WEBVTT - Surveillance: Trade Wars Are Scaring People, Stringham Says

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>jay Ley. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg And

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>now to give us a little bit of perspective. When

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>we see that the SMP five hundred is down twelve

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>percent for the year, the nasdack down ten percent, the

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Dow Jones industrial leverage posting a decline of eleven and

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a half percent, we went looking under the tree for

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>someone who is optimistic, and luckily we didn't have to

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>go very far. Edward Stringham joins us now here in

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>our studios. He's the president of the American Institute for

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>econom Research. Edward Stringham, Merry post Christmas and Happy Boxing

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Day to you. I'm so glad that you're here because

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you are optimistic about the global economy in twenty nineteen.

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Give us some reasons why we should put the humbug aside.

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So I would say, uh, potentially, potentially we got it

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>with a little hope. There's the there's a joke in

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the Soviet Union of the optimists and the pessimists. That

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the pessimist says, oh, things are so bad, they can't

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>get any worse. The optimist says, no, don't be so pessimistic.

0:01:36.920 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Things can get a lot worse. So I hope that's

0:01:41.480 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>in the past. So I I would say that there's

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of things that could go wrong in two

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand nineteen, but there's just so much that could go well.

0:01:50.080 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So we're at right now record low unemployment rates, the

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>lowest we've seen in the past fifty years. We've seen

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of increase in UH certain sectors of the economy,

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>like the financial sector due to I would say de

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>regulation of the economy or the past couple of years,

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a lot of strength in our business due

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to lowering taxes and increasing corporate opportunity. On the other hand,

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot that is actually interfering, getting people upset.

0:02:23.320 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say things like the trade wars are scaring people.

0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>They're hammering markets in China. If you look at the

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>stock indexes for for the Chinese stock markets, I feel

0:02:34.000 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>very bad for them. So you know, there's a lot

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>more than the Hank Sang is down more than this

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>year it's just unbelievable. So that's what we would predict. However,

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>when we see that people can gain from trade and

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>then we see that that could be taken away from this,

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what we would predict, is decreases in our

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.679
<v Speaker 1>major trading partners stock markets. All Right, I'm going to

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>play the optimist for you here because I'm wondering whether

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the sort of imagination of investors has run away with

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>them when they think about the repercussions from the trade

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>confrontation between the United States and China, between the United

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>States and the European Union, because it seems to be

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>at least let's go down the list, be a little specific.

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 1>The issue of intellectual property is one that no one,

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>at least in the United States, Republican or Democrats, seems

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to have an issue with. Everybody sees the perspective that

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>China has been stealing or at least misappropriating intellectual property

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>not only from the United States but from other countries.

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.640
<v Speaker 1>It's I think a very interesting issue that has come

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>up in light of these discussions about tariffs, and a

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of people say, oh, it's really not about restrictions

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 1>on trade, it's these other things. But when the president

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:57.640
<v Speaker 1>came out a few weeks ago, I say, I am

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a tariff man. I think that that really shows deep

0:04:01.360 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 1>down that he might be actually a tariff man, and

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that to me does worry me. So there's a lot

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of these I would say, I don't think it's just

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>a political stand. I wanted to get Chinese to change

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the way they do business. I I don't know. A

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of my friends actually argue that that's what he's doing.

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>It's part of his art of the deal, and he's

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>really just bargaining. And if that ends up being the

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>case and we end up with lower tariffs all around,

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>then I will be thrilled and say yes two thousand nineteen,

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.239
<v Speaker 1>I think if they were to actually take their foot

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>off of the throat of international trade, the government or

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.200
<v Speaker 1>take its foot off the throat of international trade, we

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>would have a huge increase in markets, and that also

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>could be potentially part of his strategy to actually open

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>up unleash markets at a later date. What do you

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>make of the argument that the reason we've seen this

0:04:56.480 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>steady sell off in stocks is directly related to the

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>US Federal Reserve, the increase in interest rates, and the

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:08.480
<v Speaker 1>wind down the ongoing wind down of the Federal Reserve's

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet. That's another very interesting and complicated issue. We've

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>got a system where the Federal Reserve controls so much

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>of the important parts of our economy, specifically the interest rate.

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>We had a series of very loose monetary policy for

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 1>over ten years, and people saying we've got to move

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>away from that. We've had what I would say are

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>very artificially low UH interest rates for so long, and

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve said, basically, we can't continue this, and

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>they've been easing off of this what I would call

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>this overly loose monetary policy. So I think it had

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to happen at one point. We're going into this direction.

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And then the question is is this going to be

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 1>distabling or destabilizing of the economy or not. You believe

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it will be destabilizing. I mean, it's really is this

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>level of interest rates. I mean, you take a look

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>at you know, three percent for the thirty year and

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, to take a look at the two year

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>at two point five, that doesn't seem like an outsized

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>increase in interest at all. I totally agree with you

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>that we're we're talking about, you know, a quarter percent

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.799
<v Speaker 1>increase last week, and it's like, oh, the sky is falling.

