WEBVTT - NFL Week 7 Best Bets (Ep. 119)

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody, welcome back to the Betting Pros Podcast. I

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>am your host, Dan Harris. Find me on Twitter at

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Dan Harris eighty. It is time talk about our best

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>bets four week seven, and here to do that with

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>me is Ian McMillan over at bet sided. Find him

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Ian mac betts. That's I A I

0:00:33.800 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>m Ian. Thanks for popping on the show again. How

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>are you.

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing well man, Thanks for having me.

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's great to have you now. I do want

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>to ask because I know the last time you were on,

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>which was for the Early look aheadlines, you had mentioned

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that you are betting every single NFL game this year.

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to know how that's going for you.

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.840
<v Speaker 2>So far, it's going way better than I ever could

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 2>have imagined. To be completely honest, I never would have

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 2>expected I got off to this heart of a star.

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:01.640
<v Speaker 2>But I'm sixty three and thirty one for up twenty

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 2>nine point nine to two units. So oh, my best

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:07.919
<v Speaker 2>start I've ever had in any betting, you know, betting,

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 2>any sport ever. So it's definitely not going to keep up.

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna hit it close to seventy percent all season,

0:01:13.000 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 2>but I'll enjoy wild lasts.

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, hopefully it doesn't end until after this week.

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 1>At least you can get out some good ad. Guys here,

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>are you just betting spreads, by the way, or are

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 1>you betting totals or anything else?

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Spreads? Totals and at least one money line underdog, well,

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 2>which I've actually done. I think I'm like eight and

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 2>one with my money line underdog picks, so that those

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 2>that helps quite a bit when you're hitting at that.

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Rate with those, yeah, no doubt. All right, well, hopefully

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a money line underdog for us today. But

0:01:39.160 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>let's get into it again. This is our three best

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>bets for the weekend Spreads, totals or money lines, is

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Ian said. And then we're just going to quickly run

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 1>through any of the games that we didn't touch on.

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Before we do, let's get into the latest offer from

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>bet MGM. This whole podcast is brought to you by

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>bet MGM, and new customers can bet ten dollars and

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>win two hundred dollars if the team they bet on

0:01:57.600 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 1>scores a touchdown this weekend. In the end, fl again

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars two hundred dollars in free bets from BEDMGM.

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>For new customers when you sign up here with our

0:02:05.960 --> 0:02:09.399
<v Speaker 1>code Juice one hundred again Daily Juice. That is our

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>daily podcast hosted by Matt Perrault. Juice one hundred is

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the code and that is available in New Jersey, Colorado, Indiana,

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>West Virginia, Tennessee, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Virginia, Iowa, Washington, d C, Arizona,

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and Wyoming. In addition, we are giving away as signed

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Taquon Barkley, Jersey. It is real easy to enter for

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that giveaway, to leave review, honest review, whatever you want

0:02:31.040 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to say here for this show over an Apple podcasts

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>or castbox, and then go to Betting Pros dot com

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>slash review. If you are subscribed to our YouTube channel

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.679
<v Speaker 1>over YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros. That's three times

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the entries and I also get a lot of good stuff,

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>including a props video, my weekly video that I just

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>dropped right before, which should probably come out shortly after

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you listen to this podcast. All right, before we get

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>into Ian's Unstoppable picks, I suppose let's very briefly recap

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:58.839
<v Speaker 1>last week. Our guest Benny Richardi went two and one.

0:02:58.880 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>He hit on the Bengals three and a half to

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 1>the Lions, and he hitting the Cowboys laying three and

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a half to the Patriots, even though I'm going to

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:06.480
<v Speaker 1>say that I still think that that was obviously the

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>wrong side and I was leaning the other way. He

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>did miss though, on the Chiefs and the Washington football

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>team over fifty four and a half. I also went

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to in one another positive day, hitting on the Bengals

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and Lions under forty seven and a half, the Vikings

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>laying one and a half to the Panthers. I did

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>miss on my favorite bet of the week, admittedly, which

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was the Browns laying three to the Cardinals. I will

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.040
<v Speaker 1>say that now puts me It is not quite an

0:03:27.080 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Ian McMillan level, but it puts me at twelve and

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>four so far on this podcast, five consecutive winning weeks.

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So we've got a lot of things going in our

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>favorite Ian. Let's hope that we can keep going. It

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>is a tougher slate obviously, with all the bull with

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>all the buys. Pardon me, but remember're going to be

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 1>using bettingpros dot Com lines. I'll note when there are

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>differences and everything like that. You can use the app.

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the betting pros app download Make your picks.

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Follow along in the leaderboard. Ian, I've talked enough, Go ahead,

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>what's your first pick of the week.

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 2>So my first pick of the week here? Does it

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 2>matter what we start with? Total reprea?

0:04:01.080 --> 0:04:03.559
<v Speaker 1>Does it? You get to start with whatever you want?

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm gonna give I'm gonna I'm gonna start out hot.

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 2>Then I'm gonna give out my most aggressive pick. I

0:04:09.920 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 2>would recommend most people probably take the spread here, take

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 2>the points. But I mentioned I've been doing well with

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 2>my money line underdog picks. I got a little bit

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 2>of a heat check this week. I'm tossing up a

0:04:20.800 --> 0:04:23.240
<v Speaker 2>tossing up a shot from mid court here from the logo.

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:28.039
<v Speaker 2>Love this pick. Bengals plus two to twenty five against

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 2>the Baltimore Ravens. I'm taking them on the money line.

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 2>You can get them what plus six plus six and

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 2>a half right now? If you want to be a

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 2>little bit more conservative, and I would not blame you,

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 2>but first of all, I think this is a big

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 2>sell high spot on the Ravens. I mean, you know this,

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 2>betting on sports, especially the NFL, is a little bit

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 2>like kind of the stock market. You want to buy

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 2>low on some teams, at some point you want to

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 2>sell high on some other teams. I think this is

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 2>a big sell high spot on the Ravens. After that

0:04:52.680 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 2>big comeback two weeks ago against the Colts on Monday

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Night Football, big win last week against the Chargers, who

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 2>everyone's been praising lately, but don't forget like a few

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.920
<v Speaker 2>weeks ago they needed a sixty six aired field goal

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 2>to beat the Detroit Lions. So this team's not unbeatable.

0:05:06.279 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 2>And the Bengals have actually impressed me so far the season,

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 2>especially their defense second in the NFL and opponent yards

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.159
<v Speaker 2>per play and seventh in opponent yards per carry, And

0:05:15.200 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 2>we know that's huge. If you want to beat the Ravens,

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 2>you have to be able to stop the run, and

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals run defense has been pretty solid this year.

0:05:22.320 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 2>Ravens defense hasn't been as good as people expected, especially

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 2>in their secondary twenty first and opponent yards per past tempt.

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 2>I expect Joe Burrow to have a big day. So

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 2>my heat check game, my money line upset pick Bengals

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 2>plus two twenty fives.

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>The Ravens, well, I think, like I'm not gonna take

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 1>it with you Okay, I'm gonna let you be as

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>hot as impossilic to kiss this up now. You obviously

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>like the six and a half, as you mentioned, which

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 1>is where it is, by the way, consensus right now,

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>six and a half. I'm a little worried just about

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:50.000
<v Speaker 1>how good the Ravens are at home. They're just this

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>absolutely dominant on the road, like obviously the odds wouldn't

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>be as good, of course, but I do think that

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals are a much much better team than I

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>still think even the public gives them credit for their defense.

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>Has really surprised me with how well they've played. Burrow again,

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I expected to struggle early on in the season because

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 1>I thought figured, you know, coming back from the injury,

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>both physically and mentally, he would be a little slow,

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>but he has been great. Jamar Chase has been elite

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>out there, and the Ravens do have holes. I think

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I might be a little gun shy just because of

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I was actually on the Chargers last week against them,

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and they just absolutely destroyed them. So you realistically you

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.280
<v Speaker 1>think the Bengals are gonna walk out of here winners.

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:33.720
<v Speaker 2>I like Bengals plus six and a half. Obviously a

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:35.920
<v Speaker 2>lot better if you just want to take a bet

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 2>that's gonna win. I think I Bengals and the points

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 2>is a great bet. But like I said, I've been

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 2>hitting my money line underdog picks this so far this year.

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 2>It's a heat check. It's a little bit like, yeah

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 2>what I am, But I mean divisional game as well.

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:50.919
<v Speaker 2>I think it's gonna be closed. I think the Bengals

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 2>can win this. Also two weeks when the Bengals lost

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.600
<v Speaker 2>to the Packers in overtime, I still walked away like

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 2>more impressed with the Bengals even though they lost than

0:06:57.960 --> 0:06:59.120
<v Speaker 2>what I was before that game.

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>So a hundred and they obviously could have easily won

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that game, of course, given all the field goal issues

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 1>and everything like that. But I do think that the

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>divisional game aspect of it does weigh certainly in your

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>favorite because every divisional game just scares the crap out

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of you because you just have no idea. The teams

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 1>know each other well. Obviously, we know exactly what Baltimore

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to do. It's really just about whether or

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 1>not they can start them. Okay, I'm going to take

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a pick that I really I don't like taking those

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.560
<v Speaker 1>type of pick okay, so feel free. I want to

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>know which side you're on. I'm taking a road favorite,

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.960
<v Speaker 1>which is don't love it. It's the Panthers lanth three

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Giants. For me, there are just a lot

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of things working against the Giants in this game. First Off,

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>they're just generally speaking terrible at home own three this year,

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>nine and twenty six at Medlife since twenty seventeen. Nobody

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>is showing up to these games. The fans when they do,

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty much just booing. So it's a road game

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>for Carolina because they're away from home, but it's not

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:58.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly like they're walking into any sort of hostile environment. Second,

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the Giants offensive line is really in terrible shape. They

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>actually played pretty well early on the season, better than

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I expected them to play, but you saw what happened

0:08:06.600 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams. A lot of that is Andrew Thomas,

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:10.559
<v Speaker 1>who also was one of the key cogs and playing

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>better than I expected him to play, but he is

0:08:12.960 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>now out for this game. And on ir and again,

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not just the quality of their alignment at

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>this point, it's the consistency in the fact that they're

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>constantly shuffling guys in and out because they're getting nicked

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>up and they're moving guys from one position to another.

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>It's really difficult to play with an offensive line, and

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that's huge for someone like Daniel Jones, who's just much

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>worse when he is pressured. Fifty four percent completion percentage

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:36.640
<v Speaker 1>when he's under pressure. And the Panthers, even on a

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>bad day, get pressure like their fourth and pressure. Right

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>they're one of the better teams there. So against this

0:08:40.520 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>offensive line with all, by the way, the injuries the

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>playmakers offensively, like I don't expect seko On Barkley, I

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>don't expect Darius Tony, and I don't expect Kenni Galladay

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.679
<v Speaker 1>to play at this point. So they're really down a

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of AMMO here on offense. So I think they're

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 1>going to struggle to score. And the Panthers, by the way,

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>have a good defense. I know they had the JC

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Horn injury. Keith Taylor has subbed in pretty well, so

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 1>J Henderson is getting healthier. I don't think Stefan Gilmore

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be up for this game, but regardless, they

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>are playing pretty well defensively anyway, and offensively. I didn't

0:09:10.920 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>like the spot for them last week again I said

0:09:12.400 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I took the Vikings Ian because of the pressure. That's

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a big thing. I think with Sam Darnold, which I

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>know very well having watched him for years, that is

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>not where the Giants shine. The Giants do not get

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>a ton of pressure. So I think that's pretty good

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 1>as to what we're gonna see. And as well, I

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>think you heard them talk about the fact that they're

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna run the ball here a little more. Take some

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>pressure off Donald. That is good. The Giants are twenty

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>seventh in DVA against the run. This game just kind

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>of sets up well for me for the Panthers. They

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>need to win. They don't have to take chances to

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 1>get it. You gotta banged up Giants team in dis array.

