840 Speaker 2: then program that into AI. This is what they mean 1606 01:19:23,880 --> 01:19:26,599 Speaker 2: when they say regulation. If you didn't want more evidence 1607 01:19:26,640 --> 01:19:28,599 Speaker 2: of what the left establishment actually wants for the new 1608 01:19:28,600 --> 01:19:31,240 Speaker 2: AI regime, look at this. This is a new declaration 1609 01:19:31,280 --> 01:19:34,400 Speaker 2: from Open Philanthropy. It's a technology nonprofit. It's funded by 1610 01:19:34,439 --> 01:19:38,120 Speaker 2: several left wing, left aligned multi billionaires in Silicon Valley. 1611 01:19:38,439 --> 01:19:41,880 Speaker 2: Some of their new propositions for AI regulation sound fine 1612 01:19:41,920 --> 01:19:45,880 Speaker 2: like software export controls, but some hint at total dystopia. 1613 01:19:46,000 --> 01:19:48,400 Speaker 2: One proposition, for example, is to have some sort of 1614 01:19:48,439 --> 01:19:52,200 Speaker 2: government implanted chip and inside AI systems. 1615 01:19:52,439 --> 01:19:53,720 Speaker 3: The chip would. 1616 01:19:53,479 --> 01:19:56,320 Speaker 2: Monitor the AI at all times and shut it off 1617 01:19:56,400 --> 01:19:59,160 Speaker 2: if they deem it to be going off rag. Now again, 1618 01:19:59,240 --> 01:20:02,080 Speaker 2: you can actually world where that could be justified. But 1619 01:20:02,120 --> 01:20:03,880 Speaker 2: you could also see one where would be one of 1620 01:20:03,880 --> 01:20:07,479 Speaker 2: the greatest tools for control ever devised. Number four, too, 1621 01:20:07,560 --> 01:20:10,120 Speaker 2: is about licensing. All companies that want to work on 1622 01:20:10,160 --> 01:20:12,880 Speaker 2: AI create some sort of registry. Here, again, we have 1623 01:20:12,920 --> 01:20:15,760 Speaker 2: an easily gamable system. Consider we already have two of 1624 01:20:15,760 --> 01:20:18,759 Speaker 2: the largest companies on planet Earth competing in this space, 1625 01:20:19,040 --> 01:20:21,439 Speaker 2: Microsoft and Google. You think they won't fight tooth and 1626 01:20:21,520 --> 01:20:23,599 Speaker 2: nail to make sure the only ones with a license. 1627 01:20:23,880 --> 01:20:26,479 Speaker 2: Note I am just trying to poke holes in every 1628 01:20:26,640 --> 01:20:29,840 Speaker 2: argument here. I don't have any idea what to think. 1629 01:20:30,200 --> 01:20:32,639 Speaker 2: On the one hand, I am terrified of a Matrix 1630 01:20:32,800 --> 01:20:37,599 Speaker 2: like scenario unchecked and unchecked power. On the other, terrified 1631 01:20:37,640 --> 01:20:41,160 Speaker 2: if some oligarchic arrangement where a few tech companies controlled 1632 01:20:41,160 --> 01:20:44,280 Speaker 2: by the government a nonprofit industrial complex have a monopoly 1633 01:20:44,360 --> 01:20:47,799 Speaker 2: on information and use it to push their social agenda 1634 01:20:48,040 --> 01:20:50,719 Speaker 2: on the American people and really the world. They're equally 1635 01:20:50,800 --> 01:20:52,960 Speaker 2: terrifying to me, and my view is one I've laid 1636 01:20:52,960 --> 01:20:55,960 Speaker 2: out here yesterday. But I see people, very few people 1637 01:20:55,960 --> 01:20:58,759 Speaker 2: pushing for AI should be pro human, should have enforcement 1638 01:20:58,800 --> 01:21:00,960 Speaker 2: mechanisms with them, and to assure they're always being working 1639 01:21:01,000 --> 01:21:03,840 Speaker 2: towards a tool, not towards supplant us. I think AI 1640 01:21:03,920 --> 01:21:05,439 Speaker 2: should be required to stay within the balance of the 1641 01:21:05,439 --> 01:21:07,280 Speaker 2: First Amendment here in the United States, and only the 1642 01:21:07,320 --> 01:21:09,479 Speaker 2: First Amendment should also be required not. 1643 01:21:09,479 --> 01:21:10,360 Speaker 3: To deviate from it. 1644 01:21:10,560 --> 01:21:14,479 Speaker 2: In other words, no equity manipulation, nonsense, the truth, and 1645 01:21:14,680 --> 01:21:19,320 Speaker 2: robust actual competition meaning rigorous antitrust enforcement to ensure that 1646 01:21:19,360 --> 01:21:22,160 Speaker 2: what happened to the Internet from nineteen ninety to twenty 1647 01:21:22,240 --> 01:21:25,439 Speaker 2: ten does ever happen again. Centralized control of the next 1648 01:21:25,479 --> 01:21:27,840 Speaker 2: generation of tech in the hands of very few in 1649 01:21:27,880 --> 01:21:31,040 Speaker 2: the ideologically captured personally, I really don't think that's going 1650 01:21:31,120 --> 01:21:33,479 Speaker 2: to happen. The most likely scenario is the one that 1651 01:21:33,560 --> 01:21:38,719 Speaker 2: really exists today social media and tech, total ideological regulatory capture, 1652 01:21:38,760 --> 01:21:42,080 Speaker 2: effective control over the most powerful sector of the economy. 1653 01:21:42,360 --> 01:21:45,280 Speaker 2: But at the very least, let's hope and try to 1654 01:21:45,320 --> 01:21:47,400 Speaker 2: make sure that doesn't go that way again, because if 1655 01:21:47,439 --> 01:21:49,320 Speaker 2: it does, we could really all be in for a 1656 01:21:49,360 --> 01:21:53,639 Speaker 2: bad time. It's really hard, Crystal right, because you can 1657 01:21:53,720 --> 01:21:56,120 Speaker 2: see there's downside to everything there. 