Speaker 1: You're listening to Comedy CENTRALOW coming to you from New
Speaker 1: York City. Please loose me city in America. It's the
Speaker 1: Daily Show, Florida, Ghost Trower, the Internet, it's another thing.
Speaker 1: George Stephanopolis. This He's the Daily Show with Trevor. Everybody,
Speaker 1: Welcome to the day shot coming on. Thank you so
Speaker 1: much for chuning In, Thank you for coming out in Houstons,
Speaker 1: thank you for Beniapania, thank you so much for Bania.
Speaker 1: We have got a cham Pat Chophi and tonight, take
Speaker 1: a seat. Let's get into it. Mother just became a billionaire.
Speaker 1: The game of chess is getting dirty, and there's been
Speaker 1: a massive outbreak of racism under the CE. So let's
Speaker 1: do this people. Let's come straight into today's headlines. All right,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be honest. With all the news that happened today,
Speaker 1: I don't think we have enough space in today's show. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. I tried everything. I even went to a
Speaker 1: Junkyard and asked them to use that machine that crushes
Speaker 1: the cars, and now I need a new car. But
Speaker 1: there's still too much news and not enough time. Fortunately,
Speaker 1: not enough time is just enough time for a segment.
Speaker 1: Week call ain't nobody got time for that. Let's kick
Speaker 1: things off with one of the most amazing and positive
Speaker 1: stories involving a billionaire. You know how most billionaires only
Speaker 1: seem to want to get more and more and more
Speaker 1: billions so that I guess they can afford the new iPhone. Well,
Speaker 1: it turns out not every super rich person thinks like that.
Speaker 1: In an extraordinary active charity, the founder of the outdoor
Speaker 1: gear and clothing brand Patagonia has given away his three
Speaker 1: billion dollar company ownership has now been transferred to especially
Speaker 1: created trust that is going to use any profits not
Speaker 1: reinvested in the business to fight climate change. That's expected
Speaker 1: to be roughly one hundred million dollars a year. Three
Speaker 1: year old Devon Snard, who started Patagonia roughly a half
Speaker 1: centur year ago, said quote, we are making Earth our
Speaker 1: only shareholder. Wow. The founder of Patagonia decided being a
Speaker 1: billionaire was too much balling for any one person, and
Speaker 1: so he's decided to give all the money away. What
Speaker 1: which where you think about? It? Is actually the most
Speaker 1: bullet move of all time. Huh yeah, because who's more
Speaker 1: of a baller the person who has a billion dollars
Speaker 1: or the person who literally used their billion dollars to
Speaker 1: make it rain. That's what he's doing because the Earth
Speaker 1: is going through a drought. You saw what happened in California, Like,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna make it rain. And who would have thought
Speaker 1: that a billionaire could give away his money to help
Speaker 1: the planet instead of trying to escape it in a
Speaker 1: Penis rocket. I didn't even though that was possible. I
Speaker 1: didn't know, but apparently you can. And if I'm the Earth,
Speaker 1: this is great news for me because I mean, yeah,
Speaker 1: pollution is killing me, but now I'm rich enough to
Speaker 1: stunt on other planets. Where's your private chet, Pluto? Are
Speaker 1: you even a planet anymore? Bamn bitch? I would say
Speaker 1: it's gonna be a little bit awkward for if A
Speaker 1: Charnaud's kids when they try and explain why they didn't
Speaker 1: inherit their dad's billions. You know, it's like, so did
Speaker 1: your father give you the money? It's like, no, he
Speaker 1: gave it to a polar bear. It's like, damn, you
Speaker 1: probably suck. Now. If we had more time, we could
Speaker 1: talk about how the founder of Patagonia is showing us
Speaker 1: that you can still be super rich and not be
Speaker 1: a billionaire and he's showing that hyper capitalism isn't the
Speaker 1: only way of business can run, and it can still
Speaker 1: be successful, and it can still make money, and it
Speaker 1: can contribute as much as it gets. But we don't
Speaker 1: have the time to talk about that, because well, the
Speaker 1: owner of Patagonia is trying to be the biggest advocate.
Speaker 1: Florida governor run the scientists is trying to be the
Speaker 1: Earth's biggest dick. Now to that dramatic and controversial twist
Speaker 1: in the battle over immigration. Overnight, the governor of Florida
Speaker 1: taking credit for sending at least two planes filled with
Speaker 1: migrants to the wealthy Massachusetts island of Martha's Vineyard. The
Speaker 1: planes carried fifty migrants from Venezuela, and the island community
Speaker 1: was given no heads up about it. All they did
Speaker 1: was see some planes and a bunch of people come off.