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>So seventy percent ian Panthers laying three on the road

0:09:46.640 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to the Giants, tell me what you're thinking.

0:09:49.520 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, to be honest, out of all the games this week,

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 2>the Giants Panthers game is the one game where, like

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:56.199
<v Speaker 2>I wish I wasn't betting on every single NFL game,

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 2>because really pass on this game. I think this is

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 2>the toughest game, toughest game on the board this week

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion, and any what concerns me is number one,

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 2>the injuries. But what concerns me with the Panthers when

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 2>you look at their stats compared to the first three

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 2>games compared to the last three games, just night and day. So, like,

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:16.439
<v Speaker 2>what version, in my opinion, like, what version of the

0:10:16.480 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Panthers team is for real? Are they more like the

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 2>team they played like in the first three weeks or

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 2>are they more like the team that we saw the

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 2>last three weeks. Anytime that there was a toss up game,

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion, which I think this is, I end

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 2>up just taking the team that's getting the points. So

0:10:30.480 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 2>I am on the Giants. But like I said, I

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 2>think it's it's my least favorite bet of the week.

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 2>I cannot argue against someone who's on the Panthers. I

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 2>went back and forth for a while trying to decide

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.280
<v Speaker 2>who to bet on in this game. But it's tough.

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, you made a couple of really good points.

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Giants eight twenty one and one against the spread their

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 2>last thirty home games, We're just terrible, terrible, terrible. Daniel

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 2>Daniel Jones is terrible at home compared to on the road,

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 2>So those things are certainly going in the Panthers favor.

0:10:57.760 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 2>So I am on the Giants, but I will not

0:11:00.120 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 2>I will not argue too much against the Panthers pick.

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>So what's funny is that I think that your point

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of like, well, which Panthers team are we going to see?

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:08.719
<v Speaker 1>I think you're going to see the version of the

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Panthers team that plays the crappy opponent, which is what

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the first three games. Now that the

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Saints weren't terrible, but the Saints aren't that good or

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>anything like that. The Jets in Houston versus what you

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>see in the next three games, which is Dallas Philadelphia,

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>which their defense played fine. By the way, they easily

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 1>could have won that game. But the Philadelphia defense is

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 1>much stronger, and we'll talk about that maybe in a

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit. And I think people give them credit for

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and then Minnesota to me honestly, offensively, I think this

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>is a game first of all, they have to win

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>because they've got to get back on track number one.

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think the Giants them I think sometimes like

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a model. I admit, like I don't

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>have a model that I plug in and I come

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>up with the appropriate spread. I know a lot of

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, professional gamblerss and everything like that. But I

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 1>think this is just a spot right now where there

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.680
<v Speaker 1>are some things of regardless of sort of how it

0:11:51.760 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>might look on the service level, you just dig deep

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>into this Giants team. They look broken right now, and

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the constant injuries or whatever it is, I mean,

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>they're just absolutely devastated at this point. I don't think

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they really have at this point that the mental you know,

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I almost say mental wherewithal but just where they are

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>right now to be able to come in here and

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>put it against the team that is desperate for a win.

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>And again, I think the fact that they're going to

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>be able to be Panthers, to be able to take

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>such like a non risky game, essentially a safe game

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>plan here, I think leads of their favorite But that's fine.

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:26.920
<v Speaker 1>You don't even want to bet it. You did have

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 1>to bet it, and you bet against me. So this

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is where the irresistible force meets the immovable object with

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>this one. All right, get to your next game? What

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 1>do you want?

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 2>All right? So I'll go I'll go my total, my

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 2>favorite total for the week here and I'm gonna go

0:12:41.120 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Jets Patriots under forty two and a half is what

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:45.880
<v Speaker 2>I got to that I think this is just a spot.

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 2>You can't overthink it. They already played once this season.

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 2>I took the under in that game and finished with

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 2>a total of thirty one points. Score of that game.

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.559
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's two bad offenses and two good defenses.

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:00.440
<v Speaker 2>So yards per play Patriots are twenty third, Jets are

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 2>thirty first, red zone offense Patriots thirtieth, Jets twenty eighth,

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 2>points per game Patriots twenty fourth, Jets dead last. And

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 2>then the defensive side of those stats, Patriots thirteenth, fifth

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:16.439
<v Speaker 2>and ninth, Jets ninth, second and eighteenth. Interesting fact, they're

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 2>about the Jets second and red zone defense so far

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.199
<v Speaker 2>this NFL season, which I did not expect before looking

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 2>into those numbers. Yeah, and obviously red zone defense is huge.

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:27.880
<v Speaker 2>If we're betting on an under, you want those drives

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 2>to end in field goals, not in touchdowns. So fifth

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.719
<v Speaker 2>and second in red zone defense makes me quite a

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 2>bit more confident. Also, Bill Belichick has been one of

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the most conservative coaches in the NFL so far the

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 2>season with his play calling. He's not taking a whole

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of shots downfield, not going forward on fourth down,

0:13:44.640 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 2>basically whatsoever the Jets offense has has I apologize because

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I know you're a jew. Non existing Yeah, I got

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 2>just non existing against decent defenses so far the season. So,

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 2>like I said first meeting in in thirty one points,

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:04.000
<v Speaker 2>it's a bit of a low total forty two and

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 2>a half, which does scare me a little bit. Sure,

0:14:05.920 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 2>I think when you look at the numbers, I think

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 2>it's the only play you can make in this game.

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Ah, that's the correct pick. And I would have taken

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>it as well if not for you, as I look

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the way we've worked since the first game, where I

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>felt like I got the short end of the stick

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>because I didn't get Seawan's picks the first week pardon me,

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>where I didn't get Shawn's picks and events and he

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>picked my favorite game of the week, and I would

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of like, all right, I'll scramble and pick another one.