1658 01:21:56,560 --> 01:21:59,480 Speaker 1: And if you want to hear my reaction to Sagres's monologue, 1659 01:21:59,479 --> 01:22:05,759 Speaker 1: become a pre Damium subscriber today at breakingpoints dot com. 1660 01:22:06,000 --> 01:22:06,960 Speaker 3: What are you taking a look at? 1661 01:22:07,200 --> 01:22:10,760 Speaker 1: Well, guys, smelling blood in the water. Former President Trump 1662 01:22:10,800 --> 01:22:13,200 Speaker 1: has opened up a new front in his war against 1663 01:22:13,360 --> 01:22:16,960 Speaker 1: Ron DeSantis, torching him relentlessly over the Florida governor's ongoing 1664 01:22:17,000 --> 01:22:20,719 Speaker 1: battle with Disney, and especially the humiliating spectacle of DeSantis 1665 01:22:20,720 --> 01:22:23,439 Speaker 1: getting outplayed by the mouse. Now, before I get into 1666 01:22:23,439 --> 01:22:26,040 Speaker 1: this whole thing, let me just promise by preface by 1667 01:22:26,040 --> 01:22:28,760 Speaker 1: saying there is no one to root for here. DeSantis 1668 01:22:28,920 --> 01:22:32,280 Speaker 1: is hitting an unaccountable giant corporation in Disney, but he's 1669 01:22:32,320 --> 01:22:34,360 Speaker 1: doing it in the dumbest possible way for the dumbest 1670 01:22:34,360 --> 01:22:37,880 Speaker 1: possible reasons. Disney has humiliated Dasantis, which is kind of 1671 01:22:37,880 --> 01:22:40,960 Speaker 1: satisfying to see, but their power does legitimately deserve to 1672 01:22:40,960 --> 01:22:44,160 Speaker 1: be checked and their hollow virtue signaling exposed. Trump is 1673 01:22:44,200 --> 01:22:47,160 Speaker 1: also torching DeSantis, which is also kind of satisfying, but 1674 01:22:47,160 --> 01:22:49,599 Speaker 1: in doing so is standing on the side of unchecked 1675 01:22:49,640 --> 01:22:52,000 Speaker 1: corporate power. So it is all a bit tangled here. 1676 01:22:52,320 --> 01:22:54,760 Speaker 1: I suppose that is what makes the story interesting to me, though, 1677 01:22:54,840 --> 01:22:57,840 Speaker 1: all right, quick refresher on how we got here. Desanta's 1678 01:22:57,840 --> 01:22:59,680 Speaker 1: passed the Don't Say Gay Bill, which was basically a 1679 01:22:59,680 --> 01:23:01,640 Speaker 1: way to set signal his anti grumor cred in the 1680 01:23:01,680 --> 01:23:04,840 Speaker 1: right wing culture war. Dujore. Disney, with a large gay 1681 01:23:04,880 --> 01:23:08,960 Speaker 1: fan base, has long billed itself as LGBTQ friendly. Under pressure, 1682 01:23:09,000 --> 01:23:11,479 Speaker 1: they belatedly put out some weak ass statement against the 1683 01:23:11,479 --> 01:23:15,200 Speaker 1: bill and cut off GP donations. Spotting an opportunity to 1684 01:23:15,240 --> 01:23:18,200 Speaker 1: bolster his anti woke cred, DeSantis and his alleys then 1685 01:23:18,240 --> 01:23:21,760 Speaker 1: went on the attack against Disney and their so called wokeness. 1686 01:23:21,800 --> 01:23:26,320 Speaker 1: In particular, DeSantis targeted the Reedy Creek Improvement District, which 1687 01:23:26,360 --> 01:23:29,799 Speaker 1: has since the sixties basically allowed Disney to govern itself, 1688 01:23:29,840 --> 01:23:33,559 Speaker 1: including taxing themselves, loving bonds, green lighting infrastructure, running fire 1689 01:23:33,560 --> 01:23:36,280 Speaker 1: and police stations. Even provided Disney with the rights to 1690 01:23:36,280 --> 01:23:38,760 Speaker 1: build a nuclear power plant should they ever desire to 1691 01:23:38,760 --> 01:23:43,439 Speaker 1: do so. Unaccountable taxpayer backed corporate power is indeed wrong 1692 01:23:43,600 --> 01:23:46,120 Speaker 1: and bad. But after patting himself on the back for 1693 01:23:46,160 --> 01:23:48,840 Speaker 1: his big alpha male energy, DeSantis took his eye off 1694 01:23:48,840 --> 01:23:51,600 Speaker 1: the ball, and the giant corporation did what giant corporations 1695 01:23:51,640 --> 01:23:54,800 Speaker 1: do in America. They took power, and a publicly noticed meeting, 1696 01:23:55,040 --> 01:23:58,360 Speaker 1: the still Disney backed Reedy Creek Board granted a massive 1697 01:23:58,360 --> 01:24:02,080 Speaker 1: development deal to Disney. This effectively handed all control of 1698 01:24:02,080 --> 01:24:05,200 Speaker 1: the region back to the big corporation mere weeks before 1699 01:24:05,240 --> 01:24:08,920 Speaker 1: DeSantis cronies were set to take control of that board. Now, 1700 01:24:09,000 --> 01:24:11,880 Speaker 1: Disney's maneuver immediately turned what had been a winning hand 1701 01:24:11,880 --> 01:24:15,560 Speaker 1: for DeSantis with the GOP base into a potentially disastrous catastrophe. 1702 01:24:15,680 --> 01:24:18,519 Speaker 1: He scrambled to respond with some fake blusters, suggesting perhaps 1703 01:24:18,520 --> 01:24:20,920 Speaker 1: the building state prison next to Disney take a listen 1704 01:24:20,960 --> 01:24:21,200 Speaker 1: to that. 1705 01:24:22,520 --> 01:24:24,759 Speaker 13: You're not going to have Disney have its own government 1706 01:24:24,800 --> 01:24:27,040 Speaker 13: in Central Florida. They're going to live under the same 1707 01:24:27,120 --> 01:24:28,280 Speaker 13: laws as everybody else. 1708 01:24:28,360 --> 01:24:29,679 Speaker 3: What should we do with this land? 1709 01:24:30,000 --> 01:24:32,759 Speaker 13: And so you know, it's like okay, I mean people 1710 01:24:32,760 --> 01:24:36,679 Speaker 13: have said, you know, maybe maybe have another maybe create 1711 01:24:36,720 --> 01:24:40,759 Speaker 13: a state park, maybe try to do more amusement parks. 1712 01:24:41,240 --> 01:24:44,200 Speaker 13: Someone even said like maybe you need another state prison. 1713 01:24:44,240 --> 01:24:44,759 Speaker 6: Who knows. 1714 01:24:44,840 --> 01:24:48,120 Speaker 13: I mean, I just think that the possibilities are our 1715 01:24:48,280 --> 01:24:48,639 Speaker 13: end list. 1716 01:24:51,360 --> 01:24:53,040 Speaker 1: I wasn't the only one who can smell the desperation 1717 01:24:53,160 --> 01:24:56,200 Speaker 1: here and every single DeSantis and me immediately pounced twenty 1718 01:24:56,240 --> 01:25:00,280 Speaker 1: twenty four hopeful Nikki Haley and potential presidential can ends, 1719 01:25:00,360 --> 01:25:02,920 Speaker 1: Chris Christy and chrisni Sanu Nu they all got in 1720 01:25:03,000 --> 01:25:06,719 Speaker 1: on the action. So Nunu accused DeSantis of just going 1721 01:25:06,720 --> 01:25:10,520 Speaker 1: after a headline saying the fight convolutes the entire Republican message. 