WEBVTT - Adam Grant Helps Unlock Our Hidden Potential

0:00:14.956 --> 0:00:21.756
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin Hay Slight Changers, It's Maya. Before we get to

0:00:21.796 --> 0:00:23.876
<v Speaker 1>this week's episode, I wanted to let you know that

0:00:23.916 --> 0:00:26.796
<v Speaker 1>I'm launching a newsletter. It's a place where I can

0:00:26.916 --> 0:00:30.396
<v Speaker 1>update you about the podcast, my life, and other exciting news.

0:00:31.076 --> 0:00:32.836
<v Speaker 1>If you'd like to sign up, you can visit the

0:00:32.836 --> 0:00:36.076
<v Speaker 1>link in our show description or go to Maya Shunker

0:00:36.116 --> 0:00:38.916
<v Speaker 1>dot com. That's m A y A s h A

0:00:39.116 --> 0:00:40.956
<v Speaker 1>n k a r dot com.

0:00:41.196 --> 0:00:52.436
<v Speaker 2>Thanks.

0:00:54.076 --> 0:00:56.516
<v Speaker 3>So much of learning requires us to put ourselves in

0:00:56.556 --> 0:01:00.356
<v Speaker 3>uncomfortable situations because that's where the challenge lies. But the

0:01:00.356 --> 0:01:03.676
<v Speaker 3>fear of embarrassment holds us back, and so we end

0:01:03.756 --> 0:01:06.916
<v Speaker 3>up making these tiny little adjustments instead of big leaps.

0:01:07.596 --> 0:01:10.596
<v Speaker 1>Author and podcaster at A Grant is back on a

0:01:10.636 --> 0:01:13.676
<v Speaker 1>slight change of plans, and he's got a new book

0:01:13.796 --> 0:01:17.116
<v Speaker 1>full of ideas for how we can unlock our hidden potential.

0:01:17.996 --> 0:01:20.556
<v Speaker 1>One of his tips is to think differently about how

0:01:20.596 --> 0:01:21.956
<v Speaker 1>we learn from others.

0:01:22.556 --> 0:01:25.076
<v Speaker 3>A lot of people think being a sponge is about

0:01:25.116 --> 0:01:28.676
<v Speaker 3>just absorbing as much information as you can seek infinite

0:01:28.716 --> 0:01:33.596
<v Speaker 3>amounts of feedback. Engage all of your critics, not so much.

0:01:34.196 --> 0:01:37.556
<v Speaker 3>Not all critics are thinking critically, and I think a

0:01:37.636 --> 0:01:40.396
<v Speaker 3>huge part of being an effective sponge is being proactive,

0:01:40.636 --> 0:01:43.396
<v Speaker 3>not just about what you take in, but also what

0:01:43.436 --> 0:01:44.956
<v Speaker 3>you expel out.

0:01:48.836 --> 0:01:56.156
<v Speaker 1>On today's episode, how to Unlock Your Hidden Potential, I'm

0:01:56.196 --> 0:01:58.956
<v Speaker 1>maya Shunker and this is a slight change of plans,

0:01:59.316 --> 0:02:01.476
<v Speaker 1>a show about who we are and who we become

0:02:01.796 --> 0:02:15.756
<v Speaker 1>in the face of a big change. Adam is an

0:02:15.836 --> 0:02:19.436
<v Speaker 1>organizational psychologist and a professor at the Wharton School at

0:02:19.476 --> 0:02:22.836
<v Speaker 1>the University of Pennsylvania. He's also the author of a

0:02:22.876 --> 0:02:26.436
<v Speaker 1>bunch of bestsellers and a repeat visitor to the Ted stage.

0:02:26.876 --> 0:02:29.516
<v Speaker 1>I'm pretty sure after one more Ted talk he can

0:02:29.556 --> 0:02:33.476
<v Speaker 1>turn in his punch card for free sandwich. Adam's new

0:02:33.516 --> 0:02:37.596
<v Speaker 1>book is called Hidden Potential, The Science of Achieving Greater Things,

0:02:38.236 --> 0:02:40.716
<v Speaker 1>and as you'll hear, this is one of my favorite

0:02:40.716 --> 0:02:45.036
<v Speaker 1>topics to discuss and spar with him about. I started

0:02:45.076 --> 0:02:48.676
<v Speaker 1>our conversation by asking Adam why he's so interested in

0:02:48.716 --> 0:02:50.276
<v Speaker 1>the topic of hidden potential.

0:02:51.636 --> 0:02:53.916
<v Speaker 3>I think there are so many reasons to be interested

0:02:53.916 --> 0:02:56.036
<v Speaker 3>in it. I mean, how many times have you met

0:02:56.076 --> 0:02:59.596
<v Speaker 3>somebody who didn't live up to the potential you saw

0:02:59.636 --> 0:03:02.676
<v Speaker 3>in them because they didn't see it in themselves, or

0:03:02.716 --> 0:03:04.836
<v Speaker 3>because they weren't lucky enough to have a coach or

0:03:04.876 --> 0:03:07.436
<v Speaker 3>a mentor, or a teacher or a parent who saw

0:03:07.436 --> 0:03:09.996
<v Speaker 3>it in them. And I think the fundamental mistake we

0:03:10.076 --> 0:03:11.956
<v Speaker 3>make can we make this mistake when we're judging other

0:03:11.956 --> 0:03:15.316
<v Speaker 3>people and when we're evaluating ourselves, is that we assess

0:03:15.356 --> 0:03:19.476
<v Speaker 3>potential by where we start, and if something's easy for us,

0:03:19.596 --> 0:03:23.076
<v Speaker 3>if we have a natural talent for it, then we

0:03:23.116 --> 0:03:25.756
<v Speaker 3>assume there's a very highest ceiling on our potential. And

0:03:25.796 --> 0:03:28.756
<v Speaker 3>if we struggle early or if we fail, we think

0:03:28.956 --> 0:03:31.716
<v Speaker 3>this is not for me. And what we overlook is

0:03:31.756 --> 0:03:34.796
<v Speaker 3>that growth is not determined by where you start. It's

0:03:34.796 --> 0:03:37.356
<v Speaker 3>about the distance you can travel. But we can't see

0:03:37.356 --> 0:03:39.236
<v Speaker 3>that distance yet, right. We don't have a crystal law

0:03:39.236 --> 0:03:41.516
<v Speaker 3>to look into the future, and so we end up

0:03:41.556 --> 0:03:44.716
<v Speaker 3>missing out on a great deal of possibility that I

0:03:44.756 --> 0:03:45.956
<v Speaker 3>think goes unrecognized.

0:03:46.596 --> 0:03:48.716
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and one thing I loved reading about in your book,

0:03:48.756 --> 0:03:50.916
<v Speaker 1>as you say, the things that you're most proud of

0:03:51.476 --> 0:03:54.516
<v Speaker 1>aren't the domains where you've gotten to the highest heights.

0:03:54.516 --> 0:03:56.836
<v Speaker 1>It's actually where you started off at the lowest point

0:03:57.236 --> 0:03:59.356
<v Speaker 1>but made a ton of progress along the way. So

0:03:59.396 --> 0:04:00.916
<v Speaker 1>can you share a little bit more about that.

0:04:01.836 --> 0:04:06.236
<v Speaker 3>I really loved sports growing up, and after failing to

0:04:06.276 --> 0:04:08.996
<v Speaker 3>make the middle school basketball team and the high school

0:04:08.996 --> 0:04:12.396
<v Speaker 3>soccer team, I turned my attention to springboard diving, which

0:04:12.476 --> 0:04:14.836
<v Speaker 3>I had sort of caught the bug for late as

0:04:14.876 --> 0:04:18.076
<v Speaker 3>a teenager. And it was abundantly clear that I did

0:04:18.116 --> 0:04:20.116
<v Speaker 3>not have the physical talent to be a great diver.

0:04:20.596 --> 0:04:22.876
<v Speaker 3>My teammates called me Frankenstein because I didn't bend my

0:04:22.916 --> 0:04:26.116
<v Speaker 3>knees when I walked, which was ironic because in order

0:04:26.156 --> 0:04:27.916
<v Speaker 3>to touch my toes I had to bend my knees.

0:04:27.956 --> 0:04:31.596
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't flexible, I didn't have the grace or explosive power,

0:04:31.956 --> 0:04:35.876
<v Speaker 3>and I was also afraid of heights, so not exactly

0:04:35.956 --> 0:04:39.516
<v Speaker 3>set up for success. And I had an extraordinary coach,

0:04:39.596 --> 0:04:42.636
<v Speaker 3>Eric Best, who said on day one of practice, I

0:04:42.676 --> 0:04:45.796
<v Speaker 3>will never cut anyone who wants to be here, and

0:04:46.476 --> 0:04:49.756
<v Speaker 3>if you know, if you focus your energy on this,

0:04:49.876 --> 0:04:51.876
<v Speaker 3>I believe you can be a state finalist by the

0:04:51.916 --> 0:04:54.796
<v Speaker 3>time you're a senior in high school. And thanks to

0:04:54.916 --> 0:04:57.076
<v Speaker 3>Eric's coaching, I made the state finals as a junior

0:04:57.076 --> 0:05:00.436
<v Speaker 3>in high school, and I got nowhere near the Olympics.

0:05:00.516 --> 0:05:03.316
<v Speaker 3>Let's be clear, I could not have qualified for Olympic

0:05:03.356 --> 0:05:06.516
<v Speaker 3>trials if my life depended on it. But I got

0:05:06.556 --> 0:05:08.716
<v Speaker 3>a lot better than I ever expected. I ended up

0:05:08.796 --> 0:05:11.476
<v Speaker 3>qualified for the Junior Olympic Nationals twice, and I made

0:05:11.476 --> 0:05:13.476
<v Speaker 3>the All American list and ended up getting recruited a

0:05:13.556 --> 0:05:17.316
<v Speaker 3>diving college. And it was such a pivotal experience for

0:05:17.396 --> 0:05:20.476
<v Speaker 3>me to realize just because I start with a lack

0:05:20.516 --> 0:05:24.236
<v Speaker 3>of talent doesn't mean I can't overcome many of the

0:05:24.276 --> 0:05:25.316
<v Speaker 3>obstacles on my path.

0:05:25.596 --> 0:05:29.036
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I resonate with your story. I truly think

0:05:29.076 --> 0:05:33.356
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing that I enjoy more in life than witnessing progress.

0:05:33.436 --> 0:05:36.076
<v Speaker 1>Well maybe a really good Indian meal cooked by my mother,

0:05:36.116 --> 0:05:40.316
<v Speaker 1>but second to that, I love witnessing progress. And so

0:05:40.556 --> 0:05:43.196
<v Speaker 1>I think my version of Adam as the diver is

0:05:43.996 --> 0:05:47.716
<v Speaker 1>I began learning Mandarin about six years ago or so

0:05:47.916 --> 0:05:51.916
<v Speaker 1>because my husband's Chinese and none of his relatives speak English,

0:05:51.996 --> 0:05:53.476
<v Speaker 1>and so I thought, oh, this would be a really

0:05:53.596 --> 0:05:56.876
<v Speaker 1>nice way to connect with his family and you know,

0:05:56.916 --> 0:05:58.996
<v Speaker 1>try to show them that I, you know, really love

0:05:59.076 --> 0:06:01.116
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy and I really you know want to fit into

0:06:01.156 --> 0:06:05.276
<v Speaker 1>the family. And talk about a low starting point, Adam,

0:06:05.556 --> 0:06:08.956
<v Speaker 1>I took the cake there, I promise, But the joy

0:06:09.356 --> 0:06:13.356
<v Speaker 1>of improving at a language that I found so challenging

0:06:14.156 --> 0:06:17.516
<v Speaker 1>has been intoxicating, like truly. So I remember there was

0:06:17.556 --> 0:06:20.436
<v Speaker 1>this one day where I got into a lift and

0:06:20.596 --> 0:06:22.756
<v Speaker 1>it was clear that driver was a little bit uneasy

0:06:22.796 --> 0:06:25.236
<v Speaker 1>because he didn't speak English. And then I looked at

0:06:25.236 --> 0:06:27.876
<v Speaker 1>his phone and I saw Chinese characters, and I was like,

0:06:27.996 --> 0:06:30.276
<v Speaker 1>this is my moment, and so I filt of all

0:06:30.276 --> 0:06:32.996
<v Speaker 1>this courage and I spoke to him in broken Mandarin

0:06:33.356 --> 0:06:35.916
<v Speaker 1>and he understood what I was saying. And after I

0:06:35.916 --> 0:06:38.036
<v Speaker 1>got out of that lift, I called Jimmy and I

0:06:38.116 --> 0:06:40.916
<v Speaker 1>was squealing. It was literally like the best day of

0:06:40.916 --> 0:06:44.276
<v Speaker 1>my year. And so yeah, and that starting point again

0:06:44.356 --> 0:06:47.276
<v Speaker 1>was so low that when you witness the potential that

0:06:47.916 --> 0:06:50.476
<v Speaker 1>you had in a space where you really underestimated yourself,

0:06:50.516 --> 0:06:51.636
<v Speaker 1>it's just so satisfying.

0:06:51.836 --> 0:06:53.876
<v Speaker 3>That's amazing. I had no idea that you learned Mandarin.

0:06:54.076 --> 0:06:55.436
<v Speaker 3>Where have you been hiding this secret?

0:06:55.556 --> 0:06:59.676
<v Speaker 1>Well, learning I inng It is a works in progress.

0:07:00.316 --> 0:07:02.876
<v Speaker 1>So this is what's really interesting because this, I think

0:07:02.956 --> 0:07:05.436
<v Speaker 1>hits on another theme in your book, which is my

0:07:05.556 --> 0:07:07.836
<v Speaker 1>decision to pick up a new language of all things

0:07:07.836 --> 0:07:11.436
<v Speaker 1>in adulthood was never something that I thought would happen.

0:07:11.516 --> 0:07:15.116
<v Speaker 1>And that's because I historically just sucked at learning foreign languages.

0:07:15.196 --> 0:07:18.556
<v Speaker 1>So in high school I took Spanish. In college I

0:07:18.596 --> 0:07:21.356
<v Speaker 1>took Hi the terrible at both of them, and so

0:07:21.556 --> 0:07:24.116
<v Speaker 1>I was pretty hesitant to give a foreign language a go,

0:07:24.436 --> 0:07:25.436
<v Speaker 1>especially in my thirties.

0:07:25.716 --> 0:07:28.476
<v Speaker 3>This is so fascinating. Okay, I have a bunch of reactions.

0:07:28.636 --> 0:07:31.356
<v Speaker 3>So first of all, can we just pause to mark

0:07:31.436 --> 0:07:34.156
<v Speaker 3>the moment when the world learned that there was something

0:07:34.156 --> 0:07:35.676
<v Speaker 3>that Maya Shankar was not good at?

0:07:36.156 --> 0:07:37.956
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Adam, that's.

0:07:38.036 --> 0:07:41.476
<v Speaker 3>Because I mean, I think everyone admires what a natural

0:07:41.516 --> 0:07:45.116
<v Speaker 3>you are at so many things you know, from your

0:07:45.236 --> 0:07:49.396
<v Speaker 3>music virtuoso childhood to your mastery of cognitive science to

0:07:49.636 --> 0:07:52.556
<v Speaker 3>your ability to have a conversation with anyone about anything

0:07:52.676 --> 0:07:57.796
<v Speaker 3>and make their complex ideas understandable. I think it's reassuring

0:07:57.796 --> 0:07:59.556
<v Speaker 3>to the rest of us that there are things that

0:07:59.596 --> 0:08:03.156
<v Speaker 3>you two struggle with. Would be my first reaction. Secondly,

0:08:03.356 --> 0:08:06.316
<v Speaker 3>I'm thinking about I guess the common arc of saying, well,

0:08:06.356 --> 0:08:09.036
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a foreign language person, I lack this skill,

0:08:09.556 --> 0:08:12.116
<v Speaker 3>and then realizing that it was actually not skill that

0:08:12.156 --> 0:08:14.796
<v Speaker 3>you lacked entirely. It sounds to me like you had

0:08:14.836 --> 0:08:16.356
<v Speaker 3>a different kind of motivation.

0:08:16.156 --> 0:08:17.836
<v Speaker 1>In your thirties, one hundred percent.

0:08:18.396 --> 0:08:21.996
<v Speaker 3>You were one excited intrinsically to learn, which maybe you

0:08:22.036 --> 0:08:25.236
<v Speaker 3>were less so in high school. And two you also

0:08:25.236 --> 0:08:27.676
<v Speaker 3>had a really strong pro social purpose here, which is

0:08:27.916 --> 0:08:31.316
<v Speaker 3>you're trying to connect with Jimmy's family, and I think

0:08:31.356 --> 0:08:33.556
<v Speaker 3>that probably made the language learning a lot more meaningful.

0:08:34.156 --> 0:08:37.476
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the root of your motivation matters so much when

0:08:37.516 --> 0:08:39.996
<v Speaker 1>it comes to learning. So when I was in high school,

0:08:40.076 --> 0:08:41.916
<v Speaker 1>it was like, Okay, just got to get through that

0:08:41.996 --> 0:08:44.716
<v Speaker 1>language requirement, try to get the A because I want

0:08:44.716 --> 0:08:47.156
<v Speaker 1>to get into a good college, like blah blah blah. Right,

0:08:47.196 --> 0:08:49.996
<v Speaker 1>And then similarly in college, I think Hindy was just

0:08:50.036 --> 0:08:52.356
<v Speaker 1>a way of checking the box on the foreign language requirement.

0:08:52.876 --> 0:08:55.516
<v Speaker 1>And what happened with Mandarin, like you said, is it

0:08:55.796 --> 0:08:59.156
<v Speaker 1>took on this hugely emotional quality to it, right, which

0:08:59.156 --> 0:09:02.436
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't expecting. And on top of feeling like I

0:09:02.436 --> 0:09:04.276
<v Speaker 1>was going to be able to connect with Jimmy's relatives,

0:09:04.316 --> 0:09:07.796
<v Speaker 1>what I didn't realize is that so much of culture

0:09:07.956 --> 0:09:10.516
<v Speaker 1>is baked into language, and so when I was learning it,

0:09:10.556 --> 0:09:14.596
<v Speaker 1>I was learning about this fundamental humility that exists within

0:09:14.676 --> 0:09:17.316
<v Speaker 1>Chinese culture, and like how much I love that? And

0:09:17.356 --> 0:09:20.516
<v Speaker 1>so it's really it's been so charming to learn about

0:09:20.556 --> 0:09:23.356
<v Speaker 1>those elements, and I would have ignored them entirely in

0:09:23.396 --> 0:09:25.276
<v Speaker 1>the context of like a high school class right where

0:09:25.276 --> 0:09:27.036
<v Speaker 1>I didn't understand how it's going to play out.

0:09:27.236 --> 0:09:29.076
<v Speaker 3>Yes, and I wonder, okay. So the other thing is

0:09:29.156 --> 0:09:32.796
<v Speaker 3>you talk about using it in the cab. So one

0:09:32.796 --> 0:09:35.516
<v Speaker 3>of the things I learned while researching basically, how do

0:09:35.556 --> 0:09:39.756
<v Speaker 3>you become better at getting better? So what's the science

0:09:39.756 --> 0:09:42.476
<v Speaker 3>of improving at improving? One of the things that holds

0:09:42.476 --> 0:09:44.596
<v Speaker 3>a lot of us back is we're reluctant to put

0:09:44.636 --> 0:09:48.516
<v Speaker 3>ourselves in uncomfortable situations. And nowhere is this more clear

0:09:48.596 --> 0:09:51.196
<v Speaker 3>than learning a foreign language. If you look at why

0:09:51.316 --> 0:09:53.516
<v Speaker 3>so many people struggle in high school to learn a language,

0:09:53.516 --> 0:09:56.396
<v Speaker 3>it's not necessarily that they lack the language gene or

0:09:56.396 --> 0:09:58.516
<v Speaker 3>they missed the critical period, and if only they had

0:09:58.556 --> 0:10:01.356
<v Speaker 3>learned it younger, they had an aptitude that's gone. It's

0:10:01.396 --> 0:10:03.516
<v Speaker 3>that they're afraid to use it because you don't want

0:10:03.516 --> 0:10:06.036
<v Speaker 3>to sound like an idiot. Absolutely, we don't want to

0:10:06.036 --> 0:10:09.676
<v Speaker 3>embarrass ourselves, and that's totally reasonable. But the only way

0:10:09.716 --> 0:10:12.156
<v Speaker 3>to learn to speak a language is to talk it

0:10:12.236 --> 0:10:14.876
<v Speaker 3>out loud and to use it as you're acquiring it,

0:10:15.276 --> 0:10:17.996
<v Speaker 3>whereas most people expect that they can master it, that

0:10:17.996 --> 0:10:20.876
<v Speaker 3>they can commit the entire vocabulary and grammar to memory,

0:10:21.076 --> 0:10:24.116
<v Speaker 3>and only then are they ready to speak it. I

0:10:24.156 --> 0:10:26.196
<v Speaker 3>wonder if you were that person earlier.

0:10:26.876 --> 0:10:29.396
<v Speaker 1>I was so anxious about speaking in a foreign language,

0:10:29.476 --> 0:10:32.676
<v Speaker 1>especially Chinese, where you might say a tone with a

0:10:32.716 --> 0:10:36.396
<v Speaker 1>slightly different inflection, and you've now set a completely different sentence,

0:10:36.516 --> 0:10:39.236
<v Speaker 1>because it's like ma versus ma, right, those mean totally

0:10:39.236 --> 0:10:41.756
<v Speaker 1>different things. And yet I think what happened in the

0:10:41.756 --> 0:10:44.716
<v Speaker 1>car that day and where I found the courage was

0:10:45.436 --> 0:10:49.276
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't speak English. He's clearly feeling anxious. I'm clearly

0:10:49.276 --> 0:10:52.116
<v Speaker 1>feeling anxious that I can't communicate with him, and so

0:10:52.196 --> 0:10:53.996
<v Speaker 1>that I like dig within myself. I have to like

0:10:54.076 --> 0:10:56.796
<v Speaker 1>excavate courage, like it's so deep inside of my body,

0:10:56.796 --> 0:10:59.476
<v Speaker 1>and I pull it out and I communicate with him.

