WEBVTT - Charity's Crime

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to History on Trial, a production of

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:12.200
<v Speaker 1>iHeart Podcasts. Listener discretion advised. As he walked home on

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:16.680
<v Speaker 1>May thirteenth, eighteen fifty four, Nathaniel Lamb was presented with

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a vision of loveliness all around him. Spring was unfurling,

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Dormant plants poked their heads from the soil to greet

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the sun covering the world in green. Oregon winters can

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>be dreary, but all those gray, rainy days pay off.

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Thirty four year old Nathaniel was returning from a hunt,

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>accompanied by two friends and his eldest son, thirteen year

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:45.040
<v Speaker 1>old Abraham. They'd managed to get a bear, even split

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>three ways. This was a good haul of meat, and

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Nathaniel had claimed one of the bear's paws too, as

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a trophy. The paw would add some character to his

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>family's cabin, which, like most pioneer dwellings, was a barbones affair,

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>but it was sturdy enough to have gotten the Lambs, Nathaniel,

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>his wife Charity, and their six children through the last

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.919
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months since it arrived in the Oregon territory. Though

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>with only two rooms, quarters likely felt tight, especially since

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the arrival of baby Presley. Reaching the cabin. Nathaniel unloaded

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>his share of meat from the wagon and carried it

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>into the back room, passing by Charity, who was cooking

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>at the fireplace. The table was set for supper, so

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:30.479
<v Speaker 1>Nathaniel set the meat and the paw down and took

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>his seat. His sixteen year old daughter mary Anne went

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>to look at the bear paw, while her five younger brothers,

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>who ranged in age from thirteen year old Abraham to

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>baby Presley, sat down to eat. The perfect end to

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the perfect day, it seemed. The family snug inside their cabin,

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.680
<v Speaker 1>gathered around a warm meal as the sun sunk behind

0:01:51.720 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the Douglas Firs and big leaf maples, its last rays

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>illuminating the Lamb's property, hundreds of acres of lush or

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>wagon land that, after only three more years of occupancy

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and improvement, would belong to the Lamb family outright and

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:12.239
<v Speaker 1>secure their future on this new frontier of the United States.

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>But that future would never come, because as Nathaniel Lamb

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 1>bent over his supper, his wife Charity rose from her seat,

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>grabbed an axe, and slammed it into the back of

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>his head. Welcome to history on trial. I'm your host,

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Mira Hayward this week the Territory of Oregon v. Charity Lamb.

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>To understand what happened that night in the Lamb cabin,

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>we need to travel back nearly twenty years and three

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:48.639
<v Speaker 1>thousand miles to July fourteenth, eighteen thirty six, the day

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 1>that eighteen year old Charity Robins married sixteen year old

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>Nathaniel Lamb in Randolph County, North Carolina. Young marriages were

0:02:56.960 --> 0:03:00.920
<v Speaker 1>not uncommon in Charity and Nathaniel's world. Their parents had

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>all married in their teens. Nathaniel's mother, Susannah, was only

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>thirteen when Nathaniel was born in eighteen twenty. Nathaniel was

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:11.919
<v Speaker 1>the first of eighteen children that Susannah would bear over

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the next twenty seven years, before divorcing her husband in

0:03:15.240 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 1>eighteen fifty, blaming that he was an alcoholic who'd abandoned

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.679
<v Speaker 1>the family and spent all their money. Her mother in

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>law's story might have served as a cautionary tale to

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Charity Lamb, but by the time Susannah filed for divorce,

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Charity and Nathaniel were long gone from North Carolina. Their

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>first child, Mary Anne, had been born in North Carolina

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen thirty seven, a year after their marriage, but

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:42.280
<v Speaker 1>by eighteen forty, when their second child, Abraham arrived, the

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>family had moved to Illinois. Their next three children, Thomas, William,

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and John, were all born even further west in Missouri,

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but even that frontier was not far enough for Nathaniel Lamb.

0:03:55.200 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Not long after the birth of the Lamb's fifth child, John,

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen fifty one, Nathaniel decided to take his family

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Oregon Territory. The Donation Land Claim Act of

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>eighteen fifty allowed white married couples to claim three hundred

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and twenty acres of land in the territory free of charge,

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>provided they arrived on the land before eighteen fifty four

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 1>and lived on and worked the land for four years.

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>The Lambs were some of the estimated three to four

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.919
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand Americans who traveled the Oregon Trail between eighteen

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>forty and eighteen sixty. It was an arduous, multi month

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>journey of more than two thousand miles, requiring settlers to

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>face a litany of dangers, from bad weather to wagon

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>accidents to disease. As anyone who's played the Oregon Trail

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:46.480
<v Speaker 1>computer game nos dying from dysentery, all too easy. But

0:04:46.560 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>for Charity Lamb, the dangers of the trail came from

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a more proximate source. Her husband, Nathaniel, had never been

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 1>a kind husband nor a law abiding one. Later, Charity

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>would recount how he'd stole and a horse and an

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.239
<v Speaker 1>ox while they lived in Missouri and threatened his family

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>with death if they turned him in. Their son, Abraham,

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>described his parents as frequently quarreling. Their daughter Mary Anne,

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 1>said quote, my parents have quarreled all their lives. But

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 1>things got worse as they headed west on the plains.

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Mary Anne Lamb later testified he threatened her, and she

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 1>carried the gun all day ahead of the wagon train

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>through fear he would kill her with it. Miraculously, all

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>the Lamb survived the trail as far as we know.

