1 00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,040 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News. 2 00:00:10,800 --> 00:00:14,800 Speaker 2: Welcome to the Debreak Asia Podcast. I'm Doug Chrisner. Israel 3 00:00:14,960 --> 00:00:18,239 Speaker 2: and Iran appear to be honoring a ceasefire broker by 4 00:00:18,280 --> 00:00:22,360 Speaker 2: President Trump Lake Monday, despite some early reporting of violations 5 00:00:22,400 --> 00:00:25,640 Speaker 2: on both sides. Earlier in the day, President Trump issued 6 00:00:25,680 --> 00:00:27,840 Speaker 2: some harsh criticism to both countries. 7 00:00:28,280 --> 00:00:31,800 Speaker 3: We basically have two countries that have been fighting so 8 00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:34,680 Speaker 3: long and so hard that they don't know what the 9 00:00:35,040 --> 00:00:35,600 Speaker 3: sayre doing. 10 00:00:35,680 --> 00:00:38,919 Speaker 2: You understand that President Trump speaking there as he traveled 11 00:00:38,920 --> 00:00:41,920 Speaker 2: to the Hague for this week's NATO summit. We also 12 00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:44,640 Speaker 2: heard in the last session from FED Schaer J. Powell. 13 00:00:45,040 --> 00:00:48,440 Speaker 2: He began two days of congressional testimony on Tuesday, and 14 00:00:48,560 --> 00:00:51,200 Speaker 2: he repeated that he's not in a hurry to cut 15 00:00:51,240 --> 00:00:53,680 Speaker 2: interest rates. In a moment or two, we'll take a 16 00:00:53,720 --> 00:00:57,120 Speaker 2: look at the Fed's path with Joeanne Bianco, senior investment 17 00:00:57,160 --> 00:01:01,480 Speaker 2: strategist at bond Blocks. But we begin this morning with geopolitics. 18 00:01:02,040 --> 00:01:04,880 Speaker 2: Israel and Iran have spent the better part of the 19 00:01:04,880 --> 00:01:07,959 Speaker 2: past two weeks exchanging strikes, and in the process, the 20 00:01:08,080 --> 00:01:11,960 Speaker 2: US was drawn into this conflict. The situation highlights the 21 00:01:12,080 --> 00:01:16,080 Speaker 2: role of another power player though China. Joining me now 22 00:01:16,240 --> 00:01:19,640 Speaker 2: is Jenny Marsh. Jenny is Greater China Eco GUV team 23 00:01:19,720 --> 00:01:21,920 Speaker 2: leader for Bloomberg News, and she joins us from our 24 00:01:21,959 --> 00:01:25,560 Speaker 2: studios in Hong Kong. It's always a pleasure to benefit 25 00:01:25,640 --> 00:01:29,720 Speaker 2: from your perspective. And as long as we're talking about geopolitics, 26 00:01:29,840 --> 00:01:33,400 Speaker 2: let's talk about what's going on between the US, Israel, 27 00:01:33,520 --> 00:01:37,119 Speaker 2: and Iran. Now, after the strikes, the recent strikes by 28 00:01:37,160 --> 00:01:41,760 Speaker 2: the US government on Iranian nuclear facilities, Beijing issued a 29 00:01:41,840 --> 00:01:45,640 Speaker 2: strong condemnation and basically called it a violation of the 30 00:01:45,720 --> 00:01:49,760 Speaker 2: UN Charter and of international law. I'm wondering whether or 31 00:01:49,840 --> 00:01:52,880 Speaker 2: not China may have played a role in this. Do 32 00:01:52,920 --> 00:01:53,800 Speaker 2: you have a sense of that. 33 00:01:54,800 --> 00:01:58,040 Speaker 4: My sense is it China very much will be remembered 34 00:01:58,040 --> 00:02:01,720 Speaker 4: for sitting on the sidelines. You know, Like they issued 35 00:02:01,760 --> 00:02:05,160 Speaker 4: this very strong statement condemning the US, and they talked 36 00:02:05,200 --> 00:02:08,640 Speaker 4: about how America was sort of blowing up, you know, 37 00:02:08,720 --> 00:02:12,680 Speaker 4: the international system for sort of maintaining order I the 38 00:02:12,800 --> 00:02:17,520 Speaker 4: US led you know, UN framework for resolving conflicts. And 39 00:02:18,000 --> 00:02:21,320 Speaker 4: before the US strikes, you know, she and Putin had 40 00:02:21,360 --> 00:02:23,640 Speaker 4: got on the phone and sort of worked out this 41 00:02:23,760 --> 00:02:27,840 Speaker 4: four point plan for peace. But really for China, they 42 00:02:27,919 --> 00:02:31,840 Speaker 4: kind of left it at diplomacy, and I don't think, 43 00:02:32,040 --> 00:02:35,640 Speaker 4: you know, they were particularly effective in what they were messaging. 44 00:02:35,960 --> 00:02:38,560 Speaker 4: We know that Wangyi spoke to both the Israeli and 45 00:02:39,080 --> 00:02:42,079 Speaker 4: the Uranian foreign ministers, so there was some sort of 46 00:02:42,160 --> 00:02:46,840 Speaker 4: attempt at sort of back channeling. But essentially, you know, Tehran, 47 00:02:47,040 --> 00:02:50,160 Speaker 4: you know, China was one of Tehran's sort of strongest partners, 48 00:02:50,320 --> 00:02:53,160 Speaker 4: and when it came to its darkest hour, China really 49 00:02:53,200 --> 00:02:54,919 Speaker 4: didn't do much apart from call for peace. 50 00:02:55,600 --> 00:02:59,280 Speaker 2: Is it pretty much a selfish move that boils down 51 00:02:59,320 --> 00:03:01,640 Speaker 2: to crude oil? Is that really what this is about? 52 00:03:01,639 --> 00:03:02,560 Speaker 2: This relationship? 53 00:03:03,680 --> 00:03:06,840 Speaker 4: I think this relationship is about the US, and I 54 00:03:06,840 --> 00:03:08,760 Speaker 4: think one of the reasons I say that is, yes, 55 00:03:08,960 --> 00:03:12,480 Speaker 4: China is one of the places that will buy sanctioned 56 00:03:12,480 --> 00:03:16,680 Speaker 4: Iranian oil. It's a very very slim percentage of China's 57 00:03:16,800 --> 00:03:20,200 Speaker 4: oil supplies, about ten percent, and they can easily source 58 00:03:20,240 --> 00:03:22,840 Speaker 4: this oil from other places. And I think, you know, 59 00:03:22,960 --> 00:03:25,960 Speaker 4: there's a couple of practical reasons why these sort of 60 00:03:26,080 --> 00:03:28,680 Speaker 4: it's mainly sort of these teapot refineries in northern China 61 00:03:28,720 --> 00:03:31,440 Speaker 4: that take this oil. It's much cheaper. But also I 62 00:03:31,440 --> 00:03:34,800 Speaker 4: think the Chinese government tolerates it because they are vehemently 63 00:03:34,840 --> 00:03:38,880 Speaker 4: opposed to the US sanctions regime, and so they they 64 00:03:39,120 --> 00:03:41,960 Speaker 4: let this go as a way of sort of defying 65 00:03:42,000 --> 00:03:45,160 Speaker 4: the US sanctions regime, which is something they and Russia 66 00:03:45,200 --> 00:03:49,480 Speaker 4: and Iran are all united in opposing. But I think 67 00:03:49,600 --> 00:03:53,240 Speaker 4: the broader relationship with Iran has been about sort of 68 00:03:53,280 --> 00:03:56,400 Speaker 4: finding partners that it will join hands with Beijing and 69 00:03:56,480 --> 00:03:58,800 Speaker 4: challenge the US of world order. And I think you 70 00:03:58,800 --> 00:04:02,720 Speaker 4: can see that through you know, she has ushered Iran 71 00:04:02,800 --> 00:04:05,360 Speaker 4: into the Bricks Group of Emerging Markets, which is this 72 00:04:05,400 --> 00:04:09,520 Speaker 4: block that it's expanding with India and South Africa and 73 00:04:09,560 --> 00:04:12,520 Speaker 4: Brazil as sort of a kind of a rival framework 74 00:04:12,560 --> 00:04:15,160 Speaker 4: to the G twenty. It also welcomed Iran in the 75 00:04:15,240 --> 00:04:19,600 Speaker 