1 00:00:08,440 --> 00:00:22,400 Speaker 1: Bodybags with Joseph Scott Morgan. Sometimes you sit back as 2 00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:26,320 Speaker 1: a crime scene investigator and you try to observe things 3 00:00:26,400 --> 00:00:31,560 Speaker 1: from the perspective of a clinician, somebody that's kind of cold, 4 00:00:31,720 --> 00:00:35,400 Speaker 1: that goes in and just wants the facts. But there 5 00:00:35,479 --> 00:00:40,600 Speaker 1: are those cases that I don't know, tease your humanity 6 00:00:40,640 --> 00:00:43,640 Speaker 1: out of you at the scene, those things that you 7 00:00:43,720 --> 00:00:46,280 Speaker 1: look at them and you think, how in the world 8 00:00:47,440 --> 00:00:53,400 Speaker 1: could this possibly have happened. Today, we're going to talk 9 00:00:53,440 --> 00:00:59,200 Speaker 1: about a mother and a wife by the name of 10 00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:04,840 Speaker 1: on A wash We're gonna talk about her disappearance, her 11 00:01:05,560 --> 00:01:10,720 Speaker 1: possible homicide, and her dismemberment. I'm Joseph Scott Morgan and 12 00:01:10,959 --> 00:01:18,720 Speaker 1: this is Body Backs. Joining me today is my friend 13 00:01:19,160 --> 00:01:24,880 Speaker 1: Jackie Howard, executive producer of Crime Stories with Nancy Grace. Jackie, 14 00:01:25,040 --> 00:01:27,440 Speaker 1: I know that you, like much of the country, has 15 00:01:27,480 --> 00:01:30,560 Speaker 1: been following this case or sometime. I think that we're 16 00:01:30,640 --> 00:01:34,760 Speaker 1: left again with the case where we've gotten more questions 17 00:01:34,760 --> 00:01:37,959 Speaker 1: and answers. What do you think about that? I think 18 00:01:38,000 --> 00:01:41,360 Speaker 1: you are absolutely right. The disappearance of on A Walsh 19 00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:47,840 Speaker 1: has so many more questions than answers, Just like Jennifer 20 00:01:47,880 --> 00:01:53,640 Speaker 1: Doulos up North this woman disappeared, I mean literally disappeared. 21 00:01:53,680 --> 00:01:57,000 Speaker 1: One day, she was here, next day, cannot find her. 22 00:01:57,080 --> 00:02:00,080 Speaker 1: There's a lot of similarities between these two cases. Is 23 00:02:00,160 --> 00:02:03,400 Speaker 1: for that. But on a Walsh left her home. She 24 00:02:03,520 --> 00:02:06,280 Speaker 1: was seen leaving her house with her bags in hand. 25 00:02:06,720 --> 00:02:10,640 Speaker 1: She worked at a different location. She was a real 26 00:02:10,800 --> 00:02:14,160 Speaker 1: estate professional. She had taken on a new job in 27 00:02:14,200 --> 00:02:17,240 Speaker 1: the Boston area, and she actually traveled from her home 28 00:02:17,600 --> 00:02:23,120 Speaker 1: in Massachusetts weekly to go for this position. So she 29 00:02:23,240 --> 00:02:26,000 Speaker 1: was last seen leaving her home with bags in hand, 30 00:02:26,440 --> 00:02:30,480 Speaker 1: according to her husband. And what happened to her after 31 00:02:30,560 --> 00:02:33,200 Speaker 1: that is the question. She has not been seen. She 32 00:02:33,240 --> 00:02:35,959 Speaker 1: did not make the flight, she did not make her 33 00:02:36,160 --> 00:02:39,640 Speaker 1: new job, so they missed her in the office. That's 34 00:02:39,680 --> 00:02:46,600 Speaker 1: when the questions began. That's where our investigation needs to begin. 35 00:02:47,320 --> 00:02:50,160 Speaker 1: How do we start that timeline, Joe, I don't know 36 00:02:50,240 --> 00:02:53,200 Speaker 1: that it's necessarily starting the tomline as much as it 37 00:02:53,360 --> 00:02:55,720 Speaker 1: is location. You know, I know that those two things 38 00:02:55,720 --> 00:02:58,120 Speaker 1: are kind of married together. You've got a husband that's 39 00:02:58,120 --> 00:03:02,120 Speaker 1: actually stating, and he was very pacific. He said she 40 00:03:02,320 --> 00:03:05,800 Speaker 1: left the house in either an uber or lift. Let's 41 00:03:05,800 --> 00:03:09,720 Speaker 1: back up to that, because now you've got again here 42 00:03:09,720 --> 00:03:12,760 Speaker 1: we go again, Jackie, we've got a digital footprint, because 43 00:03:12,800 --> 00:03:16,320 Speaker 1: if you were allegend that she left in an uber 44 00:03:16,440 --> 00:03:18,120 Speaker 1: or left and though not only do you have a 45 00:03:18,160 --> 00:03:21,359 Speaker 1: digital footprint, you're what your alleging means that you would 46 00:03:21,400 --> 00:03:24,720 Speaker 1: have a physical witness to her getting into the vehicle 47 00:03:24,840 --> 00:03:29,480 Speaker 1: with you to be transported somewhere. So if that's what 48 00:03:29,720 --> 00:03:33,440 Speaker 1: is being put forth, then that would be solid information 49 00:03:33,480 --> 00:03:37,520 Speaker 1: to go on. But there's no indication that she was 50 00:03:37,680 --> 00:03:41,760 Speaker 1: seen by anybody getting into the vehicle to go somewhere. 51 00:03:42,640 --> 00:03:45,720 Speaker 1: So where do we begin, Well, we begin the home. 52 00:03:46,600 --> 00:03:50,800 Speaker 1: We begin where an individual lives, where they're domiciled. You know, 53 00:03:50,880 --> 00:03:53,120 Speaker 1: you have to think that that's the last place she 54 00:03:53,200 --> 00:03:57,440 Speaker 1: was seeing. So what could have occurred within that home 55 00:03:58,120 --> 00:04:02,520 Speaker 1: that would have essentially led to her total and complete disappearance, 56 00:04:02,600 --> 00:04:04,720 Speaker 1: Like you mentioned just a second ago, it seemingly just 57 00:04:04,800 --> 00:04:07,920 Speaker 1: vanishes off the face of the planet. Well, you peg 58 00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:11,400 Speaker 1: that one pretty well, Joe, because now we know that 59 00:04:11,640 --> 00:04:15,880 Speaker 1: Anna Walsh's husband, Brian has been charged in her disappearance. 