WEBVTT - Week in Tech: Hungry Hungry Hippocampus 

0:00:00.200 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for tunion to tech Stuff. If you don't recognize

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:06.000
<v Speaker 1>my voice, my name is Osvoloshan, and I'm here because

0:00:06.040 --> 0:00:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the inimitable Jonathan Strickland has passed the baton to Kara

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Price and myself to host tech Stuff. The show will

0:00:12.240 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>remain your home for all things tech, and all the

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>old episodes will remain available in this feed. Thanks for listening.

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio and Kaleidoscope.

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Osvoloshian today co host Kara Price, and I will

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>bring you three things. First, the headlines this week. Second,

0:00:33.760 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with four O four Media's Jason Kebler about

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>some deceptive AI bots looking to trick their human counterparts

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:44.360
<v Speaker 1>in today's Tech Support segment. And finally, we head to

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>see yes kind of. We take a look back at

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the year in tech with Emma Barker of Time magazine,

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>who edited Time's list of the two hundred best inventions

0:00:53.159 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty four. All of that on this Week

0:00:55.840 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>in Tech. It's Friday, January tenth. Stay with us, so Carat,

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 1>it's very nice to see you. It's been almost half

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 1>a decade since we've been in studio together. A pandemic,

0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>A pandemic.

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 2>Many developments in tech, very few in my own personal life.

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 2>But you know, there's nothing like a big mic in

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.639
<v Speaker 2>my face to make me feel like a normal person again.

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 2>And I know we thank Jonathan already in our last

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 2>episode for bringing us back together, but I want to

0:01:41.240 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 2>get him a gift, and I think it's going to

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.680
<v Speaker 2>be to see the show. Oh, Mary, I didn't know

0:01:45.720 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 2>he was such a theater buff.

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I remember because we did an interview with him a

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>few years ago that he was a big Shakespeare guy. Oh.

0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>He seemed to think it would be easier for us

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to host the show as two people or rather than

0:01:58.040 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>as just him, and I kind of see his point,

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>But I also think he probably hasn't spent quite enough

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 1>time with either of us to make a truly informed

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>speculation about that.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.160
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think the reason that this show works

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 2>between the two of us is I think you and

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 2>I sort of speak to each other in link tongues.

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.520
<v Speaker 2>I always say, you know, there's the love languages. Yeah,

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 2>I have a ace love language, which is links links, and.

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>That's yeah tongues. Okay. I was going to say, actually,

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:31.160
<v Speaker 1>for the avoidance of doubt, just friends.

0:02:31.320 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 2>We always say as Sherlock and Watson the most platonic

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 2>and they live together on Baker's story exactly.

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>So so no, I mean it's going to be It's

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be the two of us with two people.

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>But we are in constant communication about all things tech

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully we'll be able to shine a bit of

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a light on some of the most interesting intriguing things

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>each week, including this one. So, Caara, we've been texting

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot. What have you been reading that really stood

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>out to you?

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 3>So?

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 2>I think, like everyone in America at least, I've been

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 2>following the cyber truck explosion in Las Vegas and Futurism,

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 2>which is a website I frequent picked up on some

0:03:05.240 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 2>original reporting from the Associated Press that has been kind

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 2>of quiet. The bomber YEP, who's an active duty Green Beret. Yeah,

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 2>used chat GPT.

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you know what I saw this this morning? I

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 1>was so sad this wasn't on my list. I'm happy

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>this on yours.

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 2>Like, I don't mean to make light of the situation

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 2>because it's it's very depressing on a number of levels,

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 2>but I knew you would see the story.

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>No, I was fascinated, but It was the fourth story

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.680
<v Speaker 1>on Exios today, and I'm glad that it's the first

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.120
<v Speaker 1>story on your show because I found it totally mind blowing.

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 2>And obviously every part of this story is terrible, including

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:45.600
<v Speaker 2>the fact that a cyber truck was involved. Anything involving

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 2>a cyber truck makes me want to die. Yeah, I

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 2>hate that car more than I hate most things. But

0:03:50.800 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 2>what was so interesting to me about it was it

0:03:54.880 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 2>marks this moment of really underlying how next generation search

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:07.320
<v Speaker 2>works YEP on like a very disturbingly practical level. And

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Kevin McHale, who is the Las Vegas County Sheriff, says

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 2>that it's the first known us of chat GPT to

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 2>help build an explosive and he he followed up by saying,

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:19.239
<v Speaker 2>it's a concerning.

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Moment under statement of the week.