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I now get our guests picks in advance, just so

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I can know exactly what they are. And this I

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>immediately emailed back Ian and I was like, Ah, that

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>was definitely a pick I was eyeing as well. Yes,

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>all the reasons that you said, I think this is

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely a game that is just going to lean heavily

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>towards the ender. It again, there are a lot of

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>these load totals, and I think better first of all, better'

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>is like overs anyway, like casual betters, because you want

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to root for something then again something. And I think

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 1>these low totals generally scare betters off regardless. But I

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>really think there are a lot of teams that you

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>can go. I mean again, I picked the Broncos under

0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>for the first like three or four weeks. I think

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>that's been a good spot generally speaking. I have it

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>as well tonight so people will know when they listen.

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>So I hope not not in the under. I've teased

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the under up. Just overitess, Okay, I am going to

0:15:13.720 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>stick with your least favorite game. Because you went with

0:15:16.440 --> 0:15:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the over under, I will also go with an over under.

0:15:18.480 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I will stick in this Panthers Giants game, which is

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>very funny to me because it's the game. You're like, man,

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the one game out of the whole year that I

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>need to get away from is this game. And I'm like, sweet,

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 1>let me bet all my money on this game. And

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>it is so the total right now, the consensus total

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>at bettingpros dot com is forty three. There are some

0:15:34.760 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 1>forty three and a half's out there. It's actually forty

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>two and a half at my book DraftKings, but the

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>consensus line is forty three. That's where most books are,

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and I am going the under, and it is basically

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>for all the reasons I explained before. I think the

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Giants are going to really struggle to put up points here.

0:15:48.440 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, whatever they are able to do, you know, defensively,

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about that in the second. Offensively, it's just

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>very difficult to see. I think for this to go over,

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you're going to need some sort of defensive score here

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>from the Panthers are something flukey, which again always the

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>worry when you have this high low of total and everything.

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>But I do think again with their offensive line injuries,

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>with how few playmakers they have, with how bad Daniel

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Jones plays at home generally speaking, with how Baddie is

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>especially under pressure, it just really strikes me as a

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 1>game that they're not going to put up a lot

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of points. And conversely, again this is not me buying

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 1>into Sam Darnold. They're buying into the Panthers' offense. What

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 1>This is buying into is Matt rule, understanding that they

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>have to win a game, and the way to do

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>that is to run the ball a ton against a

0:16:35.320 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>defense that struggles to stop the run. And when you

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>do that, when you run the ball, the clock keeps running.

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>They're in no hurry to really get here. So I

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>think this is another game where the game script sets

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:47.480
<v Speaker 1>up two teams that are not going to put up

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>a ton of points. One of the teams that probably

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>will win is going to run the ball a ton,

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 1>especially when I think they are leading in this game,

0:16:54.080 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>as I expect them to win, and then they want

0:16:55.840 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to run out the clock. To me, it screams under

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>as a low scoring game. So I imagine you are avoiding

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 1>this game entirely regardless of the over under. But I'm

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna go under here for under forty three is the

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.040
<v Speaker 1>official play for my second pick.

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was deciding between for this game. I was

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 2>deciding between the Giants or the under. So I agree

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 2>with you on the on the on the total play,

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 2>I would not be going over in this game whatsoever,

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:19.880
<v Speaker 2>based on how these two teams have looked so far

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 2>this season. So yeah, I'm not playing the under. But

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 2>like I said, I was deciding between Giants and the

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 2>points in the under. I ended up going with the

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Giants on this game.

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 1>But I like the pick, all right, I will accept that.

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>Then let's get to your third pick. Here is it

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a spread? Did you go one, two three with each

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the different one money line over under and then spread?

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Yep? So yeah, my favorite, my favorite favorite on the spread.

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 2>So usually I like to avoid double digit spreads, but

0:17:46.720 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 2>this is one that I actually really like this week,

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 2>and it's the Bucks over the Bears. I go to

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 2>the twelve and a half and it's just a bad

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 2>stylistic matchup for the Bears offense and a fantastic style

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 2>listic matchup for the Bucks offense. So fifty two point

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.719
<v Speaker 2>four percent of the offensive yards gained by the Bears

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 2>so far this season have come on the ground, which

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 2>is by far the most mount almost ten percent more

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 2>than any other team. So they get like the majority

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:16.360
<v Speaker 2>of their yards come on the ground, and now they're

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 2>facing a Bucks defense that is one of the best

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 2>run defenses in the NFL, second in the NFL and

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 2>opponent yards per carry at three point four and first

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL and opponent rushing yards per game, only

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 2>allowing fifty four point eight rushing yards per game. So

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:32.119
<v Speaker 2>if they're limiting teams on the ground, I don't know

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:33.440
<v Speaker 2>how the Bears are gonna be able to move the

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 2>ball against them. And then the opposite is true for

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 2>the Tampa Bay offense. Seventy nine point nine to seven

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 2>percent of the Bucks offensive yards come through the air.

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 2>That's the most in the NFL. And now they're facing

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 2>a Bears defense whose weakness is the secondary they rank

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:51.639
<v Speaker 2>nineteenth in the NFL and opponent yards per pass attempt. So,

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:55.640
<v Speaker 2>like I said, I don't love Benning double digit favorites

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL, but this is one that I'm going

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 2>to back for sure because it's just styles make fights.

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 2>That's something that's something I kind of hold truth in

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 2>most sports, and I think this is just a terrible

0:19:07.880 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 2>stylistic matchup for the Bears.

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so it is twelve and a half at the

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:15.359
<v Speaker 1>consensus line. It is twelve. Oddly enough, at my book DraftKings,

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>I probably can't go there just because, like you, I

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.600
<v Speaker 1>just despise the giant spreads. If I did have to

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>go one place, I think I would take the blocks.

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>And I was a little ambivalent on it early in

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 1>the year and early in the week. Pardon me, I

0:19:27.720 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 1>think really the issue is for me, You're right, they're

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:30.919
<v Speaker 1>not going to be able to run the ball. By

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the way, Khalil Herbert is also banged up. We don't

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>know whether or not Damian Williams is even coming off

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the COVID list. So even if they wanted to run

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 1>the ball, who knows if they could. But you're going

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>to have to have Justin Fields open it up and

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 1>throw the ball here against a pretty decimated secondary that

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>can certainly be beaten. But do we trust Justin Fields

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do that? Is the question. I mean,

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>when you can beat a team one way and the

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 1>person who's in charge of beating them that way has

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:57.160
<v Speaker 1>not impressed the entire season, it is difficult to see

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>them covering this spread. Now we do. Antony Brown, I

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.639
<v Speaker 1>think this practice again today, so we'll see whether or

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>not he plays. But again, the Bucks are off the

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Mini bi right because you know, they played on Thursday,

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:09.119
<v Speaker 1>so they have a little extra time to prepare. So

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I think, like you, if I were in your position

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I was forced to bet every single game, I would

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>take the Bucks. But it's a. I'm leery of the giant.

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's so many giant spreads right now this

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.119
<v Speaker 1>week are out of curiosity. We'll get there. Actually, we'll

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.400
<v Speaker 1>get there later. So I want to know what you're

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:25.119
<v Speaker 1>doing with all the other giant spreads. But I'm going

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to take a Gamian. I feel confident you're on the

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you have taken the other side of this, okay, so

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll see about this one. I am going to take

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles getting three points from the Raiders.

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:35.439
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>When I looked at this on Monday and I opened

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 1>it up, I said, I'm pretty sure I'm going to

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>wind up taking the Raiders because it felt like the

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>right side. And then I dug into it a little bit,

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think that the Eagles are not only going

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>to cover the spread, but if I had more intestinal fortitude,

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I would take them on the money line because I

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 1>do think they wind up pulling this one out. I

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>cannot quit the Eagles. I have tried. I don't know

0:20:57.880 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>why I continue to back them, but I am going

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to do it. But it's also sort of a cell

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>high spot for the Raiders. Right we had all these questions,

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 1>how are the Raiders gonna respond? After the whole John

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Gruden thing, and they responded incredibly and it was one

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:10.520
<v Speaker 1>of two ways it can go, and the way it

0:21:10.560 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>went was, Okay, we've got this giant weight lifted off

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>our shoulder now, and they put up a tremendous effort there.

0:21:15.240 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think this is actually a good matchup here,

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 1>especially for the Eagles defense, because what you've got is

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders that what do they really make their money on. Offensively,

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it's the explosive place, right like, that's what they do.

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>They lead the league in pass plays of twenty plus

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>yards with thirty two overall. But the Eagles converse, they

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 1>are basically at the opposite end of the spectrum. They

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 1>absolutely limit those plays. That's what their defense is almost

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:43.159
<v Speaker 1>designed to do. And you know, even though they have

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:47.160
<v Speaker 1>played the Bucks and the Cowboys and the Chiefs, they've

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.880
<v Speaker 1>allowed just eleven pass plays of twenty plus yards. So

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>it is something where basically the Raiders' strength meets the

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.959
<v Speaker 1>exact strength of the Eagles defense. The Raiders can't really

0:21:58.040 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 1>run the ball. Their offensive line is bad. They're averaging

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty three point four yards per carry. Pardon me. They

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:07.199
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighth in rush rushing DVA offensively, and the Eagles

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>defensive line is very good and Derek Carr really there

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>are two ways there at Car succeeds when you watch

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>him play. Number one, there is no pressure on him

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's able to have time and survey the field.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Are number two, he gets blitzed. Pretty good against the

0:22:18.960 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>blitz but he is not good as most quarterbacks when

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 1>you're able to get pressure on him without blitzing. That

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>is something the Eagles do very very well. So offensively

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>at the very least, I don't expect the Raiders to

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>have a huge game for the Eagles offensively. Like the Bucks,

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:34.960
<v Speaker 1>they're coming off a mini bi I think they finally

0:22:35.000 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>found a little bit of something here with Miles Sanders,

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>which everybody in the world. I mean, you have their

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>fans derisively cheering when they finally gave Sanders a carry,

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:44.159
<v Speaker 1>and they don't do it on a good day. They

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>weren't doing it against the Bucks. But Sanders has played

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>well when he's gotten the work. He played well against

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks when he got the work. You can attack

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders a little bit more here on the ground.

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Their secondary is also a little banged up. The Philadelphia

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>is getting Dallas Goddard back now he's been activated off

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the COVID lit Sirianna's got to get something going. Okay,

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>they're tuned four. They look stagnant on offense, is getting

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of heat. I think they're going to take

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 1>this week to design a game plan. It's basically a

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>cell high spot here on the Raiders as well, So

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't hit the under either. It's forty

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half for me, but my official pick

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the Eagles getting three points against

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders in Las Vegas. Tell me you're on the

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 1>other side.

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 2>No, So we're actually in agreement on this game. Now,

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I didn't I didn't back the Eagles though, but if

0:23:27.840 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 2>I was going to take the spread out, I would

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 2>have taken the Eagles. But I did take the bet

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 2>that you just mentioned, which is the under. So I'm

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm on the under in this game. I agree with

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the points that you just that you

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 2>just made two underrated defenses. Eagles are third in the

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 2>NFL and pony yards per play. Vegas is fifth in

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 2>the NFL and the pony yards per play. Both teams

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:49.000
<v Speaker 2>are good against the pass. The reason why I didn't

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 2>take the Eagles and why they scared me a little bit,

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 2>and you kind of alluded to it there you mentioned it,

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Eagle's very good at running the ball, but they kind

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 2>of refuse to do it for their tenth and like

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 2>passing play percentage, like they're just passing the ball like

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 2>in the upper third of the NFL, but yet their

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 2>second in the NFL in yards per carry. Like they're

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 2>very good, very effective at running the ball, but they

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 2>just don't do it that much, which makes no sense

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 2>to me, especially when your quarterback is Jalen Hurts, like,

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 2>run the ball like, I don't know. I don't know

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 2>what they're doing. They haven't shown me yet that they're

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 2>willing to do it, and until they are, I'm going

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 2>to stop betting on them. Because actually, you mentioned at

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 2>the start of your pick two about how much you've

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 2>been betting on the Eagles. This is actually the first

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 2>week I haven't taken the Eagles on the spread or

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 2>money line, so I've been betting on the Eagles almost

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 2>every week as well. But I want to see them

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 2>start running the ball more, so I am going to

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 2>take the under instead. I think it's just two underrated

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.280
<v Speaker 2>defenses well, I saw the total like I would have

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 2>said it like forty six for me too.

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And to be fair, I wanted another spread bed

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:56.119
<v Speaker 1>here anyway, just because I want to get into it.

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>And I did like the Eagles when I got into it,

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and then I checked what the total was, and when

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>it was forty nine, I was like, wait, what so

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>really that's probably almost a better play, But you know

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:07.720
<v Speaker 1>what doing in game teaser, then tease the total up

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and take the under, and then tease the spread up

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 1>for me for the Eagles, And yeah, look the Eagles

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 1>they wound up covering the spread despite how bad they

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>looked against the Bucks on Thursday. But also I do

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>think I don't want to do the foulacity for rational coaching,

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>but I think at this point, like you know, if

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>you continue to do this, if you're Nick Siriani and

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>you continue to run this offense through Jalen Hurts passing

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the ball and they continue to lose like this, that's

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:35.359
<v Speaker 1>just devastating for you as a coach, as a rookie coach,

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:37.360
<v Speaker 1>when you have someone like Miles Sanders and they run

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the ball pretty effectively. When they do so, they came out,

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, Shane Seken they came out. They basically like,

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>we got to run the ball a little bit more here,

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>So I do think that this is a spot for

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 1>them to do that. So all right, let's recaut the

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>picks very quickly. You're taking the Bengals on the money

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.160
<v Speaker 1>line against the Ravens at plus two point thirty. That's dropping,

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:54.399
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I see a couple of books now

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>dropping it, So get on it now if you like that.

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:58.719
<v Speaker 1>You're taking the Jets and the Patriots under forty two

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and a half, a pick that I like very much

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>as well, and the Bucks playing twelve and a half

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Bears. I'm taking the Panthers laying three to

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the Giants. I'm also taking the under forty three in

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that same game, and I'm also taking the Eagles getting

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 1>three in Las Vegas. Let's run through the remaining spreads

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't touchdown, now, people, you know what I'm

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna actually ask it people listening to this. It'll drop,

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure before the Thursday night game, but just in

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 1>case afterwards, so we can have our record. Where did

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you go here with the Broncos and the Browns? Since

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:27.639
<v Speaker 1>you have to pick every game right now, The spread,

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is at one and a half. I

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:30.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you were able to get it early

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 1>enough at the you know, the the Broncos getting three

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and a half.

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 2>Originally, I'm on the Browns, so I lock in my

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 2>bets Wednesday night. So did already drop down to one

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 2>and a half.

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>Okay.

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm a big underreact guy when it comes to injury news,

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 2>So anytime you know, a player comes out like Baker

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.639
<v Speaker 2>Mayfield in this game, everyone's gonna jump on the Broncos.

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 2>I like to underreact to the news and stick with

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:55.479
<v Speaker 2>that team. I did it last week. Russell Wilson got

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 2>ruled out obviously, the sure Gino Smith got put in.

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:02.439
<v Speaker 2>Every everyone was betting against the Seahawks, they went with

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 2>the Steelers. I underreacted to it. I took the Seahawks

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 2>on the spread and a work though for me. So yeah,

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm sticking with the Browns here minus one and a half.

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:13.840
<v Speaker 2>I just think the offensive line is going to be

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:15.879
<v Speaker 2>able to get the job done. Denver's dead last the

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 2>NFL and third down conversion percentage, which is a bad

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 2>sign for their offense. I think the Browns get it

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 2>done and case Keenum's a very capable backup.

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh yes, case Kinon's won the better backup quarterbacks only

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:28.400
<v Speaker 1>he could probably start for one or two teams here

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. I am, I'm going to say this

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:34.160
<v Speaker 1>is a game that only betters and fantasy players can

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>really love. But let's go to the Packers at home

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, laying seven and a half. There are some

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:41.920
<v Speaker 1>eight and a half's actually out there, so it's wild

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit here. The Packers at home, length seven

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and a half to Washington.

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.720
<v Speaker 2>I'm taking Washington and the points in this one. I

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 2>think people are overvaluing the Packers, especially their offense. Everyone's

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:57.880
<v Speaker 2>looking at Aaron Rodgers, you know, reigning MVP. They're eighteenth

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 2>in yards per play, only slightly better than Wall at

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 2>twenty first fourteenth and third down conversion percentage, twenty second,

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.840
<v Speaker 2>red zone offense, fifteenth in yards per carry, So statistically

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:11.160
<v Speaker 2>they're an average offense and defensively, fun little fact about them,

0:28:11.560 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 2>dead last and red zone defense. Every single time an

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.080
<v Speaker 2>opponent has gone into the red zone this year, they've

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 2>scored a touchdown fifteen red zone trips fifteen touchdowns. That's

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:23.360
<v Speaker 2>not a good sign. I like Washington in the points.

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, we already know you like the Bengals getting

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>the six and a half, certainly from the Ravens as

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned. How about your Falcons traveling to Miami off

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:32.399
<v Speaker 1>a bye and getting two and a half points. No,

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 1>giving to a half points. I'm so sorry giving to

0:28:34.160 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and a half points.

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm going to back my Falcons here. I'm starting

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 2>to buy in on them a little bit, to be

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 2>completely honest. Dolphins, Panthers, Saints next three weeks. I've bought

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 2>in on the fact they're gonna be five and three

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 2>and in the hunt for wild card spot. But I

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 2>think the Dolphins are the worst team in the NFL

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 2>quite frankly. And Falcons right now eighth in red zone offense,

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 2>fifth and third down conversion percentage. I think that's a

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 2>good sign of this offense. I think Arthur Smith is

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 2>kind of coming into his own with his play calling,

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Matt Ryan a little bit more comfortable to the passable game.

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 2>So I'm gonna lay the points with the Falcons.

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the offense is definitely playing a little better and

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins are just in disarray right now. Also, I

0:29:06.640 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know how you don't take the buy after London,

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:11.440
<v Speaker 1>because I believe they offer every team that after London

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and you can't take the buy, and they opted not

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>to terrible. There were obviously all the rumors about the

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Shaun Watson you know yesterday, so that team is just tough.

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>And even if the secondary gets healthier with Zaman Howard

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and Barne Jones, like, I can't really trust them. So

0:29:24.440 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I am with you. Originally, when I first looked at it,

0:29:26.720 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I think the doll you know, they're

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 1>not quite that bad, but I do trust a little

0:29:31.720 --> 0:29:33.200
<v Speaker 1>bit more of the Falcons coming off the buy. How

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>about the Jets are visiting New England, they are getting seven.

0:29:37.760 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 2>That was the under that I'm on. I think if

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 2>I go with the spread, I think i'd have to

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 2>take Jets in the points because their defense is extremely underrated.

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Like I said earlier, second red zone defense. So I

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 2>would take the Jets and the points. But that's my under.

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a complete I know you're on the ender,

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>of course, but I would avoid. I can't take this

0:29:55.720 --> 0:29:57.760
<v Speaker 1>bread like I just it's a terrible thing. I don't

0:29:57.880 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>mac Jones when you were laying a touchdown is just

0:29:59.720 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>not so thing I'm comfortable doing. Despite the fact that

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>he has played pretty well, and you're hopeful that the

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Jets off the buy sort of get something going here.

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>But it's a tough one, this one. I'm interested to

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>hear which way you went. The Chiefs are visiting the Titans.

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>The Chiefs are laying five. What'd you do with that one?

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 2>I just took the over. I mean, flip a coin

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 2>if you're gonna go to spread. Both these teams just

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 2>just some of the worst defenses in the NFL right now.

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 2>The total totals what up to, like fifty seven or something.

0:30:25.640 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, fifty seven, yep.

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's an it's insanely high total. But I

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:32.560
<v Speaker 2>can't back either team based on their defense. I mean

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs laying points, I mean their defense is literally

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 2>the worst in the NFL right now, So I can't lay.

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 2>I can't lay points. I don't care who's their quarterback,

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't care how good their offense is. And then

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the Titans, I mean, their defense is almost as bad

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 2>as the chief So on the spread, flip a coin,

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 2>I guess the Chiefs have the better offense. Both defenses stink.

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm just gonna take the over and roof some points.

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, It's a terrible game to bet, really, and it's

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>a weird spot too, because the Titans are coming off

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>the Giant win on Monday Night. Who knows what that

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>does to them, you know, exactly. So I mean, forced

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to pick a side, probably I'll take the Chiefs with

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 1>get lay in the points. But it's a game that

0:31:11.040 --> 0:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>this would be the game, and this would be a

0:31:12.800 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 1>game that on a spread level, I would just try

0:31:14.680 --> 0:31:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to desperately avoid. We talked about the Panthers and the Giants.

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's get some of the bigger spreads. You've got the

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Rams laying fifteen and a half to Detroit in Los Angeles.

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is a big plug your nose game. I

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:28.719
<v Speaker 2>think you have to take the lines at that many points.

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 2>I know you mentioned earlier you don't like betting double

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 2>digit favorites. I'm the same way. But where I draw

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the line is two touchdowns. If you're gonna lay a

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 2>team is getting over two touchdowns, I have to take

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 2>the underdog. I mean, this is the NFL. These guys

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 2>are professionals or professional athletes. They're gonna show up. This

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 2>is not college football Alabama against South Carolina. These teams

0:31:50.400 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 2>are gonna show up. But I mean, I'm a big

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 2>stats guy. I look at stats more than anything else.

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 2>And if you're gonna bet at based on the stats,

0:31:57.560 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 2>you have to take the Rams. Like Rams are first

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL, and yards per past ten lines are

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 2>dead last, so you literally have the best passing offense

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 2>against literally the worst passing defense. So all the stats

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:09.280
<v Speaker 2>say the Rams are gonna win by like thirty, but

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 2>the NFL is just yeah, fifteen points is none. The

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Rams could be up twenty one points, the line score

0:32:16.200 --> 0:32:18.320
<v Speaker 2>like a garbage time touchdown with a minute left, and

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 2>they're covering.

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, no, I'm That's the thing. I think if

0:32:21.440 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the Rams wanted to and they kept their foot on

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the gas, they'd win this game by thirty one points, right, Like,

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>they can do whatever they want. But they won't, right

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:29.760
<v Speaker 1>because at the end of the game, they're just going

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:31.440
<v Speaker 1>to ease back, and you're right, it just screams back

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to our cover. I agree. If I have to go somewhere,

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I am taking the points, as I do with most

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of these games. We talked already about the Eagles Raiders,

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>We talked already about the Bears and the Bucks. Another

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:43.920
<v Speaker 1>big spread, Cardinals ar laying seventeen and a half points

0:32:44.040 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 1>to the Houston Texans Or is this another point where

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you're just like you have to take the points or what?

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, just take everything I just said about the last

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 2>game and apply seventeen and a half points the NFL game.

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 2>And also don't forget like I can kind of actually

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 2>understand a little bit more with the Rams, but like

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 2>the Cardinals defense eighteenth in opponent yards per play, second last,

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:07.320
<v Speaker 2>and opponent yards per carry. Teams are getting five point

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 2>two yards per carry on the ground against them. This

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 2>like no defense that's like an average to below average

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 2>defense should be a seventeen and a half point favorite

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 2>against an NFL team. Makes no sense to me. He

0:33:18.200 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 2>got it back the Texans here.

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I hate it, but I agree. And the Sunday

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 1>night game, forty nine ers are laying four to the

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Colts at very interesting or what you think about this one?

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? This is this is a tough game as well.

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:32.360
<v Speaker 2>I would put this right behind the Giants Panthers as

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 2>far as the toughest games to GAINDICAP this week. I

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 2>am gonna lay the points with the forty nine ers

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:40.160
<v Speaker 2>in this one. It really just comes down to the

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 2>they have the much better defense. Really, both offenses are

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:48.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of comparable so far, especially like third down defense,

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 2>which is something I look at quite a bit. Same

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 2>with the red zone defense. Forty nine ers fourth and

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 2>third down defense, Colts are twentieth. Colts are also terrible

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 2>against the pass. No, the forty nine Ers obviously aren't

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 2>a huge passing team, twenty eighth in opponent yards for

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 2>past attempt The forty nine Ers will be able to

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:05.400
<v Speaker 2>do something against the air, against the through the air

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 2>against this Colts team, I'm gonna lay the points with

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 2>the forty nine ers, but it's definitely not one of

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:11.880
<v Speaker 2>my better bets of the week. It's a tough one.

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. When I looked at this on Monday, I like

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the Colts actually a lot, and now I don't. It's

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 1>just to stay away from me, you know, the forty

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 1>nine ers, you know, at home as a favorite. It's

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:23.359
<v Speaker 1>not like something where I want to necessarily back Kyle

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Shannan off the by though, you know, with Jimmy g

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>back in there, which helps them, you know, from a

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>betting perspective, at least in my opinion as of right now,

0:34:33.320 --> 0:34:35.239
<v Speaker 1>with the Colts, I really do like what I've seen

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.320
<v Speaker 1>from them a little more offensively, and they're getting a

0:34:37.360 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>little healthier, at least on the offensive line. Of course,

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe Quentin Nelson comes back, maybe, but they've also got

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>other injuries. Hilton is fifty to fifty for Sunday, so

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can rely on him. They obviously

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>just lost Paris Campbell, and they have injuries on defense

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:53.879
<v Speaker 1>as well, So I think I would just if I

0:34:53.880 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 1>if I had to bet like you, I would probably

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 1>lean the forty nine ers, but I'm staying away. And finally,

0:34:58.440 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>the Saints are visiting the Seahawks on Monday Night and

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:04.719
<v Speaker 1>the Seahawks are getting four and a half points. What

0:35:04.719 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>do you think?

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is a very similar handicap to the Sunday

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:12.480
<v Speaker 2>night game. I'm back the Saints laying the points here

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 2>because it just comes down to the difference between the

0:35:14.719 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 2>two defenses. Saints offense is actually not could at all

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:20.800
<v Speaker 2>and the Seahawks offense has completely lost their bite with

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 2>Russell Wilson and Gino Smith in. But the Saints defense,

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 2>compared to the Seahawks defense, just completely night and day.

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Saints have the best rush defense right now, only allowing

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:36.600
<v Speaker 2>three point three yards per carry, best red zone defense

0:35:36.640 --> 0:35:39.239
<v Speaker 2>as well, which is absolutely huge. Also been a good

0:35:39.320 --> 0:35:41.640
<v Speaker 2>road bet recently, fourteen to four against the spread in

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 2>their last eighteen road games, So I think the defense

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 2>is what makes the big difference here. Obviously, if Russell

0:35:47.120 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 2>Wilson was playing, it's a different story. But I'll lay

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:51.200
<v Speaker 2>the points with the Saints in this one just based

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:52.480
<v Speaker 2>on how good their defense has been.

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, as well, I coming off the buy as well.

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I think they've got plenty of time to prepare, and

0:35:56.760 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you know that the Seayoffs are a little banged up

0:35:58.440 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 1>here after that tough game there against the Steelers. All right, Ian,

0:36:02.320 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>excellent work and again every your incredible job that you're

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 1>doing this season, Like the number actually boggles my mind.

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So everybody make sure they follow you, but go ahead

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:12.359
<v Speaker 1>and tell everybody where they can find you in your work.

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Thank you. Yes, Twitter is probably the best place. eMac

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 2>bets ai n m Ac Bets in the Bacon Bets

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 2>podcast that gets released every Thursday morning, where I break

0:36:21.840 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 2>down my pick for every single NFL game that week,

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:25.719
<v Speaker 2>So check that out as well.

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I probably should again recap just all our

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 1>picks just in case somebody you know forgot what they

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.279
<v Speaker 1>were the Bengals. You were taking the Bengals on the

0:36:32.280 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>money line plus two thirty against the Ravens, the Jets

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Patriots under forty two and a half, and

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks laying twelve and a half to the Bears.

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>I am taking the Panthers laying three to the Giants

0:36:42.080 --> 0:36:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the under in that same game forty three, and also

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:48.799
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles getting three from the Raiders. Thanks everybody for

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 1>tuning in. Again, if you're listening to this, we be

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.520
<v Speaker 1>back on Monday again breaking down with our early look

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>at the Week eight NFL lines. And again, you want

0:36:57.600 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>to watch this, you want to see a bunch of

0:36:58.840 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>videos that we put out, go ahead and subscribe over

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:04.720
<v Speaker 1>on our YouTube channel YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros.

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Thanks again for listening to everybody. I'll talk to again

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, m