WEBVTT - Astronomical Suffering and the Terran Diaspora

0:00:04.200 --> 0:00:08.319
<v Speaker 1>You've finally done it. For so long, the solution alluded you.

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:12.160
<v Speaker 1>You explored every angle and pursuit the answer in the

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>waking world of mathematics and the fragmented landscape of dreams.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>But here it is the Serenian Engine, a functional technological

0:00:22.239 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>means of transporting humanity not only at greater speeds between planets,

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>but two other stars. You fall to your knees before

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 1>its golden splendor. You swipe through the air at your

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>side and summon a holographic keypad. It's time to tell

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 1>the corporation what you've achieved. But before you can initiate

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>the command, the air shimmers with a strange energy. A

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>flash of panic burns through you as you fear some

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 1>unforeseen side effect of the engine's power reality parts, and

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a glowing vigor slips through the incision. It speaks to

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you in a voice like a whisper. Professor, Up, what

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.760
<v Speaker 1>are you? I am the messenger from the future age

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>come to warn you. Impossible, paradoxical, no more so than

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:14.120
<v Speaker 1>your engine. It must be destroyed. Then you have come

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>to kill me. I cannot, but you can be activate

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:22.120
<v Speaker 1>this machine, scatter its plans to the four winds, and

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:25.679
<v Speaker 1>leave the future untarnished by its power. But why should

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I do that? I built it to open up the cosmos,

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>to spread humanity beyond Earth, to safeguard us against destruction,

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and in doing so create hell worlds beyond number, places

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>with the descendants of humanity writhe and poverty, misery and pain.

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>The mass of their collective suffering dwarfs all of humanity's

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>achievements in my time, reducing the human experience to a

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>median of immoral horror. And I know, for I have

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>walked the mire and ruin of each world. I have

0:01:56.880 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>looked into their eyes. And I ask you now, in

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:03.000
<v Speaker 1>the hope that no one else will retrace your steps,

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:12.519
<v Speaker 1>to please turn off the machine. Welcome to Stuff to

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind production of My Heart Radio. Hey you,

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name is

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick. And today we wanted

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the question of, hey, what if we

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>accidentally turned the Milky Way into a living hell? That's right,

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:38.679
<v Speaker 1>you were getting into this topic um of astronomical suffering.

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>And we we tried to make sure the title had

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.119
<v Speaker 1>a spin of far future science fiction to it, and

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 1>we decided to kick things off with a nice hefty

0:02:47.440 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 1>slice of original sci fi to you know, to firmly

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>ground the conversation, because this is going to be a

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.360
<v Speaker 1>conversation that gets into a lot of far future territory,

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 1>speculative science fiction territory, but ultimately wrestling with some some

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>real philosophical considerations about the nature of humanity and and

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:11.640
<v Speaker 1>how we go about our decision making. Yeah. Um, so,

0:03:11.760 --> 0:03:14.839
<v Speaker 1>one thing that this topic makes me think about, maybe

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a good place to start is how much of future

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking among people, you know, people who like to think

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:27.720
<v Speaker 1>about the far future, just assumes space colonization as a given, Like,

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>does not interrogate the idea at all, does not say, like,

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, would it be good to colonize other planets,

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>other star systems and stuff. It just assumes Yeah, I mean,

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of course that's what you do. Humans. You know, they

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>spread over the surface of the Earth, and now they'll

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>keep spreading on into other little rocks in space. But

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the science fiction was so concerned with the question of

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>whether or not it could it didn't stop to think

0:03:48.800 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of it should. Yes, the the Ian Malcolm Uh factor

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>often uh features into our conversations here, because yeah, for

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>for many, if not most, of us, Colonization and of

0:04:00.240 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>other worlds has kind of always seemed humanity's destiny. And

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of it is simply the extrapolation of

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>our terrestrial ideals and ambitions and just the sort of

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.080
<v Speaker 1>flow of of world history. We're just taking that in

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.239
<v Speaker 1>applying it to other worlds. Our species spread from continent

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>to continent, finally overtaking every last, uh, you know, truly

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>habitable island in the global ocean. And so we've long

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>dreamt a voyaging off planet to whatever islands of life

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>or potential life we might find or create in this

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>cosmic ocean. Now, I know most of you consume science fiction,

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>so we don't have to tell you how pervasive the

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 1>dream happens to be. You know, Star Trek continues to

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>stand as a towering, optimistic example of how this might

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>play out. But we also see it in all manner

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of sci fi visions, you know, from the near future,

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>gritty world of something like the expanse or altered carbon,

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, to far reaching worlds like Doom, Star Our Wars,

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the Culture series, and many, many, many more. I think

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Dune might be a good example for us to keep

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.720
<v Speaker 1>in mind throughout this episode, though, because while I don't

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>recall in Dune there being much of a question about

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the general project of colonizing worlds other than than humanity's

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:20.680
<v Speaker 1>origin on Earth, um doing at least does present a

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>vision of a planet that is both inhabited and completely crappy,

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:31.919
<v Speaker 1>just completely inhospitable in every way, like we shouldn't be there,

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and yet we're there because we have to be. Now,

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>in Dune, that's because of demand for a particular resource

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that's only generated on this planet. But you could imagine

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:43.480
<v Speaker 1>other scenarios where there could be a planet that's just

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:47.599
<v Speaker 1>really not hospitable to human life in any way, except

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we just have to be there, maybe because it is

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the only rock that we can stand on within reach. Yeah.

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And there's also that kind of nietzsche In quality to

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 1>some of the world's too, like because there's of course

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 1>i Racus, and then there's the home world of the Sarticre,

0:06:03.480 --> 0:06:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the the you know, the elite soldiers of the Empire,

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:09.719
<v Speaker 1>which is described as a quote unquote hell world, the

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.039
<v Speaker 1>idea that it's just so brutal there that it it

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>creates the super soldiers, and of course uh Oracus creates

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 1>their own elite um fighting force as well. Uh So, yeah,

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>I think Dune is a great one to continually return

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>to the I think the world of the Sarto Car

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Troops come from. It's supposed to be sort of like

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the planet where the Superman villain dooms Day comes from,

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:35.160
<v Speaker 1>right where it's just like made stronger and stronger by

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>by being subjected to every form of punishment and suffering

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>day in day out. Yes, yeah, exactly, and and that

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that idea is covered in I think some other works

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>as well. I know, uh in in Banks in the

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Culture series has a has a species it shows up

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that is biologically immortal, and part of that is tied

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that it emerges from such a hostile

0:06:55.560 --> 0:07:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and competitive ecosystem. Uh that, like natural death was just

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:03.839
<v Speaker 1>never part of its of its physiology, you know. I

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>will say there's another science fiction book that I've talked

0:07:07.320 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>about on the show before. I think I recommended it

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>one year for summer reading that I really enjoyed, specifically

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>because it asks a question along these lines. It's uh,

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Kim Stanley Robinson's novel Aurora, which is about a generation

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>starship that has a colonization mission. Um, you know, trying

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to go to another star system and colonize another habitable planet.

0:07:26.600 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>But a big theme of that book is the question

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of just like how how special Earth might be, and

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>ways in which we we don't realize that leaving Earth

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>is just abandoning everything that we depend upon and everything

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that makes life good. And so ultimately there is kind

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of a question in the book like, well, maybe should

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.320
<v Speaker 1>we should we actually have our sight set on other planets,

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's something inescapably perfect about Earth, and instead we

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>should focus on making Earth as habitable as possible for

0:07:58.920 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>as long as possible. Um and and I remember, I

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>think reading some reviews of this book that criticized it

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>essentially as being like pessimistic and a down er for

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>for in some ways being characterized as anti space exploration,

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>which I'm not sure the book exactly is, but it

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>at least explores possibilities in that space, which I which

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I think is fascinating and very worth considering. Yeah, I

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>think the and and you know, actually a Christian and

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I record an episode years ago called the Case against

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Space that went into some cases that could be made

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:36.480
<v Speaker 1>against UH spending time and resources and money on on

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>space exploration, you know, just to explore the other side.

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>But but I think that one thing we get into

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>here is the kind of like soft futurism that we

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>sometimes engage in, like without really thinking long and hard

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 1>about the rigors of creating an off world colony of say,

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>colonizing and terraforming Mars. You just kind of tuck it

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.200
<v Speaker 1>away in the back of your mind, is like, oh, well,

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>we have a plan and and and and in reality,

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we we don't really have a plan. B. There is

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>no earth to um you were talking about very um

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>inhospitable worlds, extreme environments, places that are even the closest

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>uh locations we could go to our far far away

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and we've touched on the the like the challenges of

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of Mars on the show before. But it's it's a

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>danger to to just sort of categorize that casually in

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the back of your head as like a reason to

0:09:31.440 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 1>not fully invest in the health of this planet. Yeah, totally. Uh. Yeah,

0:09:36.920 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to be going around thinking like, well,

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>we gotta backup plan. Yeah, I mean long term, we might,

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>but that is in no way a guarantee. Yeah, but

0:09:47.880 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>but I do want to stress that, you know, speaking

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>for myself, I certainly still buy into this this future.

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:56.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it is an optimistic vision for the future

0:09:56.720 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>for the most part. But like all all things, considering

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the of the future, you know, we have to we

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>have to have a balance of optism and realism, and

0:10:03.760 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to entertain some of the worst case scenarios

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. Oh, totally. I mean, I want to be

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>clear that in talking about this today, we're not trying

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to make the case that space colonization is bad. We're

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>just saying, here are some questions to consider exactly. Yeah,

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>because I think a large part of this whole dream's

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>vision of expanding to other worlds, it's based in humanity's

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:30.480
<v Speaker 1>innate desire to explore and expand. It's our scientific zeal, uh,

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, and this is part of what makes humanity great.