0:06:24.279 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think that that is that the excuse

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>for why people sell, but they don't have any other

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>President said just the other day he said he said

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the only bad thing going on in the economy is

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>a federal reserve. And I think that's trying to put

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 1>point the finger too much at the federals. I'm not

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 1>saying the federal reserve is great, but to say that

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>they're responsible for all woes and the economy, I just

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 1>don't buy it. Well, they can't rack up a trillion

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>dollar deficit all by themselves, right, I mean, they need

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>help from side, from the government. Do you believe that

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the increase in the debt and the deficits that the

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>government is the U S Government is running, you think

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>that this is going to really hurt the economy? In so,

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>this is I would call a long term problem. We've

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>got unsustainable deficits, unsustainably growing debt, and I think the

0:07:18.800 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>longer this last, the more we're gonna have to be

0:07:22.000 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>paying on interest servicing debt. But I do think that

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>this is going to come in gradually and it's going

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to be more and more problematic. But I don't I

0:07:32.200 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>can't predict that this is what everybody who is listening

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>has already retired, and the children and grandnill do. Right.

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think tonight there's going to be this

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>massive crisis. But but over time, certainly, as we go

0:07:45.560 --> 0:07:47.840
<v Speaker 1>more and more into the realm of higher and higher debt,

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that isn't going to be increasingly a problem. Okay, so

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.320
<v Speaker 1>you've talked about the labor picture, which means more people working.

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.240
<v Speaker 1>You see help wanted signs, it's difficult to hire workers

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>for certain jobs. Do you believe that that will help

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the economy in because if you're working, you're paying taxes,

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and that money also goes into the economy because you've

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>got to spend it. Sure. Yeah, there's a very good

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>labor market right now. There's increases in wages, and by

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>all accounts, that's actually very positive. The more people we

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>have hired, the more, as you said, the people are working,

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the more they're producing, the more everybody has. So so

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>to what do you really ascribe the gloom that seems

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to have settled on financial markets, whether it's the debt market, treasuries, leverage, loans, equities, yeah,

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I I don't. I don't consider things like leverage loans

0:08:40.720 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to be the problem. I consider the problem to be policy.

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 1>Uncertainty of bad government policy can really throw a wrench

0:08:50.280 --> 0:08:54.440
<v Speaker 1>into things. It can interfere with businesses plans if all

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden the inputs of their products are more expensive.

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>American corporations are now put at a competitive disadvantage worldwide.

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Consumers themselves are going to be buying fewer goods when

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>they have to pay higher tariffs. So I certainly hope

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that this trade ward doesn't balloon and explode, But it's

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>something that can cause a lot of alarm to to anybody.

0:09:21.920 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, So I'm just gonna before we let you go,

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.079
<v Speaker 1>I just got to assume that you came here either

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>in some vehicle or you've taken a plane. In the

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 1>last couple of days. We've got oil right now at

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:35.960
<v Speaker 1>forty three dollars of barrel trading on the nimax. It's

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:38.439
<v Speaker 1>up two percent today, but that's the minimus because it's

0:09:38.760 --> 0:09:42.679
<v Speaker 1>six cents higher. If oil stays at forty three, is

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that going to be good for consumers and good for

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the economy, and good for the airlines and so on?

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a really difficult question. We've got so many prices

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and stock markets prices are determined by

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>all factors, including current input crisis. So I think that,

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 1>um uh, the oil. Oil is an important factor in

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the economy, but I think there's so many other, bigger,

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>more important things that are in our control. The oil

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>markets is kind of outside of our control in the

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>short run at least. But what isn't our control is policy.

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Economic policy matters. All right, Well done, thanks very much.

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>Edward Stringham is the president of the American Institute for

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Economic for Research. I'vean fine set. Tigers Financial Chief investment

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>officer and director of Research joins us. Now, Ivan, it

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>looks like a good open today, but what about a

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>close for the year. Do you think that we're going

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to be able to rebound from these pretty steep sell

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:07.560
<v Speaker 1>offs and all the indexes? Well, I think now it

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>is the time to take advantage of the after Christmas

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>sale on Wall Street. I mean, there are some incredible

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.719
<v Speaker 1>values here. There's been, unfortunately, there's been a huge disconnect

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>between how well the economy is doing and now how

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>badly the stock market is doing. And there's been some

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>near term issues I mean, the concern over the trade

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>situation with China. Now the um uh government shutdown, and um,

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>some concerning tweets from President Trump about the lack of

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>confidence in the FED and uh, you know, and wanting

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to potentially remove Jerome Powell as the head of the FED. Yes,

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and his statement of the fact that the FED doesn't

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>understand financial markets is is a little odd. That's like

0:11:53.840 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>saying the doctor who's about to operate on you doesn't

0:11:56.320 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>understand medicine. So, um, some of these near term things

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>have been disappointing. And uh, two of the things that

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>President Trump had going for him was the strength of

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Everybody liked the Trump economy and the Trump

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>stock market, and unfortunately the Trump rally has faded. However,

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I still believe that the underlying economic strength in the

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>US is still strong, and you know, just look at

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the strong holiday season that we had. And uh, for

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the most part, stocks are cheaper than they were a

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 1>year ago at this time. Surely, But but I gotta

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:30.080
<v Speaker 1>pressed you, ivan, I mean, did you see this sell