1722 01:25:10,760 --> 01:25:13,800 Speaker 1: Hailey's super pac called it an embarrassing blow and mocked 1723 01:25:13,800 --> 01:25:16,799 Speaker 1: DeSantis's desperate attempt to regain the alpha position by suggesting 1724 01:25:16,840 --> 01:25:19,479 Speaker 1: he might build a prison next to Disney. Nikki Haley, 1725 01:25:19,520 --> 01:25:22,519 Speaker 1: I guess kicking sideways there. After all, here in part 1726 01:25:22,600 --> 01:25:24,160 Speaker 1: is what Chris Christy had to say. 1727 01:25:24,720 --> 01:25:27,960 Speaker 9: I'm all for the use, the appropriate use of governmental 1728 01:25:27,960 --> 01:25:31,400 Speaker 9: power to achieve latable goals. And when you're the governor 1729 01:25:31,439 --> 01:25:34,040 Speaker 9: of a state, and our governorship is constitutionally the most 1730 01:25:34,080 --> 01:25:36,720 Speaker 9: powerful governorship of the country, the New Jersey governorship has 1731 01:25:36,880 --> 01:25:40,040 Speaker 9: enormous authority, and I loved using the levers of that 1732 01:25:40,160 --> 01:25:44,160 Speaker 9: authority to be able to accomplish things. But can you 1733 01:25:44,160 --> 01:25:46,200 Speaker 9: put someone in that position or have a composition to president. 1734 01:25:46,920 --> 01:25:48,680 Speaker 9: If you're going to use those levers, you've got to 1735 01:25:48,720 --> 01:25:50,519 Speaker 9: look around the corners to see what the result of 1736 01:25:50,520 --> 01:25:52,720 Speaker 9: that will be for him to have taken the action 1737 01:25:52,840 --> 01:25:56,320 Speaker 9: he took against Disney and did not have foreseen that 1738 01:25:56,439 --> 01:25:58,120 Speaker 9: Disney was going to do what they did in response, 1739 01:25:58,120 --> 01:26:00,840 Speaker 9: which was to completely take over the millions and millions 1740 01:26:00,880 --> 01:26:02,840 Speaker 9: of acres, and his any decisions of that before they 1741 01:26:02,880 --> 01:26:04,880 Speaker 9: got the authority. Well, I'll tell you this much, that's 1742 01:26:04,880 --> 01:26:06,519 Speaker 9: not the guy I want sitting at cars for President 1743 01:26:06,600 --> 01:26:09,080 Speaker 9: g and negotiating our next agreement with China. We're sitting 1744 01:26:09,120 --> 01:26:11,599 Speaker 9: at cars for Putin and trying to resolve with having Ukraine. 1745 01:26:11,640 --> 01:26:13,400 Speaker 9: If you can't see around the corner that Bob Ig're 1746 01:26:13,400 --> 01:26:14,400 Speaker 9: creating for you. 1747 01:26:15,640 --> 01:26:18,400 Speaker 1: So for their park, Disney had already troll DeSantis showed 1748 01:26:18,400 --> 01:26:21,000 Speaker 1: they were not remotely deterred by announcing they will host 1749 01:26:21,080 --> 01:26:25,040 Speaker 1: the largest LGBTQ plus conference in the world at their 1750 01:26:25,040 --> 01:26:28,080 Speaker 1: Florida park just this summer. Now, to be honest, even 1751 01:26:28,120 --> 01:26:30,840 Speaker 1: though Disney busting DeSantis is embarrassing, the governor is clearly 1752 01:26:30,840 --> 01:26:32,680 Speaker 1: struggling to figure out how to improve his now very 1753 01:26:32,720 --> 01:26:34,960 Speaker 1: poor position. I still would have bet on the Disney 1754 01:26:34,960 --> 01:26:36,920 Speaker 1: fight being a net benefit for the governor. With the 1755 01:26:36,920 --> 01:26:39,160 Speaker 1: Republican base base that really couldn't care less about what 1756 01:26:39,240 --> 01:26:41,040 Speaker 1: Nikki Hiali or Chris Christy or christ the New New 1757 01:26:41,040 --> 01:26:43,800 Speaker 1: things about this or any other matter really, But now 1758 01:26:44,200 --> 01:26:46,280 Speaker 1: the big dog has weighed in the way that only 1759 01:26:46,320 --> 01:26:49,080 Speaker 1: he can. In a post on truth social Trump trash, 1760 01:26:49,160 --> 01:26:54,360 Speaker 1: DeSantis writing Dysanctus is being absolutely destroyed by Disney. His 1761 01:26:54,600 --> 01:26:57,640 Speaker 1: original pr plan fizzled, so now he's going back with 1762 01:26:57,720 --> 01:27:00,800 Speaker 1: a new one in order to save face. Disney's next 1763 01:27:00,840 --> 01:27:03,080 Speaker 1: move will be the announcement that no more money will 1764 01:27:03,120 --> 01:27:05,599 Speaker 1: be invested in Florida because of the governor. In fact, 1765 01:27:05,640 --> 01:27:07,880 Speaker 1: they could even announce a slow withdrawal or sale of 1766 01:27:07,880 --> 01:27:10,960 Speaker 1: certain properties or the whole thing watch that would be 1767 01:27:11,000 --> 01:27:13,960 Speaker 1: a killer. In the meantime, this is also unnecessary a 1768 01:27:14,040 --> 01:27:17,800 Speaker 1: political stunt. Ron should work on the squatter mess. Now. 1769 01:27:17,880 --> 01:27:20,280 Speaker 1: The political dynamics of this, to me are kind of fascinating. 1770 01:27:20,439 --> 01:27:23,439 Speaker 1: The more upscale chamber of commerce part of the Republican 1771 01:27:23,479 --> 01:27:27,160 Speaker 1: Party that is Governor DeSantis's more natural base, they don't 1772 01:27:27,200 --> 01:27:29,800 Speaker 1: like his move here because it's anti business. And the 1773 01:27:29,920 --> 01:27:32,880 Speaker 1: more downscale populist part of the Republican Party that probably 1774 01:27:32,880 --> 01:27:35,920 Speaker 1: initially liked the anti Disney fight is the most likely 1775 01:27:35,960 --> 01:27:38,760 Speaker 1: to be swayed by Trump trashing DeSantis over it and 1776 01:27:38,840 --> 01:27:41,240 Speaker 1: basically calling him a cock. And let's face it, the 1777 01:27:41,240 --> 01:27:44,120 Speaker 1: GOP base is basically held together by vibes and aesthetics 1778 01:27:44,120 --> 01:27:45,920 Speaker 1: at this point, so if you get branded a cuck 1779 01:27:45,960 --> 01:27:48,320 Speaker 1: and a loser, the details really won't matter all that much. 1780 01:27:48,760 --> 01:27:52,280 Speaker 1: At its core, the whole situation reveals how