60 00:04:16,480 --> 00:04:21,320 Speaker 1: The beginning of that suspicion from police began in the 61 00:04:21,360 --> 00:04:24,560 Speaker 1: basement of the home, it did, and you begin to 62 00:04:24,600 --> 00:04:27,960 Speaker 1: look for things like physical evidence that can begin to 63 00:04:28,080 --> 00:04:32,480 Speaker 1: turn up. One of the things with death investigation, and 64 00:04:32,680 --> 00:04:36,160 Speaker 1: I think that for many reasons, it goes back to this. Certainly, 65 00:04:36,279 --> 00:04:39,720 Speaker 1: people in literature use this a lot as a device. 66 00:04:40,000 --> 00:04:42,960 Speaker 1: You look for blood, don't you. Blood is always associated 67 00:04:43,040 --> 00:04:46,320 Speaker 1: with either the loss of life or you know, at 68 00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:50,000 Speaker 1: least the diminishment of life to some degree, particularly if 69 00:04:50,040 --> 00:04:53,240 Speaker 1: you wind up would say, for instance, a tremendous amount 70 00:04:53,279 --> 00:04:55,520 Speaker 1: of blood that you fund at the scene. And there's 71 00:04:55,560 --> 00:04:58,480 Speaker 1: a term that's used. We've talked about it before on bodybacks, 72 00:04:58,520 --> 00:05:02,000 Speaker 1: but it bears repeating, and that is the idea of 73 00:05:02,160 --> 00:05:04,600 Speaker 1: the amount of blood that you have at a scene 74 00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:10,600 Speaker 1: gives the appearance of an event being incompatible with life. However, 75 00:05:10,920 --> 00:05:13,920 Speaker 1: at least to this point, I don't know that there 76 00:05:14,160 --> 00:05:17,880 Speaker 1: is that much blood evidence. Although there was blood evidence 77 00:05:17,920 --> 00:05:20,599 Speaker 1: found at the home that would give an indication that 78 00:05:20,800 --> 00:05:24,719 Speaker 1: something very troublesome happened there in the basement. I would 79 00:05:24,760 --> 00:05:27,599 Speaker 1: think that a bloody knife found in the basement would 80 00:05:27,680 --> 00:05:32,400 Speaker 1: indeed give an indication that something bad happened. From a 81 00:05:32,440 --> 00:05:35,560 Speaker 1: forensic standpoint, we hear about this a lot in cases. 82 00:05:35,839 --> 00:05:38,039 Speaker 1: There's a couple of cases out there right now where 83 00:05:38,720 --> 00:05:41,680 Speaker 1: I think that many times, the general public begins to 84 00:05:41,680 --> 00:05:46,039 Speaker 1: think about, well, you have blood, so therefore you can 85 00:05:46,880 --> 00:05:50,760 Speaker 1: get an arrest warrant and arrest somebody. That's not the 86 00:05:50,800 --> 00:05:53,479 Speaker 1: way it works, not in forensics at least, if you 87 00:05:53,800 --> 00:05:57,440 Speaker 1: find something that you believe is in fact blood, you 88 00:05:57,520 --> 00:05:59,920 Speaker 1: have to verify that, don't you. You have to do 89 00:06:00,240 --> 00:06:03,200 Speaker 1: what is referred to as presumptive testing on an item 90 00:06:03,279 --> 00:06:06,479 Speaker 1: that might have blood on the surface, say for instance, 91 00:06:06,480 --> 00:06:08,120 Speaker 1: with a knife, or if you have a piece of 92 00:06:08,120 --> 00:06:10,560 Speaker 1: cloth or even a droplet on the floor. You cannot 93 00:06:10,600 --> 00:06:13,839 Speaker 1: just simply assume that that is first off, that it 94 00:06:13,920 --> 00:06:16,719 Speaker 1: is blood. So that's our first step. We have to 95 00:06:16,720 --> 00:06:19,080 Speaker 1: go in and take a look at that sample and 96 00:06:19,120 --> 00:06:22,080 Speaker 1: see if it is in fact blood, and then from 97 00:06:22,120 --> 00:06:25,320 Speaker 1: that point you can move on to the next level, 98 00:06:25,560 --> 00:06:28,440 Speaker 1: which is where we're going to take a look at 99 00:06:28,440 --> 00:06:31,440 Speaker 1: it from the perspective of, well, we verified that it 100 00:06:31,560 --> 00:06:34,040 Speaker 1: is blood, but is it human blood? Because you can 101 00:06:34,080 --> 00:06:36,359 Speaker 1: have animal blood as well if you have pets in 102 00:06:36,360 --> 00:06:39,039 Speaker 1: the home. There's a couple of cases out there where 103 00:06:39,040 --> 00:06:42,120 Speaker 1: people were deer hunters, they track blood into the house 104 00:06:42,560 --> 00:06:44,599 Speaker 1: and it turned out not to be human it was 105 00:06:44,680 --> 00:06:47,400 Speaker 1: actually dear blood. So you have to be able to 106 00:06:47,400 --> 00:06:49,800 Speaker 1: whittle that down. Well, if you establish that it is 107 00:06:49,839 --> 00:06:53,239 Speaker 1: in fact human blood, you go to the next level 108 00:06:53,240 --> 00:06:56,320 Speaker 1: of testing, which of course begins to lead into well 109 00:06:56,680 --> 00:06:59,640 Speaker 1: typing the blood, what blood grouping does it fall into? 110 00:07:00,400 --> 00:07:03,400 Speaker 1: And if you have a missing person, if you try 111 00:07:03,440 --> 00:07:07,960 Speaker 1: to say, okay, well what blood group would on a 112 00:07:08,080 --> 00:07:11,640 Speaker 1: fall into and hopefully you can establish that, and then 113 00:07:11,640 --> 00:07:14,040 Speaker 1: of course then you're going to have a DNA fingerprint 114 00:07:14,040 --> 00:07:17,440 Speaker 1: as well. Relative to that, what about the age of 115 00:07:17,480 --> 00:07:20,360 Speaker 1: the blood, Joe, I know you've probably told me this before. 