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:34.440
<v Speaker 1>off coming? No, not not to this extreme point. Okay,

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you didn't see this, okay, So my point is,

0:12:38.000 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't see it coming. Many people didn't see

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it come. You've got a lot of company. Is it

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>possible that the stock market and investors, like you know,

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:55.199
<v Speaker 1>the bookmakers, are telling the public something that they didn't

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>know before, that they really are concerned about something in

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the future, and that it is a future looking machine

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:07.839
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes gets it right. Well, there is a lot

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of concern amongst investors about the decline in stocks, but

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>they are more upset that the market is down, and

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 1>not more upset that that not upset that they believe

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the economy is slowing. You know, everybody says the economy

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 1>still looks good from various people's advantage point of you know,

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.199
<v Speaker 1>the companies they run, or the jobs they have, or

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the situations that they're in. They still say the economy

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>is good. But this sell off in the stock market

0:13:32.600 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>has been somewhat technical. I think we've seen a lot

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of margins selling recently, and a lot of UH forced

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>selling by over leveraged hedge funds, and a lot of

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>funds are in net redemption now, which has caused a

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of forced selling, and there's a lot of panic

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 1>out there. Explain in a second, I've explained how that

0:13:53.040 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>forced redemptions work because if you invest in an alternative

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>such as a hedge fund, it's like you can just

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>call them up on the phone or send them an

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>email whatever it is, and say I want to get out,

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 1>send me my check. It takes a while, doesn't it. Well.

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.319
<v Speaker 1>Usually some have, you know, minimum of thirty day notice

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to redeem. Others have a periodic redemptions that you have

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to get in line for. But I think with the

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>poor performance and hedge funds that we've seen, um, they

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in theory underperform on the way up because their heads,

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>but they're supposed to protect you on the way down,

0:14:28.400 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and many haven't and they are getting a lot of

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>redemptions uh for the end of the year and have

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>been forced to sell. Also, a lot of hedge funds

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>use leverage and they have been in a significant deleveraging process.

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of the argument that the reason

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that stock prices have fallen is directly correlated to the

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve with drawing liquidity and buying power in the marketplace.

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>They've raised rates and they have been contracting their balance sheet.

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 1>But I don't really believe it has been a huge

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>reduction in liquidity I think the point that Treasury Secretary

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Minution was making on Sunday night with his calls to

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the heads of all the big banks was that there

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>is plenty of liquidity out there, so we really there's

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 1>not really a liquidity issue. I think we've seen a

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>buyer strike. People have just pulled back from buying, and

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>when you have a lot of shares being dumped on

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the market, prices moved downward quickly. But I don't think

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that there's a lack of liquidity in any of the

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>financial markets. So where do you believe this on the skyline? Okay?

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>So where do you believe the new money will come

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>from in order to boost stock prices because the only

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.160
<v Speaker 1>reason they go up is someone else is willing to

0:15:49.200 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>pay more for the same share. Well, that's a good question.

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>The first flow of money will begin on the middle

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of January when people start to get paid again and

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>uh start to contribute into their four o one case

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:07.000
<v Speaker 1>because um, you know, during the course of a year

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you may reach the limit, and that for some people

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>can be anywhere from the middle of the year toward

0:16:13.080 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, later on in the year. So we still

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>maxing out your four oh one contribution you think that

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 1>has an effect. That's number one, yes, yes, So you

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>will see UM money flow back into four one case,

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>which goes back into the stock market on a periodic

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>basis one of the best ways to invest. The second

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>catalyst for the upside I believe will be Q four earnings,

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>which we start to get in towards the end of January,

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and the and the and two thousand nineteen outlooks, and

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we have not seen a huge reduction in corporate outlooks,

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, most CEOs are still very optimistic for

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen. They haven't cut their outlook back. So

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at earnings being a boost when we receive

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>those fourth quarter results. I think there's you know, two

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>a catalysts. The flow of money that always begins in

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>January into pensions in four O one case is always

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 1>positive for the market. Second is uh, I think that

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>earnings will be a positive catalyst. The third is I

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>think we will get some type of UM trade deal

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 1>with China. I've said for a long time President Trump

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>had the upper hand for a while, as the Chinese

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>stock market has declined significantly since the trade battle began

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in February, and now the decline in our market, which

0:17:32.040 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>is partially caused by the uncertainty over trade with China.

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I think President Trump maybe a little bit more flexible

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:44.360
<v Speaker 1>in his negotiations. Uh, and he's probably as stubborn as

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>President sigen Ping is too. So you have two sub

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>negotiators that you know are being forced to the table

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:54.080
<v Speaker 1>because of current economic and market situations in their own countries.