Speaker 1: The group arrived with children and some elderly family members,
Speaker 1: all of whom could not speak English. The community, though,
Speaker 1: banded together they helped them. They set them up in
Speaker 1: a nearby church overnight. Now, what's truly bizarre about the
Speaker 1: situation is all of these immigrants came from Texas, and
Speaker 1: it appears only the planes were provided by Florida specifically
Speaker 1: to bring them here. You know, there's assholes and then
Speaker 1: there's this guy not because you know, sometimes you know
Speaker 1: someone is so terrible, the would asshole doesn't quite capture
Speaker 1: the essence enough, you know, because everyone is an asshole,
Speaker 1: Like my neighbors an asshole. You know, drivers and trafficker assholes. Hell,
Speaker 1: I'm an asshole. But Run to Sanctists he's like, he's
Speaker 1: like the little edges, little ridges around the asshole. They
Speaker 1: really catch all the ship. And because I can't show
Speaker 1: you that on TV, here's a picture of a star
Speaker 1: wos mold, so you know exactly what I'm trying to say.
Speaker 1: It's these little Because here's the thing. Remember, Run to
Speaker 1: Sanctists is the governor of Florida. So why is he
Speaker 1: grabbing refugees in Texas and shipping them to Massachusetts? Huh?
Speaker 1: Why so he can prove that America's immigration system is broken. Yeah,
Speaker 1: everyone knows that. But instead of pushing lawmakers to actually
Speaker 1: reform the system, he's doing taxpayer money to what go
Speaker 1: viral because that's what he what he what he wants
Speaker 1: to do, right, And this is what gets to me.
Speaker 1: If you told the Sanctus to spend the same amount
Speaker 1: of money helping these asylum seekers, he'd be like, Oh,
Speaker 1: we don't have the funding for that, But to troll
Speaker 1: the Democrats, suddenly he's like, put it on my card. Yeah.
Speaker 1: And by the way, America actually has a history of
Speaker 1: doing this. In the nineteen sixties, racist organizations in the
Speaker 1: South shipped black people up to than states to make
Speaker 1: liberals uncomfortable. But Rondan Sanctus obviously doesn't know about that
Speaker 1: because the pages in his history books were torn out
Speaker 1: any state. So I get it now. If we had
Speaker 1: more time, we could delve into a long history of
Speaker 1: how American lawmakers are all too happy to put tons
Speaker 1: of resources into destabilizing Central and South American countries, but
Speaker 1: when the effects of that destabilizational felts in America, suddenly
Speaker 1: they don't have the money to make the consequences of
Speaker 1: their actions. But we don't have the time to get
Speaker 1: into that, because while American lawmakers arguing about what's happening
Speaker 1: at land borders, Americans on the internet are at war
Speaker 1: about what's happening under the sea. The new trailer for
Speaker 1: the live action remake of The Little Mermaid already has
Speaker 1: more than a hundred million views. While it's got a
Speaker 1: lot of fans, it is also being attacked by some
Speaker 1: Internet rolls. The actress Hallie Bailey stars as Ariel in
Speaker 1: Disney's new live action film, and she looks at nothing
Speaker 1: like the animated Little Mermaid with red hair from the
Speaker 1: original nine classic. The trailer has received more than one
Speaker 1: point five million dislikes on YouTube. Then there are the
Speaker 1: ugly racist tweets the Little Mermaid is white, not black.
Speaker 1: Rarely people were doing this again. Huh, she looks nothing
Speaker 1: like they're nothing like. They both have the tail, they
Speaker 1: both have the red she looks nothing like her. How
Speaker 1: do I even know that she's not Myrmaid? Once again,
Speaker 1: a bunch of Internet racists so upset that a fictional
Speaker 1: character is being played by a black person. And honestly,
Speaker 1: I don't know what the big deal is. You guys
Speaker 1: realized that Nemo was black too, right, Yeah, that whole
Speaker 1: movie was about a fish who can't find his dad. Yeah,
Speaker 1: calm down, calm down. I can say that because my
Speaker 1: dad left and he's white. So who's racist now? He's
Speaker 1: so ridiculous. First of all, of course, the Little Mermaid
Speaker 1: is black, alright, everyone whose name starts with little is black, Lotule, Wayne,
Speaker 1: Little NASAs Little Kim. Honestly, if you heard that there
Speaker 1: was a woman named Little Mermaid, you just assume that
Speaker 1: she's on the track with Cardy B. You know, but
Speaker 1: not wet ass Flippers. So look, so look, stop being ridiculous.
Speaker 1: It's imaginary, you know. I hope the scandal doesn't overshadow
Speaker 1: the rest of the movie. The Little Mermaid is a
Speaker 1: beautiful story about a young woman changing her core identity
Speaker 1: to please a man. Let's not forget about that. People. Well, look,
Speaker 1: if we had more time, we could talk about how
Speaker 1: Disney already created a black Mermaid thirty years ago and
Speaker 1: nobody can, or how there's still plenty of white princesses
Speaker 1: for little girls whose dream it is to be in
Speaker 1: a monarchy. And let's not forget you can still watch
Speaker 1: the original Little Mermaid. It's not like if you try
Speaker 1: to turn it on, Micky's gonna jump out of the
Speaker 1: screen and be like racist. But we don't have time
Speaker 1: for that, because racism isn't just on Twitter. It turns
Speaker 1: out it's also ruining the NBA. Deceiving the major headline
Speaker 1: out of the NBA. They have now suspended Phoenix Suns
Speaker 1: and Phoenix Mercury owner Robert Sarver for a year. They
Speaker 1: find him ten million dollars after a nearly year long
Speaker 1: investigation that detailed in appropriate behavior during his eighteen years
Speaker 1: with the team. The league says Sarver, whose teams are
Speaker 1: mostly black, repeated the N word five times, bullied employees,
Speaker 1: and sent pornographic material, including a video, to staffers. Server
Speaker 1: also allegedly made jokes frequently to employees in large in
Speaker 1: small settings about sex and sex related anatomy who. They say,
Speaker 1: this guy was using the N word, he was bullying people,
Speaker 1: and there was sexual harassment. That's a triple double and
Speaker 1: HR violations. I mean, how do you justify sending porn
Speaker 1: to your employees? What are you doing? What's what's the rationale?
Speaker 1: Just be like, do you see that gang bang video
Speaker 1: that I emailed you? Well, that's the kind of teamwork
Speaker 1: I want to see at the court tonight. People come on,
Speaker 1: get off there now. To be fair. To be fair,
Speaker 1: Saba wasn't calling black people the N word, all right.
Speaker 1: He was just allegedly repeating black people's use of the
Speaker 1: N word and then complaining about why he couldn't say it,
Speaker 1: but they could, but he was saying it. So he
Speaker 1: isn't necessarily racist, but he's definitely a moron. And here's
Speaker 1: what I don't get. Here's what I don't get. If
Speaker 1: you're someone who wants to walk around saying the N word,
Speaker 1: then pretty much the worst place in the world for
Speaker 1: you is the NBA, because like I love saying d
Speaker 1: N word and I hate the sound of squeaky shoes. Well,
Speaker 1: my man, you chose the wrong field. Now, if we
Speaker 1: had more time, we could talk about whether or not
Speaker 1: a one year suspension is enough of a punishment for
Speaker 1: what this owner has done, because if you can't learn
Speaker 1: in five minutes that you shouldn't be saying the N word,
Speaker 1: and I'm not sure that the year is going to help.
Speaker 1: But we don't have the time for that because while
Speaker 1: the NBA is dealing with one bad owner, there's a
Speaker 1: scandal in the chess world right now that is shaking
Speaker 1: the entire sport. A cheating scandal is rocking the world
Speaker 1: of chess like never before. After World chess champion Magnus
Speaker 1: Carlson recently lost a match to young up and comer
Speaker 1: Hans Nieman Carlson abruptly quit the tournament and then posted
Speaker 1: a cryptic tweet that many interpreted as an accusation that
Speaker 1: Nieman had cheated. Since then, speculation has run wild about
Speaker 1: how Niemen could have cheated, some people suggesting that some
Speaker 1: kind of wearable vibrating device could have been feeding him moves.
Speaker 1: A world chan bean has never withdrawn from a chess
Speaker 1: tournament before this in the history of the game of chess,
Speaker 1: so it's really unprecedented. Yeah, you damn right, this is unprecedented.
Speaker 1: A chess grand master might have been cheating. That is disgusting.
Speaker 1: The game of chess is sacred. It's an ancient game
Speaker 1: of skill and strategy with the little horses that you
Speaker 1: play with. I'll shape now. Even though lots of people
Speaker 1: are accusing Nemon of cheating, nobody can say exactly how
Speaker 1: he did it, although you may have heard them say vibrating. Yeah.
Speaker 1: The one theory which the Internet is running wild with
Speaker 1: is that he used vibrating anal beads to tell him
Speaker 1: what moves to make, which I know sounds nuts, but
Speaker 1: I get why someone would use vibrating anal beats to cheats,
Speaker 1: you know, because even if you lose, you still kind
Speaker 1: of win, you know, And let's be clear. Let us
Speaker 1: be clear, there is absolutely no place for sex toys
Speaker 1: in the game of chess, except for the pawns and
Speaker 1: the bishop if you nasty. Now, if only we had
Speaker 1: more time, we could have so much fun joking about
Speaker 1: which vibrations equal which moves, or we could even talk
Speaker 1: about the real scandaling chess, which is how all the
Speaker 1: pieces the same size? So is the giant horst the
Speaker 1: size of a castle or is a tiny costle the
Speaker 1: size of a horse? Either way, protecting okay, it's the
Speaker 1: least of your problems. But we just don't have the
Speaker 1: time for that, because I'm being told through my vibrating
Speaker 1: beads that we need to go to a commercial break.
Speaker 1: So don't go away, because when we come back, we're
Speaker 1: gonna find out what you know about the news, You
Speaker 1: know what I mean, Welcome back Tuesday's show. You know,
Speaker 1: here at the show we pay a lot of attention
Speaker 1: to what's going on in the news, but how much
Speaker 1: other people outside our studio following along? Well, we sent
Speaker 1: Michael Costa to find out for another edition of phil
Speaker 1: me in Welcome to Welcome to answer the question. Answer
Speaker 1: the question with Michael fill me in time to find
Speaker 1: out how much New Yorkers know about today's most trending quotes.
Speaker 1: Taylor Swift, her new album is called Midnight's is for
Speaker 1: people who lie awake at night quote hoping that just
Speaker 1: maybe when the clock strikes twelve, we will fall asleep,
Speaker 1: party turn into a pumpkin. Do you think Taylor Swift's
Speaker 1: new album Midnight's is a homage to Cinderella? Something like that? Hey,
Speaker 1: why does your dumb husband say things like this? What's
Speaker 1: another word for green that has most of the same
Speaker 1: letters in it? But isn't green? Meet yourself? Mayor? How
Speaker 1: is the right answer? Big reaction? All right, who's this
Speaker 1: my man? That's my man, Timothy Shallowman. That is Harry Styles.
Speaker 1: It's Harry Styles. All right. He just said this about
Speaker 1: his new film, my favorite thing about the movies, And
Speaker 1: it feels like that is good and it's wrong. What
Speaker 1: does the movie feel like? Entertainment? Entertainment? How is the
Speaker 1: movie supposed to feel It's supposed to be like a book? No,
Speaker 1: it's it supposed to feel like a TV show? No? No,
Speaker 1: is it supposed to feel like a Broadway musical? No, no,
Speaker 1: So a movie is supposed to feel like entertainment. No,
Speaker 1: shut up, you already said that the movie feels like Yes.
Speaker 1: Timothy shallow May said at the premiere of his newest movie,
Speaker 1: it's tough to be alive right now. Blank is in
Speaker 1: the air. Um, love is in the air. Do you
Speaker 1: smell love? Not really around here? It's something that happened
Speaker 1: in Rome. Let me see if that works. It's have
Speaker 1: to be alive right now. Ashes in the air. What
Speaker 1: happened around eventually in fellow? Whoa? Now we're getting somewhere.
Speaker 1: It's too late. Really, we should just be packing a
Speaker 1: go back. You know what I'm saying. Society, You got
Speaker 1: it right. Kim Kardashian, when asked what her talent is, says, quote,
Speaker 1: I can give you a million talents. I can cook. Well,
Speaker 1: use my blank for anything. It's not what you think.
Speaker 1: Well guess what brain is wrong. Let me give you
Speaker 1: a hint. It's one part of her body that we've
Speaker 1: seen the least of. You're gonna say, feet, what's on
Speaker 1: the feet, shoes, what's in the shoes? Socks? Sucks? What's
Speaker 1: in the socks? Feet? What is in the feet? Not
Speaker 1: all of today's quotes are from movie stars. Okay, AOC
Speaker 1: quote it. It's really important for people to feel like
Speaker 1: they're elected officials. Blank care. She didn't say care. She
Speaker 1: gave a little more New York sass. Oh that's too
Speaker 1: much sass. It's caring. But using her word for poop. Oh,
Speaker 1: now put it together. It's really important for people to
Speaker 1: feel like they're elected officials. Give this ship to great
Speaker 1: give the ship. Do you feel like you're elected official
Speaker 1: gives a ship about you? You know, it does give
Speaker 1: a shit about you. Harry Styles, Yeah, I think so
Speaker 1: much about Michael I say truth because when we come
Speaker 1: back stepping up and this will be joining me, welcome
Speaker 1: back to the day to show my guest to Mike's
Speaker 1: the host of Good Morning America, and this week he's
Speaker 1: here to talk about his new weekly political docuseries for
Speaker 1: WHOKNU called Power Trip, which premier is September. Please welcome
Speaker 1: George Stephanopolis Stepanoplus, Welcome to the great to be here,
Speaker 1: this is this is so amazing having you here because
Speaker 1: I mean like I feel like this is your world.
Speaker 1: You know, you're one of the most familiar faces. You
Speaker 1: one of the names that is most synonymous with all
Speaker 1: things news, and now you're taking us behind the scenes
Speaker 1: in this docuseries where NBC ABC is gonna be um
Speaker 1: embedding journalist seven young journalists. They're in their twenties. They're
Speaker 1: all ambitious, passionate, smart kids. They don't have a lot
Speaker 1: of experience, but they're gonna go out on the campaign
Speaker 1: trail basically his own defense, covering the country and cover
Speaker 1: all these campaigns. We're doing it for the first time
Speaker 1: for these midterm elections. Because I said it in that clip,
Speaker 1: I think our democracy is at stake in these mid terms.
Speaker 1: We've never seen anything like it before, and we want
Speaker 1: to make sure we get it in as real way
Speaker 1: as we can. It feels like these mid terms are
Speaker 1: going to be different, and you know, and people often
Speaker 1: say that I've seen, you know, American news try and
Speaker 1: drum up interest, but it feels like these are going
Speaker 1: to be at this time. This is the first time
Speaker 1: I think in a midterm election we saw a little
Speaker 1: bit of a lot of it where the very way
Speaker 1: we debate and decide elections is under assault. I mean,
Speaker 1: you've got of the country who still doesn't believe the
Speaker 1: last election is over, of the country who is determined
Speaker 1: who doesn't accept facts in a in a debate, And
Speaker 1: you know, our whole system is premised on the ideas
Speaker 1: both sides can argue out based on a common set
Speaker 1: of facts. Whoever wins wins and you go on to
Speaker 1: fight another day. This is different because that has not
Speaker 1: been settled after the last election. Let me ask you
Speaker 1: this as somebody who's been covering the news for so
Speaker 1: long and somebody who's been involved in campaigns. You've seen
Speaker 1: the types shift, You've seen the attitude change. Did you
Speaker 1: see this coming? Is it new? And if if you
Speaker 1: did see it coming, what was the moment. There's gonna
Speaker 1: be one moment where you you noticed that something had
Speaker 1: I can't say I ever saw this coming to this degree.
Speaker 1: I never believed. I mean I still well up when
Speaker 1: I think of the capital under assault on January six
Speaker 1: after an election. Our whole system is premised on the
Speaker 1: idea of a peaceful transfer of power. But the change
Speaker 1: that started to happen, and you make it sound like
Speaker 1: I'm very old, I guess I am. But when I
Speaker 1: first worked it could be at when I first worked
Speaker 1: in campaigns, we used to footnote our commercials because we
Speaker 1: were so concerned about being called out for not telling
Speaker 1: the true. Interesting, But what has changed over time is
Speaker 1: that as each side basically just tries to get out
Speaker 1: their own voters rather than trying to persuade others, they
Speaker 1: care less about whether they're called out by the media
Speaker 1: on telling that true. You know, it's interesting you say
Speaker 1: that because I've noticed on on the news shows you'll
Speaker 1: be talking to politicians, and back in the day, it
Speaker 1: felt like a politician was so afraid to to contradict themselves,
Speaker 1: to be a hypocrite, to have any moment where there
Speaker 1: was a discrepancy. And now it feels like just having
Speaker 1: the platform to come on your news show and say
Speaker 1: something is more important than whether whether or not you
Speaker 1: will you know what they love. Often you'll have someone
Speaker 1: come on and you can show and it can be footnoted.
Speaker 1: You can go to the dictionary, you can go to
Speaker 1: eight thousand reference books and say you're just not telling
Speaker 1: the truth, and they say, well, you're lying, and they
Speaker 1: don't care because to the group of voters they're trying
Speaker 1: to appeal to, calling us out whether they we're right
Speaker 1: or wrong, works for them. So do you do you
Speaker 1: ever get to a point whereas the news organization you
Speaker 1: say we can right now. I mean, I will not
Speaker 1: put anybody on my show who will not accept the
Speaker 1: results of the last election. Just they don't come on. Um,
Speaker 1: well you have you have me keep scumming up all
Speaker 1: the time. I had an interview with a senator a
Speaker 1: few weeks back, which I still can't believe. And remember
Speaker 1: how when Hillary Clinton had her emails that were classified,
Speaker 1: Trump said locker up, Republicans wanted investigation after investigation. This
Speaker 1: senator would not even say that Trump having all of
Speaker 1: those documents in his house was wrong. Four questions, four times,
Speaker 1: I would not say it was wrong. So you're in
Speaker 1: an interesting position. For a long time, America had an
Speaker 1: agreed idea of what was happening on the news for
Speaker 1: the most parts, supposed right. Cable news came and then
Speaker 1: it became, you know, really positive, and you could have
Speaker 1: it this way and you could have it that when
Speaker 1: your facts could almost be Alacotte. Now you still occupy
Speaker 1: a position to you know, yeah, but you still occupy
Speaker 1: this position when most people think of it as Okay,
Speaker 1: this is the middle, this is but the overtson window
Speaker 1: of middle is shifting. How do you not respond, do
Speaker 1: you try and do you have to cater to some
Speaker 1: of these positions, Here's what you don't do. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think there is a risk when you're talking to
Speaker 1: certain politicians if if you're willing to say what you're
Speaker 1: saying is not true, and sometimes you have to risk
Speaker 1: looking partisan by doing that. But I think we can't
Speaker 1: bow to that threat. I mean, as long as as
Speaker 1: I'm confident when I am that we're arguing about facts,
Speaker 1: undisputable facts, I have no problem saying you're not telling
Speaker 1: the truth, even if that's going to cause somebody to say, oh,
Speaker 1: you know, you're just being a political hack. You have
Speaker 1: to do that. That's what we have to stand up
Speaker 1: for as journalists, right and wrong, fact not fiction. You, um,
Speaker 1: you are now sending these journalists as m beds. You know,
Speaker 1: they on the ground, they're getting information on the ground
Speaker 1: from these people. What we see even in that clip,
Speaker 1: and I think the documentary it really gets into it
Speaker 1: is people say, well you have fake news. Do you
Speaker 1: think we're moving towards a world where the news is
Speaker 1: what you want to hear and then what you do
Speaker 1: essentially almost falls away. It's it's the great I think
Speaker 1: it's one of the greatest dangers of democrat see faces
Speaker 1: right now. I think there's no question about that. You
Speaker 1: see it right there. By definition, there's gonna be certain
Speaker 1: people who, no matter what the facts are, if I'm
Speaker 1: saying it, you're a liar, it's fake news. If they're
Speaker 1: if they're Kennedy is saying he's right, not wrong, and
Speaker 1: you're right, people just end up going to the places
Speaker 1: where they know the view that they already have is
Speaker 1: going to be reinforced whether or not it's true. Have
Speaker 1: you found any way to break through on the ground
Speaker 1: on your show in any of the trying to do it?
Speaker 1: With this new show, I think what we're gonna try
Speaker 1: to do is show the process of these young reporters
Speaker 1: trying to get the truth, show them doing it in
Speaker 1: the right way, showing them doing it we hope with integrity,
Speaker 1: showing the risks they take to do it, and if
Speaker 1: I think if people have if if if we have
Speaker 1: some transparency on the process, I hope that people will
Speaker 1: trust what they're hearing. Well. I wish you the best
Speaker 1: of luck. Thank you so much. The Jenny Una say
Speaker 1: really fascinating about the series, and make sure to check
Speaker 1: it out. Short stuffing off with everybody say check right
Speaker 1: back afterday, thank you must. Yeah, that's auld lay, Well,
Speaker 1: that's ours up with tonight? What's the Daily Show weeknights
Speaker 1: at eleven tenth Central on Comedy Central and stream full
Speaker 1: episodes anytime on Paramount Plus. This has been a Comedy
Speaker 1: Central podcast