WEBVTT - Episode 1: The Campaign

0:00:15.356 --> 0:00:22.596
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Okay, so, how are you going to start this?

0:00:24.116 --> 0:00:26.916
<v Speaker 2>Well, I'm really excited. This is kind of new for us.

0:00:27.236 --> 0:00:32.396
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely a little role reversal. Amy gains McQuaid as my producer.

0:00:32.916 --> 0:00:35.236
<v Speaker 1>She's worked on the past four seasons of deep Cover.

0:00:35.836 --> 0:00:38.716
<v Speaker 1>It may not have heard Amy's voice about in effect

0:00:38.996 --> 0:00:42.156
<v Speaker 1>you did, because when we do a season of deep Cover,

0:00:42.756 --> 0:00:45.516
<v Speaker 1>Amy's the one that reads through all thousand pages of

0:00:45.516 --> 0:00:49.196
<v Speaker 1>the court transcript and knows every last detail. She's the

0:00:49.196 --> 0:00:52.036
<v Speaker 1>one who helps me track down sources and wed through

0:00:52.116 --> 0:00:55.076
<v Speaker 1>hours of interviews to make the episodes that you've heard.

0:00:56.396 --> 0:00:58.756
<v Speaker 1>So while we're hard at work on the next season

0:00:58.796 --> 0:01:01.476
<v Speaker 1>of deep Cover, we have a special mini series for

0:01:01.556 --> 0:01:05.036
<v Speaker 1>you in a brand new format. About a year ago.

0:01:05.316 --> 0:01:08.036
<v Speaker 1>Amy comes to me and says, look, there's this story

0:01:08.076 --> 0:01:10.796
<v Speaker 1>I really want to report. A story that took place

0:01:10.916 --> 0:01:13.836
<v Speaker 1>in fact where Amy grown up, A story about a

0:01:13.876 --> 0:01:17.396
<v Speaker 1>man who may just be one of the greatest liars

0:01:17.676 --> 0:01:21.316
<v Speaker 1>of all time, which got my attention because it sounded

0:01:21.316 --> 0:01:25.276
<v Speaker 1>an awful lot like a deep Cover story unfolding in

0:01:25.396 --> 0:01:25.916
<v Speaker 1>real time.

0:01:28.036 --> 0:01:30.676
<v Speaker 2>George Anthony de Volder Santos, Oh.

0:01:30.556 --> 0:01:32.516
<v Speaker 3>Good morning, chabach allom too, everybody.

0:01:33.516 --> 0:01:36.636
<v Speaker 2>This is him speaking to the Republican Jewish Coalition in

0:01:36.756 --> 0:01:37.516
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two.

0:01:38.116 --> 0:01:41.036
<v Speaker 3>I'm a first generation born American, like many in our

0:01:41.076 --> 0:01:44.556
<v Speaker 3>great nation. My parents came to this country in search

0:01:44.596 --> 0:01:45.596
<v Speaker 3>of the American dream.

0:01:45.996 --> 0:01:46.356
<v Speaker 4>Today.

0:01:46.796 --> 0:01:49.196
<v Speaker 2>He ran for Congress to represent New York's third District

0:01:49.276 --> 0:01:52.076
<v Speaker 2>on Long Island, which is where I grew up. And

0:01:52.276 --> 0:01:55.276
<v Speaker 2>a huge part of his message was this that he

0:01:55.916 --> 0:02:00.676
<v Speaker 2>was the embodiment of the American dream. And that message

0:02:00.676 --> 0:02:01.876
<v Speaker 2>worked because he won.

0:02:02.636 --> 0:02:05.596
<v Speaker 3>Only in this country can the little boy born in

0:02:05.596 --> 0:02:08.476
<v Speaker 3>a basement apartment in Jackson Heights, Queens in New York

0:02:08.516 --> 0:02:12.236
<v Speaker 3>City become a United States congressman at thirty four?

0:02:13.636 --> 0:02:16.116
<v Speaker 1>Okay, interesting, So I know there's a lot more that

0:02:16.196 --> 0:02:18.836
<v Speaker 1>he said on the campaign trail, but can you just

0:02:18.876 --> 0:02:19.796
<v Speaker 1>give me the recap.

0:02:20.476 --> 0:02:23.556
<v Speaker 2>So the version of George Santos that he sold on

0:02:23.596 --> 0:02:28.316
<v Speaker 2>the campaign trail was that George Stantos was a successful

0:02:28.356 --> 0:02:32.676
<v Speaker 2>businessman working in the financial industry. He claimed that he'd

0:02:32.716 --> 0:02:36.716
<v Speaker 2>worked for Goldman, Sachs and City Group. He claimed that

0:02:36.876 --> 0:02:40.836
<v Speaker 2>he had gone to college at Baruch and NYU. He

0:02:40.876 --> 0:02:44.396
<v Speaker 2>had also told some stories about his personal life.

0:02:44.916 --> 0:02:47.236
<v Speaker 4>I'm very proud of my Jewish heritage. I'm very proud

0:02:47.276 --> 0:02:49.036
<v Speaker 4>of my grandparents' story.

0:02:49.156 --> 0:02:52.676
<v Speaker 2>Claiming Jewish heritage and said that some of his family

0:02:52.676 --> 0:02:56.676
<v Speaker 2>members had survived the Holocaust. Here he is speaking to

0:02:56.916 --> 0:02:58.996
<v Speaker 2>a reporter for a Jewish news service.

0:02:59.476 --> 0:03:01.676
<v Speaker 4>I'm so proud to be able to keep our family

0:03:01.716 --> 0:03:04.076
<v Speaker 4>going forward and showing that not only did we survive,

0:03:04.516 --> 0:03:07.036
<v Speaker 4>but now I'm able to go advocate and fight for

0:03:07.236 --> 0:03:09.996
<v Speaker 4>other Jewish people all across my my district.

0:03:10.676 --> 0:03:13.756
<v Speaker 2>So the story that he told was an inspiring one.

0:03:14.396 --> 0:03:18.476
<v Speaker 2>Here he was the son of Brazilian immigrants who had

0:03:18.516 --> 0:03:21.996
<v Speaker 2>built this impressive life for himself, living in New York

0:03:22.036 --> 0:03:25.436
<v Speaker 2>City as an openly gay man, working on Wall Street,

0:03:26.036 --> 0:03:29.956
<v Speaker 2>getting into politics, and it seemed like this moment when

0:03:30.036 --> 0:03:33.276
<v Speaker 2>he won would just be the cherry on top. He

0:03:33.436 --> 0:03:34.836
<v Speaker 2>was going to be a congressman.

0:03:35.396 --> 0:03:38.796
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's inspiring. I'm kind of inspired hearing it.

0:03:39.356 --> 0:03:43.876
<v Speaker 2>But in the coming weeks and months, another narrative would

0:03:43.956 --> 0:03:49.236
<v Speaker 2>start to emerge, a different version of George Santos, one

0:03:49.276 --> 0:03:52.396
<v Speaker 2>that was far more alarming. And if it were true,

0:03:52.596 --> 0:03:56.956
<v Speaker 2>then this was a man who lied, cheated, and stole

0:03:57.076 --> 0:04:01.556
<v Speaker 2>from people who trusted him, basically one man with two faces,

0:04:02.316 --> 0:04:06.756
<v Speaker 2>and it left a lot of people, including myself, wondering

0:04:07.596 --> 0:04:12.276
<v Speaker 2>who is the real George Santos. I think the thing

0:04:12.276 --> 0:04:15.436
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of people might remember is the New

0:04:15.516 --> 0:04:19.156
<v Speaker 2>York Times story that broke in December of twenty twenty two,

0:04:19.716 --> 0:04:21.156
<v Speaker 2>because it was pretty explosive.

0:04:21.436 --> 0:04:23.036
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I remember that headline.

0:04:23.476 --> 0:04:27.676
<v Speaker 2>The story revealed that Santos had essentially fabricated a lot

0:04:27.716 --> 0:04:32.156
<v Speaker 2>of information on his resume. But through my reporting, I've

0:04:32.156 --> 0:04:34.956
<v Speaker 2>been finding that that story was really just the beginning.