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Speaking with Ivan fine Set, he is Tigris Financial's chief

0:17:58.240 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>investment officer and director of Research, Ivan, are you surprised

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:07.919
<v Speaker 1>that there are not more bullish calls for equity, particularly

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>when you see the price of fossil fuel of crude

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 1>oil at forty two dollars a barrel. The one thing

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I have been right on and recently has been I've

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>said oil was going to drop, and I believe the

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>oil will go closer to forty dollars than many people

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:27.679
<v Speaker 1>calling for sixty dollars and lower oil prices is another

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>positive thing for consumer discretionary spending, so that also is

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.199
<v Speaker 1>helpful the economy. Why do you think oil prices are

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 1>gonna hit forty because they will not be able to

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>support prices meaning OPEC with the recently announced UM production

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>cuts and Uh, the US is now a wash and oil,

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and we are the world's biggest producer of oil now

0:18:50.320 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and the shale oil that keeps coming online is also

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>helping keep prices lower. Russia, while they are not an

0:18:57.320 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>OPEC member, they meet with OLPEC and try to have

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a consensus on production because obviously we have an interest

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>in the price of oil. But they will pump what

0:19:06.480 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 1>they want and when they want, and we just have

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of supply. Also, company countries like Venezuela is

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>in desperty to cash though they want to pump as

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>much as they can. So um, the world is a

0:19:20.080 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 1>wash and oil. It's supply and demand and right now

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>we have an oversupply which should take prices for you

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>know lower. Well, it just to give you thirty seconds,

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'd like you to spend some more time with us,

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and because I want to get your sort of specific

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>views on the market which sectors. But is it possible

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>that the decline in oil prices is linked to slowing

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>demand and that's weaker economic output outside the United States? Well,

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>there has been some concern that the decline in oil

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>would be an indication of economic weakness. My guest is

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 1>Ivan Fined set He is the chief investment officer and

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>director of Research for Tigress Financial Show Ivan. It has

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>been a brutal fourth quarter for stock investors. We know

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that we are approaching a decline in the S and

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>P five currently at one. We'll wait to see what

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the open brings us. You have mentioned that you are

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.160
<v Speaker 1>bullish and you believe that there is a buying opportunity.

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you are an investor who has money to invest,

0:20:24.040 --> 0:20:27.160
<v Speaker 1>where would you specifically be looking to put it to work?

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>The first sector would be the tech sector. It's still

0:20:30.880 --> 0:20:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the engine of growth for our economy and pretty much

0:20:34.760 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>most global economies. And the sell off there has been

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>the most dramatic companies like Amazon and Apple and UM,

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Intel and Microsoft and Nvidiah and along with many of

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 1>the other chip stocks like Skyworks, Corbo and Quilcom. I

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>think there are huge bargains there. And then retail Costco UH,

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Best Buy, UM, Target, UH, Nordstrooms and Macy's. And then

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 1>in the industrials Caterpillar, Boeing, ALCOA, UM. There's just a

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>tremendous number of companies that have good growth, pay good dividends,

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>and have a huge amount of opportunity ahead of them.

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:21.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's take each one of these if we

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>can just a little bit more detail. You mentioned technology.

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>You spoke about Amazon dot Com, of course retail plus technology.

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Also you mentioned chip stocks and Apple. I didn't hear

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Facebook in there. Oh yes, I forgot face Facebook. You'd

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>be buying Facebook at these levels. Absolutely. You don't believe

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>that there's any concern about government regulation. Um not. I'm

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>not overly concerned about it. I think that they are

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot to The two key issues are fake

0:21:56.560 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>accounts and um pretty much false news, and they have

0:22:01.440 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>hired about twenty people to oversee compliance and are heavily

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>using artificial intelligence to ferret out a lot of the issues.

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>But the most important driver is they have two point

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>six billion monthly active users, and advertisers want to go

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to where the customers are, and the digital advertising continues

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to grow because you can use technology and target and

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:36.959
<v Speaker 1>measure your return on advertising invested dollar. And Facebook offers

0:22:37.400 --> 0:22:40.439
<v Speaker 1>the best value and opportunity to the advertisers and that

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:43.199
<v Speaker 1>is the key. Al Right, So at a hundred and

0:22:44.200 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>do a share, you're a buyer of Facebook. Absolutely. In

0:22:49.280 --> 0:22:52.679
<v Speaker 1>Facebook is now at the cheapest level since the history

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of it being a public company. All right, so you're

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>positive on Facebook. Make the case for Apple. When we

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:05.000
<v Speaker 1>heard from many analysts that the transition from hardware sales

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 1>of iPhones to service revenue and software is going to

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 1>be a challenge, Well, I don't know if it's going

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to be a challenge. It continues to happen. iPhone sales

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>are slowing slightly, but they sold million phones in the

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>last quarter. They have a active iPhone user base of

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 1>seven and fifty million that they can sell additional services to.

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 1>They could go to a subscription model for the sale

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>of the phones, where uh, most people do buy their

0:23:43.440 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>phones on a monthly basis as part of the contract

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:50.479
<v Speaker 1>with their service. They can go to a Amazon Pride

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 1>type of membership for streaming media for iTunes um. They

0:23:56.760 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>can also include the Apple Care warranty on a for

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:02.879
<v Speaker 1>a monthly fee as part of the purchase of the phone.

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot they can do to monetize this huge

0:24:07.000 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple customer base, and they continue to sell product. They

0:24:11.320 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 1>continue to go through the ongoing upgrade cycle of the phones.