116 00:07:20,920 --> 00:07:25,480 Speaker 1: Can they tell did this happen last week, has happened 117 00:07:25,520 --> 00:07:28,720 Speaker 1: five years ago? What can they tell? Blood is a 118 00:07:28,720 --> 00:07:33,800 Speaker 1: curious substance because it's multi layered. It contains several elements 119 00:07:33,880 --> 00:07:38,720 Speaker 1: to it that actually make it blood. And much of 120 00:07:38,760 --> 00:07:43,120 Speaker 1: this relative to attempting to determine how old it is, 121 00:07:43,200 --> 00:07:46,600 Speaker 1: it's going to be heavily depended upon not so much 122 00:07:46,720 --> 00:07:52,680 Speaker 1: time as it is exposure. What this sample has been 123 00:07:52,680 --> 00:07:55,040 Speaker 1: exposed to over a period time. You can go back 124 00:07:55,160 --> 00:07:57,560 Speaker 1: and take a look at samples from long long ago. 125 00:07:57,680 --> 00:08:00,200 Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, famously, we're able to take 126 00:08:00,240 --> 00:08:03,280 Speaker 1: a sample of President Lincoln's blood and actually do a 127 00:08:03,360 --> 00:08:06,800 Speaker 1: DNA profile on it. So, yeah, you can take historic 128 00:08:06,840 --> 00:08:10,600 Speaker 1: samples even and essentially profile them. So in a case 129 00:08:10,720 --> 00:08:13,960 Speaker 1: that is this fresh, Remember Anna has only been missing 130 00:08:14,000 --> 00:08:16,680 Speaker 1: since January the first, so it's not like we've got 131 00:08:16,720 --> 00:08:19,720 Speaker 1: someone that has been missing for six months, a year, 132 00:08:19,800 --> 00:08:23,360 Speaker 1: or two years. This sample would still be viable at 133 00:08:23,360 --> 00:08:25,640 Speaker 1: this point in tom and I think that that's what 134 00:08:25,680 --> 00:08:28,440 Speaker 1: they're dealing with. But when the officers came into the 135 00:08:28,440 --> 00:08:31,760 Speaker 1: basement and they see a substance that they think is blood, 136 00:08:31,920 --> 00:08:34,360 Speaker 1: and given the amount of time that Anna has been missing, 137 00:08:34,840 --> 00:08:37,360 Speaker 1: it would have more than likely been dried. So when 138 00:08:37,400 --> 00:08:40,679 Speaker 1: they see that based on the color, can they look 139 00:08:40,720 --> 00:08:42,920 Speaker 1: at that and go, oh, that happened yesterday, Oh that 140 00:08:42,960 --> 00:08:46,120 Speaker 1: happened two weeks ago, Oh that happened six years ago. 141 00:08:46,640 --> 00:08:50,920 Speaker 1: How does what they see? What clues does that give 142 00:08:51,000 --> 00:08:54,960 Speaker 1: an officer? There's a certain level of dehydration that occurs 143 00:08:54,960 --> 00:08:57,280 Speaker 1: with blood, depended upon how long it's been down and 144 00:08:57,320 --> 00:09:01,760 Speaker 1: again it's completely depended upon environment a factors, And you 145 00:09:01,800 --> 00:09:04,559 Speaker 1: can kind of eyeball it and get an idea that 146 00:09:04,640 --> 00:09:07,160 Speaker 1: if you've got a sample that has gotten to the 147 00:09:07,200 --> 00:09:11,120 Speaker 1: point where it has gone from brilliant red to brown, 148 00:09:11,960 --> 00:09:14,600 Speaker 1: and then there's another phase where it will essentially go 149 00:09:14,760 --> 00:09:18,199 Speaker 1: to this kind of brown cracked appearance where it and 150 00:09:18,240 --> 00:09:21,760 Speaker 1: this is why why this is so difficult when you're 151 00:09:21,800 --> 00:09:24,160 Speaker 1: you're eyeballing what you think is a blood sample, because 152 00:09:24,200 --> 00:09:26,360 Speaker 1: it can actually look like chocolate, believe it or not, 153 00:09:26,600 --> 00:09:29,280 Speaker 1: and it goes from this kind of brown cracked appearance 154 00:09:29,440 --> 00:09:34,120 Speaker 1: to flaking. But here's the problem. There is no and 155 00:09:34,160 --> 00:09:37,960 Speaker 1: I repeat, there is no definitive time marker that you 156 00:09:38,000 --> 00:09:42,000 Speaker 1: can place on that where it is an absolute okay, 157 00:09:42,160 --> 00:09:45,040 Speaker 1: you're gonna have a lot of wiggle room. And one 158 00:09:45,040 --> 00:09:48,000 Speaker 1: of the reasons is is that you cannot account for 159 00:09:48,080 --> 00:09:51,800 Speaker 1: all of the environmental influences that have taken place in 160 00:09:51,800 --> 00:09:55,240 Speaker 1: in surrounding that environment. We're talking about Massachusetts. Yeah, it 161 00:09:55,280 --> 00:09:58,800 Speaker 1: would be cold outside, but conversely, are you running the 162 00:09:58,800 --> 00:10:00,960 Speaker 1: furnace in the house and you've got the sink cranked 163 00:10:01,040 --> 00:10:02,720 Speaker 1: up so that it's so hot in there that it's 164 00:10:02,720 --> 00:10:05,480 Speaker 1: going to cause changes in any kind of biological element 165 00:10:05,559 --> 00:10:09,120 Speaker 1: that you have have around. If you've got garbage that's 166 00:10:09,120 --> 00:10:10,880 Speaker 1: got I don't know, a piece of chicken in it, 167 00:10:11,000 --> 00:10:13,840 Speaker 1: for instance, and you've you've got the heat jacked up 168 00:10:13,840 --> 00:10:16,120 Speaker 1: in the house, it's going to promote the decomposition of 169 00:10:16,120 --> 00:10:18,199 Speaker 1: that piece of chicken, whereas if it was cooler, it 170 00:10:18,240 --> 00:10:20,720 Speaker 1: would preserve it longer. So it's it's gonna be completely 171 00:10:20,840 --> 00:10:43,760 Speaker 1: totally environmentally dependent. You've got a missing wife. As an investigator, 172 00:10:45,240 --> 00:10:48,840 Speaker 1: where do your eyes go first? I'm not talking about 173 00:10:48,920 --> 00:10:53,960 Speaker 1: at the scene. I'm talking about information. I'm talking about 174 00:10:55,080 --> 00:10:57,600 Speaker 1: where are you gonna go? What's the well spring of 175 00:10:57,760 --> 00:11:02,120 Speaker 1: data here to find out what exactly happening in this case? Jackie, 176 00:11:02,200 --> 00:11:04,280 Speaker 1: I think that those answers are going to rest with 177 00:11:04,280 --> 00:11:07,600 Speaker 1: a husband. They are, and police again have taken the 178 00:11:07,679 --> 00:11:11,679 Speaker 1: husband into custody. And it's strange to me if you 179 00:11:11,840 --> 00:11:16,840 Speaker 1: look at what friends, neighbors, family say about this man, 180 00:11:17,320 --> 00:11:21,520 Speaker 1: they all received a strange vibe about him. He didn't 181 00:11:21,559 --> 00:11:25,800 Speaker 1: want his picture taken, he wasn't friendly. The town there 182 00:11:25,920 --> 00:11:29,319 Speaker 1: where the Walsh has lived. People in the shops there, 183 00:11:30,000 --> 00:11:33,439 Speaker 1: shop owners like pizza parlor, and in another restaurant there 184 00:11:33,520 --> 00:11:37,360 Speaker 1: say when they came in that Anna was extremely quiet, 185 00:11:37,400 --> 00:11:40,800 Speaker 1: she didn't speak a lot, and that he as well, 186 00:11:40,840 --> 00:11:43,320 Speaker 1: just kind of gave off a creepy vibe, is how 187 00:11:43,360 --> 00:11:48,400 Speaker 1: they describe it. So she goes missing. The police find 188 00:11:48,480 --> 00:11:52,760 Speaker 1: blood in the home, that they now believe shows that 189 00:11:52,840 --> 00:11:58,240 Speaker 1: he murdered and dismembered. Anna, where do you go from here? Joe? 190 00:11:58,280 --> 00:12:01,920 Speaker 1: Her body is missing. I mean you can get rid 191 00:12:01,920 --> 00:12:05,160 Speaker 1: of a body a thousand ways. How do you track 192 00:12:05,720 --> 00:12:09,160 Speaker 1: what he did? Next? When you go to the scene 193 00:12:09,520 --> 00:12:12,760 Speaker 1: and you begin to dig around its scene and you 194 00:12:12,960 --> 00:12:15,360 Speaker 1: suddenly realize that you don't have what's referred to as 195 00:12:15,360 --> 00:12:18,800 Speaker 1: a corpus delecti, that is the body of the evidence, 196 00:12:19,120 --> 00:12:21,440 Speaker 1: you're gonna have to expand your search from there. If 197 00:12:21,480 --> 00:12:23,959 Speaker 1: the police were to suspect that the husband was involved 198 00:12:23,960 --> 00:12:27,840 Speaker 1: in any level, they have to begin to track his movements. 199 00:12:28,280 --> 00:12:30,760 Speaker 1: You know you had mentioned, and rightly so. Just a 200 00:12:30,800 --> 00:12:34,079 Speaker 1: moment ago they found this knife in the basement. And 201 00:12:34,600 --> 00:12:39,240 Speaker 1: one little appeased to this that we didn't mention is 202 00:12:39,240 --> 00:12:42,240 Speaker 1: that this knife was bent. You get a bent knife 203 00:12:42,520 --> 00:12:46,800 Speaker 1: and it's got blood on it. That means that probably 204 00:12:47,160 --> 00:12:51,880 Speaker 1: you could make an intellectual leap scientifically and say this 205 00:12:52,040 --> 00:12:55,040 Speaker 1: knife was probably involved in some kind of vigorous behavior, 206 00:12:55,840 --> 00:12:59,400 Speaker 1: that the knife was not necessarily meant for this purpose. 207 00:13:00,120 --> 00:13:02,640 Speaker 1: And when you begin to think about taking a part 208 00:13:02,640 --> 00:13:04,840 Speaker 1: of body, which is what the police are at least 209 00:13:04,880 --> 00:13:08,040 Speaker 1: thinking has happened, and that goes to this idea of 210 00:13:08,640 --> 00:13:11,680 Speaker 1: you're in a fever, you're using the tools that you 211 00:13:11,760 --> 00:13:14,440 Speaker 1: have at hand, and the tool is not meant for 212 00:13:14,480 --> 00:13:17,880 Speaker 1: the job, so therefore it's going to bend and it's 213 00:13:17,880 --> 00:13:20,400 Speaker 1: going to potentially break. In this case, it didn't. But 214 00:13:20,760 --> 00:13:23,920 Speaker 1: what other elements are you looking for? Well, there's a 215 00:13:24,000 --> 00:13:28,160 Speaker 1: rug that they have apparently found that had blood on it. 216 00:13:29,120 --> 00:13:33,840 Speaker 1: And here's one more thing, and this is key. There's 217 00:13:35,000 --> 00:13:40,400 Speaker 1: evidence that the husband had gone to a store and 218 00:13:40,440 --> 00:13:42,880 Speaker 1: it's purchased about Get this, I don't know how much 219 00:13:42,880 --> 00:13:46,120 Speaker 1: you've spent on cleaning supplies, Jackie. He spent four hundred 220 00:13:46,200 --> 00:13:50,920 Speaker 1: dollars allegedly on cleaning supplies. You know how much cleaning 221 00:13:50,920 --> 00:13:54,120 Speaker 1: supplies do you need in order to accomplish a task. 222 00:13:54,720 --> 00:13:58,880 Speaker 1: That gives you an indication that maybe, in this fevered state, 223 00:13:59,120 --> 00:14:01,400 Speaker 1: he's just attempt need to cover all of his bases. 224 00:14:01,400 --> 00:14:04,400 Speaker 1: He's going to use everything that he possibly can in 225 00:14:04,520 --> 00:14:06,200 Speaker 1: order to clean up this mess, and it would have 226 00:14:06,240 --> 00:14:09,880 Speaker 1: been a big, big mess. Well, as police continue their 227 00:14:09,880 --> 00:14:16,680 Speaker 1: investigation into things that Brian Walsh had bought, we also 228 00:14:16,760 --> 00:14:20,080 Speaker 1: find that he bought a hax all. You know, we've 229 00:14:20,080 --> 00:14:22,760 Speaker 1: talked about the use of hack saws in the past 230 00:14:22,920 --> 00:14:27,440 Speaker 1: on bodybags. When you begin to look at this in total, 231 00:14:27,600 --> 00:14:30,320 Speaker 1: you think, well, what's the purpose, Why would you choose 232 00:14:30,440 --> 00:14:32,720 Speaker 1: this particular instrument, Why would you bring it to bear 233 00:14:32,760 --> 00:14:35,640 Speaker 1: as a post to say, for instance, a carpenter saw 234 00:14:36,080 --> 00:14:40,000 Speaker 1: or limb saw. With hack saws, they have different blades 235 00:14:40,280 --> 00:14:42,880 Speaker 1: that can be applied to them. Now we don't necessarily 236 00:14:43,440 --> 00:14:47,240 Speaker 1: know at this point in time the specifics about the 237 00:14:47,320 --> 00:14:51,080 Speaker 1: type of blade that was on this particular hack saw, 238 00:14:51,360 --> 00:14:55,320 Speaker 1: but it is essentially something that you can work with 239 00:14:55,520 --> 00:14:59,120 Speaker 1: in a very tight, fine space. It's not going to 240 00:14:59,240 --> 00:15:02,000 Speaker 1: leave as big a mess. Say, for instance, if you 241 00:15:02,040 --> 00:15:03,920 Speaker 1: really go over the top and you're using some kind 242 00:15:03,960 --> 00:15:07,680 Speaker 1: of electrical saw, a saws all or maybe a circular 243 00:15:07,720 --> 00:15:09,320 Speaker 1: saw and this sort of thing so you can kind 244 00:15:09,320 --> 00:15:12,040 Speaker 1: of keep it contained. You have to think, well, was 245 00:15:12,080 --> 00:15:15,480 Speaker 1: he thinking about this? Is he thinking about using a 246 00:15:15,600 --> 00:15:18,680 Speaker 1: hacks all where you can kind of diminish the amount 247 00:15:18,720 --> 00:15:20,760 Speaker 1: of evidence