0:04:35.956 --> 0:04:38.516
<v Speaker 2>So George Santos is actually scheduled to go to trial

0:04:38.636 --> 0:04:42.316
<v Speaker 2>in just a few weeks in September. He's facing a

0:04:42.356 --> 0:04:49.036
<v Speaker 2>whole bunch of charges, wirefraud, money laundering, falsifying records, identity theft,

0:04:49.876 --> 0:04:53.516
<v Speaker 2>a whole bunch. I've been talking with lots of people

0:04:53.836 --> 0:04:57.636
<v Speaker 2>to essentially try and figure out how did George Santos

0:04:57.676 --> 0:05:00.556
<v Speaker 2>go from lies about where he went to school and

0:05:00.596 --> 0:05:05.196
<v Speaker 2>where he worked to allegations of serious federal crimes, crimes

0:05:05.196 --> 0:05:07.476
<v Speaker 2>that could land him in prison for roughly two decades,

0:05:07.796 --> 0:05:11.596
<v Speaker 2>and just how deep to his go. This is deep

0:05:11.636 --> 0:05:25.876
<v Speaker 2>Cover George Santos, Episode one the campaign. Jake, I want

0:05:25.876 --> 0:05:27.916
<v Speaker 2>to go back in time to that moment when the

0:05:27.916 --> 0:05:31.916
<v Speaker 2>New York Times story broke, because that's when the cracks

0:05:31.996 --> 0:05:37.156
<v Speaker 2>in Santos's facade really start to show. Okay, So two

0:05:37.276 --> 0:05:39.836
<v Speaker 2>journalists at the New York Times, their names are Grace

0:05:39.996 --> 0:05:44.676
<v Speaker 2>Ashford and Michael Gold, they come out with this massive story.

0:05:44.996 --> 0:05:49.276
<v Speaker 2>It's called who is Rep. Elect George Santos? His resume

0:05:49.596 --> 0:05:53.956
<v Speaker 2>may be largely fiction. The headline from this story is really,

0:05:54.676 --> 0:05:58.916
<v Speaker 2>maybe this guy isn't who he claimed to be? And

0:05:58.956 --> 0:06:02.356
<v Speaker 2>that for me was a moment where I heard from

0:06:02.396 --> 0:06:04.956
<v Speaker 2>basically everyone in my life who knew I was from

0:06:05.036 --> 0:06:07.276
<v Speaker 2>Long Island and knew that I worked on stories like this,

0:06:07.436 --> 0:06:12.036
<v Speaker 2>and just you know, asking me, what the fuck what

0:06:12.396 --> 0:06:15.276
<v Speaker 2>happened here? Who is this guy? And how did he

0:06:15.316 --> 0:06:19.556
<v Speaker 2>get elected? He's, you know, living this double life essentially

0:06:19.596 --> 0:06:21.516
<v Speaker 2>who he says he is in public, but who he

0:06:21.596 --> 0:06:24.756
<v Speaker 2>actually is in private. And one person who is in

0:06:25.036 --> 0:06:29.436
<v Speaker 2>the center of this mess was George Santos's communications director.

0:06:30.276 --> 0:06:33.556
<v Speaker 2>Her name is Nasa Woomer. Do you remember where you

0:06:33.636 --> 0:06:36.596
<v Speaker 2>were when the New York Times story broke? Oh?

0:06:36.636 --> 0:06:36.996
<v Speaker 5>I do?

0:06:37.236 --> 0:06:41.956
<v Speaker 6>I know exactly where. I was actually coming out of

0:06:42.076 --> 0:06:46.756
<v Speaker 6>the Starbucks and it broke, and I was heading into

0:06:46.796 --> 0:06:48.276
<v Speaker 6>our office right by the State House.

0:06:48.796 --> 0:06:52.396
<v Speaker 2>And the timing here is really interesting because she actually

0:06:52.436 --> 0:06:56.716
<v Speaker 2>accepted the job right before the New York Times story broke.

0:06:57.156 --> 0:07:00.556
<v Speaker 6>Everyone is sending like, Niassa, have you seen this? Oh

0:07:00.556 --> 0:07:03.116
<v Speaker 6>my god, is this the guy you're working for? My

0:07:03.196 --> 0:07:06.716
<v Speaker 6>stomach had dropped, and I thought, what the well, I

0:07:06.716 --> 0:07:09.796
<v Speaker 6>don't want to say the F bomb, but but that's

0:07:09.796 --> 0:07:10.996
<v Speaker 6>what I'm thinking.

0:07:11.236 --> 0:07:13.196
<v Speaker 1>At this point, like how many days on the job

0:07:13.316 --> 0:07:13.516
<v Speaker 1>is she?

0:07:13.716 --> 0:07:16.796
<v Speaker 2>By the way, so Nesa hasn't actually started working for

0:07:16.876 --> 0:07:20.956
<v Speaker 2>Santos in that moment. She's still working in Boston for

0:07:21.076 --> 0:07:25.276
<v Speaker 2>the Republican administration there, so she's not actually even in

0:07:25.316 --> 0:07:28.676
<v Speaker 2>touch with George Santos. But she did hear through the

0:07:28.676 --> 0:07:33.156
<v Speaker 2>grapevine through some staffer that a story about Santos would

0:07:33.156 --> 0:07:33.636
<v Speaker 2>be coming.

0:07:34.076 --> 0:07:35.956
<v Speaker 6>I already knew there was going to be a hit piece,

0:07:36.396 --> 0:07:39.436
<v Speaker 6>but my understanding was that this was just going to

0:07:39.516 --> 0:07:41.156
<v Speaker 6>be We thought it was going to be a traditional

0:07:41.236 --> 0:07:45.156
<v Speaker 6>hit piece of conservative Republican Flip's Democrat seat.

0:07:45.956 --> 0:07:47.796
<v Speaker 2>But of course that was not the New York Times

0:07:47.796 --> 0:07:51.236
<v Speaker 2>story at all. The New York Times story made clear

0:07:51.276 --> 0:07:54.156
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of the stories that George Santos had

0:07:54.156 --> 0:07:58.076
<v Speaker 2>told on the campaign trail were at best inaccurate, at

0:07:58.076 --> 0:08:04.396
<v Speaker 2>worst entirely fabricated. And so after the story publishes, Santos

0:08:04.396 --> 0:08:07.916
<v Speaker 2>comes out with this statement through his attorney that says

0:08:09.276 --> 0:08:13.316
<v Speaker 2>it's no surprise that Congressman elect Santos has enemies at

0:08:13.356 --> 0:08:16.076
<v Speaker 2>The New York Times who are attempting to smear his

0:08:16.076 --> 0:08:18.596
<v Speaker 2>good name with these defamatory allegations.

0:08:19.156 --> 0:08:21.236
<v Speaker 6>I even spoke with the chief of Stuff and he

0:08:21.236 --> 0:08:24.196
<v Speaker 6>said he's speaking with his lawyers. They're going to handle it.

0:08:24.236 --> 0:08:26.916
<v Speaker 6>And I just said, okay, well, like they need to

0:08:26.956 --> 0:08:32.116
<v Speaker 6>handle it immediately, because you know, this is this is

0:08:32.396 --> 0:08:33.396
<v Speaker 6>really bad.

0:08:34.196 --> 0:08:36.356
<v Speaker 1>And is Santo's freaking out at this point.

0:08:36.916 --> 0:08:39.356
<v Speaker 2>So I can't vouch for how Santos is feeling because

0:08:39.396 --> 0:08:40.756
<v Speaker 2>I have not spoken with him directly.

0:08:41.196 --> 0:08:42.876
<v Speaker 1>We've tried, yes.

0:08:42.796 --> 0:08:45.556
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we've reached out to him for comment. So far

0:08:45.636 --> 0:08:50.476
<v Speaker 2>he's declined those requests. But Santos appears to have been

0:08:50.676 --> 0:08:55.676
<v Speaker 2>attempting some damage control. He's not giving a ton of interviews,

0:08:55.676 --> 0:08:58.716
<v Speaker 2>but he does grant one to Fox News and it's

0:08:58.756 --> 0:09:02.396
<v Speaker 2>a guest anchor, so it is Tulca Gabbard conducting the interview.