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>They still sell max, they still sell iPads um. The

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:22.360
<v Speaker 1>demand for their products is strong, alright, So bullish on Facebook,

0:24:22.400 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>bullish on Apple. Turn your attention to industrial as you

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>mentioned them. Just give us one industrial stock to give

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:31.479
<v Speaker 1>you about the thirty seconds. What industrial company would you

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>most like to own? They just raised their dividend. Is

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:40.159
<v Speaker 1>that part of the story. Yes, they just increased their dividend.

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>They just increased their buy back by two billion dollars

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>from eighteen billion billion. Plane that they have a backlog

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of plane demand for the next twenty years. Few companies

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 1>have that kind of visibility. Uh. They just got a

0:24:54.720 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>huge A fifty plane order from a subsidiary of Saudi

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Arabia Airlines worth almost six billion dollars. Uh. The UH

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>seven thirty seven Max remains their best selling phone. Excuse me,

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>past selling plane. They've had no loss of letters since

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the unfortunate Lion Air issue, which is now coming out.

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 1>It was all right, he's got a trifecta. We've got

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to leave it there. Ivan find set the Chief investment Officer,

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 1>Director of Research Tigers Financial, Bullish on Boeing, Apple and Facebook.

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>If you happen to go through the lobby of just

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 1>about any casino, perhaps the Tropicana in Atlantic City, what

0:25:47.240 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>will you find signs that direct you to place your

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>bets for sports. And here to tell us all about

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the industry is none other than our own expert, Brian Egger.

0:25:58.600 --> 0:26:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Here's our Bloomberg Intelligence senior gaming analysts, and you can

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>follow him on Twitter as we all do at Eggerantonomics.

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Alright at Egernomics, give us the lowdown on where you

0:26:11.560 --> 0:26:16.199
<v Speaker 1>can legally bet on sports. Yeah, there's been this remarkable

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:19.360
<v Speaker 1>proliferation of where you could actually bet on sports. So

0:26:19.840 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>in the last year, actually since May when the Supreme

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Court repealed the federal ban on sports betting. It now

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>exists in Delaware, New Jersey, West Virginia, Mississippi, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania,

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and also one track in New Mexico. So it's seven

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>other states other than Nevada. All right, So those seven

0:26:38.040 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 1>other states, does the amount of money that is bet

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>in those seven other states come close to what is

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.120
<v Speaker 1>bet in Vegas? So it's starting to and you really

0:26:46.119 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>have to distinguish between the amount bet in Vegas uh

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to the amount that actually is retained as revenue,

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>And that amount in Vegas actual annually is about two

0:26:57.440 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty million dollars as revenue, about five or center the

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>amount wagered and so far in New Jersey, if you

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>extrapolate the last few months for the brick and mortar

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 1>sports books there, it's been a similar piece of revenue

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.719
<v Speaker 1>so far. All right, now, I'm looking at the sign

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 1>that exists at the Tropicana in Atlantic City. It's a

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 1>William Hill sign there the sports book You've got basketball, soccer, tennis, golf, baseball.

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>But the biggest, the one that's most out front is football.

0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about betting on football? Football is really the

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 1>major sport. If you look at Nevada, the most well

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 1>developed and long standing market, football accounts for about thirty

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:42.879
<v Speaker 1>six percent of annual sports betting revenue, and then basketball

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 1>comes next at about a third of the total. So

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 1>football is really, uh the big one, which is why

0:27:48.119 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>these books wanted to get up and running if possible

0:27:51.080 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>before the advent of the football season. Is there a

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>dichotomy between the market for sports betting when it comes

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to physic all betting I mean going to a casino

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and placing the bet versus online betting using your smartphone?

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 1>There is now The online betting markets vary in size

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:11.280
<v Speaker 1>by state. A lot of these states are new. But

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>if you look at New Jersey, UH, the month of November,

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the most recent data we've got. It's kind of interesting

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 1>because there are seven brick and mortar, seven casino affiliated

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:26.240
<v Speaker 1>sports books, and only two racetracks. Yet those two racetracks,

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Meadowlands and Monmouth Park, account fort of the total sports

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 1>betting revenue so so far, um, the on the racetracks

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>are winning this proportionally, and UH the online portion is

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>also about so the big winners so far are the

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>race tracks and the online betting sites, which are about

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>about the total. Now, as someone that has been following

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 1>this industry for a long time, do you believe that

0:28:54.840 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the actual physical betting locations, the casinos, the companies that

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 1>provide the infrastructure to do it, are they really going

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to benefit or is it possible that we just have

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>an online explosion like we've had in the retail world.

0:29:10.160 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's a really interesting question because sports betting

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>historically has only accounted for about two percent of the

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>total gaming revenue, UH coming out of Nevada. The rest

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>comes from slot machines and table games. Likewise, in New Jersey,

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:25.800
<v Speaker 1>it's been kind of in the order of kind of

0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:30.480
<v Speaker 1>three four percent, So as a revenue generator because the

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.479
<v Speaker 1>casino has only retained five percent of dollars wagered as

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>when it's comparatively small compared to the slop machines and

0:29:37.360 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the table games. But it's really important as an ancillary

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 1>traffic driver during those big UH sports betting weekends, football

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>weekends and t double A basketball semifinals, World Series, etcetera.