0:10:59.516 --> 0:11:03.076
<v Speaker 1>And I thought to myself, Wow, talk about a emotional

0:11:03.116 --> 0:11:05.796
<v Speaker 1>return on investment, Like I communicated with a human that

0:11:05.796 --> 0:11:07.996
<v Speaker 1>I would not have been able to communicate with had

0:11:08.036 --> 0:11:10.396
<v Speaker 1>it not been for the skill building. And so sometimes

0:11:10.396 --> 0:11:14.516
<v Speaker 1>it takes situations like that to allow yourself to engage

0:11:14.516 --> 0:11:16.196
<v Speaker 1>with the thing you're not very good at before you

0:11:16.236 --> 0:11:17.076
<v Speaker 1>achieve mastery.

0:11:17.636 --> 0:11:19.636
<v Speaker 3>I literally could have written about you in chapter one

0:11:19.676 --> 0:11:23.316
<v Speaker 3>of the book. You're embodying the very principle I was

0:11:23.316 --> 0:11:26.276
<v Speaker 3>trying to unpack. And I feel like so much of

0:11:26.396 --> 0:11:29.676
<v Speaker 3>learning requires us to put ourselves in uncomfortable situations, because

0:11:29.716 --> 0:11:33.316
<v Speaker 3>that's where the challenge lies. Yes, but the fear of embarrassment,

0:11:33.556 --> 0:11:38.116
<v Speaker 3>of feeling incompetent, of looking stupid holds us back, and

0:11:38.156 --> 0:11:41.276
<v Speaker 3>so we end up making these tiny little adjustments instead

0:11:41.316 --> 0:11:41.996
<v Speaker 3>of big leaps.

0:11:42.276 --> 0:11:45.356
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I mean discomfort carries the illusion that we're

0:11:45.356 --> 0:11:49.876
<v Speaker 1>not making progress, right, And I mean, from a neuroscientific perspective,

0:11:50.116 --> 0:11:53.596
<v Speaker 1>the best way to boost brain plasticity is to fail

0:11:53.636 --> 0:11:57.476
<v Speaker 1>at things, because when you fail, those errors signal to

0:11:57.476 --> 0:12:01.196
<v Speaker 1>the brain that something's wrong. In turn, it triggers the

0:12:01.236 --> 0:12:05.036
<v Speaker 1>release of this beautiful cocktail of neurochemicals that help reshape

0:12:05.036 --> 0:12:09.116
<v Speaker 1>the brain. It's only when you tell your nervous system, hey, buddy,

0:12:09.116 --> 0:12:12.076
<v Speaker 1>the current setups not good enough that it starts making

0:12:12.116 --> 0:12:14.636
<v Speaker 1>the relevant changes, right, And so maybe we can channel

0:12:14.676 --> 0:12:16.276
<v Speaker 1>some of that when we get frustrated.

0:12:16.716 --> 0:12:19.116
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. Yeah, that's a great way to describe it.

0:12:20.956 --> 0:12:24.276
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's now shift to the ingredients to the toolkit

0:12:24.396 --> 0:12:28.076
<v Speaker 1>for unlocking our potential. You talk about the importance of

0:12:28.316 --> 0:12:32.196
<v Speaker 1>character or what's otherwise known as soft skills, and can

0:12:32.236 --> 0:12:35.396
<v Speaker 1>you please first share the origin story of the term

0:12:35.756 --> 0:12:37.836
<v Speaker 1>soft skills because I absolutely loved it, and I feel

0:12:37.836 --> 0:12:39.516
<v Speaker 1>like soft skills has gotten such a bad rep for

0:12:39.556 --> 0:12:41.956
<v Speaker 1>so long, and I feel like you're redeeming it. So

0:12:42.036 --> 0:12:44.956
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of all people who enjoy soft skills and

0:12:45.036 --> 0:12:46.756
<v Speaker 1>enjoy cultivating them. Thank you, sir.

0:12:47.636 --> 0:12:50.996
<v Speaker 3>Yes, anytime I think of character skills as learn capacity

0:12:51.076 --> 0:12:52.676
<v Speaker 3>is to put your principles into practice.

0:12:53.236 --> 0:12:53.436
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:12:53.796 --> 0:12:55.396
<v Speaker 3>At some point I got curious about where the term

0:12:55.436 --> 0:12:58.996
<v Speaker 3>came from, like, why do we call these vital behavioral skills?

0:12:59.476 --> 0:13:02.516
<v Speaker 3>Why do we call them soft? That sounds weak. Well,

0:13:02.556 --> 0:13:05.636
<v Speaker 3>if you trace the history, it turns out that the

0:13:05.756 --> 0:13:08.996
<v Speaker 3>term originated from the US Army when they were trying

0:13:09.036 --> 0:13:13.716
<v Speaker 3>to classify different skills for soldiers and basically measure competencies

0:13:13.756 --> 0:13:17.396
<v Speaker 3>to go and defend national security. And they had a

0:13:17.476 --> 0:13:20.676
<v Speaker 3>list of hard skills, which were literally the capabilities to

0:13:20.676 --> 0:13:23.716
<v Speaker 3>work with machines. Machines were made out of metal that's hard,

0:13:24.076 --> 0:13:26.476
<v Speaker 3>and so operating a tank or a gun was considered

0:13:26.476 --> 0:13:31.116
<v Speaker 3>a hard skill, and so then everything else leadership collaboration

0:13:32.196 --> 0:13:34.996
<v Speaker 3>was lumped in this soft skills bucket, which they didn't

0:13:34.996 --> 0:13:38.716
<v Speaker 3>think was unimportant. They just meant you're not using a

0:13:38.756 --> 0:13:43.836
<v Speaker 3>piece of almost unbreakable equipment. Yeah, exactly. So I think

0:13:43.956 --> 0:13:47.716
<v Speaker 3>obviously that did a great disservice to this category of skills.

0:13:47.716 --> 0:13:51.076
<v Speaker 3>And I actually really wonder if we had called those

0:13:51.156 --> 0:13:54.276
<v Speaker 3>behavioral skills, if they had been called leadership skills, would

0:13:54.316 --> 0:13:58.356
<v Speaker 3>they be branded differently today. The study that really blew

0:13:58.436 --> 0:14:01.556
<v Speaker 3>my mind was a study that roz Chetti led where

0:14:01.676 --> 0:14:04.076
<v Speaker 3>he found that we could predict your income in your twenties,

0:14:04.276 --> 0:14:06.916
<v Speaker 3>how much money you make from the number of years

0:14:06.916 --> 0:14:09.076
<v Speaker 3>of experience your kindergarten teacher had.

0:14:09.876 --> 0:14:11.796
<v Speaker 1>Wow, unreal.

0:14:12.196 --> 0:14:14.556
<v Speaker 3>I could not believe this when I read this research.

0:14:14.676 --> 0:14:17.356
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, listeners, Rod Shetty is like a

0:14:17.436 --> 0:14:20.436
<v Speaker 1>natural experiment genius, so he has controlled for all of

0:14:20.476 --> 0:14:24.236
<v Speaker 1>the relevant variables, I assure you. Anyway, continue, Yeah.

0:14:23.996 --> 0:14:28.436
<v Speaker 3>He's a world class economist and the finding is very robust.

0:14:28.756 --> 0:14:31.956
<v Speaker 3>And the big question is, well, what are these experienced

0:14:31.996 --> 0:14:35.476
<v Speaker 3>kindergarten teachers doing that sets kids up on a different trajectory.

0:14:35.796 --> 0:14:39.636
<v Speaker 3>And my assumption was cognitive skills, like they're giving you

0:14:39.716 --> 0:14:41.716
<v Speaker 3>an edge and reading and math, and then you get

0:14:41.756 --> 0:14:43.756
<v Speaker 3>to carry that with you. It is true that the

0:14:43.796 --> 0:14:47.476
<v Speaker 3>more experienced teachers are better at teaching math and reading,

0:14:47.996 --> 0:14:50.356
<v Speaker 3>but that advantage dissipates over the next few years and

0:14:50.716 --> 0:14:54.276
<v Speaker 3>other kids catch up. Where kids get a lasting advantage

0:14:54.316 --> 0:14:57.636
<v Speaker 3>from an experienced kindergarten teacher is in character skills. In

0:14:57.796 --> 0:15:00.396
<v Speaker 3>fourth and eighth grade, the kids who happen to have

0:15:00.436 --> 0:15:04.316
<v Speaker 3>a more experienced kindergarten teacher randomly assigned ended up getting

0:15:04.356 --> 0:15:10.716
<v Speaker 3>rated higher by their later teachers in being proactive, pro social, disciplined,

0:15:10.916 --> 0:15:15.356
<v Speaker 3>and determent, and those skills are almost two and a

0:15:15.396 --> 0:15:20.076
<v Speaker 3>half times more important for predicting future success than cognitive skills.

0:15:20.876 --> 0:15:23.316
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if we can explore some of the mechanisms

0:15:23.356 --> 0:15:26.796
<v Speaker 1>by which character skills lead to better outcomes. So, as

0:15:26.796 --> 0:15:29.076
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking about it now, it seems like, okay, determination

0:15:29.516 --> 0:15:31.796
<v Speaker 1>kind of a clear one. It means you're practicing maybe

0:15:31.796 --> 0:15:36.236
<v Speaker 1>more deliberately, you're practicing harder, etc. It's also possible that

0:15:36.756 --> 0:15:39.996
<v Speaker 1>when you build character skills, you're more likable, and so

0:15:40.036 --> 0:15:44.236
<v Speaker 1>you're more likely to draw in mentors and peers and

0:15:44.836 --> 0:15:47.796
<v Speaker 1>teachers and to attract the attention of employers, And so

0:15:47.796 --> 0:15:51.316
<v Speaker 1>there might be this virtuous cycle where character certainly is

0:15:51.316 --> 0:15:54.756
<v Speaker 1>making you better at honing the craft, but having character

0:15:54.836 --> 0:15:58.436
<v Speaker 1>skills makes other people in your orbit more likely to

0:15:58.516 --> 0:16:00.356
<v Speaker 1>want to work with you and help make you better.

0:16:01.316 --> 0:16:03.716
<v Speaker 3>I think that's right. I do wonder how much of

0:16:04.076 --> 0:16:08.996
<v Speaker 3>growth is about character skills elevating your individual learning versus

0:16:09.116 --> 0:16:12.996
<v Speaker 3>attracting people into your orbit who build the scaffolding to

0:16:13.076 --> 0:16:13.796
<v Speaker 3>help you climb.