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:37.159
<v Speaker 1>In the autumn of eighteen fifty two, the family arrived

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>in Oregon and staked their claim. The land they chose

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:43.679
<v Speaker 1>was just north of the Clacamus River, southeast of present

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:49.400
<v Speaker 1>day Portland. Though remote, the land was lovely. Frank branch Riley,

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>who later owned the plot, described it as quote a

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>picturesque high mountain meadow with far flung breath taking panoramas

0:05:57.000 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>of the valleys of the Clacamus River and Eagle Creek,

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:04.839
<v Speaker 1>an environment of scenic, loveliness and tranquility, and an improbable

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>setting for a horrendous story of violent hate and assassination.

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps not so improbable for Charity Lamb. She later told

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the family's hired hand, Dwight Muzzy, that she quote did

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 1>not like the land. It was very remote. The Lamb's

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>nearest neighbors, the Smiths, were half a mile away. After that,

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>there was no one for two miles in any direction.

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>The nearest town, Oregon City, was nine miles away. Legal

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:37.359
<v Speaker 1>historian Ronald Lansing describes Charity as quote snared in a

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:43.040
<v Speaker 1>land far from friends, family, and familiar places, and Nathaniel's

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>abuse was intensifying. Not long after their arrival, in the

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>winter of eighteen fifty two, Charity fell ill and took

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to her bed. When Nathaniel commanded her to get up,

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>she said she could not, so he picked up a

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 1>stool and said he would move her by force. The

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>next spring, he threw a hammer at her head, striking

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>her in the forehead and leaving a scar. Charity was

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>likely pregnant with the couple's sixth child, Presley at the time.

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>After Presley's birth, Charity believed Nathaniel tried to poison her.

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Later that year, when Charity didn't help Nathaniel carry a

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>log into the house, he punched her. When she fell

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>into the snow. Stunned, he kicked her repeatedly. Their children

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.080
<v Speaker 1>witnessed all of this, but worse was still to come.

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Sometime in late eighteen fifty three or early eighteen fifty four,

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a man named Collins came into the Lamb's life. Little

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>is known about Collins, including his first name, but his

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>reputation apparently was concerning. According to the Oregon Statesman, in

0:07:45.040 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the summer of eighteen fifty three, Collins quote seduced a

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>man's wife and a divorce was obtained. Now, Collins had

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>his sights set on mary Anne Lamb, a round face

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>sixteen year old with lustrous dark hair. Charity, perhaps hoping

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 1>to get her daughter out of their violent home, supported

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Collins's suit. Nathaniel did not. Eventually, he threatened to kill

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Collins if the man kept showing up at their house.

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Later rumors and reports would claim that both Mary Anne

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and Charity were in love with Collins, but we have

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 1>no evidence of this. The only thing we know is

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that in the spring of eighteen fifty four, mary Anne,

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>with the help of her mother, tried to get back

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>into contact with Collins. Charity wrote the letter on her

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>daughter's behalf. Marianne then hid the letter in the front

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.079
<v Speaker 1>of her dress, waiting for a chance to mail it.

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:39.719
<v Speaker 1>But on Saturday May sixth, before she could get the

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:45.319
<v Speaker 1>letter off, her father discovered it. Nathaniel irrupted, furious at

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>his wife and daughter's betrayal of his commands. You will

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>not live at my expense longer than a week, he

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.239
<v Speaker 1>bellowed at Charity. He would kill her the next Saturday,

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>he told her, and take their sons and leave. Nine

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>year old Thomas Lamb later explained that it was only

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a matter of logistics that Nathaniel did not kill Charity

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and leave that very day. Quote he said he was

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:10.559
<v Speaker 1>going to take us boys along because he was not

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>going to let her raise us, but that he was

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 1>waiting for the cow to have a calf so that

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>he could take the baby along and have milk for it.

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>That is what he waited so long for. For the

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>next week, Charity awoke each morning and wondered if it

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>would be the day she would die. At one point,

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Nathaniel seemed to relent. He told her to leave if

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>she wanted, But then he told her that if she left,

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>he would follow her, and, in their thirteen year old

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:38.839
<v Speaker 1>son Abraham's words, quote settle her when she didn't know it.

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Nine year old Thomas put it more plainly. She said

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>she didn't know what to do, for he was going

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to kill her, and if she ran off, he would

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>follow her and kill her. Anyhow, Nathaniel toyed with Charity,

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>pretending to change his mind once more and telling her

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to go. Charity snatched her bonnet and hurried out the door,

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>but before she reached the gate, she heard her husband,

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll drop you before you get out of sight. Nathaniel

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>said his rifle was aimed straight at her. Charity came

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>back on Friday evening, with one day left in the week.

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Nathaniel had given Charity to live. Mary Anne and Thomas

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>saw their father point his gun once more at their mother.

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 1>When he saw that they were watching him, Nathaniel turned

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and shot his gun into a tree instead. The next morning,

0:10:27.040 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the thirteenth, before Nathaniel and Abraham left on the hunt,

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Abraham noticed that his mother appeared quote, tolerably uneasy. She

0:10:35.800 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>pulled Abraham aside and told him that his father, quote,

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:41.079
<v Speaker 1>was going to kill her and mary Anne and take

0:10:41.160 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>us boys and go to California. The family's hired hand,

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty four year old Dwight Muzzy, was working near the

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 1>cabin that day and came in for breakfast and lunch.

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>He said. Charity looked downcast and dejected. At lunch, she

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>pulled Muzzy aside and said she had something to tell him,

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 1>something that must be kept a secret. She believed Lamb

0:11:02.440 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>was going to leave. She knew it because he was

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>making preparations. He had sold his mare, and she knew

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>he had got money for it. He was going to

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>California and would take the boys with him. Muzzy said

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>he hoped it wasn't true, but Charity insisted it was.