that you're going to leave behind or not. 248 00:15:21,440 --> 00:15:24,000 Speaker 1: And that's kind of a fascinating point here. I'm can 249 00:15:24,040 --> 00:15:26,880 Speaker 1: I ask you something that's kind of morbid, But then again, 250 00:15:26,960 --> 00:15:29,840 Speaker 1: what we talk about is kind of morbid. If you 251 00:15:30,040 --> 00:15:35,560 Speaker 1: were going to dismember a body, What is the end 252 00:15:35,640 --> 00:15:39,880 Speaker 1: result going to be if you do it when the 253 00:15:39,880 --> 00:15:42,880 Speaker 1: body has only been deceased for a couple of hours, 254 00:15:43,160 --> 00:15:47,400 Speaker 1: as opposed to if the body has been deceased for days. 255 00:15:48,000 --> 00:15:51,000 Speaker 1: Mm hmm, Well that's an excellent question. Here's what my 256 00:15:51,040 --> 00:15:53,840 Speaker 1: thought is on this. First off, you've got two sides 257 00:15:53,920 --> 00:15:58,000 Speaker 1: to think about here. If it is immediately afterwards, the 258 00:15:58,040 --> 00:16:02,440 Speaker 1: blood that remains in the body is not going to 259 00:16:02,520 --> 00:16:06,680 Speaker 1: be See how can I term this? Not as viscous 260 00:16:06,800 --> 00:16:10,160 Speaker 1: or thick as it would be after the body has 261 00:16:10,560 --> 00:16:14,400 Speaker 1: been decomposing for a while, and so therefore it's going 262 00:16:14,400 --> 00:16:17,080 Speaker 1: to be in more of a liquid state closer to 263 00:16:17,160 --> 00:16:21,080 Speaker 1: life than it is to a decomposition and advanced decompositional state. 264 00:16:21,800 --> 00:16:24,480 Speaker 1: So that's going to create a problem. You'll have more 265 00:16:24,560 --> 00:16:27,680 Speaker 1: blood to clean up, if you will. All right, now, 266 00:16:27,760 --> 00:16:30,600 Speaker 1: we're not even talking about any kind of injuries that 267 00:16:30,640 --> 00:16:33,600 Speaker 1: this individual would have sustained prior to death, because that 268 00:16:33,760 --> 00:16:35,960 Speaker 1: if you're talking about gunshot wounds or stab wounds and 269 00:16:35,960 --> 00:16:39,160 Speaker 1: that sort of thing, that's a completely different set of 270 00:16:39,240 --> 00:16:41,760 Speaker 1: problems that you have. There were just merely talking about 271 00:16:42,160 --> 00:16:46,120 Speaker 1: the dismemberment of human remains. So in the early state 272 00:16:46,400 --> 00:16:48,680 Speaker 1: like this, you can still have quite a bit of 273 00:16:48,760 --> 00:16:51,760 Speaker 1: blood seeping out, and so that is going to pose 274 00:16:51,920 --> 00:16:55,400 Speaker 1: problem for anybody that is doing a dismemberment like this, 275 00:16:55,600 --> 00:16:58,200 Speaker 1: and so you'll have blood everywhere, You'll have contact blood 276 00:16:58,800 --> 00:17:02,000 Speaker 1: obviously on the instant that you're using. The individual cannot 277 00:17:02,240 --> 00:17:05,520 Speaker 1: escape this event without having blood all over them. Even 278 00:17:05,560 --> 00:17:08,080 Speaker 1: if they're wearing gloves, you're still going to get blood 279 00:17:08,080 --> 00:17:10,800 Speaker 1: on you. Because this is the thing about it, is 280 00:17:10,840 --> 00:17:15,760 Speaker 1: that when perpetrator shows up to a scene with let's say, 281 00:17:15,760 --> 00:17:19,520 Speaker 1: for instance, a hack saw all right and a knife 282 00:17:19,720 --> 00:17:22,480 Speaker 1: that you might use in your kitchen, they ain't got 283 00:17:22,520 --> 00:17:25,280 Speaker 1: the tools to use. And my suspicion is is that 284 00:17:25,359 --> 00:17:29,040 Speaker 1: they don't have the anatomical knowledge in order to facilitate this. 285 00:17:29,200 --> 00:17:31,960 Speaker 1: We have specific instruments that we use for these purposes. 286 00:17:32,680 --> 00:17:36,160 Speaker 1: That's certainly something that you have to factor in. You're 287 00:17:36,160 --> 00:17:38,920 Speaker 1: going to have quite a big mess early on. Now, 288 00:17:39,400 --> 00:17:41,920 Speaker 1: the further you move down range and say, you ask 289 00:17:41,960 --> 00:17:43,959 Speaker 1: the question, Jackie, if if you have a body that 290 00:17:44,160 --> 00:17:47,960 Speaker 1: is in moderate to advanced state of decomposition, you're gonna 291 00:17:48,000 --> 00:17:50,320 Speaker 1: have to deal with smell. You're gonna have to deal 292 00:17:50,480 --> 00:17:53,280 Speaker 1: with the changes in the tissue itself. But I guess 293 00:17:54,640 --> 00:17:57,200 Speaker 1: I hate to use the term upside, but if there 294 00:17:57,280 --> 00:18:01,520 Speaker 1: is an upside with dismemberment of decomposing remain, the joints 295 00:18:01,960 --> 00:18:05,800 Speaker 1: become much more malleable because of the breakdown of the tissues, 296 00:18:05,840 --> 00:18:08,200 Speaker 1: all the connective tissues and everything that are in there. 297 00:18:08,240 --> 00:18:10,439 Speaker 1: So if you go into, say, for instance, a shoulder 298 00:18:10,520 --> 00:18:13,800 Speaker 1: joint or to the elbow or to the wrist, those 299 00:18:13,800 --> 00:18:17,480 Speaker 1: are going to be much easier to access and kind 300 00:18:17,520 --> 00:18:20,520 Speaker 1: of take apart if you will. It's just that you're 301 00:18:20,520 --> 00:18:22,760 Speaker 1: going to have to deal with all of the problems 302 00:18:22,760 --> 00:18:42,760 Speaker 1: that come along in the messiness of the decomposing body. YEA, 303 00:18:45,840 --> 00:18:50,480 Speaker 1: For investigators, it's certainly one thing when you have an 304 00:18:50,520 --> 00:18:54,719 Speaker 1: intact human remain. I'm not gonna say it's easy, because 305 00:18:55,000 --> 00:18:58,040 Speaker 1: that's that's kind of a diminishment of what all is 306 00:18:58,119 --> 00:19:01,840 Speaker 1: involved in a death investigation. How Ever, I think that 307 00:19:01,880 --> 00:19:03,640 Speaker 1: we can all agree on the fact that if you're 308 00:19:03,680 --> 00:19:08,840 Speaker 1: talking about a case that involves possible dismemberment, what's happened, 309 00:19:09,400 --> 00:19:13,720 Speaker 1: What's happened to all of those various dismembered remains. Are 310 00:19:13,760 --> 00:19:17,719 Speaker 1: they in one location or they spread out over a 311 00:19:17,800 --> 00:19:20,399 Speaker 1: vast area, and that's certainly something that the police are 312 00:19:20,440 --> 00:19:23,479 Speaker 1: faced with right now, Jackie, this case reminds me so 313 00:19:23,560 --> 00:19:28,400 Speaker 1: much of the Jennifer Doulos case. Mom goes missing, husband 314 00:19:28,480 --> 00:19:35,080 Speaker 1: is arrested. He is caught on videotape and with evidence, 315 00:19:35,800 --> 00:19:41,879 Speaker 1: putting evidence into dumpsters and trash cans around the city 316 00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:47,239 Speaker 1: and away from the home. So my question is, and 317 00:19:47,320 --> 00:19:50,760 Speaker 1: again in the Doulos case, the idea of dismemberment was 318 00:19:50,840 --> 00:19:54,640 Speaker 1: also brought into play. How do you start this kind 319 00:19:54,640 --> 00:19:57,320 Speaker 1: of an investigation where you believe the body has been 320 00:19:57,359 --> 00:20:02,000 Speaker 1: dismembered and taken to separate Loca. The dumpster at Brian 321 00:20:02,080 --> 00:20:08,760 Speaker 1: Walsh's mother's apartment was searched, so your area of search 322 00:20:08,960 --> 00:20:12,919 Speaker 1: has become massive. And at what point do you stop 323 00:20:13,000 --> 00:20:16,240 Speaker 1: and say, Okay, sorry, we've gone out fifteen miles, we're 324 00:20:16,240 --> 00:20:19,520 Speaker 1: not going out any farther. Very difficult. It's kind of 325 00:20:19,560 --> 00:20:22,640 Speaker 1: like stopping a battleship. You can't snap your fingers and 326 00:20:22,680 --> 00:20:25,920 Speaker 1: have it stopped. Right now, I'm thinking about what kind 327 00:20:25,920 --> 00:20:27,960 Speaker 1: of logistics are involved in this for the police. And 328 00:20:27,960 --> 00:20:29,800 Speaker 1: I've been involved in cases where I've had to go 329 00:20:29,920 --> 00:20:33,640 Speaker 1: to landfills and they are an absolute nightmare. I mean 330 00:20:33,840 --> 00:20:36,000 Speaker 1: it is a nightmare. Remember when of your kids used 331 00:20:36,000 --> 00:20:38,560 Speaker 1: to play that that game called red light, green Light. 332 00:20:38,720 --> 00:20:41,160 Speaker 1: Everybody would be moving in the yard. You'd be all 333 00:20:41,200 --> 00:20:43,440 Speaker 1: together and somebody say green light, red light, and you'd 334 00:20:43,440 --> 00:20:48,719 Speaker 1: have to stop. We're trying to stop the process of Okay, 335 00:20:48,760 --> 00:20:54,000 Speaker 1: I'll repeat it. The process of processing garbage is monumental. 336 00:20:54,280 --> 00:20:59,119 Speaker 1: Where are the receptacles and then on what kind of 337 00:20:59,160 --> 00:21:03,480 Speaker 1: schedule are the trucks on they're gonna pick this stuff up? 338 00:21:03,640 --> 00:21:07,959 Speaker 1: And then once the trucks, if they're serviced by specific service, 339 00:21:08,080 --> 00:21:10,760 Speaker 1: what landfill are they going to go to? Because various 340 00:21:10,800 --> 00:21:13,439 Speaker 1: different locations and deepended upon the region of the country 341 00:21:13,440 --> 00:21:16,400 Speaker 1: you're in. They might be serviced by private companies, might 342 00:21:16,440 --> 00:21:18,640 Speaker 1: not necessarily the city of the county that's doing this, 343 00:21:18,720 --> 00:21:21,000 Speaker 1: and so they have different areas they're gonna go to. 344 00:21:21,080 --> 00:21:24,640 Speaker 1: And again that adds another layer to this. So from 345 00:21:24,640 --> 00:21:26,800 Speaker 1: that moment time we do have a starting place. We 346 00:21:26,880 --> 00:21:30,800 Speaker 1: have obviously the washes trash. And then you were referring 347 00:21:30,840 --> 00:21:34,680 Speaker 1: to the husband's mother's location. Where would her trash go? 348 00:21:35,400 --> 00:21:38,640 Speaker 1: How would you track that down? Oh, and by the way, 349 00:21:39,240 --> 00:21:44,160 Speaker 1: between his house, the washers home and his mother's home. 350 00:21:45,080 --> 00:21:47,080 Speaker 1: Where else is there that he could have gone to, 351 00:21:47,800 --> 00:21:50,720 Speaker 1: or did he take some kind of detour in going there? 352 00:21:51,160 --> 00:21:53,960 Speaker 1: Is there some kind of other location where items could 353 00:21:54,000 --> 00:21:56,880 Speaker 1: be deposited along the way, And all of that has 354 00:21:56,880 --> 00:22:00,000 Speaker 1: to be factored in. And listen, you've got a very 355 00:22:00,040 --> 00:22:03,199 Speaker 1: very tight window to do this in because if this 356 00:22:03,240 --> 00:22:06,920 Speaker 1: stuff makes it out to a landfill, Jackie, they put 357 00:22:06,960 --> 00:22:10,720 Speaker 1: it out into grids, and those grids are subsequently covered up. 358 00:22:11,200 --> 00:22:13,880 Speaker 1: You've got this stratification that's going on with this very 359 00:22:14,040 --> 00:22:19,280 Speaker 1: very fragile biological evidence that begins to break down very quickly. 360 00:22:19,320 --> 00:22:21,040 Speaker 1: I'm gonna throw one more thing out that i want 361 00:22:21,040 --> 00:22:24,840 Speaker 1: our listeners to understand. When you are in a landfill, 362 00:22:25,400 --> 00:22:30,240 Speaker 1: this is a highly aerobic environment, which means that you've 363 00:22:30,280 --> 00:22:35,000 Speaker 1: got a lot of microscopic activity going on, and it's 364 00:22:35,160 --> 00:22:39,120 Speaker 1: made that way so that things break down, and that's 365 00:22:39,119 --> 00:22:41,879 Speaker 1: why they periodically turn the trash out there. They're always 366 00:22:41,960 --> 00:22:45,399 Speaker 1: running over it with big these big trucks and and 367 00:22:45,520 --> 00:22:48,560 Speaker 1: equipment and stuff. So time is of the essence. If 368 00:22:48,600 --> 00:22:51,960 Speaker 1: you don't captured at that moment time, your entire case 369 00:22:52,000 --> 00:22:54,200 