0:09:02.876 --> 0:09:04.916
<v Speaker 7>First question I really want to ask you now that

0:09:04.956 --> 0:09:08.356
<v Speaker 7>all this has been revealed, is what does the word

0:09:08.436 --> 0:09:09.996
<v Speaker 7>integrity mean to you?

0:09:11.076 --> 0:09:14.156
<v Speaker 3>Well, Tulsi, thank you for having me, you know, to

0:09:14.396 --> 0:09:18.276
<v Speaker 3>answer your question. Integrity is very important, and bellis What

0:09:18.276 --> 0:09:18.796
<v Speaker 3>does it mean?

0:09:18.836 --> 0:09:18.996
<v Speaker 5>Though?

0:09:19.356 --> 0:09:19.916
<v Speaker 2>What does it mean?

0:09:19.956 --> 0:09:23.396
<v Speaker 7>Because the meaning of the word actually matters in practice.

0:09:24.316 --> 0:09:27.916
<v Speaker 3>Of course, it means to carry yourself in an honorable way.

0:09:28.276 --> 0:09:30.876
<v Speaker 3>And I made a mistake, and I think humans are

0:09:30.916 --> 0:09:32.436
<v Speaker 3>flawed and we all make mistakes.

0:09:32.476 --> 0:09:33.636
<v Speaker 2>Tulsi, this is.

0:09:33.636 --> 0:09:36.316
<v Speaker 1>Fox News and he's a Republican and he's getting very

0:09:36.316 --> 0:09:39.916
<v Speaker 1>hostile treatment here. So, I mean, lord knows what would

0:09:39.916 --> 0:09:43.676
<v Speaker 1>happen if he had gone on MSNBC or even CNN.

0:09:44.316 --> 0:09:49.436
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering how is this playing out with his constituents.

0:09:50.156 --> 0:09:54.676
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I remember the reaction was pretty swift.

0:09:55.516 --> 0:10:03.076
<v Speaker 5>George Chantlis's campaign last year was a campaign of decei, lies, fabrication.

0:10:04.036 --> 0:10:07.196
<v Speaker 5>He deceived the voters of the third Congressional district.

0:10:07.996 --> 0:10:11.276
<v Speaker 2>That's Joe Chiro, head of the Republican Party in Nasa County.

0:10:11.556 --> 0:10:14.796
<v Speaker 2>This is from a press conference they held where he,

0:10:14.996 --> 0:10:19.236
<v Speaker 2>along with other New York Republicans, actually ask for Santos' resignation.

0:10:19.796 --> 0:10:23.556
<v Speaker 8>There's absolutely no way mister Santos can be an effective

0:10:23.636 --> 0:10:29.956
<v Speaker 8>member of Congress and represent the people who elected him.

0:10:30.316 --> 0:10:32.316
<v Speaker 1>One of the questions I have is like, talk to

0:10:32.356 --> 0:10:37.516
<v Speaker 1>me about this district that elects him.

0:10:37.956 --> 0:10:41.556
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. So Santos ran in New York's third congressional district,

0:10:41.596 --> 0:10:43.996
<v Speaker 2>which if you've ever looked at a political map, you

0:10:44.076 --> 0:10:46.876
<v Speaker 2>know these districts get drawn in a kind of crazy,

0:10:46.956 --> 0:10:50.796
<v Speaker 2>nonsensical way. When you look at the district itself, it

0:10:50.996 --> 0:10:54.196
<v Speaker 2>holds part of Nasa County, which is where I grew up,

0:10:54.636 --> 0:10:57.476
<v Speaker 2>and specifically in my neighborhood, I can say it's a

0:10:57.516 --> 0:11:01.236
<v Speaker 2>lot of working class folks, so people who commute into

0:11:01.236 --> 0:11:06.436
<v Speaker 2>New York City every day, cops, firefighters, teachers. It also

0:11:06.516 --> 0:11:09.356
<v Speaker 2>includes the north shore of Long Island, which is like

0:11:09.516 --> 0:11:13.276
<v Speaker 2>Gatspeak country. There's lots of big houses and old money.

0:11:13.836 --> 0:11:16.836
<v Speaker 2>And over the years the district has changed, the lines

0:11:16.876 --> 0:11:19.836
<v Speaker 2>have been redrawn, but by the time that Santos was running,

0:11:20.636 --> 0:11:23.396
<v Speaker 2>the district included a little sliver of Queens which is

0:11:23.476 --> 0:11:24.796
<v Speaker 2>actually where Santos grew up.

0:11:25.396 --> 0:11:30.316
<v Speaker 1>It's funny because when you describe it, I totally almost

0:11:30.356 --> 0:11:32.836
<v Speaker 1>get why he would have to be a guy, that

0:11:32.876 --> 0:11:34.716
<v Speaker 1>would be a chameleon, that would have to be able

0:11:34.916 --> 0:11:38.156
<v Speaker 1>to play a lot of different parts, because his constituency

0:11:38.356 --> 0:11:40.836
<v Speaker 1>is just like a crazy cross section of America.

0:11:41.876 --> 0:11:45.636
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think when George Santos is running for office,

0:11:46.476 --> 0:11:50.676
<v Speaker 2>he is building the narrative around himself that he started

0:11:50.716 --> 0:11:56.116
<v Speaker 2>from nothing and built himself into a successful businessman in

0:11:56.156 --> 0:11:59.476
<v Speaker 2>the financial industry. So he claims that he was working

0:11:59.596 --> 0:12:02.836
<v Speaker 2>for Goldman Sachs, he claims that he was working for

0:12:02.916 --> 0:12:03.436
<v Speaker 2>City Group.

0:12:04.716 --> 0:12:06.676
<v Speaker 1>None of these things are true. None of that is

0:12:06.676 --> 0:12:07.436
<v Speaker 1>a crime.

0:12:07.636 --> 0:12:11.436
<v Speaker 2>That's true. But it's around the same moment in time

0:12:11.556 --> 0:12:15.476
<v Speaker 2>that new reports are emerging that Santos is being investigated

0:12:15.756 --> 0:12:18.196
<v Speaker 2>for actual crimes he may have committed.

0:12:18.556 --> 0:12:22.716
<v Speaker 9>The Republican District Attorney of Nassau County says she's looking

0:12:22.756 --> 0:12:26.796
<v Speaker 9>into whether any of those fabrications amounted to crimes, and

0:12:26.916 --> 0:12:32.316
<v Speaker 9>federal prosecutors are also looking into Santos's financial disclosures. Stunning

0:12:32.356 --> 0:12:36.276
<v Speaker 9>revelations and questions about his personal and professional life continue

0:12:36.276 --> 0:12:38.996
<v Speaker 9>to come to light, including new questions about the money

0:12:38.996 --> 0:12:40.356
<v Speaker 9>he spent on his campaign.

0:12:42.396 --> 0:13:02.356
<v Speaker 2>We'll be right back. So when the New York Times

0:13:02.356 --> 0:13:05.476
<v Speaker 2>story comes out, there are a number of things that

0:13:05.516 --> 0:13:09.716
<v Speaker 2>are exposed, but there are also a lot of questions remaining.

0:13:09.916 --> 0:13:13.196
<v Speaker 2>And so I think, you know, reporters, especially reporters who

0:13:13.196 --> 0:13:16.396
<v Speaker 2>are working in DC can kind of smell blood in

0:13:16.436 --> 0:13:18.876
<v Speaker 2>the water, right, and they're like, what else can I

0:13:18.916 --> 0:13:19.956
<v Speaker 2>find out about this guy?

0:13:20.516 --> 0:13:22.916
<v Speaker 10>I was trying to cover the New York area because

0:13:22.996 --> 0:13:25.796
<v Speaker 10>I'm a New Yorker, and I understood that there was

0:13:25.836 --> 0:13:30.236
<v Speaker 10>this buzz that there were some members that might actually

0:13:30.276 --> 0:13:34.436
<v Speaker 10>overcome some of the Democratic nominees that were running for Congress.

0:13:34.956 --> 0:13:38.116
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Jake. So this is Kadea Goba, and she's a

0:13:38.156 --> 0:13:41.836
<v Speaker 2>political reporter for Semaphore, which is this sort of newer

0:13:41.916 --> 0:13:42.956
<v Speaker 2>journalism outlet.

0:13:43.396 --> 0:13:46.156
<v Speaker 10>So I set out in October to interview a bunch

0:13:46.236 --> 0:13:50.156
<v Speaker 10>of them. George Santos did not give me access after

0:13:50.236 --> 0:13:53.796
<v Speaker 10>he won. He was like, he became a challenge to me.

0:13:53.876 --> 0:13:55.196
<v Speaker 10>I needed to talk to this man.

0:13:56.516 --> 0:13:59.556
<v Speaker 2>Kadia actually worked at BuzzFeed before she was with Semaphore,

0:14:00.036 --> 0:14:03.396
<v Speaker 2>but she hasn't always been a journalist. This is a

0:14:03.476 --> 0:14:04.116
<v Speaker 2>second career.

0:14:04.716 --> 0:14:10.196
<v Speaker 10>I was in the clothing industry for over two decades

0:14:10.476 --> 0:14:12.596
<v Speaker 10>as a sales rep. So this is sort of a

0:14:12.636 --> 0:14:16.596
<v Speaker 10>midlife crisis that worked out anyways.

0:14:16.596 --> 0:14:19.516
<v Speaker 2>So near the end of twenty twenty two, Kadilla is

0:14:19.556 --> 0:14:24.036
<v Speaker 2>working as a reporter on Capitol Hill and she meets

0:14:24.236 --> 0:14:28.036
<v Speaker 2>George Santos, in person. She gave him her card. You know,

0:14:28.076 --> 0:14:30.636
<v Speaker 2>I'm a reporter working on the hill, would love to

0:14:30.636 --> 0:14:34.116
<v Speaker 2>be in touch, but he doesn't give her his But

0:14:34.396 --> 0:14:37.516
<v Speaker 2>she gets his phone number anyways, and she wants to

0:14:37.516 --> 0:14:40.636
<v Speaker 2>talk to him, so she's calling a lot, even though

0:14:40.676 --> 0:14:43.356
<v Speaker 2>he would never pick up until this one time.

0:14:43.756 --> 0:14:46.956
<v Speaker 10>I remember very distinctly he either called me back or

0:14:47.516 --> 0:14:51.156
<v Speaker 10>picked up the phone this one time and said, I

0:14:51.236 --> 0:14:54.076
<v Speaker 10>remember not giving you my phone number, which I thought

0:14:54.116 --> 0:14:57.716
<v Speaker 10>was very funny because he understood who had been calling him,

0:14:57.836 --> 0:14:59.676
<v Speaker 10>but just was intentionally ignoring me.

0:14:59.956 --> 0:15:00.356
<v Speaker 2>Whatever.

0:15:00.476 --> 0:15:02.756
<v Speaker 10>Fine, He eventually picked up the phone, and he told

0:15:02.836 --> 0:15:05.956
<v Speaker 10>me that at that time he was going on Fox,

0:15:06.236 --> 0:15:09.596
<v Speaker 10>that I shouldn't tell anyone, but maybe he could talk

0:15:09.636 --> 0:15:10.676
<v Speaker 10>to me afterwards.

0:15:11.276 --> 0:15:14.036
<v Speaker 1>Wait, this is the same interview that we heard at

0:15:14.036 --> 0:15:16.116
<v Speaker 1>the top with Tulci Gabbard.

0:15:16.636 --> 0:15:16.916
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:15:17.756 --> 0:15:22.356
<v Speaker 10>So I watched the interview and it went terribly.

0:15:22.836 --> 0:15:25.156
<v Speaker 2>My question is do you have no shame?

0:15:25.836 --> 0:15:29.556
<v Speaker 3>Look, I understand everybody wants to knitpick at me. I'm

0:15:29.596 --> 0:15:32.756
<v Speaker 3>going to reassure this once and for all. I'm not

0:15:32.836 --> 0:15:34.396
<v Speaker 3>a facade. I'm not a persona.

0:15:34.996 --> 0:15:38.356
<v Speaker 10>You could tell he was uncomfortable. It wasn't what he expected.

0:15:38.596 --> 0:15:40.556
<v Speaker 10>I think he thought this was going to be a

0:15:40.596 --> 0:15:44.116
<v Speaker 10>good opportunity for him to talk about what happened or

0:15:44.196 --> 0:15:48.596
<v Speaker 10>explain his situation, and none of that happened. So of

0:15:48.676 --> 0:15:51.716
<v Speaker 10>course I kind of just texted him after the interview

0:15:51.836 --> 0:15:55.156
<v Speaker 10>was over and kind of said like, are you free

0:15:55.276 --> 0:15:59.116
<v Speaker 10>or do you want to talk? And he texted back

0:15:59.316 --> 0:16:02.316
<v Speaker 10>like something like get your pen and paper ready.

0:16:04.596 --> 0:16:07.476
<v Speaker 1>Wow. That kind of surprises me. Given how badly it went,

0:16:07.556 --> 0:16:10.196
<v Speaker 1>you think maybe he would be a little guns Oh.

0:16:10.316 --> 0:16:13.396
<v Speaker 2>I think Kadilla's view was the opposite that. You know,

0:16:13.476 --> 0:16:15.636
<v Speaker 2>he thought that the Fox interview would be a good

0:16:15.676 --> 0:16:18.596
<v Speaker 2>opportunity and then when it went so poorly, he's just

0:16:18.716 --> 0:16:21.756
<v Speaker 2>kind of panicking, and he's he's open to talking to

0:16:21.836 --> 0:16:25.236
<v Speaker 2>people because he wants to clear the air. Right, he's

0:16:25.236 --> 0:16:27.076
<v Speaker 2>in crisis mode, I see.

0:16:27.236 --> 0:16:29.516
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, they just get back up to the plate

0:16:29.556 --> 0:16:30.476
<v Speaker 1>again kind of thing.

0:16:31.076 --> 0:16:34.756
<v Speaker 10>And sure enough, like maybe fifteen minutes later, he called me,

0:16:35.796 --> 0:16:38.276
<v Speaker 10>and I think I talked to him as he drove

0:16:38.756 --> 0:16:40.516
<v Speaker 10>from the Fox studio home.

0:16:40.956 --> 0:16:43.076
<v Speaker 2>So what is your goal in that interview? What is

0:16:43.116 --> 0:16:44.876
<v Speaker 2>the big question you want to ask?

0:16:45.276 --> 0:16:47.356
<v Speaker 10>Clearly I want to ask where he got his money from,

0:16:47.396 --> 0:16:49.156
<v Speaker 10>because that was like the big discrepancy.

0:16:49.276 --> 0:16:53.636
<v Speaker 2>Right, He had presented himself on the campaign trail as

0:16:53.676 --> 0:16:58.916
<v Speaker 2>this wealthy, successful individual. How much money does he have

0:16:59.076 --> 0:17:01.356
<v Speaker 2>really and what is the source of that money?

0:17:01.996 --> 0:17:03.996
<v Speaker 1>So this is what Kadia is talking about, the big

0:17:03.996 --> 0:17:06.196
<v Speaker 1>the discrepancy and where did the money come from?

0:17:06.676 --> 0:17:08.796
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and Kadia is following this, and I think it

0:17:08.796 --> 0:17:10.756
<v Speaker 2>would be fair to say that a lot of reporters

0:17:10.756 --> 0:17:14.436
<v Speaker 2>were fixated on this question at the time of you know, okay,

0:17:14.476 --> 0:17:18.036
<v Speaker 2>George Santos has been exposed as a potential liar. What

0:17:18.236 --> 0:17:21.676
<v Speaker 2>else could he be lying about? It appears on paper

0:17:22.196 --> 0:17:24.716
<v Speaker 2>like George Santos has a lot of money, but is

0:17:24.716 --> 0:17:27.836
<v Speaker 2>that actually the case? And it's around this time that

0:17:28.076 --> 0:17:31.876
<v Speaker 2>many people start looking at his campaign finance filings. And

0:17:31.956 --> 0:17:35.276
<v Speaker 2>one of those people is a guy named Sarav Ghosh.

0:17:35.796 --> 0:17:39.356
<v Speaker 11>I'm the director of Federal Campaign Finance Reform at Campaign

0:17:39.396 --> 0:17:42.596
<v Speaker 11>Legal Center, and what I work on every day are

0:17:42.996 --> 0:17:47.836
<v Speaker 11>the laws that govern how people raise and spend money

0:17:48.316 --> 0:17:51.316
<v Speaker 11>when they're trying to convince others to vote for them.

0:17:51.876 --> 0:17:54.396
<v Speaker 2>He was a lawyer at the FEC, which is the

0:17:54.436 --> 0:17:59.036
<v Speaker 2>Federal Election Commission, and it's basically Sarov's job to find

0:17:59.116 --> 0:18:01.716
<v Speaker 2>people violating campaign finance laws.

0:18:01.956 --> 0:18:03.996
<v Speaker 1>I see, so he's like a nonprofit do good or

0:18:03.996 --> 0:18:06.236
<v Speaker 1>private detective exactly.

0:18:07.036 --> 0:18:10.716
<v Speaker 2>So Siav and his team would eventually file a complaint

0:18:10.836 --> 0:18:15.516
<v Speaker 2>with the Federal Election Commission, and some of the things

0:18:15.516 --> 0:18:18.676
<v Speaker 2>that they flag actually show up later on in the

0:18:18.676 --> 0:18:20.316
<v Speaker 2>federal indictment against Santos.

0:18:20.756 --> 0:18:21.876
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, I see.

0:18:22.356 --> 0:18:25.516
<v Speaker 2>Uh, you know that week between Christmas and New Year's

0:18:25.516 --> 0:18:29.556
<v Speaker 2>when basically no one wants to work. Yeah, definitely that

0:18:29.636 --> 0:18:34.596
<v Speaker 2>week Surav and his team were actually surprisingly busy. They

0:18:34.956 --> 0:18:39.556
<v Speaker 2>started reviewing santosis campaign finance filings, and a few things

0:18:39.676 --> 0:18:41.076
<v Speaker 2>stick out to Surrov right away.

0:18:41.796 --> 0:18:47.036
<v Speaker 11>There was this glaring disconnect between his personal finances, as

0:18:47.036 --> 0:18:51.676
<v Speaker 11>he had reported on financial disclosure form that every House

0:18:51.716 --> 0:18:56.076
<v Speaker 11>candidate is required to file, and his campaign reports, which

0:18:56.516 --> 0:19:00.956
<v Speaker 11>indicated he had loaned his own campaign a ton of money,

0:19:01.236 --> 0:19:04.436
<v Speaker 11>a six figure sum north of seven hundred thousand dollars.

0:19:04.596 --> 0:19:05.036
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

0:19:05.076 --> 0:19:08.596
<v Speaker 11>So it's it's very I won't say comment, it's not

0:19:08.676 --> 0:19:12.316
<v Speaker 11>unheard for a candidate to loan his own campaign that

0:19:12.436 --> 0:19:14.916
<v Speaker 11>kind of money, or even to just give it to

0:19:14.956 --> 0:19:19.596
<v Speaker 11>the campaign outright, but you typically expect to see backing

0:19:19.636 --> 0:19:24.076
<v Speaker 11>that up a financial disclosure that shows, well, this person

0:19:24.156 --> 0:19:27.116
<v Speaker 11>is wealthy, right, they have the assets, they have the income.

0:19:27.516 --> 0:19:29.436
<v Speaker 11>With Santos, it was the exact opposite.

0:19:30.236 --> 0:19:32.356
<v Speaker 2>So one thing quickly that I should just mention to you.

0:19:32.476 --> 0:19:37.916
<v Speaker 2>Jake Santos actually ran for Congress twice. He ran first

0:19:37.956 --> 0:19:42.076
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty. He lost. SIREV look through those records too,

0:19:42.796 --> 0:19:48.156
<v Speaker 2>he claimed to loan his unsuccessful twenty twenty campaign something

0:19:48.236 --> 0:19:52.076
<v Speaker 2>like eighty thousand dollars. That didn't really make sense because

0:19:52.116 --> 0:19:56.396
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty he had personal assets and income of

0:19:56.476 --> 0:19:59.596
<v Speaker 2>just fifty five thousand dollars according to his self reporting,

0:20:00.036 --> 0:20:02.196
<v Speaker 2>So it was just fifty five thousand dollars.

0:20:02.276 --> 0:20:05.276
<v Speaker 11>Fifty five thousand, yeah, wow, So it made no sense

0:20:05.316 --> 0:20:08.196
<v Speaker 11>how somebody with fifty five thousand dollars could even afford

0:20:08.236 --> 0:20:10.876
<v Speaker 11>to loan his campag eighty thousand dollars.

0:20:11.476 --> 0:20:15.676
<v Speaker 2>So what Suraba is outlining here is that alongside those

0:20:15.676 --> 0:20:18.876
<v Speaker 2>campaign filings, he's supposed to also be reporting what kind

0:20:18.916 --> 0:20:21.196
<v Speaker 2>of income he's making, what kind of assets he has.

0:20:21.716 --> 0:20:24.796
<v Speaker 2>And Surav's looking at this and just truly saying the

0:20:24.796 --> 0:20:27.836
<v Speaker 2>math isn't adding up. And then when you get to

0:20:27.916 --> 0:20:31.636
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two, when he's running the second time, he's

0:20:31.676 --> 0:20:34.956
<v Speaker 2>loaning his campaign even more money that there's one loan

0:20:34.996 --> 0:20:37.956
<v Speaker 2>in particular of five hundred thousand dollars. In March of

0:20:37.996 --> 0:20:43.676
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty two, Santos files a disclosure form that lists

0:20:43.836 --> 0:20:47.676
<v Speaker 2>his assets and income. In this document, you can see

0:20:47.836 --> 0:20:51.876
<v Speaker 2>he lists an apartment in Brazil that he values somewhere

0:20:51.876 --> 0:20:55.036
<v Speaker 2>between half a million and a million dollars. He says

0:20:55.076 --> 0:20:57.636
<v Speaker 2>he has somewhere between one hundred and two hundred and

0:20:57.636 --> 0:21:00.916
<v Speaker 2>fifty thousand dollars in a checking account. And then there's

0:21:00.916 --> 0:21:05.876
<v Speaker 2>this business called the Devolder Organization, and he values the

0:21:05.916 --> 0:21:10.916
<v Speaker 2>Devolder Organization as somewhere between a million and five million dollars.

0:21:11.316 --> 0:21:14.636
<v Speaker 11>That's one of his surnames as de Vold. And he

0:21:14.716 --> 0:21:19.196
<v Speaker 11>claimed that this organization, which was founded within months of

0:21:19.636 --> 0:21:22.596
<v Speaker 11>losing in the twenty twenty election, he claimed that this

0:21:22.716 --> 0:21:25.916
<v Speaker 11>company was basically an overnight success story.

0:21:26.716 --> 0:21:27.596
<v Speaker 1>And he was.

0:21:27.796 --> 0:21:32.716
<v Speaker 11>Very ambiguous and sketchy, quite quite honestly about what the

0:21:32.756 --> 0:21:36.036
<v Speaker 11>company did and how it made so much money overnight.

0:21:36.796 --> 0:21:41.956
<v Speaker 1>So he's filing these disclosures with the House, is that correct?

0:21:42.036 --> 0:21:42.436
<v Speaker 2>Correct?