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:53.040
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of traffic flowing through from the sports

0:29:53.080 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>books into the casino. So it's I think it's actually

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>more important as a traffic driver of casino activity. There's

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 1>an actual revenue source per se. Now I know that

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:06.320
<v Speaker 1>you spend some time at the Tropicana in Atlantic City recently.

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 1>What did you see? Okay? And I should say I

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:10.840
<v Speaker 1>spend most of my time at my desk doing analysis.

0:30:10.960 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Of course you do, of course, But what I saw

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>was we were there and that's why you have that

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>the one armed bands exact screen exactly. UM. So what

0:30:19.520 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I saw there was, although it wasn't a very busy time,

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you saw a lot of sports books. It's interesting that

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>William Hill, the UK bookmaker UM has so far three

0:30:29.080 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>sports books in New Jersey, three physical ones UH. The

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Ocean Resort in Tropicana, Atlantic City and in Mommouth Park

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the race tracks. So a lot of the way these

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>sports books have kind of emerged is through these allignances

0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:44.920
<v Speaker 1>between race tracks and casinos and commercial gaming markets and

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the big betting houses like William Hill and

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>of course the daily fantasy sports companies really involved. Also,

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to something you said about

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the five percent take that the casinos have when it

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>comes to the revenue, right that they get about five

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:04.440
<v Speaker 1>is that materially different than the table stakes as well

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:07.959
<v Speaker 1>as the slot machine business. So it's probably similar to

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the whole rate if you will, on slaw machines. The

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>table game hold rates are are a little higher, you know,

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>but that kind of activity is determined by UH competition.

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Nevada is a fairly competitive and developed sports market. But

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the reason, you know, we kind of point this out

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 1>is if you were to look at the theoretical size

0:31:25.720 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 1>of sports betting, UH, look at the amount of a

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>legal betting that has taken place in this country, and

0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>assigned that five percent rate to it, you know, theoretically

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>there's seven to eight billion dollars of revenue flowing to

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>these legal sports books. But that's only if people give

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>up their legal bookies. And of all these states legalized

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>sports betting, is there a potential for more states to

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>offer this kind of legal sports betting? Yeah, there is.

0:31:51.000 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're only in the early innings of the

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:57.840
<v Speaker 1>legalization UH process to use a sports betting metaphor. So

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 1>so far, we've had, recently within the last week, Washington,

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>d c. Getting ready to roll it out next year,

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>New York State likely to next year as his Massachusetts

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:09.640
<v Speaker 1>likely to consider it UH and Michigan had a kind

0:32:09.680 --> 0:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>of way development with an introduction of a sportsmaning bill

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>that might gain traction during the twenty nineteen legislative session. Brian,

0:32:17.720 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>if I were to say to you ten years ago

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:23.720
<v Speaker 1>that there would be legal sports betting in the United States,

0:32:23.760 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 1>not just in Vegas but throughout the country, and you

0:32:27.160 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>twin that with the legal cannabis market in the United States,

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>would you have said I was crazy? Uh. I wouldn't

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:37.880
<v Speaker 1>have said you're crazy. But you have, with that great foresight,

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>if you thought that was strong. Yes, far in mind

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that the you know, the various states have kind of

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>taken upon themselves to legalize recreational cannabis, whereas this is

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>actually a supreme Court case that a floodgates. You know,

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:53.240
<v Speaker 1>this is it may reflect changing social opinion and permissiveness,

0:32:53.280 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>but this is something that New Jersey has been trying

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to get through since their early nineties to overturn the

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>band that really restricted UM sports betting in a large

0:33:01.080 --> 0:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>part to Nevada. So it's really the Supreme Court that

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:07.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of came to the rescue of the commercial gaming industry.

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:09.400
<v Speaker 1>All right. The reason I bring this up is because

0:33:09.440 --> 0:33:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of the revenue from the taxes that both of these

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>activities would bring to the state's treasuries. Is that having

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>an effect? You know, it's it's it's potentially significant over time.

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 1>And the tax rates vary by state, as they do

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>for the casino industry. It's about a percent in New Jersey.

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 1>It's as high as thirty four percent of sports betting

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>revenue in Pennsylvania. Uh And obviously from the perspective of

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the sports books, the lower the lower the tax rate,

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the better. But it is going to be an incremental

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>source of gaming revenues. Bear mind again, for markets like Nevada,

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 1>nine percent of that gaming revenue pie is coming from

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>slab machines, table games, all the traditional stuff. Okay, we are,

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>of course getting to that point in the season when

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:57.200
<v Speaker 1>people are looking towards the super Bowl and the estimates

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to how much money is going to be better this

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>year on the super Bowl. I don't have an estimate

0:34:03.320 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and the n C Double A. Actually it's interest in

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>American Gaming Association comes out with an estimate every year

0:34:08.239 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 1>about how much money will we bet on the n

0:34:10.680 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>C Double A basketball men's regional semifinals. That the super

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 1>Bowl is certainly really big seasonal events. Sports betting is

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>by its nature very seasonal, so I don't have an estimate.