0:16:14.836 --> 0:16:17.156
<v Speaker 1>So, speaking of character skills, I mean, you're just one

0:16:17.156 --> 0:16:19.116
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite people to intellectually spar with. But we

0:16:19.116 --> 0:16:21.556
<v Speaker 1>were chatting last week about the degree to which we

0:16:21.596 --> 0:16:25.716
<v Speaker 1>think character skills are valuable. I tend to lean more

0:16:25.916 --> 0:16:28.996
<v Speaker 1>nature versus nurture in that debate, and so, yeah, I

0:16:28.996 --> 0:16:32.676
<v Speaker 1>guess my question here is do we have encouraging evidence

0:16:32.676 --> 0:16:36.076
<v Speaker 1>that adults can improve their character skills in a persistent

0:16:36.556 --> 0:16:39.556
<v Speaker 1>and meaningful way. And, by the way, I would love

0:16:39.596 --> 0:16:41.356
<v Speaker 1>for you to be right here. I want to be

0:16:41.476 --> 0:16:43.716
<v Speaker 1>wrong because I really do want these skills to be

0:16:43.876 --> 0:16:47.636
<v Speaker 1>valuable and mutable, and so I have no pride around

0:16:47.676 --> 0:16:48.796
<v Speaker 1>my current point of view.

0:16:49.636 --> 0:16:52.276
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's no one easier to persuade than somebody who's

0:16:52.316 --> 0:16:54.196
<v Speaker 3>already invested in believing.

0:16:53.996 --> 0:16:55.236
<v Speaker 1>The case hereabouts exactly.

0:16:56.156 --> 0:16:58.276
<v Speaker 3>Well, no, honestly, I'm not here to make an argument.

0:16:58.756 --> 0:17:00.596
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to persuade you. What I want to

0:17:00.636 --> 0:17:02.916
<v Speaker 3>do is share with you some of the evidence that's

0:17:02.956 --> 0:17:05.276
<v Speaker 3>really shaped my thinking on this and see if you

0:17:05.356 --> 0:17:08.036
<v Speaker 3>find it compelling. So let's start with the evidence in

0:17:08.076 --> 0:17:12.916
<v Speaker 3>the book. I was quite taken with the experiment that

0:17:12.996 --> 0:17:17.156
<v Speaker 3>Francisco Campus and colleagues did on entrepreneurs in West Africa.

0:17:17.716 --> 0:17:20.636
<v Speaker 3>So you take in this experiment, you take fifteen hundred

0:17:20.836 --> 0:17:25.116
<v Speaker 3>small business owners, You randomly assign them to a control group,

0:17:25.156 --> 0:17:28.436
<v Speaker 3>a cognitive skills training group or a character skills training group,

0:17:29.196 --> 0:17:33.316
<v Speaker 3>and the character skills training group sees their businesses grow

0:17:33.916 --> 0:17:36.236
<v Speaker 3>almost three times as much over the next two years

0:17:36.476 --> 0:17:39.756
<v Speaker 3>as the cognitive skills training group. Now, these founders are

0:17:39.796 --> 0:17:42.836
<v Speaker 3>mostly in their forties and fifties, so it's quite late

0:17:42.876 --> 0:17:44.076
<v Speaker 3>to be learning character skills.

0:17:44.156 --> 0:17:48.756
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're not in any kind of critical period, you know. Yeah, exactly.

0:17:49.276 --> 0:17:51.916
<v Speaker 3>And the training program is not rocket science. It's a

0:17:51.956 --> 0:17:57.356
<v Speaker 3>week of practicing being proactive and disciplined and determined, and

0:17:57.396 --> 0:17:59.796
<v Speaker 3>then thinking about how those skills apply to your business.

0:18:00.076 --> 0:18:03.196
<v Speaker 3>The fact that randomly assigning people to just practice honing

0:18:03.236 --> 0:18:06.796
<v Speaker 3>those skills for a week at midlife, mid career, then

0:18:07.116 --> 0:18:10.436
<v Speaker 3>you know, dramatically increases their revenue you looking at both

0:18:10.436 --> 0:18:14.476
<v Speaker 3>sales and profits. That to me is pretty persuasive. So

0:18:14.756 --> 0:18:16.916
<v Speaker 3>tell me why that didn't persuade you or why it

0:18:16.956 --> 0:18:17.556
<v Speaker 3>wasn't enough.

0:18:17.916 --> 0:18:20.716
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, So let me tell you what I think

0:18:21.236 --> 0:18:24.356
<v Speaker 1>would persuade me. Just conceptually and embarras me, I'm thinking

0:18:24.356 --> 0:18:27.116
<v Speaker 1>about this out loud. What I hear in the study

0:18:27.156 --> 0:18:30.356
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned from Africa might be explained by the following.

0:18:30.916 --> 0:18:34.556
<v Speaker 1>There are capacities that lay dormant in many of us,

0:18:34.956 --> 0:18:37.836
<v Speaker 1>and we simply don't know that they're useful to recruit

0:18:38.036 --> 0:18:40.516
<v Speaker 1>in any given setting. And so what you've done in

0:18:40.516 --> 0:18:43.796
<v Speaker 1>this intervention is you've simply made salient to these entrepreneurs

0:18:44.156 --> 0:18:48.676
<v Speaker 1>that things like proactivity and determination, whatever the other soft

0:18:48.676 --> 0:18:51.076
<v Speaker 1>skills are are going to be helpful to them in

0:18:51.116 --> 0:18:55.116
<v Speaker 1>their business pursuits. So it's less about them growing and

0:18:55.156 --> 0:18:58.076
<v Speaker 1>seeing improvement in their character skills as much as knowing

0:18:58.116 --> 0:19:02.836
<v Speaker 1>to access them in the first place. Fascinating, fascinating, and

0:19:02.956 --> 0:19:05.196
<v Speaker 1>because it's week long, I'm kind of like that could

0:19:05.196 --> 0:19:08.356
<v Speaker 1>be an alternative explanation, and that's still valuable right to

0:19:08.396 --> 0:19:11.196
<v Speaker 1>alert people in certain disciplines that that matters.

0:19:12.436 --> 0:19:15.756
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, that's very interesting. Yeah, I find that totally plausible.

0:19:16.916 --> 0:19:19.476
<v Speaker 3>I would still say that, you know, what's happening is

0:19:19.956 --> 0:19:23.156
<v Speaker 3>they're activating a set of dormant capacities and turning them

0:19:23.156 --> 0:19:26.916
<v Speaker 3>into useful skills, and so in that sense, they're still learning.

0:19:27.076 --> 0:19:30.156
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that. But if say these things exist

0:19:30.236 --> 0:19:32.676
<v Speaker 1>in their dormant and you unlock them over the course

0:19:32.716 --> 0:19:34.836
<v Speaker 1>of a week, you might go from like zero to

0:19:34.876 --> 0:19:37.076
<v Speaker 1>four in terms of like how much you know. And

0:19:37.116 --> 0:19:40.196
<v Speaker 1>what I'm arguing is, in the absence of a longitudinal

0:19:40.236 --> 0:19:42.916
<v Speaker 1>study that shows that a person can go on the

0:19:42.956 --> 0:19:46.596
<v Speaker 1>Proactivity scale, for example, go from zero to seventy five,

0:19:47.356 --> 0:19:50.436
<v Speaker 1>I'm not certain about how much room for growth there

0:19:50.596 --> 0:19:55.036
<v Speaker 1>is within that particular character trait, and so I'm unclear

0:19:55.076 --> 0:19:57.516
<v Speaker 1>as to how again malleable it is. So we know

0:19:57.676 --> 0:19:59.636
<v Speaker 1>they can unlock it in the first place, we know

0:19:59.716 --> 0:20:01.716
<v Speaker 1>they can maybe inch a little forward over the course

0:20:01.716 --> 0:20:04.476
<v Speaker 1>of the week, But how possible is it for two

0:20:04.556 --> 0:20:07.276
<v Speaker 1>people pull out of a random sample to both get

0:20:07.276 --> 0:20:09.036
<v Speaker 1>to seventy five with the right tools.

0:20:09.876 --> 0:20:12.156
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a very good question. I think it's an

0:20:12.156 --> 0:20:15.236
<v Speaker 3>empirical question that I have not seen a good answer to.

0:20:16.596 --> 0:20:20.556
<v Speaker 1>After the break the case for imperfectionism from a fellow

0:20:20.636 --> 0:20:24.796
<v Speaker 1>recovering perfectionist, and we'll hear about a technique to unlock

0:20:24.796 --> 0:20:29.196
<v Speaker 1>our hidden potential. It comes from a sea creature that's

0:20:29.276 --> 0:20:48.676
<v Speaker 1>up next. On a slight change of plans, I want

0:20:48.676 --> 0:20:51.516
<v Speaker 1>to start with your suggestion that we try and be

0:20:52.316 --> 0:20:56.676
<v Speaker 1>more like a sponge, and like a literal, living sea sponge.

0:20:56.676 --> 0:20:59.316
<v Speaker 1>We're not talking about like a kitchen dish sponge situation.

0:20:59.756 --> 0:21:01.476
<v Speaker 1>So can you tell me a little bit more about

0:21:01.516 --> 0:21:03.756
<v Speaker 1>this metaphor, and then I will tell you why I'm

0:21:03.796 --> 0:21:04.436
<v Speaker 1>obsessed with it.

0:21:05.556 --> 0:21:07.796
<v Speaker 3>So when I was interested in proactivity, I was interested

0:21:07.796 --> 0:21:10.956
<v Speaker 3>in being proactive to absorb information that helps you grow.

0:21:11.316 --> 0:21:12.836
<v Speaker 3>And we've known for a long time that this is

0:21:12.876 --> 0:21:16.596
<v Speaker 3>an important driver of reaching potential. I was looking for

0:21:16.676 --> 0:21:19.556
<v Speaker 3>insight about that, and people kept saying as I talked

0:21:19.596 --> 0:21:22.476
<v Speaker 3>to people who had achieved extraordinary growth or coach others

0:21:22.476 --> 0:21:24.756
<v Speaker 3>to do the same, they kept saying I was like

0:21:24.796 --> 0:21:28.436
<v Speaker 3>a sponge, she was a sponge. He was a human sponge.

0:21:28.796 --> 0:21:30.516
<v Speaker 3>And eventually it hit me that this might be more

0:21:30.556 --> 0:21:33.996
<v Speaker 3>than a metaphor. So I started reading about sea sponges

0:21:34.156 --> 0:21:37.116
<v Speaker 3>and I learned that the yeah, I mean, that's in

0:21:37.156 --> 0:21:41.476
<v Speaker 3>the job description. Obviously, any self respecting social scientists has

0:21:41.516 --> 0:21:42.796
<v Speaker 3>to take the sea sponge.

0:21:42.876 --> 0:21:45.756
<v Speaker 1>Yes, there's the sea sponge part of the textbook.

0:21:45.356 --> 0:21:48.476
<v Speaker 3>Right, Yeah, du Never. I didn't know a thing about them.