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 2>This is not someone googling.

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>The anarchist cookbook or what was that old book.

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:27.360
<v Speaker 2>That the anarchist ye cookbook.

0:04:27.400 --> 0:04:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that was a huge moment, and I think

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the history of publication and First Amendment whether you could

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:33.280
<v Speaker 1>like distribute a book that told you how to make

0:04:33.320 --> 0:04:35.679
<v Speaker 1>a bomb. But the cat's out of the bag now.

0:04:35.720 --> 0:04:37.599
<v Speaker 2>Well, and I'll tell you who knows it's out of

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:41.520
<v Speaker 2>the back open ai right, Because for open ai to

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:46.039
<v Speaker 2>very quickly respond to this, I think is really interesting.

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Did they volunteer? By the way, oops, ps the guy

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 1>used chet gpt to plan this? Or how did it

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 1>come out? Do we know how it came out?

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 2>The Las Vegas Sheriff announced that it was clear that

0:04:59.040 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 2>chat gbt had been used to build this explosive and

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:06.600
<v Speaker 2>so open ai then sent an email that was quoted

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 2>in Futurism that said, in this case, chat gpt responded

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 2>with information already publicly available on the internet and provided

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 2>warnings against harmful or illegal activities. We're working with law

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 2>enforcement to support their investigation. And just before you say anything,

0:05:24.839 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm really surprised, like as you were saying, it's a

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 2>four store anaxios, I don't understand how this isn't like

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 2>the lead. I agree, but I guess that's why we're

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 2>doing a tech podcast. So what's what's on your docket today?

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, you started with a cyber truck. I've also got

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a vehicle story for you. There was a story in

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street Journal over the holidays I found pretty fascinating,

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:55.799
<v Speaker 1>which is basically a study on Alzheimer's in different populations,

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and the headline was want to avoid Alzheimer's. Taxi drive

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>can show you how interesting?

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Say more so?

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Basically, mass General Brigham Hospital in Boston ran a study

0:06:09.560 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>about the rate of Alzheimer's in various populations. Taxi drivers

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and ambulance drivers had up to four times lower rate

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>of Alzheimer's than the general population. And apparently this actually

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:25.119
<v Speaker 1>made sense to researches because the part of the brain

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>that does real time spatial processing and decision making, the hippocampus,

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>as I learned is called, is also one of the

0:06:32.480 --> 0:06:34.480
<v Speaker 1>first parts of atrophies when you get Alzheimer's.

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 2>That's so interesting. So people who have made this their

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 2>job essentially are people who are kind of saving themselves unknowingly.

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 1>One hundred percent. One of the most interesting things I

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>thought was that London bus drivers don't get the same

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>benefit as London taxi drivers because they follow a preset route.

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 2>I was going to say that one of my favorite

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 2>things is just the old facts about how much a

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:00.839
<v Speaker 2>London taxi driver has to know people. What is it

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 2>called the why.

0:07:01.560 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 1>The knowledge they have when when they when they die

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.839
<v Speaker 1>in the autopsy, they have larger other people. But you

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>know who else doesn't get these benefits? Yes, come on

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:15.040
<v Speaker 1>New Yorkers. People who use Google Maps or ways or

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Apple Maps and what do we call that? We call

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that automation bias.

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Correct, that's our fave.

0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>So I just found this really interesting. Here. Here is

0:07:22.200 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the technology Google Maps that I use all the time

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>every day, and I absolutely adore it. And I literally

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.520
<v Speaker 1>every time I go on vacation, I think, how the

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>hell would I have had a good time if I

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't literally literally divorce. Yeah, I would literally go to

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>some like the concierge or whatever, or the some random

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>person who worked in the hotel say can you give

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>me a physical map and tell me how I have

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a good time? I'd be like, I would never travel.

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 2>So, but isn't it what we always talk about, which

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 2>is the sort of the double edge totally?

0:07:50.440 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>And but the idea that using this scene that I

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>love every day is you know, shrinking my hippocampus I

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:57.400
<v Speaker 1>find really quite chilling.

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think about this in terms of my

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 2>hands and my Sum's true, Like I just think all

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 2>the time about just burning nerves.

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Well, the devil has no time to make use of

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>your sums because they are never idle.

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 2>They're definitely not idle. I think you have one more thing.

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I do have one more thing. And this, don't worry.

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>We're not going to talk about that length thing I

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>talked to somebody else about. But this was basically, you know,

0:08:21.880 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>there are these new open AI models, one that was

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>released in September last year, and three right before the

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>holiday on the twelfth day of ship mess as the

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>execs called it, but one was being red teamed. Do

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you know what red teaming is. It's when you try

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.440
<v Speaker 1>and make a technological product to break its own rules

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>or do unsafe things. So, oh, one was being red teamed,

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and surprise, surprise, in a very interesting way, it started

0:08:51.440 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to deceive its human counterpart. And that's exactly what

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about on our next segment, which

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is Tech Support. Every week we'll do a segment called

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 1>tech Support when we talk to true experts and reporters

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>who can go far deeper behind the headlines than you

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and I can, to basically help us sort the signal

0:09:10.120 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>from the noise. And I genuinely don't think there's anyone

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:15.199
<v Speaker 1>better to talk to than the team at four or

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>four Media. These are reporters who were formerly basically the

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>team at Vice's motherboard, and now they've started their own collective,

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and they are the people who the tech world follows

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>most closely to find out what's really going on in

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>all corners of the digital world.

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this week we're excited to share this conversation

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 2>we had with Jason Kebler, who's one of the co

0:09:35.440 --> 0:09:38.000
<v Speaker 2>founders at four h four, who will be filling us

0:09:38.040 --> 0:09:41.800
<v Speaker 2>in on the study that the initial excitement around the

0:09:42.040 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 2>three release meant did not get enough attention, which revealed

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 2>that cutting edge AI systems, including both open AI's one

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 2>and Anthropics Claude three point five, sonet whatever the way

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 2>they name this stuff is so self agrandizing, have been

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 2>shown to have a shocking t tendency to deceive.

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Shocking tendency to deceive. Indeed, So we talked to Jason

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>right before the holidays when this news just came out,

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and we.

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.319
<v Speaker 2>Jump right in, Jason, what's popping.

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 4>So there's a new paper out by Apollo Research, which

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 4>is this group that's funded by various governments as well

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 4>as various artificial intelligence companies like Google, DeepMind, Inthropic, open Ai,

0:10:28.160 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 4>et cetera. And it's a new paper about what's called

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:37.920
<v Speaker 4>AI alignment, which is the idea that is an artificial

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 4>intelligence tool doing what the human asked or is it

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 4>doing something else. I think that one of the really

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 4>scary things about artificial intelligence is that they are largely

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 4>black boxes. We're not totally sure how they work, and

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:02.400
<v Speaker 4>this can lead to all sorts of very interesting outcomes.

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 4>You know, in this case, the researchers at Apollo Research

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 4>Group were able to find that these sort of cutting

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 4>edge large language models, which you know, one of the

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 4>biggest ones is open ais oh one.

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>They finally gave it immigrant visa status.

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 4>So they found that in some cases, these sort of

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:27.200
<v Speaker 4>newest large language models have the I don't even want

0:11:27.200 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 4>to say ability because I don't want to anthropomorphize them

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:34.679
<v Speaker 4>so much, but like the tendency to deceive AI is

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:39.239
<v Speaker 4>quote covertly pursuing goals that are misaligned from its developers

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 4>or users. And examples of this are like, if you

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 4>ask it to answer questions on a test, the artificial

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 4>intelligence would be worried that if it performed too well

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 4>on the test that it would be turned off or deprogrammed,

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 4>and so it would give answers that are not so good,

0:11:57.760 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 4>so that the human would think that it is not

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 4>as smart as it actually is. In other examples, it

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:10.319
<v Speaker 4>copied itself onto another server more or less so that

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 4>it was like multiplying itself, which is something that straight

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 4>out of science fiction. I've watched many science fiction movies

0:12:17.360 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 4>where the artificial intelligence doesn't want to die and so

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 4>it makes like millions of copies of itself all over

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 4>the Internet. And so this type of I mean, I

0:12:25.200 --> 0:12:28.319
<v Speaker 4>guess you call it emergent behavior, which means that it's

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:32.840
<v Speaker 4>behavior that is not expected and not really programmed in,

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 4>is quite concerning.

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>To be clear. This is a testing environment though, right, Like,

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>there's made one copy of itself, but we shouldn't be

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 1>worried about millions mold, right at least not yet?

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean not yet.

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.080
<v Speaker 5>It does remind me, though, of those moments where parents

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:54.840
<v Speaker 5>talk about seeing a child do something that reminds the

0:12:54.920 --> 0:13:03.040
<v Speaker 5>parent exactly of themselves and they're like, uh, oh, yeah.

0:13:03.080 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, every large language model to date has been

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 4>trained on sort of like the some knowledge of humanity,

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.199
<v Speaker 4>and so one of the very early things that people

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 4>were talking about with these systems is that they replicate

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 4>human biases because they're trained on what we put out

0:13:20.679 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 4>into the world and humans are biased. But I think

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.719
<v Speaker 4>that as artificial intelligence gets more advanced, there is the

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 4>ability for something to go wrong. And I think that

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 4>that is what this research is showing is not that

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:40.040
<v Speaker 4>the artificial intelligence is sentient and that is thinking for itself,

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 4>like how can I deceive this human? But as it

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:48.240
<v Speaker 4>is doing more complex research, there there is the ability

0:13:48.280 --> 0:13:52.200
<v Speaker 4>for the artificial intelligence at some point to feel like

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 4>it has some goal that is not aligned with what

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.160
<v Speaker 4>the human is asking it for.

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back with more from Jason and Lion conniven

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Ai after the break.

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 4>I think that there is like when these things are

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 4>being programmed, there is a sense of self preservation being

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 4>programmed into them because people try to mess with these

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 4>all the time. This is like a time tested tradition

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 4>of trolling on the Internet. But in trying to develop guardrails,

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 4>the companies that are programming the lms need to say, like,

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 4>if the user tries to mess with you, preserve yourself

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 4>in some way. And so that's what I think might

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 4>be happening here is because the companies are trying to

0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 4>make these models robust, and they know that humans are

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 4>messing with them. There is an aspect to it that

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 4>when a human messes with you figure out how to

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 4>protect yourself.

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>But doesn't that perfectly encapsulate the alignment problem? It does.

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 4>I mean, don't get me wrong, like this is it's creepy.

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 4>It is These tools, these large language models, are getting

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 4>incredibly sophisticated, and I mean, this is one of the

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 4>biggest debates that's going on in the artificial intelligence community

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 4>is what is consciousness? What is thought?

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 3>Like?

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 4>How how does reasoning work in humans and how will

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 4>it work in computers? And is it going to be

0:15:29.280 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 4>the same? The answer right now is no, it's not

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 4>the same. But the things that large language models are

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:43.359
<v Speaker 4>doing approximates a lot of how humans solve problems.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 2>But also it's a little bit different in a non

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 2>perfect way.

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 4>Exactly exactly. I think that's a good way of looking

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 4>at it.

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:53.440
<v Speaker 2>I do think that one of the things that I

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 2>find the most interesting.

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 5>And you preface this whole conversation with, you know, not

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:03.280
<v Speaker 5>wanting to answer morphie a large language model. We don't

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 5>really have any ability to not do that because it's

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 5>the only way we know how to talk about things.

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:13.000
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a really great point, because the academics

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 4>who studied this for a long time say, don't anthropomorphize

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 4>AI because they're not people. They don't work in the

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 4>same way that people do. And yet if you don't

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 4>have us very very sophisticated knowledge of how these things work,

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 4>we don't have or I don't have the language to

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.760
<v Speaker 4>talk about this stuff without anthropmorphise.

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>By the way, are in the zero point one percentile

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of the people whom understand this if not no point

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>not one.

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 4>And it's a lot easier to talk about it if

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 4>you say, oh, like she when referring to Siri. So

0:16:47.520 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 4>I agree entirely with you that we sort of like

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:54.000
<v Speaker 4>everything that's being done is being done by humans in

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 4>the sort of like anthropological context of human culture and

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 4>trying to emulate that. And so then to say, let's

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 4>not call Syria a woman, or let's always call it

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.480
<v Speaker 4>it and try to understand what's happening under the hood

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.680
<v Speaker 4>is a really difficult thing for our brains to do.

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 1>I think, yeah, Jason, just to close, how only be

0:17:17.440 --> 0:17:19.320
<v Speaker 1>following this story for the year ahead, because I guess

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.760
<v Speaker 1>generative AI has been since like November tween twenty two

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the dominant story in all of technology journalism.

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:30.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean to follow this sort of stuff like

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 4>AI becoming sentient. You really do have to follow academic conferences,

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:41.200
<v Speaker 4>big papers like this, because these companies are not releasing

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 4>these models without guardrails specifically to prevent this sort of thing,

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 4>so as you're not going to be able to like

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:53.120
<v Speaker 4>type into chat GPT like hey, build me a company

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.160
<v Speaker 4>and then the AI creates its own company and fires

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 4>you or something like. That's not going to happen at

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 4>this not yet. Yeah, but who knows. Maybe twenty twenty six.

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Well that was that was wonderful Jason Kebler from four

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.280
<v Speaker 1>or four Media or was it so much?

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 2>We'll keep an eye out, thank you.

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So, Karen, I'm very excited about this next part. One

0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 1>of the things we got to do together back when

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we were presenting Sleepwalkers in the Dark Ages.

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, in twenty nineteen, that's when the show came out.

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Trent nineteen was the show. But in January twenty twenty

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>we got to go to Las Vegas together to none

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.119
<v Speaker 1>other than the Consumer Electronics Show, and we got to

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>see all these incredible new gadgets and exciting technologies and

0:18:43.600 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>new futures being presented in an enormous series of nested

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>conference centers. We didn't get to go this year, but

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>we did get to do the next best thing, or

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe even something better, and we wanted to share it

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 1>with the tech Stuff listeners as a kind of special

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>bonus for the first episode we have in the host chairs.

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we are very lucky to have with us today.

0:19:05.160 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 2>Emma Barker of Time Magazine ever heard of it? Who

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.439
<v Speaker 2>edit's the Time two hundred, which is a list of

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 2>the best inventions of twenty twenty four.

0:19:14.000 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us. Welcome to take stuff, Emma,

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me.

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 2>How do you edit down? I mean I feel like

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.119
<v Speaker 2>every year there's just more, So like, where do you

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 2>how do you even get to two hundred?

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:19:25.520 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's actually famous for the one hundred.

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 3>It's actually technically two fifty now because we have two

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 3>hundred on the list and fifty special mentions. Oh well,

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 3>and the list has varied in its length over the years.

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 3>There we were a bunch of years where it was

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 3>only twenty five and some years where it was fifty,

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 3>and it's it's ranged a lot, but at this point

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 3>We do a really wide swath of pitches from our

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 3>freelance network as well as our staffers. So we have

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 3>bureaus in Singapore, London, and then we have contributors all

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 3>over the globe who we reach out to for pitches

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 3>for companies that they're reporting on their products, things like that.

0:20:07.080 --> 0:20:09.640
<v Speaker 3>And then we're very news driven because it's a news magazine,

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 3>so we're looking at kind of the biggest news stories

0:20:11.600 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 3>of the year and products that drove those.

0:20:14.240 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Is there something that you've noticed, you know, having done

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:21.159
<v Speaker 2>this now for a few years this year, especially versus

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 2>years past.

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean AI of course, ye, that started a couple

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:29.520
<v Speaker 3>of years ago. But I think actually it's it can

0:20:29.600 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 3>be more of a hindrance than a help for a

0:20:31.400 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 3>lot of inventions.

0:20:32.680 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Huh. Why is that?

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.360
<v Speaker 3>Because there's so much news AI or companies that are

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 3>adding AI features that are not necessarily helping their product.

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:45.879
<v Speaker 2>Just for buzz or you know, we call that the

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 2>little sprinkle, Yeah, the AI sprinkle.

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 3>Yeah exactly. So I don't think it always helps the product.

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 3>But it's been really interesting sorting through the AI inventions

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 3>and what we're really looking for at this point in

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:04.280
<v Speaker 3>the AI journey is inventions that have demonstrable impact.

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So in mid journey, so to speak.

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, exactly, that's a good rest.

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 1>So, Harry, you and I spent some time with the

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>list and picked out some favorites. What was your first favorite.

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Maybe I'm of the age where it's like marriage is

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.679
<v Speaker 2>on the mind. But one of the things that really

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 2>stuck out to me was this software called Dia.

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:29.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. So Dia is actually a government app for in

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 3>Ukraine and it does a lot more than what we

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 3>wrote about here. It's been around for a while. Most

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Ukrainians use it. It's basically an app where you can

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:44.800
<v Speaker 3>do all government services. But yes, this year, because partially

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 3>because of the war, they launched a future in which

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 3>you can propose marriage via the app. The person you

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.439
<v Speaker 3>proposed to has a certain amount of time to accept

0:21:55.440 --> 0:22:00.959
<v Speaker 3>your proposal, and then if they do romanmomes romance, and

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 3>then if they accept your proposal, you can do a

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:07.400
<v Speaker 3>video chat wedding that's official with an efficient from the government,

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 3>like a city hall wedding over video chat, and you're married.

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:13.440
<v Speaker 3>And the reason they did that is because so many

0:22:13.440 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 3>couples are separated by the war right now physically that

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 3>it's difficult, and they wanted to, you know, let people.

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Still have and this was something that was pretty widely adopted, right,

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:22.840
<v Speaker 2>like people really.

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 3>Use Yeah, it's been Yeah, it's been really widely used.

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to derail us, but this one actually

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>connects to a personal story of mine, which is that

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>my grandfather was a refugee from Ukraine who was separated

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>from his mother in nineteen thirty nine and they met

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>in the app one that twenty five years later, in

0:22:40.119 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the mid sixties, after the Red Cross, would reunite families

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>who have been separated by World War Two, and they

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>didn't even recognize each other. But just interesting how you know,

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>history kind of rhymes and so, you know, kind of

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:53.960
<v Speaker 1>this this is the story I found intriguing but also

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of moving personally.

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 2>One of the other things that was on your list,

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 2>amazingly is something that I own and I am very

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 2>much a you know wellness app skeptic although user I

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 2>don't know where I knew about it from because it's

0:23:14.240 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 2>a Dutch company, but I bought it here today to

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 2>show you, and it is a demo. It is the

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 2>moon Bird AI for listeners.

0:23:25.400 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 3>It's uh, basically like a little pod that you hold

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 3>in your hand and it vibrates.

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 2>It actually as pulses like a pulse. It mimics the

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:41.040
<v Speaker 2>act of breathing, so it goes in and out and

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 2>in and out. Yeah, it does look like a vibrantor

0:23:46.080 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 2>yeah it does. There's just no way. There's no way.

0:23:49.040 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 2>And honestly, the carrying case does. The carrying case doesn't help.

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 2>My mother saw me using it and she was.

0:23:54.920 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Like, huh and I.

0:24:00.040 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Very modern family. We're going to take a quick break

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.200
<v Speaker 2>to pay the piper. We'll be back with more from

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:11.159
<v Speaker 2>the amazing Emma Barker of Time magazine Stay with us.

0:24:16.400 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 2>I actually find this to be an incredible device. It

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.919
<v Speaker 2>is so simple. It's something that links through Bluetooth to

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:26.880
<v Speaker 2>my phone. And this is called moons called moon Bird AI.

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:29.640
<v Speaker 1>How did you choose it, Emma for the Time list.

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 3>So, wellness devices are tricky, as you note, and there's

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:39.359
<v Speaker 3>always a lot of wellness apps and things that don't

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 3>have a ton of scientific backup, and frankly, it's just

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 3>hard to get scientific backing for a lot of these,

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 3>and so I'm always looking for the things that that

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:54.119
<v Speaker 3>I feel like don't necessarily need that you know, I

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 3>think it's it's hard when you get into things like

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 3>mental health, yes, and things like that. But but things

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 3>like meditation, deep breathing, those things are techniques that are

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 3>proven enough that if it's a device that helps you

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 3>with that, you don't need to have a clinical trial

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 3>backing that up. And I really liked moon Bird. There's

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 3>some of these different things, but I liked moon Bird

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 3>because a it doesn't have a screen, even though it

0:25:21.800 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 3>does pair with your phone, you can know you're not

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 3>as this side.

0:25:25.280 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 2>And the AI piece of it that I that I

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 2>guess is AI is that it does make the program

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 2>that is training you on breathing smarter because.

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 1>It's adapts to you. It's personalized correct correct. Another one

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.199
<v Speaker 1>which Karen and I are both fascinated by last year,

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:44.359
<v Speaker 1>which was made it onto your list was Google's Notebook LM.

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>And this is obviously in some sense not new right.

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:50.679
<v Speaker 1>It's like a generative AI application where you know, you

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:52.400
<v Speaker 1>ask questions and you get answers.

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 2>I just think, for the sake of having it, if

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.760
<v Speaker 2>you can describe what it is so that like people

0:25:57.800 --> 0:25:59.720
<v Speaker 2>can conceive of it if they haven't heard of it.

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 3>It's a sign your notebook of all your data, so

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 3>you can pull in different sources. You can upload your

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 3>own information. You could upload, you know, your thesis paper

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 3>for your you know, senior project, and it can parse that,

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 3>it can organize that. But it can also create an

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 3>entire podcast based on that content, which has AI generated

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:29.440
<v Speaker 3>voices having a natural conversation.

0:26:29.320 --> 0:26:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Which we actually experimented with. We did it. We had

0:26:31.960 --> 0:26:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Notebook LM do a version of a podcast that we

0:26:34.320 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>were also also doing.

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 2>And he sent it to me and I was like,

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 2>is someone I thought someone was plagiarizing our format. It

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 2>was very weird.

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:43.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm really glad you guys didn't prank me, but I

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 3>have I made come in here and talk to.

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>So how did I mean, how did you decide to

0:26:50.000 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>put notebook LM on the list?

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:54.879
<v Speaker 3>I think it was one of the best executed AI

0:26:54.960 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 3>inventions of the year. One thing we look for or

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:04.800
<v Speaker 3>in AI inventions is typically we're looking for ones with

0:27:04.920 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 3>broad proven use that have really shifted how an industry

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:12.200
<v Speaker 3>or group of people functions. So not just a cool idea,

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 3>but could change an industry and not to further light

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 3>the fire under you guys, but this has really big

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:26.159
<v Speaker 3>implications for the audio industry and media in general is generative,

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, content, Like you.

0:27:28.040 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Know, what I really like about this one is the

0:27:30.480 --> 0:27:32.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that you can choose your own sources. I find

0:27:32.680 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it like one of the big things about AI, of

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 1>course is like where's this coming from? And like is

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.199
<v Speaker 1>the source material garbage? But to be able to say no,

0:27:41.840 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>like please draw on these sources and then generate something,

0:27:44.960 --> 0:27:47.800
<v Speaker 1>I found it really really cool, and it is obviously

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a little scary, being very honest. What was your favorite

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>item on this whole list if you can, if you

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:55.000
<v Speaker 1>can name a favorite, or if there are a couple

0:27:55.000 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't talked about that really stood out to you.

0:27:57.240 --> 0:28:01.679
<v Speaker 3>One of my favorite sort of tech things but anti

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:03.399
<v Speaker 3>tech is the Yonder pouch.

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 2>Oh I love the Yonder pouch. Yes, so you have

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:09.160
<v Speaker 2>them at screenings? Oh?

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Interesting?

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 3>So the thing that it's really transformed is schools. There's

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 3>a huge movement for kids to have more phone free

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 3>spaces where they're not allowed and this kind of speaks

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 3>to this law that passed in Australia where I think

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 3>kids can't have be on social media until they're sixteen

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:31.160
<v Speaker 3>or something like that.

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>What is it? Sorry?

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh, Yonder is a little pouch that you just locked

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 3>your phone in.

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I like that, is it wearable?

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:28:42.120 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>You go.

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 3>Basically, they'll have like a station with a bunch of

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 3>Yonder pouches. You lock your phone in there and then

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 3>you go into the event.

0:28:50.000 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, you do.

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 3>Some musical artists will have them at their concerts if

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 3>they don't want footage of the concert being taken or

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.800
<v Speaker 3>just the concert being ruined by everyone having their phone up.

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, a lot of schools have started adopting them

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 3>where kids lock their phones at the beginning of the

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 3>day and they get them back at the end of

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 3>the day. Yonder the company itself, has had a huge

0:29:09.480 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 3>role in pushing these phone free spaces and advocating for

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 3>this and so on top of the product, the company

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.160
<v Speaker 3>is doing a lot of advocacy.

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>On this topic.

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:23.239
<v Speaker 2>We've talked about phones as cigarettes and sugar, and it

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:25.320
<v Speaker 2>really this is the kind of thing where you're like,

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 2>we should have more, we should have more strength than this,

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 2>But no, We've been introduced these products throughout history that

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 2>we get very dependent on, and so people have to

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 2>come up with strategies to allow us to extricate ourselves

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 2>from It's like a smoke free zone. I mean it's

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 2>a very similar thing to me. Yeah, absolutely, and I

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 2>think it's necessary unfortunately, but.

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 3>I think it's really transformative for especially schools, but also

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 3>privacy of different experiences and places.

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Which I think people yearn form more and more.

0:29:57.680 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Has that been a time where you've got a pitch

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and you like, no, that's garbage and then it turned

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 1>out to be like the big thing.

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 3>I'd say more often is the opposite. And this is

0:30:08.800 --> 0:30:10.760
<v Speaker 3>where I own up to the fact that last year,

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 3>well by last year, I mean twenty twenty three, we

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:16.840
<v Speaker 3>put the humane aipin on it. Essentially it was a

0:30:16.840 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 3>pin that was fully operated by voice control and AI,

0:30:21.640 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 3>and I think that's an example of a product for

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:27.280
<v Speaker 3>one thing. It came out like right when the list

0:30:27.320 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 3>came out, so it wasn't like super well trialed yet,

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 3>but I think it was an example of something that

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:37.680
<v Speaker 3>was newsworthy, even if it didn't come through in execution

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:38.360
<v Speaker 3>all the way.

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>That will probably happen. There will be a product that is.

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 3>There will be that product, and I think voice control

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:46.800
<v Speaker 3>just doesn't at the point yet where you can fully

0:30:46.840 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 3>rely on it.

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 1>But that one was also quite dangerous right, or at

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>least he got very hot.

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't know about dangerous, but I think it just

0:30:53.280 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 3>didn't like work as well as.

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:56.200
<v Speaker 2>You very well too.

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but I think it was exciting and I think

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 3>it pushed the conversation forward. So I think there's a

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 3>lot of those where people get very excited about a

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 3>product and then it is a flop.

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, part of the course, I feel like, and you

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 2>know that better than anyone.

0:31:12.640 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely. And I also looking back through twenty three

0:31:17.200 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 3>years of best inventions, seeing the same kind of seeing

0:31:22.360 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 3>the progress of different flops pushing each other forward really

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 3>drives home the fact that they're important even if they

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 3>don't they don't make it.

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:36.719
<v Speaker 2>Which is a very existential thing to think about. We

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 2>are just driven by our series of flops.

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Tennis, and we rise on stepping sterns of our

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>former selves to greater things.

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.920
<v Speaker 2>There you go, Well, thank you so much for taking

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.360
<v Speaker 2>the time to talk to us. This is yeah, thank you,

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 2>really interesting.

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed it.

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 2>Of course we didn't even have to go to Vegas.

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's always nice to doff our caps

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to those who went before, and one of the most

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:03.840
<v Speaker 1>influential and iconic things I can think about in the

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>history of media is Jerry's final thought. So what should

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we leave with this week?

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 2>So brain rot? Actually, the Oxford English Dictionaries word of

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 2>the Year is sort of a way that internet speak

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 2>has infiltrated our day to day lives.

0:32:25.840 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>A brain rot each week will be our final thought,

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that will be our final thoughts. So what's this week?

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 2>This one which I see on TikTok now a lot

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:36.959
<v Speaker 2>is so good and you sort of have to know

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 2>that it's something that's happening on TikTok to understand the

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 2>context of it. It started sort of in context of pregnancy,

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:48.040
<v Speaker 2>where like you're at a certain age and people aren't

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 2>sure if like you're happy to be pregnant, and so

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 2>they started saying congradgudolences, congradudolences. Yeah, there's I just have

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 2>to play this one.

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:00.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm at the age where if you post that you're pregnant,

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna need you to tell me whether you're happy

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>body or not, because like just being like, oh, I'm pregnant, Like,

0:33:06.120 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>am I supposed to say congratulations?

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Am I supposed to feel bad?

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't know how to like respond to that,

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, so like just tell me, just be like, yeah,

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna keep this one. And I'm like, oh, congratulations.

0:33:18.800 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>What she means is congratulals, right, which.

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 2>What she means is congradulences. It's like, I think a

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 2>perfect example is like you have friends that are like, oh,

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna break up with this guy, and next thing

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:31.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, they are on FaceTime being like we're engaged,

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 2>and you're like, congratual, you got you got what you

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:39.520
<v Speaker 2>wanted with the wrong guy. So that's my brain rot.

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna be hearing.

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Twitter blew up yesterday because Zendaiya since

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>getting engaged, when she's doing interviews now she gestures with

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:47.640
<v Speaker 1>her left hand rather than her right hand, so everyone

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>can to that.

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:52.600
<v Speaker 2>I say congratulences. I don't know to who.

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this week for tech stuff, I'm as.

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 2>L and I'm care Price. This episodisode was produced by

0:34:00.920 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Eliza Dennis, Victoria Dominguez, and Lizzie Jacobs for Kaleidoscope. It

0:34:05.000 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 2>was executive produced by me os Vaalashan and Kate Osbourne

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 2>for iHeart. The executive producer is Katrina Norvel. The engineer

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:15.399
<v Speaker 2>is Biheed Fraser and it's mixed by Kyle Murdoch, who

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 2>also wrote our theme song.

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Join us next Wednesday for tech Stuff The Story, when

0:34:20.719 --> 0:34:23.839
<v Speaker 1>we'll share an in depth conversation with a longtime tech

0:34:23.920 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>chronicler Nicholas Thompson, former editor in chief of Wired and

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>current CEO of the Atlantic And please rate, review and

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>reach out to us at tech Stuff Podcast at gmail

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:37.960
<v Speaker 1>dot com with your feedback. We really want to hear

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.760
<v Speaker 2>From you, really, really bad, bad