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 1>But what's unusual about this? First this next super Bowl

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and n C Double A tournament in twenty nineteen, it

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>will be the first time these events have taken place

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:37.719
<v Speaker 1>amid the widespread proliferation of legalized sports betting. This means

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you're just going to be a lot busier this year. Finally,

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned William Hill, UK company that has a partnership

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:49.360
<v Speaker 1>with the Tropicana and many other casinos. Are there US

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:52.759
<v Speaker 1>companies that are good at doing this, so U S

0:34:52.760 --> 0:34:56.959
<v Speaker 1>companies UM are are involved. There There are entities out

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 1>there like UM Scientific Games ST Interactive, UH. There are

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the sports betting UM Sports daily fantasy sports companies. There's

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>sp Tech in conjunction with Scientific Games. There's a number

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>out there that involved but William Hill kind of really

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:15.839
<v Speaker 1>important um as ore and I mentioned one other thing too,

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 1>you talk about US versus International patty power. Betfair now

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>has a controlling steak uh In Fandel, So we're really

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing this convergence of the traditional UK European betting houses

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>with the DELA fantasy sports companies working alongside the casinos.

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, Brian Edgar as always fascinating, interesting

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and worthwhile Bloomberg Intelligence senior gaming analysts. Well, if you're

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 1>an American consumer, chances are your email inboxes filling up

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:01.720
<v Speaker 1>with what it's called boxing day sales or post Christmas sales.

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Flyers here to tell us about the state of the

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:08.839
<v Speaker 1>retail industry, Dana Telsey tells the Advisory Group chief executive

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and chief research Officer, Dana the sales are already starting,

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>aren't they. They are. The sales are definitely beginning today

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>as your As you mentioned, everyone's email boxes are filling up.

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:24.719
<v Speaker 1>But the early lead on holiday season sales from MasterCards

0:36:24.760 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 1>from November thirty five one percent. Who's right in line

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 1>with our forecast of five so it seems like we

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 1>have a good season and now we want to see

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>inventory levels cleared and what the margins look like. Okay,

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>but that five percent, I understand comes with a little

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>bit of a footnote for department stores, because the department

0:36:46.760 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>store take actually fell more than one percent. It was

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>down one preecent to department stores. And keep in mind

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you had a lot of closures, whether it was the

0:36:56.400 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 1>Bontans closures, some of the Macy's closure closures, or J. C. Penny.

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that when you look at the Perl stores,

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:05.960
<v Speaker 1>they were up seven point nine percent, which is one

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of the best we've seen out there all of all,

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>whether it was the slight decline and department stores, the

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>increase in apparel stores, the consumer had more dollars to spend,

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the products were innovative, and we pulled out a good season.

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>This doesn't mean that two thousand nineteen we're entering with

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 1>an easy glide past. It's going to be more challenging

0:37:25.840 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand nineteen than it was an eighteen. All Right,

0:37:28.520 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get the two thousand nineteen in just

0:37:31.040 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>a second. But I want to find out from you,

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>what do you believe was the hottest offering in retail where?

0:37:37.760 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>What was the trend? I think the trend you definitely

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>had some of the electronics items like the Alexas out there.

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Drones are also quite popular. Dad sneakers were very popular,

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and also denim jeans continue to be strong. We're fortunate

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:55.319
<v Speaker 1>that we had a cooler season this year than in

0:37:55.440 --> 0:37:59.760
<v Speaker 1>year's past. Out where, whether it was Canada, Goose, whether

0:37:59.800 --> 0:38:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it was North Bace, we definitely saw strength and outwhere.

0:38:03.680 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 1>And let's not forget thugs that goes along with that. Okay,

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 1>so that seems to be something that is correlated a

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit to the weather. How about the online world,

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>that was an increase at least from the Master Cards survey,

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the Spending Pulse survey, that was an increase of more

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:25.399
<v Speaker 1>than n for online sales. Yes, and that was better,

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 1>it will touch better than the Adobe forecast also of

0:38:28.360 --> 0:38:32.479
<v Speaker 1>eighteen percent. So it was a solid online selling season two.

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think the thing to take away is online

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and bricks and mortar go together, and you're seeing brands

0:38:39.600 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 1>overall and retailers. The combination of the two is what

0:38:43.520 --> 0:38:46.880
<v Speaker 1>was powerful. We saw buy online, pick up in store,

0:38:47.400 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 1>drive more traffic and drive more sales. I think that's

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be one of the takeaways on the Holiday

0:38:52.960 --> 0:38:57.120
<v Speaker 1>two eighteen season. If you are a new retailer or

0:38:57.239 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>looking to establish a retail brand, what do you take

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 1>away from the results of this season That you have

0:39:05.280 --> 0:39:08.560
<v Speaker 1>a customer who's interested, if it's innovati the new, if

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:11.760
<v Speaker 1>you have a loyalty program and participate in social media

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 1>to drive awareness, there's dollars out there for you to

0:39:15.080 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>capture if you can create interest. Okay, now let's talk

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:23.239
<v Speaker 1>about the potential for interest in retail in twenty nineteen.