0:21:48.636 --> 0:21:50.036
<v Speaker 3>I learned a lot, and one of the things that

0:21:50.076 --> 0:21:54.676
<v Speaker 3>I learned was that they're not just adept at taking

0:21:54.716 --> 0:21:58.996
<v Speaker 3>in nutrients, they also have finely tuned filters to expel

0:21:59.236 --> 0:22:03.516
<v Speaker 3>harmful particles. And I think why this resonated with me

0:22:03.636 --> 0:22:05.916
<v Speaker 3>is a lot of people think being a sponge is

0:22:05.956 --> 0:22:09.476
<v Speaker 3>about just absorbing as much information as you can seek

0:22:09.516 --> 0:22:14.236
<v Speaker 3>infinite amounts of feedback, engage all of your critics. Not

0:22:14.356 --> 0:22:18.356
<v Speaker 3>so much. Not all critics are thinking critically, not all

0:22:18.356 --> 0:22:22.076
<v Speaker 3>critics are speaking constructively, And I think a huge part

0:22:22.076 --> 0:22:24.956
<v Speaker 3>of being an effective sponge is being proactive, not just

0:22:24.996 --> 0:22:28.996
<v Speaker 3>about what you take in, but also what you expel out.

0:22:29.236 --> 0:22:32.636
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I mean, I love this concept about filtration because

0:22:32.676 --> 0:22:37.116
<v Speaker 1>I think it's so crucial and it's interesting. I mean,

0:22:37.156 --> 0:22:39.596
<v Speaker 1>you talk in the book about the perils of having

0:22:39.636 --> 0:22:42.276
<v Speaker 1>an ego based filtration system, So that's where you're pushing

0:22:42.276 --> 0:22:44.716
<v Speaker 1>out a lot of the bad stuff that you hear

0:22:44.956 --> 0:22:47.036
<v Speaker 1>and you're just kind of absorbing all the like, Oh,

0:22:47.076 --> 0:22:48.676
<v Speaker 1>you're great, and this speech is great, and there's no

0:22:48.756 --> 0:22:53.476
<v Speaker 1>room for improvement, right. I have the underfiltration problem that

0:22:53.556 --> 0:22:56.236
<v Speaker 1>you described, and it's been a journey over time. So

0:22:57.036 --> 0:22:59.196
<v Speaker 1>if I rewind the clock a bit, I mean, starting

0:22:59.196 --> 0:23:01.036
<v Speaker 1>from the time that I was a little kid playing

0:23:01.036 --> 0:23:04.276
<v Speaker 1>the violin, I was always someone who sought out an

0:23:04.436 --> 0:23:07.276
<v Speaker 1>enormous amount of feedback. But the problem that I have

0:23:07.676 --> 0:23:11.316
<v Speaker 1>is I've let too much feedback in and at times

0:23:11.356 --> 0:23:13.756
<v Speaker 1>assigned equal importance to all of it than would have

0:23:13.756 --> 0:23:16.756
<v Speaker 1>been helpful. And the way that I rationalize this, that

0:23:16.796 --> 0:23:19.196
<v Speaker 1>I've justified this is, Okay, I'm a person with a

0:23:19.196 --> 0:23:21.116
<v Speaker 1>lot of blind spots. There's a lot of people out

0:23:21.156 --> 0:23:22.596
<v Speaker 1>there who know a lot more than I do about

0:23:22.596 --> 0:23:24.796
<v Speaker 1>any given thing, and I want to improve as much

0:23:24.836 --> 0:23:26.876
<v Speaker 1>as possible, and I don't want to be prideful in

0:23:26.876 --> 0:23:30.076
<v Speaker 1>these pursuits. But it's taken me a lot of time

0:23:30.556 --> 0:23:36.036
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of confidence building to recognize what feedback

0:23:36.556 --> 0:23:39.716
<v Speaker 1>better serves the thing I'm working on and what doesn't.

0:23:40.276 --> 0:23:43.876
<v Speaker 1>And that's a really hard it's really hard to fine

0:23:43.916 --> 0:23:46.516
<v Speaker 1>tune this filtration system.

0:23:46.756 --> 0:23:51.916
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's not easy, and I think probably I would

0:23:51.916 --> 0:23:54.676
<v Speaker 3>guess that most people are on one extreme or another

0:23:54.716 --> 0:23:57.556
<v Speaker 3>on this. Either they pay attention to all the criticism

0:23:57.716 --> 0:23:59.916
<v Speaker 3>because they're so obsessed with learning and they think that's

0:23:59.956 --> 0:24:03.756
<v Speaker 3>part of having a growth mindset, or their egos are

0:24:03.796 --> 0:24:07.676
<v Speaker 3>fragile and being in secure means that nothing gets in. Yeah,

0:24:07.716 --> 0:24:11.196
<v Speaker 3>and they don't really learn from criticism, and I obviously

0:24:11.236 --> 0:24:14.436
<v Speaker 3>want to find the sweet spot there. So I think

0:24:14.636 --> 0:24:17.636
<v Speaker 3>for me, the key questions looking at the research on

0:24:17.876 --> 0:24:22.956
<v Speaker 3>what makes for useful input are one expertise is this

0:24:22.996 --> 0:24:27.196
<v Speaker 3>person credible in the domain? Two familiarity does this person

0:24:27.236 --> 0:24:30.876
<v Speaker 3>know you? And three care? Are they actually trying to

0:24:30.876 --> 0:24:31.636
<v Speaker 3>help you get better?

0:24:31.756 --> 0:24:32.036
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:24:32.516 --> 0:24:35.956
<v Speaker 3>Yes, And I think it's very common to have a

0:24:35.996 --> 0:24:39.876
<v Speaker 3>critic who checks the first two boxes but not the third,

0:24:40.596 --> 0:24:43.836
<v Speaker 3>which means they don't necessarily have your best interest at heart.

0:24:43.956 --> 0:24:44.476
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:24:44.756 --> 0:24:48.276
<v Speaker 3>I think a good coach is not just attacking your

0:24:48.276 --> 0:24:51.516
<v Speaker 3>worse self, but actually recognizing your hidden potential and trying

0:24:51.516 --> 0:24:53.356
<v Speaker 3>to help you become a better version of yourself.

0:24:54.236 --> 0:24:56.356
<v Speaker 1>And I think to add to that, it's okay to

0:24:56.396 --> 0:24:59.116
<v Speaker 1>not assign equal weight to every piece of feedback given

0:24:59.156 --> 0:25:01.956
<v Speaker 1>to you by someone that you admire. So there's a

0:25:01.956 --> 0:25:06.116
<v Speaker 1>difference between admiring a person and then accepting all of

0:25:06.156 --> 0:25:08.876
<v Speaker 1>their feedback, and we shouldn't confuse the two. And I

0:25:08.916 --> 0:25:11.756
<v Speaker 1>have a personal example with you on this topic, right,

0:25:11.796 --> 0:25:14.596
<v Speaker 1>So you generously gave me a bunch of feedback on

0:25:14.636 --> 0:25:19.036
<v Speaker 1>my TED talk. You really helped elevate it. But crucially

0:25:19.636 --> 0:25:22.916
<v Speaker 1>I didn't accept all your feedback. And I remember thinking,

0:25:23.396 --> 0:25:27.196
<v Speaker 1>wait a second, I'm rejecting Adam Grant's feedback. And this

0:25:27.276 --> 0:25:30.436
<v Speaker 1>man literally holds the world record for like the most

0:25:30.436 --> 0:25:33.476
<v Speaker 1>TED talks given by like any human. But then I

0:25:33.516 --> 0:25:36.556
<v Speaker 1>thought to myself, what would Adam tell me about whether

0:25:36.676 --> 0:25:38.796
<v Speaker 1>or not to reject this feedback? And I heard you

0:25:38.836 --> 0:25:41.596
<v Speaker 1>in my head. I heard you telling me on the phone, Leya,

0:25:41.756 --> 0:25:44.436
<v Speaker 1>I'm just one person. It's one person's feedback. Just reject

0:25:44.436 --> 0:25:46.676
<v Speaker 1>this feedback if this doesn't apply to you or feel

0:25:46.876 --> 0:25:49.276
<v Speaker 1>constant with you and your personality type and the kind

0:25:49.276 --> 0:25:51.956
<v Speaker 1>of TED talk you want to give who cares like.

0:25:52.196 --> 0:25:55.436
<v Speaker 1>Don't accept feedback just because it's someone's feedback. Accept it

0:25:55.476 --> 0:25:58.636
<v Speaker 1>because it resonates with you. And that was growth for

0:25:58.756 --> 0:26:01.356
<v Speaker 1>me because I think back in the day right, Like

0:26:01.436 --> 0:26:03.556
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, I would have been like, accept it all,

0:26:03.876 --> 0:26:07.196
<v Speaker 1>no filtration process. But I appreciate you being that voice

0:26:07.196 --> 0:26:08.676
<v Speaker 1>in my head along the way.

0:26:09.596 --> 0:26:11.956
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm sorry that I didn't say it more explicitly

0:26:12.036 --> 0:26:14.716
<v Speaker 3>right off the bat. If you get a comment just

0:26:14.756 --> 0:26:17.796
<v Speaker 3>from one person, that may just be their idiosyncratic taste

0:26:17.996 --> 0:26:20.516
<v Speaker 3>or their subjective reaction, and you don't have to pay

0:26:20.556 --> 0:26:22.476
<v Speaker 3>attention to it just because someone that you like or

0:26:22.516 --> 0:26:23.396
<v Speaker 3>respect said it.

0:26:23.756 --> 0:26:26.556
<v Speaker 1>No, exactly. And I think actually the root cause of this,

0:26:26.636 --> 0:26:27.916
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just I'm going to be working on the

0:26:27.956 --> 0:26:29.876
<v Speaker 1>skill over the course of my whole life, is that

0:26:30.516 --> 0:26:34.396
<v Speaker 1>it is very very easy for me to see another

0:26:34.436 --> 0:26:37.116
<v Speaker 1>person's point of view. And I don't want to rid

0:26:37.116 --> 0:26:39.796
<v Speaker 1>myself of this trait altogether, because I really do value

0:26:39.796 --> 0:26:41.516
<v Speaker 1>my open mind and I think it makes me a

0:26:41.556 --> 0:26:44.036
<v Speaker 1>better person overall. It's just that I see that there

0:26:44.036 --> 0:26:44.916
<v Speaker 1>are some downsides.

0:26:45.356 --> 0:26:47.436
<v Speaker 3>I agree, and I think this would be an example

0:26:47.636 --> 0:26:50.196
<v Speaker 3>of what psychologists would call a strength overused.

0:26:50.396 --> 0:26:51.276
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's really nice.

0:26:51.356 --> 0:26:54.356
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So you don't want to eliminate the strength. You

0:26:54.436 --> 0:26:56.996
<v Speaker 3>want to make sure you're not using it excessively or

0:26:57.116 --> 0:27:00.116
<v Speaker 3>misusing it by applying it in the wrong situations.