confused, listless, 1781 01:27:52,280 --> 01:27:55,000 Speaker 1: and chaotic the Republican Party is right now. The new 1782 01:27:55,080 --> 01:27:58,160 Speaker 1: goal of standing out up to quote unquote wont capital 1783 01:27:58,439 --> 01:28:02,160 Speaker 1: exists very uneasily along the other longtime goal of giving 1784 01:28:02,200 --> 01:28:05,519 Speaker 1: giant corporations literally everything they could possibly want at every turn, 1785 01:28:05,880 --> 01:28:09,200 Speaker 1: and so lacking any coherent organizing philosophy, the center of 1786 01:28:09,200 --> 01:28:12,200 Speaker 1: gravity and political sentiment generally moves whoever wins the latest 1787 01:28:12,200 --> 01:28:15,680 Speaker 1: alpha male dickswinging contest. Whatever happens with Disney, that is 1788 01:28:15,720 --> 01:28:18,200 Speaker 1: not a fight that DeSantis can win. I'm clearly not 1789 01:28:18,240 --> 01:28:19,720 Speaker 1: the only one who sees it that way. As we 1790 01:28:19,760 --> 01:28:22,360 Speaker 1: covered earlier, Trump just rolled down a whole newslate of 1791 01:28:22,439 --> 01:28:27,760 Speaker 1: endorsements from Florida Republicans. Florida Republicans six members now eight 1792 01:28:27,920 --> 01:28:31,679 Speaker 1: of Florida's congressional delegation are officially backing Trump, including several 1793 01:28:31,720 --> 01:28:34,160 Speaker 1: who are not hard Trump loyalists, and should have been 1794 01:28:34,200 --> 01:28:37,479 Speaker 1: imminently gettable for DeSantis. I suppose they can read the 1795 01:28:37,520 --> 01:28:39,960 Speaker 1: vibes in the polls as well as anyone else. As 1796 01:28:40,000 --> 01:28:44,240 Speaker 1: DeSantis once said, just look at the scoreboard. So, Sager, 1797 01:28:44,320 --> 01:28:48,440 Speaker 1: I just read this morning that apparently, you know, DeSantis 1798 01:28:48,479 --> 01:28:50,519 Speaker 1: is trying to make some legislative moves to roll back 1799 01:28:50,560 --> 01:28:50,960 Speaker 1: that deal. 1800 01:28:51,120 --> 01:28:53,960 Speaker 2: And if you want to hear my reaction to Crystal's monologue, 1801 01:28:53,960 --> 01:29:00,200 Speaker 2: become a premium subscriber today at Breakingpoints dot com. 1802 01:29:00,320 --> 01:29:02,519 Speaker 1: Very excited to introduce our next guest, who I actually 1803 01:29:02,600 --> 01:29:05,519 Speaker 1: grew up with but has become a big time sports 1804 01:29:05,600 --> 01:29:08,200 Speaker 1: radio host. He's always been a huge sports fan, and 1805 01:29:08,280 --> 01:29:11,640 Speaker 1: especially a huge Washington sports fan, Grant Paulson. He is 1806 01:29:11,720 --> 01:29:14,040 Speaker 1: host of the Grant and Danny Show on one of 1807 01:29:14,120 --> 01:29:15,960 Speaker 1: six to seven the Fan, and he joins us now 1808 01:29:16,000 --> 01:29:19,400 Speaker 1: to talk about whatever is happening with the latest commander's 1809 01:29:19,560 --> 01:29:22,040 Speaker 1: sale story. So great to see you, Grant. 1810 01:29:22,120 --> 01:29:24,519 Speaker 6: Welcome, Great to you, man, Great to you, good, good 1811 01:29:24,520 --> 01:29:26,360 Speaker 6: to meet you. Yes, absolutely happy to be here. How 1812 01:29:26,400 --> 01:29:26,920 Speaker 6: are you guys? 1813 01:29:27,360 --> 01:29:27,840 Speaker 2: Very good? 1814 01:29:28,240 --> 01:29:31,240 Speaker 1: So Dan Snyder has been like the worst NFL owner 1815 01:29:31,320 --> 01:29:33,360 Speaker 1: in history, and the team is now up for sale, 1816 01:29:33,400 --> 01:29:36,240 Speaker 1: which you know. I'm a long time suffering Washington sports 1817 01:29:36,280 --> 01:29:38,400 Speaker 1: fan as you are as well, and so I've been 1818 01:29:38,400 --> 01:29:40,760 Speaker 1: following a little bit loosely what is going on here? 1819 01:29:41,160 --> 01:29:43,280 Speaker 1: My understanding is it looked like they had a deal 1820 01:29:43,360 --> 01:29:46,080 Speaker 1: and things were kind of proceeding normally, and then there 1821 01:29:46,160 --> 01:29:48,519 Speaker 1: was this curveball thrown in at the last minute of 1822 01:29:48,640 --> 01:29:51,880 Speaker 1: an all cash offer, where I was like, but where 1823 01:29:51,960 --> 01:29:55,000 Speaker 1: is this money actually coming from? And there are now 1824 01:29:55,120 --> 01:29:57,439 Speaker 1: rumors put this up on the screen that this all 1825 01:29:57,640 --> 01:30:02,280 Speaker 1: cash offer maybe coming from Saudi Arabia. So give us 1826 01:30:02,320 --> 01:30:04,599 Speaker 1: the details of what exactly is going on here, Grant. 1827 01:30:05,080 --> 01:30:07,200 Speaker 7: Yeah, So, for a little while, as you said, it 1828 01:30:07,200 --> 01:30:09,760 Speaker 7: did seem like this was going to be a moderately 1829 01:30:09,840 --> 01:30:12,599 Speaker 7: normal sale, although there's not a whole lot normal about it. 1830 01:30:12,720 --> 01:30:17,040 Speaker 7: Very rarely do owners sell teams that they don't want 1831 01:30:17,080 --> 01:30:19,839 Speaker 7: to sell. But what has happened here is that Dan Snyder, 1832 01:30:20,320 --> 01:30:23,639 Speaker 7: either by way of force or some force, is being 1833 01:30:23,800 --> 01:30:26,400 Speaker 7: told he can no longer own the Commander's best we 1834 01:30:26,479 --> 01:30:28,800 Speaker 7: could tell by way of the National Football League and 1835 01:30:28,800 --> 01:30:32,000 Speaker 7: other owners. After he is being investigated by an all 1836 01:30:32,000 --> 01:30:34,920 Speaker 7: the way up to the house Oversight Committee Virginia, Maryland 1837 01:30:34,920 --> 01:30:37,559 Speaker 7: has investigated him. There was an ESPN report that the 1838 01:30:37,640 --> 01:30:40,800 Speaker 7: FBI was looking into possible bank fraud because he didn't 1839 01:30:40,800 --> 01:30:43,439 Speaker 7: have his minority owners sign off on a loan they 1840 01:30:43,439 --> 01:30:45,800 Speaker 7: were supposed to sign off on before he bought them 1841 01:30:45,800 --> 01:30:47,120 Speaker 7: out to buy the entire team. 1842 01:30:47,160 --> 01:30:48,240 Speaker 6: He owned sixty percent. 1843 01:30:48,520 --> 01:30:51,120 Speaker 7: Now he owns one hundred percent after buying those owners 1844 01:30:51,120 --> 01:30:53,720 Speaker 7: out for forty percent. So there have been so many investigations, 1845 01:30:54,040 --> 01:30:56,680 Speaker 7: so many headaches for the league recently that they want 1846 01:30:56,760 --> 01:30:59,000 Speaker 7: Dan Snyder, who as you said, has done a very 1847 01:30:59,040 --> 01:31:01,160 Speaker 7: poor job running the team on the field and off 1848 01:31:01,160 --> 01:31:03,720 Speaker 7: the field for twenty four years out. So he is 1849 01:31:03,840 --> 01:31:06,320 Speaker 7: in the process of selling and it looks like we 1850 01:31:06,360 --> 01:31:09,280 Speaker 7: are almost at the finish line with an actual bid 1851 01:31:09,320 --> 01:31:12,160 Speaker 7: and real money from Josh Harris, who owns the Philadelphia 1852 01:31:12,240 --> 01:31:14,960 Speaker 7: seventy six ers in the NBA, New Jersey Devil's in 1853 01:31:15,000 --> 01:31:18,160 Speaker 7: the NHL. There's a billionaire he's working with, Mitchell Rails 1854 01:31:18,160 --> 01:31:20,960 Speaker 7: out of DC. These two guys are combined with former 1855 01:31:21,000 --> 01:31:24,800 Speaker 7: basketball icon and legend Magic Johnson and thirteen other people 1856 01:31:24,800 --> 01:31:27,679 Speaker 7: to try to buy this team out of nowhere. Though 1857 01:31:28,280 --> 01:31:31,000 Speaker 7: there is a gentleman named Brian Davis, who is a 1858 01:31:31,000 --> 01:31:34,920 Speaker 7: former star basketball player in college at Duke, who had 1859 01:31:34,960 --> 01:31:38,960 Speaker 7: a cup of coffee in the NBA, who apparently has, 1860 01:31:39,000 --> 01:31:42,200 Speaker 7: as you said, engaged now in trying to buy this 1861 01:31:42,280 --> 01:31:45,439 Speaker 7: team with what he says is his money. He claims 1862 01:31:45,439 --> 01:31:48,559 Speaker 7: he can offer seven billion dollars in cash. He claims 1863 01:31:48,560 --> 01:31:52,320 Speaker 7: he can additionally offer another two billion dollars to do 1864 01:31:52,400 --> 01:31:54,599 Speaker 7: some different things that need to be done with the 1865 01:31:54,640 --> 01:31:57,679 Speaker 7: stadium and some other financing. And he says he currently 1866 01:31:57,680 --> 01:32:00,680 Speaker 7: has ten billion dollars in the bank account that that 1867 01:32:00,760 --> 01:32:04,479 Speaker 7: he recently got from what he calls not investors, but partners. 1868 01:32:04,760 --> 01:32:07,120 Speaker 7: And so, as you guys can imagine, when there's no 1869 01:32:07,400 --> 01:32:10,720 Speaker 7: recent record via Forbes or any kind of valuation of 1870 01:32:10,760 --> 01:32:14,080 Speaker 7: this person being worth this kind of money. Oprah Winfrey's 1871 01:32:14,120 --> 01:32:16,639 Speaker 7: worth two billion, Tiger Woods is worth a little over 1872 01:32:16,680 --> 01:32:19,800 Speaker 7: a billion, Donald Trump's worth two point five. You look 1873 01:32:19,840 --> 01:32:21,720 Speaker 7: at some of the people and what they're worth, and 1874 01:32:21,760 --> 01:32:23,960 Speaker 7: then this guy says he's got ten billion dollars who 1875 01:32:24,000 --> 01:32:24,720 Speaker 7: nobody's heard of? 1876 01:32:25,200 --> 01:32:26,120 Speaker 6: How is this a thing? 1877 01:32:26,479 --> 01:32:28,360 Speaker 7: And so when you start digging into that, there are 1878 01:32:28,400 --> 01:32:29,480 Speaker 7: major questions. 1879 01:32:29,800 --> 01:32:30,519 Speaker 3: Okay, got it? 1880 01:32:30,560 --> 01:32:33,320 Speaker 2: And so then in terms of the bidding process, forgive me. 1881 01:32:33,400 --> 01:32:34,799 Speaker 2: I'm not entirely familiar. 1882 01:32:35,240 --> 01:32:35,920 Speaker 3: Are they like? 1883 01:32:36,600 --> 01:32:40,400 Speaker 2: Is Snyder required to entertain all bids? Is this more 1884 01:32:40,400 --> 01:32:43,840 Speaker 2: of a media process? I had read previously like Bezos 1885 01:32:44,320 --> 01:32:48,120 Speaker 2: was interested but because Snyder didn't like Bezos. It's not 1886 01:32:48,160 --> 01:32:51,599 Speaker 2: like a shareholder corporation as I understand it, where they 1887 01:32:51,640 --> 01:32:53,960 Speaker 2: have to entertain all bids regardless of whether they like 1888 01:32:54,040 --> 01:32:54,400 Speaker 2: them or not. 1889 01:32:54,479 --> 01:32:57,519 Speaker 7: So you're correct, it's not that different, maybe than selling 1890 01:32:57,520 --> 01:33:01,040 Speaker 7: your house initially, where Dan Snyder can sell to he 1891 01:33:01,120 --> 01:33:04,120 Speaker 7: wants to. Here's the problem with that, though twenty four 1892 01:33:04,680 --> 01:33:07,040 Speaker 7: NFL owners, there are thirty one of them, because the 1893 01:33:07,080 --> 01:33:10,120 Speaker 7: Packers don't technically have one, twenty four of the thirty 1894 01:33:10,120 --> 01:33:12,320 Speaker 7: one are going to have to sign off on whoever 1895 01:33:12,680 --> 01:33:16,000 Speaker 7: this new owner is to welcome them into their club. So, 1896 01:33:16,000 --> 01:33:18,840 Speaker 7: as an example, when Dan Snyder bought the team over 1897 01:33:18,880 --> 01:33:21,840 Speaker 7: two decades ago, there was actually a person that had 1898 01:33:21,920 --> 01:33:24,880 Speaker 7: agreed to buy the team from the previous owner, John 1899 01:33:24,960 --> 01:33:28,160 Speaker 7: ken Cook, who didn't get approved by the National Football League. 