WEBVTT - Ep 189 Newborn screening: The future is here

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Hello. My name is Jessica. My second baby, Max, was

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>born on my thirty eighth birthday in twenty twenty five.

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Max has one older sister, and both of my pregnancies

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>were pretty normal. Because I was considered to be of

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>advanced maternal age, we were offered genetic testing each time.

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>We were able to find out the sex of our

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>babies very early because of this, and we held our

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:26.240
<v Speaker 1>breath through each round of waiting for the other results. Luckily,

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>no abnormalities were ever found. I had a scheduled sea

0:00:30.680 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>section at thirty nine weeks and I was in the

0:00:32.800 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>hospital for four days but doing really well healing and

0:00:36.200 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>nursing Max. Doctors, nurses, pediatricians, and lactations specialists were all

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in and out of my room from the hospital and

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.199
<v Speaker 1>from my own insurance company. I felt like Max and

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>I were very well taken care of and watched over

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>during our hospital's stay. On day three, a pediatrician came

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>into our room and sat down. As soon as she did,

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>it felt like something was wrong. She began explaining that

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Max was given a newborn screening at twenty four hours old.

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>She explained that newborn screenings are a series of tests

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 1>given to babies in order to identify certain metabolic, endocrine,

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and hemoglobin disorders. These conditions are serious, but many are

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>treatable if they are detected early in a child's life.

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>She told us that Max had tested positive for a

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>condition called phenyl kitenoria or PKU for short. She explained

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that in very rare cases, a person's body cannot process

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 1>one specific amino acid that is found in protein. In

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>these people, the amino acid, phenylalanine, builds up in the

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>blood and can cause brain damage and severe developmental problems

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>if the condition is not treated. She told us that

0:01:50.520 --> 0:01:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a repeat test would be performed because false positives can occur. However,

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>she let us know that Max's results were so high

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>she really didn't need to give that second test to

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>confidently say he had PKU. She also told us that

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>she had never seen a newborn screening come back positive

0:02:07.640 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>for PKU, and that it was very very rare. My

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>husband and I both had to be carriers, and any

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>children we had would then need to receive a recessive

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>gene from each of us for the disorder to manifest

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>in them. She asked about our first daughter, who would

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>have also been given a newborn screening, but we were

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>not informed about any results with her, so it was

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>safe to say she did not have PKU. I was

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>hearing the pediatrician's words and I can reflect back on

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 1>them now, but mostly I remember a blur of not

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>understanding what was going to happen to my baby. Sorry,

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I know. I cried for a good amount of time

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>before finally managing to ask her what life would look

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:55.079
<v Speaker 1>like for Max. The part about protein poisoning his brain

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and severe disabilities played on repeat in my mind. Luckily,

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>for us, PKU is manageable with a very strict diet

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and medical formula. I could talk on and on about

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>our experience with PKU and the low protein world that

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I never knew existed before this, but I will stay

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>focused on newborn screening for this episode. Max just turned

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>six months old and we are starting to introduce foods.

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>He gets to eat almost all fruits because they have

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 1>very little protein, and a specific list of low protein vegetables.

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Eventually he will get to eat some medical foods that

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>have the fee removed from them, like rice and pasta.

0:03:39.200 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>He is closely monitored with weekly heel pricks to test

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the level of feet in his blood. By his pediatrician,

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>who had not encountered PKU since medical school, but has

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>done an amazing job of research and reaching out to experts,

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and by our wonderful genetics team at Emory. Right here

0:03:56.320 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta. Max is thriving and hitting every single milestone.

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>He's even beaten his sister to some because she was

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a very late roller. However, absolutely none of this would

0:04:12.680 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>have been possible if we had not caught this disorder

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>as early as we did with a newborn screaming. I

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 1>will never be able to express how grateful and privileged

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>I am to live in a place and in a

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>time where newborn screaming is the norm. If we were

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in another country, or if Max had been born sixty

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.799
<v Speaker 1>years ago, his life and ours would look completely different.

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Jessica, thank you, thank you so much for sharing your

0:05:24.520 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 2>story with us. It is so meaningful. I feel like

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 2>to hear firsthand the experiences of someone who is like

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:34.799
<v Speaker 2>this information completely changed my life.

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:39.159
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, it's really truly incredible and powerful and something

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 3>that we could never express without your help. So thank

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 3>you so much for sharing yours and your family story.

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 3>And we're so glad that things are going well.

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah yeah, Hi, I'm Aaron Welsh and I'm Aaron Amman Updike,

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:55.479
<v Speaker 2>and this is this podcast will kill you.

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Newborn Screening. To Newborn Screening. I don't know

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 3>why I did. And white Hands, I liked that.

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 2>I would like you to do more of that throughout

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 2>the rest of our show. Thank you, thank you. I'm

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 2>really excited for this episode, Erin, because I feel like

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 2>it we talk a lot about individual things that are

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, individual conditions or medications or organs, gallbladder. But

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 2>I feel like this has been a really interesting experience

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 2>to learn about a screening, right, not like a diagnostic test,

0:06:30.200 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 2>but like the process of screening and all of the

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 2>good and weird and bad and you know, gray areas

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 2>that come with it.

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 3>I also am biased, but screening is one of my

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 3>favorite things.

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:47.039
<v Speaker 2>Like, yeah, it's amazing, it's.

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:49.120
<v Speaker 3>So incredible, and I love it so much, and we'll

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.920
<v Speaker 3>get to talk so much about it today. But yeah,

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:55.720
<v Speaker 3>and I love newborn screening specifically, So I'm I'm really

0:06:55.760 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 3>excited about this episode.

0:06:57.320 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I'm also excited that we have a very special

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.360
<v Speaker 2>guest that we're going to be bringing on later, so

0:07:03.720 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 2>stay tuned. Someone who's like literally an expert on the

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 2>ground developing the future. The future is now, and the

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:12.640
<v Speaker 2>future of newborn screening is.

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.600
<v Speaker 3>Now is now and they're doing it. So yeah, kind

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 3>of a big deal.

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 2>But we will get to that in a bit.

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 3>First, it is it's quarantiney time.

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 2>It is Aaron. What are we drinking this week?

0:07:23.600 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 3>We're drinking a drop of knowledge. We are the drop

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 3>of blood in that. We don't need to explain it

0:07:29.880 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 3>every time, do we.

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 2>We don't. We'll get to it. It's a drop of blood, yeah, okay, okay,

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 2>a drop of knowledge though, like the drink and drink.

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 2>I was at a deli the other day and I

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 2>saw that, you know, like the I think it's Doctor

0:07:44.720 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Brown's celery soda.

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I don't. I don't know what that is, but

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 3>I love the idea of it.

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 2>I feel like you would love this. It's so good.

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 2>It's celery flavored soda, which sounds weird and maybe not good,

0:07:55.240 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 2>but it's actually delicious. And I thought, what would make

0:07:57.960 --> 0:08:00.920
<v Speaker 2>a good cocktail with this? May be a little bit

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 2>of a drop of lemon juice and if you would

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 2>like some gin.

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 3>If you'd like, if you'd like, why not, we'll post

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 3>the full recipe on our website. This podcast willill you.

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 3>You know, we actually haven't been posting it on the website.

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 2>I know, I need to figure I don't know how

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 2>to do the embedded videos.

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I know that it's a simple Google listen. They

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 3>they do get posted on all of our social media.

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 3>I can't do so.

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Check it out here following us there, but on our website.

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 2>Even though we might not yet have Quarantini and plasy

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Barta videos up there, we do have lots of other things.

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 2>We've got transcripts, We've got links to merch to bookshop

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 2>dot org, affiliate page, to our Goodreads list, to music

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 2>by Bloodmobile. We've got a contact us form, so if

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 2>you have any thoughts or episode suggestions, that's where you

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:50.600
<v Speaker 2>do it. And then we've got a first hand account

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 2>form if you have a story of yours that you

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 2>would like to share. We probably have other things too,

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 2>So check out.

0:08:57.080 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 3>This podcast would Kill You dot com. While you're on

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 3>the in you can also check and make sure that

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 3>you are subscribed to the podcatcher that you enjoy or

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 3>the exactly Right YouTube channel, where you can also find

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:15.680
<v Speaker 3>video versions of my van a White hands worth It

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 3>and that's why we do it, why we do what

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 3>we do. The end, Aaron, can you tell us we're

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 3>doing this a little out of order? Can you tell

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 3>us about the history of newborn screening, because I know

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 3>it's a good one.

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 4>It is.

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's take a quick break and I'll tell you

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 2>all about it. In the sixty years since the first

0:09:54.160 --> 0:09:59.040
<v Speaker 2>newborn screening program began, these screenings have prevented death and

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 2>disability in countless children across the globe, making it one

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 2>of the greatest public health achievements of the twentieth century,

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 2>alongside some of our other favorites like antibiotics, vaccine, fluoride,

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.600
<v Speaker 2>and seat belts, which we should do an episode on

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 2>seat belts.

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 3>I've never thought of doing an episode on seat belts,

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 3>but I bet there's an interesting history there. Eric, Yes, okay,

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm adding it to the List's like a new episode

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 3>that I get to learn about.

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 2>I feel like there will be a lot that you

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 2>will tell me about seatbelts.

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 3>I'd have to learn about forces and physics and that

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 3>sounds No.

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 2>We don't have to do that, okay, or crash test dummies.

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, Yeah, okay, anyways, Yeah, going back to newborn screening.

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 2>With one just one drop of blood, we can screen

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 2>a newborn baby for dozens of conditions that we can

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 2>treat or provide some other medical intervention for.

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 3>It is like more than one actual drop, but like

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 3>it's very few drops.

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a figurative. It could be one drop if it's

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 2>a larger drop. Yeah, anyway, So, but children who end

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 2>up receiving a diagnosis for one of these disorders are

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 2>now given opportunities that simply were not available at any

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 2>other point in human history. Newborn screening has grown steadily

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 2>over those past sixty years as our technology allows us

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 2>to cast a wider and wider net. In the early

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 2>years of newborn screening, you'd find just like one or

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 2>two disorders on the panel. Now dozens, There are dozens

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 2>soon it could be hundreds and soon meaning like very soon,

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 2>like kind of now. For some people, the enormity of

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 2>information that is contained in that tiny drop or large drop,

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 2>multiple drops, is staggering, and we are just now starting

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 2>to realize it's full potential with whole genome sequencing, which

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 2>is both excited and overwhelming, because determining whether a disorder

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.320
<v Speaker 2>should be included on the panel that can be tricky

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:11.920
<v Speaker 2>to navigate, and it involves weighing things like treatment options,

0:12:11.960 --> 0:12:15.359
<v Speaker 2>the feasibility of screening, and the potential benefit to the individual,

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.000
<v Speaker 2>among other considerations. And I know that later on we'll

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:21.480
<v Speaker 2>talk more about the Wilson and Younger criteria, right totally,

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 2>But going through that process for each and every condition

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 2>that we have the ability to screen for, that takes

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 2>an enormous amount of time, resources, and combined expertise. But

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 2>it is necessary to ensure that we are utilizing newborn

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 2>screening to achieve the greatest benefit and equitability Here in

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.599
<v Speaker 2>the US. Currently, we have a standardized list of disorders

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 2>that all states are recommended to include in their newborn screening.

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:57.439
<v Speaker 2>It's called the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel or our USP,

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 2>and it includes thirty eight core and twenty six secondary disorders.

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Two main bodies are involved in the decision making process

0:13:06.400 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 2>for the RUSP. There's the Head of HHS and there's

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:18.239
<v Speaker 2>the Advisory Committee Inheritable Disorders in Newborns and Children. Ultimately,

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 2>it's up to each state which disorders they screen for,

0:13:21.160 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 2>but all have at least those core ones that I

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:24.600
<v Speaker 2>mentioned on their panel.

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 3>Right, It's like the Recommended minimum, yes, yeah, and that,

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 3>but that wasn't always the case, right, So, like before

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 3>two thousand.

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 2>And three, which is not that long ago, that is

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 2>when the which is when the committee was unofficially formed.

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 2>It was later like formalized in two thousand and eight,

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.959
<v Speaker 2>but before two thousand and three, some states maybe screen

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 2>for just a handful of disorders while others had upwards

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 2>of fifty on their list, and so that made newborn

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 2>screening like quite uneven across the US. And so since

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 2>its creation, one of the major things that the RUSP

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 2>has done has been to newborn screening much more equitable

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 2>across these states. And it has also provided and especially

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 2>vital service as testing technology has advanced so very rapidly

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 2>to like a mind boggling degree, right, So, like now

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 2>we have whole genome sequencing on the very very near horizon, right,

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 2>and we need to be prepared for how to handle

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 2>this massive influx of information because if we could incorporate

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:32.160
<v Speaker 2>whole genome sequencing to newborn screening, which spoilers we are doing,

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 2>our screening capacity will expand enormously.

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it totally changes the game.

