WEBVTT - From the Vault: Hyper-Real Religion

0:00:05.680 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Welcome to Stuff to blow your mind. My name

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:10.639
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and it's Saturday.

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Time for a Vault episode. Going into the Vault, this

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>time to explore the world of religion. This episode originally

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>aired March twenty nine, and it is about the concept

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:24.159
<v Speaker 1>of hyper real religion. Yeah, this is a This is

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating topic. It gets into areas such as the

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>flying spaghetti monster, the Jedi religion, Jedi religion or sad

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.600
<v Speaker 1>devotion to that ancient religion is no match for the

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>power of this space station. Is that body says? It

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 1>sounds right? Yeah. Basically, the idea of modern humans picking

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.239
<v Speaker 1>and choosing their religions, not only from the religions of

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>the ancient world or or even new religions that have

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:52.199
<v Speaker 1>popped up in recent decades, but just going straight to

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the fictional world, going to fictional religions that that that

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>they know are fictional, and finding some sort of inspiration

0:01:01.800 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>or worldview in them, something they can latch onto. Yeah,

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>this is one of my favorites we've done. So we

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>hope you out there enjoyed this episode on hyper real religion.

0:01:14.640 --> 0:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind from how Stuff

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Works dot com. Hey, you're welcome to Stuff to Blow

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.240
<v Speaker 1>your Mind. My name is Robert Lamb, and I'm Joe McCormick,

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and I want to share with you a modern legend.

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>You've probably heard this one before. It it's one of

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the most persistent rumors of the modern age, the l

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Ron Hubbard Robert A. Heinland bar bet. You know this one, Robert, Yes, Now,

0:01:44.959 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I looked into it and I couldn't find any convincing

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>evidence that this bet ever actually took place, so it's

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:52.760
<v Speaker 1>probably just more of a legend than than a real

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>historical account. But the legend I always heard goes something

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>like this, You've got l Ron Hubbard and Robert A.

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Island to science fiction authors of the twentieth century, and

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>they're sitting in a bar. They don't walk into a bar,

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess. I suppose they have to walk into the

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>bar first if they don't take coverboards, or maybe they

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>power arm or stamp into the bar. But anyway, they're

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>in the bar. They're down in some Bruskis and this

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>is probably some time, I would guess in the late

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>nineteen forties, and they are discussing the best way to

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>make a ton of money, because let's face it, writing

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.120
<v Speaker 1>science fiction doesn't always pay amazingly right, and at this

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>point in both of them in his career, they are

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>sci fi writers. Yeah, very much. Uh So Hubbard has

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.519
<v Speaker 1>an opinion. L Ron Hubbard says, you know, the best

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>strategy is really to take advantage of the common people's

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>desire for transcendence and salvation. So he says, quote religion,

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that's where the real money is. And Hubbard boasts that

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>he could invent a religion and make millions. Of course,

0:02:53.280 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Hinland box at this, that sounds kind of extravagant. So

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.239
<v Speaker 1>they make a bet can he do it? Can he

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>not do it? And by the end of the century

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>there are at least tens of thousands of Scientologists in

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the world. The Church of Scientology claims millions of of

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>adherents those numbers. Who knows what the real numbers are,

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>but it seems like at least tens of thousands. And

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Scientology is the sci fi religion founded on the teachings

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of l. Ron Hubbard. Yeah, and it has official religious

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>status in numerous countries. So even though this bat probably

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>did not take place, like it's one of those things

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 1>where yes, it could have if you really crunch it,

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 1>but there's an absolutely no documentation. Yeah, there's no good

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>evidence for it. And and in fact, we we we

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>probably really should emphasize that because apparently there in the

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>past there have been some legal actions against people who

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>promulgate this as if it were true. So probably not true.

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>But why is the rumors so persistent? Everybody's heard this, right,

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I bet you sitting at home or sitting standing running

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>wherever you are listening, I bet you've heard some version

0:03:56.040 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of this before, right, So you could chalk it up

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to people's just gen real distaste for scientology. There there's

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of antipathy out there, right, there's no sortage

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>of scientology criticism, uh and and lampooning on the internet

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>these days. Right. But you could also say that this

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of story sticks in the mind and merits repeating

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>simply because of the sheer audacity of it. It offends

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 1>our most basic sensibilities about what religion is and is

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be creating a religion out of thin air,

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>just on a whim, coming up with a new religion.

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Something about it seems fiercely wrong, just nakedly perverse. Well, yeah,

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I think I think so. I think yeah. On one hand,

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it does seem like sheer audacity that somebody would just

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>create it wholesale. Though, of course, as we'll discuss to

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a large extent, nobody creates a religion wholesale. You're building

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>it out of existing parts. It's all kind of like

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>that first Iron Man suit that that that Stark builds

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in the first Iron Man filming, just builds out of

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>all the stuff that's laying around and then he uses

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that to his advantage. And that's I think. I would

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 1>argue that that's what you see in most of these cases,

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>though the particular suit of religious armor changes depending on

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the quality of the ingredients. Yeah. And I would say

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>this relates back to something we talked about in our

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Techno Religion for the Masses episodes, which is that I

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:22.479
<v Speaker 1>personally think that a lot of the power we attribute

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to religion lies in our chronological alienation from its origins

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and from its contents. I mean it comes down to

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of like, what does someone want from a religion?

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:34.599
<v Speaker 1>What does one want from a god? They want something

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>greater than themselves, something that stands outside of themselves. What

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>better way than to have something that stands outside of

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>not only your lifespan, but even your generation, outside of

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>your your your era, even you know it's calling to

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you from a distant place slash time. Some of the

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 1>power comes from the mystery of its separation. That's sort

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of what holiness is. It's way less impressive if it

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>seems to spring from the very ground we walk on

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>from day to day. And and yet all religions start somewhere.

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>No religion can have always been ancient, because every religion

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that exists today, even the one you believe in, you

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>would you would have to admit, has an origin. It

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.200
<v Speaker 1>started at some point people started believing in this thing. Uh.

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Though most are probably not the result of a single

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>moment of creativity, whether inspired by gambling and Brusque's and whatnot.

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're probably from gradual evolutions of beliefs, right, Yeah,

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:36.600
<v Speaker 1>new ideas that suddenly get picked up by, in many

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>cases a charismatic individual who is bringing this to people

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>or you know, it ties into UH two shifts and

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>changes in the structure of society and UH and then

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in our sort of and then when you layer over

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:53.839
<v Speaker 1>the mythic UH materials as well you're gonna throw in

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>some miracles. You're gonna throw in some some fantastic occurrences,

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>golden books falling out of the sky or emerging from

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the ground. Right, Yeah, But this is what we want

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.320
<v Speaker 1>to talk about today, right, So it's the beginnings of

0:07:05.360 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>religious movements, and especially on those that draw from sources

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>other than direct spiritual revelation. So you might have a

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>movement that starts with somebody thinks they've received a message

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>from God or from other worldly powers, from a supernatural agent,

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and then they deliver that message and found a new religion.

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>You've got those, But we want to talk about what

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 1>happens when something that everybody recognizes as a fiction or

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:35.040
<v Speaker 1>an in joke or a prank or a fan club

0:07:35.560 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 1>takes on the mantle of religion and genuine sanctity. Yeah,

0:07:40.120 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>when does it become an actual religion? And I know

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that some of you might be thinking, well, what does

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>any of this have to do with science and the

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>flag of science that is up there over stuff to

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>buy your mind? Well a lot, actually, because because most

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>of what we're gonna talk about is occurring, if not

0:07:56.840 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>right now, then at least in the scientific age. And

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I believe that that that the the age of science,

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>this age of a reason has a lot to do

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 1>with the emergence of hyper real religions. Absolutely, and I

0:08:10.200 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 1>think we would be remiss if we did not begin

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>this discussion with one of the most popular jokes turned

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>religions of our modern age, and that is postafarianism. Yes,

0:08:22.280 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and and I do want to just throw in real

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>quick this. Of course, the the word postafarianism is is

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:32.199
<v Speaker 1>a play on Rastafarianism, and I do I do want

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to just point out that we are aware that adherents

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:40.959
<v Speaker 1>of the Rastafari faith uh often do not like the

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>term Rastafarianism. So it's kind of like there's a little

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 1>bit of of insult to Rastafari adherents built into postafarianism.

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Well maybe for that, for that reason, we could avoid

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>it and just say flying spaghetti monsterism. Well we I

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>think we can refer to either just what I just

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:00.960
<v Speaker 1>thought it was important to it ignore knowlledge that yes,

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>uh uh, there's I don't think it was intentional, but

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>they're the postaparianism could be deemed offensive by some out there, certainly,

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 1>And if you're already lost, we need to back up

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>because In order for this to make sense, we've got

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to start with a brief bit of historical context, especially

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:20.040
<v Speaker 1>for those of you who live outside the United States

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and aren't familiar with the school creationism controversy that's gone

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:27.160
<v Speaker 1>on in the United States, I'd say mostly in the

0:09:27.200 --> 0:09:30.960
<v Speaker 1>last twenty years or so many twenty years. So in

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States, we have a constitutional doctrine of separation

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of church and State, and this is traditionally interpreted to

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>say that private citizens can believe whatever they want. You have,

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever religious beliefs you want. An agents of the government

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.720
<v Speaker 1>can't interfere with that, but also agents of the government

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 1>can't use their civil authority to punish or promote particular

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 1>religious ideas. Right. And for the most part, that works

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty well, except where there's this crossover where on one

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>side the science book is saying, uh, there's this thing

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>called evolution, there were these things called dinosaurs. This is

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the basic timeline as a science understands it versus more

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>fundamentalist and literal interpretations of biblical tradition. Right. And this

0:10:16.559 --> 0:10:19.199
<v Speaker 1>is the most common example in the United States of

0:10:19.280 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a conflict between between separate between the sort of individual

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>beliefs of people who work for the government, and the

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the idea that civil servants of the government shouldn't be

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 1>using their power to inflict their religious beliefs on other people.

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, a large percent of Americans are what we

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>would call Young Earth creationists. And what does that mean. Well,

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a gallop pole released in June found that forty two

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>percent of Americans said they agreed with the following statement

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>quote God created human beings pretty much in their present

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>form at one time within the last ten thousand years

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>or so, which is of course complete nonsense, right, And

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:03.960
<v Speaker 1>if you're listening to this podcast, I'm just gonna go

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and assume you do not believe this. Yeah, as you

0:11:06.960 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>could guess, this entails a rejection of biological evolution and

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:15.000
<v Speaker 1>common descent usually, uh, pretty much all of geology, radiometric dating,

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:19.599
<v Speaker 1>all mainstream scientific thinking about fossils and paleontology, probably a

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of astronomy and astrophysics too, for example, the creation

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Solar System and the formation of galaxies, and

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>probably plenty of other things. You could just generally say

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>that Young Earth creationism is a belief that encounters generalized

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 1>to difficulty when held alongside a scientific picture of our world. Yeah,

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it's the the rejection of the best modern scientific understanding

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of how the world works, and the acceptance of and

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>the reliance upon a sort of modern untangling of ancient

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Babylonian right. So, but the problem is plenty of civil

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>servants in the United States, especially people who might be

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>teachers in public schools or a proving curricular or textbook

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>selection for public schools, hold these beliefs themselves, and they

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>sometimes try to promote these beliefs and their consequences in

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>what are supposed to be secular, religiously neutral classes for

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>all students. And this can take a lot of forms.

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.000
<v Speaker 1>At one extreme, it might have biology classes teaching about

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>the Garden of Eden and Noah's Ark as an alternative

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary theory. At the other end, it might be less

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>overt than that, and it might just insist on biology

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 1>classes including materials prepared by creationists that sort of cast vague,

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:38.600
<v Speaker 1>unfounded doubts on modern biology, or that uh teach children

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>scientifically false arguments against evolution, like you know, things you've

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>heard before, like there are no transitional fossils and stuff

0:12:45.880 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>like that. And obviously this has led to lots of

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>social conflict, big public debates and lots of court cases.

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>One example of such a court case occurs very close

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to home for us here in Cobb County, Georgia, which

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is includes northern suburbs of Atlanta. And on March twenty,

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand to the public school officials in Cobb County

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>approved a measure requiring biology textbooks to wear a sticker

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>on the inside cover that has the following statement. It says,

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of living living things. Uh And in two thousand five,

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>this was ruled unconstitutional by U. S District Judge Clarence Cooper,

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:27.440
<v Speaker 1>who said of this ruling quote, by denigrating evolution, the

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>school board appears to be endorsing the well known prevailing

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>alternative theory creationism or variations thereof, even though the sticker

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 1>does not specifically reference the alternative theories. Uh and this

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>gets us back to the monster in question, the spaghetti monster.

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Where where did this come from? Well? This originates with

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a protest, Yeah, a protest against the inclusion of statements

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>like the stickers like this in science textbooks. Like the

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>basic idea here is Hey, if this nonsense is going

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to be presented as an alter native to our science.

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>How about this nonsense? How about I just blatantly make

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>something up, just completely off the top of my head,

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>just the craziest thing you can imagine. Let's put that

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.160
<v Speaker 1>in there as well. Yeah, and this of course takes

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>this to Kansas. Yeah to two thousand five, when the

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Kansas State Board of Education had decided to allow intelligent

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>design the sort of a moniker of creationism, you might

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>call it, like a marketing term to make it seem

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>more scientific, like to add a lexicon of scientific vocabulary

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>to uh, to creationism. And they said that they wanted

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to introduce this into the curriculum as an as an

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>alternative to evolution, you know, teach both theories. So uh.

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Then twenty five year old physics graduate Bobby Henderson wrote

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 1>what is known as the Open Letter to the Kansas

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>School Board, published online in two thousand five, to present

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:58.040
<v Speaker 1>his vision for religious inclusivity in the science classroom. Robert,

0:14:58.080 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>would you like to read a select quote from the

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>le I shall quote. I am writing you with much concern,

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>after having read of your hearing, to decide whether the

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>alternative theory of intelligent design should be taught along with

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the theory of evolution. Let us remember that there are

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>multiple theories of intelligent design. I and many others around

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the world are of the strong belief that the universe

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>was created by a flying spaghetti monster. Right. So, throughout

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:28.240
<v Speaker 1>this letter, Henderson goes on to critique and satirize the

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>intelligent design arguments by showing how the claims of flying

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>spaghetti monsterism, though they might appear to conflict with scientists

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>around the world, don't actually because the flying spaghetti monster

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 1>reaches out with his newly appendages to tweak the results

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of experiments so that we will be tricked into believing

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>in an evolutionary model of the old Earth. Uh. And

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>he goes on also to insist that when flying spaghetti

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 1>monsterism is taught in science classrooms, the teacher must wear

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>full pirate regalia. Quote. The concise explanation for this is

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that he becomes angry if we don't. Yeah. So, and

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of course this leads to um wonderful depictions of the

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>flying spaghetti monster, yeah, of which you've all seen before, right,

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the meme very much. It started as a bit of satire,

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>a joke on this religious social movement that the author

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of this letter opposed, but it really took on a

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>life of its own. It became a meme, it became

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>picked up on the internet. So there's artwork, Like you said,

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>there's uh, it's a whole living library of self referential

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>humor based around this original idea of a flying spaghetti monster,

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>including actually becoming some form of church. Yeah. I mean

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to look at the evolution of the joke.

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean I'm often just taken by the visual depictions

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like those really pick up a lot

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of steam. And the spaghetti monster itself is funny looking.

0:16:55.480 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>It kind of looks like testicles, So it's it's it's

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>inherently goofy. It has meatballs, by the way, it's a

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a large pile of spaghetti flying through the sky

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>with eyes and meatballs generally too, and and and yeah,

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 1>to your point, like a lot of it's kind of

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a community assembled mythos as well, like everyone, all sorts

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>of little bits and pieces are thrown in kind of

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>willy nilly to create this overall faith. And it's one

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of those the theology is not all top down, sort

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:26.199
<v Speaker 1>of bottom up theology. Yeah, and it's it's one of

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:27.959
<v Speaker 1>those jokes that I think over the years, Like when

0:17:28.000 --> 0:17:29.879
<v Speaker 1>I first heard it, I was kind of like, didn't

0:17:29.880 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>get the joke, and then I got the joke, and

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, Okay, I get it. But then the joke,

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the joke just keeps going. People keep telling it

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to the point where it's not really that funny anymore.

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's kind of like having that that

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>friend in high school who loves Monty Python so much

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that they won't Yeah, they're just fit a reference or

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.919
<v Speaker 1>half a skit into every conversation. Like that's kind of

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>how I feel about Pastafari. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, I

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what you mean. And also I would say

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that in some cases it evolved from a specific satire

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of of teaching of Young Earth creationism in public schools

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>to become a more general critique of of religion across

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the board, which I think is not necessarily what the

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 1>author originally intended, right, But yeah, that's definitely becomes kind

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of a you know, an atheistic protest religion, um, and

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 1>it serves a useful purpose there, I think, you know it.

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>It's it. It continually argues, hey, um, why do we

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>believe that in the things we believe in. You know,

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>why is this valuable? And this isn't um and you know,

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 1>as a joke goes it is it has proven to

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>be effective, you know, in the way that jokes can

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>often tear down the most formidable walls in our society

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>but also piss people off royally. Now, I can take

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>the other side for a second and say that I

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>can understand why some religious people would be less than

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>impressed with this joke as it exists today, because, let's

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 1>be fair, in a lot of cases, it does seem

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to represent a just sort of generalized critique, and critique

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>might be a generous word of of religion without much

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>attempt to understand people's religions or doctrines and the values

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>they provide to the people that hold them. Yeah, it

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>is you can just look at as a kind of shallow,

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 1>outsider mockery. Yeah, and I and I definitely, you know,

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I can definitely relate to some of those feelings about it,

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, over the years, because at times I have

0:19:31.560 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>felt like, not only is it a joke that I

0:19:33.560 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe don't don't get or I don't find its funny,

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, I could also see where it's a little

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 1>a little offensive, you know, because you're it's kind of

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:44.159
<v Speaker 1>like you're taking just three minutes to throw up a

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>spaghetti monster image to rebuke a person's lifetime of faith,

0:19:49.520 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, to to rebuke their their their cultural heritage

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in many cases. But as we said, this is becoming

0:19:57.080 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a new heritage of its own. And I'm I'm curious

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>us to see what the Church of the Flying Spaghetti

0:20:02.760 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Monster looks like in twenty years. Yeah. I think for

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:10.159
<v Speaker 1>the most part, for most people, it's it's remains that

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>bumper sticker level of involvement. You know, it is just

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>something you throw up on social media or stick on

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the back of your car. Other people have taken it

0:20:17.080 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to two greater extremes, going in and trying to get

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>their official um you know state I D with a

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>colander on their head, which is of course one of

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the other articles of faith for the adherents, and UH

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and other folks have pushed for official religious status, which

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>is is really taking it to the next level, saying

0:20:36.760 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>not only is our joke religion jokey, but it is

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>actually a religion, or it is as real religion as

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.840
<v Speaker 1>your religion, and we want the government to recognize that fact,

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think there are some governments that have recognized it, right, Yeah,

0:20:50.560 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 1>at least the Netherlands and New Zealand to to some degree.

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>That the Netherlands where that was where we saw the

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>most recent headlines about it, and apparently they had to

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>they had to prove that it wasn't just a fad,

0:21:03.359 --> 0:21:05.399
<v Speaker 1>that it was an actual thing that people believed in

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:08.359
<v Speaker 1>and that they had like a marriage ritual, uh, that

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:10.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing, so that it was it's the kind

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>of thing that people are invested in enough that it is,

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:16.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, potentially a part of your life. Yeah, and

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>this leads us to the realization that a religion need

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>not be ancient in order to be followed. So I

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.199
<v Speaker 1>stand by what I said earlier about a lot of

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the aesthetic power of religion does seem to come from

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>its antiquity and its chronological alienation, the sort of alien

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>holiness of the distant past. But this doesn't mean you

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>can't create religions in the modern day that gain a following. Yeah.

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean we've already mentioned Rastafari, which is an abrahammock religion, uh,

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, certainly with a lot of elements that are

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:52.840
<v Speaker 1>based in deep history. But it also venerated uh then

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Emperor of Ethiopia highly Selassi, you know. And it's it's

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly a religion I would love to to look

0:22:00.359 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>at in greater depth at some point in the future.

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, you have a situation where it's it's in

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the past, it's it's taking place in the present. And

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, to have your Messiah live and and die

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>within the lifespan of the faith, uh and to see

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that sort of happen in in recent history, it's fascinating. Well,

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 1>how about how about Joseph Smith and the Latter day Saints.

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I mean there's another good one. Um, it's

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the origins date back around eighteen thirty. This is a

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>millennialist religion that preach the impending second Coming, continuing revelations

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and uh uh an identity and values that I guess

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you'd say we're more grounded in the temporary setting. So

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's America. It's there's a modern cosmology, very

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>American religion. Yeah, very much. So. If if you don't

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>realize that this is the name, the official name of

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the Mormons, it's the Church of Jesus Christ of the

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Latter day Saints, and it too, of course, sprang up

0:22:54.760 --> 0:23:00.119
<v Speaker 1>around a single charismatic individual. And uh, it's it's it's

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:03.000
<v Speaker 1>actually a very interesting religion to look at in terms

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>of science as well, um, in the in since it's

0:23:06.160 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>since it is more of a more closely tied to

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:12.080
<v Speaker 1>our scientific age, you do find elements of it that

0:23:12.200 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>are that that conflict less with modern scientific cosmology, such

0:23:18.119 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>as the the idea that there are other planets and

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>that there is a potential for life on other worlds.

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, though even without the introduction of new holy

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>texts such as the Book of Mormon, you could point

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 1>out that lots of modern Christians have adapted their beliefs

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to include modern science. Oh certainly. I mean, when we

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the numbers from from that Gallup poll, only

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>forty two percent of Americans adhered to a literal understanding

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:47.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Bible, and so that's obviously not even maybe

0:23:47.920 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that's like half of Christians or something in America. Yeah, yeah,

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean you can certainly still be a Christian according

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to me anyway. I mean, this is going to very

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>depending on who's who's serving in your Christianity, but um, yeah,

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you can still be a Christian and not believe that

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>there was a literal garden of eaton. You can still

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>look at something like Noah's ark uh and and really

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>and and view it as mythology without and view it

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 1>as mythology, not in the as a dismissal, but understanding

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the power of myth and the necessity of myth uh

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 1>in our culture right. Well, or you might not even

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>put it in those terms. You might just say like, well,

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a story that's part of our received

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>tradition and I accepted as a story. But I but

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>also I wouldn't deny what the evidence in the lab says.

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean that would be foolish. So so one is

0:24:34.920 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>science and one is my religion, and you know that

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to smash them together in a particle

0:24:39.800 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>collider of my brain. Yeah, I mean you can. You can.

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:44.680
<v Speaker 1>You can look at it as literature. You can look

0:24:44.720 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 1>at it as mythology if you want. You can look

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>at it as some sort of a literal historical document.

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:54.359
<v Speaker 1>But to do so is to throw out our modern

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:56.920
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the world. Yeah, so how about the other

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>uh recently created religion that we open with talking about scientology,

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Like we said, the bar Bet story probably isn't true,

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>but scientology certainly is a religion explicitly created in the

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:14.160
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century. That's right, nineteen four UM contemporary individual focused

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>movement elements of science fiction, New age philosophy, and the

0:25:18.040 --> 0:25:23.439
<v Speaker 1>psycho analysis, though it also has historically been anti psychiatry.

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 1>UM and Uh. I think it's sort of almost uh

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>positions itself as an alternative to psychiatry. Yes, yeah, I

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>think very much so, um and one of them. We're

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:35.959
<v Speaker 1>not going to go in deep into all the mysteries

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of scientology here, but it essentially says that we're all

0:25:39.720 --> 0:25:42.919
<v Speaker 1>alien souls called Theton's that bounce around from life to life.

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:45.960
<v Speaker 1>One attempts to free oneself from this cycle and train

0:25:46.040 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>their true self. So it's kind of like space Buddhism,

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>which you know, I with without getting into the other details,

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I could get behind the idea of some space Buddhism.

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I could see the appeal in the abstract at least, though,

0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>as you note, it is a pretty divisive religion. Everybody's

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:02.479
<v Speaker 1>got an opinion on it. Yeah, it's hard to find

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and I'm I'm one of those people that I would

0:26:05.040 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 1>love to see more. Just like objective down the middle

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.680
<v Speaker 1>coverage of scientology. But for the most part it's either

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly, just researching online you're gonna find one

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 1>voice or the other in very drastically different positions on

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the matter. Now, any of the religions that we've mentioned

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>so far, you can definitely go at them and point

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.440
<v Speaker 1>out at least little bits and pieces that don't match

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 1>up with our scientific understanding of reality. You can say, hey,

0:26:30.800 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>bees didn't have four legs. As we've mentioned in previous episodes,

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>there were no New World horses prior to UH, to

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the colonial presence UH in North America. You hold on,

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>how is that relevant? Um? Some criticize, you know, the

0:26:48.280 --> 0:26:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Book of Mormon and point to UH passages about horses

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and and use this as a, you know, a sort

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of rallying point for Oh, you're totally full of it,

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>because this thing doesn't match up with with real life. Likewise,

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you can say, oh, there're no demonic space aliens, there

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 1>no there was no Zen, New etcetera. But as we're

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:08.239
<v Speaker 1>about to discuss, there are religions or hyper religions as

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:12.719
<v Speaker 1>they're they're sometimes called, in which there is definite fiction

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>going on, like the whole bedrock for the faith is

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>fiction where not everybody agrees that fiction nobody and the

0:27:19.800 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>people on the inside. Yeah, So it's not a situation

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 1>where someone is having to say, well, you know, this

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:28.159
<v Speaker 1>one little detail about horses or bees or what have you,

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:30.479
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't match up, because X, Y and Z they're saying, oh, no,

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>I fully agree with you. This is all fiction. But

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the thing that comes out of that fiction is real.

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about religions that draw inspiration from fictional narratives

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that don't claim to adhere to reality at all. And

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 1>here we're going to get into a little bit of

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the work of a sort of cultural critic and sociologist

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 1>named Adam Possum I and possum Eze got a it's

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.359
<v Speaker 1>got a book that came out in two thousand five

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>called Religion and Popular Culture a hyper real Testament like

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that title, uh. And in this book he he builds

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>on some postmodern social theory. Now, don't worry, we're not

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>going to get too into the weeds of social theory

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and post modern criticism. But basically here's how it goes.

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>It says the twentieth century represents a turn from traditional

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>cultural structures to individualized consumer experiences driven by capitalism. So

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>just think about that for a second. Oh, and he says,

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of course this extends to religion. And so if you

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>think about that, it's sort of saying that instead of

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>having a structure like a community accountable to one another

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that gathers to pray and worship, in the received antique tradition,

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 1>people consume their religion individually in the same way they

0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:01.479
<v Speaker 1>do their shopping and their media perience is religion becomes

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a co modified, consume arized thing that you you can

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>pick off the shelf and take home with you. And

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure I totally agree, but I think there

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>is at least a grain of truth to this. Uh.

0:29:14.000 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Simply by looking at the esthetics of religion in America today,

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you could point to, for example, I think the rise

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of televangelism, TV ministry networks. You can change the channel

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>at home religious participation on your own time with the

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>TV program. You could also look at megachurches, which I

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>think are a really interesting cultural phenomenon. I have huge congregations,

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>and what's the point of the huge congregation. Well, if

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to look at it from this critical point

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of view, you could say, really a huge congregation like

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>that provides each individual church go or a kind of

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Walmart level of anonymity. You don't have to have a

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:55.200
<v Speaker 1>personal relationship. You just go and sort of consume as

0:29:55.240 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>another face in the crowd as on your own time,

0:29:58.080 --> 0:30:01.400
<v Speaker 1>on your own terms. Now off or is that also

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 1>can be The very thing about a mega church that

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:05.240
<v Speaker 1>would turn someone away is that they want to go

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.520
<v Speaker 1>into a church. They want to be recognized, they want

0:30:07.520 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>to be an individual, the want of a community exactly.

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 1>But then also you could look at their attention grabbing

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>multimedia experiences like let's, you know, let's watch Pastor Trent

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 1>rock out with the praise band on the JumboTron, which

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>there there's certainly plenty of that. And sometimes they've even

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 1>got truly built in shopping experiences. You've got coffee shops,

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>bookstores and the church and stuff like that. And so

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>this is the work that I think possum I is

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>building on. And so possum I when he gets to

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the concept of hyper real religion, he makes a comparison

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 1>between trends in fantasy literature and trends in religion. And

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 1>so he starts out by looking at fantasy fiction, and

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:49.160
<v Speaker 1>he says He says essentially that fantasy fiction has this

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>traditional library of tropes, styles, and contents from which it

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>usually draws, like sword and sorcery fiction. He possum I

0:30:57.800 --> 0:31:00.840
<v Speaker 1>claims that this is based mostly on chival ric or

0:31:00.880 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 1>medieval romance like the R three and cycle, you know,

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.959
<v Speaker 1>King Arthur in those kind of stories, that they form

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the library of things which the modern fantasy author can

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>now reach in and grab and put together in his

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>or her own way. And so among the standard library

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of tropes or things like magic, creatures, thieves, warriors, druids, wizards, orcs, elves,

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 1>what else, oh, gelatinous cubes. Yeah, all the standard dunez

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and dragons, characters, creatures and tropes for sure. But then

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 1>possum My points to an interesting development in the history

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>of fantasy, which he singles out as the two thousand

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>two video game Kingdom Hearts. Now, I've never played this of,

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:45.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, but I'm familiar with the with the series,

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>especially it's it's crossovers with like Disney material. But yeah,

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I did not expect Kingdom Hearts to show up in

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the material. But this is exactly what he points out.

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a really interesting point. He says, So, okay,

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Kingdom Hearts is a video game following a very traditional

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 1>fantasy put in some ways, it has a traditional fantasy

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>plot structure. There's a quest, there's a main character who

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>has a sort of symbolic sword and uh, and the

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:13.320
<v Speaker 1>main character is seeking reunification with friends who are lost.

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>It all sounds like this could be Tolkien or something.

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>But instead of having all of just the regular dungeons

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and dragons, chivalry, you know, the nights and the elves

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and the orcs and all that, it's got characters from

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Disney movies. Like you say, so, it's got characters from

0:32:30.840 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Aladdin and Peter Pan and a hundred and one Dalmatians

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:38.959
<v Speaker 1>and Alice in Wonderland. And so he's looking at this

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 1>as saying, huh, So, when you put yourself in the

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>fantasy mindset, you kind of have to uh accept as

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>real all of the tropes that are being pulled from

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the the antique library of medieval and fantasy tropes like

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>wizards and stuff like that. That's the real material that

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you work with within the fantasy realm. But this is

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>binging in all this stuff where people are explicitly familiar

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>with the origins Disney movies. Disney movies they saw when

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>they were a kid, and now they're part of the

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 1>fantasy library. Huh. Yeah, this is I mean, this just

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 1>makes me think about walking around the office here and

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:17.400
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works. Uh. You go by each desk and

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone has at least it seems like one figurine, right,

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 1>one action figure, some sort of pop culture comic bookie

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:30.760
<v Speaker 1>character that is serving as kind of uh, kind of

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>an avatar, kind of an icon, kind of uh, kind

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of a holy artifact, a little god, a little shrine

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:39.680
<v Speaker 1>at your desk. Yeah, exactly. I mean, like like I

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>think about in my own situation, like I carry a

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Ganesha in my pocket, Ganesha being of course that the Hindu,

0:33:47.440 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a little elephant deity, the remover of obstacles, um and

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and so you know, I carry him around as a

0:33:54.320 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of a good good luck token. But on my

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>desk here at work, I also have a gammera and

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a tom Servo, which very fine idols. Yeah, and they

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:07.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of what they kind of embody certain you know,

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe not completely thought out ideas, but they embody certain

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>nostalgic powers and thematic powers that I kind of draw

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:16.760
<v Speaker 1>in a draw on as I work. Gammera has stuff

0:34:16.800 --> 0:34:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we can all get behind. He loves all children, It's right.

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>He's a friend of children. And he breathes fire and flies,

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:25.719
<v Speaker 1>so he's you know, he's he's a he's a powerful

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:28.759
<v Speaker 1>force to to to, to turn to. So anytime there's

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a bat in your vicinity that begins to emit rays

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you know that you have Gammera on your side. Exactly. Yeah.

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 1>But you know, to what extent are all these little

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:39.399
<v Speaker 1>little creatures and a little toy? I mean, they are

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:41.680
<v Speaker 1>all kind of religious icons. They're kind of the gods

0:34:41.680 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of the New Age, right, Yeah, And so we should

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>note about possum I before we continue that. In the

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>academic community postmodern religious and cultural criticism, there's been you know,

0:34:53.600 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a ton of ink spill debating the merits of possum eze,

0:34:57.440 --> 0:35:00.640
<v Speaker 1>definitions and analysis. We're not going to get into all that.

0:35:00.680 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>We're we're not going to get into these debates. We

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>can just focus on that the example itself, basically the

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>subjective analysis. So if there's nothing definite about any of it, yeah,

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:13.680
<v Speaker 1>but but it does it does make a lot of

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>sense in this one. We're discussing it here, But essentially,

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 1>the idea is creating religions inspired by source material that

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>the religion's own adherents except to be fiction. Well, let's

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>run through some examples of this, because I mean, I

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:28.400
<v Speaker 1>know it's if you're not familiar with this, your your

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>brain is probably going in circles here, like how do

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you base a religion? It's one thing to say, oh,

0:35:32.080 --> 0:35:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I get some inspiration from a gammera, but how would

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>you actually have a gammera based faith. Well, do you

0:35:36.520 --> 0:35:38.839
<v Speaker 1>mind if I talk about the Jedi first? Talk about

0:35:38.880 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the Jedi? Okay, so how about Jedi is M. Have you?