0:26:59.636 --> 0:27:03.876
<v Speaker 1>Yes, exactly. But I also think from a developmental perspective,

0:27:04.076 --> 0:27:07.796
<v Speaker 1>is really natural and healthy when we're young to allow

0:27:07.836 --> 0:27:09.916
<v Speaker 1>in a bunch of feedback and to test out because

0:27:10.356 --> 0:27:13.396
<v Speaker 1>we're still figuring out who we are, like, what we

0:27:13.516 --> 0:27:16.596
<v Speaker 1>care about, what we value, what we prize when it

0:27:16.596 --> 0:27:19.116
<v Speaker 1>comes to giving a talk or writing a song or

0:27:19.116 --> 0:27:22.276
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. And it is through the process of

0:27:22.356 --> 0:27:25.756
<v Speaker 1>receiving feedback and seeing how we respond that we sometimes

0:27:25.796 --> 0:27:29.196
<v Speaker 1>even learn what our preferences are in the first place, right,

0:27:29.236 --> 0:27:31.396
<v Speaker 1>and what we care about. And what's so interesting in

0:27:31.396 --> 0:27:34.076
<v Speaker 1>my own evolution is that I assumed with age that

0:27:34.396 --> 0:27:37.516
<v Speaker 1>this would become easier, right, Filtering would become easier, and

0:27:37.556 --> 0:27:41.996
<v Speaker 1>it absolutely has overall. But I do feel like when

0:27:42.036 --> 0:27:46.236
<v Speaker 1>I enter a new domain, so podcasting for example, or

0:27:46.316 --> 0:27:49.076
<v Speaker 1>giving my first head talk, I go back into that

0:27:49.156 --> 0:27:52.916
<v Speaker 1>developmental stage of mind where I open the floodgates and

0:27:52.956 --> 0:27:56.036
<v Speaker 1>I let all this feedback in and I again have

0:27:56.156 --> 0:27:59.796
<v Speaker 1>to fine tune those filtration skills to figure out, you know,

0:27:59.836 --> 0:28:02.356
<v Speaker 1>where I want to go. So it can be a process, right.

0:28:02.716 --> 0:28:04.916
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's better to err on the side

0:28:04.956 --> 0:28:07.916
<v Speaker 3>of being too open than too closed, because it's much

0:28:07.916 --> 0:28:10.556
<v Speaker 3>easier to turn on the filter than it is to

0:28:10.836 --> 0:28:14.596
<v Speaker 3>suddenly absorb information that you don't have access to anymore

0:28:14.596 --> 0:28:18.436
<v Speaker 3>because people have learned that you're not receptive to it.

0:28:18.716 --> 0:28:21.316
<v Speaker 3>And I love the research showing that we're better off

0:28:21.356 --> 0:28:22.676
<v Speaker 3>asking for advice than feedback.

0:28:23.156 --> 0:28:25.596
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, tell me more about that, because when I read

0:28:25.596 --> 0:28:26.956
<v Speaker 1>that in the book, I was like, aren't they kind

0:28:26.956 --> 0:28:27.556
<v Speaker 1>of the same thing.

0:28:28.156 --> 0:28:31.756
<v Speaker 3>So when you ask for feedback, the other person rewinds

0:28:31.756 --> 0:28:33.476
<v Speaker 3>to the past and tells you what you did wrong

0:28:33.676 --> 0:28:36.036
<v Speaker 3>or what you did right, and that can lead you

0:28:36.076 --> 0:28:39.396
<v Speaker 3>to ruminate about all of your mistakes. Yeah, and then

0:28:39.396 --> 0:28:41.756
<v Speaker 3>it's really hard to carry that forward to what am

0:28:41.756 --> 0:28:44.316
<v Speaker 3>I going to do differently tomorrow. It can also if

0:28:44.356 --> 0:28:46.476
<v Speaker 3>it's positive feedback, it can lead you to say, all right,

0:28:46.516 --> 0:28:49.916
<v Speaker 3>I'm good, I don't need to change anything. And when

0:28:49.956 --> 0:28:53.316
<v Speaker 3>you ask for advice, people actually look ahead and they say, well,

0:28:53.316 --> 0:28:56.396
<v Speaker 3>here's the thing I might adjust next time, And then

0:28:56.596 --> 0:28:59.476
<v Speaker 3>you can immediately think about, Okay, next time I'm in

0:28:59.476 --> 0:29:02.676
<v Speaker 3>this situation, what do I want to try? And that's

0:29:02.756 --> 0:29:05.676
<v Speaker 3>less threatening. You're not defensive. You don't have to claim

0:29:05.716 --> 0:29:09.516
<v Speaker 3>that you actually were perfect last time. It's a little

0:29:09.516 --> 0:29:12.116
<v Speaker 3>bit more optimistic because you have an opportunity to improve it.

0:29:12.836 --> 0:29:15.236
<v Speaker 3>So I've actually stopped asking for feedback. I used to

0:29:15.236 --> 0:29:17.036
<v Speaker 3>do every talk, I would get off stage and say,

0:29:17.196 --> 0:29:19.636
<v Speaker 3>what feedback do you have? Now I say, what's the

0:29:19.676 --> 0:29:20.956
<v Speaker 3>one thing I can do better?

0:29:21.236 --> 0:29:22.116
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:29:22.476 --> 0:29:25.116
<v Speaker 1>So, on the topic of coaches, how is it that

0:29:25.156 --> 0:29:28.516
<v Speaker 1>we find good coaches and mentors? And there's a somewhat

0:29:28.516 --> 0:29:30.556
<v Speaker 1>counterintuitive finding in your book that I'd love you to

0:29:30.556 --> 0:29:34.036
<v Speaker 1>talk about when it comes to searching for these people. Yeah.

0:29:34.076 --> 0:29:35.956
<v Speaker 3>I think what most of us assume is that you

0:29:35.996 --> 0:29:39.156
<v Speaker 3>want to learn from the best, So find the most

0:29:39.196 --> 0:29:44.156
<v Speaker 3>accomplished musician, the greatest athlete, the genius scientist, whatever your

0:29:44.196 --> 0:29:47.076
<v Speaker 3>field is, you want to learn from the expert. The

0:29:47.116 --> 0:29:50.636
<v Speaker 3>empirical evidence does not support that as the best idea.

0:29:51.196 --> 0:29:54.076
<v Speaker 3>My favorite demonstration being that if you take an intro

0:29:54.236 --> 0:29:59.156
<v Speaker 3>class with an adjunct professor or a lecturer as opposed

0:29:59.156 --> 0:30:02.356
<v Speaker 3>to somebody who's tenured or tenure track in that field,

0:30:02.636 --> 0:30:04.636
<v Speaker 3>you actually go on to get better grades in your

0:30:04.676 --> 0:30:07.756
<v Speaker 3>next class than that subject. In other words, the person

0:30:07.796 --> 0:30:11.556
<v Speaker 3>with less expertise is a better teacher. Why would that be?

0:30:12.276 --> 0:30:15.316
<v Speaker 3>I think there's evidence for a couple of mechanisms. One

0:30:15.356 --> 0:30:19.276
<v Speaker 3>is that sometimes experts are too far from where you

0:30:19.316 --> 0:30:22.396
<v Speaker 3>are to actually remember what it's like to be in

0:30:22.396 --> 0:30:26.876
<v Speaker 3>your shoes, so they can't teach the basics. Einstein was

0:30:27.196 --> 0:30:31.636
<v Speaker 3>an awful intro physics teacher. The second challenge is that

0:30:31.836 --> 0:30:35.276
<v Speaker 3>the process of gaining expertise can make people worse at

0:30:35.276 --> 0:30:38.316
<v Speaker 3>communicating what they know. So it's not just that they forgot,

0:30:38.356 --> 0:30:40.596
<v Speaker 3>it's that they've been doing a lot of it on autopilot,

0:30:40.636 --> 0:30:43.316
<v Speaker 3>and they tend to take much of the knowledge they

0:30:43.316 --> 0:30:46.196
<v Speaker 3>have for granted. I think oftentimes the best mentor is

0:30:46.196 --> 0:30:48.196
<v Speaker 3>somebody who's just a couple of steps ahead of you,

0:30:49.116 --> 0:30:51.996
<v Speaker 3>and maybe not somebody who was a natural, but somebody

0:30:51.996 --> 0:30:55.156
<v Speaker 3>who struggled because they actually had to study how to improve.

0:30:55.796 --> 0:30:59.156
<v Speaker 3>And I guess that has led me to say, instead

0:30:59.196 --> 0:31:03.236
<v Speaker 3>of those who can't do teach, we should say those

0:31:03.236 --> 0:31:05.396
<v Speaker 3>who can do often can't teach the basics.

0:31:05.516 --> 0:31:08.836
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I love this message. And then also

0:31:08.876 --> 0:31:11.516
<v Speaker 1>with that said, you know, I did have the amazing

0:31:11.516 --> 0:31:14.876
<v Speaker 1>fortune of studying with It's a Pearlman, who's yeah, widely

0:31:14.876 --> 0:31:18.196
<v Speaker 1>considered the greatest violinist in the world. And I will

0:31:18.196 --> 0:31:22.116
<v Speaker 1>say that Pearlman had a very unusual way of teaching

0:31:22.396 --> 0:31:24.876
<v Speaker 1>that led to really great outcomes, and this is what

0:31:24.916 --> 0:31:28.476
<v Speaker 1>he did. So I would be playing some passage and

0:31:28.596 --> 0:31:31.916
<v Speaker 1>rather than being prescriptive about what to do and like

0:31:31.956 --> 0:31:34.716
<v Speaker 1>how I could play it better, he would interrogate me

0:31:35.196 --> 0:31:38.236
<v Speaker 1>with a litany of questions around how it is that

0:31:38.476 --> 0:31:40.796
<v Speaker 1>I thought I could make the passage better. So it

0:31:40.836 --> 0:31:43.276
<v Speaker 1>was sort of like a maya, you're clearly unhappy with

0:31:43.316 --> 0:31:45.596
<v Speaker 1>the way that phrase is being shaped. What do you

0:31:45.596 --> 0:31:47.716
<v Speaker 1>think you can do about it? And at the time, Adam,

0:31:47.756 --> 0:31:51.356
<v Speaker 1>I remember being like, dude, you're the freakin' expert. Why

0:31:51.356 --> 0:31:54.436
<v Speaker 1>are you asking me? Right? My like thirteen year old

0:31:54.436 --> 0:31:57.156
<v Speaker 1>brain didn't really understand the power the gift that he

0:31:57.196 --> 0:31:59.316
<v Speaker 1>was giving me. But what he was training me to

0:31:59.396 --> 0:32:02.476
<v Speaker 1>do was to be a critical thinker. I don't want

0:32:02.516 --> 0:32:04.396
<v Speaker 1>to be a lobbyist for the world experts. They don't

0:32:04.396 --> 0:32:06.556
<v Speaker 1>actually need our help right now. They're doing just fine.

0:32:06.996 --> 0:32:09.756
<v Speaker 1>But I want to argue that there's the potential for

0:32:09.796 --> 0:32:10.876
<v Speaker 1>them to be great teachers too.

0:32:11.396 --> 0:32:14.156
<v Speaker 3>I think they have hidden potential. So many teachers and

0:32:14.196 --> 0:32:17.996
<v Speaker 3>mentors think that they're supposed to be Yoda and they're

0:32:18.036 --> 0:32:21.236
<v Speaker 3>just gonna they're gonna unfold their wisdom for you. And

0:32:21.316 --> 0:32:25.076
<v Speaker 3>the reality is that people are much better positioned to

0:32:25.156 --> 0:32:27.876
<v Speaker 3>learn if you guide them to come up with their

0:32:27.916 --> 0:32:31.676
<v Speaker 3>own answers as opposed to just spoon feeding them your answers.

0:32:32.276 --> 0:32:34.276
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like what it's like Proman was doing for

0:32:34.316 --> 0:32:36.996
<v Speaker 3>you is activating the tutor effect and the coach effect.

0:32:37.556 --> 0:32:39.676
<v Speaker 3>So the tutor effect is the finding that the best

0:32:39.676 --> 0:32:42.156
<v Speaker 3>way to learn something is often to teach it that

0:32:42.476 --> 0:32:44.436
<v Speaker 3>when you have to, in this case, sort of teach

0:32:44.516 --> 0:32:47.036
<v Speaker 3>yourself and say, well, here's what I didn't like about

0:32:47.036 --> 0:32:50.596
<v Speaker 3>this violin performance. That leads you to understand it better

0:32:50.596 --> 0:32:52.316
<v Speaker 3>because you have to explain it. It leads you to

0:32:52.356 --> 0:32:55.116
<v Speaker 3>remember it better because you have to retrieve it. And

0:32:55.156 --> 0:32:57.476
<v Speaker 3>then in the process of coaching, normally it would be

0:32:57.516 --> 0:33:00.116
<v Speaker 3>coaching someone else, but in this case coaching yourself out loud,

0:33:00.756 --> 0:33:03.196
<v Speaker 3>you actually discover that you have some of the knowledge

0:33:03.236 --> 0:33:06.196
<v Speaker 3>you already need, and that builds your confidence and your motivation.

0:33:06.956 --> 0:33:09.236
<v Speaker 3>Is better to be uncomfortable today and better to maor

0:33:09.756 --> 0:33:12.836
<v Speaker 3>than it is to avoid discomfort today and stagnate tomorrow.

0:33:12.996 --> 0:33:16.156
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Okay, there are limits though, right to our desire

0:33:16.156 --> 0:33:18.996
<v Speaker 1>to get better. Talk about imperfectionism and how that can

0:33:19.036 --> 0:33:21.356
<v Speaker 1>be an asset to us when it comes to unlocking

0:33:21.356 --> 0:33:22.436
<v Speaker 1>our hidden potential.

0:33:22.996 --> 0:33:25.956
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so this is for me, being an imperfectionist is

0:33:25.996 --> 0:33:29.236
<v Speaker 3>about It's not about lowering your standards at all. It's

0:33:29.276 --> 0:33:32.156
<v Speaker 3>about learning to accept the right imperfections that are not

0:33:32.436 --> 0:33:35.036
<v Speaker 3>essential to the excellence you're trying to achieve, or that

0:33:35.116 --> 0:33:38.956
<v Speaker 3>are necessary for growth. So I'll give you my diving example,

0:33:39.436 --> 0:33:41.876
<v Speaker 3>because this is where I first learned that this is

0:33:41.916 --> 0:33:44.716
<v Speaker 3>a skill. And to be clear, I'm still in recovery

0:33:45.156 --> 0:33:45.956
<v Speaker 3>from perfectionism.

0:33:46.076 --> 0:33:49.396
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're both recovering perfectionists, so big time, big time.

0:33:50.756 --> 0:33:53.516
<v Speaker 3>But I think in diving, I always was trying to

0:33:53.516 --> 0:33:55.236
<v Speaker 3>aim for a perfect ten. And one day my coach,

0:33:55.356 --> 0:33:57.476
<v Speaker 3>Eric Best sat me down and said, you know, there's

0:33:57.516 --> 0:33:59.716
<v Speaker 3>no such thing as a perfect ten. It's a misnomer.

0:34:00.196 --> 0:34:02.436
<v Speaker 3>In one rule book, a ten is for excellence. In

0:34:02.476 --> 0:34:06.196
<v Speaker 3>the other, it's very good. And all of a sudden

0:34:06.196 --> 0:34:09.596
<v Speaker 3>I realized that the time I was spent trying to

0:34:09.596 --> 0:34:12.756
<v Speaker 3>perfect my dives was actually limiting my growth. In fact,

0:34:13.316 --> 0:34:15.876
<v Speaker 3>I've come to believe that if perfectionism were medication, it

0:34:15.876 --> 0:34:18.796
<v Speaker 3>would come with a warning label that says warning may

0:34:18.876 --> 0:34:20.036
<v Speaker 3>cause stunted growth.

0:34:21.196 --> 0:34:23.196
<v Speaker 1>You just got yourself a job at the FDA out

0:34:23.196 --> 0:34:23.876
<v Speaker 1>of a nice job.

0:34:24.036 --> 0:34:27.116
<v Speaker 3>I mean maybe, but what I lived was exactly what

0:34:27.156 --> 0:34:29.436
<v Speaker 3>the research shows, which is you only work on the

0:34:29.476 --> 0:34:31.476
<v Speaker 3>things you know you can do well. Yeah, if you're

0:34:31.476 --> 0:34:33.996
<v Speaker 3>trying to be perfect, you avoid anything where you might fail.

0:34:34.916 --> 0:34:36.996
<v Speaker 3>You end up missing the forest in the trees and

0:34:37.036 --> 0:34:39.756
<v Speaker 3>trying to tinker with these tiny details instead of looking

0:34:39.756 --> 0:34:42.196
<v Speaker 3>at the big picture, and you ruminate a lot and

0:34:42.236 --> 0:34:44.196
<v Speaker 3>beat yourself up. And I guess the way that I've

0:34:44.236 --> 0:34:47.916
<v Speaker 3>tried to put that into practice is I try to calibrate.

0:34:49.156 --> 0:34:51.316
<v Speaker 3>I have, you know, a range of different priorities in

0:34:51.316 --> 0:34:53.836
<v Speaker 3>my life. And when I write a book, I'm aiming

0:34:53.836 --> 0:34:56.956
<v Speaker 3>for a nine because it's a huge investment of time

0:34:57.036 --> 0:34:59.636
<v Speaker 3>and I hope there will be a decent number of

0:34:59.676 --> 0:35:02.916
<v Speaker 3>people who read it and benefit from it. But I

0:35:02.916 --> 0:35:05.596
<v Speaker 3>don't treat everything that way, you know, I'm very content

0:35:05.836 --> 0:35:09.276
<v Speaker 3>with a seven when I give a speech, no, knowing

0:35:09.396 --> 0:35:12.796
<v Speaker 3>that each audience is a little different and each performance

0:35:12.836 --> 0:35:15.676
<v Speaker 3>is going to be a little different, and good enough

0:35:15.716 --> 0:35:17.796
<v Speaker 3>is actually good enough in that situation. And I think

0:35:17.796 --> 0:35:20.396
<v Speaker 3>this is something we can all do, is to pause

0:35:20.436 --> 0:35:22.356
<v Speaker 3>to ask how high are the stakes here?

0:35:22.516 --> 0:35:23.316
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:35:23.356 --> 0:35:26.676
<v Speaker 3>And we aim obviously higher when it's more important and

0:35:27.156 --> 0:35:29.836
<v Speaker 3>we give ourselves a little bit more grace and permission

0:35:29.876 --> 0:35:35.356
<v Speaker 3>to be imperfect on things that are less consequential. And look,

0:35:35.756 --> 0:35:37.836
<v Speaker 3>no matter how good you get, there are always going

0:35:37.876 --> 0:35:40.276
<v Speaker 3>to be people who don't like what you do, and

0:35:40.356 --> 0:35:42.636
<v Speaker 3>there are always going to be aspects of your performance

0:35:42.996 --> 0:35:45.956
<v Speaker 3>that are going to fall short of someone's standards. You

0:35:46.036 --> 0:35:49.916
<v Speaker 3>cannot please everyone, so you might as well decide who

0:35:49.916 --> 0:35:50.996
<v Speaker 3>you're willing to disappoint.

0:35:51.196 --> 0:35:53.356
<v Speaker 1>Can you just say that one more time? I need

0:35:53.396 --> 0:35:53.836
<v Speaker 1>to hear that.

0:35:53.796 --> 0:35:58.036
<v Speaker 3>One you, in particular, you as a human cannot please everyone,

0:35:58.036 --> 0:36:00.076
<v Speaker 3>and neither can anyone.

0:36:00.356 --> 0:36:02.476
<v Speaker 1>Okay, and therapy right there.

0:36:03.276 --> 0:36:05.756
<v Speaker 3>So you might as well decide who you're willing to

0:36:05.796 --> 0:36:09.636
<v Speaker 3>disappoint and which standards are important to you.

0:36:10.876 --> 0:36:13.796
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I'm thinking about all the domains where this

0:36:14.036 --> 0:36:17.636
<v Speaker 1>imperfectionism perfectionist mindset is relevant. And I'm thinking about all

0:36:17.676 --> 0:36:20.436
<v Speaker 1>those parents out there that just brate themselves every day

0:36:20.796 --> 0:36:23.876
<v Speaker 1>because they don't think they're the perfect parents. And it's like, well,

0:36:23.916 --> 0:36:26.996
<v Speaker 1>what if a nine is every day my kids knew

0:36:27.036 --> 0:36:29.356
<v Speaker 1>I loved them? Like what if that was a nine?

0:36:29.436 --> 0:36:33.036
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe that is good enough slash perfection in the

0:36:33.036 --> 0:36:35.956
<v Speaker 1>domain of parenting versus oh, I know coach them through

0:36:35.956 --> 0:36:37.636
<v Speaker 1>the remote. I mean, just so it is a huge

0:36:37.636 --> 0:36:39.876
<v Speaker 1>manual now, right for how it is that we should

0:36:40.036 --> 0:36:42.196
<v Speaker 1>raise our kids. But yeah, it's just making me think

0:36:42.236 --> 0:36:45.676
<v Speaker 1>about how we define our north star. Yeah.

0:36:45.676 --> 0:36:47.916
<v Speaker 3>At first I was really reluctant to apply this to parenting,

0:36:48.356 --> 0:36:53.276
<v Speaker 3>Like I don't want parents to be scored. Your parenting

0:36:53.276 --> 0:36:56.476
<v Speaker 3>today was a three and a half. Yeah, but you

0:36:56.636 --> 0:36:59.876
<v Speaker 3>just changed my mind because there's no reason why we

0:36:59.956 --> 0:37:03.316
<v Speaker 3>can't clarify. Like, first of all, you should not expect

0:37:03.316 --> 0:37:05.316
<v Speaker 3>to be a perfect parent. No one will ever achieve

0:37:05.356 --> 0:37:09.276
<v Speaker 3>that standard. It's impossible. Yeh. Every parent makes mistakes. I

0:37:09.276 --> 0:37:11.716
<v Speaker 3>think that's part of how we grow as parents. I

0:37:11.716 --> 0:37:13.396
<v Speaker 3>think some of my best moments of growth as a

0:37:13.396 --> 0:37:16.196
<v Speaker 3>parent actually have come when I've been really disappointed in

0:37:16.236 --> 0:37:19.956
<v Speaker 3>myself for getting frustrated and impatient with our kids. But

0:37:20.036 --> 0:37:21.756
<v Speaker 3>I don't think a lot of parents I think this

0:37:21.916 --> 0:37:23.876
<v Speaker 3>is a big aha mooent for me. I don't think

0:37:23.876 --> 0:37:25.556
<v Speaker 3>a lot of parents have sat down to say, Okay,

0:37:26.356 --> 0:37:28.396
<v Speaker 3>I want to be a nine parent, not a ten parent,

0:37:28.756 --> 0:37:30.556
<v Speaker 3>because that's going to be healthier for me and for

0:37:30.676 --> 0:37:34.876
<v Speaker 3>my kid. What does a nine look like? What are

0:37:34.876 --> 0:37:37.156
<v Speaker 3>the behaviors that really matter and what are the ones

0:37:37.196 --> 0:37:38.876
<v Speaker 3>that are okay to be imperfect on.