4: last couple of years into the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, which 76 00:04:19,680 --> 00:04:22,960 Speaker 4: is another sort of grouping that it's expanding, which has 77 00:04:23,040 --> 00:04:26,240 Speaker 4: more of a security flavor. But when it comes to 78 00:04:26,279 --> 00:04:28,800 Speaker 4: sort of trade with Iran, I mean the trade is 79 00:04:28,920 --> 00:04:33,080 Speaker 4: very very isn't significant, you know, it doesn't sell much 80 00:04:33,120 --> 00:04:36,919 Speaker 4: to Iran. Actually, trade with Iran actually fell off in 81 00:04:36,960 --> 00:04:38,560 Speaker 4: the first four months of this year. It was down 82 00:04:38,560 --> 00:04:42,800 Speaker 4: about twenty percent, and the broader Middle Eastern region, from 83 00:04:42,800 --> 00:04:46,680 Speaker 4: my bottom road perspective, is more important to Beijing. So 84 00:04:46,720 --> 00:04:48,919 Speaker 4: I think really this was sort of, you know, a 85 00:04:48,960 --> 00:04:51,840 Speaker 4: partnership of convenience, and for China was always about finding 86 00:04:51,880 --> 00:04:55,159 Speaker 4: partners that will stand hands join hands with it to 87 00:04:55,279 --> 00:04:56,680 Speaker 4: stand against the US. 88 00:04:57,320 --> 00:05:00,920 Speaker 2: So to that point, maybe China is not so reliant 89 00:05:00,960 --> 00:05:03,479 Speaker 2: on Irani and crude oil. I get the fact that 90 00:05:03,520 --> 00:05:06,080 Speaker 2: they're only going to import let's say ten percent, but 91 00:05:06,200 --> 00:05:10,520 Speaker 2: the Strait of Hormuze, I would imagine, is perhaps more critical. 92 00:05:10,640 --> 00:05:14,560 Speaker 2: And if there were a way for Beijing to become 93 00:05:14,680 --> 00:05:18,400 Speaker 2: influential in dialing down a lot of this tension just 94 00:05:18,960 --> 00:05:22,520 Speaker 2: so that the conflict didn't extend into the strait, is 95 00:05:22,560 --> 00:05:24,280 Speaker 2: that part of the thinking here as well. 96 00:05:24,839 --> 00:05:27,799 Speaker 4: Yeah, so I think the Strait of Homus is definitely 97 00:05:27,839 --> 00:05:30,640 Speaker 4: a different story in a much, much, sort of more 98 00:05:30,960 --> 00:05:35,760 Speaker 4: alarming concern for China. About forty five percent of its 99 00:05:35,839 --> 00:05:39,640 Speaker 4: oil shipments that come through that straight and China is 100 00:05:39,680 --> 00:05:41,960 Speaker 4: the country that is most dependent on the oil coming 101 00:05:42,040 --> 00:05:47,479 Speaker 4: through that waterway globally, so yeah, massive exposure there. That 102 00:05:47,600 --> 00:05:51,600 Speaker 4: being said, China has been stockpiling on oil. So if 103 00:05:51,600 --> 00:05:54,040 Speaker 4: the wars a crisis that closed the straight for you know, 104 00:05:54,080 --> 00:05:57,360 Speaker 4: a short period of time, it wouldn't feel the immediate impact, 105 00:05:57,680 --> 00:06:00,960 Speaker 4: but in the long term, absolutely doesn't want this conflict spiral. 106 00:06:01,400 --> 00:06:04,320 Speaker 4: And I think that was the message from the four 107 00:06:04,320 --> 00:06:06,560 Speaker 4: point plan that she put forward. He talked about like 108 00:06:06,680 --> 00:06:09,880 Speaker 4: not wanting this to expand, and when they're condemning the US, 109 00:06:09,960 --> 00:06:11,760 Speaker 4: they were saying, you know, the US is fanning the 110 00:06:11,800 --> 00:06:14,440 Speaker 4: flames of war and would be to blame essentially if 111 00:06:14,440 --> 00:06:18,400 Speaker 4: this did become a broader conflict. I think the problem 112 00:06:18,440 --> 00:06:22,160 Speaker 4: for China