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:46.239
<v Speaker 1>Have you folks heard of this jedi Ism, Jeddism or

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:48.879
<v Speaker 1>jeddi is M. Jedism always makes me think of Jed

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:52.040
<v Speaker 1>from Beverly Hillbillies. It's the religion of Jed clamp At. Yes,

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:55.759
<v Speaker 1>because he came across the Black Gold, so he must

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:59.280
<v Speaker 1>be inspired. Yes he would God let him there. But anyway,

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that no, jed Edi is Um is a Star Wars

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>inspired religion that takes after the Jedi, the Jedi knights

0:36:05.400 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>of the Star Wars universe. Who are the heroes? I mean,

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I probably don't need to explain the Star Wars context you,

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I assume you've seen it. If not, suffice to say, they're,

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, a quasi mystical religious order of good guys

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 1>facing off against an evil empire. Well evil in quotation,

0:36:22.800 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how evil they actually were. But but oh,

0:36:25.600 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 1>so you've got a bone to pick there, Well, it's

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not really worth picking at this point, never mind. Okay,

0:36:30.880 --> 0:36:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, in my best judgment, Jedi pretty clearly began

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:39.720
<v Speaker 1>as a joke. It just explicitly a joke. Uh. First example,

0:36:39.920 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the two thousand one since this phenomenon, so around the

0:36:42.719 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 1>time of the year two thousand one, there was a

0:36:45.160 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>widespread international email campaign urging people to list Jedi as

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 1>their religion on official census forms. And it worked. It worked,

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:59.439
<v Speaker 1>according to the BBC. In the two thousand one UK

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:03.600
<v Speaker 1>since US three hundred ninety thousand, one hundred and twenty

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.760
<v Speaker 1>seven people, which amounted to about zero point seven percent

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of the population at the time, listed their religion as

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:14.800
<v Speaker 1>some variation on Jedi on that census Jedi or Jedi

0:37:14.880 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Knight something like. That same year, according to the Sydney

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Morning Herald, seventy thousand, five hundred and nine Australians, or

0:37:23.239 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>about zero point three seven percent of Australians registered as

0:37:27.239 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Jedi on on the two thousand one census. So at

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:32.839
<v Speaker 1>the time, I think everybody assumed this was sort of

0:37:32.880 --> 0:37:36.640
<v Speaker 1>like flying spaghetti monsterism. It's a joke carried out by

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>atheists and secularists, maybe trying to point out something about

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:44.439
<v Speaker 1>the arbitrary nous of people's religious beliefs. Maybe they thought

0:37:44.440 --> 0:37:46.160
<v Speaker 1>they were making a point. Maybe they didn't even think

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>they were making a point. Maybe they just thought it

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>was funny to say I'm a Jedi instead of to

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>say no religion or none or something. Yeah, and it's

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:56.720
<v Speaker 1>probably the kind of thing where in many of these cases,

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:58.879
<v Speaker 1>not a tremendous a tremendous amount thought is not going

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.080
<v Speaker 1>into this. It's it's just kind of a gut reaction.

0:38:01.960 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 1>But the roots may run a little deeper than they're

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>conscious off. Yeah. So that was two thousand one. But

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the website now of the Temple

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 1>of the Jedi Order, and if you listen to their spokespeople,

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it starts to seem less and less like a joke

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:21.400
<v Speaker 1>or even a statement in order to make a point.

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:25.239
<v Speaker 1>If you look at them. Now, the Jedi have beliefs,

0:38:25.640 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>they have doctrines, they have credle statements, and it sounds

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to me perhaps unsettlingly sincere, I don't mean unsettling as

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in I'm mocking them. I just mean it's surprising. So

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:40.879
<v Speaker 1>I want to read a couple of little things from

0:38:40.960 --> 0:38:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the Temple of the Jedi Order. These are These are

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:46.480
<v Speaker 1>statements they have. One is the Jedi Code, and there

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:48.319
<v Speaker 1>are two versions of it. I want to read the

0:38:48.360 --> 0:38:56.480
<v Speaker 1>simplified version. The Jedi Code reads emotion yet peace, Ignorance yet, knowledge,

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Passion yet, serenity, chaos us yet, harmony, death yet the Force. Okay,

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:10.879
<v Speaker 1>that sounds pleasingly mystic and and deep. Yeah, okay. There's

0:39:10.920 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 1>also a Jedi creed, believe it or not, so that

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:17.000
<v Speaker 1>this is their creed. I am a Jedi, an instrument

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:19.959
<v Speaker 1>of peace where there is hatred. I shall bring love

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:24.320
<v Speaker 1>where there is injury, pardon where there is doubt, faith

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:28.919
<v Speaker 1>where there is despair, hope where there is darkness, light,

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and where there is sadness joy. I am a Jedi.

0:39:33.440 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>I shall never seek so much to be consoled as

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to console, to be understood, as to understand, to be

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>loved as to love, for it is in giving that

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we receive, it is in pardoning that we're pardoned, and

0:39:47.680 --> 0:39:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it is in dying that we're born to eternal life.

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:54.320
<v Speaker 1>The forces with me always, for I am a Jedi. Okay,

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:57.680
<v Speaker 1>so this makes me instantly wonder are we are we

0:39:57.719 --> 0:40:01.879
<v Speaker 1>witnessing here the evolution of faith or the evolution of

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the joke? Are we are we kind of in like

0:40:04.120 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the Andy Kaufman uh period of the joke where we're

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 1>just forced to feel kind of confused and maybe a

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:15.839
<v Speaker 1>little uncomfortable about where we stand, uh in bit versus reality?

0:40:16.080 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, because I so first of all, that

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:20.920
<v Speaker 1>creed I read there, they said they claimed that is

0:40:20.960 --> 0:40:24.880
<v Speaker 1>actually adapted from a traditional prayer of St. Francis of ASSISI.

0:40:25.800 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Um so that's sort of interesting that they're adapting traditional

0:40:29.680 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>religious materials. But I also listened to an interview with

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the spokesperson from the organization, the Temple of the Jedi,

0:40:38.560 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and you know what, he seemed to me like a

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:43.720
<v Speaker 1>level headed guy who was not playing a prank. In fact,

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 1>he the weirdest thing was he didn't even seem like

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:49.759
<v Speaker 1>all that obsessive of a Star Wars fan. Umh. And

0:40:49.800 --> 0:40:52.000
<v Speaker 1>he so he explained that all the Jedi believe in

0:40:52.000 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>the Force, but the Jedi need not believe in like

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a literal physical reality of the Force as an energy

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:01.719
<v Speaker 1>field that's around us and binds us. Though apparently you

0:41:01.760 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>can believe in that instead. He made it sound like

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:08.279
<v Speaker 1>the Force can be defined however you like. It can

0:41:08.320 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 1>be a physical reality, it can be a metaphor for

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:13.959
<v Speaker 1>the interconnectedness of the universe, or it can be something

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 1>else entirely pretty much whatever you want. He seemed very

0:41:17.200 --> 0:41:22.080
<v Speaker 1>earnest and serious about Jedism being taken seriously as a religion, or,

0:41:22.120 --> 0:41:25.120
<v Speaker 1>if not a religion, as a sort of philosophy accorded

0:41:25.160 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the same cultural respect as a religion. Well, it's interesting,

0:41:29.239 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 1>right because you're what is that what is Star Wars

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>but sort of a rehashing and reassemblage of various uh

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:41.920
<v Speaker 1>mythic tropes, right, yeah, And he pointed to exactly this thing.

0:41:41.960 --> 0:41:44.440
<v Speaker 1>He said, Star Wars doesn't exist in a vacuum, you know,

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>yet it draws on traditional philosophies and religions, and so

0:41:49.080 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 1>we're essentially using Star Wars as as a metaphorical way

0:41:52.760 --> 0:41:55.319
<v Speaker 1>to go back to these ancient traditions. So it's kind

0:41:55.320 --> 0:41:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of like, hey, I really love Star Wars. Why do

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I love Star Wars? And then if the answer is, well,

0:42:00.400 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 1>some of these belief systems are kind of appealing to me.

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 1>If you then explore the roots of those things and

0:42:06.080 --> 0:42:08.000
<v Speaker 1>began to find meaning in the roots of those things

0:42:08.040 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 1>without abandoning that initial science fiction lens by continuing to

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:17.360
<v Speaker 1>have that be a part of your your I'm hesitant

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to say worldview, but let's say your your spiritual construction.

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Then you you have yourself a hyper real religion. Yeah,

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:28.359
<v Speaker 1>but the Star Wars universe is not the only one

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that has created movements like this. I think there are

0:42:31.160 --> 0:42:34.000
<v Speaker 1>others that I would say chart a similar path. It

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>looks to me, and like I have to admit, as

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:39.840
<v Speaker 1>with all these I'm an outsider, So you know, I

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 1>can't speak as a Jedi or something, and I don't

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 1>want to diminish people's experiences in that faith or in

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:48.880
<v Speaker 1>any other faith. But what I'll say is, it looks

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:51.839
<v Speaker 1>to me like it definitely started as a joke. Well,

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and it it and it took on a seriousness and

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and there are others like that, like, well, that's just

0:42:57.640 --> 0:43:01.239
<v Speaker 1>like your opinion. Man, right, how about the Dude. That's right.

0:43:01.320 --> 0:43:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Dudaism is another big one. Um, I assume we also

0:43:04.680 --> 0:43:06.920
<v Speaker 1>have some Big Lebowski fans, I should hope. So yeah,

0:43:06.960 --> 0:43:10.680
<v Speaker 1>The Big Lebowski, the Coen Brothers. Uh, just wonderful film

0:43:10.680 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't really do well when it came out,

0:43:12.600 --> 0:43:14.520
<v Speaker 1>but it's one of those that has continued to just

0:43:14.560 --> 0:43:18.720
<v Speaker 1>gaining a cult following conventions and even its own hyper

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:23.360
<v Speaker 1>real religion in the form of Dudaism. So it's basically

0:43:23.360 --> 0:43:26.520
<v Speaker 1>all boils down to the dude abides right. Um, it's

0:43:26.560 --> 0:43:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a dude centric philosophy and lifestyle, more or less a

0:43:30.239 --> 0:43:34.759
<v Speaker 1>modern pop culture take on on Dalloism dallasm. I've heard

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it described also as having a lot of similarities to

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Zen Buddhism. Yeah, indeed, it's you know, it's a little

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:44.399
<v Speaker 1>it's chill, it's uh, it's peaceful, it's uh, it's it's

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:49.719
<v Speaker 1>it's all of the positive aspects of the dude, um,

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:52.960
<v Speaker 1>without some of his more you know, reckless or laziness. Well,

0:43:52.960 --> 0:43:54.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the funny things is that the

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:57.680
<v Speaker 1>thing about the dude is that he's chill. But throughout

0:43:57.760 --> 0:43:59.799
<v Speaker 1>much of the movie, the Dude is not chill. Yeah,

0:43:59.880 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>the the dude gets a little irritated, and uh and

0:44:03.760 --> 0:44:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and and is even criticized by the stranger for his

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>his vulgar language. So it's it's it's one of the

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>This is another great example, though, where you when you

0:44:14.080 --> 0:44:16.799
<v Speaker 1>look at Dudaism and you see the the people who

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:20.000
<v Speaker 1>follow it or at least like to talk about it,

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 1>It all does begin in that kind of bumper sticker area,

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:24.680
<v Speaker 1>like it's fun to say, hey, what's your religion? Oh,

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 1>it's Dudaism, you know, because I really love this movie.

0:44:28.080 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 1>But you see the same thing, right, You see individuals

0:44:31.560 --> 0:44:34.480
<v Speaker 1>who seem to follow the roots of it or sort

0:44:34.480 --> 0:44:38.720
<v Speaker 1>of ask themself questions, well, if Dudaism were a real faith,

0:44:38.760 --> 0:44:42.719
<v Speaker 1>if it were a real philosophy, what would what would

0:44:42.719 --> 0:44:44.880
<v Speaker 1>his tenants be? What would be what? What would I

0:44:44.920 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>need to understand? And then they sort of follow it

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:52.319
<v Speaker 1>backwards into um, you know, more historical modes of belief. Yeah,

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think this would encounter the same kind of

0:44:55.400 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 1>criticisms from outsiders that all these others would. People would

0:44:58.520 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 1>be like, wait a second, hold on, what do you

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:03.960
<v Speaker 1>mean do you really believe in Judaism? Is that really

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:06.279
<v Speaker 1>your religion. Well, it's kind of it kind of makes

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 1>me think of you remember win App. Oh yeah, the

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>old like MP three player that we all had. That's

0:45:13.000 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the thing. You had different skins, right, we all have

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the same program, but we use different skins that appeal

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to us personally. Since you have like a tool skin

0:45:21.040 --> 0:45:23.160
<v Speaker 1>on win App, I think I had some sort of

0:45:23.160 --> 0:45:26.360
<v Speaker 1>like horrible blood splattery one or something like that. It was,

0:45:26.600 --> 0:45:29.759
<v Speaker 1>it was nice and dark and moody. But but I

0:45:30.120 --> 0:45:32.840
<v Speaker 1>can't help but feel like we encounter something something similar

0:45:32.880 --> 0:45:36.000
<v Speaker 1>with these hyper real religions that we're discussing, where the

0:45:36.080 --> 0:45:41.760
<v Speaker 1>actual mode of beliefs, the actual mechanics are either something

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:44.879
<v Speaker 1>old or something cobbled together from other beliefs, But it's

0:45:44.920 --> 0:45:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that skin that brings us in. That skin is unique

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and appeals to us. I got another one. I was

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:55.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to tell Rachel last night about Jeddism, my wife Rachel,

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:59.000
<v Speaker 1>about Jedis to convert her or or to Jedism. No, no, no,

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 1>just to explain it. And she was like, oh, I

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:03.840
<v Speaker 1>bet there is this for Lord of the Rings and

0:46:03.840 --> 0:46:05.759
<v Speaker 1>and what do you know that there are there are

0:46:05.760 --> 0:46:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Tolkien inspired religious ideas, which is very interesting to me

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 1>because I would say that in some ways Tolkien is

0:46:13.880 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of adapting Christianity to a fantasy setting, or at

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 1>least some ideas of Christianity. It's not like an explicit

0:46:22.719 --> 0:46:26.759
<v Speaker 1>one to one metaphor, but a lot of his messages

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I think in Lord of the Rings are Christian ones. Yeah,

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:36.320
<v Speaker 1>it's these sort of sort of vague Tolkien asked neopagan religions.

0:46:36.400 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 1>They're they're interesting because you had the book itself. They're

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they're often these arguments, you know, people saying, oh, this

0:46:42.120 --> 0:46:44.800
<v Speaker 1>is a pagan work, and and it's they're the pagan

0:46:44.840 --> 0:46:47.120
<v Speaker 1>elements are what's important here. Other saying no, it's inherently

0:46:47.120 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 1>a Christian work. Other people saying it's a it's a

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:53.280
<v Speaker 1>synthesis of the two um. And maybe all these arguments

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 1>there are ultimately kind of silly, but you, I mean,

0:46:56.960 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a very popular work, and especially out of the

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen seventies where you saw people are really into Tolkien.

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:05.200
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of good there's still a lot of

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:08.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, Coulter cultural energy going on. It's in Led

0:47:08.320 --> 0:47:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Zeppelin albums, all Zeppelin albums, and it it has a

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:14.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of power to it. It has a lot of um,

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:16.719
<v Speaker 1>it has a lot of depth to it. You can

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:20.440
<v Speaker 1>just go completely crazy, uh, filling in all the details

0:47:20.440 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 1>in your mind about the world of Tolkien. We maybe

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:26.680
<v Speaker 1>don't advise that. No, Well, you go for it if

0:47:26.719 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you want. Um. I mean, that's one thing I always

0:47:29.000 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 1>enjoy about the various sci fi and fantasy properties that

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that really engage me is if there's a really rich mythos,

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 1>they're either one that is explicitly um laid out for

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you or one where they are all these holes that

0:47:42.000 --> 0:47:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you can't help but fill in the details yourself. You know,

0:47:44.560 --> 0:47:47.160
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about this concept of hyper real religions

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and Christian Sega, our other host, brought Satanism

0:47:52.719 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to mind. That's right. Um. And if anyone remembers the

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Satanic Panic episode that Christian and I did, I guess

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:01.880
<v Speaker 1>about a year ago. Know, um, as we discussed in

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that Satanism like never really existed, certainly not in the

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:10.319
<v Speaker 1>way that that it was presented in during the Satanic Panic, Right.

0:48:10.360 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would say that what you have as Satanism,

0:48:13.280 --> 0:48:16.320
<v Speaker 1>people who would actually claim this religion is almost explicitly

0:48:16.400 --> 0:48:19.759
<v Speaker 1>an atheistic religion, right. Yeah, And generally when we talk

0:48:19.800 --> 0:48:23.799
<v Speaker 1>about Satanism. We're talking about Lavay and Satanism, which was

0:48:24.239 --> 0:48:26.600
<v Speaker 1>comes from the Church of Satan, found in nineteen sixty

0:48:26.600 --> 0:48:29.880
<v Speaker 1>six by Anton LaVey. Was you know, ultimately it's an

0:48:29.920 --> 0:48:35.800
<v Speaker 1>atheistic individualist philosophy. It's UH with more than a dash

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of of drama, symbolism, fun. It's about messing with the

0:48:39.080 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 1>squares and and putting on a you know, a fun show. Well,

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 1>in some ways I think it has a lot in

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:47.840
<v Speaker 1>common with the Flying Spaghetti Monster is um and that

0:48:48.000 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's maybe more than this, but in in some

0:48:51.760 --> 0:48:54.680
<v Speaker 1>ways you could think of it as a massive prank. Yes,

0:48:54.880 --> 0:48:58.040
<v Speaker 1>very much so um And And I think lave I

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:00.440
<v Speaker 1>think was was pretty straightforward about I mean, this is

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy that came from sort of Carney roots at

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the very Carney faith, and and I love it. You

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:07.640
<v Speaker 1>can't help it but get involved with the trappings of it,

0:49:07.760 --> 0:49:10.960
<v Speaker 1>especially as the years roll by and it becomes a

0:49:11.000 --> 0:49:15.880
<v Speaker 1>part of uh, you know, an entire segment of of music. Right,

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you get into all this death metal that has varying

0:49:18.040 --> 0:49:20.759
<v Speaker 1>degrees of satanic elements. All right, but I think it's

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:23.480
<v Speaker 1>time to turn to psychology to try to see what

0:49:23.520 --> 0:49:26.440
<v Speaker 1>we can figure out about what people are actually trying

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to get out of these religious beliefs. It seems fairly

0:49:29.400 --> 0:49:33.080
<v Speaker 1>clear what people get out of traditional religious beliefs where

0:49:33.200 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 1>there is at the core of them the assumption of

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a real revelation about the metaphysical nature of reality. Um,

0:49:41.840 --> 0:49:43.799
<v Speaker 1>maybe not in all of them, but in lots of them.

0:49:44.000 --> 0:49:46.479
<v Speaker 1>But in these religious beliefs that are in some way

0:49:46.520 --> 0:49:50.360
<v Speaker 1>based on what everybody agrees is fiction. What what is

0:49:50.400 --> 0:49:54.279
<v Speaker 1>the goal of the seeker of the adherent? Well, one

0:49:54.320 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 1>take on this comes from Carol mq sax Invented Religions, Imagination,

0:49:59.040 --> 0:50:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Fiction and Faith, and she posits that invented religions, such

0:50:02.800 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 1>as the ones we're discussing here, they demonstrate that what

0:50:06.280 --> 0:50:10.279
<v Speaker 1>meaning hungry humans really want is a powerful narrative, particularly

0:50:10.280 --> 0:50:14.160
<v Speaker 1>one in which unseen agents affect causality in our world

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and in our lives. Okay, so maybe saying that even

0:50:17.239 --> 0:50:21.120
<v Speaker 1>if we don't agree that the narratives refer to a

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:25.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that's literally true, just participation in the narrative is enough. Yeah,

0:50:25.560 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like the fictional realm becomes the place where

0:50:28.560 --> 0:50:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it is okay to dream, whereas to to dream in

0:50:33.000 --> 0:50:36.279
<v Speaker 1>the more real world of of sort of you know

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 1>religious history that is, uh, that's that is sometimes seen

0:50:40.080 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 1>as a bit weird in some circles. Well, that relates

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:44.800
<v Speaker 1>to something that we that I know, we read a

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit about about why fantasy is popular these days.

0:50:49.360 --> 0:50:52.919
<v Speaker 1>It actually reminds me of of some thoughts, some observations

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:55.759
<v Speaker 1>that are Scott Baker made our Scott Baker himself being

0:50:55.840 --> 0:51:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a uh successful and in my opinion highly talented um

0:51:00.200 --> 0:51:04.919
<v Speaker 1>fantasy writer himself background in philosophy, and also he works

0:51:05.000 --> 0:51:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a fair amount of neuroscience into his into his creations.

0:51:08.600 --> 0:51:13.400
<v Speaker 1>But um. In his paper that published on science fiction

0:51:13.400 --> 0:51:16.759
<v Speaker 1>and Fantasy, World, Wine, Fantasy and Whine now Um, he

0:51:16.800 --> 0:51:19.920
<v Speaker 1>says that fantasy is quote the primary literary response to

0:51:19.960 --> 0:51:22.880
<v Speaker 1>what is often called the contemporary crisis of meaning. So

0:51:22.920 --> 0:51:24.239
<v Speaker 1>the idea here is that we live in an age

0:51:24.239 --> 0:51:26.640
<v Speaker 1>of reason and science. We have all sorts of myth

0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:30.719
<v Speaker 1>erasing answers for how the world works, so so long

0:51:30.800 --> 0:51:34.480
<v Speaker 1>as we don't require teleological answers. So this get in

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:36.880
<v Speaker 1>other words, this gets down to, you know, we have

0:51:36.920 --> 0:51:39.800
<v Speaker 1>all these answers about how, say, the solar system works,

0:51:40.160 --> 0:51:43.600
<v Speaker 1>how life works, but we don't have the wise, Right,

0:51:43.680 --> 0:51:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the stuff that that is beyond science. Yeah, he

0:51:47.200 --> 0:51:51.160
<v Speaker 1>almost says science is essentially created too reliable of a

0:51:51.200 --> 0:51:54.800
<v Speaker 1>tool for finding correct answers about reality, and so reliable

0:51:54.800 --> 0:51:58.279
<v Speaker 1>in fact, that it has left us with nihilism. Uh.

0:51:58.320 --> 0:52:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Now we we don't necessarily need to agree with that

0:52:00.920 --> 0:52:03.760
<v Speaker 1>perspective to say that. Certainly a lot of people probably

0:52:03.760 --> 0:52:07.759
<v Speaker 1>feel this way that if science is the only socially

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:12.840
<v Speaker 1>legitimate way of of asserting that something is definitely true,

0:52:13.640 --> 0:52:16.880
<v Speaker 1>where do you get your meaning of life from? Yeah?

0:52:17.000 --> 0:52:18.759
<v Speaker 1>If science is not going to give that to you,

0:52:19.080 --> 0:52:21.600
<v Speaker 1>and it can lead to a sense of kind of despair,

0:52:21.640 --> 0:52:24.399
<v Speaker 1>of hopelessness, of emptiness. You know, what is life really

0:52:24.440 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 1>all about? I mean, who cares if I can finally

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:30.839
<v Speaker 1>understand the mysteries of the of quantum physics. If if

0:52:30.920 --> 0:52:33.600
<v Speaker 1>what it reveals is that there's no way to answer

0:52:33.719 --> 0:52:36.279
<v Speaker 1>the question of the meaning of life. Yeah, so you

0:52:36.360 --> 0:52:39.720
<v Speaker 1>end up turning to fantasy um, and to a certain

0:52:39.760 --> 0:52:42.360
<v Speaker 1>certain extent science fiction, but largely we're talking about fantasy.

0:52:42.400 --> 0:52:45.839
<v Speaker 1>You're trying to turn to these fantastic stories, uh, in

0:52:45.880 --> 0:52:49.280
<v Speaker 1>which you can find if not find that meaning for yourself,

0:52:49.440 --> 0:52:51.960
<v Speaker 1>then you at least embodied characters who find that meaning

0:52:51.960 --> 0:52:55.319
<v Speaker 1>and world and live in a world where life and

0:52:55.320 --> 0:52:58.840
<v Speaker 1>in the individual has significance. Now, I I personally probably

0:52:58.840 --> 0:53:02.239
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't agree with big or that this is what this

0:53:02.320 --> 0:53:04.840
<v Speaker 1>is what is entailed by the scientific view of the world.

0:53:04.920 --> 0:53:07.160
<v Speaker 1>But I can certainly see how if you do go

0:53:07.280 --> 0:53:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to that conclusion, fantasy could provide a very powerful escape

0:53:10.680 --> 0:53:12.600
<v Speaker 1>from it. Right. And you know, I do have to

0:53:12.640 --> 0:53:17.040
<v Speaker 1>say our Scott Baker's own work, his Um Second Apocalypse series,

0:53:17.480 --> 0:53:20.719
<v Speaker 1>he he crowns these cads. It's definitely dark fantasy, but

0:53:20.760 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 1>he grounds these many of these characters, uh, in this

0:53:25.080 --> 0:53:30.640
<v Speaker 1>this very believable philosophical place that is at times like you,

0:53:30.719 --> 0:53:33.000
<v Speaker 1>at times you're loot, you lose yourself in the story,

0:53:33.040 --> 0:53:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in the narrative, in the world. But other times he

0:53:35.480 --> 0:53:38.560
<v Speaker 1>forces the reader to to really ask some troubling questions

0:53:38.600 --> 0:53:44.160
<v Speaker 1>about about who we are and how we work as individuals. Um. So, yeah,

0:53:44.160 --> 0:53:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say that his critique of fantasy genre UM

0:53:47.520 --> 0:53:50.160
<v Speaker 1>does not apply to everything within that realm, and it

0:53:50.160 --> 0:53:59.759
<v Speaker 1>certainly doesn't apply to all readers. Come back to the question, right,

0:53:59.760 --> 0:54:03.920
<v Speaker 1>what modern religious individuals want? So he would say maybe,

0:54:03.960 --> 0:54:06.279
<v Speaker 1>meaning right, he would say meaning he would tie it

0:54:06.280 --> 0:54:09.799
<v Speaker 1>into this idea he he coined the term the semantic apocalypse. Uh,

0:54:09.880 --> 0:54:12.200
<v Speaker 1>this idea that we are either at the point where

0:54:12.200 --> 0:54:15.520
<v Speaker 1>we're approaching this point where we just we're just completely

0:54:15.600 --> 0:54:18.799
<v Speaker 1>stupefied by the lack of meaning in our lives and

0:54:18.840 --> 0:54:21.120
<v Speaker 1>in the world. But then again, I mean, I'm sure

0:54:21.160 --> 0:54:24.399
<v Speaker 1>there have been some scientific studies that look into what

0:54:24.560 --> 0:54:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it is that people want out of religions in general. Uh.

0:54:29.040 --> 0:54:32.359
<v Speaker 1>There have, yeah, and one in particular. And again, this

0:54:32.400 --> 0:54:35.680
<v Speaker 1>is when we're talking about papers and studies about religion.

0:54:36.080 --> 0:54:39.480
<v Speaker 1>This is all ultimately, you know, subjective analysis. Uh, So

0:54:39.520 --> 0:54:41.799
<v Speaker 1>feel free to disagree and our idea with us and uh,

0:54:41.840 --> 0:54:45.280
<v Speaker 1>but in this case, uh. According to Ohio State University

0:54:45.280 --> 0:54:48.160
<v Speaker 1>professor Stephen rice Offer, an author of the two thousand

0:54:48.239 --> 0:54:52.799
<v Speaker 1>sixteen book, uh, The Sixteen Strivings for God, he says

0:54:52.840 --> 0:55:03.919
<v Speaker 1>people have sixteen basic desires. I liked these interesting. Yeah, Acceptance, curiosity, eating, family, honor, idealism, independence, order,

0:55:04.040 --> 0:55:10.280
<v Speaker 1>physical activity, power, romance, saving, social contact, status, tranquility, and vengeance.

0:55:11.120 --> 0:55:12.799
<v Speaker 1>And then a pretty good list. I was trying to

0:55:12.800 --> 0:55:15.319
<v Speaker 1>think of things other than that. Yeah, though, I think

0:55:15.360 --> 0:55:17.759
<v Speaker 1>he covered all the basics there and you can't help

0:55:17.800 --> 0:55:19.879
<v Speaker 1>but look at that list and sort of check things

0:55:19.880 --> 0:55:21.399
<v Speaker 1>off in your head as you look at your own

0:55:21.640 --> 0:55:25.040
<v Speaker 1>either your own religious beliefs, your spiritualism, or your the

0:55:25.080 --> 0:55:28.319
<v Speaker 1>fantasy that you're into. Um. But he developed this Rice

0:55:28.400 --> 0:55:32.360
<v Speaker 1>motivation profile that measures how much people value each of

0:55:32.360 --> 0:55:35.880
<v Speaker 1>these sixteen goals, and he administered it to a hundred

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:39.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand plus people, and he found that the appeal of

0:55:39.080 --> 0:55:42.400
<v Speaker 1>any given religion relates to how it responds to one

0:55:42.640 --> 0:55:46.000
<v Speaker 1>or more of those desires. Uh, and it competes with

0:55:46.080 --> 0:55:50.560
<v Speaker 1>secular society to meet those desires. So, so think about it,

0:55:50.680 --> 0:55:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in what ways can both traditional religions and hyper real

0:55:53.680 --> 0:55:57.600
<v Speaker 1>religions meet in any of these desires such as uh? Well,

0:55:57.719 --> 0:56:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean stuff like curiosity. I can doubt only see

0:56:00.719 --> 0:56:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the appeal of that because one of the things that

0:56:02.880 --> 0:56:05.799
<v Speaker 1>always drew me into actual religions and continues to draw

0:56:05.800 --> 0:56:08.960
<v Speaker 1>me into actual religions is the mystery and the creativity,

0:56:09.120 --> 0:56:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the the interplay and narratives of these gods and heroes. Right,

0:56:12.960 --> 0:56:16.040
<v Speaker 1>It's what brings me into uh to you know, reading

0:56:16.080 --> 0:56:18.759
<v Speaker 1>a Hinduism, and brings me into reading a uh, you

0:56:18.800 --> 0:56:22.279
<v Speaker 1>know about ancient Egypt. It brings me into reading you know,

0:56:22.800 --> 0:56:26.160
<v Speaker 1>various fantasy novels as well. Well. I mean, in some cases,

0:56:26.200 --> 0:56:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I think this might grow out of a slight disconnect

0:56:30.120 --> 0:56:33.160
<v Speaker 1>between the things we need, you know, these things we

0:56:33.200 --> 0:56:36.360
<v Speaker 1>strive for and desire, versus what we really know is

0:56:36.400 --> 0:56:40.239
<v Speaker 1>appropriate in modern society, given that we've started to think

0:56:40.280 --> 0:56:43.239
<v Speaker 1>out ethical issues in a secular way. I don't know

0:56:43.280 --> 0:56:46.280
<v Speaker 1>if you can say that there's really a good, widely

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:51.120
<v Speaker 1>agreed upon, secular justification for things like a desire for honor,

0:56:51.880 --> 0:56:55.239
<v Speaker 1>And yet the ancient structures of fantasy, or of traditional

0:56:55.280 --> 0:56:58.200
<v Speaker 1>religions or something like that might all include concepts of

0:56:58.239 --> 0:57:01.080
<v Speaker 1>honor that can sort of legitimate this desire that we

0:57:01.160 --> 0:57:04.280
<v Speaker 1>have biologically, even if we can't think of a good

0:57:04.400 --> 0:57:07.799
<v Speaker 1>reason to seek honor. Yeah, it makes more something like

0:57:07.880 --> 0:57:11.240
<v Speaker 1>honor often makes more sense in a simplified and highly

0:57:11.239 --> 0:57:14.880
<v Speaker 1>symbolic world than it does and you know, the minutia

0:57:14.920 --> 0:57:18.680
<v Speaker 1>of real life. Yeah, um, you know. Likewise, something like vengeance,

0:57:19.240 --> 0:57:22.000
<v Speaker 1>which made the list, Like vengeance is something that in

0:57:22.040 --> 0:57:24.880
<v Speaker 1>your own life, like vengeance is kind of ikey um,

0:57:24.920 --> 0:57:27.200
<v Speaker 1>well yeah, and it's the thing we all desire, but

0:57:27.560 --> 0:57:29.720
<v Speaker 1>most of us would probably agree we sort of know

0:57:29.840 --> 0:57:32.320
<v Speaker 1>better than to try to get it right. But like

0:57:32.360 --> 0:57:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a religious faith, you know, you have some sort of

0:57:34.600 --> 0:57:39.400
<v Speaker 1>hell doctrine in there, an outsource vengeance, I'd say, I

0:57:39.440 --> 0:57:42.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have to get revenge something bad might happen to

0:57:42.720 --> 0:57:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you outside of my control. Yeah, and and and likewise,

0:57:47.360 --> 0:57:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we continually turn to fictional models of what vengeance might

0:57:51.920 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 1>consist of. I mean, revenge tails have always been popular,

0:57:55.160 --> 0:57:58.479
<v Speaker 1>will continue to be popular, and again they often fall

0:57:58.560 --> 0:58:03.760
<v Speaker 1>back on a simplified and highly symbolic world. You know,

0:58:03.920 --> 0:58:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if studies on religious experience would indicate that

0:58:09.080 --> 0:58:12.880
<v Speaker 1>that hyper reality could become or is becoming, the new

0:58:12.960 --> 0:58:16.760
<v Speaker 1>norm for religious experiences. Yeah. It often reminds me of

0:58:16.800 --> 0:58:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the line in Big Trouble, Little China from the Sorcerer

0:58:19.920 --> 0:58:24.360
<v Speaker 1>egg Shin, who talks about Chinese modes of belief in

0:58:24.400 --> 0:58:26.400
<v Speaker 1>saying that it's like a salad bar that you choose,

0:58:27.360 --> 0:58:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you take what you like, and you leave the rest. Uh.

0:58:29.960 --> 0:58:33.280
<v Speaker 1>In this case, the character was referring to Confusism and

0:58:33.400 --> 0:58:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Taoism and and uh and and uh and and also

0:58:37.160 --> 0:58:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Buddhism as well. But but yeah, I I find that

0:58:39.880 --> 0:58:42.360
<v Speaker 1>increasingly in my own life that I do that that

0:58:42.440 --> 0:58:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I kind of take what I want from these various models,

0:58:45.160 --> 0:58:50.120
<v Speaker 1>including some fictional models, and and incorporated into my sort

0:58:50.160 --> 0:58:54.840
<v Speaker 1>of religious, spiritual worldview. There's actually a two thousand fifteen

0:58:54.840 --> 0:59:00.240
<v Speaker 1>study from the University of Evansville published in American Sociological View,

0:59:00.280 --> 0:59:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and it took a pretty thorough look at the way

0:59:02.560 --> 0:59:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Americans process religion and science. So the author's crunch data

0:59:07.760 --> 0:59:11.280
<v Speaker 1>from three waves of the General Social Survey and found

0:59:11.280 --> 0:59:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that US adults hold one of three perspectives based on

0:59:14.840 --> 0:59:17.400
<v Speaker 1>their knowledge and attitudes about science and religion. Now, the

0:59:17.400 --> 0:59:19.800
<v Speaker 1>first two are long established, but the third isn't is,

0:59:20.040 --> 0:59:24.160
<v Speaker 1>according to the author's entirely new. So there's a modern perspective,

0:59:24.240 --> 0:59:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a worldview that favors science over religion, and that scored Okay,

0:59:28.720 --> 0:59:31.960
<v Speaker 1>science Trump's religion. That's that's that version. Then there's a

0:59:32.000 --> 0:59:37.560
<v Speaker 1>traditional perspective, a worldview that favors religion over science, which

0:59:38.280 --> 0:59:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you know to interpret that that that score as you will.

0:59:42.280 --> 0:59:44.800
<v Speaker 1>But then the third one is the post secular perspective,

0:59:44.840 --> 0:59:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a worldview that values both science and religion, but quote

0:59:48.360 --> 0:59:51.400
<v Speaker 1>rejects science in favor of religion when it comes to

0:59:51.400 --> 0:59:56.720
<v Speaker 1>topics such as creation and evolution. And that scored. So

0:59:57.720 --> 1:00:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that is kind of the salad bar situation in action

1:00:01.320 --> 1:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>there right, where the individual is willing to favor science

1:00:07.280 --> 1:00:10.000
<v Speaker 1>and religion, in fact, favor science over religion, except for

1:00:10.040 --> 1:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>those places where it becomes um, teleologically difficult, where if

1:00:16.200 --> 1:00:20.920
<v Speaker 1>not overt issues of meaning come into play, then at

1:00:21.000 --> 1:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>least implied um meaning, you know, implied issues of meaning.

1:00:25.200 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>So you know, it's like like, ultimately, I think there

1:00:27.720 --> 1:00:29.800
<v Speaker 1>can be a strong case to be made that what

1:00:29.880 --> 1:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>does it matter if if life evolved or of the

1:00:34.080 --> 1:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>hand of God shaped it, But if your interpretation sees

1:00:39.080 --> 1:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>one vision version as problematic or threatening to the overall

1:00:44.240 --> 1:00:47.439
<v Speaker 1>religious structure in your head, then you then in this case,

1:00:47.440 --> 1:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna favor that religious construct over the science. And

1:00:52.320 --> 1:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a separate question I think would be just what are

1:00:55.440 --> 1:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the triggers that cause people to view these things as

1:00:58.080 --> 1:01:00.959
<v Speaker 1>in conflict anyway? Like, some people are obviously hold both

1:01:01.040 --> 1:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>views in their heads without trouble, and some people perceive

1:01:04.320 --> 1:01:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a conflict. Um I'm not sure what makes the difference,

1:01:07.720 --> 1:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>but it seems significant. Yeah, so yeah, So what we're

1:01:11.440 --> 1:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about here that the post secular perspective. It's not

1:01:14.080 --> 1:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a mere midpoint between the traditional and the modern but

1:01:16.880 --> 1:01:19.040
<v Speaker 1>rather a unique way of looking at reality through the

1:01:19.040 --> 1:01:22.480
<v Speaker 1>combined lenses of science and religion. So you can think

1:01:22.480 --> 1:01:24.439
<v Speaker 1>of it as a as kind of a hybrid view.

1:01:24.880 --> 1:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the hyper real religions that we're

1:01:27.720 --> 1:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at are kind kind of represent a high red

1:01:29.560 --> 1:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>view of a different, slightly different form where instead of

1:01:33.920 --> 1:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>rejecting the science that that that threatens, meaning, we're going

1:01:40.400 --> 1:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to just we're going to outsource the religion into a

1:01:43.480 --> 1:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of a safe bucket, into the bucket of fiction,

1:01:46.120 --> 1:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and then build from there. I think that's an interesting

1:01:48.640 --> 1:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>way of looking at it. Like we said, I mean

1:01:50.320 --> 1:01:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these people who have these beliefs, I

1:01:53.440 --> 1:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>get the sense are basically uh non basically material list humanists,

1:02:01.840 --> 1:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Like they typically have humanist values, they could subscribe to

1:02:05.360 --> 1:02:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the humanist manifesto, and they typically don't believe in uh

1:02:10.760 --> 1:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>spirits or something anything other than the natural world. That

1:02:14.680 --> 1:02:16.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly isn't the case for all of them, but that

1:02:16.440 --> 1:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>seems to be a dominant way of thinking. But like,

1:02:19.680 --> 1:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>like as we know from Buddhism and stuff like that,

1:02:21.880 --> 1:02:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you need not be a supernaturalist in order to be

1:02:24.320 --> 1:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a religious person, right, Yeah, And there are ways of engaging.

1:02:27.880 --> 1:02:30.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just for Buddhism on its on its own.

1:02:31.000 --> 1:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>You can take a very sort of abstract philosophical approach

1:02:34.360 --> 1:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>to Buddhism where you don't literally believe in life to

1:02:39.040 --> 1:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>life reincarnation, or you can take you can take one

1:02:42.600 --> 1:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that is very traditional and ultimately you know it's it's

1:02:45.400 --> 1:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>all about being fearful and responding from a place of

1:02:49.200 --> 1:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>fear in terms of what your your next incarnation will

1:02:52.240 --> 1:02:55.560
<v Speaker 1>consist of. I had another idea based in psychology, about

1:02:55.600 --> 1:02:57.640
<v Speaker 1>what might explain some of this. I mean, I certainly

1:02:57.680 --> 1:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want to say that all of it could is

1:03:00.400 --> 1:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>explained by this, but it could explain some of the

1:03:02.880 --> 1:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>transition from joke religions into real religions. And it would

1:03:06.760 --> 1:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>be based in the idea of sunk costs, choice, supportive bias,

1:03:11.000 --> 1:03:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and post purchase rationalization. So let's say you spend a

1:03:15.400 --> 1:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of money on a new lawnmower. Okay, I can't

1:03:18.360 --> 1:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>imagine it happening in my case, but yeah, you've mowed

1:03:21.520 --> 1:03:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the lawn a few times, and you start to worry

1:03:24.240 --> 1:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that maybe you didn't spend your money all that well,

1:03:27.200 --> 1:03:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So you start to engage in an internal conversation, which

1:03:30.720 --> 1:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is a form of choice supportive bias, a bias towards

1:03:34.440 --> 1:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>validating the choice you already made. That's called post purchase rationalization.

1:03:40.240 --> 1:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>You start coming up with the reasons why you know

1:03:42.360 --> 1:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this really was a good way to spend my money.

1:03:45.120 --> 1:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I think I did the right thing by spending the

1:03:47.120 --> 1:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>money on this lawnmower, because it could sort of lead

1:03:50.040 --> 1:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>to some unpleasant cognitive dissonance. If you don't come to

1:03:53.320 --> 1:03:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that conclusion, you can think, man, I really screwed up.

1:03:55.920 --> 1:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't have gone down this road. So it's kind

1:03:58.720 --> 1:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of kind of gets into the area if I read

1:04:00.800 --> 1:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Dune three times or more times than that, even maybe

1:04:04.880 --> 1:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't just a good book. Maybe it wasn't just

1:04:07.040 --> 1:04:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a great book, but maybe it was a book that

1:04:08.920 --> 1:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>was so meaningful that it is that it achieves kind

1:04:12.320 --> 1:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of a spiritual level exactly, or in another way, it

1:04:15.840 --> 1:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>could be true that Let's say if you spent a

1:04:18.720 --> 1:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of time and effort just carrying out a joke,

1:04:21.720 --> 1:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>just on a prank religion. Let's say you start spending

1:04:24.680 --> 1:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>time on Judaism because you love the Big Lebowski and

1:04:28.000 --> 1:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's funny. It's funny to pretend that there's a

1:04:30.280 --> 1:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>dude religion. But after realizing how much sunk costs you've

1:04:34.280 --> 1:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>incurred in your own time and energy over a long

1:04:36.600 --> 1:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>period of time, you start seeking ways to rationalize the

1:04:40.760 --> 1:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>purchase of these beliefs by saying, huh uh, you know,

1:04:45.160 --> 1:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe if if I've spent three hundred hours on Dudaism,

1:04:49.960 --> 1:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>was it really just a joke? Maybe it wasn't just

1:04:52.200 --> 1:04:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a joke. Maybe there's really some meaning in this. And

1:04:55.280 --> 1:04:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and that's not even to say that the meaning you

1:04:58.000 --> 1:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>find is invalid if that's your method that of coming

1:05:00.560 --> 1:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to that meaning. I would say that that conclusions reached

1:05:05.880 --> 1:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>through choice supportive bias aren't necessarily untrue conclusions. I think

1:05:10.600 --> 1:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>in many cases, the time and financial investment involved here,

1:05:13.440 --> 1:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it just forces you to double down on something that

1:05:15.840 --> 1:05:19.840
<v Speaker 1>you were already inclined to support or inclined to buy into.

1:05:19.960 --> 1:05:22.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, It's it's like I already thought this was

1:05:22.200 --> 1:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a great idea, but now that I've I've potentially wasted

1:05:26.560 --> 1:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>this much time on it, it's definitely a great idea.

1:05:29.560 --> 1:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>One other thing I wanted to note, I was interested

1:05:31.880 --> 1:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>to see what you thought of this, is that these

1:05:34.280 --> 1:05:38.680
<v Speaker 1>religions the hyper real religions, especially like Jedi is m

1:05:38.680 --> 1:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and Judaism, seemed to be very much creatures of the Internet.

1:05:45.480 --> 1:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, even I mentioned that I listened to an

1:05:48.040 --> 1:05:51.280
<v Speaker 1>interview with the spokesperson of the Jedi Temple. The guy

1:05:51.320 --> 1:05:54.200
<v Speaker 1>who I listened to explicitly pointed to the introduction of

1:05:54.680 --> 1:05:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Internet fan communities and forums in the nineteen nineties as

1:05:58.520 --> 1:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the thing that made the Jedi religion possible. And so

1:06:01.920 --> 1:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that makes me wonder how the Internet has changed what's

1:06:04.600 --> 1:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>possible in terms of social movements and the birth of religions. Well, yeah,

1:06:09.080 --> 1:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Internet has made it possible to to

1:06:11.920 --> 1:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>find those communities of people that share your belief You

1:06:15.600 --> 1:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>might be the only person in your small town that

1:06:18.040 --> 1:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>loves Star Wars as much as you do, but the

1:06:20.480 --> 1:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Internet allows you to find all those other individuals who

1:06:23.200 --> 1:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>are as invested, and you find the community in your

1:06:26.600 --> 1:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>fandom that that one could you know, that would pre

1:06:30.120 --> 1:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>one could previously find, perhaps only in something like a religion.

1:06:34.240 --> 1:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>You're finding that religious community in your fandom. But then again,

1:06:37.800 --> 1:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I come back to the question. I mean, I have

1:06:39.760 --> 1:06:42.720
<v Speaker 1>to wonder what the evolution of this looks like over

1:06:42.800 --> 1:06:45.320
<v Speaker 1>a long time. Could you ever reach the point where

1:06:45.800 --> 1:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>there are jeddi Ists who believe in the truth of

1:06:49.240 --> 1:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>jedi Is m so firmly that they would actually come

1:06:53.000 --> 1:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to the position of the creationists we talked about at

1:06:55.640 --> 1:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, where they would want their views taught as

1:06:58.160 --> 1:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>an alternative to modern science ends in schools, where they

1:07:01.600 --> 1:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>would say, you know, I I don't just say that

1:07:04.000 --> 1:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a useful framework for my life. That kind

1:07:06.720 --> 1:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of makes sense to me. I say, this is how

1:07:09.160 --> 1:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>reality is, and I've got the exclusive truth. Uh, I

1:07:14.080 --> 1:07:16.600
<v Speaker 1>mean I it's hard to imagine with the jedi Ists

1:07:16.640 --> 1:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>of today, who, like we said, seemed to be just

1:07:18.520 --> 1:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a taking from the salad bar of

1:07:21.640 --> 1:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting ideas. But who knows what would be possible in

1:07:25.600 --> 1:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the future. Yeah, well, it seems to me it would

1:07:27.400 --> 1:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>be less of a conflict between between science and this

1:07:31.760 --> 1:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of storytelling mythology, but would be more a conflict

1:07:35.120 --> 1:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>between mythology. So would be more in line with a

1:07:38.480 --> 1:07:41.360
<v Speaker 1>jedi Is saying, Hey, if you're going to teach the

1:07:41.440 --> 1:07:44.800
<v Speaker 1>children about Greek mythology, uh, then and if you're going

1:07:44.840 --> 1:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to teach them about you know, about Hinduism or some

1:07:48.040 --> 1:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>of these other um, you know, modes of sort of

1:07:50.280 --> 1:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>mythological belief, and you have to teach them about our

1:07:52.360 --> 1:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>mode as well, because yeah, because our mode has all

1:07:55.800 --> 1:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>of those old ideas, but it's been kind of purified

1:07:59.200 --> 1:08:02.439
<v Speaker 1>through the lens of of modern culture. Well, I will

1:08:02.480 --> 1:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>say I do believe Obi wan Kenobi is much wiser

1:08:05.680 --> 1:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>than most of the Greek gods. He's he's a very

1:08:09.160 --> 1:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>wise individual. It's hard not to. Oh, I don't know.

1:08:12.400 --> 1:08:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Some of his choices in the prequels may have been

1:08:15.400 --> 1:08:20.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even talking about that. That's heretical. Heretic, Yes, blasphemy. Robert,

1:08:20.640 --> 1:08:24.519
<v Speaker 1>what's your own personal choice for hyper real religion? Well,

1:08:24.560 --> 1:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, like if if you had to go

1:08:26.920 --> 1:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>with one, I could see myself as a follower of

1:08:30.800 --> 1:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>annasurmbor Kellis, the aspect emperor of the three season our

1:08:34.040 --> 1:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Scott Baker's Second Apocalypse saga. Um, okay, I don't know

1:08:37.680 --> 1:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>anything about that. It's pretty it's pretty rich and deep

1:08:40.320 --> 1:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and uh, that is one where there are segments in

1:08:43.200 --> 1:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>those books where I've keep they come back to me.

1:08:45.880 --> 1:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I think about little motifs that he rolls out, and like,

1:08:49.520 --> 1:08:51.880
<v Speaker 1>some of it is as meaningful as any you know,

1:08:51.960 --> 1:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>actual religion. Actual mythology in my life. Likewise the doom universe. Hey,

1:08:57.120 --> 1:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I am right with you there. In fact, I think

1:08:59.520 --> 1:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the some of the liturgical formulas of the

1:09:04.160 --> 1:09:07.439
<v Speaker 1>done universe are absolutely useful in the real world, and

1:09:07.520 --> 1:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to buy into the reality of done

1:09:09.600 --> 1:09:13.439
<v Speaker 1>at all. I'd say try the Litany against Fear sometime. Yeah,

1:09:13.600 --> 1:09:16.880
<v Speaker 1>if you are feeling fear, say these words, I must

1:09:16.880 --> 1:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>not fear. Fear is the mind killer. Fear is the

1:09:20.360 --> 1:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>little death that brings total obliteration. I will face my fear.

1:09:24.840 --> 1:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I will permit it to pass over me and through me.

1:09:27.560 --> 1:09:29.599
<v Speaker 1>And when it has gone past, I will turn the

1:09:29.600 --> 1:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>inner eye to see the path, and where the fear

1:09:32.720 --> 1:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>has gone, there will be nothing. Only I will remain. Yeah,

1:09:36.479 --> 1:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean I have. I have seriously taken some some

1:09:39.000 --> 1:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>strength and comfort from from from those words and in

1:09:42.640 --> 1:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>the past. Yeah, I mean, they sort of take on

1:09:44.360 --> 1:09:47.479
<v Speaker 1>the nature of a proverb where it's not necessarily it's

1:09:47.520 --> 1:09:51.200
<v Speaker 1>not the authority of the text that gives it its power,

1:09:51.320 --> 1:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it's self evidently powerful. It's a it's a piece of

1:09:54.880 --> 1:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>literature that you you don't even need to know where

1:09:57.280 --> 1:10:00.679
<v Speaker 1>it came from in order for it to be effective exactly.

1:10:01.000 --> 1:10:03.679
<v Speaker 1>So how about you, what what hyper real religion would

1:10:03.680 --> 1:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>you turn to cha? Well, besides that, you know, I

1:10:06.240 --> 1:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>do love the Litany against Fear, but my own personal

1:10:09.280 --> 1:10:12.000
<v Speaker 1>choice for years was you know, Facebook. He used to

1:10:12.040 --> 1:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>ask you what your religion is, and I was like, well,

1:10:14.720 --> 1:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that's none of your business. Facebook. So I'm gonna say

1:10:17.040 --> 1:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Fulsa Doom. Right, the Temple of Set from the from

1:10:21.360 --> 1:10:24.519
<v Speaker 1>James Earl Jones and the Schwarzenegger Conan the Barbarian movie.

1:10:24.680 --> 1:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm to understand Thulsa Doom is kind of different in

1:10:26.960 --> 1:10:30.559
<v Speaker 1>other media, right, Yeah, but my opinion is that he

1:10:31.040 --> 1:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>gained perfection in that film. Yeah, I James Earl Jones,

1:10:35.080 --> 1:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>he's the perfect Fulsa Doom. He's a great villain, but

1:10:37.640 --> 1:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>he's a very profound and literary villain, very charismatic. What

1:10:41.840 --> 1:10:44.639
<v Speaker 1>is steel compared to the hand that wields it? He

1:10:44.800 --> 1:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>has the whole message that flesh is stronger than steel

1:10:48.360 --> 1:10:51.080
<v Speaker 1>because steel is just a tool. The flesh is the will.

1:10:51.960 --> 1:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>And I can get behind that. I see what he's

1:10:54.120 --> 1:10:56.599
<v Speaker 1>getting at. Yeah, and plus the parties looked pretty cool.

1:10:56.760 --> 1:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, cannibal stew, giant snakes and uh, lots of

1:11:01.360 --> 1:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>lounging around. Yeah, well one more thing. I mean, I

1:11:04.400 --> 1:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>have to admit that there's there's ever so slight a

1:11:07.560 --> 1:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>temptation to some jedi Ism. I'm not saying I would

1:11:10.080 --> 1:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>ever be a jedi Ist, but I can get a

1:11:12.439 --> 1:11:14.759
<v Speaker 1>little misty when I think about the fact that luminous

1:11:14.880 --> 1:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>beings are we not this crude matter? All right, Well,

1:11:19.200 --> 1:11:22.080
<v Speaker 1>there you have it. Hyper real religions kind of a

1:11:22.439 --> 1:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, an examination of of where we are in

1:11:25.360 --> 1:11:30.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of modern religious faith and and fandom, where we've

1:11:30.000 --> 1:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>come from, and perhaps a new way to sort of

1:11:31.880 --> 1:11:34.599
<v Speaker 1>look at these these old religions as well. Of course,

1:11:34.600 --> 1:11:36.640
<v Speaker 1>we want to hear from everyone else out there. Do

1:11:36.720 --> 1:11:40.639
<v Speaker 1>any of you guys and gals follow a hyper real religion?

1:11:41.000 --> 1:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Do we have any uh unutologists the audience that want

1:11:45.120 --> 1:11:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to speak up about about Altman, about Church of the SubGenius. Yeah,

1:11:49.080 --> 1:11:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Church of the SubGenius. They're a number of big ones

1:11:51.240 --> 1:11:52.599
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't we didn't even have time to get

1:11:52.600 --> 1:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to in this podcast. So we would love to hear

1:11:55.000 --> 1:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>from any and all of you about that, And sincerely,

1:11:58.520 --> 1:12:00.519
<v Speaker 1>if you want to let us know what you truly

1:12:00.520 --> 1:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>love about this religion and why you consider it a

1:12:03.120 --> 1:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>real faith. Please share. Yeah, yeah, I do so, we will.

1:12:06.280 --> 1:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>We will keep an open mind and encourage everyone else

1:12:08.439 --> 1:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>keep an open mind about it as well. Um. In

1:12:10.680 --> 1:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, check us out of Stuff to Blow your

1:12:12.439 --> 1:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Mind dot com. That's where you will find all the podcasts,

1:12:15.240 --> 1:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the videos, blog post links out to our social media accounts.

1:12:18.120 --> 1:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>We are we are blow the Mind on Facebook and Twitter.

1:12:20.680 --> 1:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>We are Stuff to Blow your Mind on tumbler, And

1:12:23.400 --> 1:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>if you want to get in touch with us with

1:12:24.840 --> 1:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the feedback to this episode or any other recent episode,

1:12:27.360 --> 1:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>you can email us it blow the Mind at how

1:12:29.320 --> 1:12:41.679
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. Well more on this and thousands

1:12:41.720 --> 1:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of other topics. Is that how stuff works dot com.

1:12:51.760 --> 1:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Superstis Towns Burn