Speaker 1: could be lost and all of the physical evidence can 370 00:22:54,200 --> 00:22:56,560 Speaker 1: be lost as well. You brought up a really good 371 00:22:56,560 --> 00:23:01,800 Speaker 1: point talking about this time factor in finding things in 372 00:23:01,800 --> 00:23:04,960 Speaker 1: the trash and how important it is. We can see 373 00:23:04,960 --> 00:23:10,680 Speaker 1: this in the Idaho murders case with Ryan Coburger. He 374 00:23:10,840 --> 00:23:16,440 Speaker 1: was caught putting trash into his neighbor's ben at four 375 00:23:16,440 --> 00:23:20,240 Speaker 1: o'clock in the morning, wearing gloves. It just so happened 376 00:23:20,280 --> 00:23:22,960 Speaker 1: that the police were staking him out and caught him 377 00:23:23,400 --> 00:23:26,119 Speaker 1: saw him doing that, so that they were able to 378 00:23:26,160 --> 00:23:29,320 Speaker 1: retrieve that in case there was any evidence in there. 379 00:23:30,359 --> 00:23:35,720 Speaker 1: The idea that that's a possibility makes a forensic experts 380 00:23:36,160 --> 00:23:40,760 Speaker 1: job a thousand times more difficult. How do you say, okay, 381 00:23:40,840 --> 00:23:44,000 Speaker 1: check this neighbor, but don't check that neighbor, or do 382 00:23:44,119 --> 00:23:46,480 Speaker 1: you just check them all? Well? I think that a 383 00:23:46,520 --> 00:23:50,000 Speaker 1: lot of this goes back to the police having to 384 00:23:50,240 --> 00:23:53,560 Speaker 1: look at who their primary suspect is and what kind 385 00:23:53,560 --> 00:23:58,080 Speaker 1: of behaviors is this individual normally engaged in. Here's kind 386 00:23:58,080 --> 00:24:02,080 Speaker 1: of a assailiant point. I believe people have, as you 387 00:24:02,200 --> 00:24:05,920 Speaker 1: well reported Jackie, earlier, you talked about how people viewed 388 00:24:05,960 --> 00:24:09,159 Speaker 1: him as kind of standoffice figure. The question would be 389 00:24:09,240 --> 00:24:11,920 Speaker 1: for me is who did he talk to? Not where 390 00:24:11,960 --> 00:24:14,080 Speaker 1: didn't he go, but where did he go on a 391 00:24:14,080 --> 00:24:20,359 Speaker 1: regular basis, and that's within a comfort zone for this individual. 392 00:24:20,600 --> 00:24:24,000 Speaker 1: Most people that perpetrate a crime and they're not arch 393 00:24:24,119 --> 00:24:26,880 Speaker 1: criminal out there, which most of those types of people 394 00:24:26,920 --> 00:24:30,040 Speaker 1: don't truly exist that they do in comic books. But 395 00:24:30,080 --> 00:24:34,320 Speaker 1: when you find yourself in the midst of having been involved, 396 00:24:34,440 --> 00:24:39,200 Speaker 1: allegedly involved in something so horrific, you need those things 397 00:24:39,160 --> 00:24:42,280 Speaker 1: that are gonna you're gonna feel comfortable with, and you're 398 00:24:42,280 --> 00:24:45,640 Speaker 1: gonna feel most comfortable going to locations that you frequent, 399 00:24:45,720 --> 00:24:47,960 Speaker 1: things that you pass by every day that you would see, 400 00:24:48,000 --> 00:24:50,960 Speaker 1: Hey look there's a dumpster behind that convenience store, or 401 00:24:50,960 --> 00:24:54,320 Speaker 1: hey look there's a trash can. This person never takes 402 00:24:54,320 --> 00:24:56,600 Speaker 1: in their trash cans to leave it out there all 403 00:24:56,680 --> 00:24:58,760 Speaker 1: week long. It's always sits by the road and we'll 404 00:24:58,840 --> 00:25:01,159 Speaker 1: arbitrarily throw this in and my gosh, all we have 405 00:25:01,240 --> 00:25:03,320 Speaker 1: to do is think back, Jackie. This is one of 406 00:25:03,320 --> 00:25:05,720 Speaker 1: our earliest cases that we covered on Body Bags, and 407 00:25:05,760 --> 00:25:10,000 Speaker 1: that was infamous Ingrid Lynn case out of Seattle, where 408 00:25:10,200 --> 00:25:12,280 Speaker 1: she had met this guy on a dating app and 409 00:25:12,400 --> 00:25:16,560 Speaker 1: he brought her home that evening and wound up killing 410 00:25:16,600 --> 00:25:19,840 Speaker 1: her and actually dismembering her body in a bathtub in 411 00:25:19,880 --> 00:25:24,040 Speaker 1: that house, and he went to places that were convenient 412 00:25:24,080 --> 00:25:28,520 Speaker 1: for him along his route, and he actually deposited parts 413 00:25:28,600 --> 00:25:33,040 Speaker 1: of her body all over the city in recyclable trash can. 414 00:25:33,080 --> 00:25:35,240 Speaker 1: Say it just so happened. I think that they would 415 00:25:35,240 --> 00:25:37,360 Speaker 1: have had a hard time with this case, even more 416 00:25:37,359 --> 00:25:40,560 Speaker 1: difficult than they wound up having, if this random citizen 417 00:25:40,640 --> 00:25:43,159 Speaker 1: had not walked out to their trash can to retrieve 418 00:25:43,160 --> 00:25:45,280 Speaker 1: it and noticed that it was heavy, looked down in 419 00:25:45,320 --> 00:25:47,240 Speaker 1: there and can you imagine this looks down in there 420 00:25:47,240 --> 00:25:50,360 Speaker 1: and discovers I think it was a foot sticking out. 421 00:25:51,000 --> 00:25:54,399 Speaker 1: So you just never know about what a perpetrator is 422 00:25:54,480 --> 00:25:56,800 Speaker 1: going to do. They're going to do. I think those 423 00:25:56,840 --> 00:25:59,200 Speaker 1: things that make them feel most comfortable, because this is 424 00:25:59,240 --> 00:26:02,680 Speaker 1: already COMPLI caated enough when you begin to think about 425 00:26:02,800 --> 00:26:05,560 Speaker 1: what kind of intellectual energy has to go into this 426 00:26:05,600 --> 00:26:08,240 Speaker 1: in order to facilitate this pull it off, and you've 427 00:26:08,280 --> 00:26:10,119 Speaker 1: always got it in the back of your mind. I 428 00:26:10,119 --> 00:26:14,080 Speaker 1: would imagine, as somebody is always watching, that they're going 429 00:26:14,119 --> 00:26:16,960 Speaker 1: to get onto you, that you're going to leave a 430 00:26:17,119 --> 00:26:21,200 Speaker 1: trace behind, and of course they always do. But going 431 00:26:21,240 --> 00:26:23,760 Speaker 