0:37:39.636 --> 0:37:40.236
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:37:40.276 --> 0:37:41.796
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a great discussion that we could all

0:37:41.796 --> 0:37:44.396
<v Speaker 3>have with our families. I'm going to force myself to

0:37:44.396 --> 0:37:46.076
<v Speaker 3>have it this weekend.

0:37:46.356 --> 0:37:49.436
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I think the most hopeful message coming out of

0:37:49.476 --> 0:37:51.956
<v Speaker 1>your book, and I love that you devote a sizeable

0:37:52.076 --> 0:37:54.996
<v Speaker 1>chunk of the book to this topic, is how we

0:37:55.076 --> 0:37:58.236
<v Speaker 1>can help unlock potential in others. It is a very

0:37:58.316 --> 0:38:00.516
<v Speaker 1>other focused orientation, which I think is just going to

0:38:00.556 --> 0:38:03.596
<v Speaker 1>make humanity better across the board, because you don't always

0:38:03.596 --> 0:38:06.876
<v Speaker 1>see that represented in in psych books. And so can

0:38:06.916 --> 0:38:10.396
<v Speaker 1>you just leave us with some reflections on how we

0:38:10.476 --> 0:38:13.116
<v Speaker 1>can help unlock potential in those around us?

0:38:13.556 --> 0:38:16.916
<v Speaker 3>This is my top pick for kicking myself that I

0:38:16.956 --> 0:38:19.716
<v Speaker 3>didn't write this into the book, Like, how did this

0:38:19.836 --> 0:38:23.276
<v Speaker 3>not make the cut? I don't know, all right. So,

0:38:23.516 --> 0:38:26.396
<v Speaker 3>a group of my colleagues, led by Laura Morgan Roberts,

0:38:26.476 --> 0:38:30.356
<v Speaker 3>created an exercise called the Reflected Best Self Portrait, and

0:38:30.436 --> 0:38:33.636
<v Speaker 3>the idea is that a lot of people have hidden

0:38:33.636 --> 0:38:36.196
<v Speaker 3>potential that's invisible to them. It's almost like the opposite

0:38:36.236 --> 0:38:38.836
<v Speaker 3>of a blind spot, that you're not aware of some

0:38:38.876 --> 0:38:41.276
<v Speaker 3>of your own strengths and so you need other people

0:38:41.276 --> 0:38:43.116
<v Speaker 3>to hold up a mirror to help you identify the

0:38:43.156 --> 0:38:46.236
<v Speaker 3>things that you're good at that maybe these are underutilized

0:38:46.236 --> 0:38:48.636
<v Speaker 3>strengths as opposed to the overused ones that we talked

0:38:48.676 --> 0:38:53.036
<v Speaker 3>about earlier. So the exercise, I've had students and leaders

0:38:53.396 --> 0:38:56.156
<v Speaker 3>do it for about fifteen years now, and people often

0:38:56.196 --> 0:38:58.916
<v Speaker 3>come back and say, this was a life changing experience.

0:38:59.596 --> 0:39:01.916
<v Speaker 3>So all you do is you reach out to some

0:39:01.956 --> 0:39:03.676
<v Speaker 3>people who know you well in different walks of life.

0:39:03.716 --> 0:39:06.516
<v Speaker 3>You could do this with family, some friends, some colleagues,

0:39:07.076 --> 0:39:09.116
<v Speaker 3>and you ask them to tell a story about you

0:39:09.156 --> 0:39:11.796
<v Speaker 3>at a time when you were at your best. And

0:39:11.836 --> 0:39:15.116
<v Speaker 3>then you collect all the stories, which is the most

0:39:15.116 --> 0:39:18.716
<v Speaker 3>delightful set of emails you will ever get. And then

0:39:18.756 --> 0:39:21.836
<v Speaker 3>your job is to recognize the patterns and compose a

0:39:21.836 --> 0:39:24.596
<v Speaker 3>self portrait of who you are at your best. And

0:39:25.316 --> 0:39:27.636
<v Speaker 3>very often when people do this like oh, I didn't

0:39:27.636 --> 0:39:29.756
<v Speaker 3>even know that was the strength of mine, and now

0:39:29.956 --> 0:39:32.316
<v Speaker 3>I see all these places I can use it. I

0:39:32.356 --> 0:39:35.076
<v Speaker 3>also felt like this is a gift you can give

0:39:35.116 --> 0:39:37.396
<v Speaker 3>to other people to help them see their hidden potential.

0:39:37.476 --> 0:39:39.436
<v Speaker 3>So when I first learned about this exercise, I think

0:39:39.436 --> 0:39:41.436
<v Speaker 3>it was gosh, it must have been twenty years ago.

0:39:41.516 --> 0:39:44.956
<v Speaker 3>I remember the winter break starting and I was a

0:39:44.996 --> 0:39:47.916
<v Speaker 3>first year grad student. I had nothing on my calendar.

0:39:48.156 --> 0:39:50.596
<v Speaker 3>I was broke. What am I going to do with

0:39:50.756 --> 0:39:53.316
<v Speaker 3>this week? I decided that I was going to invert

0:39:53.356 --> 0:39:57.196
<v Speaker 3>the exercise, and I picked up a bunch of people who

0:39:57.236 --> 0:39:59.676
<v Speaker 3>mattered to me, and I wrote them all a story

0:39:59.836 --> 0:40:02.276
<v Speaker 3>about a time when they were at their best and

0:40:02.396 --> 0:40:06.836
<v Speaker 3>just emailed it to them out of the blue. It

0:40:06.916 --> 0:40:10.236
<v Speaker 3>is one of the most meaningful weeks I have ever spent,

0:40:10.436 --> 0:40:14.676
<v Speaker 3>even though I was just sitting in a room writing emails,

0:40:15.316 --> 0:40:18.076
<v Speaker 3>because really thinking about, well, what is other people's hidden

0:40:18.076 --> 0:40:21.316
<v Speaker 3>potential and how can I make that more visible to

0:40:21.356 --> 0:40:26.676
<v Speaker 3>them felt like a really meaningful act of friendship or

0:40:26.756 --> 0:40:29.756
<v Speaker 3>you know, an investment in a relationship, and people seem

0:40:29.796 --> 0:40:30.756
<v Speaker 3>to really appreciate it.

0:40:30.956 --> 0:40:33.156
<v Speaker 1>I love that example. That's something that everyone listening can

0:40:33.196 --> 0:40:34.076
<v Speaker 1>actually do right now.

0:40:34.196 --> 0:40:37.116
<v Speaker 3>I mean, just even pick one person and tell them

0:40:37.196 --> 0:41:10.476
<v Speaker 3>who they are at their best.

0:41:13.116 --> 0:41:15.956
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks so much for listening. If you enjoyed my

0:41:15.996 --> 0:41:18.236
<v Speaker 1>conversation with Adam, you might want to check out the

0:41:18.276 --> 0:41:20.956
<v Speaker 1>first time he was on the show. It's an episode

0:41:20.996 --> 0:41:24.036
<v Speaker 1>called Adam Grant Thinks Again, and we'll link to it

0:41:24.076 --> 0:41:27.276
<v Speaker 1>in the show notes. And that's a wrap on our season.

0:41:27.916 --> 0:41:29.916
<v Speaker 1>I just want to thank you for spending this time

0:41:29.916 --> 0:41:32.556
<v Speaker 1>with me and the remarkable guests we've had on the show.

0:41:33.276 --> 0:41:36.356
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back early next year with new episodes. In

0:41:36.396 --> 0:41:39.276
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, I'm wishing you a happy and healthy rest

0:41:39.276 --> 0:41:42.236
<v Speaker 1>of your year and a bit more equanimity in the

0:41:42.236 --> 0:41:55.196
<v Speaker 1>face of any Slight Changes of plan. A Slight Change

0:41:55.196 --> 0:41:58.196
<v Speaker 1>of Plans is created, written, and executive produced by me

0:41:58.316 --> 0:42:02.756
<v Speaker 1>Maya Schunker. The Slight Change family includes our showrunner Tyler Green,

0:42:03.236 --> 0:42:07.796
<v Speaker 1>our senior editor Kate Parkinson Morgan, our producer Trisha Bovida,

0:42:08.156 --> 0:42:12.476
<v Speaker 1>and our sound engineer Andrew Vestola. Louis Scara wrote our

0:42:12.516 --> 0:42:16.196
<v Speaker 1>delightful theme song, and Ginger Smith helped arrange the vocals.

0:42:16.676 --> 0:42:19.796
<v Speaker 1>A Slight Change of Plans is a production of Pushkin Industries,

0:42:19.956 --> 0:42:23.396
<v Speaker 1>so big thanks to everyone there, and of course a

0:42:23.596 --> 0:42:26.836
<v Speaker 1>very special thanks to Jimmy Lee. You can follow A

0:42:26.836 --> 0:42:51.836
<v Speaker 1>Slight Change of Plans on Instagram at doctor Maya Schunker. So,

0:42:51.876 --> 0:42:54.916
<v Speaker 1>I remember when I flew to China after Jimmy and

0:42:54.916 --> 0:42:57.156
<v Speaker 1>I got married, and we had this big wedding reception,

0:42:57.796 --> 0:43:00.916
<v Speaker 1>and I was so jetlagged first of all, and I

0:43:00.996 --> 0:43:04.276
<v Speaker 1>was in extremely elementary Chinese land. I'm still in elementary

0:43:04.356 --> 0:43:07.556
<v Speaker 1>Chinese land, but I remember my in laws kind of

0:43:07.556 --> 0:43:09.876
<v Speaker 1>looked at me and they're like, so archie to say something.

0:43:09.956 --> 0:43:11.436
<v Speaker 1>And then on the spot, I had to come up

0:43:11.476 --> 0:43:15.276
<v Speaker 1>with this like wedding speech, and it was so it

0:43:15.356 --> 0:43:18.756
<v Speaker 1>was so basic, Adam. I was like, hello, I am Maya,

0:43:19.196 --> 0:43:22.316
<v Speaker 1>I'm married Jimmy. Thank you so much for being here,

0:43:22.356 --> 0:43:25.516
<v Speaker 1>you know, really poetic, like so much emotional residence. I'm

0:43:25.516 --> 0:43:27.316
<v Speaker 1>sure this is great.

0:43:27.356 --> 0:43:30.916
<v Speaker 3>You're like, see spot spot run exactly.

0:43:30.996 --> 0:43:34.356
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, I currently am in China. You are all

0:43:34.396 --> 0:43:35.516
<v Speaker 1>currently here as well,