0:21:43.196 --> 0:21:46.116
<v Speaker 1>Basically saying like, look, I've got this apartment in Brazil,

0:21:46.396 --> 0:21:50.356
<v Speaker 1>I've got this company over here, Like yeah, I'm a

0:21:50.356 --> 0:21:53.756
<v Speaker 1>wealthy man like I am more than capable of loading

0:21:53.756 --> 0:21:58.396
<v Speaker 1>my campaign this money. And my question is was that true?

0:21:58.436 --> 0:22:02.476
<v Speaker 1>Did he actually have any of these assets or was

0:22:02.516 --> 0:22:05.436
<v Speaker 1>this also part of his fabulous's tale.

0:22:05.716 --> 0:22:09.116
<v Speaker 2>So Sarav is looking at this and to be very clear,

0:22:09.116 --> 0:22:11.876
<v Speaker 2>sav does not believe the financial disclosure form. I think

0:22:11.916 --> 0:22:14.716
<v Speaker 2>also because he's looking at the previous forms and just saying,

0:22:14.796 --> 0:22:18.796
<v Speaker 2>how did this materialize overnight? Right? And he's also suspicious

0:22:18.836 --> 0:22:21.876
<v Speaker 2>of like what's driving this income? And that is a

0:22:21.956 --> 0:22:25.756
<v Speaker 2>question that Kadella, the reporter you heard from earlier, is

0:22:25.956 --> 0:22:29.076
<v Speaker 2>also very interested in getting an answer to you know,

0:22:29.436 --> 0:22:32.036
<v Speaker 2>what is going on with George Santos and his money,

0:22:32.596 --> 0:22:36.316
<v Speaker 2>Where is this alleged income coming from? And just to say,

0:22:36.716 --> 0:22:39.276
<v Speaker 2>if it's not already clear, all of this is happening

0:22:39.356 --> 0:22:43.716
<v Speaker 2>at the same time. So we have Sarav, who's our watchdog.

0:22:44.316 --> 0:22:47.436
<v Speaker 2>Him and his team are digging into these campaign finance

0:22:47.476 --> 0:22:50.876
<v Speaker 2>reports in the week between Christmas and New Year's and

0:22:51.196 --> 0:22:57.396
<v Speaker 2>that same week, Kadea, the clothing sales rep turned journalist,

0:22:57.676 --> 0:23:01.676
<v Speaker 2>is trying to get that interview with George Santos and

0:23:01.996 --> 0:23:05.236
<v Speaker 2>she's going to finally get it in the moment after

0:23:05.356 --> 0:23:09.556
<v Speaker 2>his disastrous interview on Fox, and so he's actually calling

0:23:09.596 --> 0:23:12.836
<v Speaker 2>her on the drive home from the Fox studio.

0:23:13.876 --> 0:23:16.676
<v Speaker 10>This is also eight o'clock at night, So I'm like

0:23:17.076 --> 0:23:20.716
<v Speaker 10>in my apartment. You know, Congress has been out for

0:23:20.796 --> 0:23:23.196
<v Speaker 10>weeks now, and I was like, I can't believe this

0:23:23.236 --> 0:23:26.436
<v Speaker 10>is happening. I'm actually interviewing this guy that everyone is

0:23:26.476 --> 0:23:30.916
<v Speaker 10>talking about. So I was working with like a Hanvis

0:23:30.956 --> 0:23:33.236
<v Speaker 10>and kind of was just like, so, how'd you.

0:23:33.156 --> 0:23:35.396
<v Speaker 2>Get all of this money? That was like my first question.

0:23:36.196 --> 0:23:39.556
<v Speaker 10>He gave this scenario where like, okay, let's say someone

0:23:39.796 --> 0:23:42.516
<v Speaker 10>buys a boat and they don't want to go through

0:23:42.636 --> 0:23:47.396
<v Speaker 10>like the normal chain, they want a smaller broken tree.

0:23:47.476 --> 0:23:50.116
<v Speaker 10>I come in and I kind of negotiate the deal

0:23:51.276 --> 0:23:54.996
<v Speaker 10>and you know, introduce them to potential sellers. And he

0:23:55.076 --> 0:23:57.716
<v Speaker 10>called this thing capital intro. He kept saying capital Intro,

0:23:57.756 --> 0:23:59.436
<v Speaker 10>and I was like, well, what is that? And he

0:23:59.516 --> 0:24:04.916
<v Speaker 10>explained that capital introduction you basically just connect hedge fund

0:24:04.996 --> 0:24:07.556
<v Speaker 10>people with investors.

0:24:07.636 --> 0:24:09.076
<v Speaker 2>Essentially. What is.

0:24:10.596 --> 0:24:10.716
<v Speaker 12>That?

0:24:10.756 --> 0:24:13.476
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't even really make sense to me, Like how does?

0:24:14.756 --> 0:24:18.676
<v Speaker 1>But okay, so he's like he's like a connector. I mean,

0:24:19.396 --> 0:24:21.076
<v Speaker 1>had the guy ever actually sold a boat?

0:24:21.636 --> 0:24:24.116
<v Speaker 2>The New York Times would later report that the FBI

0:24:24.316 --> 0:24:27.236
<v Speaker 2>was curious about this question too, and in fact, there

0:24:27.316 --> 0:24:31.516
<v Speaker 2>was at least one yacht sale that Santos brokered while

0:24:31.556 --> 0:24:33.836
<v Speaker 2>he was running for Congress that there are a lot

0:24:33.876 --> 0:24:36.916
<v Speaker 2>of questions about. But that's about all we know, Okay,

0:24:37.236 --> 0:24:42.556
<v Speaker 2>But jumping back to December twenty twenty two, Kadella just

0:24:42.596 --> 0:24:46.156
<v Speaker 2>had that interview with George Santos and he told her

0:24:46.596 --> 0:24:49.996
<v Speaker 2>that he works in capital introduction. This is what Kadea

0:24:50.076 --> 0:24:54.676
<v Speaker 2>reports attributing to George Santos, of course, and that brings

0:24:54.756 --> 0:25:00.276
<v Speaker 2>us back to Sarav, who reads Kadia's reporting, And for Sarav,

0:25:00.756 --> 0:25:04.516
<v Speaker 2>it's just not really checking out. And I think even

0:25:04.556 --> 0:25:08.076
<v Speaker 2>if what Santos told Kadea is true, maybe he did

0:25:08.436 --> 0:25:13.556
<v Speaker 2>sell a boat or two, but from Sarab's perspective, this

0:25:13.676 --> 0:25:17.156
<v Speaker 2>still doesn't really account for the massive cash windfall that

0:25:17.236 --> 0:25:20.956
<v Speaker 2>he appears to have almost overnight, I see. And so

0:25:20.996 --> 0:25:24.596
<v Speaker 2>Sarav's question, and what he's trying to piece together through

0:25:24.636 --> 0:25:28.836
<v Speaker 2>the reporting that's emerging is what is the full picture

0:25:28.996 --> 0:25:32.996
<v Speaker 2>of Devolder? You know, what kind of business is Devolder doing?

0:25:33.076 --> 0:25:35.836
<v Speaker 2>What kind of money is Devolder bringing in right?

0:25:35.956 --> 0:25:38.716
<v Speaker 1>And is it enough business that it could explain these

0:25:38.796 --> 0:25:42.196
<v Speaker 1>massive contributions of the campaign. What half a million dollars

0:25:42.276 --> 0:25:43.316
<v Speaker 1>right exactly?

0:25:43.356 --> 0:25:45.636
<v Speaker 2>And so Sarab is just trying to connect these dots.

0:25:45.916 --> 0:25:50.036
<v Speaker 2>And there's two things that Sirov is fairly suspicious of.

0:25:51.196 --> 0:25:54.796
<v Speaker 2>The first is that Santos is not listing any clients

0:25:54.956 --> 0:25:59.276
<v Speaker 2>on these disclosure forms, and you know, Siav and multiple

0:25:59.316 --> 0:26:02.836
<v Speaker 2>others flag that because if you're in this so called

0:26:02.916 --> 0:26:07.876
<v Speaker 2>capital introduction industry, you should have clients. That's basically the

0:26:07.916 --> 0:26:13.476
<v Speaker 2>whole business model. So that's concerning. The second is that

0:26:14.236 --> 0:26:17.956
<v Speaker 2>Sirov is also suspicious about the timing of all of this.

0:26:18.836 --> 0:26:23.916
<v Speaker 2>He notices that Santos declares his candidacy one month and

0:26:23.956 --> 0:26:28.076
<v Speaker 2>then he incorporates de Volder the next month, and then

0:26:28.116 --> 0:26:31.516
<v Speaker 2>he's making loans to his campaign the month after that.

0:26:31.516 --> 0:26:36.996
<v Speaker 1>That's fucking crazy.

0:26:35.476 --> 0:26:37.916
<v Speaker 2>Like how many boats do you have to sell? A Yeah,

0:26:38.156 --> 0:26:38.756
<v Speaker 2>make that up.

0:26:40.236 --> 0:26:43.436
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's like the greatest success story of all

0:26:43.436 --> 0:26:46.716
<v Speaker 1>the time if it's true. Dude sold some yachts mighty quick.

0:26:49.596 --> 0:26:52.116
<v Speaker 2>And there's something about that that's just not sitting right

0:26:52.156 --> 0:26:55.076
<v Speaker 2>with Sirov, and that leads him to wonder, Okay, where

0:26:55.196 --> 0:26:58.036
<v Speaker 2>is Santos actually getting this money from and he has

0:26:58.036 --> 0:26:58.956
<v Speaker 2>a couple theories about that.

0:26:59.516 --> 0:27:03.156
<v Speaker 11>So in our mind, this was a possible straw donor scheme.

0:27:03.756 --> 0:27:06.996
<v Speaker 11>A straw donor scheme is basically a scheme in which

0:27:07.476 --> 0:27:11.596
<v Speaker 11>someone is making a contribution to a candidate or a

0:27:11.636 --> 0:27:16.316
<v Speaker 11>pack through someone else. So Santos, in our mind, was

0:27:16.356 --> 0:27:20.196
<v Speaker 11>getting money from some external source. And that could be

0:27:20.236 --> 0:27:23.476
<v Speaker 11>a corporation, it could be a billionaire, it could be

0:27:23.516 --> 0:27:27.996
<v Speaker 11>a foreign national. So any of these possibilities struck us

0:27:27.996 --> 0:27:31.116
<v Speaker 11>as deeply problematic in our mind. You know, it wasn't

0:27:31.156 --> 0:27:34.916
<v Speaker 11>his money, it was someone else, and not knowing is

0:27:35.756 --> 0:27:37.756
<v Speaker 11>part of the problem, maybe the biggest problem.

0:27:38.516 --> 0:27:41.876
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting to me because to me, I get why

0:27:41.916 --> 0:27:44.956
<v Speaker 1>Sarab thinks that it's a straw donor, because that's like,

0:27:44.996 --> 0:27:47.596
<v Speaker 1>that's his his his purview, that's his job. He's looking

0:27:47.596 --> 0:27:53.676
<v Speaker 1>at people who are skirting finance campaign finance law. Right,

0:27:53.916 --> 0:27:57.316
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't realize that he's actually going after like a hustler.

0:27:57.796 --> 0:28:00.756
<v Speaker 1>Is there a paper shail that shows like a deposit

0:28:01.316 --> 0:28:04.116
<v Speaker 1>to his campaign coffers.

0:28:04.356 --> 0:28:08.796
<v Speaker 2>That's not required. Okay, so he can say I loaned

0:28:08.796 --> 0:28:12.276
<v Speaker 2>this out to my campaign, but he doesn't actually have

0:28:12.316 --> 0:28:15.756
<v Speaker 2>to back that up. With a wire transfer or a

0:28:15.796 --> 0:28:20.476
<v Speaker 2>bank account showing that money hits right. And so it's

0:28:21.036 --> 0:28:24.916
<v Speaker 2>a requirement for transparency, but it's limited, and so he's

0:28:24.956 --> 0:28:29.076
<v Speaker 2>able to stay on paper. Yes, I am a wealthy businessman,

0:28:29.236 --> 0:28:32.476
<v Speaker 2>and I was able to loan my campaign this six

0:28:32.556 --> 0:28:33.196
<v Speaker 2>figure sum.

0:28:34.156 --> 0:28:39.476
<v Speaker 1>I see, okay, because where I thought this was going

0:28:39.676 --> 0:28:44.356
<v Speaker 1>was that the loan was bullshit and this was just

0:28:44.396 --> 0:28:45.636
<v Speaker 1>a way for him to make money.

0:28:46.196 --> 0:28:49.476
<v Speaker 2>Well, you might be right about that, so, Jake. What

0:28:49.516 --> 0:28:53.276
<v Speaker 2>the government has alleged is that Santos lied in these

0:28:53.316 --> 0:28:58.956
<v Speaker 2>campaign finance reports in a sense inflating his fundraising numbers.

0:28:59.876 --> 0:29:05.596
<v Speaker 2>So prosecutors alleged that at least some of these loans

0:29:05.876 --> 0:29:10.316
<v Speaker 2>that Santos said he made to his campaign did not happen,

0:29:11.476 --> 0:29:16.916
<v Speaker 2>and they also alleged that he fudged these numbers for

0:29:16.996 --> 0:29:18.356
<v Speaker 2>a very specific reason.

0:29:19.476 --> 0:29:25.596
<v Speaker 11>Santos he understood that his campaign had to report earning

0:29:25.596 --> 0:29:28.236
<v Speaker 11>a certain amount or report raising a certain amount of

0:29:28.236 --> 0:29:32.916
<v Speaker 11>money to get support from the party, and so that

0:29:33.076 --> 0:29:36.356
<v Speaker 11>was something that the investigations revealed, is that he had

0:29:36.476 --> 0:29:40.836
<v Speaker 11>emails where he was making it clear that he was

0:29:40.916 --> 0:29:44.716
<v Speaker 11>trying to establish, you know, that he'd hit those benchmarks

0:29:44.756 --> 0:29:48.316
<v Speaker 11>and so qualified for the kind of support from the

0:29:48.316 --> 0:29:52.876
<v Speaker 11>Republican Party that only folks with that amount of financial

0:29:53.076 --> 0:29:54.836
<v Speaker 11>viability would be able to receive.

0:29:55.796 --> 0:30:00.756
<v Speaker 1>If I'm understanding this correctly, and this guy is coming

0:30:00.796 --> 0:30:05.716
<v Speaker 1>in and selling a whole story about how much money

0:30:05.756 --> 0:30:10.236
<v Speaker 1>he made and how much money he's loaned his his campaign,

0:30:10.996 --> 0:30:17.156
<v Speaker 1>and it smells like bullshit. The question is to what end?

0:30:17.596 --> 0:30:20.316
<v Speaker 1>And if I'm understanding this correctly, he was actually trying

0:30:20.356 --> 0:30:23.476
<v Speaker 1>to hustle the Republican Party basically, just to convince them

0:30:23.516 --> 0:30:28.076
<v Speaker 1>that he was healthier and stronger and a bigger baller

0:30:28.076 --> 0:30:28.836
<v Speaker 1>than he really was.

0:30:28.996 --> 0:30:31.876
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I think that there's a clear goal here,

0:30:31.916 --> 0:30:35.196
<v Speaker 2>and this is supported by what the government outlines in

0:30:35.236 --> 0:30:39.076
<v Speaker 2>the indictment. I mean, what they allege is that Santos

0:30:39.116 --> 0:30:42.836
<v Speaker 2>and his campaign treasurer Nancy Marx did this in order

0:30:42.876 --> 0:30:46.036
<v Speaker 2>to gain support from the Republican Party. And Nancy is

0:30:46.036 --> 0:30:50.476
<v Speaker 2>the person on his staff that is responsible for those filings. Now,

0:30:51.116 --> 0:30:54.076
<v Speaker 2>I should tell you Nancy Marx took a plea deal

0:30:54.156 --> 0:30:57.916
<v Speaker 2>last year for her role in some of this, and

0:30:58.156 --> 0:31:00.596
<v Speaker 2>I expect to hear a lot more about all of

0:31:00.636 --> 0:31:08.476
<v Speaker 2>this at trial. I mean, this program that Santos receives

0:31:08.596 --> 0:31:12.756
<v Speaker 2>by hitting these fundraising benchmarks, right, Yeah, he gets support

0:31:12.836 --> 0:31:16.196
<v Speaker 2>with ads, he gets support splitting the cost of polls,

0:31:16.756 --> 0:31:21.796
<v Speaker 2>focus groups, what they call coordinated expenditures, which is basically like,

0:31:21.876 --> 0:31:24.476
<v Speaker 2>we're going to spend money with you and for you, right,

0:31:24.676 --> 0:31:28.076
<v Speaker 2>And so if he's trying to get into office, he

0:31:29.196 --> 0:31:32.316
<v Speaker 2>understandably wants this support from the Republican Party.

0:31:33.076 --> 0:31:39.516
<v Speaker 1>Does sirob think that any money actually even existed like

0:31:39.716 --> 0:31:45.436
<v Speaker 1>this five hundred thousand dollars? Was it ever real or

0:31:45.476 --> 0:31:47.636
<v Speaker 1>is it just all on paper just like a full

0:31:47.716 --> 0:31:49.036
<v Speaker 1>on like charade.

0:31:49.556 --> 0:31:51.596
<v Speaker 2>So this is something that I've dug into a lot,

0:31:51.636 --> 0:31:55.476
<v Speaker 2>and the story is actually really complicated. What the government

0:31:55.516 --> 0:31:58.716
<v Speaker 2>alleges is that at a certain point in time related

0:31:58.756 --> 0:32:03.236
<v Speaker 2>to that twenty twenty two campaign, George Santos claimed to

0:32:03.316 --> 0:32:08.036
<v Speaker 2>have loaned his own campaign five hundred thousand dollars. What

0:32:08.116 --> 0:32:11.236
<v Speaker 2>the government alleges is that loan never happened, No money

0:32:11.316 --> 0:32:15.636
<v Speaker 2>changed hands in that moment. Now, some reporting has indicated

0:32:15.676 --> 0:32:19.636
<v Speaker 2>that maybe later on some money might have gotten moved

0:32:19.636 --> 0:32:23.796
<v Speaker 2>around to try and potentially make the books look better.

0:32:24.476 --> 0:32:29.076
<v Speaker 2>But what the government is charging in their indictment is

0:32:29.076 --> 0:32:33.676
<v Speaker 2>that this loan did not happen when the campaign said

0:32:33.676 --> 0:32:36.876
<v Speaker 2>it happened, and that it happened for a specific reason,

0:32:37.316 --> 0:32:43.036
<v Speaker 2>and that was to hit these campaign benchmarks, the fundraising benchmarks,

0:32:43.316 --> 0:32:45.796
<v Speaker 2>in order to get this support at a critical moment

0:32:45.956 --> 0:32:46.796
<v Speaker 2>in his campaign.

0:32:47.036 --> 0:32:49.716
<v Speaker 1>I get it, you know, he using his personal charm

0:32:49.916 --> 0:32:54.196
<v Speaker 1>and potentially his lies is like getting popular support. But

0:32:55.356 --> 0:32:57.596
<v Speaker 1>it's one thing to claim you were a successful businessman.

0:32:57.716 --> 0:33:00.956
<v Speaker 1>But then by loaning yourself this money or appearing to

0:33:02.276 --> 0:33:04.596
<v Speaker 1>you're passing the second test, which is he has the

0:33:04.636 --> 0:33:07.636
<v Speaker 1>war chest to make this work, We're going to supplement

0:33:07.716 --> 0:33:11.076
<v Speaker 1>that money. Being the Republican Party and really helped push

0:33:11.156 --> 0:33:12.236
<v Speaker 1>him over the line.

0:33:12.716 --> 0:33:15.756
<v Speaker 2>And it actually goes a step further. What the government

0:33:15.836 --> 0:33:18.716
<v Speaker 2>is alleging is that he that Santos and Nancy Marks

0:33:18.836 --> 0:33:24.156
<v Speaker 2>also conspired to put fake donations on the books in

0:33:24.196 --> 0:33:26.476
<v Speaker 2>the names of people who never either never gave or

0:33:26.476 --> 0:33:29.436
<v Speaker 2>didn't given that amount. What it looks like is that

0:33:29.476 --> 0:33:34.196
<v Speaker 2>they were really manipulating these reports to present a version

0:33:34.236 --> 0:33:40.076
<v Speaker 2>of Santos's campaign that was much healthier than the reality.

0:33:40.156 --> 0:33:45.356
<v Speaker 2>We've spent this episode talking about this moment in December

0:33:45.436 --> 0:33:49.116
<v Speaker 2>of twenty twenty two, when the New York Times reporting

0:33:49.196 --> 0:33:52.436
<v Speaker 2>kind of blows the story open and then everyone is

0:33:52.476 --> 0:33:55.516
<v Speaker 2>trying to figure out what else they could find out

0:33:55.556 --> 0:33:56.276
<v Speaker 2>in the wake of that.

0:33:56.396 --> 0:33:58.556
<v Speaker 1>Right, it might quibble with your phrasing of that. It

0:33:58.556 --> 0:34:01.516
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem like the Times blows the story open. It's

0:34:01.556 --> 0:34:03.876
<v Speaker 1>more like they find a crack and that the sad

0:34:04.476 --> 0:34:06.316
<v Speaker 1>may be a fairly big one, but a crack, and

0:34:06.356 --> 0:34:10.956
<v Speaker 1>that the sod that he has created about this super

0:34:10.996 --> 0:34:13.756
<v Speaker 1>successful businessman that he is. And it's like, then all

0:34:13.756 --> 0:34:15.756
<v Speaker 1>these other people are kind of like peering into the

0:34:15.756 --> 0:34:17.556
<v Speaker 1>crack and being like, what else is in there?

0:34:18.076 --> 0:34:20.476
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, No, you're right, And I will say that this

0:34:20.636 --> 0:34:23.756
<v Speaker 2>is really just the beginning of what will be uncovered

0:34:23.756 --> 0:34:27.636
<v Speaker 2>about George Santos, and ultimately this is a story of

0:34:27.716 --> 0:34:33.076
<v Speaker 2>personal betrayal. Coming up on the next episode of Deep Cover.

0:34:33.636 --> 0:34:34.756
<v Speaker 2>George Santos.

0:34:35.276 --> 0:34:37.876
<v Speaker 12>His mom is pretty central his campaign. He called her

0:34:38.076 --> 0:34:41.196
<v Speaker 12>a Wall Street executive. He said that she escaped the

0:34:41.236 --> 0:34:44.876
<v Speaker 12>South Tower during nine to eleven. He said that she

0:34:45.036 --> 0:34:46.836
<v Speaker 12>was a big political actor.

0:34:47.076 --> 0:34:48.596
<v Speaker 6>There are a few people in this world you should

0:34:48.636 --> 0:34:51.316
<v Speaker 6>not lie to. You're a lawyer, your doctor, and your

0:34:51.356 --> 0:34:52.596
<v Speaker 6>communications director.

0:34:55.476 --> 0:34:58.796
<v Speaker 1>This series is produced by Amy Gaines McQuaid and Joey

0:34:58.876 --> 0:35:03.316
<v Speaker 1>fish Ground. Our editor is Karen Chakerji. Our executive producer

0:35:03.436 --> 0:35:08.116
<v Speaker 1>is Jacob Smith, mastering by Jake Gorski, fact checking by

0:35:08.156 --> 0:35:11.676
<v Speaker 1>Anica Robbins. Our show art was designed by Sean Carney.

0:35:12.276 --> 0:35:15.836
<v Speaker 1>Music in this episode is from Luis Gerra and Epidemic

0:35:15.956 --> 0:35:20.556
<v Speaker 1>Sound Special thanks to Sarah Nix, Eric Sandler, and Greta Cone.

0:35:21.356 --> 0:35:22.276
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jake calpern