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 2>Totally, totally. Unfortunately, unfortunately, in April of this year twenty

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>twenty five, the Department of Health and Human Services, headed

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 2>by Robert F. Kennedy Junior, the one and only dissolved

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 2>the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborn's and Children.

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 2>This is the committee that weighs in on the RUSP. Yeah,

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 2>the decision was quietly announced just a few weeks just

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 2>a few weeks before the committee was set to evaluate

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 2>two new conditions for screening so metachromatic leco dystrophy and

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Dusche muscular dystrophy. And so far no formal announcement has

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 2>been made regarding whether this committee will be reinstated in

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 2>some form or another and if those conditions will be

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 2>added to the RUSP, which is hugely disappointing to say

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the least, I think for these advocacy groups, the medical

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 2>practitioners and researchers who have worked so very hard to

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 2>nominate these conditions for inclusion, to get them on the

0:15:39.080 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 2>possible list.

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 3>It's especially just so depressing to think about how so

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 3>many of the advocates for every one of these disorders

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 3>that ends up being added to the RUSP are parents

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 3>of kids whose diagnoses weren't caught because these things are

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 3>not on the RUSP, despite the fact that we do

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 3>have tests for them and we do have tree it's

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 3>available where if things were caught earlier, their condition could

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 3>have been different.

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, So yeah, this is a big deal.

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 2>It is a big deal. It is a big deal,

0:16:10.640 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 2>and you know, I think, just to put some numbers

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 2>onto this, every year, approximately thirteen thousand infants in the

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 2>US receive a diagnosis for a treatable condition and it

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 2>was initially detected through newborn screening.

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Thirteen thousands every year. That's a lot.

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and that number has the potential to grow as

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 2>we are able to capture more individuals, more.

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:36.440
<v Speaker 3>Things you add to the list.

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, especially with genome with whole genome sequencing. But for

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 2>that number to grow, for the number of conditions that

0:16:43.920 --> 0:16:47.920
<v Speaker 2>we detect to grow, and for newborn screening to grow equitably,

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 2>we will need some sort of panel of experts to

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 2>help sift through the tsunami of information that is now

0:16:56.600 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 2>available thanks to genomic sequencing. Fortunately, this is like the

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.960
<v Speaker 2>hope on the horizon that does seem like it might

0:17:06.000 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 2>be within reach because also in April of this year,

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 2>so this is just before the announcement dissolving the Advisory

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Committee came out, the NIH Common Fund announced a research

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:24.639
<v Speaker 2>opportunity titled the Newborn Screening by Hold Genome Sequencing Collaboratory Initiative. Okay,

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 2>like a lot of words like, yeah, what does that mean?

0:17:26.920 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean? Yeah, So what it means is

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 2>that the NIH has set aside a pot of cash,

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 2>so four point eight million dollars per year over three years,

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 2>so totally fourteen point four million dollars. Okay, that's what

0:17:41.520 --> 0:17:43.919
<v Speaker 2>the NIH has set aside to figure out how we

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 2>can incorporate hold genome sequencing into the existing state based

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 2>US public health newborn screening programs. So basically, this money

0:17:53.320 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 2>is saying, okay, different programs, please apply to be the

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 2>ones to help us, you know, use our existing infrastructure

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 2>to develop and implement hold genome sequencing for newborn screening

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 2>across the US.

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 3>It's like, help us figure out how we're going to

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 3>convert from what we have now to hold genome sequencing

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 3>at some point in the future. Yes, and we're going

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 3>to do it at these sites that we pick based

0:18:18.840 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 3>on whoever applies to this to.

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 2>This initial collaboratory fund. Yeah, okay, iniative.

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:26.400
<v Speaker 3>That's great, it's great.

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 2>It's great. So, yeah, the focus of this initiative is

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 2>not like, how do we best develop whole genome technolo

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:35.679
<v Speaker 2>hold genome sequencing technology. We have that technology for the

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.200
<v Speaker 2>most part, but it's just how can we best fold

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 2>it into the screening programs that we already have. So

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 2>the the other good news thing about this is that

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 2>it's moving pretty rapidly. So applications were due in May

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:52.120
<v Speaker 2>and the earliest start date was September one, twenty twenty five,

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 2>so it's possible that by the time this episode is released,

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 2>the project is already underway. So that's that's pretty that's

0:18:59.040 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 2>pretty good.

0:18:59.520 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 2>There's still this issue though, of the dissolved advisory committee,

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:06.239
<v Speaker 2>so like what does it mean in light of that?

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 2>It does seem that part of this new initiative involves

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 2>determining a target gene list, so, in other words, genetic

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 2>conditions to include on the screening panel.

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 3>Which is really important and we'll talk in a lot

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 3>more detail about how those decisions are made.

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Hugually important, hugely. Yeah, and so this could conceivably supplement

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:34.240
<v Speaker 2>or eventually replace the RUSP as genomics sequencing supplants traditional

0:19:34.280 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 2>newborn screening greatly. Expanding the number of conditions that we

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 2>screened for in that process. Okay, and so this project

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 2>seems like it would go a long way towards bringing

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 2>or it will go a long way towards bringing newborn

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 2>screening into this new era of whole genome sequencing. And

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 2>the panel that was dissolved would probably have had to

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 2>change to incorporate this new technology at.

0:19:59.440 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 3>Some point the future, once it exists already.

0:20:03.840 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 2>Right, So that's that's that's the sort of the question

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 2>is like, is this a perfect replacement? It doesn't seem

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:11.960
<v Speaker 2>at this point like it is, right, Like I the

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 2>questions that I still have are what happens to the

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:19.879
<v Speaker 2>RUSP while this project slash collaboratory gets up and running.

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.719
<v Speaker 2>Will those two nominated conditions or or any others that

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 2>come up in the you know, in the next few years,

0:20:27.160 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 2>will those be evaluated and added? You know, what happens

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:34.880
<v Speaker 2>if we're still a decade away from genomic sequencing being

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:37.959
<v Speaker 2>the norm at state public health departments like our state's

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 2>on their own until then?

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 2>What happens? Also after three years when this project ends,

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 2>will the funding be renewed?

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, So, like I this. I mean, this

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 2>initiative is a really exciting and necessary step forward to

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:03.960
<v Speaker 2>meet the informational challenge posed by genomic sequencing technology, because

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 2>the future is here, and this project will help us

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 2>navigate that future carefully, thoughtfully, and with evidence to support

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.439
<v Speaker 2>our decisions. I still don't know what happens to newborn

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 2>screening in the meantime.

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I feel like that's what sounds very scary about it.

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Is it's like, yeah, we're gonna get all ready for this,

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 3>but then it's like, so we're just what are we

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:29.080
<v Speaker 3>We're just gonna stay stagnant. Is one state maybe like

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 3>advisory board gonna take over like supplant the thing just informally?

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, Like, yeah, is every state just gonna

0:21:35.960 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 3>have to work harder to decide if they're going to

0:21:38.040 --> 0:21:40.360
<v Speaker 3>add things to their newborn screening list in the meantime?

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 2>Right, will one state emerge as a leader and say

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 2>these are the things that we should be screening for?

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:46.119
<v Speaker 4>You know?

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:52.720
<v Speaker 2>Will someone take up that, right torch? I guess yeah? Yeah.

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 2>But okay, so now that we know what the future

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 2>might look like, even if you still have questions about

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:02.879
<v Speaker 2>the present, shall we take a peek at the past

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 2>to see the origins of newborn screening and how far

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 2>we've come since then. Yes, let's okay, okay. On November

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 2>twenty fifth, nineteen sixty one, a letter to the editor

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 2>appeared in Jamma with the title quote blood screening for

0:22:17.480 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 2>fetal keytenuria end quote.

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 3>That's it. That's just the whole title. The whole title. Okay.

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 2>This is a letter to the editor. By the way, So,

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 2>in just over six hundred and sixty words, doctor Robert

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:31.439
<v Speaker 2>Guthrie described a new technique for testing newborns for a

0:22:31.480 --> 0:22:37.400
<v Speaker 2>condition called feenal keytinuria. Briefly, it's PKU. I won't keep

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:41.919
<v Speaker 2>saying that because it's difficult. Erin, could you give us

0:22:41.920 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 2>like a brief rundown of what PKU is?

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh my gosh, really, how on the spot?

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 4>As sure?

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 3>So PKU is as a metabolic disorder where babies are

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 3>not able to break down certain amino acids and so

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 3>then they build up in their bloodstream and can end

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 3>up being toxic.

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 2>That's the shortest way to say it. That's great, okay, perfect,

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 2>thank you. I probably should have written something out, but

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 2>I was like, no, you did it.

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 3>I have nothing. My heart rate spike.

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:17.119
<v Speaker 2>Oh no, I'm sorry. It did great, A plus A plus.

0:23:18.440 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 2>So yeah. But this, this test that Robert Gouthrie had

0:23:21.960 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 2>written to the editor about examined a spot of blood

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 2>to see if there was an excess amount of an

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:31.040
<v Speaker 2>amino acid called phenylalanine. It was not a diagnostic test,

0:23:31.440 --> 0:23:34.800
<v Speaker 2>but it indicated which individuals needed to be tested further

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 2>to confirm that they had PKU. The blood screen was

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 2>it was inexpensive, it was easy to administer, and it

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 2>produced sensitive results. And even better, one of the best things,

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 2>the biggest improvements about this test was that it could

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:53.679
<v Speaker 2>be administered twenty four hours after birth, like super early,

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 2>super early, because there was an existing PKU test at

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:00.439
<v Speaker 2>this time. But what it did is what it used

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 2>urine collected in diapers, and it was only accurate, like

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:07.080
<v Speaker 2>six to eight weeks after birth, during.

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 3>Had time for things to build up probably.

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Yep, exactly, so like enough marker. But then if you're

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 2>getting that high enough, like once you were able to

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 2>detect there, the baby might have already experienced irreversible brain

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 2>damage due to the build up of the semino acids.

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 2>So but in the letter, Guthrie mentioned that they had

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 2>tested over three thousand kids who were residents at a

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:34.680
<v Speaker 2>state school, two thousand already and this and the test

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 2>had confirmed those that had already been diagnosed with the

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:40.920
<v Speaker 2>diaper test and detected at least two more that had

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:41.440
<v Speaker 2>been missed.

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:41.920
<v Speaker 5>Wow.

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 2>So like this is six hundred and sixty words. He

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 2>was able to fit a whole lot.

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 3>Really just creamedeon in there quite concise. Yep, yep.

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 2>And this, this Guthrie test, as it would become known,

0:24:55.480 --> 0:25:00.639
<v Speaker 2>it would revolutionize medical genetics and public health because the

0:25:00.680 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 2>potential was immediately seen for like what this could do? Right, So,

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.800
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen sixty three, two years after this letter's publication,

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 2>Massachusetts became the first state to mandate newborn screening.

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:25:15.200 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Two years, two years. And this is after successful campaigning

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 2>by the Joseph P. Kennedy Junior Foundation and JFK's New

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Task Force. Other states and countries shortly followed Massachusetts lead,

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 2>and by nineteen sixty five, thirty two US states had

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 2>laws for newborn screening.

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Four years, that's very fast.

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, in medical times.

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 2>In medical I mean, right. And so of those thirty

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 2>two US states that had you know, included newborn screening,

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven had mandated it okay, And as the number

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 2>of babies whose blood was tested climbed into the hundreds

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 2>of thousands, and then into the millions, it was clear

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 2>that newborn screening was not only FEASA, it was changing

0:26:01.920 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 2>people's lives and futures. And so people were like, well,

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 2>what else can we do with this? Like this has

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 2>had such a hugely positive impact so far, there must

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:15.199
<v Speaker 2>be more out there that we can screen for, And

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.359
<v Speaker 2>so researchers were looking into other conditions that could be

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 2>treated early and that could be easily included in this

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 2>blood drop, this heel prick test, And by the nineteen

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.280
<v Speaker 2>sixties the late nineteen sixties, a few other conditions ended

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 2>up being added to some country screening protocols, and research

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 2>was still underway to identify others, as it will always

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 2>be underway. And so along with this heightened interest in

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 2>this area of research came this realization that, like okay,

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 2>we have to figure out some ethical guidelines for what

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 2>we should and what we shouldn't screen for, Like how

0:26:49.680 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 2>should we prioritize research efforts to achieve the greatest benefit

0:26:54.640 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 2>while also minimizing the potential for harm. Because knowledge, yes,

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 2>knowledge can be power if we use that knowledge for good,

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 2>if an early diagnosis, you know, allows us to intervene

0:27:08.359 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 2>and prevent a disease from progressing further, or if it

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 2>helps us to better look out for signs of disease later,

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 2>like if we know that, oh, we should keep an

0:27:17.040 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 2>eye out for this, right, But knowledge also has the

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 2>power to harm. Sometimes it may be better not to know,

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 2>especially if knowing doesn't change anything. If you get if

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.480
<v Speaker 2>you test positive for something and there are no available treatments,

0:27:34.520 --> 0:27:37.479
<v Speaker 2>what happens? What do you do? What does that knowledge

0:27:37.480 --> 0:27:39.840
<v Speaker 2>give you? And that's like, I mean, there's this is

0:27:39.880 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 2>like a whole field medical medical philosophy.

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, and it's all a very individual It's really

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 3>it's an individual right to know or not to know

0:27:50.240 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 3>at the bottom of line, right, yeah, right.

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 2>And so with all of the sort of these ethical

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 2>questions swirling around newborn screening, in nineteen sixty eight, the

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 2>WHO published a report in which they outlined ten principles

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 2>for which disorders should be included in newborn screening programs.

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 2>And this is the so called Wilson and Younger criteria,

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 2>which I know you'll go into a bit more depth

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:16.360
<v Speaker 2>with this erin but A couple of the key points

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 2>include that a condition can be tested for, like we

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 2>have a suitable test that will, you know, help to

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 2>not detect it. It's not diagnostic, but like, yeah, I

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know why I can't find the words, but you

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean, right.

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 3>You've got to be able to check for it.

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 2>You got to be able to check for it. And

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:36.719
<v Speaker 2>it sounds fairly straightforward.

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 3>But yeah.

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:40.239
<v Speaker 2>And then also the treatment exists, like some sort of

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 2>medical intervention exists. And in the decades since these criteria

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:50.160
<v Speaker 2>were put forth, they've stayed quite relevant and helpful, but

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 2>it's not always as clear cut as you think. Okay,

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 2>a treatment exists. Check, Okay, this a screening test exists.

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Chat check exactly right, Like, there's a lot more there's

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 2>a lot more new there's a lot more gray area.

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 2>And so as technology especially has expanded our capabilities to

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 2>detect a wider and wider array of conditions, these these

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 2>gray areas, this nuance has really grown with that newborn

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:18.960
<v Speaker 2>screening is not without controversy and the harm benefit calculation

0:29:19.200 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 2>is not always clear cut. So let's get into some

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 2>newborn screening nuance. Okay, every history of newborn screening starts

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 2>with Guthrie and PKU, and I think it's worth asking

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 2>why PKU, and to some extent why Guthrie like, who

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 2>was this guy? Yeah, I'll tell your I mean, aren't

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 2>we all yes, we can all yeah. Uh. PKU had

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 2>only been described a couple of decades before Guthrie developed

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:58.240
<v Speaker 2>his test, so it's like actually fairly recent in Guthrie's time,

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 2>and had been described by an Norwegian pediatrics resident in

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 2>nineteen thirty four. So this guy Falling examined a couple

0:30:05.240 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 2>of siblings who were both intellectually disabled, and he unexpectedly

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 2>found a dietary derivative of phenolalitin in their urine, something

0:30:14.200 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 2>that he had never been described before. Just he was like,

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 2>there's surely this is someone has had to have written

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 2>about this.

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 3>Nope.

0:30:22.040 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 2>So he wrote it up and was like, I think

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 2>that this might be linked to the intellectual disability in

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 2>these children, and if you are. Other physicians were like, okay,

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 2>well we'll take a peek too, and they confirmed this

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 2>finding in other children who also had intellectual disabilities, and

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 2>so it was like, Okay, this is a stronger, stronger

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 2>evidence for these two things being Linkedah, could the intellectual

0:30:45.920 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 2>disability that we have observed be caused by a buildup

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 2>of phenolalanine in the brain, and if so, could it

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 2>be prevented through a diet that restricted phenolalanine, because that

0:30:59.880 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 2>is that was possible. It's not like something that you

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:06.680
<v Speaker 2>were always constantly exposed to. Some foods have it, some

0:31:06.720 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 2>foods don't, and so.

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 3>And it's not something that like your body is just

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.800
<v Speaker 3>making willing nilly. It's like you are consuming it and

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 3>you're not able to break it down in the way

0:31:15.880 --> 0:31:18.000
<v Speaker 3>that you're supposed to, and therefore it builds up two

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 3>toxic levels.

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:19.880
<v Speaker 2>So if you are just.

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Never exposed to it, if you never consume it, then

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 3>you can maintain low.

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Level exactly exactly. And so that is that logic right

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.960
<v Speaker 2>there is exactly what a couple of British doctors used

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 2>to create or propose this phenolalanine restricted diet. And so

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:38.480
<v Speaker 2>they were like, if we administered this early enough, what

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 2>is it possible to prevent the intellectual disability and some

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:45.719
<v Speaker 2>of the other symptoms associated with PKUM. So they're like, well,

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 2>let's try it out.

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 2>The issue, though, which is what I said earlier, was

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:53.040
<v Speaker 2>that phenolalanine sometimes took a few weeks to show up

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 2>in the urine, at which point the child's brain made

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 2>might already have been damaged. And so the ad event

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 2>of Guthrie's test was faster. Test was huge. Within twenty

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 2>four hours, you could say, oh, yes, there is like

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 2>we need to implement a pheeninality restricted diet. But Guthrie,

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Guthrie himself came from kind of an unusual background. He

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 2>was not involved, He had no background in metabolic disorders

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:24.719
<v Speaker 2>or genetic conditions. He was a microbiologist by training, okay,

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:27.840
<v Speaker 2>and he had been doing cancer research before he developed

0:32:27.840 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 2>this test, So like, how how did he go from

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 2>point A to point B? Well, Gothrie happened to also

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 2>have a son who was intellectually disabled, and he was

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:41.560
<v Speaker 2>involved in the local chapter of what was then called

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 2>the Association for Retarded Children, now called the ARC, and

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 2>this is where he learned about PKU and the newly

0:32:48.200 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 2>developed diet. He was talking I think to a speaker

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 2>who had come and was discussing this, and he was

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 2>like but at the same time, I think he had

0:32:56.840 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 2>heard about the limitations of the test and was like, gosh,

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 2>we could really do something. If we could have a

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:05.960
<v Speaker 2>faster test, that could be huge. Maybe there's a better way.

0:33:07.160 --> 0:33:10.320
<v Speaker 2>And so he was at the time working on a

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 2>bacterial inhibition essay for cancer screening, and he was like,

0:33:14.760 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 2>what if I just tweaked a few things here and

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 2>there and used the same thing to look for funlalanine

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 2>And that's what he did. He like that was like

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 2>so much, here's my idea, and here it is. It worked.

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:31.800
<v Speaker 3>I love stories like that where it's like, oh, I

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 3>was working on this other thing, but I was like, huh,

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 3>I wonder if I could do it for this thing,

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 3>and then bing bang boom, and now you've like revolutionized

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:40.840
<v Speaker 3>people's lives people's lives.

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 2>And I think it also just like goes to show

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 2>sometimes that thinking outside the box, like approaching a problem

0:33:49.520 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 2>as an outsider, can really open up your perspective and

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 2>be like oh and everyone else is like, oh my god,

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 2>the solution was there all along. I mean, I think

0:33:58.120 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 2>I might be overstating this simplicity of it and like

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 2>the work that he put into it, but still I

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 2>think it was like a flash of insight. Yeah, And

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:11.239
<v Speaker 2>so he actually left his cancer work and took on

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 2>a job at a Children's Hospital to continue his research

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:15.279
<v Speaker 2>on this.

0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Wow, I know.

0:34:17.680 --> 0:34:20.080
<v Speaker 2>And so in the midst of this work, prior to

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 2>his letter to the editor, he learned also that his niece,

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:27.960
<v Speaker 2>who was severely intellectually disabled, had been diagnosed with PKU,

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 2>and so that gave him even more like motivation inspiration

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 2>knowing that this test could be critical in delivering time

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 2>sensitive information that could prevent the effects of PKU. Yeah.

0:34:41.360 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 2>So when he announced his test in nineteen sixty one,

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 2>it was mostly though not entirely enthusiastically.

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.239
<v Speaker 3>Received sounds about right, yeah.

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's I feel like a like a normal reaction.

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:55.640
<v Speaker 3>Right, better than most I would say.

0:34:55.880 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this was a sensitive test that could help with

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:04.280
<v Speaker 2>a diagnosis for a condition that had a very clear

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:09.799
<v Speaker 2>and effective intervention if administered immediately, a phenilalanine restricted diet.

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 2>But some people, including a prominent doctor, remained vocal skeptics,

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 2>saying things like oh, well, I don't think it's felinilalanine

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 2>that causes brain damage, or saying like well, I don't

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 2>think the diet is effective, or it might be effective

0:35:25.160 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 2>and only a few and so this like led to

0:35:28.440 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 2>concern that this was a costly diet that could harm

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 2>or bother those who didn't need it, and also it

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:35.720
<v Speaker 2>was just like, why are you going through the effort

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.000
<v Speaker 2>of this if it's not going to provide a benefit.

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 3>They were like, we don't feel like you know PKU

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:41.840
<v Speaker 3>well enough.

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think that was one of the concerns. Or

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 2>it was like this might be effective in some children

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 2>with PKU, but not everyone, like this is not yeah

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 2>right right, And a couple of the other complaints that

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 2>were less medically focused. One was that newborn screening with socialism,

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, the boogeyman, and also that I found this

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 2>one really interesting, actually that newborn screening would take focus

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 2>away from social support programs for children with intellectual disabilities.

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 3>That is an interesting critique.

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I see where they're coming from with that, because

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 2>if it's like, if we have a limited pot of

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 2>money and we're now spending it on research rather than

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:30.719
<v Speaker 2>social safety like social safety net programs, then you know.

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:32.040
<v Speaker 3>You're going to take our money and you're going to

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 3>shunt it over there, right, rather than yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:35.439
<v Speaker 3>I get that.

0:36:35.760 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if that is actually what, like, was

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 2>the pot of money the same right, was it the

0:36:40.320 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 2>same source? But this was also especially felt, I think

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:48.040
<v Speaker 2>because kids with PKU made up a very small proportion

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 2>of all kids who had intellectual or developmental disabilities. And finally,

0:36:54.480 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 2>the last complaint was that the test was not accurate

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 2>enough or not specific enough, so meaning it either missed

0:37:00.560 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 2>kids who had PKU or it led to false positives. Okay,

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:05.440
<v Speaker 2>false positives.

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:08.920
<v Speaker 3>We'll talk all about things like that, Aaron, Yeah, we will.

0:37:09.440 --> 0:37:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Many of these objections faded away over the years as

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 2>the test improved and as more data were collected on

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:21.640
<v Speaker 2>the efficacy of early intervention, but some objections remained, not

0:37:21.880 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 2>just for PKU, but for other conditions newly added or

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 2>proposed to be added to newborn screening programs. Because, especially

0:37:31.440 --> 0:37:35.360
<v Speaker 2>as technology has allowed us to cast a wider net,

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 2>first with the incorporation of tandem mass spectrometry in the

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 2>nineteen nineties and now with whole genome sequencing capabilities, one

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 2>major area that people have expressed concern about is privacy.

0:37:49.880 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 2>How to ensure that our genetic information cannot be used

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 2>without our consent, for instance, by insurance companies to discriminate

0:37:57.800 --> 0:38:03.920
<v Speaker 2>against us. Right, I think that's a valid concerned Totally,

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 2>Every newborn screening program has privacy policies intended to protect

0:38:08.600 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 2>against this, and clear guidelines on how the information will

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 2>be used, including restricting who can access it. Whether that's

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 2>enough is beyond the scope of this conversation, and I

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:23.160
<v Speaker 2>think that like a legal podcast should definitely pick that up.

0:38:23.640 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 2>I'd be fascinated to tune into that. And I also

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 2>want to make sure that we I talk about the

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:35.680
<v Speaker 2>other considerations for newborn screening. The first is what happens

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:40.919
<v Speaker 2>if a positive test ultimately leads to a confirmed diagnosis? Right,

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:44.560
<v Speaker 2>The path forward is not always clear when it comes

0:38:44.600 --> 0:38:46.640
<v Speaker 2>to treatment, you know, I think that earlier we kind

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 2>of touched on this when in the criteria where we're

0:38:48.560 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 2>like is there treatment right, yes or no?

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 5>Right?

0:38:52.000 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 2>Sometimes that answer is not obvious. So, like many of

0:38:55.680 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 2>the conditions that are included in newborn screening have a

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:02.759
<v Speaker 2>range of severe and since these are rare disorders, we

0:39:02.880 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 2>might not have as much data as we like for

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:10.080
<v Speaker 2>how effective some of these treatments or interventions are, especially

0:39:10.080 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 2>in the long term. Sometimes deciding what to do, you know,

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:17.520
<v Speaker 2>should I do this treatment or that one? Should I

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 2>do one at all? Sometimes that's not clear cut. Diagnoses

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 2>can be inconclusive or intermediary. So for example, cystic fibrosis,

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:29.319
<v Speaker 2>sometimes it's like we don't know the severity based on

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 2>whichever specific illeal we're data deficient in some of these situation.

0:39:33.960 --> 0:39:37.399
<v Speaker 3>We have great treatments for this type and less great

0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:40.759
<v Speaker 3>treatments for this type. So there's still so many questions

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 3>wor yes, yeah.

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 2>And this could leave parents to wonder, you know, if

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 2>my child may never show symptoms, what should I be

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:50.520
<v Speaker 2>doing here?

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:51.319
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:54.720
<v Speaker 2>And this is something absolutely that is taken into account

0:39:54.760 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 2>when considering whether a condition should be included in the screening.

0:39:58.360 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 3>It's almost like that's why we need people who know

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 3>what they're doing to make the decisions about what we

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 3>should include on the panel.

0:40:05.320 --> 0:40:10.839
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, but we are also though, approaching an era

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:15.759
<v Speaker 2>where someone's entire genetic information could be accessed by or

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 2>provided to parents. Yep, who does that information belong to?

0:40:19.920 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeap the child the parents are both like should parents

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:26.919
<v Speaker 2>be able to ask for all results even if there

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:28.880
<v Speaker 2>are no interventions or treatments?

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:29.359
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 2>Knowledge can weigh heavily.

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Or things that might not happen until adulthood, or maybe

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:36.960
<v Speaker 3>you're at higher risk of something as an adult but

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:41.439
<v Speaker 3>not as a child, Like what.

0:40:40.080 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 2>What is a parent allowed access to that right, and

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 2>so currently these are largely hypothetical concerns. We haven't quite

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 2>gotten to that point with sequencing, but it's conceivable that

0:40:51.719 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 2>we will have to confront them eventually.

0:40:54.560 --> 0:40:55.439
<v Speaker 3>And then.

0:40:56.600 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 2>There's the other scenario, what happens if a positive test

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 2>positive screening test does not lead to a confirmed diagnosis,

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:08.200
<v Speaker 2>and this is very often the case. The high rates

0:41:08.200 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 2>of false positives in newborn screening are a side effect

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 2>of wanting to make sure that we catch every true positive,

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 2>right that is, that is often how screenings go, and

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:21.040
<v Speaker 2>it is a it's not unique to newborn screening, and

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:24.840
<v Speaker 2>newborn screening is just that it is a screening. It

0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:28.920
<v Speaker 2>screens for certain conditions. It's not diagnostic at all. So

0:41:29.160 --> 0:41:33.240
<v Speaker 2>if someone's newborn screening is flagged for a certain condition,

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 2>that that baby will undergo additional tests to confirm or

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 2>reject the diagnosis, and the vast majority of the time,

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:42.880
<v Speaker 2>like I mentioned, it ends up being a false positive.

0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 2>But that doesn't like, that doesn't undo the financial cost

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 2>of the additional testing, battling with insurance, and the enormous

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 2>emotional turmoil experienced by parents during those weeks of not

0:41:56.120 --> 0:42:00.719
<v Speaker 2>knowing or imagining the worst. One study also found that

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 2>most doctors do not discuss newborn screening with parents before

0:42:04.520 --> 0:42:07.200
<v Speaker 2>the birth. And I know that we'll tell you. There's

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:11.680
<v Speaker 2>like that, I know, and many, whether it's pediatricians or OB's,

0:42:11.760 --> 0:42:13.840
<v Speaker 2>feel ill equipped to explain it. And then that's the

0:42:13.920 --> 0:42:15.960
<v Speaker 2>other sort of question is like, are you getting your

0:42:15.960 --> 0:42:18.320
<v Speaker 2>care from your OB? Is your who should tell you

0:42:18.320 --> 0:42:19.400
<v Speaker 2>about newborn screening?

0:42:19.520 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 3>Maybe you should have a family medicine doctor.

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm totally biased, but if you don't have a family

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:28.719
<v Speaker 2>medicine doctor, is your OB going to tell you? Is

0:42:28.719 --> 0:42:30.560
<v Speaker 2>your pediatrician going to tell you? Are you going to

0:42:30.560 --> 0:42:32.839
<v Speaker 2>see your pediatrician before you give nor?

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Usually not exactly. So no, it's a total It is

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 3>a failure of the way that our system is set up.

0:42:38.760 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 3>Is that yeah, A, there's usually not time in OBI visits,

0:42:41.880 --> 0:42:44.399
<v Speaker 3>No one gets enough time in those, and B you're

0:42:44.480 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 3>not probably talking about newborn stuff in your OB visits

0:42:47.640 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 3>right right, And then at your pediatrician visit it's already done.

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 3>So you get like you're in the hospital, you just

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 3>delivered a baby, and a nurse comes in and is like, okay,

0:42:55.520 --> 0:42:57.439
<v Speaker 3>we're going to do the screening or a resident comes

0:42:57.440 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 3>in and it's like, okay, we're going to do the

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 3>screening and you're like, oh, all what or you don't even.

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:04.160
<v Speaker 2>Know that it's happening. I asked my mom. I was like,

0:43:04.400 --> 0:43:08.120
<v Speaker 2>do you remember, and she goes, oh did did did

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:11.640
<v Speaker 2>that happen? I was like, yes, it did, it did.

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 2>We were all of us like it's mandatory, so it's

0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:18.239
<v Speaker 2>it is a This is something that I think that

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:22.120
<v Speaker 2>that lack of communication can leave parents terrified and in

0:43:22.160 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 2>the dark seeking information from doctor Google that could scare

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:31.520
<v Speaker 2>them even further. Right, newborn screening saves lives and has

0:43:31.560 --> 0:43:35.840
<v Speaker 2>had a tremendously positive impact over the past sixty plus years,

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:40.080
<v Speaker 2>but these positives can make it easier to brush aside

0:43:40.120 --> 0:43:43.440
<v Speaker 2>the negatives, which can be substantial for some you know

0:43:43.680 --> 0:43:47.040
<v Speaker 2>better testing that reduces the false positive rate would go

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 2>a long way toward alleviating some of the anxiety and fear.

0:43:51.200 --> 0:43:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Not to mention the cost of additional testing and having

0:43:55.960 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 2>access to genetic counseling can be hugely beneficial. Information not

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:04.760
<v Speaker 2>just about the initial counseling, additional testing, or what positive

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 2>result might mean, but also what the options are if

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 2>a diagnosis ends up being made. Genetic counseling is a

0:44:12.080 --> 0:44:15.080
<v Speaker 2>tremendous field. We should we should talk more about it.

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:17.680
<v Speaker 3>We should be we need more genetic counselors.

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:23.480
<v Speaker 2>Yes, because unfortunately not everyone has access to a genetic counselor, so.

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 3>They cannot like standard.

0:44:25.080 --> 0:44:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Not it's not and so it's really easy then to

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:31.480
<v Speaker 2>get overwhelmed by the vast amount of information and misinformation

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 2>out there. So again, newborn screening, though has saved the

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 2>lives and improved the health of countless newborns around the globe,

0:44:41.520 --> 0:44:44.600
<v Speaker 2>it is not perfect. There is room for improvement, you know,

0:44:44.719 --> 0:44:47.719
<v Speaker 2>opportunities to reduce some of the harm and false positives,

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:50.680
<v Speaker 2>remove the uncertainty and what to do next for true positives,

0:44:51.040 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 2>and better communicate to all parents what the screening does.

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:57.560
<v Speaker 2>But if we want to make any advancements in these areas,

0:44:57.840 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 2>we need more investment in research, communication programs, and a

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:05.320
<v Speaker 2>better healthcare system overall to make sure that this powerful

0:45:05.400 --> 0:45:08.160
<v Speaker 2>knowledge can continue to make a positive impact.

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 3>You're saying we should invest in public health there.

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:15.359
<v Speaker 2>Always, I will never stop saying it, except now when

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:17.319
<v Speaker 2>I turn it over to you to tell me more

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 2>about how newborn screening works.

0:45:19.160 --> 0:45:20.239
<v Speaker 3>So then I can say it.

0:45:20.600 --> 0:45:21.959
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's your truth.

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 3>I can't wait erin thank you. That was such a

0:45:25.440 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 3>good setup. I love screening so much. I want to

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:49.520
<v Speaker 3>talk for just a minute about, like what is the

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:53.279
<v Speaker 3>concept of screening because we've never gotten to on this

0:45:53.320 --> 0:45:58.040
<v Speaker 3>podcast before really, So, the concept of screening means that

0:45:58.080 --> 0:46:03.360
<v Speaker 3>we are testing a symptomatic people like entire usually hopefully

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:06.680
<v Speaker 3>well defined populations of people. So in the case of

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:11.080
<v Speaker 3>newborn screening, we're talking about testing every single newborn for

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:13.800
<v Speaker 3>a disease or a disorder, or a suite of them,

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 3>before they show any symptoms. And in medicine, we screen

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:21.040
<v Speaker 3>for so many things, like we screen everyone with a

0:46:21.040 --> 0:46:23.360
<v Speaker 3>cervix for cervical cancer starting at age twenty one or

0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:26.360
<v Speaker 3>twenty five. We screen every adult over forty five for

0:46:26.480 --> 0:46:29.400
<v Speaker 3>colon cancer or earlier, depending on your family history. We

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:31.360
<v Speaker 3>screen for high blood pressure. You might not even know

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:33.880
<v Speaker 3>that's what we're doing. We're screening for high cholesterol, diabetes,

0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:34.520
<v Speaker 3>breast cancer.

0:46:34.600 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:46:35.480 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 3>We are looking for evidence of a disease before you

0:46:40.600 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 3>ever show any signs or symptoms of that disease, right right,

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:49.200
<v Speaker 3>So in newborn screening, we are testing all of these

0:46:49.200 --> 0:46:52.120
<v Speaker 3>babies right after delivery, usually within the first twenty four

0:46:52.120 --> 0:46:54.880
<v Speaker 3>to forty eight hours of life for a whole suite

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 3>of disorders that they may develop later in their life.

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 3>And all screening, but especially newborn screening because of the

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:10.200
<v Speaker 3>scale on which it's done, is a process, not an event,

0:47:11.000 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 3>right it is.

0:47:11.840 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I love that process, not an event.

0:47:14.160 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 3>And that process is dependent on a system that has

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:20.440
<v Speaker 3>a lot of different pieces that have to be in place.

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:25.880
<v Speaker 3>It has to start with our federal and state public

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:29.920
<v Speaker 3>health agencies deciding as a group, based on expertise, what

0:47:30.040 --> 0:47:34.160
<v Speaker 3>they're screening for yep. And then there are both hospital

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:36.400
<v Speaker 3>based exams which a lot of people might not realize

0:47:36.400 --> 0:47:39.360
<v Speaker 3>are even happening, like a hearing test and a congenital

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 3>heart disease screen, as well as the blood test or

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 3>the heel prick test, which that test has to then

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:51.719
<v Speaker 3>be shipped and analyzed in a systematic way. And then

0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 3>there's all of the stuff that has to happen after

0:47:54.000 --> 0:47:56.839
<v Speaker 3>that test. The results have to be reported to the

0:47:56.880 --> 0:47:59.880
<v Speaker 3>families and the healthcare system in which they're a part of.

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:03.520
<v Speaker 3>There's then follow up diagnostic testing that has to be

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:08.080
<v Speaker 3>coordinated and completed. There's all these additional appointments hopefully you

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:10.800
<v Speaker 3>have access to genetic counseling, there might be parental testing,

0:48:11.000 --> 0:48:13.840
<v Speaker 3>and then there is some kind of treatment or intervention

0:48:14.920 --> 0:48:17.480
<v Speaker 3>in order to prevent the harms of that condition for

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:18.280
<v Speaker 3>which we screened.

0:48:18.920 --> 0:48:21.399
<v Speaker 2>Right, that's a lot, it's a lot.

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:26.200
<v Speaker 3>It's not a small event. No, no, no, And like

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I had mentioned, we think of the newborn screening test

0:48:29.200 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 3>as just that blood spot test, the heel prick, but

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:33.920
<v Speaker 3>it is a lot more than that. There's like physical

0:48:33.960 --> 0:48:36.880
<v Speaker 3>exam testing that is done on every single baby to

0:48:37.160 --> 0:48:41.800
<v Speaker 3>look for evidence of certain conditions. There's the congenital heart disease,

0:48:41.840 --> 0:48:45.000
<v Speaker 3>there's the hearing test. But the blood test is what

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:48.000
<v Speaker 3>we're going to focus on for this episode. And in

0:48:48.040 --> 0:48:52.080
<v Speaker 3>that what they do, if anyone hasn't seen this happen before,

0:48:52.960 --> 0:48:55.680
<v Speaker 3>they take a little teeny tiny lancet like you would

0:48:55.760 --> 0:48:59.000
<v Speaker 3>use to check your blood glucose and they prick the

0:48:59.040 --> 0:49:00.920
<v Speaker 3>back of the baby's heel, usually after you warm it

0:49:01.000 --> 0:49:02.600
<v Speaker 3>up really good so that you've got good blood flow,

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:06.640
<v Speaker 3>and then you drop this blood onto a little filter paper.

0:49:06.640 --> 0:49:08.799
<v Speaker 3>There's just these little circles. It's not like a whole vial.

0:49:08.840 --> 0:49:11.759
<v Speaker 3>It's literally just like dropping it onto this paper. In

0:49:11.800 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 3>these little circles that you fill up and then you

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:16.000
<v Speaker 3>let it dry and you mail it to your public

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:18.320
<v Speaker 3>health department, who usually is the ones who do the screening.

0:49:19.200 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 3>And you had mentioned, Aaron, the different modalities today, we

0:49:22.320 --> 0:49:24.919
<v Speaker 3>use a bunch of different modalities actually for our blood

0:49:24.920 --> 0:49:28.359
<v Speaker 3>screening tests. A lot of them use mass spectrometry, some

0:49:28.440 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 3>of them might use hemoglobe and electrophoresis, and then there

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:34.720
<v Speaker 3>are some genetic tests as well. It all just depends

0:49:34.719 --> 0:49:38.360
<v Speaker 3>on what you're screening for, right, Yeah, And all of

0:49:38.400 --> 0:49:42.000
<v Speaker 3>this screening generally happens at right around twenty four hours

0:49:42.000 --> 0:49:42.400
<v Speaker 3>of life.

0:49:43.680 --> 0:49:46.719
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot of information all at once, and it's

0:49:46.760 --> 0:49:49.279
<v Speaker 2>just still you don't you might not even know that

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:51.160
<v Speaker 2>it's happening exactly exactly.

0:49:51.880 --> 0:49:54.279
<v Speaker 3>And I'm not going to give you a list. I'm

0:49:54.320 --> 0:49:56.520
<v Speaker 3>not going to go through like every single condition that

0:49:56.560 --> 0:49:59.880
<v Speaker 3>we test for in the US and around the globe

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:03.879
<v Speaker 3>is not one single test. And you kind of walked

0:50:03.920 --> 0:50:06.600
<v Speaker 3>us through, Aaron, how this all got started. But it

0:50:06.680 --> 0:50:11.480
<v Speaker 3>was after the introduction of mass spectrometry that things really

0:50:11.560 --> 0:50:15.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of ramped up. But every single state in the

0:50:15.520 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 3>US manages its newborn screening program a little bit differently

0:50:20.239 --> 0:50:23.520
<v Speaker 3>and has slightly different things that they have on their

0:50:23.520 --> 0:50:26.000
<v Speaker 3>blood tests. So some states test for a lot more

0:50:26.080 --> 0:50:29.920
<v Speaker 3>conditions and some states really just rely on that recommended

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:35.920
<v Speaker 3>Universal Screening protocol that they use to make their list essentially,

0:50:36.760 --> 0:50:41.080
<v Speaker 3>and all of that is now in question. Many of

0:50:41.120 --> 0:50:43.680
<v Speaker 3>the conditions that we screen for on this blood test

0:50:43.760 --> 0:50:48.080
<v Speaker 3>are what we call metabolic disorders like PKU, which means

0:50:48.080 --> 0:50:50.800
<v Speaker 3>that they are disorders in the way that our bodies

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:55.000
<v Speaker 3>process foods or other things that can end up leading

0:50:55.000 --> 0:50:59.200
<v Speaker 3>to the accumulation of toxic byproducts or sometimes deficiencies in

0:50:59.280 --> 0:51:04.080
<v Speaker 3>other acids or things like that. There are really wide

0:51:04.160 --> 0:51:06.279
<v Speaker 3>range of these metabolic conditions that we can test for.

0:51:06.280 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 3>It there's a lot of them on newborn screening protocols.

0:51:09.680 --> 0:51:13.799
<v Speaker 3>But there's also disorders of hemoglobin right like zickle cell

0:51:13.840 --> 0:51:17.840
<v Speaker 3>anemia is on most of the newborn screenings. There's diseases

0:51:17.880 --> 0:51:20.239
<v Speaker 3>of the immune system, especially if they're caused by known

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:24.680
<v Speaker 3>genetic mutations like SKID for example, or severe combined immune deficiency.

0:51:25.320 --> 0:51:30.360
<v Speaker 3>There's things like cystic fibrosis, can general hypothyroidism, and most

0:51:30.560 --> 0:51:36.880
<v Speaker 3>across the board, these disorders without treatment, without identification and

0:51:36.920 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 3>treatment can cause really significant impacts on growth. And development

0:51:43.200 --> 0:51:46.520
<v Speaker 3>and in many cases can result in life threatening complications

0:51:46.840 --> 0:51:52.359
<v Speaker 3>very early in life, in infancy and in childhood. And

0:51:52.440 --> 0:51:57.200
<v Speaker 3>many of them have relatively straightforward treatments as far as

0:51:57.239 --> 0:52:01.400
<v Speaker 3>all things in medicine go, right, like special formulas, avoidance

0:52:01.440 --> 0:52:06.319
<v Speaker 3>of certain foods. Sometimes it's additional therapies or immanizations. Some

0:52:06.520 --> 0:52:09.920
<v Speaker 3>might be more involved, For example, with SKID, it might

0:52:10.000 --> 0:52:13.319
<v Speaker 3>be something like a bone marrow transplant, which is very

0:52:13.440 --> 0:52:16.839
<v Speaker 3>involved and not a decision to be taken lightly, but

0:52:17.160 --> 0:52:19.400
<v Speaker 3>potentially allows for cure of a disease.

0:52:19.560 --> 0:52:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Right, yeah, curative, it's amazing. Yeah.

0:52:22.040 --> 0:52:26.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. And so whenever we are talking about screening tests,

0:52:26.160 --> 0:52:28.840
<v Speaker 3>not just newborn screening but all of the screening tests

0:52:29.000 --> 0:52:31.680
<v Speaker 3>that we do in medicine, there are, like you mentioned,

0:52:31.719 --> 0:52:34.200
<v Speaker 3>a lot of factors that we have to consider to

0:52:34.280 --> 0:52:38.080
<v Speaker 3>decide what populations we're screening and what types of things

0:52:38.160 --> 0:52:41.200
<v Speaker 3>we're screening for, and what types of tests we should

0:52:41.280 --> 0:52:45.080
<v Speaker 3>use for that screening. So it was Wilson and Younger

0:52:45.160 --> 0:52:47.600
<v Speaker 3>you mentioned who came up with this list of ten

0:52:47.680 --> 0:52:51.319
<v Speaker 3>criteria back in the sixties, nineteen sixty eight. Yeah, yea,

0:52:52.040 --> 0:52:55.960
<v Speaker 3>and those mostly hold up over time, like they're mostly

0:52:56.120 --> 0:52:58.399
<v Speaker 3>the same. But I did find a more recent paper

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:01.200
<v Speaker 3>from twenty eleven that what I liked is that they

0:53:01.320 --> 0:53:05.120
<v Speaker 3>really tried to take into account how much some of

0:53:05.160 --> 0:53:07.279
<v Speaker 3>these ideas that we think of are going to have

0:53:07.360 --> 0:53:12.799
<v Speaker 3>to change as we advance into genetic testing. Right, so

0:53:12.880 --> 0:53:15.560
<v Speaker 3>there is a bit more of like an intensive framework

0:53:15.600 --> 0:53:19.080
<v Speaker 3>about how to decide what we're screening for and how

0:53:19.080 --> 0:53:19.839
<v Speaker 3>we're screening it.

0:53:20.040 --> 0:53:23.359
<v Speaker 2>I think it's like it comes down to what is

0:53:23.480 --> 0:53:27.240
<v Speaker 2>the how how much does this predict? How well does

0:53:27.320 --> 0:53:34.120
<v Speaker 2>this allele this variant genetic variant predict a disease versus predisposed.

0:53:33.480 --> 0:53:36.439
<v Speaker 3>Exactly exactly right. There's a lot of there's a lot

0:53:36.440 --> 0:53:38.320
<v Speaker 3>of things that you have to consider, especially as you

0:53:38.360 --> 0:53:41.799
<v Speaker 3>get into that genetic testing framework. But you kind of

0:53:41.840 --> 0:53:43.440
<v Speaker 3>mentioned some of the biggest ones, and I want to

0:53:43.520 --> 0:53:47.560
<v Speaker 3>just reiterate them, I think because they're so important. Like

0:53:48.239 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 3>I guess what I'm trying to emphasize is how what

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:54.000
<v Speaker 3>is being screened for is not a flippant decision.

0:53:55.040 --> 0:53:56.799
<v Speaker 2>No no, no, it's not like, hey, you know what,

0:53:57.080 --> 0:53:59.439
<v Speaker 2>we've got the capacity to do all of this, Let's

0:53:59.480 --> 0:54:00.440
<v Speaker 2>just do it all.

0:54:00.200 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Right, Let's just check everyone for everything. Like That's not

0:54:03.160 --> 0:54:03.799
<v Speaker 3>how it's done.

0:54:03.960 --> 0:54:06.040
<v Speaker 2>And I think that, like the the other piece of

0:54:06.080 --> 0:54:08.480
<v Speaker 2>the puzzle too, is like this, there has to be

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:12.120
<v Speaker 2>individual benefit. You think, Okay, well, but if we if

0:54:12.160 --> 0:54:16.840
<v Speaker 2>we don't currently have a treatment for this condition, but

0:54:17.360 --> 0:54:20.400
<v Speaker 2>we if we screen for tested, than we could in

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:23.960
<v Speaker 2>the future if we if we know that these kids

0:54:23.960 --> 0:54:26.480
<v Speaker 2>have it. But like that's not again, that's not what

0:54:26.560 --> 0:54:29.000
<v Speaker 2>individual benefit is this kid getting if there is no

0:54:29.120 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 2>existing treatment.

0:54:30.120 --> 0:54:33.719
<v Speaker 3>Exactly so exactly so some of like big picture, the

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:37.600
<v Speaker 3>biggest things that we have to have in place for

0:54:37.920 --> 0:54:40.799
<v Speaker 3>a disorder to be like added to a screening list.

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:43.880
<v Speaker 3>We have to have a test that is appropriate for

0:54:43.920 --> 0:54:48.319
<v Speaker 3>the condition that we're looking for, okay, and for screening purposes.

0:54:48.480 --> 0:54:50.440
<v Speaker 3>What that means is that we have to have something

0:54:50.480 --> 0:54:54.439
<v Speaker 3>that has what you mentioned aaron a high sensitivity, which

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:56.759
<v Speaker 3>means that we want it to pick up as many

0:54:56.800 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 3>cases as possible. We don't want anyone to be missed

0:54:59.600 --> 0:55:02.080
<v Speaker 3>and have a a bunch of false negatives, because that

0:55:02.200 --> 0:55:04.960
<v Speaker 3>means we are falsely reassuring people that you do not

0:55:05.120 --> 0:55:08.640
<v Speaker 3>have this condition if we don't have a highly sensitive test.

0:55:09.640 --> 0:55:12.480
<v Speaker 3>But the flip side of that is often, though not always,

0:55:12.880 --> 0:55:17.440
<v Speaker 3>that screening tests can then have false positives, right, which

0:55:17.480 --> 0:55:20.719
<v Speaker 3>then means that we have to have additional testing that

0:55:20.880 --> 0:55:25.680
<v Speaker 3>exists that's really good and very specific to confirm a

0:55:25.719 --> 0:55:29.439
<v Speaker 3>diagnosis if something is picked up on these screening tests, right.

0:55:30.200 --> 0:55:32.960
<v Speaker 3>And how good a test does, like how well it

0:55:33.040 --> 0:55:36.560
<v Speaker 3>actually performs, usually depends on how prevalent or how rare

0:55:36.600 --> 0:55:39.520
<v Speaker 3>a disease is in the population. So we also have

0:55:39.600 --> 0:55:42.040
<v Speaker 3>to consider some of the factors of the conditions themselves.

0:55:42.640 --> 0:55:45.520
<v Speaker 3>Are they an individual health problem and are they a

0:55:45.560 --> 0:55:49.080
<v Speaker 3>public health problem. We have to know can we do

0:55:49.239 --> 0:55:53.120
<v Speaker 3>something to prevent them if we identify them early, because,

0:55:53.160 --> 0:55:55.920
<v Speaker 3>like you said, it is not considered ethical to screen

0:55:56.000 --> 0:55:59.840
<v Speaker 3>for something that we can't do anything about. So we

0:56:00.200 --> 0:56:02.960
<v Speaker 3>have to know that these conditions exist. We can't screen

0:56:03.000 --> 0:56:06.000
<v Speaker 3>for things that we don't know about yet. And they

0:56:06.040 --> 0:56:09.000
<v Speaker 3>have to have some kind of asymptomatic stage where this

0:56:09.080 --> 0:56:11.480
<v Speaker 3>screening can be completed. And then we have to have

0:56:11.560 --> 0:56:14.319
<v Speaker 3>some kind of treatment or intervention to offer something that

0:56:14.360 --> 0:56:18.959
<v Speaker 3>can actually reasonably be accessed by everyone who you're screening, right.

0:56:19.760 --> 0:56:22.960
<v Speaker 3>And then, because this is public health, there's also always

0:56:23.000 --> 0:56:26.160
<v Speaker 3>a cost consideration, right, Like we are going to tell

0:56:26.160 --> 0:56:28.759
<v Speaker 3>you that public health investment always saves money because it

0:56:28.800 --> 0:56:32.319
<v Speaker 3>does always, but the public health agencies also are going

0:56:32.360 --> 0:56:35.120
<v Speaker 3>to be doing this cost analysis and then like they

0:56:35.120 --> 0:56:37.080
<v Speaker 3>have to weigh what is the cost of screening the

0:56:37.200 --> 0:56:40.680
<v Speaker 3>entire population plus the cost of the testing for both

0:56:40.680 --> 0:56:44.240
<v Speaker 3>false positives and true positives weighed against the potential savings

0:56:44.239 --> 0:56:46.400
<v Speaker 3>in medical care if we catch and treat these disease

0:56:46.440 --> 0:56:49.239
<v Speaker 3>early and either cure them or prevent severe disease down

0:56:49.280 --> 0:56:52.440
<v Speaker 3>the line. So all of this has to be considered

0:56:52.960 --> 0:56:55.279
<v Speaker 3>when we are deciding what conditions have to be on

0:56:55.320 --> 0:56:57.920
<v Speaker 3>this list to screen for or not. You need a

0:56:57.920 --> 0:57:02.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of expertise and you need a lot of data, yes, yeah,

0:57:02.080 --> 0:57:06.280
<v Speaker 3>And this list has been consistently updated over time as

0:57:06.360 --> 0:57:11.680
<v Speaker 3>we've developed better testing or developed better treatments. A really

0:57:11.760 --> 0:57:15.160
<v Speaker 3>good example of this is spinal muscular atrophy or SMA.

0:57:15.560 --> 0:57:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah yeah, This a treatment got approved in twenty sixteen,

0:57:19.520 --> 0:57:23.200
<v Speaker 3>and before that we didn't have any treatment available for

0:57:23.240 --> 0:57:29.120
<v Speaker 3>this disorder, which can be very, very detrimental. And because

0:57:29.200 --> 0:57:31.720
<v Speaker 3>we now had a new treatment as of twenty sixteen,

0:57:32.120 --> 0:57:34.920
<v Speaker 3>people started lobbying and recommending that this get added to

0:57:35.000 --> 0:57:37.760
<v Speaker 3>the list of recommended universal screening, and it was added

0:57:37.800 --> 0:57:40.760
<v Speaker 3>in twenty eighteen. It's still not on every individual states list,

0:57:40.920 --> 0:57:42.120
<v Speaker 3>but it is on the RUSP.

0:57:43.360 --> 0:57:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's amazing, Like I feel like that has been

0:57:46.520 --> 0:57:50.680
<v Speaker 2>newborn screening has grown so substantially. Yeah, and like consistently,

0:57:50.800 --> 0:57:54.040
<v Speaker 2>well not even consistently exponentially over the years, right, And

0:57:55.120 --> 0:57:57.080
<v Speaker 2>it's evidence based.

0:57:57.320 --> 0:57:59.360
<v Speaker 3>Maybe we have these.

0:57:59.240 --> 0:58:02.320
<v Speaker 2>Criteria, we have reasons to include these conditions.

0:58:03.200 --> 0:58:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, and all of that will change with the

0:58:08.600 --> 0:58:13.960
<v Speaker 3>advent of genomic sequencing, right, yes, without a doubt. Yeah,

0:58:15.560 --> 0:58:22.320
<v Speaker 3>genomic sequencing. Whole genome sequencing will and is enabling screening

0:58:22.400 --> 0:58:28.200
<v Speaker 3>for a much wider range of conditions, but without substantial

0:58:28.400 --> 0:58:34.120
<v Speaker 3>additional costs. Because right now, every single disorder, we have

0:58:34.200 --> 0:58:35.840
<v Speaker 3>to make sure that we have a test, that that

0:58:35.880 --> 0:58:39.160
<v Speaker 3>test is cost effective and like a good enough test,

0:58:39.560 --> 0:58:41.520
<v Speaker 3>and then we have to decide based on the treatments

0:58:41.520 --> 0:58:43.280
<v Speaker 3>and all of those other things, do we add it

0:58:43.320 --> 0:58:46.000
<v Speaker 3>to this list? Can people have the capacity to add

0:58:46.040 --> 0:58:49.840
<v Speaker 3>this test to their public health department? But with this

0:58:49.920 --> 0:58:52.960
<v Speaker 3>switch to genomic sequencing, like the game is totally changed.

0:58:53.160 --> 0:58:56.240
<v Speaker 3>And literally every recent paper in the last like five

0:58:56.320 --> 0:58:58.800
<v Speaker 3>years that has been written about newborn screening is about

0:58:58.840 --> 0:59:02.880
<v Speaker 3>genomics and the and this future is here. Like you said,

0:59:03.680 --> 0:59:07.080
<v Speaker 3>the UK has actually already made a commitment to switching

0:59:07.240 --> 0:59:09.760
<v Speaker 3>all of their newborn screening to genomics within the next

0:59:09.840 --> 0:59:12.840
<v Speaker 3>ten years. So exciting this is happening. There is no

0:59:12.920 --> 0:59:17.560
<v Speaker 3>going back, And like I said, in contrast to now,

0:59:17.920 --> 0:59:21.160
<v Speaker 3>we won't need to do all of these different types

0:59:21.200 --> 0:59:24.840
<v Speaker 3>of tests. By sequencing the entire genome of an individual,

0:59:25.080 --> 0:59:29.000
<v Speaker 3>we can look for so many different diseases and disorders.

0:59:29.240 --> 0:59:32.680
<v Speaker 3>As long as there is an identifiable gene associated with

0:59:32.760 --> 0:59:35.680
<v Speaker 3>this condition, you could, at least in theory, add it

0:59:35.720 --> 0:59:38.480
<v Speaker 3>to the list of genes that you're looking for. But

0:59:38.600 --> 0:59:43.080
<v Speaker 3>those same conditions and questions that we have mentioned will

0:59:43.240 --> 0:59:48.360
<v Speaker 3>also apply when we are talking about using genomics. Right,

0:59:48.440 --> 0:59:51.080
<v Speaker 3>these conditions need to be identifiable, they have to have

0:59:51.080 --> 0:59:53.560
<v Speaker 3>an asymptomatic stage. We should have some kind of treatment

0:59:53.640 --> 0:59:57.920
<v Speaker 3>or intervention. Right, you have to have confirmatory diagnostic testing.

0:59:58.680 --> 1:00:00.880
<v Speaker 3>And then, like you said, there's all of these additional

1:00:00.960 --> 1:00:03.640
<v Speaker 3>questions that come with genomics, like what about all of

1:00:03.720 --> 1:00:05.960
<v Speaker 3>these genes where we know there's an increased risk of

1:00:06.000 --> 1:00:10.520
<v Speaker 3>disease but maybe not necessarily a disease. What about all

1:00:10.560 --> 1:00:13.240
<v Speaker 3>of the rest of the data that comes by sequencing

1:00:13.280 --> 1:00:16.720
<v Speaker 3>an entire genome. Who owns it? Who protects it? Who

1:00:16.800 --> 1:00:20.000
<v Speaker 3>else is going to have access to that information? Do

1:00:20.040 --> 1:00:21.840
<v Speaker 3>they want to know this information?

1:00:22.200 --> 1:00:25.400
<v Speaker 2>How long does is it kept? How you know, like

1:00:25.600 --> 1:00:28.440
<v Speaker 2>can it be reaccessed exactly if you want? You know,

1:00:28.760 --> 1:00:32.920
<v Speaker 2>what's for what purposes? And so this comes with a

1:00:33.000 --> 1:00:36.640
<v Speaker 2>lot of complications and a lot of potential for huge benefit.

1:00:37.480 --> 1:00:39.560
<v Speaker 2>So we brought in an expert so then we don't

1:00:39.600 --> 1:00:43.840
<v Speaker 2>have to tell you all about it the best part.

1:00:44.280 --> 1:00:46.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's right. We brought in one of the researchers

1:00:46.920 --> 1:00:49.680
<v Speaker 3>who is involved in this huge project here in the

1:00:49.800 --> 1:00:53.200
<v Speaker 3>US which is very exciting called the Guardian Study, which

1:00:53.200 --> 1:00:56.080
<v Speaker 3>has already begun, like it's already well underway. It has

1:00:56.120 --> 1:00:58.919
<v Speaker 3>been screening really large numbers of babies in New York

1:00:58.960 --> 1:01:03.280
<v Speaker 3>City using genomics tools. The Guardian Study has been it's

1:01:03.360 --> 1:01:06.680
<v Speaker 3>been recruiting, it still is recruiting families with newborns at

1:01:06.760 --> 1:01:11.480
<v Speaker 3>New York Presbyterian Hospitals for over two hundred genes associated

1:01:11.480 --> 1:01:14.760
<v Speaker 3>with specific conditions known to affect young children. Two hundred

1:01:14.920 --> 1:01:17.840
<v Speaker 3>I know, from thirty eight to two hundred. Yeah, like

1:01:17.920 --> 1:01:19.640
<v Speaker 3>the highest at least that I could find. I think

1:01:19.640 --> 1:01:24.160
<v Speaker 3>the highest state is California with like seventy five or

1:01:24.200 --> 1:01:26.760
<v Speaker 3>so conditions that are on our screening test. So this

1:01:26.840 --> 1:01:30.280
<v Speaker 3>is like X or so much bigger yep. And some

1:01:30.320 --> 1:01:33.280
<v Speaker 3>of these conditions that they're screening for are incredibly rare

1:01:34.320 --> 1:01:37.960
<v Speaker 3>and they have had really interesting and important results already. Aarin,

1:01:38.120 --> 1:01:41.680
<v Speaker 3>your other podcast that you host, Advances and Care, had

1:01:41.720 --> 1:01:44.880
<v Speaker 3>a really excellent episode on the Guardian study. So can

1:01:44.920 --> 1:01:47.880
<v Speaker 3>you introduce us to our interviewee.

1:01:48.320 --> 1:01:52.240
<v Speaker 2>I am thrilled to yes. In that episode of Advances

1:01:52.240 --> 1:01:56.000
<v Speaker 2>and Care, which was called Newborn Gene Sequencing Expanding early

1:01:56.080 --> 1:01:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Detection of treatable Diseases, it's a great episode in March,

1:01:59.880 --> 1:02:03.120
<v Speaker 2>a good episode, the production team everyone out, all the

1:02:03.120 --> 1:02:08.160
<v Speaker 2>physician scientists amazing, just really really cool. But one of

1:02:08.200 --> 1:02:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the physician scientists featured in that episode was a one

1:02:12.440 --> 1:02:16.120
<v Speaker 2>doctor Josh Milner, who is Professor of Pediatrics and director

1:02:16.200 --> 1:02:20.480
<v Speaker 2>of Allergy, Immunology and Rheumatology at Columbia University Medical Center,

1:02:20.920 --> 1:02:24.600
<v Speaker 2>who was involved in the Guardian study. And so yes,

1:02:24.680 --> 1:02:27.800
<v Speaker 2>we're we got to speak with with doctor Milner about

1:02:27.800 --> 1:02:31.280
<v Speaker 2>the Guardian study and about all of these different aspects

1:02:31.320 --> 1:02:34.400
<v Speaker 2>of WHLD genome sequencing and what that could mean. And

1:02:34.680 --> 1:02:37.800
<v Speaker 2>also doctor Milner is part of a group of immunologists

1:02:37.800 --> 1:02:41.120
<v Speaker 2>who is working to make genomic sequencing a reality for

1:02:41.240 --> 1:02:44.280
<v Speaker 2>newborn screenings across the country.

1:02:44.040 --> 1:02:44.880
<v Speaker 3>And his role.

1:02:45.000 --> 1:02:48.720
<v Speaker 2>One of his roles involves making recommendations for which conditions

1:02:48.720 --> 1:02:53.000
<v Speaker 2>to include on screening panels, and he is extremely enthusiastic

1:02:53.080 --> 1:02:55.840
<v Speaker 2>about the recent efforts in the UK that you mentioned,

1:02:55.880 --> 1:03:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Aaron to incorporate genomic sequencing into newborn screening and also

1:03:00.520 --> 1:03:04.000
<v Speaker 2>that new NIH initiative that I mentioned at the top. Yeah,

1:03:04.040 --> 1:03:06.840
<v Speaker 2>and so in our interview, doctor Milner shares some really

1:03:06.880 --> 1:03:11.400
<v Speaker 2>fascinating insights about the potential offered by genomic sequencing for

1:03:11.480 --> 1:03:14.920
<v Speaker 2>newborn screening and we are so excited to bring these

1:03:15.000 --> 1:03:15.360
<v Speaker 2>to you.

1:03:16.000 --> 1:03:17.920
<v Speaker 3>Let's go to the interview erin.

1:03:20.200 --> 1:03:22.840
<v Speaker 2>Doctor Milner, thank you so much for joining us today.

1:03:23.000 --> 1:03:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. We're thrilled.

1:03:24.200 --> 1:03:24.880
<v Speaker 4>It's a pleasure.

1:03:26.120 --> 1:03:30.560
<v Speaker 2>So so far in this episode, we've discussed how standard

1:03:30.560 --> 1:03:33.920
<v Speaker 2>newborn screening works as well as the history of its development,

1:03:34.320 --> 1:03:37.040
<v Speaker 2>and we are really thrilled to hear from you about

1:03:37.040 --> 1:03:40.720
<v Speaker 2>what the future might hold for this important screening process,

1:03:40.920 --> 1:03:44.720
<v Speaker 2>especially with the application of genome sequencing. Could you give

1:03:44.800 --> 1:03:47.680
<v Speaker 2>us an overview of the Guardian study and how it's

1:03:47.720 --> 1:03:50.280
<v Speaker 2>different from standard newborn screening approaches.

1:03:50.920 --> 1:03:55.960
<v Speaker 4>So basically the idea of the Guardian study and generally

1:03:56.000 --> 1:04:02.360
<v Speaker 4>speaking doing genomic newborn screening is that when that blood

1:04:02.360 --> 1:04:07.800
<v Speaker 4>spot is taken from the heel, usually of a newborn baby,

1:04:09.120 --> 1:04:15.720
<v Speaker 4>that the DNA be extracted and sent for sequencing for

1:04:16.320 --> 1:04:21.880
<v Speaker 4>genes that might impact health. It's still the same sample

1:04:22.160 --> 1:04:26.000
<v Speaker 4>and it's the same process of sending it off to screen.

1:04:26.720 --> 1:04:30.400
<v Speaker 4>But when you do something like whole genome sequencing, where

1:04:30.400 --> 1:04:35.240
<v Speaker 4>you're getting the genetic code for the entire person, you

1:04:35.360 --> 1:04:41.720
<v Speaker 4>actually can look for many many more disorders where if

1:04:41.720 --> 1:04:44.720
<v Speaker 4>you have a what we call a variation which used

1:04:44.760 --> 1:04:48.760
<v Speaker 4>to be called a mutation in a particular gene that

1:04:48.920 --> 1:04:53.680
<v Speaker 4>is known to cause a disease, that that can actually

1:04:53.720 --> 1:04:57.600
<v Speaker 4>be ascertained within the first few weeks of life. And

1:04:58.360 --> 1:05:04.360
<v Speaker 4>what everyone does is essentially picks only genes where if

1:05:04.400 --> 1:05:08.320
<v Speaker 4>you found a variation in that gene that there would

1:05:08.320 --> 1:05:10.920
<v Speaker 4>be something you could do about it to prevent or

1:05:11.000 --> 1:05:16.440
<v Speaker 4>cure the disease. And so there are hundreds and hundreds

1:05:16.800 --> 1:05:22.520
<v Speaker 4>of such genes on our list, and it's a constantly

1:05:22.520 --> 1:05:26.800
<v Speaker 4>evolving process of can we now there's something to do

1:05:26.880 --> 1:05:30.320
<v Speaker 4>for this particular disorder, Oh, now we know, actually this

1:05:30.360 --> 1:05:32.320
<v Speaker 4>is a new genetic problem, but it already comes with

1:05:32.360 --> 1:05:36.200
<v Speaker 4>something you could do about it. And then, at least

1:05:36.240 --> 1:05:38.400
<v Speaker 4>in the study the way that it's been done right now,

1:05:39.880 --> 1:05:43.000
<v Speaker 4>some of the genes do encode for the problem that

1:05:43.040 --> 1:05:46.600
<v Speaker 4>you might pick up with the regular newborn screen that

1:05:46.600 --> 1:05:48.720
<v Speaker 4>we already have, so those can be compared to make

1:05:48.720 --> 1:05:53.600
<v Speaker 4>sure that the genetic strategy does not miss anything. But

1:05:53.680 --> 1:05:57.680
<v Speaker 4>it also can actually even help clarify where you're like, well,

1:05:57.720 --> 1:06:01.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure why this particular problem came up on

1:06:01.160 --> 1:06:04.400
<v Speaker 4>the regular newborn screen, but the genetic testing told me

1:06:04.440 --> 1:06:07.240
<v Speaker 4>exactly what it was. More often than not, though, the

1:06:07.240 --> 1:06:11.040
<v Speaker 4>genetic testing finds something that couldn't be tested with the

1:06:11.080 --> 1:06:14.320
<v Speaker 4>regular newborn screen. The thing about the genetic testing is

1:06:14.440 --> 1:06:18.120
<v Speaker 4>every time you make a list of the genes that

1:06:18.160 --> 1:06:23.520
<v Speaker 4>you want to be screening for mutations or variations, it

1:06:23.520 --> 1:06:27.880
<v Speaker 4>doesn't cost anymore. It's just, you know, it's the same analysis.

1:06:27.920 --> 1:06:32.600
<v Speaker 4>Whereas with the regular newborn screening, every single new disease

1:06:32.680 --> 1:06:35.400
<v Speaker 4>that you're trying to screen for you have to make

1:06:35.440 --> 1:06:38.680
<v Speaker 4>a new test. It's an extra cost. The development of

1:06:38.680 --> 1:06:41.120
<v Speaker 4>that test is very very difficult, and essentially you have

1:06:41.160 --> 1:06:44.439
<v Speaker 4>to make the case that it's good for public health

1:06:44.480 --> 1:06:46.600
<v Speaker 4>to be screening for something that's one in a million, right.

1:06:46.680 --> 1:06:50.120
<v Speaker 2>Right, So it's using the same logic really as standard

1:06:50.120 --> 1:06:53.760
<v Speaker 2>newborn screening, but you're leveraging this genomic sequencing technology, so

1:06:53.800 --> 1:06:57.200
<v Speaker 2>you're able to cast an even wider net than standard

1:06:57.200 --> 1:06:58.200
<v Speaker 2>newborn approaches.

1:06:58.400 --> 1:07:04.000
<v Speaker 3>Screening approaches, a much wider net from like a parent's perspective,

1:07:04.080 --> 1:07:06.680
<v Speaker 3>especially maybe someone who doesn't really have a medical background.

1:07:07.200 --> 1:07:09.440
<v Speaker 3>How would this process of maybe being involved in the

1:07:09.480 --> 1:07:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Guardian study or doing like a genomic screening on your newborn,

1:07:13.480 --> 1:07:16.600
<v Speaker 3>how would that be different from a parent's perspective than

1:07:16.680 --> 1:07:17.680
<v Speaker 3>just standard screening.

1:07:18.800 --> 1:07:23.640
<v Speaker 4>So again, a lot of the same follow up sort

1:07:23.640 --> 1:07:26.360
<v Speaker 4>of happens. You get called back. You might have something

1:07:26.880 --> 1:07:30.800
<v Speaker 4>we need to bring you back to see. We have

1:07:31.040 --> 1:07:34.360
<v Speaker 4>a different type of a test to check to see

1:07:35.200 --> 1:07:38.760
<v Speaker 4>if indeed this is a problem. Now, sometimes that different

1:07:38.760 --> 1:07:40.800
<v Speaker 4>type of test might be a genetic test, right, because

1:07:40.800 --> 1:07:42.960
<v Speaker 4>it's a different type of a test that says that, yes,

1:07:43.040 --> 1:07:46.240
<v Speaker 4>this biochemical problem was there. Usually though it's a different

1:07:46.360 --> 1:07:49.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, So for an immune deficiency, you know, we

1:07:49.320 --> 1:07:51.880
<v Speaker 4>would look for cells in the immune system to see

1:07:51.880 --> 1:07:52.640
<v Speaker 4>if they're missing.

1:07:52.520 --> 1:07:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Or they're not missing or something like that.

1:07:54.240 --> 1:07:56.200
<v Speaker 4>Right, so you you'd have to come in for another

1:07:56.280 --> 1:08:01.560
<v Speaker 4>test and during that time, you know, that is fraught

1:08:01.640 --> 1:08:04.200
<v Speaker 4>because we're not saying definitively that we know that there's

1:08:04.240 --> 1:08:06.880
<v Speaker 4>an issue, but this is the way that we're going

1:08:06.920 --> 1:08:08.720
<v Speaker 4>to find out is with this extra task and that

1:08:08.760 --> 1:08:11.960
<v Speaker 4>test might take DAR two or three you know, to

1:08:12.000 --> 1:08:14.920
<v Speaker 4>come back, and that of course is you know, can

1:08:14.960 --> 1:08:18.200
<v Speaker 4>be trying. Although you know that's not terribly different than

1:08:18.200 --> 1:08:21.839
<v Speaker 4>what has already done with the regular newborn screen.

1:08:22.560 --> 1:08:25.080
<v Speaker 2>And I'm wondering if there are any stories that you

1:08:25.160 --> 1:08:29.040
<v Speaker 2>can share of children whose genetic condition was detected using

1:08:29.160 --> 1:08:34.120
<v Speaker 2>this genomic screening in Guardian after being missed by traditional methods.

1:08:34.760 --> 1:08:38.360
<v Speaker 4>There actually are several stories with a similar theme, which

1:08:38.400 --> 1:08:41.800
<v Speaker 4>is again my specialty is in genetic diseases of the

1:08:41.800 --> 1:08:47.719
<v Speaker 4>immune system, and so we have a huge number, huge

1:08:47.800 --> 1:08:52.679
<v Speaker 4>number of these that we've already put into Guardian, and

1:08:52.840 --> 1:08:56.759
<v Speaker 4>many more which we are hoping to incorporate into Guardian,

1:08:57.360 --> 1:08:59.720
<v Speaker 4>just because we know that many of these are actionable

1:09:00.120 --> 1:09:01.559
<v Speaker 4>right in some way or the other.

1:09:02.200 --> 1:09:06.639
<v Speaker 5>There's one of the cases that we saw was of

1:09:07.160 --> 1:09:10.920
<v Speaker 5>a boy who had a genetic mutation that was associated

1:09:11.600 --> 1:09:14.160
<v Speaker 5>with severe combined immune deficiency.

1:09:14.280 --> 1:09:17.280
<v Speaker 4>The boy in the bubble, okay, and the boy in

1:09:17.320 --> 1:09:20.840
<v Speaker 4>the bubble couldn't get that bow Mara transplant to work

1:09:22.439 --> 1:09:25.920
<v Speaker 4>because he was already sick and older. But we do

1:09:26.040 --> 1:09:31.040
<v Speaker 4>know ninety plus percent of babies who are transplanted before

1:09:31.040 --> 1:09:34.519
<v Speaker 4>they get sick, usually before three months of age, and

1:09:35.040 --> 1:09:43.400
<v Speaker 4>will have lifetime survival cure, right, which is incredible. Otherwise

1:09:43.479 --> 1:09:45.880
<v Speaker 4>there are life threading infections which can happen. Once those

1:09:45.920 --> 1:09:50.320
<v Speaker 4>infections happen, the survival drops substantially. We are able to

1:09:50.360 --> 1:09:53.519
<v Speaker 4>keep people alive much more than the boy in the

1:09:53.520 --> 1:09:57.000
<v Speaker 4>bubble was found without having to keep them in a bubble,

1:09:57.200 --> 1:10:00.439
<v Speaker 4>but it's still they must get a transplant to be

1:10:00.600 --> 1:10:03.600
<v Speaker 4>to be cured. In this particular case, the variant that

1:10:03.640 --> 1:10:07.360
<v Speaker 4>we found had been seen in two other people, both

1:10:07.439 --> 1:10:10.880
<v Speaker 4>of whom did not have early on set infections. It

1:10:10.960 --> 1:10:16.519
<v Speaker 4>happened later and and so not surprisingly, we do have

1:10:16.560 --> 1:10:20.000
<v Speaker 4>a screen in that chemical screen, there's there's a screen

1:10:20.160 --> 1:10:25.559
<v Speaker 4>for severe one version of severe combined immune deficiency that

1:10:25.760 --> 1:10:28.960
<v Speaker 4>did not pick up did not pick up this problem

1:10:29.520 --> 1:10:33.120
<v Speaker 4>in this in this boy, and so you know, there

1:10:33.200 --> 1:10:36.439
<v Speaker 4>the parents were We're told this is the story and

1:10:36.479 --> 1:10:38.760
<v Speaker 4>the mom said, let's fix this as soon as we

1:10:38.840 --> 1:10:44.840
<v Speaker 4>possibly can. The sibling was a matched donor, went to

1:10:44.920 --> 1:10:48.639
<v Speaker 4>school the day after whatever after being a phone marrow donor.

1:10:48.680 --> 1:10:51.360
<v Speaker 4>And what did you do? Uh last week? Oh, I

1:10:51.439 --> 1:10:54.920
<v Speaker 4>saved my brother's wife and and and that was what

1:10:55.080 --> 1:11:00.320
<v Speaker 4>you know, the young sibling said about this this child, Uh, yeah,

1:11:00.320 --> 1:11:00.920
<v Speaker 4>he's doing great.

1:11:01.120 --> 1:11:02.880
<v Speaker 3>What a doing right now?

1:11:03.680 --> 1:11:04.639
<v Speaker 2>He'll never know that.

1:11:04.600 --> 1:11:06.639
<v Speaker 4>He was sick. But the parents, you know, are quite

1:11:06.640 --> 1:11:09.679
<v Speaker 4>thrilled that this was found.

1:11:10.040 --> 1:11:11.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

1:11:11.520 --> 1:11:14.839
<v Speaker 3>How does it feel for you, you know, as a researcher,

1:11:14.880 --> 1:11:18.000
<v Speaker 3>as a clinician, to be involved in this kind of work.

1:11:19.520 --> 1:11:22.200
<v Speaker 4>I'm trying to think of the best way to put it.

1:11:23.200 --> 1:11:26.640
<v Speaker 4>I can't get enough of it. We need to be

1:11:26.760 --> 1:11:30.320
<v Speaker 4>moving at light speed here because there literally are kids

1:11:30.560 --> 1:11:34.320
<v Speaker 4>who are being born where there is something to actually capture,

1:11:34.800 --> 1:11:38.599
<v Speaker 4>right and to do something about, not even as you know, Oh,

1:11:38.680 --> 1:11:40.960
<v Speaker 4>maybe this may be that there are people with concrete things.

1:11:40.960 --> 1:11:43.960
<v Speaker 4>There are people who are in the hospital now where

1:11:44.000 --> 1:11:46.640
<v Speaker 4>if we had screened them, they wouldn't be in the

1:11:46.640 --> 1:11:49.960
<v Speaker 4>hospital now, right. I just feel an urgency, I guess,

1:11:50.040 --> 1:11:51.920
<v Speaker 4>is the best way to put it. To try to

1:11:51.960 --> 1:11:56.640
<v Speaker 4>get this implemented as widely as possible, and to be

1:11:56.760 --> 1:12:02.439
<v Speaker 4>doing all that work to fill up the things that

1:12:03.200 --> 1:12:06.439
<v Speaker 4>can be treated and have those treatments ready right, to

1:12:06.479 --> 1:12:08.960
<v Speaker 4>fill up the list, you know, to to say these

1:12:09.000 --> 1:12:11.880
<v Speaker 4>are things that we can do. And then also where

1:12:12.320 --> 1:12:15.360
<v Speaker 4>it is more ethically difficult, that we start confronting those

1:12:15.439 --> 1:12:19.719
<v Speaker 4>questions in advance so that we are we are able

1:12:19.800 --> 1:12:24.240
<v Speaker 4>to move forward with a regular standard of care for

1:12:24.240 --> 1:12:26.920
<v Speaker 4>for these types of things. There's a whole separate question

1:12:27.800 --> 1:12:30.360
<v Speaker 4>about if you know about a syndrome that can't be

1:12:30.400 --> 1:12:33.439
<v Speaker 4>treated right right, right right, That's a.

1:12:33.400 --> 1:12:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Separate, separate question, a separate question.

1:12:36.160 --> 1:12:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, but a question that might make it a little

1:12:39.080 --> 1:12:42.679
<v Speaker 4>bit tricky as well. Are there somewhere we do want

1:12:42.680 --> 1:12:46.120
<v Speaker 4>to know so that someone's working on it to find

1:12:46.160 --> 1:12:50.519
<v Speaker 4>that right And and there may be ways of doing

1:12:50.520 --> 1:12:54.519
<v Speaker 4>that type of a thing where you anonymize the medical

1:12:54.560 --> 1:12:58.320
<v Speaker 4>records and the and the sequences. And that allows researchers

1:12:58.320 --> 1:13:02.320
<v Speaker 4>like me to go into databases like that and say, okay, listen,

1:13:02.320 --> 1:13:06.839
<v Speaker 4>I'm studying this particular gene or this particular variant. What

1:13:06.840 --> 1:13:12.320
<v Speaker 4>what has this resulted in your in your database? And

1:13:12.360 --> 1:13:16.760
<v Speaker 4>then now I could start working on you know, understand

1:13:16.840 --> 1:13:20.920
<v Speaker 4>why that gene causes a problem, right, and and actually

1:13:20.960 --> 1:13:24.360
<v Speaker 4>then start working on a cure. So we need to

1:13:24.400 --> 1:13:26.400
<v Speaker 4>have systems ready to do things like that.

1:13:26.760 --> 1:13:28.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's I mean, and it sounds like there are

1:13:29.000 --> 1:13:33.840
<v Speaker 2>so many different avenues for the wider application of the

1:13:33.880 --> 1:13:37.800
<v Speaker 2>type of screening that Guardian is doing, and then these

1:13:37.880 --> 1:13:40.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, ethical considerations as you discussed, and then just

1:13:40.720 --> 1:13:43.639
<v Speaker 2>research opportunities. I mean, there is It seems like we're

1:13:43.680 --> 1:13:47.559
<v Speaker 2>really on or maybe even over the threshold of where

1:13:47.680 --> 1:13:52.479
<v Speaker 2>genome sequencing will provide so many answers and also invite

1:13:52.520 --> 1:13:56.960
<v Speaker 2>more questions. And this was just such a fascinating conversation

1:13:57.240 --> 1:14:00.040
<v Speaker 2>and we really just can't thank you enough for taking

1:14:00.080 --> 1:14:01.360
<v Speaker 2>the time to chat with us today.

1:14:01.560 --> 1:14:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thank you so much.

1:14:03.280 --> 1:14:04.040
<v Speaker 4>It was a pleasure.

1:14:22.360 --> 1:14:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you again so much to doctor Milner for taking

1:14:25.040 --> 1:14:26.680
<v Speaker 2>the time to chat with us about the future of

1:14:26.680 --> 1:14:31.400
<v Speaker 2>newborn screening and the Guardian project. I just I love it. Yeah,

1:14:31.520 --> 1:14:33.719
<v Speaker 2>so again, if you would like to know more about

1:14:33.800 --> 1:14:37.200
<v Speaker 2>whole genome sequencing and Guardian, there's a great episode of

1:14:37.240 --> 1:14:40.639
<v Speaker 2>Advances and Care and also all of the episodes are amazing,

1:14:41.000 --> 1:14:44.280
<v Speaker 2>but this episode is called Newborn gene Sequencing, expanding early

1:14:44.320 --> 1:14:47.320
<v Speaker 2>detection of treatable diseases again. It was released in March.

1:14:47.400 --> 1:14:50.679
<v Speaker 2>It has some great information about about what this work

1:14:50.720 --> 1:14:53.599
<v Speaker 2>has accomplished so far, which is a lot.

1:14:53.720 --> 1:14:54.240
<v Speaker 3>I love it.

1:14:54.320 --> 1:14:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I love it. Yeah.

1:14:57.240 --> 1:14:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, if you also just want to know more by reading,

1:15:00.000 --> 1:15:02.360
<v Speaker 3>we have a list of sources for Youah.

1:15:02.640 --> 1:15:06.480
<v Speaker 2>We do, we do. I have a bunch of different papers.

1:15:06.760 --> 1:15:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna shout out three here. One is by Holtzmid

1:15:11.200 --> 1:15:14.439
<v Speaker 2>and Watson from nineteen ninety seven called Effective Genetic Testing

1:15:14.479 --> 1:15:17.160
<v Speaker 2>in the United States, Final Report of the Task Force

1:15:17.280 --> 1:15:19.240
<v Speaker 2>on Genetic Testing, and this was where I got a

1:15:19.280 --> 1:15:23.640
<v Speaker 2>lot of the history of newborn screening. And by slusec

1:15:23.760 --> 1:15:27.040
<v Speaker 2>at All from twenty twenty two, Psychosocial Issues related to

1:15:27.080 --> 1:15:30.679
<v Speaker 2>Newborn Screening, A Systematic Review and Synthesis, and then finally

1:15:30.920 --> 1:15:34.920
<v Speaker 2>by mccandalis and Wright twenty nineteen, Mandatory Newborn Screening in

1:15:34.960 --> 1:15:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the US, History, Current Status, and Existential Challenges.

1:15:40.040 --> 1:15:43.200
<v Speaker 3>Aaron I also read that Psychosocial Issues one. I really

1:15:43.240 --> 1:15:46.640
<v Speaker 3>liked that paper. Yeah yeah, I didn't talk about it

1:15:46.640 --> 1:15:48.080
<v Speaker 3>because I felt like you did such a good job.

1:15:48.080 --> 1:15:50.760
<v Speaker 3>But that's on my list too. I also have a

1:15:50.800 --> 1:15:54.759
<v Speaker 3>bunch of papers just about, like you know, newborn screen

1:15:54.800 --> 1:15:57.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean. One was called an overview of newborn screening.

1:15:57.080 --> 1:15:59.400
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't get more straightforward than that. That was from

1:15:59.439 --> 1:16:03.880
<v Speaker 3>twenty ten by Levy. There was also newborn screening from

1:16:03.920 --> 1:16:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Clinics and parent Aetology twenty fifteen. I have a few though,

1:16:07.200 --> 1:16:11.200
<v Speaker 3>like newer ones about the whole genome sequencing aspect of it.

1:16:11.439 --> 1:16:13.280
<v Speaker 3>And then I also have a link to if you

1:16:13.320 --> 1:16:15.559
<v Speaker 3>want to know you like, in your state, what are

1:16:15.560 --> 1:16:18.360
<v Speaker 3>they testing for? You can go to babies First test

1:16:18.360 --> 1:16:21.040
<v Speaker 3>dot org and they have a list of state by state.

1:16:21.120 --> 1:16:22.639
<v Speaker 3>You can look up your state, figure out what they're

1:16:22.640 --> 1:16:24.519
<v Speaker 3>testing for and all of that kind of stuff, which

1:16:24.560 --> 1:16:28.519
<v Speaker 3>is great, and there is lots more there on our

1:16:28.520 --> 1:16:30.360
<v Speaker 3>website This podcast will Kill You dot com under the

1:16:30.520 --> 1:16:32.400
<v Speaker 3>episodes tab check it out.

1:16:33.040 --> 1:16:36.000
<v Speaker 2>A big thank you again to the guests that were

1:16:36.080 --> 1:16:39.519
<v Speaker 2>featured in this episode. Jessica your first hand account, thank you,

1:16:39.600 --> 1:16:42.400
<v Speaker 2>thank you, and doctor Milner again, thanks for taking the

1:16:42.439 --> 1:16:47.640
<v Speaker 2>time and providing such important context for this really amazing technology.

1:16:47.840 --> 1:16:50.759
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, thank you, thank you so much. Thank you also

1:16:50.760 --> 1:16:53.519
<v Speaker 3>to Bloodmobile for providing the music for this episode and

1:16:53.640 --> 1:16:56.000
<v Speaker 3>every single one of our episodes.

1:16:56.040 --> 1:17:02.439
<v Speaker 2>Seriously, seriously, seriously, thanks Dan. Thank you also to Tom

1:17:02.520 --> 1:17:05.920
<v Speaker 2>and Leanna and Brent and Pete and Jess and Mike

1:17:05.960 --> 1:17:08.639
<v Speaker 2>and everyone who is involved at exactly right and helping

1:17:08.800 --> 1:17:10.240
<v Speaker 2>make this podcast happen.

1:17:10.720 --> 1:17:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Thank you. We couldn't do it without you quite literally

1:17:13.720 --> 1:17:17.920
<v Speaker 3>literally thank you. I mean to you at all. If

1:17:17.920 --> 1:17:20.280
<v Speaker 3>you're listening still, I can't believe that you listened all

1:17:20.280 --> 1:17:23.080
<v Speaker 3>the way to the end. That's wild. I thank you

1:17:23.120 --> 1:17:28.120
<v Speaker 3>for doing that. And if you're watching, thank you for

1:17:28.240 --> 1:17:28.559
<v Speaker 3>doing more.

1:17:28.640 --> 1:17:32.439
<v Speaker 2>Van A White hands tell this is why I don't

1:17:32.479 --> 1:17:33.439
<v Speaker 2>have a job as Vana White.

1:17:33.439 --> 1:17:35.040
<v Speaker 3>But thank you so much for listening and watching, and

1:17:35.240 --> 1:17:38.320
<v Speaker 3>especially to our patrons for your support. It really doesn't

1:17:38.320 --> 1:17:40.360
<v Speaker 3>mean to watch us, even though I am being ridiculous

1:17:40.439 --> 1:17:41.120
<v Speaker 3>right now. I love it.

1:17:41.160 --> 1:17:42.200
<v Speaker 2>I love it well.

1:17:43.120 --> 1:18:00.600
<v Speaker 6>Until next time, wash your hands, you filthy animals.

1:18:02.640 --> 1:18:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Um um