Speaker 1: All right, thanks Scott Shannon, and thanks to all of
Speaker 1: you for being with us. Right down our toll free
Speaker 1: telephone number, it's eight hundred and nine four one. Sean,
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of this extravaganza. Something
Speaker 1: is small, but perhaps a bell Weather I'm not going
Speaker 1: to say definitively, it is yet a special election in
Speaker 1: Texas in their sixth congressional district. This took place on Saturday,
Speaker 1: seen as the first competitive race since Biden elected President.
Speaker 1: Bell Weather perhaps on how a district that was seen
Speaker 1: to be purple reacting to Biden's first hundred days. Now
Speaker 1: when you maybe again anecdotal, I'm not saying you should
Speaker 1: glean a whole lot from it, but I think it
Speaker 1: does say something. You know, when only what twenty three
Speaker 1: four million people watched the joint speech to Congress the
Speaker 1: other night, A Biden wasn't exactly a barn Burner either. Anyway,
Speaker 1: what's interesting in this If thinking that this particular six
Speaker 1: district in Texas was purple and the results were blowout
Speaker 1: to Democrats, you end up with the results two Republicans
Speaker 1: earning enough votes to advance a runoff. Susan Rices, Sorry,
Speaker 1: Susan Wright is the wife of the late Republican representative
Speaker 1: Bron White, followed and votes by a guy named Jake Elsie,
Speaker 1: who eked out a win over Democrat Channel and Sanchez.
Speaker 1: Sanchez conceded in a social media post. I thought there
Speaker 1: was good comments by John Fund. He spends a lot
Speaker 1: of time studying all these election results forever in perpetuity.
Speaker 1: But he said, if Biden's so popular, why this It's
Speaker 1: a good question, linking the story to the election results.
Speaker 1: Republican grabbed the two runoff seats in the Texas six
Speaker 1: special election yesterday, Democrats were shut out. Their candidates won
Speaker 1: a total of thirty six percent in the Dallas area
Speaker 1: and a seat that Donald Trump only carried by three
Speaker 1: points last November. Tammy Bruce tweeted out Democrats should prepare
Speaker 1: for a slaking in twenty twenty two. Look, I'm not
Speaker 1: willing to go there yet. We people have got to
Speaker 1: understand things have to happen before twenty twenty two. I've
Speaker 1: gone over this in great specificity and great detail on
Speaker 1: this program. Is that five, five significant things are needed
Speaker 1: if you want integrity and competence in election results. One
Speaker 1: that is not on the list is hr one or
Speaker 1: SR one, which Republicans in the Senate can stop if
Speaker 1: they unite. I like answers from Lisa Murkowski, Mitt Romney,
Speaker 1: well he got booed the other night, and the likes
Speaker 1: of Ben Sass But they now do. And there's I
Speaker 1: just have an interest as a newsperson what's going to
Speaker 1: happen out in Maricopa County, Arizona, because this they're doing
Speaker 1: a full audit of the twenty twenty election. Washing to
Speaker 1: an examine, Or pointed out that at the one week mark,
Speaker 1: the Secretary of State is the Senate audit Liaison offered
Speaker 1: an update on the process that includes two point one
Speaker 1: million ballots cast, the forensic audit of voting machines, follow
Speaker 1: up interviews with voters, etc. Etc. All Right, so I'll
Speaker 1: I'm going to be interested to watch and see what
Speaker 1: the results are. Not jumping the gun on anything, but
Speaker 1: if you want election integrity, I don't think anything on
Speaker 1: my list is extreme at all. I think it's something
Speaker 1: that you would think reasonable people, regardless of what their
Speaker 1: politics are, would want. So we ensure that that there's
Speaker 1: confidence in election results. Now they're able to fix things.
Speaker 1: After two thousand in Florida, and after two thousand and
Speaker 1: sixteen in Florida, they should be able to fix it
Speaker 1: anywhere else in the country. One and at the top
Speaker 1: of the list is you got to have voter ID.
Speaker 1: That's not that I don't think that's too much to
Speaker 1: ask for voter ID. I think if you need an
Speaker 1: ID to get a PACKUS cigarettes or a six pack,
Speaker 1: or to get into the White House, or get into
Speaker 1: the Capitol, or get into a Democratic national Convention, it
Speaker 1: seems like a reasonable request. In the five hundred thousand
Speaker 1: years that Joe represented Delaware, they've always had voter idea
Speaker 1: requirements there. He never referred to it as Jim Crow
Speaker 1: two point zero. You have more accessibility by far with
Speaker 1: the new Georgia law than you do in Delaware. So
Speaker 1: you need the second thing you would need besides voter
Speaker 1: ideas signature verification. I don't think that's too much to ask.
Speaker 1: They have a database in Georgia. That's one thing they
Speaker 1: do need to add to their current law that they
Speaker 1: just passed. The next thing chain of custody, meaning when
Speaker 1: ballots come in that they are put in an area
Speaker 1: where both Republicans and Democrats can keep their eye on
Speaker 1: it and nobody can, so you have confidence that they're
Speaker 1: not being tampered with. That seems reasonable to me, sort
Speaker 1: of like a trust but verify philosophy, so chain A.
Speaker 1: I think almost every state has a law that calls
Speaker 1: for partisan observers to be able to from both sides
Speaker 1: of the aisle to watch the vote count. Now that
Speaker 1: didn't happen in twenty twenty. That means the law was violated. Now, okay,
Speaker 1: you'd argue, well, we're in the middle of a pandemic county. Well,
Speaker 1: they should have accommodated for the unique situation of a pandemic.
Speaker 1: They could have kept social distancing rules. They could have
Speaker 1: everybody in a mask. You could have the people that
Speaker 1: are opening the ballots, you know, open it in a
Speaker 1: wide open area, and then place it on a desk,
Speaker 1: and one by one you can have the Republican observer,
Speaker 1: the Democratic observer go take a look, check it's okay,
Speaker 1: not challenge it, challenge it whatever they want to do.
Speaker 1: And then I think every year you should make sure
Speaker 1: update the voter rules, make sure that everybody's, everybody on
Speaker 1: the list is current. I don't think it's that hard
Speaker 1: to do, it's that complicated. I'm not asking for anything
Speaker 1: that benefits one side over another as one fundamental fairness confidence.
Speaker 1: The American people deserve that. So we'll see what happens.
Speaker 1: It's going to be very interesting to watch this. Now.
Speaker 1: We've been talking a lot about the financial costs of
Speaker 1: what Joe Biden is doing to the economy, and it's
Speaker 1: getting scarier by the day. Now we predicted this, what
Speaker 1: did I say would happen to gas prices and filling
Speaker 1: up the pump, you know when you need to go
Speaker 1: to the pump and philip gas tank? What did I
Speaker 1: say is going to happen to heating prices and cooling
Speaker 1: prices when you want to cool your home heat your home.
Speaker 1: Every time you have an increase in gas prices, that
Speaker 1: impacts that. You could say is even a tax on
Speaker 1: every American, But Joe says, well, Americans are not. If
Speaker 1: you make four hundred thousand dollars a year, you're not
Speaker 1: going to pay a penny in taxes. I mean, I
Speaker 1: don't have to pay those tax I don't have to
Speaker 1: pay state income tax, I don't have to pay property tax.
Speaker 1: I don't have to pay capital gains tax. It's just
Speaker 1: an outright lie. And the administration can't get it straight
Speaker 1: that it's four hundred thousand dollars per couple, so two
Speaker 1: hundred thousand dollars per individual. And that's assuming when he
Speaker 1: says you're not going to pay a penny social Security taxes,
Speaker 1: I guess we're all free from all those responsibilities, because
Speaker 1: I don't think that's happening either. So they're not being honest.
Speaker 1: But you see gas prices now going up. You're going
Speaker 1: to pay more to heat your home and cool your home.
Speaker 1: There's articles out today that the price of coffee is
Speaker 1: going up, the price of wine is going up, the
Speaker 1: price of toilet papers going up. What do you think
Speaker 1: happens when truckers have to pay more for the fuel
Speaker 1: to bring every product to market. That's gonna raise the
Speaker 1: price of products because they're not gonna eat it. They
Speaker 1: still need to get paid. They need to put food
Speaker 1: on their tables, so the price will be passed on
Speaker 1: to you, the American people. And when you put a
Speaker 1: corporate tax in place, I can promise you corporations aren't
Speaker 1: going to adjust their bottom line and just accept that
Speaker 1: the higher taxes must be paid. They're gonna increase the
Speaker 1: price of goods and services for everything that they sell
Speaker 1: and every service they provide. Procter and Gamble out of Ohio.
Speaker 1: They are behind several consumer goods said they started raising
Speaker 1: prices for its baby care, feminine care, adult and continence
Speaker 1: product categories to offset rising commodity costs. On the earnings call,
Speaker 1: General Mills and American Company over a hundred food brands,
Speaker 1: A lot of breakfast cereals. I used to love some
Speaker 1: of them. I don't need cereal anymore. Cheerios, Checks, Wheaties.
Speaker 1: They're planning to increase prices Coca Cola. They said their
Speaker 1: price is expected to rise of the company's most popular brands,
Speaker 1: including carbonated drinks like Coke and Sprite and Fanta, as
Speaker 1: well as other products like Minute Made and others. The
Speaker 1: pandemic led to a rise in online wine sells following
Speaker 1: restaurant and bar closures, and the increased demand is expected
Speaker 1: to result in higher prices for everybody. Coffee prices are up,
Speaker 1: Energy prices are up. Even the New York Times is
Speaker 1: putting out shortages and price increases. They are eliciting or
Speaker 1: being watched closely by the Biden administration, and it's not
Speaker 1: looking good. A record thirty four percent of all household
Speaker 1: income in the United States now comes from the government,
Speaker 1: a record thirty four percent. Wow, think about that for
Speaker 1: a second. Is that not redistribution? Even Warren Buffets saying that, yeah,
Speaker 1: we're going to see substantial inflation and rising prices. Okay,
Speaker 1: it's all look supply and demand, criss cross and dictate price.
Speaker 1: You don't have to be an economics major to understand. Okay,
Speaker 1: you have a certain amount of supply, you have a
Speaker 1: certain demand for in this case, let's say oil, and
Speaker 1: based on the supply, based on the demand, where that
Speaker 1: intersection takes place, that would dictate what the price of
Speaker 1: a barrel of oil is. That'll dictate what the price
Speaker 1: of a gallon of gas at the pump costs. All right, Now,
Speaker 1: the United States is going to produce less oil, less gas,
Speaker 1: less energy, which means that the market has less available product,
Speaker 1: which means that people will pay more for limited products.
Speaker 1: It's simple supply and demand. It's it's not that it's
Speaker 1: not that complicated. Even Biden's own economic advisor is out
Speaker 1: there one of the Sunday programs talking about inflation that Americans, Now,
Speaker 1: that's that's the next thing we have. Then there is
Speaker 1: a concern. There was an article in The Hill. Is
Speaker 1: the US headed towards a new housing bubble because you
Speaker 1: have home prices now, you know, literally going through the
Speaker 1: roof And guess where they're going through the roof, specifically
Speaker 1: Florida and Texas and states where people are are escaping
Speaker 1: to to get rid of and away from the confiscatory
Speaker 1: high taxes of states like New York and New Joysey
Speaker 1: and Pennsylvania and Michigan and California. By the way, we're
Speaker 1: going out to California. We're gonna interview Caitlin Jenner this week,
Speaker 1: who is and I had an opportunity to speak with her.
Speaker 1: She is serious about this run this and this is
Speaker 1: gonna get very There'll be a very interesting interview. I'll
Speaker 1: tell you that. The next best part of it is
Speaker 1: I get to go to in an outburger. Linda, I'm
Speaker 1: sure you'll be joining us, correct joining you in an outburger? Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: I don't think so. You won't get one product from they.
Speaker 1: Actually you have the real potatoes there. They change the
Speaker 1: oil every day. How do you know you do not experience?
Speaker 1: You know, they change the oil every day because that's
Speaker 1: what their policy is. Where does it say that. I
Speaker 1: don't know where it says. Let me see the policy.
Speaker 1: I don't believe it. I don't believe anything. What if
Speaker 1: we let you go in the back and examine the oil.
Speaker 1: I would like to do a phenomenal I wish I
Speaker 1: could save him and bring him home to pour deprived
Speaker 1: little Liam. That you've never given a happy meal too.
Speaker 1: First of all, Liam has plenty of French fries. He's
Speaker 1: not the product I know air fried French fries, not
Speaker 1: the good ones. Yeah, listen, if you never I make
Speaker 1: my own French fries in my Masterbilt Turkey friar. How
Speaker 1: do you like that? Oh that's disgusting in peanut oil.
Speaker 1: I bet you don't change your oil either. I do. No.
Speaker 1: I actually seem very good at change in the oil.
Speaker 1: Oh okay, well, I'm gonna put a hit in camera
Speaker 1: in your masterbar. I don't believe whiles Now I look
Speaker 1: under the hood of a car, and I can't fix
Speaker 1: anything anyway. Eight hundred nine four one. No. By the way,
Speaker 1: Biden is quietly preparing for food stamp increases, by the way,
Speaker 1: without any congressional approval. Boy, how did I grow up
Speaker 1: believing that we had coequal branches of government. Joe is
Speaker 1: teaching me just the opposite, that he now gets to
Speaker 1: rule everything by executive fiat and a stroke of a pen.
Speaker 1: Eight hundred nine, San, Why did I believe my entire
Speaker 1: life that we have three co equal branches of government?
Speaker 1: You have a legislative branch, a judicial branch, and a
Speaker 1: coequal branch known as the executive branch. Because I'm reading
Speaker 1: today and that the Biden administration is quietly laying the
Speaker 1: groundwork for a long term increase in food for tens
Speaker 1: of millions of Americans without going through the ordeal of
Speaker 1: a fight with congressional Republicans. Now they're trying to use
Speaker 1: an obscure Department of Agriculture shopping list used to determine
Speaker 1: foodstamp benefits, known as the market basket, and then try
Speaker 1: to figure out a way to increase dramatically the dependency
Speaker 1: on government with no input from anybody. By the way,
Speaker 1: Biden's hitting the road this week to drum up support
Speaker 1: for his massive spending bills, which will then total six trillion,
Speaker 1: And we're just getting started with a down payment. You know,
Speaker 1: at some point math comes into play here, and you
Speaker 1: can't afford it. And you don't get to call childcare
Speaker 1: infrastructure words have meetings. You don't get to say that
Speaker 1: pre K daycare, guaranteed job housing, whatever it is, his infrastructure.
Speaker 1: Because that's what they're now saying. They need to just
Speaker 1: be honest with we, the American people. Why don't you
Speaker 1: just be honest and lay it out for the American people,
Speaker 1: make your case to them, and let the Congress decide
Speaker 1: and run the math and give us numbers. For Joe
Speaker 1: Biden to go out there and say that people making
Speaker 1: over four hundred thousand dollars a year will not pay
Speaker 1: a single cent. That's just not true. And why he
Speaker 1: gets well, remember they got rid of the fact checking
Speaker 1: section of the Washington Post because why Donald Trump's out?
Speaker 1: Why would we fact check a Democrat? We agree with
Speaker 1: their lies. We probably we are their propaganda wing. We
Speaker 1: support their lie. All right, we'll get to all of that.
Speaker 1: We got a lot of news on COVID that we
Speaker 1: will get into questions that need to be asked nobody
Speaker 1: else will scary developments with Iran and much more. All right,
Speaker 1: twenty five to the top of the hour. So we'll
Speaker 1: be out in California on Wednesday for the show. We're
Speaker 1: gonna interview Caitlin Jenner. We do have a little bit
Speaker 1: funny backstory because I had interviewed her many times before,
Speaker 1: and anyway, this this she went on Good not Good
Speaker 1: Morning to Mary. She went on Diane Sawyer and tells
Speaker 1: the whole story, which everybody knows about. And anyway, I
Speaker 1: was talking about it on the radio program and she
Speaker 1: was listening. She calls me. It's a funny call. She goes, Hannity,
Speaker 1: You're not gonna believe this. I go on. He goes,
Speaker 1: you know what. The biggest shock with all of this
Speaker 1: to Diane Sawyer was, I said, what when I said
Speaker 1: I was a Republican and a conservative? I just like,
Speaker 1: you can't make that up? That Okay? I thought that
Speaker 1: was pretty funny. Anyway, that'll be later this week. That
Speaker 1: means it's in and out Burger week. Which one will
Speaker 1: I go to eight hundred nine one, Sean, if you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program, I like, um,
Speaker 1: let me get to the Giuliani question. He's gonna be
Speaker 1: on Hannity tonight, America's mayor. We all know what's been
Speaker 1: happening with him. And then now we have three of
Speaker 1: your most prestigious brands the media mob ending up with
Speaker 1: a go all over their face this weekend. Major hippiece
Speaker 1: that they were all publishing on Rudy turns out to
Speaker 1: be a total and complete fabrication, and just like dozens
Speaker 1: of other fake news stories. Joe Contra picked up on it,
Speaker 1: writing for The Hell, The New York Times, Washington Post,
Speaker 1: NBC had to walk back they were reporting that the
Speaker 1: FBI's communication with President Trump's personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani regarding Russia.
Speaker 1: Washington Post was the first to report on Thursday that
Speaker 1: Juliani was warned that he was the target of a
Speaker 1: Russian influenced campaign last year. The news paper, citing people
Speaker 1: familiar with the matter, others quote were apparently were given
Speaker 1: a similar warning. Then the Post had to issue their
Speaker 1: correction on Saturday, saying it had removed assertions that Juliani
Speaker 1: and other places had received such warnings. As a spokesperson
Speaker 1: for the Post had no additional comment when people have
Speaker 1: reached out to them. The New York Times similarly reported
Speaker 1: on the FBI's contact with Julianni. They all have the
Speaker 1: same source themselves. You know, if you ever when I
Speaker 1: used to follow Twitter, which now seems like four centuries ago.
Speaker 1: It just amazed me, like this, this little media bubble
Speaker 1: of blue check media mob people and if you retweet
Speaker 1: my story, I'll retweet your story and we're all good,
Speaker 1: and the American people and Trump supporters are all evil.
Speaker 1: That's pretty much the narrative. And then tera can you
Speaker 1: believe that Donald Trump did this? Can you believe that
Speaker 1: Donald Trump did that? I'm like, oh, okay, pretty unbelievable.
Speaker 1: What are they going to retract their lies about Russia
Speaker 1: and Trump and collusion. Now this gets even more interesting
Speaker 1: because we now have the Epic Times reporting that former
Speaker 1: New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani was surveiled by the FBI.
Speaker 1: Remember Rudy said this and we'll get into this in
Speaker 1: more detail with him in our interview tonight, in fact,
Speaker 1: that they had surveiled his iCloud and his conversations. Remember
Speaker 1: his client at the time was Donald J. Trump, the
Speaker 1: President of the United States. This was apparently being monitored
Speaker 1: during impeachment hearings, and in a week and Giuliani was
Speaker 1: home was searched by federal agents and his attorney, Robert Costello,
Speaker 1: was told by apparently some of the US attorneys that
Speaker 1: that in fact went into his house took his electronic devices,
Speaker 1: interestingly not wanting Hunter Biden's laptop and just taking his
Speaker 1: word for it and going from there. Now, if you
Speaker 1: remember mine, remember what I recall is that Rudy, like
Speaker 1: me and the few others that didn't buy this. Oh no,
Speaker 1: no incredible person thinks anything happened wrong. And that's Joe
Speaker 1: Biden saying, telling the story unce a little foreign relations.
Speaker 1: I believe it's where he was that. You know. I
Speaker 1: said to them, you're not getting the billion dollars you got.
Speaker 1: You got six hours. I'm leaving in six hours. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you're not getting the billion dollars unless you we're not
Speaker 1: going to give you the billion dollars. They said, you
Speaker 1: have no authority, you're not the president, the president said,
Speaker 1: I said, calling him, I said, I'm telling you're not
Speaker 1: getting the billion dollars. I said, you're not getting a billion.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be leaving here. And I think it was
Speaker 1: what six hours. I look, I said, leaving in six hours.
Speaker 1: If the prosecutors not fired, you're not getting the money.
Speaker 1: All son of him got fired. The prosecutors not fired.
Speaker 1: Why would the vice President of the United States of
Speaker 1: America leverage money that's not his appropriated by the administration.
Speaker 1: All money is approved by Congress. Why would they? Why
Speaker 1: would they? Why would he take it upon himself to say,
Speaker 1: you're not getting it unless you fire a Ukrainian prosecutor.
Speaker 1: Why would he Erican vice president give a rip about
Speaker 1: a Ukrainian prosecutor. Well, it turns out that that was
Speaker 1: the prosecutor investigating his zero experience son. Hunter. It's not
Speaker 1: like he's a kid. He's fifty years old and zero experience.
Speaker 1: Hunter had no experience in oil, gas, energy or Ukraine.
Speaker 1: How do we know? Because he did probably the dumbest
Speaker 1: interview I think I've ever heard. Listen, we have that
Speaker 1: all right, Well, anyway, we have it there somewhere. We'll
Speaker 1: get to a second. But he had no experience. Well,
Speaker 1: why do you think you got the gig? I don't know.
Speaker 1: Could it be because your father's in charge of Ukrainian policy.
Speaker 1: In the list you gave me of the reasons why
Speaker 1: you're on that board, you did not list the fact
Speaker 1: that you were the son of the of course, Yeah,
Speaker 1: what role do you think that played? I think that
Speaker 1: it is impossible for me to be on any of
Speaker 1: the boards that I just mentioned without saying that I'm
Speaker 1: the son of the Vice Press in the United States.
Speaker 1: You were paid fifty thousand dollars a month for your position. Look,
Speaker 1: I'm a private citizen. One thing that I don't have
Speaker 1: to do is sit here and open my kimono as
Speaker 1: it relates to how much money I make or make
Speaker 1: or did or didn't. But it's all been reported. If
Speaker 1: your last name wasn't Biden, do you think he would
Speaker 1: have been asked to be on the board of Barisma.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't know, probably not. I don't
Speaker 1: think that there's a lot of things that would have
Speaker 1: happened in my life that if my last name wasn't Biden.
Speaker 1: So no experience, but a billion five deal with the
Speaker 1: Bank of China. Then we got the first Lady of Moscow,
Speaker 1: a Russian oligarch, Russian oligarch of all things, and the
Speaker 1: money wired transfers to his company. With that, then the
Speaker 1: Kazakh oligarch, Ukrainian oligarchs, and so the context is is
Speaker 1: that my understanding of Rudy's work at the time was
Speaker 1: and he was very public about it. We interviewed him,
Speaker 1: my belief at the time was that he was looking
Speaker 1: into that. Now they're saying that this is some type
Speaker 1: of farah, which is a law violation. Well, does that
Speaker 1: law apply to Hunter Biden? Did he file all the paperwork?
Speaker 1: That's a question I'd like to have answered. Alan Dershowitz
Speaker 1: has asked about this this weekend, and Nohole Bart hardly
Speaker 1: a conservative Harvard law professor. He said, in Banana republics,
Speaker 1: in like Castro's, Cuba and many parts of the world,
Speaker 1: when a candidate loses for president, they go after the candidate.
Speaker 1: They go after his lawyers, they go after his friends.
Speaker 1: That's happening in America. Now they're going after Rudy Giuliani. Now, Dershowitz,
Speaker 1: you know, has taken a lot of heat because he's
Speaker 1: not a conservative Republican. He happens to be a more
Speaker 1: progressive Democrat. And he said, a search warrant on a
Speaker 1: lawyer or a doctor or a priest, he said, you
Speaker 1: don't use search warrants. You don't use search warrants when
Speaker 1: people have privileged information on their self and in their computers.
Speaker 1: You use what's called a subpoena. And the difference between
Speaker 1: a subpoena and a search warrant is night and day,
Speaker 1: and it's not constitutional. So it's going to be interesting
Speaker 1: to watch all of this unfold. It's a little bit scary.
Speaker 1: I am very concerned, and I said this last week.
Speaker 1: You know, reports out this weekend that John Durham is
Speaker 1: not nobody's gonna be held accountable. Spector General Harrowitz reports
Speaker 1: with numerous referrals for the same exact charges brought against say,
Speaker 1: for example, Papadopoulos or Roger Stone or Paul Manafort process crimes.
Speaker 1: Except in the case of your you know, Donald Trump's supporter,
Speaker 1: it's a pre dawn raid, you know, guns, a blaring
Speaker 1: CNN cameras in the case of Stone rolling, you know,
Speaker 1: for lying to Congress. That's not how things usually it done.
Speaker 1: They usually the prosecutor's office will say, all right, can
Speaker 1: you call You can tell your clienting needs to be
Speaker 1: at this location at this time, be on time, and
Speaker 1: then they will surrender, especially for a process crime, not
Speaker 1: being a threat to others in society. Well, that's a
Speaker 1: dual justice system. That's not equal justice under the law.
Speaker 1: That's what we call a dual justice system. That's not
Speaker 1: healthy in America. Just like you know, bypassing that other
Speaker 1: branch of government, the legislative branch, just like HR one,
Speaker 1: no voter ID for anything. Everybody's registered, no signature verification whatsoever.
Speaker 1: Good luck trying to buy a packet of cigarettes under
Speaker 1: those circumstances. That will never have it. You'll never be
Speaker 1: able to get a pack. You'd be illegal, I'm sure
Speaker 1: that they would. If you're a Conservative, then they'd probably
Speaker 1: prosecute you to the fullest extent of the law. And
Speaker 1: that's what's happening, I mean, very very troubling times. Vaxine waters.
Speaker 1: Every day we have seen this nation get more racist now.
Speaker 1: I think a lot of this now is going back
Speaker 1: to what has happened after Tim Scott gave the response
Speaker 1: to Biden's speech last week, and those attacks now are
Speaker 1: backfiring on the Democratic Party, even especially in the state
Speaker 1: of Texas. You have a Texas Democrat is now facing
Speaker 1: serious backlash after referring to Republican South Carolina Senator Tim
Speaker 1: Scott as an oreo. Guy's name's Garry O'Connor, chairs the
Speaker 1: Lamar County Democratic Party. His comments were posted on Facebook
Speaker 1: his account last week after Senator Scott delivered the Republican
Speaker 1: response to President Biden's addressed to Congress. By the way,
Speaker 1: it's a very hard act to follow a State of
Speaker 1: the Union address, if you think back in years past,
Speaker 1: it's not a good position to be put in because
Speaker 1: you have all the pomp and you know, the majesty
Speaker 1: of the office of the President in two Houses of
Speaker 1: Congress and a joint session and a lot of noise
Speaker 1: and a lot of standing and a lot of clapping.
Speaker 1: It's a hard act to follow. And by far, Senator Scott,
Speaker 1: you know, it was his night, wasn't Joe's night anyway.
Speaker 1: I had hoped that Scott might chose some common sense.
Speaker 1: He seems he's clear he's nothing more than an oreo
Speaker 1: with no real principles. Where's the wokeness application of the
Speaker 1: left to attacking an African American who just happens to
Speaker 1: have a different political point of view, because that's all
Speaker 1: this comes down to a different political philosophy. And how
Speaker 1: is it Uncle Tim talking about Tim Scott trends for
Speaker 1: twelve straight hours before at Jack at Twitter deems it
Speaker 1: something that needs to be stopped. How does that happen?
Speaker 1: I'd like to know. It's unbelievable. And by the way,
Speaker 1: Josh Hawley slam Twitter rightly so for this whole thing.
Speaker 1: He said, it's a glaring double standard. Uncle Tim trended
Speaker 1: for twelve hours, so sad it's so offensive, and Maxie
Speaker 1: waters every day we have seen those nations get more racists.
Speaker 1: One thing that it was a very interesting development after
Speaker 1: all this was unfolding last week, is to hear Joe
Speaker 1: Biden and Kamala Harris both agree with Senator Tim Scott
Speaker 1: that America is not a racist country. Now all three
Speaker 1: of them have rightly said. There are racist people. There
Speaker 1: are ignorant people. There are evil people in life. There
Speaker 1: are very dangerous people. There are people, it's not the
Speaker 1: overwhelming majority of anybody. I actually think most Americans of
Speaker 1: all races, creeds, callers, backgrounds, are good people. But there
Speaker 1: are some bad people. There's some people that will will
Speaker 1: kill you in the blink of an eye and won't
Speaker 1: think twice about it. There are people that will sell
Speaker 1: drugs and be killing other people as long as they
Speaker 1: have their money. They don't care. They're not going to
Speaker 1: lose any sleep over it. Violent gangs, they don't seem
Speaker 1: to have much of a conscience. Bothered by what it
Speaker 1: is that they do sad and that's why you need
Speaker 1: the police. That's why you know who you're going to
Speaker 1: call with all this defunding going on, because that's not
Speaker 1: working out well. There's a New York Post article out
Speaker 1: today says Minneapolis is becoming murder Apolis again, and that's
Speaker 1: true in every state where they've been part of this
Speaker 1: defunding effort. It's not working out well for the people. California,
Speaker 1: where I'm headed, is releasing violent felons early, apparently on
Speaker 1: Saturday morning with little notice. Yeah, they're increasing the early
Speaker 1: release credits for seventy six thousand inmates, including violent and
Speaker 1: repeat felons, as they try to trim the population for
Speaker 1: what was once the largest state correctional system in the country.
Speaker 1: More than sixty three thousand inmates convicted of violent crimes
Speaker 1: will be eligible for good behavior credits that shorten their
Speaker 1: sentences by one third instead of the one fifth that
Speaker 1: had been in place since twenty seventeen. How do you
Speaker 1: think that's going to work out when you couple it
Speaker 1: with defunding the police or in some cases, dismantling the police.
Speaker 1: That's how far you're going all of this? All? Right?
Speaker 1: Eight hundred and nine for one, Shaun is our number.
Speaker 1: The border crisis is getting worse and Joe Biden is
Speaker 1: denying the truth of it. Now, the lawsuit started by
Speaker 1: the Arizona Attorney General is now picking up steam and
Speaker 1: getting support from other attorneys general around the country. And
Speaker 1: Mark Bernovitch will join us with an update when we
Speaker 1: get back an hour two Sean Hannity Show. Thanks for
Speaker 1: being with us. Eight hundred and nine four one Seawn
Speaker 1: is our number. You want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program I mentioned earlier. All prices are heading north.
Speaker 1: Prices a coffee and wine and toilet paper. Yeah. When
Speaker 1: the price of fuel goes up, everything goes up. When
Speaker 1: you tax corporations, yeah, they usually charge more. None of
Speaker 1: that should surprise anybody. Now add to that, you know
Speaker 1: all of this, this massive crisis and unmitigated, unprecedented Biden
Speaker 1: created crisis at the border. Maybe we shouldn't be thinking
Speaker 1: about money. We also have pandemic issues to worry about.
Speaker 1: With the high rate of COVID positivity at the border.
Speaker 1: If each of the thirty four thousand plus unaccompanied miners,
Speaker 1: now we're just talking about the miners who've arrived since
Speaker 1: January attends a public school next year. Well, that will
Speaker 1: cost the American taxpayers five hundred million dollars. Biden eliminated
Speaker 1: the stay in Mexico policy. He canceled now officially as
Speaker 1: of this weekend, the military funded construction of the of
Speaker 1: the border wall. Central Intelligence Agency is mocked over a
Speaker 1: recruitment as that they have, which is a separate issue.
Speaker 1: Apart from all of this, you had four killed, two
Speaker 1: dozen hospitalized after a boat overturned off San Diego during
Speaker 1: a smuggling operations suspected that took place there. And none
Speaker 1: of this is going to get better because they keep
Speaker 1: doubling down on open borders and they keep you know,
Speaker 1: for example, there's now a new driver's license for undocumented
Speaker 1: immigrants taking effect in the state of New Jersey. In
Speaker 1: other words, they'll accept applications for drivers license from people
Speaker 1: without that are in the country illegally without any federal
Speaker 1: immigration status at all. You're going to get a New
Speaker 1: Jersey driver's license. I guess you can register to vote
Speaker 1: at that point too, whether you're a citizen or not.
Speaker 1: You have all of these There's a report on Bright
Speaker 1: Party illegal alien sex offenders that are actually being freed
Speaker 1: into the US thanks to Joe Biden's Sanctuary country orders,
Speaker 1: and in February, Biden's Department of Homeland Security issue orders
Speaker 1: preventing ICE agents from arresting and deporting illegal aliens unless
Speaker 1: they're terrorists, known gang members, and recently convicted of aggravated felony.
Speaker 1: An analysis of the orders revealed that they're likely to
Speaker 1: prevent about nine and ten deportations. Those are people convicted
Speaker 1: of crimes when they already committed the crime of entering
Speaker 1: the country illegally. Now even some Democrats are getting concerned.
Speaker 1: The two Senators Kelly and Cinema out in Arizona seem
Speaker 1: very concerned how this is going to a impact them politically.
Speaker 1: And we also have others as well. Mark, Why is
Speaker 1: Mark Kelly? Why is Christen Cinema saying this for political reasons?
Speaker 1: Now Joe Biden is out there saying he still won't
Speaker 1: say that this is a crisis at the border. He's
Speaker 1: claiming we now have control. My sources on the ground
Speaker 1: say just the opposite is true. And then he tells
Speaker 1: protesters at this rally, I think this was in Georgia.
Speaker 1: Just give me another five days. Are you're gonna fix it?
Speaker 1: In five days, Joe. Here's what he said, folks, George
Speaker 1: Georgia was a hundred days ago today when I was
Speaker 1: inaugurated on the steps of the United States Capitol to
Speaker 1: be your president, and I was looking forward to coming
Speaker 1: back and seeing these guys. I agree with you. I'm
Speaker 1: working on a man, give me another five days. Immigrations
Speaker 1: was knocked. One of the crises that demanded urgent action
Speaker 1: in January. Does it demand urgent action now? Is what's
Speaker 1: happening at the southern border? Is it a crisis? It
Speaker 1: is getting urgent action now. For example, a month ago,
Speaker 1: we had thousands of the young kids in custody in
Speaker 1: places they shouldn't be controlled by the border patrol. We
Speaker 1: have now cut that down dramatically. Hey, look, here's what happened,
Speaker 1: the failure to have a real transition. The two departments
Speaker 1: that didn't you give us access to virtually anything were
Speaker 1: the Immigration and the Defense Department. So we didn't find
Speaker 1: out they had fired a whole lot of people, that
Speaker 1: they were understaffed considerably. In April, Aloneness a president, one
Speaker 1: hundred and seventy thousand people migrants appringed at the border.
Speaker 1: It's a twenty year record. They're twenty two thousand unaccompanied
Speaker 1: children in our country right now, that's a record that
Speaker 1: sells to most folks like a crisis. Well, look it's
Speaker 1: way down now. We've now gotten control. There's no control,
Speaker 1: and the cages that he built for kids that are
Speaker 1: living on top of each other in the middle of
Speaker 1: a pandemic continue to exist now. A coalition of Republican
Speaker 1: states led by Arizona, they're now trying to get the
Speaker 1: Supreme Court to intervene in the legal battle over a
Speaker 1: Trump era policy that restricted immigrants who are deemed reliant
Speaker 1: on welfare from receiving green cards. I think there ought
Speaker 1: to be I believe number one in merit based immigration.
Speaker 1: I also want to stay in Mexico. Policy back catching
Speaker 1: release is a disaster. They're not even catching, they're just releasing.
Speaker 1: At this particular point, stopping border wall construction is a
Speaker 1: bad idea. But the public charge rule is introduced in
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen, expanded the definition of public charge as an
Speaker 1: immigrant who receives one or more designated public benefits for
Speaker 1: more than twelve months within a thirty six month period
Speaker 1: of the What should the criteria be to come into
Speaker 1: this country? Well, I think a health check in light
Speaker 1: of a pandemic is a fair assessment that you should
Speaker 1: make if you're going to allow somebody into the country. One.
Speaker 1: Number two, I think a background check so you can
Speaker 1: see if people have radical ties and associations. That would
Speaker 1: be a pretty good idea. And number three for the
Speaker 1: highly coveted openings we have in the country, because we
Speaker 1: can't absorb the world's population, and if we opened our borders,
Speaker 1: which we're doing, that's what's going to happen. I think
Speaker 1: you have to show that you have the ability and
Speaker 1: means to care for yourself financially and won't be a
Speaker 1: burden on the American people. The Attorney General of the
Speaker 1: Great State of Arizona is here to update us on
Speaker 1: where this court case is headed and what the real
Speaker 1: situation at the border is. You're there every day, tell us.
Speaker 1: Thank you Sean for having me on. And the bottom
Speaker 1: line is the Biden administration rescinded essentially the public charge rule,
Speaker 1: and there was a keypending for the Supreme Court. There
Speaker 1: was cases throughout the country. There was a process that
Speaker 1: was put in place, and basically that rule, as you said,
Speaker 1: basically means that if you come here, you know, you
Speaker 1: have to be able to support yourself and you're not
Speaker 1: going to become dependent on government benefits. And so this
Speaker 1: if we fail to enforce this rule. It has existed
Speaker 1: in some form for more than a hundred years, and basically,
Speaker 1: if we don't enforce it, our emergency insistent programs will
Speaker 1: be overwhelmed when Americans need them most. So Sean basically
Speaker 1: what the Biden administration is saying that it's okay, you
Speaker 1: can break the law, you can come illegally across the border.
Speaker 1: There's not gonna be any criminal penalties, and now we're
Speaker 1: gonna go ahead and give you free government benefits. We'll
Speaker 1: put you up in a hotel, We'll make sure that
Speaker 1: your kids get all the counseling and babysitting they need.
Speaker 1: And even though American, the American people, the hardworking taxpayers
Speaker 1: don't always have access to these benefits, they're essentially giving
Speaker 1: free healthcare, free housing, free childcare for people that literally
Speaker 1: cross the border legal a week ago. So it's not
Speaker 1: only a ciscal issue. I think it's a moral responsibility
Speaker 1: issue in the sense that I just don't think it's fair.
Speaker 1: We've got homeless veterans here, we got families struggling after pandemic,
Speaker 1: and Joe Biden and Kamala Harris care more about people
Speaker 1: in Central America than they do about hardworking American taxpayers.
Speaker 1: What are they talk to you about? How many millions
Speaker 1: of dollars are they gonna send, for example, to Central
Speaker 1: America as a means of, I guess, financially bribing these
Speaker 1: countries not to allow migrants to enter the USA illegally.
Speaker 1: I'm telling it. Sorry, sir, I'm telling you. It is
Speaker 1: so depressing and it makes me so angry. In all
Speaker 1: Americas should be concerned about this. Literally, they're gonna send
Speaker 1: three hundred and ten million dollars to three Central American countries.
Speaker 1: So that's like just we can go out and start
Speaker 1: a giant bonfire. I know DC likes to waste a
Speaker 1: lot of money, and they don't understand that we pay
Speaker 1: our taxes for that. So your tax dollars, my tax dollars,
Speaker 1: anyone that works in this country, your money. Three hundred
Speaker 1: and ten millions going to Central America. Ice just signed
Speaker 1: a contract for eighty six million dollars to house people
Speaker 1: here in the country that just came across the border.
Speaker 1: Millions of dollars is being spent on healthcare. So literally
Speaker 1: you're talking about just in the last few weeks a
Speaker 1: half a billion dollars that's not going to American hard
Speaker 1: work and taxpayers, but it's literally being funnel the Central
Speaker 1: Americans and people that cross the border illegally. So why
Speaker 1: is it that if you are found guilty of a
Speaker 1: crime and you enter the country illegally, even if you
Speaker 1: spend time in jail and even in some cases violent crimes,
Speaker 1: how is it that states can get away with their
Speaker 1: sanctuary state status or the sanctuary city status. And my
Speaker 1: understanding of the law. You're the attorney general of Arizona.
Speaker 1: You can illuminate us all here and tell us my
Speaker 1: understanding is the law requires that the states at such
Speaker 1: time hand illegal immigrants over to Ice for deportation, but
Speaker 1: that rarely, if ever, now happens. Sean, You're absolutely right again,
Speaker 1: And this is what, once again is so heartbreaking and
Speaker 1: it makes you wonder what is going on in Washington,
Speaker 1: DC and what Biden and Harris are doing. Because literally,
Speaker 1: as a result of our lawsuit, we're the first state
Speaker 1: now because we sued Biden over the failure to execute
Speaker 1: the deportations that are required under Title AID to the
Speaker 1: US Code. So we have an ongoing lawsuit. We received
Speaker 1: discovery in that case and a bunch of stuff was redacted,
Speaker 1: but literally during the process of reviewing those documents. Last week,
Speaker 1: the executive director or associate executive director of ICE said
Speaker 1: their new policy will result in a fifty percent decrease
Speaker 1: in individuals and ICE custody. So that means people are
Speaker 1: not being deported. They know they're not going to be deported.
Speaker 1: And if you look at the data shown the type
Speaker 1: of people that aren't being deported, we are talking about
Speaker 1: literally murderers, rapists, people that have been charged with kidnapping.
Speaker 1: According to our state Department of Corrections officials, people are
Speaker 1: being released for prison from committing crimes and ICE refuses
Speaker 1: to pick them up. I have talked to other federal officials.
Speaker 1: People in short term federal custody. They call ICE to
Speaker 1: come get them for deportation. They're refusing to do so.
Speaker 1: So this is once again we talk about this is
Speaker 1: immoral and it's dangerous as hell because what's going to happen.
Speaker 1: And I was a prosecutor, as a game prosecutor, federal prosecutor.
Speaker 1: When you release the felons. When you release murders, rapists,
Speaker 1: and people that are guilty of crimes at kidnapping, they're
Speaker 1: going to come forward crimes and this is going to
Speaker 1: affect everyone in this country. We know, we talked about
Speaker 1: this before that the fetinel seizures are up two hundred
Speaker 1: thirty three percent last month. The cartels are making tons
Speaker 1: of money, and now you literally breaks my heart to
Speaker 1: think you literally have felons and people charge the serious
Speaker 1: crimes being released into our communities with no supervision. I mean,
Speaker 1: is it is to me? At some point, Sean someone,
Speaker 1: you know, someone needs to start asking the question what
Speaker 1: did the buying administration know and what did they know it?
Speaker 1: Because if this was any other countries or people from
Speaker 1: other than Mexico or Central America coming in, people would say,
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, two million people coming across the border
Speaker 1: in one year, all these benefits. People in the church
Speaker 1: watch this being apprehended, they would say, my goodness, this
Speaker 1: is a national security threat, which what it is. Let
Speaker 1: me ask you about the politics out there, because we
Speaker 1: have an election in Arizona for Senate next year, and
Speaker 1: I noticed that one of the most liberal senators in
Speaker 1: Washington are reliable Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, left wing senator
Speaker 1: by the name of Mark Kelly, all of a sudden
Speaker 1: after Biden's speech, said yeah, no, he needs to talk
Speaker 1: more about the crisis at the border. Why do I
Speaker 1: think that's lip service? Because Senator Kelly knows pretty darn
Speaker 1: well that the people of Arizona know more than say
Speaker 1: other states, being a border state, of what the reality
Speaker 1: is in terms of Biden's bad policies on the border.
Speaker 1: And why do I believe it's just pure politics on
Speaker 1: his part? Sean, This shouldn't be an issue of Republican
Speaker 1: verse Democrat, or right versus left. It's a fundamental issue
Speaker 1: of right versus wrong, and inforth, what the point is.
Speaker 1: I think he's been pushed into this position because he
Speaker 1: sees politically he's going to hurt him. Well, I agree,
Speaker 1: but you judge a person now by what they say
Speaker 1: about what they do. Mark Kelly has spent three months
Speaker 1: doing absolutely nothing. When Joe biden Is first day in office,
Speaker 1: stopped building the wall, when he rolled back to remain
Speaker 1: in Mexico policy, when he rescinded the deportation orders. You
Speaker 1: know our office, I filed three lawsuits for ment of
Speaker 1: those actions, he did nothing. It wasn't until two months
Speaker 1: into this crisis he finally did something. Order patrol agents
Speaker 1: are underfunded, they're demoralized. He has done nothing, and so
Speaker 1: now he issues a statement. So you know, people can
Speaker 1: talk about stuff, but you need to walk the walk.
Speaker 1: And if I mean I know that, if you know
Speaker 1: Biden was my you know, the president of what party Island,
Speaker 1: I'd be in there right now saying why the hell
Speaker 1: aren't you at the border? I mean, Kamala Harris can
Speaker 1: weigh in on Governor Nussen's recall, so she can wigh
Speaker 1: on recalls, but you can't call me like, why is
Speaker 1: why isn't this administration working with Arizona officials like me,
Speaker 1: Arizona law enforcement, the sheriff's, the ags on the border.
Speaker 1: It's because they don't care about this issue. And so
Speaker 1: if they have they even bothered to call you, they
Speaker 1: have they been talking to anybody there that you know
Speaker 1: that's on the front lines. Absolutely not, And that's what's
Speaker 1: so dood moralizing me. They've got time to go do
Speaker 1: tree projects in Mexico, Kamala Harris does, They've got time
Speaker 1: to send all this moving to Central America they've got
Speaker 1: time to stop off a pastry shops or you know whatever,
Speaker 1: get involved in the California recall. But they can't call
Speaker 1: any law enforce and official here or me to discuss
Speaker 1: the issue. As you know, I've invited Vice President Harris
Speaker 1: to come talk to us, to come to the border
Speaker 1: to see what's going on, and they refuse to do so.
Speaker 1: And the bottom line is this, did they even get
Speaker 1: back to you? No, they didn't, And it's shown. It's
Speaker 1: like with my kids. I tell them, if you ignore
Speaker 1: a problem, it doesn't mean it's going away. The adult
Speaker 1: thing to do is to address the problem, and they're
Speaker 1: refusing to do so, and they are creating chaos and
Speaker 1: they're endangering the American public. All right, we appreciate all
Speaker 1: your work. We'll keep everybody updated on it. Thank you.
Speaker 1: Attorney General Mark Bernovitch's with us from Arizona. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine four one, Sean told free telephone number. You want
Speaker 1: to be a part of the program, quick break right
Speaker 1: back your calls on the other side, straight ahead, all right,
Speaker 1: twenty five to the top of the hour, eight hundred
Speaker 1: and nine four and Sean, if you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of this extravaganza. What we're learning a lot
Speaker 1: as we now sort of sort our way through COVID
Speaker 1: the pandemic. And you know, we've learned a lot what worked,
Speaker 1: what didn't work. We've learned how wrong scientists can be,
Speaker 1: and the experts can be, and the great doctor Fauci
Speaker 1: can be. And you know, we're also learning something else.
Speaker 1: Now we have discussed some states, like Florida, their schools
Speaker 1: have been open for in person learning since August. Now
Speaker 1: I think by now this being made the next year,
Speaker 1: we would have known had that been a big problem. Well,
Speaker 1: the New York Post on Saturday did an investigative piece
Speaker 1: that the Biden CDC actually change their own guidance on
Speaker 1: school reopenings after getting pressured from the teachers unions. I've
Speaker 1: called this from many years on this program an unhold
Speaker 1: alliance with teachers unions and the Democratic Party. Now they
Speaker 1: have contributed, you know, gazillions of dollars to Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: presidential campaign, and they always donate a fortune to Democrats
Speaker 1: to get elected, and the American Federation of Teachers they
Speaker 1: lobbied the CDC and even suggested the language for the
Speaker 1: federal agency's school reopening guidance that was released in February,
Speaker 1: and the powerful teachers Union, their full court press proceeded.
Speaker 1: What was the federal agency putting the brakes on a
Speaker 1: full reopening of in person classrooms. Now that we've that,
Speaker 1: now that we've found these emails between the CDC and
Speaker 1: the American Federation of Teachers, and they show a flurry
Speaker 1: of activity between the CDC director, hard top advisors, and
Speaker 1: union officials with Biden brass being looped in at the
Speaker 1: White House. So basically, this is this decision is I
Speaker 1: thought we were going to follow the science because the
Speaker 1: science is saying that it's safe to open it, except
Speaker 1: the political pressure from one of the biggest donors to
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party puts the pressure on because they don't
Speaker 1: want in person learning. You know, there's been a lot
Speaker 1: of talk, for example, about Joe Biden and wearing masks
Speaker 1: outside and you know, okay, now the White House is
Speaker 1: saying that he's doing it as an extra precaution. Okay,
Speaker 1: it's kind of bad when even fake news CNN we'll
Speaker 1: call out Biden over's anti science mask use. And this
Speaker 1: is what the point I brought up. And I've made
Speaker 1: very clear that I'm not a doctor, So I just
Speaker 1: don't feel comfortable joining the cadre of voices out there
Speaker 1: telling people what to do medically because I don't know
Speaker 1: your medical condition. Now, thank god we're not in India,
Speaker 1: because they're setting global records right now. The pandemic there
Speaker 1: is just an absolute disaster. And uh, you know, hell
Speaker 1: freeze is over. When CNN makes an acknowledgement about Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: if you look at some of the other issues surrounding this,
Speaker 1: you know, Biden wearing masks outdoors an extra what do
Speaker 1: you mean an extra precaution? You know, because there are
Speaker 1: people that are on the fence here and I'm not
Speaker 1: going to make their decision for them. They've got to
Speaker 1: make their own decision and consultation with their doctor based
Speaker 1: on their unique medical condition. And you know, but if
Speaker 1: you're going to have guidelines, tell us why if everybody's vaccinated,
Speaker 1: then at that point doesn't it shouldn't matter because we're
Speaker 1: we were told that we get life back to normal.
Speaker 1: This doesn't look like life is getting back to normal
Speaker 1: in any way, shape, matter, or form. You know, So
Speaker 1: you know, it's it's it's it's it's confusing. If you
Speaker 1: want to know the truth, it becomes confusing for people
Speaker 1: down in Houston. Least discovered ninety illegal immigrants crammed into
Speaker 1: a single suburban house and COVID was inside the house.
Speaker 1: That's that's that's not a good sign. And of course
Speaker 1: we have another incident of a passenger removed from our
Speaker 1: plane for not wearing a mask between food bites, unaware
Speaker 1: of the federal mandate. And okay, oh and you just
Speaker 1: where is this common sense applied to things like this
Speaker 1: like a one year old on a plane. All right,
Speaker 1: let's get to our busy phones. Eight hundred nine one
Speaker 1: shuns number. Adam is in Louisiana, Adam High. How are
Speaker 1: you glad you called, sir? I'm finding it's an honor
Speaker 1: improve was showing to finally speak with you. Man. I
Speaker 1: can't express how much you and you show mean to
Speaker 1: the everyday average American. You know, with Rush, you know
Speaker 1: now gone and President Trump on a brief height it's
Speaker 1: until he gets back in four years from now. You
Speaker 1: ought a voice for the American patriot. And I can't
Speaker 1: tell you how much we appreciate. Well, listen, I'm nobody
Speaker 1: can fill rush or shoes. Let's start there. And you
Speaker 1: know I I view this and I really mean this
Speaker 1: at him, and I've said to everybody that listens, I'm like,
Speaker 1: I want to deputize all of you, because it's gonna
Speaker 1: take all of us at the end of the day.
Speaker 1: I'm trying to get out as much information as I
Speaker 1: can and convince as many people as I can and
Speaker 1: expose what I really believe to be a very very
Speaker 1: dangerous path that Joe Biden and the radical Green New
Speaker 1: Deal socialist leftists what that will do to the country.
Speaker 1: But everybody else, all hands on deck twenty twenty two matters,
Speaker 1: It really does. But thank you for your kind words.
Speaker 1: I appreciate it. But you know, the raid on the
Speaker 1: nation's mail at last week, you know, was the final
Speaker 1: nail on the cost to be Sean. It's quite well noted,
Speaker 1: Sean that Juliani offered to assist the FBI wholeheartedly with
Speaker 1: the investigation well before the raid on a debotment, you know,
Speaker 1: to smear a reputation of one of the most well
Speaker 1: respected men in this country, frankly, is unforgivable. This man
Speaker 1: has been a well as as Alan Dershwood said this weekend.
Speaker 1: He pointed out, he said, you know, in Banana republics,
Speaker 1: in Castro's Cuba, many parts of the world, candidate loses
Speaker 1: for president, they go after the candidate. And he pointed out,
Speaker 1: from a legal perspective, you don't use a search warrant
Speaker 1: when people have privileged information on their cell phones and
Speaker 1: in their computers, and uh, you use a subpoena. The
Speaker 1: difference between a subpoena and a search warrant as like
Speaker 1: night and day, and it's just not constitutional. I agree
Speaker 1: with him, you know. But the thing is that that
Speaker 1: this man has been uncovering corruption and companyarly five decades.
Speaker 1: I mean, if anybody knows what a cook looks like,
Speaker 1: it's Juliani. I mean, you know the djskond of telling
Speaker 1: you know that he did a register with some Sarah
Speaker 1: act you know, and saw Doctors show, which I'm sure
Speaker 1: you did. You know, he offered Hunter Biden's hard drive
Speaker 1: right to the FBI and they didn't want nothing to
Speaker 1: do with it. You know. Well, we have Rudy on
Speaker 1: TV tonight, so I'm gonna ask him a lot more
Speaker 1: in terms of the details. My understanding of his work
Speaker 1: that he was doing in Ukraine was directly related to
Speaker 1: trying to get to the bottom. Now. It was amazing
Speaker 1: to me, and it shows how corrupt the media is,
Speaker 1: how corrupt big tech is. But the idea that you
Speaker 1: got Joe Biden, vice president on tape bragging that he
Speaker 1: leveraged a billion dollars to the Ukrainian government, demanded a
Speaker 1: prosecutor be fired. The prosecutor that it was investigating his son.
Speaker 1: You know, he's not a young kid, he's fifty years old.
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden Jetty who goes on Good Morning America, admits
Speaker 1: he has no background, no experience and energy, oil gas,
Speaker 1: Ukraine whatsoever her And then one has to ask the
Speaker 1: important question, well, then why are you getting paid millions
Speaker 1: of dollars? And we all know the answer to that question.
Speaker 1: And the idea that the rest of the media, if
Speaker 1: the last name were Trump, we all know that would
Speaker 1: have been handled much differently. That scares me in terms
Speaker 1: of equal justice, equal application of laws in our country
Speaker 1: because if Vice President Donald Trump was in charge of
Speaker 1: Ukraine and Don Junior had no experience in energy, oil
Speaker 1: gas or anything Ukrainian and he's being paid millions and
Speaker 1: the father, you're not getting the billion unless you fire
Speaker 1: the guy investigating my son. I think that I think
Speaker 1: there would have been a political earthquake as loud as
Speaker 1: as like a volcano eruption from the media. And that's
Speaker 1: how corrupt it's gotten. That's how bad the doubles standard is.
Speaker 1: You know, it makes Americans lose hope because it's like,
Speaker 1: if you're a conservative, you spit on the sidewalk, ten
Speaker 1: years in jail. If you're Joe Biden, if you're a
Speaker 1: deep state operative you use a dirty Russian misinformation dociatus
Speaker 1: by on a president, nothing happens. The Clinton's Clinton Foundation,
Speaker 1: nothing happens that. That to me is what's so troubling
Speaker 1: in all of this. And I'm going to get into
Speaker 1: all this tonight with Rudy on TV. I hope you'll watch. Yeah, Absolutely,
Speaker 1: Sean listen. If this would have been you I doing
Speaker 1: anything remotely close to what these criminals have done, we'd
Speaker 1: be in jail twenty five years, you know, And I
Speaker 1: know every bit of this crap is a never ending
Speaker 1: attempt to keep Donald Trump from trying to run again
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four and take the office back that
Speaker 1: was stole from him. Absolutely, I'm want a millions of
Speaker 1: people that are appealed right now, the filk that's in
Speaker 1: power right now. It's only objective is the rule over
Speaker 1: and control by any means necessary. Any election was proof
Speaker 1: for that. I don't know what else. Listen, I'll run
Speaker 1: through the short list. HR one would forever, alter and
Speaker 1: ever having integrity and confidence on our election system. You
Speaker 1: know simple voter ID which exists in the state of Delaware.
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is what been a senator a thousand years
Speaker 1: and he's yet to even lift a finger to change
Speaker 1: his restrictive laws. But you know why would he call
Speaker 1: George's loft far more inclusive, far more accessibility, far less
Speaker 1: restrictive than Delaware Jim Crow two point zero? Because that
Speaker 1: is a way to gain power. Packing the courts a
Speaker 1: way to get power. Ending the legislative filipbuster a way
Speaker 1: to get power. DC statehood a way to get power.
Speaker 1: And that is the real, clear danger of the modern
Speaker 1: left Democratic Socialist Party. That's why I'm telling people that
Speaker 1: if you care about twenty twenty two and you want
Speaker 1: integrity in elections, okay, you want Shane and Custody clean
Speaker 1: out the voter rolls every year if you believe the
Speaker 1: statutory language in the law that says partisan observers can
Speaker 1: observe the vote count. If you believe in voter ID
Speaker 1: and signature verifications, simple standards applies to every other aspect
Speaker 1: of life, then every state legislator legislature needs to do
Speaker 1: their job. But they need to do that part now,
Speaker 1: and if we wait till twenty twenty two, it's too late.
Speaker 1: And at that point, I don't know where you get
Speaker 1: integrity and elections going forward, but you raise a lot
Speaker 1: of good points at them. It's it's a chill atmosphere
Speaker 1: out here, I can tell you that, but it can't
Speaker 1: be one that gets you down. It's got to be
Speaker 1: something that should motivate you to redouble your efforts to
Speaker 1: have good governance and government it's government of the people,
Speaker 1: by of and for the people. We the people of
Speaker 1: the United States. We've got to we've got to stay
Speaker 1: engaged and hold these guys accountable. As we continue back
Speaker 1: to our busy telephones, Robin and Florida, how are you, Robin?
Speaker 1: Thanks for taking my call. Actually you just kind of
Speaker 1: said what I was going to say that if if
Speaker 1: it's we the people and this is our country and
Speaker 1: these people work for us, then why is it that
Speaker 1: we the people can't form together and go after some
Speaker 1: kind of injunction or some kind of a lawsuit or
Speaker 1: some kind of something to stop some of this before
Speaker 1: it gets too crazy out of control, because if we
Speaker 1: wait for another two years to vote them out, what's
Speaker 1: going to be left? And by enduring, which I didn't,
Speaker 1: there's there's two things to do. One I just mentioned
Speaker 1: none the state level, to get state legislatures to enact
Speaker 1: voter confidence integrity laws and to shore up any problems
Speaker 1: they may have in their individual state, like Pennsylvania needs
Speaker 1: to now follow their constitution, Georgia needs to add even
Speaker 1: to their new law signature verification. Then I would say
Speaker 1: if Wisconsin and Michigan, if they're going to have early voting,
Speaker 1: then you can't. You can't have laws that say the
Speaker 1: opposite and then do it anyway. If partisan observers by
Speaker 1: the law can observe, they have to observe. So that
Speaker 1: has to be changed now. And similarly, you know we
Speaker 1: have time. I mean, if we put enough pressure on Republicans,
Speaker 1: they can walk out and none of this can can
Speaker 1: become a reality because if fifty senators don't provide a
Speaker 1: quorum and they stand strong together, but that includes Lisa Murkowski,
Speaker 1: that includes Mitt Romney, that includes Ben SaaS. If they
Speaker 1: stand together, then it can be stopped. If they don't,
Speaker 1: and you know, then you got to start counting on
Speaker 1: Mansion Cinema. I'm not that confident they're talking about the
Speaker 1: voters integrity portion. I'm talking about everything in general, the
Speaker 1: stuff going on at the border, the um you know
Speaker 1: what did they how many lasses did they file? This
Speaker 1: dot Trump from finishing the border, and how can we
Speaker 1: file those same kind of things that push some of
Speaker 1: this stuff back to where Mark Meadows group is doing
Speaker 1: it with Steve Miller his other groups. We just had
Speaker 1: the Attorney General of Arizona on He's got nineteen other
Speaker 1: states joining him, and so the states are taking it
Speaker 1: to the courts and I'm hoping that, you know, the
Speaker 1: courts follow the law, because if they do, we can
Speaker 1: be successful. You're right here for our final News round
Speaker 1: up and information overload. All right, News round Up, Information Overload,
Speaker 1: our Sean Hannity Show eight hundred and nine for one Sean.
Speaker 1: You want to be a part of the program now,
Speaker 1: I want to play this marked a great interview with
Speaker 1: Senator Josh Holly on life liberty and Levine on the
Speaker 1: Fox News Channel last night. Anyway, Holly is now rightly
Speaker 1: so because he's been going after big tech and their
Speaker 1: abusive bias corruption and this comes into playing very specific
Speaker 1: issues here, and as it relates to if they are
Speaker 1: basically a propaganda arm of the Democratic Party, well then
Speaker 1: that would be in every way in kind donation. Right.
Speaker 1: So anyway, it's if you think back Apple opposed the order.
Speaker 1: Remember the case of the San Bernardino shooter. Well, the
Speaker 1: CEO of Apple, Tim Cook, said his company will resist
Speaker 1: a federal judge's order to access the encrypted data hidden
Speaker 1: on a cell phone that belonged to the terrorist couple
Speaker 1: that killed fourteen people in San Bernardino last year. Well,
Speaker 1: now we know that they apparently had no problem getting
Speaker 1: to the iCloud of Rudy Giuliani back in twenty nineteen. Well,
Speaker 1: that would seem to me like a pretty flagrant standard
Speaker 1: Josh hollyotot thoughts said it. Well, this is him. In
Speaker 1: recent days, my office was contacted by a Facebook whistleblower,
Speaker 1: a former employee of the company with direct knowledge of
Speaker 1: the company's content moderation practices. And I want to start
Speaker 1: by talking about an internal platform called Tasks that Facebook
Speaker 1: uses to coordinate projects, including censorship. The Tasks platform allows
Speaker 1: Facebook employees to communicate about projects they're working on together.
Speaker 1: That includes Facebook censorship teams, including the so called Community
Speaker 1: well Being Team, the Integrity Team, and the Hate Speech
Speaker 1: Engineering Team, who all use the Task platform to discuss
Speaker 1: which individuals or hashtags or websites to ban. Now, mister Zuckerberg,
Speaker 1: you're familiar with the Task platform, aren't you, Senator. We
Speaker 1: use the task system for I think it's, as you say,
Speaker 1: for people coordinating all kinds of work across the company.
Speaker 1: Although I'm not sure if i'd agree with the characterizations
Speaker 1: specifically around content moderation that you gave. Well, let's get
Speaker 1: into that and let me see if we can refresh
Speaker 1: your memory and provide folks at home watching with an example.
Speaker 1: What particularly intrigued me is that the platform reflects censorship
Speaker 1: input from Google and Twitter as well so Facebook. As
Speaker 1: I understand that Facebook censorship teams communicate with their counterparts
Speaker 1: at Twitter and Google and then enter those companies suggestions
Speaker 1: for censorship onto the Task platform so that Facebook can
Speaker 1: then follow up with them and effectively coordinate their censorship efforts. Well,
Speaker 1: I'm talking about content moderation. I'm talking about individuals, websites, hashtags,
Speaker 1: phrases to ban. Is it your testimony that you do
Speaker 1: not communicate with Twitter or Google about content moderation about individuals, websites, phrases,
Speaker 1: hashtags to ban? Just yes or no? Do you communicate
Speaker 1: with Twitter or Google about coordinating your policies in this way? Senator?
Speaker 1: We do not coordinate our policies. Do your Facebook content
Speaker 1: moderation teams communicate with their counterparts at Twitter or Google? Senator,
Speaker 1: I'm not aware of anything specific, but I think it
Speaker 1: would be probably pretty normal for people to talk to
Speaker 1: their peers and colleagues in the industry. All right, So
Speaker 1: that was actually from a hearing with some of the
Speaker 1: big tech CEOs and leaders here. Now here's where we
Speaker 1: are on this, and it gets a little bit complicated,
Speaker 1: Professor Dershowitz, I had mentioned this earlier this weekend. We
Speaker 1: now know that in twenty nineteen that the FBI surveiled
Speaker 1: the President of the United States's attorney iCloud during the
Speaker 1: impeachment hearings in twenty nineteen. Now, that would seem like
Speaker 1: a pretty invasive thing, and as Professor Dershowitz pointed out,
Speaker 1: a search warrant on a lawyer or a doctor or
Speaker 1: a priest. You don't use a warrant. You don't use
Speaker 1: search warrants when people have privileged information on their cell
Speaker 1: phones and in their computers. You use a subpoena. And
Speaker 1: the difference between his subpoena and a search warrant is
Speaker 1: like night and day, and it's just not constitutional. Now.
Speaker 1: The story in the Epic Time says that former New
Speaker 1: York City Mary Rudy Giuliani that the FBI surveiled his
Speaker 1: iCloud chats during impeachment hearings in twenty nineteen. In an
Speaker 1: interview over the week end Julianni so home was searched
Speaker 1: by agents, said that his lawyer was told by the
Speaker 1: US Attorney's office in Manhattan that the alleged wire tapping
Speaker 1: took place, and he asked to repeat it because he
Speaker 1: couldn't believe that it was true. Now, we saw what
Speaker 1: happened in the twenty election when the New York Post
Speaker 1: broke the story about Hunter Biden's laptop, and we know
Speaker 1: that big tech protected all things Joe Biden. He was
Speaker 1: in the Candidate Protection Program, and they banned their platforms
Speaker 1: from putting out the information. Well since then at jacket
Speaker 1: Twitter said, Oh, I think it was a mistake because
Speaker 1: it was right, it was true, and there was no
Speaker 1: research and the double standard for conservatives and liberals. We've
Speaker 1: chronicled that well. And then when you kind of put
Speaker 1: it towards well, Okay, remember Apple, you know a number
Speaker 1: of years ago when that San Bernardino shooting took place,
Speaker 1: Apple opposed the order to help the FBI unlock the
Speaker 1: phone belonging to the shooter. Okay, does that sound right
Speaker 1: to you on any level? Any of these separate issues.
Speaker 1: A special counsel to the American Center for Law and
Speaker 1: just a senior advisor on Internet free speech with the
Speaker 1: American Principles Project, Craig parcell is with us. Thank you
Speaker 1: for being with us. Do you see like a connection
Speaker 1: here how big tech reacted to the San Bernardino shooter
Speaker 1: what we now know took place with the iCloud of
Speaker 1: Rudy Giuliani in twenty nineteen, the possible coordination which was
Speaker 1: the line of questioning of Senator Josh Hawley. Do you
Speaker 1: see these as interrelated? Yeah, I certainly do. Sean, I
Speaker 1: think you put your finger on a hornet's math they
Speaker 1: want to keep it covered up because on multiple legal
Speaker 1: and moral levels, including good governance by our government officials.
Speaker 1: This is wrong on so many levels. Let's just start
Speaker 1: with this. Let's start with the twenty nineteen iCloud invasion
Speaker 1: of attorney client privilege. I've been involved in these cases
Speaker 1: on the criminal side over the years where the FBI
Speaker 1: has done this as a technique because they really know
Speaker 1: they can get information, they think strategic information from the
Speaker 1: attorney's files or communications that is going to be protected. So,
Speaker 1: you know, mister Dershowitch is absolutely correct again that a
Speaker 1: subpoena is a public opportunity for both sides to appear
Speaker 1: in court. And what Giuliani could have done if there
Speaker 1: was a subpoena as opposed to this warrantless order that
Speaker 1: was affected giving the FBI ability to go into the
Speaker 1: iCloud account. Had it been a subpoena, the attorneys involved
Speaker 1: would have gone into court and asked to quash or
Speaker 1: dismiss the subpoena request, and a full hearing before the public,
Speaker 1: the American public, before a judge on a bench. They
Speaker 1: would make their arguments for protection of attorney client privilege
Speaker 1: and probably would have won. But of course that's just
Speaker 1: the thing. The FBI can accomplish it without going into court,
Speaker 1: without having full opportunity for both sides to be heard
Speaker 1: if they follow the current procedures. Very troubling. And then
Speaker 1: when you look back to Sayed Farouk's cell phone that
Speaker 1: Apple refused to open up even after a court order,
Speaker 1: they really didn't comply. The FBI had to hire some
Speaker 1: professional hackers over in Austria to help them to open
Speaker 1: up that phone. Meanwhile, American public safety was at issue,
Speaker 1: and apparently Apple didn't care. So on multiple levels. Number one,
Speaker 1: legal procedure was violated. Number two, it shows the hypocrisy
Speaker 1: of Silicon Valley giants Apple in particular in those cases.
Speaker 1: But number three, and this is perhaps the most troubling
Speaker 1: scenario of all that I see Facebook, Google and Twitter.
Speaker 1: They basically own the vast majority of information, viewpoint, and
Speaker 1: opinion on digital platforms that all of us use, whether
Speaker 1: it's our phones or our computers. It is the twenty
Speaker 1: first century printing press basically that's essential for all of us,
Speaker 1: both in politics, business, and our personal lives. These companies,
Speaker 1: when it came to the election issues of mister Trump's
Speaker 1: use of Facebook and Twitter. Isn't it interesting how they
Speaker 1: all worked in tandem to shut down President Trump? Then
Speaker 1: when we're going to get a permanent decision in two
Speaker 1: days from Facebook, what their decision on it is in
Speaker 1: terms of canceling President Trump? Right, Yeah, it's going to
Speaker 1: come down Wednesday morning. Those of us involved in the
Speaker 1: case are going to hear early earlier than that, probably Tuesday,
Speaker 1: but it is coming down officially on a Wednesday. We
Speaker 1: don't know what they're going to decide. But of course
Speaker 1: this is not a court in the traditional sense. This
Speaker 1: is an independent governance board created by Facebook, made up
Speaker 1: of a law professors, in former judges, and some political
Speaker 1: leaders from around the world. So we don't know what
Speaker 1: that's going how it's going to result. I know how
Speaker 1: it ought to result, and they is Facebook once again
Speaker 1: will lose and President Trump should win. But we'll find out.
Speaker 1: But I wouldn't have found in this chilling atmosphere, I
Speaker 1: wouldn't count on it. Let me let me take it
Speaker 1: a step further, Craig if I can, Yeah, exactly. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you look at the climate right now of arrogance in
Speaker 1: Silicon Valley. Facebook, Google, Twitter all came out with the
Speaker 1: same policy to start shut down COVID nineteen information that
Speaker 1: might run against what they thought was the popular opinion
Speaker 1: of the CDA. So they've all been working in lockstep.
Speaker 1: It's laughable to say that they aren't not only talking together,
Speaker 1: but planning together collectively to shut down politically incorrect content. Now,
Speaker 1: one other development today, even fake news CNN picked up
Speaker 1: on this which is interesting, and that is the Biden
Speaker 1: administration now considering using outside firms to track extremist chatter
Speaker 1: by Americans online, an effort that would expand the government's
Speaker 1: ability to quote gather intel that sounds like surveillance of
Speaker 1: Americans without any warrant. Yeah, and that's also troubling. How
Speaker 1: much power do we want to give to unelected federal
Speaker 1: agents to be able to do this. We have a
Speaker 1: court system, we have a constitution in the Fourth Amendment
Speaker 1: which talks about homes, papers, and persons being protected. Is
Speaker 1: there for a reason. It was there in the Declaration
Speaker 1: of Independence as one of the grievances that led to
Speaker 1: the American Revolution. Well, I mean that sounds like a
Speaker 1: pretty chilling atmosphere. If what are we going to have
Speaker 1: government snitches all over the place as we continue with
Speaker 1: Craig Partial Special Counsel, American Center for Law Injustice. We'll
Speaker 1: get to your calls after that. The irony in all
Speaker 1: of this is look look at for example, Twitter, which
Speaker 1: is canceled President Trump. Okay, they don't like what President
Speaker 1: Trump has to say. I think it was twelve long
Speaker 1: hours that the racial, vicious, mean spirited, hateful attack against
Speaker 1: Senator Tim Scott was trending under you, uncle Tim on Twitter.
Speaker 1: So where was at Jack's Crackerjack censors at that point?
Speaker 1: And did the people that put that hate out? Are
Speaker 1: they being permanently banned if they've been suspended like conservatives
Speaker 1: suspended and canceled every day, Facebook, Google and Twitter ought
Speaker 1: to be embarrassed, but I don't think that they have
Speaker 1: any embarrassment they have. There's no shame. And apparently the
Speaker 1: hypocrisy of basically taking their political worldview, we all know
Speaker 1: what it is. It's far left, always has been. Mark
Speaker 1: Zuckerbreu testified under oath that that is a fact. So
Speaker 1: these companies have an agenda and they are frankly blind
Speaker 1: to any criticism of that hypocrisy. And what's troubling Sean
Speaker 1: is the fact that if they were just companies who
Speaker 1: had an opinion about things. I am for free enterprise, absolutely,
Speaker 1: but these are monopolies, and they're not just monopolies. They're
Speaker 1: putting together a giant combination of monopolies that control information.
Speaker 1: And then they are going to do the handmaiden task
Speaker 1: of whatever the Biden administration wants in terms of cracking down.
Speaker 1: So if the federal government can't censor us, they will
Speaker 1: use these big tech companies to do their bidding. That's
Speaker 1: very frightening. It's frightening and it's chilling at the same time.
Speaker 1: And I don't think this is a problem that's going
Speaker 1: away any too soon. Am I wrong in thinking that
Speaker 1: the idea that we're going to get Facebook, Twitter, Instagram,
Speaker 1: YouTube to stop their political biases? I just I don't
Speaker 1: see that happening. Is the answer that conservatives must now
Speaker 1: create their own products so that they can bypass big
Speaker 1: tech and create their own big tech companies to compete
Speaker 1: with them, with their own separate platforms to compete with them.
Speaker 1: You know, that would be the best of all worlds
Speaker 1: because it energizes and innovation among companies, and hopefully there's
Speaker 1: some startups out there that really want to accomplish that
Speaker 1: and of course, there's been some chatter that in fact
Speaker 1: some are on their way to being set up right now.
Speaker 1: But here's here's the problem. The technology that these companies
Speaker 1: have developed over the decades, but just in the last decade,
Speaker 1: is so sophisticated that it will take years to probably
Speaker 1: compete with the companies that have It's a little bit
Speaker 1: like a horse race, you know, we just saw the
Speaker 1: Kentucky ar If you gave one or two horses, you know,
Speaker 1: a two or three times lead before that gate opens
Speaker 1: up for the other ones. There's no possible chance that
Speaker 1: the competitors are going to make this a horse race,
Speaker 1: and unfortunately, I think technologically just may be very difficult.
Speaker 1: That would be the best of all worlds. All right, Well,
Speaker 1: appreciate your insight as always, Craig Partial, Special counsel the
Speaker 1: ACLJ American Center for Law Injustice. Thank you, all right,
Speaker 1: twenty five to the top of the hour, eight hundred
Speaker 1: nine one. Sean you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program. By the way, Rudy Julianni will respond to
Speaker 1: the lying media mob and this revelation that apparently his
Speaker 1: cloud while he was representing the President of the United
Speaker 1: States apparently was hacked into and we'll talk about the
Speaker 1: legality or illegality of that tonight nine Eastern on Fox.
Speaker 1: I don't know how many of you saw that. Joe
Speaker 1: Biden was given the speech late last week, got confused
Speaker 1: about his ever precious Amtrak. Listen, if you think about it,
Speaker 1: when we were when I was vice president with Barak,
Speaker 1: he allowed me to put together a bunche of Ramtrak,
Speaker 1: and it had money for high speed rail at two
Speaker 1: hundred miles an hour from from chart assuming me from Charlotte.
Speaker 1: One another line going from in Florida down to Tampa.
Speaker 1: Another line. If we had more to go, we'd had
Speaker 1: that tunnel fixed in New York. Now, the money was
Speaker 1: there to get it done good, But he seems so
Speaker 1: sincere Biden today, anybody making less than four hundred thousand
Speaker 1: dollars a year will not pay a single penny in Texas. Well,
Speaker 1: it's actually couples. We've been through this now numerous times.
Speaker 1: They keep fascilating back and forth because he keeps getting
Speaker 1: it wrong, and then he gets corrected, and then he
Speaker 1: gets it wrong again. Now that isms I guess that
Speaker 1: people don't pay sales taxes. I guess that assumes that
Speaker 1: people don't pay Social Security taxes. I guess we assume
Speaker 1: that that means that they don't pay state income taxes.
Speaker 1: I assume they don't pay property taxes. I assume that
Speaker 1: they won't be bearing the burden of this new corporate
Speaker 1: tax that comes down. And I assume that that would
Speaker 1: be an exemption for people if they have capital gains
Speaker 1: and they only make four hundred thousand dollars a year
Speaker 1: or less, that they're not going to be impacted by this.
Speaker 1: None of that is true, Not one little bit of
Speaker 1: it is true. But it's like the big lie that
Speaker 1: goes on every day. But don't worry. The Washington Post,
Speaker 1: their fact checkers have closed down their office only because
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's president. Now you can't you can't even make
Speaker 1: this up. That's that's how corrupt the media mob is here.
Speaker 1: And it's sad and it's but it's so corrupt and
Speaker 1: it's so bad. I'd never thought I could get this
Speaker 1: bad in this country. I never did. That's why I
Speaker 1: hope I can deputize everybody out there, and to understand,
Speaker 1: the stakes are high moving forward. You got to pressure
Speaker 1: your senators to make sure that they're not going to
Speaker 1: allow SR which was a version of HR one, to
Speaker 1: become the law of the land. That they're not going
Speaker 1: to allow ending the legislative filibuster, they're not going to
Speaker 1: allow DC statehood, that they're not going to allow the
Speaker 1: biggest power grab attempt in the history of this country.
Speaker 1: And that means you're gonna have to rely on some
Speaker 1: people that are not particularly reliable and people and then
Speaker 1: hope that maybe people like Joe Mansion, people like Senator
Speaker 1: Cinema might actually have some thought and reason and probably
Speaker 1: some political ambition behind their unwillingness to go along with
Speaker 1: the most radical changes ever. All right, let's get to
Speaker 1: our phones as we say hi to Mark. He's in Minnesota.
Speaker 1: I saw a column today. Did you see where they're
Speaker 1: calling it Murderapolis in terms of Minneapolis instead? I didn't
Speaker 1: see that one. Yeah, sad, isn't it? I believe it?
Speaker 1: What's going on, Sir will Sean? I had a couple
Speaker 1: of questions and ask you and we had the governor
Speaker 1: of Texas in there, and he told us that he
Speaker 1: was taking his national guard to the border and he
Speaker 1: was going to secure the border. Correct, what does that mean? Well,
Speaker 1: I'm knocking the border down or does that mean helping
Speaker 1: people out of the water. I've asked the governor this
Speaker 1: very question, because what's happening now is the Biden administration.
Speaker 1: We have laws. Supposedly, we're a nation and a democratic
Speaker 1: republic governed by the rule of law. All our laws
Speaker 1: are based on our constitution. And but yet the whole
Speaker 1: concept of sanctuary city and sanctuary state, to me, is
Speaker 1: nothing short of just aiding and embedding lawbreaking and even
Speaker 1: facilitating it. The processing that's going on down to the
Speaker 1: border right now directly contradicts the law of the land. Now,
Speaker 1: you know, Joe Biden once said, I'm not a dictator,
Speaker 1: and I need to get the votes. I need to
Speaker 1: get the votes. But what the what the actual policy
Speaker 1: is is not to enforce the law, and just the opposite.
Speaker 1: They're now not only checking people for radical associations in
Speaker 1: the middle of a pandemic, doing a health check, or
Speaker 1: or seeing if people have the ability to care for
Speaker 1: themselves when they're in this country. None of that is happening.
Speaker 1: And now the states are being put in the position
Speaker 1: where they are in support of the law of the
Speaker 1: land and trying to enforce the law of the land.
Speaker 1: And I don't know how this is going to end up.
Speaker 1: To be very frank with you, I mean, I mean,
Speaker 1: remember they had the kids in cages and Child Protective
Speaker 1: Services where they had thousands of them in a center
Speaker 1: in Dallas. We weren't even allowed to go in there
Speaker 1: and check on the health and well being of the
Speaker 1: unaccompanied miners that Joe had moved to Dallas, and Joe
Speaker 1: is in Kamala, and the administration they're moving all of
Speaker 1: these illegal immigrants, They're providing them the transportation to go
Speaker 1: to all the other states in the country and spreading
Speaker 1: them out. So the answer is that that is a
Speaker 1: degree of lawlessness facilitated by the federal government. Now, I
Speaker 1: asked Governor Abbott. He said, to the best of his ability,
Speaker 1: he's going to enforce the law. But now he finds
Speaker 1: himself directly at odds with the illegal supporting policy of
Speaker 1: the administration. It's a tough it's you know, what's one
Speaker 1: to do here, right, John? That's my question. When he
Speaker 1: declares a state of emergency, that makes him the governor,
Speaker 1: the boss in that state. Now he's got a lot
Speaker 1: of power to override a lot of stuff that's going
Speaker 1: on from the federal governments. I'm not a constitutional lawyer,
Speaker 1: I'm a contractor. Sure, but where are the people that
Speaker 1: can step in and tell him you can lock the
Speaker 1: border down, you can build the government for this, because
Speaker 1: they should be doing it. And when you declare a
Speaker 1: state emergency, he has a right to request federal funch.
Speaker 1: That is exactly why we had in the last hour,
Speaker 1: Attorney General Mark Bernovitch from Arizona. I missed that one.
Speaker 1: I should have got in earlier. That's all right. Let
Speaker 1: not your hearts be trouble because we discussed this in detail.
Speaker 1: Because you have a lot of states now joining with
Speaker 1: think we're up to like nineteen now with Arizona urging
Speaker 1: the US Supreme Court whenever they're You have three branches
Speaker 1: of government, the legislative branch, the executive branch. When there's
Speaker 1: a conflict between those two branches, then it is the
Speaker 1: role of that other co equal branch of government, the judiciary,
Speaker 1: to solve whatever the conflict is. And rightly, the attorney
Speaker 1: general the attorney's general in these states are uniteting to
Speaker 1: get an answer and get the court to weigh in. Now,
Speaker 1: if the court follows the constitution and the process of
Speaker 1: how a law is created. You don't get to pick
Speaker 1: and choose what laws that you decide to enforce or
Speaker 1: not enforce. But unfortunately, my confidence in a lot of
Speaker 1: institutions in this country has long been gone. I have
Speaker 1: no confidence in the institution of media, no confidence in
Speaker 1: the institution of government, really, especially at the federal level,
Speaker 1: no confidence in the institution of big tech. I mean,
Speaker 1: we've got powerful forces, a line that's all support a
Speaker 1: radical political agenda, and if it means circumventing the law,
Speaker 1: which is what's really happening here to get the results
Speaker 1: that they want, it seems to and ends justify the
Speaker 1: means scenario that's unfolding. The last thing I want to
Speaker 1: see about the Supreme Court has they've been scared off Sean,
Speaker 1: they don't want to get involved in anything. I don't
Speaker 1: know the answer to your question. Are these are issues
Speaker 1: to me of such legal constitutional importance that they ought
Speaker 1: to be taking these cases? I agree with you, And
Speaker 1: there ought to be emergency injunctions that are in place
Speaker 1: as well, And they don't seem to have an appetite
Speaker 1: to enforce the law and uphold the constitution. That's chilling
Speaker 1: to me because that is there, that that is their
Speaker 1: role as defined by the Constitution. They take an oath
Speaker 1: to uphold the Constitution, and by upholding the Constitution, that's
Speaker 1: upholding the laws of the land. And we see it
Speaker 1: in a whole host of areas. Pretty frightening times we're
Speaker 1: living in. Anyway, good call, I appreciate it, very thoughtful.
Speaker 1: Smart back to our phones as we say hi to
Speaker 1: John in Arizona. What's up, John? How are you? Yeah? Hey, Sean.
Speaker 1: You know I got a couple comments for you. The
Speaker 1: first one is, if the GOP can't get twenty twenty right,
Speaker 1: what makes us think that they're going to get this
Speaker 1: next election right. It's like, you know, they don't give us.
Speaker 1: They trade Trump when when he needed them, and now
Speaker 1: they expect us to vote for Mitch McConnell. Give me
Speaker 1: a break. Here's where we are, and that's why I've
Speaker 1: been telling everybody the first order of business is to
Speaker 1: work with your state senators, your state governors, your state legislators, assemblies,
Speaker 1: whatever you call them. There are five specific things that
Speaker 1: I think need to happen to have and ensure voter
Speaker 1: integrity and have confidence in election results. One is voter
Speaker 1: id That's simple. By the way, they have that in
Speaker 1: Joe's state of Delaware that he's represented five thousand years. Okay.
Speaker 1: The second thing is signature verification. The third thing is
Speaker 1: there's got to be chain of custody observation. In other words,
Speaker 1: that people on both sides of the aisle when ballots
Speaker 1: come in, they get to keep an eye on them,
Speaker 1: so there's no funny business going on. I think I
Speaker 1: think that's pivotal partisan observers that that has already written
Speaker 1: into the law in almost every state. Partisan observers both
Speaker 1: sides have a right to watch the vote count and
Speaker 1: not from twenty or one hundred feet away or to
Speaker 1: be banned at all from observing anything. And I think
Speaker 1: if you do these five things, I think that we
Speaker 1: can then restore integrity. Now, the good news is Georgia
Speaker 1: has improved their law dramatically. It's not Jim Crow two
Speaker 1: point oh. It's far more inclusive than even Delaware by
Speaker 1: a long shot. And they need to add signature verification,
Speaker 1: and then I think they're actually there. Pennsylvania is in
Speaker 1: the process of fixing the problems in their state, as
Speaker 1: is Wisconsin, Michigan, in Arizona. You got this big recount
Speaker 1: going on in Arizona, right a Maricopa County, and we're
Speaker 1: watching that closely to see which way it goes. It's
Speaker 1: going to be bigger than they originally thought or planned for.
Speaker 1: So I'm curious what the outcome of that is eventually
Speaker 1: going to be. But I'll tell you exactly what the
Speaker 1: latest update on that is is. The Washington Examiner point
Speaker 1: it out that with the audit reaching the one week
Speaker 1: mark at the end of last week, the Secretary of
Speaker 1: State in Arizona, who's a state Senate audit liaison, offered
Speaker 1: an update which includes two point this audit this process,
Speaker 1: two point one million ballots, cast, forensic audit of voting machines,
Speaker 1: and follow up interviews with voters, which just you know what,
Speaker 1: if you want integrity and confidence in the results, whatever
Speaker 1: the result is, people will then accept it. All right,
Speaker 1: let us say hi to Larry Is in Indiana. What's up, Larry?
Speaker 1: How are you? Um? I'm well, Sean, thank you for
Speaker 1: taking my call. Um, just to add on to what
Speaker 1: the previous caller said, our Suppreme Court justice system is
Speaker 1: just it's a disgrace. They act so timid and so
Speaker 1: almost a shame to take any of the cases. Um,
Speaker 1: like they were like they were, you know, part of
Speaker 1: the mafia or the mob. They're on the payroll. It's
Speaker 1: just it's it's just disgusting. As far as the mask mandate, um, yeah,
Speaker 1: Indiana is not letting up on this. And it's it's
Speaker 1: funny because if you get out away from any of
Speaker 1: the metropolitan areas, if you're wearing a mask, people in
Speaker 1: my business and customers that I go into, they kind
Speaker 1: of look at you and go, um, that's not necessary here.
Speaker 1: So I'm going to be very frank being a public figure.
Speaker 1: I kind of like the mask for me. It kind
Speaker 1: of helps me out a little bit. I get a
Speaker 1: little of minute anonymity, a little bit in my life
Speaker 1: that I haven't had in a long time. But you're right,
Speaker 1: but when I'm outside, I'm usually not wearing a mask,
Speaker 1: but I you know, and I make sure that I
Speaker 1: am very considerate when I'm around other people. That doesn't
Speaker 1: bother me at all. But I think they're creating confusion
Speaker 1: by you know, with Joe Biden, just an extra special,
Speaker 1: extra layer of protection being extra careful. I'm like, okay,
Speaker 1: why are you being extra careful? I'm trying to understand
Speaker 1: an extra precaution. You know, you told us the vaccine works.
Speaker 1: You told us that life would get back to normal.
Speaker 1: That's what you told us. It doesn't look normal to me.
Speaker 1: You gotta wonder a sleepy Joe wears that to bed.
Speaker 1: I don't know. It's a good question anyway. Anything else
Speaker 1: on your mind today, Yeah, if you got a half
Speaker 1: a second. I was listening to several times. I listen
Speaker 1: to your show all the time, but I listened to
Speaker 1: you go back and forth with Linda on the happy
Speaker 1: meal and the French fries. And I gotta tell you, buddy,
Speaker 1: I've I've been eaten McDonald's French fries since I was
Speaker 1: probably five years old. And you know they're nowhere anywhere
Speaker 1: close what they used to be. You know, when they
Speaker 1: used to fry him in the good you know, deep
Speaker 1: animal fat, you know all the stuff that's really good
Speaker 1: for you. So I just can't believe that Linda, Linda
Speaker 1: has not won't take our son for a happy meal.
Speaker 1: In eighty five to fifteen, my audience agrees with me
Speaker 1: that little Liam, five year old Liam, deserves a happy meal.
Speaker 1: That follows the happy meal, make sure that Uncle Sewan
Speaker 1: is there to clean it up. All right, that's gonna
Speaker 1: wrap things up for today. Rudy Giuliani fighting back with
Speaker 1: his explanation and why was he being surveilled while being
Speaker 1: the President's attorney? What happened to privilege there? We'll get
Speaker 1: into it. Rudy Giulianni reaction, Ari Fleischer, Greg Jarrett, also
Speaker 1: Christy nom Leo Terrell two point zero, Monica Crowley and
Speaker 1: Lara Logan at the border, and much more news you
Speaker 1: won't get from the mob ninet Eastern tonight. We'll see
Speaker 1: you then back here tomorrow. As always, thank you for
Speaker 1: being with us.