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>You think you have a friend in Lamb, she told him,

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>but you are very much deceived. Her husband was not

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 1>a good man. She told Muzzy about all the times

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>he had abused her, the hammer he'd thrown at her head,

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the time he'd tried to poison her, all the threats

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>he'd made to her life. Now, Charity told Muzzy he

0:11:37.679 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>was going to kill her and Mary Anne Dwight. Muzzy

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>does not seem to have believed Charity Lamb. He never

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>said so outright, but his actions reveal his ambivalence. After

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>Charity poured out her fears to Muzzy, she asked if

0:11:51.280 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>he would return to the cabin later that night. He

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:58.720
<v Speaker 1>said he would not. Charity pushed, but carefully, reminding Muzzy

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>that she'd done his laundry. Wouldn't he need to come

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 1>back for a clean shirt? I said not, Muzzy recalled,

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Then he left her alone. Several hours later, Nathaniel's hunting companions,

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>William Cook and David Deardorf, dropped Nathaniel and Abraham off

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 1>at the cabin, then continued on towards the Smith's house.

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>After stopping for a few minutes to chat with Benjamin Smith,

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>the two men set off again. They made it only

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>a few hundred yards before they heard Benjamin Smith call

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>them back. Abraham Lamb stood at Smith's side, panting he

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>had just run there, carrying the news that his father

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>was dead. Smith and Cook and Deardorf and Abraham ran

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>back to the Lamb cabin, passing Charity and Mary Anne

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Lamb who were running in the opposite direction. When Charity

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 1>saw Abraham, she paused and cried out to him take

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>care of the baby. Then she ran off. At the Lambs,

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the men found Nathaniel sprawled outside, his head a bloody mess.

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.120
<v Speaker 1>As they bent down to pick him up, they drew

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>back in shock. Nathaniel Lamb was still alive. Doctor Presley

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Welch was quickly summoned to the Lamb cabin. What he

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>saw did not make him optimistic. The top of Nathaniel's

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>skull was split by a five inch long gash that

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>penetrated two inches into his brain. The bone was also

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>damaged in the back of the skull. Even though Nathaniel

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 1>was alive now, doctor Welch knew he would not remain

0:13:29.440 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that way for long. Having done all he could for

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the patient, doctor Welch set out towards the Smith's, the

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 1>direction Charity had last been seen heading. He found Charity

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>inside the Smith's cabin, sitting in a bed. She asked

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>about her husband. Welch told her his wounds were mortal.

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Charity seemed surprised quote she said she did not mean

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to kill the critter. Welch recalled that she only intended

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to stun him until they could get away. Even despite

0:13:57.480 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Welch's report, Charity did not seem convince that her husband

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>would die. When one of the Smith's sons returned home

0:14:04.320 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>from the Lamb cabin, he found Charity smoking her pipe.

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Her first question for him was whether her husband would

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>be able to come find her and kill her. The

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>boy replied that he did not think so, and that

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Nathaniel would not live long. Charity asked the same question

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of everyone who came to the smith house that night,

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>would her husband be able to come after her? After

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>hearing over and over again that he would not, she

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>finally went to sleep. The next morning, she told the

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Smiths that she needed to go home and feed her

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>children breakfast. Nathaniel was still lying in the other room

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>alive when she arrived, but she did not go in

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>to see him. When told by doctor Welsh that Nathaniel

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see her, Charity quote refused to go in

0:14:46.800 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>where he was, saying that he would certainly kill her.

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Only after repeated assurances from doctor Welch that Nathaniel was

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>quote entirely helpless, did she agree. By now, infection was

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>setting in Nathaniel was delirious and mumbling to himself. But

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>when Charity said Nathaniel, I am here, he seemed to

0:15:07.760 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>become lucid and asked her, yes, dear, I see you are,

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>my dear. What did you kill me for? Charity began

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>listing all the ways Nathaniel had abused her. He denied

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 1>all of it. When doctor Welch later asked Charity why

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>she had done it, she told him about her son Abraham, saying, quote,

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:30.720
<v Speaker 1>there is a boy thirteen years old who has never

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>been inside of a schoolhouse or meeting house. I could

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 1>not think of having my children raised by such a man.

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 1>She described Nathaniel's criminal past and his violent actions. Doctor

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Welch told her that the law would probably come for her. Nonetheless,

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Charity seemed surprised, but resigned, telling the doctor quote, the

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>worst they could do would be to hang me, and

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I am willing to be hung in case he should die.

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Nathaniel did die six days later, on May twentieth, eighteen

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty four. By then, the story of the murder had

0:16:03.080 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>hit the papers. The Oregonian, who smugly wrote that Missus

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>lamb ought to be called Missus Tiger, claimed that quote

0:16:11.480 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the domestic peace of the family had been invaded by

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 1>another man, and the husband had threatened an exposure of

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>his faithless wife. Philip Foster, a prominent local citizen who

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>was one of the first white settlers in Oregon, added

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 1>fuel to the fire when he told the Oregon Statesman

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>that Charity and Marianne had both been in love with

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Collins and had killed Nathaniel when he foiled their plans

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to run off with their lover. Foster, who had also

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>occasionally employed Nathaniel, called his neighbor quote an industrious and

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>quiet citizen. The Statesman concluded that Charity was a monster.

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Charity's trial was initially scheduled for July, but due to

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>an issue with the grand jury, it was postponed until September.

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Until then, Charity would be kept in the Oregon City Penitentiary,

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>where she was the only female prison While Charity sat

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>in jail, the probate court decided what to do about

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the Lamb children and estate. Joseph Church, the local Justice

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Peace, had taken the Lamb children in temporarily

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>after the attack. On May twenty seventh, Church filed a

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>petition to be named administrator of Nathaniel Lamb's estate and

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>guardian of his minor children. His petition was granted on

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>June sixth, stripping Charity of her parental rights. Next, Church

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>petitioned the court to allow him to sell the Lamb's

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:33.199
<v Speaker 1>personal property in order to pay back Nathaniel's creditors and

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 1>his estate expenses. The probate court once again approved the petition,

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>and Church sold all of the family's belongings and livestock.