1900 01:33:28,240 --> 01:33:31,320 Speaker 7: They said no to that person. Snyder swooped in and 1901 01:33:31,400 --> 01:33:34,400 Speaker 7: got universally accepted as an owner, which I'm sure they 1902 01:33:34,439 --> 01:33:35,120 Speaker 7: regret now. 1903 01:33:35,320 --> 01:33:37,680 Speaker 6: But yet he could sell to whoever he wants to. 1904 01:33:37,720 --> 01:33:40,360 Speaker 7: I guess theoretically as long as he thinks the money 1905 01:33:40,400 --> 01:33:42,680 Speaker 7: is legit, or maybe as he gets ready to pack 1906 01:33:42,760 --> 01:33:45,400 Speaker 7: up shop he's already it seems like living in or 1907 01:33:45,439 --> 01:33:47,639 Speaker 7: going to be living in London, maybe taking his money 1908 01:33:47,640 --> 01:33:50,000 Speaker 7: and leaving. He could say, you guys ran me out 1909 01:33:50,040 --> 01:33:51,960 Speaker 7: of here. The fans hate me. I don't care what 1910 01:33:52,040 --> 01:33:54,000 Speaker 7: kind of shambles I leave you in. I'll sell to 1911 01:33:54,000 --> 01:33:56,000 Speaker 7: whoever I want. The problem with that is that the 1912 01:33:56,040 --> 01:34:00,360 Speaker 7: League would never approve someone who just fell into billions 1913 01:34:00,360 --> 01:34:02,639 Speaker 7: of dollars. And we actually had this guy, Brian Davis 1914 01:34:02,680 --> 01:34:05,639 Speaker 7: on our radio station yesterday for a thirty plus minute 1915 01:34:05,640 --> 01:34:09,519 Speaker 7: interview that was somewhere between fascinating and riveting and comical. 1916 01:34:09,680 --> 01:34:13,240 Speaker 7: Where I mean, there are just so many unanswered questions 1917 01:34:13,479 --> 01:34:16,760 Speaker 7: where he has said he sold his intellectual property for 1918 01:34:16,960 --> 01:34:22,800 Speaker 7: fifty billion dollars, which again just common sense would say, 1919 01:34:23,479 --> 01:34:27,760 Speaker 7: if George Lucas is worth five billion dollars, how is 1920 01:34:27,800 --> 01:34:31,000 Speaker 7: this person that nobody knew a couple of weeks ago, 1921 01:34:31,320 --> 01:34:34,360 Speaker 7: somehow selling his intellectual property for fifty billion, which he 1922 01:34:34,400 --> 01:34:38,080 Speaker 7: explains away is he has a business that creates business 1923 01:34:38,360 --> 01:34:40,320 Speaker 7: and he was able to get someone to buy in 1924 01:34:40,360 --> 01:34:42,439 Speaker 7: on a very small scale at a big amount, which 1925 01:34:42,439 --> 01:34:44,760 Speaker 7: now makes them worth this much larger amount when you 1926 01:34:44,800 --> 01:34:47,559 Speaker 7: extrapolated out, it just doesn't make a lot of sense, 1927 01:34:47,880 --> 01:34:50,840 Speaker 7: but it has been a fascinating diversion to It looks 1928 01:34:50,960 --> 01:34:53,400 Speaker 7: like a sale to the Harris Rails group that could 1929 01:34:53,439 --> 01:34:54,400 Speaker 7: be happening imminently. 1930 01:34:54,920 --> 01:34:58,599 Speaker 1: Huh. So the Saudi rumors that they're the ones who 1931 01:34:58,600 --> 01:35:02,080 Speaker 1: are really behind this, which you know, makes some logical sense. 1932 01:35:02,080 --> 01:35:04,439 Speaker 1: Obviously they've invested in what I would characterize is basically 1933 01:35:04,439 --> 01:35:08,680 Speaker 1: it's like sportswashing with the big live golf play. Are 1934 01:35:08,680 --> 01:35:11,240 Speaker 1: those just rumors or is there anything to back that up? 1935 01:35:11,800 --> 01:35:13,320 Speaker 6: So so far they're just rumors. 1936 01:35:13,360 --> 01:35:16,040 Speaker 7: I mean, he point blank on the radio yesterday said 1937 01:35:16,040 --> 01:35:17,920 Speaker 7: that that wasn't the case, and what was kind. 1938 01:35:17,800 --> 01:35:19,000 Speaker 6: Of an awkward exchange. 1939 01:35:19,120 --> 01:35:22,559 Speaker 7: Right, Let's start with the fact that when he initially 1940 01:35:22,600 --> 01:35:25,120 Speaker 7: said he had this money, I think everyone believed. 1941 01:35:24,760 --> 01:35:26,800 Speaker 6: That he didn't. He has, what I. 1942 01:35:26,720 --> 01:35:29,280 Speaker 7: Have been told by folks in the media been able 1943 01:35:29,320 --> 01:35:32,719 Speaker 7: to at least partially try to prove that this money 1944 01:35:32,760 --> 01:35:35,680 Speaker 7: is in an account somewhere. Okay, so he claims not 1945 01:35:35,720 --> 01:35:38,519 Speaker 7: only that he has the money, but then the idea 1946 01:35:38,640 --> 01:35:40,360 Speaker 7: was well if you have money, it's not your money. 1947 01:35:40,360 --> 01:35:42,360 Speaker 7: Who are you trying to buy this team on behalf 1948 01:35:42,400 --> 01:35:44,200 Speaker 7: of He says, it is my money. 1949 01:35:44,600 --> 01:35:46,720 Speaker 6: This is his opinion. He says, this is my. 1950 01:35:46,760 --> 01:35:49,880 Speaker 7: Money they paid me for essentially my company. I can 1951 01:35:49,880 --> 01:35:52,920 Speaker 7: now do what I want with this cash. So the 1952 01:35:53,000 --> 01:35:56,040 Speaker 7: thought was, Okay, who is backing this and it's an anonymity, 1953 01:35:56,080 --> 01:35:58,000 Speaker 7: we don't know. I think that's where some of the 1954 01:35:58,080 --> 01:36:00,640 Speaker 7: rumors the thoughts came from. As you said, based on 1955 01:36:00,680 --> 01:36:02,800 Speaker 7: the landscape right now, based on what we're seeing with 1956 01:36:02,840 --> 01:36:06,519 Speaker 7: the live tour, people suggested maybe it is Saudi Arabian. 1957 01:36:06,920 --> 01:36:09,080 Speaker 6: He adamantly said it wasn't. 1958 01:36:09,120 --> 01:36:11,439 Speaker 7: And his comment on the radio, which was I thought 1959 01:36:11,520 --> 01:36:14,439 Speaker 7: very weird, was that the money came from white people, 1960 01:36:14,560 --> 01:36:17,920 Speaker 7: as he put it. He then said that he said 1961 01:36:17,920 --> 01:36:23,240 Speaker 7: it was a Jewish Italian and Sicilian was what he suggested. 1962 01:36:23,280 --> 01:36:26,640 Speaker 1: That was his words, but is a weird way to 1963 01:36:26,720 --> 01:36:28,360 Speaker 1: characterize it. 1964 01:36:28,360 --> 01:36:29,080 Speaker 6: It was very odd. 1965 01:36:29,120 --> 01:36:32,680 Speaker 7: I will say again, the interview was something. It was 1966 01:36:32,720 --> 01:36:35,320 Speaker 7: really good radio. I don't I don't know what else 1967 01:36:35,360 --> 01:36:38,080 Speaker 7: it was, but it left a lot of people with 1968 01:36:38,120 --> 01:36:40,439 Speaker 7: a lot of questions. But he says he doesn't want 1969 01:36:40,439 --> 01:36:44,320 Speaker 7: people saying it's it's from Saudi Arabian money. He said 1970 01:36:44,360 --> 01:36:47,240 Speaker 7: it's not the case. But he also claims, I mean, 1971 01:36:47,240 --> 01:36:50,200 Speaker 7: he claimed a lot of things. He said that, you 1972 01:36:50,200 --> 01:36:53,840 Speaker 7: know again, intellectual properties worth fifty billion. He's already been 1973 01:36:53,840 --> 01:36:56,160 Speaker 7: paid ten billion for it. Now here's the big question. 1974 01:36:56,160 --> 01:36:58,200 Speaker 7: I think there's there's two parts of this. Number One, 1975 01:36:58,200 --> 01:37:00,800 Speaker 7: does he actually have the money? He says it come clean? 1976 01:37:01,360 --> 01:37:04,479 Speaker 7: Number Two, would the league, ever, let's say he does 1977 01:37:04,520 --> 01:37:06,599 Speaker 7: have the money, let's say somethhow he got the money. 1978 01:37:06,800 --> 01:37:09,519 Speaker 7: Would the league sell the team to this person? And 1979 01:37:09,520 --> 01:37:11,880 Speaker 7: that's where, guys, all along my answer has been no. 1980 01:37:12,640 --> 01:37:14,960 Speaker 7: I will badly apologize to him very loudly in a 1981 01:37:15,000 --> 01:37:17,200 Speaker 7: megaphone when he buys the team. 1982 01:37:17,560 --> 01:37:19,360 Speaker 6: I'm not going to start writing that apology. 1983 01:37:19,680 --> 01:37:25,240 Speaker 1: Yeah wow, And Grant, finally, a bigger picture question take 1984 01:37:25,320 --> 01:37:27,559 Speaker 1: us through, like what has happened to this franchise. I mean, 1985 01:37:27,600 --> 01:37:29,639 Speaker 1: this one used to be one of the most valuable, 1986 01:37:29,680 --> 01:37:32,879 Speaker 1: if not the most valuable sports franchise in the entire world. 1987 01:37:33,360 --> 01:37:36,120 Speaker 1: As you said, the tenure under Snyder has just been 1988 01:37:36,320 --> 01:37:39,920 Speaker 1: one disaster effectively after another, both on the field and 1989 01:37:40,160 --> 01:37:41,880 Speaker 1: you know, in terms of personnel, in the way that 1990 01:37:41,920 --> 01:37:44,080 Speaker 1: the business side has been run like, what is the 1991 01:37:44,120 --> 01:37:46,320 Speaker 1: state of this enterprise at this point? 1992 01:37:46,600 --> 01:37:47,520 Speaker 6: It's incredible. 1993 01:37:47,680 --> 01:37:49,800 Speaker 7: I mean, Chris, I won't bore people too much with 1994 01:37:49,840 --> 01:37:52,200 Speaker 7: the football element of this, but I will say that 1995 01:37:52,280 --> 01:37:56,320 Speaker 7: you could literally teach a four hundred level course and frankly, 1996 01:37:56,400 --> 01:37:59,599 Speaker 7: somebody should on how not to run a business by 1997 01:37:59,720 --> 01:38:03,400 Speaker 7: just wining to what has become of this organization. When 1998 01:38:03,439 --> 01:38:07,120 Speaker 7: we were growing up in the DC area two plus 1999 01:38:07,160 --> 01:38:12,200 Speaker 7: decades ago, this team was one of the most successful 2000 01:38:12,320 --> 01:38:16,040 Speaker 7: pillars of a sport that owns a day of the week, right, 2001 01:38:16,080 --> 01:38:19,960 Speaker 7: I mean, the Washington Redskins brand as a three time 2002 01:38:20,040 --> 01:38:24,200 Speaker 7: Super Bowl champion was iconic in sports. It was right 2003 01:38:24,240 --> 01:38:26,800 Speaker 7: there with any of the big teams, the Yankees and 2004 01:38:26,840 --> 01:38:27,600 Speaker 7: the Dodgers. 2005 01:38:28,000 --> 01:38:29,439 Speaker 6: He takes over this team. 2006 01:38:29,800 --> 01:38:34,440 Speaker 7: They are among the elite in ticket sales and attendance, 2007 01:38:34,840 --> 01:38:37,719 Speaker 7: and they have a new stadium, and they are among 2008 01:38:37,760 --> 01:38:39,960 Speaker 7: the best. It's a top ten media market in the 2009 01:38:39,960 --> 01:38:43,280 Speaker 7: country in TV ratings. They have been dead last the 2010 01:38:43,360 --> 01:38:46,400 Speaker 7: last two seasons in attendance and specifically this last year 2011 01:38:46,800 --> 01:38:50,439 Speaker 7: dead last. Think about that their TV numbers have dropped 2012 01:38:50,439 --> 01:38:53,439 Speaker 7: off and cratered so much that there are times in 2013 01:38:53,520 --> 01:38:56,400 Speaker 7: their TV window in the DC area where they get 2014 01:38:56,400 --> 01:38:59,960 Speaker 7: outdrawn by the Ravens in Baltimore or a random AFC. 2015 01:39:00,439 --> 01:39:04,240 Speaker 7: I mean, these things would be utterly unfathomable. And it's 2016 01:39:04,320 --> 01:39:09,280 Speaker 7: most specifically, and I think directly because of people's hatred 2017 01:39:09,400 --> 01:39:12,000 Speaker 7: for this owner. They have decided, I will not put 2018 01:39:12,000 --> 01:39:14,600 Speaker 7: a penny in this person's pocket. I'm not going to 2019 01:39:14,600 --> 01:39:19,040 Speaker 7: buy tickets, I'm not going to buy gear. Subsequently, they 2020 01:39:19,040 --> 01:39:21,400 Speaker 7: have had to change their name, which is a massive 2021 01:39:21,439 --> 01:39:25,280 Speaker 7: story both in and outside of sports obviously, but there 2022 01:39:25,280 --> 01:39:27,240 Speaker 7: are plenty of fans who have left and will never 2023 01:39:27,280 --> 01:39:29,680 Speaker 7: come back because of that. That just happened within the 2024 01:39:29,720 --> 01:39:32,200 Speaker 7: last few years and also can be tied back to 2025 01:39:32,320 --> 01:39:35,599 Speaker 7: probably Dan Snyder, who, rather than having the name and 2026 01:39:35,720 --> 01:39:40,400 Speaker 7: just proceeding quietly this losing team, he was very vocal 2027 01:39:40,439 --> 01:39:42,519 Speaker 7: they would never change the name. In a USA Today 2028 01:39:42,560 --> 01:39:45,040 Speaker 7: story said right in all caps, will never change the 2029 01:39:45,120 --> 01:39:47,759 Speaker 7: name and basically egged on the idea that wouldn't happened. 2030 01:39:48,000 --> 01:39:50,599 Speaker 6: He lost that battle, but a couple. 2031 01:39:50,439 --> 01:39:53,120 Speaker 7: Of years ago, forty plus employees came forward to say 2032 01:39:53,479 --> 01:39:56,679 Speaker 7: they've been harassed. Some have an alleged assault directly against 2033 01:39:56,760 --> 01:40:00,920 Speaker 7: Dan Snyder sexually. This has been a person that for decades, 2034 01:40:01,479 --> 01:40:03,400 Speaker 7: the only team in the NFL that hasn't won eleven 2035 01:40:03,439 --> 01:40:06,080 Speaker 7: games while he's on the team. They have two playoff 2036 01:40:06,120 --> 01:40:08,720 Speaker 7: wins in his twenty four seasons. One of them was 2037 01:40:08,720 --> 01:40:11,360 Speaker 7: his first year taking over when someone else built the roster. 2038 01:40:11,840 --> 01:40:15,680 Speaker 7: Just one playoff win since. On the field, horrific, and 2039 01:40:15,720 --> 01:40:18,240 Speaker 7: it's been better on the field where they were arguably 2040 01:40:18,240 --> 01:40:20,320 Speaker 7: the worst team in the league under his watch. Ben 2041 01:40:20,400 --> 01:40:23,280 Speaker 7: Off the field, whereas I said, he's been investigated over 2042 01:40:23,320 --> 01:40:28,519 Speaker 7: the last few months by Congress Virginia Maryland DC, and 2043 01:40:29,600 --> 01:40:33,000 Speaker 7: apparently according to the ESPN, you know, the FBI has 2044 01:40:33,040 --> 01:40:36,640 Speaker 7: been looking into some of his practices financially, so you know, 2045 01:40:36,680 --> 01:40:40,200 Speaker 7: the allegations are bountiful, and fans just kind of got 2046 01:40:40,200 --> 01:40:43,560 Speaker 7: fed up of trying to explain themselves. 2047 01:40:43,160 --> 01:40:44,280 Speaker 6: To be in the bunt of a joke. 2048 01:40:44,640 --> 01:40:46,920 Speaker 1: Well, I mean, I can result I can say for 2049 01:40:47,000 --> 01:40:49,759 Speaker 1: myself personally, and I used to be a religious watcher 2050 01:40:49,800 --> 01:40:53,719 Speaker 1: of Redskins, grew up in the whole fandom, super committed. 2051 01:40:53,880 --> 01:40:56,120 Speaker 1: I mean, it just becomes exhausting. Really, this is not 2052 01:40:56,200 --> 01:40:59,080 Speaker 1: worth my time, It's not worth my emotional investment. Like, 2053 01:40:59,320 --> 01:41:01,519 Speaker 1: I'm done here, got other things that I need to 2054 01:41:01,560 --> 01:41:02,080 Speaker 1: do with my life. 2055 01:41:03,280 --> 01:41:06,479 Speaker 7: Sports are supposed to be fun, right, Like, people listen 2056 01:41:06,560 --> 01:41:10,280 Speaker 7: to my show occasionally because either something in the world 2057 01:41:10,400 --> 01:41:12,000 Speaker 7: or news or politics whatever. 2058 01:41:11,920 --> 01:41:13,360 Speaker 6: Sometimes can get to be too much. 2059 01:41:13,560 --> 01:41:14,880 Speaker 7: So you come to me for a little bit of 2060 01:41:14,920 --> 01:41:17,720 Speaker 7: a diversion and we'll talk about the Nats throwing a 2061 01:41:17,760 --> 01:41:21,120 Speaker 7: good game or the Redskins now Commanders winning a football game. 2062 01:41:21,280 --> 01:41:23,240 Speaker 7: It got to a point, to your point where it 2063 01:41:23,280 --> 01:41:26,360 Speaker 7: was exhausting, it was work like being a fan of 2064 01:41:26,400 --> 01:41:30,479 Speaker 7: the team literally stopped being fun. And when that happens 2065 01:41:30,560 --> 01:41:35,519 Speaker 7: as a sports entity, you are done and dance night. 2066 01:41:36,040 --> 01:41:40,439 Speaker 1: So true, so true. Grant Paulson, Pride of King George County, Virginia. 2067 01:41:40,479 --> 01:41:42,120 Speaker 1: Where can people find you and listen to your show? 2068 01:41:42,640 --> 01:41:45,120 Speaker 6: Yeah, I'm on social at Grant H. Paulson. 2069 01:41:45,160 --> 01:41:48,479 Speaker 7: If you like sports and movie and food takes those 2070 01:41:48,479 --> 01:41:51,400 Speaker 7: are my three category that I stink too. 2071 01:41:51,960 --> 01:41:54,519 Speaker 2: Congrats on your success. We really appreciate you joining us. 2072 01:41:54,520 --> 01:41:54,760 Speaker 3: Man thing. 2073 01:41:54,880 --> 01:41:55,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's so great to see you. 2074 01:41:56,240 --> 01:41:57,679 Speaker 6: Same to you, guys. Keep up the great work. 2075 01:41:57,880 --> 01:41:58,479 Speaker 1: Yeah you too. 2076 01:41:59,680 --> 01:42:01,880 Speaker 2: Thank you guys so much for watching. We really appreciate it. 2077 01:42:02,040 --> 01:42:03,559 Speaker 2: As we said at the top of the show, if 2078 01:42:03,560 --> 01:42:05,799 Speaker 2: you can help us out while we're building this new studio, 2079 01:42:05,920 --> 01:42:08,920 Speaker 2: biggest expense ever in the history of Breaking Points, more 2080 01:42:08,960 --> 01:42:11,880 Speaker 2: so than when we even launched the show itself, building 2081 01:42:11,920 --> 01:42:14,759 Speaker 2: up for twenty twenty four and more. We really appreciate 2082 01:42:14,760 --> 01:42:17,439 Speaker 2: the yearly in the lifetime members breakingpoints dot com. 2083 01:42:17,479 --> 01:42:18,920 Speaker 3: If you're able to help us. 2084 01:42:18,880 --> 01:42:21,559 Speaker 2: Out otherwise spread the words, send the show to your friends. 2085 01:42:21,840 --> 01:42:22,679 Speaker 3: All of that you got. 2086 01:42:22,720 --> 01:42:25,040 Speaker 2: We don't spend a dollar on marketing everybody who's our 2087 01:42:25,080 --> 01:42:27,479 Speaker 2: marketer or the people who's spread it by word of mouth, 2088 01:42:27,520 --> 01:42:29,600 Speaker 2: So thank you all very much. On you guys, we 2089 01:42:29,680 --> 01:42:31,320 Speaker 2: love you and we'll see you all later.