is like, how can it affect or what 113 00:06:22,200 --> 00:06:24,640 Speaker 4: is it willing to do to stop it from becoming 114 00:06:24,640 --> 00:06:27,280 Speaker 4: a broader conflict, And the answer is not very much. 115 00:06:27,680 --> 00:06:30,120 Speaker 4: You know, China doesn't like to get its hands dirty 116 00:06:30,200 --> 00:06:33,840 Speaker 4: in foreign conflicts. It definitely doesn't go anywhere near the 117 00:06:33,920 --> 00:06:36,080 Speaker 4: US play because these sort of far away wars and 118 00:06:36,120 --> 00:06:40,120 Speaker 4: military operations, and even with Russia, which it has a 119 00:06:40,160 --> 00:06:44,200 Speaker 4: much stronger trade relationship and sort of interdependency with Russia 120 00:06:44,240 --> 00:06:47,159 Speaker 4: has now overtaken Saudi as the top supplier of crude 121 00:06:47,160 --> 00:06:50,360 Speaker 4: oil to China. Even when Puutine went to war in Ukraine, 122 00:06:51,160 --> 00:06:53,240 Speaker 4: she was very careful not to do anything they would 123 00:06:53,279 --> 00:06:56,799 Speaker 4: invite US sanctions so yes, he stepped up economic support 124 00:06:56,920 --> 00:07:00,960 Speaker 4: and diplomatic support, and then there was there's some controversy 125 00:07:00,960 --> 00:07:03,919 Speaker 4: about sort of you know, the dual use items that 126 00:07:03,960 --> 00:07:07,000 Speaker 4: have been shipped but never only to direct you know, 127 00:07:07,200 --> 00:07:10,480 Speaker 4: military support that would cross these red lines in America 128 00:07:10,520 --> 00:07:12,880 Speaker 4: and Europe laid out very clearly, you know, and I 129 00:07:12,880 --> 00:07:15,160 Speaker 4: think China is a country you have to remember that 130 00:07:15,200 --> 00:07:19,760 Speaker 4: has no formal allies by design, you know, and its 131 00:07:19,760 --> 00:07:22,760 Speaker 4: self interest will always be it's sort of north star 132 00:07:22,840 --> 00:07:25,520 Speaker 4: of what it does when these kind of conflicts break out. 133 00:07:26,000 --> 00:07:29,400 Speaker 2: Do we want to include North Korea even at the fringe? 134 00:07:29,880 --> 00:07:32,440 Speaker 4: Yeah, North Korea is the closest that China does have 135 00:07:33,480 --> 00:07:36,960 Speaker 4: to an ally, and obviously in the nineteen fifties it 136 00:07:37,080 --> 00:07:39,360 Speaker 4: did go to war for the North Koreans, but it's 137 00:07:39,400 --> 00:07:41,960 Speaker 4: still today. I mean, it doesn't want North Korea to 138 00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:48,280 Speaker 4: have nuclear weapons. China has a non proliferation policy, you know, 139 00:07:48,480 --> 00:07:51,960 Speaker 4: and ties between she and Kim have been sort of 140 00:07:52,360 --> 00:07:55,720 Speaker 4: entering this frostier period over recent years, and we've seen 141 00:07:55,760 --> 00:07:58,600 Speaker 4: then North Korea become closer to Putin and actually the 142 00:07:58,600 --> 00:08:02,000 Speaker 4: North Koreans being the one that did offer Russia substantial 143 00:08:02,040 --> 00:08:04,640 Speaker 4: support as the war in Ukraine sort of ground on 144 00:08:04,800 --> 00:08:06,800 Speaker 4: into its sort of fourth year. 145 00:08:07,280 --> 00:08:11,360 Speaker 2: What is the degree of anti American feeling right now 146 00:08:11,400 --> 00:08:14,160 Speaker 2: in China? Not just because of what we're describing here 147 00:08:14,200 --> 00:08:17,960 Speaker 2: in terms of Israel Iran, but I'm thinking of whether 148 00:08:18,000 --> 00:08:21,480 Speaker 2: it's Taiwan, whether it's the US China trade war. Give 149 00:08:21,520 --> 00:08:24,320 Speaker 2: me a sense of the degree to which people in 150 00:08:24,440 --> 00:08:27,240 Speaker 2: China are feeling very anti American. 151 00:08:28,280 --> 00:08:30,720 Speaker 4: I think that is a really interesting question, and it 152 00:08:30,800 --> 00:08:34,840 Speaker 4: hasn't been as prominent as you might have thought, sort 153 00:08:34,840 --> 00:08:39,200 Speaker 4: of broadly towards American people. The Minecraft movie came out 154 00:08:39,280 --> 00:08:41,640 Speaker 4: in China and did pretty well, and we've seen other 155 00:08:41,640 --> 00:08:44,480 Speaker 4: sort of examples of sort of American soft power being 156 00:08:44,640 --> 00:08:47,880 Speaker 4: powerful even though the US and China are locked in 157 00:08:47,920 --> 00:08:51,000 Speaker 4: this trade war. I almost wonder if the Chinese people 158 00:08:51,120 --> 00:08:54,200 Speaker 4: sort of are able to separate Trump and you know, 159 00:08:54,240 --> 00:08:57,800 Speaker 4: the aberration or you know that is Trump from the 160 00:08:57,880 --> 00:09:01,840 Speaker 4: average American people. There was people talking about, you know, 161 00:09:02,840 --> 00:09:06,040 Speaker 4: how foolish Run had been to sort of trust the US, saying, 162 00:09:06,080 --> 00:09:08,439 Speaker 4: you know, the US came in to negotiate, then it's 163 00:09:08,480 --> 00:09:11,199 Speaker 4: ally hit Iran, and then the US hit Iran. You know, 164 00:09:11,240 --> 00:09:14,079 Speaker 4: the Iranians were falls for ever trusting America, so there 165 00:09:14,080 --> 00:09:16,280 Speaker 4: was a lot of that kind of sentiment. But I 166 00:09:16,280 --> 00:09:19,280 Speaker 4: think actually the Chinese people sort of it is not 167 00:09:19,360 --> 00:09:22,200 Speaker 4: this sort of like horizon nationalism. And I think that 168 00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:25,520 Speaker 4: is partly because the Chinese government has learned from the 169 00:09:25,559 --> 00:09:27,600 Speaker 4: first time around the first Trade War, you had this 170 00:09:27,640 --> 00:09:30,440 Speaker 4: wolf warrior policy that really stoked up a lot of 171 00:09:30,480 --> 00:09:33,199 Speaker 4: bad feeling. Then you had sort of people like huci 172 00:09:33,280 --> 00:09:35,360 Speaker 4: Jin the old the former editor in chief of the 173 00:09:35,400 --> 00:09:38,160 Speaker 4: Global Times, who were allowed to sort of really run 174 00:09:38,200 --> 00:09:41,280 Speaker 4: wild on social media. You know, when Nancy Pelosi was 175 00:09:41,280 --> 00:09:44,160 Speaker 4: flying into Taiwan, he was posting things about, you know, 176 00:09:44,400 --> 00:09:48,640 Speaker 4: perhaps shooting down you know, the jet as she came in, 177 00:09:49,679 --> 00:09:51,800 Speaker 4: which obviously just was a step too far. And I 178 00:09:51,800 --> 00:09:55,360 Speaker 4: think this time the nationalist voices on social media and 179 00:09:55,520 --> 00:09:58,760 Speaker 4: state media have been tampered down because the government doesn't 180 00:09:58,800 --> 00:10:01,160 Speaker 4: want it to get out of control to a point 181 00:10:01,160 --> 00:10:03,280 Speaker 4: where they are not the ones managing the narrative. 182 00:10:03,679 --> 00:10:06,040 Speaker 2: Jenny, it's always a pleasure. Thank you so very much, 183 00:10:06,120 --> 00:10:09,800 Speaker 2: Jenny Marsh. There she is Bloomberg Greater China ECOGOV team leader, 184 00:10:10,240 --> 00:10:12,760 Speaker 2: joining us from our studios in Hong Kong here on 185 00:10:12,800 --> 00:10:23,120 Speaker 2: the Daybreak Asia podcast. Welcome Back, to the Daybreak Asia 186 00:10:23,160 --> 00:10:26,840 Speaker 2: podcast time Doug Krisner. So, tensions in the Middle East 187 00:10:26,920 --> 00:10:29,760 Speaker 2: seem to have eased, at least for the moment. Israel 188 00:10:29,840 --> 00:10:33,480 Speaker 2: and Iran appear to be honoring their ceasefire agreement. At 189 00:10:33,480 --> 00:10:36,320 Speaker 2: the same time, during the last session, we had constructive 190 00:10:36,360 --> 00:10:40,319 Speaker 2: comments from Fetcher J. Powell on rate cuts. Here's Powell. 191 00:10:40,600 --> 00:10:44,959 Speaker 3: Despite elevated uncertainty, the economy is in a solid position overall. 192 00:10:45,040 --> 00:10:47,719 Speaker 3: A wide set of indicators suggests that the conditions in 193 00:10:47,760 --> 00:10:50,600 Speaker 3: the labor market are broadly in balanced and consistent with 194 00:10:50,679 --> 00:10:53,800 Speaker 3: maximum employment. The effects of tariffs will depend, among other things, 195 00:10:53,800 --> 00:10:55,960 Speaker 3: on their ultimate level for the time being, where we 196 00:10:56,000 --> 00:10:58,160 Speaker 3: are well positioned to wait to learn more about the 197 00:10:58,240 --> 00:11:00,920 Speaker 3: likely course of the economy before consider or any adjustments 198 00:11:00,920 --> 00:11:01,920 Speaker 3: to our policy stance. 199 00:11:02,400 --> 00:11:05,360 Speaker 2: SO yields were down across the treasury curve. The two year, 200 00:11:05,400 --> 00:11:08,800 Speaker 2: in fact, closed at its lowest yield since May, and 201 00:11:08,920 --> 00:11:11,720 Speaker 2: money markets are fully pricing in two Fed rate cuts 202 00:11:11,760 --> 00:11:14,040 Speaker 2: by the end of the year. For a closer look 203 00:11:14,040 --> 00:11:17,160 Speaker 2: now at the fixed income space, I'm joined by Joanne Bianco, 204 00:11:17,400 --> 00:11:21,840 Speaker 2: senior investment strategist at Bond Blocks Investment Management. Joanne, thank 205 00:11:21,840 --> 00:11:24,520 Speaker 2: you so very much for joining us. So, based on 206 00:11:24,520 --> 00:11:27,400 Speaker 2: what you heard today from the FED chairman, what is 207 00:11:27,440 --> 00:11:29,960 Speaker 2: your outlook for the point at which we get the 208 00:11:29,960 --> 00:11:31,119 Speaker 2: first rate cut. 209 00:11:31,440 --> 00:11:33,960 Speaker 1: Well, first of all, thank you for having me. Happy 210 00:11:33,960 --> 00:11:38,560 Speaker 1: to be here, and I think that the FED will 211 00:11:38,600 --> 00:11:43,839 Speaker 1: want to see more progress on inflation or just even 212 00:11:43,880 --> 00:11:49,959 Speaker 1: that inflation is contained instead of eventually surging from tariffs. 213 00:11:50,480 --> 00:11:53,640 Speaker 2: So do you think that July could be the first 214 00:11:53,679 --> 00:11:54,880 Speaker 2: cut or is that too soon? 215 00:11:55,760 --> 00:11:57,920 Speaker 1: I still feel like that's too soon, but I think 216 00:11:58,080 --> 00:12:02,280 Speaker 1: September is more likely. That's certainly what the markets think 217 00:12:02,320 --> 00:12:02,720 Speaker 1: as well. 218 00:12:02,960 --> 00:12:06,480 Speaker 2: So you feel pretty comfortable with the inflation story right now, 219 00:12:06,559 --> 00:12:09,640 Speaker 2: irrespective of the fact that I don't think we have 220 00:12:09,760 --> 00:12:12,920 Speaker 2: enough clarity on the impact that tariffs are having on prices. 221 00:12:13,559 --> 00:12:16,960 Speaker 1: Actually, yeah, I don't know that I necessarily feel comfortable 222 00:12:17,080 --> 00:12:20,040 Speaker 1: about where inflation may go. I do think that there 223 00:12:20,160 --> 00:12:23,040 Speaker 1: is a lot of uncertainty. But you know, if there 224 00:12:23,120 --> 00:12:27,320 Speaker 1: is this path where we don't see a surge that 225 00:12:27,640 --> 00:12:32,200 Speaker 1: is sustained in inflation, then that gives the FED room 226 00:12:32,240 --> 00:12:35,160 Speaker 1: to cut rates. But you know it could go the 227 00:12:35,200 --> 00:12:35,760 Speaker 1: other way too. 228 00:12:36,120 --> 00:12:38,080 Speaker 2: What do you feel about the labor market and the 229 00:12:38,120 --> 00:12:40,280 Speaker 2: indicators that you're seeing on that front. 230 00:12:40,640 --> 00:12:45,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, they're definitely softer, but they haven't weakened materially. 231 00:12:46,200 --> 00:12:50,040 Speaker 1: So I think with respect to the labor market, if 232 00:12:50,040 --> 00:12:52,400 Speaker 1: the FED we're going to act based upon the labor market, 233 00:12:52,520 --> 00:12:56,960 Speaker 1: they'd want to see it materially weaken from here before 234 00:12:57,320 --> 00:12:59,360 Speaker 1: that would be their reason for cutwights. 235 00:12:59,440 --> 00:13:01,199 Speaker 2: So do you think that the FED has got it 236 00:13:01,280 --> 00:13:05,120 Speaker 2: right in terms of how prudent policymakers are being Save 237 00:13:05,400 --> 00:13:07,719 Speaker 2: a couple of comments that we have had recently, I'm 238 00:13:07,760 --> 00:13:11,199 Speaker 2: thinking of Michelle Bowman and Chris Waller, who are advocating 239 00:13:11,240 --> 00:13:13,760 Speaker 2: for a cut as soon as July, but the majority 240 00:13:13,760 --> 00:13:16,960 Speaker 2: of voices that we have heard from who sit at 241 00:13:17,000 --> 00:13:19,760 Speaker 2: the FED seem to be a little bit more prudent. 242 00:13:20,000 --> 00:13:21,240 Speaker 2: Do you think that's the right tone? 243 00:13:22,400 --> 00:13:26,839 Speaker 1: Yeah, and I think it reflects the continued resiliency of 244 00:13:26,880 --> 00:13:30,240 Speaker 1: the US economy. It does give the FED a little 245 00:13:30,280 --> 00:13:32,320 Speaker 1: bit more time before they act. 246 00:13:32,840 --> 00:13:35,080 Speaker 2: So how are you deploying money in the bond market 247 00:13:35,120 --> 00:13:35,640 Speaker 2: these days? 248 00:13:36,440 --> 00:13:39,880 Speaker 1: Well, you know, fixed income has been performing very well 249 00:13:41,200 --> 00:13:44,480 Speaker 1: in the first half of the year. It's definitely the 250 00:13:44,840 --> 00:13:49,280 Speaker 1: income generation from fixed income and the higher yields that 251 00:13:49,679 --> 00:13:53,840 Speaker 1: investors are getting in a lot of different segments within 252 00:13:53,920 --> 00:13:59,200 Speaker 1: fixed income have been very nice for investors and have 253 00:13:59,679 --> 00:14:04,959 Speaker 1: pushed volatility that they might have experienced otherwise if they 254 00:14:05,000 --> 00:14:08,520 Speaker 1: had more equities in their portfolios. So we're seeing a 255 00:14:08,520 --> 00:14:13,400 Speaker 1: lot of interest in our suite of our different suites 256 00:14:13,480 --> 00:14:18,000 Speaker 1: of fixed income ETFs from those very same type of 257 00:14:18,040 --> 00:14:22,320 Speaker 1: clients that want to want want the income, but don't 258 00:14:22,320 --> 00:14:24,600 Speaker 1: want the return volatility. 259 00:14:24,760 --> 00:14:26,760 Speaker 2: So, if I were to look at putting money to 260 00:14:26,800 --> 00:14:29,840 Speaker 2: work in the bond market, irrespective of an ETF, is 261 00:14:29,880 --> 00:14:32,840 Speaker 2: there a point in the curve that you favor right now? 262 00:14:33,760 --> 00:14:38,200 Speaker 1: Well, in terms of the treasure yield curve, we're both 263 00:14:38,240 --> 00:14:41,520 Speaker 1: constructive on the short to intermediate part of the curve. 264 00:14:41,600 --> 00:14:43,560 Speaker 1: We still think that the long end of the curve, 265 00:14:44,080 --> 00:14:47,600 Speaker 1: you know, is just more volatile in terms of returns 266 00:14:47,680 --> 00:14:51,080 Speaker 1: and maybe too volatile for some investors. So we think 267 00:14:51,120 --> 00:14:55,720 Speaker 1: you get you great income from the middle part of 268 00:14:55,760 --> 00:14:58,600 Speaker 1: the curve with less return volatility. 269 00:14:58,840 --> 00:15:01,480 Speaker 2: So your resistance to money to work at the long end, 270 00:15:01,520 --> 00:15:04,440 Speaker 2: I'm wondering whether that has to do with the uncertainty 271 00:15:04,440 --> 00:15:07,400 Speaker 2: around inflation or are you concerned a little bit about 272 00:15:07,440 --> 00:15:10,000 Speaker 2: the deficit story when it comes to federal spending. 273 00:15:10,720 --> 00:15:13,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, it could actually be both of those reasons. 274 00:15:15,000 --> 00:15:16,920 Speaker 2: Is there one that predominates in your mind. 275 00:15:17,960 --> 00:15:21,120 Speaker 1: I think in the near term for US, it's really 276 00:15:21,160 --> 00:15:25,800 Speaker 1: been more about the inflation story. Longer term it would 277 00:15:25,800 --> 00:15:27,280 Speaker 1: be the deficit story. 278 00:15:28,080 --> 00:15:30,640 Speaker 2: I'm curious as to whether or not you're looking offshore 279 00:15:30,840 --> 00:15:34,960 Speaker 2: at let's say, fixed income markets in Asia or in Europe. 280 00:15:35,000 --> 00:15:36,760 Speaker 2: Are there opportunities on those fronts. 281 00:15:37,520 --> 00:15:42,320 Speaker 1: Yeah, well, we've definitely seen opportunities because we have an 282 00:15:42,360 --> 00:15:47,640 Speaker 1: ETF the Tiggers XMD, and it's short to intermediate term 283 00:15:48,040 --> 00:15:53,040 Speaker 1: US dollar denominated emerging market stat and that's been like 284 00:15:53,160 --> 00:15:56,480 Speaker 1: one of the best performers in our in our fun 285 00:15:56,560 --> 00:15:59,640 Speaker 1: lineup this year because you've seen, you know, there's less 286 00:15:59,680 --> 00:16:04,800 Speaker 1: interest read sensitivity, but there's like strong yields there and 287 00:16:04,840 --> 00:16:09,680 Speaker 1: there's been spread tightening in a number of the sovereigns. 288 00:16:09,720 --> 00:16:12,880 Speaker 1: So it's been like a great place for investors. 289 00:16:13,080 --> 00:16:15,080 Speaker 2: Joanne, we'll leave it there, Thank you so very much. 290 00:16:15,200 --> 00:16:19,680 Speaker 2: Joanne Bianco there, senior investment strategist at Bondblock's Investment Management, 291 00:16:20,040 --> 00:16:25,320 Speaker 2: joining us here on the Daybreak Asia podcast. Thanks for 292 00:16:25,400 --> 00:16:30,000 Speaker 2: listening to today's episode of the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Edition podcast. 293 00:16:30,320 --> 00:16:33,479 Speaker 2: Each weekday, we look at the story shaping markets finance 294 00:16:33,800 --> 00:16:36,920 Speaker 2: and geopolitics in the Asia Pacific. You can find us 295 00:16:36,920 --> 00:16:41,160 Speaker 2: on Apple, Spotify, the Bloomberg Podcast YouTube channel, or anywhere 296 00:16:41,160 --> 00:16:44,240 Speaker 2: else you listen. Join us again tomorrow for insight on 297 00:16:44,280 --> 00:16:48,440 Speaker 2: the market moves from Hong Kong to Singapore and Australia. 298 00:16:48,880 --> 00:16:51,359 Speaker 2: I'm Doug Chrisner, and this is Bloomberg