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Even if Charity managed to escape conviction, she would return

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to an empty cabin, but not all hope was lost.

0:17:49.520 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 1>The local court was treating offenders mercifully that summer. There

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>was the arsonist accused of burning down a barn, who

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>was convicted but deemed by Judge Cyrus only to be

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>quote more an object of pity than resentment, and given

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the minimum sentence. There was the man who killed his

0:18:06.359 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>neighbor's ox, who the grand jury declined to indict, believing

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 1>him to be insane. And then there was mary Anne Lamb.

0:18:15.240 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 1>The day after the attack, doctor Welch had asked Charity

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 1>if mary Anne had known of her plans to kill Nathaniel.

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Charity replied that mary Anne quote was going to do

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it herself. But I told her I would do it.

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Mary Anne was subsequently indicted alongside Charity for Nathaniel's murder,

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:35.120
<v Speaker 1>but at her trial on July eleventh, the first felony

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>trial of a woman in the Oregon Territory, the jury

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 1>quickly found her not guilty because, per the Oregon Statesman quote,

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>there was no evidence against her except the statements of

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>her mother, which were ruled out by the court. Though

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a lack of evidence seems like a pretty good reason

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to acquit to me. Not everyone was happy with mary

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Anne's verdict. The Oregon Spectator wrote a scathing editorial on

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 1>July fourteenth, accusing Jeff Udge Only and Noah Huber, the prosecutor,

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>of taking it easy on mary Anne. If Cyrus Only

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 1>as judge and Noah Huber as prosecuting attorney composed the

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>head and tail of the September trial, the paper warned,

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the old woman will be cleared too. Others weren't so certain.

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>A jury might be willing to look favorably on an

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:25.719
<v Speaker 1>arsonist or an alleged accomplice, but what about a killer.

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 1>The opening of the Territory of Oregon v. Charity Lamb

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>on September eleventh, eighteen fifty four proved the Spectator right

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:40.200
<v Speaker 1>on at least two counts. Judge Only and Prosecutor Huber

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>were back. This was not really a surprise. The territory

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>had only three judges, each of whom oversaw large districts.

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Cyrus only covered the district that included the Lamb's cabin.

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Thirty eight years old Only was known as a quote

0:19:57.040 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 1>modest and unassuming gentleman. No Ya Huber's appearance was also

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>not shocking. He was the district attorney, after all. Elected

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to the position earlier that summer. The thirty three year

0:20:08.560 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 1>old had been criticized by the Spectator for not prosecuting

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Mary Ann Lamb aggressively enough. Huber would show no such

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>hesitation with Charity Lamb. Judge Only had appointed James K.

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and Milton Elliott, the same lawyers who had defended

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the arsonist, the ox Killer, and Mary Ann, to represent Charity.

0:20:28.760 --> 0:20:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Kelly and Elliott's successes that summer hadn't been Fluke's. Both

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>men were experienced attorneys. Elliott had once been a prosecutor,

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>while Kelly, who also served as a territorial legislator, had

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:44.119
<v Speaker 1>played such a major role in drafting the territory's eighteen

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty four Code of Laws that it was sometimes known

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 1>as the Kelly Code. Kelly and Elliott began the trial

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>by providing Charity's plea not guilty. At Elliott and Kelly's side,

0:20:56.840 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 1>Charity sat listless, holding her infant side. Presley, The Weekly

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Oregonian wrote that she looked quote pale and sallow and

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>emaciated as a skeleton, apparently fifty years of age, though

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>probably a little younger. In reality, Charity was only thirty

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>six years of hard work, child bearing, and poverty, not

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to mention the four months in jail had aged her.

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>The conditions in the penitentiary could not have been good.

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 1>The Oregonian further records that quote her clothing was thin

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and scanty, and much worn and torn, and far from clean. Unfortunately,

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the opening statements have been lost to time, but from

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the shape of Noah Huber's prosecution case, we can imagine

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>what he might have said. Charity Lamb was a cold blooded,

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 1>remorseless killer who had planned her crime. Hubert began by

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>calling two doctors Forbes, Barkley and Presley Welch. Berkley had

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>performed the post warnem examination of Nathaniel and described the

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>man's wounds to the chair, saying that the deep slice

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 1>through his skull and into his brain was quote necessarily fatal,

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>while the secondary skull penetration was probably fatal in its

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>own right. Doctor Welch, who had tended to Nathaniel after

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the attack, concurred with Berkeley. Hubert next introduced Nathaniel's hunting

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>companions that day, who described saying goodbye to him and

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>then coming back to find him dying. William Cook described

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.919
<v Speaker 1>the graphic scene at the cabin, quote, he lay in

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the front yard, bloody as a man could be. The

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>table was standing and seats around it as if they

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>had been eating supper. There was blood on a plate,

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.040
<v Speaker 1>on a chair, and on the floor, and from there

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>out the door. Cook had also seen the murder weapon quote,

0:22:45.800 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a narrow bit chopping axe with blood and hair on it.

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:51.679
<v Speaker 1>There was little doubt that Charity was the one who

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>had wielded this axe. Nathaniel himself had identified her as

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>his killer, and Charity had openly admitted to her actions.

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.119
<v Speaker 1>According to cons See a canton Wine who had taken

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.439
<v Speaker 1>Charity to jail, Charity had told him that quote, she

0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>was sorry, She had not struck him a little harder

0:23:08.000 --> 0:23:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and prevented his giving evidence against her. The prosecution argued

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that Charity's motive for killing Nathaniel was related to the

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:19.400
<v Speaker 1>mysterious Collins and Charity's anger at Nathaniel for not allowing

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Mary Anne to marry him. A neighbor, Joseph Jones, who

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>spoke to Charity on the Monday following the attack, testified

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that Charity told him quote, she was afraid of Nathaniel

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>on account of that letter she had tried to write

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:34.919
<v Speaker 1>for Maryanne to mister Collins, which was the reason she

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>did it. That he had been mad at her ever

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>since the letter, and she was afraid of him. Doctor

0:23:40.840 --> 0:23:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Welch said that Nathaniel and Charity had discussed the letter

0:23:43.640 --> 0:23:46.439
<v Speaker 1>while he lay dying, and that Nathaniel had admitted that

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>if Collins had quote continued to cut up about my

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>house as he had done, I would have shot him.

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Constable canton Wine had asked Charity about Collins, telling her

0:23:56.320 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>he quote supposed that miserable Collins was the main cause

0:23:59.640 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of the diffyfficulty, to which Charity had replied unconvincingly that

0:24:03.880 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 1>she quote knew nothing about him. Hubert also tried to

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 1>preempt any defense claims of insanity. Philip Foster, Yes, the

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.719
<v Speaker 1>same neighbor who told newspapers that Charity was having an

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>affair with Collins, testified that he had visited Charity while

0:24:18.560 --> 0:24:22.240
<v Speaker 1>she was in jail. She appeared different. Foster said, she

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>pretended not to know anything. I thought it feigned. At

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>all other times she had appeared rational. Thank you, Philip Foster,

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Your completely unqualified opinion on insanity is noted. More concerning

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>for an insanity defense was the testimony from the two doctors.

0:24:39.320 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Forbes Barkley, who had done Nathaniel's post mortem, had

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.359
<v Speaker 1>also treated Charity for unnamed issues while she was in jail.

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:51.160
<v Speaker 1>According to him, when he first visited her, she behaved strangely. Quote,

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>she made no reply to my questions, appeared to take

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>offense that I should talk to her, was very much excited,

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 1>looked wild, appeared to have a slight fever. I thought

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:03.399
<v Speaker 1>she was pretending. She kept moving her feet and her

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>hands to make a little noise. The jailer told her

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to be quiet, and she obeyed. I think she was sane.

0:25:09.240 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Welch concurred, saying, quote, I thought her a nice woman,

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>but ignorant below mediocrity, but if she was insane, I

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>did not perceive it. On cross examination, defense lawyers Milton

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Elliott and James Kelly tried to introduce some nuance to

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>these men's claims. Was it possible for someone to be

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>rational in most cases but insane in certain circumstances. Doctor

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Berkley admitted that it was, saying quote, A person may

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>be insane on a particular subject as that there is

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>some danger impending over him, and be sane in all

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>other respects, but qualified his statement saying there would be

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>premonitory symptoms and other means of detecting it. Doctor Welch

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>acknowledged quote, I never thought about that. I thought it

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>strange she could do such an act and be so

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.640
<v Speaker 1>indifferent to it. One may be insane on a particular

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 1>subject and rational on all others. Insanity was the first

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>prong of the defense's strategy. The second was self defense.

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Abuse had come up during the prosecution's case, such as

0:26:09.880 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 1>when Constable canton Wine said Charity had told him of

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 1>Nathaniel's cruelties to her and said she did it for

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>fear of her life, that if she had not done it,

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:21.199
<v Speaker 1>he would have killed her, that she did it to

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 1>save her life. Now, the defense introduced eyewitnesses to the

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>abuse the Lamb children. The three eldest children, Mary Anne, Abraham,

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and Thomas, all testified to Nathaniel's cruelty, physical violence, and

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>threats to their mother's life. They spoke of the hammer

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and the scar it left on Charity's forehead, of the

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>stool Nathaniel had brandished at his sick wife of the

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:47.360
<v Speaker 1>time he had knocked her down and beaten her as

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>she lay in the snow. Of how according to nine

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:53.480
<v Speaker 1>year old Thomas, he threatened the day before to kill her.

0:26:53.800 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>He had threatened it before. Dwight Muzzy testified that Charity

0:26:57.520 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 1>had told him of this abuse on the day of

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the attack, and doctor Welch recounted Charity's answer when he

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>asked why she and Marianne hadn't simply run away while

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Nathaniel was out hunting. Quote, we might have, but we

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>did not know where he was, and we might meet

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 1>him and he would kill us. On September fourteenth, the

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>defense rested and closing arguments began. Noah Huber's closing like

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:23.679
<v Speaker 1>his case, was to the point it is undeniable. He

0:27:23.720 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>told the jury that the deceased received his death from

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:29.879
<v Speaker 1>blows on the head inflicted by her with an axe.

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>The only question was whether that killing was murder. Huber

0:27:34.359 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>said that it was. No provocation was given at the time,

0:27:38.240 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 1>he argued, But on the contrary, the act was unprovoked, deliberate,

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and premeditated. As to the claim of insanity, Huber said

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that quote, the testimony of the physicians ought to settle

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:53.879
<v Speaker 1>that question. Milton Elliott delivered the first defense closing argument.

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.640
<v Speaker 1>He began by discussing the death penalty, which he believed

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:00.920
<v Speaker 1>was wrong. But even if one supported the death penalty,

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 1>he continued, it could not be administered hastily. Our legislature

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.639
<v Speaker 1>has thrown around the life of the citizen a wall

0:28:08.720 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of protection, Elliott told jurors, which must be overcome in

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>every prosecution for murder in the first degree. This wall

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of protection was the requirement of premeditation, and in this case,

0:28:20.880 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Elliot said, he had not quote discovered an item of

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>evidence of such a previous design. Charity had acted impulsively

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>out of fear. The only design that Elliot saw in

0:28:32.920 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 1>this story was Nathaniel Lamb's plot to destroy his wife.

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Tyranny is odious and insufferable, Eliot said, but none so

0:28:41.840 --> 0:28:45.680
<v Speaker 1>much as domestic tyranny, whose victims are weak and helpless.

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 1>His threats and even attempts against her life show not

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>fancied but real danger. This danger, Elliot believed, might have

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>driven Charity to the point of temporary madness, and Quote,

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in the irregular and unguided action of a disordered intellect,

0:29:04.160 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>without malice or an intelligent purpose, she struck the fatal blows.

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>If the jurors had any doubt about the premeditation of

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the act, Elliott concluded, which he trusted they did, He

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>urged them to find Charity not guilty of first degree murder.

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>James Kelly's closing argument focused on insanity. Charity Lamb, Kelly said,

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>may have been sane in all other aspects of her life,

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>but when it came to her husband, her mind was irrational.

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>She thought obsessively incessantly about how nath Daniel Lamb might

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>kill her. It consumed her mind. On May thirteenth, she

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>was convinced that Quote the very time had arrived when

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>he was to terminate her life, and so unbalanced by

0:29:50.560 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>fear and anxiety, Charity took action, but that action had

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:59.200
<v Speaker 1>not been murder. According to Kelly, no, Charity had only

0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:03.000
<v Speaker 1>intended to his ass escape. Following Nathaniel's threats to follow

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and kill her if she left, Kelly said, quote, there

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 1>was but one safety, and that was to disable him

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and prevent pursuit until she could reach a place of security.

0:30:13.960 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>That the axe had buried deeper than Charity expected was

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>due to the fact that she quote did not, in

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>her terror and trepidation, judge accurately how to use the

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>instrument and how hard to strike in order to stun

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>without killing. As evidence of the theory, Kelly cited the

0:30:30.440 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>conversation's Charity had had with people after the attack when

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>she had believed that Nathaniel might still follow her. If

0:30:37.120 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>she had planned to kill him, how could she still

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 1>believe him alive? Kelly finished by echoing Elliott's arguments about premeditation.

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 1>There was quote no such proof, no lying in wait,

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>no preparing and arranging beforehand the means of death, no

0:30:53.320 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>evidence whatever that murder was in her mind before the

0:30:56.760 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>time of its execution. Thus, he concluded, quote, her life

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>cannot be taken. Noah Huber gave a rebuttal argument but

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately the details have been lost. The Oregon Statesman writes, quote,

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution replied at length, but we have not been

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 1>able to condense his argument within our limits. He combated

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the position taken on the other side and claimed a

0:31:18.440 --> 0:31:23.600
<v Speaker 1>conviction of the highest degree classic strategy. With closing arguments finished,

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Judge Cyrus only instructed the jury focusing on self defense.

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>He told the jurors that quote, it is claimed that

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>she entertained the belief that the deceased was about to

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>take her life. If the evidence convinces you that this

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>belief existed in her mind and was the motive of

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the act, she must be acquitted. Though only acknowledged that

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the prosecution quote claimed this motive to have been insincere

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>and a mere pretense to cover deliberate murder. He followed

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:54.240
<v Speaker 1>that up by arguing that quote, the evidence does not

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>even tend to prove, much less establish any other motive

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>for the act. That she has signed it at the

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:03.600
<v Speaker 1>time as her reason and has never deviated from it,

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:07.240
<v Speaker 1>That her actions have been uniformly consistent with that idea,

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that she manifested it not only to her family, but

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to Muzzy and even to the deceased upon his deathbed,

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that it reconciles all the evidence, clears up all mysteries,

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and places the whole case upon the only rational footing

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of which it is susceptible. The defense must have been

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:29.360
<v Speaker 1>cheering by the end of this statement. After then urging

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the jurors to make their own conclusions and providing them

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 1>with a list of possible verdicts, he dismissed them. The

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:39.320
<v Speaker 1>jury was out for several hours before returning with a

0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>question for the judge the relevant statute in the Oregon

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Code of eighteen fifty four. The Code that James Kelly

0:32:45.920 --> 0:32:49.920
<v Speaker 1>had helped craft, stated that homicide could be justified quote

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 1>when committed in the lawful defense of such person, when

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>there shall be a reasonable ground to apprehend a design

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:59.959
<v Speaker 1>to do some great personal injury, and there shall be

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>imminent danger of such design being accomplished. The jurors wanted

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>to know what imminent danger meant. Judge only explained that

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it meant danger. That quote appeared to be unavoidable if

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the prisoner believed the decease was then about to kill her,

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and that she could not flee without equal danger of

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:24.080
<v Speaker 1>being killed. The danger to her mind was imminent, but

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:29.719
<v Speaker 1>despite his evident sympathy for Charity, he clarified further, saying, quote,

0:33:29.960 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 1>if she saw that danger before he returned home, it

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>was her duty to have gone away and to have

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 1>had measures taken to save her life without taking his.

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 1>That would be the duty of a sane person. And

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>if you think she was sufficiently possessed of her mental

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:48.880
<v Speaker 1>faculties to be under the guidance of reason, she was

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>not justified in remaining, or at least not justified in

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>killing until some demonstration was made against her. The jury

0:33:56.960 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 1>left again, but returned only minutes later with a for

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the death of Nathaniel Lamb. The jury found Charity Lamb

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>guilty of murder in the second degree, with a recommendation

0:34:09.640 --> 0:34:16.400
<v Speaker 1>for mercy. The next morning, Charity appeared in front of

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Judge Only for sentencing. When Only asked her if she

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:24.680
<v Speaker 1>had anything she wished to say, Charity defended herself, saying, quote,

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I knew he was going to kill me. The jury

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>think you ought to have gone away in his absence,

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 1>The judge replied, Well, Charity said, he told me not

0:34:34.080 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to go, and then if I went, he would follow

0:34:36.600 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>me and find me somewhere, and he was a mighty

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>good shot. He once gave me a chance to go,

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and I consented. I even gave up my baby and started.

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:48.279
<v Speaker 1>He told me to come back or he would drop

0:34:48.320 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>me in my tracks, and I had to come back.

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 1>He threatened me very often. It had come to be

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a common thing. I did it to save my life.

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Judge only acknowledged her situation and told her that the

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:06.240
<v Speaker 1>jury had recommended mercy in sentencing, but he continued, quote,

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the law gives the court no discretion. The mandatory sentence

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:15.919
<v Speaker 1>for second degree murder was life with hard labor. At this,

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the Oregonian Records quote missus Lamb commenced weeping and her

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.399
<v Speaker 1>babe crying as the officer removed her from the bar.

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Two days later, Charity was delivered to the penitentiary in Portland. Again,

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:33.720
<v Speaker 1>she would be the only female prisoner. The male prisoners

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>did construction and manufacturing jobs. Charity's assignment was doing their

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:41.240
<v Speaker 1>laundry and the laundry of the warden and his family.

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>The next record we have of Charity comes in eighteen

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 1>fifty nine, when two visiting Quaker missionaries encountered her. When

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the missionaries quote extended words of encouragement Charity responded that

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:57.759
<v Speaker 1>she had quote not done anything wrong. She was not

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the only one to think so. In the summer of

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty the Portland Advertiser newspaper advocated for Charity's pardon

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and release, but this campaign went nowhere. Though the jury

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:12.720
<v Speaker 1>in her case had recommended mercy, and though Judge Oulney

0:36:12.800 --> 0:36:16.040
<v Speaker 1>had told her that their recommendation would quote be put

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:19.200
<v Speaker 1>upon record and preserved for any future use that may

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>be found to be proper, no mercy was worthcoming. Even

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:26.959
<v Speaker 1>if Charity had been pardoned, she would have come back

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to nothing. All her children were now in the custody

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>of other families. In eighteen fifty nine, Joseph Church, the

0:36:35.080 --> 0:36:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Justice of the Peace, who had already auctioned off most

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Lamb's belongings, had also sold the Lamb's land.

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 1>To proceed with the sale of this land, which legally

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>was owned by Charity and her children, Church claimed that

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:52.279
<v Speaker 1>he was Charity and her children's guardian, ignoring the fact

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 1>that Church had never been Charity's guardian and that Mary

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 1>Anne Lamb was not a miner probate. Judge Robert Caulfield

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:03.800
<v Speaker 1>allowed this On Christmas Eve, eighteen fifty nine, the Lamb's

0:37:03.800 --> 0:37:06.440
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and twenty acres sold for one hundred and

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 1>ninety five dollars, less than half It's a praise value.

0:37:10.880 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Charity's land and her family were gone. In December eighteen

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:21.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty two, Charity, now the longest tenured prisoner at the penitentiary,

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:24.840
<v Speaker 1>was transferred to the Hawthorne Asylum later called the Oregon

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Hospital for the Insane. In eighteen sixty five, asylum investigators

0:37:29.680 --> 0:37:33.480
<v Speaker 1>described seeing her quote knitting as the visiting party went

0:37:33.520 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>through the hall, face imperturbably fixed in half, smiling contentment,

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>apparently as satisfied with her lot as the happiest of

0:37:41.280 --> 0:37:45.359
<v Speaker 1>sane people with theirs. The inspectors do not seem to

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 1>have spoken to her before forming this generous conclusion. Fourteen

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:54.160
<v Speaker 1>years later, in September eighteen seventy nine, Charity Lamb, aged

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>sixty one, died of apoplexy, probably a stroke in the asylum.

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Is likely buried in an unmarked grave in Portland's loan

0:38:03.280 --> 0:38:09.280
<v Speaker 1>For Cemetery. Today, nearly two centuries later, the legal system

0:38:09.400 --> 0:38:12.000
<v Speaker 1>still wrestles with many of the issues that arose at

0:38:12.080 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Charity Lamb's trial for a battered woman who kills in

0:38:15.680 --> 0:38:20.319
<v Speaker 1>non confrontational circumstances, writes law professor Joan H. Kraus, the

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:23.960
<v Speaker 1>chief obstacles to proving self defense are the requirements that

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 1>she reasonably believed the threatened harm to be imminent, as

0:38:28.239 --> 0:38:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the killing occurs in the absence of any ongoing physical attack.

0:38:33.520 --> 0:38:36.440
<v Speaker 1>In the Lamb trial, the jurors seemed sympathetic to the

0:38:36.440 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 1>idea that Charity feared for her life, but they could

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:42.440
<v Speaker 1>not get past the timing of the attack. Was danger

0:38:42.480 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>really imminent? While Nathaniel Lamb ate his dinner. When they

0:38:45.960 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 1>asked Judge only to clarify, he told them that Charity

0:38:49.160 --> 0:38:53.319
<v Speaker 1>was quote not justified in killing until some demonstration was

0:38:53.360 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>made against her. As Ronald Lansing writes, quote, the instruction

0:38:57.560 --> 0:39:00.279
<v Speaker 1>was a correct statement of common law, as for set

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>down by judges and as codified by Oregon's territorial legislators.

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.600
<v Speaker 1>To kill in response to threat of distant harm, no

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 1>matter how probable the threat, and no matter how useless

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the protective alternatives, was not self defense. But he continues, quote,

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:19.719
<v Speaker 1>what if the threat of future harm is certain, an

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 1>escape is hopeless. Trapped by matrimony, parentage, vast wilderness, and culture.

0:39:25.960 --> 0:39:30.320
<v Speaker 1>What was Charity to do? Understanding the situation of defendants

0:39:30.320 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 1>who have killed their abusers in non confrontational situations, writes

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 1>legal scholar Marina Angel, requires a quote reinterpretation of time,

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 1>equal force and the duty to retreat in light of

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the realities of abuse. At Charity Lamb's trial, the only

0:39:48.080 --> 0:39:51.839
<v Speaker 1>witnesses who tried to depict the reality's Charity faced were

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>her children. When Charity herself got a chance to explain

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:59.200
<v Speaker 1>her fears, it was too late. The jury had already

0:39:59.280 --> 0:40:03.920
<v Speaker 1>pronounced herself butons. In nineteen eighty five, a North Carolina

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>woman named Judy Laws Norman, after enduring twenty years of

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.840
<v Speaker 1>relentless physical violence and psychological torture at the hands of

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>her husband J. T. Norman, shot him in the head

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:18.239
<v Speaker 1>while he slept. State v. Norman is one of the

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:22.760
<v Speaker 1>most frequently debated cases involving self defense and intimate partner violence.

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:26.640
<v Speaker 1>There are a number of parallels between Judy Norman and

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Charity Lamb. In both cases, the abuse the women suffered

0:40:31.000 --> 0:40:34.520
<v Speaker 1>escalated in the days before the killing. Both women's partners

0:40:34.560 --> 0:40:37.439
<v Speaker 1>threatened to kill them. On the day in question, both

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:40.200
<v Speaker 1>women attempted to leave, but were stopped by threats of

0:40:40.280 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>violence and concern over leaving their children. In both cases,

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the legal system rejected the women's claims of self defense.

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:50.279
<v Speaker 1>The jurors in Charity's case did not believe she met

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the requirement for imminent danger, while the judge in Judy's

0:40:53.440 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 1>case did not allow her jury to consider self defense,

0:40:56.600 --> 0:41:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and both women were convicted, Charity of second degree murder

0:41:01.120 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and Judy of manslaughter. But here their stories diverged. Judy

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Norman appealed her case. Ultimately, however, the North Carolina Supreme

0:41:10.800 --> 0:41:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Court affirmed her conviction, but in nineteen eighty nine, Judy's

0:41:14.920 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>defense attorneys circulated a petition for clemency in her home county.

0:41:19.360 --> 0:41:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Thousands of people signed that July, Governor James Martin commuted

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 1>her sentence to time served. Judy Norman was free. In

0:41:28.960 --> 0:41:31.760
<v Speaker 1>an interview after her release, Judy said that she knew

0:41:31.840 --> 0:41:36.120
<v Speaker 1>killing was wrong, but that people needed to quote understand

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the situation. Then she said that she hoped to help

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>other women avoid that situation. Despite our focus this week

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>on women who have killed their abusers, these cases are

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:51.480
<v Speaker 1>relatively rare. Far more often the reverse is true. But

0:41:51.560 --> 0:41:55.840
<v Speaker 1>for both parties, intimate partner violence can be deadly. A

0:41:55.880 --> 0:41:58.640
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and three study by Jacqueline Campbell at al.

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Found that quote the majority sixty seven to eighty percent

0:42:03.520 --> 0:42:08.760
<v Speaker 1>of intimate partner homicides in heterosexual relationships involve physical abuse

0:42:08.840 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of the female by the male before the murder, no

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:16.960
<v Speaker 1>matter which partner is killed. Therefore, the study continues, quote,

0:42:17.320 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the major ways to decrease intimate partner homicide

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>is to identify and intervene with battered women at risk, or,

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>as Judy Norman put it, help women avoid the situation.

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen seventy eight, Laurel Paulson wrote an account of

0:42:34.400 --> 0:42:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Charity's life and trial for frying Pan Magazine, which she

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>ended with a rallying cry to action, quote, there can

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>be no free charity, Lamb Committee, it's too late. Charity

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 1>has been in her grave for almost a century. But

0:42:50.760 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>there are other charity lambs. It's not too late to

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 1>do something for them. Thank you for listening to History

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:02.720
<v Speaker 1>on Try. To see images of the people and places

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in this episode, check out our instagram at History on Trial.

0:43:06.840 --> 0:43:09.840
<v Speaker 1>My main sources for this episode were Ronald B. Lansing's

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 1>article The Tragedy of Charity Lamb, Oregon's first convicted murderess,

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:17.800
<v Speaker 1>newspaper coverage of the case, and the Oregon Historical Societies

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:22.000
<v Speaker 1>project the Oregon Encyclopedia. Special thanks to the Oregon Historical

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Society's executive Director, Carrie Timchuck, who first brought Charity's story

0:43:25.840 --> 0:43:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to my attention, and to the Historical Society's Reference Services

0:43:29.480 --> 0:43:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Manager Scott Daniels, who led me through the archives for

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a phobibliography as well as a transcript of this episode

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 1>with citations. Please visit our website History on Trial podcast

0:43:39.560 --> 0:43:42.480
<v Speaker 1>dot com, where you can also subscribe to our newsletter.

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>History on Trial is written and hosted by me Mira Hayward.

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 1>The show is edited and produced by Jesse Funk, with

0:43:52.719 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 1>supervising producer Trevor Yung and executive producers Dana Schwartz, Alexander Williams,

0:43:58.719 --> 0:44:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Matt Frederick, and Hayward. Learn more about the show at

0:44:02.800 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 1>History on Trial podcast dot com and follow us on

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Instagram at History on Trial and on Twitter at Underscore

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:16.600
<v Speaker 1>History on Trial. Find more podcasts from iHeartRadio by visiting

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to

0:44:20.719 --> 0:44:23.720
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.