WEBVTT - Obamacare Replacement to Cover Fewer People, Sparking Blowback

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.040
<v Speaker 1>P and L is brought to you by proper Cloth,

0:00:02.120 --> 0:00:05.120
<v Speaker 1>a leader in men's custom shirts, with proprietary smart sized

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>technology and top rated customer service. Ordering a custom shirt

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>has never been easier. Visit proper cloth dot com to

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>order your first custom shirt today. Welcome to the Bloomberg

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>P and L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox. Along with my

0:00:22.640 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we bring you the

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for you and your money,

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>whether at the grocery store or the trading floor. Find

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg P and L Podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud and

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. We heard from President Trump just

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>shortly ago. We heard that he reiterated his plan to

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>roll back Obamacare. But what is less clear is exactly

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>how Republicans plan to do this. But with some sense

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>of clarity is Zach Tracer, a healthcare reporter for Bloomberg,

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>who wrote a really compel piece today on the Bloomberg Zach, So,

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.679
<v Speaker 1>this story talks about some of the details that we

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>are learning. Can you outline what those are? Sure? And

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the thing to keep in mind here is

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:13.960
<v Speaker 1>that we haven't seen a bill. We we don't know

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>what you know, Republicans in um the House are are

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>going to try to get past. But what we are

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>hearing is that you know, first off, UM, likely it

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>will get rid of the requirement in Obamacare that everybody

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>have health insurance. Um, it might make some changes to

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the subsidies and sort of the the net result of

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.319
<v Speaker 1>all this is that fewer people are going to have

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:36.400
<v Speaker 1>health insurance. At the end of the day, we keep

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>hearing about the three legs of the stool of the

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Affordable Care Act. Can you pull one of them away

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>and still have the stool be useful? That's right. So

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>one one of the big problems here will be that

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>by ending the individual mandate, the requirement that people buy

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 1>health insurance, it will be really tough to to keep

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>healthy people in the market potentially, And that's one of

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the things that the republic plans are trying to grapple

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>with is how do you get sort of young, healthy

0:02:03.640 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>people to buy health insurance in the absence of a

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>law requiring them requiring them to do so. And that's

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>something you know that that Obamacare struggled with too. So

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, you know, if if folks can come

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:17.200
<v Speaker 1>out of this with a better option, a better plan, um,

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that may be an improvement. How exactly are these details

0:02:20.760 --> 0:02:24.640
<v Speaker 1>about a potential replacement coming out? You know, we've been

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>talking with lawmakers and um, you know, these these lawmakers

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>are confronting constituents, and so they're trying to come up

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:32.880
<v Speaker 1>with ways of explaining here is what Republicans want in

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>an Obamacare replacement. And just when you say confronting instituents,

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about in part the town hall meetings that

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have gotten rather heated right around the around the country.

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So you know, Congress is out this week,

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>so lawmakers are back in their districts talking to the

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 1>folks who voted for them or who didn't, and they're

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to say, here is what Republicans want to do

0:02:53.520 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>with Obamacare. And it's not easy because they don't have,

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:58.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, one specific bill, and so they're they're sort

0:02:58.800 --> 0:03:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of trying to outline these principles. And one of the

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>things that we've discovered from interviewing them is that, you know,

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult to talk about this idea that fewer

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>people are going to have health insurance. Does the does

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the nomination process of Dr Tom Price for the head

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of Health and Human Services. Does that in any way

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>affect what may or may not happen with the a

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>c A. So. Dr Price, who's now the head of

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Health and Human Services, UM will probably

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 1>play some role in crafting this, uh, this replacement. It's

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>not clear yet just what that will be. UM. He

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>said he's going to leave it up to Congress at

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>least initially, but I do think the the administration will

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>play a role at some point. UM. You know, one

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>thing he talked about a lot, and that comes up

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>here is the importance of what they're calling access to

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>health insurance. So Republicans are going to give folks some

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of tax credit that will help them by health

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 1>insurance and say, look, everybody has access. It's up to

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you whether or not you buy health insurance. I have

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to wonder going forward, at what point do they have

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>to come up with a replacement. Is there a sort

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>of deadline? I think that the the insurance companies that

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:12.119
<v Speaker 1>are selling health insurance and Obamacare really really need certainty.

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>They are going to be deciding on their their plans

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>for eighteen in the next few months, really m by May,

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and this is what Etna, Anthem senteen, health Net, Wealcare,

0:04:24.440 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean all of Melina, Humana, United Health, that's right.

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>And and already we've seen you know, Humanita and United

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Health pretty much quit and has pulled back. Um And

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>you know Molina has said, for instance, that they need

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>certainty or they may pull back. Anthemis as something similar.

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:41.679
<v Speaker 1>So the health insurance are warning, look, if we don't

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>get certainty, we are not going to sell these health

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 1>insurance plans. Have they pulled back because of uncertainty or

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>because it wasn't profitable for them? More because it wasn't

0:04:50.040 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 1>profitable for them. Um. The the idea is, you know

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that if you can't make money, and this gets back

0:04:55.600 --> 0:04:57.040
<v Speaker 1>to what we were talking about with you know, getting

0:04:57.120 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>enough healthy people into the system. If you can't make

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>money on the why would you you know, play in

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>this market. What about drug pricing? The issue of whether

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Medicare can actually negotiate, whether the government can negotiate drug

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>prices has long been a point of debate. Is there

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>any anything you can tell us about that? Yeah, it's

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely a point of debate and something that that will

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>continue to be debated. Sema Verma, who's the nominee to

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:26.080
<v Speaker 1>head the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was asked

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>about this at her confirmation hearing, and she said, you know,

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the current system works pretty well. There's a

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of people that would disagree with her, and so

0:05:33.680 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's going to continue to be a

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>debate what health insurers would like to see with respected

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 1>change is made to a c A. I think one

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that health insurers really have said overall is there

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>needs to be a way to get more young and

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>healthy people into the insurance pools. So, you know, big

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>problem right now is it's mostly older and sicker people. Um,

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, they feel like, um, you know, they're they're

0:05:57.040 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 1>not tied to the old system that they'd be pretty

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.280
<v Speaker 1>open into some of the Republican replacement plans. They just

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:04.159
<v Speaker 1>want to know what are the rules that we have

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to operate under. Is there any guidance for what the

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 1>actual public exchanges will look like? Indeed, will they even

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>remain the way they are in uh, let's say online form,

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>which is where most people interact with them. You know,

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a great question. Um. I think that the Republican

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>plans will likely have some role for an online market place,

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>whether they call it an exchange or something else. It's

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:30.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, a popular way to buy you know, plane

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>tickets in hotel rooms. So so why not health insurance?

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:37.960
<v Speaker 1>From what you here are Republican and Democratic congressmen coming

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>together and discussing this or is this really being left

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to the individual parties to negotiate among themselves. I think

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>at this point that the Democrats are pretty happy to

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>leave this. Two Republicans, I mean Republicans again control both

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 1>houses of Congress, they control their presidency, so you know,

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>at this point it's something that they're having to hash out.

0:06:57.640 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 1>And um, I think they've so far not gotten Democrats

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>on board. Who is the ring leader with respect to

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the Republican negotiations? You've seen it right now coming out

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of mostly out of the House. Um, you know, so

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it has to come out of the House first, and

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>then um, move on over to the Senate. I think

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that's where the rubber may meet the road. You know,

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>there's some of the things that could pass the House

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>may not pass in the Senate where the vote margin

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.120
<v Speaker 1>is much narrower. Do we have any numbers? Do we

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>have any like how much any of this would actually cost?

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, one thing that's going to be a real

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>challenge is that cost issue. So um, Republicans will want

0:07:33.400 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>their plan to cost um to to have on the

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>cost side to cost somewhat lower than the A C A.

0:07:38.400 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>They also want to repeal a lot of the taxes,

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>potentially all of the taxes in Obamacare. That math is very,

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>very difficult, and um, we don't know how they're gonna

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>how they're gonna but I mean, is there like a

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>big number out there that we can I mean, may

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>not be accurate for what turns out to be the result,

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>but I mean, right now, is there any idea how

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>much any of this cost? Or is it sort of

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>like healthcare you don't know until actually have to go

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and pay it. Yeah, I think it's so much of

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be in the details, you know. One

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of the big questions how bigger the subsidy is going

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to be? All Right, I want to thank you very much.

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:11.239
<v Speaker 1>Zach Tracer is our healthcare reporter of for Bloomberg News.

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you're gonna be following this for quite a while.

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, thank you very much for your your insight.

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Shares of a j C Penny down about eight percent

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>right now, after the retailer says it's going to shut

0:08:34.520 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>as many as a hundred and forty stores. Here to

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>tell us more, Punom Goyal, retail analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. Punom,

0:08:43.360 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>let's begin with J C. Penny and tell us what

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.480
<v Speaker 1>are they doing in order to fix what looks like

0:08:48.520 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a very challenging experience. Sure, I think you know there's

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>very little that they can do to really fix the issue.

0:08:56.640 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Traffic is a secular issue for retail and all brick

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and mortars, So to reverse traffic and get it to

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 1>actually increase in stores is probably not something anyone can

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>turn around as quickly as they'd hope. But what they

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>can do is fix their apparel business. The apparel business

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:16.559
<v Speaker 1>is more than fifty percent of their sales, and it's struggling,

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 1>especially women's apparel, which is total business. Well, can you

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>can you zoom out a little bit? Because we've gotten

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of retail earnings this week. We've gotten l Brands,

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>We've gotten Coals, we've gotten Macy's in addition to J C. Penny,

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything that you can see that sort of

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>a unifying feature of all of the earnings that can

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>point to the state of the retail industry, sure, so

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 1>all of them across the board. Traffic is weak, but

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the number of people in the stores stores, yeah, Basically,

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.080
<v Speaker 1>people aren't going to stores anymore. They're going less and

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.960
<v Speaker 1>less and they're shopping more online. The other thing is

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that's something they can't control. But what they can control

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:02.600
<v Speaker 1>across the board is their inventory, and all of them

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>are lean on inventory, which means that they have less

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>product in store so they don't have to mark the

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>product down if sales don't meet plan, and that helps

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>their gross margins. You mentioned women's apparel. What's wrong with

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the women's apparel offering at j C Penny? You know,

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just the brands that they have. There

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 1>aren't that many national brands and women's apparel, so it

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.720
<v Speaker 1>really hinges on the private and exclusive brands that each

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:31.480
<v Speaker 1>retailer carries. The problem is not just that j C. Penny.

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Macy's has the problem too, and so does Calls. I

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>think women are just you know, shopping where they find

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the right fit, where they find the right product, and

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>they're not as loyal to where they shop, so if

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>they see things online, they're willing to go there and

0:10:44.640 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 1>try it out. Well, I'm wondering, then, does it need

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to have a real rethink of what that real estate

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that big box is all about. Because if you can't

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 1>necessarily sell the clothes and the appliances in order to

0:10:57.800 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>boost your returns, then why not use that real estate

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to invite different types of merchants to come in and

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>actually create some foot traffic. That's what we would like

0:11:08.360 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>them all to do. They're just very slow to move

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>towards that. You heard Coals talk about it a little

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>bit when they talked what are they waiting for? They

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:21.360
<v Speaker 1>waiting for a final collapse of the big box retail Uh,

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>you know location because it seems as though this has

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>been going on that you know about it, We know

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>about it, the country certainly knows about it. What's keeping

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>them from innovating lower rents so the big box retailers

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the department stores don't pay that much rent because they

0:11:37.040 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>were considered the traffic drivers when you know the mall's

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>first opened and um. Therefore, since the rents are low,

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>they're slow to innovate. UM. And that's they have long

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>term leases, so they have to work with the rates

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:56.319
<v Speaker 1>to come up with plans to add other categories or

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 1>even other retailers, or even maybe give up a floor

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of the space. Many of them owned two floors. Do

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>they really need two floors? I don't think so exactly.

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:07.079
<v Speaker 1>Why isn't there a Starbucks, let's say in every J C. Penny, Well,

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:11.600
<v Speaker 1>there's a Sephora, right, that's true. So which company of

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>these brick and mortar retailers is doing the best job?

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I think North Term is doing the best job. You

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>saw it in the results yesterday after the market closed.

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>They really, you know, kept their inventory tight to drove growth,

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>margin expansion. And while full line is still pressured, um,

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, Rack is also a little pressured. Their online sales,

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.199
<v Speaker 1>which are twenty five percent, which I think is the

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:37.079
<v Speaker 1>highest of the department store group is growing double digits. Well,

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the stocks up stocks up four percent right now. J W.

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Nord's from up at dollar eighty six cents, and they

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.440
<v Speaker 1>said that the President Trump's tweet against them had a

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>quote negligible impact on sale. So who's doing the worst

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>job in your opinion? I think L Brands right now?

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Quite frankly. I mean, they're a really good brand. But

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>when they cited their quarter was AT's say, okay, today

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>own but the February remarks that they made with victorious

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 1>secret sales down almost that's a huge miss. I think

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they really need to think about what's happening in the

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>lingerie space. They've dominated that space with elevated pricing, brand perception,

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's just been more competition there. So I think

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>they need to think about what to do next and

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>how they're going to preserve share where their price points

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>are much much higher than competition. Uh and just a

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>real quick with J. C. Penny's approach to shut up

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>to one hundred and forties stores, do you think that

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:34.959
<v Speaker 1>this will be sufficient for them? I think there will

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:37.080
<v Speaker 1>be more. I think this is the first step. They

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>have over a thousand stores that will bring them to

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a little over eight to fifty. And it's said in

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>many reports, you know, there's about four five hundred moles

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in America that you want to be in, So that's

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>still a lot more stores fun what most retailers would

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>want to be in. Yeah. It says that the closings

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>represent as much as of the company's store base, but

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>just less than five percent of total sales. It seems

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>like they're targeting the stores that have the lowest foot traffic.

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Punam Goyle, thank you so much for joining us as

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>always very informative on this peak week for retail earnings.

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>Peanter Punam Goyle, senior US retail analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence,

0:14:16.600 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>speaking to us from our headquarters in Princeton, New Jersey.

0:14:30.800 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>P and L is brought to you by Proper Cloth,

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the leader in men's custom shirts. At proper cloth dot Com.

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Ordering custom shirts has never been easier. Create your custom

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>shirt size by answering ten easy questions, select from over

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>five fabrics to suit your personal taste. Shirts start from

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>eighty five dollars and are delivered in just two weeks

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>with proper Cloths perfect fit guarantee. Remakes are completely free

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and expert staff are standing by to help. For premium quality,

0:14:57.480 --> 0:15:00.960
<v Speaker 1>perfect fitting shirts, visit proper cloth dot com um custom

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>shirts made Smarter. This is Bloomberg Market Time. PIM Fox,

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>along with Lisa Abramowits I want to bring into lou

0:15:14.480 --> 0:15:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Olo Rooney Pa. He is our White House reporter. He's

0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>at the White House for Bloomberg News to get his

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>analysis of President Donald Trump's speech today at the Conservative

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Political Action Conference that was at the Gaylord National Resort.

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And Convention Center. To Lou, is anything specific that that

0:15:33.160 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>stood out for you? I was gonna ask you about

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the Europe his comments about Europe and and Sweden and France,

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>but maybe something else stood out to you. Well. It

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>was a very long speech. She talked for about fifty minutes,

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and he talked about just about every different topic that

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>his administration has has covered in a short time. It

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>was sort of a mismatch of his his campaign speeches

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>over the last year and a half. His inauguration speech

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>he had some lines from there, and obviously the on

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>going what he calls a war with the media, which

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>he is called the enemy of the American people. He

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot of time talking about that. Right, we

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>are all fighting fake news, and he tried to distinguish

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:13.800
<v Speaker 1>fake news from all news. Uh. He also went back

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>to build the wall and uh talking about military strength.

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>To Lou, I really want to ask, has you have

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>you ever seen a president before who, right after getting

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>an office, makes no effort to reach across the aisle

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>and try to unify the different parties and and just

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of sticks to the same kind of tone that

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>they took during the campaigning. I have not and it's

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>definitely a sign that this president wants to continue to

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>rely on the base that brought him into office. He

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>believes that if he was able to get into office

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 1>using this strategy that you know, if it's not broken,

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>why why change it. So it does seem like he's

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, appealing specifically to his base and making a

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of enemies along the way, including our European partners

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>who he singled out in the speech in Germany and

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Sweden and France. Well, tlue to that point. The strategist

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>who you speak with, do they think this is going

0:17:04.800 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>to be effective? Uh, well, I think it's effective in

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>one way in terms of keeping his base, you know,

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 1>rallying behind him. But obviously we remember that the president

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>did not win the popular vote and and continues to

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>suffer from very low approval rating. So in terms of

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>being able to coalesce the Republican Party around him and

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 1>actually bring up on Democrats that he's going to need

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to get through legislation, it does not appear that it's

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.600
<v Speaker 1>going to be effective because we're not seeing very many

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.480
<v Speaker 1>people go across the aisle to say, you know, Democrats

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 1>saying that I will support President Trump. We're seeing larger

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>resistance and even some Republicans that are uh, you know,

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>going up against their own Republican members of Congress saying

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that they're not happy with the way things are going.

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:50.719
<v Speaker 1>He also mentioned the issue of NAFTA and trade agreements

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that the United States has previously signed. We know about

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the TPP Trans Pacific Partnership. It was almost a done

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:00.919
<v Speaker 1>deal that that was not going to make it to

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the to the Senate floor. Can you speak to us

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 1>about the international relationships that the United States has, because

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 1>it seems as though that has been one of the

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>sore points, at least so far, of the US administration's

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:20.360
<v Speaker 1>relations with the overseas partners. That's definitely true. The President

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>has said that he's pursuing in America first policy, and

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>that often leaves some of our international partners and allies

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>wondering whether the US is going to abandon these long

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>standing partnerships when it comes to trade. The President did

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:35.160
<v Speaker 1>pull out of the TPP deal. He's also basically said

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that he does not want to engage in multilateral deals. Um.

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.360
<v Speaker 1>He wants to engage one on one with different countries,

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and he wants to, uh, you know, take another look

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>at NAFTA, one of the long standing trade deals between

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the U S And Canada and Mexico, and a lot

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of these countries that are our allies are wondering whether

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 1>the US is going to take a more nationalist in

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>isolation isolational stance and if they do, um these countries

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:02.360
<v Speaker 1>are wondering what that means for. Was the audience at

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the Sea Pack event this time the same as it

0:19:06.080 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 1>has been in previous years. It was largely the same audience.

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>You had a number of libertarians, you have a number

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of conservatives, a lot of young people. This year, we

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>did not see as many members of Congress who attended

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:20.879
<v Speaker 1>or spoke at at this event. Uh this seems to

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>coincide with the recess portion of the congressional schedule and

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Congress members are back home and they're

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 1>facing crowds of their own with these town halls where

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:34.159
<v Speaker 1>members are facing protests. But for the most part, it

0:19:34.200 --> 0:19:36.399
<v Speaker 1>was very similar to what we've seen in the past,

0:19:36.440 --> 0:19:39.959
<v Speaker 1>but maybe a little bit more cheers and happiness at

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>the idea that there's a Republican Congress, Republican House, and

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>sent along with the Republican White House. So in other words,

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>this was the same audience that rejected President Trump last

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:54.720
<v Speaker 1>year the year before. I suppose I should say, yeah,

0:19:54.800 --> 0:19:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the President has a long history of over the last

0:19:57.680 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>five years of going to see pack and when he

0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 1>was there, he was not received with such a you know,

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>a receptive audience, in part because no one thought he

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:07.639
<v Speaker 1>was actually going to run for president. But now that

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:10.959
<v Speaker 1>he's run and he's actually won the presidency, a lot

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of people that are embracing him and they're they're sort

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of trying to merge their version of conservatism with Trump's

0:20:17.960 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 1>and uh and be a big tent party. So we'll

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 1>see how that works. Tolue another area, Dakota Access Pipeline

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.479
<v Speaker 1>and Keystone. He spoke about that, speak a little bit

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>about the energy policy and what that what the plans are. Yeah,

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the President said that, you know he uh, he basically

0:20:35.920 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>said that he's authorized construction of the Keystone and Dakota pipelines.

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 1>These are pipelines that were stopped under the Obama administration. Uh.

0:20:43.240 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>The President said that also that he wants all the

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>pipelines that are built in the US to be made

0:20:48.640 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>with US steel. We're not sure exactly how he's going

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>to go about enforcing that, but he basically said that,

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's unshackling the the the US energy market

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and allowing uh, you know, these pipelines to be built

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 1>and allowing uh, the US to access the energy that's

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>that you know, he believes it's under the ground. So

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely a market shift from what we saw under

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 1>President Obama, who took a much more environmentalist stance on

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>energy and you know, halted a number of these pipeline projects.

0:21:18.359 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>President Trump says that these are good for jobs, and

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>he does not think that the environmental regulations are as

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>important as the jobs that could be created through these

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:31.159
<v Speaker 1>different pipeline projects. Talu Alarnapa, thank you so much for

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 1>joining us. Bloomberg White House correspondent at the White House

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Busy busy man, Thank you so much for taking the time.

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:55.200
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 1>out there on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm out there

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa abramoid One. Before the podcast, you

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 1>can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio. P and

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>L is brought to you by proper Cloth, a leader

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in men's custom shirts, with proprietary smart sized technology and

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.680
<v Speaker 1>top rated customer service. Ordering a custom shirt has never

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 1>been easier. Visit proper cloth dot com to order your

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 1>first custom shirt today