1: back to my question, I think I'm kind of hung 432 00:26:23,840 --> 00:26:27,399 Speaker 1: up on the fact that while you say most people 433 00:26:27,440 --> 00:26:30,720 Speaker 1: go where they're comfortable, what they know, when you've got 434 00:26:30,720 --> 00:26:35,120 Speaker 1: that one person israel Keys, for example, travel the country 435 00:26:35,359 --> 00:26:40,119 Speaker 1: setting up kill kits in strange locations. So you've always 436 00:26:40,160 --> 00:26:43,080 Speaker 1: got that one person that goes, I'm smarter than everybody else, 437 00:26:43,640 --> 00:26:45,879 Speaker 1: And then you have to worry is he really smarter 438 00:26:45,960 --> 00:26:48,560 Speaker 1: than anybody else? And does that mean he's going to 439 00:26:48,680 --> 00:26:52,119 Speaker 1: drive two hours away to dispose of a body? And 440 00:26:52,400 --> 00:26:56,720 Speaker 1: this ties back into my original question how far out? 441 00:26:56,760 --> 00:27:00,560 Speaker 1: At what point in an investigation five miles, ten miles, 442 00:27:00,560 --> 00:27:04,000 Speaker 1: fifteen miles from home do you say, Okay, we've gone 443 00:27:04,280 --> 00:27:07,240 Speaker 1: out far enough. I'll plainly say that I don't know. 444 00:27:07,320 --> 00:27:09,160 Speaker 1: I don't know how you take the measure of that 445 00:27:09,480 --> 00:27:12,000 Speaker 1: as an investigator. As much as I hate to say 446 00:27:12,040 --> 00:27:15,680 Speaker 1: this as a scientist, some of it just relies on intuition. 447 00:27:15,880 --> 00:27:18,119 Speaker 1: I hate that term. I hated when it comes. I 448 00:27:18,160 --> 00:27:21,560 Speaker 1: hate things like intuition and gut feeling because I think 449 00:27:21,560 --> 00:27:24,119 Speaker 1: that they'll fail you most of the time. But in 450 00:27:24,160 --> 00:27:28,480 Speaker 1: this particular case, the police will exhaust to every possibility 451 00:27:28,520 --> 00:27:30,879 Speaker 1: that they can, and at some point in time you 452 00:27:30,960 --> 00:27:32,600 Speaker 1: just have to call it quits. But you know, you 453 00:27:32,600 --> 00:27:36,040 Speaker 1: want to talk about leaving a trail behind. When the 454 00:27:36,119 --> 00:27:38,960 Speaker 1: police actually got ahold of one of the I think 455 00:27:38,960 --> 00:27:42,119 Speaker 1: it was the iPad that was found in the home 456 00:27:42,600 --> 00:27:45,600 Speaker 1: per search warrant. This is what was left behind on 457 00:27:45,640 --> 00:27:49,440 Speaker 1: the iPad. Just listen. This is kind of these little 458 00:27:49,440 --> 00:27:54,040 Speaker 1: bulletin points that I have here. Ten ways to dismember 459 00:27:54,080 --> 00:27:57,840 Speaker 1: a body? Does baking soda make a body smell good? 460 00:27:58,800 --> 00:28:03,640 Speaker 1: How long is someone missing before you can inherit? Can 461 00:28:03,680 --> 00:28:07,760 Speaker 1: you throw away body parts? Can you be charged with 462 00:28:07,800 --> 00:28:12,080 Speaker 1: a murder without a body dismemberment? And the best ways 463 00:28:12,160 --> 00:28:17,400 Speaker 1: to dispose of a body? A little light Saturday afternoon reading? Huh, 464 00:28:17,440 --> 00:28:20,160 Speaker 1: you know who who searches these things out? And when 465 00:28:20,200 --> 00:28:23,800 Speaker 1: you begin to couple that with her disappearance, and well, 466 00:28:23,800 --> 00:28:26,400 Speaker 1: and don't forget the fact, Joe, don't forget the fact 467 00:28:26,480 --> 00:28:30,600 Speaker 1: that she had said before that her husband had threatened 468 00:28:30,640 --> 00:28:33,040 Speaker 1: to kill her. Yeah, and you know her mother, who 469 00:28:33,080 --> 00:28:36,359 Speaker 1: I think is from Eastern Europe maybe Serbia, was not 470 00:28:36,520 --> 00:28:39,600 Speaker 1: even aware of this, and that came out later that 471 00:28:40,120 --> 00:28:42,960 Speaker 1: he had threatened her, I think, many many years ago, 472 00:28:43,200 --> 00:28:46,160 Speaker 1: and the mother was astounded to find this out. And 473 00:28:46,520 --> 00:28:49,280 Speaker 1: who knows, you know, what might be the motivation behind 474 00:28:49,320 --> 00:28:53,160 Speaker 1: all of this, and again he's innocent until proven guilty. 475 00:28:53,160 --> 00:28:55,160 Speaker 1: He's merely been charged at this point in time. But 476 00:28:55,520 --> 00:28:58,360 Speaker 1: you have to look at the totality of the circumstances 477 00:28:58,960 --> 00:29:01,360 Speaker 1: and who would have had the opportunity in order to 478 00:29:01,400 --> 00:29:04,800 Speaker 1: perpetrate such a heinous crime. I look at this and 479 00:29:05,120 --> 00:29:08,440 Speaker 1: I begin to think, deep down in my heart of hearts, 480 00:29:09,000 --> 00:29:11,160 Speaker 1: I've been married for a long time, I've got kids. 481 00:29:11,960 --> 00:29:14,200 Speaker 1: Many of us can identify with this. At what point 482 00:29:14,240 --> 00:29:21,000 Speaker 1: in time do you get in a relationship where you say, Okay, 483 00:29:21,040 --> 00:29:24,880 Speaker 1: I'm gonna kill the person that I've been married to 484 00:29:25,240 --> 00:29:27,480 Speaker 1: and oh, by the way, not only married to, but 485 00:29:27,600 --> 00:29:30,960 Speaker 1: created life with and have attempted to build a life with. 486 00:29:31,400 --> 00:29:33,200 Speaker 1: At what point do you get to? And I think 487 00:29:33,200 --> 00:29:36,320 Speaker 1: that that's currently what the police are trying to explore. 488 00:29:36,400 --> 00:29:39,640 Speaker 1: What would be the overall motivating factor for somebody to 489 00:29:39,680 --> 00:29:42,360 Speaker 1: have done this, To do this with a person that 490 00:29:42,440 --> 00:29:46,479 Speaker 1: you've built a life with and completely destroy it. Brian 491 00:29:46,520 --> 00:29:50,640 Speaker 1: Walsh has pleaded not guilty to charges of murder and 492 00:29:50,880 --> 00:29:59,400 Speaker 1: disinenterring a body. He is being held without bail. I'm 493 00:29:59,480 --> 00:30:22,200 Speaker 1: Joseph st. Morgan and this is body backs m