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:27.640
<v Speaker 1>What are going to be the big themes? The themes

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of retail. I think there's three words to capture the

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 1>themes of retail. Where's the margin? I think we have

0:39:33.120 --> 0:39:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more headwinds to face than tail winds.

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:39.279
<v Speaker 1>The headwinds whether it's tariffs, the uncertainty of tariffs, the

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:45.440
<v Speaker 1>potential for category extensions in tariffs. You have expense pressures

0:39:45.440 --> 0:39:48.360
<v Speaker 1>from freight and labor, and you have camping. The camp

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:52.240
<v Speaker 1>comparisons are more challenging in Choose thousand, nineteen th eighteen.

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:55.160
<v Speaker 1>On the tail one side, I've got a full employment

0:39:55.200 --> 0:39:59.080
<v Speaker 1>economy with a consumer as money to spend whereby withholding

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:01.440
<v Speaker 1>should be a benefit, particularly in the first half of

0:40:01.520 --> 0:40:04.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen. And I still have some moiler taxes,

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>but there are more challenges and in two thousand nineteen

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you may not get the same rate of earnings growth

0:40:11.480 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that you had in two thousand eighteen. All right, now,

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:17.800
<v Speaker 1>to go back to your point about where are the margins?

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Are there specific companies that you track that are doing

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:27.479
<v Speaker 1>a better job of keeping those margins or expanding them.

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>When you think about margins and where they're growing, we're

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing companies like lul Lemon continue to show nice margin

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:37.919
<v Speaker 1>increases and that's the real benefit for them. I think

0:40:37.960 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing, particularly in the top line and some

0:40:40.920 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of the off prices, is certainly encouraging. What we're hearing

0:40:44.680 --> 0:40:49.360
<v Speaker 1>about from some of the companies where there's catalysts, I

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>mean the catalysts are potentially closing stores at gap and

0:40:53.280 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>for example, leading to less losses, could help the margins

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 1>over time. Dana Telsey is they're a case to be

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:07.480
<v Speaker 1>made for direct mail catalogs twinned with online offerings and

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:14.080
<v Speaker 1>in store pick up this three legged retail strategy. I

0:41:14.160 --> 0:41:16.759
<v Speaker 1>think catalogs are tough to go by. I think that

0:41:17.080 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the world of paper these days is consolidating into online

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing whether it's from magazines, whether it's from catalogs.

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>The first thing consumers look at in the morning is

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:30.600
<v Speaker 1>their phones. The last thing they look at night is

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 1>their phones. Capture the consumer where they are on their

0:41:34.040 --> 0:41:38.840
<v Speaker 1>phones and in physical stores with experiences. I'd like to

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:43.359
<v Speaker 1>get your views on home furnishings companies such as Wayfair,

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>and then perhaps at the other end, restoration Hardware or

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 1>it used to be restoration Hardware now just our H.

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:53.719
<v Speaker 1>When you think about what r H is doing, they're

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>really creating the experience the restaurants combined with the selling

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:01.279
<v Speaker 1>of furniture where they have at effects for designers to

0:42:01.360 --> 0:42:04.279
<v Speaker 1>come in and have their offices there to bring clientele

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>is compelling and I think that they're really creating a

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 1>destination Wayfair and it'll be interesting to see does Wayfair

0:42:12.560 --> 0:42:16.520
<v Speaker 1>ever get combined with a physical retailer. That combination to

0:42:16.600 --> 0:42:20.919
<v Speaker 1>be powerful and probably one of the most powerful home

0:42:21.000 --> 0:42:24.480
<v Speaker 1>retailers lately over the past few years that's taken share

0:42:24.840 --> 0:42:27.319
<v Speaker 1>is home goods. What t j X has done with

0:42:27.400 --> 0:42:31.839
<v Speaker 1>home goods and home sense is exciting, it's profitable, and

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:35.759
<v Speaker 1>it's driving inventory turns and more brands are selling in

0:42:35.800 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>their stores. Do you see any big changes to the

0:42:38.960 --> 0:42:42.719
<v Speaker 1>world of fast retail for apparel companies such as H

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and M and Zara. I do see changes there. I

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 1>think it's become more competitive in that landscape. I think

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:52.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see H and M become a more

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 1>fine tune machine given the fact that their inventory levels

0:42:55.880 --> 0:42:58.439
<v Speaker 1>have been too high. I think that you have other

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:02.759
<v Speaker 1>companies competing on price and also quality stepped up a bit,

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>so there's more competition. The old navies of the world

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:09.240
<v Speaker 1>are doing quite a good job, and you're also seeing

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:13.319
<v Speaker 1>when companies have targeted sales, it's taken some share from

0:43:13.320 --> 0:43:16.279
<v Speaker 1>some of the fast fashion retailers. I think they have

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:19.520
<v Speaker 1>an evolution ahead of them in order to become more competitive.

0:43:19.920 --> 0:43:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much for spending time with us. As always,

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Dana's Telsey Telsey Advisory Group Chief executive and chief Research

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:36.360
<v Speaker 1>officer speaking about the world of retail and shopping. Thanks

0:43:36.360 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 1>for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform

0:43:46.280 --> 0:43:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you prefer I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast.

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio