WEBVTT - Elon Musk Live from the Qatar Economic Forum 

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Hey, this is David Popatopple's host of Elon Inc. We

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>have for you this week our interview in Cutter that

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>our colleague Michelle Hussein did with Elon himself. Here is

0:00:15.520 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that interview in its entirety right now. And you should

0:00:18.840 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>also know that our episode, our Elon in episode this

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:24.959
<v Speaker 1>week is all about me and Max breaking down the

0:00:24.960 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>interview and dissecting it the highlights, the low lights, et cetera,

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Enjoy.

0:00:30.720 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Hello everyone and Elon Musk. Welcome to Cutter Economic Forum.

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 2>How are you?

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 3>Thank you for having me. I'm fan, how are you?

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Very well? Thank you and very pleased to have you

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:43.599
<v Speaker 2>with us. You know among those here in the audience

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:45.960
<v Speaker 2>in Doha are some you will know people who have

0:00:46.040 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 2>backed you financially. Over the years since you last spoke

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.239
<v Speaker 2>here in twenty twenty two, a lot has changed in

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:55.400
<v Speaker 2>your life. You're not only running multiple companies you were

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 2>doing that then, but now you also have a role

0:00:57.720 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 2>in government. So first of all, I hope you won't

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 2>mind it. For time to time, I have to move

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:03.720
<v Speaker 2>you from one topic to another because we have a

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 2>lot to cover in the time we have. That will

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 2>be all right, okay. Well, let's start then with exactly

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 2>the fact that you now have this combination of being

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 2>a CEO and having a role as a government advisor.

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:19.839
<v Speaker 2>Tell me about your week. How does it work? What's

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 2>the split of your time?

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, I travel a lot. So I was in Silicon

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Valley yesterday morning, I was in LA yesterday evening. I

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 3>mean Austin right now. I'll be in DC tomorrow. I'll

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 3>be there having dinner with President tomorrow night, I believe,

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 3>and then a lot of cabinet secretary meetings and then

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 3>back to Sloton Valley on Thursday night.

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 2>But I mean the balance of your time is it? Well,

0:01:52.120 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 2>clearly it's a lot. But is it still the case

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 2>as you said a while ago, that it's about one

0:01:56.240 --> 0:01:58.160
<v Speaker 2>to two days a week on your government work.

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's correct.

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 2>And what does that mean for your corporate life? Because

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 2>if we start with Tesla, the company has suffered in

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:14.079
<v Speaker 2>recent months what you've called blowback. So what is your

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 2>plan for turning that around? The declining sales picture? And

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 2>by what stage do you think you're going to be

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 2>able to turn it around?

0:02:23.280 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Oh, it's all ready to turn around.

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Give me some evidence for that. I've just been looking

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 2>at the sales figures for Europe in April, which show

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 2>very significant declines in the big markets.

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Europe is our weakest market. We're stronger everywhere else, so

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 3>our sales are doing well at this point. We don't

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 3>anticipate any any meaningful or sales shortfall, and the you

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 3>know the obviously the stock market recognizes that since we're

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 3>now back over a trillion dollars in marketcap, so really

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 3>the market is aware of the situation.

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 4>So it's already turned around.

0:03:04.680 --> 0:03:07.360
<v Speaker 2>But sales still down compared to this time last year.

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 3>In Europe. In Europe, okay, and yes, but that's that's

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.679
<v Speaker 3>true of all manufacturers.

0:03:16.639 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 4>There's no accessions.

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean that you're not going to be able?

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 3>Does that mean you're quite weak?

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but you would acknowledg wouldn't you that what you

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:29.680
<v Speaker 2>are facing. Okay, let's just take it as Europe, what

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 2>you are facing is a significant problem. This Tesla is

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 2>an incredibly aspirational brand. People identified with it, it saw it,

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>They saw it as being at the forefront of the

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 2>climate crisis. And now people are driving around with stickers

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 2>in their cars saying I bought this before we knew

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Elon was crazy, and there.

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Are also people who are by buying it because Elon's crazy,

0:03:50.960 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 3>or however they may view it. So, yes, we've lost

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:56.920
<v Speaker 3>some sales, perhaps on the left, but we've gained them

0:03:56.920 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 3>on the right. The sales numbers at this point are strong,

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 3>and we've seen no problem with the mad So what

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 3>do I mean? You can just look at the stock

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 3>price if you want the best inside information. The stock

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:18.799
<v Speaker 3>market analysts have that, and a stock wouldn't be trading

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 3>near all time eyes if it was not. If things

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 3>weren't in good shape, They're fine, don't worry about it.

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I was citing sales figures rather than share price.

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Well tell me then, how committed you are to Tesla?

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you see yourself and are you committed to still

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 2>being the chief executive of Tesla in five years time? Yes,

0:04:41.279 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 2>no doubt about that at all.

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:50.640
<v Speaker 3>Well no, I might die.

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, sure to that.

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Let me see if I'm dead. So there's a slighter mode.

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Does that mean that the value of your pay doesn't

0:04:58.760 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 2>have any bearing on your decision?

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's not really a subject discussion in this forum.

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 3>The I think, obviously there should be a conversation for

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.679
<v Speaker 3>if there's something incredible is done, that compensation should match

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 3>that something incredible was done. But I'm confident that whatever

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 3>the whatever some activists posing as a judge in Delaware

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 3>happens to do will not affect the future compensation.

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 2>This is the judge you twice struck down the fifty

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 2>six billion dollar pay package that was that was awarded

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 2>to you. I think the value on the basis on

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 2>the current value of stock options.

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, not a judge, Not a judge.

0:05:48.520 --> 0:05:51.160
<v Speaker 3>The activist who is cars playing a judge in a

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:52.039
<v Speaker 3>Halloween costume.

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, that's that's your characterization. I think the value on

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:00.120
<v Speaker 2>the current value of stock options. I think the.

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Actual justice according to the law, on.

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 2>The current value of stock options. I think the value

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 2>of that pay package stands at about one hundred billion dollars.

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Are you saying you are relaxed about the value of

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 2>your future pay package. Your decision to be committed to

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 2>Tesla for the next five years as long as you

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 2>are still with us on this planet is completely independent

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 2>of pay. No, it's not independent. So pay is a

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 2>relevant factor then to your commitment to Tesla.

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:37.039
<v Speaker 3>A sufficient voting control such that I cannot be ousted

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.720
<v Speaker 3>by activists, investors is what matters to me. And I've

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 3>said this publicly many times, but let's not have this

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 3>whole thing be a discussion of my list pay. It's

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 3>not a money thing. It's a reasonable control thing over

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.239
<v Speaker 3>the future of the company, especially for building millions, potentially

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 3>billions of humanoid robots.

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 4>I can't be sitting.

0:06:55.120 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 3>There and weren't going to get tossed out by litical

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 3>reasons by activists. That will be unacceptable. That's all that matters. Now,

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 3>let's move on.

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:11.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well just one question, well one question before we

0:07:11.640 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 2>move on to other companies, which is that I wonder

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 2>if some of what you've has happened to Tesla in

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 2>the last few months, did you take it personally?

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 2>And did it make you regret any of you all

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 2>think twice about your political endeavors, because it is.

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 3>I did what needed to be done, the violent antibody reaction,

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 3>and I'm not someone who's ever committed violence, and yet

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 3>massive violence was committed against my companies, massive violence was

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 3>threatened against me. Who are these people? Why would they

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 3>do that? How wrong can they be? They're on the wrong,

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 3>on the wrong side of history, and that's an evil

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 3>thing to do, to go and damage some pointocent person's

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 3>car to threaten to kill me. What strong are these people?

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 3>I have not harmed anyone, So something needs to be

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 3>done about them, and a number of them are going

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 3>to prison and they deserve it.

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 2>You're well, you're referring to the attacks on Tesla showrooms,

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 2>but I.

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 3>Think, well, let's into showrooms and burning down cars unacceptable.

0:08:40.640 --> 0:08:42.640
<v Speaker 3>Those people will go to prison, and the people that

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:45.199
<v Speaker 3>funded them and organized them will also go to prison.

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:46.959
<v Speaker 3>Don't worry, wouldn't you.

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 2>You wouldn't you wouldn't. Wouldn't you acknowledge that some of

0:08:56.440 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 2>the people who turned against Tesla in Europe were are

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 2>upset at your politics, and very few of them would

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 2>have been violent in any way. They just objected to

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 2>what they saw you say or do politically.

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's certainly fine to object to political things, but

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 3>it's not fine to resort to violence and hanging someone

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:24.760
<v Speaker 3>in effigy and death threats. That's obviously not okay. You know,

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 3>that's absurd. That is in no way justifiable at all

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 3>in any way, shape or form. And some of the

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 3>legacy media and nonetheless have sort of justified which is unconscionable.

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 3>Shame on them.

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about your other companies then, in other business area, SpaceX.

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 2>I saw that you said in a speech at the

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 2>West Point Military Academy recently that the future of warfare

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 2>is AI and drones, And obviously defense is an increasingly

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 2>booming sector. With the state of the world at the moment,

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 2>do you we see SpaceX moving into weaponized drones?

0:10:10.679 --> 0:10:15.040
<v Speaker 3>You certainly ask interesting questions that are impossible to answer.

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:23.319
<v Speaker 3>So SpaceX is is the space launch leader. So SpaceX

0:10:23.360 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 3>doesn't do drones. SpaceX builds rockets, satellites, and Internet terminals.

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 3>So SpaceX has a a very dominant position in space launch.

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 3>So of the mass launch to orbit this year, SpaceX

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 3>will probably do, China will do the remain half of

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:50.959
<v Speaker 3>the remaining amounts of five percent, and the rest of

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 3>the world, including the rest of the US, will do

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 3>about five percent. So SpaceX will do about ten times

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:56.319
<v Speaker 3>as much as the rest of the world combined, or

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty times as much as China, which is in China

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 3>is doing actually a very impressive job. The reason for

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 3>this is that we're putting it into orbit the largest

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 3>satellite constellation, the Walls I've ever seen by far. So

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:12.839
<v Speaker 3>I think at this point about maybe approaching eighty percent

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:16.440
<v Speaker 3>of all active satellites in orbit are SpaceX and they're

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 3>providing high vand with global connectivity throughout the world. In fact,

0:11:21.120 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 3>this connection is on a SpaceX connection. So I think

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.959
<v Speaker 3>this is a very good thing because it means that

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 3>we can provide low cost my bandwidth.

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 4>Internet to parts of the world that don't have it

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:33.960
<v Speaker 4>or it's very expensive.

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 3>And I think the single biggest thing you can do

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 3>to lift people out of poverty and help them is

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.520
<v Speaker 3>giving them an Internet connection, because once you have the

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 3>Internet connection, you can learn anything for free on the Internet,

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 3>and you can also sell your goods and services to

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 3>the global market. And once you have knowledge by the

0:11:55.760 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Internet and the ability to engage in commerce, that this

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 3>is going to greatly improve quality of life for people

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 3>throughout the world.

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 4>And it has.

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:08.960
<v Speaker 3>And I'd just like to think anyone in the audience

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 3>who may have been helpful and you know, with Starlink

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 3>and getting it to approved in their country, and I

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 3>think it's doing a lot of good in the countries

0:12:17.240 --> 0:12:18.720
<v Speaker 3>that to have approved it, which is I think this

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 3>point one hundred and thirty countries are very happy with it.

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 3>I don't currently into space space actually getting into the

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 3>weapons business, that's certainly that's not an aspiration.

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 4>We're fre we're frequently asked to.

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 3>Do to do weapons programs, but we have done part

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:33.720
<v Speaker 3>a client.

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you envisage SpaceX or indeed, starlink is a separate

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 2>entity publicly listing in the near future or at all.

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 3>It's possible that starlink may go public at some point

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 3>in the future.

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.559
<v Speaker 2>And what would be the what would be the time frame,

0:12:57.720 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 2>what kind of time frame you consider it?

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean right, I mean no rush to your public.

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 3>The public is I guess a way to you know,

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 3>potentially make more money, but at the expense of a

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 3>lot of public company overhead and inevitably a whole bunch

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 3>of lawsuits which are very annoying. So there's really something

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 3>needs to be done about the share shareholder shareholder derivative

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 3>lawsuits in the US, because it allows plaintiffs law firms

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:32.640
<v Speaker 3>who don't represent the shareholders to pretend that they represent

0:13:32.720 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 3>the shareholders by getting a puppet plaintiff for a few

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 3>shares to initiate a massive lawsuit against the company, and

0:13:38.880 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 3>the irony being that extreme irony that even if the

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 3>class they purport to represent were to vote that they

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 3>don't want the lawsuit, the lawsuit will still continue.

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 4>So how can it be.

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:53.800
<v Speaker 3>A class action representing a class if the class were

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 3>against it? And that's the bizarre situation we've got in

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 3>the US. It needs a diary to perform that. As

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 3>anyone's running a public company, you've experienced this. It's an

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 3>absurd situation that needs to change.

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, do you think Donald Trump might change it? You've

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 2>certainly got his ear. I imagine that you've put this

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 2>to him. Is this something you're trying to change before

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:16.679
<v Speaker 2>any starlink IPO.

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, we need a law to be passed.

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 3>The trouble being that you need sixty Senate votes and

0:14:28.040 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 3>the Democrats will vote against it. The plaintiff's bar is

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 3>I believe, the second largest contributor to the Democratic Party.

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 3>That's the issue. At the state level, this can be solved,

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 3>and I should say Texas recently passed a law which

0:14:50.040 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 3>at least the state level made is much more reasonable

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 3>because you have to get at least one in thirty

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 3>three shareholders to agree that they are part of a

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 3>class of sharehold This will be really helped with frivolous lawsuits.

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's talk about AI, which is in so many

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 2>of your businesses and in all our worlds in different ways.

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 2>It's one of the big changes the development of generative AI.

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Since you last spoke to this forum three years ago,

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 2>you're in this space, of course with Grop, which almost

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 2>everyone will know. You co founded open ai and then left,

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 2>and you've obviously got a legal battle with open ai

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.280
<v Speaker 2>and Sam Altman. I wonder if you could say something

0:15:37.320 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 2>about the status of that, because you were together in

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 2>Saudi Arabia with the president last week, with Sam Altman

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 2>in the same place at the same.

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 3>Time, in the neighborhood.

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 2>So does that mean you are pushing ahead with the

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:55.440
<v Speaker 2>lawsuit against open ai.

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 3>Yes. So look, I came up with the name open

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 3>ai as an open source and as a nonprofit, and

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:10.080
<v Speaker 3>I funded AI opening I for the first roughly fifty

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 3>million dollars, and it was intended to be a nonprofit

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 3>open source company, and now is they're trying to change

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 3>that for their own financial benefit into a for profit

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 3>company that.

0:16:24.520 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 4>Is closed source. So this would be like, let's.

0:16:27.400 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Say you you funded a nonprofit to help preserve the

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Amazon rainforest, but instead of doing that, they became a

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 3>lumber company, chopped down the forest and sold the wood.

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 3>You'd be like, wait a second, that's not what I funded.

0:16:41.440 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 3>That's opening.

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 2>They've made some changes to their call for instructure, though,

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 2>haven't they since in recognition of of what you've said?

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 3>And now that's just what they told the media.

0:16:53.720 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, part they have part they have partly walked back

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:05.119
<v Speaker 2>their plan to restructure the business. I guess that's made

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 2>no difference to how you feel about it. So you

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 2>determined to see them in court.

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Of course.

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, that's that's certainly going to be one to watch.

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 2>I also wanted to ask you about AI and regulation

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.719
<v Speaker 2>because when you were here last talking to John Micklethwaite,

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 2>you had some pretty strong words about the risk that

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 2>AI poses and you said that you really felt what

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 2>the US was missing was a federal AI regulator that

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 2>you know, something along the lines of the Food and

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 2>Drug Administration or the Federal Aviation Administration. Now you're clearly

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:40.159
<v Speaker 2>now in a zone where you're more you're more on

0:17:40.200 --> 0:17:43.920
<v Speaker 2>the cutting regulation side than wanting new regulators. So has

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 2>your view changed on the need for an AI regulator?

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, something I don't think there should be regulators. You

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.000
<v Speaker 3>think of regulators like referees on the on the field

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:57.719
<v Speaker 3>in sport, there should be some number of referees, but

0:17:57.760 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 3>that you shouldn't have so many referees that you can

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 3>the ball without hitting one. So in many, in most

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:10.360
<v Speaker 3>perhaps fields in the US, the regulatory burden has grown

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:13.680
<v Speaker 3>over time to the point where it's like having more

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 3>referees than players on the field. So and this is

0:18:18.960 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 3>a natural consequence of an extended period of prosperity. It's

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:25.879
<v Speaker 3>very important to appreciate this. This has happened throughout history.

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 3>When you have an extended period of prosperity with no

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 3>existential war, there's no there's no cleansing function for the

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 3>for unnecessary laws and regulations. So what happens is that

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 3>every year more laws and more regulations are pasted, because

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, legislators are going to legislate, regulators are going

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 3>to regulate, and you will get the steady pile of

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 3>more and more laws and regulations of a time until

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 3>everything is illegal. And let me give you an example

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 3>of truly absurd situation. Under the Biden administration, SpaceX was

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 3>sued for not hiring asylum seekers in the US. Now.

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 3>The problem is it's actually illegal for SpaceX under itart

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 3>in National Traffic and Arms regulations to hire anyone who

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 3>is not a permanent resident of the United States, because

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 3>the premise being that they will take advanced rocket technology

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 3>and return to their home country if they're not a

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 3>permanent resident.

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 4>So we're simultaneously.

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 3>In a situation where it's illegal to hire slums US

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 3>and is also illegal to hire asylum seekers, and the

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 3>Biden's Departner of Justice chose to prosecute US despite both

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:43.760
<v Speaker 3>paths being illegal.

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 4>Down if you do, down if you don't.

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 2>But my question was specifically about a regulator for AI,

0:19:50.040 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 2>which you said three years ago was needed, and you

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 2>said we need to be proactive on the regulation of

0:19:56.040 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 2>AI rather than reactive. Have you changed your mind on that?

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 4>No, of course not. What what?

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.080
<v Speaker 3>No? Of course not. What I'm saying is that there

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:08.440
<v Speaker 3>should be some referees on the field, a few referees,

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:08.679
<v Speaker 3>but you.

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 4>Shouldn't have a field jam packed.

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.439
<v Speaker 3>With referees that such that you could not kick a

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 3>ball in any direction without hitting one. So the the

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 3>the fields that have been around for a long time,

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 3>such as automotive, so aerospace you know, if the sort

0:20:25.800 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 3>of food and drug industries are overregulated, but the new

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:34.440
<v Speaker 3>fields like artificial intelligence are underregulated.

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 4>In fact, there is no regulator at.

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 2>All, so they should be.

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Do you still think that, Yes, I'm simply saying, which

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 3>I think is just basic common sense, that you want

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 3>to have at least you want you want to have

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 3>a few referees in the field. You don't want to

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:51.719
<v Speaker 3>have an army of referees, but you want to have

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 3>a few referees on any given field, in any given sport,

0:20:55.119 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 3>or even any given arena industrial arena to ensure help

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 3>that like safety is taken care of. But your already

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:08.440
<v Speaker 3>have so there's a there's there's a proper number of referees.

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 3>Like I said, it's actually very easy to visualize this

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.240
<v Speaker 3>when compared to sports. If the whole field is packed

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 3>with referees, that would look absurd. But if there were

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 3>no referees at all, your game is not going to

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 3>be as good.

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:25.879
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So let's then talk about your new world, your

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 2>your role advising government. You are in this unique and

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:34.680
<v Speaker 2>unprecedented position of having billions of dollars worth of contracts

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 2>with the federal government yourself, mostly through SpaceX and also

0:21:38.359 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 2>now an insider's knowledge of it because of dog. Can

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 2>you see that there is a conflict of interest or

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:49.400
<v Speaker 2>a potential conflict of interest in broad terms just through

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:50.480
<v Speaker 2>that very fact.

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:55.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't think so. Actually, there have been many advisors

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 3>throughout history and the US government and others who have

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 3>had economic interests, and I am silverely an advisor. I

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 3>don't have a formal power, and that's a president can

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 3>choose to accept my advice or not, and that's that's

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 3>how it goes. If there's a single contract that any

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.520
<v Speaker 3>of my companies have received that people think is somehow

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 3>not was was awarded improperly, it would immediately be front

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 3>page news, to say the least. And if if I

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 3>hadn't mentioned it, certainly my competitors would. So if you're

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 3>not seeing that, then the clearly is not a complex

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 3>to interest.

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:41.479
<v Speaker 2>The Yeah, there's another way though to look at it.

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 2>That For example, you have many competitors, whether it's companies

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:47.440
<v Speaker 2>like Boeing or companies wh would like to do more

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 2>of the kind of work you do for NASA Blue

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Origin Rocket Lab. And because those is in every federal

0:22:55.040 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 2>government department, you or people who work for and you

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:05.120
<v Speaker 2>are the driving force behind it, have an insight into

0:23:05.240 --> 0:23:09.400
<v Speaker 2>those companies' affairs and those companies relationships with the federal government.

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 3>Now, all we do is we review the organization to

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:21.680
<v Speaker 3>see if the organization has departments that are no longer

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 3>relevant and and and then are the contracts that are

0:23:26.359 --> 0:23:29.159
<v Speaker 3>being awarded good value for money? In fact, frankly, the

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 3>bar is not particularly high. Is there any value for

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.880
<v Speaker 3>money in a contract? And if there's if there isn't,

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 3>then we make recommendations to the secretary. The secretary you

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 3>can choose to take those actions or not take those actions,

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 3>and that's it. And then any action that that that

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 3>is as a function of DOGE is posted to the

0:23:47.560 --> 0:23:51.679
<v Speaker 3>DOGE website and to the DOGE dog govort at DOGE

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.960
<v Speaker 3>handle on the x platform. So it's it's complete tran transparency.

0:23:56.920 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 3>And I have not seen any case where so that's

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 3>my large It's even been an accusation of conflict because

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 3>it is as completely and utterly transparent. That's it.

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 2>And what about the international dimension. Now, let's think about Starlink.

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Starlink is obviously a very very good internet service. It's

0:24:16.240 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 2>sought after all over the world. It's critical to the

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 2>frontline in Ukraine. It has also had more contracts coming

0:24:23.600 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 2>its way, and there is some evidence that companies are

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 2>allowing access to it because they want to be close

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 2>to the Trump administration and send the right signal. So

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg broke news today that the South African government is

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.959
<v Speaker 2>working around their rules on black ownership in order to

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 2>allow starlinkin and that is being done on the eve

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.360
<v Speaker 2>of the visit the President Ramaposa is going to make

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 2>to the White House. Do you recognize that as a

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 2>conflict of interest.

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.439
<v Speaker 3>Now, of course not. First of all, you should be

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 3>questioning why is there why are the racist laws in

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 3>South Africa. That's the first plot problem. That's what you

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:00.440
<v Speaker 3>should be attacking. It's improper for the race, the laws

0:25:00.440 --> 0:25:04.439
<v Speaker 3>in South Africa. The whole idea with what Nelson Mandela,

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.280
<v Speaker 3>who is a great man, proposed, was that all races

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 3>should be on an equal footing in South Africa. That's

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 3>the right thing to do, not to replace one set

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:14.000
<v Speaker 3>of racist laws with another set of racist laws, which

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 3>is utterly wrong and improper. So that's that's the deal,

0:25:19.720 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 3>that all races should be tweat equally and there should

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 3>be no preference given to one or the other, whereas

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 3>there are now one hundred and forty laws in South

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 3>Africa that give that basically give strong preference to to

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 3>if you if you're black South African and not otherwise.

0:25:38.160 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 3>And so now I'm in the subsurd situation where I

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:42.360
<v Speaker 3>was born in South Africa but cannot get a license

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 3>to operate in starlink because I'm not black.

0:25:45.200 --> 0:25:48.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, it looks like it looks looks like that, right,

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:50.359
<v Speaker 2>it looks like that's about to change.

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 3>I just asked you a question. Please answer. Does that

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 3>seem right to you?

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Well? Those rules were designed to bring those rules were

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 2>designed to bring about an era of more economic equality

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.800
<v Speaker 2>in South Africa, and it looks like the government has

0:26:05.800 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 2>found a way around those rules for you.

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 3>Ask your question.

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 2>This is this is your interview. Everyone wants to hear

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 2>from you.

0:26:14.800 --> 0:26:15.879
<v Speaker 4>Yes or no, not.

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 2>For me to answer. I have got a question for

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 2>you about about your government works and the amount of savings.

0:26:24.080 --> 0:26:25.120
<v Speaker 4>Do you like raceless loves?

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 2>This is not for me to answer. Come on, now,

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 2>you wouldn't be trying to dodge.

0:26:31.480 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 3>A question to answer question?

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 4>Answer you answer?

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:38.479
<v Speaker 2>I say, I think if you I'm sure you can

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:40.920
<v Speaker 2>have that conversation directly with the South African government if

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:42.720
<v Speaker 2>you want to, I want to ask you about the

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 2>total I want to ask you about the total around.

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you about the total amount that

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 2>you're planning to save through Doge's work. Before the election,

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 2>you said it was going to be at least two trillion.

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 2>The number currently on doze dot gov is one hundred

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:04.679
<v Speaker 2>and seventy billion dollars. That's a big change. What happened

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 2>to the two.

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Trillion or do you expect it to happen immediately?

0:27:09.200 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Well? Is it going to happen because those is supposed

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:13.000
<v Speaker 2>to run till next July.

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, your question is absurd in this fundamental premise.

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Are you assuming that on day you know, within a

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 3>few months this instant two trillion saved?

0:27:22.760 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 2>No, I'm not sure. I'm just asking you is that

0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 2>still your aim?

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Then?

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 2>Is it still your aim to get.

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Amount of time?

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 3>Have we not made good progress given the amount of time?

0:27:32.359 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly what I'm asking, So is it still your

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 2>aim to go from one hundred and seventy billion to

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 2>two trillion?

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.479
<v Speaker 3>The ability of those to operate is this function of

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 3>whether the government and this include the Congress is willing

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:54.399
<v Speaker 3>to take our advice. We're not the dictators of the government.

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 3>We are the advisors, and so we can advise. And

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 3>the progress who made thus far think is incredible. Those

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 3>team has done incredible work, but the magnitude of the

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 3>savings is proportionate to the support we get from Congress

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 3>and from the executive branch of the government in general.

0:28:17.280 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 4>So we're not the dictators.

0:28:19.920 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 3>We are the advisors. But thus far, for advisors with

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 3>the Doorge team, to their credit, has made incredible progress.

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 2>You've talked about four billion dollars a day being saved,

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 2>but that that won't get which is an and I

0:28:39.880 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 2>think everyone can agree that combating waste and inefficiency in

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 2>government is a very good thing. But if you add

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 2>that up, it's not going to get to two trillion

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 2>over the lifetime of dog.

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm sorry.

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 2>The four billion, the four billion a day, if dose

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 2>is going to run till next July, is not going

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 2>to get you to trilli and dollars. But you still

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 2>say it's your aim, so we'll take that as read.

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 3>There's there's, there's there's what doge I mean? I fail

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 3>You're somewhat trapped in the NPC dialogue tree of a

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 3>traditional journalist. So it's difficult when when I'm conversing with

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 3>someone who's trapped in the valor te of a conventional journalist,

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 3>because it's like talking to a computer. So, uh, DOGE

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 3>is an advisory group? We are doing the best we

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:37.440
<v Speaker 3>can as an advisory group. The progress made thus far

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.600
<v Speaker 3>as an advisory group is excellent. I don't think any

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 3>advisory group has done better in the history of advisory

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 3>groups of the government. Now we were We do not

0:29:47.840 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 3>make the laws, nor do we control the judiciary, nor

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 3>do we control the executive branch. We are simply advisors

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 3>in that context, we're doing very well. Beyond that, we

0:29:59.800 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 3>can not we can't take action beyond that because we

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 3>are not some sort of imperial dictator of the government.

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 3>There are three branches of government that that art some

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 3>degree opposed to that level of cost savings. Unless let's

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:22.480
<v Speaker 3>let's let's not criticize whether there's four trillion. Instead look

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 3>at the fact that our sixty billion has been saved

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 3>and more we save two.

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 2>And as I said, I think everyone can agree that

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 2>cutting waste and indeed fraud in any government and being

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 2>responsible with taxpayer money is a very good thing. So yes,

0:30:39.160 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 2>I can see, I can see that you're proud of

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 2>that work. I do want to ask you about USAID

0:30:46.400 --> 0:30:49.120
<v Speaker 2>and the comments that Bill Gates made the other day,

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 2>which and I know that you called him. I know

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 2>you've said that already.

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 3>I learned it also, And I'm just who does Bill

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:01.479
<v Speaker 3>Gates think he is to make comments about the welfare

0:31:01.480 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 3>of children, given that he is beforequented Jeffreystein.

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well he's he's he said he regrets those and

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 2>he's spent. He spent. He spent a lot. He spent

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 2>a lot of his own money on on philanthropy around

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 2>the world over the years. My question to you is

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 2>have you looked at the data to check if he

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 2>might be right that the cuts to U S A

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I D might cost millions of lives.

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:35.479
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I'd like him to proshure us any any evidence

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 3>whatsoever that that is true.

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 4>It's false.

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 3>The what we're found with US A D cuts and

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 3>by the way, they have an urban cut. The parts

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 3>of the U S A D that we found to

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 3>be even slightly useful, we're transferred to the State Department.

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 3>So they've not been deleted, they've really been transferred to

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:54.960
<v Speaker 3>the State Department, but many many times over with US

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 3>A D and other organizations when we've when they said, oh,

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 3>well this is going to help you know, children, or

0:32:01.200 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 3>it's going to help some uh disease eradication or something

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:09.120
<v Speaker 3>like that. And then when we ask for any evidence whatsoever,

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 3>I say, well, please connect us with this group of

0:32:12.800 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 3>children so we can talk to them and understand more

0:32:15.040 --> 0:32:18.800
<v Speaker 3>about their issue. We get nothing. We don't they don't

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 3>even try to prevent a show. We should come up

0:32:22.240 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 3>with a with a show often meaning like it's sort

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 3>of like, well, can we at least see a few kids,

0:32:28.480 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 3>like where are they if they're in trouble, we'd like

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 3>to talk to them and talk to their caregivers.

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 4>And then we get something as a.

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Response because it's what we find is an enormous amount

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 3>of fraud and graft.

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let me put this example.

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 3>Very little actually gets to the kids, if anything at all.

0:32:47.440 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let me put this example to you because you

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 2>grew up in South Africa, so you will know the

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 2>impact of HIV AIDS well. And this is why I

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 2>asked about the data the US led on international efforts

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 2>to combat HIV AIDS treatment prevention, and there's an initiative

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 2>called pepfile which is credited with saving twenty six million

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 2>lives in the last twenty years. It was part of

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 2>the foreign aid freeze. Then there was a limited waiver.

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Its services are disrupted, and unaid says if permanly discontinued,

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 2>there will be another four million AIDS related deaths by

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty nine. So if you look at that example,

0:33:26.080 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 2>which is backed up by data. In twenty twenty three,

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 2>six hundred and thirty thousand people died of AIDS related illnesses,

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 2>then perhaps Bill Gates's figures are not wrong. Millions of

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:37.400
<v Speaker 2>lives could be lost.

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 3>First of all, the program, the AIDS Medication program, is continuing,

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:50.719
<v Speaker 3>so your fun model premise is wrong.

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 4>It is continuing. Now do you have another example, not.

0:33:57.200 --> 0:34:02.160
<v Speaker 2>In its entire not in its the program there's a

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 2>limited waiver, and UNAIDS have said that not all of

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.280
<v Speaker 2>the services that were previously funded by USA IDEA continuing.

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 2>So why that's why I put that example to you?

0:34:12.840 --> 0:34:14.480
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, which ones aren't being funded?

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 2>I'll fix it right now for okay. Well, actually they're

0:34:19.080 --> 0:34:22.200
<v Speaker 2>all on the unaid's website, so you'll be able to

0:34:22.200 --> 0:34:24.760
<v Speaker 2>see them, but mostly they are to deal with Mostly

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 2>they are to do with prevention. And for example, the

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:30.760
<v Speaker 2>rollout of a drug called lenna kappavir, which was hailed

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:34.959
<v Speaker 2>as one of the biggest breakthroughs against AIDS for many years,

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 2>which came out last year. So if you are perhaps,

0:34:37.600 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure UNAIDS would be delighted if you're able to

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 2>look at that again.

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, well, well, if in fact this is true, which

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:45.960
<v Speaker 3>I doubt it is, then we'll fix it.

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, fine, So finally, political, your political influence. I wondered

0:34:54.360 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 2>whether you have decided yet how much you're going to

0:34:57.239 --> 0:35:03.919
<v Speaker 2>spend on the the upcoming midterms. Is it you spent

0:35:04.000 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 2>a lot more money on the last US election than

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:09.359
<v Speaker 2>you envisaged when you were speaking here three years ago.

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Are you going to continue to spend at that kind

0:35:12.560 --> 0:35:14.680
<v Speaker 2>of level on future elections?

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 3>I think in terms of political spending, I'm going to

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:24.440
<v Speaker 3>do a lot less in the future.

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 2>And why is that?

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 3>I think I've done enough?

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:34.799
<v Speaker 2>Is it because of blowback?

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:40.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, if I see a reason to do political spending

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:41.399
<v Speaker 3>in the future, I will do it.

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:42.920
<v Speaker 4>I did not currently see reason.

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 2>What about political influence beyond the US, how often do

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 2>you speak to President Putin.

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't speak to President Putin.

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:55.760
<v Speaker 2>You've never spoken to President Putin.

0:35:57.840 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 4>I was on a video caller with him once about

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:03.280
<v Speaker 4>five years AG. That's the only that's the speak president

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 4>President Putin. Oh, you must I get it. You believe

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:07.280
<v Speaker 4>the legacy.

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 2>Actually, i've heard you. I've heard you speak about it.

0:36:09.800 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 2>For example, in your West Point speech, you said, oh,

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 2>I challenged President Putin to uh to was it an

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 2>arm wrestle? And I know the Wall Street Journal has

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 2>reported your reported conversations. If you're if you're saying they

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:23.919
<v Speaker 2>haven't happened other than once, I'll take that as read.

0:36:25.080 --> 0:36:27.400
<v Speaker 3>Is there a worse publication on the face of the

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 3>earth than the Wall Street Journal? I wouldn't use that

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:34.640
<v Speaker 3>to ligne up my cage for paragraphics that that that

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:38.759
<v Speaker 3>newspaper is the worst newspaper in the world. And there's

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 3>and you know, if there's one newspaper that should be

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 3>pro capitalist, it's the one with Wall Street in the name.

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 4>But it isn't. So I have the very lowest opinion

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:50.480
<v Speaker 4>of the Wall Street Journal.

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 3>Absolute answers, And you clearly have believed the tripe that

0:36:53.600 --> 0:36:56.240
<v Speaker 3>you've written, that you've read in those papers I read.

0:36:56.440 --> 0:36:59.279
<v Speaker 2>I read very widely, and I'm putting these questions to

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 2>you so that you have an opportunity to respond to them,

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 2>which you are and for which we're all grateful to hear.

0:37:04.520 --> 0:37:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Your response is, okay, we are. We are out of time.

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:11.799
<v Speaker 3>So you mentioned challenging. I did so on on the

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 3>X platform. I challenged Vladi Imprutin over the I didn't

0:37:18.520 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 3>talk to him. That was a post on the X platform.

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 2>That's why. That's why I asked you, and you've and

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:26.600
<v Speaker 2>you've clarified and explained, thank you. That's that's why I

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 2>was asking whether you have had reported conversations and and

0:37:30.520 --> 0:37:32.720
<v Speaker 2>you've said you have another than a video.

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 4>Okay, legacy mediaize.

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, listen. I actually thought I might give Grock the

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 2>last word, because when I asked Rock what your hardest

0:37:42.960 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 2>challenge is, it said the strain of managing multiple high

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 2>stake ventures and made financial, regulatory and public relations crises.

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:57.520
<v Speaker 2>And I wondered whether you recognize that characterization and whether

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:00.480
<v Speaker 2>you do think that this is a pivot or year

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 2>in your life.

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, every year has been somewhat pivotal, and this one's

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:12.919
<v Speaker 3>no different. So I mean in terms of interesting things

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 3>that hopefully our coverers this year the getting Starship to

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:26.280
<v Speaker 3>be fully reusable so that we catch both the booster

0:38:26.400 --> 0:38:28.880
<v Speaker 3>and the ship, which will be the first fully reusable

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 3>orbital rocket ever in history, which is would be a

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 3>profound breakthrough as the essential breakthrough necessarily to make life

0:38:36.000 --> 0:38:40.919
<v Speaker 3>multiplanetary and ultimately become a space faring civilization. We've got

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:48.959
<v Speaker 3>neuralink which is now helped five patients restore capability using

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:51.600
<v Speaker 3>the telefty implants where they're able to control the computer

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 3>simply by thinking. We'll be doing our first patient to

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:03.800
<v Speaker 3>restore blank true source site with our blind site implant,

0:39:03.840 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 3>which is the end of this year early next. In fact,

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 3>that that first patient might be in the U a E.

0:39:09.560 --> 0:39:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Since we have a relationship with you and the Cleveland

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 3>clinic clinic there. The I think what's running on the

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:21.200
<v Speaker 3>AI front, we are close to what you might call

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:28.680
<v Speaker 3>a g I or or digital superintelligence, and I think

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 3>we'll see we are seeing an explosion in digital super

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:31.800
<v Speaker 3>intelligence here.

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:35.360
<v Speaker 4>And then we've got at Tesla, the what we'll.

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 3>Be launching unsupervised autonomy basically self driving cars with no

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 3>one in them in Austin next month. So it's it's

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 3>a big year for sure. Many other things on the

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.839
<v Speaker 3>in the in the works too. I'm a technologist first

0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 3>and foremost.

0:39:52.160 --> 0:39:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk, thank you very much for joining us here

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 2>at CUT the Economic Forum. Thank you M