0:10:33.720 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Though it also leaches into our vanity and pride, and

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.959
<v Speaker 1>more to the point, it is an eventuality that our

0:10:40.000 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>space programs continue to work towards you know, such dreams, Uh.

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Sci fi visions have animated the best minds among us

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>for decades and decades, and it seems ultimately a question

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>of when, not if a human being will, for instance,

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>ever stand on the surface of Mars. Well, I think

0:10:58.920 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 1>another reason that the idea of space exploration is so

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>popular among like optimistic future thinking people is like it

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 1>seems like it is the half of adventure that is

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>not that is not antagonistic and violent. I mean, I

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>would say adventure has two main components. One is like

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>exploration and discovery, and the other is kind of this

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 1>violent conquest thing. And you know, and we like the

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>sense of adventure, but maybe we we want a way

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to have adventure that doesn't involve subjugation and violent conquest

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of whatever you find when you get somewhere. And so

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>uh the and so space exploration seems like a perfect

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 1>candidate for that kind of spirit of adventure, right to

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>fulfill that drive without doing something harmful. Maybe there there

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>are these dead rocks out in the universe that we

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>could adventure two and we could explore without having to

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.439
<v Speaker 1>make it into a struggle of conquest in war. Does

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>that make sense? Yeah? Absolutely, yeah. Now certainly you know

0:11:55.160 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 1>there's sci fi visions that that drag those elements in

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and is we'll discussed there are some It's it's not

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that that space colonization is a risk free venture. It's

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:06.480
<v Speaker 1>not like they're there are not things that we could

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>potentially break while out there. But but yeah, it does

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>seem an optimiss The idea of exploring Mars, for the

0:12:13.960 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>most part, seems far less full of conflict and horror

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>than say, uh, you know Europeans history of exploring the

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>New World right now. Another huge angle to this, though,

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>is uh, is that there is this idea that humanity

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:34.079
<v Speaker 1>must eventually leave Earth in order to survive long term

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 1>in a dangerous universe and to thwart various existential risks.

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Hawking was an advocate of this line of thinking,

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 1>among many others. Yeah, I mean Stephen Hawking is not

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong in saying this. I mean there are risks to Earth.

0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:52.679
<v Speaker 1>And uh, here's here's an analogy maybe for for people

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>who are trying to like plan the retirement savings or whatever.

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Is it good to put all of your retirement savings

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in the stock of one company. Any any investment manager

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>or whatever would tell you don't do that. You need

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to diversify your investments in order to make sure that

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you know your that your money is safe. You've got

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to invest in multiple different things because if something bad

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.440
<v Speaker 1>happens to one company and you're totally invested there, you

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>could lose everything. Some people I think, look at you know,

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the planetary habitation of humans in the long term, the

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.800
<v Speaker 1>same way catastrophic things can happen to planets. There there

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:31.880
<v Speaker 1>can be catastrophic changes to the biosphere of a planet.

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>And so if you don't spread out to other planets

0:13:35.880 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>over time, the risk just keeps accumulating more and more

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:42.440
<v Speaker 1>that something is going to happen that will cause us

0:13:42.440 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to blink out of existence. Yeah, and and we discussed

0:13:45.240 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>many of these on the show before, you know, things

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>such as near Earth objects potentially colliding with the planet.

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>Also things bound to human technology like climate change, nuclear war,

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and another. Various exams upolth some some more futuristic than others,

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:09.480
<v Speaker 1>but most given known potential existential risk. You know with them,

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:11.680
<v Speaker 1>there are there are certainly ways to attempt to safeguard

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 1>against them, at least as far as as ones that

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:17.439
<v Speaker 1>are technologically within our limits of control. Uh. Now, can

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:21.080
<v Speaker 1>we control ourselves? Arguably, Yes, that's possible, even if it

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>tends to not be the case a lot of the

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>time in human affairs. Can we track and mitigate incoming

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:29.480
<v Speaker 1>in eos? Yeah, we're continuing to improve our capabilities in

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>that department. But as we get into long term concerns

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>about say the life of the sun, UH, we'd really

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 1>need to be higher on the Karda Chef scale to

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>do anything about it. And then there's also the issue

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>of outside context problems, which is a which are problems

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that by definition, a civilization cannot anticipate. As then in

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Banks explained in the in his book Accession, which is

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>where the term was coined, most civilizations encounter just a

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 1>one outside context problem, and that is what does them

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>in Now you might be thinking, well, wait a minute,

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>what's an example of an outside context problem? I guess

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the definition of it would be that it's something that

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>we're not really envisioning right now. But maybe the easiest

0:15:10.480 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>example would be an encounter with a with a totally

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>uh incomprehensible alien species or something. Yeah. Yeah, that that's

0:15:18.600 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the big one. UM And certainly like one example

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that is often thrown out. I think Banks made this

0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>uh analogy as well is if you are one of

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the native people's of say South America, and then European

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>show up on your shore in these in these ships

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>with horses and all this technology. UM. It is not

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.480
<v Speaker 1>something they anticipated. And there were and there were other

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.760
<v Speaker 1>aspects of that problem that they just could not anticipate,

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>say the disease factor. And uh, and they ultimately, I

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 1>mean they it's not that they were completely wiped out.

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>But obviously that whole situation was was an apocalypse for

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the people's of the New World. But another thing we

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>should emphasize again that you just mentioned a second ago,

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>is that, I mean, one thing we can be sure of,

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>even if we don't encounter any outside context problems, is

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>there's basically an expiration date for life on Earth that

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with like stochastic events like a

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>near Earth object impacts or something. It's just gonna be

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the the lifespan of the Sun. Eventually, the Sun is

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>going to swell, it's going to turn into a red

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>giant and and Earth will get too hot to live

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>on there there will be no life here anymore. Yeah,

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>and and a lot of times this can seem like

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous to worry about, right, but like, come on, humanity,

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>let's let's get through July. Uh about the long term

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>survival of the human race and what happens when when

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the Sun burns out of energy. I mean, we think

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the the habitable Earth is already probably more than halfway

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>through its lifespan. You know, Earth is about four and

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>a half billion years old, probably within um you know,

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to put an exact number on it, but

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I think something like four billion years from now we

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 1>can be pretty sure that that Earth is just gonna

0:16:57.320 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>be done like that. There will be no more life

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>here at that point. It will just be too hot. Now,

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.239
<v Speaker 1>four billion years is a long time, right, you know

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that that was enough time to for single cells to

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:11.479
<v Speaker 1>evolve into humans who are capable of appreciating the RoboCop movies,

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, and so like, uh, it is a long time.

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not like something you need to worry about tomorrow.

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, if you are trying to

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>imagine the far future, something would have to happen if

0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to go on beyond that point. Yeah, and

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that's reasonable though also, of course it is

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.040
<v Speaker 1>we are talking about the far future. Um. So in

0:17:32.080 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>this episode we thought we'd explore some of the moral

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>arguments that are ultimately against the colonization of other worlds.

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>The concern, again, to to quote Ian Malcolm, is not

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>can we do it. But should we do it? What

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 1>would the moral cost be uh to a true Tarran diaspora.

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 1>If we were to expand beyond the earth, what would

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>it cost us? And would it be worth it? What

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>are some of the philosophical concerns here? Well, maybe we

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:00.800
<v Speaker 1>should take a quick rake and then when we come

0:18:00.800 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>back we can talk about them. All Right, we're back.

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.240
<v Speaker 1>So one of the key factors in this entire discussion

0:18:09.800 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with the morality of human existence

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and what you might think of a sort of the

0:18:14.760 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>media and human condition. Uh So consider this question. Is

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>human existence on average a reality worth sustaining and propagating? Uh?

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, I know, obviously it's it's not like we

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.160
<v Speaker 1>could do anything but that, I mean, that's what life does.

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>And we are we are life, no matter how self

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>aware we've become or how you know, self aware we've

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>come to believe we are, we are still just we

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.439
<v Speaker 1>are life and life propagates. Yeah, and there are of

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>course people who believe, you know, that humans should voluntarily

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.280
<v Speaker 1>go extinct. That is actually a point of view some

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>people have. I kind of and I don't mean to

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>question everyone who says this, but with at least some

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.719
<v Speaker 1>of the people who say that, I kind of question

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>their sincerity. I mean with some of the people who

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>say that, I think they're probably just saying that to

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>be interesting or to be shocking, not because they really

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 1>believe humans should disappear right, or to sort of ext

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to over express a sentiment, you know, yeah, to to

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of drive home a point, like like I think

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 1>I've probably in in the past, I've probably said something

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to the effect that I would I would be totally

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>cool with the with the male gender going extinct and

0:19:22.840 --> 0:19:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the species become exclusively female. Um. But you know, now

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I have a son, and uh, you know I can't

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 1>rationally make that argument, you know, um, and it and

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>it was, ultimately, you know, not a completely rational argument.

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you know, a little attention seeking and a little uh,

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, trying to to to make a point, I suppose,

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>but uh but still, you know, all these sort of

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>questions and considerations do get into bigger questions about like

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>what are we doing? Like what is the what? And

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.800
<v Speaker 1>what are we doing wrong? And then what is the

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the overall shape of life? This is you know real,

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 1>this is the meat of philosophy and theology. Uh, you know,

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>why is there so much suffering in the world. Is

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>life suffering? Does all the suffering make the good parts

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>worth having? Is a miserable life better than no life

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>at all? Are their fates worse than death? I mean

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>this is These are questions we continue to wrestle with.

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.120
<v Speaker 1>And then there's also the big, big question of inequality here.

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>If only a small fraction of the human population, such

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>as you know, the much talented one percent, or or

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:29.280
<v Speaker 1>even some larger percentile, depending on what your parameters are,

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>if only this small fraction of the population has access

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to true comfort, health, happiness, or whatever your gage happens

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to be, then what does that say about the overall

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>health of the system. If the popular idea of what

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it is to be human is, say the lifestyle one

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>season a popular television show, be it Friends or the Kardashians,

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>or even like Seinfeld, you know, a nice sizeable apartment

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:57.440
<v Speaker 1>in all uh, then then how do we square how

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:01.879
<v Speaker 1>out of proportion these visions are with our reality, or

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:05.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of the standard reality on earth. And likewise we

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>might wonder which ideal we're envisioning UH to be installed

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 1>in an off world colony. What are we spreading to

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>other worlds? Beyond basic human presence and just sort of

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the staked flag of empire, or perhaps ideally we envisioned

0:21:19.840 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 1>that such off world realities would encompass just a vast

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>array of emotional states, uh, you know, and that things

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.159
<v Speaker 1>would even out tomorrow will be like today in the

0:21:28.240 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>arc of the moral universe, you know, will will bend

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>towards justice and so forth. So at this point I

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>wanna I want to turn to this, this subject of

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:40.399
<v Speaker 1>astronomical suffering. Uh. And this comes from a paper by

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Marco Covid. Uh. Not to be confused with Takeishi Kovaks,

0:21:45.160 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>which we referenced earlier. This is a k O V

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I see, with the last part having a c H

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:56.639
<v Speaker 1>pronunciation like in chocolate. So uh. So Covid is a

0:21:56.720 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Swiss social scientist who is the co found owner and

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>CEO of the consulting firm Ours Cognitanis, and whose work

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:08.159
<v Speaker 1>has been featured in Ian Magazine, among other places. He

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:11.479
<v Speaker 1>also has written extensively in German and the German language,

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and hosts a German language podcast titled Din Cautelier, which

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you can you can actually you can look up. It

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is d E n K A T E l I

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>E r dot x y Z. So if you were

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a German speaker, uh, check that out. It's uh, I

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:29.959
<v Speaker 1>would check it out if my German were not just

0:22:30.160 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the most basic level ever. Uh. So you wanted to

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.359
<v Speaker 1>do this topic today because you you read an article

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 1>by Covids, right, Yeah, It published in UM. It's an

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 1>open science framework publication titled Risks of Space Colonization. You

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>can access the full paper online and I urge everyone

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>to do so because it's a thought provoking read and

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>it really puts the whole enterprise of off world colonies

0:22:54.359 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>under philosophical scrutiny. Not to say that he doesn't touch

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>on ideas that I think are already out there in

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:02.159
<v Speaker 1>the in the zeitgeist, in the you know, the science

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 1>fiction whole consideration of the future. But but it's really

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>a great ride up. We're not going to go through

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:12.119
<v Speaker 1>everything Covid discusses here, because he certainly discusses the risks

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and rewards of space colonization, including the notion that the

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>acceleration of space colonization capability would just increase the existential

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>risk coming at us, like all the technological ways that

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:28.600
<v Speaker 1>we could potentially destroy ourselves or make life worse on

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the planet that being able to to move at great speeds,

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 1>to have orbital you know, supremacy, that these things would

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>just uh create more ways for us to hurt ourselves.

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I feel like we're doing a bad enough

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:45.439
<v Speaker 1>job already at avoiding species level risks. Yeah. Yeah, but

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 1>when you consider potential technologies like you know, rods from

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.880
<v Speaker 1>God and the idea that you know, you wouldn't even

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 1>need explosives if you had orbital supremacy, if you had

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>enough just mass up there in orbit that you could

0:23:57.400 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>drop down things like that, it's the ultimate high ground. Yeah, exactly. Uh.

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And he also discusses contact with microbial extratractical extraterrestrial life,

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:11.119
<v Speaker 1>which we've discussed on the show before, secession and independence,

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 1>reactionary colonies, intercolonial conflict, which is another topic we've definitely

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>uh produced episodes on, and much much more. But I

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.200
<v Speaker 1>wanted to focus in on some of the other ideas

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:27.120
<v Speaker 1>the outlines here, such as the risk of moral catastrophes

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>quote massively undesirable outcomes of engaging in space colonization but

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:37.919
<v Speaker 1>without any intent for or complacency towards doing harm, and

0:24:38.000 --> 0:24:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the first of these that he brings up is the

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>astronomical populations ethics conundrum. And to better understand that, we

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:50.920
<v Speaker 1>have to first consider what is known as the repugnant conclusion. Yeah. So, um,

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>if if we got any moral philosophy nerds out there,

0:24:53.920 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you will recognize this immediately. The idea of the repugnant

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 1>conclusion is, uh it's a very popular or question in

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the the domain of population ethics, this sub branch of

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 1>ethics about how to know what's the right thing to

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>do when considering the creation and maintenance of populations of people.

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh So. The repugnant conclusion is also known as the

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>mere addition problem, and it was famously articulated by the

0:25:20.080 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>British philosopher Derek Parfit in his nineteen eighty four book

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>Reasons and Persons. As often understood today, the repugnant conclusion

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>takes the form of a paradox about our intuitions on

0:25:32.000 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>population ethics. Uh And there are a lot of ways

0:25:34.600 --> 0:25:37.119
<v Speaker 1>of expressing or illustrating this paradox, but to make it

0:25:37.160 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>as simple and as clear as I can, the repugnant

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 1>conclusion is a statement like this, And this is a

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:48.280
<v Speaker 1>quote for from Derek Parfitt. Quote for any possible population

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of at least ten billion people, all with very high

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>quality of life. There must be some much larger imaginable

0:25:56.640 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 1>population whose existence, if other things are equal, would be better,

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 1>even though it's members have lives that are barely worth living.

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So that that sounds very counterintuitive, right, Like there's some

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>number we don't know exactly what it is. Maybe maybe

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you know ten trillion people who might have all completely

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>miserable lives, But it would be better for all those

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>people to exist than for some smaller number of people

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to exist, all having good lives. Now, how on earth

0:26:25.760 --> 0:26:29.159
<v Speaker 1>could you arrive at that conclusion? Well, let's illustrate with

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>an example. Um, And of course I'm slightly oversimplifying here

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:37.159
<v Speaker 1>because this arises in a discussion alongside another complicated issue

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>known as the non identity problem. And with respect to

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the repugnant conclusion, Parfitt himself uses an argument with more

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:48.399
<v Speaker 1>steps and bar graphs and stuff representing hypothetical human groups

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and qualities of life. I'm just gonna try to get

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to the heart of it in a simple and clear way.

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you're put in a weird experiment by a

0:26:55.880 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>godlike consortium of cardassiev three level alien scientists, who are

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 1>so technologically powerful that they can make realities come in

0:27:04.840 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and out of being at will. And they they give

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>you two options. They give you the option to make

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>one of two scenarios a reality. Robert, would you take

0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:17.720
<v Speaker 1>this test? Yes, let's do it. Okay, So scenario one.

0:27:18.160 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>You get to exist, but I do not get to exist.

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Imagine again, not really me. You don't know me. I'm

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>just some hypothetical other person yet to be born. In

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>your existence, you have a pretty nice life. You get

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>really good food, you have a nice house. You get

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to hang out with friends and family. You have free time,

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.200
<v Speaker 1>get to exercise and experience nature. You get to read

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>interesting books and pursue creative work. It's pretty great. But

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't exist at all. Now here's scenario to both

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:51.679
<v Speaker 1>you and I get to exist. You keep everything you

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>had in the previous scenario. You get good material conditions,

0:27:55.080 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>good relationships and social life, interesting creative projects to explore,

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Nothing at all changes for you. I, on

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, have a less exciting existence. I have

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>a few social relationships, but I only get to talk

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to people through a glass barrier, and I live in

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 1>a kind of dank, concrete building that's always dimly lit

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and a little bit too cold, and I get enough

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:20.720
<v Speaker 1>food to eat, but it's not very exciting. It's basically

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 1>just like microwave frozen fish sticks and tater tots and

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a vitamin supplement to keep me more or less healthy.

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I can still sort of pursue my interests in my

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>spare time, but I don't have a lot of spare

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 1>time after all of my shifts at the Hollywood Acid Factory. Now,

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>which scenario would you pick? Oh, this is hard because

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 1>with the first one you've kind of had me like, okay, uh,

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>this sounds fine. All you know, my life and my

0:28:44.760 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>connections and the things I'm invested in those exist and

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you don't exist. And so like there's you know there,

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't really have a dog in a hunt, right,

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you don't have any skin in that. You literally do

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>not have skin in the game. But then scenario too

0:28:59.640 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>makes is a lot more difficult because it's like now

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's kind of this question of do you get

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to exist in this kind of like in this you know,

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 1>this more miserable state or not like quite miserable. I

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know, depending how you frame it. But yeah, it's like,

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>then I feel like I am imposing on you if

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I say you can't exist. Right, So just imagine all

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>of that is true. But if you asked me, I

0:29:23.800 --> 0:29:25.520
<v Speaker 1>would say, well, of course I want to exist. I

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want to not exist. Yeah, And I do not

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>feel it is my place to decide that someone should

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>not exist, you know, due to the quality of their

0:29:35.960 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>life in this case, you know, I mean, this is

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a scenario to puts me in a very tough place. Yeah,

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think most people's intuition when confronted with this

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>problem is that it would be unfair to pick scenario one.

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Even though my existence in scenario two is not ideal.

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 1>You'd assume that if you asked me, I would still

0:29:55.600 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>rather exist than not exist. Right, So scenario too, this

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 1>context is, by most people's intuition, a better world. It's

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a more preferable world. If you had the option, scenario

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 1>two would be the better one to bring about. And

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to argue with that reasoning. In order

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to argue with that reasoning, you'd have to say that

0:30:15.080 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>you have the power unilaterally to say that other people

0:30:18.240 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be able to exist and live lives that they

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>might not rate as perfect but still would want to have.

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>But this opens up a very dangerous logic because it

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>means it's possible to increase the desirability of a world

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.320
<v Speaker 1>just by adding to the number of sentient minds that

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>want to keep existing in it. Again, this is why

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it's known as the mere addition problem. That you can

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:46.080
<v Speaker 1>create scenarios where it's better to have a world with

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>more minds in it as long as those minds would

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>say that they want to exist, even if the average

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>quality of human life is drastically reduced. So like, if

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you took the average quality of my existence in your

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>existence together in scenario two, then it would be lower

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:07.480
<v Speaker 1>than the average of your existence alone in scenario one.

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:10.480
<v Speaker 1>And then if you obey this maxim that you've set out,

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>now it seems like you're committed to a chain of

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:16.400
<v Speaker 1>logic that leads to the conclusion that the value of

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 1>quantity can overwhelm the variable of quality when it comes

0:31:20.760 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to human life, as as long as most people would

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 1>rather exist than not, some greater number of lives are

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>preferable to some smaller number, even if the lives and

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the greater number are pretty abjectly miserable. Now, I think

0:31:35.400 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we should know that this logic would not apply to

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>lives that are so miserable that people would say themselves

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that they would truly rather cease to exist. You could

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:47.120
<v Speaker 1>think of some kind of like torture, like hell world

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>or something, you know, like if hell existed, it would

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:52.360
<v Speaker 1>just be better for that to not exist. Yeah, this

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is the the the option we're talking about here is

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>more in line with to bring in us another great

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 1>science fiction example, uh, the Martian cal and he's in

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 1>total recall where most people have it pretty horrible there,

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>or at least it's a rough existence, but they would

0:32:07.880 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 1>still fight to survive. Yeah. Yeah, and they they get

0:32:10.840 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>into how like the the early like the settlers were

0:32:13.600 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>just basically living in caves. You know, it's just this

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>this brutal, primitive existence. And yet at the same time,

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like they you know, they're they're not in just constant torture. Yeah, exactly. Now,

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to be very clear, as we said at

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, the point of this is not that the

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:33.040
<v Speaker 1>repugnant conclusion is correct. It's actually you know, Derek Parfitt

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 1>highlights this to say, like this really seems to be incorrect.

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:39.560
<v Speaker 1>It really seems to go against our intuitions. So the

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>problem is figuring out what part of the logical chain

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that gets you there is wrong. Because I mean, most

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 1>people I think would say that this this conclusion is incorrect.

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 1>There are these practical moral implications to it. If it

0:32:53.000 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>were actually correct, If the repugnan conclusion were really did

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>have moral force, it would have implications like humans should

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.760
<v Speaker 1>engage in maximal natalism, right, like the idea that humans

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>should reproduce as much as possible to create as much

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>human life as we possibly can, because to create less

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 1>than the maximum possible amount of human life would be immoral.

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Under this view, if you didn't work to maximize the

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>human population, you're denying future people the right to exist.

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>And again, you know too many people. That seems intuitively absurd.

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Why would you trade a world with less people living

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>fulfilling lives for a world with vastly more people living

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>lives you know, at the edge of what resources they

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 1>can get to barely survive. For instance, you could think

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:41.240
<v Speaker 1>about it in terms of cat ownership, you know, like

0:33:41.880 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>one one cat, in my opinion, is enough. Um. But

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I could see myself talked into all right,

0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>we need to get a second cat. This cat needs

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a home. Let's let's let's do it. But then the

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.680
<v Speaker 1>more cats you add to a house, the more chaotic

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it becomes, the more work has to go into taking

0:33:58.920 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>care of those cats, until you reach a point where

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just about quantity over quality, right right, exactly. Now, Again,

0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>this isn't to assume any particular correlation between the number

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 1>of people on Earth in their quality of life. I

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:17.320
<v Speaker 1>mean I think that, um, there are actually some naive

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>assumptions going around about about increasing human populations necessarily always

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>leading to bad outcomes. I don't think we should we

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>should take those conclusions for granted, but just saying that, like,

0:34:29.040 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>if you assume at some point, you know, if there

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:35.360
<v Speaker 1>were a hundred trillion humans on Earth, you can definitely

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>say that that would that would cause problems for for

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:41.600
<v Speaker 1>ecosystems and stuff, right right. And and also, just before

0:34:41.600 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 1>anybody writes me if you have multiple cats in your home,

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I am not judging you. I am just saying that

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>multiple cats, uh, does not feel right for me personally

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:54.319
<v Speaker 1>my personal household. But I know plenty of people with

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>lots of cats and they seem quite happy with the situation.

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>But but even they, I think, would probably admit that

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:05.279
<v Speaker 1>there is there is some threshold cat ownership. Right, even

0:35:05.320 --> 0:35:07.919
<v Speaker 1>if you're you're you're a sort of like cat maximalist

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in a practical sense, you're not really because you're not

0:35:10.719 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>trying to get five hundred cats in your house. Yeah,

0:35:13.719 --> 0:35:19.200
<v Speaker 1>because that's when, yeah, that's when law enforcement gets involved. Right. Um,

0:35:19.239 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 1>But then okay, so so on the on the one hand,

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking, like, no, that that can't be right, But

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 1>then compare it again to our other intuitions that got

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:28.720
<v Speaker 1>us there in the first place. Even if you wish

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:31.479
<v Speaker 1>the quality of your life were much better, most people

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:35.160
<v Speaker 1>would prefer existing over not existing, even people who are

0:35:35.200 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in pain, who lack the things that we desire, we

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>would mostly prefer to be able to exist rather than

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 1>not exist. And so it would certainly be wrong of

0:35:44.000 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>us to decide on other people's behalf that their lives

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>are not worth living. Right. Yeah, I think there's a

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a strong argument for that. Um, you know, we

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:55.279
<v Speaker 1>we do get it. We are getting into I know

0:35:55.320 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that there are all sorts of lights going off in

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>people's heads about varying you know, issues, but but but still,

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that is a for the most part of

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:05.399
<v Speaker 1>rational argument. Well, at least it's it feels that way.

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't necessarily mean it's right. So this is a

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>paradox we've got. It seems like we must choose between

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>two conclusions that both feel morally wrong. So what are

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the ways of resolving this paradox? Because so the conclusion

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is widely considered unacceptable. Parfit himself. Again, he articulates this,

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:25.720
<v Speaker 1>but not to say that the repugnant conclusion is correct.

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.800
<v Speaker 1>He brings it up to say, like, this is obviously wrong.

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:31.320
<v Speaker 1>We have to figure out why this isn't the case,

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and uh. Other philosophers have tried to find ways to

0:36:34.640 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>avoid the conclusion by like questioning some of the premises

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:41.720
<v Speaker 1>or introducing other considerations. So, for example, you could argue

0:36:41.800 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>that maximizing the average quality of human life is the

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>ideal and so so not like the number of people,

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>but you just want to make the average human life

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:53.479
<v Speaker 1>quality as high as possible. But under this model you'd

0:36:53.520 --> 0:36:56.400
<v Speaker 1>run into problems. For instance, you could improve the world

0:36:56.480 --> 0:37:00.080
<v Speaker 1>by killing everyone except the happiest person in it, and

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 1>then it would have the maximum average happiness. Uh. Then

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>again you could you could go back against that and say, well,

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:10.480
<v Speaker 1>surely killing everyone else would decrease this person's quality of life.

0:37:11.320 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But you can imagine like weird sci fi hypotheticals to

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 1>get around this, maybe, for example, that the best possible

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 1>world is the one with just one maximally satisfied person

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>living in a simulation of real life for the wind

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>howls around the you know waste land bunker that houses

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>that that person's real body. Yeah, that that reminds me

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:33.880
<v Speaker 1>of a There was a Zoom meeting that I attended

0:37:33.920 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 1>this morning. There was like a like a like a

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:39.480
<v Speaker 1>dad's meeting. There's a line with the school where my

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>son goes, and we were all asked to rate our

0:37:42.800 --> 0:37:45.839
<v Speaker 1>current level of happiness from a one to a kin

0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 1>like one being like just I just just absolute misery,

0:37:48.840 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess, and tim being like awesome, and most of

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 1>us put in sevens. I found I put on myself

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 1>put in a seven. There was like a seven point

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to someone had a seven point seven. I think somebody

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:01.399
<v Speaker 1>somebody was having a tough time, and you know, put

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>in like a six or a five. And then one

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 1>person put in a tin and I was I was

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>just like wow, like who let let's hand ownership of

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the what are they doing where they have the you know,

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the tins? So in this scenario, it's like, just cut

0:38:16.560 --> 0:38:18.880
<v Speaker 1>out all the sevens and let's just have only the

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:21.600
<v Speaker 1>guy with the tin and uh, and he shall be

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the uh the population of Earth. Right, So that obviously

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 1>goes against our moral intuitions as well. It does not

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>feel right that you could you could improve the moral

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:33.840
<v Speaker 1>worth of the world just by eliminating all the unhappy people.

0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>That's obviously wrong. Uh So, yeah, you're still stuck with

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:39.279
<v Speaker 1>this problem. Is there are a bunch of ways the

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:41.839
<v Speaker 1>different philosophers have have tried to deal with it. Some

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:45.080
<v Speaker 1>have introduced like like sort of ad hoc ways of

0:38:45.160 --> 0:38:49.680
<v Speaker 1>calculating life value that's somewhat favor average quality of life,

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:53.120
<v Speaker 1>but don't totally put that above number of people. I mean,

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 1>it's just like, this is clearly a difficult problem to

0:38:56.760 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>resolve some things that we believe in our intent with

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>each other. But however you try to deal with the problem,

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it is not hard at all to imagine how this

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:10.800
<v Speaker 1>thought experiment has an impact on the idea of space

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:14.800
<v Speaker 1>exploration and space colonization. Because think about it again, Okay,

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>imagine you're charting out to futures for humanity, and one

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is a is a future where we stay here on

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Earth and people you know, there there are varying qualities

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of life. But let's say, you know, in a in

0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a better future scenario, maybe we we implement some kind

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:34.920
<v Speaker 1>of social structure that gets basically everybody on Earth's quality

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:37.719
<v Speaker 1>of life up to a certain level where people have

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the resources they need, they can pursue creative work, they

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>can they can hang out in a in a you know,

0:39:44.080 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>unpolluted natural environment, experience nature, have good social relationships. You know,

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 1>take a best case scenario, there still the number of

0:39:52.320 --> 0:39:55.480
<v Speaker 1>people who could live on Earth in that scenario is

0:39:55.520 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 1>going to be somewhat limited. Meanwhile, you could have a

0:39:59.320 --> 0:40:02.560
<v Speaker 1>lot more potential for human life and human flourishing. And

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're playing the odds game against like you

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:07.320
<v Speaker 1>know what, if you know, we get a space impact

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:10.799
<v Speaker 1>or something really bad happens to planet Earth itself, you

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:13.919
<v Speaker 1>can have a lot more potential for human life if

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you were to spread out to other objects throughout the

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, throughout the Solar System or throughout you know,

0:40:20.080 --> 0:40:23.279
<v Speaker 1>other star systems in the Milky Way. But if you

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:25.600
<v Speaker 1>take a pessimistic view of what those would be like,

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you can easily imagine how those existences might be pretty crappy,

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, like you're you're trying to live on Mars,

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 1>but the exploration of Mars is in one sense exciting,

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 1>but also Mars is a horrible place. It's just horrible,

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Like would you really would you really want to live

0:40:43.480 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 1>there in say an underground bunker that had to shield

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:49.879
<v Speaker 1>you from radiation, and you know, you're you're eating these

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:52.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of bland foods, and you know, there's only a

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:54.959
<v Speaker 1>couple of other people who you can interact with face

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:57.359
<v Speaker 1>to face, and you can't go outside, you can't see

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a tree, you know, and and and so forth. Yeah,

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and if you're also looking at a situation where it's

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 1>not even like I'm going to make this this world,

0:41:05.680 --> 0:41:08.720
<v Speaker 1>this Martian world better for my children. If it's more like, well,

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in a thousand years, things will be much better, you know,

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it It becomes kind of difficult to imagine, you know,

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 1>getting in the mindset of you know, of of the

0:41:20.480 --> 0:41:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of that particular individual, right, and so this I feel

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 1>like this kind of question, the idea of space colonization

0:41:27.800 --> 0:41:31.359
<v Speaker 1>in a way is one particular scenario for making the

0:41:31.400 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 1>paradox of the repugnan conclusion kind of concrete. Like imagining

0:41:37.040 --> 0:41:40.360
<v Speaker 1>these different options, both of them feel kind of wrong

0:41:40.480 --> 0:41:42.719
<v Speaker 1>in a way, and this brings us back to uh

0:41:42.880 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>CO budges astro astronomical population ethics conundrum. He writes, quote,

0:41:47.840 --> 0:41:51.399
<v Speaker 1>in the context of space colonization, the repugnant conclusion could

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 1>mean that a dystopian future in which dozens or hundreds

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of billions of humans across different habitats in our Solar

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:02.600
<v Speaker 1>system and beyond live miserable, brutish, anguish field lives is

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 1>a future that is morble preferable to, for example, a

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 1>future in which there are only a few billion people

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:12.399
<v Speaker 1>who live happy lives on Earth. Now, Covid points out

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:15.279
<v Speaker 1>that yes, this is an extreme possibility, but that it's

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:18.439
<v Speaker 1>not unreasonable to presume that life on the off world

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:20.200
<v Speaker 1>colonies would indeed be hard. You know, we've just been

0:42:20.200 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 1>discussing how brutal Mars is. I mean, heck um, I

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>think it's a nanio degrass Tyson, for instance, has brought

0:42:27.160 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>up look at Antarctica, and Arctica is infinitely more hospitable

0:42:31.920 --> 0:42:35.399
<v Speaker 1>than Mars, and outside of what a few thousand people

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:38.040
<v Speaker 1>during the summer and barely a thousand people during the winter.

0:42:38.239 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 1>We don't have human life on Earth's fifth largest continent. Yeah,

0:42:42.120 --> 0:42:45.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, yeah, I think about how how uninhabitable not

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:49.839
<v Speaker 1>just an Arctica like most of Earth is. This is funny, like,

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, Earth is the place we can live, but

0:42:52.680 --> 0:42:55.279
<v Speaker 1>we can't even live on most of it. Most of

0:42:55.320 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the surface of the Earth is uninhabitable. It's either ocean

0:42:58.600 --> 0:43:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is open ocean, or it is you know, desert or

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>uninhabitable tundra, ice sheets like they are actually really just

0:43:07.040 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 1>these kind of slivers of the surface that are good

0:43:10.160 --> 0:43:12.839
<v Speaker 1>for us to settle down on. Yeah, I mean when

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you consider like the hard surface of the Earth, most

0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:21.839
<v Speaker 1>of the Earth's surface is a dark, high pressure deep

0:43:21.880 --> 0:43:25.879
<v Speaker 1>sea environment where where we we have no place. Uh so, yeah,

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:28.959
<v Speaker 1>we're we're clinging to the you know, to the parts

0:43:29.000 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of the world that we can live and VR technology,

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're able to to live in a lot

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of places that we wouldn't be able to otherwise. But

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:39.839
<v Speaker 1>but still yeah, we again, it comes kind of back

0:43:39.840 --> 0:43:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Kardashi of scale, like in terms of technology

0:43:43.719 --> 0:43:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and just sort of maximizing our planet, Like we're not

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:50.479
<v Speaker 1>even on wrong one yet, so you know, and trying

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:53.320
<v Speaker 1>to imagine people living on an world off world colony.

0:43:53.520 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 1>People born into life in another world would not exist

0:43:56.719 --> 0:44:00.120
<v Speaker 1>at all if not for the establishment of that colony. So,

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 1>on one hand of the paradox, colonizing other worlds is

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:06.080
<v Speaker 1>an inherently moral act because you know, because if you

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:08.680
<v Speaker 1>don't do it, they won't exist. But what if there

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>are not places where happiness and peace are going to

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:15.319
<v Speaker 1>be easily found? What if these are harsh, frontier colonies,

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:19.480
<v Speaker 1>even hell worlds? Uh in you know, to varying degrees

0:44:19.920 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that expand the fact of human habitation, but do so

0:44:23.080 --> 0:44:26.360
<v Speaker 1>via the reality of human suffering. So Covac connects this

0:44:26.480 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to that other standard problem of population ethics that we

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:33.759
<v Speaker 1>already mentioned, uh, the non identity problem, which just to

0:44:33.760 --> 0:44:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to reiterate that the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy states that

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it quote raises questions regarding the obligations we think we

0:44:41.760 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>have in respect of people who, by our own acts

0:44:44.680 --> 0:44:47.920
<v Speaker 1>are caused both to exist and who have existences that are,

0:44:48.280 --> 0:44:52.799
<v Speaker 1>though worth having, unavoidably flawed existence is that is, that

0:44:52.840 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 1>are flawed if those people are ever to have them

0:44:56.160 --> 0:45:00.040
<v Speaker 1>at all. Yeah, so on the non identity problem. And

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 1>this is part of the same context in which Derek

0:45:02.440 --> 0:45:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Parfitt's discussion of the repugnant conclusion was described. It's another paradox.

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 1>It's it takes the same form showing that where it

0:45:10.160 --> 0:45:12.879
<v Speaker 1>seems like you have a couple of options and they

0:45:12.920 --> 0:45:16.640
<v Speaker 1>both seem morally wrong due to our intuitions. So so

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:20.480
<v Speaker 1>he shows that there are three premises that are intuitively true,

0:45:20.560 --> 0:45:23.840
<v Speaker 1>but they're in conflict with each other. Uh So, first

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:26.879
<v Speaker 1>of all, there's the premise of what's known as the

0:45:27.000 --> 0:45:30.600
<v Speaker 1>person affecting view, and this is the belief that an

0:45:30.640 --> 0:45:34.479
<v Speaker 1>act can only be wrong if it harms someone in

0:45:34.560 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 1>some way, and actually that does no harm to anyone

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:41.439
<v Speaker 1>cannot be morally wrong. And of course this doesn't apply

0:45:41.600 --> 0:45:43.879
<v Speaker 1>just a physical harm. This would be, you know, any

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:47.400
<v Speaker 1>way of making someone's life, for situation worse. And if

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:50.319
<v Speaker 1>you disagree with this, try to think of something that

0:45:50.360 --> 0:45:53.280
<v Speaker 1>it's wrong to do but that would never hurt anyone

0:45:53.360 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>in any way. The state off marshmallow man um I mean,

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:01.719
<v Speaker 1>And and so people might have views about that, I mean,

0:46:01.760 --> 0:46:04.880
<v Speaker 1>some people might adhere to, like a what might be

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:08.360
<v Speaker 1>called a deontological view of morality where there are just

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:10.880
<v Speaker 1>certain things that are that are moral and immoral and

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it actually does not flow from consequentialism from how it

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 1>affects other people. But but I mean, a very common

0:46:16.920 --> 0:46:20.240
<v Speaker 1>view among philosophers today would be that you know, there's

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:24.320
<v Speaker 1>something about morality that has to involve effects on people,

0:46:24.440 --> 0:46:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and if something doesn't hurt anyone, it's hard to see

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:30.560
<v Speaker 1>how it's wrong. So that's the first idea, that that

0:46:30.680 --> 0:46:33.879
<v Speaker 1>there is a person affecting view of morality, that something

0:46:33.920 --> 0:46:36.560
<v Speaker 1>can only be wrong if it harms someone. The second

0:46:36.560 --> 0:46:40.640
<v Speaker 1>premise is that bringing a person into existence is not

0:46:41.120 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 1>bad for that person, even if their existence is flawed,

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 1>because being caused to exist is not a reduction in

0:46:49.600 --> 0:46:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the quality of one's existence. There is no higher baseline

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:56.440
<v Speaker 1>from which you are reduced by being caused to exist

0:46:56.480 --> 0:46:58.759
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. Does that make sense? So it's

0:46:58.800 --> 0:47:01.040
<v Speaker 1>not like you were doing great but for you existed,

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and then once you existed, then that was like a

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:07.040
<v Speaker 1>downgrading of how good you're doing. And then the third

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:10.480
<v Speaker 1>premise would be that some acts of bringing people into

0:47:10.520 --> 0:47:14.920
<v Speaker 1>existence are wrong anyway. Imagine, for example, creating an underworld

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:17.799
<v Speaker 1>space colony where the people there are going to be

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:21.240
<v Speaker 1>haunted by space more locks that hound them every waking second,

0:47:21.400 --> 0:47:24.000
<v Speaker 1>like you would think it would be wrong to create

0:47:24.080 --> 0:47:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that place, right, Yes, yes, I mean I'm try I'm

0:47:29.120 --> 0:47:31.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to envision all the ways that you know, we

0:47:31.480 --> 0:47:35.000
<v Speaker 1>can reach the space more locks and change them and

0:47:35.000 --> 0:47:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, bring space more locks and human colonists together.

0:47:38.560 --> 0:47:42.000
<v Speaker 1>But but it does sound pretty daunting. Yeah, And so

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:45.759
<v Speaker 1>this is another problem along these lines. To to a

0:47:45.760 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of philosophers, all of these premises seem correct, but

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:51.279
<v Speaker 1>they can't all be right at the same time. They're

0:47:51.280 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in conflict with each other. So COVID ways in on this.

0:47:54.719 --> 0:47:57.759
<v Speaker 1>He says, in the case of our dystopian space colonization

0:47:57.800 --> 0:48:01.200
<v Speaker 1>thought experiment, however, the horrible future or is not actually

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:04.480
<v Speaker 1>bad for anyone. If it weren't for our dystopian space

0:48:04.480 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 1>colonization activities, all those billions of people beyond Earth who

0:48:08.080 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 1>live miserable lives barely worth living would not exist at all.

0:48:11.280 --> 0:48:13.439
<v Speaker 1>From the point of view of those future people, then

0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:17.040
<v Speaker 1>their miserable lives are still preferable to the alternative, which

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:19.919
<v Speaker 1>is not having come into existence at all. The fact

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:22.960
<v Speaker 1>that they were brought into their miserable existence was therefore

0:48:23.040 --> 0:48:25.880
<v Speaker 1>not morally bad for them. And and this basically is

0:48:25.960 --> 0:48:28.719
<v Speaker 1>the second premise I mentioned a minute ago, that it's

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:32.120
<v Speaker 1>not bringing someone into existence can't be bad for them

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:35.799
<v Speaker 1>because it does not constitute a downgrading or reduction in

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:38.520
<v Speaker 1>their quality of life. They didn't have a baseline to

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:42.440
<v Speaker 1>start from. Yeah, so covid he ends up contending that,

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:46.680
<v Speaker 1>via these problems, enabling a future of space colonies is

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>at least less morally desirable than other alternatives, but perhaps

0:48:51.120 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>even morally questionable. And this brings us to the next

0:48:54.560 --> 0:48:58.880
<v Speaker 1>phase of his consideration, and that is astronomical suffering in

0:48:59.000 --> 0:49:02.360
<v Speaker 1>off world human populations. All right, well, let's take a

0:49:02.400 --> 0:49:05.000
<v Speaker 1>break and then we can come back and explore some

0:49:05.080 --> 0:49:13.359
<v Speaker 1>suffering than alright, we're back astronomical suffering, deep hurting. If

0:49:13.400 --> 0:49:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you were a centobyte, then you you may have skipped

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:18.960
<v Speaker 1>forward to this portion of the podcast because you just

0:49:19.000 --> 0:49:23.239
<v Speaker 1>want some good suffering. Uh So Coverage contends the pain

0:49:23.320 --> 0:49:26.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Mars colony will be legendary even in Hell. Yeah,

0:49:26.520 --> 0:49:29.280
<v Speaker 1>this is where they should have gone in. Uh imagine

0:49:29.360 --> 0:49:31.719
<v Speaker 1>if if we could do a read a redo of

0:49:32.080 --> 0:49:37.919
<v Speaker 1>Hell raised or three um four four, the space one

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 1>three is the one with the with the like disco

0:49:41.160 --> 0:49:44.359
<v Speaker 1>club and is it in England or I think it's

0:49:44.360 --> 0:49:47.359
<v Speaker 1>in the US. Okay, I can't remember. The one with

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:51.359
<v Speaker 1>the camera head cinebite and the c D cinebyte. Yes. Yeah,

0:49:51.400 --> 0:49:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the fourth one is in space and it's largely incomprehensible.

0:49:54.800 --> 0:49:59.960
<v Speaker 1>But imagine if it had decided to explore astronomical suffering instead.

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:05.560
<v Speaker 1>So Covid contends that increasing maximum total well being is

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:08.880
<v Speaker 1>questionable if the amount of suffering in the universe also increases,

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:11.799
<v Speaker 1>but he goes on to argue that the astronomical non

0:50:11.920 --> 0:50:16.560
<v Speaker 1>identity problem is the question of suffering. Quote merely maximizing

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:19.080
<v Speaker 1>total well being is questionable if at the same time

0:50:19.080 --> 0:50:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the amount of suffering is increased to such a degree

0:50:21.680 --> 0:50:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that average well being decreases. The problem. The increase in

0:50:24.719 --> 0:50:30.080
<v Speaker 1>suffering through space colonization can be understood as a is

0:50:30.120 --> 0:50:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a risk sue, generous or unique one, and that is

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 1>astronomical suffering. So part of the you know, the certainty

0:50:37.680 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 1>here entails suboptimal conditions for future humans and other worlds,

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:44.600
<v Speaker 1>worlds where any any of the sci fi scenarios we've

0:50:44.600 --> 0:50:48.360
<v Speaker 1>already discussed uh could potentially come to life. Like anything

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you've ever seen in the science fiction film where off

0:50:51.160 --> 0:50:55.600
<v Speaker 1>worlders have it hard, you know, living in caves, depending

0:50:55.640 --> 0:50:59.120
<v Speaker 1>on ailing or even failing technology, having to live with

0:50:59.160 --> 0:51:03.600
<v Speaker 1>astonishingly eye levels of radiation, sickness, uh, having your health

0:51:03.719 --> 0:51:07.880
<v Speaker 1>impacted by by microbiota on this other world or some

0:51:07.920 --> 0:51:11.239
<v Speaker 1>sort of disrupted microbiota that you've brought with you. You know,

0:51:11.320 --> 0:51:14.279
<v Speaker 1>things are out of sync. Um worlds where humans have

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:18.919
<v Speaker 1>to endure harsh conditions due to heat, cold or both

0:51:19.000 --> 0:51:21.960
<v Speaker 1>in the case of like a tidily locked world, high pressure,

0:51:22.000 --> 0:51:27.919
<v Speaker 1>low gravity, high gravity, caustic atmosphere, resource scarcity, dangerous native biology,

0:51:27.960 --> 0:51:32.680
<v Speaker 1>electromagnetic field anomalies, and heightened inneo activity, just to name

0:51:32.719 --> 0:51:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a few. And he also mentions the idea of invasive

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:39.640
<v Speaker 1>biology brought by by the colonists themselves, as well as

0:51:39.680 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a few technical possibilities. One the future simulations of sentient beings,

0:51:45.840 --> 0:51:48.759
<v Speaker 1>which is something we've discussed on the show before. Uh,

0:51:48.800 --> 0:51:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the idea that you know, you're you're dealing with a

0:51:51.480 --> 0:51:55.319
<v Speaker 1>heightened level of technology to even establish these worlds. So

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 1>does that also bring about all the the problems of say,

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:03.319
<v Speaker 1>creating sentient life inside of simulation and then putting it

0:52:03.360 --> 0:52:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in a hell box and then copy and pasting that

0:52:06.239 --> 0:52:10.880
<v Speaker 1>hell box, say a million times, you know. Um, like,

0:52:11.000 --> 0:52:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the horrible idea. I think we got into

0:52:13.080 --> 0:52:16.400
<v Speaker 1>that a bit in the Basilisk episode. And then he

0:52:16.440 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 1>also brings up misaligned artificial intelligence. UM. So we also

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:23.800
<v Speaker 1>have to deal with the possibility of of a I

0:52:24.400 --> 0:52:27.640
<v Speaker 1>UH coming online and UH and part of the scenario

0:52:27.920 --> 0:52:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and being part of the the overall uh unhappiness of

0:52:32.080 --> 0:52:35.759
<v Speaker 1>part of the overall UH suffering of the universe. Still,

0:52:35.800 --> 0:52:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the author contends that the scenarios that could lead to

0:52:38.360 --> 0:52:41.799
<v Speaker 1>astronomical suffering are vague and the conclusions we might draw

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:45.520
<v Speaker 1>not altogether clear. On one hand, it's possible that space

0:52:45.560 --> 0:52:50.080
<v Speaker 1>colonization could result in astronomical human suffering UH, and then

0:52:50.120 --> 0:52:51.680
<v Speaker 1>this would this If this were the case, it would

0:52:51.719 --> 0:52:55.560
<v Speaker 1>obviously be a disvalue. On the other hand, it's possible

0:52:55.600 --> 0:52:58.240
<v Speaker 1>that it that space colonization could result in an increase

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in human well being but huge decrease in non human

0:53:02.320 --> 0:53:05.719
<v Speaker 1>well being in terms of um, you know, the well

0:53:05.760 --> 0:53:09.360
<v Speaker 1>being of of other organisms. UH. This you know, because

0:53:09.360 --> 0:53:14.200
<v Speaker 1>potentially non human organisms, sentient and or non sentient digital

0:53:14.320 --> 0:53:16.680
<v Speaker 1>entities that are denied human status, so I could also

0:53:16.719 --> 0:53:20.759
<v Speaker 1>affect you know, general aies in this universe that we're imagining.

0:53:21.080 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, he also adds that such colonization

0:53:23.080 --> 0:53:26.279
<v Speaker 1>could be a force of good regarding Aiyes, I thought

0:53:26.360 --> 0:53:29.880
<v Speaker 1>this was interesting quote. It is also possible that space

0:53:29.920 --> 0:53:34.759
<v Speaker 1>colonization could result in the reduction of astronomical suffering. If

0:53:34.840 --> 0:53:39.040
<v Speaker 1>humankind were able to, for example, detect and correct misaligned

0:53:39.120 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 1>extraterrestrial artificial intelligence, that could reduce or prevent enormous amounts

0:53:44.040 --> 0:53:48.000
<v Speaker 1>of suffering. Of course, the existence of extraterrestrial artificial intelligence

0:53:48.400 --> 0:53:52.480
<v Speaker 1>is itself also a highly uncertain proposition, So I guess

0:53:52.520 --> 0:53:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea here is like, if we if we were

0:53:54.560 --> 0:53:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to venture out and we discover an alien AI that

0:53:58.280 --> 0:54:01.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, for instance, has created digital hell worlds full

0:54:02.000 --> 0:54:05.400
<v Speaker 1>oft of digital sentient beings that are being suffered, we

0:54:05.480 --> 0:54:08.480
<v Speaker 1>could we could correct that AI. We could wage a

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:12.440
<v Speaker 1>holy war against that digital hell which is exactly Uh,

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:14.919
<v Speaker 1>this is actually a major plot point in the Nan

0:54:15.040 --> 0:54:19.879
<v Speaker 1>m Banks novel. Um. Uh that that that that's that's

0:54:19.920 --> 0:54:22.640
<v Speaker 1>really explored wonderfully. I've discussed it on the show before.

0:54:23.000 --> 0:54:25.080
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, this would be this would be one

0:54:25.120 --> 0:54:29.680
<v Speaker 1>specific and granted, you know, um far fetched scenario in

0:54:29.719 --> 0:54:35.280
<v Speaker 1>which we could potentially, uh improve the state of suffering

0:54:35.600 --> 0:54:39.719
<v Speaker 1>in the universe if we win. If we're there, that's right,

0:54:40.160 --> 0:54:42.759
<v Speaker 1>because yeah, because I do know the idea of encountering

0:54:42.840 --> 0:54:47.280
<v Speaker 1>extraterrestrials much less extraterrestrial aies. There's a lot of factors

0:54:47.320 --> 0:54:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to consider there. Or what if we're the bad guys

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and we win, then then of course, well I guess

0:54:52.520 --> 0:54:55.160
<v Speaker 1>he acknowledges that could go both ways, right, Yeah, yeah,

0:54:55.200 --> 0:54:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean we could the other side of his yeahs

0:54:57.040 --> 0:54:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we we we sort of fulfill what has largely been

0:55:00.080 --> 0:55:03.319
<v Speaker 1>the human nature of exploration, and we encounter the other

0:55:03.640 --> 0:55:07.279
<v Speaker 1>civilization and bring misery and horror to it. So he

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:10.280
<v Speaker 1>contends that there are so many unknowns that to avoid

0:55:10.320 --> 0:55:13.799
<v Speaker 1>such colonization would ultimately be uh, it would be it

0:55:13.800 --> 0:55:16.640
<v Speaker 1>would be Pascal's Wager all over again, right, Uh, the

0:55:16.719 --> 0:55:19.759
<v Speaker 1>idea that Pascal's Wager essentially we discussed in more depth

0:55:19.760 --> 0:55:22.239
<v Speaker 1>than the show before, but essentially boiling down to, well,

0:55:22.640 --> 0:55:24.959
<v Speaker 1>should I believe in God or not believe in God?

0:55:25.200 --> 0:55:26.839
<v Speaker 1>To be on the safe side, I'll just go ahead

0:55:26.840 --> 0:55:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and believe in him just in case. Now Pascal's wager.

0:55:29.840 --> 0:55:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I think people who have boned up on their philosophy

0:55:32.960 --> 0:55:35.240
<v Speaker 1>might notice that there are a lot of hidden assumptions

0:55:35.280 --> 0:55:38.360
<v Speaker 1>and Pascal's wager that uh that make it maybe not

0:55:38.440 --> 0:55:41.840
<v Speaker 1>as forceful as it would have seemed to Pascal's audience

0:55:41.840 --> 0:55:45.600
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Yes, yes, so yeah. He ultimately says

0:55:45.600 --> 0:55:48.879
<v Speaker 1>that we get into similar territory here, but that nevertheless,

0:55:50.239 --> 0:55:52.520
<v Speaker 1>given the dimension of risk, he says, the problem of

0:55:52.560 --> 0:55:56.359
<v Speaker 1>astronomical suffering is certainly something that we should pay attention to,

0:55:56.400 --> 0:55:59.239
<v Speaker 1>we should think about. Uh, you know that that in

0:55:59.360 --> 0:56:01.279
<v Speaker 1>leaving the plan it or you just in considering the

0:56:01.280 --> 0:56:05.920
<v Speaker 1>future of humanity like that is that is one possibility

0:56:05.960 --> 0:56:08.799
<v Speaker 1>that is like one road to stagnation that we have

0:56:08.960 --> 0:56:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to at least consider a few other ideas that he

0:56:12.880 --> 0:56:14.880
<v Speaker 1>raises here. First of all, he says, you know, he

0:56:15.120 --> 0:56:19.040
<v Speaker 1>drives home against space colonization is not a risk free

0:56:19.160 --> 0:56:22.919
<v Speaker 1>venture and shouldn't be approached as such. So yeah, even

0:56:22.920 --> 0:56:25.480
<v Speaker 1>though it is often this kind of optimistic vision in

0:56:25.520 --> 0:56:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the back of our heads that maybe we should we

0:56:28.080 --> 0:56:32.000
<v Speaker 1>should try and counterbalance that with a little bit of

0:56:32.000 --> 0:56:36.319
<v Speaker 1>of of of astronomical suffering. He also admits that it

0:56:36.400 --> 0:56:39.880
<v Speaker 1>might actually be too late in some respects, as this

0:56:40.000 --> 0:56:43.640
<v Speaker 1>dream is just so seductive to already be the implicit

0:56:43.760 --> 0:56:47.560
<v Speaker 1>goal of public as well as private space related ventures

0:56:47.800 --> 0:56:50.799
<v Speaker 1>and ambitions. And also he drives home and this is

0:56:50.800 --> 0:56:52.879
<v Speaker 1>actually I think something he gets into in that Ian

0:56:52.960 --> 0:56:58.239
<v Speaker 1>magazine piec Road that a meaningful governance framework will be important.

0:56:58.680 --> 0:57:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, well, I mean in that article he gets

0:57:00.680 --> 0:57:02.680
<v Speaker 1>into the fact that, like, we just really do not

0:57:02.880 --> 0:57:08.400
<v Speaker 1>have a political framework establishing authority in outer space. And

0:57:08.480 --> 0:57:11.799
<v Speaker 1>we see that and even our current headlines stuff where

0:57:11.800 --> 0:57:13.960
<v Speaker 1>we're like, who wow, there's just there's just really no

0:57:14.120 --> 0:57:17.280
<v Speaker 1>rules yet. And on one hand, like I can see

0:57:17.320 --> 0:57:20.680
<v Speaker 1>how this might feel nice, like oh wow, you know what,

0:57:20.800 --> 0:57:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, the government's reach stops at the planet and

0:57:24.320 --> 0:57:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and outer space can just be this place of peaceful

0:57:27.320 --> 0:57:30.840
<v Speaker 1>exploration without any you know, like laws and militaries and

0:57:30.880 --> 0:57:33.960
<v Speaker 1>all that. That would be great. But as space becomes

0:57:34.000 --> 0:57:37.640
<v Speaker 1>more populated with you know, people seeking out their their

0:57:37.640 --> 0:57:40.760
<v Speaker 1>own ends and their own goals there, without a legal

0:57:40.800 --> 0:57:43.880
<v Speaker 1>framework for people to understand, you know, what is allowed,

0:57:43.960 --> 0:57:46.800
<v Speaker 1>what they can do, and and you know, predict what

0:57:46.920 --> 0:57:50.160
<v Speaker 1>other people will be allowed to do to them, it

0:57:50.200 --> 0:57:53.520
<v Speaker 1>starts to become you know, less less of a final

0:57:53.560 --> 0:57:57.480
<v Speaker 1>frontier and more of a wild West. Absolutely. Um, this

0:57:57.560 --> 0:57:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is how COVID rounds it all out. Quote the over

0:58:00.080 --> 0:58:02.600
<v Speaker 1>view of risks in the outline of a potential approach

0:58:02.600 --> 0:58:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to crafting governance presented in this article are preliminary at best.

0:58:06.080 --> 0:58:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Both issues, uh, the identification of colonization related risks and

0:58:10.080 --> 0:58:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the work on colonization related governance require more scholarly attention

0:58:14.320 --> 0:58:18.240
<v Speaker 1>before we can begin addressing them in practice. That attention, theoretical,

0:58:18.240 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 1>though it may seem, is warranted. Space colonization is human

0:58:21.400 --> 0:58:24.800
<v Speaker 1>kind's best bet for long term survival, and today, before

0:58:24.920 --> 0:58:28.080
<v Speaker 1>large scale space colonization efforts are underway, we still have

0:58:28.200 --> 0:58:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the capacity to develop the philosophical and practical guard rails

0:58:32.760 --> 0:58:36.280
<v Speaker 1>that make the worst outcomes of space colonization less likely.

0:58:36.720 --> 0:58:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And and you know, I would agree with that. Yeah,

0:58:38.800 --> 0:58:42.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that totally makes sense that, like, space colonization

0:58:42.200 --> 0:58:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is something that that requires a bit of pessimistic forethought,

0:58:46.800 --> 0:58:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, people should entertain ideas of what could

0:58:49.400 --> 0:58:55.000
<v Speaker 1>go wrong and uh and explore them and plan out contingencies. Um,

0:58:55.280 --> 0:58:59.360
<v Speaker 1>especially you know, like people who aren't doing space exploration themselves,

0:58:59.440 --> 0:59:02.880
<v Speaker 1>because you I think that there there are some cognitive

0:59:02.960 --> 0:59:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and and group cognitive biases probably at work in organizations

0:59:07.880 --> 0:59:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that are personally involved in space exploration and the exploitation

0:59:12.000 --> 0:59:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of resources in space. Yeah. Plus, you know, when we have,

0:59:16.160 --> 0:59:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, just sort of casual ideals of what the

0:59:18.520 --> 0:59:20.959
<v Speaker 1>future will be like in the back of our head. Again,

0:59:20.960 --> 0:59:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it kind of comes back to we were talking about

0:59:22.400 --> 0:59:26.480
<v Speaker 1>earlier with its linked to environmentalism and and and and

0:59:26.480 --> 0:59:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and how one could sort of use it as a

0:59:28.120 --> 0:59:32.320
<v Speaker 1>way to excuse harm to Earth's environment. You know. It's

0:59:33.000 --> 0:59:35.360
<v Speaker 1>if you have just a completely optimistic vision in the

0:59:35.400 --> 0:59:37.920
<v Speaker 1>back of your head, it can potentially skew the way

0:59:38.080 --> 0:59:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you look at the real world or consider other political

0:59:41.680 --> 0:59:45.800
<v Speaker 1>or technological issues. Yeah. Um, so, so this has been interesting.

0:59:45.800 --> 0:59:48.360
<v Speaker 1>It's got me thinking that this was a topic that

0:59:48.360 --> 0:59:50.440
<v Speaker 1>that you turned up and wanted to do so, Robert,

0:59:50.600 --> 0:59:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, like what your opinion is, like, do you

0:59:53.000 --> 0:59:55.120
<v Speaker 1>do you come down more on one side or the other.

0:59:55.320 --> 0:59:59.000
<v Speaker 1>We obviously we've explored how there seemed to be, at

0:59:59.040 --> 1:00:02.640
<v Speaker 1>least at first glanced strong moral hazards for both of

1:00:02.640 --> 1:00:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the two options, either first staying on Earth or for

1:00:05.280 --> 1:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>founding colonies on other objects in the solar system and beyond.

1:00:08.760 --> 1:00:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you lean one way or the other? Yeah, I

1:00:11.080 --> 1:00:15.560
<v Speaker 1>think reading about this has made me lean more towards

1:00:15.640 --> 1:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>just the idea that we should we should be cautious

1:00:18.880 --> 1:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and we should think about the problems, because I guess,

1:00:21.240 --> 1:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you know, through the consumption of science

1:00:24.720 --> 1:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>fiction and also you know, futurist thought on the subject,

1:00:29.000 --> 1:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'd always just I think I'd always just

1:00:30.520 --> 1:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of fallen into the category of thinking, well, you know,

1:00:33.200 --> 1:00:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be rough in many of these cases we

1:00:35.800 --> 1:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>are talking about harsh environments, but it will be it

1:00:37.720 --> 1:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>will be worth it, Like, you know, this is just

1:00:40.400 --> 1:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>this is just what humans do without really stopping to

1:00:44.480 --> 1:00:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to ask, well, you know, why is that the case?

1:00:47.640 --> 1:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>And does it have to be that hard, uh, you know,

1:00:50.880 --> 1:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>or or what should we potentially consider to mitigate the

1:00:54.920 --> 1:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>suffering on these other worlds, like these various sci fi visions,

1:00:59.400 --> 1:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and not so much the really pessimistic and nihilistic ones,

1:01:02.360 --> 1:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>but the more middle of the road ones like does

1:01:04.400 --> 1:01:06.479
<v Speaker 1>it have to be that way? Could it be more?

1:01:07.120 --> 1:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Could it be more Star Trek? You know, could you

1:01:09.960 --> 1:01:12.720
<v Speaker 1>lean into Star Trek more? As again, coming back to

1:01:12.760 --> 1:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the more utopian vision of the future. And and this

1:01:16.000 --> 1:01:19.120
<v Speaker 1>is something that I feel like we may have a

1:01:19.160 --> 1:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>false sense that we have explored these problems more than

1:01:23.680 --> 1:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>we actually have in the practical space, because we now

1:01:26.680 --> 1:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>have lots of astronauts who have devoted their lives to

1:01:30.800 --> 1:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>getting into and spending time in space. You know, we

1:01:34.160 --> 1:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>have astronauts that walked on the Moon. We have astronauts

1:01:36.680 --> 1:01:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that trained to go to the International Space Station, and

1:01:39.280 --> 1:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>they all do it voluntarily, like they want to go there.

1:01:41.560 --> 1:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>They're not being forced despite all of the deprivations that

1:01:45.040 --> 1:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the experience and and all of the you know, potentially

1:01:47.880 --> 1:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>negative health effects and so forth that come along with

1:01:50.160 --> 1:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>these experiences. But those are in the long run, these

1:01:54.320 --> 1:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>are actually quite limited commitments. These are people committing themselves

1:01:59.160 --> 1:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and themselves only to a period of I don't know,

1:02:01.920 --> 1:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>a number of weeks or months at a time, going

1:02:04.680 --> 1:02:08.880
<v Speaker 1>into these deprived environments, these altered environments. It is a

1:02:09.000 --> 1:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>very different thing actually to say we're going to found

1:02:12.480 --> 1:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>a permanent or semi permanent colony within these spaces, where

1:02:16.840 --> 1:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you not only commit yourself for much longer periods of time,

1:02:20.880 --> 1:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>but you're also potentially committing future generations of people born

1:02:25.080 --> 1:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>there and so forth, and you're creating a a you know,

1:02:28.720 --> 1:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a fragmented off new culture in a sense. And in

1:02:32.640 --> 1:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>that we we have to engage in the sort of

1:02:35.120 --> 1:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>long term thinking that that you know, generally doesn't come

1:02:38.200 --> 1:02:42.080
<v Speaker 1>naturally to humans, that we have to to work very

1:02:42.080 --> 1:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>hard at. You know. I also have to say this

1:02:44.080 --> 1:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>will probably uh factor into how I read uh future

1:02:48.800 --> 1:02:52.240
<v Speaker 1>science science fiction treatments of off world colonies, you know,

1:02:53.680 --> 1:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and and and like I said that, some of these

1:02:55.480 --> 1:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>concerns I think have already been reflected to varying degrees

1:02:59.200 --> 1:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>in scientific science fictional creations. So um, you know, it's

1:03:04.000 --> 1:03:05.919
<v Speaker 1>not like you know, I'm saying that this is going

1:03:05.960 --> 1:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to to change other artists visions in all cases, but

1:03:10.520 --> 1:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>it is additional, um food for thought. In the meantime,

1:03:14.480 --> 1:03:16.720
<v Speaker 1>if you would like to check out other episodes of

1:03:16.720 --> 1:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind, well, previously I would have

1:03:19.520 --> 1:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>directed you to the mothership to Stuff to Blow your

1:03:21.920 --> 1:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Mind dot com, but the mothership crashed and now we

1:03:25.160 --> 1:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>only have the off world colony of our our I

1:03:28.880 --> 1:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>heart listing for the podcast. If you gotta suff to

1:03:31.200 --> 1:03:33.360
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind dot com, it will send you over

1:03:33.400 --> 1:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to there. But we have we have colonies in other

1:03:35.520 --> 1:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>places as well, because you can ultimately find Stuff to

1:03:38.320 --> 1:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Blow your Mind wherever you get your podcasts and wherever

1:03:41.480 --> 1:03:44.919
<v Speaker 1>that happens to be, make sure you rate, review, and subscribe.

1:03:45.400 --> 1:03:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Those are the ways you can support those little off

1:03:48.400 --> 1:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>world digital colonies, and in doing so, UH support Stuff

1:03:52.720 --> 1:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to Blow your Mind itself huge thanks as always to

1:03:55.640 --> 1:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson. If you would

1:03:59.040 --> 1:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>like to get in touch with with feedback on this

1:04:01.160 --> 1:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>episode or any other, to suggest a topic for the future,

1:04:03.840 --> 1:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>or just to say hi, you can email us at

1:04:06.400 --> 1:04:17.160
<v Speaker 1>contact at stuff to blow your Mind dot com. Stuff

1:04:17.160 --> 1:04:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind is production of I Heart Radio.

1:04:19.720 --> 1:04:21.840
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts for my heart Radio, visit the i

1:04:21.880 --> 1:04:24.720
<v Speaker 1>heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you're listening to

1:04:24.760 --> 1:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows.