WEBVTT - The Black Box Problem

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production of I Heart Radios,

0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works. Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff.

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm your host, Jonathan Strickling. I'm an executive producer with

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>How Stuff Works and my Heart Radio and I love

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 1>all things tech. I always have to qualify that after

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I say it, because then I end up covering topics

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>like this one today where I don't love all things tech.

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's it's being a little a little disingenuous

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to make that claim. But recently, critical thinking has really

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>been on my mind a lot. I always want to

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>be a critical thinker, though like most humans, I do

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>have lapses. Sometimes I encounter a message that is so

0:00:49.120 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>appealing that my desire for it to be true can

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>override my skepticism, and I'll fail to ask myself or

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>anyone else for that matter, important questions to make sure

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>that what is being promised is in fact realistic and achievable.

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>My goal is to minimize the number of times I

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>go along with a pitch simply because it was a

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 1>really good pitch. But technology sometimes makes that really hard.

0:01:14.120 --> 0:01:16.559
<v Speaker 1>And I want to talk about this challenge because it's

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:21.880
<v Speaker 1>one that we all encounter. Technology is undeniably amazing. Just

0:01:21.920 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>think about how much humans have achieved in a very

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>short amount of time. For most of human history, our

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:33.959
<v Speaker 1>technological advancement was really slow. We completed some monumental achievements

0:01:33.959 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>in art and architecture, and sadly, in finding new ways

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 1>to kill each other, but apart from some early experiments

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and steam power, and a few interesting ideas from geniuses

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>like Leonardo da Vinci, we really didn't see incredibly rapid advances.

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Then we get to the nineteenth century, when a combination

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:56.800
<v Speaker 1>of factors led to the Industrial Revolution. That revolution increased

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>productivity and lead to conditions that made it possible for

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 1>more innovators to experiment and expand our knowledge, understanding, and

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>ability to exploit the world around us. Then we get

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to the twentieth century and the development of computers and

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the transistor, manaturization, mass produced plastic, and some other important

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>innovations that would allow for truly rapid technological evolution. Consider this,

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>When I was a kid, there was no public internet,

0:02:25.560 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>cell phones were pretty much restricted to R and D labs.

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Personal computers had just entered the market. Many of today's

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:36.440
<v Speaker 1>fastest growing companies couldn't have existed because the business they

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>are based off of didn't have a platform yet. For

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a while, it remained possible for the average person to

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>know enough about the technology they encountered to deal with

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it when things went wrong, at least for most of

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the technology. Some like television sets and stuff, we're already

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>well beyond the understanding of the average person. But this

0:02:56.680 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 1>actually got harder to do as technology advanced, and we've

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>seen it manifest in many ways. A good example of

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>this is in the automotive industry. Classic cars can be complicated,

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 1>but with some training and practice and owner can learn

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>how to do maintenance and repairs on a lot of

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>different parts of the car by themselves. There's a learning

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>curve there, but it's totally possible, and there are a

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who love to take old cars and

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>restore them as sort of a passion project. Today cars

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>tend to have components in them that are high tech

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>and sealed away in such a way as to make

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it difficult or impossible to access without proprietary tools and

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>a deep understanding of how they work. You might not

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>be able to tell what's wrong with a car without

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a special diagnosis scanning tool. And after learning what's wrong,

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you might not be able to do anything about it yourself.

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>As cars get more advanced with features like various sensors

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and systems for stuff like lane assist, adaptive cruise control,

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>parking assist, and more, they become harder to maintained by

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the owner. They're turning into what folks call a black box,

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in which you have a type of technology where the

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>inner workings are hidden away from the user. It doesn't

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 1>literally have to be hidden from sight, it can just

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>be so complicated that the average person finds it inaccessible.

0:04:20.400 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And this leads us to a real challenge. As we

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.600
<v Speaker 1>have learned more about the universe, we've specialized in our

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>focus we had to. We quickly reached a point in

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>which it's pretty much impossible to have a deep understanding

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of all subjects. Then of our understanding has grown, we've

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>pushed back the boundaries of ignorance. But now there's just

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>too much to know for any one person to know

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it all. And the stuff we've built has capitalized on

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>this focused understanding, but it also means that it's created

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a barrier for us. We might know that something works,

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>but we don't necessarily understand how it works because it's

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>based off a principle that's alien to us, and this

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 1>was bound to happen, but it creates a dangerous situation.

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>It's dangerous for a few different reasons. First, we as

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>consumers can grow complacent. We expect stuff to work, and

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:18.000
<v Speaker 1>when that stuff doesn't work, we're frustrated. Worse, because we

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>probably don't understand how that stuff works, we don't really

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:25.119
<v Speaker 1>know how to go about fixing it. On a positive note,

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that usually means there's opportunity for people with expertise to

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.359
<v Speaker 1>make a living as a troubleshooter or repair professional, but

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it means that as consumers we have less ability to

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>work with the stuff we actually consume. Second, our technology

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 1>is approaching the point where it could be really dangerous

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:46.480
<v Speaker 1>if we don't understand exactly how it's working. As machine

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>learning models and artificial intelligence become more sophisticated, it becomes

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>more important for us to understand how these systems are

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>coming to conclusions. It's pretty cool to say, hey, I

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>built this machine learning model and I train AI on

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 1>how to recognize a person's face. Maybe you built the

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>model to work with a camera manufacturer so that the

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>cameras they make automatically detective face and then focus on it.

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But that same technology could potentially be used in tracking

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and identification systems, and if that system was being used

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 1>by say, law enforcement, you want to understand exactly how

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the system is identifying people so that you can audit

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>it and make sure that it's being accurate and not

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>having a lot of false flags. Otherwise you run the

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>risk of having the machine mistakenly identify people during an investigation,

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>which at the very least could be disruptive. Or to

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 1>go back to cars for a second, consider driverless cars. Now.

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I am still optimistic about driverless cars, but I've tempered

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 1>my expectations on when we might see them. In my mind,

0:06:51.240 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking, well, a car decked out with sensors

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and a really fast computer system would be able to

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>detect potential problems and react to them far faster and

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>more logically than a human. I even thought a computer

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>system could be able to monitor completely around a vehicle,

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 1>whereas a human is typically focused on whatever is directly

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>in front of him or her, or perhaps in a mirror,

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but can't pay attention to all directions at the same time.

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>And sure machines can react in a fraction of the

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>time it takes humans to do it. But machines are

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>really good at handling routine situations and then responding appropriately.

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>The more unusual an event, the harder it is for

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the machine to cope with it. Machines typically aren't terribly adaptive,

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and so with many millions of cars on the road,

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>plus bicyclists, pedestrians, animals, debris, weather events, and other factors,

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty rare for any drive of a significant length

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to be completely quote unquote normal. So we need to

0:07:55.000 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>design autonomous cars that can adapt to situations. But that

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.360
<v Speaker 1>also means we need to understand what decisions a car

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>will make, or the very least, determine why a car

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:10.119
<v Speaker 1>behaved in one way versus an alternative. And so there's

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>a move in AI and artificial neural network circles to

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 1>make these processes as transparent as possible so that we're

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>not caught off guard when a machine takes a particular action.

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And third, advanced technology has given us unrealistic expectations of

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>exactly what was possible. After all, two hundred years ago,

0:08:30.920 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>we wouldn't really dream of going up into space. A

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:38.959
<v Speaker 1>century ago, we might dream of it, but we still

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>had no real understanding of how we would accomplish it.

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Then within another five decades we were sending people up

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to space, then to the moon, and now we have

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>private companies designing launch vehicles that can return to Earth

0:08:53.160 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>to be refurbished and used again in future launches. That's

0:08:56.240 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty incredible. We also have seen technology go from enormous

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>to the very tiny. In the nineteen forties, a computer

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>took up a lot of space, maybe the entire floor

0:09:07.320 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of a building, and it's processing power would be a

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>fraction of what you'd find in the average smartphone. These days,

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 1>managorization and Moore's Law have conditioned us to think that

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 1>technology is capable of pretty much anything. I mean, it

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>has to be. We wouldn't have assumed that it would

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>be easy to get your hands on a portable computer,

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>capable of acting like a camera, a communications device, and

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a direct link to the world's largest repository of human knowledge,

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>even if most of that knowledge seems to be centered

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>on cats. But that means when someone comes forward with

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.719
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary claims, it's easier for us to take them at

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>face value. Technology has created an environment in which what

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>was impossible yesterday becomes a mundane everyday task tomorrow, and

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>this means that people can leverage that to our disadvantage.

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>In some cases, you might be with an outright snake

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>oil salesman type, someone who knows very well that the

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>dream they're peddling isn't based in reality. But in other

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:12.320
<v Speaker 1>cases you might have sincere people who truly believe they've

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>either cracked the code on something that was previously thought

0:10:15.920 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>impossible or they feel they're right on the cusp and

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.760
<v Speaker 1>if they can just get enough funding to cover costs,

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:25.080
<v Speaker 1>they'll get the rest of the way there. Now. In

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a way, this could be a good thing, as it

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:30.760
<v Speaker 1>means that innovators have more access to resources than ever before,

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and it could lead to great discoveries. But in other

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>cases it can lead to frustration, financial hardship, and worse.

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>When we come back after this quick break, I'll give

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:52.400
<v Speaker 1>an example that's in everyone's minds right now. There's probably

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>no better company to point to when you're talking about

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the dangers of wishful thinking than Theopness. And I know

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.720
<v Speaker 1>it's been in the news a lot. You've probably heard

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.559
<v Speaker 1>tons about it, maybe you've seen the documentary about it,

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe you've seen the the various articles or listen to

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the podcasts about it. But we're going to talk about

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more in this context and just to

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>give you an overview in case you haven't encountered this.

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>A woman named Elizabeth Holmes founded the company after she

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>dropped out of Stanford. I do not know her. I

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 1>do not know whether or not she sincerely believed or

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>believes that the text she was seeking to invent could

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>really work. But I do know that as of right now,

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>it isn't working, and that's a big problem for those

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>of you who are unfamiliar with the story. Let's give

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a quick summary. Elizabeth Holmes wanted to create tech that

0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>could disrupt the health care industry. It would, in theory,

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.800
<v Speaker 1>give more control an agency to consumers who could learn

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>much more about their health on their own without the

0:11:58.200 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>need to make an appointment with a doctor and undergo

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>numerous blood draws to have various blood tests performed. The

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 1>basic idea was that Sara no Nos would develop a

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>device capable of taking a very small sample of blood,

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>small enough to be drawn from the tip of a finger.

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>They would then run a battery of tests to look

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>for indicators of different conditions and diseases within a relatively

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>short time. It would produce the results, giving the user

0:12:26.520 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>more information about their health, which in theory, would help

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.839
<v Speaker 1>that person have meaningful conversations with a physician if there

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>were any markers that raised concern. And it's a very powerful,

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>very compelling idea. There are technologies like labs on a

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>chip and microprocessors designed to detect the presence of certain

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>markers that indicate the presence of illness, but this would

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.600
<v Speaker 1>wrap all of that up into a single package. In fact,

0:12:52.840 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Homes worked on a project related to this. After her

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 1>first year at Stanford. She joined the Genome Institute in

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>single Or and was overseeing blood tests. She first envisioned

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>a sort of arm band that would use micro needles,

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and those micro needles would both draw small blood samples

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:16.599
<v Speaker 1>and would also administer medication on an as needed basis.

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>She later led a team to work on a machine

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>that would accept a small capsule containing a blood sample

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to run multiple tests on that sample. This

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>was in stark contrast with the normal medical procedure in

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>which a doctor or nurse would draw numerous vials of

0:13:33.200 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 1>blood for testing send those samples off to one of

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 1>two major lab testing companies in the United States. If

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Sarinos's technology worked, the company could totally up end that

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>system in the US. Patients could go to a clinic

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.439
<v Speaker 1>to have a test run and get the results back

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in hours, rather than having to take a trip to

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the doctor's office, sit for a blood draw, and wait

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>several days. They could end up being cheaper than the

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>old approach. Sarainos executives like Homes stressed that this would

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>put patients in control of their own health information and

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>could provide many benefits, such as a heads up for

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 1>possible problems in the future or catching something early enough

0:14:14.120 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to treat it before it became too severe. But the

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>problem is that this depended upon that if Thara Noss

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>technology worked. Thing. As it turned out, the tech wasn't working.

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>At least, it wasn't working at the level of the

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>company was striving for the engineers that thereas were trying

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>really hard to create a diagnostic device that could take

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that small blood sample and run it through a lot

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of tests. But as it turns out, that's actually incredibly complicated.

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Using such a small sample was already a huge challenge.

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:50.200
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, you have issues you have to

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>worry about, like contamination. A contaminated sample could give off

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>false positives, creating a situation in which a patient believes

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>they might have a particular disease or a condition when

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that isn't really the case, or it could mask something

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that the patient would need to know about, but because

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the results would be inconclusive, they wouldn't know about it. Now.

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps the hope was that the company would be able

0:15:15.040 --> 0:15:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to develop the technology rapidly with the help of large

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>investments in the company. And sure enough, there were a

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks with deep pockets who poured money into thoroughness,

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and you can sort of understand why. If it all worked,

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it would be a revolution in medicine. The company would

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>stand to gain billions of dollars, The cause appeared to

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>be noble, and the outcome looked like it would be

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>incredibly profitable. It was a very tempting opportunity, and many

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't resist that temptation. On top of all that, it

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:50.880
<v Speaker 1>was dependent upon technology, and as I mentioned, we've come

0:15:50.880 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>to a point where we believe technology can do just

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>about anything. So it didn't seem outside the realm of

0:15:56.120 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 1>possibility that a microchip inside a Suffici CICAD machine would

0:16:01.280 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to run a series of tests on the

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>small blood sample and come up with meaningful results. But

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>flash forward a few years and a bombshell of an

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>article revealing that there was really a shell game going

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>on at Sarais tells us that now we know the

0:16:17.520 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>technology was a failure, that THEOS was depending upon the

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>same sort of machines that the company was purporting to

0:16:24.120 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>replace with its innovative approach, that hundreds or thousands of

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>patients in trial locations were potentially at risk due to

0:16:32.920 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>unreliable results, and that the company used some pretty draconian

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 1>tactics to keep employees in line and prevent them speaking

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>out about what was going on. It's about as bad

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>an outcome as you could imagine. What's more, there are

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>those who say that even if everything had worked, the

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>whole enterprise was misguided in the first place. A Piece

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and Wired by Gnoam Cohen cites a couple of those people.

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 1>The piece has the title the other Big lesson we

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>should learn from thoroughness. Cohen mentions Faye Flam, who wrote

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a piece in Bloomberg that argued thoroness was tapping into

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 1>another deep human desire, the illusion of controlling our own

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>destiny through thous We could end up getting our own

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:19.960
<v Speaker 1>test results and then apply our own interpretations to them.

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps we would interpret them in a way that is

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>most comforting to us, or one that seems to align

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>with our preconceived ideas about our health. This isn't exactly

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the best way to handle a medical issue. Surely it

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:37.320
<v Speaker 1>makes more sense to have a trained medical professional provide

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:41.679
<v Speaker 1>an unbiased, objective interpretation of test results that gives you

0:17:41.720 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the best chance to take appropriate actions that will help

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>you lead a better, healthier life. So yeah, it was

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a really compelling sales pitch, no wonder so many people

0:17:52.240 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>were on board. If it worked, it would be cheaper,

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>less painful, more convenient, and at least on the surface,

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>more empowering than the established method. It was the sort

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of thing we'd want to believe in, so people did.

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I think autonomous cars are following a similar trajectory. Now,

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, I feel that a lot of great

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>work has been done in autonomous cars. They are much

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.680
<v Speaker 1>further along than a mythical blood testing device that only

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:23.440
<v Speaker 1>ever got approval for performing one type of blood test

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>when it was supposed to be able to run more

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>than one hundred of them, but we still have a

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>long way to go. Unfortunately, because of our experiences dealing

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>with truly amazing tech and the expectation that, of course,

0:18:36.040 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>technology can take care of the problem, we've had some

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 1>high profile accidents that prove this isn't the most reliable philosophy. Again,

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it would be understandable to put a lot of faith

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:51.680
<v Speaker 1>in the tech. Google's self driving cars, which have been

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>pioneers in the field, famously operated at first in secret

0:18:56.160 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and then openly for hundreds of driving miles without a

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.639
<v Speaker 1>single accident, or at least that was the official story.

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>There have been a few accidents, most of which were

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>likely the fault of a human driver, either the safety

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 1>operator in the autonomous vehicle or the driver of another car,

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>but later reports suggested that there were some serious accidents,

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>at least a few of which were caused by the

0:19:20.200 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>autonomous driving system behaving in an unexpected way. The company

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 1>kept these accidents quiet, and so there was an unearned

0:19:28.400 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>expectation of safety with this tech. Then enter Tesla and

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>the autopilot feature in the company's electric vehicles. While the

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>company issued a statement that made it clear that this

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 1>feature wasn't supposed to replace a human driver. That didn't

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>stop people from trying it out that way. Most of

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>those people didn't have any problems, but in at least

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 1>a couple of cases, drivers using autopilot ended up in

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:57.360
<v Speaker 1>tragic situations. One of those was the case of Joshua

0:19:57.440 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Brown in two thousand sixteen, his s Tesla crashed into

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:05.159
<v Speaker 1>a semi truck. Brown had been using the autopilot feature.

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 1>According to the vehicle's datalogues. Out of the thirty seven

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>minutes Brown had the autopilot feature turned on, his hands

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>were on the wheel for just twenty five seconds total,

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in direct violation of the policy that Tesla had set.

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 1>The company stressed the autopilot isn't meant to replace human

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>drivers and that the cars driver should have had their

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>hands on the wheel at all times. The second fatal

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 1>incident happened in March two thousand eighteen, when way Walter

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Huang's Model X veered into a highway safety barrier. Recently,

0:20:39.160 --> 0:20:42.439
<v Speaker 1>his family sued Tesla, alleging the company was aware of

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the dangers of the features, that Huang had been operating

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle within the parameters of autopilot, and that Tesla

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>had been using drivers like Wong to beta test changes

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 1>to the feature in the wild. That suit is just

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.520
<v Speaker 1>getting started as I record this episode, and I don't

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>mean to pick on Tesla, after all. I started this

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.879
<v Speaker 1>by talking about how Google kept several accidents on the

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.480
<v Speaker 1>q T. One of Uber's self driving cars in its

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>beta test program in Arizona, struck and killed a pedestrian

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in March two thousand eighteen. State prosecutors decided that Uber

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't liable for the accident, but that the safety operator

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 1>who was in the car might bear some responsibility for

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:23.760
<v Speaker 1>failing to act before the accident. According to venture Beat,

0:21:24.080 --> 0:21:27.159
<v Speaker 1>the operator was streaming a video of the voice and

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>watching that rather than the road. It's quite possible that

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>companies pushing autonomous car technology are doing their best to

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 1>keep incidents quiet in an effort to avoid government regulations

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and interference which could threaten the profitability of such a pursuit.

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.679
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, these high profile incidents have

0:21:45.840 --> 0:21:49.480
<v Speaker 1>dealt a blow to consumer confidence about the technology in general,

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and they really reinforce that driving is more complicated than

0:21:52.920 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>just staying within your lane and breaking if something is

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.679
<v Speaker 1>in the way. Before I wrap up this section, I

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>do want to also mention that, at least according to Tesla,

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the autopilot feature has proven to be safer than human

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>drivers operating vehicles unassistant. According to Tesla's report, there was

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 1>one accident per two point eight seven million miles driven

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:20.119
<v Speaker 1>where autopilot was engaged and one accident per one point

0:22:20.320 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>seven six million miles driven when it wasn't, and that

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 1>according to government statistics, the average is an automobile crash

0:22:28.359 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>every four hundred thirty six thousand miles. However, skeptical researchers

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.479
<v Speaker 1>have found that Tesla hasn't always been honest or at

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the very least correct about safety reports. A firm called

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Quality Control Systems sued the United States National Highway Traffic

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Safety Administration, or in ht s A, in order to

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>get the data the agency said had proved that Tesla's

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>autopilot had cut back on crashes by fort In fact,

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>QCs found at in cases in which all the data

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 1>was available, which was just a fraction of the cases

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the nh t s A had used to come up

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>with that mark, the auto steer feature on autopilot actually

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>increased crash rates by So what does all this mean.

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll get back to that in a second, but first

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. So am I saying you

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't believe anyone, Well, that's not quite it. I think

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a better thing to say is don't accept anything at

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:43.439
<v Speaker 1>face value. Sometimes people can just be wrong about stuff.

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>It happens to me more often than I care to admit.

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>But the responsible thing to do in those cases is

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to own up to the mistake and correct it where

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:55.119
<v Speaker 1>you can. I am certain that at least some people

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:58.359
<v Speaker 1>who thought they were onto some sort of free energy device,

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>for example, really did. They were onto something. Others might

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>have suspected that what they were pursuing was impossible, but

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:09.080
<v Speaker 1>they had already invested too much to back out at

0:24:09.119 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 1>any rate. Whether it's a perpetual motion machine or an

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>over unity engine, the simple fact is that these devices

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>have never been proven to actually work as described supporters say.

0:24:21.320 --> 0:24:25.200
<v Speaker 1>This is because there are powerful entities like petroleum companies

0:24:25.400 --> 0:24:28.160
<v Speaker 1>that will use every means to keep such devices from

0:24:28.200 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>being deployed. But at the level of classical physics, such

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a device would have to defy laws of physics that

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 1>have stood the test of time. Now does that mean

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:42.080
<v Speaker 1>that such a device is impossible. No, it's not impossible,

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 1>but it does mean you need truly extraordinary, irrefutable proof

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that it worked. In other cases, people are being outright

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>dishonest in an effort to advance their own agendas. They

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>might take efforts to hide any deficiencies in the technology,

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.600
<v Speaker 1>or to overly elevate stuff that's working to make it

0:25:02.640 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>seem more important than it is. They might just be

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.000
<v Speaker 1>stalling for time in the hopes that a breakthrough is

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 1>right around the corner and they can reap the benefits

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>once it all pans out. Now, we're going to see

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:19.360
<v Speaker 1>technology continue to advance and evolve. In most cases, we'll

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>see it do so gradually, perhaps so gradually that we

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:27.399
<v Speaker 1>don't really appreciate how incredible that technology can be. I

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>have owned smartphones for about ten years or so, and

0:25:30.640 --> 0:25:32.880
<v Speaker 1>now I take it for granted that I have access

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to them. But as a kid, it would have totally

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>floored me to know that such a thing would be

0:25:38.040 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 1>possible in my lifetime, let alone that I would actually

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:45.880
<v Speaker 1>own one. When confronted with claims about technology, it's good

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to ask questions questions like how is this possible? How

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>does it work. What is it doing differently from earlier

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:59.159
<v Speaker 1>versions of this tech. If it's a technology that relates

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to a specialized field, it might be necessary to consult

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:05.919
<v Speaker 1>experts in that field to get good answers. There's no

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:09.199
<v Speaker 1>shame in that back. If someone presented a technology to

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>me with claims that the whole thing worked on quantum principles,

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I need to consult with an expert. I have the

0:26:17.000 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>most basic understanding of high level quantum physics, and once

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>you get past that, it's all beyond me. I might

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>suspect something fishy, but I'd have no way of knowing

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>on my own anyway. If my suspicions were warranted, I

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 1>would need to consult with someone far more educated and

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>experience than I in the world of quantum physics to

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>get a better handle on it. Now, the more vague

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the claims, the more skepticism you should apply. If the

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:49.680
<v Speaker 1>claim includes disconnected scientific terminology, particularly if it is getting

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 1>into fields like quantum physics, that's a red flag. You

0:26:52.960 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>need to pay closer attention to those claims, or might

0:26:56.119 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>even include non scientific or meaningless language, which is another

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>big warning sign. Maybe you'll see a device that claims

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that if you wear it. The device will boost your

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote energy in some way, but what does that

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 1>actually mean? Terms must first be defined, and then you

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>can move on to the next question, which is, well,

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:16.879
<v Speaker 1>how the heck does it do this thing you claim

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it's doing. For gadgets or technologies that cite experts, it's

0:27:20.880 --> 0:27:23.880
<v Speaker 1>good to find out who those experts are. If there's

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>language like studies show that blah blah blah blah blah,

0:27:27.720 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 1>it's good to find out who did the actual study.

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Was it a reputable third party that could provide an objective,

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 1>unbiased point of view, or was it an in house

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:42.359
<v Speaker 1>team or biased party. There's lending credence to claims without

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:46.040
<v Speaker 1>actually finding out if those claims have merit. Moreover, we

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>have to remember that tech isn't magic, though science fiction

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>author Arthur C. Clark did once observe that any sufficiently

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>advanced technology would seem to be magic to us. Technology

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:04.959
<v Speaker 1>has limits. There are fundamental physical limits that tech can't breakthrough.

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And just because we see tech doing some stuff really

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>well doesn't mean it can do everything equally well. I

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>know I go on about critical thinking a lot in

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>this show, but the reason I do that is I

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.400
<v Speaker 1>want people to apply that skill set in their lives

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 1>to make better informed decisions. I want you, guys to

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>avoid pitfalls, whether they are purposefully placed in your path

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>or not. I want you to be able to spot

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a mistake or a scam. I want you to follow

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:37.199
<v Speaker 1>your suspicions when you feel something isn't on the up

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and up. And along with that, I do urge the

0:28:40.720 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>use of compassion. Please keep in mind that not everyone

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 1>hawking tech that promises too much is doing so out

0:28:48.720 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 1>of malice or agreed. Some could be genuinely misled by

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.920
<v Speaker 1>what the tech can do, and so it's a good

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:59.840
<v Speaker 1>idea to have critical thinking and compassion go hand in hand.

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Try to understand not just how realistic the claim is,

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>but the person making the claim. If they're intentionally trying

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to mislead people and take advantage of them, well they're

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of scummy and I feel they should be called

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:18.479
<v Speaker 1>out on that behavior. But maybe they're just believing in

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 1>something they want to believe in because of the promise

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it makes. That doesn't necessarily make them bad. They might

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:28.240
<v Speaker 1>mean they are gullible, or that they are in a

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>situation that they desperately want out of, and the promise

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>seems to suggest an escape route. So long story short,

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>don't believe all the hype. Ask questions, ask for clarification

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>when you get answers, to make sure that those answers

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>are actually substantive and they mean something. Be prepared to

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>dismiss a claim if the support for that claim is lacking.

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Also be prepared to accept a claim if the support

0:29:56.080 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>merits it. One of the biggest complaints about skeptics is

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that they are seen as people who dismiss claims out

0:30:02.920 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of hand, and for some people that is true, although

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:10.600
<v Speaker 1>we typically call them deniers rather than skeptics. But most

0:30:10.640 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>of us try to keep in mind that if extraordinary

0:30:13.600 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>proof for a claim exists, we should be willing to

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>adjust our world view to incorporate this new idea, even

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>if it previously seemed impossible. The proof just has to

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.560
<v Speaker 1>be there, And don't just assume everyone is out to

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>pull one over on you. Just be aware there are

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>those people out there too. In short, be good human beings,

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and keep in mind again technology as it advances, we're

0:30:42.680 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>going to keep running into this problem. Because we see

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it do amazing things in one arena, we might expect

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 1>it can do equally amazing things in another and that's

0:30:52.000 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>not always the case. Well, that's it for this soapbox

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:00.880
<v Speaker 1>edition of tech Stuff and my regular or call for

0:31:00.920 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>critical thinking. I think it's particularly important to consider it

0:31:05.440 --> 0:31:10.080
<v Speaker 1>now in the wake of things like Thorinus and Facebook

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and all of its controversies and related technological issues. And

0:31:15.480 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of course you can and should use critical thinking well

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>outside the world of technology. You should apply it pretty

0:31:22.720 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>much everywhere in your life so that you can be

0:31:25.560 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>reasonably sure you're getting the real deal and not being misled.

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.479
<v Speaker 1>If you guys have suggestions for a future episode of

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff, you can contact me. The email adjust for

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the show is tech Stuff at how stuff Works dot com,

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>or you can drop me on line on Facebook or Twitter.

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>The handle for both of those is tech Stuff hs W.

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>You can head on over to our website that's tech

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>stuff podcast dot com as an archive of all of

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>our previous episodes plus links to our background on the show,

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>as well as to our our online store, where every

0:31:57.720 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>purchase you make goes to help the show. We greatly

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a pre ate it, and I will talk to you

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:10.320
<v Speaker 1>again really soon. Yeah. Tech Stuff is a production of

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio's How Stuff Works For more podcasts from

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple podcasts,

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.